White dwarf constraints on a varying $G$
Extracted source text ยท arXiv 1308.5414
\documentclass{mem}
\usepackage{natbib}\usepackage{txfonts}\usepackage{balance}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[a4paper,breaklinks,dvipdfm]{hyperref}
\idline{75}{282}
%
\begin{document}
%
\def\la{\;
\raise0.3ex\hbox{$<$\kern-0.75em\raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}\; }
\def\ga{\;
\raise0.3ex\hbox{$>$\kern-0.75em\raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}\; }
\title{
White dwarf constraints on a varying $G$
}
\author{
E. \,Garc\'\i a--Berro\inst{1,2}
\and
S. \, Torres\inst{1,2}
\and
L. G. \,Althaus\inst{3}
\and
A. H. \,C\'orsico\inst{3}
\and
\\P. \, Lor\'en--Aguilar\inst{4}
\and
A. D. \, Romero\inst{5}
\and
J. Isern\inst{6,2}
}
\offprints{E. Garc\'\i a--Berro}
\institute{Departament de F\'\i sica Aplicada,
Universitat Polit\`ecnica de Catalunya,
c/Esteve Terrades, 5,
08860 Castelldefels,
Spain
\and
Institute for Space Studies of Catalonia,
c/Gran Capit\`a 2--4, Edif. Nexus 104,
08034 Barcelona,
Spain
\and
Facultad de Ciencias Astron\'omicas y Geof\'{\i}sicas,
Universidad Nacional de La Plata,
Paseo del Bosque s/n,
(1900) La Plata,
Argentina
\and
School of Physics,
University of Exeter,
Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QL,
United Kingdom
\and
Departamento de Astronomia,
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul,\\
Av. Bento Goncalves 9500, Porto Alegre 91501-970, RS,
Brazil
\and
Institut de Ci\`encies de l'Espai, CSIC,
Campus UAB, Facultat de Ci\`encies, Torre C-5,
08193 Bellaterra,
Spain\\
\email{enrique.garcia-berro@upc.edu}
}
\authorrunning{Garc\'\i a--Berro et al.}
\titlerunning{White dwarf constraints on a varying $G$}
\abstract{A secular variation of $G$ modifies the structure and
evolutionary time scales of white dwarfs. Using an state-of-the-art
stellar evolutionary code, an up-to-date pulsational code, and a
detailed population synthesis code we demonstrate that the effects
of a running $G$ are obvious both in the properties of individual
white dwarfs, and in those of the white dwarf populations in
clusters. Specifically, we show that the white dwarf evolutionary
sequences depend on both the value of $\dot G/G$, and on the value
of $G$ when the white dwarf was born. We show as well that the
pulsational properties of variable white dwarfs can be used to
constrain $\dot G/G$. Finally, we also show that the ensemble
properties of of white dwarfs in clusters can also be used to set
upper bounds to $\dot G/G$. Precisely, the tightest bound --- $\dot
G/G \sim -1.8 10^{-12}$~yr$^{-1}$ --- is obtained studying the
population of the old, metal-rich, well populated, open cluster
NGC~6791. Less stringent upper limits can be obtained comparing the
theoretical results obtained taking into account the effects of a
running $G$ with the measured rates of change of the periods of two
well studied pulsating white dwarfs, G117--B15A and R548. Using
these white dwarfs we obtain $\dot G/G\sim -1.8\times
10^{-10}$~yr$^{-1}$, and $\dot G/G\sim -1.3\times
10^{-10}$~yr$^{-1}$, respectively, which although less restrictive
than the previous bound, can be improved measuring the rate of
change of the period of massive white dwarfs.
%
\keywords{Stars -- White dwarfs -- Gravity}}
\maketitle{}
\section{Introduction}
General Relativity is the favorite theory of gravitation, and it is
based on the equivalence principle, and in the end on the assumption
that the gravitational constant, $G$, is indeed constant. However,
this is just a hypothesis which needs to be verified. In fact, there
are several modern grand-unification theories that predict that the
value of $G$ is a varying function of a low-mass dynamical scalar
field \citep{LAea,mio}. Hence, we expect that if these theories are
true the gravitational constant should experience slow changes over
cosmological timescales. In recent years, several constraints have
been placed on the variation of the fine structure constant, and other
interesting constants of nature --- see \cite{uzan}, and \cite{mio}
for extensive reviews. However, very few works have been devoted to
study a hypothetical variation of $G$. The most tight bounds on the
variation of $G$ are those obtained using Lunar Laser Ranging ---
$\dot{G}/G = (0.2\pm0.7)\times 10^{-12}$~yr$^{-1}$ \citep{H10} ---
solar asteroseismology --- $\dot G/G \simeq -1.6\times
10^{-12}$~yr$^{-1}$ \citep{Demarque} --- and Big Bang nucleosynthesis
--- $-0.3 \times 10^{-12}$~yr$^{-1} \la \dot{G}/G \la 0.4\times
10^{-12}$~yr$^{-1}$ \citep{CO4,B05}. Nevertheless, both Lunar Laser
Ranging and asteroseismological bounds are eminently local, while Big
Bang limits are model-dependent. At intermediate cosmological ages
the Hubble diagram of Type Ia supernovae has also been used to put
constraints on the rate of change of $G$, but the constraints are
somewhat weaker $\dot G/G\la 1\times 10^{-11}$~yr$^{-1}$ at $z\sim
0.5$~\citep{SNIa,IJMPD}. In this work we summarize why on how white
dwarfs can be used to place constraints on the rate of variation of a
rolling $G$.
\section{White dwarf cooling times}
\begin{figure}[t!]
\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[clip=true]{fig01.eps}}
\caption{\footnotesize Surface luminosity versus age for several
$0.609\, M_\odot$ white dwarf sequences, adopting different values
of $\dot{G}/G$.}
\label{fig1}
\end{figure}
A slowly rolling $G$ affects both the cooling timescales of white
dwarfs \citep{gold,gnew} and those of their progenitors \citep{Weiss}.
Consequently, the ages determined from the color-magnitude diagrams of
globular or open clusters --- namely, the main-sequence turn-off age
and the age determined from the termination of the white dwarf cooling
sequence --- change accordingly, and depend on the precise value of
$\dot G/G$ \citep{JCAP}. This allows to put upper bounds on the rate
of variation of $G$. To quantify the effects of a varying $G$ on the
derived ages, we computed the main sequence evolution of two model
stars of 1.0 and $2.0\, M_{\odot}$ considering three values for the
rate of change of $G$, namely $\dot{G}/G=-5 \times
10^{-11}$~yr$^{-1}$, $\dot{G}/G=-1 \times 10^{-11}$~yr$^{-1}$, and
$\dot{G}/G=-1 \times 10^{-12}$~yr$^{-1}$. All the evolutionary
calculations were done using the {\tt LPCODE} stellar evolutionary
code \citep{Althaus10,Renedo10}, appropriately modified to take into
account the effect of a varying $G$. Despite the small rates of
change of $G$ adopted here, the evolution of white dwarf progenitor
stars is severely modified. The evolutionary timescales can be
modelled using rather simple arguments. In particular, it turns out
that the main sequence lifetimes when a varying $G$ is adopted is
\citep{JCAP}:
\begin{equation}
\tau_{\rm MS}=\frac{1}{\gamma\left|\frac{\dot G}{G}\right|}
\ln\left[\gamma\left|\frac{\dot G}{G}\right|\left(\frac{G_0}{G_i}\right)^\gamma
\tau_{\rm MS}^0+1\right].
\label{fit}
\end{equation}
\noindent with $\gamma=3.6$. The effect of a varying $G$ on the white
dwarf cooling times is displayed in Fig.~\ref{fig1}. As can be seen,
the cooling timescales are considerably modified, being the cooling
accelerated in the case of $\dot G<0$ \citep{gnew}. This can be
explained easily. A smaller value of $G$ implies a smaller
gravitational force, and thus a smaller degeneracy (and density) is
needed to balance gravity. Hence, for $\dot G<0$ the white dwarf
expands as it evolves, and the cooling is accelerated. The cooling
track shown in Fig.~\ref{fig1} is a representative example of a set of
white dwarf cooling sequences which incorporate the most up-to-date
physical inputs. Specifically, these cooling sequences consider
$^{22}$Ne diffusion and its associated energy release
\citep{nature,Althaus10,GB08}, and together with the main sequence
lifetimes given by Eq.~(\ref{fit}) allow to derive an age for any
cluster, and for each value of $\dot G/G$. Moreover, the grid of
models has been computed for several initial values of $G$, to take
into account that the evolutionary value of $G$ must match its present
value. With these sequences the effect of a running $G$ on the
color-magnitude diagram of any cluster can be studied.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[clip=true]{fig02.eps}}
\caption{\footnotesize Upper panel: periods of the several modes of
G117$-$B15A as a function of the value of $|\dot G/G|$ with $\dot{G}
< 0$. Lower panel: period derivatives of the same modes as a
function of the secular rate of change of $G$.}
\label{fig2}
\end{figure}
We chose to employ the old, metal-rich, well populated open cluster
NGC~6791, for which the ages derived from main sequence stars and from
the termination of the degenerate sequence agree very well in the case
of a constant $G$. When a varying $G$ is adopted, the resulting age
of NGC~6791 is modified, but then the position of the main sequence
turn-off in the color-magnitude diagram is also significantly
different if the same distance modulus is adopted. However, the
distance modulus derived using an independent and reliable method
(eclipsing binaries) which does not make use of theoretical models
turns out to be $13.46\pm 0.1$ \citep{Grundahl}. Thus, large errors
in the distance modulus seem to be quite implausible. Given the
uncertainty in the distance modulus ($\simeq 0.1^{\rm mag}$), and the
measured value, an upper limit to $\dot G/G$ can be placed
\citep{JCAP}. Since $\Delta t_{\rm MSTO}/\Delta (m-M)_{\rm
F606W}\approx 4$~Gyr/mag, the maximum age difference with respect to
the case in which a constant $G$ is adopted is $\sim 0.4$~Gyr, which
translates into an upper bound $\dot G/G\sim -1.8\times
10^{-12}$~yr$^{-1}$. This upper limit considerably improves the other
existing upper bounds to the rate of variation of $G$ and is
equivalent to the upper limit set by helioseismology.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[clip=true]{fig03.eps}}
\caption{\footnotesize Rate of temporal variation of the 215~s period
of G117$-$B15A as a function of $\dot{G}/G$, red solid line. The
observational value of the rate of change of the period ---
horizontal solid line --- along with its observed error bars ---
horizontal dashed lines --- is also displayed. The formal
theoretical errors are also shown as dashed lines.}
\label{fig3}
\end{figure}
\section{Pulsating white dwarfs}
Pulsations in white dwarfs are associated to nonradial
$g$(gravity)-modes which are a subclass of spheroidal modes whose main
restoring force is gravity. These modes are characterized by low
oscillation frequencies (long periods) and by a displacement of the
stellar fluid essentially in the horizontal direction. Hence, some
characteristics of the pulsations are sensitive to the precise value
of $G$, and to its rate of change. In particular, it can be easily
understood that measuring the rate of change of the period is
equivalent to measure the evolutionary time scale of the white dwarf.
Thus, a slowly varying $G$ should have an impact in the rate of period
change of the observed periods. There are two white dwarfs for which
we have reliable determinations of the rate of period change of its
main periods, namely G117$-$B15A and R548. We performed an
asteroseismological analysis of these white dwarfs using a grid of
fully evolutionary DA models \citep{2012MNRAS.420.1462R} characterized
by consistent chemical profiles for both the core and the envelope,
and covering a wide range of stellar masses, thicknesses of the
hydrogen envelope and effective temperatures.
The pulsation periods for the modes with $\ell = 1$ and $k = 1, 2, 3$
and $4$ of the asteroseismological model of G117$-$B15A for increasing
values of $|\dot{G}/G|$ are shown in the upper panel of
Fig.~\ref{fig2}. The variation of the periods is negligible, implying
that a varying $G$ has negligible effects on the structure of the
asteroseismological model, and that, for a fixed value of the
effective temperature, the pulsation periods are largely independent
of the adopted value of $|\dot{G}/G|$. In the lower panel of
Fig.~\ref{fig2} we display the rates of period change for the same
modes. At odds with what happens with the pulsation periods, the
rates of period change are markedly affected by a varying $G$,
substantially increasing for increasing values of $|\dot{G}/G|$. This
is because that, for a decreasing value of $G$ with time, the white
dwarf cooling process accelerates \citep{gold,gnew}, and this is
translated into a larger secular change of the pulsation periods as
compared with the situation in which $G$ is constant.
In Fig.~\ref{fig3} we plot the theoretical value of $\dot{\Pi}$ the
mode with period $\Pi = 215$~s of G117$-$B15A for increasing values of
$|\dot{G}/G|$ (solid curve). The dashed curves embracing the solid
curve show the uncertainty in the theoretical value of $\dot{\Pi}$,
$\epsilon_{\dot{\Pi}} = 0.09 \times 10^{-15}$ s s$^{-1}$. This value
has been derived taking into account the uncertainty due to our lack
of knowledge of the $^{12}$C$(\alpha,\gamma)^{16}$O reaction rate ---
$\varepsilon_1 \sim 0.03 \times 10^{-15}$~s/s --- and that due to the
errors in the asteroseismological model --- $\varepsilon_2 \sim 0.06
\times 10^{-15}$~s/s \cite{2012MNRAS.424.2792C}. We assumed that the
uncertainty for the case in which $\dot{G} \neq 0$ is the same as that
computed for the case in which $G= 0$, which is a reasonable
assumption. Considering that the theoretical solution should not
deviate more than one standard deviation from the observational value,
we conclude that the secular rate of variation of the gravitational
constant obtained using the variable DA white dwarf G117$-$B15A is
$\dot{G}/G= (-1.79^{+0.53}_{-0.49}) \times 10^{-10}$~yr$^{-1}$
\citep{varG}. The same analysis applied to the other star, R548,
results in $\dot{G}/G= (-1.29^{+0.71}_{-0.63}) \times
10^{-10}$~yr$^{-1}$, a very similar upper bound --- see \cite{varG}
for a detailed discussion. Clearly, these values are completely
compatible each other, although currently less restrictive than those
obtained using other techniques, and compatible with a null result for
$\dot G/G$.
\section{Discussion, conclusions and outlook}
In this work we have reviewed the several constraints that white
dwarfs can provide on the rate of change of a secularly varying
gravitational constant. Specifically, we have shown that when a
secularly evolving value of $G$ is adopted, the white dwarf cooling
tracks (and the main sequence evolutionary times of their progenitors
as well) are noticeably affected, and depend sensitively not only on
the value of $\dot G/G$ but also on the actual value of $G$ when the
white dwarf was born. We find that for negative values of $\dot G$ the
cooling is accelerated, due a less intense gravitational interaction.
According to these results the main sequence turn-off age and the age
derived from the termination of the white dwarf cooling sequence
differ from those computed when a constant value of Newton's constant
is adopted. This can be used to constrain the rate of variation of a
rolling $G$. In particular, we have applied this technique to the
metal rich, well populated, old open cluster NGC~6791. It turns out
that the resulting age of NGC~6791 is considerably modified modified,
as it occurs with the position of the main sequence turn-off in the
color-magnitude diagram, if the same distance modulus is adopted.
Accordingly, the distance modulus necessary to fit the position in the
color-magnitude diagram of the main sequence turn-off of the cluster
needs to be changed as well. However, the distance modulus derived
using an independent and reliable method (eclipsing binaries) which
does not make use of theoretical models turns out to be $13.46\pm 0.1$
\citep{Grundahl}. Thus, large errors in the distance modulus seem to
be quite implausible. Given the uncertainty in the distance modulus
($\simeq 0.1^{\rm mag}$), and the measured value, an upper limit to
$\dot G/G$ can be placed. Since $\Delta t_{\rm MSTO}/\Delta
(m-M)_{\rm F606W}\approx 4$~Gyr/mag, the maximum age difference with
respect to the case in which a constant $G$ is adopted should be $\sim
0.4$~Gyr, which translates into an upper bound $\dot G/G\sim
-1.8\times 10^{-12}$~yr$^{-1}$. This upper limit considerably
improves the other existing upper bounds to the rate of variation of
$G$ and is equivalent to the upper limit set by helioseismology.
We have also shown that individual pulsating hydrogen-rich white
dwarfs can also be useful in setting upper limits to the rate of
variation of $G$, although these upper bounds are currently less
restrictive than those obtained using the color-magnitude diagram of
clusters. In essence, we have found that the periods of the dominant
modes of the two white dwarfs (G117--B15A and R548) for which we have
reliable observational determinations of their rate of period change
of their main modes, are not affected, thus allowing to derive an
excellent asteroseismological fit of their pulsational
spectra. However, the rates of period change of their dominant modes
are severely affected, as a consequence of the fact that the rates of
change of these periods reflect their evolutionary changes, and thus
allow to measure their evolutionary time scales. Accordingly, in the
case of an hypothetical smooth variation of the gravitational
constant, and due to the sensitivity of the cooling time scales to the
precise value of $\dot G$, the rates of period change are
modified. Our calculations in the case of a running value of $G$ allow
to compare the predictions of the theoretical models with the
observational rates of period change, and hence to derive constraints
on the value of $\dot G/G$. Using this technique we found that the
upper bounds are $\dot{G}/G= (-1.79^{+0.53}_{-0.49}) \times
10^{-10}$~yr$^{-1}$, and $\dot{G}/G= (-1.29^{+0.71}_{-0.63}) \times
10^{-10}$~yr$^{-1}$, for G117--B15A and R548 respectively. We
emphasize that although these upper limits are less restrictive than
those obtained using the previously described technique, they could be
much improved should we have reliable observational determinations of
the rate of change of the dominant periods of pulsating massive white
dwarfs, as the effect of a running $G$ is more evident for these white
dwarfs, due to their larger gravitational field.
Last, but not least, we would like to emphasize here that there is
still room for new (and possibly exciting) studies that have not been
addressed here, and that the results of such studies could translate
in interesting improved constraints. To be precise, we now have
excellent observational luminosity functions of the white dwarf
population of the Galactic disk, which are the result of both
magnitude-limited large scale surveys --- like the Sloan Digital Sky
Survey \citep{SDSS1,SDSS2} or the SuperCOSMOS sky survey
\citep{SuperCOSMOS} --- or of volume-limited surveys
\citep{Bergeron}. The completenesses of the large surveys is expected
to be high ($\sim 80\%$), while the volume-limited sample is thought
to be nearly complete. The white dwarf luminosity function reflects
the characteristic cooling time of the population of white dwarfs as a
function of the absolute bolometric magnitude, and has two distinctive
features. The first of these properties is a monotonic increase until
luminosities of the order of $\log (L/L_\odot) \sim -3.5$, which is
simply a consequence of the the fact that due to the absence of energy
sources other than the gravothermal energy of white dwarfs, the cooler
a white dwarf the longer it takes to cool further. The second --- and
for our purposes most important feature --- of the disk white dwarf
luminosity function is the presence a sharp drop-off at
$\log(L/_\odot) \sim -4.5$. This pronounced cut-off is the obvious
consequence of the finite age of the Galactic disk. The origin of this
deficit of cool stars is clear: white dwarfs have not had time enough
to cool down beyond this luminosity. Since the cooling process of
white dwarfs is sensitive to $\dot G/G$ it is rather evident that in
the case of a secularly varying $G$ the position of the cut-off should
be different. Such an analysis still remains to be done, as it
requires the calculation of an extensive set of cooling sequences for
different values of $\dot G/G$ and the initial value of $G$, which
requires considerable efforts, but it is one of our priorities for the
next future.
In summary, we have demonstrated that due to their relative structural
simplicity, to the fact that the gravothermal cooling process that
governs their evolution is well understood, to the well determined
individual and ensemble properties, and to the sensitivity of their
properties to the value of $\dot G/G$, white dwarf stars can be used
to constrain alternative theories of gravitation, and that future
efforts, both on the observational and on the theoretical sides, can
result in improved upper bounds on the rate of change of the
gravitational constant.
\begin{acknowledgements}
Part of this work was supported by AGENCIA through the Programa de
Modernizaci\'on Tecnol\'ogica BID 1728/OC-AR, by PIP 112-200801-00940
grant from CONICET, by MCINN grant AYA2011-23102, by the ESF EUROCORES
Program EuroGENESIS (MICINN grant EUI2009???04170), by the European
Union FEDER funds, and by the AGAUR.
\end{acknowledgements}
\bibliographystyle{aa}
\bibliography{Sext}
\end{document}
\begin{thebibliography}{25}
\expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
\bibitem[{{Althaus} {et~al.}(2011){Althaus}, {C{\'o}rsico}, {Torres},
{Lor{\'e}n-Aguilar}, {Isern}, \& {Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}}]{gnew}
{Althaus}, L.~G., {C{\'o}rsico}, A.~H., {Torres}, S., {et~al.} 2011, \aap, 527,
A72
\bibitem[{{Althaus} {et~al.}(2010){Althaus}, {Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, {Renedo},
{Isern}, {C{\'o}rsico}, \& {Rohrmann}}]{Althaus10}
{Althaus}, L.~G., {Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, E., {Renedo}, I., {et~al.} 2010, \apj,
719, 612
\bibitem[{{Bambi} {et~al.}(2005){Bambi}, {Giannotti}, \& {Villante}}]{B05}
{Bambi}, C., {Giannotti}, M., \& {Villante}, F.~L. 2005, \prd, 71, 123524
\bibitem[{{Copi} {et~al.}(2004){Copi}, {Davis}, \& {Krauss}}]{CO4}
{Copi}, C.~J., {Davis}, A.~N., \& {Krauss}, L.~M. 2004, \prl, 92, 171301
\bibitem[{{C{\'o}rsico} {et~al.}(2013){C{\'o}rsico}, {Althaus},
{Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, \& {Romero}}]{varG}
{C{\'o}rsico}, A.~H., {Althaus}, L.~G., {Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, E., \& {Romero},
A.~D. 2013, J. Cosm. Astropart. Phys., 6, 32
\bibitem[{{C{\'o}rsico} {et~al.}(2012){C{\'o}rsico}, {Althaus}, {Miller
Bertolami}, {Romero}, {Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, {Isern}, \&
{Kepler}}]{2012MNRAS.424.2792C}
{C{\'o}rsico}, A.~H., {Althaus}, L.~G., {Miller Bertolami}, M.~M., {et~al.}
2012, \mnras, 424, 2792
\bibitem[{{De Gennaro} {et~al.}(2008){De Gennaro}, {von Hippel}, {Winget},
{Kepler}, {Nitta}, {Koester}, \& {Althaus}}]{SDSS1}
{De Gennaro}, S., {von Hippel}, T., {Winget}, D.~E., {et~al.} 2008, \aj, 135, 1
\bibitem[{{degl'Innocenti} {et~al.}(1996){degl'Innocenti}, {Fiorentini},
{Raffelt}, {Ricci}, \& {Weiss}}]{Weiss}
{degl'Innocenti}, S., {Fiorentini}, G., {Raffelt}, G.~G., {Ricci}, B., \&
{Weiss}, A. 1996, \aap, 312, 345
\bibitem[{{Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro} {et~al.}(2008){Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, {Althaus},
{C{\'o}rsico}, \& {Isern}}]{GB08}
{Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, E., {Althaus}, L.~G., {C{\'o}rsico}, A.~H., \& {Isern},
J. 2008, \apj, 677, 473
\bibitem[{{Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro} {et~al.}(1995){Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, {Hernanz},
{Isern}, \& {Mochkovitch}}]{gold}
{Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, E., {Hernanz}, M., {Isern}, J., \& {Mochkovitch}, R.
1995, \mnras, 277, 801
\bibitem[{{Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro} {et~al.}(2007){Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, {Isern},
\& {Kubyshin}}]{mio}
{Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, E., {Isern}, J., \& {Kubyshin}, Y.~A. 2007, \aapr, 14,
113
\bibitem[{{Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro} {et~al.}(2006){Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro},
{Kubyshin}, {Lor{\'e}n-Aguilar}, \& {Isern}}]{IJMPD}
{Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, E., {Kubyshin}, Y., {Lor{\'e}n-Aguilar}, P., \& {Isern},
J. 2006, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 15, 1163
\bibitem[{{Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro} {et~al.}(2011){Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro},
{Lor{\'e}n-Aguilar}, {Torres}, {Althaus}, \& {Isern}}]{JCAP}
{Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, E., {Lor{\'e}n-Aguilar}, P., {Torres}, S., {Althaus},
L.~G., \& {Isern}, J. 2011, J. Cosm. Astropart. Phys., 5, 21
\bibitem[{{Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro} {et~al.}(2010){Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, {Torres},
{Althaus}, {Renedo}, {Lor{\'e}n-Aguilar}, {C{\'o}rsico}, {Rohrmann},
{Salaris}, \& {Isern}}]{nature}
{Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, E., {Torres}, S., {Althaus}, L.~G., {et~al.} 2010, \nat,
465, 194
\bibitem[{{Gazta{\~n}aga} {et~al.}(2002){Gazta{\~n}aga}, {Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro},
{Isern}, {Bravo}, \& {Dom{\'{\i}}nguez}}]{SNIa}
{Gazta{\~n}aga}, E., {Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, E., {Isern}, J., {Bravo}, E., \&
{Dom{\'{\i}}nguez}, I. 2002, \prd, 65, 023506
\bibitem[{{Giammichele} {et~al.}(2012){Giammichele}, {Bergeron}, \&
{Dufour}}]{Bergeron}
{Giammichele}, N., {Bergeron}, P., \& {Dufour}, P. 2012, \apjs, 199, 29
\bibitem[{{Grundahl} {et~al.}(2008){Grundahl}, {Clausen}, {Hardis}, \&
{Frandsen}}]{Grundahl}
{Grundahl}, F., {Clausen}, J.~V., {Hardis}, S., \& {Frandsen}, S. 2008, \aap,
492, 171
\bibitem[{{Guenther} {et~al.}(1998){Guenther}, {Krauss}, \&
{Demarque}}]{Demarque}
{Guenther}, D.~B., {Krauss}, L.~M., \& {Demarque}, P. 1998, \apj, 498, 871
\bibitem[{{Harris} {et~al.}(2006){Harris}, {Munn}, {Kilic}, {Liebert},
{Williams}, {von Hippel}, {Levine}, {Monet}, {Eisenstein}, {Kleinman},
{Metcalfe}, {Nitta}, {Winget}, {Brinkmann}, {Fukugita}, {Knapp}, {Lupton},
{Smith}, \& {Schneider}}]{SDSS2}
{Harris}, H.~C., {Munn}, J.~A., {Kilic}, M., {et~al.} 2006, \aj, 131, 571
\bibitem[{{Hofmann} {et~al.}(2010){Hofmann}, {M{\"u}ller}, \& {Biskupek}}]{H10}
{Hofmann}, F., {M{\"u}ller}, J., \& {Biskupek}, L. 2010, \aap, 522, L5
\bibitem[{{Lor{\'e}n-Aguilar} {et~al.}(2003){Lor{\'e}n-Aguilar},
{Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, {Isern}, \& {Kubyshin}}]{LAea}
{Lor{\'e}n-Aguilar}, P., {Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, E., {Isern}, J., \& {Kubyshin},
Y.~A. 2003, Class. \& Quantum Grav., 20, 3885
\bibitem[{{Renedo} {et~al.}(2010){Renedo}, {Althaus}, {Miller Bertolami},
{Romero}, {C{\'o}rsico}, {Rohrmann}, \& {Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}}]{Renedo10}
{Renedo}, I., {Althaus}, L.~G., {Miller Bertolami}, M.~M., {et~al.} 2010, \apj,
717, 183
\bibitem[{{Romero} {et~al.}(2012){Romero}, {C{\'o}rsico}, {Althaus}, {Kepler},
{Castanheira}, \& {Miller Bertolami}}]{2012MNRAS.420.1462R}
{Romero}, A.~D., {C{\'o}rsico}, A.~H., {Althaus}, L.~G., {et~al.} 2012, \mnras,
420, 1462
\bibitem[{{Rowell} \& {Hambly}(2011)}]{SuperCOSMOS}
{Rowell}, N. \& {Hambly}, N.~C. 2011, \mnras, 417, 93
\bibitem[{{Uzan}(2003)}]{uzan}
{Uzan}, J.-P. 2003, Rev. Mod. Phys., 75, 403
\end{thebibliography}