Structure of the Roper Resonance from Lattice QCD Constraints
Extracted source text · arXiv 1703.10715
\documentclass[reprint,a4paper,australian,amsmath,aps,prl,twocolumn,superscriptaddress,preprintnumbers,noshowpacs]{revtex4-1}
\usepackage{times}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{xcolor}
%
\usepackage{dcolumn}
\usepackage{bm}
\usepackage{yhmath}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{subfigure}
\usepackage{color}
%
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{dcolumn}
%
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{>{\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
%
\newcommand{\ket}[1]{|\, #1 \rangle}
\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\langle #1 \,|}
\newcommand{\lslash}[1]{\not\!{#1}}
\newcommand{\uslash}[1]{\not\!\!{#1}}
\newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
\newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
\newcommand{\transpose}{\intercal}
\newcommand{\ro}{\mathrm}
\newcommand{\ca}{\mathcal}
\newcommand{\CSSM}{Special Research Centre for the Subatomic Structure
of Matter (CSSM),\\Department of Physics, University of
Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia}
\newcommand{\CoEPP}{ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at
the Terascale (CoEPP),\\Department of Physics, University
of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia}
\newcommand{\Lanzhou}{School of Physical Science and Technology,\\ Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China }
\newcommand{\NCI}{National Computational Infrastructure
(NCI),\\Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory
0200, Australia}
\newcommand{\GE}[0]{\mathcal{G}_{E}}
\newcommand{\GM}[0]{\mathcal{G}_{M}}
\begin{document}
%
\preprint{ADP-17-13/T1019}
%
\title{
{Structure of the Roper Resonance from Lattice QCD Constraints}
%Light-quark contributions to the magnetic form factor of the $\mathbf{\Lambda(1405)}$
}
%
\author{Jia-jun Wu}
%\author{Waseem Kamleh}
\author{Derek B. Leinweber}
\affiliation{\CSSM}
\author{Zhan-wei Liu}
\affiliation{\CSSM}
\affiliation{\Lanzhou}
\author{Anthony W. Thomas}
\affiliation{\CSSM}
\affiliation{\CoEPP}
%
\pacs{
{12.38.Gc}{ Lattice QCD calculations}
{12.39.Fe}{ Chiral Lagrangians}
%{13.40.Gp}{ Electromagnetic form factors}
%{14.20.Jn}{ Hyperons}
}
%
\begin{abstract}
Two different descriptions of the existing pion-nucleon scattering data in the region of the Roper
resonance are constructed. Both descriptions fit the experimental data very well. In one scenario
the resonance is the result of strong rescattering between coupled meson-baryon channels, while in
the other scenario, the resonance has a large bare-baryon (or quark-model like) component. The
predictions of these two scenarios are compared with the latest lattice QCD simulation results in
this channel. Consideration of the finite volume spectra, the manner in which the states are
excited from the vacuum in lattice QCD and the composition of the states in Hamiltonian effective
field theory enable a discrimination of these two different descriptions. We find the second
scenario is not consistent with lattice QCD results whereas the first agrees with the
lattice QCD constraints. In this scenario, the mass of the quark-model like state is approximately
2 GeV and in the finite volume of the lattice is dressed to place the first radial excitation of
the nucleon at 1.9 GeV. Within this description, the infinite-volume Roper resonance is
best described as a resonance generated dynamically through strongly coupled meson-baryon channels.
\end{abstract}
%
\maketitle
%%%
%\section{Introduction}
%\label{sect:intro}
%\section{Introduction}
%
Since the discovery of the Roper resonance in1964~\cite{Roper:1964zza}, its
peculiar properties have challenged our understanding of the quark structure of hadrons and
ultimately of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) itself \cite{Aznauryan:2008pe, Joo:2005gs, Weber:1989fv,
JuliaDiaz:2006av, BarquillaCano:2007yk, Golli:2007sa, Golli:2009uk, Meissner:1984un,
Hajduk:1984ry, Krehl:1999km, Schutz:1998jx, Matsuyama:2006rp, Kamano:2010ud, Kamano:2013iva,
Suzuki:2009nj, Hernandez:2002xk, Barnes:1982fj, Golowich:1982kx, Kisslinger:1995yw}. With the
first negative-parity excitation of the nucleon, the $N^\star(1535)$, almost 600 MeV higher in
mass, expectations -- based upon the harmonic oscillator model which has enjoyed much success
in treating hadron spectroscopy -- suggest that the first positive-parity excited state should
occur at a little over 2 GeV. Yet, empirically one finds the first positive-parity, spin-1/2 Roper
resonance of the nucleon
%% with $TJ^\pi=1/2 \, 1/2^+$,
to have a mass of just 1.45 GeV, {\it below} the $N^\star(1535)$ ~\cite{Olive:2016xmw}!
To make matters worse, the first negative parity excitation of a strangeness -1 baryon, the famous
$\Lambda(1405)$, is lower in mass than both of these non-strange excited states of the nucleon
~\cite{Olive:2016xmw}. Fortunately, in this case there have recently been advances in our
understanding, thanks to modern lattice QCD simulations of not only the mass of this state but the
individual valence quark contributions to its electromagnetic form
factors~\cite{Hall:2014uca,Hall:2016kou}. These simulations have also been supported by analysis
involving an effective Hamiltonian \cite{Liu:2015ktc}, which allows a natural connection to be made
between the results calculated on a finite lattice volume and the infinite volume of the real
world~\cite{Liu:2016wxq, Molina:2015uqp}. As a result of these studies, it is now clear that the
$\Lambda(1405)$ is essentially an anti-kaon nucleon bound state with very little content
corresponding to the sort of three-quark state anticipated in a typical quark
model~\cite{Hall:2016kou}.
In this Letter, we use similar techniques to those which proved so successful for the
$\Lambda(1405)$~\cite{Liu:2015ktc} to investigate the nature of the Roper resonance.
We first introduce the coupled channel scattering formalism~\cite{Liu:2016uzk} and show the two
high quality fits obtained to existing data in the region of the Roper. In the first there is no
significant three quark coupling, while in the second there is. These models produce rather
different behaviour in the unobserved $\pi\Delta$ and $\sigma N$ channels and cannot be
distinguished by experiment. We then use the same models on a finite volume to compute the
spectrum one would expect to find in lattice QCD. Only the first scenario is consistent with recent
lattice simulations, indicating the Roper resonance is also generated dynamically through the
rescattering of coupled meson-baryon channels.
%
The three-quark state anticipated in traditional quark models appears to
lie nearer 2 GeV, which as explained earlier, is far more consistent with the mass of the observed
$N^\star(1535)$.
% \section{Theoretical framework}
%
In order to model the scattering data in the region of the Roper resonance and
describe the observed inelasticity, we include three coupled channels,
$\pi N$, $\pi \Delta$ and $\sigma N$. In the rest frame, the Hamiltonian
has the following form
%
\begin{eqnarray}
H = H_0 + H_I \, ,
\label{eq:h}
\end{eqnarray}
%
where the non-interacting Hamiltonian is
%
\begin{eqnarray}
H_0 &=&\sum_{B_0} |B_0\rangle \, m^{0}_{B} \, \langle B_0|+ \sum_{\alpha}\int d^3\vec{k}\nonumber\\
&& |\alpha(\vec{k})\rangle \, \left [ \omega_{\alpha_1}(\vec{k})
+ \omega_{\alpha_2}(\vec{k})\, \right ] \langle\alpha(\vec{k})| \, .
\label{eq:h0}
\end{eqnarray}
%
Here $B_0$ denotes a bare baryon with mass $ m^{0}_{B}$, which may be thought of
as a quark model state, $\alpha$ designates the
channel and $\alpha_1$ ($\alpha_2$) indicates the meson (baryon) state which
constitutes channel $\alpha$. The energy $\omega_{\alpha_i}(\vec{k})
= \sqrt{m^2_{\alpha_i}+\vec{k}^2}$.
The energy independent interaction Hamiltonian includes two parts, $H_I = g + v$,
where $g$ describes the vertex interaction between the bare particle
and the two-particle channels $\alpha$
%
%\begin{eqnarray}
%g &=& \sum_{\alpha,\, B_0} \int d^3\vec{k} \left \{ \,
%|\alpha(\vec{k})\rangle \, G^\dagger_{\alpha, B_0}(k)\, \langle B_0|
%\right . \nonumber \\
%&&\qquad\qquad\quad \left . + |B_0\rangle\, G_{\alpha, B_0}(k)\, \langle \alpha(\vec{k})|
%\, \right \} \, ,
%\label{eq:int-g}
%\end{eqnarray}
%
\begin{eqnarray}
g &=& \sum_{\alpha,\, B_0} \int d^3\vec{k} \left \{ \,
|\alpha(\vec{k})\rangle \, G^\dagger_{\alpha, B_0}(k)\, \langle B_0|+h.c.
\right \}\, ,
\label{eq:int-g1}
\end{eqnarray}
%
while the direct two-to-two particle interaction is defined by
%
\begin{eqnarray}
v = \sum_{\alpha,\beta} \int d^3\vec{k}\; d^3\vec{k}'\,
|\alpha(\vec{k})\rangle\, V^{S}_{\alpha,\beta}(k,k')\, \langle
\beta(\vec{k}')| \, .
\label{eq:int-v}
\end{eqnarray}
%
For the vertex interaction between the bare baryon and the two-particle
channels we choose:
%
\begin{eqnarray}
G_{\alpha, B_0}^2(k)&=&\frac{g_{B_0\alpha}^2}{4\pi^2}\left (\frac{k}{f}\right )^{2l_\alpha} \frac{ u_{\alpha}^2(k)}{\omega_{\alpha_1}(k)} \, ,
\end{eqnarray}
%
where the pion decay constant $f=92.4$ MeV and $l_\alpha$ is the orbital angular momentum in
channel $\alpha$. Here, since we are concerned with the Roper resonance, with isospin, angular
momentum and parity, $\mathbf{I(J^P)=\frac12(\frac12^+)}$, $l$ is 1 for $\pi N$ and $\pi \Delta$,
while it is 0 for $\sigma N$. The regulating form factor, $u_\alpha(k)$, takes the exponential
form
%
% \begin{equation}
$u_\alpha(k)=\exp\left ( -{k^2}/{\Lambda_\alpha^2} \right ) ,$
%\end{equation}
%
where $\Lambda_\alpha$ is the regularization scale.
%
For the direct two-to-two particle interaction, we introduce the separable
potentials for the following five channels
%
\begin{eqnarray}
V_{\alpha, \beta}^S(k,k')&=&g^S_{\alpha, \beta}\frac{\bar G_{\alpha}(k)}{\sqrt{\omega_{\alpha_1}(k)}}
\frac{\bar G_{\beta}(k')}{\sqrt{\omega_{\beta_1}(k')}}\, ,\label{eqVspiN}
\end{eqnarray}
%
where $\bar G_{\alpha}(k)=G_{\alpha, B_0}(k)/g_{B_0 \alpha}$.
%
The $T$-matrices for two particle scattering are obtained by solving
a three-dimensional reduction of the coupled-channel Bethe-Salpeter
equations for each partial wave
%
%\begin{eqnarray}
%T_{\alpha, \beta}(k,k';E)&=&V_{\alpha, \beta}(k,k';E)+\sum_\gamma \int
%q^2 dq \times \\
%&&\hspace{-2.5cm} V_{\alpha, \gamma}(k,q;E)\,
%\frac{1}{E-\omega_{\alpha_1}(q)-\omega_{\alpha_2}(q)+i \epsilon}\, T_{\gamma, \beta}(q,k';E)
%\, . \nonumber
%\end{eqnarray}
%
\begin{eqnarray}
t_{\alpha, \beta}(k,k';E)&=&V_{\alpha, \beta}(k,k';E)+\sum_\gamma \int
q^2 dq \times \\
&&\hspace{-2.5cm} V_{\alpha, \gamma}(k,q;E)\,
\frac{1}{E-\omega_{\gamma_1}(q)-\omega_{\gamma_2}(q)+i \epsilon}\, t_{\gamma, \beta}(q,k';E)
\, . \nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
The coupled-channel potential is readily calculated from the interaction Hamiltonian
%
%\begin{eqnarray}
%V_{\alpha, \beta}(k,k') &=& \sum_{B_0}\, G^\dag_{\alpha, B_0}(k)\,
%\frac{1}{E-m_B^0}\, G_{\beta, B_0}(k') \nonumber \\
%&&+V^S_{\alpha,\beta}(k,k') \, .
%\label{eq:lseq-2}
%\end{eqnarray}
%
\begin{eqnarray}
V_{\alpha, \beta}(k,k') &=& \sum_{B_0}\,
\frac{G^\dag_{\alpha, B_0}(k)\, G_{\beta, B_0}(k')}{E-m_B^0} +V^S_{\alpha,\beta}(k,k') \, ,
\label{eq:lseq-2}
\end{eqnarray}
%
with the normalization $\langle \alpha(\vec{k})\, |\, \beta(\vec{k}^{\,\,'})\rangle =
\delta_{\alpha,\beta}\, \delta (\vec{k}-\vec{k}^{\,\,'})$.
%Finally, the S-matrix
%\color{red} of $\pi N \to \pi N$ \color{black}
%is related to the
%$T$-matrix by
%
%\begin{eqnarray}
%S_{\alpha, \beta}(E)&=&1-2i\, \rho(E)\, T_{\alpha,\beta}(k_{\rm cm}, k_{\rm cm}; E) \, ,\\
%\rho(E)&=& \pi\frac{\omega_\pi(k_{\rm cm})\, \omega_N(k_{\rm cm})}{E}\, k_{\rm cm} \, ,
%\end{eqnarray}
%
%\color{red}
%\begin{eqnarray}
%S_{\pi N, \pi N}(E)&=&1+2i\, T_{\pi N,\pi N}(E) \,\nonumber \\
%&=& 1-2i\, \rho(E)\, t_{\pi N,\pi N}(k_{\rm cm}, k_{\rm cm}; E) \, ,\\
%\rho(E)&=& \pi\frac{\omega_\pi(k_{\rm cm})\, \omega_N(k_{\rm cm})}{E}\, k_{\rm cm} \, ,
%\end{eqnarray}
%\color{black}
%
%where $k_{\rm cm}$ satisfies the on-shell condition $\omega_{\pi}(k_{\rm cm})+\omega_{N}(k_{\rm
% cm})=E$.
The pole position of any bound state or resonance is obtained by searching for the
poles of the $T$-matrix in the complex plane.
%&\color{red}
%\begin{eqnarray}
%S_{\alpha, \beta}(E)&=&1+2i\, T_{\alpha,\beta}(E) \, \nonumber\\
%&=& 1-2i\, \sqrt{\rho_{\alpha}(E)\rho_{\beta}(E)}\, t_{\alpha,\beta}(k_{\alpha \rm cm}, k_{\beta \rm cm}; E) \, ,\\
%\rho_{\alpha}(E)&=& \sqrt{\pi\frac{\omega_{\alpha_1}(k_{\alpha \rm cm})\, \omega_{\alpha_2}(k_{\alpha \rm cm})}{E} k_{\alpha \rm %cm}}\, \, ,
%\end{eqnarray}
%
%where $k_{\alpha \rm cm}$ satisfies the on-shell condition of channel $\alpha$, $\omega_{\alpha_1}(k_{\alpha \rm cm})+%%\omega_{\alpha_2}(k_{\alpha \rm cm})=E$. The pole positions of any bound state or resonance is obtained by searching for the poles of the %$T$-matrix in the complex plane.
%\color{black}
%
\begin{figure}[tbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{phasepiN.pdf}
\caption{
%%%
The fitted phase shift $\delta$, inelasticity $\eta$ and $T$-matrix
for the $\pi N \to \pi N$ reaction. Red-solid and blue-dashed lines
are calculated from scenarios I and II, respectively.
%
%%%
}\label{fg:phase}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
%
In order to compare the predictions of this continuum model with the results of lattice QCD
simulations, it is necessary to rewrite the problem on a finite volume. This procedure is by now
well known and we refer to Refs.~\cite{Liu:2015ktc, Liu:2016wxq, Liu:2016uzk, Hall:2013qba,
Wu:2014vma, Wu:2016ixr} for the details. By solving for the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian
effective-field-theory (EFT), one obtains energy levels which can be compared with the energies
found in lattice QCD simulations. The eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian system describe the
composition of the eigenstates which can be compared with the interpolating fields used to excite
the lattice QCD states.
We can also extend the formalism to unphysical
pion masses. Using $m_\pi^2$ as a measure of the light quark masses, we consider the variation of
the bare mass and $\sigma$-meson mass as
%
\begin{eqnarray}
m_B^0(m_\pi^2)&=&m_B^0|_{\rm phy}+\alpha_B^0\, (m_\pi^2-m_\pi^2|_{\rm phy})\, , \\
m_\sigma^2(m_\pi^2)&=&m_\sigma^2|_{\rm phy}+\alpha_\sigma^0\, (m_\pi^2-m_\pi^2|_{\rm phy}),
\end{eqnarray}
%
%\begin{eqnarray}
%m_{B/\sigma}^0(m_\pi^2)&=&m_{B/\sigma}^0|_{\rm phy}+\alpha_{B/\sigma}^0\, (m_\pi^2-m_\pi^2|_{\rm phy})\, ,
%\end{eqnarray}
%
where the slope parameter $\alpha_B^0$ is constrained by lattice QCD data from the CSSM. In the
large quark mass regime, where constituent quark degrees of freedom become relevant, one
expects~\cite{Cloet:2002eg} $\alpha_\sigma^0 = (2/3) \alpha_N^0$.
%$m_\sigma \sim m_\sigma|_{\rm phy} + (2/3)\, \alpha_N^0 \,
%(m_\pi^2-m_\pi^2|_{\rm phy})$
% Ref.~\cite{Cloet:2002eg}
%providing $\alpha_\sigma^0 \simeq \frac43 \, m_\sigma|_{\rm phy} \, \alpha_N^0$.
The nucleon and
Delta masses away from the physical point are obtained via
linear interpolation between the lattice QCD results.
%%%%
%\section{Main results and discussion}
%%%%
%\subsection{The result for fitting experimental data}
%%%
By fitting the experimental data for $\pi N$ scattering from 1200 MeV to 1800 MeV, we found two
rather different models which appear equally acceptable in terms of the quality of the fit to
existing data. The corresponding parameters are shown in Table~\ref{tab:parameter}. In
Fig.~\ref{fg:phase}, the phase shift, inelasticity and $T$-matrix for the $\pi N \to \pi N$ channel
are shown for these two models. It is impossible to distinguish the merit of these two fits using
the existing $\pi N$ data. However, in the as yet unmeasured coupled channels there are
considerable differences.
The main differences are that the coupling of $\pi N \to \pi N$ in fit I is much larger than that
in fit II, while the coupling of the bare state to $\pi N$ and $\sigma N$ in fit I is much smaller
than in fit II. This leads to two different pictures of the Roper. In fit I it is a resonance
generated by strong rescattering in the meson-baryon channels. On the other hand, in fit II the
rescattering is weaker and the observed resonance is dominated by coupling to an underlying bare,
or quark-model like, state.
\begin{figure}[tbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{Tallother.pdf}
\caption{
%%%
%
The $T$-matrices for $\pi \Delta \to \pi \Delta$ and $\sigma N \to \sigma N$
corresponding to the two scenarios described in the text.
The two cases are encoded as in Fig.~\ref{fg:phase}.
%%%
}\label{fg:Tother}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\begin{table}[bp]
\caption{Fit parameters constrained by $\pi N$ scattering data and the
resultant pole positions in the two scenarios described in the text.
%
%% In scenario I, the resonance is generated by strong rescattering in
%% the meson-baryon channels while in scenario II the resonance is
%% dominated by coupling to an underlying bare state.
%
The pole position in the different Riemann sheets is also indicated.
The unphysical sheet is denoted "u" and the physical sheet is
denoted "p",
as defined in Ref.~\cite{Suzuki:2008rp, Doring:2009yv}, and
the order for the channels is ($\pi N$, $\pi \Delta$, $\sigma N$).
%
% For reference, the experimental pole position for the Roper
% resonance is $( 1365 \pm 15 ) - ( 95 \pm 15)\,i$ MeV.
}
\label{tab:parameter}
\begin{ruledtabular}
\begin{tabular}{ccc}
\noalign{\smallskip}
Parameter & I & II \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
\hline
\noalign{\smallskip}
$ g^S_{\pi N, \pi N} $ & $1.156$ & $0.634$ \\
$ g^S_{\pi N, \pi \Delta} $ & $-0.662$ & $-0.378$ \\
$ g^S_{\pi N, \sigma N} $ & $-0.415$ & $-1.738$ \\
$ g^S_{\pi \Delta, \pi \Delta} $ & $-0.438$ & $-0.581$ \\
$ g^S_{\pi \Delta, \sigma N} $ & $1.332$ & $0.964$ \\
$ g^S_{\sigma N, \sigma N} $ & $10.000$ & $10.000$ \\
$ m_B^0/{\rm GeV} $ & $2.000$ & $1.7000$ \\
$ g_{B_0\pi N} $ & $0.268$ & $0.954$ \\
$ g_{B_0\pi\Delta} $ & $1.544$ & $-0.118$ \\
$ g_{B_0\sigma N} $ & $ - $ & $-2.892$ \\
$ \Lambda_{\pi N}/{\rm GeV} $ & $0.5953$ & $0.6302$ \\
$ \Lambda_{\pi \Delta}/{\rm GeV} $ & $1.5000$ & $1.4318$ \\
$ \Lambda_{\sigma N}/{\rm GeV} $ & $1.5000$ & $1.4533$ \\
\noalign{\medskip}
%$\chi^2 / data $ & $241 / 72$ & $135 / 72$ \\
Pole (MeV) (uuu) & $2012.28 - 42.09\,i$ & $1355.57 - 70.81\,i$ \\
Pole (MeV) (upu) & $1392.92 - 167.13\,i$ & $1362.33 - 100.53\,i$ \\
%Pole (MeV) (upp) & $1475.20 - 104.14\,i$ & $1468.93 - 97.87\,i$ \\
% & & $1715.95 - 130.27\,i$ \\
%Pole (MeV) (uup) & $2013.44 - 51.00\,i$ & $1463.31 - 23.37\,i$ \\
\end{tabular}
\end{ruledtabular}
\end{table}
In light of the present experimental data, these two scenarios are
both acceptable. However, as illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fg:Tother},
measurements of the scattering amplitudes in the coupled channels $\pi
\Delta \to \pi \Delta$ and $\sigma N \to \sigma N$, would enable us to
distinguish between them.
%% This suggests that more experimental data would be extremely valuable in
%% shedding light on the nature of the Roper. However, we are unlikely to have
%% such data in the near future.
%
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{specI.pdf}
\caption{
%%%
The finite volume spectrum of Scenario I with a bare mass of 2.0 GeV.
The CSSM results \cite{Liu:2016uzk} are indicated by square symbols
and circles denote the more recent results from Lang {\it et al.}
\cite{Lang:2016hnn}. Solid symbols indicate states dominated by local
three-quark operators and open symbols indicate states dominated by
non-local momentum-projected five-quark operators. The colours red,
blue, green and orange are used to indicate the relative contributions
of the bare baryon basis state in the eigenstate, with red being the
largest contribution.
%%%
}\label{fg:specI}
\end{center}
% \end{figure}
%
%\begin{figure}[tbh]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{specII.pdf}
\caption{
%%%
The finite volume spectrum corresponding to Scenario II having a bare
bare mass of 1.7 GeV. Results are illustrated as described in
Fig.~\ref{fg:specI}.
%%%
}\label{fg:specII}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
%
\begin{figure}[tbh]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{waveallI.pdf}
\caption{
%%%
The pion-mass evolution of the Hamiltonian eigenvector components for
Scenario I having bare mass of 2.0 GeV. The black solid line indicates
the fraction of the bare-state, $|\langle m_0|E_i\rangle|^2$. The red
dashed, blue dotted and green dashed-dotted lines show the $\pi N$,
$\pi \Delta$ and $\sigma N$ contributions, summed over all discrete
momenta, $\sum_{\vec k} |\langle \alpha(\vec k) | E_i\rangle|^2$. (''Ei''
indicates the i'th energy level.)
%%%
}\label{fg:waveallI}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
%
%%\subsection{The result for lattice data}
%%
Given the absence of the relevant experimental data, we now turn to the results provided by
lattice QCD simulations, focussing on the recent work
of Lang {\it et al.}~\cite{Lang:2016hnn} and the
CSSM~\cite{Liu:2016uzk}.
%
The former is particularly interesting as incorporated $\pi N$ and $\sigma N$ five-quark non-local interpolating
fields with the momenta of each hadron projected to provide excellent
overlap with the low-lying scattering states of the spectrum. These
are in addition to standard three-quark interpolating fields which
have proved to favour localized states and miss the non-local
scattering states
\cite{Mahbub:2010rm,Mahbub:2012ri,Mahbub:2013ala,Mahbub:2013bba,Kiratidis:2015vpa,Kiratidis:2016hda}
making the lattice spectrum incomplete. In reporting these results in
Figs.~\ref{fg:specI} and \ref{fg:specII} we have used solid(open) symbols to
indicate states dominated by local(nonlocal) interpolating fields.
This information can be used in addition to the
standard analysis of the spectrum.
%% One of the critical challenges of modern lattice studies of excited
%% states is that there are multiple open channels coupled to a typical
%% excited state. These tend to have poor overlap with
%% typical, localized quark
%% model motivated interpolating fields and hence
%% the corresponding energy level may be missed. Lang {\it et al.}
%% sought to overcome this problem by explicitly introducing interpolating
%% fields designed to have a strong overlap with the meson baryon
%% channels and indeed were successful in seeing two low-lying states
%% corresponding to $\pi N$ and $\sigma N$ on their chosen finite volume.
%% The CSSM and Cyprus~\cite{Alexandrou:2014mka} studies did not see these
%% meson-baryon channels but it is important
%% to note that even so, the energy levels in both calculations which tended to
%% have a strong three-quark component do agree within errors. In addition,
%% the techniques employed by the CSSM Collaboration did allow one to find a
%% number of excited states, not just the lowest. For the purpose of our
%% analysis it is sufficient to note that states seen in both the CSSM and
%% Lang {\it et al.} analyses should be expected to have a significant
%% three quark (or quark model) component.
Just as insight into the composition of the lattice QCD states can be
obtained from the eigenvectors of the lattice correlation matrix used to
excite the states, Hamiltonian EFT also provides insight into their
composition via the superposition of basis
states for each eigenvector.
%% At this stage it is critical to recall that the Hamiltonian models
%% which we have applied to the same finite spatial volume used in the
%% lattice QCD studies indeed allows us to examine the composition of
%% each eigenstate.
In Figs.~\ref{fg:specI} and \ref{fg:specII} we not only show the
spectra calculated for Scenarios I and II but we also colour code the
lines to indicate the amount of the bare-baryon (or three-quark) basis
state in that particular eigenstate. The red, blue, green and orange
lines indicate the states having the first, second, third and fourth
largest bare-state contributions, respectively.
For Scenario I, all of the lattice states dominated by
local three-quark interpolating fields can be associated with a
colored line. Similarly, all of the Hamiltonian states having the
largest bare basis-state component, indicated in red in
Fig.~\ref{fg:specI}, have a nearby lattice QCD result. Thus, the
predictions of Scenario I are consistent with lattice QCD.
On the other hand, Scenario II displays little correspondence to the
lattice QCD results. Scenario II predicts a low-lying state with a
large bare basis-state component of approximately 50\%, approaching
that for the ground state. Such a state would be easy to excite in
lattice QCD with local three-quark operators. However this state is
not seen in the simulations. The lattice state that is seen at light
quark masses is actually excited by a $\pi N$ scattering-state
interpolating field. Indeed, Lang {\it et al.} \cite{Lang:2016hnn} only see
this state when they include a non-local $\pi N$ interpolating field.
%% There is a significant difference between the two scenarios in the two
%% lowest eigenstates in the physical pion mass region. In fit I the
%% lowest two states contain less than 5\% of the bare baryon state,
%% while in fit II the second eigenstate contains around 50\% of the bare
%% state. But, as we have explained, these two lowest states, which are
%% seen only in the simulations of Lang {\it et al.}, are clearly
%% meson-baryon states and one should not expect to find a significant
%% bare baryon component. Thus, the lattice data clearly supports
%% scenario I but is inconsistent with scenario II.
In Scenario I, the lattice excitation at $\simeq 1.5$ GeV is
described by a Hamiltonian eigenstate dominated by the $\pi N$ basis
state.
%
Fig.~\ref{fg:waveallI} shows the composition of the lowest ten
Hamiltonian eigenstates as a function of pion mass for
Scenario I. Near the physical mass the first eigenstate is
dominated by $\sigma N$ basis states. Again, this is consistent with
the work of Lang {\it et al.}, who only find the lowest state when
they include a non-local $\sigma N$ interpolating field. The
second state is dominated by the $\pi N$ channel but
some mixing with $\pi \Delta$ is also apparent.
%
The $\pi \Delta$ channel dominates the fifth excitation of the
spectrum at light quark masses and this serves as a prediction for
future lattice QCD calculations employing non-local momentum-projected
$\pi \Delta$ scattering-state interpolators.
It is only for the seventh, eighth and ninth eigenstates that we find
a significant bare basis-state contribution and this is precisely
where the lattice QCD states excited by local three-quark operators
reside.
%
The ninth state has an extremely large bare-state
component exceeding 50\% and both the CSSM and Lang {\it et al.}
observe lattice QCD eigenstates within one sigma of this state.
Next, we examine how the eigenstates evolve as the pion mass
increases. Here one anticipates rescattering to become suppressed as
the masses of the hadrons increase. In
Fig.~\ref{fg:waveallI} we see that in scenario I the bare baryon content of the
second and fourth eigenstates increases towards the upper end of the
pion-mass range. Once again this is consistent with the lattice
simulations as this is where the CSSM finds lower mass states in the
spectrum with local three-quark operators. Overall the Hamiltonian
eigenvectors obtained within Scenario I explain the lattice spectra
very well.
In contrast, the content of the Hamilton eigenvectors in Scenario II
is quite wrong. In particular, the lowest mass states are always
dominated by the bare-baryon basis state and as noted before, this is
inconsistent with the results of Lang {\it et al.}. Neither the CSSM
nor the Cyprus collaboration \cite{Alexandrou:2014mka} were able to
identify such states in their lattice results.
%% Returning to the region of physical pion mass, we observe that in scenario I it
%% is only for the seventh through ninth energy levels that one finds a large
%% bare baryon content. As we have already noted, that is where the CSSM and Cyprus
%% collaborations report energy levels. This naturally leads us to conclude that
In conclusion, the bare-baryon (or three-quark) basis state associated
with the Roper resonance found in Nature lies at approximately 2 GeV. This
large mass is required in order to provide a finite-volume spectrum
consistent with lattice QCD. The result is also consistent with
natural expectations from a harmonic oscillator spectrum.
%
%% With the nucleon at 1 GeV and the first negative parity excitation
%% at 1.5 GeV a 2 GeV excitation energy for a three-quark state is
%% anticipated.
%
A lower bare basis-state mass leads to the prediction of quark-model
like low-lying states dominated by a bare-state component. The
absence of such states in the lattice QCD spectrum rules out this
scenario.
%% we have shown that the experimental data in the region of the Roper
%% resonance allows two rather different interpretations, which cannot be distinguished
%% without a lot more data. In scenario I
%
In the preferred Scenario I with a 2 GeV bare-state mass, quark-model
like states sit high in the spectrum. In the finite volume of the
lattice, the bare state is dressed to produce states commencing at
$\simeq 1.9$ GeV for the lightest pion mass of 156 MeV. Indeed, the
CSSM studied the three-quark wave function of this state and
discovered it resembles the first radial excitation of the quark model
\cite{Roberts:2013ipa,Roberts:2013oea}.
%% In scenario II it is dominated by a bare baryon state, most readily
%% pictured as the state one might expect in a typical quark model. By
%% comparing the predictions of these two models with the energy levels
%% and content found in recent lattice QCD simulations, we are led to
%% conclude that while scenario I is completely consistent with the
%% lattice simulations, scenario II is not. In particular, in the region
%% of the physical pion mass the two lowest states found by Lang {\it et
%% al.} are clearly $\sigma N$ and $\pi N$ states, as predicted in
%% scenario I, whereas in scenario II they would be dominated by the bare
%% baryon component.
%% Given the enormous amount of spectroscopic work that has been carried out with
%% various quark models, it is natural to ask where the bare baryon or quark model
%% like state appears to be located. Based on the results of the CSSM and Cyprus
%% collaborations and the Hamiltonian model analysis of the content of the
%% eigenstates found in scenario I, we conclude that this state appears to lie
%% around 2 GeV. As noted earlier, this is consistent with a typical
%% harmonic oscillator spectrum with the nucleon around 1 GeV and the first negative
%% parity excitation around 1.5 GeV.
With this new insight, the mystery of the low-lying Roper resonance
may be nearing resolution. Evidence indicates the observed nucleon
resonance at 1440 MeV is best described as the result of strong
rescattering between coupled meson-baryon channels.
In working towards a definitive analysis there is ample scope for new
data to further resolve the nature of this state. Better and more
comprehensive experimental data on the channels coupled to the Roper
resonance would be of significant interest. Further development of
three-body channel contributions~\cite{Hansen:2014eka, Hansen:2015zga} in effective field theory is desired.
Similarly, a more comprehensive lattice QCD analysis of the {\em
complete} nucleon spectrum in several lattice volumes would serve
well to further expose the role of the coupled channels giving rise to
the Roper resonance.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{acknowledgments}
{\bf Acknowledgements:} We thank the PACS-CS Collaboration for making
their $2+1$ flavor configurations available and the ongoing support of
the ILDG. This research was undertaken with the assistance of the
University of Adelaide's Phoenix cluster and resources at the NCI
National Facility in Canberra, Australia. NCI resources were provided
through the National Computational Merit Allocation Scheme, supported
by the Australian Government and the University of Adelaide Partner
Share. This research is supported by the Australian Research Council
through the ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the
Terascale (CE110001104) and through Grants No.\
DP151103101 (A.W.T.), DP150103164, DP120104627 and LE120100181
(D.B.L.).
\end{acknowledgments}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%\bibliographystyle{PRbyMyself}
%\bibliography{$HOME/Articles/MyLib}
% BIBLIOGRAPHY
%\bibliographystyle{h-physrev4}
%\bibliographystyle{ieeetr}
\bibliographystyle{apsrev4-1}
\bibliography{refs}
%
%\begin{thebibliography}{10}
%%
%%\cite{Alexandrou:2014mka}
%%\bibitem{Alexandrou:2014mka}
% C.~Alexandrou, T.~Leontiou, C.~N.~Papanicolas and E.~Stiliaris,
% %``Novel analysis method for excited states in lattice QCD: The nucleon case,''
% Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 91}, no. 1, 014506 (2015)
% doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.014506
% [arXiv:1411.6765 [hep-lat]].
% %%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.014506;%%
% %13 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 03 Jan 2017
%
%\cite{Lang:2016hnn}
%\bibitem{Lang:2016hnn}
% C.~B.~Lang, L.~Leskovec, M.~Padmanath and S.~Prelovsek,
%``Pion-nucleon scattering in the Roper channel from lattice QCD,''
% arXiv:1610.01422 [hep-lat].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1610.01422;%%
%4 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 02 Jan 2017
%
%\end{thebibliography}
%
%% \section*{References}
% BIBLIOGRAPHY
% \bibliographystyle{h-physrev4}
% \biboptions{numbers,sort&compress}
%\bibliography{refs}
\end{document}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked
%Control: key (0)
%Control: author (72) initials jnrlst
%Control: editor formatted (1) identically to author
%Control: production of article title (-1) disabled
%Control: page (0) single
%Control: year (1) truncated
%Control: production of eprint (0) enabled
\begin{thebibliography}{45}%
\makeatletter
\providecommand \@ifxundefined [1]{%
\@ifx{#1\undefined}
}%
\providecommand \@ifnum [1]{%
\ifnum #1\expandafter \@firstoftwo
\else \expandafter \@secondoftwo
\fi
}%
\providecommand \@ifx [1]{%
\ifx #1\expandafter \@firstoftwo
\else \expandafter \@secondoftwo
\fi
}%
\providecommand \natexlab [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \enquote [1]{``#1''}%
\providecommand \bibnamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \bibfnamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \citenamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \href@noop [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \href [0]{\begingroup \@sanitize@url \@href}%
\providecommand \@href[1]{\@@startlink{#1}\@@href}%
\providecommand \@@href[1]{\endgroup#1\@@endlink}%
\providecommand \@sanitize@url [0]{\catcode `\\12\catcode `\$12\catcode
`\&12\catcode `\#12\catcode `\^12\catcode `\_12\catcode `\%12\relax}%
\providecommand \@@startlink[1]{}%
\providecommand \@@endlink[0]{}%
\providecommand \url [0]{\begingroup\@sanitize@url \@url }%
\providecommand \@url [1]{\endgroup\@href {#1}{\urlprefix }}%
\providecommand \urlprefix [0]{URL }%
\providecommand \Eprint [0]{\href }%
\providecommand \doibase [0]{http://dx.doi.org/}%
\providecommand \selectlanguage [0]{\@gobble}%
\providecommand \bibinfo [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \bibfield [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \translation [1]{[#1]}%
\providecommand \BibitemOpen [0]{}%
\providecommand \bibitemStop [0]{}%
\providecommand \bibitemNoStop [0]{.\EOS\space}%
\providecommand \EOS [0]{\spacefactor3000\relax}%
\providecommand \BibitemShut [1]{\csname bibitem#1\endcsname}%
\let\auto@bib@innerbib\@empty
%</preamble>
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Roper}(1964)}]{Roper:1964zza}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.~D.}\ \bibnamefont
{Roper}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.12.340} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {12}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {340} (\bibinfo {year} {1964})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = PRLTA,12,340;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Aznauryan}\ \emph {et~al.}(2008)\citenamefont
{Aznauryan} \emph {et~al.}}]{Aznauryan:2008pe}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.~G.}\ \bibnamefont
{Aznauryan}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {CLAS}),\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevC.78.045209} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {C78}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{045209} (\bibinfo {year} {2008})},\ \Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.0447}
{arXiv:0804.0447 [nucl-ex]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:0804.0447;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Joo}\ \emph {et~al.}(2005)\citenamefont {Joo} \emph
{et~al.}}]{Joo:2005gs}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont
{Joo}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {CLAS}),\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevC.72.058202} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.
Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {C72}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {058202}
(\bibinfo {year} {2005})},\ \Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-ex/0504027}
{arXiv:nucl-ex/0504027 [nucl-ex]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = NUCL-EX/0504027;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Weber}(1990)}]{Weber:1989fv}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.~J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Weber}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevC.41.2783} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {C41}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {2783} (\bibinfo {year} {1990})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = PHRVA,C41,2783;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Julia-Diaz}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Riska}(2006)}]{JuliaDiaz:2006av}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.}~\bibnamefont
{Julia-Diaz}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~O.}\ \bibnamefont
{Riska}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.09.016} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Nucl. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{A780}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {175} (\bibinfo {year} {2006})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0609064} {arXiv:nucl-th/0609064 [nucl-th]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = NUCL-TH/0609064;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Barquilla-Cano}\ \emph {et~al.}(2007)\citenamefont
{Barquilla-Cano}, \citenamefont {Buchmann},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Hernandez}}]{BarquillaCano:2007yk}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont
{Barquilla-Cano}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Buchmann}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont
{Hernandez}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.019903,
10.1103/PhysRevC.75.065203} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.
Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {C75}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {065203}
(\bibinfo {year} {2007})},\ \bibinfo {note} {[Erratum: Phys.
Rev.C77,019903(2008)]},\ \Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.3297}
{arXiv:0705.3297 [nucl-th]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:0705.3297;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Golli}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Sirca}(2008)}]{Golli:2007sa}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.}~\bibnamefont
{Golli}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Sirca}},\
}\href {\doibase 10.1140/epja/i2008-10677-3} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Eur. Phys. J.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {A38}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {271} (\bibinfo {year} {2008})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.3759} {arXiv:0708.3759 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:0708.3759;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Golli}\ \emph {et~al.}(2009)\citenamefont {Golli},
\citenamefont {Sirca},\ and\ \citenamefont {Fiolhais}}]{Golli:2009uk}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.}~\bibnamefont
{Golli}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Sirca}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Fiolhais}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1140/epja/i2009-10878-2} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Eur. Phys. J.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {A42}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {185} (\bibinfo {year} {2009})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.2066} {arXiv:0906.2066 [nucl-th]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:0906.2066;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Meissner}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Durso}(1984)}]{Meissner:1984un}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {U.~G.}\ \bibnamefont
{Meissner}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~W.}\ \bibnamefont
{Durso}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1016/0375-9474(84)90100-3} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Nucl. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{A430}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {670} (\bibinfo {year} {1984})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = NUPHA,A430,670;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Hajduk}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Schwesinger}(1984)}]{Hajduk:1984ry}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont
{Hajduk}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.}~\bibnamefont
{Schwesinger}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1016/0370-2693(84)90914-6} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{B140}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {172} (\bibinfo {year} {1984})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = PHLTA,B140,172;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Krehl}\ \emph {et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont {Krehl},
\citenamefont {Hanhart}, \citenamefont {Krewald},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Speth}}]{Krehl:1999km}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {O.}~\bibnamefont
{Krehl}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Hanhart}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Krewald}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Speth}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevC.62.025207} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {C62}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{025207} (\bibinfo {year} {2000})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/9911080} {arXiv:nucl-th/9911080 [nucl-th]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = NUCL-TH/9911080;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Schutz}\ \emph {et~al.}(1998)\citenamefont {Schutz},
\citenamefont {Haidenbauer}, \citenamefont {Speth},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Durso}}]{Schutz:1998jx}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont
{Schutz}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Haidenbauer}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Speth}}, \ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~W.}\ \bibnamefont {Durso}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevC.57.1464} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.
Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {C57}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {1464} (\bibinfo
{year} {1998})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = PHRVA,C57,1464;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Matsuyama}\ \emph {et~al.}(2007)\citenamefont
{Matsuyama}, \citenamefont {Sato},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Lee}}]{Matsuyama:2006rp}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Matsuyama}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Sato}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~S.~H.}\ \bibnamefont {Lee}},\
}\href {\doibase 10.1016/j.physrep.2006.12.003} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rept.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {439}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {193} (\bibinfo {year} {2007})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0608051} {arXiv:nucl-th/0608051 [nucl-th]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = NUCL-TH/0608051;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Kamano}\ \emph {et~al.}(2010)\citenamefont {Kamano},
\citenamefont {Nakamura}, \citenamefont {Lee},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Sato}}]{Kamano:2010ud}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.}~\bibnamefont
{Kamano}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~X.}\ \bibnamefont
{Nakamura}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~S.~H.}\ \bibnamefont
{Lee}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Sato}},\
}\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevC.81.065207} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {C81}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{065207} (\bibinfo {year} {2010})},\ \Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.5083}
{arXiv:1001.5083 [nucl-th]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1001.5083;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Kamano}\ \emph {et~al.}(2013)\citenamefont {Kamano},
\citenamefont {Nakamura}, \citenamefont {Lee},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Sato}}]{Kamano:2013iva}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.}~\bibnamefont
{Kamano}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~X.}\ \bibnamefont
{Nakamura}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~S.~H.}\ \bibnamefont
{Lee}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Sato}},\
}\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.035209} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {C88}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{035209} (\bibinfo {year} {2013})},\ \Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.4351}
{arXiv:1305.4351 [nucl-th]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1305.4351;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Suzuki}\ \emph {et~al.}(2010)\citenamefont {Suzuki},
\citenamefont {Julia-Diaz}, \citenamefont {Kamano}, \citenamefont {Lee},
\citenamefont {Matsuyama},\ and\ \citenamefont {Sato}}]{Suzuki:2009nj}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {N.}~\bibnamefont
{Suzuki}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.}~\bibnamefont {Julia-Diaz}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.}~\bibnamefont {Kamano}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~S.~H.}\ \bibnamefont {Lee}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Matsuyama}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Sato}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.042302} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {104}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{042302} (\bibinfo {year} {2010})},\ \Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.1356}
{arXiv:0909.1356 [nucl-th]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:0909.1356;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Hernandez}\ \emph {et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont
{Hernandez}, \citenamefont {Oset},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Vicente~Vacas}}]{Hernandez:2002xk}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont
{Hernandez}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont {Oset}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Vicente~Vacas}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevC.66.065201} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{C66}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {065201} (\bibinfo {year} {2002})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0209009} {arXiv:nucl-th/0209009 [nucl-th]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = NUCL-TH/0209009;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Barnes}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Close}(1983)}]{Barnes:1982fj}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont
{Barnes}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.~E.}\ \bibnamefont
{Close}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1016/0370-2693(83)90965-6} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{B123}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {89} (\bibinfo {year} {1983})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = PHLTA,B123,89;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Golowich}\ \emph {et~al.}(1983)\citenamefont
{Golowich}, \citenamefont {Haqq},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Karl}}]{Golowich:1982kx}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont
{Golowich}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont {Haqq}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Karl}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevD.28.160, 10.1103/PhysRevD.33.859} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{D28}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {160} (\bibinfo {year} {1983})},\ \bibinfo {note}
{[Erratum: Phys. Rev.D33,859(1986)]}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = PHRVA,D28,160;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Kisslinger}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Li}(1995)}]{Kisslinger:1995yw}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.~S.}\ \bibnamefont
{Kisslinger}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Z.~P.}\ \bibnamefont
{Li}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.R5986} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {D51}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {R5986} (\bibinfo {year} {1995})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = PHRVA,D51,R5986;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Patrignani}\ \emph {et~al.}(2016)\citenamefont
{Patrignani} \emph {et~al.}}]{Olive:2016xmw}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont
{Patrignani}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {Particle Data
Group}),\ }\href {\doibase 10.1088/1674-1137/40/10/100001} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Chin. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{C40}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {100001} (\bibinfo {year} {2016})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = CHPHD,C40,100001;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Hall}\ \emph {et~al.}(2015)\citenamefont {Hall},
\citenamefont {Kamleh}, \citenamefont {Leinweber}, \citenamefont {Menadue},
\citenamefont {Owen}, \citenamefont {Thomas},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Young}}]{Hall:2014uca}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~M.~M.}\
\bibnamefont {Hall}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont
{Kamleh}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~B.}\ \bibnamefont
{Leinweber}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.~J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Menadue}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.~J.}\ \bibnamefont {Owen}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~W.}\ \bibnamefont {Thomas}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~D.}\ \bibnamefont {Young}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.132002} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {114}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {132002} (\bibinfo {year} {2015})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.3402} {arXiv:1411.3402 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1411.3402;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Hall}\ \emph {et~al.}(2016)\citenamefont {Hall},
\citenamefont {Kamleh}, \citenamefont {Leinweber}, \citenamefont {Menadue},
\citenamefont {Owen},\ and\ \citenamefont {Thomas}}]{Hall:2016kou}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~M.~M.}\
\bibnamefont {Hall}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont
{Kamleh}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~B.}\ \bibnamefont
{Leinweber}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.~J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Menadue}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.~J.}\ \bibnamefont {Owen}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~W.}\ \bibnamefont {Thomas}},\
}\href@noop {} {\ (\bibinfo {year} {2016})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.07477} {arXiv:1612.07477 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1612.07477;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Liu}\ \emph {et~al.}(2016{\natexlab{a}})\citenamefont
{Liu}, \citenamefont {Kamleh}, \citenamefont {Leinweber}, \citenamefont
{Stokes}, \citenamefont {Thomas},\ and\ \citenamefont {Wu}}]{Liu:2015ktc}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Z.-W.}\ \bibnamefont
{Liu}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Kamleh}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~B.}\ \bibnamefont {Leinweber}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {F.~M.}\ \bibnamefont {Stokes}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {A.~W.}\ \bibnamefont {Thomas}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {J.-J.}\ \bibnamefont {Wu}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.082004} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {116}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{082004} (\bibinfo {year} {2016}{\natexlab{a}})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.00140} {arXiv:1512.00140 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.00140;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Liu}\ \emph {et~al.}(2017)\citenamefont {Liu},
\citenamefont {Hall}, \citenamefont {Leinweber}, \citenamefont {Thomas},\
and\ \citenamefont {Wu}}]{Liu:2016wxq}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Z.-W.}\ \bibnamefont
{Liu}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~M.~M.}\ \bibnamefont {Hall}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~B.}\ \bibnamefont {Leinweber}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~W.}\ \bibnamefont {Thomas}}, \ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {J.-J.}\ \bibnamefont {Wu}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevD.95.014506} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.
Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {D95}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {014506}
(\bibinfo {year} {2017})},\ \Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.05856}
{arXiv:1607.05856 [nucl-th]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1607.05856;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Molina}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Döring}(2016)}]{Molina:2015uqp}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont
{Molina}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Döring}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.056010,
10.1103/PhysRevD.94.079901} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.
Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {D94}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {056010}
(\bibinfo {year} {2016})},\ \bibinfo {note} {[Addendum: Phys.
Rev.D94,no.7,079901(2016)]},\ \Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.05831}
{arXiv:1512.05831 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.05831;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Liu}\ \emph {et~al.}(2016{\natexlab{b}})\citenamefont
{Liu}, \citenamefont {Kamleh}, \citenamefont {Leinweber}, \citenamefont
{Stokes}, \citenamefont {Thomas},\ and\ \citenamefont {Wu}}]{Liu:2016uzk}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Z.-W.}\ \bibnamefont
{Liu}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Kamleh}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~B.}\ \bibnamefont {Leinweber}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {F.~M.}\ \bibnamefont {Stokes}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {A.~W.}\ \bibnamefont {Thomas}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {J.-J.}\ \bibnamefont {Wu}},\ }\href@noop {} {\ (\bibinfo
{year} {2016}{\natexlab{b}})},\ \Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.04536}
{arXiv:1607.04536 [nucl-th]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1607.04536;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Hall}\ \emph {et~al.}(2013)\citenamefont {Hall},
\citenamefont {Hsu}, \citenamefont {Leinweber}, \citenamefont {Thomas},\ and\
\citenamefont {Young}}]{Hall:2013qba}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~M.~M.}\
\bibnamefont {Hall}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~C.~P.}\
\bibnamefont {Hsu}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~B.}\ \bibnamefont
{Leinweber}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~W.}\ \bibnamefont
{Thomas}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~D.}\ \bibnamefont
{Young}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.094510} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {D87}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {094510} (\bibinfo {year} {2013})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.4157} {arXiv:1303.4157 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1303.4157;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Wu}\ \emph {et~al.}(2014)\citenamefont {Wu},
\citenamefont {Lee}, \citenamefont {Thomas},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Young}}]{Wu:2014vma}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.-J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Wu}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~S.~H.}\ \bibnamefont {Lee}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~W.}\ \bibnamefont {Thomas}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~D.}\ \bibnamefont {Young}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevC.90.055206} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {C90}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{055206} (\bibinfo {year} {2014})},\ \Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.4868}
{arXiv:1402.4868 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1402.4868;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Wu}\ \emph {et~al.}(2016)\citenamefont {Wu},
\citenamefont {Kamano}, \citenamefont {Lee}, \citenamefont {Leinweber},\ and\
\citenamefont {Thomas}}]{Wu:2016ixr}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.-J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Wu}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.}~\bibnamefont {Kamano}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~S.~H.}\ \bibnamefont {Lee}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {D.~B.}\ \bibnamefont {Leinweber}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {A.~W.}\ \bibnamefont {Thomas}},\ }\href@noop {} {\ (\bibinfo
{year} {2016})},\ \Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.05970} {arXiv:1611.05970
[hep-lat]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1611.05970;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Cloet}\ \emph {et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont {Cloet},
\citenamefont {Leinweber},\ and\ \citenamefont {Thomas}}]{Cloet:2002eg}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.~C.}\ \bibnamefont
{Cloet}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~B.}\ \bibnamefont
{Leinweber}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~W.}\ \bibnamefont
{Thomas}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevC.65.062201} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{C65}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {062201} (\bibinfo {year} {2002})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0203023} {arXiv:hep-ph/0203023 [hep-ph]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = HEP-PH/0203023;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Suzuki}\ \emph {et~al.}(2009)\citenamefont {Suzuki},
\citenamefont {Sato},\ and\ \citenamefont {Lee}}]{Suzuki:2008rp}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {N.}~\bibnamefont
{Suzuki}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Sato}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~S.~H.}\ \bibnamefont {Lee}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.025205} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {C79}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{025205} (\bibinfo {year} {2009})},\ \Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.2043}
{arXiv:0806.2043 [nucl-th]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.2043;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Doring}\ \emph {et~al.}(2009)\citenamefont {Doring},
\citenamefont {Hanhart}, \citenamefont {Huang}, \citenamefont {Krewald},\
and\ \citenamefont {Meissner}}]{Doring:2009yv}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Doring}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Hanhart}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Huang}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Krewald}}, \ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {U.~G.}\ \bibnamefont {Meissner}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.08.010} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Nucl. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {A829}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {170}
(\bibinfo {year} {2009})},\ \Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.4337}
{arXiv:0903.4337 [nucl-th]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:0903.4337;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Lang}\ \emph {et~al.}(2017)\citenamefont {Lang},
\citenamefont {Leskovec}, \citenamefont {Padmanath},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Prelovsek}}]{Lang:2016hnn}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.~B.}\ \bibnamefont
{Lang}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Leskovec}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Padmanath}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Prelovsek}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.014510} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {D95}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{014510} (\bibinfo {year} {2017})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/1610.01422} {arXiv:1610.01422 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1610.01422;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Mahbub}\ \emph {et~al.}(2012)\citenamefont {Mahbub},
\citenamefont {Kamleh}, \citenamefont {Leinweber}, \citenamefont {Moran},\
and\ \citenamefont {Williams}}]{Mahbub:2010rm}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~S.}\ \bibnamefont
{Mahbub}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Kamleh}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~B.}\ \bibnamefont {Leinweber}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~J.}\ \bibnamefont {Moran}}, \ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~G.}\ \bibnamefont {Williams}} (\bibinfo
{collaboration} {CSSM Lattice}),\ }\href {\doibase
10.1016/j.physletb.2011.12.048} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {B707}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {389}
(\bibinfo {year} {2012})},\ \Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.5724}
{arXiv:1011.5724 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1011.5724;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Mahbub}\ \emph
{et~al.}(2013{\natexlab{a}})\citenamefont {Mahbub}, \citenamefont {Kamleh},
\citenamefont {Leinweber}, \citenamefont {Moran},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Williams}}]{Mahbub:2012ri}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~S.}\ \bibnamefont
{Mahbub}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Kamleh}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~B.}\ \bibnamefont {Leinweber}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~J.}\ \bibnamefont {Moran}}, \ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~G.}\ \bibnamefont {Williams}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevD.87.011501} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.
Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {D87}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {011501}
(\bibinfo {year} {2013}{\natexlab{a}})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.0240} {arXiv:1209.0240 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1209.0240;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Mahbub}\ \emph
{et~al.}(2013{\natexlab{b}})\citenamefont {Mahbub}, \citenamefont {Kamleh},
\citenamefont {Leinweber}, \citenamefont {Moran},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Williams}}]{Mahbub:2013ala}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~S.}\ \bibnamefont
{Mahbub}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Kamleh}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~B.}\ \bibnamefont {Leinweber}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~J.}\ \bibnamefont {Moran}}, \ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~G.}\ \bibnamefont {Williams}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevD.87.094506} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.
Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {D87}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {094506}
(\bibinfo {year} {2013}{\natexlab{b}})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.2987} {arXiv:1302.2987 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1302.2987;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Mahbub}\ \emph {et~al.}(2014)\citenamefont {Mahbub},
\citenamefont {Kamleh}, \citenamefont {Leinweber},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Williams}}]{Mahbub:2013bba}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~S.}\ \bibnamefont
{Mahbub}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Kamleh}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~B.}\ \bibnamefont {Leinweber}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~G.}\ \bibnamefont {Williams}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1016/j.aop.2014.01.004} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Annals Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {342}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {270} (\bibinfo {year} {2014})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.6803} {arXiv:1310.6803 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1310.6803;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Kiratidis}\ \emph {et~al.}(2015)\citenamefont
{Kiratidis}, \citenamefont {Kamleh}, \citenamefont {Leinweber},\ and\
\citenamefont {Owen}}]{Kiratidis:2015vpa}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~L.}\ \bibnamefont
{Kiratidis}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Kamleh}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~B.}\ \bibnamefont {Leinweber}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.~J.}\ \bibnamefont {Owen}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.094509} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {D91}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{094509} (\bibinfo {year} {2015})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.07667} {arXiv:1501.07667 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1501.07667;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Kiratidis}\ \emph {et~al.}(2016)\citenamefont
{Kiratidis}, \citenamefont {Kamleh}, \citenamefont {Leinweber}, \citenamefont
{Liu}, \citenamefont {Stokes},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Thomas}}]{Kiratidis:2016hda}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~L.}\ \bibnamefont
{Kiratidis}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Kamleh}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~B.}\ \bibnamefont {Leinweber}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {Z.-W.}\ \bibnamefont {Liu}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {F.~M.}\ \bibnamefont {Stokes}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {A.~W.}\ \bibnamefont {Thomas}},\ }\href@noop {} {\ (\bibinfo
{year} {2016})},\ \Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.03051} {arXiv:1608.03051
[hep-lat]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1608.03051;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Alexandrou}\ \emph {et~al.}(2015)\citenamefont
{Alexandrou}, \citenamefont {Leontiou}, \citenamefont {Papanicolas},\ and\
\citenamefont {Stiliaris}}]{Alexandrou:2014mka}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont
{Alexandrou}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont
{Leontiou}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.~N.}\ \bibnamefont
{Papanicolas}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont
{Stiliaris}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.014506} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{D91}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {014506} (\bibinfo {year} {2015})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.6765} {arXiv:1411.6765 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1411.6765;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Roberts}\ \emph {et~al.}(2013)\citenamefont
{Roberts}, \citenamefont {Kamleh},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Leinweber}}]{Roberts:2013ipa}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~S.}\ \bibnamefont
{Roberts}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Kamleh}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~B.}\ \bibnamefont {Leinweber}},\
}\href {\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.06.056} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {B725}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {164} (\bibinfo {year} {2013})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.0325} {arXiv:1304.0325 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1304.0325;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Roberts}\ \emph {et~al.}(2014)\citenamefont
{Roberts}, \citenamefont {Kamleh},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Leinweber}}]{Roberts:2013oea}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~S.}\ \bibnamefont
{Roberts}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Kamleh}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~B.}\ \bibnamefont {Leinweber}},\
}\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.074501} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {D89}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{074501} (\bibinfo {year} {2014})},\ \Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.6626}
{arXiv:1311.6626 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1311.6626;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Hansen}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Sharpe}(2014)}]{Hansen:2014eka}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~T.}\ \bibnamefont
{Hansen}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~R.}\ \bibnamefont
{Sharpe}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.116003} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{D90}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {116003} (\bibinfo {year} {2014})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.5933} {arXiv:1408.5933 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1408.5933;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Hansen}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Sharpe}(2015)}]{Hansen:2015zga}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~T.}\ \bibnamefont
{Hansen}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~R.}\ \bibnamefont
{Sharpe}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.114509} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{D92}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {114509} (\bibinfo {year} {2015})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.04248} {arXiv:1504.04248 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1504.04248;%%
\end{thebibliography}%