Incident-Angle Dependence of Electromagnetic Wave Transmission through a Nano-hole in a Thin Plasmonic Semiconductor Layer
Extracted source text ยท arXiv 1511.08871
%% bare_jrnl.tex
%% V1.4
%% 2012/12/27
%% by Michael Shell
%% see http://www.michaelshell.org/
%% for current contact information.
%%
%% This is a skeleton file demonstrating the use of IEEEtran.cls
%% (requires IEEEtran.cls version 1.8 or later) with an IEEE journal paper.
%%
%% Support sites:
%% http://www.michaelshell.org/tex/ieeetran/
%% http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/IEEEtran/
%% and
%% http://www.ieee.org/
% *** Authors should verify (and, if needed, correct) their LaTeX system ***
% *** with the testflow diagnostic prior to trusting their LaTeX platform ***
% *** with production work. IEEE's font choices can trigger bugs that do ***
% *** not appear when using other class files. ***
% The testflow support page is at:
% http://www.michaelshell.org/tex/testflow/
%%*************************************************************************
%% Legal Notice:
%% This code is offered as-is without any warranty either expressed or
%% implied; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
%% FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE!
%% User assumes all risk.
%% In no event shall IEEE or any contributor to this code be liable for
%% any damages or losses, including, but not limited to, incidental,
%% consequential, or any other damages, resulting from the use or misuse
%% of any information contained here.
%%
%% All comments are the opinions of their respective authors and are not
%% necessarily endorsed by the IEEE.
%%
%% This work is distributed under the LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL)
%% ( http://www.latex-project.org/ ) version 1.3, and may be freely used,
%% distributed and modified. A copy of the LPPL, version 1.3, is included
%% in the base LaTeX documentation of all distributions of LaTeX released
%% 2003/12/01 or later.
%% Retain all contribution notices and credits.
%% ** Modified files should be clearly indicated as such, including **
%% ** renaming them and changing author support contact information. **
%%
%% File list of work: IEEEtran.cls, IEEEtran_HOWTO.pdf, bare_adv.tex,
%% bare_conf.tex, bare_jrnl.tex, bare_jrnl_compsoc.tex,
%% bare_jrnl_transmag.tex
%%*************************************************************************
% Note that the a4paper option is mainly intended so that authors in
% countries using A4 can easily print to A4 and see how their papers will
% look in print - the typesetting of the document will not typically be
% affected with changes in paper size (but the bottom and side margins will).
% Use the testflow package mentioned above to verify correct handling of
% both paper sizes by the user's LaTeX system.
%
% Also note that the "draftcls" or "draftclsnofoot", not "draft", option
% should be used if it is desired that the figures are to be displayed in
% draft mode.
%
%\documentclass[journal]{IEEEtran}
\documentclass[journal]{IEEEtran}
%\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{amsmath}
%\usepackage{verbatim}
\thispagestyle{empty}
% If IEEEtran.cls has not been installed into the LaTeX system files,
% manually specify the path to it like:
% \documentclass[journal]{../sty/IEEEtran}
% Some very useful LaTeX packages include:
% (uncomment the ones you want to load)
% *** MISC UTILITY PACKAGES ***
%
%\usepackage{ifpdf}
% Heiko Oberdiek's ifpdf.sty is very useful if you need conditional
% compilation based on whether the output is pdf or dvi.
% usage:
% \ifpdf
% % pdf code
% \else
% % dvi code
% \fi
% The latest version of ifpdf.sty can be obtained from:
% http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/oberdiek/
% Also, note that IEEEtran.cls V1.7 and later provides a builtin
% \ifCLASSINFOpdf conditional that works the same way.
% When switching from latex to pdflatex and vice-versa, the compiler may
% have to be run twice to clear warning/error messages.
% *** CITATION PACKAGES ***
%
%\usepackage{cite}
% cite.sty was written by Donald Arseneau
% V1.6 and later of IEEEtran pre-defines the format of the cite.sty package
% \cite{} output to follow that of IEEE. Loading the cite package will
% result in citation numbers being automatically sorted and properly
% "compressed/ranged". e.g., [1], [9], [2], [7], [5], [6] without using
% cite.sty will become [1], [2], [5]--[7], [9] using cite.sty. cite.sty's
% \cite will automatically add leading space, if needed. Use cite.sty's
% noadjust option (cite.sty V3.8 and later) if you want to turn this off
% such as if a citation ever needs to be enclosed in parenthesis.
% cite.sty is already installed on most LaTeX systems. Be sure and use
% version 4.0 (2003-05-27) and later if using hyperref.sty. cite.sty does
% not currently provide for hyperlinked citations.
% The latest version can be obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/cite/
% The documentation is contained in the cite.sty file itself.
% *** GRAPHICS RELATED PACKAGES ***
%
\ifCLASSINFOpdf
% \usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx}
% declare the path(s) where your graphic files are
% \graphicspath{{../pdf/}{../jpeg/}}
% and their extensions so you won't have to specify these with
% every instance of \includegraphics
% \DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.pdf,.jpeg,.png}
\else
% or other class option (dvipsone, dvipdf, if not using dvips). graphicx
% will default to the driver specified in the system graphics.cfg if no
% driver is specified.
% \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
% declare the path(s) where your graphic files are
% \graphicspath{{../eps/}}
% and their extensions so you won't have to specify these with
% every instance of \includegraphics
% \DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.eps}
\fi
% graphicx was written by David Carlisle and Sebastian Rahtz. It is
% required if you want graphics, photos, etc. graphicx.sty is already
% installed on most LaTeX systems. The latest version and documentation
% can be obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/required/graphics/
% Another good source of documentation is "Using Imported Graphics in
% LaTeX2e" by Keith Reckdahl which can be found at:
% http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/info/epslatex/
%
% latex, and pdflatex in dvi mode, support graphics in encapsulated
% postscript (.eps) format. pdflatex in pdf mode supports graphics
% in .pdf, .jpeg, .png and .mps (metapost) formats. Users should ensure
% that all non-photo figures use a vector format (.eps, .pdf, .mps) and
% not a bitmapped formats (.jpeg, .png). IEEE frowns on bitmapped formats
% which can result in "jaggedy"/blurry rendering of lines and letters as
% well as large increases in file sizes.
%
% You can find documentation about the pdfTeX application at:
% http://www.tug.org/applications/pdftex
% *** MATH PACKAGES ***
%
%\usepackage[cmex10]{amsmath}
% A popular package from the American Mathematical Society that provides
% many useful and powerful commands for dealing with mathematics. If using
% it, be sure to load this package with the cmex10 option to ensure that
% only type 1 fonts will utilized at all point sizes. Without this option,
% it is possible that some math symbols, particularly those within
% footnotes, will be rendered in bitmap form which will result in a
% document that can not be IEEE Xplore compliant!
%
% Also, note that the amsmath package sets \interdisplaylinepenalty to 10000
% thus preventing page breaks from occurring within multiline equations. Use:
%\interdisplaylinepenalty=2500
% after loading amsmath to restore such page breaks as IEEEtran.cls normally
% does. amsmath.sty is already installed on most LaTeX systems. The latest
% version and documentation can be obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/required/amslatex/math/
% *** SPECIALIZED LIST PACKAGES ***
%
%\usepackage{algorithmic}
% algorithmic.sty was written by Peter Williams and Rogerio Brito.
% This package provides an algorithmic environment fo describing algorithms.
% You can use the algorithmic environment in-text or within a figure
% environment to provide for a floating algorithm. Do NOT use the algorithm
% floating environment provided by algorithm.sty (by the same authors) or
% algorithm2e.sty (by Christophe Fiorio) as IEEE does not use dedicated
% algorithm float types and packages that provide these will not provide
% correct IEEE style captions. The latest version and documentation of
% algorithmic.sty can be obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/algorithms/
% There is also a support site at:
% http://algorithms.berlios.de/index.html
% Also of interest may be the (relatively newer and more customizable)
% algorithmicx.sty package by Szasz Janos:
% http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/algorithmicx/
% *** ALIGNMENT PACKAGES ***
%
%\usepackage{array}
% Frank Mittelbach's and David Carlisle's array.sty patches and improves
% the standard LaTeX2e array and tabular environments to provide better
% appearance and additional user controls. As the default LaTeX2e table
% generation code is lacking to the point of almost being broken with
% respect to the quality of the end results, all users are strongly
% advised to use an enhanced (at the very least that provided by array.sty)
% set of table tools. array.sty is already installed on most systems. The
% latest version and documentation can be obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/required/tools/
% IEEEtran contains the IEEEeqnarray family of commands that can be used to
% generate multiline equations as well as matrices, tables, etc., of high
% quality.
% *** SUBFIGURE PACKAGES ***
%\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc
% \usepackage[caption=false,font=normalsize,labelfont=sf,textfont=sf]{subfig}
%\else
% \usepackage[caption=false,font=footnotesize]{subfig}
%\fi
% subfig.sty, written by Steven Douglas Cochran, is the modern replacement
% for subfigure.sty, the latter of which is no longer maintained and is
% incompatible with some LaTeX packages including fixltx2e. However,
% subfig.sty requires and automatically loads Axel Sommerfeldt's caption.sty
% which will override IEEEtran.cls' handling of captions and this will result
% in non-IEEE style figure/table captions. To prevent this problem, be sure
% and invoke subfig.sty's "caption=false" package option (available since
% subfig.sty version 1.3, 2005/06/28) as this is will preserve IEEEtran.cls
% handling of captions.
% Note that the Computer Society format requires a larger sans serif font
% than the serif footnote size font used in traditional IEEE formatting
% and thus the need to invoke different subfig.sty package options depending
% on whether compsoc mode has been enabled.
%
% The latest version and documentation of subfig.sty can be obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/subfig/
% *** FLOAT PACKAGES ***
%
%\usepackage{fixltx2e}
% fixltx2e, the successor to the earlier fix2col.sty, was written by
% Frank Mittelbach and David Carlisle. This package corrects a few problems
% in the LaTeX2e kernel, the most notable of which is that in current
% LaTeX2e releases, the ordering of single and double column floats is not
% guaranteed to be preserved. Thus, an unpatched LaTeX2e can allow a
% single column figure to be placed prior to an earlier double column
% figure. The latest version and documentation can be found at:
% http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/base/
%\usepackage{stfloats}
% stfloats.sty was written by Sigitas Tolusis. This package gives LaTeX2e
% the ability to do double column floats at the bottom of the page as well
% as the top. (e.g., "\begin{figure*}[!b]" is not normally possible in
% LaTeX2e). It also provides a command:
%\fnbelowfloat
% to enable the placement of footnotes below bottom floats (the standard
% LaTeX2e kernel puts them above bottom floats). This is an invasive package
% which rewrites many portions of the LaTeX2e float routines. It may not work
% with other packages that modify the LaTeX2e float routines. The latest
% version and documentation can be obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/sttools/
% Do not use the stfloats baselinefloat ability as IEEE does not allow
% \baselineskip to stretch. Authors submitting work to the IEEE should note
% that IEEE rarely uses double column equations and that authors should try
% to avoid such use. Do not be tempted to use the cuted.sty or midfloat.sty
% packages (also by Sigitas Tolusis) as IEEE does not format its papers in
% such ways.
% Do not attempt to use stfloats with fixltx2e as they are incompatible.
% Instead, use Morten Hogholm'a dblfloatfix which combines the features
% of both fixltx2e and stfloats:
%
% \usepackage{dblfloatfix}
% The latest version can be found at:
% http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/dblfloatfix/
%\ifCLASSOPTIONcaptionsoff
% \usepackage[nomarkers]{endfloat}
% \let\MYoriglatexcaption\caption
% \renewcommand{\caption}[2][\relax]{\MYoriglatexcaption[#2]{#2}}
%\fi
% endfloat.sty was written by James Darrell McCauley, Jeff Goldberg and
% Axel Sommerfeldt. This package may be useful when used in conjunction with
% IEEEtran.cls' captionsoff option. Some IEEE journals/societies require that
% submissions have lists of figures/tables at the end of the paper and that
% figures/tables without any captions are placed on a page by themselves at
% the end of the document. If needed, the draftcls IEEEtran class option or
% \CLASSINPUTbaselinestretch interface can be used to increase the line
% spacing as well. Be sure and use the nomarkers option of endfloat to
% prevent endfloat from "marking" where the figures would have been placed
% in the text. The two hack lines of code above are a slight modification of
% that suggested by in the endfloat docs (section 8.4.1) to ensure that
% the full captions always appear in the list of figures/tables - even if
% the user used the short optional argument of \caption[]{}.
% IEEE papers do not typically make use of \caption[]'s optional argument,
% so this should not be an issue. A similar trick can be used to disable
% captions of packages such as subfig.sty that lack options to turn off
% the subcaptions:
% For subfig.sty:
% \let\MYorigsubfloat\subfloat
% \renewcommand{\subfloat}[2][\relax]{\MYorigsubfloat[]{#2}}
% However, the above trick will not work if both optional arguments of
% the \subfloat command are used. Furthermore, there needs to be a
% description of each subfigure *somewhere* and endfloat does not add
% subfigure captions to its list of figures. Thus, the best approach is to
% avoid the use of subfigure captions (many IEEE journals avoid them anyway)
% and instead reference/explain all the subfigures within the main caption.
% The latest version of endfloat.sty and its documentation can obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/endfloat/
%
% The IEEEtran \ifCLASSOPTIONcaptionsoff conditional can also be used
% later in the document, say, to conditionally put the References on a
% page by themselves.
% *** PDF, URL AND HYPERLINK PACKAGES ***
%
%\usepackage{url}
% url.sty was written by Donald Arseneau. It provides better support for
% handling and breaking URLs. url.sty is already installed on most LaTeX
% systems. The latest version and documentation can be obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/url/
% Basically, \url{my_url_here}.
% *** Do not adjust lengths that control margins, column widths, etc. ***
% *** Do not use packages that alter fonts (such as pslatex). ***
% There should be no need to do such things with IEEEtran.cls V1.6 and later.
% (Unless specifically asked to do so by the journal or conference you plan
% to submit to, of course. )
% correct bad hyphenation here
\hyphenation{op-tical net-works semi-conduc-tor}
%
\begin{document}
%
% paper title
% can use linebreaks \\ within to get better formatting as desired
% Do not put math or special symbols in the title.
\title{Incident-Angle Dependence of Electromagnetic Wave Transmission through a Nano-hole in a Thin Plasmonic Semiconductor Layer}
%
%
% author names and IEEE memberships
% note positions of commas and nonbreaking spaces ( ~ ) LaTeX will not break
% a structure at a ~ so this keeps an author's name from being broken across
% two lines.
% use \thanks{} to gain access to the first footnote area
% a separate \thanks must be used for each paragraph as LaTeX2e's \thanks
% was not built to handle multiple paragraphs
%
\author{D\'{e}sir\'{e}~Miessein,
Norman~J.~Morgenstern~Horing,
Harry~Lenzing~and~Godfrey Gumbs% <-this % stops a space
\thanks{D\'{e}sir\'{e}~Miessein is with the Department of Physics and Engineering Physics,
Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA (e-mail: dmiessei@stevens.edu)
(present address: Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, Fordham University, Bronx, NY 10458, USA )}
\thanks{Norman~J.~Morgenstern~Horing is with the Department of Physics and Engineering Physics,
Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
(phone:201-216-5651; fax:201-216-5638; e-mail: nhoring@stevens.edu)}% <-this % stops a space
\thanks{Harry Lenzing is with the Department of Physics and Engineering Physics,
Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA (e-mail: harry07757@comcast.net)}
\thanks{Godfrey Gumbs is with the Department of Physics and Astronomy,
Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, NY 10065, USA (e-mail: ggumbs@hunter.cuny.edu)}% <-this % stops a space
}
% note the % following the last \IEEEmembership and also \thanks -
% these prevent an unwanted space from occurring between the last author name
% and the end of the author line. i.e., if you had this:
%
% \author{....lastname \thanks{...} \thanks{...} }
% ^------------^------------^----Do not want these spaces!
%
% a space would be appended to the last name and could cause every name on that
% line to be shifted left slightly. This is one of those "LaTeX things". For
% instance, "\textbf{A} \textbf{B}" will typeset as "A B" not "AB". To get
% "AB" then you have to do: "\textbf{A}\textbf{B}"
% \thanks is no different in this regard, so shield the last } of each \thanks
% that ends a line with a % and do not let a space in before the next \thanks.
% Spaces after \IEEEmembership other than the last one are OK (and needed) as
% you are supposed to have spaces between the names. For what it is worth,
% this is a minor point as most people would not even notice if the said evil
% space somehow managed to creep in.
% The paper headers
%\markboth{Journal of \LaTeX\ Class Files,~Vol.~, No.~, November~2015}%
%{Shell \MakeLowercase{\textit{et al.}}: Bare Demo of IEEEtran.cls for Journals}
% The only time the second header will appear is for the odd numbered pages
% after the title page when using the twoside option.
%
% *** Note that you probably will NOT want to include the author's ***
% *** name in the headers of peer review papers. ***
% You can use \ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview for conditional compilation here if
% you desire.
% If you want to put a publisher's ID mark on the page you can do it like
% this:
%\IEEEpubid{0000--0000/00\$00.00~\copyright~2012 IEEE}
% Remember, if you use this you must call \IEEEpubidadjcol in the second
% column for its text to clear the IEEEpubid mark.
% use for special paper notices
%\IEEEspecialpapernotice{(Invited Paper)}
%
\date{\today}
%
%
%
% make the title area
\maketitle
%
% As a general rule, do not put math, special symbols or citations
% in the abstract or keywords.
\begin{abstract}
This work is focussed on the role of the angle of incidence of an incoming electromagnetic wave in its transmission
through a subwavelength nano-hole in a thin semiconductor plasmonic layer. Fully detailed calculations and results are exhibited for $ p$-
and $s$-polarizations of the incident wave for a variety of incident angles in the near, middle and far zones of the transmitted radiation.
Our dyadic Green's function formulation includes both (1) the electromagnetic field transmitted directly through the $ 2D $ plasmonic layer
superposed with (2) the radiation emanating from the nano-hole. Interference fringes due to this superposition are explicitly exhibited.
Based on an integral equation formulation, this dyadic Green's function approach does not involve any appeal to metallic boundary conditions.
It does incorporate the role of the $ 2D $ plasmon of the semiconductor layer, which is smeared due to its lateral wave number dependence.
We find that the interference fringes, which are clustered near the nano-hole, flatten to a uniform level of transmission directly
through the sheet alone at large distances from the nano-hole. Furthermore, as the incident angle increases, the axis of the relatively
large central transmission maximum through the nano-hole follows it, accompanied by a spatial compression of interference fringe maxima forward of
the large central transmission maximum, and a spatial thinning of the fringe maxima behind it. For $p$-polarization, the transmission results show
a strong increase as the incident angle $\theta_0 $ increases, mainly in the dominant $ E_z$ component (notwithstanding a concomitant decrease
of the $ E_x $ component as $\theta_0$ increases). We also find that in the case of $s$-polarization of the incident electromagnetic wave,
the transmission decreases as $\theta_0$ increases. These results, for both $p$- and $s$-polarizations, are consistent with earlier results
for perfect metal boundary conditions, which are \emph{not invoked here} as we have treated the problem of a nano-hole in a \emph{semiconductor} layer and
have determined its electromagnetic transmission including the role of its two dimensional plasma.
\end{abstract}
%
% Note that keywords are not normally used for peerreview papers.
\begin{IEEEkeywords}
Dyadic Green's function, Incident-Angle Dependence, Electromagnetic Wave Transmission, Nano-hole, Thin Plasmonic Semiconductor Layer.
\end{IEEEkeywords}
%
%
% For peer review papers, you can put extra information on the cover
% page as needed:
% \ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview
% \begin{center} \bfseries EDICS Category: 3-BBND \end{center}
% \fi
%
% For peerreview papers, this IEEEtran command inserts a page break and
% creates the second title. It will be ignored for other modes.
\IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle
%
%
%
\section{Introduction}
% The very first letter is a 2 line initial drop letter followed
% by the rest of the first word in caps.
%
% form to use if the first word consists of a single letter:
% \IEEEPARstart{A}{demo} file is ....
%
% form to use if you need the single drop letter followed by
% normal text (unknown if ever used by IEEE):
% \IEEEPARstart{A}{}demo file is ....
%
% Some journals put the first two words in caps:
% \IEEEPARstart{T}{his demo} file is ....
%
% Here we have the typical use of a "T" for an initial drop letter
% and "HIS" in caps to complete the first word.
\IEEEPARstart{I}{n} a recent study of electromagnetic wave transmission through a nano-hole in a thin plasmonic semiconductor layer,
we examined the transmission in detail for normal incidence of the wave train [1-5]. Our dyadic Green's function formulation elliminated the need
for separate treatment of the boundary conditions used in earlier works [6]. Other important works [7-9] using dyadic Green's functions and variational
principles assumed the layer to be a perfect metallic conductor, whereas our present interest considers the layer to be a thin plasmonic semiconductor.
Similar remarks apply to additional interesting studies [10-19] that restrict consideration to a layer that is a perfect metal, which restriction is eliminated
in the present work that also treats arbitrary angles of incidence of the incoming electromagnetic wave.
Our earlier work [1] involved the analytic determination
of the dyadic electromagnetic Green's function for the system in closed form, facilitating relatively simple calculation
of the transmitted radiation through both the hole as well as through the layer itself for normal incidence. Employment of the Green's function
in an integral equation formulation automatically embedded the role of the electromagnetic boundary conditions and the 2D plasmon
in the layer (which is "smeared" due to its lateral wavenumber dependence) obviating the need for separate treatment.
In the present paper, we employ the same method to analyze electromagnetic transmission through such a system for \emph{non}-normal
incidence of the electromagnetic wave train. In Section 2, we review the appropriate dyadic Green's function for the perforated
plasmonic screen with a subwavelength aperture and its application to electromagnetic transmission in the construction of the
system's inverse dielectric tensor, with emphasis on non-normal incidence. The calculated results for various angles of incidence
are exhibited in the figures of Section 3, and a summary is presented in Section 4.
%
% You must have at least 2 lines in the paragraph with the drop letter
% (should never be an issue)
%
%\hfill mds
%
%\hfill December 27, 2012
%
%\subsection{Subsection Heading Here}
%Subsection text here.
%
% needed in second column of first page if using \IEEEpubid
%\IEEEpubidadjcol
\section{ Dyadic Green's Function and Inverse Dielectric Tensor }
\numberwithin{figure}{section}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=7cm,height=8cm]{FIG1411}
\caption{Two dimensional plasmonic layer (thickness $ d $, embedded
at $ z=0 $ in a three dimensional bulk medium) with a nano-hole of radius
$ R $, area $ A $ at the origin of the $(x-y)$ plane., shown with incident, reflected and
transmitted wave vectors ($ \vec{k}_{0}, \vec{k}_{r}, \vec{k}_{t} $) for waves
($ \vec{E}_{0}(x,y,z;t), \vec{E}_{r}(x,y,z;t), \vec{E}_{t}(x,y,z;t)$). The angle of incidence is $ \theta_{0}$
in the $x-z$ plane($ k_{0y}\equiv 0 $).}
\label{FIG1411}
\qquad
\end{figure}
The dyadic Green's function for a thin perforated plasmonic screen with a nano-hole was determined
as $ \left( \beta = \gamma {A}=\frac{4\,i\pi\omega}{c^2}\sigma^{(2D)}_{fs}(\omega)\,{A} \right)$:
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A2.1}
\widehat{G}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},0;z,0;\omega)&=&
{\widehat{G}_{fs}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},0;z,0;\omega)}
\nonumber\\
&\times &
\left[ {\widehat{I}\,+\,\beta \widehat{G}_{fs}(0,0;0,0;\omega)}\right]^{-1}.
\end{eqnarray}
\normalsize
Here, $\widehat{G}_{fs}$ is the dyadic Green's function for the thin plasmonic layer in the absence of the
subwavelength aperture, and it is given by
%\onecolumn
\tiny
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A2.2}
{\widehat{{G}}_{fs}}({k}_{x},{k}_{y}=0;z,0;\omega) =
\nonumber\\
\begin{bmatrix}
{G}_{fs}^{xx}({k}_{x},{k}_{y}=0;z,0;\omega) & 0 & {G}_{fs}^{xz}({k}_{x},{k}_{y}=0;z,0;\omega) \\
0 & {G}_{fs}^{yy}({k}_{x},{k}_{y}=0;z,0;\omega) & 0 \\
{G}_{fs}^{zx}({k}_{x},{k}_{y}=0;z,0;\omega) & 0 & {G}_{fs}^{zz}({k}_{x},{k}_{y}=0;z,0;\omega)
\end{bmatrix}
\nonumber\\
\end{eqnarray}
\normalsize
%\twocolumn
where $\vec{k}_{\parallel}$ is wavevector parallel to the plasmonic screen and the matrix elements of
$ \widehat{G}_{fs}$ are given by
\begin{equation}\label{A2.3}
{G}_{fs}^{xx}({k}_{x},{k}_{y}=0;z,0;\omega)=\,-\,\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\left[\frac{1}{\overline{D}_{1}}\left\{\left(1-\frac{k_{x}^{2}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right) \right\}\right],
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{A2.4}
{G}_{fs}^{yy}({k}_{x},{k}_{y}=0;z,0;\omega)=\,-\,\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\left[\frac{1}{\overline{D}_{3}}\right],
\end{equation}
\small
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A2.5}
{G}_{fs}^{zz}({k}_{x},{k}_{y}=0;z,0;\omega)&=&-\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}
\nonumber\\
&\times &
\left[\frac{1}{\overline{D}_{2}}\left\{\left(1-\frac{k_{z}^{2}- 2 i k_{z} \delta (z)}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right)\right\}\right],
\nonumber\\
\end{eqnarray}
\normalsize
\begin{equation}\label{A2.6}
{G}_{fs}^{xy}({k}_{x},{k}_{y}=0;z,0;\omega)=0,
\end{equation}
\small
\begin{equation}\label{A2.7}
{G}_{fs}^{xz}({k}_{x},{k}_{y}=0;z,0;\omega)=\,+\,\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\left[\frac{1}{\overline{D}_{2}}\left(\frac{k_{x}\,k_{z}sgn(z)}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right)\right],
\end{equation}
\normalsize
\begin{equation}\label{A2.8}
{G}_{fs}^{yz}({k}_{x},{k}_{y}=0;z,0;\omega)=0,
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{A2.9}
{G}_{fs}^{yx}({k}_{x},{k}_{y}=0;z,0;\omega) = 0,
\end{equation}
\small
\begin{equation}\label{A2.10}
{G}_{fs}^{zx}({k}_{x},{k}_{y}=0;z,0;\omega)=\,+\,\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\left[\frac{1}{\overline{D}_{1}}\left(\frac{k_{z}\,k_{x}sgn(z)}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right)\right],
\end{equation}
\normalsize
\begin{equation}\label{A2.11}
{G}_{fs}^{zy}({k}_{x},{k}_{y}=0;z,0;\omega)=0,
\end{equation}
and
\begin{small}
\begin{equation*}
\bigg( \gamma\,=\,\frac{4\pi\,i\,\omega}{c^{2}}\,{\sigma}_{fs}^{(2D)}({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};\omega); \: {\sigma}_{fs}^{(2D)}({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};\omega)=\frac{i\,\omega}{4\pi}\left[ \varepsilon_{b}^{(3D)}-\varepsilon(\omega)\right]d \bigg)
\end{equation*}
\end{small}
\begin{equation}\label{A2.12}
\overline{D}_{1}=\left[1+ \left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right) \left( 1- \frac{k_{x}^{2}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right) \right],
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{A2.13}
\overline{D}_{2}=\left[1+ \left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right) \left( 1- \frac{a_{0}^{2}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right) \right],
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{A2.14}
\overline{D}_{3}=\left[1+ \left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right)\right]
\end{equation}
with $ a_{0}^{2}=k_{z}^{2}\,-\,\frac{2\,i\,k_{z}}{d} $.
While the dyadic Green's function above determines the electromagnetic response to a current source, it does not, by itself,
describe the response to an incident electromagnetic wave field. For that, it is necessary to construct the inverse
dielectric tensor of the system which provides the relation between the actual field $ \vec{E}(\vec{r};t)$ and the impressed (incident)
field $ \vec{E}_{0}(\vec{r};t)$. Considering that $ \widehat{G}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},\vec{r}^{\,\prime}_{\parallel};z,z^{\,\prime};\omega)$ described above already
incorporates the role of induced current, it provides the system's response to an externally impressed current $ \vec{J}_{ext}$
\textit{alone} as
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A2.15}
\vec{E}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},z;\omega)&=&\frac{4\pi\,i\,\omega}{c^{2}}
\int d^{2}\vec{r}^{\,\prime}_{\parallel}
\nonumber\\
&\times &
\int d\vec{z}^{\,\prime}\,{\widehat{G}}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},z;\vec{r}^{\,\prime}_{\parallel},z^{\prime};\omega)\,\vec{J}_{ext}(\vec{r}^{\,\prime}_{\parallel},z^{\,\prime};\omega)
\nonumber\\
\end{eqnarray}
or
\begin{equation}\label{A2.16}
\vec{E}\,=\,\frac{4\pi\,i\,\omega}{c^{2}}\,{\widehat{G}}\,\vec{J}_{ext},
\end{equation}
in matrix notation.
Bearing in mind that ($ \widehat{\sigma}^{(2D)}_{fs}$, $\widehat{\sigma}^{(2D)}_{hole} $ are the conductivities of the full 2D screen and the excluded hole, respectively)
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A2.17}
\widehat{G}^{-1}= \widehat{G}^{-1}_{3D}
& - & \frac{4\pi\,i\omega}{c^{2}}\,\widehat{\Sigma}_{2D}
\end{eqnarray}
where
\begin{equation}\label{A2.18}
\widehat{\Sigma}_{2D}=
{\widehat{\sigma}_{fs}}^{(2D)}\,-\,
{\widehat{\sigma}_{hole}}^{(2D)}
\end{equation}
and that the incident field $ \vec{E}_{0}$ is related to its distant current source $ \vec{J}_{ext}$ by
\begin{equation}\label{A2.19}
\vec{E}_{0}\,=\,\frac{4\pi\,i\,\omega}{c^{2}}\,{\widehat{G}_{3D}}\,\vec{J}_{ext}
\end{equation}
or
\begin{equation}\label{A2.20}
\vec{J}_{ext}\,=\,\left[\frac{4\pi\,i\,\omega}{c^{2}}\,{\widehat{G}_{3D}}\right]^{-1}\vec{E}_{0},
\end{equation}
we have
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A2.21}
\vec{E}\,&=&\,\widehat{G}\,\widehat{G}^{-1}_{3D}\vec{E}_{0}
\nonumber\\
&=&\,
\widehat{G}\left[\widehat{G}^{-1}\,+\,\frac{4\pi\,i\,\omega}{c^{2}}\,{\widehat{\Sigma}_{2D}}\right]\vec{E}_{0}
\nonumber\\
&=&\,
\left[\widehat{I}\,+\,\frac{4\pi\,i\,\omega}{c^{2}}\widehat{G}\,{\widehat{\Sigma}_{2D}}\right]\vec{E}_{0}.
\end{eqnarray}
Obviously, this introduces the inverse dielectric dyadic/tensor $\widehat{K}$ as
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A2.22}
\widehat{K}\,=\,
\left[\widehat{I}\,+\,\frac{4\pi\,i\,\omega}{c^{2}}\widehat{G}\,{\widehat{\Sigma}_{2D}}\right],
\end{eqnarray}
in complete analogy to the results\cite{Levine_1950,Levine_1948} of references \cite{Dez_2015} and \cite{Dez_thesis}.
Thus, we have the actual $\vec{E}$-field as
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A2.23}
\vec{E}(\vec{r}_{\parallel};z;\omega) =
\vec{E}_{0}(\vec{r}_{\parallel};z;\omega)\,+\,\vec{E}_{1}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},z;\omega)\,+\,\vec{E}_{2}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},z;\omega),
\nonumber\\
\end{eqnarray}
where the electric field contributions $\vec{E}_{1}$ and $\vec{E}_{2}$ are defined by
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A2.24}
\vec{E}_{1}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},z;\omega)& =&
\frac{4\pi\,i\,\omega}{c^{2}}\int{d^{2}\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{'}}
\nonumber\\
&\times&
\int{d^{2}\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{''}} \int{dz^{'}} \int{dz^{''}}
\widehat{G}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{'};z,z^{'};\omega)
\nonumber\\
&\times&
{\widehat{\sigma}_{fs}}^{(2D)}
(\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{'},\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{''};z^{'},z^{''};\omega)\,
\vec{E}_{0}(\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{''};z^{''};\omega)
\nonumber\\
\end{eqnarray}
and
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A2.25}
\vec{E}_{2}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},z;\omega) &=&
\frac{4\pi\,i\,\omega}{c^{2}}\int{d^{2}\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{'}}
\nonumber\\
&\times&
\int{d^{2}\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{''}} \int{dz^{'}} \int{dz^{''}}
\widehat{G}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{'};z,z^{'};\omega)
\nonumber\\
&\times&
{\widehat{\sigma}_{hole}}^{(2D)}
(\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{'},\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{''};z^{'},z^{''};\omega)
\vec{E}_{0}(\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{''};z^{''};\omega).
\nonumber\\
\end{eqnarray}
Because the conductivities $ \widehat{\sigma}^{2D}_{fs} $ and $ \widehat{\sigma}^{2D}_{hole}$ are confined to the 2D screen
at $ z=0 $ (thickness $d$) they may be written in lateral and $ z $ - representation as
\begin{equation}\label{A2.26}
\widehat{\sigma}_{f_{s}}^{2D}(\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{'},\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{''};z^{'},z^{''};\omega)=
\widehat{I}\, {\sigma}_{fs}^{(2D)}(\omega)\delta^{(2D)}
(\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{'}-\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{''})\,\delta(z^{'})\,\delta(z^{''})
\end{equation}
and
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A2.27}
\widehat{\sigma}^{(2D)}_{hole}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{'};z,z^{'};\omega)&\approx &
\widehat{I} {A} \sigma_{fs}^{(2D)}(\omega)
\nonumber\\
&\times&
\delta^{2D}(\vec{r}_{\parallel})\delta^{2D}(\vec{r}_{\parallel}-\vec{r}_{\parallel}^{'})\delta(z)\delta(z').
\nonumber\\
\end{eqnarray}
It should be noted that in the absence of the nano-hole,
\newline
$ A \longmapsto 0$, the field contribution
$ \vec{E}_{2}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},z;\omega)$ vanishes, leaving
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A2.28}
\vec{E}(\vec{r}_{\parallel};z;\omega) &=&
\vec{E}_{0}(\vec{r}_{\parallel};z;\omega)\,+\,\vec{E}_{1}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},z;\omega)
\nonumber\\
\,&=&\,\vec{E}_{fs}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},z;\omega),
\end{eqnarray}
where $ \vec{E} \longmapsto \vec{E}_{fs} $ jointly with $ \widehat{G} \longmapsto \widehat{G}_{fs}$
are the field and associated Green's function (respectively) for the transmission/reflection of the field
$ \vec{E}_{0}$ impingent on the full, unperforated 2D layer.
Finally, the resulting electric field $ \vec{E}$ can be written in position representation as
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A2.29}
\vec{E}(\vec{r}_{\parallel};z;t)&=&
\vec{E}_{0}(\vec{r}_{\parallel};z;t)
\nonumber\\
&+&
\gamma_{0}\,
\widehat{{G}}_{fs}(\vec{k}_{0_{\parallel}};z,0;\omega_{0})\,\vec{E}_{0}\,
e^{i\,\left[\,\vec{k}_{0_{\parallel}}\,\cdot\,\vec{r}_{\parallel}\,-\,\omega_{0}\,t\right]}\,
\nonumber\\
&-&
\,\beta_{0}\,\widehat{G}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},0;z,0;\omega_{0})
\nonumber\\
& \times &
\left[{\widehat{I}+\gamma_{0}
\widehat{\overline{\overline{G}}}_{fs}(\vec{k}_{0_{\parallel}};0,0;\omega_{0})}\right]
\,\vec{E}_{0}\,\,e^{-i\,\omega_{0}\,t}
\nonumber\\
\end{eqnarray}
where ($ \gamma_{0}=\,-\,\frac{d\,\omega_{P_{3D}}^{2}}{c^{2}}\,\,\,\, \textrm{and} \,\,\,\, \omega_{_{P3D}}= \sqrt{\frac{4\,\pi\,e^{2}\,\rho_{_3D}}{m^{\star}}}$
is the 3D bulk plasma frequency; $ \beta_{0} = \gamma_{0}\, {A} $; $ \Gamma_{0}=-\,\frac{i\,\gamma_{0}}{2}$; $ \vec{k}_{0}$ and $ \omega_{0}$ are the incident wavevector and frequency, respectively)
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A2.30}
\overline{\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,xx}(\vec{k}_{0_{\parallel}};0,0;\omega_{0})=\, \frac{\,-\,\cos(\theta_{0})}{2\,i\,\left[q_{\omega_{0}}\,+\,\Gamma_{0}\,\cos(\theta_{0})\right]},
\end{eqnarray}
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A2.31}
\overline{\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,yy}(\vec{k}_{0_{\parallel}};0,0;\omega_{0})=\,\frac{\,-\,1}{2\,i\,\left[\,\Gamma_{0}\,+\,q_{\omega_{0}}\,\cos(\theta_{0})\right]},
\end{eqnarray}
and
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A2.32}
\overline{\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,zz}(\vec{k}_{0_{\parallel}};0,0;\omega_{0})=
\nonumber\\
\frac{\,-\,1}{2\,i}
\left\{\frac{q_{\omega_{0}}\,\sin^{2}(\theta_{0})+2\,i\,\delta(0)\cos(\theta_{0})}{\cos(\theta_{0})\,
\left[\,q_{\omega_{0}}^{2}\,+\,2\,i\,\delta(0)\Gamma_{0}\right]\,+\,\Gamma_{0}\,q_{\omega_{0}}\,\sin^{2}(\theta_{0})}\right\}.
\nonumber\\
\end{eqnarray}
\normalsize
(Note that $ \widehat{\overline{\overline{G}}}_{fs}(\vec{k}_{0_{\parallel}};0,0;\omega_{0})$ was shown to be diagonal
in reference \cite{Dez_2015}, see appendices)
\section{Incident Angle Dependence of Electromagnetic Wave Transmission Through a 2D Plasmonic Layer with a Nano-hole }
The results above are employed here to examine the spatial dependence of the scattered/transmitted wave arising
from an incoming electromagnetic wave at an arbitrary angle of incidence, $\theta_{0}$, in the $ x-z $ plane ($ k_{0y}\equiv 0 $). Detailed computations are carried out for
incident angles of $ 30^{\circ}$, $ 60^{\circ}$ and $ 80^{\circ}$. The figures below present results for
$\mid E_{x}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$, $\mid E_{y}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ and $\mid E_{z}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ in the near, intermediate and
far field diffraction zones and are shown in both 3D and density plots for both $ p-$ and $ s-$polarizations of the incident wave.
In all computations represented in these figures,
we employ the following parameters: $ R =5\,nm $, $ d = 10\,nm $ and $ {f}_{0}= 300\,THz $; the screen is taken to be $ GaAs $ with effective mass $ m^{\ast}=0.067\,m_{0} $ ($ m_{0} $ is the free-electron mass) and density $ n_{3D}=4 \times 10^{21}/cm^{3}$ ($ \varepsilon_{b}^{(3D)}=1 $ is the dielectric constant of the host medium). For the near, intermediate and far field zones, we fix the $z$-coordinates at $ z=50\,R $, $ z=300\,R $ and $ z=1000\,R $, respectively. In Figures \ref{FIGNFT30ExEz}-\ref{FIGFFT306080Ey}, we set $y\equiv0$ and $ r_{\parallel}=x$ varies over the indicated zone range, Figures \ref{FIG3DNFR5T30Exz}a-\ref{FIG3DMFR5T306080Ey}a exhibit $3D$ plots of the transmitted power distributions, while Figures \ref{FIG3DNFR5T30Exz}b-\ref{FIG3DMFR5T306080Ey}b provide the associated power density plots, all as functions of both $ x$ and $ y $ for the fixed $z$-values indicated above.
\newpage
\numberwithin{subsection}{section}
\numberwithin{figure}{section}
%\subsection{$ p $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $; \textbf{$ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$} }
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$ }
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
(a)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGNFT30Ex}\\
(b)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGNFT30Ez}
\caption{ $p$-polarization-Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $; \textbf{$ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$}:
\newline (a) $\mid {E}_{x}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ and (b) $\mid {E}_{z}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ produced by a perforated
2D plasmonic layer of GaAs as a function of lateral distance $ r_{_{\parallel}}= x\,(y=0)$ from the aperture.}
\label{FIGNFT30ExEz}
\qquad
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
(a)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGNFT60Ex}\\
(b)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGNFT60Ez}
\caption{$p$-polarization-Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $; \textbf{$ \theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$}:
\newline (a) $\mid {E}_{x}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ and (b) $\mid {E}_{z}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ produced by a perforated
2D plasmonic layer of GaAs as a function of lateral distance $ r_{_{\parallel}}= x\,(y=0)$ from the aperture.}
\label{FIGNFT60ExEz}
\qquad
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
(a)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGNFT80Ex}\\
(b)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGNFT80Ez}
\caption{$p$-polarization-Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $; \textbf{$ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$}:
\newline (a) $\mid {E}_{x}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ and (b) $\mid {E}_{z}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ produced by a perforated
2D plasmonic layer of GaAs as a function of lateral distance $ r_{_{\parallel}}= x\,(y=0)$ from the aperture.}
\label{FIGNFT80ExEz}
\qquad
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ s $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $ }
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
(a) \\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=6cm]{FIGNFT30Ey}\\
(b)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=6cm]{FIGNFT60Ey}\\
(c)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=6cm]{FIGNFT80Ey}
\caption{$s$-polarization-Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $ : $\mid {E}_{y}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ (a) $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$, (b) $ \theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$
and (c) $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$ produced by a perforated 2D plasmonic layer of GaAs as a function of lateral distance $ r_{_{\parallel}}= x\,(y=0)$ from the aperture.}
\label{FIGNFT306080Ey}
\qquad
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$ }
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
(a)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGMFT30Ex}\\
(b)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGMFT30Ez}
\caption{$ p $ - polarization-Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$:
\newline
(a) $\mid {E}_{x}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ and (b) $\mid {E}_{z}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ produced by a perforated 2D plasmonic layer of GaAs as a function of lateral distance $ r_{_{\parallel}}= x\,(y=0)$ from the aperture.}
\label{FIGMFT30ExEz}
\qquad
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
(a)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGMFT60Ex}\\
(b)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGMFT60Ez}
\caption{$ p $ - polarization-Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$:
\newline
(a) $\mid {E}_{x}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ and (b) $\mid {E}_{z}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ produced by a perforated 2D plasmonic layer of GaAs as a function of lateral distance $ r_{_{\parallel}}= x\,(y=0)$ from the aperture.}
\label{FIGMFT60ExEz}
\qquad
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $; $\theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
(a)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGMFT80Ex}\\
(b)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGMFT80Ez}
\caption{$ p $ - polarization-Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$:
\newline
(a) $\mid {E}_{x}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ and (b) $\mid {E}_{z}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ produced by a perforated
2D plasmonic layer of GaAs as a function of lateral distance $ r_{_{\parallel}}= x\,(y=0)$ from the aperture.}
\label{FIGMFT80ExEz}
\qquad
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ s $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $ }
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
(a)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=6cm]{FIGMFT30Ey}\\
(b)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=6cm]{FIGMFT60Ey}\\
(c)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=6cm]{FIGMFT80Ey}
\caption{ $ s $ - polarization-Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $; $\mid {E}_{y}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$:
(a) $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$ , (b) $ \theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$
and (c) $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$ produced by a perforated
2D plasmonic layer of GaAs as a function of lateral distance $ r_{_{\parallel}}= x\,(y=0)$ from the aperture.}
\label{FIGMFT306080Ey}
\qquad
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$ }
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
(a)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGFFT30Ex}\\
(b)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGFFT30Ez}
\caption{$ p $ - polarization-Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $;$ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$:
\newline
(a) $\mid {E}_{x}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ and (b) $\mid {E}_{z}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ produced by a perforated
2D plasmonic layer of GaAs as a function of lateral distance $ r_{_{\parallel}}= x\,(y=0)$ from the aperture.}
\label{FIGFFT30ExEz}
\qquad
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $; $\theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
(a)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGFFT60Ex}\\
(b)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGFFT60Ez}
\caption{$ p $ - polarization-Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $;$ \theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$:
\newline
(a) $\mid {E}_{x}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ and (b) $\mid {E}_{z}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ produced by a perforated
2D plasmonic layer of GaAs as a function of lateral distance $ r_{_{\parallel}}= x\,(y=0)$ from the aperture.}
\label{FIGFFT60ExEz}
\qquad
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
(a)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGFFT80Ex}\\
(b)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{FIGFFT80Ez}
\caption{$ p $ - polarization-Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $;$ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$:
\newline
(a) $\mid {E}_{x}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ and (b) $\mid {E}_{z}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$ produced by a perforated
2D plasmonic layer of GaAs as a function of lateral distance $ r_{_{\parallel}}= x\,(y=0)$ from the aperture.}
\label{FIGFFT80ExEz}
\qquad
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ s $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $ }
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
(a)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=6cm]{FIGFFT30Ey}\\
(b)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=6cm]{FIGFFT60Ey}\\
(c)\\
\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=6cm]{FIGFFT80Ey}
\caption{$ s $ - polarization - Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $; $\mid {E}_{y}(x,y,z;t)/{E}_{0}\mid^{2}$:
(a) $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$ , (b) $ \theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$ and (c) $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$ produced by a perforated 2D plasmonic layer of GaAs as a function of lateral distance $ r_{_{\parallel}}= x\,(y=0)$ from the aperture.}
\label{FIGFFT306080Ey}
\qquad
\end{figure}
\newpage
\numberwithin{figure}{section}
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$ }
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.8cm]{3DNFR5T30Ex1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.8cm]{3DNFR5T30Ex2}\\
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.8cm]{3DNFR5T30Ez1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.8cm]{3DNFR5T30Ez2}\\
\caption{$ p $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$ - Field distribution of GaAs layer in terms of 3D $(a's)$ and density $(b's)$ plots:
$\mid E_{x}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ and $ \mid E_{z}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ as functions of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DNFR5T30Exz}
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.8cm]{3DNFR5T60Ex1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.8cm]{3DNFR5T60Ex2}\\
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.8cm]{3DNFR5T60Ez1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.8cm]{3DNFR5T60Ez2}\\
\caption{$ p $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$ - Field distribution of GaAs layer in terms of 3D $(a's)$ and density $(b's)$ plots:
$\mid E_{x}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ and $ \mid E_{z}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ as functions of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DNFR5T60Exz}
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.8cm]{3DNFR5T80Ex1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.8cm]{3DNFR5T80Ex2}\\
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.8cm]{3DNFR5T80Ez1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.8cm]{3DNFR5T80Ez2}\\
\caption{$ p $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$ - Field distribution of GaAs layer in terms of 3D $(a's)$ and density $(b's)$ plots:
$\mid E_{x}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ and $ \mid E_{z}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ as functions of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DNFR5T80Exz}
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ s $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.90cm]{3DNFR5T30Ey1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.90cm]{3DNFR5T30Ey2}\\
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.90cm]{3DNFR5T60Ey1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.90cm]{3DNFR5T60Ey2}\\
\caption{{$ s $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $ } - Field distribution of GaAs layer in terms of 3D $(a's)$ and density $(b's)$ plots:
$\mid E_{y}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ (a) $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}, 60^{\circ}$ and (b) $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}, 60^{\circ}$ as functions of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DNFR5T306080Ey}
\qquad
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ s $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DNFR5T80Ey1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DNFR5T80Ey2}\\
\caption{{$ s $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $ } - Field distribution of GaAs layer in terms of 3D $(a)$ and density $(b)$ plots:
$\mid E_{y}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ (a) $ \theta_{0}= 80^{\circ}$ and (b) $ \theta_{0}= 80^{\circ}$ as functions of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DNFR5T306080Ey1}
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DMFR5T30Ex1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DMFR5T30Ex2}\\
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DMFR5T30Ez1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DMFR5T30Ez2}\\
\caption{$ p $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$ - Field distribution of GaAs layer in terms of 3D $(a's)$ and density $(b's)$ plots:
$\mid E_{x}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ and $\mid E_{z}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ as functions of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DMFR5T30Exz}
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DMFR5T60Ex1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DMFR5T60Ex2}\\
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DMFR5T60Ez1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DMFR5T60Ez2}\\
\caption{$ p $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$ - Field distribution of GaAs layer in terms of 3D $(a's)$ and density $(b's)$ plots:
$\mid E_{x}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ and $ \mid E_{z}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ as functions of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DMFR5T60Exz}
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DMFR5T80Ex1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DMFR5T80Ex2}\\
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DMFR5T80Ez1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DMFR5T80Ez2}\\
\caption{$ p $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$ -Field distribution of GaAs layer in terms of 3D $(a's)$ and density $(b's)$ plots:
$\mid E_{x}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ and $ \mid E_{z}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ as functions of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DMFR5T80Exz}
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ s $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.90cm]{3DMFR5T30Ey1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DMFR5T30Ey2}\\
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DMFR5T60Ey1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DMFR5T60Ey2}\\
\caption{$ s $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $ - Field distribution of GaAs layer in terms of 3D $(a's)$ and density $(b's)$ plots:
$\mid E_{y}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ (a) $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}, 60^{\circ}$ and (b) $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}, 60^{\circ}$ as functions of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DMFR5T306080Ey}
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ s $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DMFR5T80Ey1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DMFR5T80Ey2}\\
\caption{$ s $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $ - Field distribution of GaAs layer in terms of 3D $(a)$ and density $(b)$ plots:
$\mid E_{y}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ (a) $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$ and (b) $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$
as functions of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DMFR5T306080Ey1}
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DFFR5T30Ex1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DFFR5T30Ex2}\\
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DFFR5T30Ez1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DFFR5T30Ez2}\\
\caption{$ p $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$ - Field distribution of GaAs layer in terms of 3D $(a's)$ and density $(b's)$ plots:
$\mid E_{x}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ and $\mid E_{z}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ as functions of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DFFR5T30Exz}
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DFFR5T60Ex1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DFFR5T60Ex2}\\
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DFFR5T60Ez1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DFFR5T60Ez2}\\
\caption{$ p $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$ - Field distribution of GaAs layer in terms of 3D $(a's)$ and density $(b's)$ plots:
$\mid E_{x}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ and $ \mid E_{z}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ as functions of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DFFR5T60Exz}
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ p $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DFFR5T80Ex1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DFFR5T80Ex2}\\
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DFFR5T80Ez1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DFFR5T80Ez2}\\
\caption{$ p $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $; $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$ - Field distribution of GaAs layer in terms of 3D $(a's)$ and density $(b's)$ plots:
$\mid E_{x}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ and $ \mid E_{z}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ as functions of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DFFR5T80Exz}
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ s $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.90cm]{3DFFR5T30Ey1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DFFR5T30Ey2}\\
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DFFR5T60Ey1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=4.9cm]{3DFFR5T60Ey2}\\
\caption{$ s $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $ - Field distribution of GaAs layer in terms of 3D $(a's)$ and density $(b's)$ plots:
$\mid E_{y}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ (a) $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}, 60^{\circ}$ and (b) $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}, 60^{\circ}$
as functions of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DFFR5T306080Ey}
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ s $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5cm]{3DFFR5T80Ey1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5cm]{3DFFR5T80Ey2}\\
\caption{$ s $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $ - Field distribution of GaAs layer in terms of 3D $(a)$ and density $(b)$ plots:
$\mid E_{y}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ (a) $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$ and (b) $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$ as functions of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DFFR5T306080Ey1}
\end{figure}
%
%
\section{Conclusions}
In this work we have explored the role of \emph{non}-normal angles of incidence on the transmission of an
electromagnetic waves train through a nano-hole in a thin plasmonic semiconductor screen. This study is
based on our previously constructed [1-5] closed-form dyadic electromagnetic Green's function for a thin
plasmonic/excitonic layer adapted to embody a nano-hole.
The resulting closed-form dyadic Green's function encompasses electromagnetic wave
transmission through both the hole as well as through the screen itself.
This analytic approach involving closed-form solutions of associated integral equations
has facilitated the relatively simple numerical computations exhibited above,
and is not in any way restricted to a metallic screen. Moreover, our formulation,
which is based on the use of an \textit{integral} equation for the dyadic Green's function
involved automatically incorporates the boundary conditions, which would otherwise need to be addressed explicitly.
It also incorporates the role of the two dimensional plasmon of the thin layer, which is smeared by
its lateral wavenumber dependence.
The calculated results shown in the figures of Section III contrast sharply with the corresponding figures
for normal incidence. Even for the lowest incident angle of $ 30^{\circ} $ considered in the case of $ p $-polarization,
the near field zone $ (z=50\,R)$ results are highly asymmetric in $ x $ (while the corresponding results for normal incidence
are symmetric). Such strong asymmetry persists at higher angles of incidence considered $(60^{\circ}, 80^{\circ})$, as may be
seen in Figs.\ref{FIGNFT30ExEz}-\ref{FIGNFT306080Ey} for $ p $-polarization and $ s $-polarization in the near field zone.
Corresponding asymmetric transmission results are exhibited for the middle field zone $(z=300\,R)$ in Figs.\ref{FIGMFT30ExEz}-\ref{FIGMFT306080Ey}
for $ p $-and $ s $-polarizations at incident angles of $ 30^{\circ}, 60^{\circ}, 80^{\circ}$. Far field zone ($ z=1000\,R $) transmission
results, also asymmetric, are shown in Figs.\ref{FIGFFT30ExEz}-\ref{FIGFFT306080Ey} for $ p $- and $ s $-polarizations
at angles of incidence $ 30^{\circ}, 60^{\circ}, 80^{\circ}$. Further supporting $ 3D $ and density plots are given in
Figs.\ref{FIG3DNFR5T30Exz}a-\ref{FIG3DFFR5T306080Ey1}a and \ref{FIG3DNFR5T30Exz}b-\ref{FIG3DFFR5T306080Ey1}b for the various angles of incidence
and polarizations in the spatial zones considered.
All of the figures exhibit interference fringes due to the superposition of the field transmitted through the nano-hole with
the field transmitted \textit{directly} through the plasmonic sheet. At large distances from the nano-hole, the transmission
directly through the plasmonic sheet dominates, and the interference fringes flatten to a uniform level of transmission through
the sheet alone, with the nano-hole contribution negligible.
Finally, it should be noted that the figures show that as the incident angle increases, the axis of the relatively large central transmission
maximum follows it, accompanied by a spatial compression of interference fringe maxima forward of the large central transmission maximum and a spatial
thinning of the fringe maxima behind it. Moreover, while there is strong asymmetry of electromagnetic transmission with respect to
the $x$-axis (of the $x-z$ plane of incidence), it should be borne in mind that the transmission is fully symmetric with respect to
the $y$-axis (normal to the plane of incidence). Furthermore, the $ p $-polarization transmission results show strong increase as
incident angle $ \theta_{0}$ increases, mainly in the $ E_{z} $ component. Although the corresponding $ E_{x}$ component results
decrease as $ \theta_{0}$ increases, the overall combined transmission increases as a function of $ \theta_{0}$.
The $ p $-polarization results for the resultant power transmission, described in terms of \newline
$\mid E_{xz}(x,y,z;t)\mid^{2} \equiv \mid E_{x}(x,y,z;t)\mid^{2} + \mid E_{z}(x,y,z;t)\mid^{2}$ are exhibited in
Figs.\ref{FIG3DNFR5T30Exz}-\ref{FIG3DNFR5T80Exz}, for the near field region and in Figs.\ref{FIG3DMFR5T30Exz}-\ref{FIG3DMFR5T80Exz} for the middle field, also in Figs.\ref{FIG3DFFR5T30Exz}-\ref{FIG3DFFR5T80Exz} for the far field, in both $ 3D $ and density plots in all
cases. We also find that in the case of $ s $-polarization, the net transmission decreases as $ \theta_{0}$ increases.
All of these results, for both $ p $- and $ s $-polarizations, are consistent with those of Petersson and Smith [20] notwithstanding
the introduction of the $2D$ plasmon of the semiconductor layer accounted for in the present work.
\newpage
\onecolumn
\textbf{$ P $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.5cm]{3DNFR5T30Exz1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.5cm]{3DNFR5T30Exz2}\\
\caption{{$ p $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $ } - Transmitted field distribution of GaAs layer for $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$ in terms of 3D $(a)$ and density $(b)$ plots:
$\mid E_{xz}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ plotted as a function of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DNFR5T30Exz}
\qquad
\end{figure}
%
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.5cm]{3DNFR5T60Exz1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.5cm]{3DNFR5T60Exz2}\\
\caption{{$ p $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $ } - Transmitted field distribution of GaAs layer for $ \theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$ in terms of 3D $(a)$ and density $(b)$ plots:
$\mid E_{xz}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ plotted as a function of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DNFR5T60Exz}
\qquad
\end{figure}
%
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.5cm]{3DNFR5T80Exz1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.5cm]{3DNFR5T80Exz2}\\
\caption{{$ p $ - polarization: Near-Field, $ z = 50\,R $ } - Transmitted field distribution of GaAs layer for $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$ in terms of 3D $(a)$ and density $(b)$ plots:
$\mid E_{xz}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ plotted as a function of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DNFR5T80Exz}
\end{figure}
%\twocolumn
\newpage
\textbf{$ P $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.50cm]{3DMFR5T30Exz1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.50cm]{3DMFR5T30Exz2}\\
\caption{{$ p $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $ } - Transmitted field distribution of GaAs layer for $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$ in terms of 3D $(a)$ and density $(b)$ plots:
$\mid E_{xz}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ plotted as a function of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DMFR5T30Exz}
\qquad
\end{figure}
%
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.50cm]{3DMFR5T60Exz1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.50cm]{3DMFR5T60Exz2}\\
\caption{{$ p $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $ } - Transmitted field distribution of GaAs layer for $ \theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$ in terms of 3D $(a)$ and density $(b)$ plots:
$\mid E_{xz}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ plotted as a function of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DMFR5T60Exz}
\qquad
\end{figure}
%
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.5cm]{3DMFR5T80Exz1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.5cm]{3DMFR5T80Exz2}\\
\caption{{$ p $ - polarization: Middle-Field, $ z = 300\,R $ } - Transmitted field distribution of GaAs layer for $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$ in terms of 3D $(a)$ and density $(b)$ plots:
$\mid E_{xz}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ plotted as a function of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DMFR5T80Exz}
\end{figure}
\newpage
\textbf{$ P $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.50cm]{3DFFR5T30Exz1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.50cm]{3DFFR5T30Exz2}\\
\caption{{$ p $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $ } - Transmitted field distribution of GaAs layer for $ \theta_{0}=30^{\circ}$ in terms of 3D $(a)$ and density $(b)$ plots:
$\mid E_{xz}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ plotted as a function of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DFFR5T30Exz}
\qquad
\end{figure}
%
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.50cm]{3DFFR5T60Exz1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.50cm]{3DFFR5T60Exz2}\\
\caption{{$ p $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $ } - Transmitted field distribution of GaAs layer for $ \theta_{0}=60^{\circ}$ in terms of 3D $(a)$ and density $(b)$ plots:
$\mid E_{xz}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ plotted as a function of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DFFR5T60Exz}
\qquad
\end{figure}
%
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.50cm]{3DFFR5T80Exz1}
%\includegraphics[width=7.0cm,height=5.50cm]{3DFFR5T80Exz2}\\
\caption{{$ p $ - polarization: Far-Field, $ z = 1000\,R $ } - Transmitted field distribution of GaAs layer for $ \theta_{0}=80^{\circ}$ in terms of 3D $(a)$ and density $(b)$ plots:
$\mid E_{xz}(x,y,z;t)/E_{0}\mid^{2}$ plotted as a function of $ x $ and $ y $ for fixed $ z $.}
\label{FIG3DFFR5T80Exz}
\end{figure}
\twocolumn
%
\appendices
\section{Matrix Elements of $\widehat{\Omega}^{-1}$ and $\widehat{G}_{3D}(\vec{k}_{\parallel},z,0;\omega)$}\label{App:AppendixA}
The elements of $\widehat{\Omega}^{-1}$ are given by(notation: $ a_{0}^{2}=k_{z}^{2}-
\frac{2 i k_{z}}{d}$)
\small
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A.1}
[\widehat{\Omega}^{-1}]_{_{11}} = \frac{\left[1+ \left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}
\right) \left( 1- \frac{k_{y}^{2}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right)
\right]}{\left[\left(1+\left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right)\right)\left(1+ \left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right) \left( 1- \frac{k_{\parallel}^{2}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right) \right)
\right]},
\end{eqnarray}
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A.2}
[\widehat{\Omega}^{-1}]_{_{12}} = \frac{\left[\left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right) \left(\frac{k_{x}\,k_{y}}{q_{\omega}^{2}} \right)
\right]}{\left[\left(1+\left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right)\right)\left(1+ \left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right) \left( 1- \frac{k_{\parallel}^{2}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right) \right)
\right]},
\end{eqnarray}
\begin{equation}\label{A.3}
[\widehat{\Omega}^{-1}]_{_{21}} = [\widehat{\Omega}^{-1}]_{_{12}},
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{A.4}
[\widehat{\Omega}^{-1}]_{_{31}} = [\widehat{\Omega}^{-1}]_{_{13}}=[\widehat{\Omega}^{-1}]_{_{32}}=[\widehat{\Omega}^{-1}]_{_{23}}=0,
\end{equation}
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A.5}
[\widehat{\Omega}^{-1}]_{_{22}} = \frac{\left[1+ \left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right) \left( 1- \frac{k_{x}^{2}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right)
\right]}{\left[\left(1+\left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right)\right)\left(1+ \left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right) \left( 1- \frac{k_{\parallel}^{2}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right) \right)
\right]},
\end{eqnarray}
\normalsize
and
\small
\begin{eqnarray}\label{A.6}
[\widehat{\Omega}^{-1}]_{_{33}} = \frac{1}{\left[1+ \left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right) \left( 1- \frac{a_{0}^{2}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right)
\right]}.
\end{eqnarray}
\normalsize
% you can choose not to have a title for an appendix
% if you want by leaving the argument blank
\section{}\label{App:AppendixB}
Furthermore the elements of ${\widehat{G}_{3D}}({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;
\omega)$ are given by the matrix ${{G}_{3D}}^{\,ij}({\vec{k}}_{
\parallel};z,0;\omega)$
as:
\begin{equation}\label{B.1}
{G}_{3D}^{xx}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right) =\,-\,\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\left(1-\frac{k_{x}^{2}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right),
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{B.2}
{G}_{3D}^{yy}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right)=\,-\,\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\left(1-\frac{k_{y}^{2}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right),
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{B.3}
{G}_{3D}^{zz}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right)=\,-\,\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\left(1-\frac{k_{z}^{2}- 2 i k_{z} \delta (z)}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right),
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{B.4}
{G}_{3D}^{xy}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right)=\,+\,\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\left(\frac{k_{x}\,k_{y}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right),
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{B.5}
{G}_{3D}^{xz}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right)=\,+\,\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\left(\frac{k_{x}\,k_{z}sgn(z)}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right),
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{B.6}
{G}_{3D}^{yz}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right)=\,+\,\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\left(\frac{k_{y}\,k_{z}sgn(z)}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right),
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{B.7}
{G}_{3D}^{yx}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right) = {G}_{3D}^{xy}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right),
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{B.8}
{G}_{3D}^{xz}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right) = {G}_{3D}^{zx}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right),
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{B.9}
{G}_{3D}^{yz}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right) = {G}_{3D}^{zy}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right).
\end{equation}
Therefore, Eq.(\ref{A2.16}) may rewritten as
\begin{equation}\label{B.10}
{\widehat{G}_{fs}}({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega)={\widehat{G}_{3D}}({
\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega)\,{\widehat{\Omega}}^{-1}.
\end{equation}
\section{Matrix Elements of $\widehat{G}_{fs}$ $ \longmapsto $ ${G}_{fs}^{ij}(\vec{k}_{\parallel},z,0;\omega)$}\label{App:AppendixC}
\tiny
\begin{eqnarray}\label{C.1}
{G}_{fs}^{xx}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right)&=&\,-\,\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}
\nonumber\\
&\times&
\left[\frac{1}{D_{1}}\left\{\left(1-\frac{k_{x}^{2}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right) +\left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right)
\left(1-\frac{k_{\parallel}^{2}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right)\right\}\right],
\end{eqnarray}
\begin{eqnarray}\label{C.2}
{G}_{fs}^{yy}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right)&=&\,-\,\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}
\nonumber\\
&\times&
\left[\frac{1}{D_{1}}\left\{\left(1-\frac{k_{y}^{2}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right) +\left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right)
\left(1-\frac{k_{\parallel}^{2}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right)\right\}\right],
\end{eqnarray}
\normalsize
\small
\begin{equation}\label{C.3}
{G}_{fs}^{zz}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right)=\,-\,\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\left[\frac{1}{D_{2}}\left\{\left(1-\frac{k_{z}^{2}- 2 i k_{z} \delta (z)}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right)\right\}\right],
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{C.4}
{G}_{fs}^{xy}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right)=\,+\,\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\left[\frac{1}{D_{1}}\left(\frac{k_{x}\,k_{y}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right)\right],
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{C.5}
{G}_{fs}^{xz}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right)
=\,+\,\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\left[\frac{1}{D_{2}}\left(\frac{k_{x}\,k_{z}sgn(z)}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right)\right],
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{C.6}
{G}_{fs}^{yz}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right)=\,+\,\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\left[\frac{1}{D_{2}}\left(\frac{k_{y}\,k_{z}sgn(z)}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right)\right],
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{C.7}
{G}_{fs}^{yx}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right) = {G}_{fs}^{xy}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right),
\end{equation}
\begin{eqnarray}\label{C.8}
{G}_{fs}^{zx}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right)&=&\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}
\nonumber\\
&\times&
\left[\frac{1}{D_{1}}\left(\left(1+\left(\frac{\gamma}{2
\,i\,k_{z}}\right)\right)\frac{k_{z}\,k_{x}sgn(z)}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right)\right],
\nonumber\\
\end{eqnarray}
\begin{eqnarray}\label{C.9}
{G}_{fs}^{zy}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right)
&=&\frac{e^{i\,k_{z}\mid z\mid }}{2\,i\,k_{z}}
\nonumber\\
&\times&
\left[\frac{1}{D_{1}}\left(\left(1+\left(\frac{
\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right)\right)\frac{k_{z}\,k_{y}sgn(z)}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right)\right],
\nonumber\\
\end{eqnarray}
\begin{equation}\label{C.10}
{G}_{fs}^{xz}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right) = {G}_{fs}^{zx}\left({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};z,0;\omega\right),
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{C.11}
D_{1}=\left(1+\left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right)\right)\left[1+ \left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right) \left( 1- \frac{k_{\parallel}^{2}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right) \right],
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{C.12}
D_{2}=\left[1+ \left(\frac{\gamma}{2\,i\,k_{z}}\right) \left( 1-
\frac{a_{0}^{2}}{q_{\omega}^{2}}\right) \right].
\end{equation}
\normalsize
It should be noted that, in the text above, we choose the coordinate system such that
$ k_{y}\equiv 0 $. In this case, $ k_{\parallel}=k_{x} $ and $ k_{z}^{2}=q_{\omega}^{2}-
k_{x}^{2}$. Moreover, with $ k_{y}=0 $, $
{\widehat{G}_{3D}}({\vec{k}}_{\parallel};0,0;\omega)$ becomes diagonal.
\section{Matrix Elements of $\widehat{T}^{0}$ }\label{App:AppendixD}
Since $ \widehat{\overline{\overline{G}}}_{fs}(\vec{k}_{0_{\parallel}};0,0;
\omega_{0})$ is diagonal, we have
%\small
\begin{eqnarray}\label{D.1}
{\widehat{T}^{0}} & = &
\begin{bmatrix}
{G}^{xx} & 0 & {G}^{xz} \\
0 & {G}^{yy} & 0 \\
{G}^{zx} & 0 & {G}^{zz}
\end{bmatrix}.
\nonumber\\
&\times&
\begin{bmatrix}
1+\gamma_{0}{\overline{\overline{G}}}_{fs}^{\,xx} & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 1+\gamma_{0}{\overline{\overline{G}}}_{fs}^{\,yy} & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 1+\gamma_{0}{\overline{\overline{G}}}_{fs}^{\,zz}
\end{bmatrix}
\end{eqnarray}
%\normalsize
or
\begin{eqnarray}\label{D.2}
{\widehat{T}^{0}} & = &
\begin{bmatrix}
{T}_{xx}^{0} & 0 & {T}_{xz}^{0} \\
0 & {T}_{yy}^{0} & 0 \\
{T}_{zx}^{0} & 0 & {T}_{zz}^{0}
\end{bmatrix}
\end{eqnarray}
where the matrix elements are given by
\begin{equation}\label{D.3}
\left\{
\begin{array}{ll}
{T}_{xx}^{0} = & \hbox{$ G^{xx}\left[ 1\,+\,\gamma_{0}\,\overline{
\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,xx}\right]$ ; (a)} \\
{T}_{zx}^{0} = & \hbox{$ G^{zx}\left[ 1\,+\,\gamma_{0}\,\overline{
\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,xx}\right]$ ; (b)} \\
{T}_{yy}^{0} = & \hbox{$ G^{yy}\left[ 1\,+\,\gamma_{0}\,\overline{
\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,yy}\right]$ ; (c)} \\
{T}_{xz}^{0} = & \hbox{$ G^{xz}\left[ 1\,+\,\gamma_{0}\,\overline{
\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,zz}\right]$ ; (d)} \\
{T}_{zz}^{0} = & \hbox{$ G^{zz}\left[ 1\,+\,\gamma_{0}\,\overline{
\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,zz}\right]$ . (e)}
\end{array}
\right.
\end{equation}
In order to facilitate the calculations of the above matrix elements, it is important to note that
$ \widehat{G}=\widehat{G}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},0;z,0;\omega_{0}) $
and $ \widehat{\overline{\overline{G}}}_{fs}= \widehat{\overline{\overline{G}}}_{fs}(\vec{k}_{0_{\parallel}};0,0;\omega_{0})$ are
evaluated at the incident wave frequency $
\omega_{0}$. Therefore, the matrix elements of the dyad $ {\widehat{T}^{0}} $
are given by (note that $\theta_{0}$ is the angle of incident)
\begin{equation}\label{D.4}
{T}_{xx}^{0} = G_{fs}^{xx}\left[\frac{1\,+\,\gamma_{0}\,\overline{
\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,xx}}{1\,
+\,\beta_{0}\,{G}_{fs0}^{\,xx}}\right] \,\,\,\,
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}\label{D.4I}
\left\{
\begin{array}{ll}
\overline{\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,xx} \equiv\, & \hbox{$\frac{\,-\,\cos(\theta_{0})}{2\,i\,\left[q_{\omega_{0}}\,+\,\Gamma_{0}\,\cos(\theta_{0})\right]}$; (a)} \\
{G}_{fs0}^{\,xx} \equiv\, & \hbox{$ {G}_{fs0}^{\,xx}(0-0;0,0;\omega_{0}) $; (b)} \\
{G}_{fs}^{\,xx} \equiv\, & \hbox{$ {G}_{fs}^{\,xx}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},0;z,0;\omega_{0})$. (c)}
\end{array}
\right.
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{D.5}
{T}_{yy}^{0} = G_{fs}^{yy}\left[\frac{1\,+\,\gamma_{0}\,\overline{\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,yy}}{1\,+\,\beta_{0}\,{G}_{fs0}^{\,yy}}\right] \,\,\,\,
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}\label{D.5I}
\left\{
\begin{array}{ll}
\overline{\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,yy} \equiv\, & \hbox{$\frac{\,-\,1}{2\,i\,\left[\,\Gamma_{0}\,+\,q_{\omega_{0}}\,\cos(\theta_{0})
\right]}$; (a)} \\
{G}_{fs0}^{\,yy} \equiv\, & \hbox{$ {G}_{fs0}^{\,yy}(0-0;0,0;\omega_{0}) $; (b)} \\
{G}_{fs}^{\,yy} \equiv\, & \hbox{$ {G}_{fs}^{\,yy}(
\vec{r}_{\parallel},0;z,0;\omega_{0})$. (c)}
\end{array}
\right.
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{D.6}
{T}_{zz}^{0} = G_{fs}^{zz}\left[\frac{1\,+\,\gamma_{0}\,\overline{\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,zz}}{1\,+\,\beta_{0}\,{G}_{fs0}^{\,zz}}\right] \,\,\,\,
\end{equation}
where
\small
\begin{equation}\label{D.6I}
\left\{
\begin{array}{ll}
\overline{\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,zz} \equiv\, & \hbox{$ \frac{\,-\,1}{2\,i} \left\{\frac{q_{\omega_{0}}\,\sin^{2}(\theta_{0})+2\,i\,\delta(0)\cos(\theta_{0})}{\cos(\theta_{0})\,
\left[\,q_{\omega_{0}}^{2}\,+\,2\,i\,\delta(0)\Gamma_{0}\right]\,+\,\Gamma_{0}\,q_{\omega_{0}}\,\sin^{2}(\theta_{0})}\right\}$; (a)} \\
{G}_{fs0}^{\,zz} \equiv\, & \hbox{$ {G}_{fs0}^{\,zz}(0-0;0,0;\omega_{0}) $; (b)} \\
{G}_{fs}^{\,zz}\equiv\, & \hbox{$ {G}_{fs}^{\,zz}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},0;z,0;\omega_{0})$. (c)}
\end{array}
\right.
\end{equation}
\normalsize
\begin{equation}\label{D.7}
{T}_{xz}^{0} = G_{fs}^{xz}\left[\frac{1\,+\,\gamma_{0}\,\overline{\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,zz}}{1\,+\,\beta_{0}\,{G}_{fs0}^{\,zz}}\right] \,\,\,\,
\end{equation}
where
\small
\begin{equation}\label{D.7I}
\left\{
\begin{array}{ll}
\overline{\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,zz} \equiv\, & \hbox{$ \frac{\,-\,1}{2\,i} \left\{\frac{q_{\omega_{0}}\,\sin^{2}(\theta_{0})\,+2\,i\,\delta(0)\cos(\theta_{0})}{\cos(\theta_{0})\,
\left[\,q_{\omega_{0}}^{2}\,+\,2\,i\,\delta(0)\,\Gamma_{0}\right]\,+\,\Gamma_{0}\,q_{\omega_{0}}\,\sin^{2}(\theta_{0})}\right\}$; (a)} \\
{G}_{fs0}^{\,zz} \equiv\, & \hbox{$ {G}_{fs0}^{\,zz}(0-0;0,0;\omega_{0}) $; (b)} \\
{G}_{fs}^{\,xz} \equiv\, & \hbox{$ {G}_{fs}^{\,xz}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},0;z,0;\omega_{0})$. (c)}
\end{array}
\right.
\end{equation}
\normalsize
and
\begin{equation}\label{D.8}
{T}_{zx}^{0} = G_{fs}^{zx}\left[\frac{1\,+\,\gamma_{0}\,\overline{\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,xx}}{1\,+\,\beta_{0}\,{G}_{fs0}^{\,xx}}\right] \,\,\,\,
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}\label{D.8I}
\left\{
\begin{array}{ll}
\overline{\overline{G}}_{fs}^{\,xx} \equiv\, & \hbox{$\frac{\,-\,\cos(\theta_{0})}{2\,i\,\left[q_{\omega_{0}}\,+\,\Gamma_{0}\,\cos(\theta_{0})\right]}$; (a)} \\
{G}_{fs0}^{\,xx} \equiv\, & \hbox{$ {G}_{fs0}^{\,xx}(0-0;0,0;\omega_{0}) $; (b)} \\
{G}_{fs}^{\,zx} \equiv\, & \hbox{$ {G}_{fs}^{\,zx}(\vec{r}_{\parallel},0;z,0;\omega_{0})$. (c)}
\end{array}
\right.
\end{equation}
% use section* for acknowledgement
\section*{Acknowledgment}
D. Miessein gratefully acknowledges support by the AGEP program of the NSF; also the assistance of Prof. M. L. Glasser, Dr. Andrii Iurov and Dr. Nan Chen.
\begin{thebibliography}{1}
\bibitem{Dez_2015} N.J. M. Horing, D\'{e}sir\'{e} Miessein and G. Gumbs, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 32, 1184-1198 (2015).
\bibitem{Dez_thesis} D\'{e}sir\'{e} Miessein, Ph.D Thesis
\bibitem{Horing_2007} N.J. M. Horing, et al., J. Optical Soc. Amer. B. 24, 2428 (2007).
\bibitem{Horing_2015} N.J. M. Horing, " Quantum Statistical Fields Theory: Schwinger's Variational Method", Oxford University Press, in press.
\bibitem{Horing_2008} N.J. M. Horing , IEEE Sensors J. Vol.8, N0.6, 771 (2008).
\bibitem{Bethe_1944} A. Bethe, " Theory of Diffraction by Small Holes ", Phys. Rev. 66, 163,(1944 ).
\bibitem{Levine_1950} Levine and J. Schwinger, Commun. Pure and Appl. Math. 3, 355-391(1950).
\bibitem{Levine_1948} Levine and J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 74, 958(1948).
\bibitem{Levine_1949} Levine and J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 75, 1423(1949).
\bibitem{Tai_1994} Chen-To Tai, " Dyadic Green's Functions in Electromagnetic Theory", Intext Educational Publishers (1971); reprinted as
" Dyadic Green's Functions in Electromagnetic Theory", IEEE Press: Piscataway, NJ, (1994).
\bibitem{Tai_1997} Chen-To Tai, " General Vector and Dyadic Analysis: Applied Mathematics in Field Theory",2nd Edition, Wiley-IEEE Press (April 15, 1997).
\bibitem{Collin_1991} Robert E. Collin, " Field Theory of Guided Waves", 2nd Edition, IEEE Press (1991).
\bibitem{Chew_1995} Weng Cho Chew, " Waves and Fields In Inhomogeneous Media" IEEE, Inc, (1995).
\bibitem{Genet_2007} C. Genet and T. Ebbesen, Nature, 445, 390(2007).
\bibitem{Kukh_2006} S.V. Kukhlevsky, M. Mechler, O. Samek, K. Janssens, " Analytical model of the enhanced light transmission through subwavelength metal slits: Green's function formalism versus Rayleigh's expansion ", Appl. Phys. B: Lasers and Optics 84:19-24 (2006).
\bibitem{Kukh_2004} S.V. Kukhlevsky, M. Mechler, L. Csapo, K. Janssens, and O. Samek, Phys. Rev. B 70, 195428 (2004).
\bibitem{Neerhoff_1973} F. L. Neerhoff G. Mur, Appl. Sci. Res. 28, 73 (1973).
\bibitem{tb:integral_1980} Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik (6th Ed.) Academic Press, New York (1980).
\bibitem{Arnoldus_2002} Henk F. Arnoldus and John T. Foley , " Traveling and evanescent parts of the electromagnetic Green's tensor", J. Optical Soc. Amer. A. 19, 1701 (2002).
\bibitem{Glen_2004} L. E. Richard Petersson and Glenn S. Smith, J. Optical Soc. Amer. A. 21, 975-980 (2004).
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}