Electron scattering from a deeply bound nucleon on the light-front
Extracted source text · arXiv 1805.04639
%\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,aps,nofootinbib ]{revtex4}
\documentclass[prc,aps,tighten,preprint,showpacs]{revtex4}
%\documentclass[prc,aps]{revtex4}
%\documentclass[prc,aps,tighten,preprint]{revtex4}
%hayrmer
% \usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
\pdfoutput=1
\usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
\usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
\usepackage{bm}% bold math
\usepackage{slashed}
\usepackage{float}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{grffile}
\usepackage{fancybox}
\bibliographystyle{apsrev}
\usepackage[usenames,dvipsnames]{xcolor}
\newcommand{\sh}[1]{#1\hskip -6pt / }
\newcommand{\shl}[1]{#1\hskip -4pt / }
\graphicspath{ {figures/} }
\begin{document}
\title{Electron scattering from a deeply bound nucleon on the light-front}
\author{Frank Vera and Misak M. Sargsian}
\affiliation{Department of Physics, Florida International University, Miami,
Florida 33199, USA}
\date{\today}
\begin{abstract}
We calculate the cross section of the electron scattering from a bound nucleon within light-front approximation.
The advantage of this approximation is the possibility of
systematic account for the off-shell effects which become
essential in high energy electro-nuclear processes aimed at probing the nuclear structure at small distances.
We derive a new dynamical parameter which allows to control the extent of the "off-shellness" of electron - bound-nucleon
electromagnetic current for different regions of momentum transfer and initial light-cone momenta of the bound nucleon.
The derived cross section is compared with the results of other approaches in treating the off-shell effects in
electron-nucleon scattering.
\end{abstract}
\pacs{24.10.Jv, 25.30.-c}
\maketitle
\section{Introduction}
High energy electro-nuclear processes ranging from inclusive $A(e,e^\prime)X$ to the double
$A(e,e^\prime N_f)X$ and triple $A(e,e^\prime N_f,N_r)X$ coincidence reactions, in which $e^\prime$ is the scattered electron,
$N_f$ and $N_r$ are struck and recoil nucleons are the main processes used to probe the short-range structure of nuclei.
During the last two decades a multitude of dedicated experiments have been performed that significantly
advanced our understanding of the dynamics of short-range nuclear correlations (for recent reviews on this subject see
Refs.\cite{arnps,Hen:2016kwk,dreview,srcprog,Atti:2015eda,srcrev}). All of these experiments were performed at quasi-elastic kinematics in which
electrons are scattered off the deeply bound nucleon producing a struck nucleon ($N_f$) in the final state.
The observed experimental signatures were in agreement with the expectations that deeply bound nucleons emerge from
short-range nucleon-nucleon correlations~(SRCs).
These signatures included the onset of scaling for the inclusive $A(e,e^\prime)X$ cross section ratios of nucleus, A to
the deuteron or $^3He$\cite{FSDS93,Kim1,Kim2,Fomin:2011ng}, strong angular correlation between
momenta of struck, $N_f$ and recoil, $N_r$ nucleons\cite{EIP2,EIP3} as well as significant dominance
of the $pn$ correlations\cite{isosrc,EIP4,newprops,Hen:2014nza} in the domain of 2N SRCs.
The next stage of SRC studies requires the exploration of quantitative properties of the nuclear structure
describing nucleons in the SRC. This research can be both experimental - performing extraction of nuclear spectral and decay functions
in the region of high momentum and removal energy of the struck nucleon or theoretical- by modeling
these structure functions~(see e.g. \cite{Artiles_Sargsian-multisrc1}) and predicting electroproduction cross sections in
large missing momentum and removal energy kinematics. One of the outstanding problems in such
research is the understanding of the reaction mechanism and
final state interaction~(FSI) effects associated with the electron scattering from a deeply bound nucleon in
the nucleus.
During the last two decades significant efforts have been made in the calculation of FSI effects in high $Q^2$ electro-nuclear
processes (see e.g. Refs.\cite{gea,ms01,CiofidegliAtti:2004jg,Jeschonnek:2008zg,Laget04,eheppn1,eheppn2,Sargsian:2009hf,edex,disfsirev}).
One of the approaches, referred to as generalized eikonal approximation\cite{gea,Sargsian:2009hf},
selfconsiestently treated the relativistic effects associated with the large momentum of bound nucleon
involved in the reaction, as such these approach provided a theoretical framework for
calculating FSI effects relevant to studies of the nuclear structure at short distances.
However not much theoretical attention is given currently to the studies of the reaction mechanism of elastic scattering
from the high momentum bound nucleon in the nucleus. The problem of the proper description of electromagnetic scattering from
deeply bound nucleon in the nucleus was realized in 1980's with the advent of the intermediate energy $A(e,e^\prime N_f)$
experiments at SACLAY\cite{SACLAY1,SACLAY2} and NIKHEF\cite{NIKHEF}.
The first approaches in describing electron-deeply bound nucleon scattering were based on different methods of
interpreting the spinor of the bound (off-shell) nucleon. In one of the earlier models\cite{Mougey} the on-shell nucleon spinors
were used with the mass estimated as $m_N^{* \ 2} = E^2 - p^2$.
Currently the most popular model is that of de Forest\cite{deForest(1983)} in which
different expressions for the $eN_{bound}$ cross sections are obtained based on the different assumptions for
effective $\gamma^*N_{bound}$ vertices with on-shell spinors used for the bound nucleon.
No preference is given to any of the considered eight expressions of the $eN_{bound}$ cross section and as such
these approximations allowed to check uncertainty due to the binding effects
rather than calculating their actual values. Such an approach was characteristic to the intermediate energy (few hundred MeV of
incoming beam energy) scattering processes in which no small parameters existed in treating the strong binding effects in
nucleon electromagnetic current.
The situation has recently changed
with the emergence of high energy and momentum transfer $eA$ experiments
(see e.g. \cite{arnps,dreview,srcprog}) in which deeply bound nucleons in the nucleus are probed with high $Q^2$ virtual photons
producing
final nucleons with momenta above $few$~GeV/c region.
The high energy nature of the scattering process allows for
important simplifications in describing the scattering process similar to those in hadronic physics.
One of the main characteristics of high energy
scattering is that the process evolves along the light-front (see e.g. \cite{Feynman,KS(1970),LB(1980),FS81,BPP(1997)}) which makes the
light-cone the most natural reference frame to describe the reaction. The important advantage of such description is the suppression of
the negative energy contribution in the propagator of bound nucleon as well as
the possibility of identifying the "good" component of electromagnetic current for which the off-shell effects are minimal. There have been
several extensive studies of nuclear dynamics on light-front (see e.g. Refs.\cite{FS81,FS77,KP91,Miller00}) with the main emphasis given
to the description of the nuclear structure in relativistic kinematics.
In the current work we focus on light-front treatment of the electron-bound nucleon interaction.
Based on the effective light-front perturbation theory, we calculate the cross section of electron-bound nucleon scattering
by explicit separation of the propagating (prop) and instantaneous (inst) contributions. Within light-front approach we introduced
a new, parameter, $\eta$ which allows to quantify the off-shellness of the $\gamma^*N_{bound}$ scattering, universally for any kinematical
situation. The derived expressions are compared with the off-shell cross sections which are
currently being used in the description of electro-nuclear reactions. We also present numerical analysis of our calculations where we identify
kinematics in which off-shell effects can be suppressed or isolated for dedicated investigation of bound nucleon properties. The numerical analysis
allows us to conclude that by restricting the new off-shell parameter $\eta<0.1$ one can confine the off-shell effects below $5\%$ for any realistic values of
bound nucleon momenta at different $Q^2$ of electroproduction reaction.
In Sec.\ref{II} we set up the
calculations isolating the electromagnetic hadronic tensor for exclusive $d(e,e^\prime N)N$ scattering within
plane wave impulse approximation~(PWIA). We discuss here the main problems associated with
probing deeply bound nucleons,
namely the increased role of the vacuum-fluctuations and identification of the nuclear wave function for a bound nucleon.
Sec.\ref{III} presents the calculation of the PWIA diagram within effective light-front perturbation theory and identification of
the propagating and instantaneous
components of the bound nucleon electromagnetic current. We also introduce the boost invariant off-shell parameter that
naturally quantifies the off-shell effects in the light-front approach.
In Sec.\ref{IV} we present the results in the form of the
electron-bound-nucleon cross section $\sigma_{eN}$ which is compared with the predictions of other approaches in Sec.\ref{V}.
Sec.\ref{VI} presents the summary of the results and outlook on possible extension beyond PWIA approximation.
In Appendix~\ref{App.A} we give the diagrammatic rules of effective light-front perturbation theory. The details of derivation of the bound nucleon
structure functions are presented in Appendix~\ref{App.B}.
\section{Setting-up to the Calculation}
\label{II}
The simplest case of electroproduction process
involving electron scattering from a
bound nucleon is the reaction:
\begin{equation}
e + d \rightarrow e^\prime + N_f + N_r,
\label{reaction}
\end{equation}
in which one of the nucleons is knocked-out ($N_f$) by the virtual photon and the other is
treated as a recoil ($N_r$). Deuteron represents as testing ground for development of many relativistic
approaches in description of electro-nuclear processes (see e.g. \cite{FS77,Gross79,Glazek84,Miller13} ) % {FGMSS95 ??}
which in principle can be generalized for medium to heavy nuclei.
For our purpose of defining the cross section of electron-bound nucleon scattering we consider the single photon exchange case of the above
reaction within plane wave impulse approximation~(PWIA) corresponding to the diagram of Fig.\ref{Deuteron-PWIA}.
\begin{figure}[ht]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{figures/edepn_pwia.pdf}
\vskip -0.5cm
\caption{Exclusive electro-disinegration of the deuteron in plane wave impulse approximation:}
\label{Deuteron-PWIA}
\end{figure}
Here, within PWIA the off-shellness of the bound nucleon is completely defined by the four-momentum of the deuteron, $p_d$ and
spectator nucleon $p_r$: $p_i = p_D - p_r$.
The one photon-exchange approximation allows to factorize electron and hadronic parts of the interaction in the invariant Feynman amplitude
presented as follows:
\begin{equation}
{ \cal M} = \langle \lambda_f\mid j_e^\nu\mid \lambda_i\rangle {e^2g_{\nu\mu}\over q^2 } \langle s_f,s_r \mid A_0^\mu\mid s_d\rangle,
\label{M}
\end{equation}
where $q^2$ is the virtual photon's momentum squared. Here the leptonic current $j_e^\nu$ is defined as:
\begin{equation}
\langle \lambda_f\mid j_e^\nu\mid \lambda_i\rangle = \bar{u}(k_f,\lambda_f)\gamma^\nu u(k_i,\lambda_i),
\end{equation}
where $\langle s_f,s_r \mid A_0^\mu\mid s_d\rangle$ represents the invariant amplitude of $\gamma^*d\rightarrow NN$ scattering,
Using Eq.(\ref{M}) for the differential cross section of reaction (\ref{reaction}) one obtains:
\begin{equation}\label{cross-section}
{d\sigma\over d^3k_f/\epsilon_f d^3p_f/E_f} = {1\over 4 \sqrt{(p_d \cdot k_i)^2}} {e^4\over q^4} L^{\mu\nu} H_{\mu\nu} {\delta((q+p_d - p_f)^2 - m_N^2) \over 4 (2\pi)^5}.
\end{equation}
where, terms proportional to electron's mass squared ($m_e^2$) are neglected. Here the leptonic tensor is defined as:
\begin{equation}\label{L-Tensor}
L^{\mu\nu} = {1\over 2} \sum\limits_{\lambda_1 \lambda_2} \left( \bar{u}(k_f,\lambda_f)\gamma^\nu u(k_i,\lambda_i)\right)^{\dagger} \bar{u}(k_f,\lambda_f)\gamma^\mu u(k_i,\lambda_i)
\end{equation}
whereas the nuclear electromagnetic tensor is expressed through the scattering amplitude $A_0^\mu$ as follows:
\begin{equation}\label{H-Tensor}
H^{\mu\nu} = {1\over 3} \sum\limits_{s_d s_r s_f} \langle s_d \mid A_0^{\mu \dagger} \mid s_f,s_r \rangle \langle s_f,s_r \mid A_0^\nu\mid s_d\rangle.
\end{equation}
If one introduces $\Gamma_{\gamma^*}^\mu$ and $\Gamma_{D}$ invariant vertices (Fig.\ref{Deuteron-PWIA}) then
within PWIA the amplitude $A_0^\mu$ can be presented in the form:
\begin{equation}\label{A0_cov}
\langle s_f,s_r \mid A_0^\mu\mid s_d\rangle = -\bar u(p_f,s_f)\Gamma_{\gamma^*}^\mu \frac{\sh p_i + m_N}{ p_i^2-m^2_N}
\cdot \bar u(p_r,s_r) \Gamma_{D}\cdot \chi^{s_d},
\end{equation}
where $\chi^{s_d}$ is the spin wave function of the deuteron.
As it follows from the above equation $A_0^\mu$ contains neither the electron-bound nucleon scattering nor the
nuclear wave function
in the explicit form. The $eN_{bound}$ scattering and the nuclear wave function appears only when one considers the amplitude of Fig.\ref{Deuteron-PWIA} in a time ordered perturbation theory in which case
the invariant Feynman diagram splits into two time orderings as presented in Fig.\ref{tordered}.
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.9]{figures/edepn_pwia_tordered.pdf}
\vskip -0.5cm
\caption{Representation of the covariant scattering amplitude (a) as a sum two time-ordered
diagrams. (a) Virtual photon scattering from the bound nucleon; (b) Production of the $\bar N N$ pair by the virtual photon
with subsequent absorption of the antinucleon by the deuteron.}
\label{tordered}
\end{figure}
Here, Fig.\ref{tordered}(b) represents a
scenario in which
the virtual photon interacts with the preexisting bound nucleon in the deuteron with
$\Gamma_{DNN}$ representing the vertex of $D\to NN$ transition and $\Gamma_{N\gamma^*N}$
the $\gamma^*N\rightarrow N$ electromagnetic interaction.
Fig.\ref{tordered}(c) however represents a
very different scenario, in this case the
virtual photon produces an
intermediate $\bar NN$ state at
the $\Gamma_{\gamma^*\bar N N}$ vertex with subsequent absorption of the antinucleon, $\bar N$ in the deuteron at the $\Gamma_{\bar NDN}$
vertex. The latter is not related to the $\gamma^*N$ scattering and the nucleon wave function in the deuteron. Fig.\ref{tordered}(c) is commonly
refereed as a "Z-graph" and is a
purely relativistic effect. As a result in the
non-relativistic limit one deals with the diagram of Fig.\ref{tordered}(b)
only, which allows to express the covariant scattering amplitude through the nonrelativistic nuclear wave function and $\gamma ^* N_{bound}$
scattering amplitude. However the situation becomes complicated when one is interested in the bound nucleon momentum $p_i \sim M_N$, which
can be probed at momentum transfer $q\gg M_N$. In this case
the
"Z-graph" contribution (Fig.\ref{tordered}(c)) becomes comparable with
the one in Fig.\ref{tordered}(b) preventing the straightforward introduction of the
nuclear wave function.
This situation is reminiscent to
the QCD processes in probing partonic structure of hadrons in which case due to the
relativistic nature of partons, vacuum diagrams can
not be neglected in the time ordered perturbation theory defined in the lab frame of the hadron\cite{Feynman}.
The solution in this case is to consider
the scattering process in the infinite momentum frame (or on the light-front), which allows to suppress
the "Z-graphs" and consider only the diagrams similar to Fig.\ref{tordered}~(b) for which one can introduce
the wave function of the
constituents.
Our approach in probing deeply bound nucleon is similar to that of the partonic model,
in which we consider the reaction~(\ref{reaction}) on
the light-front allowing us to exclude the contribution of the vacuum diagrams (Fig.\ref{tordered}(c)) and introduce a
light-front nuclear wave function.
%To be able to calculate the PWIA amplitude of reaction (\ref{reaction}) we apply effective
%light-front perturbation theory~(LFPT) in the light-cone $\tau$-time ordered representation of the scattering amplitude $A_0^\mu$.
\section{Derivation within Effective Light-Front Perturbation Theory}
\label{III}
\subsection{Scattering amplitude in PWIA}
We consider now the reaction (\ref{reaction}) on the light-front, where the light-cone time is
defined as $\tau\equiv t+z$.
To calculate the PWIA amplitude of the reaction (\ref{reaction}) we apply effective
light-front perturbation theory~(LFPT) in the $\tau$-time ordered representation of the scattering amplitude $A_0^\mu$.
In such approach the scattering amplitude (\ref{A0_cov}) is expressed as a sum of the noncovariant diagrams presented
in Fig.\ref{tauordered}. Here in addition to the two $\tau$ orderings analogous to the time ordering of Fig.\ref{tordered} one has
an additional contribution of Fig.\ref{tauordered}(c) corresponding to the instantaneous interaction due to
the spinor nature of the bound nucleon.
To proceed with the calculations we choose a
reference frame with $z$ axis antiparallel to the transferred
momentum, $\hat z \ || \ -{\bf q}$, such that the deuteron is aligned along $\hat z$.
\begin{figure}[ht]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.9]{figures/tau_ordered.pdf}
\vskip -0.5cm
\caption{Representation of the covariant scattering amplitude as a sum of two light-cone ($\tau$)-time -ordered
diagrams as well as instantaneous interaction. (a) Virtual photon scattering from the bound nucleon; (b) Production of the $\bar N N$
pair by the virtual photon with subsequent absorption of the antinucleon by the deuteron., (c) Instantaneous interaction of virtual photon with the bound nucleon.}
\label{tauordered}
\end{figure}
The calculations are performed in the Light-Cone (LC) reference frame in which case
where the four-momenta are defined as
$(p^+, p^-, p_x,p_y)$, where $p^\pm = E\pm p_z$ with $p^+$ representing the light-cone longitudinal momentum.
We employ the $\gamma$-matrix algebra using the following light-cone definitions:
\begin{equation}\label{LC-gammas}
\gamma^\mu = (\gamma^+, \gamma^-, \gamma_1,\gamma_2), \ \ \ \mbox{where} \ \ \ \gamma^\pm = \gamma_0\pm \gamma_3.
\end{equation}
The scalar products and other properties of four-vectors as well as $\gamma$ matrices on the light-front are given
in Appendix~\ref{App.A}.
We also define the light-cone momentum fractions, which are Lorentz invariant quantities with respect to
boosts along the $z$ direction:
\begin{equation}
\alpha_r = {2 p_r^+\over p_d^+}, \ \ \ \alpha_q = {2 q^+\over p_d^+}, \ \ \ \alpha_f = {2 p_f^+\over p_d^+}, \ \ \ \alpha_N = \alpha_f - \alpha_q = 2-\alpha_r.
\label{alphas}
\end{equation}
Here $\alpha_r$, $\alpha_q$ and $\alpha_f$ correspond to the fraction of LC
"+" component of the deuteron momentum carried by the
recoil nucleon, virtual photon and final knock-out nucleon respectively.
The light-cone momentum fraction of the bound nucleon $\alpha_N$ is defined through
the energy-momentum conservation.
We proceed with the calculation of the scattering amplitude corresponding to the diagrams of Fig.\ref{tauordered} by applying the
Light-Front perturbation rules (\cite{KS(1970), LB(1980)}) in an effective theory in which one identifies effective vertices for
nuclear transition and electron-bound nucleon scattering (see Appendix~\ref{App.A}). At each vertices
the transverse, $p_\perp$ and plus, $p^+$ components of momenta are conserved. Because of the latter and the
chosen reference frame in which $q^+ = q_0 - |\textbf{q}| < 0$ the diagram of the Fig.\ref{tauordered}(b) will not contribute since
the production of $\bar N N$ pair will require $q^+ >0$.
The remaining diagrams represent the amplitudes in which the virtual photon knocks-out a bound nucleon which propagates from
the $d\rightarrow NN$ transition vertex to the $\gamma^*N$ interaction point, $A^\mu_{prop}$ (Fig.\ref{tauordered}(a)), and the instantaneous amplitude, $A^\mu_{inst}$ (Fig.\ref{tauordered}(c)) in which $d\rightarrow NN$ transition and $\gamma^*N$ interaction take place at the same light cone time -$\tau$.
In both diagrams the nucleus exposes its constituents and the scattering takes place off the bound nucleon, which allow us to introduce the light-front
nuclear wave function and the amplitude of $\gamma^*N_{bound}$ scattering.
We now apply the light-front diagrammatic rules\cite{LB(1980)} (summarized in Appendix~\ref{App.A}) which yields for the propagating
part of the scattering amplitude (Fig.\ref{tauordered}(a)):
\begin{equation}
%\label{H-Amp-LF-vertex}
\langle s_f,s_r \mid A_{prop}^\mu\mid s_d\rangle = - \bar u(p_f,s_f)\Gamma_{\gamma^* N}^\mu
\ \frac{1}{p_i^+} \frac{(\sh p_i + m_N)_{on}}{ (p_d^- - p_r^- - p_{i,on}^- )} \bar u(p_r,s_r) \Gamma_{DNN} \chi^{s_d},
\label{A0prop}
\end{equation}
where $p_d^-$, $p_r^-$ and $p_{i,on}^-$
are defined from the on-energy shell condition: $p^- = {m_j^2 + p_{\perp,j}^2\over p_j^+}$ with $j = d, r, (i,on)$.
The "on" subscript in $(\sh p_i + m_N)_{on}$ indicates that all the components of the
bound nucleon light-cone momenta are taken on-energy shell.
For the instantaneous diagram of Fig.\ref{tauordered}(c) applying the rules of Appendix~\ref{App.A} one obtains:
\begin{equation}
\langle s_f,s_r \mid A_{inst}^\mu\mid s_d\rangle = - \bar u(p_f,s_f)\Gamma_{\gamma^* N}^\mu \frac{1}{p_i^+}\left( \frac{1}{2}\gamma^+ \right)
\bar u(p_r,s_r) \Gamma_{DNN} \chi^{s_d}.
\label{A0inst}
\end{equation}
Note that in
both expressions (\ref{A0prop}) and (\ref{A0inst}) one has the same nuclear, $\Gamma_{DNN}$ and electromagnetic,
$\Gamma_{\gamma^* N}$ vertices.
For further elaborations, we introduce
the off-energy shell "-" component of the
bound nucleon $p_i^- = p_d^- - p_r^-$ ,
and using the
definition:
$p_j^- = {m_j^2 + p_{j,\perp^2} \over p_j^+}$ for the on-energy-shell "-" component for $ j = d,r$
as well as Eq.(\ref{alphas}) one obtains:
\begin{equation}
\frac{1}{ p_d^- - p^-_r - p^-_{i,on} } = \frac{1}{ p_i^- - p^-_{i,on} } = \frac{p_d^+} {M_d^2 - 4 \frac{(m_N^2 + p_\bot^2)}{\alpha(2-\alpha)} }.
\label{denom}
\end{equation}
Using the above relation as well as the sum rule relation for on-shell spinors:
\begin{equation}
(\sh{p}_{i} + m_N )_{on}= \sum_{s_i} \left( u(p_i,s_i) \bar{u}(p_i,s_i)\right)_{on},
\label{sumrule}
\end{equation}
for the sum of the two amplitudes in Eqs.(\ref{A0prop}) and (\ref{A0inst}) one obtains:
\begin{eqnarray}
A^{\mu} = A^\mu_{prop} + A^\mu_{inst} = && - \bar u(p_f,s_f)\Gamma_{\gamma^* N}^\mu \frac{\sum_{s_i} u(p_i,s_i) \bar{u}(p_i,s_i)}
{ \frac {\alpha}{2}\left( M^{2}_{d}-4\frac {m^{2}_N+{\bf p_T}^2}{\alpha \left( 2-\alpha \right) }\right)} \bar u(p_r,s_r) \Gamma_{DNN} \chi^{s_d} \\
&&- \bar u(p_f,s_f)\Gamma_{\gamma^* N}^\mu \frac{ \frac{1}{2} \gamma^{+} \left({p}_{i }^{-} - {p}_{i,on}^{-} \right)}{ \frac {\alpha}{2}\left( M^{2}_{d}-4\frac {m^{2}_N+{\bf p_T}^2}{\alpha \left( 2-\alpha \right) }\right)}
\bar u(p_r,s_r) \Gamma_{DNN} \chi^{s_d}. % =A_{on}^{\mu} + A_{off}^{\mu}
\label{A0s}
\end{eqnarray}
Within PWIA we can factorize the above expression in the form of
a product of
electromagnetic current and the
light-front nuclear wave function. For this we introduce the
light-front wave functions in the form\cite{FS81,Artiles_Sargsian-multisrc1}:
\begin{equation}
\psi ^{s_{i}s_{r}s_{d}}_{LF }\left( \alpha ,{\bf p_T}\right) =-\frac {\bar {u}( p_{i}, s_i) \bar u( p_{r}, s_r) \Gamma _{DNN}\chi^{s_d}}{\frac {1}{2}\left( M^{2}_{d}-4\frac {m^{2}_N+{\bf p_T}^2}{\alpha \left( 2-\alpha \right) }\right) }\dfrac {1}{\sqrt {2\left( 2\pi \right) ^{3}}}.
\label{wflf}
\end{equation}
From the above definition one also obtains:
\begin{equation}
\frac{ 1}{\frac {\alpha}{2}\left( M^{2}_{d}-4\frac {m^{2}_N+{\bf p_T}^2}{\alpha \left( 2-\alpha \right) }\right)} \bar u(p_r ,s_r) \Gamma_{DNN} \ \chi^{s_d} = - \sum_{s_i} \frac{ u(p_i,s_i) }{2m_N} \frac {\psi ^{s_{i} s_r s_d}_{LF}\left( \alpha, {\bf p_T}\right) }{\alpha }\sqrt {2\left( 2\pi \right) ^{3}}
\label{wfrel}
\end{equation}
Using now the above Eqs.(\ref{wflf}) and (\ref{wfrel}) in $A_{prop}^\mu$ and $A_{inst}^\mu$ respectively, the Eq.(\ref{A0s}) can be presented
in the form:
\begin{equation}
A^{\mu }= A^{\mu}_{prop} + A^\mu_{inst} = \sum _{s_i}J^{\mu }_{N} \left( p_{f}s_{f},p_{i}s_{i}\right) \dfrac {\psi ^{s_{i} s_r s_d}_{LF}\left( \alpha, {\bf p_T}\right) }{\alpha }\sqrt {2\left( 2\pi \right) ^{3}},
\label{A0sb}
\end{equation}
where we introduced the electromagnetic current
of the bound nucleon as follows:
\begin{equation}
J^{\mu}_{N} (p_f s_f,p_i s_i) = \bar{u}(p_f s_f) \Gamma_{\gamma\ast N}^{\mu} u(p_i s_i) +
\bar{u}(p_f s_f) \Gamma_{\gamma\ast N}^{\mu} \frac{ \gamma^{+} \left({p}_{i }^{-} - {p}_{i \ on}^{-} \right)}{4m_N} u(p_i s_i).
\label{J_N}
\end{equation}
Here, the Dirac spinor of the initial nucleon $u(p_i,s_i)$ is defined for
the on-shell momentum, $p_{i,on} = (p^-_{i,on},p_{i}^+, p_{i}^\perp)$.
Our main focus in the following sections will be the electromagnetic current of Eq.(\ref{J_N},
which characterizes the interaction of
the electron probe with the bound nucleon.
\subsection{Propagating and Instantaneous Components of Electromagnetic Current}
To identify the
propagating and instantaneous parts of the electromagnetic current in Eq.(\ref{J_N}) we consider first
the electromagnetic vertex $\Gamma_{\gamma\ast N}^{\mu}$.
Since the final state of the interacting nucleon is on mass shell, and only the positive light-front
energy projections enter in the amplitude, we are led to the half off-shell vertex function in the general form
(see e.g. \cite{Bincer60,Koch90,Koch96}:
\begin{equation}
\Gamma_{\gamma^{\ast} N}^{\mu} = \gamma^{\mu }F_{1} + i \sigma^{\mu \nu} q_{\nu} F_{2} {\kappa \over 2 m_N} + q^{\mu} F_{3},
\label{eNvertex}
\end{equation}
where the form-factors $F_{1,2,3}=F_{1,2,3}(m_N^2,p_i^2,q^2)$ are functions of Lorentz invariants constructed from the momenta
of initial and final nucleons and momentum transfer $q$. In general one expects $F_{1,2}(m_N^2,p_i^2,q^2)$ not to be identical
with the corresponding on-shell nucleon form-factors ($F_{1,2}(m_N^2,m_N^2,q^2)$). This difference is due
to the modification of the internal structure of nucleons in the nuclear medium. Such modification, in principle, should
originate from the dynamics similar to the
one responsible for the medium modification of partonic distributions of bound nucleon - commonly referred as EMC effect (\cite{EMC}).
This however is out of the scope of our discussion since we are interested only in
the effects related to the off-shellness of the interacting
nucleon's electromagnetic current. Thus, in the numerical estimates we will use unmodified nucleon form-factors measured for free nucleons.
Concerning to $F_{3}$, it does not contribute to the cross section of the process due to the gauge invariance of the leptonic current:
$q_\mu j_e^\mu = 0$. However for consistency one can estimate the $F_{3}$ form-factor based on the fact that due to
the conservation of the momentum sum rule in light-front approach the electromagnetic current of the bound-nucleon is conserved:
\begin{equation}
q_\mu J_N^\mu=0.
\label{qcons}
\end{equation}
Using Eq.(\ref{J_N}) together with (\ref{eNvertex}) one obtains: $ F_{3} = F_{1} { \shl{q} \over Q^2}$. Inserting the later into Eq.(\ref{eNvertex})
one can separate the
propagating and instantaneous parts of the electromagnetic vertex in the form
\begin{equation}
\Gamma_{\gamma^{\ast} N}^{(prop) \mu} = \gamma^{\mu }F_{1} + i \sigma^{\mu \nu} q_{\nu} F_{2} {\kappa \over 2 m_N},
\label{Vertex-on}
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
\Gamma_{\gamma^{\ast} N}^{(inst) \mu}
= \left( \gamma^{\mu }F_{1} + i \sigma^{\mu \nu} q_{\nu} F_{2} {\kappa \over 2 m_N} \right) \frac{ \Delta\sh{p}_i}{2m_N} - F_1{q^{\mu} \over q^2} \sh{q} \Big( {\bf 1} + \frac{ \Delta\sh{p}_i}{2m_N} \Big),
\label{Vertex-off}
\end{equation}
where, $\Delta{p}_i^\mu=p^\mu_{i } - p^\mu_{i, on}$ and $2 \Delta\sh{p}_i=\gamma^{+} \left( p^-_i - p^-_{i, on }\right)$ since $\Delta p_i^+ = \Delta p_{i}^\perp = 0$. In the following derivations we will use the relation:
\begin{equation}
\Delta{p}_i^- = -q^- + (p_f^- - p_{i,on}^-) = \dfrac{Q^2}{q^+} - \dfrac{m^{2}_N+{\bf p_{T}}^2 }{p_f^+ p_i^+} q^+ = \frac{1}{p_d^+} \left(M_d^2 - 4 \frac{(m_N^2 + {\bf p_{T}}^2)}{\alpha(2-\alpha)} \right),
\label{off-shell_factor}
\end{equation}
as well as:
\begin{equation}
2 \Delta{p}_i \cdot p_i = \Delta{p}_i^- p_i^+ = p_i^2 - m_N^2,
\end{equation}
which allow to express the electromagnetic current in boost-invariant variables.
The separation of the electromagnetic vertex into propagating and instantaneous parts in Eqs.(\ref{Vertex-on}) and (\ref{Vertex-off} allows to separate
the electromagnetic current in Eq.(\ref{J_N}) into corresponding parts in the following form:
\begin{equation}
J_{N}^\mu (p_f s_f,p_i s_i) = J^{\mu}_{prop} (p_f s_f,p_i s_i) + J^{\mu }_{inst}(p_f s_f,p_i s_i)
\label{Jsum}
\end{equation}
where,
\begin{eqnarray}
J^{\mu}_{prop} (p_f s_f,p_i s_i) &= & \bar{u}(p_f s_f) \Gamma_{\gamma\ast N}^{(prop) \mu} u(p_i s_i) \nonumber \\
J^{\mu }_{inst}(p_f s_f,p_i s_i) &= & \bar{u}(p_f s_f) \Gamma_{\gamma\ast N}^{(inst) \mu} u(p_i s_i).
\label{J_on_off}
\end{eqnarray}
It is worth mentioning that even though the propagating vertex in Eq.(\ref{Vertex-on}) has the same form as the free on-shell nucleon
vertex the corresponding electromagnetic current $J^{\mu}_{prop}$
does not correspond to an on-shell scattering amplitude, since
$q^\mu\ne p_f^\mu - p_{i,on}^\mu$. Also, the current conservation (Eq.(\ref{qcons})) is satisfied only for the sum of the propagating and
instantaneous currents in Eq.(\ref{Jsum}).
\subsection{Off-Shell Parameter of $eN_{bound}$ Scattering}
While the off-shell effects in the propagating vertex of Eq.(\ref{Vertex-on}) are kinematical, due to the fact that $q^\mu\ne p_f^\mu - p_{i,on}^\mu$, the
off-shell effects in the instantaneous vertex are dynamical. The latter interaction arises exclusively due to the binding of the nucleon. As it follows
from Eq.(\ref{Vertex-off}) the strength of the instantaneous vertex is proportional to the magnitude of the
factor $\Delta p_i^-$ defined in Eq.(\ref{off-shell_factor}).
One can express the
$\Delta p_i^-$ factor through a boost invariant quantities by defining the light-front reference frame such that the four-momenta of the
deuteron, $p_d^\mu$ and momentum transfer $q^\mu$ are:
\begin{eqnarray}
p_d^\mu & = & ({Q^2\over m_N}, {m_d^2 m_N\over Q^2},\bf{0_T}) \\ \nonumber
q^\mu & = & (-{Q^2 x\over m_N (1 + \sqrt{1 + {4m_N^2x^2\over Q^2}} \ )}, {m_N\over x} ( 1 + \sqrt{1 + {4m_N^2x^2\over Q^2}} ),\bf{0_T}).
\end{eqnarray}
Using above definitions one introduces the off-shell parameter $\eta$ such that,
\begin{equation}
\Delta{p}_i^- = -{m_N}\eta,
\end{equation}
where,
\begin{equation}
\eta = {1\over Q^2} \left(4 \frac{(m_N^2 + {\bf p_{T}}^2)}{\alpha(2-\alpha)} - m_d^2 \right).
\label{eta}
\end{equation}
As it will be shown in the derivations bellow, the parameter $\eta$ provides the universal measure of the off-shell effect which combines both
the resolution of the probe through the $Q^2$ and the binding effects of the nucleon through the light-cone variables, $\alpha$ and $\bf{p_T}$.
\section{ Electron-Nucleon Scattering Cross Section }
\label{IV}
In many practical applications one needs to evaluate the electron-bound-nucleon cross section $\sigma_{eN}$ as it is defined in Ref.\cite{deForest(1983)}.
Such a cross section is calculated within PWIA in which case using Eq.(\ref{A0sb}) the nuclear electromagnetic tensor of Eq.(\ref{H-Tensor}) can be expressed as follows:
\begin{equation}\label{H=H_N*rho}
H^{\mu \nu}=H^{\mu \nu }_{N}(p_f,p_i) \ \rho_d \left( \alpha, {\bf p_T}\right) \ \dfrac {2-\alpha }{\alpha ^{2}} \ 2\left( 2\pi \right) ^{3},
\end{equation}
where spin averaged light cone density matrix of the deuteron $\rho_d(\alpha, p_T)$ and bound nucleon electromagnetic tensor
$H^{\mu \nu }_{N}(p_f,p_i)$ are defined in the following forms:
\begin{equation}\label{LF-density}
\rho \left( \alpha, {\bf p_T}\right) = \dfrac {1}{2s_d+1} \cdot \frac {1}{2}
\sum _{s_{d},s_i,s_r }\dfrac {\left| \psi ^{s_{i}s_{r}s_{d}}_{LF}\left( \alpha,{\bf p_T}\right) \right| ^{2}}{2-\alpha}
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{HN}
H^{\mu \nu }_{N}=\frac {1}{2}\sum_{s_{i}s_{f}=-1/2}^{1/2} J_{N}^{\nu}\left( p_{f}s_{f}, p_{i}s_{i}\right)^{\dagger} J^{\mu }_{N}\left( p_{f}s_{f}, p_{i}s_{i}\right).
\end{equation}
Inserting now Eq.(\ref{H=H_N*rho}) into Eq.(\ref{cross-section})
the Lorentz invariant cross section of the reaction (\ref{reaction}) can be presented as follows:
\begin{equation}\label{Inv-DCS}
{d\sigma\over d^3k_f/\epsilon_f d^3p_f/E_f} = {1\over 2 p_d \cdot k_i} {\alpha^2_{EM}\over q^4} L_{\mu\nu} H^{\mu \nu }_{N}\rho \left( \alpha, {\bf p_T}\right) \dfrac {2-\alpha }{\alpha ^{2} } \delta\left( p_r^2 - m_N^2\right),
\end{equation}
where $\alpha_{EM}=e^2/(4\pi)$. Introducing the light-front nuclear spectral function in the form:
\begin{equation}\label{Spectral function}
S_d^{LF}(\alpha, {\bf p_T}) = \rho_d \left( \alpha, {\bf p_T}\right) \dfrac {2-\alpha }{\alpha ^{2} } \delta\left( p_r^2 - m_N^2\right),
\end{equation}
similar to Ref.(\cite{deForest(1983)}) one can present the differential cross section as a product of $\sigma_{eN}$ and the spectral function
as follows:
\begin{equation}\label{factorized_cross-section}
{d\sigma\over d\epsilon_f d\Omega_{k_f} d^3p_f} = \sigma_{eN} \ S_d^{LF}(\alpha, {\bf p_T}),
\end{equation}
were
\begin{equation}\label{sigma_eN}
\sigma_{eN} = {1\over 2 m_D \epsilon_i} \ {\epsilon_f \over E_f} \ {\alpha^2_{EM}\over q^4} \ L_{\mu\nu} H^{\mu \nu }_{N}.
\end{equation}
Here $\epsilon_i$, $\epsilon_f$ are initial and scattered electron energies. The $E_f$ represents the energy of
the knock-out nucleon.
It is worth mentioning that the expression in Eq.(\ref{factorized_cross-section}) is universal for any nuclei in which case one needs to
replace the deuteron spectral function by the light-front spectral function of the nucleus being considered.
\subsection{Structure Functions of Bound Nucleon}
In calculating $\sigma_{eN}$ in Eq.(\ref{sigma_eN}) it is convenient to present it through the four independent structure functions
of the nucleon $V^N_L$, $V^N_{TL}$, $V^N_T$ and $V^N_{TT}$ in the form:
\begin{equation}\label{sigma_eN-Gross}
\sigma_{eN} = {1\over 2 m_D E_f} \ {\sigma_{Mott}} \left( \eta_L V_L^N + \eta_{TL} V_{TL}^N \cos\phi + \eta_{T} V_{T}^N + \eta_{TT} V_{TT}^N \cos(2\phi) \right),
\end{equation}
where $\sigma_{Mott} = {\alpha^2 \cos({\theta\over 2})^2\over 4 \epsilon_i^2 \sin({\theta\over 2})^4}$ with $\theta$ being
scattered electron angle. In the above equation:
\begin{eqnarray}
\eta_L &= & \frac{Q^4}{{\bf q}^4} \nonumber \\
\eta_T &= & \frac{Q^2}{2{\bf q}^2} + \tan^2\frac{\theta}{2} \nonumber \\
\eta_{TT} &= & \frac{ Q^2}{ 2 {\bf q}^2} \nonumber \\
\eta_{TL} &= & \frac{Q^2}{ {\bf q}^2}\left( \frac{Q^2}{{\bf q}^2} + \tan^2\frac{\theta}{2} \right)^{1/2},
\end{eqnarray}
where $Q^2 = 4\epsilon_i\epsilon_f\sin({\theta\over 2})^2$, and $\bf q$ is the three momentum of the virtual photon.
The above defined structure functions of the bound nucleon can be related to the light-front components of the
nucleonic electromagnet tensor as follows (see Appendix \ref{App.B}):
\begin{eqnarray} \label{V-Gross}
V^N_L & =& \frac{ {\bf q}^2 }{4 Q^2} \left( H^{++}{ Q^2 \over (q^+)^2 } + 2 H^{+-} + {(q^+)^2 \over Q^2 } H^{- -} \right)\nonumber \\
V^N_{TL} & =& {|{\bf q}| \over q^+} \left( H^{+ \parallel}_N + H^{- \parallel }_N {(q^+)^2 \over Q^2} \right) \nonumber \\
V^N_T & =& H^{\parallel \parallel }_N + H^{\bot \bot} _N \nonumber \\
V^N_{TT} & =& H_N^{\parallel \parallel} - H_N^{\bot \bot}
% \label{VTT},
\end{eqnarray}
where $\pm$ correspond to $t\pm \hat z$ directions on the light-cone with $\hat z$ defined in the negative direction of
of the transfered three momentum $\bf q$. The transverse components are chosen as follows: the perpendicular direction is defined by $ \textbf{n}_{\bot}=\frac{\textbf{p}_f\times \textbf{q} }{|\textbf{p}_f\times \textbf{q}|}$, and the parallel unit vector projection is $\textbf{n}_{\parallel}=\frac{ \textbf{q} \times \textbf{n}_{\bot} }{|\textbf{q} \times \textbf{n}_{\bot}|}$. The scattering and reaction planes of the reaction are defined in Fig.\ref{sc_planes}.
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{figures/scattering_planes1.pdf}
\vskip -0.5cm
\caption{Definition of scattering and reaction planes of knock-out reaction.}
\label{sc_planes}
\end{figure}
Using now the Eq.(\ref{HN}) and the expression of the bound nucleon electromagnetic current from Eqs.(\ref{Jsum}),
and (\ref{J_on_off}) one
can calculate nucleon structure functions explicitly.
In what follows we split the structure functions into two terms:
\begin{equation}
V^N_i = V^N_{i,prop} + V^N_{i,inst} \ \ \ \ \text{for i = L,TL,T,TT}
\end{equation}
where subscript "prop" corresponds to the structure functions calculated using
the
propagating part of the electromagnetic current, $J_{prop}^\mu$ only,
while the terms with the subscript "inst" correspond to the contribution from $J_{inst}^\mu$ and its interference with $J_{prop}^\mu$.
Using the explicit forms of the currents from Eqs.(\ref{Jsum}),(\ref{J_on_off})
%in Appendix \ref{App.B}
we calculate the above structure functions
expressing them through
the
off-shell parameter $\eta$ (Eq.(\ref{eta})) as follows\footnote{In Appendix \ref{App.B} we also presented the same structure functions
in more conventional form in terms of scalar products of kinematical variables describing the reaction (see Eq.(\ref{V_LF})).}:
\begin{eqnarray}
V_{L \ prop}^N & = & {\bf{q}}^2 \left[ F_1^2 \tau^{-1} \left( 1+ {p^2_{ \textbf{T}} \over m_N^2} + \tau \eta_i(\eta_i+\eta_q) \right) - F_1 F_2 {\kappa } \left( 2+ \eta_q \right) + F_2^2 \kappa^2 \left( {p^2_{ \textbf{T}} \over m_N^2} + \tau(1 + \eta_q) \right) \right], \nonumber \\
\vspace*{0.3cm}
V_{L \ inst}^N & = & {\bf{q}}^2 \Big[ F_1^2 \eta_i \Big( \tau \eta_i(1 + \eta_q) - 2 - \eta_q \Big) + F_1 F_2 \kappa \Big( \tau \eta_i \left( 2-2\eta_i-\eta_q \right) +\eta_q \Big) \nonumber \\
& & + F_2^2 \kappa^2 \tau \Big( \tau \eta_i(\eta_i+\eta_q) - \eta_q \Big) \Big], \nonumber \\
\vspace*{0.3cm}
V_{TL \ prop}^N & = & 2 \ |{\bf{q}}| \ p_{\textbf{T}} \left( F_1^2 + F_2^2 \kappa^2 \tau \right)\left[ 2 +4{\alpha_N \over \alpha_q} + 2\eta_i + \eta_q \right], \nonumber \\
\vspace*{0.3cm}
V_{TL \ inst}^N & = & 2 |{\bf{q}}| p_\textbf{T} \left( F_1^2 + F_2^2 \kappa^2 \tau \right) \left( 1 - \tau \eta_i \right) \eta_q, \nonumber \\
\vspace*{0.3cm}
V_{T \ prop \ \ }^N & =& \ 4m_N^2 \left[ F_1^2 \left( {p^2_{ \textbf{T}} \over m_N^2} + 2 \tau(1 + \eta_q) \right) + 2 F_1 F_2 {\kappa } \tau \left( 2 + \eta_q \right) + F_2^2 \kappa^2 \tau \left( 2 + {p^2_{ \textbf{T}} \over m_N^2} + 2 \tau \eta_i(\eta_i+\eta_q) \right) \right], \nonumber \\
\vspace*{0.3cm}
V_{T \ inst \ \ }^N & =& 2 Q^2 \Big[ F_1^2 \Big( \tau \eta_i(\eta_i+\eta_q) - \eta_q \Big) + F_1 F_2 \kappa \Big( \tau \eta_i \left( 2\eta_i+\eta_q - 2 \right) - \eta_q \Big) \nonumber \\
& & + F_2^2 \kappa^2 \tau \eta_i \Big( \tau \eta_i(1 + \eta_q) - 2 - \eta_q \Big) \Big], \nonumber \\
\vspace*{0.3cm}
V_{TT \ prop}^N & = & 4 p_{\textbf{T}}^2 \left( F_1^2 + F_2^2 \kappa^2 \tau \right), \nonumber \\
\vspace*{0.3cm}
V_{TT \ inst}^N & = & 0,
\label{V_LFtoRP}
\end{eqnarray}
where, $\tau=Q^2/(4 m_N^2)$, $\ \eta_i=\eta \ \alpha_N/2$, $\ \eta_q=\eta \ \alpha_q/2$. Alternatively, one can write,
\begin{eqnarray}
\eta_i & = & - {2 \Delta{p}_i \cdot p_i \over Q^2}= {(m^{2}_N+{\bf p_{T}}^2 ) \over Q^2 } \dfrac{\alpha_q}{\alpha_f } - \dfrac{\alpha_N}{\alpha_q}, \\
\eta_q & = & - {2 \Delta{p}_i \cdot q \over Q^2} = {(m^{2}_N+{\bf p_{T}}^2 ) \over Q^2} \dfrac{\alpha_q^2}{\alpha_f \alpha_N} - 1 .
\end{eqnarray}
The structure functions in Eq.(\ref{V_LFtoRP}) are Lorentz invariant and expressed through the boost invariant
variables $\eta$, $\alpha_i$, $\alpha_q$ and $\alpha_f$. Since many experiments in probing
high momentum bound nucleons are performed in the fixed target experiments it is convenient to express the
above variables through the four momenta measured in the lab frame. Considering a Lab reference frame in which
$\hat z || {\bf q}$, the $\alpha_i$, $\alpha_q$ and $\alpha_f$ parameters can be expressed as follows:
\begin{equation}
\alpha_i = 2 - \alpha_r = \alpha_f - \alpha_q, \ \ \ \alpha_r = {2 (E_r - p_r cos\theta_r) \over m_d}, \ \ \
\alpha_q = {2 (q_0 - {\bf q})\over m_d}, \ \ \ \alpha_f = {2 (E_f - p_f cos\theta_f) \over m_d},
\end{equation}
where, $p_d^\mu = (m_d,0)$, $q^\mu = (q_0, {\bf q})$, $p_r^\mu = (E_r, {\bf p_r})$ and $p_f^\mu = (E_f, {\bf p_f})$ are four-momenta of
the target deuteron, virtual photon, recoil and struck nucleon measured in the Lab frame.
\section{Numerical Estimates}
\label{V}
We present numerical estimates for kinematics which will be explored in experiments planned for 12 GeV upgraded Jefferson Lab. In all calculations below we take the initial energy of the electron beam $\epsilon_i = 11$~GeV.
To quantify the extent of the binding effects we consider the ratio:
\begin{equation}
R = {\sigma_{eN}\over \sigma_{eN}^{on}},
\label{R}
\end{equation}
where $\sigma_{eN}$ is the cross section of electron bound nucleon scattering defined in Eq.(\ref{sigma_eN}) for
given initial momenta $\bf {p_i}$ or ($\alpha_i$ and $p_T$), while
$\sigma_{eN}^{on}$ corresponds to the same cross section for the electron scattering off the free moving
nucleon with the same initial momenta.
\begin{figure}[th]
\vskip 0.3cm
\centering
\includegraphics
% [scale=0.16]
[height=7cm,width=16cm]{figures/R_Ang-Dist_Pm005-02-04-06_Merged_P.pdf}
\vskip -0.4cm
\caption{The $\theta_{p_iq}$ dependence of ratios of the off-shell cross section of electron-bound proton
scattering to that of the one-shell cross section. The solid lines are LF approximation, dashed and dash-dotted
curves corresponds to CC2 and CC1 versions of de Forest approximation\cite{deForest(1983)}. The panels
correspond to the bound nucleon momenta $p_i=50, 200,400$ and $600$~MeV/c for
$Q^2 = 1$ and $4$~(GeV/c)$^2$. The {\em minus} sign of $\theta_{pq}$ indicates on kinematics corresponding
to $\phi=180^0$ between scattering and reaction planes. Calculations done for initial electron energy $\epsilon_i = 11$~GeV.}
\label{theta_dep_Q2_p}
\end{figure}
First, we consider the dependence of $R$ on "traditional" kinematical parameters which define the
electronuclear processes such as initial momentum of the bound nucleon ($p_i$) its relative angle with
respect to the transferred 3-momentum
($\bf q$) as well as
the virtuality of the transferred momentum ($Q^2$).
Additionally we compare the predictions of LF approximation with that of the de Forest
formalism\cite{deForest(1983)} which is commonly used in the analysis of the experimental data.
In all these estimates we use the same parameterization for the electric and magnetic form-factors of
the nucleons. These parameterizations are the same for the free nucleon. Thus we do not consider the
effects related to the possible modification of the charge and magnetic current distributions in the bound nucleon.
In Fig.{\ref{theta_dep_Q2_p} and Fig.\ref{theta_dep_Q2_n} we compare the angular dependences
of ratio $R$ at different values of missing momenta at fixed $Q^2=1$ and $4$~(GeV/c)$^2$ for bound proton and
neutron respectively. As Fig.{\ref{theta_dep_Q2_p} shows LF approximation predicts
off-shell effects for $Q^2=1$ (GeV/c)$^2$ as large as $40-250\%$ for bound proton momenta $\ge 400$~MeV/c.
Even larger effects are expected within the de Forest approach\cite{deForest(1983)}. We observe also that the prediction within LF and de Forest approximations
significantly diverge close to the kinematical limit of the scattering process as it can be seen in calculations for $p_i = 600$~MeV/c.
\begin{figure}[th]
\vskip 0.25cm
\centering
\includegraphics
%[scale=0.16]
[height=7cm,width=16cm]{figures/R_Ang-Dist_Pm005-02-04-06_Merged_N.pdf}
\vskip -0.4cm
\caption{The same as in Fig.\ref{theta_dep_Q2_p} but for scattering from bound neutron.}
\label{theta_dep_Q2_n}
\end{figure}
Because of different magnitudes and signs of form-factors one predicts somewhat different off-shell
effects for scattering from a bound proton or neutron. However, qualitatively the dependences of $R$ for
kinematical parameters of the reaction for both proton and neutron are similar.
\begin{figure}[th]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{figures/Q2-Dist_Proton_Neutron_Ang-70.pdf}
\vskip -0.5cm
\caption{The $Q^2$ dependence of the off-shell effects for $\theta_{p_iq} = -70^0$ for proton and neutron targets.}
\label{Q2_dep_p_n}
\end{figure}
An important feature of LF calculations following from Fig.\ref{theta_dep_Q2_p} and Fig.\ref{theta_dep_Q2_n} is the diminishing of the off-shell effects with an increase of $Q^2$.
This reflects the dynamical nature of the LF approximation in which case the harder the probe (larger $Q^2$) lesser is
the sensitivity to the binding effects of the target nucleon.
It is worth mentioning that no such behavior exists in the de Forest approximation since in this case part of the off-shell effects
are kinematical in which the energy of bound nucleon is taken to be equal to the on-shell energy for the given momentum of the nucleon, with
the phase space of the initial nucleon being proportional to ${1\over \sqrt{m_N^2 + p_i^2}}$.
To ascertain the extent of the $Q^2$ suppression on the off-shell effects, in Fig.\ref{Q2_dep_p_n} we present the $Q^2$ dependence of the ratio $R$ for proton and neutron initial momenta of
$p_i = 600$~ and $800$~MeV/c. Here we choose $\theta_{p_iq} = -70^0$ for which large off-shell effects
are observed in Fig.\ref{theta_dep_Q2_p} and Fig.\ref{theta_dep_Q2_n}. These calculations indicate that already
at $Q^2\ge 4$~GeV$^2$ the off-shell effects predicted in light-front approximation are not more than $10\%$ for such a large
bound nucleon momenta.
\begin{figure}[th]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.32]{figures/Proton_Pmiss-Dist_Q2-425_Ang_iq-140.pdf}
\vskip -0.5cm
\caption{Off shell effects expected for the experiment of Ref.\cite{Boeglin:2014aca} (left panel). The right-panel is the similar effects for $\phi = 0$ kinematics. }
\label{pi_dep_p}
\end{figure}
For practical purposes in Fig.\ref{pi_dep_p} we estimate the dependence of the off-shell effects on
the momentum of the bound nucleon for kinematics relevant to the planned JLAB experiment\cite{Boeglin:2014aca} which is aimed at probing deuteron structure at very large internal momenta.
As the figure shows for both cases of the angles between scattering and reaction planes ($\phi$) the light-front approach predicts off-shell effects to be less than $8\%$ for all kinematics with the latter value happening at $p_i = 850$~MeV/c.
At the end of the section we discuss whether the parameter $\eta$ introduced in Eq.(\ref{eta}) can be used as a
universal parameter for estimation of the of-shell effects for any kinematic conditions of electro-production reaction.
For this, in Fig. \ref{eta-graph} we calculate the $\eta$ dependence of $|R-1|$ for very large magnitudes of bound nucleon
momenta ($p_i = 600$ and $800$~MeV/c) at different values of transverse momentum $p_T$. Note that, the expected off-shell effects
will be much less for smaller values of $p_i$.
\begin{figure}[th]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{figures/eta-p_t-Dist_R-1_LF.pdf}
\vskip -0.5cm
\caption{ The $\eta$ parameter dependence of the off-shell effects $|R-1|$ for $p_i = 0.6$ and $0.8$~GeV/c at different
values of the transverse momentum $p_T$. }
\label{eta-graph}
\end{figure}
As the figure shows for any possible scenarios of kinematics the off shell effects can be confined below $5\%$ as soon as
$\eta <0.1$. This represents a strong indication that the variable $\eta$ can be considered as an universal parameter for
controlling the off-shell effects in the reaction mechanism of electron-nuclear processes.
\section{Summary and Outlook}
\label{VI}
Based on light-front approach we calculated electron-deuteron scattering within PWIA which allowed us to
isolate the electron-bound-nucleon scattering cross section, $\sigma_{eN}$. Within LF approximation the vacuum
contribution naturally disappears while the off-shell nature of the nucleon
results in a appearance of an instantaneous term in the electromagnetic current of electron-bound nucleon scattering.
In deriving $\sigma_{eN}$ we separated the propagating and instantaneous contributions in the electromagnetic
current which allowed explicitly to trace the effects associated with the binding of the nucleon.
Furthermore in LF approach we were able to identify the parameter (defined as $\eta$) that universally characterizes the
extent of the off-shellness of
electromagnetic current.
The derived $\sigma_{eN}$ is used to estimate the expected off-shell effects in electro-nuclear processes
in kinematics relevant to the 12 GeV energy upgraded Jefferson Lab experiments. We compared the
LF predictions with that of the de Forest approximation widely used by experimentalists to estimate the
off-shell effects in the reaction mechanism of electro-nuclear processes. These comparisons indicate that practically in
all kinematic cases the LF approach predicts less off-shell effects at $Q^2\ge 1$~GeV$^2$ than the de Forest
approximation does. Most importantly the LF approach predicts a significant drop of the off-shell effects with an increase
of $Q^2$ which intuitively can be understood as a decrease in the sensitivity
of the hard processes on the off-shellness
of the target nucleon.
We also checked our conjecture that the $\eta$-variable can be considered as a universal parameter in controlling
off-shell effects. We found that for wide range of kinematics the off-shell effects can be suppressed on the level of
$5\%$ as as soon as $\eta < 0.1$. The latter gives an effective method
for controlling the uncertainties
in
the reaction mechanism for large varieties of electro-nuclear processes probing deeply bound nucleons in
the nucleus.
Finally, it is worth mentioning that even though we considered the $eA$ scattering within PWIA the
obtained expressions for electromagnetic current are applicable also for scattering amplitudes in which
the final state interaction between outgoing nucleons is considered within eikonal approximation.
In this case (see e.g. Refs.\cite{gea,ms01}) the main part of the re-scattering amplitude is evaluated at the
pole value of the struck nucleon propagator in the intermediate state. As a result the entered electromagnetic
current is again half-off-shell as the considered electromagnetic current in Eq.(\ref{Jsum}).
\acknowledgments
We are thankful to Dr. Werner Boeglin and Chris Leon for numerous discussions on the physics of high energy electro-nuclear reactions.
This work is supported by the US DOE grant under contract DE-FG02-01ER-41172.
\appendix
\section{Light Front Perturbation Theory Rules}\label{App.A}
We present here a summary of the rules for computation of amplitudes within Light Front (LF) formalism.
The LF scalar product and notations are (Lepage-Brodsky convention\cite{LB(1980),BPP(1997)}):
% \begin{equation}
\begin{eqnarray}\label{x*p}
& & \ x \cdot p={ 1 \over 2} \left( x^+ p^- + x^- p^+\right) - \textbf{x}_{\textbf{T}} \cdot \textbf{p}_{\textbf{T}} \nonumber \\
& & x^{\mu }=\left( x^{+}, {x}^-, x, y \right) = \left( x^{+}, {x}^-, \textbf{x}_{\textbf{T}}\right) \ , \ p^{\mu }=\left( p^{+},p^{-}, \textbf{p}_{\textbf{T}}\right) \nonumber \\
& & x^{\pm} = t \pm z
\end{eqnarray}
\vskip 0.3cm
\begin{figure}[h]
\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{figures/LCPT-Vertices-QED.pdf}
\centering
\caption{Example of the scattering amplitude on the light-front ($\tau=x^+$ flows from left to right).}
\label{LCPT-Vertices-QED}
\end{figure}
\vskip -0.3cm
Diagrammatic Rules for effective light-front perturbation theory can be formulated as follows:
\begin{enumerate}
\item Draw all topologically distinct $\tau \equiv x^+$-ordered diagrams at the desired coupling power.
In addition to the usual advanced and retarded propagation between two events one needs to include a third possibility
in which the two events connected by an internal fermion or photon interact at the same LF $\tau$- time, commonly referred as
instantaneous term.
\item Assign to each line a four-momentum $p^\mu$ and spin $s$ (or helicity, $\lambda$) corresponding to a single on-mass-shell particle, i.e. $p^2 = m^2$.
\item With spin 1/2 fermions associate on-mass-shell spinors $u(p, s)$, with antifermions $v(p, s)$, with photons $\epsilon_\mu(q,\lambda)$, etc, such that,
\begin{eqnarray}\label{Spinors-Norm}
\bar{u}(p, s') u(p, s) & = & - \bar{v}(p, s') v(p, s) = 2m\delta_{s s'} \nonumber \\
\sum_{s} u(p,s) \bar{u}(p,s) & = & \sh{p} + m \nonumber \\
\sum_{s} v(p,s) \bar{v}(p,s) & = & \sh{p} - m \nonumber \\
\epsilon^\mu(q, \lambda') \epsilon^\mu(q, \lambda) & = & - \delta_{\lambda ' \lambda} \ , \ \ q \cdot \epsilon(q, \lambda) = 0 \nonumber \\
\sum_{\lambda} \epsilon^\mu(q, \lambda) \epsilon^\nu(q, \lambda) & = & - g^{\mu \nu } + { q^\mu \eta^\nu + q^\nu \eta^\mu \over q \cdot \eta}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\eta$ is a null vector ($\eta^2=0$), given in LC gauge by, $ \eta = (0,2,0,0)$
\item Each intermediate state gets a factor (inverse of the difference of the sums over initial and intermediate LF energies ($p_-$):
{\small
\begin{equation}
\frac{1}{ \sum_{ini} p^- - \sum_{int} p^- + i\epsilon}
\end{equation}
}
where, '$ini$' stands for the initial state of the diagram and '$int$' for intermediate states. All particles are on-mass-shell, that is: $\ p^- = \frac{ m^2 + p_{\textbf{T}}^2 }{p_i^+} > 0$.
\item Internal lines account for two kind of interactions:
\vskip .1cm
\begin{itemize}
\item Propagating, in which case, for a vertex like in Fig.(\ref{LCPT-Vertices-QED})(a) one has:
\begin{equation}
\Gamma \ \bar{u}(p',s') \sh{\epsilon}(q,\lambda) u(p,s) \delta^2(\sum_{in} p_{\textbf{T}} - \sum_{out} p_{\textbf{T}} ) \delta(\sum_{in} p^+ - \sum_{out} p^+ ) \end{equation}
where, '$in$' and '$out $' mean flowing into and out of the vertex.
The $\delta$ functions at the vertex provide an explicit conservation of the plus and transverse components of '$in$' and '$out$' momenta.
\item Instantaneous. For each vertex like in Fig.(\ref{LCPT-Vertices-QED})(b) (fermionic), include,
\begin{equation}
\Gamma^2 \ \bar{u}(p',s') \sh{\epsilon}(q',\lambda') {\gamma^+ \over 2(q^+ - p'^+) } \sh{\epsilon}(q,\lambda) u(p,s) \delta^2(\sum_{in} p_{\textbf{T}} - \sum_{out} p_{\textbf{T}} ) \delta( \sum_{in} p^+ - \sum_{out} p^+ ).
\end{equation}
And, for each vertex like in Fig.(\ref{LCPT-Vertices-QED}) (c) (vector), include,
\begin{equation}
\Gamma^2 \ \bar{u}(p',s') \gamma^+ u(p,s) {1 \over (p'^+ - p^+)^2 } \bar{u}(k',\sigma') \gamma^+ u(k,\sigma) \delta^2(\sum_{in} p_{\textbf{T}} - \sum_{out} p_{\textbf{T}} ) \delta( \sum_{in} p^+ - \sum_{out} p^+ ).
\end{equation}
\end{itemize}
Here $\Gamma$ factors represent effective vertices which can be specified for the particular case of the
scattering. They can correspond to electron-bound nucleon scattering as well as nuclear transition to the
constituent nucleons. The conditions for for which such an effective vertices can be introduced in the Feynman diagrams
are discussed in Ref.\cite{ms01}.
% To convert incoming into outgoing lines or vice versa or particles to antiparticles, replace,
% $$ u \leftrightarrow v \ , \ \ \ \bar{u} \leftrightarrow - \bar{v} \ , \ \ \ \epsilon \leftrightarrow \epsilon^* .$$
\item Sum over polarizations and integrate over each internal line with the factor,
{\small$$ \sum_{s} \int \frac{dp_{\textbf{T}} dp^+}{2(2\pi)^3 p^+} \Theta(p^+) $$ }
which ensures the plus component positivity (all particles move forward in LC time.)
\item Include symmetry factors. Also, a factor of -1 for each fermion loop, for fermion lines beginning and ending at the initial state, and for each diagram in which fermion lines are interchanged in either of the initial or final states, as well as the overall sign from Wick's theorem.
\end{enumerate}
\section{Nucleonic Tensor}\label{App.B}
%The nucleonic tensor presents two characteristic contributions.
Substituting Eq.(\ref{Jsum}) into Eq.(\ref{HN}), allows us to express the nucleonic tensor as a sum of two terms:
\begin{equation}\label{HNsum}
H^{\mu \nu}_{N } = H^{\mu \nu}_{N \ prop} + H^{\mu \nu}_{N \ inst},
\end{equation}
where the the propagating contribution is given by,
\begin{equation}\label{HN-on_JJ}
H^{\mu \nu}_{N \ prop} = {1 \over 2} \sum_{s_i s_f} (J^{s_i s_f \ \mu}_{prop} )^{\dagger} (J^{s_i s_f}_{prop} )^\nu = \frac{1}{2}Tr\left[\overline{\Gamma}_{\gamma^\ast N}^{(on) \mu} (\sh{p}_f + m_N) \Gamma_{\gamma^\ast N}^{(on) \nu} (\sh{p}_{i,on} + m_N) \right],
\end{equation}
and the instantaneous by,
\begin{eqnarray}\label{HN-off_JJ}
H^{\mu \nu}_{N \ inst} &=& {1 \over 2} \sum_{s_i s_f} \left( (J^{s_i s_f \ \nu}_{off})^{\dagger} J^{s_i s_f \ \mu}_{inst} + (J^{s_i s_f \ \nu}_{prop})^{\dagger} J^{s_i s_f \ \mu}_{inst} + (J^{s_i s_f \ \nu}_{inst})^{\dagger} J^{s_i s_f \ \mu}_{prop} \right) \\ \nonumber
%H^{\mu \nu}_{N \ off}
&=& \dfrac{1}{2} Tr\Big[ \overline{\Gamma}_{\gamma^\ast N}^{(off) \nu} (\sh p_f + m_N) \Gamma_{\gamma^\ast N}^{(off) \mu} (\sh{p}_{i,on} + m_N) \\
&& + \overline{\Gamma}_{\gamma^\ast N}^{(on) \nu} (\sh p_f + m_N) \Gamma_{\gamma^\ast N}^{(off) \mu} (\sh{p}_{i,on} + m_N) + \overline{\Gamma}_{\gamma^\ast N}^{(off) \nu} (\sh p_f + m_N) \Gamma_{\gamma^\ast N}^{(on) \mu} (\sh{p}_{i,on} + m_N) \Big], \nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
where, $\overline{\Gamma}_{\gamma^\ast N}^{\mu} = \gamma^0 \left( {\Gamma}_{\gamma^\ast N}^{\mu}\right)^{\dagger} \gamma^0 $.
Notice that the initial momentum of the nucleon, $p_i$, occurring from now-on corresponds to $p_{i,on} $, which allows to drop the on-shell label
"on" without confusion.
With this, we can write propagating and instantaneous contributions of the tensor, $H^{\mu,\nu}$ as functions of the nucleon form
factors $F_1$ and $F_2$ as follows:
\begin{eqnarray}\label{HN-on}
H^{\mu \nu}_{N \ prop} & =& \ 2 F_1^2 \Big[ g^{\mu\nu} \left( m_N^2 - p_i \cdot p_f \right) + \left( p_i^{\mu} p_f^{\nu} + p_i^{\nu} p_f^{\mu} \right) \Big]
\nonumber \\
& + & F_1 F_2 \kappa \Big[ 2 g^{\mu\nu} q \cdot \left( p_f - p_i\right) + \left( p_i^{\mu} q^{\nu} + p_i^{\nu} q^{\mu} \right) - ( p_f^{\mu} q^{\nu} +p_f^\nu q^{\mu} ) \Big] \nonumber \\
& + & F_2^2 {\kappa^2 \over 2 m_N^2} \Big[ g^{\mu\nu} \big[ q^2 \left( p_i \cdot p_f + m_N^2 \right) - 2 \ q \cdot p_i \ q \cdot p_f \big] - q^2 \left( p_i^{\mu} p_f^{\nu} + p_i^{\nu} p_f^{\mu} \right) \nonumber \\
& & \ \ \ \ - q^{\mu}q^{\nu} \left( p_i \cdot p_f + m_N^2 \right) + q \cdot p_f \left( p_i^{\mu} q^{\nu} + p_i^{\nu} q^{\mu} \right) + q \cdot p_i \left( p_f^{\mu} q^{\nu} + p_f^{\nu} q^{\mu} \right), \Big]
\end{eqnarray}
and the instantaneous correction as follows:
\begin{eqnarray}\label{HN-off}
& & H^{\mu \nu}_{N \ inst} = \ 2 F_1^2 \Big[ g^{\mu\nu} \Big( \Delta p_i \cdot\left( p_i - p_f \right) - { \Delta p_i \cdot p_i \over m_N^2} \Delta p_i \cdot p_f \Big) + \left(\Delta p_i^\mu p_f^{\nu} + \Delta p_i^{\nu} p_f^{\mu} \right) \Big( 1 + {\Delta p_i \cdot p_i \over m_N^2 } \Big) \nonumber \\
& + & {2 \over q^2} q^{\mu}q^{\nu} \Big( {2 \over q^2} q \cdot p_{f} \ q \cdot ( \Delta p_i + p_{i} ) - ( p_{i} - p_f) \cdot ( \Delta p_i + p_{i} ) + { \Delta p_i \cdot p_i \over m_N^2} \Big( { \Delta p_i \cdot q \over q^2} p_f \cdot q +{\Delta p_i \cdot p_f } \Big) \Big) \nonumber \\
& - & {2 \over q^2} \left( p_i^{\mu} q^{\nu} + p_i^{\nu} q^{\mu} \right) q \cdot p_f - {2 \over q^2} ( p_f^{\mu} q^{\nu} +p_f^\nu q^{\mu} ) \Big( q \cdot ( \Delta p_i + p_{i} ) + {\Delta p_i \cdot p_i \over m_N^2} \Delta p_i \cdot q \Big) \nonumber \\
& - & {2 \over q^2} \left(\Delta p_i^\mu q^{\nu} + \Delta p_i^{\nu} q^{\mu} \right) q \cdot p_{f} \Big( 1 + { \Delta p_i \cdot p_i \over m_N^2} \Big) \Big]
\nonumber \\
& + & F_1 F_2 \kappa \Big[ g^{\mu\nu} \Big( { \Delta p_i \cdot p_i \over m_N^2} q \cdot ( 2 p_f - \Delta p_i ) - 2 \Delta p_i \cdot q \Big) + q^{\mu}q^{\nu} \Big( { \Delta p_i \cdot p_i \over m_N^2 q^2} q \cdot( \Delta p_i - 2 p_{f}) - 2 \Big) \nonumber \\
& & \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - \left( p_i^{\mu} q^{\nu} + p_i^{\nu} q^{\mu} \right) + ( p_f^{\mu} q^{\nu} +p_f^\nu q^{\mu} ) \Big] \nonumber \\
& + & F_2^2 {\kappa^2 \over 2 m_N^2} \Big[ g^{\mu\nu} \big[ \left( q^2 \ \Delta p_i \cdot p_f - 2 \ q \cdot \Delta p_i \ q \cdot p_f\right) \Big( 1 + {\Delta p_i \cdot p_i \over m_N^2 } \Big) +q^2 \ \Delta p_i \cdot p_i \big] \nonumber \\
& & \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - \left( \Delta p_i^{\mu} p_f^{\nu} + \Delta p_i^{\nu} p_f^{\mu} \right) q^2 \Big( 1 + {\Delta p_i \cdot p_i \over m_N^2 } \Big) - q^{\mu}q^{\nu} \big[ \Delta p_i \cdot p_f \Big( 1 + {\Delta p_i \cdot p_i \over m_N^2 } \Big) - \Delta p_i \cdot p_i \big] \nonumber \\
& & \ \ \ \ \ \ \ + \left( \Delta p_i^{\mu} q^{\nu} + \Delta p_i^{\nu} q^{\mu} \right) q \cdot p_f \Big( 1 + {\Delta p_i \cdot p_i \over m_N^2 } \Big) + \left( p_f^{\mu} q^{\nu} + p_f^{\nu} q^{\mu} \right) q \cdot \Delta p_i \Big( 1 + {\Delta p_i \cdot p_i \over m_N^2 } \Big) \Big].
\end{eqnarray}
With our choice of reference frame (Fig.(\ref{sc_planes})), one can expand the $L_{\mu\nu}H^{\mu\nu}$ product in the following form:
\begin{eqnarray}
L_{\mu \nu} H^{\mu \nu}_N & = & \left( L_{00}H^{00} - 2 L_{0z}H^{0z} + L_{zz}H^{zz} \right) + \left( -2 L_{0 \parallel }H^{0 \parallel } + 2 L_{z \parallel }H^{z \parallel} \right) \nonumber \\
& + & \frac{1}{2} \left( L_{\parallel \parallel } + L_{\bot \bot} \right) \left( H^{\parallel \parallel } + H^{\bot \bot} \right) + {1 \over 2 } \left( L_{\parallel \parallel } - L_{\bot \bot} \right) \left( H^{\parallel \parallel } - H^{\bot \bot} \right).
\end{eqnarray}
Furthermore, using the gauge-invariance of leptonic current, one expresses the above product in the form:
\vspace{-0.3cm}
\begin{eqnarray}
L_{\mu \nu} H^{\mu \nu}_N & = & L_{00} \left( H^{00} - 2 {q^0 \over q_z } H^{0z} + \left({q^0 \over q_z}\right)^2 H^{zz} \right) + 2 L_{0 \parallel } \left( - H^{0 \parallel } + {q^0 \over q_z } H^{z \parallel} \right) \nonumber \\
& + & \frac{1}{2} \left( L_{\parallel \parallel } + L_{\bot \bot} \right) \left( H^{\parallel \parallel } + H^{\bot \bot} \right) + {1 \over 2 } \left( L_{\parallel \parallel } - L_{\bot \bot} \right) \left( H^{\parallel \parallel } - H^{\bot \bot} \right) \nonumber \\
& = & Q^2 (\tan(\theta/2))^2 \left( \eta_L V_{N,L} + \eta_{TL} V_{N,TL} \cos(\phi) + \eta_T V_{N,T} + \eta_{TT} V_{N,TT} \right).
\end{eqnarray}
Using the definitions of $\eta_i$ for $ i=L,T,TL,TT$, from Eq.(\ref{eta}) for hadronic structure functions, ($V_{N,i} $), one obtains:
\begin{eqnarray} \label{V-Gross-app}
V^N_L & =& \frac{ {\bf q}^4 }{Q^4} \left( H^{00} - 2 {q^0 \over q_z } H^{0z} + ({q^0)^2 \over {\bf q}^2 } H^{zz} \right) = \frac{ {\bf q}^2 }{4 Q^2} \left( H^{++}{ Q^2 \over (q^+)^2 } + 2 H^{+-} + {(q^+)^2 \over Q^2 } H^{- -} \right) \nonumber \\
V^N_{TL} & =& 2 { {\bf q}^2 \over Q^2 } \left( {q^0 \over q_z } H^{z \parallel}_N - H^{0 \parallel }_N \right) = {|{\bf q}| \over q^+} \left( H^{+ \parallel}_N + H^{- \parallel }_N {(q^+)^2 \over Q^2} \right) \nonumber \\
V^N_T & =& H^{\parallel \parallel }_N + H^{\bot \bot} _N \\
V^N_{TT} & =& H_N^{\parallel \parallel} - H_N^{\bot \bot},
\end{eqnarray}
where we have used, $ - q_z = |{\bf q}|$, as well as the relation between components of the nucleonic tensor in light-cone and Minkowski coordinates:
\begin{eqnarray}\label{H-components-LC}
H^{00} &=& { 1 \over 4 }(H^{++} + 2 H^{+-} + H^{- -}) \nonumber \\
H^{0z} &=& {1 \over 4} (H^{++} - H^{- -}) \nonumber \\
H^{zz} &=& {1 \over 4} (H^{++} - 2 H^{+-} + H^{- -}) \nonumber \\
H^{0 \parallel } &=& {1 \over 2} (H^{+ \parallel} + H^{- \parallel} ) \nonumber \\
H^{z \parallel} &=& {1 \over 2} (H^{+ \parallel} - H^{- \parallel} ).
\end{eqnarray}
From Eqs.(\ref{HN-on}, \ref{V-Gross-app})
we compute the explicit forms of the structure functions.
In the reference frame of Fig.(\ref{sc_planes}), they are given by:
\begin{eqnarray}
V_{L \ prop}^N & = & F_1^2 {\bf{q}}^2 \dfrac{\alpha_N \alpha_f}{\alpha_q^2} \Big( {m^{2}_N+p_\textbf{T}^2 \over Q^2} \dfrac{\alpha_q^2 }
{\alpha_N \alpha_f} + 1 \Big) - F_1 F_2 {\bf{q}}^2 {\kappa } \left( {m^{2}_N+p_\textbf{T}^2 \over Q^2}
\dfrac{\alpha_q^2 }{\alpha_N \alpha_f} + 1 \right) \nonumber \\
& & + F_2^2 {\bf{q}}^2 \left( {\kappa \over 2 m_N} \right) ^2 \left( (m^{2}_N+p_\textbf{T}^2 )\dfrac{\alpha_q^2 }{\alpha_N \alpha_f} + 4 p_{\textbf{T}}^2 \right) \nonumber \\
V_{L \ inst}^N & = & F_1^2{ \alpha_{N} \over \alpha_{q}} {\bf{q}}^2 \left( 1 - \left( {m^{2}_N+p_\textbf{T}^2 \over Q^2} \dfrac{\alpha_q^2 }{\alpha_N \alpha_f} \right)^2
+ {(m^{2}_N+p_\textbf{T}^2 ) \over 2m^2} \dfrac{\alpha_q }{\alpha_N } + \left( {m^{2}_N +p_\textbf{T}^2 \over Q^2} \dfrac{\alpha_q^2 }{\alpha_N \alpha_f} - 1 \right) ^2 \right) \nonumber \\
& & - 2 F_1 F_2 \kappa {\alpha_{N} \over \alpha_{q}} {\bf{q}}^2 { (q\cdot \Delta p_i)^2 \over m^2 Q^2} \left( 2 {\alpha_{f} \over \alpha_{q}} + 2{ m^2 \over q\cdot \Delta p_i } +1 \right) \nonumber \\
& & + F_2^2 \Big( {\kappa \over m^2_N} \Big)^2 {\bf{q}}^2 ~ q\cdot \Delta p_i \left( 1 + {q\cdot \Delta p_i \over m^2 } { \alpha_N \alpha_f \over \alpha_q^2 } \right) \nonumber \\
V_{TL \ prop}^N & = & |{\bf{q}}| \dfrac{ \alpha_N + \alpha_f }{\alpha_q} p_{\textbf{T}} \left( 2 F_1^2 + 2 F_2^2 \Big( {\kappa \over 2 m_N} \Big)^2 Q^2\right) \left( 1 + {m^{2}_N+p_{\textbf{T}}^2 \over Q^2} \dfrac{ \alpha_q^2 }{\alpha_N \alpha_f} \right) \nonumber \\
V_{TL \ inst}^N & = & 8 |{\bf{q}}| { q \cdot \Delta p_i \over Q^2 } p_\textbf{T} \left( 1 +{p_i \cdot \Delta p_i \over m^2} \right) \left( F_1^2 + F_2^2 \Big( {\kappa \over 2 m_N} \Big)^2 \right) \nonumber \\
V_{T \ prop \ \ }^N & =& \ F_1^2\left( 2 (m^{2}_N+p_{\textbf{T}}^2 )\dfrac{\alpha_q^2}{\alpha_N \alpha_f} + 4 (p_{\textbf{T}})^2 \right) + 2 \kappa F_1 F_2 \left( (m^{2}_N+p_{\textbf{T}}^2 ) \dfrac{\alpha_q^2}{\alpha_N \alpha_f} + Q^2 \right) \nonumber \\
& & + F_2^2 \left( {\kappa \over 2 m_N} \right) ^2 \left( 2 \dfrac{\alpha_N \alpha_f}{\alpha_q^2} \left( (m^{2}_N+p_{\textbf{T}}^2 ) \dfrac{\alpha_q^2}{\alpha_N \alpha_f} + Q^2 \right) ^2 - 4 Q^2 p_{\textbf{T}}^2 \right) \nonumber \\
V_{T \ inst \ \ }^N & =& 8 F_1^2 \left( q\cdot \Delta p_i + p_f \cdot \Delta p_i {p_i \cdot \Delta p_i \over m^2 } \right) + 8 F_1 F_2 \kappa \left( 1 +{p_i \cdot \Delta p_i \over m^2} \right) \left( q\cdot \Delta p_i - p_f \cdot q {p_i \cdot \Delta p_i \over m^2 + p_i \cdot \Delta p_i } \right) \nonumber \\
& & + 8 F_2^2 \left( {\kappa \over 2 m_N} \right) ^2 \left( 1 +{p_i \cdot \Delta p_i \over m^2} \right) \left( q \cdot p_f ~ q\cdot \Delta p_i + Q^2 ~p_f \cdot \Delta p_i + Q^2 { m^2 ~p_i \cdot \Delta p_i \over m^2 + p_i \cdot \Delta p_i } \right) \nonumber \\
V_{TT \ prop}^N & = & 4 p_{\textbf{T}}^2 \left( F_1^2 + F_2^2 {\kappa^2 \over 4 m_N^2} Q^2 \right) \nonumber \\
V_{TT \ off}^N & = & 0.
\label{V_LF}
\end{eqnarray}
The kinematic variables, and scalar products used in the calculation are as follows:
The light-cone momentum fractions are:
\begin{equation}
\alpha_N= {2 p_N^+\over p_d^+}= {2 (E_N + p_{N, z}) \over p_d^+}, \ \ \ \alpha_q = {2 q^+\over p_d^+}= {2(q^0 - |{\bf{q}}|) \over p_d^+}, \ \ \ \alpha_f = \alpha_N + \alpha_q
\end{equation}
and the off-shell factor is, $ \Delta{p}_i^\mu=p^\mu_{i } - p^\mu_{i, on} $, with, $ p^\mu_{i }=p^\mu_{d}-p^\mu_{r} $.
Since $\Delta p_i^+ = \Delta p_{i}^\perp = 0$, we have, $ 2 \Delta\sh{p}_i=\gamma^{+} \left( p^-_i - p^-_{i, on }\right) $ with the minus component
defined as follows:
\begin{equation}
\Delta{p}_i^-=p_{i }^- - p_{i \ on}^- = -q^- + (p_f^- - p_{i \ on}^-) = \dfrac{Q^2}{q^+} - \dfrac{m^{2}_N+p_\bot^2 }{p_f^+ p_i^+} q^+ .
\end{equation}
The scalar products of initial ($p_{i,on}^\mu$), final ($p_{f}^\mu$) and transferred ($q^\mu$) momenta with the off-shell factor $\Delta{p}_i^\mu$, can be written as:
\begin{eqnarray}
2 \Delta{p}_i \cdot p_i & = & Q^2 \dfrac{\alpha_N}{\alpha_q} - (m^{2}_N+{\bf p_{T}}^2 ) \dfrac{\alpha_q}{\alpha_f } \nonumber \\ 2 \Delta{p}_i \cdot p_f& = & Q^2 \dfrac{\alpha_f}{\alpha_q} - (m^{2}_N+{\bf p_{T}}^2 ) \dfrac{\alpha_q}{\alpha_i }\nonumber \\
2 \Delta{p}_i \cdot q & = & Q^2 - (m^{2}_N+{\bf p_{T}}^2 ) \dfrac{\alpha_q^2}{\alpha_f \alpha_N}.
\end{eqnarray}
\begin{thebibliography}{16}
\bibitem{arnps}
N.~Fomin, D.~Higinbotham, M.~Sargsian and P.~Solvignon,
%``New Results on Short-Range Correlations in Nuclei,''
Ann.\ Rev.\ Nucl.\ Part.\ Sci.\ {\bf 67}, 129 (2017).
\bibitem{Hen:2016kwk}
O.~Hen, G.~A.~Miller, E.~Piasetzky and L.~B.~Weinstein,
%``Nucleon-Nucleon Correlations, Short-lived Excitations, and the Quarks Within,''
Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf 89}, no. 4, 045002 (2017).
\bibitem{dreview}
W.~Boeglin and M.~Sargsian,
%``Modern Studies of the Deuteron: from the Lab Frame to the Light Front,''
Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ E {\bf 24}, no. 03, 1530003 (2015).
\bibitem{Atti:2015eda}
C.~Ciofi degli Atti,
%``In-medium short-range dynamics of nucleons: Recent theoretical and experimental advances,''
Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 590}, 1 (2015).
\bibitem{srcprog}
J.~Arrington, D.~W.~Higinbotham, G.~Rosner and M.~Sargsian,
%``Hard probes of short-range nucleon-nucleon correlations,''
Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 67}, 898 (2012).
\bibitem{srcrev}
L.~Frankfurt, M.~Sargsian and M.~Strikman,
%``Recent observation of short range nucleon correlations in nuclei and their implications for the structure of nuclei and neutron stars,''
Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 23}, 2991 (2008).
\bibitem{FSDS93}
L.~L.~Frankfurt, M.~I.~Strikman, D.~B.~Day and M.~Sargsian,
%``Evidence for short range correlations from high Q**2 (e, e-prime) reactions,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 48}, 2451 (1993).
\bibitem{Kim1}
K.~S.~Egiyan {\it et al.} [CLAS Collaboration],
%``Observation of nuclear scaling in the A(e, e-prime) reaction at x(B) greater than 1,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 68}, 014313 (2003).
\bibitem{Kim2}
K.~S.~Egiyan {\it et al.} [CLAS Collaboration],
%``Measurement of 2- and 3-nucleon short range correlation probabilities in nuclei,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 96}, 082501 (2006).
\bibitem{Fomin:2011ng}
N.~Fomin {\it et al.},
%``New measurements of high-momentum nucleons and short-range structures in nuclei,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 108}, 092502 (2012).
\bibitem{EIP2}
A.~Tang {\it et al.},
%``n-p short range correlations from (p,2p + n) measurements,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 90}, 042301 (2003).
%\cite{Shneor:2007tu}
\bibitem{EIP3} R.~Shneor {\it et al.} [Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration],
%``Investigation of proton-proton short-range correlations via the C-12(e, e-prime pp) reaction,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 99}, 072501 (2007).
\bibitem{isosrc}
E.~Piasetzky, M.~Sargsian, L.~Frankfurt, M.~Strikman and J.~W.~Watson,
%``Evidence for the strong dominance of proton-neutron correlations in nuclei,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 97}, 162504 (2006).
\bibitem{EIP4} R.~Subedi {\it et al.},
%``Probing Cold Dense Nuclear Matter,''
Science {\bf 320}, 1476 (2008).
\bibitem{newprops}
M.~M.~Sargsian,
%``New properties of the high-momentum distribution of nucleons in asymmetric nuclei,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 89}, no. 3, 034305 (2014).
\bibitem{Hen:2014nza}
O.~Hen {\it et al.},
%``Momentum sharing in imbalanced Fermi systems,''
Science {\bf 346}, 614 (2014).
\bibitem{Artiles_Sargsian-multisrc1} O.~Artiles and M.~M.~Sargsian,
%``Multi-Nucleon Short-Range Correlation Model for Nuclear Spectral Functions: I. Theoretical Framework,''
% arXiv:1606.00468 [nucl-th].
Phys. Rev. {\bf C94}, 064318.
\bibitem{gea}
L.~L.~Frankfurt, M.~M.~Sargsian and M.~I.~Strikman,
%``Feynman graphs and Gribov-Glauber approach to high-energy knockout processes,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 56}, 1124 (1997).
\bibitem{ms01}
M.~M.~Sargsian,
%``Selected topics in high energy semiexclusive electronuclear reactions,''
Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ E {\bf 10}, 405 (2001).
\bibitem{CiofidegliAtti:2004jg}
C.~Ciofi degli Atti and L.~P.~Kaptari,
%``Calculations of the exclusive processes H-2(e, e-prime p)n, He-3(e, e-prime p)H-2 and He-3(e, e-prime p)(pn) within a generalized Glauber approach,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 71}, 024005 (2005).
\bibitem{Jeschonnek:2008zg}
S.~Jeschonnek and J.~W.~Van Orden,
%``A New calculation for D(e, e-prime p)n at GeV energies,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 78}, 014007 (2008).
\bibitem{Laget04}
J.~M.~Laget,
%``The Electro-disintegration of few body systems revisited,''
Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 609}, 49 (2005).
%\cite{Sargsian:2004tz}
\bibitem{eheppn1}
M.~M.~Sargsian, T.~V.~Abrahamyan, M.~I.~Strikman and L.~L.~Frankfurt,
%``Exclusive electrodisintegration of He-3 at high Q**2. I. Generalized eikonal approximation,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 71}, 044614 (2005).
\bibitem{eheppn2}
M.~M.~Sargsian, T.~V.~Abrahamyan, M.~I.~Strikman and L.~L.~Frankfurt,
%``Exclusive electro-disintegration of He-3 at high Q2. II. Decay function formalism,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 71}, 044615 (2005).
\bibitem{Sargsian:2009hf}
M.~M.~Sargsian,
%``Large Q**2 Electrodisintegration of the Deuteron in Virtual Nucleon Approximation,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 82}, 014612 (2010).
\bibitem{edex}
W.~Cosyn and M.~Sargsian,
%``Final-state interactions in semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering off the Deuteron,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 84}, 014601 (2011).
\bibitem{disfsirev}
W.~Cosyn and M.~Sargsian,
%``Nuclear final-state interactions in deep inelastic scattering off the lightest nuclei,''
Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ E {\bf 26}, no. 09, 1730004 (2017).
%\cite{Bussiere:1981mv}
\bibitem{SACLAY1}
A.~Bussiere {\it et al.},
%``Momentum Distribution of Nucleons in the Deuteron From the $D(e,e^\prime P)N$ Reaction,''
Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 365}, 349 (1981).
%\cite{TurckChieze:1984fy}
\bibitem{SACLAY2}
S.~Turck-Chieze {\it et al.},
%``Exclusive Deuteron Electrodisintegration At High Neutron Recoil Momentum,''
Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf 142B}, 145 (1984).
\bibitem{NIKHEF}
J.~F.~J.~Van Den Brand {\it et al.},
%``Electrodisintegration of $^{4}$He Studied With the Reaction $^{4}$He ($e$, $e^\prime P$) $^{3}$H,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 60}, 2006 (1988).
\bibitem{Mougey}S. Frullani and J. Mougey, Adv. \ Nucl. \ Phys. {\bf 14}, 1 (1984).
\bibitem{deForest(1983)}
% Off-Shell Electron-Nucleon Cross Sections (The Impulse Approximation)
T.~de Forest, Nuclear Physics {\bf A392} 232-248 (1983)
\bibitem{Feynman} %\cite{Feynman:1973xc}
%\bibitem{Feynman:1973xc}
R.~P.~Feynman, ``Photon-hadron interactions,''
Reading 1972, 282p.
\bibitem{KS(1970)}
J.~Kogut and D. Soper,
%``Quantum Electrodynamics in the Infinite-Momentum Frame,"
Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D1}, 2901 (1970).
\bibitem{LB(1980)}
G.~P.~Lepage and S.~J.~Brodsky,
%``Exclusive Processes in Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 22}, 2157 (1980).
\bibitem{FS81}
L.~L.~Frankfurt and M.~I.~Strikman,
%``High-Energy Phenomena, Short Range Nuclear Structure and QCD,''
Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 76}, 215 (1981).
\bibitem{BPP(1997)}
S.~J.~Brodsky, H.~C.~Pauli and S.~S.~Pinsky,
%``Quantum chromodynamics and other field theories on the light cone,''
Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 301}, 299 (1998).
\bibitem{FS77}
L.~L.~Frankfurt and M.~I.~Strikman,
%``Relativistic Description of the Deuteron: Elastic and Inelastic Form-Factors in the Region Kinematically Forbidden for Scattering on a Free Nucleon,''
Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 148}, 107 (1979).
\bibitem{KP91}
B.~D.~Keister and W.~N.~Polyzou.
%``Relativistic Hamiltonian dynamics in nuclear and particle physics,''
Adv.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 20}, 225 (1991).
\bibitem{Miller00}
G.~A.~Miller,
%``Light front quantization: A Technique for relativistic and realistic nuclear physics,''
Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 45}, 83 (2000).
\bibitem{Gross79}
W.~W.~Buck and F.~Gross,
%``A Family of Relativistic Deuteron Wave Functions,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 20}, 2361 (1979).
\bibitem{Glazek84}
S.~D.~Glazek,
%``Deuteron Structure In The Elastic Electron Deuteron Scattering,''
Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 14}, 893 (1983).
\bibitem{Miller13}
G.~A.~Miller,
%``Pionic and Hidden-Color, Six-Quark Contributions to the Deuteron b1 Structure Function,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 89}, no. 4, 045203 (2014).
\bibitem{Bincer60}
% Electromagnetic Structure of the Nucleon
A. M. Bincer, Phys. Rev. {\bf 118}, 855 (1960).
\bibitem{Koch90}
% Electron Scattering from a Bound Nucleon
H.~W.~L.~Naus, S.~J.~Pollock, J.~H.~Koch and U.~Oelfke, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A509} 717-735 (1990)
\bibitem{Koch96}
% The electron-nucleon cross section in (e,e′p) reactions
H.~W.~L.~Naus, S.~J.~Pollock, J.~H.~Koch, Phys. Rev. {\bf C53}, 2304 (1996)
% \bibitem{Atti_Kaptari (2004)}
% Calculations of the Exclusive Processes 2H(e,e'p)n, 3He(e,e'p)2H and 3He(e,e'p)(pn) within a Generalized Glauber Approach
% C.~Ciofi degli Atti and L.~P.~Kaptari, arXiv:nucl-th/0407024 v1 (2004)
\bibitem{EMC} J.~J.~Aubert {\it et al.} [European Muon Collaboration],
%``The ratio of the nucleon structure functions $F2_n$ for iron and deuterium,''
Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf 123B}, 275 (1983).
% \bibitem{Freese_Sargsian (2015)}
% Probing superfast quarks in nuclei through dijet production at the LHC
% A.~J.~Freese, M.~M.~Sargsian and M.~I.~Strikman, Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 75} 534 (2015).
%\cite{Boeglin:2014aca}
\bibitem{Boeglin:2014aca}
W.~U.~Boeglin {\it et al.},
%``Deuteron Electro-Disintegration at Very High Missing Momenta,''
arXiv:1410.6770 [nucl-ex].
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1410.6770;%%
%5 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 09 Jan 2018
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}