Gravity Defied (from potato asteroids to magnetised neutron stars) IV. Neutron Stars (dead stars of the second kind)
Extracted source text ยท arXiv 1705.09962
%2,5,5,4
%==========================================================================%
\documentclass{resonance}
%%This is Resonance General Article sample
%%amsthm, array
%%
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{color}
%--------------------------------------------------------------------------%
%
% Sushan's Macros
\parindent=0pt
\parskip=8pt
\def\i{\item}
\def\ni{\noindent}
\def\etal{{\it et al.}\thinspace}
\def\ie{{\it i.e.,}\thinspace}
\newcommand{\f}{\frac}
\newcommand{\cp}{\clearpage}
\newcommand{\bed}{\begin{displaymath}}
\newcommand{\eed}{\end{displaymath}}
\newcommand{\bei}{\begin{itemize}}
\newcommand{\eei}{\end{itemize}}
\newcommand{\bef}{\begin{figure}}
\newcommand{\eef}{\end{figure}}
\newcommand{\ben}{\begin{enumerate}}
\newcommand{\een}{\end{enumerate}}
\newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
\newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
\newcommand{\ber}{\begin{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\eer}{\end{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\ab}{\bf A}
\newcommand{\bb}{\bf B}
\newcommand{\eb}{\bf e}
\newcommand{\fb}{\bf f}
\newcommand{\eg}{\bf g}
\newcommand{\jb}{\bf J}
\newcommand{\vb}{\bf v}
\newcommand{\nb}{\bf \nabla}
\newcommand{\rb}{\bf r}
\newcommand{\rn}{$\rho_{\rm nuc}$}
\newcommand{\rd}{$\rho_{\rm drip}$}
\newcommand{\pa}{\partial}
\newcommand{\uv}{\bf \hat{e}}
\newcommand{\vt}{v_{\theta}}
\newcommand{\vtr}{\bf v_{\rm tr}}
\newcommand{\gcc}{\mbox{${\rm g} \, {\rm cm}^{-3}$}}
\newcommand{\edot}{\mbox{$\dot E$}}
\newcommand{\lsun}{\mbox{{\rm L}$_{\odot}$}}
\newcommand{\mdot}{\mbox{$\dot{M}$}}
\newcommand{\msun}{\mbox{{\rm M}$_{\odot}$}}
\newcommand{\rsun}{\mbox{{\rm R}$_{\odot}$}}
\newcommand{\ndot}{\mbox{$\dot {\nu}$}}
\newcommand{\pdot}{\mbox{$\dot P$}}
\newcommand{\dmdt}{{\mbox{{\rm M}$_{\odot}$}} {\rm yr}$^{-1}$}
\newcommand{\lsim}{\raisebox{-0.3ex}{\mbox{$\stackrel{<}{_\sim} \,$}}}
\newcommand{\gsim}{\raisebox{-0.3ex}{\mbox{$\stackrel{>}{_\sim} \,$}}}
%
% Collaborative Editing
%
\newcounter{attnctr} \setcounter{attnctr}{0}
\newcommand{\attn}[1]{\addtocounter{attnctr}{1}{\color{magenta} /*{\sf ATTN(\arabic{attnctr})} {\color{magenta} #1} {\color{magenta}{\sf */}}}}
% to display suggested change together with the original
\newcommand{\suggest}[2]{{\color{gray} \sout{#1}} {\color{blue} #2}}
% to commit the suggested changes: either uncomment this line,
%\renewcommand{\suggest}[2]{#2}
% or change all \suggest below this line to \commit.
\newcommand{\commit}[2]{#2}
\newcommand{\revert}[2]{#1}
%
% Colours :
%
\definecolor{cblue}{rgb}{0.9,0.9,1.0}
\definecolor{darkblue}{rgb}{0.1,0.1,0.6}
\definecolor{darkred}{rgb}{0.6,0.1,0.1}
%
%--------------------------------------------------------------------------%
\begin{document}
% 4 chapters of 2500 - 3000 word each
% 4 chapters of 4000 - 5000 word each?
\title{Gravity Defied \\
From potato asteroids to magnetised neutron stars}
\secondTitle{IV. Neutron Stars (dead stars of the second kind)}
\author{Sushan Konar}
\maketitle
%
\authorIntro{\includegraphics[width=2cm,angle=90]{sushan01.eps}\\
Sushan Konar works at NCRA-TIFR, Pune. She tries to understand the
physics of stellar compact objects (white dwarfs, neutron stars) for
her livelihood and writes a blog about life in academia as a hobby.}
%
%
\begin{abstract}
%
A star burns its nuclear fuel and balances gravitation by the
pressure of the heated gas, during its active lifetime. After the
exhaustion of the nuclear fuel, a low mass star finds peace as a
{\em white dwarf}, where the pressure support against gravitation is
provided by Fermi-degenerate electrons. However, for massive stars
the gravitational squeeze becomes so severe that in the final phase
of evolution, the average density approximately equals the nuclear
density. At such densities most of the protons combine with
electrons to convert themselves into neutrons. A {\em Neutron
star}, composed of such neutron-rich material, is host to some
fascinating physics arising out of its amazingly compact state of
matter (where a solar mass is packed inside a sphere of radius
$\sim$ 10Km).
%
\end{abstract}
%
%
\monthyear{2017}
%
\artNature{GENERAL ARTICLE}
\section{The beginnings..}
The discovery of a radio pulsar by Jocelyn Bell (Fig.~\ref{f_jocelyn})
in 1967 and its subsequent identification with a neutron star, one of
the most exotic objects in the Universe, is a watershed moment for
theoretical astrophysics when predictions made several decades
previously were finally confirmed through observation. The story of
neutron stars has always been marked with prescient ideas and
serendipitous observations, which is not surprising given the
unbelievably rich and complex physics these tiny stars pack within
themselves.
\keywords{Neutron Stars, Radio Puslars, X-ray Binaries}
Along with the understanding of their nuclear energy source, arose the
question about the end states of stars. The nuclear fuel is said to
be exhausted either when a star is unable to reach the temperature
required for the nuclear fusion of the next element or when
$_{26}$Fe$^{56}$ is formed ending the fusion reaction chain. In 1930s,
S. Chandrasekhar showed that white dwarfs could be one such end state
of stars where gravitation is balanced by the pressure of
Fermi-degenerate electrons. The logical extension of this argument is
the {\em neutron stars} where the pressure comes from the degenerate
neutrons and from the forces of nuclear interaction making these the
{\em dead stars of the second kind}.
%%
%\begin{figure}[!t]
%%
% \caption{HST (Hubble Space Telescope) image of Crab nebula, a
% supernova remnant, observed at a distance of 6500 light-years in
% the Taurus constellation. Picture curtesy - {\em
% https://www.spacetelescope.org/}}
%%
% \label{f_crab}
%%
%\vspace{-0.5cm}
%\centering\includegraphics[width=5.0cm]{crab.ps}
%\vspace{-0.5cm}
%\end{figure}
%%
%
\begin{figure}[!t]
%
\caption{Jocelyn Bell, photographed in front of the Cambridge radio
telescope in 1967. Bell was working with Anthony Hewish, for her
PhD thesis on interplanetary scintillation, when she observed a
unusually periodic signal coming from the sky. After discarding
many plausible and implausible theories (including one involving
the `little green men') these signals were finally identified to
be radio emissions coming from a highly magnetised neutron star.}
%
\label{f_jocelyn}
%
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\centering\includegraphics[width=7.5cm]{jocelyn_bell.ps}
%\vspace{-0.5cm}
\end{figure}
%
Interestingly, this is exactly what was suggested by Walter Baade and
Fritz Zwicky in 1934, only two years after neutrons were discovered by
James Chadwick (and almost three decades before neutron stars were
actually observed)! The discovery that Andromeda is an external
galaxy enabled them to estimate the energy released from the nova
observed in 1885 to be around $\sim 10^{52}$~erg~\mfnote{The
gravitational energy release associated with the formation of a
neutron star is calculated to be,
%
\beq
%
E_{\rm G} \simeq G \frac{M^2}{R} \simeq 10^{52}~\mbox{erg}\,;
\nonumber
%
\eeq
%
where $M$ = 1\msun~and $R$ = 10~Km has been assumed.}. They
hypothesised that this must be associated with the formation of an
object of radius $\sim$10~Km and such an object must be almost
entirely made up of neutrons. In the mid 1930s, Lev Landau
strengthened this argument by showing that beyond a density of
$10^{11}$~\gcc, electrons would combine with protons to form neutrons.
To understand how prescient this suggestion was, one needs to remember
that one of the end products of this process, known as
$\beta$-capture, is a {\em neutrino} which would be discovered only in
1956~\mfnote{$\beta$-capture reaction :
%
\vspace{-0.25cm}
%
\beq
%
p^+ + e^- \rightleftharpoons n + \nu \,. \nonumber
%
\eeq
%
}!
In the 1940s, it was pointed out that the position of the crab nebula
coincided with that of the 1054 guest star, recorded by the Chinese
court astronomers. The discovery of a radio pulsar at the centre of
Crab nebula vindicated Baade and Zwicky's hypothesis completely. The
current understanding from stellar evolution theories is that stars
with main sequence masses of 8 - 20 \msun~end their lives in
supernovae. Most of the stellar mass is thrown away in such a
supernova explosion and a compact neutron star ($M \sim 1.4 \msun$, $R
\sim 10$~km) is left behind.
\section{The interior..}
%
\begin{figure}
%
\caption{The neutron-proton ratio in terrestrial nucleons is shown
with the stability band (greenish region). Picture courtesy -
{\em Chemistry, Mcmury Fay, Prentice-Hall, 2004.} A few
neutron-rich elements, expected to be found in neutrons star
crusts are marked in magenta.}
%
\label{f_nucleon}
%
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\centering\includegraphics[width=10.0cm]{nucleon.eps}
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\end{figure}
%
One of the key theoretical concepts associated with neutron stars is
the stability of neutrons inside it. Free neutrons decay~\mfnote{Decay
of free neutrons is known as $\beta$-decay and is the reverse
process of $\beta$-capture, where a neutron decays into a proton, an
electron and an anti-neutrino.
%
\vspace{-0.25cm}
%
\beq
%
n \rightleftharpoons p^+ + e^- + \overline{\nu} \,. \nonumber
%
\eeq
%
} with a half-life of $\sim$15 minutes. The forward direction of this
reaction is prohibited inside a neutron star. As mentioned before,
free neutrons exist only beyond a density of $\sim 10^{11}$\gcc. At
such densities, the electrons are degenerate with very large Fermi
energies ($E_{\rm F} \propto \rho^{1/3}$, because electrons are also
relativistic at these densities). Since, all quantum levels with $E <
E_{\rm F}$ would be occupied, an electron produced through a
$\beta$-decay process would require an energy larger than $E_{\rm
F}$. A neutron at rest is unable to supply such energies to the
electron produced and the $\beta$-decay is therefore prohibited.
As in the case of a white dwarf, the structure of a neutron star is
obtained by solving the hydrostatic pressure balance equation in
conjunction with the equation of state. Except, a neutron star being
far more compact (with $V_{\rm E}/c \lsim 0.5$), we would have to
solve the TOV equation instead of the non-relativistic hydrostatic
equation~\mfnote{see S. Konar, Gravity Defied, Resonance, Vol 22,
No.5}. The main problem though, lies in finding the correct equation
of state, that is identifying the correct state of matter.
%
\begin{table}
%
\caption{Neutron-rich nuclei expected to be found in the crust of a
neutron star. The neutron to proton ratio increases with increasing
density as more and more protons convert into neutrons through
$\beta$-capture. Stable terrestrial counterparts of these nuclei
have also been shown for comparison. It can be seen from
Fig.~\ref{f_nucleon} above that the nucleons expected in the
neutron star crust have very different neutron to proton ratio
compared to their terrestrial counterparts. The data is taken from
{\em Baym, Pethick and Sutherland, 1971, ApJ, 170, 299}.}
%
\begin{tabular}{rllllr}
$\rho$ && Z && A & terrestrial\\
\gcc && && & element \\
$10$ && 26 && 56 & $^{26}$Fe$_{56}$ \\
$10^6$ && 26 && 56 & $^{26}$Fe$_{56}$ \\
$10^7$ && 28 && 62 & $^{28}$Ni$_{58}$ \\
$10^8$ && 28 && 62 & $^{28}$Ni$_{58}$ \\
$10^9$ && 28 && 64 & $^{28}$Ni$_{58}$ \\
$10^{10}$ && 32 && 82 & $^{32}$Ge$_{72}$ \\
$10^{11}$ && 28 && 78 & $^{28}$Ni$_{58}$ \\
$10^{12}$ && 42 && 137 & $^{42}$Mo$_{96}$ \\
$10^{13}$ && 52 && 200 & $^{52}$Te$_{128}$ \\
$5 \times 10^{13}$ && 74 && 375 & $^{74}$W$_{184}$ \\
\end{tabular}
%
\label{t_nscrust}
%
\end{table}
%
%
\begin{figure}
%
\caption{Composition of a neutron star. There is a huge uncertainty
about the state of matter at highest densities, in the core of a
neutron star (denoted by a question mark). Different assumptions
about this result in different mass-radius relations. Accurate
mass measurements can lift the degeneracy about core composition
as can be seen from Fig.~\ref{f_eos}. Picture courtesy -
{\em https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/}}
%
\label{f_interior}
%
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\centering\includegraphics[width=10.0cm]{ns_interior.ps}
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\end{figure}
%
Neutron star matter encompasses a wide range of densities, from $\sim
10^6$\gcc~at the surface to several times the nuclear density in the
stellar core (Fig.~\ref{f_interior}). At a given density, the
equilibrium composition is the one which is most stable against
$\beta$-capture. Starting from ordinary Fe$^{56}$ at the surface, the
equilibrium nuclide becomes more and more neutron-rich
(Table~\ref{t_nscrust}) as the density increases. Though neutron-rich,
the material is expected to arrange itself into a crystalline solid
with the electrons forming a Fermi-degenerate gas. At a density of
$\sim 4 \times 10^{11}$\gcc~the neutrons are so numerous that their
highest energy level, inside a nucleus, reach the continuum value and
some of the neutrons become free of the nuclear binding (`drip' out of
the nucleus). Therefore, from this `drip' density onwards, the neutron
star material is composed of a neutron-rich nuclei (again forming a
crystalline solid), Fermi-degenerate electrons and a gas of free
neutrons. It is understood that this free neutrons actually exist in a
super-fluid state, giving rise to a number of interesting
observational consequences. The solid crystalline phase extends upto
the nuclear density and this outer part of a neutron star is known as
the {\em crust}.
%
\begin{figure}
%
\caption{A schematic diagram showing a radio pulsar undergoing an
episode of `glitch' - a sudden spin-up.}
%
\label{f_glitch}
%
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\centering\includegraphics[width=7.5cm]{glitch.eps}
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\end{figure}
%
The nuclei completely dissolve into its constituent particles when
nuclear density is reached in the inner part of the star known as the
{\em core}. It is believed that both neutrons and protons exist in
separate super-fluid phases (neutron forming a neutral superfluid, and
protons forming a charged superconductor) inside the core of a neutron
star. It is also understood that the rotation of a neutron star is
supported by creation of Onsager-Feynman vortices in the neutron
superfluid, whereas the magnetic field is supported by Abrikosov
fluxoids generated in the proton superconductor~\mfnote{Protons are
thought to form a type-II superconductor inside the core of a
neutron star and can support magnetic fields in quantised Abrikosov
fluxoids, each of which carry a flux quantum $\phi$ given by
%
\beq
%
\phi = \frac{hc}{2e} = 2 \times 10^{-7}~\mbox{G-cm$^2$} \,. \nonumber
%
\eeq
%
Alexei Abrikosov (1928-2017) was instrumental in developing the theory
of `type-II superconductors', a phase of matter that later found to be
of great important for modern technology.} Both of these superfluid
vortices are created when neutron star matter goes into the superfluid
phase. It is understood that the superfluid transition temperature of
the neutron star material is $\gsim 10^9$K and the neutron star cools
down to such temperatures (from $\sim 10^{11}$K at the time of birth)
within a very short time after its formation in a supernova explosion.
It is difficult to envisage the existence of superfluidity inside
neutron stars except from a theoretical viewpoint. Fortunately, there
are indirect evidences to support this conjecture. Many radio pulsars
have been observed to undergo a period `glitch'. The radiation from a
radio pulsar comes at the expense of its rotational energy. As a
result a radio pulsar undergoes a secular spin-down. Some radio
pulsars are observed to undergo a sudden spin-up, with a total or
partial recovery to its original rate of spin-down
(Fig.~\ref{f_glitch}). We can understand the origin of this sudden
spin-up in the following way. The crust of a neutron star rotates
like a rigid body. However, the superfluid component rotates by
creating vortices each of which carry a finite amount of angular
momentum. To slow down, the superfluid needs to expel a number of
these vortices pinned to the crustal lattice through the neutron's
interaction with the nucleons. So, even though the solid crust slows
down, the superfluid component continues to rotate at a faster
rate. As the difference in the rotation rate increases, so does the
tension at the sites the vortices are pinned. When the difference in
rotational energy overcome the pinning energy there is a sudden
un-pinning of the vortices and they are expelled from the superfluid.
Evidently, this results in the solid crust gaining an extra amount of
angular momentum which shows up as a sudden spin-up. Though the
spin-up itself can be explained in terms of the super-fluids (there
exist other theories that do not involve super-fluids), it is actually
the post-glitch behaviour of certain pulsars that definitively
indicates the presence of a superfluid inside a neutron star.
%
\begin{figure}
%
\caption{Inside the core of a neutron star, when the density is
$\simeq 8 \rho_{\rm nuclear}$, the neutrons and protons are expected
to undergo a deconfinement transition to a quark phase composed of
`up' and `down' quarks. Apparently, the stable quark phase is
achieved when some of these convert into `strange' quarks and
achieve a 1:1:1 ratio between all three quark flavors.}
%
\label{f_deconf}
%
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\centering\includegraphics[width=10.0cm]{deconf.eps}
%\vspace{-0.5cm}
\end{figure}
%
It is conjectured that various novel phases like the hyperon
matter~\mfnote{A hyperon is a baryon, containing one or more quarks.
These are highly unstable under terrestrial conditions and quickly
decay into nucleons. At densities $\sim 2 - 3\rho_{\rm nuc}$,
realisable in the core of a neutron star, the inverse reactions can
take place producing hyperons.}, Bose-Einstein condensates of
strange mesons and quark matter can exist inside the core, giving rise
to a plethora of possible equations of state. For example, EoS
involving the strange quark matter (SQM), where up, down and strange
quarks exist in equal numbers (Fig.~\ref{f_deconf}) and is expected to
appear when the density is approximately 8 times that of the nuclear
density, have been rather popular for a while. Fortunately, observed
masses and radii of neutron stars can directly constrain the
composition and the EoS of the interior. Technological advances has
allowed for rather precise mass measurements in recent years. It can
be seen from Fig.~\ref{f_eos} that mass measurement of the neutron
star J1614-2230 has ruled out all EoS based on pure SQM.
%
\begin{figure}
%
\caption{Mass-radius relations for non-rotating neutron stars for
different equations state (blue - nucleons, pink - nucleons +
exotic matter, green - strange quark matter). The horizontal bands
correspond to actual observational mass measurements. of a few
neutron stars. An EoS line not intersecting an observed mass band
is ruled out by that measurement. Most exotic matter EoS are ruled
out by mass measurement of the neutron star J1614-2230. The grey
regions show parameter space ruled out by other theoretical or
observational constraints (GR - general relativity, P - spin
period). Figure courtesy - {\em Demorest et al., 2010, Nature,
467, 1081}}
%
\label{f_eos}
%
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\centering\includegraphics[width=10.0cm]{eos.ps}
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\end{figure}
%
\section{The observations..}
It's been half a century since the discovery of a neutron star as a
radio pulsar and $\sim$3000 objects have been observed during the
intervening period. As a result of these observations, the spin-period
($P_s$) and the surface magnetic field ($B_s$) have emerged to be the
most significant intrinsic parameters of a neutron star. The
population of neutron stars is seen to display a wide range of these
parameters ($P_s \sim 10^{-3} - 10^2$~s, $B_s \sim 10^8 - 10^{15}$~G)
and have diverse observational characteristics. However the population
can be broadly classified into three categories, depending on the
nature of the energy generation in these stars.
{\bf Rotation Powered Pulsars (RPP) :} The rotation powered radio
pulsars are so named because of the pulsed radio emission received
from them (Fig.~\ref{f_pulsar}). This pulsed emission,
characterized by its precise periodicity, is essentially {\em magnetic
dipolar} radiation that comes at the expense of the rotational
energy. As a result the star slows down. Measuring this rate of slow
down ($\dot {P_s}$) we can estimate the surface magnetic field to be :
%
\beq
%
B = (\frac{3 I c^3 P_s \dot{P_s}}{8 \pi^2 R_s^6})^{1/2}
%
\simeq 3.2\times 10^{19} (P_s\dot{P_s})^{1/2} \, {\rm G}\,,
\nonumber
%
%
\eeq
%
where, $I$ ($\sim 10^{45} \mbox{ g cm}^{-2}$) is the moment of inertia
and $R_s$ is the radius of the star. Of course, this simple estimate
provides a measure of the long-range dipole field only, measures of
higher multipoles (known to exist near the surface) etc. can not be
obtained from this.
From the measurement of $\dot{P_s}$ we can also obtain an approximate
age of a radio pulsar. This is known as the characteristic age
($\tau_{\rm ch}$) and is given by,
%
\beq
%
\tau_{\rm ch} = \frac{P_s}{2\dot{P_s}}
%
\eeq
%
This estimate closely approximates the true age of a radio pulsar if -
a) the pulsar's initial spin-period has been much smaller compared to
the current observed period, b) there has been no decay of the
magnetic field, and c) the energy loss is due entirely to magnetic
dipolar radiation.
%
\begin{figure}
%
\caption{A neutron star in its radio pulsar phase. The misalignment
between its rotation and magnetic axis makes the beam of radiation
sweep through the space, giving it a lighthouse effect. Picture
courtesy - {\em http://www.scmp.com/}}
%
%http://www.scmp.com/infographics/article/1974448/interactive-everything-you-need-know-about-chinas-giant-new-radio
%
\label{f_pulsar}
%
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\centering\includegraphics[width=5.0cm]{pulsar.ps}
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\end{figure}
%
The class of radio pulsars is again be divided into two distinct groups -
%
{\bf (a)} the classical radio pulsars ({\bf PSR}) with $P \sim 1$~s,
$B \sim 10^{11} - 10^{13.5}$~G; \,\,
%
{\bf (b)} the millisecond radio pulsars ({\bf MSRP}) with $P \lsim
20$~ms, $B \lsim 10^{10}$~G, and having very different evolutionary
histories. (These are or have been members of binary systems and are
believed to have been `recycled' through accretion episodes reducing
the value of both $P_s$ and $B_s$ in them.)
%
{\bf Accretion Powered Pulsars (APP) :} This class mainly refers to
neutron stars in binaries that are undergoing active material
accretion from the companion. Accretion onto the neutron star gives
rise to the energetic radiation in APPs. Depending on the mass of the
donor star these are classified as High-Mass X-ray Binaries (HMXB) or
Low-Mass X-Ray Binaries (LMXB) (Fig.~\ref{f_hmxb} \&
Fig.~\ref{f_lmxb}).
%
\begin{figure}
%
\caption{A neutron star in an HMXB. The accreting material is being
channeled by the strong magnetic field and the resulting emission
is in the form of X-ray pulses. Picture courtesy - {\em Dany Page,
UNAM, Mexico City.}}
%
\label{f_hmxb}
%
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\centering\includegraphics[width=10.0cm]{hmxb.ps}
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\end{figure}
%
Neutron stars in HMXBs typically have $B_p \sim 10^{12}$~G, and $O$ or
$B$ type stars as companions. The strong magnetic field channels the
flow of material from the companion to the surface of the star and the
emission comes out in the form of periodic pulses. Consequently,
neutron stars in HMXBs mostly show up as X-ray pulsars. Photons
inside the hot accretion column on the surface of the neutron stars
undergo resonant scattering from the electrons, generating an
absorption like feature at the resonance energies of the final
emergent spectra, known as cyclotron resonance scattering features
(CRSF). These features are used to estimate the magnetic field
strength of the neutron star. However, this estimate only gives the
local field strength and uncertainties about local geometry prevent us
from obtaining the corresponding surface dipole field strength. So
field estimates obtained from radio pulsars and from X-ray binaries,
in reality, correspond to two altogether different physical
quantities.
%
\begin{figure}
%
\caption{A neutron star in a low-mass X-ray binary. The accreted
material accumulates on the stellar surface and ignites upon
reaching appropriate temperatures. These sudden episodes of nuclear
reaction are observed as X-ray bursts. Picture courtesy - {\em Dany
Page, UNAM, Mexico City.}}
%
\label{f_lmxb}
%
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\centering\includegraphics[width=10.0cm]{lmxb.ps}
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\end{figure}
%
LMXBs, on the other hand, harbour neutron stars with magnetic fields
significantly weakened ($B \lsim 10^{11}$~G) through extended phases
of accretion. Physical process taking place in such accreting systems
manifest as - thermonuclear X-ray bursts; accretion-powered
millisecond-period pulsations; kilohertz quasi-periodic oscillations;
broad relativistic iron lines; and quiescent emissions. It is even
more difficult to measure the magnetic field of neutron stars residing
in LMXBs. However, recent work on accreting millisecond X-ray pulsars
(where the accretion rate could be low enough for the neutron star's
weak magnetic field to be able to channel such flow) have opened up a
new direction in understanding the physics of LMXBs containing neutron
stars.
%
{\bf Internal Energy Powered Neutron Stars (IENS) :} A mixed bag of
objects, these IENS are so called because the emission has its origin
in some internal mechanism or energy source of the neutron stars. The
following are some of the prime examples of such objects.
%
\ben
%
\i {\bf Magnetars} are young, isolated neutron stars and their
emission is thought to be due to the decay of their
super-strong magnetic fields.
%
\i The seven isolated neutron stars ({\bf INS}), popularly
known as the {\em Magnificent Seven}, have blackbody-like X-ray
spectra ($T \sim 10^6$~K), relatively nearby and have long
spin-periods ($P \sim - 10$~s). They are probably like
ordinary pulsars but a combination of strong magnetic field and
spatial proximity make them visible in the X-rays.
%
\een
%
\section{Towards unification..}
One of the important questions in neutron star research is to
understand the connections (or absence thereof) between different
observational classes. There are indications that there exist
evolutionary links between these classes and the magnetic field,
ranging from $10^8$~G in MSRPs to $10^{15}$~G in magnetars, is
instrumental in providing this link. It is expected that the evolution
of the magnetic field and associated phenomena chart those
evolutionary pathways.
%
\begin{figure}
%
\caption{Different observational classes of neutron stars shown in
the spin-period vs. surface magnetic field ($P_s-B_s$) plane.
The blue and magenta arrows indicate `recycling' of neutron stars
in X-ray binaries. The orange and green arrows hint at possible
evolutionary pathways between high magnetic radio pulsars and the
magnetars. The `RPP death-line' corresponds to a limiting
combination of $P_s$ and $B_s$, on the left hand side of which the
radio pulsar mechanism stops working. The `MSRP spin-up' line
indicates the maximum value of $P_s$ that can be achieved through
binary processing for a given final value of $B_s$. {\bf \em
Legends :} I/B - isolated/binary, GC - globular cluster, GD -
galactic disc, EG - extra-galactic objects. See {\em Konar et
al., 2016, JOAA, 37, 36} to know about the data used here.}
%
\label{f_bp}
%
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\centering\includegraphics[width=10.0cm]{bp03.ps}
\vspace{-0.5cm}
\end{figure}
%
%%
%\begin{figure}
%%
% \caption{}
%%
% \label{f_null}
%%
%\vspace{-0.5cm}
%\centering\includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{null.eps}
%\vspace{-0.5cm}
%\end{figure}
%%
However, one of the major roadblocks encountered while developing a
theory of field evolution is the uncertainty about the process of
field generation, which determines the location of the currents that
support the field. Currently, three plausible theories are in vogue,
though each of them suffer from certain inherent inconsistencies.
The simplest theory considers the conservation of magnetic flux
existing inside the core of the progenitor star through supernova
explosion and core collapse. Flux conservation would ensure an
increase in the field strength by a factor $(R_{\rm progenitor}/R_{\rm
NS})^2$ ($\sim 10^{10}$) and magnetic fields of strength $10^{12} -
10^{14}$~G can easily be formed. Evidently, magnetic field formed in
this fashion would be located in the core of the neutron star.
Another theory hold turbulent dynamo processes, active in the core of
a neutron star in the early phases of its life, responsible for the
generation of the magnetic field.
The magnetic field can also be generated as a consequence of thermal
effects occurring in the outer crust in the early phases of the star's
thermal evolution. The field can grow either in the liquid phase and
then be convected into the solid regions, or it could grow in the
solid crust itself. The coexistence of a heat flux and a seed
magnetic field, in excess of $10^8$ Gauss, in the liquid will cause
the fluid to circulate which may lead to effective dynamo action which
would help the field grow stronger. The currents supporting this field
would be located in the outer crust of a neutron star.
Whatever the origin, the evolution of the magnetic field is either
spontaneous or happens as a consequence of material accretion. Recent
investigations, focusing on the magneto-rotational evolution of a
neutron in the early phases, consider spontaneous evolution. This is
important to understand the evolution of isolated neutron stars with
strong magnetic fields and may answer the question whether there exist
any evolutionary link between the magnetars and the strong magnetic
field radio pulsars. On the other hand, accretion induced field
evolution explains the processing of ordinary pulsars (with strong
magnetic fields and long periods) that produce MSRPs with ultra-fast
rotation and much weaker magnetic fields. All these pathways
(established or conjectured) have been summarised in Fig.~\ref{f_bp}.
It goes without saying that a lot of questions remain unanswered
regarding these disparate observational classes of neutron stars. With
the advent of finer technology and bigger and better telescopes it is
expected that we would be in a better position to answer many of those
questions. However, detection of many more neutron stars would likely
bring many new classes to the fore giving rise to a new set of
questions in the future.
\section*{Acknowledgment}
Dipankar Bhattacharya, my formal `guru' (thesis advisor), and G. Srinivasan
have not only taught me all that I have ever learned about neutron stars;
but have also managed to transmit their passions for these exotic objects
that challenge the very boundaries of known physics.
%----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
%
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\bibitem{srini11b}
G. Srinivasan,
\textit{Can stars find peace?},
Universities Press, Hyderabad, 2011
\bibitem{srini97}
G. Srinivasan,
\textit{Neutron Stars},
in ``Stellar Remnants, Lecture Notes 1995, Saas-Fee Advanced Course 25'',
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997
\bibitem{shapi83}
S.~L. Shapiro \& S.~A. Teukolsky,
\textit{Black Holes, White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars},
Wiley-Interscience, 1983
\bibitem{baade34}
W. Baade \& F. Zwicky,
\textit{On Super-novae},
Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci., 20, pp.254-259, 1934
\bibitem{hewis68}
\textit{Observation of a Rapidly Pulsating Radio Source},
A. Hewish et al.,
Nature, 217, pp.709-713, 1968
\bibitem{lyne90}
A.~G. Lyne \& F. Graham-Smith,
\textit{Pulsar Astronomy},
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998
\bibitem{manch77}
R.~N. Manchester \& J.~H. Taylor,
\textit{Pulsars},
W.~H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1977
\bibitem{konar16}
S. Konar et al.,
\textit{Neutron Star Physics in the Square Kilometre Array Era:
An Indian Perspective},
JOAA, 37, pp.36, 2016
\end{thebibliography}
%
\end{document}
%==========================================================================%