Dark matter production in association with a single top-quark at the LHC in a two-Higgs-doublet model with a pseudoscalar mediator
Extracted source text · arXiv 1712.03874
%%
%% Copyright 2007, 2008, 2009 Elsevier Ltd
%%
%% This file is part of the 'Elsarticle Bundle'.
%% ---------------------------------------------
%%
%% It may be distributed under the conditions of the LaTeX Project Public
%% License, either version 1.2 of this license or (at your option) any
%% later version. The latest version of this license is in
%% http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
%% and version 1.2 or later is part of all distributions of LaTeX
%% version 1999/12/01 or later.
%%
%% The list of all files belonging to the 'Elsarticle Bundle' is
%% given in the file `manifest.txt'.
%%
%% Template article for Elsevier's document class `elsarticle'
%% with Harvard style bibliographic references
%% SP 2008/03/01
%\documentclass[preprint,12pt]{elsarticle}
%% Use the option review to obtain double line spacing
%% \documentclass[authoryear,preprint,review,12pt]{elsarticle}
%% Use the options 1p,twocolumn; 3p; 3p,twocolumn; 5p; or 5p,twocolumn
%% for a journal layout:
%% \documentclass[final,1p,times,authoryear]{elsarticle}
%% \documentclass[final,1p,times,twocolumn,authoryear]{elsarticle}
%% \documentclass[final,3p,times,authoryear]{elsarticle}
%% \documentclass[final,3p,times,twocolumn,authoryear]{elsarticle}
%% \documentclass[final,5p,times,authoryear]{elsarticle}
\documentclass[final,5p,times,twocolumn,sort&compress]{elsarticle}
%% For including figures, graphicx.sty has been loaded in
%% elsarticle.cls. If you prefer to use the old commands
%% please give \usepackage{epsfig}
%% The amssymb package provides various useful mathematical symbols
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
%% The amsthm package provides extended theorem environments
%% \usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{subcaption}
%% The lineno packages adds line numbers. Start line numbering with
%% \begin{linenumbers}, end it with \end{linenumbers}. Or switch it on
%% for the whole article with \linenumbers.
%% \usepackage{lineno}
\renewcommand{\bottomfraction}{0.8}
\usepackage{placeins}
%\usepackage[hyperref=true,style=numeric-comp, sorting=none]{biblatex}
%\usepackage{biblatex}
%\DeclareFieldFormat[article]{title}{}
%\DeclareFieldFormat[inproceedings]{booktitle}{}
%\DeclareFieldFormat[inproceedings]{title}{}
%\DeclareFieldFormat[booklet]{title}{}
%\renewbibmacro{in:}{}
%\DeclareFieldFormat[article]
%{pages}{#1}
\journal{Physics of the Dark Universe}
\pdfoutput=1 % if your are submitting a pdflatex (i.e. if you have
% images in pdf, png or jpg format)
%\usepackage{jheppub} % for details on the use of the package, please
% see the JHEP-author-manual
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % if needed
\usepackage{graphicx,epsfig}
\usepackage{xspace}
%\usepackage{subfigure}
\usepackage{verbatim}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\newcommand{\mtlep}{\ensuremath{m_{\mathrm T}^{\ell}}}
\newcommand{\pt}{\ensuremath{p_{\mathrm T}}}
\def\etmiss{\ensuremath{E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}}\xspace}
\def\EtMiss{\ensuremath{E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}}\xspace}
\def\ptmiss{\ensuremath{\vec p^{\mathrm{\ miss}}_\mathrm{T}\xspace}}
\def\ptl{\ensuremath{\vec p^{\mathrm{\ \ell}}_\mathrm{T}\xspace}}
\def\dphimin{\ensuremath{\Delta\phi_{\mathrm{min}}}}
\newcommand{\mttwo}{\ensuremath{m_{\mathrm{T2}}}\xspace}
\newcommand{\amttwo}{\ensuremath{am_{\mathrm{T2}}}\xspace}
\newcommand{\pbll}{\ensuremath{p_{\mathrm{b}}^{ll}}\xspace}
\newcommand{\ptll}{\ensuremath{p_{\mathrm{T}}^{ll}}\xspace}
\newcommand{\ttbarW}{\ensuremath{t\bar{t}W}\xspace}
\newcommand{\ttbarZ}{\ensuremath{t\bar{t}Z}\xspace}
\newcommand{\mTlep}{\ensuremath{m_\mathrm{T}^{lep}}}
\def\ttbar{\ensuremath{t\bar{t}}}
\newcommand{\Wjets}{\ensuremath{W}+jets}
\newcommand{\W}{\ensuremath{W}}
\newcommand{\bjet}{\ensuremath{b}-jet}
\newcommand{\btagged}{\ensuremath{b}-tagged}
\def\TeV{\ifmmode {\mathrm{\ Te\kern -0.1em V}}\else
\textrm{Te\kern -0.1em V}\fi}%
\def\GeV{\ifmmode {\mathrm{\ Ge\kern -0.1em V}}\else
\textrm{Ge\kern -0.1em V}\fi}%
\def\bm#1{\mbox{\boldmath$#1$\unboldmath}}
\def \beq{\begin{equation}}
\def \eeq{\end{equation}}
\def \bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
\def \eea{\end{eqnarray}}
\def\Mmed{M}
\def\Msca{M_\phi}
\def\Mpse{M_a}
\usepackage{multicol}
%\usepackage[printonlyused, smaller]{acronym} % smaller, footnote, nohyperlinks, printonlyused, dua, nolist
%You can define acronyms with \acrodef{label}[acronym]{written out form},
\usepackage[colorlinks]{hyperref}
\begin{document}
\begin{frontmatter}
%% Title, authors and addresses
%% use the tnoteref command within \title for footnotes;
%% use the tnotetext command for theassociated footnote;
%% use the fnref command within \author or \address for footnotes;
%% use the fntext command for theassociated footnote;
%% use the corref command within \author for corresponding author footnotes;
%% use the cortext command for theassociated footnote;
%% use the ead command for the email address,
%% and the form \ead[url] for the home page:
%% \title{Title\tnoteref{label1}}
%% \tnotetext[label1]{}
%% \author{Name\corref{cor1}\fnref{label2}}
%% \ead{email address}
%% \ead[url]{home page}
%% \fntext[label2]{}
%% \cortext[cor1]{}
%% \address{Address\fnref{label3}}
%% \fntext[label3]{}
\title{Dark matter production in association with a single top-quark at the LHC
in a two-Higgs-doublet model with a pseudoscalar mediator}
%in a 2HDM with a pseudoscalar mediator}
%% use optional labels to link authors explicitly to addresses:
%% \author[label1,label2]{}
%% \address[label1]{}
%% \address[label2]{}
% more complex case: 4 authors, 3 institutions, 2 footnotes
\author[1]{Priscilla Pani}
\author[2]{and Giacomo Polesello}
% The "\note" macro will give a warning: "Ignoring empty anchor..."
% you can safely ignore it.
\address[1]{CERN, Experimental Physics Department, \\ CH-1211 Geneva
23, Switzerland}
\address[2]{INFN, Sezione di Pavia\\ Via Bassi 6, 27100 Pavia, Italy}
% e-mail addresses: one for each author, in the same order as the authors
%\emailAdd{priscilla.pani@cern.ch}
%\emailAdd{giacomo.polesello@cern.ch}
\begin{abstract}
%% Text of abstract
The sensitivity of the LHC experiments to the associated
production of dark matter with a single top is studied in the framework
of an extension of the standard model featuring two Higgs doublets and
an additional pseudoscalar mediator.
It is found that the experimental sensitivity
is dominated by the on-shell production of a charged Higgs boson, when this assumes a mass below $1\,\TeV$. Dedicated selections considering one and two lepton final states are developed to assess the coverage in parameter space for this signature
at a centre-of-mass energy of $14\,\TeV$ assuming an integrated luminosity of 300~fb$^{-1}$.
For a pseudoscalar mediator $a$ with mass $150\,\GeV$ and maximally mixed with the
pseudoscalar of the two Higgs doublets, values of $\tan\beta$ up to 3 and down
to 15 can be excluded at 95\%~CL, if the $H^{\pm}$ mass is in the range $300\,\GeV$-$1\,\TeV$.
This novel signature complements the parameter space coverage of the
mono-Higgs, mono-$Z$ and $t{\bar t}$+$\etmiss$ signatures considered in previous publications
for this model.
\end{abstract}
\begin{keyword}
ATLAS, LHC, dark matter, missing energy, pseudoscalar mediators, top quark.
%% keywords here, in the form: keyword \sep keyword
%% PACS codes here, in the form: \PACS code \sep code
%% MSC codes here, in the form: \MSC code \sep code
%% or \MSC[2008] code \sep code (2000 is the default)
\end{keyword}
\end{frontmatter}
\section{Introduction}
\label{sec:introduction}
The nature of the dark matter (DM) is one of the key open questions of
contemporary physics, and its experimental investigation is the subject of
a worldwide effort based on several different and complementary
experimental techniques.
The search for particle DM produced at
accelerators is an essential part of this program, and it is
vigorously pursued at the CERN LHC, a proton-proton ($pp$) collider
currently operating at a center-of-mass energy of $13\,\TeV$.
Since the DM particles are weakly interacting
they would escape the detector unseen when produced in $pp$ collisions
at the LHC.
The minimal experimental signature of DM production
at a hadron collider thus consists in events with a visible final-state
object $X$ recoiling against missing transverse energy
(\etmiss) associated with the undetected DM. Based on the LHC data collected between
2009 and 2016, the ATLAS and CMS collaborations have
analysed a variety of such signatures involving jets of hadrons,
photons, electroweak (EW) gauge bosons, top and bottom quarks as well as
the Higgs boson in the final state~\cite{Aaboud:2016qgg,Sirunyan:2017hci,CMS-EXO-16-012,Aaboud:2017dor,Sirunyan:2017xgm,Sirunyan:2017ewk,Aaboud:2017uak,Aaboud:2017yqz,Aaboud:2017bja,Aaboud:2017rzf,Sirunyan:2017leh,Aaboud:2017phn,Aaboud:2017aeu}. Given the absence of
a signal, upper limits on the production cross sections
have been obtained. The corresponding
\etmiss searches have been interpreted in the context of three
different classes of theories: ultraviolet (UV) complete theories,
simplified models (see the reviews \cite{Abdallah:2014hon,Abdallah:2015ter, Abercrombie:2015wmb} for a complete list of references),
and effective field
theories~\cite{Beltran:2010ww,Goodman:2010yf,Bai:2010hh,Goodman:2010ku,Rajaraman:2011wf,Fox:2011pm} .
%\cite{Bai:2010hh,Fox:2011pm,Dudas:2009uq,Goodman:2011jq,An:2012va,Frandsen:2012rk,Buchmueller:2013dya,Chang:2013oia,An:2013xka,Bai:2013iqa,DiFranzo:2013vra,Alves:2013tqa,Papucci:2014iwa,Abdallah:2014hon,Abdallah:2015ter,Abercrombie:2015wmb}.
In particular, simplified models have become quite popular recently.
They allow the study of the different possible signatures
for DM production at the LHC focusing on the final state
kinematics, and thanks to their very limited set of parameters,
they provide a very effective mapping of the phenomenological
space accessible to experimentation.
While handy and in many cases useful, in general simplified models
need to be employed with care.
In some instances they might be too ``simplified'' to allow for an adequate
investigation of the experimental potential of DM searches,
as they sometimes neglect unique signatures which may arise
from a more complete description of the interactions of DM
with the standard model (SM).
In addition, it might happen that specific research channels become
explicitly sensitive to the UV completion. Glaring examples are given
by violation of unitarity and gauge invariance, which points
to the need for more complex extensions of the SM
\cite{Chala:2015ama,Bell:2015sza,Kahlhoefer:2015bea,Bell:2015rdw,Haisch:2016usn,Englert:2016joy}.
Focusing on the cases where the interaction with DM is
mediated by a scalar or a pseudoscalar particle \cite{Cheung:2010zf, Buckley:2014fba, Haisch:2015ioa, Backovic:2015soa, Arina:2016cqj,Banerjee:2017wxi}, a natural
extension of the spin-0 simplified models is achieved by considering
the mixing of the mediator with the Higgs boson.
The experimental constraints on the Higgs boson couplings \cite{Khachatryan:2016vau},
however already severely constrain such a possibility.
One way to relax the constraints from Higgs physics is to add to the SM a second Higgs
doublet (2HDM). \cite{Ipek:2014gua,No:2015xqa,Goncalves:2016iyg,Bauer:2017ota,Arcadi:2017wqi}.
In this case the mediator that couples
to DM can obtain its couplings to SM fermions from mixing with the
second Higgs doublet.
In the case of a 2HDM and a pseudoscalar mediator that couples to Dirac
DM (2HDM+$a$), a detailed phenomenological analysis of the resulting
\etmiss signatures at the LHC has been performed in~\cite{Bauer:2017ota}.
The conclusion drawn in that article is that the mono-Higgs and mono-$Z$
signatures provide a very good and complementary coverage of the parameter
space of the model, with a minor but relevant role for the
associated production of DM and a top-anti-top pair (DM$t\bar t$).
However the DM$t\bar t$ signature, as discussed in \cite{Haisch:2015ioa,Backovic:2015soa,Cheung:2010zf,Lin:2013sca,Buckley:2015ctj,Haisch:2016gry, Arina:2016cqj},
gives through the study of the kinematics of the top-anti-top pair, access
to CP properties of the mediator and is therefore of great
phenomenological interest in case of the future
observation of a non-SM \etmiss signal.
A complementary signature with heavy quarks in the final state
is the associated production of a single top quark with DM (DM$t$).
This signature has typically lower cross-section than DM$t\bar t$,
and has received little attention in the literature.
A recent study \cite{Pinna:2017tay} based on a simplified model
with a singlet scalar or pseudoscalar mediator shows that the consideration of
this process increases the coverage of
existing analyses targeting the DM$t\bar t$ process.
Given the promising result, it is worthwhile to extend the investigation
of \cite{Pinna:2017tay} in two directions.
On the one hand it is necessary to check whether the DM$t$ signature
is still promising in a more complete model that is not plagued by unitarity
issues, as discussed above. We choose the 2HDM+$a$ model of
\cite{Bauer:2017ota} as a benchmark model for this purpose.
On the other hand, the possible interest of the signature for future
searches at the LHC can only be properly assessed if a dedicated
experimental analysis is developed, fully exploiting the final
state topology of the signal in order to suppress the SM backgrounds.
%We therefore choose to study
%investigate in the framework of the
%2HDM+$a$ model of \cite{Bauer:2017ota} the associated production
%of a single top and DM through dedicated experimental analyses.
The aim of this article is therefore to develop an experimental
search strategy at the LHC for the DM$t$ signature, and to
explore the parameter space of the chosen model that can be covered
with the full LHC Run 3 statistics of 300~fb$^{-1}$ taken at a centre-of-mass
energy of $14 \,\TeV$.
\section{The 2HDM+$a$ model}
\label{sec:2HDM}
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\begin{subfigure}{.23\textwidth}\centering
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Pfeyn_tchan_1}
\caption{}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}{.23\textwidth}\centering
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Pfeyn_tchan_2}
\caption{}
\end{subfigure}
\caption{Representative diagrams for $t$-channel production of DM in association with a single top quark.}
%($pp \rightarrow tj\chi\chi$)}
\label{fig:feyn1}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The extension to the SM proposed in \cite{Bauer:2017ota} includes
a scalar sector with two Higgs doublets
(see for example~\cite{Gunion:1989we,Branco:2011iw}),
where the parameters relevant
for phenomenology are $\alpha$, the mixing angle of the two
doublets and $\tan\beta$, the ratio of the vacuum expectation values (VEVs)
of the two doublets.
The angles $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are chosen according to the well-motivated alignment/decoupling limit of the~2HDM where $\alpha = \beta - \pi/2$. In this case $\sin \left ( \beta - \alpha \right ) = 1$ meaning that the field~$h$ has SM-like EW~gauge boson couplings. It can therefore be identified with the boson of mass~$m(h) \simeq 125 \, \GeV$ discovered at the LHC \cite{Aad:2012tfa,Chatrchyan:2012xdj}.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\begin{subfigure}{.23\textwidth}\centering
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Pfeyn_tw2}
\caption{}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}{.23\textwidth}\centering
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Pfeyn_tw1}
\caption{}
\end{subfigure}
\caption{Representative diagrams for $tW$ production of DM
in association with a single top quark and a $W$ boson.}
% ($pp \rightarrow tW\chi\chi$)}
\label{fig:feyn2}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Dark matter is coupled to the SM
by mixing a SU(2) singlet CP-odd mediator $P$ with the CP-odd Higgs that arises from the 2HDM potential. The relevant interactions terms read
\beq \label{eq:VP}
\begin{split}
V_{P} & = \frac{1}{2} \hspace{0.1mm} m_P^2 P^2 + P \left ( i \hspace{0.05mm} b_P \hspace{0.05mm} H_1^\dagger H_2 + {\rm h.c.} \right ) \\[2mm]
& \phantom{xx} + P^2 \left ( \lambda_{P1} \hspace{0.05mm} H_1^\dagger H_1 + \lambda_{P2} \hspace{0.05mm} H_2^\dagger H_2 \right ) \,,
\end{split}
\eeq
where $m_P$ and $b_P$ are parameters with dimensions of mass. The quartic
portal interactions with couplings $\lambda_{P1}$ and $\lambda_{P2}$ do
not affect the phenomenology studied in this paper, and
$\lambda_{P1}$ and $\lambda_{P2}$ are thus set to zero hereafter.
The portal coupling $b_P$ appearing in~(\ref{eq:VP}) mixes the two neutral CP-odd weak
eigenstates with $\theta$ representing the associated mixing angle
which emerges from the diagonalisation the mass-squared matrices
of the scalar states. The resulting CP-even mass eigenstates will be denoted by $h$ and~$H$,
while in the~CP-odd sector the states will be called $A$ and $a$, where $a$
%denotes the extra degree of freedom not present in 2HDMs and it
denotes the mixing of the CP-odd scalar from the 2HDM and of
the CP-odd mediator with weights $\sin\theta$ and $\cos\theta$, respectively.
The scalar spectrum also contains two charged mass eigenstates $H^\pm$ of identical mass.
The Yukawa sector is built by respecting the so-called natural flavour
conservation hypothesis, requiring that not more than one of the Higgs doublets
couples to fermions of a given charge \cite{Glashow:1976nt,Paschos:1976ay}.
In the following we consider a 2HDM Yukawa assignment of type II
yielding a coupling of the top quark (bottom quark and $\tau$ lepton)
proportional to $-\cot\beta$ ($\tan\beta$) respectively.
The DM is taken to be a Dirac fermion $\chi$ and is coupled to the
pseudoscalar mediator $P$ through the interaction term
\beq \label{eq:Lx}
{\cal L}_\chi = - i \hspace{0.25mm} y_\chi P \hspace{0.25mm} \bar \chi \hspace{0.25mm} \gamma_5 \hspace{0.1mm} \chi \,.
\eeq
The DM coupling strength $y_\chi$ and the DM mass $m_\chi$ are further free parameters
and are fixed as $y_\chi = 1$ and $m_\chi = 1 \, \GeV$ throughout our work.
The choice of the value of $m_\chi$ has no impact on the phenomenology addressed in this
study as long as the decays $A,a\rightarrow\chi \bar \chi$ are kinematically open.
To avoid constraints from EW precision measurements, we furthermore
assume that $m(H)=m(A)=m(H{^\pm})$. Together with
the restrictions specified above, this leaves a four-dimensional parameter space
including $\tan\beta$, $\sin\theta$, $m(H^{\pm})$ and $m(a)$ for the
phenomenological exploration in this paper.
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\begin{subfigure}{.49\textwidth}\centering
\includegraphics[width=.9\textwidth]{figures/xstb.pdf}
\caption{}
\label{fig:xstba}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}{.49\textwidth}\centering
\includegraphics[width=.9\textwidth]{figures/xstb1000.pdf}
\caption{}
\label{fig:xstbb}
\end{subfigure}
\caption{Cross-section for the associated production
of a top quark and DM for $pp$ collisions at $14 \; \TeV$
as a function of $\tan\beta$ for $m(a)=150\,\GeV$ and
$m(H^{\pm})=500\,\GeV$ (a) and $100\,\GeV$ (b).
The full line
corresponds to the $tW$ channel, while the
dotted line shows the result for $t$-channel production.
The dashed line indicates
the contribution to $tW$ production that arises from the on-shell production
of a $H^{\pm}$ boson cascading into a $W^\pm$ and a DM pair.}
\label{fig:xstb}
\end{center}
\end{figure*}
\section{The DM$t$ signal}
Like single top production within the SM, the DM$t$ signature in the model~(\ref{eq:VP}) receives three different types of contributions at leading order (LO) in QCD. These are $t$-channel production, $s$-channel production and
associated production together with a $W$ boson ($tW$).
The relative impact of the three production modes has been discussed in detail in~\cite{Pinna:2017tay} for the case of simplified spin-0 DM models.
DM$t$ production in the $s$-channel is, compared to the other channels, characterised by a very small cross-section, and we therefore neglect its contribution in our analysis.
The $t$-channel process $pp \rightarrow tj\chi \bar \chi$ receives the dominant contributions from the
two diagrams shown in Figure~\ref{fig:feyn1}. One has (a) the SM single top $t$-channel diagram
with radiation of the mediator from the top ($a$-strahlung), and (b)
the $t$-channel fusion
of a charged Higgs and a $W$ into the mediator~$a$.
The two diagrams interfere destructively, and the amount of interference
decreases with increasing $H^{\pm}$ mass. As a result the $t$-channel production
cross-section in our model~(\ref{eq:VP}) is, for equivalent values of the mediator mass
and couplings, always smaller than the corresponding prediction
in the spin-0 DM simplified model. The observed destructive interference
ensures perturbative unitarity of the process $pp \rightarrow tj\chi \bar \chi$ in the 2HDM+$a$ model.
In the case of the $tW$ production channel it turns out that also two diagrams provide the dominant contributions to the DM$t$ cross-section. The
relevant graphs are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:feyn2}. The
$a$-strahlung diagram, also present in the simplified spin-0 DM model, is displayed on the left-hand side, while the right diagram
represents the associated production of a $H^{\pm}$ and a $t$ quark. Like in the case of $t$-channel production the two diagrams interfere destructively
to ensure unitarity.
When the decay $H^{\pm}\rightarrow W^{\pm} a$ is possible, the $H^{\pm}$ is produced on-shell,
and the cross-section of $pp \rightarrow tW\chi\chi$,
assuming $H^{\pm}$ masses of a few hundred \GeV, is around one order of magnitude larger
than the one for the same process in the simplified model. Moreover the production
and cascade decay of a resonance yields kinematic signatures
which can be exploited to separate the signal from the SM background.
The dependence of the production cross-section on $\tan\beta$
for both the $t$-channel and $tW$ processes is shown in the two panels of
Figure~\ref{fig:xstb}. Both panel employ
$\sin\theta=1/\sqrt{2}$ and $m(a)=150\,\GeV$, while
$m(H)=m(A)=m(H^{\pm})=500 \, \GeV$ and $1 \, \TeV$ is used in the left
and right plot, respectively.
The cross-section for the contribution of the on-shell production of
$H^{\pm}$ to the $tW$ final state is also shown as a dashed line. The calculation is performed at LO in QCD in the 5-flavour scheme,
%with {\tt NNPDF3.0} PDFs \cite{Ball:2014uwa},
and the Yukawa couplings of both $t$ and $b$ quarks are included in the calculation.
From the shown results, one observes that the $tW$
contribution to the DM$t$ cross-section always dominates over the
$t$-channel, and that this dominance is more pronounced for lower
values of $m(H^{\pm})$. This feature is easy to understand by noting
that the $tW$ channel itself receives the dominant contribution from
resonant $H^{\pm}$ production for charged Higgs masses of a few
hundred \GeV, while for $m(H^{\pm})=1 \, \TeV$ resonant $H^{\pm}$
production amounts to only around 50\% of the $tW$ cross-section.
For all processes a rapid decrease with increasing $\tan\beta$ is observed,
with a minimum at $\tan\beta\simeq 5$, followed by a slower increase
towards high $\tan\beta$ values. The resonant $H^{\pm}$ production has a
broad maximum for $\tan\beta$ in the range of $[20, 30]$.
This $\tan\beta$ dependence is the result of the interplay of
four factors: the production cross-section for $H^\pm$ production in $gb$ fusion is
proportional to $m(t)^2\cot^2\beta + m(b)^2\tan^2\beta + {\rm const.}$;
the cross-section for diagrams where the $a$ is radiated off a top quark
is proportional to $\cot^2\beta$;
the branching ratio (BR) for $H^{+}\rightarrow W^{+}a$
acquires a $\tan\beta$ dependence from the
competition with the decay $H^{+}\rightarrow t \bar b$;
finally, the BR for $a\rightarrow\chi \bar \chi$
decreases at high $\tan\beta$ since the partial decay width
$a\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ grows as $\tan^2 \beta$.
Since both the widths for $H^{\pm}\rightarrow W^{\pm}a$ and $a\rightarrow\chi\chi$
are proportional to $\sin^2\theta$, the cross-section for DM$t$
grows monotonically with $\sin\theta$.
For the following studies we fix the value of the mixing angle $\theta$
such that $\sin\theta=1/\sqrt{2}$,
corresponding to maximal mixing in the pseudoscalar sector.
\section{MC simulations}
\label{sec:montecarlo}
In this section we provide a brief description of the MC simulations used
to generate both the DM signal and the SM backgrounds and explain how muons,
electrons, photons, jets and missing transverse energy, \etmiss, are built in our detector simulation.
Throughout our analysis we will consider~$pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} =
14 \, \TeV$.
\subsection{Signal generation}
\label{sec:signalgeneration}
The signal samples used in this paper are generated at LO using the 2HDM+$a$
UFO model~\cite{Degrande:2011ua} implementation provided in~\cite{Bauer:2017ota}.
The DM$t$ events are generated with {\tt MadGraph5\_aMC@NLO}~\cite{Alwall:2014hca},
employing {\tt NNPDF3.0} parton distribution functions (PDFs)~\cite{Ball:2014uwa}.
The final-state top quarks
and $W$ bosons are decayed with {\tt MadSpin}~\cite{Artoisenet:2012st}
and the events are showered with {\tt PYTHIA~8.2}
\cite{Sjostrand:2014zea} and a 5-flavour scheme is assumed.
We consider a grid in the ($m(H^{\pm})$, $\tan\beta$) plane
with seven different values of the $H^{\pm}$ mass, varying
from $300 \, \GeV$ to $1\, \TeV$ and nine values of $\tan\beta$
between $0.5$ and $50$. The mass of the pseudoscalar mediator $m(a)$ is set to $150 \,\GeV$ for this grid.
An additional scan of the pseudoscalar mediator $m(a)$ between $50\,\GeV$
and $375\,\GeV$ is performed, taking $m(H^{\pm}) = 500\,\GeV$ and
$\tan\beta = 1$, in order to assess the dependence of the results on
the $m(a)$ assumption.
In both grid scans, the heavy scalar and pseudoscalar masses are always set to the same value
$m(H) = m(A) = m(H^{\pm})$.
\subsection{Background generation}
\label{sec:backgroundgeneration}
In order to describe the $t + \etmiss$ backgrounds accurately, SM
processes involving at least one lepton coming from the decay of vector
bosons are generated.
Backgrounds either with fake electrons from jet misidentification
or with real non-isolated leptons from the decay of heavy flavours are
not considered in our analysis, as a reliable estimate of these backgrounds
would require a simulation of detector effects beyond the scope of this
work. Based on ATLAS experimental results \cite{Aaboud:2017rzf}, we estimate
these backgrounds not to exceed around $15\%$ for the selections considered in
this paper. The backgrounds from $\ttbar$~\cite{Campbell:2014kua},
$tW$~\cite{Re:2010bp}, $WW$, $WZ$ and $ZZ$ production~\cite{Melia:2011tj,Nason:2013ydw}
were all generated at next-to-leading order (NLO) with {\tt POWHEG~BOX} \cite{Alioli:2010xd}. The
${\rm jets}+Z$ and ${\rm jets}+W$ samples are generated at~LO with
{\tt MadGraph5\_aMC@NLO}
and considering up to four jets for the matrix element calculation.
{\tt MadGraph5\_aMC@NLO} is also used to
simulate the $\ttbar V$ backgrounds with $V = W,Z$ at LO with a multiplicity
of up to two jets, and the $tZ$ and $tWZ$ backgrounds at LO.
%All partonic events are showered with {\tt PYTHIA~8.2}.
The samples produced with {\tt POWHEG~BOX} are normalised to the NLO cross
section given by the generator, except $t\bar{t}$ which is normalised to
the cross section obtained at next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO)
plus next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic
accuracy~\cite{Czakon:2011xx,Czakon:2013goa}. The ${\rm jets} + W/Z$ samples
are normalised to the known NNLO cross sections~\cite{Anastasiou:2003ds,Gavin:2012sy},
and finally the NLO cross sections calculated
with {\tt MadGraph5\_aMC@NLO} are used as normalisations for the~$\ttbar V$~samples .
\subsection{Detector smearing}
\label{sec:detectorsmearing}
Muons, electrons, photons, jets and \etmiss\ are constructed from the
the stable particles in the generator output.
Jets are constucted by clustering the true momenta of all the
particles interacting in the calorimeters, with the exception of
muons. An
%Jets are constructed from the true momenta of particles interacting in
%the calorimeters, except for muons, using an
anti-$k_t$ algorithm~\cite{Cacciari:2008gp}
with a parameter $R=0.4$ is used, as implemented in {\tt FastJet}~\cite{Cacciari:2011ma}.
Jets originating from the hadronisation of bottom-quarks ($b$-jets) are experimentally
tagged with high efficiency (\btagged\ jets).
The variable \ptmiss \ with magnitude~\etmiss is defined at truth level,~i.e.~before
applying detector effects, as the negative of the vector sum of
the \pt s of all the invisible particles (neutrinos and DM
particles in our case). The effect of the detector on the kinematic quantities
utilised in the analysis is simulated by applying a Gaussian smearing to the momenta
of the different reconstructed objects and reconstruction and tagging efficiency factors.
The parametrisation of the smearing and the reconstruction and tagging efficiencies is tuned to mimic
the performance of the ATLAS detector~\cite{Aad:2008zzm,Aad:2009wy}
and is defined as a function of momentum and pseudorapidity of the objects.
The discrimination of the signal from the background is greatly affected by the
experimental smearing assumed for the \etmiss, which is the main handle to tame
the large~$\ttbar$~background. To this aim, the transverse momenta
of unsmeared electrons, muons and jets are subtracted from the truth \etmiss
and replaced by the corresponding smeared quantities. The residual truth
imbalance is then smeared as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse
momenta of the particles not assigned to jets or electrons.
The final selections and results are
derived by analysing the simulated sample using the TDataFrame tool \cite{enrico_guiraud_2017_260230}.
\section{Kinematic properties of DM$t$ and analysis strategy}
\label{sec:analysis}
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{figures/hpkine2.pdf}
\caption{Representation of the $H^{\pm}$ decay chain.}
\label{fig:kine}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure*}
% kinematics of the two analyses
\centering
\begin{subfigure}{.49\textwidth}\centering
\includegraphics[width=.9\textwidth]{figures/mtl.pdf}
\caption{}
\label{fig:kinematicsa}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}{.49\textwidth}\centering
\includegraphics[width=.9\textwidth]{figures/memvar.pdf}
\caption{}
\label{fig:kinematicsb}
\end{subfigure}
\caption{Distribution of the transverse mass variables used in the (a) one-lepton and (b) two-lepton selections after all requirements described in Sec.~\ref{sec:analysis}, except for the one on the plotted variable which is indicated with an arrow instead. The expected SM backgrounds and two signal benchmarks are compared in the figure for an integrated luminosity of 300~fb$^{-1}$ at the $14 \, \TeV$ LHC.}
\label{fig:kinematics}
\end{figure*}
The discussion of the DM$t$ signal in Section \ref{sec:2HDM} should have made clear
that the $tW$ channel
is the dominant production mechanisms for all parameter choices in which the $H^{\pm}$ can
decay on-shell into the pseudoscalar mediator and a $W$ boson.
In order to search for this signal, we consider two different final states in our analysis,
containing either one or two leptons.
In both cases the leptons are produced in the decay of a $W$ boson,
either prompt or in a cascade from the top-quark decay.
Furthermore, the signal events contain one $b$-jet,
which again stems from the top-quark decay.
In the one-lepton final state, two additional jets are produced from the hadronic
decay of one of the $W$ bosons. A significant
amount of \etmiss associated to both the DM particles and the neutrinos
from $W \to \ell \nu_\ell$ decays is also present in the events.
If the $W$ boson from $H^{\pm}\rightarrow aW^{\pm}$ decays
leptonically into an electron or a muon, the resulting
final state includes one lepton and three invisible particles,
with two invisible particles upstream of the lepton, and one downstream.
See Figure~\ref{fig:kine} for the corresponding decay chain.
The kinematics of this decay topology is analysed in the appendix of
Ref.~\cite{Polesello:2009rn}. The transverse mass
$\mtlep$\footnote{%
We define:
$\mtlep = M_{\mathrm{T}}(\ptl,\ptmiss)^2\equiv2|\ptl||\ptmiss|(1-\cos\Delta\phi_{\ptl\ptmiss})$}
built with the components transverse to the beam of the lepton
momentum ($\ptl$) and of the vector sum of the momenta of the
invisible particles ($\ptmiss$) has a distribution with an end-point
which is a function of $m(H^{\pm})$, $m(W)$ and $m(a)$.
This variable can be directly measured for the one-lepton
final state when the lepton is produced in the $H^{\pm}$ decay.
In the case of the two-lepton final state, the distribution of $\mtlep$ for the $H^{\pm}$
decay enters the construction of the $\mttwo$ variable \cite{Lester:1999tx,Barr:2003rg} built
out of the two leptons and $\ptmiss$, which has the same end-point.
\begin{figure}[b]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{figures/invmassHlep.pdf}
%\includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{}
\caption{The invariant mass of the lepton and the
leading \btagged\ jet ($m(b1,\ell)$) and of
the leading light jet and the leading \btagged\ jet ($m(b1,j1)$) are displayed for the lepton and hadronic decays of the $H^\pm$ in the $tW$ channel.
For comparison also the distributions for $t$-channel production are shown. All results correspond to $m(H^{\pm})=800 \, \GeV$ and $\tan\beta = 20$.}
\label{fig:Hleptruth}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The two variables $\mtlep$ and $\mttwo$ can therefore be exploited to strongly reduce the
dominant SM backgrounds from single or double production of
top quarks, in which case $\etmiss$ is generated only from the neutrinos
from $W$ decay and the distributions display an end-point at the $W$-boson
masses.
The discriminating power of the \mtlep\ (left panel) and $\mttwo$ (right panel) observables
is illustrated in Figure~\ref{fig:kinematics}, which shows the relevant distributions
after all the one-lepton and two-lepton signal selection
requirements, as described in the next section, have been applied.
The events surviving the \mtlep\ requirement for the one-lepton selection are dominated
by $t\bar{t}$ events that decay into two leptons, but one
of the two leptons is not identified in the detector.
The variable $\amttwo$ \cite{Konar:2009qr,Lester:2014yga} was developed to
tame this background and is therefore employed in the one-lepton analysis.
Secondary backgrounds like the production of single or double
vector bosons are efficiently suppressed by requiring QCD jet production
in the event. The angular
correlation between the jets and $\etmiss$ has a good discrimination
power, both for the 1-lepton and the 2-lepton case, as for
leptonic decays of the $H^{\pm}$ all jets in the event are
produced in the decay of the accompanying top quark, while
$\etmiss$ is dominantly aligned with the $H^{\pm}$, implying
that $\etmiss$ is mostly isolated from jets.
\subsection{One-lepton analysis}
Events with exactly one isolated lepton ($e$ or $\mu$) with
$\pt > 25\,\GeV$, at least three jets
($\pt > \{50,50,20\}\,\GeV$, $|\eta|<2.5$) and $\etmiss > 250\,\GeV$ are
selected for this topology.
All reconstructed jets with $p_\mathrm{T}^j >25 \, \GeV$
within $|\eta_{\ell}|<2.5$ have to satisfy $|\Delta\phi_{\rm min}|>1.1$,
where~$\Delta\phi_{\rm min}$ is defined to be the angle between
$\vec{p}_{\rm T}^{\ j}$ and $\ptmiss$ for the jet closest to $\etmiss$
in the azimuthal plane. At least one jet is required to be \btagged.
All dominant backgrounds except for single top production are
characterised by two hard \bjet s produced in the decay of a top
quark.
In order to suppress these backgrounds, event with a second
\btagged\ jet with $\pt > 50\,\GeV$ are rejected. The semi-leptonic
and dileptonic \ttbar\ backgrounds are strongly suppressed by
requiring $\mtlep > 300\,\GeV$ and $\amttwo > 200 \,\GeV$,
respectively.
%\noindent
Further requirements on the invariant mass of the lepton and the
leading \btagged\ jet ($m(b1,\ell) > 160\,\GeV$) and on the invariant mass of
the leading light jet and the leading \btagged\ jet ($m(b1,j1) < 150\,\GeV$)
are placed to further suppress the residual background compatible with
the presence of a semileptonic top decay in the event. As it can be
seen in Figure~\ref{fig:Hleptruth}, these requirements select the signal
topology where the $H^{\pm}$ decays leptonically, which was found to
have kinematic features that made it easier to discriminate it
from the backgrounds.
The signal events where the $H^{\pm}$ decays hadronically are
kinematically more similar to the SM backgrounds, due to the smearing
of \etmiss\ associated to neutrinos in top decays.
In this case a dedicated strategy would be needed to successfully
distinguish between signal and background. The same applies to the
production via $t$-channel diagrams, which is also rejected by the requirements
of the analysis. The definition of a dedicated signal region
targeting the hadronic $H^{\pm}$ decay is expected to increase
significantly the sensitivity of the analysis. We leave the definition
of such region to the experimental collaborations.
%The total background after these selections ix XX events for 300~fb$^{-1}$
%and the efficiency for the signal varies between XX for $m(H^{\pm})=300$~GeV
%and XX for $m(H^{\pm})=1$~TeV:
\subsection{Two-lepton analysis}
As a first step, events with two leptons and at least one \btagged\ jet
are selected. The events are required to contain
exactly two isolated oppositely charged leptons (electrons,
muons or one of each flavour) with $p_\mathrm{T}^{\ell_1} >25 \, \GeV$,
$p_\mathrm{T}^{\ell_2} >20 \, \GeV$, $|\eta_{\ell}|<2.5$ and an invariant
mass that satisfies $m_{\ell \ell} > 20 \, \GeV$.
If the charged signal leptons are of the same flavour
the additional requirement $m_{\ell \ell} \in [71, 111] \, \GeV$ is
imposed to veto events where the charged lepton pair arises from a~$Z
\to \ell^+ \ell^-$ decay. Furthermore, each event is required to
contain at least one \btagged\ jet with $\pt >40\,\GeV$.
All reconstructed jets with $\pt^j >25 \, \GeV$
within $|\eta_{\ell}|<2.5$ have to satisfy $|\Delta\phi_{\rm
min}|>1.5$. The variable $\Delta\phi_{\rm boost}$, the azimuthal angular distance between $\ptmiss$ and the vector sum of $\ptmiss$ and the transverse
momenta of the leptons must satisfy the requirement $|\Delta\phi_{\rm boost}|<1$.
The reducible backgrounds are suppressed by requiring that the
invariant mass of at least one lepton with the leading $b$-jet is
smaller than $150\,\GeV$, and thence compatible with the decay of a top quark.
The dominant $t\bar{t}$ backgrounds have a second \btagged\ jet,
with $p_T$ typically in excess of $50\,\GeV$, whereas the signal
has only one top decay. The requirement that the scalar sum
of the transverse momenta of all the jets observed in the
event be lower than $150\,\GeV$ suppresses events with two
real top quarks.
The final cut, following \cite{Haisch:2016gry} is based on the following
linear combination of~$\etmiss$ and~$\mttwo$:
\beq \label{eq:Cem}
C_{\rm em} \equiv \mttwo + 0.2 \cdot \etmiss \,.
\eeq
The requirement that this variable be larger than $180\,\GeV$, together
with the cut $\mttwo>100\,\GeV$ reduces the background from
$t\bar{t}$ production well below the irreducible $t\bar{t}+Z$ background.
This is shown in the right panel of Figure~\ref{fig:kinematics}.
%The total background after these selections ix XX events for 300~fb$^{-1}$
%and the efficiency for the signal varies between XX for $m(H^{\pm})=300$~GeV
%and XX for $m(H^{\pm})=1$~TeV:
%\FloatBarrier
\section{Results}
\label{sec:results}
On the basis of the selection criteria defined in the previous section,
we study the LHC sensitivity to the DM$t$ signature for
an integrated luminosity of $300 \, {\rm fb}^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s} = 14 \, \TeV$.
The total background in the one-lepton selection is approximately 25 events.
More than half of the background contribution is coming from $tt+V$ and $tZ$ processes
and the rest is due to the contribution of top pairs (dileptonic decays) and single top $tW$ channel in an approximate ratio of 2 to 1.
In the charged Higgs mass range from
$500 \, \GeV $ to $1\, \TeV$ the acceptance for signal events containing at
least one lepton
amounts to $[0.5, 1]\%$ ($[0.2, 0.8]\%$) for $m(a) = 150\, \GeV$ and
$\tan\beta = 1 \, (20)$.
The total background in the two-lepton selection is approximately 10 events, dominantly composed of
the $\ttbar+V$ and $tWZ$ background processes.
For $m(H^\pm)$ between $300 \, \GeV$ to $700\, \GeV$ the acceptance
for signal events containing at least two leptons
is in the range $[0.1, 0.7]\%$ ($[0.06, 0.5]\%$) for $m(a) = 150\, \GeV$ and
$\tan\beta = 1 \, (20)$.
A profiled likelihood ratio test statistic is used to evaluate the
upper limit on the ratio of the signal yield to that predicted in the
2HDM+$a$ model. The CLs method \cite{Read:2002hq} is used to derive exclusion limits at 95\%
Confidence Level (CL). The statistical analysis has been performed
by employing the RooStat toolkit \cite{Moneta:2010pm}.
The results are interpreted in terms of relevant parameters defining the model, namely
$m({H^\pm})$, $m(a)$ and $\tan \beta$.
The masses of the other Higgs bosons, except for the SM one, are set to the mass of the charged Higgs.
\begin{figure}[h]
\begin{center}
\begin{subfigure}{.49\textwidth}\centering
\includegraphics[width=.98\textwidth]{figures/SRComb2latb1_ULscan}
\caption{}
\label{fig:95clSpina}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}{.49\textwidth}\centering
\includegraphics[width=.98\textwidth]{figures/SRComb2latb1_ULscan_tb1}
\caption{}
\label{fig:95clSpinb}
\end{subfigure}
\caption{Upper limits at 95\% CL on the ratio of the signal yield to that predicted in the
2HDM+$a$ model using the combination of the one-lepton and two-lepton selections described in the text.
The limits are presented in (a) as a function of $\tan\beta$ for different $m(H^\pm)$ masses and $m(a) = 150\,\GeV$, and in (b) as a function of $m(a)$
for $m(H^\pm) = 500\,\GeV$ and $\tan\beta = 1 $.
The reach assumes $300 \, {\rm fb}^{-1}$ of $14 \, \TeV$ LHC data and a systematic uncertainty of 20\% (5\%) on the SM background (signal).}
\label{fig:95clSpin}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Given the relatively large irreducible background surviving all the
selections, the experimental sensitivity will be dominantly determined by
the systematic uncertainty on the estimate of the SM backgrounds. Such
uncertainty has two main sources: the uncertainties affecting
the detector performance such as the energy scale
for hadronic jets and the identification efficiency for leptons,
and, in addition, the uncertainties plaguing
the evaluation procedure for the background which typically
includes a mix of theoretical uncertainties on
the MC modelling of SM processes and uncertainties on
the data-driven estimates of the main backgrounds.
Depending on the process and on the kinematic selection,
the total uncertainty can vary between a few
percent and a few tens of percent. Since the present analysis does not select
an extreme kinematic phase space for the dominant $\ttbar Z$ background,
it should be possible to control the systematic uncertainties
at the 10\% to 30\% level. In the following, we will assume a 20\%
uncertainty on the backgrounds and, furthermore, a 5\% uncertainty on the
signal, which accounts for the impacto of scale and PDF variations on the signal modelling.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{figures/combined_2dscan}
%\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{figures}
\caption{Regions in the (m($H^{\pm}$), $\tan\beta$) plane which can be excluded at 95\%~CL through the one-lepton and two-lepton searches described in the
text. The reach assumes $300 \, {\rm fb}^{-1}$ of $14 \, \TeV$ LHC data and a systematic uncertainty of 20\% (5\%) on the SM background (signal).}
\label{fig:95clSpinc}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Since the one-lepton and two-lepton analyses select two orthogonal event
samples, they can be statistically combined, in order to assess the
potential gain in sensitivity deriving from such treatment. In the combination,
both signal and background uncertainties are treated as correlated.
Figure~\ref{fig:95clSpina} shows the exclusion limits obtained by the
combination of the one-lepton and two-lepton selections for different charged
Higgs masses as a function of $\tan\beta$. The sensitivity trend
closely follows the cross-section distribution shown in Figure~\ref{fig:xstb}.
The maximum of the sensitivity is found for $m(H^{\pm}) = 500\,\GeV$,
while $\sigma_{\rm excl}/\sigma_{\rm th}$ is relatively
flat for masses between $400 \, \GeV$ and $700\, \GeV$.
In Figure~\ref{fig:95clSpinb} we instead show the exclusion limits as a
function of the light pseudoscalar mass for $m(H^{\pm})$ and $\tan\beta$
set to $500\,\GeV$ and $1$ respectively. One observes that the sensitivity
is relatively flat for
$m(a)$ values between $50 \, \GeV$ and $200\, \GeV$, and
that for the chosen parameters $\sigma_{\rm excl}/\sigma_{\rm th} < 1$ for
$m(a) \lesssim 300 \, \GeV$.
Finally, Figure~\ref{fig:95clSpinc} shows the exclusion contour in the
$(m(H^{\pm}), \tan\beta)$ plane for the separate one-lepton and two-lepton
selections and their combination. The $z$-axis shows the ratio of the
excluded and the theoretical cross-sections for the combined fit.
Comparing the contours, the complementarity
in reach between the one-lepton and the two-lepton selections is evident,
resulting only in a small improvement when the two channels are combined.
Limits on the production of $H^{\pm}$ followed by the decay into either
$\tau\nu_{\tau}$ \cite{Aaboud:2016dig,CMS-PAS-HIG-16-031} or $tb$
\cite{Aad:2015typ,Khachatryan:2015qxa,ATLAS-CONF-2016-089} are available from the ATLAS and CMS collaborations.
%based on the analysis of 36.1~fb${-1}$ of data.
For the decay into $\tau\nu$ the limits are outside
the range of parameters considered in this analysis.
For the $tb$ decay we recast the limits given in \cite{ATLAS-CONF-2016-089}
taking into account
that the $H^{\pm} \to tb$ BR is reduced because the partial decay width
$H^{\pm}\rightarrow a W^{\pm}$ is in general non-vanishing in our model~(\ref{eq:VP}).
The results are shown as a blue dashed line in Figure~\ref{fig:95clSpinc}, and
they cover an area largely complementary to the results of the DM$t$ analysis.
\section{Conclusions}
\label{sec:conclusions}
In this article we have assessed the prospects of future LHC runs to probe
spin-0 interactions between DM and top quarks via the $t + \etmiss$
signature. We have focused on a model
with two Higgs doublets and a pseudoscalar mediator.
The rich structure of the Higgs sector in the the 2HDM+$a$ model provides
interesting final-state signatures dependent on the mass hierarchy
of the different bosons. In particular, the $t + \etmiss$ signature is
dominated by on-shell production of the charged Higgs
associated with a top-quark, if the decay channel
$H^{\pm} \rightarrow W^{\pm} a$ is kinematically accessible.
Two final states were considered, involving one and two
leptons from the decay of the two $W$ bosons in the event.
Analysis strategies were developed which take advantage of the
topology of the leptonic $H^{\pm}$ decay to enhance the signal
with respect to the SM backgrounds. It was shown that the one-lepton
and two-lepton analyses have complementary sensitivity as
a function of $m(H^{\pm})$, with the former (latter) being more sensitive
at higher (lower) masses.
For a mediator with mass $150 \, \GeV$, and maximally mixed with the
pseudoscalar $A$ of the two Higgs doublet model,
values of $\tan\beta$ up to 3 and down
to 15 can be excluded at 95\%~CL by the LHC
with an integrated luminosity
of 300~fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s} = 14 \, \TeV$,
if the $H^{\pm}$ mass is in the range of $300 \, \GeV$ and $1 \, \TeV$.
The $t + \etmiss$ signature considered here for the first time
therefore complements the parameter coverage of the
mono-Higgs, mono-$Z$ and $t\bar t +\etmiss$ searches that have been discussed
in the context of the 2HDM+$a$ model in~\cite{Bauer:2017ota}.
\section{Acknowledgments}
We thank Uli Haisch and Fabio Maltoni for several enlightening
conversations during the development of the analysis, and for useful
comments on the manuscript. This work was started during the
BSM session of the workshop "Physics at TeV Colliders"
held in Les Houches in June
2017. We thank the organisers for the stimulating
environment of the workshop, and the colleagues taking part
in the meetings for useful discussions.
%% The Appendices part is started with the command \appendix;
%% appendix sections are then done as normal sections
%% \appendix
%% \section{}
%% \label{}
%% If you have bibdatabase file and want bibtex to generate the
%% bibitems, please use
%%
\bibliographystyle{elsarticle-num}
\bibliography{hplus}
\end{document}
\endinput
%%
%% @Article{Bauer:2016gys,
%% author = "Albert, Andreas and others",
%% title = "{Towards the next generation of simplified Dark Matter
%% models}",
%% journal = "Phys. Dark Univ.",
%% volume = "16",
%% year = "2017",
%% pages = "49-70",
%% doi = "10.1016/j.dark.2017.02.002",
%% eprint = "1607.06680",
%% archivePrefix = "arXiv",
%% primaryClass = "hep-ex",
%% SLACcitation = "%%CITATION = ARXIV:1607.06680;%%"
%% }
\begin{thebibliography}{10}
\expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
\def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname href\endcsname\relax
\def\href#1#2{#2} \def\path#1{#1}\fi
\bibitem{Aaboud:2016qgg}
{ATLAS Collaboration}, {Search for dark matter produced in association with a
hadronically decaying vector boson in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV
with the ATLAS detector}, Phys. Lett. B763 (2016) 251--268.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.02372} {\path{arXiv:1608.02372}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.10.042}
{\path{doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.10.042}}.
\bibitem{Sirunyan:2017hci}
{CMS Collaboration}, {Search for dark matter produced with an energetic jet or
a hadronically decaying W or Z boson at $ \sqrt{s}=13 $ TeV}, JHEP 07 (2017)
014.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.01651} {\path{arXiv:1703.01651}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2017)014}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2017)014}}.
\bibitem{CMS-EXO-16-012}
{CMS Collaboration}, {Search for associated production of dark matter with a
Higgs boson decaying to $b\bar{b}$ or $\gamma\gamma$ at $\sqrt{s} =
13\;\mbox{TeV}$, } (2017).
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.05236} {\path{arXiv:1703.05236}}.
\bibitem{Aaboud:2017dor}
{ATLAS Collaboration}, {Search for dark matter at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV in final
states containing an energetic photon and large missing transverse momentum
with the ATLAS detector}, Eur. Phys. J. C77~(6) (2017) 393.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.03848} {\path{arXiv:1704.03848}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4965-8}
{\path{doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4965-8}}.
\bibitem{Sirunyan:2017xgm}
{CMS Collaboration}, {Search for dark matter produced in association with
heavy-flavor quarks in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s)=13 TeV, } (2017).
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.02581} {\path{arXiv:1706.02581}}.
\bibitem{Sirunyan:2017ewk}
{CMS Collaboration}, {Search for new physics in the monophoton final state in
proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV, } (2017).
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03794} {\path{arXiv:1706.03794}}.
\bibitem{Aaboud:2017uak}
{ATLAS Collaboration}, {Search for dark matter in association with a Higgs
boson decaying to two photons at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,
} (2017).
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03948} {\path{arXiv:1706.03948}}.
\bibitem{Aaboud:2017yqz}
{ATLAS Collaboration}, {Search for Dark Matter Produced in Association with a
Higgs Boson Decaying to $b\bar b$ using 36 fb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions at
$\sqrt s=13$ TeV with the ATLAS Detector}, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119~(18) (2017)
181804.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.01302} {\path{arXiv:1707.01302}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.181804}
{\path{doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.181804}}.
\bibitem{Aaboud:2017bja}
{ATLAS Collaboration}, {Search for an invisibly decaying Higgs boson or dark
matter candidates produced in association with a $Z$ boson in $pp$ collisions
at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, } (2017).
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1708.09624} {\path{arXiv:1708.09624}}.
\bibitem{Aaboud:2017rzf}
M.~Aaboud, et~al., {Search for dark matter produced in association with bottom
or top quarks in $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, }
(2017).
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.11412} {\path{arXiv:1710.11412}}.
\bibitem{Sirunyan:2017leh}
{CMS Collaboration}, {Search for top squarks and dark matter particles in
opposite-charge dilepton final states at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV, } (2017).
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.00752} {\path{arXiv:1711.00752}}.
\bibitem{Aaboud:2017phn}
{ATLAS Collaboration}, {Search for dark matter and other new phenomena in
events with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum using the
ATLAS detector, } (2017).
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.03301} {\path{arXiv:1711.03301}}.
\bibitem{Aaboud:2017aeu}
{ATLAS Collaboration}, {Search for top-squark pair production in final states
with one lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum using 36 fb$^{-1}$ of
$\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV pp collision data with the ATLAS detector, } (2017).
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11520} {\path{arXiv:1711.11520}}.
\bibitem{Abdallah:2014hon}
J.~Abdallah, et~al., {Simplified Models for Dark Matter and Missing Energy
Searches at the LHC} (2014).
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.2893} {\path{arXiv:1409.2893}}.
\bibitem{Abdallah:2015ter}
J.~Abdallah, et~al., {Simplified Models for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC},
Phys. Dark Univ. 9-10 (2015) 8--23.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.03116} {\path{arXiv:1506.03116}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2015.08.001}
{\path{doi:10.1016/j.dark.2015.08.001}}.
\bibitem{Abercrombie:2015wmb}
D.~Abercrombie, et~al., {Dark Matter Benchmark Models for Early LHC Run-2
Searches: Report of the ATLAS/CMS Dark Matter Forum} (2015).
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.00966} {\path{arXiv:1507.00966}}.
\bibitem{Beltran:2010ww}
M.~Beltran, D.~Hooper, E.~W. Kolb, Z.~A.~C. Krusberg, T.~M.~P. Tait, {Maverick
dark matter at colliders}, JHEP 09 (2010) 037.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.4137} {\path{arXiv:1002.4137}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2010)037}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2010)037}}.
\bibitem{Goodman:2010yf}
J.~Goodman, M.~Ibe, A.~Rajaraman, W.~Shepherd, T.~M.~P. Tait, H.-B. Yu,
{Constraints on Light Majorana dark Matter from Colliders}, Phys. Lett. B695
(2011) 185--188.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.1286} {\path{arXiv:1005.1286}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010.11.009}
{\path{doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.11.009}}.
\bibitem{Bai:2010hh}
Y.~Bai, P.~J. Fox, R.~Harnik, {The Tevatron at the Frontier of Dark Matter
Direct Detection}, JHEP 12 (2010) 048.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.3797} {\path{arXiv:1005.3797}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2010)048}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2010)048}}.
\bibitem{Goodman:2010ku}
J.~Goodman, M.~Ibe, A.~Rajaraman, W.~Shepherd, T.~M.~P. Tait, H.-B. Yu,
{Constraints on Dark Matter from Colliders}, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 116010.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.1783} {\path{arXiv:1008.1783}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.116010}
{\path{doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.116010}}.
\bibitem{Rajaraman:2011wf}
A.~Rajaraman, W.~Shepherd, T.~M.~P. Tait, A.~M. Wijangco, {LHC Bounds on
Interactions of Dark Matter}, Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 095013.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.1196} {\path{arXiv:1108.1196}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.095013}
{\path{doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.095013}}.
\bibitem{Fox:2011pm}
P.~J. Fox, R.~Harnik, J.~Kopp, Y.~Tsai, {Missing Energy Signatures of Dark
Matter at the LHC}, Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 056011.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4398} {\path{arXiv:1109.4398}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.056011}
{\path{doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.056011}}.
\bibitem{Chala:2015ama}
M.~Chala, F.~Kahlhoefer, M.~McCullough, G.~Nardini, K.~Schmidt-Hoberg,
{Constraining Dark Sectors with Monojets and Dijets}, JHEP 07 (2015) 089.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.05916} {\path{arXiv:1503.05916}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2015)089}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2015)089}}.
\bibitem{Bell:2015sza}
N.~F. Bell, Y.~Cai, J.~B. Dent, R.~K. Leane, T.~J. Weiler, {Dark matter at the
LHC: Effective field theories and gauge invariance}, Phys. Rev. D92~(5)
(2015) 053008.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07874} {\path{arXiv:1503.07874}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.053008}
{\path{doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.053008}}.
\bibitem{Kahlhoefer:2015bea}
F.~Kahlhoefer, K.~Schmidt-Hoberg, T.~Schwetz, S.~Vogl, {Implications of
unitarity and gauge invariance for simplified dark matter models}, JHEP 02
(2016) 016.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.02110} {\path{arXiv:1510.02110}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2016)016}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2016)016}}.
\bibitem{Bell:2015rdw}
N.~F. Bell, Y.~Cai, R.~K. Leane, {Mono-W Dark Matter Signals at the LHC:
Simplified Model Analysis}, JCAP 1601~(01) (2016) 051.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.00476} {\path{arXiv:1512.00476}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/01/051}
{\path{doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/01/051}}.
\bibitem{Haisch:2016usn}
U.~Haisch, F.~Kahlhoefer, T.~M.~P. Tait, {On Mono-W Signatures in Spin-1
Simplified Models}, Phys. Lett. B760 (2016) 207--213.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01267} {\path{arXiv:1603.01267}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.06.063}
{\path{doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.06.063}}.
\bibitem{Englert:2016joy}
C.~Englert, M.~McCullough, M.~Spannowsky, {S-Channel Dark Matter Simplified
Models and Unitarity}, Phys. Dark Univ. 14 (2016) 48--56.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.07975} {\path{arXiv:1604.07975}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2016.09.002}
{\path{doi:10.1016/j.dark.2016.09.002}}.
\bibitem{Cheung:2010zf}
K.~Cheung, K.~Mawatari, E.~Senaha, P.-Y. Tseng, T.-C. Yuan, {The Top Window for
dark matter}, JHEP 10 (2010) 081.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.0618} {\path{arXiv:1009.0618}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2010)081}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2010)081}}.
\bibitem{Buckley:2014fba}
M.~R. Buckley, D.~Feld, D.~Goncalves, {Scalar Simplified Models for Dark
Matter}, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 015017.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.6497} {\path{arXiv:1410.6497}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.015017}
{\path{doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.015017}}.
\bibitem{Haisch:2015ioa}
U.~Haisch, E.~Re, {Simplified dark matter top-quark interactions at the LHC},
JHEP 06 (2015) 078.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.00691} {\path{arXiv:1503.00691}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2015)078}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2015)078}}.
\bibitem{Backovic:2015soa}
M.~Backovic, M.~Kramer, F.~Maltoni, A.~Martini, K.~Mawatari, M.~Pellen,
{Higher-order QCD predictions for dark matter production at the LHC in
simplified models with s-channel mediators}, Eur. Phys. J. C75~(10) (2015)
482.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.05327} {\path{arXiv:1508.05327}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3700-6}
{\path{doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3700-6}}.
\bibitem{Arina:2016cqj}
C.~Arina, et~al., {A comprehensive approach to dark matter studies: exploration
of simplified top-philic models}, JHEP 11 (2016) 111.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.09242} {\path{arXiv:1605.09242}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2016)111}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2016)111}}.
\bibitem{Banerjee:2017wxi}
S.~Banerjee, D.~Barducci, G.~Bélanger, B.~Fuks, A.~Goudelis, B.~Zaldivar,
{Cornering pseudoscalar-mediated dark matter with the LHC and cosmology},
JHEP 07 (2017) 080.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.02327} {\path{arXiv:1705.02327}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2017)080}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2017)080}}.
\bibitem{Khachatryan:2016vau}
G.~Aad, et~al., {Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and
constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the
LHC pp collision data at $ \sqrt{s}=7 $ and 8 TeV}, JHEP 08 (2016) 045.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.02266} {\path{arXiv:1606.02266}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2016)045}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2016)045}}.
\bibitem{Ipek:2014gua}
S.~Ipek, D.~McKeen, A.~E. Nelson, {A Renormalizable Model for the Galactic
Center Gamma Ray Excess from Dark Matter Annihilation}, Phys. Rev. D90~(5)
(2014) 055021.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.3716} {\path{arXiv:1404.3716}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.055021}
{\path{doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.055021}}.
\bibitem{No:2015xqa}
J.~M. No, {Looking through the pseudoscalar portal into dark matter: Novel
mono-Higgs and mono-Z signatures at the LHC}, Phys. Rev. D93~(3) (2016)
031701.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.01110} {\path{arXiv:1509.01110}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.031701}
{\path{doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.031701}}.
\bibitem{Goncalves:2016iyg}
D.~Goncalves, P.~A.~N. Machado, J.~M. No, {Simplified Models for Dark Matter
Face their Consistent Completions}, Phys. Rev. D95~(5) (2017) 055027.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.04593} {\path{arXiv:1611.04593}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.055027}
{\path{doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.055027}}.
\bibitem{Bauer:2017ota}
M.~Bauer, U.~Haisch, F.~Kahlhoefer, {Simplified dark matter models with two
Higgs doublets: I. Pseudoscalar mediators}, JHEP 05 (2017) 138.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.07427} {\path{arXiv:1701.07427}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2017)138}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)138}}.
\bibitem{Arcadi:2017wqi}
G.~Arcadi, M.~Lindner, F.~S. Queiroz, W.~Rodejohann, S.~Vogl, {Pseudoscalar
Mediators: A WIMP model at the Neutrino Floor} (2017).
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.02110} {\path{arXiv:1711.02110}}.
\bibitem{Lin:2013sca}
T.~Lin, E.~W. Kolb, L.-T. Wang, {Probing dark matter couplings to top and
bottom quarks at the LHC}, Phys. Rev. D88~(6) (2013) 063510.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.6638} {\path{arXiv:1303.6638}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.063510}
{\path{doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.063510}}.
\bibitem{Buckley:2015ctj}
M.~R. Buckley, D.~Goncalves, {Constraining the Strength and CP Structure of
Dark Production at the LHC: the Associated Top-Pair Channel}, Phys. Rev.
D93~(3) (2016) 034003, [Phys. Rev.D93,034003(2016)].
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.06451} {\path{arXiv:1511.06451}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.034003}
{\path{doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.034003}}.
\bibitem{Haisch:2016gry}
U.~Haisch, P.~Pani, G.~Polesello, {Determining the CP nature of spin-0
mediators in associated production of dark matter and $ t\overline{t} $
pairs}, JHEP 02 (2017) 131.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.09841} {\path{arXiv:1611.09841}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2017)131}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2017)131}}.
\bibitem{Pinna:2017tay}
D.~Pinna, A.~Zucchetta, M.~R. Buckley, F.~Canelli, {Single top quarks and dark
matter}, Phys. Rev. D96~(3) (2017) 035031.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.05195} {\path{arXiv:1701.05195}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.035031}
{\path{doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.035031}}.
\bibitem{Gunion:1989we}
J.~F. Gunion, H.~E. Haber, G.~L. Kane, S.~Dawson, {The Higgs Hunter's Guide},
Front. Phys. 80 (2000) 1--404.
\bibitem{Branco:2011iw}
G.~C. Branco, P.~M. Ferreira, L.~Lavoura, M.~N. Rebelo, M.~Sher, J.~P. Silva,
{Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models}, Phys. Rept. 516
(2012) 1--102.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.0034} {\path{arXiv:1106.0034}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002}
{\path{doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002}}.
\bibitem{Aad:2012tfa}
{ATLAS Collaboration}, {Observation of a new particle in the search for the
Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC}, Phys. Lett.
B716 (2012) 1--29.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7214} {\path{arXiv:1207.7214}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020}
{\path{doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020}}.
\bibitem{Chatrchyan:2012xdj}
{CMS Collaboration}, {Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the
CMS experiment at the LHC}, Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 30--61.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7235} {\path{arXiv:1207.7235}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021}
{\path{doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021}}.
\bibitem{Glashow:1976nt}
S.~L. Glashow, S.~Weinberg, {Natural Conservation Laws for Neutral Currents},
Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 1958.
\newblock \href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.15.1958}
{\path{doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.1958}}.
\bibitem{Paschos:1976ay}
E.~A. Paschos, {Diagonal Neutral Currents}, Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 1966.
\newblock \href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.15.1966}
{\path{doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.1966}}.
\bibitem{Degrande:2011ua}
C.~Degrande, C.~Duhr, B.~Fuks, D.~Grellscheid, O.~Mattelaer, T.~Reiter, {UFO -
The Universal FeynRules Output}, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 1201--1214.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.2040} {\path{arXiv:1108.2040}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2012.01.022}
{\path{doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.01.022}}.
\bibitem{Alwall:2014hca}
J.~Alwall, R.~Frederix, S.~Frixione, V.~Hirschi, F.~Maltoni, O.~Mattelaer,
H.~S. Shao, T.~Stelzer, P.~Torrielli, M.~Zaro, {The automated computation of
tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their
matching to parton shower simulations}, JHEP 07 (2014) 079.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0301} {\path{arXiv:1405.0301}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079}}.
\bibitem{Ball:2014uwa}
R.~D. Ball, et~al., {Parton distributions for the LHC Run II}, JHEP 04 (2015)
040.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8849} {\path{arXiv:1410.8849}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040}}.
\bibitem{Artoisenet:2012st}
P.~Artoisenet, R.~Frederix, O.~Mattelaer, R.~Rietkerk, {Automatic
spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations}, JHEP
03 (2013) 015.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.3460} {\path{arXiv:1212.3460}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2013)015}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2013)015}}.
\bibitem{Sjostrand:2014zea}
T.~Sj{\"o}strand, S.~Ask, J.~R. Christiansen, R.~Corke, N.~Desai, P.~Ilten,
S.~Mrenna, S.~Prestel, C.~O. Rasmussen, P.~Z. Skands, {An Introduction to
PYTHIA 8.2}, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159--177.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.3012} {\path{arXiv:1410.3012}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024}
{\path{doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024}}.
\bibitem{Campbell:2014kua}
J.~M. Campbell, R.~K. Ellis, P.~Nason, E.~Re, {Top-Pair Production and Decay at
NLO Matched with Parton Showers}, JHEP 04 (2015) 114.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.1828} {\path{arXiv:1412.1828}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2015)114}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)114}}.
\bibitem{Re:2010bp}
E.~Re, {Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the
POWHEG method}, Eur. Phys. J. C71 (2011) 1547.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.2450} {\path{arXiv:1009.2450}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1547-z}
{\path{doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1547-z}}.
\bibitem{Melia:2011tj}
T.~Melia, P.~Nason, R.~Rontsch, G.~Zanderighi, {W+W-, WZ and ZZ production in
the POWHEG BOX}, JHEP 11 (2011) 078.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.5051} {\path{arXiv:1107.5051}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2011)078}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2011)078}}.
\bibitem{Nason:2013ydw}
P.~Nason, G.~Zanderighi, {$W^+ W^-$ , $W Z$ and $Z Z$ production in the
POWHEG-BOX-V2}, Eur. Phys. J. C74~(1) (2014) 2702.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.1365} {\path{arXiv:1311.1365}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2702-5}
{\path{doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2702-5}}.
\bibitem{Alioli:2010xd}
S.~Alioli, P.~Nason, C.~Oleari, E.~Re, {A general framework for implementing
NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX}, JHEP 06
(2010) 043.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.2581} {\path{arXiv:1002.2581}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043}}.
\bibitem{Czakon:2011xx}
M.~Czakon, A.~Mitov, {Top++: A Program for the Calculation of the Top-Pair
Cross-Section at Hadron Colliders}, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2930.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.5675} {\path{arXiv:1112.5675}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2014.06.021}
{\path{doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.06.021}}.
\bibitem{Czakon:2013goa}
M.~Czakon, P.~Fiedler, A.~Mitov, {Total Top-Quark Pair-Production Cross Section
at Hadron Colliders Through $O(\frac{4}{S})$}, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013)
252004.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.6254} {\path{arXiv:1303.6254}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.252004}
{\path{doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.252004}}.
\bibitem{Anastasiou:2003ds}
C.~Anastasiou, L.~J. Dixon, K.~Melnikov, F.~Petriello, {High precision QCD at
hadron colliders: Electroweak gauge boson rapidity distributions at NNLO},
Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 094008.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0312266}
{\path{arXiv:hep-ph/0312266}}, \href
{http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.094008}
{\path{doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.094008}}.
\bibitem{Gavin:2012sy}
R.~Gavin, Y.~Li, F.~Petriello, S.~Quackenbush, {W Physics at the LHC with FEWZ
2.1}, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 208--214.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.5896} {\path{arXiv:1201.5896}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2012.09.005}
{\path{doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.09.005}}.
\bibitem{Cacciari:2008gp}
M.~Cacciari, G.~P. Salam, G.~Soyez, {The Anti-k(t) jet clustering algorithm},
JHEP 04 (2008) 063.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/0802.1189} {\path{arXiv:0802.1189}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063}
{\path{doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063}}.
\bibitem{Cacciari:2011ma}
M.~Cacciari, G.~P. Salam, G.~Soyez, {FastJet User Manual}, Eur. Phys. J. C72
(2012) 1896.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.6097} {\path{arXiv:1111.6097}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2}
{\path{doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2}}.
\bibitem{Aad:2008zzm}
{ATLAS Collaboration}, {The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron
Collider}, JINST 3 (2008) S08003.
\newblock \href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08003}
{\path{doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08003}}.
\bibitem{Aad:2009wy}
{ATLAS Collaboration}, {Expected Performance of the ATLAS Experiment -
Detector, Trigger and Physics, } (2009).
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.0512} {\path{arXiv:0901.0512}}.
\bibitem{enrico_guiraud_2017_260230}
E.~Guiraud, A.~Naumann, D.~Piparo,
\href{https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.260230}{{TDataFrame: functional chains
for ROOT data analyses}} (Jan. 2017).
\newblock \href {http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.260230}
{\path{doi:10.5281/zenodo.260230}}.
\newline\urlprefix\url{https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.260230}
\bibitem{Polesello:2009rn}
G.~Polesello, D.~R. Tovey, {Supersymmetric particle mass measurement with the
boost-corrected contransverse mass}, JHEP 03 (2010) 030.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.0174} {\path{arXiv:0910.0174}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2010)030}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2010)030}}.
\bibitem{Lester:1999tx}
C.~G. Lester, D.~J. Summers, {Measuring masses of semiinvisibly decaying
particles pair produced at hadron colliders}, Phys. Lett. B463 (1999)
99--103.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9906349}
{\path{arXiv:hep-ph/9906349}}, \href
{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00945-4}
{\path{doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00945-4}}.
\bibitem{Barr:2003rg}
A.~Barr, C.~Lester, P.~Stephens, {m(T2): The Truth behind the glamour}, J.
Phys. G29 (2003) 2343--2363.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0304226}
{\path{arXiv:hep-ph/0304226}}, \href
{http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/29/10/304}
{\path{doi:10.1088/0954-3899/29/10/304}}.
\bibitem{Konar:2009qr}
P.~Konar, K.~Kong, K.~T. Matchev, M.~Park, {Dark Matter Particle Spectroscopy
at the LHC: Generalizing M(T2) to Asymmetric Event Topologies}, JHEP 04
(2010) 086.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.4126} {\path{arXiv:0911.4126}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2010)086}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2010)086}}.
\bibitem{Lester:2014yga}
C.~G. Lester, B.~Nachman, {Bisection-based asymmetric M$_{T2}$ computation: a
higher precision calculator than existing symmetric methods}, JHEP 03 (2015)
100.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4312} {\path{arXiv:1411.4312}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2015)100}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2015)100}}.
\bibitem{Read:2002hq}
A.~L. Read, {Presentation of search results: The CL(s) technique}, J. Phys. G28
(2002) 2693--2704, [,11(2002)].
\newblock \href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313}
{\path{doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313}}.
\bibitem{Moneta:2010pm}
L.~Moneta, K.~Belasco, K.~S. Cranmer, S.~Kreiss, A.~Lazzaro, D.~Piparo,
G.~Schott, W.~Verkerke, M.~Wolf, {The RooStats Project}, PoS ACAT2010 (2010)
057.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.1003} {\path{arXiv:1009.1003}}.
\bibitem{Aaboud:2016dig}
{ATLAS Collaboration}, {Search for charged Higgs bosons produced in association
with a top quark and decaying via $H^{\pm} \rightarrow \tau\nu$ using $pp$
collision data recorded at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV by the ATLAS detector}, Phys.
Lett. B759 (2016) 555--574.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.09203} {\path{arXiv:1603.09203}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.06.017}
{\path{doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.06.017}}.
\bibitem{CMS-PAS-HIG-16-031}
{CMS Collaboration}, \href{https://cds.cern.ch/record/2223865}{{Search for
charged Higgs bosons with the $\mathrm{H}^{\scriptscriptstyle \pm}\rightarrow
\tau^{\scriptscriptstyle \pm}\nu_{\tau}$ decay channel in the fully hadronic
final state at $\sqrt{s} = 13~\mathrm{TeV}$}}, CMS-PAS-HIG-16-031, Geneva
(2016).
\newline\urlprefix\url{https://cds.cern.ch/record/2223865}
\bibitem{Aad:2015typ}
{ATLAS Collaboration}, {Search for charged Higgs bosons in the $H^{\pm}
\rightarrow tb$ decay channel in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=8 $ TeV using
the ATLAS detector}, JHEP 03 (2016) 127.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03704} {\path{arXiv:1512.03704}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2016)127}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2016)127}}.
\bibitem{Khachatryan:2015qxa}
{CMS Collaboration}, {Search for a charged Higgs boson in pp collisions at $
\sqrt{s}=8 $ TeV}, JHEP 11 (2015) 018.
\newblock \href {http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.07774} {\path{arXiv:1508.07774}},
\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2015)018}
{\path{doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2015)018}}.
\bibitem{ATLAS-CONF-2016-089}
{ATLAS Collaboration}, \href{https://cds.cern.ch/record/2206809}{{Search for
charged Higgs bosons in the $H^{\pm}\to tb$ decay channel in $pp$ collisions
at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV using the ATLAS detector }}, ATLAS-CONF-2016-089, Geneva
(Aug 2016).
\newline\urlprefix\url{https://cds.cern.ch/record/2206809}
\end{thebibliography}