Physics with ions at the Future Circular Collider
Extracted source text ยท arXiv 1704.05891
% Template for Elsevier CRC journal article
% version 1.2 dated 09 May 2011
% This file (c) 2009-2011 Elsevier Ltd. Modifications may be freely made,
% provided the edited file is saved under a different name
% This file contains modifications for Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplement
% Changes since version 1.1
% - added "procedia" option compliant with ecrc.sty version 1.2a
% (makes the layout approximately the same as the Word CRC template)
% - added example for generating copyright line in abstract
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%% This template uses the elsarticle.cls document class and the extension package ecrc.sty
%% For full documentation on usage of elsarticle.cls, consult the documentation "elsdoc.pdf"
%% Further resources available at http://www.elsevier.com/latex
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% %%
%% Important note on usage %%
%% ----------------------- %%
%% This file should normally be compiled with PDFLaTeX %%
%% Using standard LaTeX should work but may produce clashes %%
%% %%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\documentclass[3p,times,procedia]{elsarticle}
\usepackage{nupha_ecrc}
%% The ecrc package defines commands needed for running heads and logos.
%% For running heads, you can set the journal name, the volume, the starting page and the authors
%% set the volume if you know. Otherwise `00'
\volume{00}
%% set the starting page if not 1
\firstpage{1}
%% Give the name of the journal
\journalname{Nuclear Physics A}
%% Give the author list to appear in the running head
%% Example \runauth{C.V. Radhakrishnan et al.}
\runauth{}
%% The choice of journal logo is determined by the \jid and \jnltitlelogo commands.
%% A user-supplied logo with the name <\jid>logo.pdf will be inserted if present.
%% e.g. if \jid{yspmi} the system will look for a file yspmilogo.pdf
%% Otherwise the content of \jnltitlelogo will be set between horizontal lines as a default logo
%% Give the abbreviation of the Journal.
\jid{nupha}
%% Give a short journal name for the dummy logo (if needed)
\jnltitlelogo{Nuclear Physics A}
%% Hereafter the template follows `elsarticle'.
%% For more details see the existing template files elsarticle-template-harv.tex and elsarticle-template-num.tex.
%% Elsevier CRC generally uses a numbered reference style
%% For this, the conventions of elsarticle-template-num.tex should be followed (included below)
%% If using BibTeX, use the style file elsarticle-num.bst
%% End of ecrc-specific commands
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
\usepackage{xspace}
\usepackage{calrsfs}
% put your own definitions here:
% \newcommand{\cZ}{\cal{Z}}
% \newtheorem{def}{Definition}[section]
% ...
\newcommand{\sqrts}{\sqrt{s}}
\newcommand{\pT}{\rm p_{T}}
\newcommand{\sqrtsnn}{\sqrt{s_{_{\mbox{\rm \tiny{NN}}}}}}
\newcommand{\RAA}{R_{_{\rm AA}}}
\newcommand{\alphaS}{\alpha_{\rm s}}
\newcommand{\pt}{p_{\rm T}}%{p_{_{\rm T}}}
\newcommand{\Lumi}{\mathcal{L}}
\newcommand{\Lint}{\mathcal{L}_{\mbox{\rm \tiny{int}}}}
\newcommand{\Lunits}{cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$}
\newcommand{\pythia}{{\sc pythia}}
%\newcommand{\herwig}{{\sc herwig}}
\newcommand{\mcfm}{{\sc mcfm}}
%\newcommand{\vbfnlo}{{\sc vbfnlo}}
\newcommand{\jpsi} {\rm J/\psi}
\newcommand{\gaga} {\gamma\,\gamma}
\newcommand{\qqbar} {q\bar{q}}
\newcommand{\ccbar} {c\bar{c}}
\newcommand{\bbbar} {b\bar{b}}
\newcommand{\ttbar} {t\bar{t}}
%\newcommand{\qqbar} {\rm q\bar{q}}
%\newcommand{\ccbar} {\rm c\bar{c}}
%\newcommand{\bbbar} {\rm b\bar{b}}
%\newcommand{\ttbar} {\rm t\bar{t}}
\newcommand{\lele}{\ell^{+}\,\ell^{-}}
\newcommand{\epem}{\rm e^{+}\,e^{-}}
\newcommand{\CHECK}[1]{\textbf{\color{red}#1}}
\newcommand\cO{{\cal O}}
\newcommand*{\eg}{e.g.\@\xspace}
\newcommand*{\ie}{i.e.\@\xspace}
\newcommand*{\cm}{c.m.\@\xspace}
\def\ttt#1{\texttt{\scriptsize #1}}
\renewcommand\arraystretch{1.3}% Tabular row height (1.0 is for standard spacing)
% add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
%\hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
% declarations for front matter
\begin{document}
\begin{frontmatter}
%% Title, authors and addresses
%% use the tnoteref command within \title for footnotes;
%% use the tnotetext command for the associated footnote;
%% use the fnref command within \author or \address for footnotes;
%% use the fntext command for the associated footnote;
%% use the corref command within \author for corresponding author footnotes;
%% use the cortext command for the associated footnote;
%% use the ead command for the email address,
%% and the form \ead[url] for the home page:
%%
%% \title{Title\tnoteref{label1}}
%% \tnotetext[label1]{}
%% \author{Name\corref{cor1}\fnref{label2}}
%% \ead{email address}
%% \ead[url]{home page}
%% \fntext[label2]{}
%% \cortext[cor1]{}
%% \address{Address\fnref{label3}}
%% \fntext[label3]{}
%% Instructions from Editor: Please use the following \dochead only in the preprint version (e-print arXiv etc.);
%% use empty \dochead{} when submitting to Nuclear Physics A!
\dochead{XXVIth International Conference on Ultrarelativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions\\ (Quark Matter 2017)}
%\dochead{}
%% Use \dochead if there is an article header, e.g. \dochead{Short communication}
%% \dochead can also be used to include a conference title, if directed by the editors
%% e.g. \dochead{17th International Conference on Dynamical Processes in Excited States of Solids}
\title{Physics with ions at the Future Circular Collider}
%% use optional labels to link authors explicitly to addresses:
%% \author[label1,label2]{<author name>}
%% \address[label1]{<address>}
%% \address[label2]{<address>}
\author{David~d'Enterria$^\dagger$ for the FCC-ions study group (L.~Apolinario, N.~Armesto, A.~Dainese,
J.~Jowett, J.P.~Lansberg, S.~Masciocchi, G.~Milhano, %W.~Riegler,
C.~Roland, C.A.~Salgado, M.~Schaumann, M.~van Leeuwen, U.A.~Wiedemann)}
\address{$^\dagger$CERN, EP Department, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland}
\begin{abstract}
The unique physics opportunities accessible with nuclear collisions at the CERN Future Circular Collider (FCC)
are summarized. Lead-lead (PbPb) and proton-lead (pPb) collisions at $\sqrtsnn$~=~39 and 63~TeV respectively
with $\Lint$~=~33~nb$^{-1}$ and 8~pb$^{-1}$ monthly integrated luminosities, will provide unprecedented
experimental conditions to study quark-gluon matter at temperatures $\cO$(1~GeV). The following topics
are succinctly discussed: %(i) midrapidity particle and energy densities at least twice larger than those ever reached before,
(i) charm-quark densities thrice larger than at the LHC, leading to direct heavy-quark impact in the bulk QGP properties,
(ii) quarkonia, including $\Upsilon(1S)$, melting at temperatures up to five times above the QCD critical temperature,
(iii) access to initial-state nuclear parton distributions (nPDF) at fractional momenta as low as $x\approx 10^{-7}$,
(iv) availability of about $5\cdot 10^5$ top-quark pairs per run to study the high-$x$ gluon nPDF and the
energy loss properties of boosted colour-antennas, %$4\cdot 10^5$
(v) study of possible Higgs boson suppression in the QGP, and
(vi) high-luminosity $\gaga$ (ultraperipheral) collisions at c.m. energies up to 1~TeV.
\end{abstract}
\begin{keyword}
FCC \sep nuclear collisions \sep charm \sep quarkonia \sep low-$x$ QCD \sep top quark \sep Higgs boson \sep photon-photon collisions
%% MSC codes here, in the form: \MSC code \sep code
%% or \MSC[2008] code \sep code (2000 is the default)
\end{keyword}
\end{frontmatter}
% \linenumbers
%\vspace{1cm}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Introduction}
%\label{}
The FCC is a future collider project under study at CERN aiming at proton-proton (pp) collisions at a centre-of-mass (\cm)
energy $\sqrts$~=~100~TeV in a new 80--100 km tunnel with 16--20~T dipoles~\cite{Benedikt:2015poa}.
The FCC operation with nuclear beams yields nucleon-nucleon \cm\ energies
$\rm \sqrtsnn=\!100~TeV\cdot\sqrt{Z_1Z_2/(A_1A_2)}\!$~=~39~TeV (63~TeV) for PbPb (pPb), \ie\ $\times$7
larger than those accessible at the LHC. The expected (monthly) integrated luminosities
are also $\times$10 above the LHC values: $\Lint$~=~33~nb$^{-1}$ and 8~pb$^{-1}$ for PbPb and
pPb~\cite{Schaumann:2015fsa,Dainese:2016gch}.
This writeup succinctly summarizes the novel physics opportunities at reach with nuclear collisions at the
FCC, covering the detailed studies presented in~\cite{Dainese:2016gch} plus some more recent developments.
%, with an emphasis on hard probes (top quark, Higgs boson)
%accessible in large samples for the first time at such high \cm\ energies.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Global medium properties, and small-$x$ QCD}
%\label{}
At 39~TeV, central PbPb collisions will produce $\rm dN_{ch}/d\eta|_{\eta=0}\approx$~3\,600 charged
particles per unit rapidity at midrapidity, according to an extrapolation of the current data based on a
$\propto(\!\sqrtsnn)^{0.3}$ dependence. For a participant volume of V~=~11\,000~fm$^{3}$, the formation of
a quark-gluon plasma (QGP) with 35--40~GeV/fm$^{3}$ energy density is expected at $\tau_0$~=~1~fm/c~\cite{Dainese:2016gch}.
%These values, twice larger than the corresponding quantities at the LHC, imply
At earlier times, the medium temperatures will reach T~$\approx$~1~GeV.
The twofold larger multiplicities and hotter medium open up the possibility to carry out
event-by-event measurements of high-harmonics $v_n$ of the azimuthal distribution of particles
with respect to the reaction plane over a large density range. Such Fourier coefficients
are sensitive to different dependencies of the QGP shear-viscosity over entropy-density
($\eta/s$) ratio as a function of temperature (Fig.~\ref{fig:1}, left).
\begin{figure*}[hbpt!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.37\textwidth,height=6.5cm]{viscosity_vn_FCC.pdf}\hspace{0.5cm}
\includegraphics[width=0.47\textwidth,height=6.5cm]{x_Q2_map_FCC_pA.pdf}
\caption{Left: Different dependencies of the $\eta/s$ ratio versus temperature (top) and associated
viscous hydrodynamics predictions of the $v_n$ azimuthal coefficients as a function of particle density (bottom).
Right: Regions of the $x$--$Q^2$ plane covered in pPb at FCC and LHC
(for varying rapidities $y_{\rm lab}$~=~0--6.6) and in nuclear DIS+DY,
compared to the expected saturation scale $Q^2_{sat}(x)$ curve.}
\label{fig:1}
\end{figure*}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%\section{Small-$x$ QCD}
%\label{}
The large FCC \cm\ energies and correspondingly broad rapidity ranges for particle
production result in a very wide kinematical reach in terms of probed fractional
momenta $x$ in the nuclear parton distribution functions (nPDF).
%The kinematical coverage of the FCC, LHC and previous fixed target machines.
Semihard ($Q\approx$~5~GeV) forward ($|y|>3$) particles will probe nPDF down to
$x \approx Q\,e^{-y}/\sqrtsnn\approx$~10$^{-7}$, while cross sections of the
``standard candles'' W and Z bosons will be sensitive to $x\approx$~10$^{-4}$ at midrapidity (Fig.~\ref{fig:1}, right).
Since currently there are no direct data constraints on nPDF below $x\approx 5\cdot10^{-3}$~\cite{Eskola:2009uj},
the FCC data provides a huge lever-arm to study the small-$x$ parton structure and evolution.
%Given the fast rise of the gluon density at low $x$, one expects their saturation through $gg$ recombination
%processes at scales $Q_{sat}\approx A^{1/3}(\sqrtsnn)^\lambda\,e^{\lambda\,y}$ with $\lambda\approx 0.3$~\cite{Gelis:2010nm}.
Back-to-back jet/hadron correlations at forward $y$ in pPb~\cite{Rezaeian:2012ye}, and
exclusive $\jpsi$ production in ultraperipheral (photon-induced) PbPb collisions~\cite{Armesto:2017hrs}
will be processes particularly sensitive to the saturation regime (below the $Q_{sat}$ curve in Fig.~\ref{fig:1}, right),
where standard DGLAP collinear factorization is expected to break down~\cite{Gelis:2010nm}.%, due to large non-linear QCD corrections~\cite{Gelis:2010nm}.
%Saturation physics can be studied in pPb collisions at the FCC through %a variety of measurements at the FCC such as
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Open charm and bottom, quarkonia, and top quarks}
%\label{}
PbPb collisions at 39~TeV will lead to a very abundant production of charm quarks from both initial
gluon-gluon interactions (the $\ccbar$ cross sections will even exceed $\rm \sigma_{inel}(pPb,PbPb)$,
indicating a very large probability for multiple charm production per event~\cite{dEnterria:2016yhy})
plus secondary $gg\to\ccbar$ processes in the thermalizing plasma~\cite{Zhou:2016wbo,Liu:2016zle} which
increase the final yield by 50--100\%. Such large charm densities will have two main
consequences. First, since finite-T QCD calculations~\cite{Laine:2006cp} indicate that charm quarks start
contributing as thermal degrees-of-freedom in the QGP equation of state for T$\approx$~350~MeV,
they will modify the bulk thermodynamic properties of the medium compared to lower-energy collisions,
as well as actively participate in the collectively flowing medium. Secondly, thermal %thermally produced charm
$\ccbar$ quarks can recombine into $\jpsi$ bound states with larger probability than at the LHC~\cite{Andronic:2011yq},
leading to a change in the $\jpsi$ production pattern from the suppression %($\RAA<1$)
observed so far to an enhanced production %($\RAA>1$)
at low $\pT$ compared to pp collisions at the same energy~\cite{Liu:2016zle}.
In the bottom-quark sector, the initial QGP temperatures $\cO$(1~GeV) can lead to direct melting of the $\Upsilon$(1S)
bound-state, expected by lattice-QCD calculations to occur at T~=~(4--5)T$_c$~\cite{Aarts:2014cda}, although the large
density of $\bbbar$ pairs may partially compensate such a suppression through recombination
in the plasma~\cite{Andronic:2011yq}.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%\section{Physics with top quarks}
%\label{}
The top quark production cross sections at FCC energies are very large: $\sigma(\ttbar)\approx$~3.2,~300~$\mu$b
in pPb and PbPb respectively~\cite{d'Enterria:2015mgr,dEnterria:2017jyt}, %as computed at NLO accuracy~\cite{Campbell:2010ff},
\ie\ $\times$55--85 larger than at the LHC. The corresponding yields per month, after typical analysis
cuts, amount to few $10^5$ $\ttbar$ pairs in the ``cleanest'' fully leptonic decay channel,
$\ttbar\to \bbbar\,2\ell\,2\nu$~\cite{dEnterria:2017jyt} (or about $\times$4 more in the lepton+jets modes).
Top quarks provide valuable information of both
the initial and final states in nuclear collisions. Since top pairs are dominantly produced in $gg$ fusion
processes, the rapidity distribution of their decay leptons in pPb compared to pp collisions traces accurately
the nuclear modification of the gluon nPDF at high scales $Q = m_{\rm top}$ over a wide $x$ range~\cite{d'Enterria:2015mgr}.
%but, in particular, in the unexplored high-$x$ region where ``antishadowing'' and ``EMC'' effects are supposed
%to modify its shape compared to the free proton case~\cite{Eskola:2009uj}.
The impact that the FCC $\ttbar$ data would have in a nPDF EPS09 global fit~\cite{Eskola:2009uj}
%has been quantified via a Hessian reweighting technique~\cite{Paukkunen:2014zia}. The expected improvements of
is shown via the $R_{\rm g}^{\rm Pb}(x,Q^2) = g_{\rm Pb}(x,Q^2)/g_{\rm p}(x,Q^2)$ ratio
%at $Q^2=m^2_{\rm top}$
in Fig.~\ref{fig:2} (left). The uncertainties on the nuclear glue are reduced by about a factor
of two (grey band compared to red dashes), mostly in the so-far unexplored antishadowing and EMC $x$
regions~\cite{d'Enterria:2015mgr,Dainese:2016gch}.
\begin{figure*}[hbpt!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.50\textwidth]{gluons4.pdf}\hspace{0.1cm}
\includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{top_pT_Eloss.png}
\caption{Left: Ratio of Pb over p nuclear EPS09 gluon at $Q=m_{\rm top}$ (red dashes) and estimated improvements
obtained using FCC pPb pseudodata (grey band)~\cite{d'Enterria:2015mgr,dEnterria:2017jyt}.
Right: Reconstructed top mass as a function of top-quark $\pT$ for various energy loss scenarios~\cite{top_Eloss}.}
\label{fig:2}
\end{figure*}
The top quark can also be used as sensitive probe of in-medium parton energy loss by studying boosted
topologies with increasingly longer (Lorentz-dilated) decays into final-state quarks $t\to W(\qqbar')b$.
Due to the Lorentz boost, the system travels through the medium as a colour-singlet antenna
for some fraction of the time.
By comparing the reconstructed top mass as a function of its $\pT$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:2}, right), it should be thus possible
to get a unique insight into the space-time evolution of jet-quenching in the hot QCD medium~\cite{top_Eloss}.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Higgs boson suppression, and photon-photon collisions}
%\label{}
The FCC will also allow for the observation of the Higgs boson in nuclear collisions since its production
cross sections, $\sigma(gg\to \rm H)\approx$~0.12,~12~$\mu$b in pPb and PbPb respectively, are $\times$20
larger than at the LHC~\cite{dEnterria:2017jyt}. In the clean diphoton ``discovery'' channel, after branching
ratio (BR~=~0.23\%), acceptance and efficiency losses, one expects about 500 and 1\,000 Higgs events per month
in PbPb and pPb, on top of the corresponding $\gaga$ non-resonant background. Figure~\ref{fig:3} (left) shows the
expected invariant mass distribution in PbPb at 39~TeV. The expected significance of the diphoton signal
(S) over the background (B), computed via S/$\sqrt{\rm B}$ at the Higgs peak, is 5.5$\sigma$.
Interestingly, once produced, the Higgs boson, with a lifetime of $\rm \tau_0 \approx$~50~fm/c, %in PbPb collisions,
traverses the final-state medium and can scatter with the surrounding partons, resulting in a potential
depletion of its yields compared to the pp case~\cite{DdE_CL}. Since the Higgs boson production cross
section in absence of final-state effects is theoretically very well known~\cite{Anastasiou:2015ema},
the amount of potential Higgs boson suppression can thus be used to accurately determine the density of the produced QGP.\\
\begin{figure*}[hbpt!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,height=5.6cm]{dsigmadm_Hgg_SplusB_PbPb_39TeV_lumi33invpb.pdf}\hspace{0.0cm}
\includegraphics[width=0.54\textwidth,height=5.6cm]{lumi_gammagamma_fcc_ions.pdf}
\caption{Left: Expected diphoton invariant mass in PbPb at $\sqrtsnn$~=~39~TeV
for a Higgs boson signal injected on top of the $\gaga$ backgrounds~\cite{dEnterria:2017jyt}.
Right: Effective photon-photon luminosities as a function of $\gaga$ \cm\ energy ($W_{\gaga}$)
for 5 different systems at FCC and LHC energies (the vertical dashed lines indicate the
thresholds for Higgs, $W^+W^-$, Z\,Z, and $\ttbar$ photon-fusion production.}
\label{fig:3}
\end{figure*}
Ultraperipheral interactions of ions, without hadronic overlap, provide very clean means to study photon-photon collisions
at high energies, as their luminosities are extremely enhanced in nuclear compared to proton or electron beams
(by a factor $Z^4 = 5\cdot10^7$ for PbPb)~\cite{Baltz:2007kq}. Figure~\ref{fig:3} (right) shows the effective
photon-photon luminosity as a function of the $\gaga$ \cm\ energy reachable in various colliding systems
($\epem$, pp, and PbPb) at the LHC and FCC energies. Clearly, PbPb at 39 TeV provides the largest two-photon
luminosities, reaching for the first time the energy range beyond 1~TeV. The vertical lines show the thresholds for
photon-fusion production of Higgs, $W^+W^-$, $ZZ$, and $\ttbar$. All such processes, sensitive to different tests
of the electroweak sector of the Standard Model, will have visible counts at the FCC in its PbPb running mode.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%\section{Photon-induced collisions}
%\label{}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Summary}
%\label{}
The FCC provides unique physics capabilities for heavy-ion physics in pPb and PbPb collisions
with $\times$7 and $\times$10 larger \cm\ energies and integrated luminosities than at the LHC.
The expected particle and energy densities will be twice above those reached at the LHC,
leading to medium temperatures in the 1~GeV range; charm densities will be $\times$3 those at the LHC,
leading to a possibly enhanced $\jpsi$ production by recombination in the plasma;
and the tightly-bounded $\Upsilon$(1S) resonance can be melted in the hot QGP. The large
\cm\ energies will open up studies of nuclear parton distributions in the unexplored
saturation (down to $x\approx$~10$^{-7}$) and large-$x$ (antishadowing
and EMC domains, with top-quarks) regimes. The heaviest SM elementary particles (top quark and Higgs boson)
will be copiously produced, offering novel high-precision handles to study the properties of hot
and dense QCD matter. Last but not least, ultraperipheral nuclear collisions will provide high-luminosity
two-photon collisions at \cm\ energies reaching the TeV range. %for the first time.
%In the first case, forward charm production will probe
%nPDFs down to $x\approx$~10$^{-7}$ where saturation should dominate the parton dynamics.
%In the large $x$ regime, the very copious production of $\ttbar$ pairs will provide unique
%handles to study the gluon nPDFs in the unknown antishadowing and EMC domains.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{thebibliography}{00}
%\cite{Benedikt:2015poa} %``FCC-hh Hadron Collider - Parameter Scenarios and Staging Options,''
\bibitem{Benedikt:2015poa}M.~Benedikt, B.~Goddard, D.~Schulte, F.~Zimmermann and M.~J.~Syphers, IPAC-2015-TUPTY062.
%%CITATION = IPAC-2015-TUPTY062;%%
%\cite{Schaumann:2015fsa}%``Potential performance for Pb-Pb, p-Pb and p-p collisions in a future circular collider,''
\bibitem{Schaumann:2015fsa}M.~Schaumann, Phys.\ Rev.\ ST Accel.\ Beams {\bf 18} (2015) 091002
% doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.18.091002
[arXiv:1503.09107 [physics.acc-ph]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.18.091002;%%
%\cite{Dainese:2016gch} %``Heavy ions at the Future Circular Collider,''
\bibitem{Dainese:2016gch} A.~Dainese, U.~A. ~Wiedemann, N.~Armesto, D.~d'Enterria, J.~M.~Jowett {\it et al.},
arXiv:1605.01389 [hep-ph]. %%CITATION = ARXIV:1605.01389;%%
% {EPS09: A New Generation of NLO Nuclear PDFs},
\bibitem{Eskola:2009uj}K.~J. Eskola, H.~Paukkunen, C.~A. Salgado, JHEP {\bf 04} (2009) 065; [arXiv:0902.4154 [nucl-th]].
%\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.4154} {\path{arXiv:0902.4154}},
% \href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/04/065} {\path{doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/04/065}}.
%\cite{Rezaeian:2012ye}%``CGC predictions for p+A collisions at the LHC and signature of QCD saturation,''
\bibitem{Rezaeian:2012ye} A.~H.~Rezaeian, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 718} (2013) 1058
% doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.11.066
[arXiv:1210.2385 [hep-ph]]. %%CITATION = doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.11.066;%%
%\cite{Armesto:2017hrs}%``Diffractive production in ultra-peripheral collisions at high-energy,''
\bibitem{Armesto:2017hrs}N.~Armesto and A.~H.~Rezaeian, AIP Conf.\ Proc.\ {\bf 1819} (2017) 030008.
% doi:10.1063/1.4977126 %%CITATION = doi:10.1063/1.4977126;%%
%\cite{Gelis:2010nm} %``The Color Glass Condensate,''
\bibitem{Gelis:2010nm}F.~Gelis, E.~Iancu, J.~Jalilian-Marian and R.~Venugopalan, Ann.\ Rev.\ Nucl.\ Part.\ Sci.\ {\bf 60} (2010) 463
% doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.010909.083629
[arXiv:1002.0333 [hep-ph]]. %%CITATION = doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.010909.083629;%%
%\cite{dEnterria:2016yhy}%``Triple parton scatterings in proton-nucleus collisions at high energies,''
\bibitem{dEnterria:2016yhy} D.~d'Enterria and A.~M.~Snigirev, arXiv:1612.08112 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1612.08112;%%
%\cite{Zhou:2016wbo}%``Thermal Charm and Charmonium Production in Quark Gluon Plasma,''
\bibitem{Zhou:2016wbo} K.~Zhou, Z.~Chen, C.~Greiner and P.~Zhuang, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 758} (2016) 434
% doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.05.051
[arXiv:1602.01667 [hep-ph]]. %%CITATION = doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.05.051;%%
%\cite{Liu:2016zle}%``Thermal production of charm quarks in heavy ion collisions at Future Circular Collider,''
\bibitem{Liu:2016zle}Y.~Liu and C.~M.~Ko, J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 43} (2016) 125108 %doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/12/125108
[arXiv:1604.01207 [nucl-th]]. %%CITATION = doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/12/125108;%%
%\cite{Laine:2006cp} %``Quark mass thresholds in QCD thermodynamics,''
\bibitem{Laine:2006cp} M.~Laine and Y.~Schroder, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73} (2006) 085009
% doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.085009
[hep-ph/0603048]. %%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.085009;%%
%\cite{Andronic:2011yq}%``The thermal model on the verge of the ultimate test: particle production in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC,''
\bibitem{Andronic:2011yq}A.~Andronic, P.~Braun-Munzinger, K.~Redlich and J.~Stachel, J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 38} (2011) 124081
% doi:10.1088/0954-3899/38/12/124081
[arXiv:1106.6321 [nucl-th]]. %%CITATION = doi:10.1088/0954-3899/38/12/124081;%%
%\cite{Aarts:2014cda}%``The bottomonium spectrum at finite temperature from N$_{f}$ = 2 + 1 lattice QCD,''
\bibitem{Aarts:2014cda}G.~Aarts, C.~Allton, T.~Harris, S.~Kim, M.~P.~Lombardo {\it et al.}, %, S.~M.~Ryan and J.~I.~Skullerud,
JHEP {\bf 07} (2014) 097
% doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)097
[arXiv:1402.6210 [hep-lat]]. %%CITATION = doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)097;%%
%\bibitem{Campbell:2010ff} %{MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC},
%J.~M. Campbell, R.~K. Ellis,Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 205-206 (2010) 10--15; [arXiv:1007.3492 [hep-ph]]
%\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.3492} {\path{arXiv:1007.3492}},
% \href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2010.08.011}
% {\path{doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2010.08.011}}.
%\bibitem{Boughezal:2016wmq} %{Color Singlet Production at NNLO in MCFM},
%R.~Boughezal, J.~M. Campbell, R.~K. Ellis, C.~Focke, W.~Giele {\it et al.}, %X.~Liu, F.~Petriello, C.~Williams,
%Eur. Phys. J. C77~(1) (2017) 7; [arXiv:1605.08011 [hep-ph]]
%\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.08011} {\path{arXiv:1605.08011}},
% \href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4558-y} {\path{doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4558-y}}.
%Top-quark production in proton~nucleus and nucleus~nucleus collisions at LHC energies and beyond},
\bibitem{d'Enterria:2015mgr}D.~d'Enterria, K.~Krajczar, H.~Paukkunen, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 746} (2015) 64 %--72
[arXiv:1501.05879 [hep-ph]].
%\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.05879} {\path{arXiv:1501.05879}},
% \href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.04.044}
% {\path{doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.04.044}}.
%\cite{dEnterria:2017jyt} %``Top-quark and Higgs boson perspectives at heavy-ion colliders,''
\bibitem{dEnterria:2017jyt} D.~d'Enterria, arXiv:1701.08047 [hep-ex].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1701.08047;%%
\bibitem{top_Eloss}L.~Apolinario {\it et al.}, to be submitted (2017).
%\bibitem{Paukkunen:2014zia} %%{PDF reweighting in the Hessian matrix approach},
%H.~Paukkunen, P.~Zurita, JHEP 12 (2014) 100;
%\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.6623} {\path{arXiv:1402.6623}},
% \href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2014)100}
% {\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2014)100}}.
%[arXiv:1402.6623 [hep-ph].
\bibitem{DdE_CL}D.~d'Enterria and C.~Loizides, to be submitted (2017).
\bibitem{Anastasiou:2015ema} %%{Higgs Boson Gluon-Fusion Production in QCD at Three Loops},
C.~Anastasiou, C.~Duhr, F.~Dulat, F.~Herzog, B.~Mistlberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 114} (2015) 212001 [arXiv:1503.06056 [hep-ph]].
%\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.06056} {\path{arXiv:1503.06056}},
% \href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.212001}
% {\path{doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.212001}}.
%\cite{Baltz:2007kq} %``The Physics of Ultraperipheral Collisions at the LHC,''
\bibitem{Baltz:2007kq}A.~J.~Baltz G. Baur, D. d'Enterria, L. Frankfurt, F. Gelis {\it et al.}, Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 458} (2008) 1
% doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.12.001
[arXiv:0706.3356 [nucl-ex]]. %%CITATION = doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.12.001;%%
%\cite{dEnterria:2016ztx}%``Measuring light-by-light scattering at the LHC and FCC,''
%\bibitem{dEnterria:2016ztx}D.~d'Enterria and G.~G.~da Silveira, arXiv:1602.08088 [hep-ph].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1602.08088;%%
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}
%%
%% End of file `nupha-template.tex'.