The lifetime of the $B_c^-$ meson and the anomalies in $B\to D^{(*)}\tau\nu$
Extracted source text · arXiv 1611.06676
\documentclass[english,aps,prd,floats,floatfix,nofootinbib,preprintnumbers]{revtex4}
\usepackage{natbib}
\usepackage{times}
\usepackage{float}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{slashed}
\usepackage[usenames]{xcolor}
\usepackage{soul} % For strikeout, using \st{Hellow world}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage[colorlinks, hyperindex]{hyperref}
\hypersetup
{
colorlinks, %
citecolor=blue, %
linkcolor=red, %
urlcolor=blue, %
}
\usepackage{doi}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\newcommand{\eL}{\epsilon_L}
\newcommand{\eR}{\epsilon_R}
\newcommand{\eS}{\epsilon_S}
\newcommand{\eP}{\epsilon_P}
\newcommand{\eT}{\epsilon_T}
\newcommand{\ket}[1]{| #1 \rangle}
\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\langle #1 |}
\def\slashp{p \!\!\! \slash}
\def\slashs{s \!\!\! \slash}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\newcommand{\rodrigo}[1]{{\color{red} #1}}
\newcommand{\ben}[1]{{\color{olive} #1}}
\newcommand{\jorge}[1]{{\color{magenta} #1}}
\begin{document}
\preprint{CERN-TH-2016-230}
\title{The lifetime of the $B_c^-$ meson and the anomalies in $B\to D^{(*)}\tau\nu$}
\author{Rodrigo Alonso$^1$, Benjam\'in Grinstein$^2$ and Jorge Martin Camalich$^1$}
\affiliation{$^1$CERN, Theoretical Physics Department, Geneva, Switzerland\\
$^2$Dept. Physics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0319, USA}
\begin{abstract}
We investigate a new constraint on new-physics interpretations of the anomalies observed in $B\to D^{(*)}\tau\nu$ decays
making use of the lifetime of the $B_c^-$ meson. A constraint is obtained by
demanding that the rate for $B_c^-\to\tau^-\bar\nu$ does not exceed the fraction of the total width that is allowed by the calculation of the lifetime in the standard model. This leads to a very strong bound on new-physics scenarios involving scalar operators since they lift the slight, but not negligible, chiral suppression of the $B_c^-\to\tau^-\bar\nu$ amplitude in the standard model. The new constraint renders a scalar interpretation of the enhancement measured in $R_{D^*}$ implausible, including explanations implementing extra Higgs doublets or certain classes of leptoquarks. We also discuss the complementarity of $R_{D^{(*)}}$ and a measurement of the longitudinal polarization of the $\tau$ in the $B\to D^*\tau\nu$ decay in light of our findings.
\end{abstract}
\maketitle
\section{Introduction}
The last decade has witnessed a very rapid development of the experimental measurement and theoretical understanding of many $B$-meson transitions. Although no observations of new particles have been reported at the LHC, some discrepancies with the predictions of the Standard Model (SM) have started to appear in semileptonic $B$ decays~\cite{Aaij:2014ora,Aaij:2015oid,Wehle:2016gfb,Lees:2012xj,Lees:2013uzd,Huschle:2015rga,Sato:2016svk,Abdesselam:2016xqt}. For instance, measurements of the charged-current $b\to c\tau\nu$ transitions turn out to be enhanced with respect to the SM. These have been measured through the lepton-universality ratios $R_{D^{(*)}} = \Gamma(B\to D^{(*)} \tau \nu)/\Gamma(B\to D^{(*)} \ell \nu)$ (henceforth $\ell$ stands for the muon or the electron) by two different experiments for the $B\to D \tau \nu$ channel, Babar~\cite{Lees:2012xj,Lees:2013uzd} and Belle~\cite{Huschle:2015rga,Sato:2016svk,Abdesselam:2016xqt}, and also by LHCb~\cite{Aaij:2015yra} for the $B\to D^{*} \tau \nu$ one. On the other hand, the theoretical predictions are very accurate as they only rely on parametrizations of the experimental spectra of the $B\to D^{(*)} \ell \nu$ decays with form factors described within the heavy-quark expansion and incorporating constraints from unitarity~\cite{deRafael:1993ib,Boyd:1995sq,Boyd:1997kz,Caprini:1997mu}.
Moreover, calculations of the relevant form factors beyond the zero-recoil limit in lattice QCD have started to appear~\cite{Lattice:2015rga,Na:2015kha,Du:2015tda}. The global significance of these anomalies currently stands at $\sim 4\sigma$ and they have been addressed in many different models of new physics (NP)~\cite{Tanaka:2012nw,Fajfer:2012vx,Becirevic:2012jf,Datta:2012qk,Duraisamy:2013kcw,Biancofiore:2013ki,Bhattacharya:2015ida,Alok:2016qyh,Feruglio:2016gvd,Faroughy:2016osc,Bardhan:2016uhr,Hou:1992sy,Tanaka:1994ay,Kiers:1997zt,Chen:2006nua,Crivellin:2012ye,Celis:2012dk,Crivellin:2013wna,Cline:2015lqp,Kim:2015zla,Crivellin:2015hha,Wang:2016ggf,Ko:2012sv,Sakaki:2013bfa,Sakaki:2014sea,Alonso:2015sja,Freytsis:2015qca,Barbieri:2015yvd,Calibbi:2015kma,Fajfer:2015ycq,Bauer:2015knc,Hati:2015awg,Sahoo:2015pzk,Zhu:2016xdg,Dumont:2016xpj,Das:2016vkr,Li:2016vvp,Bhattacharya:2016mcc,Becirevic:2016yqi,Sahoo:2016pet}.
An efficient strategy to analyse the possible NP scenarios is using a bottom-up approach in effective field theory (EFT), which starts with the most-general effective Lagrangian valid at the energy scale characteristic of the physical decay process, $\mu\sim m_B$:
\begin{multline}
\label{eq:leff1}
{\cal L}_{\rm eff}
=
- \frac{4G_F V_{cb}}{\sqrt{2}} \,
\Bigg[
\Big(1 + \epsilon_L \Big) \bar{\tau} \gamma_\mu P_L \nu_{\tau} \cdot \bar{c} \gamma^\mu P_L b+\eR \bar{\tau} \gamma_\mu P_L \nu_{\tau} \cdot \bar{c} \gamma^\mu P_R b\\
+ \epsilon_T
\, \bar{\tau} \sigma_{\mu \nu} P_L \nu_{\tau} \cdot \bar{c} \sigma^{\mu \nu} P_L b+ \epsilon_{S_L}\bar{\tau} P_L \nu_{\tau}\cdot \bar{c}P_L b+\epsilon_{S_R}\bar{\tau} P_L\nu_{\tau}\cdot\bar{c}P_R b
\Bigg]+{\rm h.c.}
\end{multline}
In the construction of this low-energy EFT (LEEFT) we have used SM particles only. Furthermore, if there is a mass gap between the NP and electroweak-symmetry breaking (EWSB) scales, as the current empirical evidence seems to suggest, then one can express the low-energy operators in terms of $SU(2)_L\times U(1)_Y$-invariant ones~\cite{Buchmuller:1985jz,Cirigliano:2009wk,Grzadkowski:2010es}. In the context of this EFT of the SM (SMEFT), it follows that, at leading order in the decoupling limit ($\sim v^2/\Lambda^2$), $\eR$ is independent of the
charged-lepton flavor~\cite{Bernard:2006gy} and it cannot explain lepton-universality violation in $R_{D^{(*)}}$~\cite{Alonso:2015sja}.\footnote{See Ref.~\cite{Cata:2015lta} for a discussion of the consequences in the EFT arising with a nonlinear realization of EWSB.}
Nonetheless, a model that has been very popular in the interpretation of these anomalies
is the two-Higgs-doublet model (2HDM)~\cite{Branco:2011iw} which adds an extra Higgs
doublet to the SM and induces effective scalar couplings $\epsilon_{S_{L,R}}$
mediated by a charged Higgs, $H^\pm$. Focusing on implementations with discrete symmetries to avoid flavour-changing neutral currents, the resulting LEEFT of Eq.~(\ref{eq:leff1}) satisfies the minimal-flavor-violation and minimal-lepton-flavor-violation hypothesis, and as a result $\epsilon_{L,R}$ are lepton-flavor invariant up to order $(m_\tau/v)^2$, while $\epsilon_{S_{L,R}}^l\propto m_l/v$ break lepton-flavor at leading order in the lepton mass. This naturally explains the characteristic flavor structure required from the interaction, coupling selectively to the heavy leptons
to explain $R_{D^{(*)}}$ and secluded from the very stringent tests of lepton universality
involving light quarks done with pion, kaon and nuclear (neutron) $\beta$ decays~\cite{Gonzalez-Alonso:2016etj}.
In fact, collider and low-energy flavor data still allow for all the Higgs bosons emerging in the 2HDM to have masses at the EWSB scale~\cite{Akeroyd:2016ymd}. If one only adds this light-Higgs
doublet to the particle content of the SM, and still assumes there is a mass gap
with respect to any other NP scale, then the resulting 2HDM EFT~\cite{Crivellin:2016ihg}
still cannot produce a non-lepton-universal coupling $\eR$ at leading order in the
decoupling limit.
Another NP solution to the anomalies that have been discussed
extensively in the literature invoke the presence of leptoquarks. As colored particles,
the leptoquarks should be produced copiously in $pp$ collisions at the LHC, which leads to
stringent lower bounds on their mass currently reaching the TeV scale. This justifies
studying their effects at lower energies by matching first the
corresponding model to the SMEFT~\cite{Alonso:2015sja}.
Thus, within these assumptions in the EFT framework (encompassing both the SMEFT and the 2HDM EFT) one has a model-independent parametrization of any possible NP contribution in the amplitudes and observables in terms of the four Wilson coefficients $\epsilon_L$, $\epsilon_{S_L}$, $\epsilon_{S_R}$ and $\epsilon_T$. In order to narrow down the \textit{shape} of the putative NP effect and discriminate among different models, new observables are necessary which have different sensitivities
to the various $\epsilon_i$. Examples that have been proposed in the literature include the polarization observables related to the $\tau$ in
the decay~\cite{Bullock:1992yt,Tanaka:1994ay,Tanaka:2010se,Abdesselam:2016xqt}, the kinematic distributions~\cite{Lees:2013uzd,Freytsis:2015qca},
in particular, in terms of the final observable decay products~\cite{Nierste:2008qe,Sakaki:2012ft,Hagiwara:2014tsa,Bordone:2016tex,Alonso:2016gym,Ligeti:2016npd} or all the very same observables appearing in the equivalent decay modes of other bottom hadrons~\cite{CiezarekLHCb}, such as $B_s$~\cite{Bhol:2014jta},
$B_c$~\cite{Lytle:2016ixw} and $\Lambda_b$~\cite{Detmold:2015aaa}.
In this work, we investigate a powerful constraint on NP that can be derived from the lifetime of the $B_c$ meson~\cite{Li:2016vvp}. This is obtained
by demanding that the total rate of the $B_c^-\to\tau^-\bar\nu$ decay does not exceed the fraction of the total width that is allowed
by the calculation of the lifetime in the SM. Since the chirally-flipped operators lift the chiral suppression that the amplitude
receives in the SM, one obtains a very strong bound on the scalar operators. We discuss how this new observation puts considerable stress on
\textit{any} ``scalar interpretation'' of $R_{D^*}$, such as those produced by the 2HDM and certain leptoquark models. Finally, we discuss the
interplay also between $R_D^{(*)}$ and the longitudinal polarization of the $\tau$ in the $B\to D^*\tau\nu$ decay in light of our findings and the recent
measurement of Belle~\cite{Abdesselam:2016xqt}.\footnote{For all the calculations related to the $B\to D^{(*)}\tau\nu$ decay modes we follow~\cite{Alonso:2016gym}.}
\section{Interplay between the $B_c$ lifetime and $R_{D^*}$}
Parity conservation of the strong interactions implies that only the hadronic form factors for
the pseudoscalar (scalar) combination $\eP=\epsilon_{S_R}-\epsilon_{S_L}$ ($\eS=\epsilon_{S_R}+\epsilon_{S_L}$) can contribute to $R_{D^*}$ ($R_D$)
mode (see for instance~\cite{Manohar:2000dt}). This immediately links the $R_{D^*}$
anomaly to the tauonic decay of the $B_c^-$, $B_c^-\to\tau^-\bar \nu$, for the latter
also receives a contribution from $\epsilon_P$ with a slight (but non-negligible) enhancement with respect to the SM produced by the chirally-flipped
nature of the scalar operators. Namely, from the effective Lagrangian in Eq.~(\ref{eq:leff1}) one obtains~\cite{Gonzalez-Alonso:2016etj}:
\begin{eqnarray}
{\rm Br}(B_c^-\to\tau\bar\nu_\tau)=\tau_{B_c^-}\,\frac{m_{B_c}m_\tau^2 f_{B_c}^2G_F^2 |V_{cb}|^2}{8\pi}\left(1-\frac{m_\tau^2}{m_{B_c}^2}\right)^2\,
\left|1+\epsilon_L+\frac{m_{B_c}^2}{m_\tau(m_b+m_c)}\eP\right|^2,
\label{eq:Bctotaunu}
\end{eqnarray}
where $f_{B_c}=434(15)$ MeV~\cite{Colquhoun:2015oha} is the $B_c$ decay constant and $m_b$ and $m_c$ are the quark masses in the $\overline{MS}$
evaluated at $\mu=2$ GeV (and so is $\eP$). Note that $\epsilon_T$ does not enter the decay as opposed to $\epsilon_R$ which does but its not included since we study lepton-universality violation.
Therefore, any experimental measurement or bound on ${\rm Br}(B_c^-\to\tau\bar\nu_\tau)$
can help constraining $\eP$, and to a lesser extent, $\eL$.
The $B_c$ enjoys high production rates at the LHC~\cite{Gouz:2002kk} and precise
measurements of the lifetime~\cite{Aaij:2014gka,Agashe:2014kda} or the branching ratios of many of its nonleptonic exclusive decay modes
are now available~\cite{Anderlini:2014dha,Dey:2016qck}. However, a measurement of the tauonic decay branching fraction, giving \textit{direct} access to the NP
operators in Eq.~(\ref{eq:Bctotaunu}), seems to be out of reach~\cite{Gouz:2002kk}. An \textit{indirect} constraint on NP can be extracted, though,
from the experimentally measured $B_c$ lifetime itself~\cite{Li:2016vvp}, whose PDG value is~\cite{Agashe:2014kda},
\begin{equation}
\tau_{B_c}=0.507(8)~\text{ ps}, \label{eq:Bc_lifetime_expt}
\end{equation}
and the fact that it should be mainly accounted for by $b$ and $c$ decays in the $B_c$ meson~\cite{Gershtein:1994jw,Bigi:1995fs}.
Indeed, the lifetime of the $B_c$ can be calculated in the SM computing the inclusive $\sum b\to c$, $\sum \bar c\to \bar s$ and annihilation decay rates
using an operator product expansion (OPE) matched to non-relativistic QCD~\cite{Bigi:1995fs,Beneke:1996xe,Chang:2000ac}, which lead to results
consistent with the experimental measurement~\cite{Beneke:1996xe},
\begin{equation}
\tau_{B_c}^{\rm OPE}=0.52^{+0.18}_{-0.12}~\text{ ps}.\label{eq:Bc_lifetime_OPE}
\end{equation}
For the central value, the width of the $B_c$, $\Gamma_{B_c}^{\rm OPE}=1/\tau_{B_c}^{\rm OPE}$, is distributed among modes induced by the partonic
transitions $\bar c\to \bar s \bar u d$ (47\%), $\bar c\to \bar s \ell \bar\nu$ (17\%), $b\to c \bar u d$ (16\%),
$b\to c \bar \nu \ell$ (8\%) and $b\to c \bar c s$ (7\%). Hence, according to this calculation, only $\lesssim5\%$ of the measured experimental width,
$\Gamma_{B_c}=1/\tau_{B_c}$, can be explained by (semi)tauonic modes, including those NP effects that would explain the $R_{D^{(*)}}$ anomalies.
Similar conclusions are derived from the other OPE
calculations~\cite{Bigi:1995fs,Chang:2000ac} as well as from those obtained using potential models~\cite{Gershtein:1994jw} or QCD sum rules~\cite{Kiselev:2000pp}
(see Ref.~\cite{Gouz:2002kk} for a comparison among the different predictions). This constraint can be relaxed up to a
$\lesssim30\%$ of $\Gamma_{B_c}$ if the longer lifetime given by the upper limit in Eq.~(\ref{eq:Bc_lifetime_OPE}) is taken as an input for the SM calculation
in the OPE.
The discussion above is immaterial for a NP scenario involving the left-handed contribution $\eL$, which explains $R_{D^{(*)}}$ by an overall
$\sim15\%$ enhancement of the SM at the amplitude level (see below) and modifies the corresponding branching fraction for $B_c^-\to \tau^-\bar \nu$ ($\sim 2\%$)
well below these limits. On the other hand, the $B_c$ lifetime becomes a very severe constraint for scenarios aiming to explain $R_{D^*}$ with pseudoscalar
contributions. Indeed, fitting the average of the experimental determinations~\cite{Amhis:2014hma},
\begin{equation}
R_{D^*}^{\rm expt}=0.316(16)(10),\label{eq:RDs_expt}
\end{equation}
to $\eP$ we find the following $1\sigma$ range,
\begin{equation}
\eP=1.48(34),\label{eq:eP_RDs}
\end{equation}
which is consistent with the fit in the very same scenario reported in~\cite{Bardhan:2016uhr} and where we have neglected another solution which
interferes destructively with the SM, $\eP\simeq-4.3$. The value in Eq.~(\ref{eq:eP_RDs}),
together with the enhancement factor $m_{B_c}^2/(m_\tau(m_b+m_c))\simeq 4$, leads to a boost of the $B_c^-\to \tau^-\bar \nu$ branching fraction
by a factor of no less than $\sim25$, that not only exceeds the limits discussed above but can also be larger than the experimental width of the $B_c$.
This is illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:BctaunuRDs} where we plot the correlation between $R_{D^*}$ and ${\rm Br}(B_c\to\tau\nu)$
in the presence of a pseudoscalar operator. The maximum value of $R_{D^*}$ that can be achieved without violating $\text{Br}(B_c\to\tau\nu)\lesssim 30\%$
is $R_{D^*}\simeq0.27$, corresponding to the value $\eP^{\rm max}=0.61$, and describing the experimental value for $R_{D^*}$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:RDs_expt})
would saturate (or even exceed) the experimental width of the $B_c$ with the rate of the tauonic decay.
The conclusion is that the $B_c$ lifetime makes highly implausible \textit{any} explanation of $R_{D^*}$ induced by $\eP$.
In fact, this type of scenario encompasses models of NP that have been popular in the interpretation of the $R_{D^{(*)}}$, such as the 2HDM~\cite{Hou:1992sy,Tanaka:1994ay,Kiers:1997zt,Chen:2006nua,Crivellin:2012ye,Celis:2012dk,Crivellin:2013wna,Cline:2015lqp,Kim:2015zla,Crivellin:2015hha,Wang:2016ggf}. In light of the constraint from the $B_c$ lifetime, any of the 2HDM interpretations of $R_{D^*}$ is ruled out, in particular those realizations of the model based on the so-called type III, with general Yukawa couplings to the different fermions~\cite{Branco:2011iw}, which can explain simultaneously $R_D$ and $R_{D^{*}}$~\cite{Crivellin:2012ye,Crivellin:2013wna,Cline:2015lqp,Kim:2015zla,Crivellin:2015hha,Wang:2016ggf} unlike the 2HDM tested by BaBar~\cite{Lees:2012xj,Lees:2013uzd} and Belle~\cite{Huschle:2015rga}. Model-building possibilities invoking leptoquarks are also subject to the bound from the lifetime of the $B_c$ meson if they generate sizable scalar operators~(see for instance ref.~\cite{Li:2016vvp} for a first discussion of this).
\begin{figure}[h]
\begin{tabular}{cc}
\includegraphics[width=74mm]{Bctaunu.jpeg}\hspace{1cm} &\includegraphics[width=78mm]{RDVPLV.jpeg}\\
\end{tabular}
\caption{\textit{Left-panel:} Correlation between $R_{D^*}$ and ${\rm Br}(B_c\to\tau\nu)$ for a pseudoscalar NP interaction (red line). The shaded areas
are the 1$\sigma$-band corresponding to the measurement of $R_{D^*}$ (vertical orange) and to the bound on the NP contribution to the
lifetime of the $B_c$ assuming that the SM accounts for the 70\% of it (gray horizontal). \textit{Right-panel:} The (black) dashed line represents the parametric
$\eT$-dependence of $R_{D^*}$ and $P_L^*$. The overlaid (red) solid line corresponds to values of $\eT$ for which $R_D$ is consistent with the experimental measurement at
$1\sigma$. The shaded areas are the 1$\sigma$-bands corresponding to current data set (orange)
and \textit{na\"ive} experimental prospects discussed in the main text (purple).
\label{fig:BctaunuRDs}}
\end{figure}
\section{Interplay between $P_L^*$ and $R_{D^{(*)}}$}
The analysis of the $B_c$ lifetime leaves only $\eL$ and $\eT$ as possible mechanisms to explain the $R_{D^*}$ anomaly. As discussed
succinctly above, the left-handed scenario leads to a \textit{universal} enhancement with respect to the SM of \textit{all} the $b\to c\tau\nu$
decay rates by the very same $\sim30\%$ that is required to simultaneously explain $R_D$ and $R_D^{*}$. Moreover, observables of a given semitauonic decay,
normalized by the corresponding total rate of the \textit{same} decay, must be insensitive to $\eL$ because the enhancements cancel in the ratio.
The tensor (and scalar) contribution,
on the other hand, has a different structure that is manifest not only in the total rate but also in the kinematic distributions of
the decay~\cite{Tanaka:2012nw,Biancofiore:2013ki,Bhattacharya:2015ida,Alonso:2016gym,Gonzalez-Alonso:2016etj}. Therefore, normalized observables together with
$R_{D^{(*)}}$ can discriminate between the two NP scenarios.
To illustrate our argument let us start by fitting the tensor contribution to $R_{D^{*}}^{\rm expt}$ together with the experimental average of $R_D$~\cite{Amhis:2014hma},
\begin{equation}
R_D^{\rm expt}=0.397(40)(28).
\end{equation}
Adding the statistical and systematic error of the experimental results in quadratures and taking into account their relative negative
correlation, $\rho=-0.21$~\cite{Amhis:2014hma}, we find the solution
\begin{equation}
\eT=0.377(12). \label{eq:eT_RDs}
\end{equation}
with a $\chi^2=1.49$. In contrast, in the left-handed scenario we find $\eL=0.13(3)$ at the minimum $\chi^2=0.013$.
One example of the normalized observables defined above is the longitudinal polarization of the $\tau$ in the decay, which is defined as~\cite{Tanaka:1994ay},
\begin{equation}
d P_L^{(*)}=\frac{d\Gamma_+-d\Gamma_-}{d\Gamma_++d\Gamma_-},\label{eq:LongPoltau_def}
\end{equation}
where $d\Gamma_\pm$ denotes generically a differential decay rate (e.g. in $q^2$) of $B\to D^{(*)}\tau\nu$ and with
the helicity of the $\tau$ being $\lambda_\tau=\pm$. The longitudinal polarization can be measured using the kinematic distributions
of the detected decay products of the $\tau$ as polarimeters~\cite{Bullock:1992yt,Tanaka:2010se} and a very first measurement of the
integrated longitudinal polarization for the $BD^*$ channel, $P_L^*$, has been reported using the $\tau\to\pi\nu$ and $\tau\to\rho\nu$ modes in the full Belle
dataset~\cite{Abdesselam:2016xqt},
\begin{equation}
P_L^{*,{\rm expt}}=-0.44(47)^{+0.20}_{-0.17},\label{eq:PLs_expt}
\end{equation}
which is consistent with the SM prediction, $P_L^{*,{\rm SM}}=-0.504(24)$. Using the result of the fit obtained in Eq.~(\ref{eq:eT_RDs}),
we obtain,
\begin{equation}
P_L^{*}=0.190(10).\label{eq:PLs_tens}
\end{equation}
This prediction of the tensor scenario leads to a $P_L^*$ with the opposite sign compared to the SM and stands at about $1\sigma$ from the experimental measurement
in Eq.~(\ref{eq:PLs_expt}). To be more quantitative, we can add
$P_L^*$ to the fit of $\eT$ to the experimental averages of $R_{D^{(*)}}$ performed above. Assuming no further correlation an adding the errors in Eq.~(\ref{eq:PLs_expt})
in quadratures,
the position of the minima in Eq.~(\ref{eq:eT_RDs}) does not change and the $\chi^2$ increases to $\sim3$. This suggests that the tensor scenario is disfavored
with respect to the left-handed one, although more precise measurements of $P_L^*$ (or other normalized observables) would be essential to confirm or refute
this conclusion with a higher statistic significance. This is illustrated on the right-hand panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:BctaunuRDs}, where we display the
correlation between $R_{D^*}$ and $P_L^*$ as parametric functions of $\eT$ compared to the current experimental measurements. We also show prospects
estimated naively assuming an order-of-magnitude increase in statistics and improving the systematics by a factor of two.
We end the discussion by pointing out a caveat in our latter conclusions. The tension between the ``tensor interpretation'' of the anomalies and data can
be relaxed if one adds the coefficient $\eS$, which exclusively contributes to the $B\to D\tau\nu$ channel, to the fit. One can, indeed, see that
in this case $R_{D^*}$ can be explained by a small negative value of $\eT$ that interferes constructively with the SM in the $B\to D^*\tau\nu$ channel and does not contribute
to $P_L^*$ significantly. This solution interferes destructively in the $B\to D\tau\nu$ channel, producing a deficit in $R_D$ that needs a moderate
value of $\eS$ to make it consistent with the experimental value. The effect of this combined $\eT$-$\eS$ scenario is represented by the dashed-line
that developes to the right of the SM in the right panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:BctaunuRDs}. It can be distinguished from the other scenarios above efficiently
only by looking for the effects of $\eS$ in normalized observables of the $B\to D\tau\nu$ channel such as $P_L$.
\section{Conclusions}
We have discussed a powerful constraint on possible new-physics interpretations of the $R_{D^{(*)}}$ anomalies that
is derived from the lifetime of the $B_c$ meson. This is obtained by demanding that the contribution rate of the $B_c\to\tau \nu$ decay channel does not
exceed the fraction of the total width that is allowed by the calculation of the lifetime in the Standard Model. This leads to a very strong bound on
scenarios manifest at low energies as 4-fermion scalar contact operators, since they lift the slight (but not negligible) chiral suppression of the
$B_c^-\to\tau^-\bar\nu$ amplitude in the Standard Model. The new constraint is sufficient to rule out, model-independently, explanations of the
enhancement in $R_{D^*}$ based on scalar operators because the $B\to D^*\tau \nu$ decay amplitude depends on exactly the same pseudoscalar combination
of the corresponding Wilson coefficients as the one contributing to the pure tauonic $B_c$ decay. Popular new-physics models implementing extra
Higgs doublets or certain classes of leptoquarks enter into this category. Updated calculations of the $B_c$ lifetime in QCD and measurements of the branching fractions of its decay channels at the LHC should refine the bound in the future.
Taking into account the constraint of the lifetime of the $B_c$ meson simplifies the new-physics analyses of the $R_{D^{(*)}}$ anomaly. For instance,
only two effective operators, left-handed or tensorial, remain at low energies to account for the enhancement in $R_{D^*}$. We argued that the precise
measurement of normalized observables, such as the longitudinal polarizations, could become instrumental to distinguish between the different scenarios.
\section{Acknowledgments}
This work was supported in part by the US Department of Energy under grant DE-SC0009919.
\bibliographystyle{kp}
%\bibliographystyle{plainurl}
\bibliography{BtoDtaunu.bib}
\end{document}
\begingroup\raggedright\begin{thebibliography}{91}
\expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
\bibitem[Aaij et~al.(2014)]{Aaij:2014ora}
{\bfseries LHCb collaboration} Collaboration, R.~Aaij {\em et~al.}, ``{Test of
lepton universality using $B^{+}\rightarrow K^{+}\ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ decays}'',
{\em Phys.Rev.Lett.} {\bfseries 113} (2014), no.~15, 151601,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1406.6482}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1406.6482}}.
%\%CITATION = ARXIV:1406.6482;\%\%.
\bibitem[Aaij et~al.(2016)]{Aaij:2015oid}
{\bfseries LHCb} Collaboration, R.~Aaij {\em et~al.}, ``{Angular analysis of
the $B^{0} \to K^{*0} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$ decay using 3 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated
luminosity}'', {\em JHEP} {\bfseries 02} (2016) 104,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1512.04442}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1512.04442}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.04442;%%.
\bibitem[Wehle(2016)]{Wehle:2016gfb}
S.~Wehle, ``{Angular Analysis of $B \to K^\ast \ell\ell$ and Search for $B^+\to
K^+ \tau \tau$ at the Belle Experiment}'', PhD thesis, Hamburg,
2016.
\newblock
%%CITATION = DESY-THESIS-2016-025;%%.
\bibitem[Lees et~al.(2012)]{Lees:2012xj}
{\bfseries BaBar} Collaboration, J.~P. Lees {\em et~al.}, ``{Evidence for an
excess of $\bar{B} \to D^{(*)} \tau^-\bar{\nu}_\tau$ decays}'', {\em Phys.
Rev. Lett.} {\bfseries 109} (2012) 101802,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1205.5442}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1205.5442}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1205.5442;%%.
\bibitem[Lees et~al.(2013)]{Lees:2013uzd}
{\bfseries BaBar} Collaboration, J.~P. Lees {\em et~al.}, ``{Measurement of an
Excess of $\bar{B} \to D^{(*)}\tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau$ Decays and Implications
for Charged Higgs Bosons}'', {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D88} (2013), no.~7,
072012,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1303.0571}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1303.0571}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1303.0571;%%.
\bibitem[Huschle et~al.(2015)]{Huschle:2015rga}
{\bfseries Belle} Collaboration, M.~Huschle {\em et~al.}, ``{Measurement of the
branching ratio of $\bar{B} \to D^{(\ast)} \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau$ relative to
$\bar{B} \to D^{(\ast)} \ell^- \bar{\nu}_\ell$ decays with hadronic tagging
at Belle}'', {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D92} (2015), no.~7, 072014,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1507.03233}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1507.03233}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1507.03233;%%.
\bibitem[Sato et~al.(2016)]{Sato:2016svk}
{\bfseries Belle} Collaboration, Y.~Sato {\em et~al.}, ``{Measurement of the
branching ratio of $\bar{B}^0 \rightarrow D^{*+} \tau^- \bar{\nu}_{\tau}$
relative to $\bar{B}^0 \rightarrow D^{*+} \ell^- \bar{\nu}_{\ell}$ decays
with a semileptonic tagging method}'',
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1607.07923}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1607.07923}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1607.07923;%%.
\bibitem[Abdesselam et~al.(2016)]{Abdesselam:2016xqt}
A.~Abdesselam {\em et~al.}, ``{Measurement of the $\tau$ lepton polarization in
the decay ${\bar B} \rightarrow D^* \tau^- {\bar \nu_{\tau}}$}'',
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1608.06391}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1608.06391}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1608.06391;%%.
\bibitem[Aaij et~al.(2015)]{Aaij:2015yra}
{\bfseries LHCb} Collaboration, R.~Aaij {\em et~al.}, ``{Measurement of the
ratio of branching fractions $\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}^0 \to
D^{*+}\tau^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\tau})/\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}^0 \to
D^{*+}\mu^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\mu})$}'', {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bfseries 115}
(2015), no.~11, 111803, \href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1506.08614}{{\ttfamily
arXiv:1506.08614}},
[Addendum: Phys. Rev. Lett.115,no.15,159901(2015)].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1506.08614;%%.
\bibitem[de~Rafael and Taron(1994)]{deRafael:1993ib}
E.~de~Rafael and J.~Taron, ``{Analyticity properties and unitarity constraints
of heavy meson form-factors}'', {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D50} (1994)
373--380,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9306214}{{\ttfamily
arXiv:hep-ph/9306214}}.
%%CITATION = HEP-PH/9306214;%%.
\bibitem[Boyd et~al.(1996)Boyd, Grinstein, and Lebed]{Boyd:1995sq}
C.~G. Boyd, B.~Grinstein, and R.~F. Lebed, ``{Model independent determinations
of anti-B ---> D (lepton), D* (lepton) anti-neutrino form-factors}'', {\em
Nucl. Phys.} {\bfseries B461} (1996) 493--511,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9508211}{{\ttfamily
arXiv:hep-ph/9508211}}.
%%CITATION = HEP-PH/9508211;%%.
\bibitem[Boyd et~al.(1997)Boyd, Grinstein, and Lebed]{Boyd:1997kz}
C.~G. Boyd, B.~Grinstein, and R.~F. Lebed, ``{Precision corrections to
dispersive bounds on form-factors}'', {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D56} (1997)
6895--6911,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9705252}{{\ttfamily
arXiv:hep-ph/9705252}}.
%%CITATION = HEP-PH/9705252;%%.
\bibitem[Caprini et~al.(1998)Caprini, Lellouch, and Neubert]{Caprini:1997mu}
I.~Caprini, L.~Lellouch, and M.~Neubert, ``{Dispersive bounds on the shape of
anti-B ---> D(*) lepton anti-neutrino form-factors}'', {\em Nucl. Phys.}
{\bfseries B530} (1998) 153--181,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9712417}{{\ttfamily
arXiv:hep-ph/9712417}}.
%%CITATION = HEP-PH/9712417;%%.
\bibitem[Bailey et~al.(2015)]{Lattice:2015rga}
{\bfseries MILC} Collaboration, J.~A. Bailey {\em et~al.}, ``{$B\to D\ell\nu$
form factors at nonzero recoil and $|V_{cb}|$ from 2+1-flavor lattice QCD}'',
{\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D92} (2015), no.~3, 034506,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1503.07237}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1503.07237}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1503.07237;%%.
\bibitem[Na et~al.(2015)Na, Bouchard, Lepage, Monahan, and
Shigemitsu]{Na:2015kha}
{\bfseries HPQCD} Collaboration, H.~Na, C.~M. Bouchard, G.~P. Lepage,
C.~Monahan, and J.~Shigemitsu, ``{B→Dlν form factors at nonzero recoil and
extraction of |V$_{cb}$|}'', {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D92} (2015), no.~5,
054510,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1505.03925}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1505.03925}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1505.03925;%%.
\bibitem[Du et~al.(2016)Du, El-Khadra, Gottlieb, Kronfeld, Laiho, Lunghi,
Van~de Water, and Zhou]{Du:2015tda}
D.~Du, A.~X. El-Khadra, S.~Gottlieb, A.~S. Kronfeld, J.~Laiho, E.~Lunghi, R.~S.
Van~de Water, and R.~Zhou, ``{Phenomenology of semileptonic B-meson decays
with form factors from lattice QCD}'', {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D93}
(2016), no.~3, 034005,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1510.02349}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1510.02349}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1510.02349;%%.
\bibitem[Tanaka and Watanabe(2013)]{Tanaka:2012nw}
M.~Tanaka and R.~Watanabe, ``{New physics in the weak interaction of $\bar B\to
D^{(*)}\tau\bar\nu$}'', {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D87} (2013), no.~3,
034028,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1212.1878}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1212.1878}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1212.1878;%%.
\bibitem[Fajfer et~al.(2012)Fajfer, Kamenik, and Nisandzic]{Fajfer:2012vx}
S.~Fajfer, J.~F. Kamenik, and I.~Nisandzic, ``{On the $B \to D^* \tau \bar
\nu_{\tau}$ Sensitivity to New Physics}'', {\em Phys.Rev.} {\bfseries D85}
(2012) 094025,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1203.2654}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1203.2654}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1203.2654;%%.
\bibitem[Becirevic et~al.(2012)Becirevic, Kosnik, and
Tayduganov]{Becirevic:2012jf}
D.~Becirevic, N.~Kosnik, and A.~Tayduganov, ``{$\bar B\to D\tau\bar \nu_\tau$
vs. $\bar B\to D\mu\bar \nu_\mu$}'', {\em Phys.Lett.} {\bfseries B716} (2012)
208--213,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1206.4977}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1206.4977}}.
%\%CITATION = ARXIV:1206.4977;\%\%.
\bibitem[Datta et~al.(2012)Datta, Duraisamy, and Ghosh]{Datta:2012qk}
A.~Datta, M.~Duraisamy, and D.~Ghosh, ``{Diagnosing New Physics in $b \to c \,
\tau \, \nu_\tau$ decays in the light of the recent BaBar result}'', {\em
Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D86} (2012) 034027,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1206.3760}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1206.3760}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1206.3760;%%.
\bibitem[Duraisamy and Datta(2013)]{Duraisamy:2013kcw}
M.~Duraisamy and A.~Datta, ``{The Full $B \to D^{*} \tau^{-} \bar{\nu_\tau}$
Angular Distribution and CP violating Triple Products}'', {\em JHEP}
{\bfseries 09} (2013) 059,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1302.7031}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1302.7031}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1302.7031;%%.
\bibitem[Biancofiore et~al.(2013)Biancofiore, Colangelo, and
De~Fazio]{Biancofiore:2013ki}
P.~Biancofiore, P.~Colangelo, and F.~De~Fazio, ``{On the anomalous enhancement
observed in $B \to D^{(*)}\tau{\bar \nu}_\tau$ decays}'', {\em Phys. Rev.}
{\bfseries D87} (2013), no.~7, 074010,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1302.1042}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1302.1042}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1302.1042;%%.
\bibitem[Bhattacharya et~al.(2016)Bhattacharya, Nandi, and
Patra]{Bhattacharya:2015ida}
S.~Bhattacharya, S.~Nandi, and S.~K. Patra, ``{Optimal-observable analysis of
possible new physics in $B\to D^{(\ast)}\tau\nu_{\tau}$}'', {\em Phys. Rev.}
{\bfseries D93} (2016), no.~3, 034011,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1509.07259}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1509.07259}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1509.07259;%%.
\bibitem[Alok et~al.(2016)Alok, Kumar, Kumbhakar, and Sankar]{Alok:2016qyh}
A.~K. Alok, D.~Kumar, S.~Kumbhakar, and S.~U. Sankar, ``{D* polarization as a
probe to discriminate new physics in B --> D* tau nubar}'',
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1606.03164}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1606.03164}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1606.03164;%%.
\bibitem[Feruglio et~al.(2016)Feruglio, Paradisi, and
Pattori]{Feruglio:2016gvd}
F.~Feruglio, P.~Paradisi, and A.~Pattori, ``{Revisiting Lepton Flavour
Universality in B Decays}'',
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1606.00524}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1606.00524}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1606.00524;%%.
\bibitem[Faroughy et~al.(2016)Faroughy, Greljo, and Kamenik]{Faroughy:2016osc}
D.~A. Faroughy, A.~Greljo, and J.~F. Kamenik, ``{Confronting lepton flavor
universality violation in B decays with high-$p_T$ tau lepton searches at
LHC}'',
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1609.07138}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1609.07138}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1609.07138;%%.
\bibitem[Bardhan et~al.(2016)Bardhan, Byakti, and Ghosh]{Bardhan:2016uhr}
D.~Bardhan, P.~Byakti, and D.~Ghosh, ``{A closer look at the $R_D$ and
$R_{D^*}$ anomalies}'',
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1610.03038}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1610.03038}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1610.03038;%%.
\bibitem[Hou(1993)]{Hou:1992sy}
W.-S. Hou, ``{Enhanced charged Higgs boson effects in B- ---> tau
anti-neutrino, mu anti-neutrino and b ---> tau anti-neutrino + X}'', {\em
Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D48} (1993)
2342--2344.
%%CITATION = PHRVA,D48,2342;%%.
\bibitem[Tanaka(1995)]{Tanaka:1994ay}
M.~Tanaka, ``{Charged Higgs effects on exclusive semitauonic $B$ decays}'',
{\em Z. Phys.} {\bfseries C67} (1995) 321--326,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9411405}{{\ttfamily
arXiv:hep-ph/9411405}}.
%%CITATION = HEP-PH/9411405;%%.
\bibitem[Kiers and Soni(1997)]{Kiers:1997zt}
K.~Kiers and A.~Soni, ``{Improving constraints on tan Beta / m($H$) using $B
\to D \tau$ anti-neutrino}'', {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D56} (1997)
5786--5793,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9706337}{{\ttfamily
arXiv:hep-ph/9706337}}.
%%CITATION = HEP-PH/9706337;%%.
\bibitem[Chen and Geng(2006)]{Chen:2006nua}
C.-H. Chen and C.-Q. Geng, ``{Charged Higgs on B- ---> tau anti-nu(tau) and
anti-B ---> P(V) l anti-nu(l)}'', {\em JHEP} {\bfseries 10} (2006) 053,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/0608166}{{\ttfamily
arXiv:hep-ph/0608166}}.
%%CITATION = HEP-PH/0608166;%%.
\bibitem[Crivellin et~al.(2012)Crivellin, Greub, and Kokulu]{Crivellin:2012ye}
A.~Crivellin, C.~Greub, and A.~Kokulu, ``{Explaining $B\to D\tau\nu$, $B\to
D^*\tau\nu$ and $B\to \tau\nu$ in a 2HDM of type III}'', {\em Phys. Rev.}
{\bfseries D86} (2012) 054014,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1206.2634}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1206.2634}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1206.2634;%%.
\bibitem[Celis et~al.(2013)Celis, Jung, Li, and Pich]{Celis:2012dk}
A.~Celis, M.~Jung, X.-Q. Li, and A.~Pich, ``{Sensitivity to charged scalars in
$\boldsymbol{B\to D^{(*)}\tau\nu_\tau}$ and $\boldsymbol{B\to\tau\nu_\tau}$
decays}'', {\em JHEP} {\bfseries 1301} (2013) 054,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1210.8443}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1210.8443}}.
%\%CITATION = ARXIV:1210.8443;\%\%.
\bibitem[Crivellin et~al.(2013)Crivellin, Kokulu, and Greub]{Crivellin:2013wna}
A.~Crivellin, A.~Kokulu, and C.~Greub, ``{Flavor-phenomenology of
two-Higgs-doublet models with generic Yukawa structure}'', {\em Phys. Rev.}
{\bfseries D87} (2013), no.~9, 094031,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1303.5877}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1303.5877}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1303.5877;%%.
\bibitem[Cline(2016)]{Cline:2015lqp}
J.~M. Cline, ``{Scalar doublet models confront τ and b anomalies}'', {\em
Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D93} (2016), no.~7, 075017,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1512.02210}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1512.02210}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.02210;%%.
\bibitem[Kim et~al.(2015)Kim, Yoon, and Yuan]{Kim:2015zla}
C.~S. Kim, Y.~W. Yoon, and X.-B. Yuan, ``{Exploring top quark FCNC within 2HDM
type III in association with flavor physics}'', {\em JHEP} {\bfseries 12}
(2015) 038,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1509.00491}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1509.00491}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1509.00491;%%.
\bibitem[Crivellin et~al.(2016)Crivellin, Heeck, and
Stoffer]{Crivellin:2015hha}
A.~Crivellin, J.~Heeck, and P.~Stoffer, ``{A perturbed lepton-specific
two-Higgs-doublet model facing experimental hints for physics beyond the
Standard Model}'', {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bfseries 116} (2016), no.~8,
081801,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1507.07567}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1507.07567}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1507.07567;%%.
\bibitem[Wang et~al.(2016)Wang, Yang, and Zhang]{Wang:2016ggf}
L.~Wang, J.~M. Yang, and Y.~Zhang, ``{Probing a pseudoscalar at the LHC in
light of $R(D^{(*)})$ and muon g-2 excesses}'',
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1610.05681}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1610.05681}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1610.05681;%%.
\bibitem[Ko et~al.(2013)Ko, Omura, and Yu]{Ko:2012sv}
P.~Ko, Y.~Omura, and C.~Yu, ``{$B \to D^{(*)} \tau \nu$ and $B \to \tau \nu$ in
chiral U(1)' models with flavored multi Higgs doublets}'', {\em JHEP}
{\bfseries 03} (2013) 151,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1212.4607}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1212.4607}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1212.4607;%%.
\bibitem[Sakaki et~al.(2013)Sakaki, Tanaka, Tayduganov, and
Watanabe]{Sakaki:2013bfa}
Y.~Sakaki, M.~Tanaka, A.~Tayduganov, and R.~Watanabe, ``{Testing leptoquark
models in $\bar B \to D^{(*)} \tau \bar\nu$}'', {\em Phys.Rev.} {\bfseries
D88} (2013), no.~9, 094012,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1309.0301}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1309.0301}}.
%\%CITATION = ARXIV:1309.0301;\%\%.
\bibitem[Sakaki et~al.(2015)Sakaki, Tanaka, Tayduganov, and
Watanabe]{Sakaki:2014sea}
Y.~Sakaki, M.~Tanaka, A.~Tayduganov, and R.~Watanabe, ``{Probing New Physics
with $q^2$ distributions in $\bar{B} \to D^{(*)} \tau \bar\nu$}'', {\em Phys.
Rev.} {\bfseries D91} (2015), no.~11, 114028,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1412.3761}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1412.3761}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1412.3761;%%.
\bibitem[Alonso et~al.(2015)Alonso, Grinstein, and
Martin~Camalich]{Alonso:2015sja}
R.~Alonso, B.~Grinstein, and J.~Martin~Camalich, ``{Lepton universality
violation and lepton flavor conservation in $B$-meson decays}'', {\em JHEP}
{\bfseries 10} (2015) 184,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1505.05164}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1505.05164}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1505.05164;%%.
\bibitem[Freytsis et~al.(2015)Freytsis, Ligeti, and Ruderman]{Freytsis:2015qca}
M.~Freytsis, Z.~Ligeti, and J.~T. Ruderman, ``{Flavor models for $\bar{B} \to
D^{(*)} \tau \bar{\nu}$}'', {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D92} (2015), no.~5,
054018,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1506.08896}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1506.08896}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1506.08896;%%.
\bibitem[Barbieri et~al.(2016)Barbieri, Isidori, Pattori, and
Senia]{Barbieri:2015yvd}
R.~Barbieri, G.~Isidori, A.~Pattori, and F.~Senia, ``{Anomalies in $B$-decays
and $U(2)$ flavour symmetry}'', {\em Eur. Phys. J.} {\bfseries C76} (2016),
no.~2, 67,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1512.01560}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1512.01560}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.01560;%%.
\bibitem[Calibbi et~al.(2015)Calibbi, Crivellin, and Ota]{Calibbi:2015kma}
L.~Calibbi, A.~Crivellin, and T.~Ota, ``{Effective Field Theory Approach to
b→sℓℓ(′), B→K(*)ν$\overline{ν}$ and B→D(*)τν with Third
Generation Couplings}'', {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bfseries 115} (2015)
181801,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1506.02661}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1506.02661}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1506.02661;%%.
\bibitem[Fajfer and Ko{\v s}nik(2015)]{Fajfer:2015ycq}
S.~Fajfer and N.~Ko{\v s}nik, ``{Vector leptoquark resolution of $R_K$ and
$R_{D^{(*)}}$ puzzles}'',
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1511.06024}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1511.06024}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1511.06024;%%.
\bibitem[Bauer and Neubert(2015)]{Bauer:2015knc}
M.~Bauer and M.~Neubert, ``{One Leptoquark to Rule Them All: A Minimal
Explanation for $R_{D^{(*)}}$, $R_K$ and $(g-2)_\mu$}'',
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1511.01900}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1511.01900}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1511.01900;%%.
\bibitem[Hati et~al.(2016)Hati, Kumar, and Mahajan]{Hati:2015awg}
C.~Hati, G.~Kumar, and N.~Mahajan, ``{$\bar{B}\rightarrow D^{(\ast)}\tau
\bar{\nu}$ excesses in ALRSM constrained from $B$, $D$ decays and
$D^{0}-\bar{D}^{0}$ mixing}'', {\em JHEP} {\bfseries 01} (2016) 117,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1511.03290}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1511.03290}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1511.03290;%%.
\bibitem[Sahoo and Mohanta(2016)]{Sahoo:2015pzk}
S.~Sahoo and R.~Mohanta, ``{Lepton flavor violating B meson decays via a scalar
leptoquark}'', {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D93} (2016), no.~11, 114001,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1512.04657}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1512.04657}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.04657;%%.
\bibitem[Zhu et~al.(2016)Zhu, Gan, Wang, Fan, Chang, and Xu]{Zhu:2016xdg}
J.~Zhu, H.-M. Gan, R.-M. Wang, Y.-Y. Fan, Q.~Chang, and Y.-G. Xu, ``{Probing
the R-parity violating supersymmetric effects in the exclusive $b\to
c\ell^-\bar{\nu}_\ell$ decays}'', {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D93} (2016),
no.~9, 094023,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1602.06491}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1602.06491}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1602.06491;%%.
\bibitem[Dumont et~al.(2016)Dumont, Nishiwaki, and Watanabe]{Dumont:2016xpj}
B.~Dumont, K.~Nishiwaki, and R.~Watanabe, ``{LHC constraints and prospects for
$S_1$ scalar leptoquark explaining the $\bar B \to D^{(*)} \tau \bar\nu$
anomaly}'', {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D94} (2016), no.~3, 034001,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1603.05248}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1603.05248}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1603.05248;%%.
\bibitem[Das et~al.(2016)Das, Hati, Kumar, and Mahajan]{Das:2016vkr}
D.~Das, C.~Hati, G.~Kumar, and N.~Mahajan, ``{Towards a unified explanation of
$R_{D^{(\ast)}}$, $R_{K}$ and $(g-2)_{\mu}$ anomalies in a left-right model
with leptoquarks}'', {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D94} (2016) 055034,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1605.06313}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1605.06313}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1605.06313;%%.
\bibitem[Li et~al.(2016)Li, Yang, and Zhang]{Li:2016vvp}
X.-Q. Li, Y.-D. Yang, and X.~Zhang, ``{Revisiting the one leptoquark solution
to the R(D$^{(∗)}$) anomalies and its phenomenological implications}'',
{\em JHEP} {\bfseries 08} (2016) 054,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1605.09308}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1605.09308}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1605.09308;%%.
\bibitem[Bhattacharya et~al.(2016)Bhattacharya, Datta, Guévin, London, and
Watanabe]{Bhattacharya:2016mcc}
B.~Bhattacharya, A.~Datta, J.-P. Guévin, D.~London, and R.~Watanabe,
``{Simultaneous Explanation of the $R_K$ and $R_{D^{(*)}}$ Puzzles: a Model
Analysis}'',
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1609.09078}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1609.09078}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1609.09078;%%.
\bibitem[Bečirević et~al.(2016)Bečirević, Fajfer, Košnik, and
Sumensari]{Becirevic:2016yqi}
D.~Bečirević, S.~Fajfer, N.~Košnik, and O.~Sumensari, ``{Leptoquark model to
explain the $B$-physics anomalies, $R_K$ and $R_D$}'',
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1608.08501}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1608.08501}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1608.08501;%%.
\bibitem[Sahoo et~al.(2016)Sahoo, Mohanta, and Giri]{Sahoo:2016pet}
S.~Sahoo, R.~Mohanta, and A.~K. Giri, ``{Explaining $R_{K}$ and $R_{D^{(*)}}$
anomalies with vector leptoquark}'',
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1609.04367}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1609.04367}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1609.04367;%%.
\bibitem[Buchmuller and Wyler(1986)]{Buchmuller:1985jz}
W.~Buchmuller and D.~Wyler, ``{Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New
Interactions and Flavor Conservation}'', {\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bfseries B268}
(1986)
621--653.
%%CITATION = NUPHA,B268,621;%%.
\bibitem[Cirigliano et~al.(2010)Cirigliano, Jenkins, and
Gonzalez-Alonso]{Cirigliano:2009wk}
V.~Cirigliano, J.~Jenkins, and M.~Gonzalez-Alonso, ``{Semileptonic decays of
light quarks beyond the Standard Model}'', {\em Nucl.Phys.} {\bfseries B830}
(2010) 95--115,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/0908.1754}{{\ttfamily arXiv:0908.1754}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:0908.1754;%%.
\bibitem[Grzadkowski et~al.(2010)Grzadkowski, Iskrzynski, Misiak, and
Rosiek]{Grzadkowski:2010es}
B.~Grzadkowski, M.~Iskrzynski, M.~Misiak, and J.~Rosiek, ``{Dimension-Six Terms
in the Standard Model Lagrangian}'', {\em JHEP} {\bfseries 10} (2010) 085,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1008.4884}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1008.4884}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1008.4884;%%.
\bibitem[Bernard et~al.(2006)Bernard, Oertel, Passemar, and
Stern]{Bernard:2006gy}
V.~Bernard, M.~Oertel, E.~Passemar, and J.~Stern, ``{K(mu3)**L decay: A
Stringent test of right-handed quark currents}'', {\em Phys. Lett.}
{\bfseries B638} (2006) 480--486,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/0603202}{{\ttfamily
arXiv:hep-ph/0603202}}.
%\%CITATION = HEP-PH/0603202;\%\%.
\bibitem[Catà and Jung(2015)]{Cata:2015lta}
O.~Catà and M.~Jung, ``{Signatures of a nonstandard Higgs boson from flavor
physics}'', {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D92} (2015), no.~5, 055018,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1505.05804}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1505.05804}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1505.05804;%%.
\bibitem[Branco et~al.(2012)Branco, Ferreira, Lavoura, Rebelo, Sher, and
Silva]{Branco:2011iw}
G.~C. Branco, P.~M. Ferreira, L.~Lavoura, M.~N. Rebelo, M.~Sher, and J.~P.
Silva, ``{Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models}'', {\em Phys.
Rept.} {\bfseries 516} (2012) 1--102,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1106.0034}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1106.0034}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1106.0034;%%.
\bibitem[Aoki et~al.(2009)Aoki, Kanemura, Tsumura, and Yagyu]{Aoki:2009ha}
M.~Aoki, S.~Kanemura, K.~Tsumura, and K.~Yagyu, ``{Models of Yukawa interaction
in the two Higgs doublet model, and their collider phenomenology}'', {\em
Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D80} (2009) 015017,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/0902.4665}{{\ttfamily arXiv:0902.4665}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:0902.4665;%%.
\bibitem[Gonz\'alez-Alonso and Martin~Camalich(2016)]{Gonzalez-Alonso:2016etj}
M.~Gonz\'alez-Alonso and J.~Martin~Camalich, ``{Global Effective-Field-Theory
analysis of New-Physics effects in (semi)leptonic kaon decays}'',
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1605.07114}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1605.07114}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1605.07114;%%.
\bibitem[Akeroyd et~al.(2016)]{Akeroyd:2016ymd}
A.~G. Akeroyd {\em et~al.}, ``{Prospects for charged Higgs searches at the
LHC}'',
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1607.01320}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1607.01320}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1607.01320;%%.
\bibitem[Crivellin et~al.(2016)Crivellin, Ghezzi, and
Procura]{Crivellin:2016ihg}
A.~Crivellin, M.~Ghezzi, and M.~Procura, ``{Effective Field Theory with Two
Higgs Doublets}'', {\em JHEP} {\bfseries 09} (2016) 160,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1608.00975}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1608.00975}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1608.00975;%%.
\bibitem[Bullock et~al.(1993)Bullock, Hagiwara, and Martin]{Bullock:1992yt}
B.~K. Bullock, K.~Hagiwara, and A.~D. Martin, ``{Tau polarization and its
correlations as a probe of new physics}'', {\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bfseries B395}
(1993)
499--533.
%%CITATION = NUPHA,B395,499;%%.
\bibitem[Tanaka and Watanabe(2010)]{Tanaka:2010se}
M.~Tanaka and R.~Watanabe, ``{Tau longitudinal polarization in B -> D tau nu
and its role in the search for charged Higgs boson}'', {\em Phys. Rev.}
{\bfseries D82} (2010) 034027,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1005.4306}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1005.4306}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1005.4306;%%.
\bibitem[Nierste et~al.(2008)Nierste, Trine, and Westhoff]{Nierste:2008qe}
U.~Nierste, S.~Trine, and S.~Westhoff, ``{Charged-Higgs effects in a new B --->
D tau nu differential decay distribution}'', {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D78}
(2008) 015006,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/0801.4938}{{\ttfamily arXiv:0801.4938}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:0801.4938;%%.
\bibitem[Sakaki and Tanaka(2013)]{Sakaki:2012ft}
Y.~Sakaki and H.~Tanaka, ``{Constraints on the charged scalar effects using the
forward-backward asymmetry on B¯→D(*)τν¯τ}'', {\em Phys. Rev.}
{\bfseries D87} (2013), no.~5, 054002,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1205.4908}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1205.4908}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1205.4908;%%.
\bibitem[Hagiwara et~al.(2014)Hagiwara, Nojiri, and Sakaki]{Hagiwara:2014tsa}
K.~Hagiwara, M.~M. Nojiri, and Y.~Sakaki, ``{$CP$ violation in $B \to D\tau
\nu_{\tau}$ using multipion tau decays}'', {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D89}
(2014), no.~9, 094009,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1403.5892}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1403.5892}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1403.5892;%%.
\bibitem[Bordone et~al.(2016)Bordone, Isidori, and van Dyk]{Bordone:2016tex}
M.~Bordone, G.~Isidori, and D.~van Dyk, ``{Impact of leptonic $\tau $ decays on
the distribution of $B\rightarrow P\mu \bar{\nu }$ decays}'', {\em Eur. Phys.
J.} {\bfseries C76} (2016), no.~7, 360,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1602.06143}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1602.06143}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1602.06143;%%.
\bibitem[Alonso et~al.(2016)Alonso, Kobach, and
Martin~Camalich]{Alonso:2016gym}
R.~Alonso, A.~Kobach, and J.~Martin~Camalich, ``{New physics in the kinematic
distributions of $\bar B\to
D^{(*)}\tau^-(\to\ell^-\bar\nu_\ell\nu_\tau)\bar\nu_\tau$}'',
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1602.07671}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1602.07671}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1602.07671;%%.
\bibitem[Ligeti et~al.(2016)Ligeti, Papucci, and Robinson]{Ligeti:2016npd}
Z.~Ligeti, M.~Papucci, and D.~J. Robinson, ``{New Physics in the Visible Final
States of $B\to D^{(*)}\tau\nu$}'',
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1610.02045}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1610.02045}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1610.02045;%%.
\bibitem[Ciezarek(2016)]{CiezarekLHCb}
G.~Ciezarek, ``{Update and prospects on R(Xc) at LHCb}'', in ``{Implications of
LHCb measurements and future prospects, CERN, Geneva, October 12-14, 2016}''.
\newblock 2016.
\bibitem[Bhol(2014)]{Bhol:2014jta}
A.~Bhol, ``{Study of Bs $\to$ Ds$^{(*)}$l$\nu_l$ semileptonic decays}'', {\em
Europhys. Lett.} {\bfseries 106} (2014)
31001.
%%CITATION = EULEE,106,31001;%%.
\bibitem[Lytle et~al.(2016)Lytle, Colquhoun, Davies, Koponen, and
McNeile]{Lytle:2016ixw}
A.~Lytle, B.~Colquhoun, C.~Davies, J.~Koponen, and C.~McNeile, ``{Semileptonic
$B_c$ decays from full lattice QCD}'', in ``{16th International Conference on
B-Physics at Frontier Machines (Beauty 2016) Marseille, France, May 2-6,
2016}''.
\newblock 2016.
\newblock
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1605.05645}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1605.05645}}.
\newblock
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1605.05645;%%.
\bibitem[Detmold et~al.(2015)Detmold, Lehner, and Meinel]{Detmold:2015aaa}
W.~Detmold, C.~Lehner, and S.~Meinel, ``{$\Lambda_b \to p \ell^-
\bar{\nu}_\ell$ and $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda_c \ell^- \bar{\nu}_\ell$ form
factors from lattice QCD with relativistic heavy quarks}'', {\em Phys. Rev.}
{\bfseries D92} (2015), no.~3, 034503,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1503.01421}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1503.01421}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1503.01421;%%.
\bibitem[Manohar and Wise(2000)]{Manohar:2000dt}
A.~V. Manohar and M.~B. Wise, ``{Heavy quark physics}'', {\em Camb. Monogr.
Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol.} {\bfseries 10} (2000)
1--191.
%%CITATION = CMPCE,10,1;%%.
\bibitem[Colquhoun et~al.(2015)Colquhoun, Davies, Dowdall, Kettle, Koponen,
Lepage, and Lytle]{Colquhoun:2015oha}
{\bfseries HPQCD} Collaboration, B.~Colquhoun, C.~T.~H. Davies, R.~J. Dowdall,
J.~Kettle, J.~Koponen, G.~P. Lepage, and A.~T. Lytle, ``{B-meson decay
constants: a more complete picture from full lattice QCD}'', {\em Phys. Rev.}
{\bfseries D91} (2015), no.~11, 114509,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1503.05762}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1503.05762}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1503.05762;%%.
\bibitem[Gouz et~al.(2004)Gouz, Kiselev, Likhoded, Romanovsky, and
Yushchenko]{Gouz:2002kk}
I.~P. Gouz, V.~V. Kiselev, A.~K. Likhoded, V.~I. Romanovsky, and O.~P.
Yushchenko, ``{Prospects for the $B_c$ studies at LHCb}'', {\em Phys. Atom.
Nucl.} {\bfseries 67} (2004) 1559--1570,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/0211432}{{\ttfamily
arXiv:hep-ph/0211432}},
[Yad. Fiz.67,1581(2004)].
%%CITATION = HEP-PH/0211432;%%.
\bibitem[Aaij et~al.(2015)]{Aaij:2014gka}
{\bfseries LHCb} Collaboration, R.~Aaij {\em et~al.}, ``{Measurement of the
lifetime of the $B_c^+$ meson using the $B_c^+\rightarrow J/\psi\pi^+$ decay
mode}'', {\em Phys. Lett.} {\bfseries B742} (2015) 29--37,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1411.6899}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1411.6899}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1411.6899;%%.
\bibitem[Olive et~al.(2014)]{Agashe:2014kda}
{\bfseries Particle Data Group} Collaboration, K.~A. Olive {\em et~al.},
``{Review of Particle Physics}'', {\em Chin. Phys.} {\bfseries C38} (2014)
090001.
%%CITATION = CHPHD,C38,090001;%%.
\bibitem[Anderlini(2014)]{Anderlini:2014dha}
{\bfseries ATLAS, LHCb, CMS} Collaboration, L.~Anderlini, ``{Properties and
Decays of the $B_c^+$ meson}'', in ``{12th Conference on Flavor Physics and
CP Violation (FPCP 2014) Marseille, France, May 26-30, 2014}''.
\newblock 2014.
\newblock
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1407.8066}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1407.8066}}.
\newblock
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1407.8066;%%.
\bibitem[Dey(2016)]{Dey:2016qck}
B.~Dey, ``{Hadron Spectroscopy, exotics and $B_c^+$ physics at LHCb}'', in
``{12th International Conference on Beauty, Charm, and Hyperons in Hadronic
Interactions (BEACH 2016) Fairfax, Virginia, United States, June 12-18,
2016}''.
\newblock 2016.
\newblock
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1609.03888}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1609.03888}}.
\newblock
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1609.03888;%%.
\bibitem[Gershtein et~al.(1995)Gershtein, Kiselev, Likhoded, and
Tkabladze]{Gershtein:1994jw}
S.~S. Gershtein, V.~V. Kiselev, A.~K. Likhoded, and A.~V. Tkabladze, ``{Physics
of B(c) mesons}'', {\em Phys. Usp.} {\bfseries 38} (1995) 1--37,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9504319}{{\ttfamily
arXiv:hep-ph/9504319}},
[Usp. Fiz. Nauk165,3(1995)].
%%CITATION = HEP-PH/9504319;%%.
\bibitem[Bigi(1996)]{Bigi:1995fs}
I.~I.~Y. Bigi, ``{Inclusive B(c) decays as a QCD lab}'', {\em Phys. Lett.}
{\bfseries B371} (1996) 105--110,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9510325}{{\ttfamily
arXiv:hep-ph/9510325}}.
%%CITATION = HEP-PH/9510325;%%.
\bibitem[Beneke and Buchalla(1996)]{Beneke:1996xe}
M.~Beneke and G.~Buchalla, ``{The $B_c$ Meson Lifetime}'', {\em Phys. Rev.}
{\bfseries D53} (1996) 4991--5000,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9601249}{{\ttfamily
arXiv:hep-ph/9601249}}.
%%CITATION = HEP-PH/9601249;%%.
\bibitem[Chang et~al.(2001)Chang, Chen, Feng, and Li]{Chang:2000ac}
C.-H. Chang, S.-L. Chen, T.-F. Feng, and X.-Q. Li, ``{The Lifetime of $B_c$
meson and some relevant problems}'', {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bfseries D64} (2001)
014003,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/0007162}{{\ttfamily
arXiv:hep-ph/0007162}}.
%%CITATION = HEP-PH/0007162;%%.
\bibitem[Kiselev et~al.(2000)Kiselev, Kovalsky, and Likhoded]{Kiselev:2000pp}
V.~V. Kiselev, A.~E. Kovalsky, and A.~K. Likhoded, ``{$B_c$ decays and lifetime
in QCD sum rules}'', {\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bfseries B585} (2000) 353--382,
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/0002127}{{\ttfamily
arXiv:hep-ph/0002127}}.
%%CITATION = HEP-PH/0002127;%%.
\bibitem[Amhis et~al.(2014)]{Amhis:2014hma}
{\bfseries Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFAG)} Collaboration, Y.~Amhis {\em
et~al.}, ``{Averages of $b$-hadron, $c$-hadron, and $\tau$-lepton properties
as of summer 2014}'',
\href{http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1412.7515}{{\ttfamily arXiv:1412.7515}}.
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1412.7515;%%.
\end{thebibliography}\endgroup