Electron-positron pair production near the Galactic Centre and the 511 keV emission line
Extracted source text ยท arXiv 1511.07933
\documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib]{mn2e} \usepackage{graphicx}
\title{Electron-positron pair production near the Galactic Centre and the
511 keV emission line} \author[Chan]{Man Ho Chan
\thanks{chanmh@ied.edu.hk}\\ Department of Science and Environmental
Studies, The Hong Kong Institute of Education}
\begin{document}
\date{Accepted XXXX, Received XXXX}
\pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}} \pubyear{XXXX}
\maketitle
\label{firstpage}
\begin{abstract}
Recent observations indicate that a high production rate of positrons
(strong 511 keV line) and
a significant amount of excess GeV gamma-ray exist in our Galactic bulge.
The latter issue can be explained by $\sim 40$ GeV dark matter
annihilation through $b \bar{b}$ channel while the former one remains a
mystery. On the other hand, recent studies reveal that a large amount of
high density gas might exist near the Galactic Centre million years ago to
account for the young, massive stars extending from 0.04 pc - 7 pc. In
this article, I propose a new scenario and show that the 40 GeV dark
matter annihilation model can also explain the required positron
production rate (511 keV line) in the bulge due to the existence
of the high density gas cloud near the supermassive black hole long time
ago.
\end{abstract}
\begin{keywords}
Dark matter
\end{keywords}
\section{Introduction}
In the past few decades, a flux of 511 keV photons $\phi_{511} \sim
10^{-3}$ ph cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ emitted in the Milky Way was reported
\citep{Leventhal,Knodlseder}. These
511 keV photons are supposed to originate from the positrons produced. The
predicted production rate of positrons in the bulge and disk are
respectively given by $\dot{N}_{e^+}=11.5^{+1.8}_{-1.44} \times 10^{42}$
s$^{-1}$ and $\dot{N}_{e^+}=8.1^{+1.5}_{-1.4} \times 10^{42}$ s$^{-1}$
\citep{Prantzos,Perets}. In particular, the bulge to disk ratio is
abnormally high $B/D=1.42^{+0.34}_{-0.30}$ \citep{Prantzos,Perets}. The
positrons produced in the Galactic disk can be explained by some
mechanisms, such as novae, supernovae, pulsars and low-mass X-ray binaries
(LMXRB) \citep{Prantzos}. However, the
high positron production rate in the bulge remains a mystery, especially
at the central part. Observations
indicate that the 511 keV line comes from mainly diffuse
sources rather than point sources \citep{Cesare}. It has been
suggested that the positrons produced through dark matter annihilation can
account for the required production rate \citep{Boehm}. For example,
Ascasibar et al. (2006) show that
dark matter annhilation can give enough positrons, and the dark matter
mass should be smaller than 100 MeV if the annihilation cross section is
velocity-independent. Later, based on the gamma-ray spectral
shape, Sizun et al. (2006) further constrain the dark matter mass to
smaller than 7.5 MeV. Although these models can give enough positrons to
account for the 511 keV line, we do not have another independent promising
observational evidence to support these models. Also, most of the models
depend strongly on the dark matter density profile, annihilation
cross-section and the dark matter annihilation channels.
Recently, an excess of GeV gamma-ray near the Galactic Centre has been
reported \citep{Goodenough,Hooper,Gordon,Abazajian,Daylan}. The spectrum
obtained can be best fitted with the annihilation
of dark matter particles with mass $m \sim 40$ GeV through $b \bar{b}$
channel. The required annihilation cross-section $<\sigma v>$ is about
$(1-7) \times 10^{-26}$ cm$^3$ s$^{-1}$ \citep{Abazajian,Daylan}, which is
consistent with the expected canonical thermal relic abundance
cross-section $<\sigma v>=3 \times 10^{-26}$ cm$^3$ s$^{-1}$ in cosmology.
Based
on this result, Boehm et al. (2014) try to use this model to explain the
511 keV line. However, the production rate is too small to account for the
required rate \citep{Boehm2}.
In this letter, I suggest a possible mechanism to account for both the 511
keV line and the GeV gamma-ray excess. By assuming the existence of a
large dense cloud near the supermassive black hole $\sim 10^6$ years ago
and following the model that used to account for the GeV gamma-ray excess,
the production rate of positrons can satisfy the required rate.
\section{The dense cloud near the supermassive black hole}
Recent studies indicate that a large amount of dense gas $\sim
10^5M_{\odot}$ in the form of a disk might exist near
the Galactic Centre ($r \le 0.4$ pc) $10^{6.5}$ years ago to account for
the young, massive stars extending from 0.04 pc - 0.4 pc
\citep{Wardle,Lucas,Wardle2}. The existence of the dense gas can
overcome tidal shear in the vicinity of the supermassive black hole
and help to explain the truncation of the stellar surface density within
0.04 pc. Part of the cloud is converted to stars and the remainder is
accreted onto the
supermassive black hole \citep{Wardle2}. The accretion can last for $\sim
10^{14}$ s, and the number density of the cloud can be as high as $n_g
\sim 10^{10}$ cm$^{-3}$ \citep{Wardle2}. Most particles in the gas are
electrically neutral because the temperature is not enough for ionization
\citep{Wardle2}. Furthermore, recent studies also indicate that the
density of gas was $n_g \sim 2\times 10^8$ cm$^{-3}$ at 1 pc from
the Galactic Centre million years ago to overcome tidal shear
\citep{Zadeh}. The size of such a high density region is probably
larger than $5-7$ pc \citep{Goicoechea,Zadeh}.
In the following, I propose that a large amount of positrons can be
produced in the dense gas through
pair-production mechanism ($\gamma \rightarrow e^++e^-$). If the photons
produced by dark matter annihilation have energy greater than $2m_ec^2$,
pair-production is possible in the field of the nucleus from the
surrounding gas. The pair-production cross-section for photon energy
greater than 0.1 GeV is $\sigma_{pp} \approx 9 \times 10^{-27}$ cm$^2$
\citep{Longair}, and it would be smaller for lower energy.
Although this cross-section is small, the amount of positrons produced
would still be large if the number of gas nuclei is large.
Therefore, when a large amount of gamma-ray produced by dark matter
annihilation is passing through this dense cloud of gas, a large amount of
positrons can be produced. The positrons produced can also generate
secondary photons by bremsstrahlung process. These photons produced can
further produce high-energy positrons. As a result, cascades of
electrons, positrons and photons would be produced. Assume that the mean
density and the size of the dense cloud are $n_g \sim 10^8$ cm$^{-3}$ and
$R \sim 5$ pc respectively. The optical depth of
the electron-positron pair-production is $\tau \approx n_g \sigma_{pp} R
\sim 13$. If we assume that the gas cloud density is falling with
distance $n_g \propto 1/r^3$ \citep{Zadeh}, the optical depth is
$\tau=\int_{\rm 0.4~pc}^{\rm 5~pc}n_g \sigma_{pp}dr \approx 17$. For
$\tau=13-17$, each high-energy photon entering the cloud
would generate $\sim 1000$ positrons in the pair-production mechanism
\citep{Longair}. The pair-production rate is efficient when the photon
energy is greater than 0.1 GeV.
Since the optical depth is large, the energy of the final positrons
produced would be $E \approx 2m_ec^2 \approx 1$ MeV (still relativistic).
This satisfies with the strong constraints on higher energy positrons
from in-flight annihilations ($E \le 3$ MeV) \citep{Beacom}. When the
positrons leave the dense cloud, they would cool down mainly by
synchrontron loss, inverse Compton scattering, bremsstrahlung loss and
coulomb loss \citep{Longair,Storm}:
\begin{equation}
b(E)=b_s \gamma_e^2+b_i \gamma_e^2+b_bn_H \left( \frac{E}{1~\rm eV}
\right)+b_cn_e \left[1+\frac{\ln(\gamma_e/n_e)}{75} \right],
\end{equation}
where $b_s=6.6\times 10^{-14}$ eV/s, $b_i=6.5\times 10^{-15}$ eV/s,
$b_b=3.7 \times 10^{-16}$ eV/s, $b_c=6.1 \times 10^{-7}$ eV/s, $n_H$ is
the number density of hydrogen atom in cm$^{-3}$, $n_e$ is
the electron number density in cm$^{-3}$, and $\gamma_e$ is the Lorentz
factor of a positron. Here, we assume that the magnetic field strength
in the Galactic bulge is of the order $B \sim 10^{-5}$ G \citep{Muno}.
The survival probability of positrons before forming positroniums is
\citep{Prantzos}
\begin{equation}
P(E,E_f)=1-\exp \left[-n_e \int_{E_f}^{E} \frac{v(E')
\sigma_a(E')dE'}{b(E')} \right],
\end{equation}
where $\sigma_a$ is the annihilation cross-section and $E_f$ is the final
energy of positrons after cooling. In order to form positronium, a
positron should cool down to lower than 100 eV. For $E=1$ MeV, $E_f=100$
eV and
$n_e \sim 0.1$ cm$^{-3}$ near the Galactic Centre, only less than 1\% of
positrons would annihilate with electrons before forming positroniums.
Fig.~1 shows that our model satisfies the constraint of MeV photon
spectrum observed \citep{Beacom}. A relativistic positron can cool down
to non-relativistic in $\sim 10^{13}$ s if the injection energy
is $\sim 1$ MeV (see Fig.~2). This means that the
positrons produced $\sim 10^{14}$ s ago by pair-production mechanism in
the dense gas would use $\sim 10^{13}$ s to cool down to
non-relativistic. Then they would combine with hydrogen atoms to form
positroniums and emit 511 keV line. Basically, since we can still observe
the strong 511
keV line nowadays, the cooling time scale $t_c$ should be less than the
time of existence of the gas cloud $t_e$. Moreover, the cooling time
scale should be longer than the timescale of disappearance of the gas
cloud $t_a$ (the duration between the present time and the moment of the
disappearance of the gas cloud). Based on our calculations, the condition
$t_e>t_c$ is satisfied. However, since $t_a$ is hard to confirm, we assume
that $t_e>t_a$ in the following discussion.
In fact, the positrons produced in the dense cloud would finally be
trapped by the magnetic field to within 100 pc \citep{Beacom}. In other
words, the 511 keV line signal produced by these positrons would only
extend to 100 pc from the Galactic Centre, which seems inconsistent with
the morphology observed ($\sim 1$ kpc in size)
\citep{Knodlseder}. Nevertheless, the 511 photon flux from the outer part
of Galactic bulge ($\ge 100$ pc) can be explained by the morphology of
LMXRB ($\phi_{511} \approx 2 \times 10^{-3}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$
rad$^{-1}$) \citep{Bird,Weidenspointner,Prantzos}. Our model is going to
account for the unexplained
strong 511 keV line from the central part of Galactic bulge
($\phi_{511} \approx 6 \times 10^{-3}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ rad$^{-1}$).
The rate of dark matter annihilation within a radius $R$ is given by
\begin{equation}
\dot{N}_{DM}=\int_0^R \frac{\rho_{DM}^2}{m^2}<\sigma v>4 \pi r^2dr,
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
\rho_{DM}=\rho_{\odot} \left( \frac{r}{r_{\odot}} \right)^{-\gamma} \left[
\frac{1+(r/r_s)^{\alpha}}{1+(r_{\odot}/r_s)^{\alpha}}
\right]^{-(\beta-\gamma)/\alpha}.
\end{equation}
Following \citet{Cirelli}, we take $\rho_{\odot}=0.3$ GeV/cm$^3$,
$r_{\odot}=8.5$
kpc, $r_s=20$ kpc, $\alpha=1$, $\beta=3$ and $\gamma=1.26$ (the best-fit
value to account for the GeV excess). By using Eq.~(3) and assuming
$<\sigma v>=3 \times 10^{-26}$ cm$^3$ s$^{-1}$, the dark matter
annihilation rate within 5 pc is $\dot{N}_{DM}=8 \times 10^{37}$
s$^{-1}$. By using the spectrum calculated in \citet{Cembranos}, the total
number of
photons produced with energy greater than 0.1 GeV through dark matter
annihilation is 115 per one annihilation (see Fig.~3). Assuming $\tau=13$,
the total
number of positrons produced in this pair-production mechanism within
5 pc is $\sim 10^{43}$ s$^{-1}$, which is enough to account for the 511
keV line.
On the other hand, the diffuse source of positrons produced directly from
dark matter annihilation can be estimated by using the positron energy
spectrum obtained from \citet{Borriello} (see Fig.~4). The total number of
positrons produced per one annihilation is 12. By using Eq.~(3),
$\dot{N}_{DM} \sim 10^{39}$ for $R=1$ kpc. Therefore, the rate of diffuse
positron production within 1 kpc is about $10^{40}$ s$^{-1}$. This
minor diffuse source of positrons requires a bit longer time to cool
down to non-relativistic (see Fig.~2). They would finally contribute to
the 511 keV line which extend to 1 kpc from the Galactic Centre. However,
this minor diffuse source is negligible compared with the other available
explanations.
The rate of change of total number of positrons in the bulge is given by
\begin{equation}
\frac{dN_{e^+}}{dt}=\dot{N}_{e^+}-N_{e^+}n_H\sigma_{eH}v,
\end{equation}
where $\sigma_{eH}$ is the cross-section of positronium production.
Since the energy dependence of the cross-section is an exponential
function of the positron energy, the positronium formation rate would be
the largest for certain positron energy ($\sim 14$ eV) \citep{Boehm2}.
As a result, a dynamical equilibrium state would be achieved when the
positrons are cooled to around 14 eV and become positroniums. In
equilibrium, the total number of cooled positrons in the bulge is $N_{e^+}
\sim 10^{50}$ because $\dot{N}_{e^+} \sim 10^{43}$ s$^{-1}$ and
$n_H\sigma_{eH}v \sim 10^{-7}$ s$^{-1}$. However, part of the dense cloud
would eventually change to stars, and most of the remaining part would be
captured by the supermassive black hole. Therefore, the relatively strong
511 keV line would not last forever. When the dense cloud disappears, the
production rate would reduce to $\dot{N}_{e^+} \sim 10^{42}$ s$^{-1}$
(from novae, supernovae, pulsars, LMXRB, etc.). Also, the final batch of
positrons produced from the dense cloud would diffuse away and cool down
to form positroniums to give 511 keV line. As a result, from the
solution of Eq.~(5), the total number of positrons would
decrease significantly at $t_c$ after the disappearance of the dense
cloud:
\begin{equation}
N_{e^+}=\frac{\dot{N}_{e^+}}{n_H\sigma_{eH}v}
\left(1-e^{-n_H\sigma_{eH}vt} \right)+N_{e^+0}e^{-n_H\sigma_{eH}vt},
\end{equation}
where $N_{e^+0} \sim 10^{50}$ is the original number of positrons, and
$t$ is the time after all the positrons produced from the dense cloud
disappeared. When $t \gg 10^7$ s, the total number of positrons in the
bulge would reduce to $N_{e^+} \sim 10^{49}$, and the intensity of the 511
keV line would decrease by a factor of three. In Fig.~5, we show the
changes of positron number, gas cloud density and the stregth of 511 keV
flux as a function of time.
\begin{figure*}
\vskip 5mm
\includegraphics[width=100mm]{MeVspectrum.eps}
\caption{The solid and dashed lines represent the MeV photon spectrum
due to positron-electron annihilation after passing through the dense
cloud and the observed MeV photon spectrum respectively \citep{Beacom}.}
\vskip 5mm
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}
\vskip 5mm
\includegraphics[width=100mm]{positron_cooling.eps}
\caption{The cooling of a 1 MeV positron (dashed line) and a 0.5 GeV
positron (solid line).}
\vskip 5mm
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}
\vskip 5mm
\includegraphics[width=100mm]{gamma_40.eps}
\caption{The photon spectrum per one dark matter annihilation
\citep{Cembranos}. Here, we assume $m=40$ GeV.}
\vskip 5mm
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}
\vskip 5mm
\includegraphics[width=100mm]{positron_40.eps}
\caption{The positron spectrum per one dark matter annihilation
\citep{Borriello}. Here, we assume $m=40$ GeV.}
\vskip 5mm
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}
\vskip 5mm
\includegraphics[width=100mm]{timeline.eps}
\caption{The changes of positron number, gas cloud density and the
strength of 511 keV flux as a function of time. Here, we assume that the
time of existence of the gas cloud $t_e$ and the cooling time scale for
positrons $t_c$ are $10^{14}$ s and $2 \times 10^{13}$ s respectively.}
\vskip 5mm
\end{figure*}
\section{Discussion and Conclusion}
In this letter, we discuss a possible model to explain the observed 511
keV line. Following the dark matter annihilation scenario that used to
account for the GeV gamma-ray excess in the Galactic Centre, the gamma-ray
produced by the dark matter annihilation can generate enough positrons
($\sim 10^{43}$ s$^{-1}$) through electron-positron pair-production inside
the dense cloud, if we assume the existence of a dense
gas cloud surrounding the supermassive black hole $10^{14}$ s ago. The
cooling time scale (diffusion time scale) of positrons is $t_c \sim
10^{13}$ s. Therefore, the
strong 511 keV line observed is just a single event, which last for about
$\sim 10^{13}$ s after the disappearance of the dense cloud.
However, the uncertainties in the cloud size and density may significantly
affect the optical depth for pair-production. Our model would fail if the
optical depth near the supermassive black hole is too small for the
high-energy gamma-ray. Therefore, more observational data from the
parsec region near the supermassive black hole is needed to verify our
proposed model. To conclude, by assuming a large dense cloud with number
density $\sim 10^8$ cm$^{-3}$, it can generate enough positrons to account
for the 511 keV line and explain the excess GeV gamma-ray observed in the
Galactic Center.
\begin{thebibliography}{}
\bibitem[Abazajian et al. (2014)]{Abazajian} Abazajian K. N., Canac N.,
Horiuchi S., Kaplinghat M., 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 90, 023526.
\bibitem[Ascasibar et al. (2006)]{Ascasibar} Ascasibar Y., Jean P.,
Boehm C., Kn\"odlseder J., 2006, MNRAS, 368, 1695.
\bibitem[Beacom and Yuksel (2006)]{Beacom} Beacom J. F., Yuksel H., 2006,
Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, 071102.
\bibitem[Bird et al. (2007)]{Bird} Bird A. J. {\it et al.}, 2007, ApJS,
170, 175.
\bibitem[Boehm et al. (2004)]{Boehm} Boehm C. {\it et al.}, 2004, Phys.
Rev. Lett., 92, 101301.
\bibitem[Boehm et al. (2014)]{Boehm2} Boehm C., Gondolo P., Jean P.,
Larcroix T., Norman C., Silk J., arXiv:1406.4683.
\bibitem[Borriello et al. (2009)]{Borriello} Borriello E., Cuoco A., Miele
G., 2009, Phys. Rev. D, 79, 023518.
\bibitem[Cembranos et al. (2011)]{Cembranos} Cembranos J. A. R., de la
Cruz-Dombriz A., Dobado A., Lineros R. A., Maroto A. L., 2011, Phys. Rev.
D, 83, 083507.
\bibitem[Cesare et al. (2006)]{Cesare} De Cesare G. {\it et al.},
2006, Advances in Space Research, 38, 1457.
\bibitem[Cirelli, Serpico and Zaharijas (2013)]{Cirelli} Cirelli M.,
Serpico P. D., Zaharijas G., 2013, JCAP, 11, 035.
\bibitem[Daylan et al. (2014)]{Daylan} Daylan T., Finkbeiner D. P.
Hooper D., Linden T., Portillo S. K. N., Rodd N. L., Slatyer T. R.,
arXiv:1402.6703.
\bibitem[Delahaye et al. (2008)]{Delahaye} Delahaye T., Lineros R.,
Donato F., Fornengo N., Salati P., 2008, Phys. Rev. D, 77, 063527.
\bibitem[Ferriere, Gillard and Jean (2007)]{Ferriere} Ferriere K.,
Gillard W., Jean P., 2007, A \& A, 467, 611.
\bibitem[Fornengo et al. (2012)]{Fornengo} Fornengo N., Lineros R. A.,
Regis M., Taoso M., 2012, JCAP, 01, 005.
\bibitem[Goicoechea et al. (2013)]{Goicoechea} Goicoechea J. R. {\it et
al.}, 2013, ApJ, 769, L13.
\bibitem[Goodenough and Hooper (2009)]{Goodenough} Goodenough L., Hooper
D., arXiv:0910.2998.
\bibitem[Gordon and Macias (2013)]{Gordon} Gordon C., Macias O., 2013,
Phys. Rev. D, 88, 083521.
\bibitem[Hooper and Goodenough (2011)]{Hooper} Hooper D., Goodenough L.,
2011, Phys. Lett. B, 697, 412.
\bibitem[Kn\"odlseder et al. (2005)]{Knodlseder} Kn\"odlseder J. {\it et
al.}, 2005, A \& A 441, 513.
\bibitem[Lacroix, Boehm and Silk (2014)]{Lacroix} Lacroix T., Boehm C.,
Silk J., 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 90, 043508.
\bibitem[Leventhal, MacCallum and Stang (1978)]{Leventhal} Leventhal M.,
MacCallum C. J., Stang P. D., 1978, ApJL, 225, L11.
\bibitem[Longair (1994)]{Longair} Longair M. S., 1994, {\it High Energy
Astrophysics}, vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
\bibitem[Lucas et al. (2013)]{Lucas} Lucas W. E., Bonnell I. A.,
Davies M. B., Rice W. K. M., 2013, MNRAS, 433, 353.
\bibitem[Muno et al. (2004)]{Muno} Muno M. P., 2004, {\it et al.}, ApJ,
613, 326.
\bibitem[Perets (2014)]{Perets} Perets H. B., arXiv:1407.2254.
\bibitem[Prantzos et al. (2011)]{Prantzos} Prantzos N. {\it et al.}, 2011,
Rev. Mod. Phys., 83, 1001.
\bibitem[Regis and Ullio (2008)]{Regis} Regis M. and Ullio P., Phys. Rev.
D, 78, 043505.
\bibitem[Sizun, Casse and Schanne (2006)]{Sizun} Sizun P., Casse M.,
Schanne S., 2006, Phys. Rev. D, 74, 063514.
\bibitem[Storm et al. (2013)]{Storm} Storm E., Jeltema T. E., Profumo
S., Rudnick L., 2013, ApJ, 768, 106.
\bibitem[Wardle and Yusef-Zadeh (2012)]{Wardle} Wardle M., Yusef-Zadeh F.,
2012, ApJ, 750, L38.
\bibitem[Wardle and Yusef-Zadeh (2014)]{Wardle2} Wardle M., Yusef-Zadeh
F., 2014, ApJ, 787, L14.
\bibitem[Weidenspointner et al. (2008)]{Weidenspointner} Weidenspointner
G. {\it et al.}, 2008, New Astronomy Reviews, 52, 454.
\bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh et al. (2015)]{Zadeh} Yusef-Zadeh F. {\it et al.},
arXiv:1505.05177.
\end{thebibliography}
\label{lastpage}
\end{document}