A classical and a relativistic law of motion for SN1987A
Extracted source text ยท arXiv 1609.02939
\documentclass[a4paper,10pt]{article}
\usepackage{graphicx,amsmath,natbib}
%\bibliographystyle{apr}
%\input riviste.tex
%journalbegin
%here the abbreviations of the journal begin
\def\aap{A\&A\, }%% Astronomy and Astrophysics
\def\aaps{A\&AS }% % Astronomy and Astrophysics, Supplement
\def\acp{Anal. Cell. Pathol. } %Analytical Cellular Pathology
\def\aj{AJ }%% The Astronomical Journal
\def\aplett{Astrophys. Lett.\, }%Astrophysics Letters
\def\apj{ApJ\, }%% Astrophysical Journal
\def\apjl{ApJ\, }%% Astrophysical Journal, Letters
\def\apjs{ApJS }%% Astrophysical Journal, Supplement
\def\apss{Astrophysics and Space Science }%Astrophysics and Space Science
\def\araa{ARA\&A }% Annual Review of Astron and Astrophys
\def\azh{AZh}% Astronomicheskii Zhurnal
\def\bain{BAN }%% Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of the Netherlands
\def\cjaa{Chinese J. Astron. Astrophys. }% Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
\def\eup{Europhys. Lett. }% Europhysics Letters
\def\fcp{Fundamentals of Cosmic Physics}% Fundamentals of Cosmic Physics
\def\iaucirc{IAU circ. }
\def\icarus{Icarus}
\def\jaa{J. Astrophys. Astr. }% (Indian) Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy Astrophysics
\def\jpc{J. Phys. C } %Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics
\def\JPG{J. Phys. G\, }%Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics
\def\jsp{J. Stat. Phys } %Journal of Statistical Physics
\def\jcap{Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physic } %Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
\def\jcp{J. Comput. Phys. } %Journal of Computational Physics
\def\jcpp{Journal of Chemical Physics }
\def\jrasc{JRASC } %journal Royal Astronomical Society Canada
\def\mnras{MNRAS\, }%% Monthly Notices of the RAS
\def\na {New Astronomy\, }%% New Astronomy
\def\nat{Nature\, }%% Nature
\def\npb{Nuc. Phys. B }%% Nuclear Physics B
\def\oe{Optic Express }% Optic Express
\def\pasj{PASJ\, }%% Publications of the ASJ
\def\solphys{Sol. Phys.\, }%% Solar Physics
\def\planss{Planet. Space Sci. }% Planetary Space Science
\def\pasp{PASP }% % Publications of the ASP
\def\pasa{PASA }% % Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
\def\POF{Physics of Fluids }
\def\physrep{Phys. Rep.\, }% % Physics Reports
\def\pla{Phys. Lett. A }%% Physics Letters A
\def\pra{Phys. Rev. A }% % Physical Review A
\def\prb{Phys. Rev. B }% % Physical Review B
\def\prc{Phys. Rev. C }% % Physical Review C
\def\prd{Phys. Rev. D }% % Physical Review D
\def\pre{Phys. Rev. E }% % Physical Review E
\def\prl{Phys. Rev. Lett. }% % Physical Review Letters
\def\physa{Phys. A }% % Physica A
\def\rmp{Rev. Mod. Phys. }% Reviews of Modern Physics
\def\rmxaa{Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica}
\def\rpp{Rep.Prog.Phys. }%%Reports on Progress in Physics
\def\sovast{Soviet Astronomy} %Soviet Astronomy
\def\za{Z. Astrophys. } %Zeitschrift f Astrophysik
\def\zap{Zeitschrift fur Astrophysik} %Zeitschrift fur Astrophysik
%here the abbreviations of the journal end
%journalend
% beginning macro of the author
\def\sn1987a{SN \,1987A\,}
\def\sun{\hbox{$\odot$}}
\DeclareRobustCommand{\orderof}{\ensuremath{\mathcal{O}}}
\def\snr{SN\,1993J~}
\def\degreezan{^{\,\circ}}
% end macro of the author
%\input riviste.tex
%journalbegin
%here the abbreviations of the journal begin
\def\aap{A\&A\, }%% Astronomy and Astrophysics
\def\aaps{A\&AS }% % Astronomy and Astrophysics, Supplement
\def\acp{Anal. Cell. Pathol. } %Analytical Cellular Pathology
\def\aj{AJ }%% The Astronomical Journal
\def\aplett{Astrophys. Lett.\, }%Astrophysics Letters
\def\apj{ApJ\, }%% Astrophysical Journal
\def\apjl{ApJ\, }%% Astrophysical Journal, Letters
\def\apjs{ApJS }%% Astrophysical Journal, Supplement
\def\apss{Astrophysics and Space Science }%Astrophysics and Space Science
\def\araa{ARA\&A }% Annual Review of Astron and Astrophys
\def\azh{AZh}% Astronomicheskii Zhurnal
\def\bain{BAN }%% Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of the Netherlands
\def\cjaa{Chinese J. Astron. Astrophys. }% Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
\def\eup{Europhys. Lett. }% Europhysics Letters
\def\fcp{Fundamentals of Cosmic Physics}% Fundamentals of Cosmic Physics
\def\iaucirc{IAU circ. }
\def\icarus{Icarus}
\def\jaa{J. Astrophys. Astr. }% (Indian) Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy Astrophysics
\def\jpc{J. Phys. C } %Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics
\def\JPG{J. Phys. G\, }%Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics
\def\jsp{J. Stat. Phys } %Journal of Statistical Physics
\def\jcap{Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physic } %Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
\def\jcp{J. Comput. Phys. } %Journal of Computational Physics
\def\jcpp{Journal of Chemical Physics }
\def\jrasc{JRASC } %journal Royal Astronomical Society Canada
\def\mnras{MNRAS\, }%% Monthly Notices of the RAS
\def\na {New Astronomy\, }%% New Astronomy
\def\nat{Nature\, }%% Nature
\def\npb{Nuc. Phys. B }%% Nuclear Physics B
\def\oe{Optic Express }% Optic Express
\def\pasj{PASJ\, }%% Publications of the ASJ
\def\solphys{Sol. Phys.\, }%% Solar Physics
\def\planss{Planet. Space Sci. }% Planetary Space Science
\def\pasp{PASP }% % Publications of the ASP
\def\pasa{PASA }% % Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
\def\POF{Physics of Fluids }
\def\physrep{Phys. Rep.\, }% % Physics Reports
\def\pla{Phys. Lett. A }%% Physics Letters A
\def\pra{Phys. Rev. A }% % Physical Review A
\def\prb{Phys. Rev. B }% % Physical Review B
\def\prc{Phys. Rev. C }% % Physical Review C
\def\prd{Phys. Rev. D }% % Physical Review D
\def\pre{Phys. Rev. E }% % Physical Review E
\def\prl{Phys. Rev. Lett. }% % Physical Review Letters
\def\physa{Phys. A }% % Physica A
\def\rmp{Rev. Mod. Phys. }% Reviews of Modern Physics
\def\rmxaa{Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica}
\def\rpp{Rep.Prog.Phys. }%%Reports on Progress in Physics
\def\sovast{Soviet Astronomy} %Soviet Astronomy
\def\za{Z. Astrophys. } %Zeitschrift f Astrophysik
\def\zap{Zeitschrift fur Astrophysik} %Zeitschrift fur Astrophysik
%here the abbreviations of the journal end
%journalend
\title
{
A classical and a relativistic law of
motion for SN1987A
}
\author{L. Zaninetti \\
Dipartimento di Fisica\\
Via Pietro Giuria 1
10125, Turin, Italy \\
\footnote{zaninetti@ph.unito.it}\hspace{0.08cm}
{Corresponding author: zaninetti@ph.unito.it}}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\begin{abstract}
In this paper we derive some first order differential
equations which model the classical and the relativistic
thin layer approximations
in the presence of a circumstellar medium with a density
which is decreasing in the distance $z$
from the equatorial
plane.
The circumstellar medium is
assumed to follow a density profile with $z$ of
hyperbolic type,
power law type,
exponential type
or Gaussian type.
The first order differential equations
are solved analytically,
or numerically, or by a series expansion,
or by
Pad\'e approximants.
The initial conditions are chosen in order to model
the temporal evolution of SN 1987A over 23 years.
The free parameters of the theory are found
by maximizing the observational reliability
which is based on an observed section of SN 1987A.
\end{abstract}
{
\bf{Keywords:}
}\\
supernovae: general
supernovae: individual (SN 1987A)
ISM : supernova remnants
\section{Introduction}
The theories of the expansion of supernovae (SN) in the
circumstellar medium (CSM) are usually built in a spherical
framework.
Unfortunately, only a few SNs present a spherical expansion, such as
\snr , see \cite{Marcaide2009,MartiVidala2011}.
The more common observed morphologies are barrel or
hourglass shapes, see \cite{Lopez2014} for a classification.
A possible classification for the asymmetries firstly identifies
the center of the explosion and then defines the radius in the
equatorial plane, $R_{eq}$,
then the radius in the downward direction, $R_{down}$,
and then the radius in the upward direction, $R_{up}$,
see \cite{Zaninetti2000}.
The above classification allows introducing a symmetry:
$R_{down}$=$R_{up}$ means that the expansion from
the equatorial plane along the two opposite
polar directions is the same.
A second symmetry can be introduced in
the framework of spherical coordinates
assuming independence from the azimuthal angle.
The theories for asymmetric SNs or late
supernova remnants (SNRs) have therefore been set up,
we select some of them.
Possible reasons for the distortion of SNRs
have been extensively
studied analytically and numerically by
\cite{Chevalier1974,Bisnovatyi-Kogan1989,Igumenshchev1992,Arthur1993,Maciejewski1999}.
Two SNRs presenting a barrel morphology were observed and
explained in \cite{Gaensler1998}.
Numerical calculations of the interaction of an SN with an
axisymmetric structure with a high density
in the equatorial plane were carried out by
\cite{Blondin1996}.
New laws of motion,
assuming that only a fraction of the mass which resides in the surrounding medium is accumulated in the
advancing thin layer, were developed
both in a classical framework in the presence of an exponential profile,
see \cite{Zaninetti2012b} or an isothermal self-gravitating disk,
see \cite{Zaninetti2013c},
and both in a relativistic framework in the presence of
an isothermal self-gravitating disk,
see \cite{Zaninetti2014c}.
We now present some maximum observed velocities in SNs:
the maximum velocity for Si II $\lambda$6355
vary in [15000,25000]\ km s$^{-1}$ according to Figure 13 in
\cite{Silverman2015}
or in [13000,24000]\ km s$^{-1}$
according to Figure 4 in \cite{Zhao2015}.
These high observed velocities demand a relativistic
treatment of the theory.
In this paper we introduce, in
Section \ref{secpreliminary},
four asymmetric density profiles,
in Section \ref{secclassical}
we derive the differential equations
which model the thin layer approximation
for an SN in the presence of four asymmetric types of medium
and a relativistic treatment is carried out in
Section \ref{secrelativistic}
for two asymmetric types of medium.
\section{Preliminaries}
\label{secpreliminary}
This section introduces
the spherical coordinates and
four density profiles with axial symmetry
for the CSM:
a hyperbolic profile,
a power law profile,
an exponential profile
and a Gaussian profile.
\subsection{Spherical coordinates}
A point in Cartesian coordinates is characterized by
$x,y$, and $z$.
The same point in spherical coordinates is characterized by
the radial distance $r \in[0,\infty]$,
the polar angle $\theta \in [0,\pi]$,
and the azimuthal angle $\varphi \in [0,2\pi]$.
Figure \ref{section_asymm} presents a section of an
asymmetric SN where there can be clearly seen
the polar angle
$\theta$ and the three
observable radii $R_{up}$, $R_{down}$, and $R_{eq}$.
% figure section_asymm
% figure section_asymm
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=7cm]{f01.eps}
\end {center}
\caption
{
Sketch for an asymmetric SN.
}
\label{section_asymm}
\end{figure*}
% figure section_asymm
% figure section_asymm
\subsection{A hyperbolic profile}
The density is assumed to have the following
dependence on $z$
in Cartesian coordinates,
\begin{equation}
\rho(z;z_0,\rho_0) =
\begin{cases}
\rho_0 & \quad \text{if } z \leq z_0\\
\rho_0 \frac{z_0}{z} & \quad \text{if } z > z_0\\
\end{cases}
\label{profhyperbolic}
\quad ,
\end{equation}
where the parameter $z_0$ fixes the scale and $\rho_0$ is the
density at $z=z_0$.
In spherical coordinates
the dependence on the polar angle is
\begin{equation}
\rho(r;\theta,z_0,\rho_0) =
\begin{cases}
\rho_0 & \quad \text{if } r \cos(\theta) \leq z_0\\
\rho_0 \frac{z_0}{r \cos(\theta)} & \quad \text{if } r \cos(\theta) > z_0\\
\end{cases}
\label{profhyperbolicr}
\quad .
\end{equation}
Given a solid angle $\Delta \Omega$
the mass $M_0$ swept
in the interval $[0,r_0]$
is
\begin{equation}
M_0 =
\frac{4}{3}\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{3} \Delta \Omega
\quad .
\end{equation}
The total mass swept, $M(r;r_0,z_0,\alpha,\theta,\rho_0) $,
in the interval $[0,r]$
is
\begin{equation}
M(r;r_0,z_0,\alpha,\theta,\rho_0)= \bigl (
\frac{4}{3}\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{3}+2\,{\frac {\rho_{{0}}{\it z_0}\,\pi
\, \left( {r}^{2}-{r_{{0}}}^{2} \right) }{\cos \left( \theta \right) }
}
\bigr) \Delta \Omega
\quad .
\label{masshyperbolic}
\end{equation}
The density $\rho_0$ can be obtained
by introducing the number density expressed in particles
$\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$,
$n_0$,
the mass of hydrogen, $m_H$,
and a multiplicative factor $f$,
which is chosen to be 1.4, see \cite{Dalgarno1987},
\begin{equation}
\rho_0 = f m_H n_0
\quad .
\end{equation}
The astrophysical version of the total swept mass,
expressed in solar mass
units, $M_{\sun}$, is therefore
\begin{equation}
M (r_{pc};z_{0,pc},n_0,\theta)\approx
\frac{0.216 \,n_{{0}}{\it z}_{{{\it 0,pc}}}{r_{{{\it pc}}}}^{2}}
{cos(\theta)}
\Delta \Omega \,M_{\sun}
\quad ,
\end{equation}
where
$z_{0,pc}$, $r_{0,pc}$ and $r_{0,pc}$
are $z_0$, $r_0$ and $r$ expressed in pc units.
\subsection{A power law profile}
The density is assumed to have the following dependence on $z$
in Cartesian coordinates:
\begin{equation}
\rho(z;z_0,\rho_0) =
\begin{cases}
\rho_0 & \quad \text{if } z \leq z_0\\
\rho_0 (\frac{z_0}{z})^{\alpha} & \quad \text{if } z > z_0\\
\end{cases}
\label{profpower}
\quad ,
\end{equation}
where $z_0$ fixes the scale.
In spherical coordinates,
the dependence on the polar angle is
\begin{equation}
\rho(r,\theta,z_0,\rho_0) =
\begin{cases}
\rho_0 & \quad \text{if } r \cos(\theta) \leq z_0\\
\rho_0 (\frac{z_0}{r \cos(\theta)})^{\alpha} & \quad \text{if } r \cos(\theta) > z_0\\
\end{cases}
\label{profpowerz}
\end{equation}
The mass $M_0$ swept
in the interval $[0,r_0]$ in a given solid angle
is
\begin{equation}
M_0 =
\frac{4}{3}\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{3} \Delta \Omega
\quad .
\end{equation}
The total mass swept,
$M(r;r_0,\alpha,\theta,\rho_0) $,
in the interval $[0,r]$
is
\begin{multline}
M (r;r_0,\alpha,z_0,\theta,\rho_0)= \\
\bigg (
\frac{4}{3}\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{3}-4\,{\frac {{r}^{3}\rho_{{0}}\pi }{
\alpha-3} \left( {\frac {{\it z_0}}{r\cos \left( \theta \right) }}
\right) ^{\alpha}}+4\,{\frac {\rho_{{0}}\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{3}}{\alpha-3
} \left( {\frac {{\it z_0}}{r_{{0}}\cos \left( \theta \right) }}
\right) ^{\alpha}}
\bigg ) \Delta \Omega
\quad .
\label{sweptmasspower}
\end{multline}
The astrophysical swept mass is
\begin{equation}
M (r_{pc};z_{0,pc},\alpha,n_0,\theta )\approx
\frac
{
0.432 \,n_{{0}}{{\it z}_{{{\it 0,pc}}}}^{\alpha}{r_{{{\it pc}
}}}^{-\alpha+3} \left( \cos \left( \theta \right) \right) ^{-\alpha}
}
{
3-\alpha
}
\Delta \Omega \,M_{\sun}
\quad .
\end{equation}
\subsection{An exponential profile}
The density is assumed to have the following
exponential dependence on $z$
in Cartesian coordinates:
\begin{equation}
\rho(z;b,\rho_0) =
\rho_0 \exp{(-z/b)}
\quad ,
\label{profexponential}
\end{equation}
where $b$ represents the scale.
In spherical coordinates,
the density is
\begin{equation}
\rho(r;r_0,b,\rho_0) =
\begin{cases}
\rho_0 & \quad \text{if } r \leq r_0\\
\rho_0 \exp{-\frac{r\cos(\theta)}{b}} & \quad \text{if } r > r_0\\
\end{cases}
\label{profexponentialr}
\end{equation}
The total mass swept, $M(r;r_0,b,\theta,\rho_0) $,
in the interval $[0,r]$ is
\begin{multline}
M (r;r_0,b,\theta,\rho_0)= \\
\frac{4}{3}\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{3}-4\,{\frac {b \left( {r}^{2} \left(
\cos \left( \theta \right) \right) ^{2}+2\,rb\cos \left( \theta
\right) +2\,{b}^{2} \right) \rho_{{0}}\pi }{ \left( \cos \left(
\theta \right) \right) ^{3}}{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r\cos \left( \theta
\right) }{b}}}}}
\\
+4\,{\frac {b \left( {r_{{0}}}^{2} \left( \cos
\left( \theta \right) \right) ^{2}+2\,r_{{0}}b\cos \left( \theta
\right) +2\,{b}^{2} \right) \rho_{{0}}\pi }{ \left( \cos \left(
\theta \right) \right) ^{3}}{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r_{{0}}\cos \left(
\theta \right) }{b}}}}}
\Delta \Omega
\quad .
\label{massexponential}
\end{multline}
The astrophysical version expressed in solar masses is
\begin{multline}
M (r;r_{0,pc},b_{pc},\theta,n_0)= \\
-\frac{1}{\left( \cos \left( \theta \right) \right) ^{3}}
\biggl(
0.288\,n_{{0}} ( - 0.5\,{{\it r}_{{{\it 0,pc}}}}^{3}
( \cos ( \theta ) ) ^{3}
+ 1.5\,{\it b_{pc}}\,{
{\rm e}^{- 1\,{\frac {r_{{{\it pc}}}\cos ( \theta ) }{{
\it b_{pc}}}}}}{r_{{{\it pc}}}}^{2} ( \cos ( \theta )
) ^{2}
\\
+ 3.0\,{{\it b_{pc}}}^{2}{{\rm e}^{- 1\,{\frac {r_{{{\it
pc}}}\cos ( \theta ) }{{\it b_{pc}}}}}}r_{{{\it pc}}}\cos
( \theta )
+ 3.0\,{{\it b_{pc}}}^{3}{{\rm e}^{- 1\,{\frac {
r_{{{\it pc}}}\cos ( \theta ) }{{\it b_{pc}}}}}}
\\
- 1.5\,{\it
b_{pc}}\,{{\rm e}^{- 1\,{\frac {{\it r}_{{{\it 0,pc}}}\cos (
\theta ) }{{\it b_{pc}}}}}}{{\it r}_{{{\it 0,pc}}}}^{2} ( \cos
( \theta ) ) ^{2}
\\
- 3.0\,{{\it b_{pc}}}^{2}{{\rm e}^{-
1\,{\frac {{\it r}_{{{\it 0,pc}}}\cos ( \theta ) }{{\it
b_{pc}}}}}}{\it r}_{{{\it 0,pc}}}\cos ( \theta ) - 3.0\,{{\it
b_{pc}}}^{3}{{\rm e}^{- 1\,{\frac {{\it r}_{{{\it 0,pc}}}\cos (
\theta ) }{{\it b_{pc}}}}}} )
\biggr )
\Delta \Omega \,M_{\sun}
\quad ,
\end{multline}
where $b_{pc}$ is the scale expressed in pc.
\subsection{A Gaussian profile}
The density is assumed to have the following Gaussian
dependence on $z$
in Cartesian coordinates:
\begin{equation}
\rho(z;b,\rho_0) =
\rho_0 {{\rm e}^{-\frac{1}{2}\,{\frac {{z}^{2}}{{b}^{2}}}}}
\quad ,
\label{profgaussian}
\end{equation}
where $b$ represents the standard deviation.
In spherical coordinates,
the density is
\begin{equation}
\rho(r;r_0,b,\rho_0) =
\begin{cases}
\rho_0 & \quad \text{if } r \leq r_0\\
\rho_0 {{\rm e}^{-\frac{1}{2}\,{\frac {{z}^{2}}{{b}^{2}}}}} & \quad \text{if } r > r_0\\
\end{cases}
\label{profgaussianr}
\quad .
\end{equation}
The total mass swept, $M(r;r_0,b,\theta,\rho_0) $,
in the interval $[0,r]$
is
\begin{multline}
M (r;r_0,b,\theta,\rho_0)=
\frac{4}{3}\,\rho0\,\pi \,{{\it r_0}}^{3}+4\,\rho0\,\pi \, \Bigl ( -{\frac {r{b}
^{2}}{ ( \cos ( \theta ) ) ^{2}}{{\rm e}^{-\frac{1}{2}
\,{\frac {{r}^{2} ( \cos ( \theta ) ) ^{2}}{{b}
^{2}}}}}}\\
+\frac{1}{2}\,{\frac {{b}^{3}\sqrt {\pi }\sqrt {2}}{ ( \cos
( \theta ) ) ^{3}}{\rm erf} (\frac{1}{2}\,{\frac {
\sqrt {2}\cos ( \theta ) r}{b}} )} \Bigr ) -4\,\rho0\,
\pi \, \Bigl ( -{\frac {{\it r_0}\,{b}^{2}}{ ( \cos ( \theta
) ) ^{2}}{{\rm e}^{-\frac{1}{2}\,{\frac {{{\it r_0}}^{2} (
\cos ( \theta ) ) ^{2}}{{b}^{2}}}}}}\\
+\frac{1}{2}\,{\frac {{b
}^{3}\sqrt {\pi }\sqrt {2}}{ ( \cos ( \theta )
) ^{3}}{\rm erf} (\frac{1}{2}\,{\frac {\sqrt {2}\cos ( \theta
) {\it r_0}}{b}} )} \Bigr )
\Delta \Omega
\quad ,
\label{massgaussian}
\end{multline}
where $\mathop{\mathrm{erf}}(x)$
is the error function, defined by
\begin{equation}
\mathop{\mathrm{erf}\/}\nolimits
(x)=\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_{0}^{x}e^{-t^{2}}dt
\quad .
\end{equation}
The previous formula expressed is solar masses is
\begin{multline}
M (r;r_{0,pc},b_{pc},\theta,n_0)= \\
\frac{1}{ ( \cos ( \theta ) ) ^{3}}
\Biggl (
- 1.024\,10^{-7}\,n_{{0}} \Bigl ( - 1.4\,10^6\,{{\it r}_{{{\it 0,pc}}}}
^{3} ( \cos ( \theta ) ) ^{3}\\
+ 4.226\,10^6\,{
{\rm e}^{- 0.5\,{\frac {{r_{{{\it pc}}}}^{2} ( \cos (
\theta ) ) ^{2}}{{{\it b_{pc}}}^{2}}}}}r_{{{\it pc}}}{{\it
b_{pc}}}^{2}\cos ( \theta ) \\
- 5.297\,10^6\,{{\it b_{pc}}}^{3}
{\rm erf} ( 0.707 \,{\frac {\cos ( \theta ) r_{{
{\it pcc}}}}{{\it b_{pc}}}} )\\
- 4.226 \,10^6 \,{{\rm e}^{- 0.5\,{\frac {{
{\it r}_{{{\it 0,pc}}}}^{2} ( \cos ( \theta )
) ^{2}}{{{\it b_{pc}}}^{2}}}}}{\it r}_{{{\it 0,pc}}}{{\it b_{pc}}}^{2
}\cos ( \theta ) \\
+ 5.297\,10^6\,{{\it b_{pc}}}^{3}{\rm erf}
( 0.707\,{\frac {\cos ( \theta ) {\it r}_{{{
\it pc}}}}{{\it b_{pc}}}} ) \Bigr )
\Biggr )
\Delta \Omega \,M_{\sun}
\quad .
\end{multline}
\section{The classical thin layer approximation}
\label{secclassical}
The conservation of the classical momentum in
spherical coordinates
along the solid angle $\Delta \Omega$
in the framework of the thin
layer approximation states that
\begin{equation}
M_0(r_0) \,v_0 = M(r)\,v
\quad ,
\end{equation}
where $M_0(r_0)$ and $M(r)$ are the swept masses at $r_0$ and $r$,
and $v_0$ and $v$ are the velocities of the thin layer at $r_0$ and $r$.
This conservation law can be expressed as a differential equation
of the first order by inserting $v=\frac{dr}{dt}$:
\begin{equation}
M(r)\, \frac{dr}{dt} - M_0\, v_0=0
\quad .
\end{equation}
The above differential equation is independent
of the azimuthal angle $\varphi$.
The 3D surface which represents the advancing shock of the SN
consists of the rotation about the $z$-axis
of the curve in the $x-z$ plane defined by
the analytical or numerical solution $r(t)$;
this is the {\it first symmetry}.
A {\it second symmetry} around the $z=0$ plane
allows building the two lobes of the advancing surface.
The orientation of the 3D surface is characterized by
the
Euler angles $(\Theta, \Phi, \Psi)$
and therefore by a total
$3 \times 3$ rotation matrix,
$E$, see \cite{Goldstein2002}.
The adopted astrophysical units are pc
for length and
yr for time;
the initial velocity $v_{{0}}$ is
expressed in
pc yr$^{-1}$.
The astronomical velocities are evaluated in
\ km s$^{-1}$
and therefore
$v_{{0}} =1.02\times10^{-6} v_{{1}}$
where $v_{{1}}$ is the initial
velocity expressed in
km s$^{-1}$.
\subsection{The case of \sn1987a}
The complex structure of \sn1987a can be classified as
a torus only, a torus plus two lobes, and a torus plus 4 lobes,
see \cite{Racusin2009}.
The region connected with the
radius of the advancing torus is here identified
with our equatorial
region,
in spherical coordinates, $\theta =\frac{\pi}{2}$.
The radius of the torus only as a function of time can be found in
Table 2 of \cite{Racusin2009} or Figure 3 of \cite{Chiad2012},
see Figure \ref{twodataeq} for a comparison of the
two different techniques.
The radius of the torus only as given by the
counting pixels method (\cite{Chiad2012})
shows a more regular behavior
and we calibrate our codes in the equatorial region
in such a way that at time
23 years the radius is $\frac{0.39}{2}$\,pc.
% figure twodataeq
% figure twodataeq
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=7cm]{f02.eps}
\end {center}
\caption
{
Observed radius of torus only as function of time:
full points as in Racusin et al. 2009
and
empty stars as in Chiad et al. 2012.
}
\label{twodataeq}
\end{figure*}
% figure twodataeq
% figure twodataeq
Another useful resource for calibration is a section
of \sn1987a
reported as a sketch in Figure 5 of \cite{France2015}.
This section
was digitized and rotated in the $x-z$ plane
by $-40\degreezan$, see Figure \ref{section_obs_sn1987a}.
% figure section_obs_sn1987a
% figure section_obs_sn1987a
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=7cm]{f03.eps}
\end {center}
\caption
{
Section of \sn1987a
in the $x-z$ plane adapted by the author from Figure 5
in \cite{France2015}.
}
\label{section_obs_sn1987a}
\end{figure*}
% figure section_obs_sn1987a
% figure section_obs_sn1987a
The above approximate section allows introducing
an observational
percentage reliability, $\epsilon_{\mathrm {obs}}$,
over the whole range
of the polar angle $\theta$,
\begin{equation}
\epsilon_{\mathrm {obs}} =100(1-\frac{\sum_j |r_{\mathrm {obs}}-r_{\mathrm{num}}|_j}{\sum_j
{r_{\mathrm {obs}}}_{,j}})
,
\label{efficiencymany}
\end{equation}
where
$r_{\mathrm{num}}$ is the theoretical radius,
$r_{\mathrm{obs}}$ is the observed radius, and
the index $j$ varies from 1 to the number of
available observations, in our case 81.
The above statistical method allows fixing the parameters
of the theory in a scientific way rather
than adopting an ``ad hoc'' hypothesis.
\subsection{Motion with an hyperbolic profile}
In the case of a hyperbolic density profile
for the CSM
as given by Eq. (\ref{profhyperbolic}),
the differential equation
which models momentum conservation
is
\begin{equation}
\left(\frac{4}{3}\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{3}+2\,{\frac {\rho_{{0}}{\it
z_0}\,\pi \, \left( -{r_{{0}}}^{2}+ \left( r \left( t \right) \right)
^{2} \right) }{\cos \left( \theta \right) }} \right) {\frac {\rm d}{
{\rm d}t}}r \left( t \right) -\frac{4}{3} \,\rho_{{0}}\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{3}v_{{0}
}=0
\quad ,
\end{equation}
where the initial conditions
are $r=r_0$ and $v=v_0$
when $t=t_0$.
The variables can be separated and
the radius as a function of the time
is
\begin{equation}
r(t;t_0,z_0,v_0)= \frac{HN}{HD}
\quad ,
\nonumber
\label{rtanalyticalhyper}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{multline}
HN=
r_{{0}}\sqrt [3]{3} ( -2\,\cos ( \theta ) \sqrt [3]{3}
r_{{0}}+ ( -9\,\cos ( \theta ) t_{{0}}v_{{0}}\sqrt {{
\it z_0}}+9\,\cos ( \theta ) tv_{{0}}\sqrt {{\it z_0}}
\\
+9\,
\cos ( \theta ) r_{{0}}\sqrt {{\it z_0}}
\\
-9\,{{\it z_0}}^{3/2}
+\sqrt {3}\sqrt {\cos ( \theta ) {\it AHN}} ) ^{2/3}+
3\,\sqrt [3]{3}{\it z_0} )
\end{multline}
with
\begin{multline}
AHN=
27\,\cos ( \theta ) {t}^{2}{v_{{0}}}^{2}{\it z_0}-54\,\cos
( \theta ) tt_{{0}}{v_{{0}}}^{2}{\it z_0}+27\,\cos (
\theta ) {t_{{0}}}^{2}{v_{{0}}}^{2}{\it z_0}
\\
+8\, ( \cos
( \theta ) ) ^{2}{r_{{0}}}^{3}
+54\,\cos (
\theta ) r_{{0}}tv_{{0}}{\it z_0}
\\
-54\,\cos ( \theta )
r_{{0}}t_{{0}}v_{{0}}{\it z_0}-9\,\cos ( \theta ) {r_{{0}}}^
{2}{\it z_0}
-54\,tv_{{0}}{{\it z_0}}^{2}+54\,t_{{0}}v_{{0}}{{\it z_0}}^{2
}
\end{multline}
and
\begin{equation}
HD =
3\,\sqrt {z_{{0}}}\sqrt [3]{{\it BHD}}
\end{equation}
with
\begin{multline}
BHD=
-9\,\cos \left( \theta \right) t_{{0}}v_{{0}}\sqrt {z_{{0}}}+9\,\cos
\left( \theta \right) tv_{{0}}\sqrt {z_{{0}}}+9\,\cos \left( \theta
\right) r_{{0}}\sqrt {z_{{0}}}
\\
-9\,{z_{{0}}}^{3/2}+\sqrt {3}\sqrt {
\cos \left( \theta \right) {\it AHN}}
\quad .
\end{multline}
The velocity as a function of the radius $r$ is
\begin{equation}
v(t)=
2\,{\frac {{r_{{0}}}^{3}v_{{0}}\cos \left( \theta \right) }{2\,{r_{{0}
}}^{3}\cos \left( \theta \right) -3\,{r_{{0}}}^{2}z_{{0}}+3\,{r}^{2}z_
{{0}}}}
\quad .
\end{equation}
Figure \ref{cut_hyper_1987a} displays a cut of \sn1987a
in the $x-z$ plane.
% figure cut_hyper_1987a
% figure cut_hyper_1987a
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=7cm]{f04.eps}
\end {center}
\caption
{
Section of \sn1987a
in the $x-z$ plane with a hyperbolic profile
(green points)
and observed profile (red stars).
The parameters
$r_0=0.06$\ pc,
$z_0=0.001$\ pc,
$t=21.86$\ yr,
$t_0 =0.1$ yr and
$v_0\,=25000$ km s$^{-1}$
give
$\epsilon_{\mathrm {obs}}=92.13\%$.
}
\label{cut_hyper_1987a}
\end{figure*}
% figure cut_hyper_1987a
% figure cut_hyper_1987a
A rotation around the
$z$-axis of the previous section allows
building a 3D surface, see
Figure \ref{3dsurfacehyper}.
% figure 3dsurfacehyper
% figure 3dsurfacehyper
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=7cm]{f05.eps}
\end {center}
\caption
{
3D surface of \sn1987a
with parameters as in Figure \ref{cut_hyper_1987a}.
The three Euler angles are $\Theta=40$, $\Phi=60$ and
$ \Psi=60 $.
}
\label{3dsurfacehyper}
\end{figure*}
% figure 3dsurfacehyper
% figure 3dsurfacehyper
\subsection{Motion with a power law profile}
In the case of a power-law density profile for the CSM
as given by Eq. (\ref{profpower}),
the differential equation
which models the momentum conservation
is
\begin{multline}
\frac{4}{3}\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{3}v_{{0}}
-\bigl (\frac{4}{3}\,\rho_{{0}}\pi
\,{r_{{0}}}^{3}-4\,{\frac { ( r ( t ) ) ^{3}
\rho_{{0}}\pi }{\alpha-3} ( {\frac {z_{{0}}}{r ( t )
\cos ( \theta ) }} ) ^{\alpha}}\\
+4\,{\frac {\rho_{{0}}
\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{3}}{\alpha-3} ( {\frac {z_{{0}}}{r_{{0}}\cos
( \theta ) }} ) ^{\alpha}} \bigr ) {\frac {\rm d}{
{\rm d}t}}r ( t ) =0
\label{eqndiffpower}
\quad .
\end{multline}
The velocity is
\begin{equation}
v(r;r_0,v_0,\theta,\alpha) =
\frac
{
-{r_{{0}}}^{3}v_{{0}} \left( \alpha-3 \right)
}
{
3\, \left( {\frac {z_{{0}}}{r\cos \left( \theta \right) }} \right) ^{
\alpha}{r}^{3}-3\, \left( {\frac {z_{{0}}}{r_{{0}}\cos \left( \theta
\right) }} \right) ^{\alpha}{r_{{0}}}^{3}-{r_{{0}}}^{3}\alpha+3\,{r_{
{0}}}^{3}
}
\quad .
\end{equation}
We now evaluate the following integral
\begin{equation}
I =\int_{r_0}^r \frac{1}{v(r;r_0,v_0,\theta,\alpha)} dr
\quad ,
\end{equation}
which is
\begin{multline}
I_p(r) =3\,{\frac {{r}^{4}}{{r_{{0}}}^{3}v_{{0}} \left( \alpha-3 \right)
\left( \alpha-4 \right) }{{\rm e}^{\alpha\,\ln \left( {\frac {z_{{0}
}}{r\cos \left( \theta \right) }} \right) }}}
\\
+3\,{\frac {r}{v_{{0}}
\left( \alpha-3 \right) } \left( {\frac {z_{{0}}}{r_{{0}}\cos \left(
\theta \right) }} \right) ^{\alpha}}+{\frac {\alpha\,r}{v_{{0}}
\left( \alpha-3 \right) }}-3\,{\frac {r}{v_{{0}} \left( \alpha-3
\right) }}
\end{multline}
The solution of the differential equation (\ref{eqndiffpower})
can be found solving numerically the following nonlinear equation
\begin{equation}
I(r)- I(r_0)= t-t_0
\quad .
\end{equation}
More precisely we used the
FORTRAN SUBROUTINE
ZBRENT from \cite{press} and
Figure \ref{cut_power_1987a} reports the numerical
solution as a cut of \sn1987a
in the $x-z$ plane.
% figure cut_power_1987a
% figure cut_power_1987a
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=7cm]{f06.eps}
\end {center}
\caption
{
Section of \sn1987a
in the $x-z$ plane with a power law profile
(green points)
and observed profile (red stars).
The parameters
$r_0=0.05$ pc,
$z_0=0.002$\ pc,
$t=21.86$\ yr,
$t_0 =0.1$\ yr,
$\alpha=1.3$,
$v_0\,=15000$ \ km s$^{-1}$
give
$\epsilon_{\mathrm {obs}}=90.76\%$.
}
\label{cut_power_1987a}
\end{figure*}
% figure cut_power_1987a
% figure cut_power_1987a
\subsection{Motion with an exponential profile}
In the case of an exponential density profile
for the CSM
as given by Eq. (\ref{profexponential}),
the differential equation
which models momentum conservation
is
\begin{multline}
\Bigl( \frac{4}{3}\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{3}-4\,{\frac {b (
( r ( t ) ) ^{2} ( \cos ( \theta
) ) ^{2}+2\,r ( t ) b\cos ( \theta
) +2\,{b}^{2} ) \rho_{{0}}\pi }{ ( \cos (
\theta ) ) ^{3}}{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r ( t )
\cos ( \theta ) }{b}}}}}
\\
+4\,{\frac {b ( {r_{{0}}}^{2}
( \cos ( \theta ) ) ^{2}+2\,r_{{0}}b\cos
( \theta ) +2\,{b}^{2} ) \rho_{{0}}\pi }{ (
\cos ( \theta ) ) ^{3}}{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r_{{0}}
\cos ( \theta ) }{b}}}}} \Bigr ) {\frac {\rm d}{{\rm d}t}}r
( t )\\
-\frac{4}{3}\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{3}v_{{0}}=0
\quad .
\label{eqndiffexp}
\end{multline}
An analytical solution does not exist
and we present the following
series solution of order 4 around $t_0$
\begin{multline}
r(t) =
r_{{0}}+ \left( t-{\it t_0} \right) v_{{0}}-3/2\,{\frac {{v_{{0}}}^{2}
\left( t-{\it t_0} \right) ^{2}}{r_{{0}}}{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r_{{0}}
\cos \left( \theta \right) }{b}}}}}
\\
+\frac{1}{2}\,{\frac {{v_{{0}}}^{3} \left(
t-{\it t_0} \right) ^{3}}{{r_{{0}}}^{2}b}{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r_{{0}}\cos
\left( \theta \right) }{b}}}} \left( 9\,{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r_{{0}}
\cos \left( \theta \right) }{b}}}}b+r_{{0}}\cos \left( \theta \right)
-2\,b \right) }
\\
+ \orderof \left ( t-t_0 \right)^4
\label{rtseriesexp}
\quad .
\end{multline}
A second approximate solution can be found by
deriving the velocity
from (\ref{eqndiffexp}):
\begin{equation}
v(r;r_0,v_0,\theta,b) =\frac{VN}{VD}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
VN= -{r_{{0}}}^{3}v_{{0}} \left( \cos \left( \theta \right) \right) ^{3}
\quad ,
\end{equation}
and
\begin{multline}
VD=
3\,{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r\cos ( \theta ) }{b}}}} ( \cos
( \theta ) ) ^{2}b{r}^{2}-3\,{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r_{
{0}}\cos ( \theta ) }{b}}}} ( \cos ( \theta
) ) ^{2}{r_{{0}}}^{2}b- ( \cos ( \theta
) ) ^{3}{r_{{0}}}^{3}
\\
+6\,{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r\cos
( \theta ) }{b}}}}\cos ( \theta ) {b}^{2}r
-6\,{
{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r_{{0}}\cos ( \theta ) }{b}}}}\cos
( \theta ) r_{{0}}{b}^{2}
\\
+6\,{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r\cos
( \theta ) }{b}}}}{b}^{3}-6\,{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r_{{0}}
\cos ( \theta ) }{b}}}}{b}^{3}
\quad .
\end{multline}
Given a function $f(r)$, the Pad\'e approximant,
after \cite{Pade1892},
is
\begin{equation}
f(r)=\frac{a_{0}+a_{1}r+\dots+a_{p}r^{p}}{b_{0}+b_{1}%
r+\dots+b_{q}r^{q}}
\quad ,
\end{equation}
where the notation is the same of \cite{NIST2010}.
The coefficients $a_i$ and $b_i$
are found through Wynn's cross rule,
see \cite{Baker1975,Baker1996}
and our choice is $p=2$ and $q=1$.
The choice of $p$ and $q$ is a compromise between
precision, high values for $p$ and $q$, and
simplicity of the expressions to manage,
low values for $p$ and $q$.
The inverse of the velocity expressed by the
the Pad\`e approximant
is
\begin{equation}
(\frac{1}{v(r)})_{2,1} = \frac{N21}{D21}
\quad .
\end{equation}
where
\begin{multline}
N21= ( r-r_{{0}} ) ( 9\,{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r_{{0}}\cos
( \theta ) }{b}}}}br-9\,{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r_{{0}}\cos
( \theta ) }{b}}}}br_{{0}}
\\+2\,\cos ( \theta ) r
r_{{0}}-2\,\cos ( \theta ) {r_{{0}}}^{2}-4\,br+10\,r_{{0}}b
)
\end{multline}
and
\begin{equation}
D21=
2\,v_{{0}} \left( \cos \left( \theta \right) rr_{{0}}-\cos \left(
\theta \right) {r_{{0}}}^{2}-2\,br+5\,r_{{0}}b \right)
\end{equation}
The above result allows deducing a solution $r_{2,1}$
expressed through the Pad\`e approximant
\begin{equation}
r(t)_{2,1} =
\frac
{
B+\sqrt {A}
}
{
9\,{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r_{{0}}\cos \left( \theta \right) }{b}}}}b+2\,r_
{{0}}\cos \left( \theta \right) -4\,b
}
\label{rtpade}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{multline}
A=
\left( \cos \left( \theta \right) \right) ^{2}{r_{{0}}}^{2}{t}^{2}{v
_{{0}}}^{2}-2\, \left( \cos \left( \theta \right) \right) ^{2}{r_{{0}
}}^{2}tt_{{0}}{v_{{0}}}^{2}+ \left( \cos \left( \theta \right)
\right) ^{2}{r_{{0}}}^{2}{t_{{0}}}^{2}{v_{{0}}}^{2}
\\
-4\,\cos \left(
\theta \right) r_{{0}}b{t}^{2}{v_{{0}}}^{2}+8\,\cos \left( \theta
\right) r_{{0}}btt_{{0}}{v_{{0}}}^{2}
-4\,\cos \left( \theta \right) r
_{{0}}b{t_{{0}}}^{2}{v_{{0}}}^{2}
\\
+54\,{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r_{{0}}\cos
\left( \theta \right) }{b}}}}r_{{0}}{b}^{2}tv_{{0}}-54\,{{\rm e}^{-{
\frac {r_{{0}}\cos \left( \theta \right) }{b}}}}r_{{0}}{b}^{2}t_{{0}}v
_{{0}}+6\,\cos \left( \theta \right) {r_{{0}}}^{2}btv_{{0}}
\\
-6\,\cos
\left( \theta \right) {r_{{0}}}^{2}bt_{{0}}v_{{0}}+4\,{b}^{2}{t}^{2}{
v_{{0}}}^{2}-8\,{b}^{2}tt_{{0}}{v_{{0}}}^{2}
+4\,{b}^{2}{t_{{0}}}^{2}{v
_{{0}}}^{2}-12\,r_{{0}}{b}^{2}tv_{{0}}
\\
+12\,r_{{0}}{b}^{2}t_{{0}}v_{{0}
}+9\,{b}^{2}{r_{{0}}}^{2}
\end{multline}
and
\begin{multline}
B=
r_{{0}}tv_{{0}}\cos \left( \theta \right) -r_{{0}}t_{{0}}v_{{0}}\cos
\left( \theta \right) +9\,{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r_{{0}}\cos \left(
\theta \right) }{b}}}}br_{{0}}+2\,\cos \left( \theta \right) {r_{{0}}}
^{2}
\\
-2\,btv_{{0}}+2\,bt_{{0}}v_{{0}}-7\,r_{{0}}b
\quad .
\end{multline}
Figure \ref{pade_exp} compares
the numerical solution,
the approximate series solution,
and the Pad\'e approximant solution.
% figure pade_exp
% figure pade_exp
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=7cm]{f07.eps}
\end {center}
\caption
{
Numerical solution (full line) ,
power series solution (dashed line)
and
Pad\'e approximant solution (dot-dash-dot-dash line),
which is nearly equal to the numerical solution.
The parameters are
$r_0=0.06$ pc,
$t=21.86$\ yr,
$t_0 =0.1$\ yr,
$b= 0.011$ pc,
$\theta=0$,
and
$v_0\,=12000 \ km s^{-1}$.
}
\label{pade_exp}
\end{figure*}
% figure pade_exp
% figure pade_exp
The above figure clearly shows the limited range of validity
of the power series solution.
The good agreement between the Pad\'e approximant solution
and numerical solution, in
Figure \ref{pade_exp}
the two solutions can not
be distinguished,
has a percentage error
\begin{equation}
\epsilon = \frac{\big | r(t) - r(t)_{2,1} \big |}
{r(t) } \times 100
\quad ,
\end{equation}
where $r(t) $ is the numerical solution
and $r(t)_{2,1}$ is the Pad\'e approximant solution.
Figure \ref{pade_effi_exp} shows
the percentage error as a function of the
polar angle $\theta$.
% figure pade_effi_exp
% figure pade_effi_exp
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=7cm]{f08.eps}
\end {center}
\caption
{
Percentage error
of the Pad\'e approximant solution compared
to the numerical solution, as a function of the
angle $\theta$ and
other parameters as in Figure \ref{pade_exp}.
}
\label{pade_effi_exp}
\end{figure*}
% figure pade_effi_exp
% figure pade_effi_exp
Figure \ref{cut_exp_1987a} shows a cut of \sn1987a
in the $x-z$ plane evaluated with the numerical solution.
% figure cut_exp_1987a
% figure cut_exp_1987a
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=7cm]{f09.eps}
\end {center}
\caption
{
Section of \sn1987a
in the $x-z$ plane with an exponential profile
(green points)
and observed profile
(red stars).
The parameters are the same as Figure \ref{pade_exp}
and
$\epsilon_{\mathrm {obs}}=90.66\%$.
}
\label{cut_exp_1987a}
\end{figure*}
% figure cut_exp_1987a
% figure cut_exp_1987a
\subsection{Motion with a Gaussian profile}
In the case of a Gaussian density profile
for the CSM
as given by Eq. (\ref{profgaussian}),
the differential equation
which models momentum conservation
is
\begin{multline}
\bigl (\frac{4}{3}\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{3}+4\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \, (
-{\frac {r ( t ) {b}^{2}}{ ( \cos ( \theta
) ) ^{2}}{{\rm e}^{-\frac{1}{2}\,{\frac { ( r ( t
) ) ^{2} ( \cos ( \theta ) ) ^{2}
}{{b}^{2}}}}}}
\\
+\frac{1}{2}\,{\frac {{b}^{3}\sqrt {\pi }\sqrt {2}}{ ( \cos
( \theta ) ) ^{3}}{\rm erf} (\frac{1}{2}\,{\frac {
\sqrt {2}\cos ( \theta ) r ( t ) }{b}} )}
)
-4\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \, ( -{\frac {r_{{0}}{b}^{2}}{ (
\cos ( \theta ) ) ^{2}}{{\rm e}^{-\frac{1}{2}\,{\frac {{r_{{0
}}}^{2} ( \cos ( \theta ) ) ^{2}}{{b}^{2}}}}}}
\\
+
\frac{1}{2}\,{\frac {{b}^{3}\sqrt {\pi }\sqrt {2}}{ ( \cos ( \theta
) ) ^{3}}{\rm erf} (\frac{1}{2}\,{\frac {\sqrt {2}\cos
( \theta ) r_{{0}}}{b}} )} ) \bigr )
{\frac
{\rm d}{{\rm d}t}}r ( t )
\\
- \frac{4}{3}\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{
3}v_{{0}}=0
\quad .
\end{multline}
An analytical solution does not exist and
Figure \ref{cut_gauss_1987a}
shows a cut of \sn1987a
in the $x-z$ plane evaluated with a numerical solution.
% figure cut_gauss_1987a
% figure cut_gauss_1987a
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=7cm]{f10.eps}
\end {center}
\caption
{
Section of \sn1987a
in the $x-z$ plane with a Gaussian profile
(green points)
and observed profile
(red stars).
The parameters
$r_0=0.07$ pc,
$t=21.86$\ yr,
$t_0 =0.1$\ yr,
$b_0= 0.018$ pc,
$v_0=13000$\ km s$^{-1}$
give
$\epsilon_{\mathrm {obs}}=90.95\%$.
}
\label{cut_gauss_1987a}
\end{figure*}
% figure cut_gauss_1987a
% figure cut_gauss_1987a
\section{The relativistic thin layer approximation}
\label{secrelativistic}
The conservation of relativistic momentum
in spherical coordinates
along the solid angle $\Delta \Omega$
in the framework of the thin
layer approximation gives
\begin{equation}
{\frac {M \left( t ;\theta\right) \beta}{\sqrt {1-{\beta}^{2}}}}
\Delta \Omega
={\frac {M_{
{0}} \left( t_{{0}} \right) \beta0}{\sqrt {1-{\beta0}^{2}}}}
\Delta \Omega
\quad .
\end{equation}
where $M_0(r_0)$ and $M(r)$ are the swept
masses at $r_0$ and $r$,
$\beta=\frac{v}{c}$ , $\beta_0=\frac{v_0}{c}$,
and $v_0$ and $v$ are the velocities of the thin
layer at $r_0$ and $r$.
We have chosen as units pc for distances and
yr as time and therefore the speed of light is
$c=0.306$\ pc\ yr$^{-1}$.
\subsection{Relativistic motion with a hyperbolic profile}
In the case of a hyperbolic density profile for the CSM
as given by Eq. (\ref{profhyperbolic}),
the differential equation
which models the momentum conservation
is
\begin{equation}
\left(\frac{4}{3}\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{3}+2\,{\frac {\rho_{{0}}{\it
z_0}\,\pi \, \left( -{r_{{0}}}^{2}+ \left( r \left( t \right) \right)
^{2} \right) }{\cos \left( \theta \right) }} \right) {\frac {\rm d}{
{\rm d}t}}r \left( t \right) -\frac{4}{3} \,\rho_{{0}}\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{3}v_{{0}
}=0
\quad ,
\end{equation}
where the initial conditions
are $r=r_0$ and $v=v_0$
when $t=t_0$.
\subsection{Relativistic motion with a hyperbolic profile}
In the case of a hyperbolic density profile for the CSM
as given by Eq. (\ref{profhyperbolic}),
the differential equation
which models the relativistic momentum conservation
is
\begin{equation}
\frac
{
2\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \, \left( 2\,{r_{{0}}}^{3}\cos \left( \theta \right)
+3\,{\it z0}\, \left( r \left( t \right) \right) ^{2}-3\,{\it z0}\,{r
_{{0}}}^{2} \right) {\frac {\rm d}{{\rm d}t}}r \left( t \right)
}
{
3\,\cos \left( \theta \right) c\sqrt {1-{\frac { \left( {\frac {\rm d}{
{\rm d}t}}r \left( t \right) \right) ^{2}}{{c}^{2}}}}
}
-
\frac
{
4\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{3}\beta_{{0}}
}
{
3\,\sqrt {1-{\beta_{{0}}}^{2}}
}
=0
\label{eqndiffrelhyper}
\quad .
\end{equation}
The velocity expressed in terms of $\beta$ can be derived
from the above equation:
\begin{equation}
\beta = \frac
{
2\,{r_{{0}}}^{3}\cos \left( \theta \right) \beta_{{0}}
}
{
D
}
\quad ,
\end{equation}
where
%siamoqui
\begin{multline}
D=
\Bigl (
12\,{r_{{0}}}^{5}{\beta_{{0}}}^{2}{\it z0}\,\cos \left( \theta
\right) -12\,{r_{{0}}}^{3}{\beta_{{0}}}^{2}{r}^{2}{\it z0}\,\cos
\left( \theta \right)
\\
+4\,{r_{{0}}}^{6} \left( \cos \left( \theta
\right) \right) ^{2}-9\,{r_{{0}}}^{4}{\beta_{{0}}}^{2}{{\it z0}}^{2} \\
+18\,{r_{{0}}}^{2}{\beta_{{0}}}^{2}{r}^{2}{{\it z0}}^{2}-9\,{\beta_{{0
}}}^{2}{r}^{4}{{\it z0}}^{2}-12\,{r_{{0}}}^{5}{\it z0}\,\cos \left(
\theta \right)
\\
+12\,{r_{{0}}}^{3}{r}^{2}{\it z0}\,\cos \left( \theta
\right)
+9\,{r_{{0}}}^{4}{{\it z0}}^{2}-18\,{r_{{0}}}^{2}{r}^{2}{{
\it z0}}^{2}+9\,{r}^{4}{{\it z0}}^{2} \Bigr )^{\frac{1}{2}}
\quad .
\end{multline}
An analytical solution
of (\ref{eqndiffrelhyper})
does not exist, but we present the following
series solution of order three around $t_0$:
\begin{equation}
r(t)=r_{{0}}+\beta_{{0}}c \left( t-{\it t0} \right) +\frac{3}{2} {\frac {{c}^{2}
\left( {\beta_{{0}}}^{2}-1 \right) z_{{0}}{\beta_{{0}}}^{2} \left( t-
{\it t0} \right) ^{2}}{{r_{{0}}}^{2}\cos \left( \theta \right) }}
+ \orderof \left ( t-t_0 \right)^3
\label{rtserieshyperrel}
\quad .
\end{equation}
Figure \ref{cut_hyper_rel_1987a} shows the numerical solution
for \sn1987a
in the $x-z$ plane.
% figure cut_hyper_rel_1987a
% figure cut_hyper_rel_1987a
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=7cm]{f11.eps}
\end {center}
\caption
{
Section of \sn1987a
in the $x-z$ plane with a hyperbolic profile: relativistic case
(green points)
and observed profile (red stars).
The parameters
$r_0=0.1$ pc,
$z_0=0.003$\ pc,
$t=21.86$\ yr,
$t_0 =0.1$ yr,
$v_0\,=78000$\ km s$^{-1}$,
and $\beta_0=0.26$
give
$\epsilon_{\mathrm {obs}}=88.68\%$.
}
\label{cut_hyper_rel_1987a}
\end{figure*}
% figure cut_hyper_rel_1987a
% figure cut_hyper_rel_1987a
\subsection{Relativistic motion with an exponential profile}
In the case of an exponential density profile for the CSM
as given by Eq. (\ref{profexponential}),
the differential equation
which models the relativistic momentum conservation
is
\begin{equation}
\frac{N\,{\frac {\rm d}{{\rm d}t}}r ( t
)}
{
3\, \left( \cos \left( \theta \right) \right) ^{3}c\sqrt {1-{\frac {
\left( {\frac {\rm d}{{\rm d}t}}r \left( t \right) \right) ^{2}}{{c}
^{2}}}}
}
-
\frac
{
4\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \,{r_{{0}}}^{3}\beta_{{0}}
}
{
3\,\sqrt {1-{\beta_{{0}}}^{2}}
}
=0
\quad ,
\end{equation}
where
\begin{multline}
N=-4\,\rho_{{0}}\pi \, \Bigl ( 3\, ( r ( t ) ) ^{2
} ( \cos ( \theta ) ) ^{2}{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r
( t ) \cos ( \theta ) }{b}}}}b- ( \cos
( \theta ) ) ^{3}{r_{{0}}}^{3}
\\
-3\, ( \cos
( \theta ) ) ^{2}{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r_{{0}}\cos
( \theta ) }{b}}}}{r_{{0}}}^{2}b
+6\,r ( t )
\cos ( \theta ) {{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r ( t ) \cos
( \theta ) }{b}}}}{b}^{2}
\\
-6\,\cos ( \theta ) {
{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r_{{0}}\cos ( \theta ) }{b}}}}r_{{0}}{b}^
{2}
-6\,{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r_{{0}}\cos ( \theta ) }{b}}}}{b}
^{3}+6\,{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r ( t ) \cos ( \theta
) }{b}}}}{b}^{3} \Bigr )
\label{eqndiffrelexp}
\quad .
\end{multline}
An analytical solution
of (\ref{eqndiffrelexp})
does not exist, so we present the following
series solution of order three around $t_0$:
\begin{multline}
r(t)=
\\
r_{{0}}+c\beta_{{0}} \left( t-{\it t0} \right) +\frac{3}{2}\,{\frac {{\beta_{{0
}}}^{2}{c}^{2} \left( {\beta_{{0}}}^{2}-1 \right) \left( t-{\it t0}
\right) ^{2}}{r_{{0}}}{{\rm e}^{-{\frac {r_{{0}}\cos \left( \theta
\right) }{b}}}}}
+ \orderof \left ( t-t_0 \right)^3
\label{rtseriesexprrel}
\quad .
\end{multline}
Figure \ref{cut_exp_rel_1987a} shows the numerical solution
for \sn1987a
in the $x-z$ plane.
% figure cut_exp_rel_1987a
% figure cut_exp_rel_1987a
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=7cm]{f12.eps}
\end {center}
\caption
{
Section of \sn1987a
in the $x-z$ plane with an exponential
profile: relativistic case
(green points)
and observed profile (red stars).
The parameters
$r_0$=0.1 pc,
$b=0.02$\ pc,
$t=21.86$\ yr,
$t_0 =0.1$~yr,
$v_0\,=70000$\ km s$^{-1}$,
and $\beta_0=0.233$
give
$\epsilon_{\mathrm {obs}}=90.23\%$.
}
\label{cut_exp_rel_1987a}
\end{figure*}
% figure cut_exp_rel_1987a
% figure cut_exp_rel_1987a
\section{Conclusions}
{\bf Type of medium:}
We have selected four density profiles, which decrease
with the distance ($z$-axis) from the equatorial plane.
The integral which evaluates the swept mass increases
in complexity according to the following
sequence of density profiles: hyperbolic,
power law,
exponential, and
Gaussian.
{\bf Classical thin layer}
The application of the thin layer approximation
with different profiles produces differential equations
of the first order.
The solution of the first order differential equation
can be analytical in the classical case characterized by a
hyperbolic density profile,
see (\ref{rtanalyticalhyper}),
and numerical in all other cases.
We also evaluated the approximation of the solution
as a power law series,
see
(\ref{rtseriesexp}),
or using the Pade approximant, see (\ref{rtpade}):
the differences between the two approximations
are outlined in Figure \ref{pade_exp}.
{\bf Relativistic thin layer}
The application of the thin layer approximation
to the relativistic case produces first order differential
equations which can be solved only numerically
or as a power series,
see
(\ref{rtseriesexprrel})
and
(\ref{rtserieshyperrel}).
{\bf The astrophysical case}
The application of the theory here developed
is connected with a clear definition of the
advancing SN's surface in 3D.
We have concentrated the analysis on \sn1987a
with the cuts of the advancing surface
in the $x-z$ plane when the $z$ axis is in front of the observer.
Another choice of the
point of view of the observer would complicate
the situation, and a comparison between theory and
observation then requires the introduction of
the three
Euler angles which characterize
the observer,
see the rotated advancing surface of \sn1987a
shown in Figure \ref{3dsurfacehyper}.
Is interesting note that
the rotation of the observed image
with the polar axis aligned with the $z$-direction
has been done for the
Homunculus
nebula,
see Figure 4 in \cite{Smith2006},
but only an approximate section
of the H-$\alpha$ imaging connected with
\sn1987a has been already reported,
see Figure 5
in \cite{France2015}.
A more precise definition of the section of \sn1987a
will help the theoretical determination of the parameters
maximizing the observational reliability,
$\epsilon_{\mathrm {obs}}$,
see \ref{efficiencymany}.
Is important note that the observational reliability
gives already an acceptable result and
$\epsilon_{\mathrm {obs}}$
lies within the interval [88\%--92\%] for the six models, four classical and two relativistic,
here analyzed.
%\bibliography{biblio}
\begin{thebibliography}{27}
\newcommand{\enquote}[1]{``#1''}
\expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
\bibitem[{{Arthur} and {Falle}(1993)}]{Arthur1993}
{Arthur}, S.~J. and {Falle}, S.~A.~E.~G. (1993), \enquote{{Supernova remnants
in plane-stratified media---Predictions for H-alpha-emitting regions},}
\textit{\mnras}, 261, 681--693.
\bibitem[{{Baker}(1975)}]{Baker1975}
{Baker}, G. (1975), \textit{Essentials of Pad{\'e} approximants}, New York:
Academic Press.
\bibitem[{{Baker} and {Graves-Morris}(1996)}]{Baker1996}
{Baker}, G.~A. and {Graves-Morris}, P.~R. (1996), \textit{Pad{\'e}
Approximants}, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
\bibitem[{{Bisnovatyi-Kogan} et~al.(1989){Bisnovatyi-Kogan}, {Blinnikov}, and
{Silich}}]{Bisnovatyi-Kogan1989}
{Bisnovatyi-Kogan}, G.~S., {Blinnikov}, S.~I., and {Silich}, S.~A. (1989),
\enquote{{Supernova remnants and expanding supershells in inhomogeneous
moving medium},} \textit{\apss}, 154, 229--246.
\bibitem[{{Blondin} et~al.(1996){Blondin}, {Lundqvist}, and
{Chevalier}}]{Blondin1996}
{Blondin}, J.~M., {Lundqvist}, P., and {Chevalier}, R.~A. (1996),
\enquote{{Axisymmetric Circumstellar Interaction in Supernovae},}
\textit{\apj}, 472, 257.
\bibitem[{{Chevalier} and {Gardner}(1974)}]{Chevalier1974}
{Chevalier}, R.~A. and {Gardner}, J. (1974), \enquote{{The Evolution of
Supernova Remnants. 11. Models of an Explosion in a Plane-Stratified
Medium},} \textit{\apj}, 192, 457--464.
\bibitem[{{Chiad} et~al.(2012){Chiad}, {Karim}, and {Ali}}]{Chiad2012}
{Chiad}, B.~T., {Karim}, L.~M., and {Ali}, L.~T. (2012), \enquote{{Study the
Radial Expansion of SN 1987A Using Counting Pixels Method},}
\textit{International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics}, 2, 199--203.
\bibitem[{{France} et~al.(2015){France}, {McCray}, {Fransson}, {Larsson},
{Frank}, {Burrows}, {Challis}, {Kirshner}, {Chevalier}, {Garnavich}, {Heng},
{Lawrence}, {Lundqvist}, {Smith}, and {Sonneborn}}]{France2015}
{France}, K., {McCray}, R., {Fransson}, C., {Larsson}, J., {Frank}, K.~A.,
{Burrows}, D.~N., {Challis}, P., {Kirshner}, R.~P., {Chevalier}, R.~A.,
{Garnavich}, P., {Heng}, K., {Lawrence}, S.~S., {Lundqvist}, P., {Smith}, N.,
and {Sonneborn}, G. (2015), \enquote{{Mapping High-velocity H{$\alpha$} and
Ly{$\alpha$} Emission from Supernova 1987A},} \textit{\apjl}, 801, L16.
\bibitem[{{Gaensler}(1998)}]{Gaensler1998}
{Gaensler}, B.~M. (1998), \enquote{{The Nature of Bilateral Supernova
Remnants},} \textit{\apj}, 493, 781--792.
\bibitem[{{Goldstein} et~al.(2002){Goldstein}, {Poole}, and
{Safko}}]{Goldstein2002}
{Goldstein}, H., {Poole}, C., and {Safko}, J. (2002), \textit{{Classical
Mechanics}}, San Francisco: Addison-Wesley.
\bibitem[{{Igumenshchev} et~al.(1992){Igumenshchev}, {Tutukov}, and
{Shustov}}]{Igumenshchev1992}
{Igumenshchev}, I.~V., {Tutukov}, A.~V., and {Shustov}, B.~M. (1992),
\enquote{{Shapes of Supernova Remnants},} \textit{\sovast}, 36, 241.
\bibitem[{{Lopez}(2014)}]{Lopez2014}
{Lopez}, L.~A. (2014), \enquote{{What Shapes Supernova Remnants?}} in
\textit{IAU Symposium}, eds. {Ray}, A. and {McCray}, R.~A., vol. 296 of
\textit{IAU Symposium}, pp. 239--244.
\bibitem[{{Maciejewski} and {Cox}(1999)}]{Maciejewski1999}
{Maciejewski}, W. and {Cox}, D.~P. (1999), \enquote{{Supernova Remnant in a
Stratified Medium: Explicit, Analytical Approximations for Adiabatic
Expansion and Radiative Cooling},} \textit{\apj}, 511, 792--797.
\bibitem[{{Marcaide} et~al.(2009){Marcaide}, {Mart{\'{\i}}-Vidal}, {Alberdi},
and {P{\'e}rez-Torres}}]{Marcaide2009}
{Marcaide}, J.~M., {Mart{\'{\i}}-Vidal}, I., {Alberdi}, A., and
{P{\'e}rez-Torres}, M.~A. (2009), \enquote{{A decade of SN 1993J: Discovery
of radio wavelength effects in the expansion rate},} \textit{\aap}, 505,
927--945.
\bibitem[{{Mart{\'{\i}}-Vidal} et~al.(2011){Mart{\'{\i}}-Vidal}, {Marcaide},
{Alberdi}, {Guirado}, {P{\'e}rez-Torres}, and {Ros}}]{MartiVidala2011}
{Mart{\'{\i}}-Vidal}, I., {Marcaide}, J.~M., {Alberdi}, A., {Guirado}, J.~C.,
{P{\'e}rez-Torres}, M.~A., and {Ros}, E. (2011), \enquote{{Radio emission of
SN1993J: The complete picture. I. Re-analysis of all the available VLBI
data},} \textit{\aap}, 526, A142+.
\bibitem[{{McCray}(1987)}]{Dalgarno1987}
{McCray}, R.~A. (1987), \enquote{{Coronal interstellar gas and supernova
remnants},} in \textit{Spectroscopy of Astrophysical Plasmas}, ed.
{A.~Dalgarno \& D.~Layzer}, Cambridge: {Cambridge University Press}, pp.
255--278.
\bibitem[{Olver et~al.(2010)Olver, Lozier, Boisvert, and Clark}]{NIST2010}
Olver, F. W. J., Lozier, D. W., Boisvert, R. F., and Clark, C. W.
(2010), \textit{{NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions}}, Cambridge:
{Cambridge University Press}.
\bibitem[{{Pad{\'e}}(1892)}]{Pade1892}
{Pad{\'e}}, H. (1892), \enquote{Sur la repr{\'e}sentation approch{\'e}e d'une
fonction par des fractions rationnelles,} \textit{Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm.
Sup.}, 9, 193.
\bibitem[{{Press} et~al.(1992){Press}, {Teukolsky}, {Vetterling}, and
{Flannery}}]{press}
{Press}, W.~H., {Teukolsky}, S.~A., {Vetterling}, W.~T., and {Flannery}, B.~P.
(1992), \textit{{Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN. The Art of Scientific
Computing}}, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
\bibitem[{{Racusin} et~al.(2009){Racusin}, {Park}, {Zhekov}, {Burrows},
{Garmire}, and {McCray}}]{Racusin2009}
{Racusin}, J.~L., {Park}, S., {Zhekov}, S., {Burrows}, D.~N., {Garmire}, G.~P.,
and {McCray}, R. (2009), \enquote{{X-ray Evolution of SNR 1987A: The Radial
Expansion},} \textit{\apj}, 703, 1752--1759.
\bibitem[{{Silverman} et~al.(2015){Silverman}, {Vink{\'o}}, {Marion},
{Wheeler}, {Barna}, {Szalai}, {Mulligan}, and {Filippenko}}]{Silverman2015}
{Silverman}, J.~M., {Vink{\'o}}, J., {Marion}, G.~H., {Wheeler}, J.~C.,
{Barna}, B., {Szalai}, T., {Mulligan}, B.~W., and {Filippenko}, A.~V. (2015),
\enquote{{High-velocity features of calcium and silicon in the spectra of
Type Ia supernovae},} \textit{\mnras}, 451, 1973--2014.
\bibitem[{{Smith}(2006)}]{Smith2006}
{Smith}, N. (2006), \enquote{{The Structure of the Homunculus. I. Shape and
Latitude Dependence from H2 and Fe II Velocity Maps of eta Carinae},}
\textit{\apj}, 644, 1151--1163.
\bibitem[{{Zaninetti}(2000)}]{Zaninetti2000}
{Zaninetti}, L. (2000), \enquote{{Large scale structures and synchrotron
emission. I. Asymmetric supernova remnants},} \textit{\aap}, 356, 1023--1030.
\bibitem[{{Zaninetti}(2012)}]{Zaninetti2012b}
--- (2012), \enquote{{On the spherical--axial transition in supernova
remnants},} \textit{Astrophysics and Space Science}, 337, 581--592.
\bibitem[{{Zaninetti}(2013)}]{Zaninetti2013c}
--- (2013), \enquote{Three dimensional evolution of SN 1987A in a
self-gravitating disk,} \textit{International Journal of Astronomy and
Astrophysics}, 3, 93--98.
\bibitem[{{Zaninetti}(2014)}]{Zaninetti2014c}
--- (2014), \enquote{{The Relativistic Three-Dimensional Evolution of SN
1987A},} \textit{International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics}, 4,
359--364.
\bibitem[{{Zhao} et~al.(2015){Zhao}, {Wang}, {Maeda}, {Sai}, {Zhang}, {Zhang},
{Huang}, {Rui}, {Zhou}, and {Mo}}]{Zhao2015}
{Zhao}, X., {Wang}, X., {Maeda}, K., {Sai}, H., {Zhang}, T., {Zhang}, J.,
{Huang}, F., {Rui}, L., {Zhou}, Q., and {Mo}, J. (2015), \enquote{{The
Silicon and Calcium High-velocity Features in Type Ia Supernovae from Early
to Maximum Phases},} \textit{\apjs}, 220, 20.
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}
\end