Broad Diphotons from Narrow States
Extracted source text · arXiv 1512.08378
\documentclass[twocolumn,english,aps,reprint,groupedaddress,notitlepage,nobibnote,nofootinbib,preprintnumbers,showpacs]{revtex4-1}
\pdfoutput=1
\usepackage{lmodern}
\renewcommand{\ttdefault}{lmodern}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[latin9]{inputenc}
\usepackage{geometry}
\geometry{verbose,tmargin=0.8in,bmargin=1in,lmargin=0.75in,rmargin=0.75in,columnsep=0.25in}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{babel}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{esint}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{comment}
\usepackage{tabu}
\usepackage{relsize}
%\usepackage{arydshln}
%\usepackage{pdflscape}
\usepackage[table]{xcolor}
\usepackage[unicode=true,pdfusetitle,
bookmarks=true,bookmarksnumbered=false,bookmarksopen=false,
breaklinks=false,pdfborder={0 0 1},backref=false,colorlinks=true]
{hyperref}
%\makeatletter
%\newcommand{\thickhline}{%
% \noalign {\ifnum 0=`}\fi \hrule height .5pt
% \futurelet \reserved@a \@xhline
%}
%\newcolumntype{"}{@{\hskip\tabcolsep\vrule width .5pt \hskip\tabcolsep}}%{\hskip\tabcolsep\vrule width .5pt\hskip\tabcolsep}}
%\makeatother
\hypersetup{
citecolor=blue,linkcolor=blue,urlcolor=blue}
\makeatletter
\newcommand{\lyxdot}{.}
\def\lovname{List of Videos}
\@ifundefined{textcolor}{}
{
\definecolor{BLACK}{gray}{0}
\definecolor{WHITE}{gray}{1}
\definecolor{RED}{rgb}{1,0,0}
\definecolor{GREEN}{rgb}{0,1,0}
\definecolor{BLUE}{rgb}{0,0,1}
\definecolor{CYAN}{cmyk}{1,0,0,0}
\definecolor{MAGENTA}{cmyk}{0,1,0,0}
\definecolor{YELLOW}{cmyk}{0,0,1,0}
}
\usepackage{babel}
%\makeatletter
%\def\simgt{\mathrel{\lower2.5pt\vbox{\lineskip=0pt\baselineskip=0pt
% \hbox{$>$}\hbox{$\sim$}}}}
%\def\simlt{\mathrel{\lower2.5pt\vbox{\lineskip=0pt\baselineskip=0pt
% \hbox{$<$}\hbox{$\sim$}}}}
%\makeatother
\newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
\newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
\newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\Ref}[1]{Ref.~\cite{#1}}
\newcommand{\Fig}[1]{Fig.~\ref{#1}}
\newcommand{\Eq}[1]{Eq.~(\ref{#1})}
\newcommand{\Eqs}[2]{Eqs.~(\ref{#1}) and (\ref{#2})}
\newcommand{\Sec}[1]{Sec.~\ref{#1}}
\newcommand{\Secs}[2]{Secs.~\ref{#1} and \ref{#2}}
\newcommand{\App}[1]{App.~\ref{#1}}
\newcommand{\vev}[1]{\langle #1 \rangle}
\newcommand{\azero}{\rightarrow 0}
%\newcommand{\nda}{\mathsf{x}}
\newcommand{\nda}{\scriptstyle{\times}}
\newcommand{\ysq}{\scriptstyle{y^2}}
\newcommand{\ydsq}{\scriptstyle{\bar y^{2}}}
\newcommand{\ab}[1]{\langle #1 \rangle}
\newcommand{\sa}{\tilde{a}}
% commands for table colors
\newcommand{\cw}{\cellcolor{white}}
\newcommand{\czg}{\cellcolor{zero1}}
\newcommand{\czb}{\cellcolor{zero2}}
\newcommand{\czp}{\cellcolor{zero3}}
\newcommand{\czr}{\cellcolor{zero4}}
\definecolor{zero1}{rgb}{0.35,0.4,0.85}
\definecolor{zero2}{rgb}{0.88,0.88,.88}
%\definecolor{zero2}{rgb}{0.88,0.95,1}
%\definecolor{zero2}{rgb}{0.8,0.875,1}
\definecolor{zero3}{rgb}{0.85,0.85,0.95}
\definecolor{zero4}{rgb}{1,0.3,0.3}
%\newcommand{\draftnoteCC}[1]{\textbf{\color{red}#1}}
%\newcommand{\draftnoteGR}[1]{\textbf{\color{blue}#1}}
\newcommand{\eq}[1]{\begin{align}#1\end{align}}
\newcommand{\mPl}{m_{\rm Pl}}
\newcommand{\LL}{\mathcal{L}}
\newcommand{\OO}{\mathcal{O}}
\newcommand{\BR}{\textrm{BR}}
\newcommand{\ang}[1]{\langle #1 \rangle}
\newcommand{\sq}[1]{[ #1 ]}
\newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}
\newcommand{\hol}{\mathfrak{h}}
\newcommand{\nonhol}{\mathfrak{n}}
\newcommand{\sslash}[1]{\ensuremath\raisebox{-0.00cm}{{\small\slash}}\hspace{-0.17cm}#1\/}
%\makeatletter
\newcommand{\dd}[1]{\frac{\partial}{\partial #1}}
%\newcommand{\draftnoteCC}[1]{\textbf{\color{red}#1}}
%\newcommand{\draftnoteHA}[1]{\textbf{\color{blue}#1}}
%\newcommand{\draftnoteYZ}[1]{\textbf{\color{green}#1}}
%\newcommand{\thickhline}{%
% \noalign {\ifnum 0=`}\fi \hrule height 0.75pt
% \futurelet \reserved@a \@xhline
%}
%\newcolumntype{"}{@{\hskip\tabcolsep\vrule width 0.75pt\hskip\tabcolsep}}
%\makeatother
\makeatletter
\def\CT@@do@color{%
\global\let\CT@do@color\relax
\@tempdima\wd\z@
\advance\@tempdima\@tempdimb
\advance\@tempdima\@tempdimc
\advance\@tempdimb\tabcolsep
\advance\@tempdimc\tabcolsep
\advance\@tempdima1.5\tabcolsep
\kern-1.5\@tempdimb
\leaders\vrule
%\@height\p@\@depth\p@
\hskip\@tempdima\@plus 1fill
\kern-1.5\@tempdimc
\hskip-\wd\z@ \@plus -1fill }
\makeatother
\begin{document}
%\preprint{\hbox{CALT-2015-024} }
\title{Broad Diphotons from Narrow States}
\author{Haipeng An}
\author{Clifford Cheung}
\author{Yue Zhang}
\affiliation{Walter Burke Institute for Theoretical Physics \\California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125\,}
\date{\today}
\email{anhp@caltech.edu, \\ clifford.cheung@caltech.edu, \\ yuezhang@theory.caltech.edu}
%\pacs{}
\begin{abstract}
ATLAS and CMS have each reported a modest diphoton excess consistent with the decay of a broad resonance at $\sim 750$ GeV. We show how this signal can arise in a weakly coupled theory comprised solely of narrow width particles. In particular, if the decaying particle is produced off-shell, then the associated diphoton resonance will have a broad, adjustable width. We present simplified models which explain the diphoton excess through the three-body decay of a scalar or fermion.
Our minimal ultraviolet completion is a weakly coupled and renormalizable theory of a singlet scalar plus a heavy vector-like quark and lepton.
The smoking gun of this mechanism is an asymmetric diphoton peak recoiling against missing transverse energy, jets, or leptons.
\end{abstract}
\preprint{CALT-TH-2015-065}
\maketitle
\section{Introduction\label{intro}}
The ATLAS and CMS collaborations have both observed a curious excess in the diphoton invariant mass spectrum in the vicinity of $\sim $ 750 GeV~\cite{ATLAS, CMS}. The significance of the excess in each experiment is $\sim$ 3.6$\sigma$ and $\sim$ 2.6$\sigma$, respectively, with a rate consistent with a signal cross-section of $\sim$ 5--10 fb. Current observations favor a broad resonance, with ATLAS reporting a width of $\sim$ 45 GeV, corresponding to $6\%$ of the mass.
While the diphoton excess may well be a statistical fluke or experimental systematic, it is nevertheless important to understand the range of new physics scenarios which can accommodate this observation. Recently, there has been an enormous flurry of papers discussing the implications for beyond the standard model physics~\cite{theychaseanomaly}, mostly observing that the excess is consistent with a strongly coupled sector linking a new decaying state to gluons and photons with quite large couplings.
%While this appears to disfavor weakly coupled dynamics, we would like to point out an broad class of exceptions to this intuition.
In this paper we point out that weakly coupled physics can explain both the rate of the diphoton excess as well as its apparently broad width. To do so, we introduce a now familiar ingredient: a singlet scalar which decays to diphoton. Such a state is narrow in a weakly coupled theory but if it is predominantly produced {\it off-shell} then the associated diphoton spectrum will be broadened. This occurs, for example, if the scalar is produced through the three-body decay of a lighter state. The observed width of the diphoton resonance is then an adjustable parameter controlled by the spectrum of masses.
A generic prediction of this mechanism is that the peak in the diphoton invariant mass is asymmetric, with more events below the apex than above. Moreover, the high energy photons in each event should be associated with recoiling missing transverse energy, jets, or leptons.
In \Sec{sec:setup} we summarize the basic mechanism and then analyze a set of simplified models characterizing the three-body decay of a scalar or fermion. We then present explicit models for the diphoton excess in \Sec{sec:DM} and \Sec{sec:QL}. Our minimal ultraviolet complete theory is a renormalizable model of a singlet scalar plus a vector-like quark and lepton. We conclude in \Sec{sec:conclusions}.
\begin{figure}[t]
\vspace*{0.3cm}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=.3\textwidth]{Feynman_diagram.pdf}
\end{center}
\vspace*{-0.3cm}
\caption{Three-body decay yielding a slightly off-shell resonance with an effectively adjustable width.}
\label{fig:3bd}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure*}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=.9\textwidth]{ScalarCase.pdf}
\end{center}
\vspace*{-0.5cm}
\caption{Differential decay rate for the scalar three-body decay $\chi_1 \rightarrow \chi_2 (\phi^* \rightarrow \gamma\gamma)$ as a function of the diphoton invariant mass, $m_{\gamma\gamma} \equiv |p|$, with maximum normalized to 1.
In the left panel, $m_{\chi_1}=750$ GeV, $m_{\chi_2}=10$ GeV, and
$m_\phi-m_{\chi_1}=0$ (blue), 5 (magenta), 10 (yellow), 20 (green) GeV .
In the right panel, $m_{\chi_1}=m_\phi=750\,$GeV, $m_{\chi_2}=1$ (blue), 10 (magenta), 20 (yellow), 30 (green) GeV.
The width of the peak can be adjusted with the particles masses involved in the three-body decay. }
\label{fig:sc}
\end{figure*}
\section{Basic Setup}
\label{sec:setup}
Our basic setup involves three states: $\phi$, $\chi_1$, and $\chi_2$. Here $\phi$ is a scalar that decays via $
\phi \rightarrow \gamma \gamma$, although $\phi\rightarrow gg$ may be allowed as well.
Meanwhile, $\chi_1$ is created in proton-proton collisions, either directly or from cascade decays. Once produced, $\chi_1$ decays three-body via
\eq{
\chi_1 \rightarrow \chi_2 (\phi^* \rightarrow \gamma \gamma) \ ,
\label{3body}
}
through an off-shell $\phi$, as shown in \Fig{fig:3bd}.
For \Eq{3body} to be the dominant decay mode requires
%\begin{itemize}
\eq{
m_\phi &> m_{\chi_1} - m_{\chi_2} \gg 0 \ .
\label{eq:primarycondition}
}
The first inequality is necessary to forbid the direct two-body decay, $\chi_1 \rightarrow \chi_2 \phi$. The second inequality is required so the three-body decay $\chi_1 \rightarrow \chi_2 (\phi^* \rightarrow \gamma \gamma)$ into highly energetic photons is kinematically allowed.
Note also that the width of $\phi$ must be of order or greater than the width of $\chi_2$, so the dominant three-body decay is via off-shell $\phi$ rather than off-shell $\chi_2$. This is automatic if $\chi_2$ is a stable or long-lived particle. As we will see, this is naturally accommodated if $\chi_1$ and $\chi_2$ are odd under a stabilizing parity.
In the on-shell limit, $m_\phi = m_{\chi_1} - m_{\chi_2}$, the $\phi$ particle is produced at rest, yielding a narrow diphoton resonance regulated by a narrow Breit-Wigner width. However, as one detunes to the off-shell regime $m_\phi > m_{\chi_1} - m_{\chi_2}$, this pushes the $\phi$ propagator off-shell, widening the peak.
%\sesection{Simplified Models}
%We now present simplified models characterizing the three-body decay required for a broad diphoton spectrum. These modular constructions can be attached to the bottom of any cascade of new physics states.
%We have remained agnostic about the identity of $\phi_1$, $\phi_2$, and $\phi_3$, but later we will see that some may even be standard model states.
In the subsequent sections we study this mechanism with the aid simplified models. We begin with a discussion of the couplings of $\phi$ to photons and gluons, followed by an analysis of scalar and fermion simplified models for the interactions of $\phi$, $\chi_1$, and $\chi_2$.
\begin{figure*}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=.9\textwidth]{FermionCase.pdf}
\end{center}
\vspace*{-0.5cm}
\caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:sc} but for fermion decay. The peaks are wider than for scalar decay, as explained in the text. }
\label{fig:fe}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{Photon and Gluon Couplings}
As noted in \cite{falkowski}, $\phi$ decays are effectively mediated by the higher dimension operators
\eq{
\frac{\alpha}{6\pi \Lambda} \phi \, F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} + \frac{\alpha_s}{6\pi \Lambda_s} \phi \, G_{a\mu\nu} G^{a\mu\nu} \ ,
% + \frac{\alpha_s}{4\pi \Lambda_G} \phi_1 G^a_{\mu\nu} G^{a\mu\nu}.
\label{eq:geniusoperator}
}
where in a weakly coupled theory $\Lambda$ and $\Lambda_s$ are of order the masses of heavy electrically charged and colored particles. If, for example, these heavy particles are Dirac fermions then
\eq{
\frac{1}{\Lambda} = \sum_i \frac{k_i q_i^2}{m_i} \quad \textrm{and} \quad
\frac{1}{\Lambda_s} = \sum_i \frac{k_i T_i}{m_i} \ ,
}
where $i$ sums over heavy states. Here $k_i$ denotes the Yukawa coupling of $\phi$ to a Dirac fermion of mass $m_i$, charge $q_i$, and color Dynkin index $T_i$.
The decay rate of $\phi$ into diphoton is
\eq{
\Gamma(\phi \rightarrow \gamma\gamma) &=\frac{m_\phi^3}{4\pi}\left(\frac{\alpha }{6\pi \Lambda}\right)^2 \nn \\ &\simeq \textrm{6 keV} \times \left(\frac{m_\phi}{\textrm{750 GeV}} \right)^3 \left(\frac{\textrm{1 TeV}}{\Lambda} \right)^2 \ , \label{eq:gammagamma}
}
while the decay rate into digluon is
\eq{
\Gamma(\phi \rightarrow gg) &= 8\times \frac{m_\phi^3}{4\pi} \left(\frac{\alpha_s }{6\pi \Lambda_s}\right)^2 \nn \\ &\simeq \textrm{6 MeV} \times \left(\frac{m_\phi}{\textrm{750 GeV}} \right)^3 \left(\frac{\textrm{1 TeV}}{\Lambda_s} \right)^2 \ .\label{eq:gluongluon}
}
%XXX\draftnoteCC{Computed for $\alpha_s = 0.0913594$ and $\alpha^{-1} = 126.6$ from running couplings up to 750.}
The digluon rate is enhanced over the diphoton rate by a factor of $(\alpha_s/\alpha)^2$ together with a color multiplicity factor.
Notably, neither decay rate is remotely close to the $\sim$ 45 GeV width quoted by ATLAS, which is why we are interested in three-body decays in the first place.
With couplings to both photons and gluons, the relative branching ratio implied by \Eq{eq:gammagamma} and \Eq{eq:gluongluon} is
\eq{
\frac{\Gamma(\chi_1\to\chi_2 \gamma \gamma)}{\Gamma(\chi_1\to\chi_2 gg)} = \frac{\Gamma(\phi \rightarrow \gamma\gamma)}{\Gamma(\phi \rightarrow gg)} \simeq 10^{-3} \times \left( \frac{\Lambda_s}{\Lambda}\right)^2 \ .
\label{eq:Br}
}
For electrically charged and colored particles of similar mass scales, we see that the branching ratio between diphoton and digluon is of order one in a thousand, which is incredibly small. To counterbalance this effect requires $\Lambda < \Lambda_s$, so the electrically charged particles are substantially lighter or more numerous than the colored ones. This scenario is of course less constrained by LHC results since limits on colored production are far more stringent than for electroweak production.
In the subsequent sections we present simplified models characterizing the three-body decay into photons. We split our discussion to the cases where the initial particle is a scalar or a fermion.
\subsection{Scalar Simplified Model}
%Concretely, if $\phi_1$ couples with
%\eq{
%\frac{1}{\Lambda_F} &= \frac{2}{3}\sum_{\rm fermions} \frac{q^2}{M} + \frac{1}{3}\sum_{\rm bosons} \frac{q^2}{M}\\
%\frac{1}{\Lambda_G} &= \frac{2}{3}\sum_{\rm fermions} \frac{T}{M} + \frac{1}{3}\sum_{\rm bosons} \frac{T}{M},
%}
Let us define a simplified model for the three-body decay where $\chi_1$ and $\chi_2$ are scalars, interacting via
\eq{
%{\cal L} &=
g \phi \chi_1 \chi_2 \ ,
%+ \frac{\alpha}{6\pi \Lambda} \phi \, F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} \ ,
%+ \frac{\alpha_s}{6\pi \Lambda_s} \phi \, G_{a\mu\nu} G^{a\mu\nu} \ ,
\label{eq:Lint}
}
where $g$ is a dimensionful cubic interaction.
% This model is simply an augmentation by $\chi_1$ and $\chi_2$ of the simple $\phi$ effective theory described in many papers \cite{}.
%While for generality we have included both the photon and gluon coupling, let us ignore the latter for now and consider processes involving just diphoton.
%The three-body
%decay amplitude, summed over final state photon polarizations, is
%\eq{
%\sum_{\rm pols} |M|^2 &= 8g^2 \left( \frac{\alpha}{6\pi \Lambda} \right)^2 \frac{p^4}{(p^2 -m_\phi^2)^2} \ ,
%}
%where $p^2$ is the invariant mass of the diphoton system.
%From this we compute the
The three-body differential decay rate to photons is
\eq{
&\frac{d\Gamma({\chi_1\to\chi_2 \gamma\gamma})
}{dp^2} =\frac{g^2}{64\pi^3m_{\chi_1}^3} \left( \frac{\alpha}{6\pi \Lambda} \right)^2 \frac{p^4}{(p^2 -m_\phi^2)^2} \nn \\
& \quad \times \sqrt{((m_{\chi_1} + m_{\chi_2})^2-p^2)((m_{\chi_1} - m_{\chi_2})^2-p^2)} \ ,
\label{eq:dGamma}
}
where we have defined
\eq{
p^2 &= m_{\gamma\gamma}^2 \ ,
}
to be the invariant mass of the diphoton system.
Note that as $p^2$ approaches $m_\phi^2$, the denominator approaches zero, yielding a singularity. However, this pole is cut off by the zero in the numerator that arises when $p^2$ approaches $(m_{\chi_1} - m_{\chi_2})^2$.
This results in a peak for the diphoton spectrum that has a tunable width.
For illustrative purposes, in \Fig{fig:sc} we have plotted the diphoton spectrum for various choices of $m_\phi$, $m_{\chi_1}$, and $m_{\chi_2}$. As shown, the observed width of $\sim$ 45 GeV is easily attainable. Moreover, the peaks are always asymmetric, with substantially more events to the left of the maximum than to the right.
Next, let us compute the total width into photons.
The expression in \Eq{eq:dGamma} is exact but unwieldy, so it will be convenient to consider the limit in which $m_{\chi_2} \ll m_{\chi_1}$, which as noted earlier is sufficient for the decay to yield highly energetic photons. In this limit the total width into photons is
\eq{
\Gamma({\chi_1\to\chi_2 \gamma\gamma}) &=\frac{g^2 m_{\phi}}{128 \pi^3 } \left( \frac{\alpha}{6\pi \Lambda} \right)^2f(m_{\chi_1}/m_\phi) \ ,
}
where we have defined the function
\eq{
f(x) = \frac{x^2(x^2-6)+(4x^2-6)\log(1-x^2)}{x^3} \ .
}
For our kinematic regime, $f(m_{\chi_1} /m_\phi)$ is order one. Thus, if the dominant decay channel is to photons, then the decay length is
\eq{
\tau \simeq 0.6 \textrm{~$\mu$m} \times \left(\frac{\textrm{750 GeV}}{m_\phi} \right) \left(\frac{\textrm{100 GeV}}{g} \right)^2 \left(\frac{\Lambda}{\textrm{1 TeV}} \right)^2 \ ,
}
which is quite prompt on collider scales.
\subsection{Fermion Simplified Model}
Next, consider a simplified model where $\chi_1$ and $\chi_2$ are Dirac fermions, interacting via
\eq{
%{\cal L} &=
y \phi (\bar\chi_1 \chi_2 +\bar\chi_2 \chi_1) \ ,
%+ \frac{\alpha}{6\pi \Lambda} \phi \, F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} \ , %+ \frac{\alpha_s}{6\pi \Lambda_s} \phi \, G_{a\mu\nu} G^{a\mu\nu} \ ,
\label{eq:Lint}
}
where $y$ is a dimensionless Yukawa interaction. %The three-body decay amplitude, summed over final state photon and fermion polarizations and averaged over the initial fermion polarizations is
%\eq{
%\frac{1}{2} \sum_{\rm poles} |M|^2 &= 2y^2 \left( \frac{\alpha}{6\pi \Lambda} \right)^2 \frac{p^4((m_{\chi_1}+m_{\chi_2})^2-p^2)}{(p^2 -m_\phi^2)^2} \ .
%}
The three-body differential decay rate to photons is
\eq{
&\frac{d\Gamma({\chi_1\to\chi_2 \gamma\gamma})}{dp^2} =\frac{y^2}{64\pi^3m_{\chi_1}^3} \left( \frac{\alpha}{6\pi \Lambda} \right)^2 \frac{p^4 ((m_{\chi_1}+m_{\chi_2})^2-p^2)}{(p^2 -m_\phi^2)^2} \nn \\
&\quad \times \sqrt{((m_{\chi_1} + m_{\chi_2})^2-p^2)((m_{\chi_1} - m_{\chi_2})^2-p^2)} \ .
}
While this formula is similar to the one we obtained for the scalar model, there is a crucial difference: the numerator has a factor of $(m_{\chi_1}+m_{\chi_2})^2-p^2 $ which can cancel the singularity from the $\phi$ propagator. For instance, in the limit that $m_{\chi_2}=0$ and $m_{\chi_1} = m_\phi$, the singularity is cancelled. Hence, in this kinematic regime there is no resonant structure---merely an off-shell tail in the diphoton spectrum.
Consequently, for a viable model we require that
\eq{
m_\phi &< m_{\chi_1}+ m_{\chi_2} \ ,
\label{eq:conditionF}
}
so the pole does not cancel. In view of Eq.~(\ref{eq:primarycondition}), this implies that $m_{\chi_2}\neq0$. This is an extra constraint that applies to the fermion model but not the scalar model.
In \Fig{fig:fe} we have plotted the diphoton spectrum from fermion three-body decays for various choices of $m_\phi$, $m_{\chi_1}$, and $m_{\chi_2}$. As noted, for small $m_{\chi_2}$, the spectrum is more like an off-shell tail than a resonance.
Again restricting to $m_{\chi_2} \ll m_{\chi_1}$ for simplicity, we find that the total width into photons is
\eq{
\Gamma({\chi_1\to\chi_2 \gamma\gamma}) &=\frac{y^2m_\phi^6}{192 \pi^3 m_{\chi_1}^3 } \left( \frac{\alpha}{6\pi \Lambda} \right)^2f(m_{\chi_1}/m_\phi) \ ,
}
where this time we define
\eq{
f(x) = 12x^2-12x^4+x^6+6(2-3x^2+x^4)\log(1-x^2) \ .
}
Since $f(m_{\chi_1} /m_\phi)$ is order one, the associated decay length is prompt,
\eq{
\tau \simeq 0.02 \textrm{ $\mu$m}\times y^{-2}\left(\frac{\textrm{750\,GeV}}{m_\phi} \right)^6 \left(\frac{m_{\chi_1}}{\textrm{750\,GeV}} \right)^3 \left(\frac{\Lambda}{\textrm{1\,TeV}} \right)^2, \label{eq:taufermion}
}
assuming here that the decay to photons is dominant.
\begin{figure}[t]
\vspace*{0.3cm}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=.45\textwidth]{single_production.pdf}
\end{center}
\vspace*{-0.3cm}
\caption{Single production of a singlet scalar $\phi$ followed by cascade decay into dark matter and $\gamma\gamma$.}
\label{fig:single_production}
\end{figure}
\section{Dark Matter Model}
\label{sec:DM}
We now present a simple weakly coupled model that explains the broad diphoton excess via three-body decays. As noted earlier, a diphoton spectrum arises only if $\phi$ is wider than $\chi_2$. This is naturally accommodated if $\chi_2$ is stable dark matter, in which case $\chi_1$ and $\chi_2$ are odd under a dark matter stabilizing symmetry.
The Lagrangian for this theory is simply
\eq{
{\cal L} &= g \phi \chi_1 \chi_2 + \frac{\alpha}{6\pi \Lambda} \phi \, F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} + \frac{\alpha_s}{6\pi \Lambda_s} \phi \, G_{a\mu\nu} G^{a\mu\nu}
\ ,
\label{eq:DML}
}
which is the usual effective theory for the diphoton excess~\cite{falkowski} augmented by $\chi_1$ and $\chi_2$.
Proton-proton collisions will produce cascade decays like the one depicted in \Fig{fig:single_production} to explain the diphoton excess.
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{FitPeak2.pdf}
\end{center}
\vspace*{-0.5cm}
\caption{A fit to the ATLAS and CMS diphoton excesses.
The red histogram corresponds to the scalar model with $m_{\chi_1} = 769$ GeV, $m_\phi=780$ GeV, $m_{\chi_2}=0$ GeV.
The green histogram corresponds to the fermion model with $m_{\chi_1} = 764$ GeV, $m_\phi=760$ GeV, $m_{\chi_2}=5$ GeV.
The blue curves are the fits to the standard model background provided in the experimental papers.
}
\label{fig:fit_scalar}
\end{figure*}
First, the $\phi$ particle is produced through its couplings to gluons with a cross-section
\eq{
\sigma(pp\rightarrow \phi ) &= \frac{\pi^2 \Gamma (\phi\to gg)}{8 m_\phi s} \int_{m_\phi^2/s}^{1} \frac{dx}{x} f_g(x) f_g\left( \frac{m_\phi^2/s}{x} \right) \ ,
\label{eq:gluonfusion}
}
where $f_g(x)$ is the gluon parton distribution function.
%For concreteness, let us study a benchmark for which $m_\phi = 750$ GeV.
%When the gluon coupling is sizable there are two competing effects: $\phi$ will be produced via gluon fusion, but at the same time $\phi$ will dominantly decay to gluons, decreasing its branching ratio to diphoton. While the $\phi$ width will increase, the state is still narrow relative to the observed diphoton excess.
For $m_\phi = 750$ GeV, the production cross section is
\eq{
%\sigma(pp\rightarrow \phi ) &\sim 27 \textrm{ fb } \left( \frac{\textrm{1 TeV}}{\Lambda_s} \right)^2,
\sigma(pp\rightarrow \phi ) &\simeq 40 \textrm{ fb}\times \left( \frac{\textrm{1 TeV}}{\Lambda_s} \right)^2,
}
which is quite sizable in spite of the fact that it is mediated by a higher dimension operator.
Once produced via gluon-gluon fusion, $\phi$ will decay two-body via $\phi \rightarrow \chi_1 \chi_2$, assuming $m_\phi > m_{\chi_1} + m_{\chi_2}$ so it is kinematically allowed. Afterwards, the resulting $\chi_1$ has no recourse but to decay three-body back the way it came, as shown in \Fig{fig:single_production}.
Taking into account the branching ratio dictated by \Eq{eq:Br}, we find
\eq{
\sigma(pp\rightarrow \gamma\gamma) &= \sigma(pp\rightarrow \phi) {\rm Br}(\phi\to \chi_1 \chi_2) {\rm Br}(\chi_1 \to \chi_2\gamma\gamma) \nonumber \\
%&\quad\quad\quad 6 \textrm{ fb } \times \left[ 10^3 \left(\frac{\Lambda}{\textrm{1 TeV}}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{\Lambda_s}{\textrm{1 TeV}}\right)^2 \right]^{-1} \ ,
& \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! \simeq 40 \textrm{ fb} \times \left[ \left(\frac{\Lambda}{\textrm{30 GeV}}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{\Lambda_s}{\textrm{1 TeV}}\right)^2 \right]^{-1} \ ,
}
for the final signal cross section.
The diphoton excess implies a signal cross-section between $\sim$ 5--10 fb. To be concrete, a signal cross-section of $\sigma(pp\rightarrow \gamma\gamma) \simeq $ 5 fb would require hierarchical values of $\Lambda \simeq$ 80 GeV and $\Lambda_s \simeq $ 1 TeV. The higher dimension operators in \Eq{eq:DML} can thus be realized by coupling $\phi$ to vector-like quarks and leptons, with the latter substantially lighter. Note that since $\phi$ is not allowed to decay into these intermediate vector-like leptons, these states must be heavier than $\sim$ 375 GeV, which is half its mass. Therefore, to achieve small $\Lambda \lesssim 80$ GeV for order one Yukawa interaction, we need four to five copies of vector-like charged leptons to generate the signal. Some of these multiplicity factors could arise if these leptons are multiplets of $SU(2)_L$.
In Fig.~\ref{fig:fit_scalar}, the red histogram is our fit to the excesses from ATLAS and CMS, choosing $m_{\chi_1} = 769$ GeV, $m_\phi=780$ GeV, and $m_{\chi_2} = 0$ GeV for the shape, and $\Lambda\simeq80$ GeV, $\Lambda_s=1$ TeV for the normalization.\footnote{Note that in the CMS analysis, the excess is shown with both of the photons reconstructed in the barrel region of the electromagnetic calorimeter (EBEB), which covers the region of $|\eta| < 1.479$ corresponding to $|\cos\theta| < 0.901$. Based on Monte Carlo simulation with MadGraph5~\cite{Alwall:2014hca}, this will reduce the signal by a factor of 0.63 and 0.71 for the scalar and fermion cases, respectively. }
Note that in every cascade decay, two $\chi_2$ dark matter particles are created. Due to the somewhat compressed spectrum, these dark matter particles do not carry away an enormous amount of missing energy. Nevertheless, this associated signal would be an interesting secondary prediction of this model.
%Folding in the branching ratio to photons, $\Gamma(\phi \rightarrow \gamma\gamma) /\Gamma(\phi \rightarrow gg)$, then the dependence on $\Lambda_s$ cancels and we obtain
%\eq{
%\sigma(gg\rightarrow \phi )\textrm{BR}(\phi \rightarrow \gamma \gamma)&= 0.027 \textrm{ fb } \left( \frac{\textrm{1 TeV}}{\Lambda} \right)^2.
%\label{eq:sigmaBRphi}
%}
%Thus a low value of $\Lambda \sim 100$ GeV is needed to obtain a total cross-section of order a couple fb. As electroweak states at exactly this mass are disfavored by direct collider searches, such a value of $\Lambda$ requires several electrically charged states with masses above $\sim 100$ GeV.
%Let us now return to the gluon coupling to $\phi$. When it is sizable, then $\phi$ will be produced directly via gluon fusion and will also decay to gluons, depleting the branching ratio to photons. In this case, the total cross-section to diphoton in \Eq{eq:sigmaBRphi} applies. To fit the excesses from ATLAS and CMS the decay branching ratio of $\phi$ to diphoton needs to be enlarged. As indicated in Eq.~(\ref{eq:sigmaBRphi}), we need $\Lambda_s$ to be around 70 GeV. Furthermore, in order for $\phi$ not to decay into these intermediate vector-like leptons, their masses must be larger than 375 GeV. Therefore, for order one Yukawa interaction, we need five to six copies of vector-like charged leptons to generate the signal.
%In this limit we can solve for the value of $p^2$ at which $d\Gamma /dp^2$ reaches a maximum,
%\eq{
%s_{\rm max} &= \frac{3m_\phi^2}{2} \left(1-\sqrt{1-\frac{8 m_{\chi_1}^2}{9m_\phi^2} }\right),
%}
%which approaches $m_\phi^2$ when $m_{\chi_1}$ and $m_\phi$ are more degenerate.
\section{Heavy Quark and Lepton Model}
\label{sec:QL}
We now present an ultraviolet complete model for the diphoton excess which is weakly coupled and renormalizable. This model is an extension of the standard model by a real singlet scalar $\phi$ plus a vector-like quark $Q$ and a vectorlike lepton $L$, which for simplicity we take to be $SU(2)_L$ singlets. These states interact via
\eq{
{\cal L} &= y \phi (\bar q Q + \bar Q q) + k_Q \phi \bar Q Q + k_L \phi \bar L L\ .
}
We will consider when $q=b, t$ are the bottom and top quark, in which case $Q$ is effectively a heavy bottom or top partner.
As we will discuss shortly, the vector-like lepton $L$ must be electrically charged in order to produce a photon coupling to $\phi$.
The Yukawa couplings of $\phi$ to the $Q$ and $L$ radiatively generate gluon and photon couplings to $\phi$ with
\eq{
\frac{1}{\Lambda} = 3 q_Q^2\frac{k_Q}{m_Q} + q_L^2 \frac{k_{L}}{m_{L}} \quad \textrm{and} \quad \frac{1}{\Lambda_s} =\frac{k_Q}{2m_Q} \ ,
\label{Bmodel}
}
in terms of the higher dimensional operators in \Eq{eq:geniusoperator}.
In this model, $Q\bar Q$ are pair produced at the LHC and then each decays into a pair of photons or a pair of gluons plus a standard model quark $q$ at the parton level. The Feynman diagram is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:double_production}.
To fit the diphoton excesses observed by ATLAS and CMS, we require one of the $Q\bar Q$ pair to decay into photons and the other into gluons. This is necessary since the diphoton signal arises from events with exactly two hard photons.
Given a target signal cross-section $\sigma(pp\rightarrow \gamma\gamma) $, we define the product of these branching ratios to be
\eq{
r& = {\rm Br} (Q\to q \gamma\gamma) {\rm Br} (Q\to q g g)
= \frac{\sigma(pp\rightarrow \gamma\gamma)}{2\sigma (pp\to Q\bar Q)} \ .
\label{eq:rdef}
}
For $ {\rm Br} (Q\to q \gamma \gamma) \ll {\rm Br} ( Q\to q g g) $ this implies that
\eq{
r\simeq \frac{{\rm Br} (Q\to q \gamma\gamma)}{{\rm Br} ( Q\to q g g)} \ .
}
From Eqs.~(\ref{eq:Br}) and (\ref{Bmodel}), we then derive that
\begin{equation}\label{eq:vecBL}
q_L^2\frac{k_L}{m_L} \simeq \left( \sqrt{250r} - 3 q_Q^2 \right) \frac{k_Q}{m_Q} \ .
\end{equation}
%The current constraint on vector-like charged leptons from the 8 TeV LHC is $m_{Li} > 265$ GeV~\cite{Kumar:2015tna}. However, in order for $\phi$ to have a significant branching ratio to the diphoton channel, $m_{Li}$ must be above the $\phi$ decay threshold. Therefore, we have
%\begin{equation}
%m_{Li} > \frac{1}{2} m_\phi \approx 375{~\rm GeV} \ .
%\end{equation}
%Therefore, one can see that Eq.~(\ref{eq:vecBL}) can be satisfied with one more vector-like quark with the coupling $k_L$ a little bit larger than $k_B$.
Throughout, we assume a benchmark signal cross-section of $\sigma(pp\rightarrow \gamma\gamma) \simeq $ 5 fb to fit the diphoton excess.
Note that the rate of heavy quark pair production is substantially higher at 13 TeV than 8 TeV, offering a reason why a diphoton excess was not observed in the first run of the LHC~\cite{Khachatryan:2015qba, Aad:2015kqa, Aad:2015mba}.
Next, let us discuss the case when $Q$ is a bottom partner or top partner, respectively.
\begin{figure}[t]
\vspace*{0.3cm}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=.37\textwidth]{double_production.pdf}
\end{center}
\vspace*{-0.3cm}
\caption{Pair production of a vector-like quark $Q$ followed by cascade decays into $\gamma\gamma$ and $gg$, respectively, plus quarks.}
\label{fig:double_production}
\end{figure}
\medskip
\noindent {\bf Bottom Partner.} For the case $q=b$, the heavy quark $Q$ has the quantum numbers of the bottom. In this scenario, we require $m_Q \sim m_{\gamma \gamma} + m_b \sim 750\,$GeV to fit the shapes of excesses from both ATLAS and CMS, as shown in the
green histograms in Fig.~\ref{fig:fit_scalar}.
The pair production rate of 750 GeV vector-like quarks at the 13 TeV LHC is $\sigma (pp\to Q\bar Q)\simeq 260$ fb. This fixes an upper bound on the signal cross section, so from \Eq{eq:rdef}, $r\simeq 0.0096$. To produce a high enough yield of diphoton, we require that $q_L^2 {k_L}/{m_L} \sim 1.2 {k_Q}/{m_Q}$ to be satisfied according to \Eq{eq:vecBL}, which is easily accommodated in a weakly coupled model. For instance, we can take $k_Q$ to be small, thus decreasing the Yukawa coupling of $\phi$ to $Q$ and depleting the branching ratio of $\phi$ to gluons. Since the production cross-section of $\phi$ is controlled by $Q$ pair production, this will not decrease the rate of $\phi$ production in proton-proton collisions.
In this scenario, the diphoton events in the signal are always accompanied by hard jets whose invariant mass will be close $\sim$ 750 GeV. This model also predicts a subpopulation of four-photon events with each pair reconstructing a $\sim$ 750 GeV bump, possibly observable at the LHC with higher luminosity.
\medskip
\noindent {\bf Top Partner.} For the case $q=t$, the heavy quark $Q$ has the quantum numbers of the top. Here we need heavier $m_Q \sim m_{\gamma \gamma} + m_t \sim 920\,$GeV to fit the excesses so that an on-shell top can be produced.
The pair production rate of 920 GeV vector-like quarks at the 13 TeV LHC is $\sigma (pp\to Q\bar Q)\simeq 70$ fb, implying that $r\simeq 0.036$.
The observed diphoton rate requires $q_L^2 {k_L}/{m_L} \sim 1.7 {k_Q}/{m_Q}$, which is easily achievable in a weakly coupled theory.
A potential issue here is that $Q$ can in principle decay via $Q\rightarrow (t^* \rightarrow W b) \phi$ through an off-shell top quark. If $W$ can be produced on-shell then the partial width for this channel is much greater than for the desired channel, $Q \rightarrow t (\phi^*\rightarrow \gamma\gamma)$. The way around this is to forbid this kinematically by requiring $m_Q -m_\phi < m_W + m_b$ so that when $\phi$ is on-shell the residual energy is insufficient to produce an on-shell $W$ and $b$. In this case the leading decay of $Q$ via an off-shell $t$ is actually four-body via an off-shell $W$ and $t$, and thus highly suppressed. The associated decay width is roughly
\begin{eqnarray}
\Gamma(Q\to t^*\phi) &\simeq& \frac{y^2 g_2^4}{24576\pi^5} \frac{m_W^3}{m_t^2} \left(\frac{m_Q - m_\phi}{m_W}\right)^7 \nonumber \\
&\simeq& (0.02 \,\mu {\rm m})^{-1} \times y^2 \left(\frac{m_Q - m_\phi}{50\,{\rm GeV}}\right)^7 \ ,
\end{eqnarray}
where $g_2\sim 0.65$ is the $SU(2)_L$ gauge coupling. One can see that $\Gamma(Q\to t^*\phi )$ is much smaller than the decay width of the channel with $t$ on-shell as shown in Eq.~(\ref{eq:taufermion}) if we choose $m_Q - m_\phi < 50$\,GeV.
The diphoton signal produced in this case is similar to the bottom case discussed earlier. A key difference in the prediction is that here in addition to the two hard jets, one can also look for charged leptons and missing transverse energies associated with the diphoton.
%A potential issue here is that the decay to $b$ and $W$ through an off-shell top is much larger than that of $\phi$ given in Eqs.~(\ref{eq:gammagamma}) and (\ref{eq:gluongluon}), which violates the condition required by Eq.~(\ref{eq:conditionF}).
%This will make the decay $T \rightarrow t^* \phi$ via off-shell top quark and on-shell $\phi$ dominant and the diphoton resonance ends up too narrow.
\section{Conclusions}
\label{sec:conclusions}
We have presented a weakly coupled mechanism that produces a broad, tunable resonance in the diphoton invariant mass spectrum. This is implemented in theories where a three-body decay yields an off-shell state decaying to diphoton. A generic prediction of these models is associated missing energy, jets, or leptons in events contributing to the diphoton excess.
\bigskip
\noindent {\it Acknowledgements}:
H.A. is supported by the Walter Burke Institute at Caltech and by DOE Grant No.~DE-SC0011632.
C.C. is supported by a DOE Early Career Award under Grant No.~DE-SC0010255 and a Sloan Research Fellowship.
Y.Z. is supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation through Grant \#776 to the Caltech Moore Center for Theoretical Cosmology and Physics, and by the DOE Grant Nos.~DE-FG02-92ER40701 and DE-SC0010255 .
\bibliographystyle{apsrev4-1}
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\bibitem{ATLAS}
The ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS-CONF-2015-081.
\bibitem{CMS}
The CMS Collaboration, CMS PAS EXO-15-004.
\bibitem{theychaseanomaly}
%\cite{Mambrini:2015wyu}
%\bibitem{Mambrini:2015wyu}
Y.~Mambrini, G.~Arcadi and A.~Djouadi,
%``The LHC diphoton resonance and dark matter,''
arXiv:1512.04913 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.04913;%%
%69 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Harigaya:2015ezk}
%\bibitem{Harigaya:2015ezk}
K.~Harigaya and Y.~Nomura,
%``Composite Models for the 750 GeV Diphoton Excess,''
arXiv:1512.04850 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.04850;%%
%67 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Backovic:2015fnp}
%\bibitem{Backovic:2015fnp}
M.~Backovic, A.~Mariotti and D.~Redigolo,
%``Di-photon excess illuminates Dark Matter,''
arXiv:1512.04917 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.04917;%%
%65 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Franceschini:2015kwy}
%\bibitem{Franceschini:2015kwy}
R.~Franceschini {\it et al.},
%``What is the gamma gamma resonance at 750 GeV?,''
arXiv:1512.04933 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.04933;%%
%78 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{DiChiara:2015vdm}
%\bibitem{DiChiara:2015vdm}
S.~Di Chiara, L.~Marzola and M.~Raidal,
%``First interpretation of the 750 GeV di-photon resonance at the LHC,''
arXiv:1512.04939 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.04939;%%
%67 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Angelescu:2015uiz}
%\bibitem{Angelescu:2015uiz}
A.~Angelescu, A.~Djouadi and G.~Moreau,
%``Scenarii for interpretations of the LHC diphoton excess: two Higgs doublets and vector-like quarks and leptons,''
arXiv:1512.04921 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.04921;%%
%67 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Knapen:2015dap}
%\bibitem{Knapen:2015dap}
S.~Knapen, T.~Melia, M.~Papucci and K.~Zurek,
%``Rays of light from the LHC,''
arXiv:1512.04928 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.04928;%%
%63 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Pilaftsis:2015ycr}
%\bibitem{Pilaftsis:2015ycr}
A.~Pilaftsis,
%``Diphoton Signatures from Heavy Axion Decays at LHC,''
arXiv:1512.04931 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.04931;%%
%66 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Abazov:2015nnn}
%\bibitem{Abazov:2015nnn}
V.~M.~Abazov {\it et al.} [D0 Collaboration],
%``Study of double parton interactions in diphoton + dijet events in $p\bar{p}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 1.96$ TeV,''
arXiv:1512.05291 [hep-ex].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05291;%%
%\cite{Ellis:2015oso}
%\bibitem{Ellis:2015oso}
J.~Ellis, S.~A.~R.~Ellis, J.~Quevillon, V.~Sanz and T.~You,
%``On the Interpretation of a Possible $\sim 750$ GeV Particle Decaying into $\gamma \gamma$,''
arXiv:1512.05327 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05327;%%
%62 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Bellazzini:2015nxw}
%\bibitem{Bellazzini:2015nxw}
B.~Bellazzini, R.~Franceschini, F.~Sala and J.~Serra,
%``Goldstones in Diphotons,''
arXiv:1512.05330 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05330;%%
%59 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Gupta:2015zzs}
%\bibitem{Gupta:2015zzs}
R.~S.~Gupta, S.~Jäger, Y.~Kats, G.~Perez and E.~Stamou,
%``Interpreting a 750 GeV Diphoton Resonance,''
arXiv:1512.05332 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05332;%%
%57 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Molinaro:2015cwg}
%\bibitem{Molinaro:2015cwg}
E.~Molinaro, F.~Sannino and N.~Vignaroli,
%``Minimal Composite Dynamics versus Axion Origin of the Diphoton excess,''
arXiv:1512.05334 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05334;%%
%59 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Higaki:2015jag}
%\bibitem{Higaki:2015jag}
T.~Higaki, K.~S.~Jeong, N.~Kitajima and F.~Takahashi,
%``The QCD Axion from Aligned Axions and Diphoton Excess,''
arXiv:1512.05295 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05295;%%
%56 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{McDermott:2015sck}
%\bibitem{McDermott:2015sck}
S.~D.~McDermott, P.~Meade and H.~Ramani,
%``Singlet Scalar Resonances and the Diphoton Excess,''
arXiv:1512.05326 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05326;%%
%63 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Petersson:2015mkr}
%\bibitem{Petersson:2015mkr}
C.~Petersson and R.~Torre,
%``The 750 GeV diphoton excess from the goldstino superpartner,''
arXiv:1512.05333 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05333;%%
%59 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Dutta:2015wqh}
%\bibitem{Dutta:2015wqh}
B.~Dutta, Y.~Gao, T.~Ghosh, I.~Gogoladze and T.~Li,
%``Interpretation of the diphoton excess at CMS and ATLAS,''
arXiv:1512.05439 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05439;%%
%41 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Cao:2015pto}
%\bibitem{Cao:2015pto}
Q.~H.~Cao, Y.~Liu, K.~P.~Xie, B.~Yan and D.~M.~Zhang,
%``A Boost Test of Anomalous Diphoton Resonance at the LHC,''
arXiv:1512.05542 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05542;%%
%37 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Matsuzaki:2015che}
%\bibitem{Matsuzaki:2015che}
S.~Matsuzaki and K.~Yamawaki,
%``750 GeV Diphoton Signal from One-Family Walking Technipion,''
arXiv:1512.05564 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05564;%%
%40 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Kobakhidze:2015ldh}
%\bibitem{Kobakhidze:2015ldh}
A.~Kobakhidze, F.~Wang, L.~Wu, J.~M.~Yang and M.~Zhang,
%``LHC 750 GeV diphoton resonance explained as a heavy scalar in top-seesaw model,''
arXiv:1512.05585 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05585;%%
%44 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Cox:2015ckc}
%\bibitem{Cox:2015ckc}
P.~Cox, A.~D.~Medina, T.~S.~Ray and A.~Spray,
%``Diphoton Excess at 750 GeV from a Radion in the Bulk-Higgs Scenario,''
arXiv:1512.05618 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05618;%%
%45 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Ahmed:2015uqt}
%\bibitem{Ahmed:2015uqt}
A.~Ahmed, B.~M.~Dillon, B.~Grzadkowski, J.~F.~Gunion and Y.~Jiang,
%``Higgs-radion interpretation of 750 GeV di-photon excess at the LHC,''
arXiv:1512.05771 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05771;%%
%42 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Agrawal:2015dbf}
%\bibitem{Agrawal:2015dbf}
P.~Agrawal, J.~Fan, B.~Heidenreich, M.~Reece and M.~Strassler,
%``Experimental Considerations Motivated by the Diphoton Excess at the LHC,''
arXiv:1512.05775 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05775;%%
%39 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Martinez:2015kmn}
%\bibitem{Martinez:2015kmn}
R.~Martinez, F.~Ochoa and C.~F.~Sierra,
%``Diphoton decay for a $750$ GeV scalar boson in an $U(1)'$ model,''
arXiv:1512.05617 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05617;%%
%36 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{No:2015bsn}
%\bibitem{No:2015bsn}
J.~M.~No, V.~Sanz and J.~Setford,
%``See-Saw Composite Higgses at the LHC: Linking Naturalness to the $750$ GeV Di-Photon Resonance,''
arXiv:1512.05700 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05700;%%
%46 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Demidov:2015zqn}
%\bibitem{Demidov:2015zqn}
S.~V.~Demidov and D.~S.~Gorbunov,
%``On sgoldstino interpretation of the diphoton excess,''
arXiv:1512.05723 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05723;%%
%42 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Chao:2015ttq}
%\bibitem{Chao:2015ttq}
W.~Chao, R.~Huo and J.~H.~Yu,
%``The Minimal Scalar-Stealth Top Interpretation of the Diphoton Excess,''
arXiv:1512.05738 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05738;%%
%44 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Fichet:2015vvy}
%\bibitem{Fichet:2015vvy}
S.~Fichet, G.~von Gersdorff and C.~Royon,
%``Scattering Light by Light at 750 GeV at the LHC,''
arXiv:1512.05751 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05751;%%
%45 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Curtin:2015jcv}
%\bibitem{Curtin:2015jcv}
D.~Curtin and C.~B.~Verhaaren,
%``Quirky Explanations for the Diphoton Excess,''
arXiv:1512.05753 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05753;%%
%42 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Bian:2015kjt}
%\bibitem{Bian:2015kjt}
L.~Bian, N.~Chen, D.~Liu and J.~Shu,
%``A hidden confining world on the 750 GeV diphoton excess,''
arXiv:1512.05759 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05759;%%
%45 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Chakrabortty:2015hff}
%\bibitem{Chakrabortty:2015hff}
J.~Chakrabortty, A.~Choudhury, P.~Ghosh, S.~Mondal and T.~Srivastava,
%``Di-photon resonance around 750 GeV: shedding light on the theory underneath,''
arXiv:1512.05767 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05767;%%
%42 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Csaki:2015vek}
%\bibitem{Csaki:2015vek}
C.~Csaki, J.~Hubisz and J.~Terning,
%``The Minimal Model of a Diphoton Resonance: Production without Gluon Couplings,''
arXiv:1512.05776 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05776;%%
%43 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Falkowski:2015swt}
%\bibitem{Falkowski:2015swt}
A.~Falkowski, O.~Slone and T.~Volansky,
%``Phenomenology of a 750 GeV Singlet,''
arXiv:1512.05777 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05777;%%
%49 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Aloni:2015mxa}
%\bibitem{Aloni:2015mxa}
D.~Aloni, K.~Blum, A.~Dery, A.~Efrati and Y.~Nir,
%``On a possible large width 750 GeV diphoton resonance at ATLAS and CMS,''
arXiv:1512.05778 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05778;%%
%41 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Bai:2015nbs}
%\bibitem{Bai:2015nbs}
Y.~Bai, J.~Berger and R.~Lu,
%``A 750 GeV Dark Pion: Cousin of a Dark G-parity-odd WIMP,''
arXiv:1512.05779 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05779;%%
%41 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Benbrik:2015fyz}
%\bibitem{Benbrik:2015fyz}
R.~Benbrik, C.~H.~Chen and T.~Nomura,
%``Higgs singlet as a diphoton resonance in a vector-like quark model,''
arXiv:1512.06028 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06028;%%
%27 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Kim:2015ron}
%\bibitem{Kim:2015ron}
J.~S.~Kim, J.~Reuter, K.~Rolbiecki and R.~R.~de Austri,
%``A resonance without resonance: scrutinizing the diphoton excess at 750 GeV,''
arXiv:1512.06083 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06083;%%
%22 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Gabrielli:2015dhk}
%\bibitem{Gabrielli:2015dhk}
E.~Gabrielli, K.~Kannike, B.~Mele, M.~Raidal, C.~Spethmann and H.~Veermäe,
%``A SUSY Inspired Simplified Model for the 750 GeV Diphoton Excess,''
arXiv:1512.05961 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05961;%%
%26 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Alves:2015jgx}
%\bibitem{Alves:2015jgx}
A.~Alves, A.~G.~Dias and K.~Sinha,
%``The 750 GeV $S$-cion: Where else should we look for it?,''
arXiv:1512.06091 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06091;%%
%26 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Megias:2015ory}
%\bibitem{Megias:2015ory}
E.~Megias, O.~Pujolas and M.~Quiros,
%``On dilatons and the LHC diphoton excess,''
arXiv:1512.06106 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06106;%%
%27 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Carpenter:2015ucu}
%\bibitem{Carpenter:2015ucu}
L.~M.~Carpenter, R.~Colburn and J.~Goodman,
%``Supersoft SUSY Models and the 750 GeV Diphoton Excess, Beyond Effective Operators,''
arXiv:1512.06107 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06107;%%
%25 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Bernon:2015abk}
%\bibitem{Bernon:2015abk}
J.~Bernon and C.~Smith,
%``Could the width of the diphoton anomaly signal a three-body decay ?,''
arXiv:1512.06113 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06113;%%
%22 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Chao:2015nsm}
%\bibitem{Chao:2015nsm}
W.~Chao,
%``Symmetries Behind the 750 GeV Diphoton Excess,''
arXiv:1512.06297 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06297;%%
%15 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Arun:2015ubr}
%\bibitem{Arun:2015ubr}
M.~T.~Arun and P.~Saha,
%``Gravitons in multiply warped scenarios - at 750 GeV and beyond,''
arXiv:1512.06335 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06335;%%
%12 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Han:2015cty}
%\bibitem{Han:2015cty}
C.~Han, H.~M.~Lee, M.~Park and V.~Sanz,
%``The diphoton resonance as a gravity mediator of dark matter,''
arXiv:1512.06376 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06376;%%
%14 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Chang:2015bzc}
%\bibitem{Chang:2015bzc}
S.~Chang,
%``A Simple $U(1)$ Gauge Theory Explanation of the Diphoton Excess,''
arXiv:1512.06426 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06426;%%
%15 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Dhuria:2015ufo}
%\bibitem{Dhuria:2015ufo}
M.~Dhuria and G.~Goswami,
%``Perturbativity, vacuum stability and inflation in the light of 750 GeV diphoton excess,''
arXiv:1512.06782 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06782;%%
%9 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Han:2015dlp}
%\bibitem{Han:2015dlp}
H.~Han, S.~Wang and S.~Zheng,
%``Scalar Explanation of Diphoton Excess at LHC,''
arXiv:1512.06562 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06562;%%
%11 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Luo:2015yio}
%\bibitem{Luo:2015yio}
M.~x.~Luo, K.~Wang, T.~Xu, L.~Zhang and G.~Zhu,
%``Squarkonium/Diquarkonium and the Di-photon Excess,''
arXiv:1512.06670 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06670;%%
%9 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Chang:2015sdy}
%\bibitem{Chang:2015sdy}
J.~Chang, K.~Cheung and C.~T.~Lu,
%``Interpreting the 750 GeV Di-photon Resonance using photon-jets in Hidden-Valley-like models,''
arXiv:1512.06671 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06671;%%
%11 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Bardhan:2015hcr}
%\bibitem{Bardhan:2015hcr}
D.~Bardhan, D.~Bhatia, A.~Chakraborty, U.~Maitra, S.~Raychaudhuri and T.~Samui,
%``Radion Candidate for the LHC Diphoton Resonance,''
arXiv:1512.06674 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06674;%%
%12 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Feng:2015wil}
%\bibitem{Feng:2015wil}
T.~F.~Feng, X.~Q.~Li, H.~B.~Zhang and S.~M.~Zhao,
%``The LHC 750 GeV diphoton excess in supersymmetry with gauged baryon and lepton numbers,''
arXiv:1512.06696 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06696;%%
%12 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Liao:2015tow}
%\bibitem{Liao:2015tow}
W.~Liao and H.~q.~Zheng,
%``Scalar resonance at 750 GeV as composite of heavy vector-like fermions,''
arXiv:1512.06741 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06741;%%
%11 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Cho:2015nxy}
%\bibitem{Cho:2015nxy}
W.~S.~Cho, D.~Kim, K.~Kong, S.~H.~Lim, K.~T.~Matchev, J.~C.~Park and M.~Park,
%``The 750 GeV Diphoton Excess May Not Imply a 750 GeV Resonance,''
arXiv:1512.06824 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06824;%%
%14 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Barducci:2015gtd}
%\bibitem{Barducci:2015gtd}
D.~Barducci, A.~Goudelis, S.~Kulkarni and D.~Sengupta,
%``One jet to rule them all: monojet constraints and invisible decays of a 750 GeV diphoton resonance,''
arXiv:1512.06842 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06842;%%
%14 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Chakraborty:2015jvs}
%\bibitem{Chakraborty:2015jvs}
I.~Chakraborty and A.~Kundu,
%``Diphoton excess at 750 GeV: Singlet scalars confront naturalness,''
arXiv:1512.06508 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06508;%%
%11 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Ding:2015rxx}
%\bibitem{Ding:2015rxx}
R.~Ding, L.~Huang, T.~Li and B.~Zhu,
%``Interpreting $750$ GeV Diphoton Excess with R-parity Violation Supersymmetry,''
arXiv:1512.06560 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06560;%%
%13 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Han:2015qqj}
%\bibitem{Han:2015qqj}
X.~F.~Han and L.~Wang,
%``Implication of the 750 GeV diphoton resonance on two-Higgs-doublet model and its extensions with Higgs field,''
arXiv:1512.06587 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06587;%%
%17 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Antipin:2015kgh}
%\bibitem{Antipin:2015kgh}
O.~Antipin, M.~Mojaza and F.~Sannino,
%``A natural Coleman-Weinberg theory explains the diphoton excess,''
arXiv:1512.06708 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06708;%%
%14 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Wang:2015kuj}
%\bibitem{Wang:2015kuj}
F.~Wang, L.~Wu, J.~M.~Yang and M.~Zhang,
%``750 GeV Diphoton Resonance, 125 GeV Higgs and Muon g-2 Anomaly in Deflected Anomaly Mediation SUSY Breaking Scenario,''
arXiv:1512.06715 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06715;%%
%13 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Cao:2015twy}
%\bibitem{Cao:2015twy}
J.~Cao, C.~Han, L.~Shang, W.~Su, J.~M.~Yang and Y.~Zhang,
%``Interpreting the 750 GeV diphoton excess by the singlet extension of the Manohar-Wise Model,''
arXiv:1512.06728 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06728;%%
%13 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Huang:2015evq}
%\bibitem{Huang:2015evq}
F.~P.~Huang, C.~S.~Li, Z.~L.~Liu and Y.~Wang,
%``750 GeV Diphoton Excess from Cascade Decay,''
arXiv:1512.06732 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06732;%%
%12 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Heckman:2015kqk}
%\bibitem{Heckman:2015kqk}
J.~J.~Heckman,
%``750 GeV Diphotons from a D3-brane,''
arXiv:1512.06773 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06773;%%
%11 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Bi:2015uqd}
%\bibitem{Bi:2015uqd}
X.~J.~Bi, Q.~F.~Xiang, P.~F.~Yin and Z.~H.~Yu,
%``The 750 GeV diphoton excess at the LHC and dark matter constraints,''
arXiv:1512.06787 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06787;%%
%12 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Kim:2015ksf}
%\bibitem{Kim:2015ksf}
J.~S.~Kim, K.~Rolbiecki and R.~R.~de Austri,
%``Model-independent combination of diphoton constraints at 750 GeV,''
arXiv:1512.06797 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06797;%%
%13 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Berthier:2015vbb}
%\bibitem{Berthier:2015vbb}
L.~Berthier, J.~M.~Cline, W.~Shepherd and M.~Trott,
%``Effective interpretations of a diphoton excess,''
arXiv:1512.06799 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06799;%%
%13 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Cline:2015msi}
%\bibitem{Cline:2015msi}
J.~M.~Cline and Z.~Liu,
%``LHC diphotons from electroweakly pair-produced composite pseudoscalars,''
arXiv:1512.06827 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06827;%%
%11 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Bauer:2015boy}
%\bibitem{Bauer:2015boy}
M.~Bauer and M.~Neubert,
%``Flavor Anomalies, the Diphoton Excess and a Dark Matter Candidate,''
arXiv:1512.06828 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06828;%%
%16 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Chala:2015cev}
%\bibitem{Chala:2015cev}
M.~Chala, M.~Duerr, F.~Kahlhoefer and K.~Schmidt-Hoberg,
%``Tricking Landau-Yang: How to obtain the diphoton excess from a vector resonance,''
arXiv:1512.06833 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06833;%%
%10 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Boucenna:2015pav}
%\bibitem{Boucenna:2015pav}
S.~M.~Boucenna, S.~Morisi and A.~Vicente,
%``The LHC diphoton resonance from gauge symmetry,''
arXiv:1512.06878 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06878;%%
%7 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Dev:2015isx}
%\bibitem{Dev:2015isx}
P.~S.~B.~Dev and D.~Teresi,
%``Asymmetric Dark Matter in the Sun and the Diphoton Excess at the LHC,''
arXiv:1512.07243 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07243;%%
%9 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{deBlas:2015hlv}
%\bibitem{deBlas:2015hlv}
J.~de Blas, J.~Santiago and R.~Vega-Morales,
%``New vector bosons and the diphoton excess,''
arXiv:1512.07229 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07229;%%
%7 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Murphy:2015kag}
%\bibitem{Murphy:2015kag}
C.~W.~Murphy,
%``Vector Leptoquarks and the 750 GeV Diphoton Resonance at the LHC,''
arXiv:1512.06976 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06976;%%
%9 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Hernandez:2015ywg}
%\bibitem{Hernandez:2015ywg}
A.~E.~C.~Hernández and I.~Nisandzic,
%``LHC diphoton 750 GeV resonance as an indication of $SU(3)_c\times SU(3)_L\times U(1)_X$ gauge symmetry,''
arXiv:1512.07165 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07165;%%
%7 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Dey:2015bur}
%\bibitem{Dey:2015bur}
U.~K.~Dey, S.~Mohanty and G.~Tomar,
%``750 GeV resonance in the Dark Left-Right Model,''
arXiv:1512.07212 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07212;%%
%8 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Pelaggi:2015knk}
%\bibitem{Pelaggi:2015knk}
G.~M.~Pelaggi, A.~Strumia and E.~Vigiani,
%``Trinification can explain the di-photon and di-boson LHC anomalies,''
arXiv:1512.07225 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07225;%%
%8 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Belyaev:2015hgo}
%\bibitem{Belyaev:2015hgo}
A.~Belyaev, G.~Cacciapaglia, H.~Cai, T.~Flacke, A.~Parolini and H.~Serôdio,
%``Singlets in Composite Higgs Models in light of the LHC di-photon searches,''
arXiv:1512.07242 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07242;%%
%10 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Huang:2015rkj}
%\bibitem{Huang:2015rkj}
W.~C.~Huang, Y.~L.~S.~Tsai and T.~C.~Yuan,
%``Gauged Two Higgs Doublet Model confronts the LHC 750 GeV di-photon anomaly,''
arXiv:1512.07268 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07268;%%
%3 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Cao:2015xjz}
%\bibitem{Cao:2015xjz}
Q.~H.~Cao, S.~L.~Chen and P.~H.~Gu,
%``Strong CP Problem, Neutrino Masses and the 750 GeV Diphoton Resonance,''
arXiv:1512.07541 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07541;%%
%3 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Gu:2015lxj}
%\bibitem{Gu:2015lxj}
J.~Gu and Z.~Liu,
%``Running after Diphoton,''
arXiv:1512.07624 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07624;%%
%2 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Moretti:2015pbj}
%%\bibitem{Moretti:2015pbj}
S.~Moretti and K.~Yagyu,
%``The 750 GeV diphoton excess and its explanation in 2-Higgs Doublet Models with a real inert scalar multiplet,''
arXiv:1512.07462 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07462;%%
%2 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Patel:2015ulo}
%%\bibitem{Patel:2015ulo}
K.~M.~Patel and P.~Sharma,
%``Interpreting 750 GeV diphoton excess in SU(5) grand unified theory,''
arXiv:1512.07468 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07468;%%
%2 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Badziak:2015zez}
%%\bibitem{Badziak:2015zez}
M.~Badziak,
%``Interpreting the 750 GeV diphoton excess in minimal extensions of Two-Higgs-Doublet models,''
arXiv:1512.07497 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07497;%%
%2 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Chakraborty:2015gyj}
%%\bibitem{Chakraborty:2015gyj}
S.~Chakraborty, A.~Chakraborty and S.~Raychaudhuri,
%``Diphoton resonance at 750 GeV in the broken MRSSM,''
arXiv:1512.07527 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07527;%%
%3 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Altmannshofer:2015xfo}
%%\bibitem{Altmannshofer:2015xfo}
W.~Altmannshofer, J.~Galloway, S.~Gori, A.~L.~Kagan, A.~Martin and J.~Zupan,
%``On the 750 GeV di-photon excess,''
arXiv:1512.07616 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07616;%%
%4 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Cvetic:2015vit}
%%\bibitem{Cvetic:2015vit}
M.~Cveti?, J.~Halverson and P.~Langacker,
%``String Consistency, Heavy Exotics, and the $750$ GeV Diphoton Excess at the LHC,''
arXiv:1512.07622 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07622;%%
%3 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Allanach:2015ixl}
%%\bibitem{Allanach:2015ixl}
B.~C.~Allanach, P.~S.~B.~Dev, S.~A.~Renner and K.~Sakurai,
%``Di-photon Excess Explained by a Resonant Sneutrino in R-parity Violating Supersymmetry,''
arXiv:1512.07645 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07645;%%
%\cite{Davoudiasl:2015cuo}
%%\bibitem{Davoudiasl:2015cuo}
H.~Davoudiasl and C.~Zhang,
%``A 750 GeV Messenger of Dark Conformal Symmetry Breaking,''
arXiv:1512.07672 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07672;%%
%\cite{Das:2015enc}
%%\bibitem{Das:2015enc}
K.~Das and S.~K.~Rai,
%``The 750 GeV Diphoton excess in a $U(1)$ hidden symmetry model,''
arXiv:1512.07789 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07789;%%
%\cite{Cheung:2015cug}
%%\bibitem{Cheung:2015cug}
K.~Cheung, P.~Ko, J.~S.~Lee, J.~Park and P.~Y.~Tseng,
%``A Higgcision study on the 750 GeV Di-photon Resonance and 125 GeV SM Higgs boson with the Higgs-Singlet Mixing,''
arXiv:1512.07853 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07853;%%
%\cite{Craig:2015lra}
%%\bibitem{Craig:2015lra}
N.~Craig, P.~Draper, C.~Kilic and S.~Thomas,
%``How the $\gamma \gamma$ Resonance Stole Christmas,''
arXiv:1512.07733 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07733;%%
%\cite{Liu:2015yec}
%%\bibitem{Liu:2015yec}
J.~Liu, X.~P.~Wang and W.~Xue,
%``LHC diphoton excess from colorful resonances,''
arXiv:1512.07885 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07885;%%
%\cite{Zhang:2015uuo}
%%\bibitem{Zhang:2015uuo}
J.~Zhang and S.~Zhou,
%``Electroweak Vacuum Stability and Diphoton Excess at 750 GeV,''
arXiv:1512.07889 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07889;%%
%\cite{Casas:2015blx}
%%\bibitem{Casas:2015blx}
J.~A.~Casas, J.~R.~Espinosa and J.~M.~Moreno,
%``The 750 GeV Diphoton Excess as a First Light on Supersymmetry Breaking,''
arXiv:1512.07895 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07895;%%
%\cite{Hall:2015xds}
%%\bibitem{Hall:2015xds}
L.~J.~Hall, K.~Harigaya and Y.~Nomura,
%``750 GeV Diphotons: Implications for Supersymmetric Unification,''
arXiv:1512.07904 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.07904;%%
\bibitem{falkowski}
\url{http://resonaances.blogspot.com/2015/12/a-new-boson-at-750-gev.html}.
%\cite{Kumar:2015tna}
\bibitem{Kumar:2015tna}
N.~Kumar and S.~P.~Martin,
%``Vectorlike leptons at the Large Hadron Collider,''
arXiv:1510.03456 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1510.03456;%%
%3 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 23 Dec 2015
%\cite{Alwall:2014hca}
\bibitem{Alwall:2014hca}
J.~Alwall {\it et al.},
%``The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,''
JHEP {\bf 1407}, 079 (2014)
doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079
[arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079;%%
%659 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 23 Dec 2015
%\cite{Khachatryan:2015qba}
\bibitem{Khachatryan:2015qba}
V.~Khachatryan {\it et al.} [CMS Collaboration],
%``Search for diphoton resonances in the mass range from 150 to 850 GeV in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 8 TeV,''
Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 750}, 494 (2015)
doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.09.062
[arXiv:1506.02301 [hep-ex]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.09.062;%%
%34 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Aad:2015kqa}
\bibitem{Aad:2015kqa}
G.~Aad {\it et al.} [ATLAS Collaboration],
%``Search for production of vector-like quark pairs and of four top quarks in the lepton-plus-jets final state in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV with the ATLAS detector,''
JHEP {\bf 1508}, 105 (2015)
doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2015)105
[arXiv:1505.04306 [hep-ex]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2015)105;%%
%44 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
%\cite{Aad:2015mba}
\bibitem{Aad:2015mba}
G.~Aad {\it et al.} [ATLAS Collaboration],
%``Search for vectorlike $B$ quarks in events with one isolated lepton, missing transverse momentum and jets at $\sqrt{s}=$ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 91}, no. 11, 112011 (2015)
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.112011
[arXiv:1503.05425 [hep-ex]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.112011;%%
%20 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Dec 2015
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}