Analytical solutions for the radial Scarf II potential
Extracted source text ยท arXiv 1704.05634
%%
%% Copyright 2007, 2008, 2009 Elsevier Ltd
%%
%% This file is part of the 'Elsarticle Bundle'.
%% ---------------------------------------------
%%
%% It may be distributed under the conditions of the LaTeX Project Public
%% License, either version 1.2 of this license or (at your option) any
%% later version. The latest version of this license is in
%% http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
%% and version 1.2 or later is part of all distributions of LaTeX
%% version 1999/12/01 or later.
%%
%% The list of all files belonging to the 'Elsarticle Bundle' is
%% given in the file `manifest.txt'.
%%
%% Template article for Elsevier's document class `elsarticle'
%% with numbered style bibliographic references
%% SP 2008/03/01
%%
%%
%%
%% $Id: elsarticle.cls,v 1.20 2008-10-13 04:24:12 cvr Exp $
%%
%%
\documentclass[preprint,12pt]{elsarticle}
%% Use the option review to obtain double line spacing
%% \documentclass[preprint,review,12pt]{elsarticle}
%% Use the options 1p,twocolumn; 3p; 3p,twocolumn; 5p; or 5p,twocolumn
%% for a journal layout:
%% \documentclass[final,1p,times]{elsarticle}
%% \documentclass[final,1p,times,twocolumn]{elsarticle}
%% \documentclass[final,3p,times]{elsarticle}
%% \documentclass[final,3p,times,twocolumn]{elsarticle}
%% \documentclass[final,5p,times]{elsarticle}
%% \documentclass[final,5p,times,twocolumn]{elsarticle}
%% if you use PostScript figures in your article
%% use the graphics package for simple commands
%% \usepackage{graphics}
%% or use the graphicx package for more complicated commands
\usepackage{graphicx}
%% or use the epsfig package if you prefer to use the old commands
%% \usepackage{epsfig}
%% The amssymb package provides various useful mathematical symbols
\usepackage{amssymb}
%% The amsthm package provides extended theorem environments
%% \usepackage{amsthm}
%% The lineno packages adds line numbers. Start line numbering with
%% \begin{linenumbers}, end it with \end{linenumbers}. Or switch it on
%% for the whole article with \linenumbers after \end{frontmatter}.
%% \usepackage{lineno}
%% natbib.sty is loaded by default. However, natbib options can be
%% provided with \biboptions{...} command. Following options are
%% valid:
%% round - round parentheses are used (default)
%% square - square brackets are used [option]
%% curly - curly braces are used {option}
%% angle - angle brackets are used <option>
%% semicolon - multiple citations separated by semi-colon
%% colon - same as semicolon, an earlier confusion
%% comma - separated by comma
%% numbers- selects numerical citations
%% super - numerical citations as superscripts
%% sort - sorts multiple citations according to order in ref. list
%% sort&compress - like sort, but also compresses numerical citations
%% compress - compresses without sorting
%%
%% \biboptions{comma,round}
% \biboptions{}
\journal{Physics Letters A}
\begin{document}
\begin{frontmatter}
%% Title, authors and addresses
%% use the tnoteref command within \title for footnotes;
%% use the tnotetext command for the associated footnote;
%% use the fnref command within \author or \address for footnotes;
%% use the fntext command for the associated footnote;
%% use the corref command within \author for corresponding author footnotes;
%% use the cortext command for the associated footnote;
%% use the ead command for the email address,
%% and the form \ead[url] for the home page:
%%
%% \title{Title\tnoteref{label1}}
%% \tnotetext[label1]{}
%% \author{Name\corref{cor1}\fnref{label2}}
%% \ead{email address}
%% \ead[url]{home page}
%% \fntext[label2]{}
%% \cortext[cor1]{}
%% \address{Address\fnref{label3}}
%% \fntext[label3]{}
\title{Analytical solutions for the radial Scarf II potential}
%% use optional labels to link authors explicitly to addresses:
%% \author[label1,label2]{<author name>}
%% \address[label1]{<address>}
%% \address[label2]{<address>}
\author[atomki]{G. L\'evai\corref{cor1}\fnref{telfax}}
\ead{levai@atomki.mta.hu}
\address[atomki]{
Institute for Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
(Atomki), Debrecen, Pf.~51, Hungary 4001}
\author[ud]{\'A. Baran}
\address[ud]{Faculty of Informatics, University of Debrecen, Debrecen,
Pf.~400, Hungary 4002}
\author[atomki]{P. Salamon}
\author[atomki,ud]{T. Vertse}
\cortext[cor1]{Corresponding author}
\fntext[telfax]{Tel: +36-52-509238, Fax: +36-52-416181}
\begin{abstract}
%% Text of abstract
The real Scarf II potential is discussed as a radial problem. This
potential has been studied extensively as a one-dimensional problem,
and now these results are used to construct its bound and resonance
solutions for $l=0$ by setting the origin at some arbitrary value
of the coordinate. The solutions with appropriate boundary conditions
are composed as the linear combination of the two independent
solutions of the Schr\"odinger equation. The asymptotic expression
of these solutions is used to construct the $S_0(k)$ $s$-wave
$S$-matrix, the poles of which supply the $k$ values corresponding
to the bound, resonance and anti-bound solutions. The location of
the discrete energy eigenvalues is analyzed, and the relation of
the solutions of the radial and one-dimensional Scarf II potentials
is discussed. It is shown that the generalized Woods--Saxon potential
can be generated from the Rosen--Morse II potential in the same way
as the radial Scarf II potential is obtained from its one-dimensional
correspondent. Based on this analogy, possible applications are also
pointed out.
\end{abstract}
\begin{keyword}
%% keywords here, in the form: keyword \sep keyword
Scarf II potential \sep Analytical solutions \sep radial potentials
\sep $S$-matrix \sep bound states \sep resonances
%% PACS codes here, in the form: \PACS code \sep code
\PACS 03.65.Ge\sep 03.65.Nk\sep 02.30.Gp\sep 02.30.Ik\sep 24.10.Ht
%% MSC codes here, in the form: \MSC code \sep code
%% or \MSC[2008] code \sep code (2000 is the default)
\end{keyword}
\end{frontmatter}
%%
%% Start line numbering here if you want
%%
% \linenumbers
%% main text
%\section{}
%\label{}
\section{Introduction}
Exactly solvable quantum mechanical potentials proved to be invaluable tools
in the understanding of many fundamental quantum mechanical concepts. In
particular, they give insight into complex phenomena, like the symmetries
of quantum mechanical systems, and they allow the investigation of
transitions through critical parameter domains. Besides this, analytical
solutions serve as a firm basis for the development of numerical techniques.
The one-dimensional Schr\"odinger equation
\begin{equation}
-\psi''(x)+V(x)\psi(x)=E\psi(x)
\label{scheq}
\end{equation}
occurs in many applications. Here the potential function and the energy
eigenvalue are defined such that they contain reduced mass $m$ and $\hbar$ as
$V(x)=2mv(x)/\hbar^2$ and $E=2m \epsilon/\hbar^2$, so their physical dimension
is distance$^{-2}$. In the simplest case (\ref{scheq}) is defined on the
full $x$ axis, i.e. $x\in(-\infty,\infty)$, while for spherical
potentials defined in higher, typically three dimension, Eq.
(\ref{scheq}) can be obtained after the separation of the angular
variables, if only the $s$-wave ($l=0$) solutions are considered. In
this case the problem is defined on the positive half axis, $r\in[0,\infty)$,
and the $x$ variable is denoted by $r$. Besides these options, (\ref{scheq})
can also be defined on finite sections of the real $x$ axis, or even on
more complicated trajectories of the complex $x$ plane, but we shall not
consider these in the present work.
Being a second-order ordinary differential equation, (\ref{scheq}) has
two independent solutions, and the physical solutions can be obtained
as linear combination of these, satisfying the appropriate boundary
conditions. Due to normalizability, bound states have to vanish at the
boundaries (i.e. $x=\pm\infty$ in one dimension, and $r=0$ and $r=\infty$
in the radial case). Unbound solutions, e.g. scattering and resonance
solutions also have to satisfy asymptotic boundary conditions, depending
on the nature of the potential. If $V(x)$ vanishes exactly or exponentially
for $x\rightarrow\pm\infty$, then
these solutions of the one-dimensional problem have exponential
asymptotic components $\exp(\pm {\rm i}kx)$, where $E=k^2$. In the
radial case the same asymptotics are valid for $r\rightarrow\infty$,
while for $r=0$ these solutions have to vanish.
There are some potentials that are defined both as one-dimensional
and as radial problems, e.g. the harmonic oscillator. The bound-state
solutions of these two problems are related to each other in a special
way: the odd wave functions of the one-dimensional potential, which vanish
at $x=0$, are identical for $x\ge 0$ to the $s$-wave ($l=0$) radial
wave functions, and the energy eigenvalues are also identical.
A rather effective way for the unified discussion of bound, scattering
and resonance solutions
in asymptotically vanishing potentials
is the application of the transmission coefficient
$T(k)$ (in one dimension) and the $s$-wave $S$ matrix $S_0(k)$ (in the
radial case). These quantities can be constructed from the asymptotic
solutions, and their poles correspond to the bound, anti-bound and
resonance states. From the exact solutions of these problems $T(k)$
and $S_0(k)$ can also be expressed in closed analytic form.
Here we dicuss the Scarf II potential as a radial problem. This
potential has two independent terms and
belongs to the shape-invariant \cite{gendenshtein} subclass
of the Natanzon potential class \cite{natanzon}, which contains
problems with bound-state solutions written in terms of a single
hypergeometric function. The first reference to potential
(\ref{sciipot}) in the English literature occurred in 1983 in
Ref. \cite{gendenshtein}, so it is sometimes referred to as the
Gendenshtein potential. However, it was already mentioned a year
before in a Russian monograph \cite{natpriv}. Its detailed
description was presented later, e.g.
the normalization coefficients of its bound-state solutions
have been calculated only recently \cite{pla02}. The transmission
and reflection coefficients have been given in Ref. \cite{ks88}, with
corrections added in Ref. \cite{jpa01}. It has been a favourite toy
model in ${\cal PT}$-symmetric quantum mechanics, where it was used
to demonstrate the breakdown of ${\cal PT}$ symmetry
\cite{Ahm01a,mpla01a}. Further studies concerned its algebraic
\cite{BQ00,jpa01} and scattering aspects \cite{jpa01}, the combined
effects of SUSYQM and ${\cal PT}$ symmetry \cite{jpa02b}, the
pseudo-norm of its bound states \cite{pla02}, the handedness (chirality)
effects in scattering \cite{Ahm04}, spectral singularities \cite{Ahm09},
unidirectional invisibility \cite{Ahm13} and the accidental crossing
of its energy levels \cite{Ahm15}.
Despite its prominent status as a one-dimensional quantum system, the
Scarf II potential has not been considered yet as a radial problem. Here we
fill this gap by introducing a lower cut at a certain $x=r_0$ value
and prescribing the appropriate boundary conditions. We construct
the $S$-matrix for the $s$-wave solutions, $S_0(k)$, and determine
its poles on the complex $k$ plane to identify its bound, anti-bound
and resonance solutions. This will be done in Sec. \ref{radscii},
following the discussion of the one-dimensional problem for reference
in Sec. \ref{1dscii}. In Sec. \ref{gwsanalogy} the analogy with the
case of the generalized Woods--Saxon and the Rosen--Morse II
potentials will be outlined, and possible applications are pointed out.
Finally the results are summarized in Sec. \ref{summary}.
\section{The Scarf II potential in one dimension}
\label{1dscii}
A possible parametrization of this potential is \cite{jpa02b}
\begin{equation}
V(x)=-\frac{V_1}{\cosh^2(cx)}
+\frac{V_2\sinh(cx)}{\cosh^2(cx)}\ ,
\label{sciipot}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
V_1=c^2\left(\frac{\alpha^2+\beta^2}{2}-\frac{1}{4}\right)\hspace{2cm}
V_2={\rm i}c^2\frac{\beta^2-\alpha^2}{2}\ ,
\label{v1v2}
\end{equation}
and $c>0$ is a scaling factor of the coordinate.
This potential is real if $\alpha^*=\beta$ holds, while it is
${\cal PT}$-symmetric if $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are real or
imaginary. In what follows we consider the real version only.
Potential (\ref{sciipot}) is depicted in Fig. \ref{fig1} for
some values of the parameters. It has a minimum $x_-$ and a
maximum $x_+$ at
\begin{equation}
x_{\pm}=c^{-1}\sinh^{-1}\left[\frac{V_1}{V_2}
\pm \left[\left(\frac{V_1}{V_2}\right)^2+1\right]^{1/2}\right]\ .
\label{xpxm}
\end{equation}
The potential reflected by $x=0$ can be constructed easily by
considering $V_2\rightarrow -V_2$, i.e.
$\alpha\leftrightarrow\beta$.
The bound-state wave functions are
\begin{equation}
\psi_n(x) =C_n
(1-{\rm i}\sinh(cx))^{
\frac{\alpha}{2}+\frac{1}{4}}
(1+{\rm i}\sinh(cx))^{\frac{\beta}{2}+\frac{1}{4}}
P_n^{(\alpha,\beta)}({\rm i}\sinh(cx))\ ,
\label{sciiwf}
\end{equation}
while the corresponding energy eigenvalues are written as
\begin{equation}
E_n=
-c^2\left(n+\frac{\alpha+\beta+1}{2}\right)^2\ .
\label{sciien}
\end{equation}
Normalizability of (\ref{sciiwf}) requires
\begin{equation}
n<-\frac{1}{2}[{\rm Re}(\alpha+\beta)+1]\ .
\label{sciincond}
\end{equation}
$C_n$ in (\ref{sciiwf}) was calculated for the real and the
${\cal PT}$-symmetric
version of the Scarf II potential in Ref. \cite{pla02}. In the former
case it can be written as
\begin{equation}
C_n=2^{-\frac{\alpha+\beta}{2}-1}
\left[c\frac{\Gamma(-\alpha-n)\Gamma(-\beta-n)(-\alpha-\beta-2n-1)n!
}{
\Gamma(-\alpha-\beta-n)\pi
}
\right]^{1/2}\ .
\label{Cn}
\end{equation}
Note that although $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are complex, $C_n$ is real due to
$\alpha=\beta^*$ and Eq. (\ref{sciincond}). It can also be proven that
the bound-state wave functions (\ref{sciiwf}) are real for even $n$, and
imaginary for odd $n$: this can be demonstrated by expressing the
complex conjugate of (\ref{sciiwf}), which turns out to be
$[\psi_n(x)]^*=(-1)^n \psi_n(x)$, due to Eq. 22.4.1 of
Ref. \cite{AS70}.
With a reparametrization, the notation of Ref. \cite{jpa01} can
be obtained, in which the scattering aspects of the one-dimensional
Scarf II potential have been discussed. Taking
\begin{equation}
\alpha=-s-\frac{1}{2}-{\rm i}\lambda\ , \hspace{1cm}
\beta=-s-\frac{1}{2}+{\rm i}\lambda
\label{ab}
\end{equation}
one obtains
\begin{eqnarray}
V_1=c^2[s(s+1)-\lambda^2] \hspace{1cm} V_2=c^2(2s+1)\lambda
\label{v1v2sl}
\end{eqnarray}
in Eq. (\ref{sciipot}).
According to (\ref{ab}), the Scarf II potential will be real for real
values of $s$ and $\lambda$.
Note that this potential remains invariant if the signs of $s+1/2$ and
$\lambda$ are reversed simutaneously. This means that without the loss
of generality one can require $s>-1/2$. Condition (\ref{sciincond}) is now
$n<{\rm Re}(s)=s$, so in order to obtain normalizable states one needs
$s>0$. It is notable that $E_n$ in (\ref{sciien}) depends only on
$s=-(\alpha+\beta+1)/2$, and is independent of
$\lambda={\rm i}(\alpha-\beta)/2$.
In Ref. \cite{jpa01} the general solutions of the Schr\"odinger equation with
the potential (\ref{sciipot}) and (\ref{v1v2sl}) are expressed in terms of
hypergeometric functions as
\begin{eqnarray}
F_1(x) &&=
(1-{\rm i}\sinh(cx))^{-\frac{s+{\rm i}\lambda}{2}}
(1+{\rm i}\sinh(cx))^{-\frac{s-{\rm i}\lambda}{2}}
\nonumber\\
&&\times
_2F_1(-s-{\rm i}k, -s+{\rm i}k; {\rm i}\lambda-s+1/2; (1+{\rm i}\sinh(cx))/2)
\label{sol1}
\end{eqnarray}
and
\begin{eqnarray}
F_2(x) &&=
A(1-{\rm i}\sinh(cx))^{-\frac{s+{\rm i}\lambda}{2}}
(1+{\rm i}\sinh(cx))^{\frac{s+1-{\rm i}\lambda}{2}}
\nonumber\\
&&\times _2F_1(1/2-{\rm i}\lambda-{\rm i}k, 1/2-{\rm i}\lambda+{\rm i}k;
s+3/2-{\rm i}\lambda; (1+{\rm i}\sinh(cx))/2)\ .
\nonumber\\
\label{sol2}
\end{eqnarray}
Note that (\ref{sol2}) is obtained
from (\ref{sol1}) by Eq. 15.5.4 of Ref. \cite{AS70},
where $A=2^{{\rm i}\lambda -s -1/2}$. Note also that the two solutions
are connected by the $s+1/2\leftrightarrow {\rm i}\lambda$ transformation,
which leaves (\ref{v1v2sl}), and thus (\ref{sciipot}) invariant.
The asymptotic behavior of (\ref{sol1}) and (\ref{sol2}) can be obtained by
applying 15.3.4, 15.3.5 and 15.3.6 of Ref. \cite{AS70}, and the results are
\begin{eqnarray}
\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} F_1(x) &=&
a_{1+}\exp({\rm i}kx)+b_{1+}\exp(-{\rm i}kx)
\label{ab1+}\\
\lim_{x\rightarrow -\infty} F_1(x) &=&
a_{1-}\exp({\rm i}kx)+b_{1-}\exp(-{\rm i}kx)
\label{ab1-}\\
\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} F_2(x) &=&
a_{2+}\exp({\rm i}kx)+b_{2+}\exp(-{\rm i}kx)
\label{ab2+}\\
\lim_{x\rightarrow -\infty} F_2(x) &=&
a_{2-}\exp({\rm i}kx)+b_{2-}\exp(-{\rm i}kx)\ ,
\label{ab2-}
\end{eqnarray}
where
\begin{eqnarray}
a_{1+}=D_1 2^{-s-2{\rm i}k/c}{\rm e}^{\pi(k/c-\lambda-{\rm i}s)/2} &&
b_{1+}=C_1 2^{-s+2{\rm i}k/c}{\rm e}^{\pi(-k/c-\lambda-{\rm i}s)/2}
\label{ab1p}\\
a_{1-}=b_{1+}{\rm e}^{\pi(k/c+\lambda+{\rm i}s)} &&
b_{1-}=a_{1+}{\rm e}^{\pi(-k/c+\lambda+{\rm i}s)}
\label{ab1m}\\
a_{2+}=D_2 2^{-s-2{\rm i}k/c}{\rm e}^{\pi(k/c+\lambda+{\rm i}(s+1))/2}
\hspace{.4cm} &&
b_{2+}=C_2 2^{-s+2{\rm i}k/c}{\rm e}^{\pi(-k/c+\lambda+{\rm i}(s+1))/2}
\nonumber\\
\label{ab2p}\\
a_{2-}=b_{2+}{\rm e}^{\pi(k/c-\lambda-{\rm i}(s+1))} &&
b_{2-}=a_{2+}{\rm e}^{\pi(-k/c-\lambda-{\rm i}(s+1))}\ ,
\label{ab2m}
\end{eqnarray}
and
\begin{eqnarray}
C_1=\frac{\Gamma({\rm i}\lambda+1/2-s)\Gamma(-2{\rm i}k/c)}{
\Gamma({\rm i}\lambda+1/2-{\rm i}k/c)\Gamma(-s-{\rm i}k/c)}
&&
D_1=\frac{\Gamma({\rm i}\lambda+1/2-s)\Gamma(2{\rm i}k/c)}{
\Gamma({\rm i}\lambda+1/2+{\rm i}k/c)\Gamma(-s+{\rm i}k/c)}
\nonumber\\
\label{cd1}\\
C_2=\frac{\Gamma(-{\rm i}\lambda+3/2+s)\Gamma(-2{\rm i}k/c)}{
\Gamma(s+1-{\rm i}k/c)\Gamma(-{\rm i}\lambda+1/2-{\rm i}k/c)}
\hspace{.4cm}
&&
D_2=\frac{\Gamma(-{\rm i}\lambda+3/2+s)\Gamma(2{\rm i}k/c)}{
\Gamma(s+1+{\rm i}k/c)\Gamma(-{\rm i}\lambda+1/2+{\rm i}k/c)}
\nonumber\\
\label{cd2}
\end{eqnarray}
For a wave traveling to the right the transmission and reflection
coefficients are expressed as \cite{ks88,jpa01}
\begin{eqnarray}
T(k)&=&\frac{a_{1+}b_{2+}-b_{1+}a_{2+}}{a_{1-}b_{2+}-b_{1+}a_{2-}}
\nonumber\\
&=&
\frac{\Gamma(-s-{\rm i}k/c)\Gamma(s+1-{\rm i}k/c)
\Gamma({\rm i}\lambda+1/2-{\rm i}k/c)\Gamma(-{\rm i}\lambda+1/2-{\rm i}k/c)
}{\Gamma(-{\rm i}k/c)\Gamma(1-{\rm i}k/c)\Gamma^2(1/2-{\rm i}k/c)}
\nonumber\\
\label{tk}
\\
R(k)&=&\frac{b_{1-}b_{2+}-b_{1+}b_{2-}}{a_{1-}b_{2+}-b_{1+}a_{2-}}
\nonumber\\
&=&
T(k)\left(\frac{\cos(\pi s)\sinh(\pi\lambda)}{\cosh(\pi k/c)}
+{\rm i}\frac{\sin(\pi s)\cosh(\pi\lambda)}{\sinh(\pi k/c)}\right)\ .
\nonumber\\
\label{rk}
\end{eqnarray}
The poles of $T(k)$ are located at $-n=-s-{\rm i}k/c$, $-n=s+1-{\rm i}k/c$,
$-n=-{\rm i}\lambda+1/2-{\rm i}k/c$ and $-n={\rm i}\lambda+1/2-{\rm i}k/c$.
The first choice corresponds to the energy eigenvalues
\begin{equation}
E_n=-c^2(s-n)^2
\label{sciiensl}
\end{equation}
in accordance with (\ref{sciincond}), and converts $F_1(x)$ in (\ref{sol1})
into (\ref{sciiwf}) (up to the constant factor
$(-1)^n n! \Gamma(\beta+1)[\Gamma(\beta+n+1)C_n]^{-1}$) after applying
Eqs. 15.3.6 and 22.5.42 of Ref. \cite{AS70}.
The second one stands for anti-bound or virtual states with $k$
located on the negative imaginary axis, while the last two poles
correspond to non-normalizable
complex-energy states, i.e. resonances with
$E_n=k^2=-c^2(n-1/2\pm {\rm i}\lambda)^2$.
\section{The Scarf II potential as a radial problem}
\label{radscii}
In this case the general wave function is constructed from the linear
combination of the two independent solutions (\ref{sol1}) and (\ref{sol2})
with boundary condition that it should vanish at the origin. The position
of the origin need not be chosen at $x=0$, rather one can cut the
one-dimensional potential (\ref{sciipot}) at an arbitrary finite
value. Let us thus define $x=r+r_0$, where $r\in[0,\infty)$, i.e.
$x\in [r_0,\infty)$. Figure \ref{fig1} displays three possible
radial Scarf II potential with origin corresponding to various
values of $x=r_0$.
The general solution
\begin{equation}
\psi(r)=F_1(x)+C F_2(x)
\label{gensol}
\end{equation}
should vanish at $x=r_0$, which defines the constant $C$ as
\begin{equation}
C=-F_1(r_0)/F_2(r_0)\ .
\label{orig}
\end{equation}
The asymptotic behavior of the solution has to be inspected only for
$r\rightarrow \infty$, and the $S$-matrix for $l=0$ can be obtained from
\begin{equation}
\lim_{r\rightarrow\infty} \psi(r) =
\exp(-{\rm i}kr) -S_0(k)\exp({\rm i}kr)\ .
\label{smatrix}
\end{equation}
Making use of Eqs. (\ref{ab1+}) and (\ref{ab2+}) of the one-dimensional
problem the $S$-matrix can be constructed as
\begin{equation}
S_0(k)=-\frac{a_{1+}+C a_{2+}}{b_{1+}+C b_{2+}}
\label{scarfiism1}
\end{equation}
After some straightforward algebra one obtains
\begin{eqnarray}
S_0(k)=&&-2^{-4{\rm i}k/c} \exp(\pi k/c)
\frac{\Gamma(2{\rm i}k/c)}{\Gamma(-2{\rm i}k/c)}
\nonumber \\
&&\times
\left[
\frac{\Gamma({\rm i}\lambda+1/2-s)}{
\Gamma({\rm i}\lambda+1/2+{\rm i}k/c)\Gamma(-s+{\rm i}k/c)}
+{\rm i}C
\frac{\Gamma(-{\rm i}\lambda+3/2+s)\exp(\pi(\lambda+{\rm i}s))}{
\Gamma(s+1+{\rm i}k/c)\Gamma(-{\rm i}\lambda+1/2+{\rm i}k/c)}
\right]
\nonumber \\
&&\times
\left[
\frac{\Gamma({\rm i}\lambda+1/2-s)}{
\Gamma({\rm i}\lambda+1/2-{\rm i}k/c)\Gamma(-s-{\rm i}k/c)}
+{\rm i}C
\frac{\Gamma(-{\rm i}\lambda+3/2+s)\exp(\pi(\lambda+{\rm i}s))}{
\Gamma(s+1-{\rm i}k/c)\Gamma(-{\rm i}\lambda+1/2-{\rm i}k/c)}
\right]^{-1}
\nonumber\\
\label{scarfiism}
\end{eqnarray}
where
\begin{equation}
C=-\frac{(1+{\rm i}\sinh(cr_0))^{-s+{\rm i}\lambda-1/2}\
_2F_1(-s-{\rm i}k/c, -s+{\rm i}k; {\rm i}\lambda-s+1/2; (1+{\rm i}\sinh(cr_0))/2)
}{A
_2F_1(1/2-{\rm i}\lambda-{\rm i}k/c, 1/2-{\rm i}\lambda+{\rm i}k/c;
s+3/2-{\rm i}\lambda; (1+{\rm i}\sinh(cr_0))/2)
}
\\
\label{cconst}
\end{equation}
The $S$-matrix of Ref. \cite{npa96} is recovered in the special case of
$c=1$,
$\lambda=0$ and $r_0=0$. In that case the radial wave functions are obtained
from the odd-$n$ solutions of the one-dimensional problem that vanish
at the origin.
The poles of the $S$-matrix displayed for the various $r_0$ used in
Fig. \ref{fig1} are shown in Fig. \ref{2-9}.
The solutions of the one-dimensional and the radial problems can be
related to each other by various ways. First, if $r_0$ is defined
to be at a node of a particular wave function $\psi_n(x)$ of the
one-dimensional problem, then Eq. (\ref{gensol}) implies that
$\psi_n(r_0)=0$ can occur only for $C=0$, i.e. the solution of
the radial problem will be the corresponding solution of the
one-dimensional problem, defined for $x\ge r_0$. Furthermore, the
energy eigenvalues (and $k$) will also be the same. This scenario
is illustrated by the $E_3$ excited state of the one-dimensional
problem in Table
%\ref{tab1}:
1: $r_0=-2.017825$ coincides with the
first of the three nodes of $\psi_3(x)$ in (\ref{sciiwf}), so
this function will also act as the second excited state ($n=2$)
of the radial problem with the same energy eigenvalue
($E_2=-0.64$), since it has two more nodes.
The unnormalized bound-state wave functions of this potential
are displayed in Fig. \ref{fig3}. Obviously, the remaining
solutions of the radial problem cannot be calculated in the same
way. The situation is analogous to the case of the harmonic
oscillator, where some solutions of the radial problem can be
generated from those of the one-dimensional problem.
Another relation follows in situations when $r_0$ is defined at
a large enough negative value, where the bound-state wave functions
of the one-dimensional problem are close to zero. In this case
the boundary condition at $r_0$ implies that the second term
of (\ref{gensol}) should also be small in magnitude ($C$ will be
small), so the solution will be dominated by $F_1(x)$, i.e. the
bound-state
solution of the one-dimensional problem. This also means that
the energy eigenvalues of the radial problem will also be close
to those of the one-dimensional problem. A simple test for
some parameters is displayed in Table \ref{calcener}.
It is seen that the energy eigenvalues match reasonably well,
and the agreement gets better with $r_0\rightarrow-\infty$ and
for lower values of the $n$ quantum number, i.e. in situations
when the magnitude of $\psi_n(r_0)$ is smaller.
Considering
that the resonance solutions do not vanish asymptotically, the
same argumentation cannot be applied to them. Consequently, the
resonance energies of the one-dimensional and the radial Scarf II
potential differ from each other significantly.
\section{Relation to the generalized Woods--Saxon potential and possible
applications}
\label{gwsanalogy}
It can be noted that the radial Scarf II potential can be brought to a
form that is close to the notation of the generalized Woods--Saxon potential.
Applying the variable transformation
\begin{equation}
cx=c(r-R)\equiv \frac{r-R}{2a}
\label{vartr}
\end{equation}
in (\ref{sciipot}),
the equivalent form
\begin{eqnarray}
V(x)&=&-4V_1\frac{\exp((r-R)/a)}{[1+\exp((r-R)/a)]^2}
\nonumber\\
&&+2V_2\left[\frac{\exp((r-R)/(2a))}{1+\exp((r-R)/a)}
-2\frac{\exp((r-R)/(2a))}{[1+\exp((r-R)/a)]^2} \right]
\label{sciipottr}
\end{eqnarray}
is obtained.
%For $a=1/2$,
$r_0$ corresponds to $-R$, so the
radial version of the potential can be obtained by defining the
origin at the negative value of $r_0=-R$.
In fact, the same variable transformation relates the generalized
Woods--Saxon potential with the Rosen--Morse II potential \cite{jpa09b}
\begin{equation}
V(x)=-\frac{U_1}{\cosh^2(cx)}+U_2\tanh(cx)\ .
\label{rmiipot}
\end{equation}
After applying the (\ref{vartr}) transformation one obtains
\begin{equation}
V(r)=
-4U_1 \frac{\exp((r-R)/(a))}{[1+\exp((r-R)/a)]^2}
-U_2\frac{2}{1+\exp((r-R)/a)} +U_2\ ,
\label{rmiipotws}
\end{equation}
which is the Woods--Saxon potential with a shifted energy scale.
Note that the first terms of (\ref{sciipottr}) and (\ref{rmiipotws})
are the same, and also that the diffusity parameter $a$ is related
to $c$ via (\ref{vartr}).
The first ``surface'' term of (\ref{rmiipotws}) (and thus of
(\ref{rmiipot})) can be obtained as the first derivative of second
``volume'' term. There is no similar relation for the
Scarf II potential: however, the second term of (\ref{sciipot})
can be obtained from the first-order derivative of
$(\cosh(cx))^{-1}$, i.e. the square root of the first term.
Obviously, similar relation holds for (\ref{sciipottr}) too.
It should be noted that the Rosen--Morse II potential is defined
on the full real $x$ axis, so in order to obtain the Woods--Saxon
potential from it, one should consider $r\in [0,\infty)$ in
(\ref{vartr}). This means that the two solutions have to be
matched at $r=0$ in a way similar to that considered previously for
the Scarf II potential. In fact, the procedure applied there is the
same as that described in the notable work of Bencze \cite{bencze},
where the $S$ matrix of the Woods--Saxon potential was constructed
in an analytical form. See also Ref. \cite{npa16} as a more
accessible source of the formulas.
Note that in the one-dimensional Rosen--Morse II potential the
normalizable states are expressed in terms of only one of the
two independent solutions (similarly to the case of the one-dimensional
Scarf II potential), and they exist only for $U_1>0$ \cite{jpa09b}.
In contrast with this, in the radial problem, this ``surface'' term usually
plays the role of a barrier, i.e. $U_1<0$, and the attractive component
of the potential is represented by the ``volume'' term with $U_2>0$.
The relation between the Rosen--Morse II and the generalized
Woods--Saxon potential has been pointed out in Ref. \cite{berkd},
where analytical expressions were given for the $l=0$ bound-state
wave functions and the corresponding energy eigenvalues. However,
those wave functions do not vanish at the origin (their structure
is similar to the wave functions of the one-dimensional Rosen--Morse II
potential), so that approach can be considered as an approximation
only.
Given the analogy with the generalized Woods--Saxon potential,
possible applications of the radial Scarf II potential can be envisaged
in nuclear physics, for example. The barrier in Fig. \ref{fig1} can
simulate the effects of the Coulomb barrier that occurs when charged
particles (e.g. protons or $\alpha$-particles) interact with a nucleus.
The situation is qualitatively similar to the case of the generalized
Woods--Saxon potential, which has a similar barrier, and the difference
occurs within the nucleus, where the latter potential is constant,
while the radial Scarf II potential has a clear minimum, and
depending on $r_0$ it can increase close to the origin.
%
Potentials of this kind might be relevant to nuclei exhibiting
depleted central nucleon density. Such ``bubble'' nuclei have been
observed in recent experiments \cite{bubble}.
It is also possible to shift the barrier {\it inside} the nucleus
by formally reflecting the potential curve in Fig. \ref{fig1}
about $x=0$ and defining the origin near the potential maximum.
Staying with the original formalism, this corresponds to considering
$V_2<0$, i.e. taking $\alpha\leftrightarrow\beta$ in (\ref{v1v2}) or
$\lambda\rightarrow -\lambda$ in (\ref{v1v2sl}).
Potentials with such shape occur in
hypernuclei, where the interaction of $\Lambda$ particles with $\alpha$
particles or nucleons requires the presence of a soft repulsive core
with variable heigth \cite{daska}.
Finally, the formalism can be extended to the case of optical potentials
with complex values of $V_1$ and $V_2$: the calculation of the
wave functions, $S$-matrix, energy eigenvalues, including that of
the resonances will be the same.
\section{Summary}
\label{summary}
Based on the results of the one-dimensional Scarf II potential, the
radial version of this potential was studied. For this, the origin
was defined at an arbitrary value on the real $x$ axis, and the
$s$-wave solutions were constructed from the two independent
solutions of the one-dimensional Schr\"odinger equation, after
prescribing the appropriate boundary conditions. The asymptotic
form of these solutions was used to construct the $S_0(k)$
$S$-matrix. The poles of $S_0(k)$ were located, and were
identified with the bound, anti-bound and resonance solutions.
It was shown that by selecting the origin far enough from
the potential minimum, the bound-state energy eigenvalues and
wave functions of the radial potential tended to those of the
one-dimensional potential. Furthermore, selecting the origin
at the node of some bound-state wave function of the one-dimensional
potential, this wave function appeared as a bound-state wave
function of the radial potential with the same energy eigenvalue.
With a slightly modified parametrization, the radial Scarf II
potential could be compared with the generalized Woods--Saxon
potential, and it was shown that they share a term (the ``surface''
term of the latter potential). In fact, it was demonstrated that
the radial Scarf II potential can be generated from the
one-dimensional Scarf II potential in the same way as the
generalized Woods--Saxon
potential is generated from the one-dimensional Rosen--Morse II
potential. The connection between the latter two potentials has
been known before \cite{berkd}, however, the bound-state wave
functions generated from this connection did not satisfy the
appropriate boundary conditions.
Based on its similarity with the generalized Woods--Saxon potential,
the radial Scarf II potential could be applied in nuclear physics,
for example.
One possibility is considering problems, which are characterized
by a barrier at the surface of the nucleus, but in which the flat
potential inside the nucleus is replaced with a potential well
with a clear minimum. Another option is placing the barrier inside
the nucleus near the origin, simulating a repulsive interaction
there. The formalism can be extended to the case of complex values
of $V_1$ and $V_2$, i.e. to optical potentials.
\section*{Acknowledgments}
This work was supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research
Fund -- OTKA, grant No. K112962.
%% The Appendices part is started with the command \appendix;
%% appendix sections are then done as normal sections
%% \appendix
%% \section{}
%% \label{}
%% References
%%
%% Following citation commands can be used in the body text:
%% Usage of \cite is as follows:
%% \cite{key} ==>> [#]
%% \cite[chap. 2]{key} ==>> [#, chap. 2]
%%
%% References with bibTeX database:
%\bibliographystyle{elsarticle-num}
%\bibliography{<your-bib-database>}
%% Authors are advised to submit their bibtex database files. They are
%% requested to list a bibtex style file in the manuscript if they do
%% not want to use elsarticle-num.bst.
%% References without bibTeX database:
% \begin{thebibliography}{00}
\begin{thebibliography}{00}
\bibitem{gendenshtein} L. E. Gendenshtein,
{\it Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. Pis. Red.} {\bf 38} (1983) 299
(Eng. transl. {\it JETP Lett.} {\bf 38} (1983) 35).
\bibitem{natanzon} G. A. Natanzon G,
{\it Teor. Mat. Fiz.} {\bf 38} (1971) 146.
\bibitem{natpriv} G. Natanson 2011, private communication
\bibitem{pla02} G. L\'evai, F. Cannata and A. Ventura,
{\it Phys. Lett. A} {\bf 300} (2002) 271.
\bibitem{ks88} A. Khare and U. P. Sukhatme,
{\it J. Phys. A:Math. Gen.} {\bf 21} (1988) L501.
\bibitem{jpa01} G. L\'evai, F. Cannata and A. Ventura,
{\it J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.} {\bf 34} (2001) 839.
\bibitem{Ahm01a} Z. Ahmed,
{\it Phys. Lett. A} {\bf 282} (2001) 343.
\bibitem{mpla01a} G. L\'evai and M. Znojil,
{\it Mod. Phys. Lett. A} {\bf 30} (2001) 1973.
\bibitem{BQ00} B. Bagchi and C. Quesne,
{\it Phys. Lett. A} {\bf 273} (2000) 285.
\bibitem{jpa02b} G. L\'evai and M. Znojil,
{\it J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.} {\bf 35} (2002) 8793.
\bibitem{Ahm04} Z. Ahmed,
{\it Phys. Lett. A} {\bf 324} (2004) 152.
\bibitem{Ahm09} Z. Ahmed,
{\it J. Phys. A:Math. Theor.} {\bf 42} (2009) 472005.
\bibitem{Ahm13} Z. Ahmed,
{\it Phys. Lett. A} {\bf 377} (2013) 957.
\bibitem{Ahm15} Z. Ahmed, D. Ghosh, J. A. Nathan and G. Parkar,
{\it Phys. Lett. A} {\bf 379} (2015) 2424.
\bibitem{AS70} M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun,
{\it Handbook of Mathematical Functions},
Dover, New York, 1970.
\bibitem{npa96} D. Baye, G. L\'evai and J.-M. Sparenberg,
{\it Nucl. Phys. A} {\bf 599} (1996) 435.
\bibitem{jpa09b} G. L\'{e}vai and E. Magyari,
{\it J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.} {\bf 42} (2009) 19:5302.
\bibitem{bencze} Gy. Bencze,
{\it Commentationes Physico-Mathematicae} {\bf 31} (1966) 1.
\bibitem{npa16} P. Salamon, \'A. Baran and T. Vertse,
{\it Nucl. Phys. A} {\bf 952} (2016) 1.
\bibitem{berkd} C. Berkdemir, A. Berkdemir and R. Sever,
{\it Phys. Rev. C} {\bf 72} (2005) 027001.
\bibitem{bubble} A. Mutschler, A. Lemasson, O. Sorlin, D. Bazin,
C. Borcea, R. Borcea, Z. Dombr\'adi, J.-P. Ebran,
A. Gade, H. Iwasaki, E. Khan, A. Lepailleur, F. Recchia,
T. Roger, F. Rotaru, D. Sohler, M. Stanoiu, S. R. Stroberg,
J. A. Tostevin, M. Vandebrouck, D. Weisshaar and K. Wimmer,
{\it Nature Physics} (2016) doi:10.1038/nphys3916
\bibitem{daska} C. Daskaloyannis, M. Grypeos and H. Nassena
{\it Phys. Rev. C} {\bf 26} (1982) 702.
\end{thebibliography}
\begin{figure}[h]
\begin{center}
\resizebox*{10cm}{!}{{\includegraphics{fig1_new.eps}}}
\end{center}
\caption{The structure of the one-dimensional Scarf II
potential for $V_1=13.4$ and $V_2=18.92$ corresponding to
$c=1$,
$\alpha=-4.3-2.2{\rm i}=\beta^*$, $s=3.8$ and $\lambda=2.2$.
This potential has four bound states
at $E_0=-14.44$, $E_1=-7.84$, $E_2=-3.24$ and $E_3=-0.64$.
% --> Table 1.
The vertical lines at $x=r_0=-0.4965$, $-2.017825$ (abbreviated in the
plot) and $-6.0$
define three radial potentials (see Sec. \ref{radscii}) with different
location of the origin. In the first case $r_0=x_-$, while the
second $r_0$ corresponds to the first node of $\psi_2(x)$ in
(\ref{sciiwf}).
}
\label{fig1}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[h]
\begin{center}
\resizebox*{10cm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig2_new_color.eps}}
\end{center}
\caption{The poles of $S_0(k)$ for the parameters used in Fig. \ref{fig1}.
Poles located on the positive and negative imaginary axis correspond
to bound and anti-bound states, respectively, while those appearing
symmetrically in the third and fourth quadrant represent resonance states.
}
\label{2-9}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[h]
\begin{center}
\resizebox*{10cm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig3.eps}}
\end{center}
\caption{Modulus of the unnormalized $l=0$ bound-state wave
functions of the radial Scarf II potential for $r_0=-2.017825$.
The remaining parameters are the same as those used in
Fig. \ref{fig1}. The second ($n=2$) excited wave function with
two nodes coincides with the wave function of the one-dimensional
problem belonging to the same energy eigenvalue, $-0.64$ (see
Table 1). For the
normalization of the wave functions, integrals containing the
product of hypergeometric functions defined on
$x\in[r_0,\infty)$ would have to be calculated using numerical
methods.}
\label{fig3}
\end{figure}
\begin{table}[h!]
\begin{center}
\caption{Bound-state energies of the one-dimensional Scarf II
potential and those of the radial one defined with various $r_0$
in Fig. \ref{fig1}.}
\label{calcener}
\begin{tabular}{lcccc}
\hline
& 1D case & $r_0=-0.4965$ & $r_0=-2.017825$ & $r_0=-6.0$ \\
\hline\\
$E_0$ & $-14.44$ & $-5.69802$ & $-14.41825$ & $-14.44000$ \\
$E_1$ & $-7.84$ & -- & $-7.34803$ & $-7.84000$ \\
$E_2$ & $-3.24$ & -- & $-0.64000$ & $-3.23998$ \\
$E_3$ & $-0.64$ & -- & -- & $-0.61366$ \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\label{tab1}
\end{table}
\end{document}