Neutron width statistics using a realistic description of the neutron channel
Extracted source text · arXiv 1811.01492
\documentclass{cernyrep}
\usepackage{texnames}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\pagestyle{plain}
\newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}} \newcommand{\ee}{ \end{equation}}
\newcommand{\ba}{\begin{eqnarray}} \newcommand{\ea}{ \end{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\ve}{\varepsilon}
\begin{document}
\title{Neutron width statistics using a realistic description of the neutron channel}
% Neutron width statistics in a realistic statistical-reaction model
\author{ P.~Fanto$^{1}$, G.~F.~Bertsch$^{2}$, and Y.~Alhassid$^{1}$}
\institute{$^{1}$Center for Theoretical Physics, Sloane Physics Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA \\
$^{2}$Department of Physics and Institute for Nuclear Theory,
Box 351560, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA\\
}
\maketitle % this produces the title block
\begin{abstract}
A basic prediction of the statistical model of compound nucleus reactions is that the partial widths for decay into any open channel channel fluctuate according to the Porter-Thomas distribution (PTD). A recent experiment on $s$- and $p$-wave neutron scattering from platinum isotopes found that the experimental $s$-wave partial neutron width distributions deviated substantially from the PTD. Several explanations for this finding have been proposed within the statistical model, but none has resolved this issue. Here, we review the application of a realistic resonance-reaction model to $s$-wave neutron scattering from $^{194}$Pt. Our main conclusion is that the PTD provides an excellent description of the partial neutron width distribution, provided that the secular energy dependence of the average neutron width is correctly described. Within a realistic range of model parameters, there can be a near-threshold bound or virtual state of the neutron channel that changes this secular dependence from the usual $\sqrt{E}$ dependence, as proposed by Weidenmüller~\cite{Weidenmuller2010}. In this case, the use of the $\sqrt{E}$ dependence to analyze the data will lead to apparent deviations from the PTD. We discuss the limited parameter range where such a near threshold state can have a significant effect.
\end{abstract}
\section{Introduction}\label{sec:intro}
Compound nucleus (CN) reactions are important in basic nuclear science, nuclear astrophysics, and nuclear technology applications. %The CN describes an equilibrated intermediate state of the fused projectile and target nuclei.
% that survives for a long time, relative to the time the projectile would take to cross the nuclear volume.
%Because the number of CN states at the neutron threshold energy is enormous, a statistical description of the CN is necessary.
The statistical model of CN reactions~\cite{Mitchell2010} provides the theoretical framework for understanding this class of nuclear reactions. The basic assumption of the statistical model is that the CN can be described by a random matrix drawn from the Gaussian orthogonal ensemble (GOE)~\cite{Mitchell2010,Alhassid2000}. %The model consequently predicts fluctuations of the resonance energies and widths that resemble those observed in any chaotic quantum system that is invariant under time reversal.
Energy-averaged cross sections and resonance parameters are calculated as averages over the ensemble. The statistical model modifies the traditional Hauser-Feshbach theory of CN reactions~\cite{Hauser1952} %, which is based on Bohr's hypothesis of the independence of the CN formation and decay~\cite{Bohr1936},
through the so-called width fluctuation correction (WFC)~\cite{Kawano2015}. The Hauser-Feshbach plus WFC approach is used in statistical reaction codes~\cite{Koning2012}.
%and EMPIRE \cite{Herman2007}.
A basic prediction of the statistical model is that, for isolated resonances, the partial widths for any reaction channel fluctuate according to the Porter-Thomas distribution (PTD)~\cite{Porter1956, Mitchell2010}. However, a relatively recent experiment~\cite{Koehler2010} found that the distributions of partial neutron widths in $s$-wave scattering of neutrons off $^{192,194,196}$Pt were significantly broader than the PTD. A number of theoretical studies attempted to explain these deviations from PTD within the statistical model framework. These studies proposed the following explanations:
(i).~In the experiment of Ref.~\cite{Koehler2010}, the resonance energies and partial widths were extracted using an $R$-matrix fit to measured data. To obtain the partial width fluctuations, the partial widths must be divided by the secular dependence of the average neutron width on the resonance energy. This energy dependence is expected to be proportional
%to the squared penetrability within the $R$-matrix formalism, i.e.,
to $\sqrt{E}$ for $s$-wave neutrons. Weidenm\"uller proposed~\cite{Weidenmuller2010} that, for the Pt isotopes, a near threshold bound or virtual state of the $s$-wave neutron channel\footnote{A bound state of the $s$-wave neutron channel corresponds to a pole of the $S$-matrix on the positive imaginary axis in the complex wavenumber $k$ space. As the potential is made less attractive, this pole crosses onto the negative imaginary axis and becomes a virtual state with negative energy and zero width. See Ref.~\cite{Taylor1972} for details.} changes this secular energy dependence. Thus, the use of the $\sqrt{E}$ form in the experimental analysis might have caused the observed PTD violation in Ref.~\cite{Koehler2010}.
(ii).~Coupling to the reaction channels induces non-statistical interactions among the CN resonances. These interactions consist of a purely imaginary term due to on-shell coupling to the channels, and a real term called the Thomas-Ehrman shift due to off-shell processes~\cite{Mitchell2010}. In the regime of isolated resonances, these interactions are expected to be negligibly weak. However, the experimental finding of Ref.~\cite{Koehler2010} motivated closer studies of the effect of these interactions on the fluctuations of the partial widths. It was shown numerically~\cite{Celardo2011} and analytically~\cite{Fyodorov2015} that even a relatively weak imaginary term could cause the partial width fluctuations to deviate from the PTD. However, it is unclear if the coupling for isolated resonances is strong enough to cause this effect. In Ref.~\cite{Volya2015}, it was proposed that the Thomas-Ehrman shift could be quite strong near the neutron threshold for the Pt isotopes and cause deviations from the PTD. %Moreover, numerical tests of Ref.~\cite{Volya2015} seemed to show such an effect.
However, Bogomolny subsequently proved that the only effect of an energy-independent real shift is to modify the secular variation of the average partial neutron width with energy~\cite{Bogomolny2017}. %As this variation is always divided out to obtain the fluctuations, such a real shift cannot affect the PTD. Moreover, this secular variation is slow, so the PTD survives when only a few resonances in the center of the spectrum are studied.
The numerical results of Ref.~\cite{Volya2015} were obtained using the entire resonance spectrum without dividing out this secular variation.
%We note that the PTD violation has also been attributed to many-body correlations beyond the statistical model \cite{Volya2011}. An accurate test of such correlations is difficult due to the huge model space of allowed states and thus has not been done.
However, explanations (i) and (ii) have not been studied within a model that describes fully %includes all aspects of
the coupling between the entrance neutron channel and the CN states. Specifically, near threshold, the non-statistical interactions vary significantly with energy, and this variation has been neglected in the above studies. %Moreover, investigating explanation %the effect of the near threshold state proposed in
%(i) requires a realistic description of the entrance neutron channel, which has not previously been done.
Here, we review a recent study~\cite{Fanto2018} of $s$-wave neutron scattering from $^{194}$Pt within a model that combines a realistic description of the entrance neutron channel with the usual GOE description of the internal CN states. %This model naturally includes all physical aspects of the coupling between the neutron channel and the CN. Moreover, it enables the calculation of cross sections within the same framework in which resonance energies and widths are calculated.
This model enables the calculation of cross sections and resonance energies and widths within the same framework. We used a baseline set of the model parameters from the published literature. We then varied these parameters to investigate explanations (i) and (ii) above. Our main conclusion is that the PTD provides an excellent description of the partial neutron width distribution, provided that the secular dependence of the average width on energy is correctly described. Within our parameter range, there can be a near-threshold bound or virtual state of the neutron channel that modifies the usual $\sqrt{E}$ secular variation of the average neutron width. In this case, use of the $\sqrt{E}$ form to analyze the width fluctuations yields apparent PTD violation. We find that this effect is significant only within a limited range of the model parameters.
\section{Resonance-reaction model}\label{sec:model}
We describe the $s$-wave neutron channel on a spatial mesh with spacing $\Delta r$ and $N_n$ radial sites $r_i = i\Delta r$ $(i = 1,...,N_n)$. The neutron channel Hamiltonian matrix is obtained by discretizing the usual radial Schr\"odinger equation
\be\label{eq:H-neutron}
\mathbf{H_n}_{,ij} = [2t + V(r_i)]\delta_{ij} - t \delta_{i,j+1} - t\delta_{i,j-1} \, , \qquad i,j = 1,...,N_n\;,
\ee
where $t = \hbar^2/(2 \mu\Delta r^2)$ ($\mu$ is the reduced mass) and $V(r)$ is the neutron channel potential. The neutron channel potential has a Woods-Saxon form $V(r) = -V_0 [1 + \exp((r-R)/a)]^{-1}$ where $R = r_0 A^{1/3}$ for mass number $A$ of the target nucleus. The model includes $N_c$ internal CN states, taken from the middle third of the spectrum of a GOE matrix. To account for gamma decay of the resonances, we add to each energy a constant imaginary term that corresponds to the total gamma decay width $\Gamma_\gamma$. This gives the CN Hamiltonian matrix
\be\label{eq:H-CN}
\mathbf{H_c}_{,\mu\nu} = \delta_{\mu\nu} \left(\epsilon_\mu - \frac{i}{2}\Gamma_\gamma \right) \, , \qquad \mu,\nu = 1,...,N_c\;,
\ee
%where $\Gamma_\gamma$ is the total gamma width.
The neutron channel is coupled to the internal states at one spatial site $r_{\rm ent} = i_{\rm ent}\Delta r$ by the coupling matrix
\be\label{eq:V}
\mathbf{V}_{i\mu} = \delta_{i, i_{\rm ent}} v_0 s_\mu(\Delta r)^{-1/2}\;.
\ee
In Eq.~(\ref{eq:V}), $v_0$ is a model parameter, $s_\mu$ is a normally distributed random variable accounting for the fluctuations of the GOE internal states, and the explicit $\Delta r$ dependence allows the results to be consistent in the continuum limit $\Delta r \to 0$. The full Hamiltonian matrix $\mathbf{H}$ of dimension $(N_n+N_c)\times(N_n+N_c)$ is obtained by combining Eqs.~(\ref{eq:H-neutron}-\ref{eq:V}).
%\be\label{eq:H}
%\mathbf{H} = \left[ \begin{matrix} \mathbf{H_n} & \mathbf{V} \\ \mathbf{V}^T & \mathbf{H_c}\end{matrix}\right]
%\ee
%To calculate either resonances or cross sections, one combines the radial Schr\"odinger equation with the regularity condition $u(0) = 0$ and the appropriate asymptotic boundary condition. This approach was introduced by G.~F. Bertsch in his computer program Mazama (see, e.g. Ref..~\cite{Bertsch2018}).
%\subsection{Resonance determination}
%To calculate resonances, or $S$-matrix poles, one considers the asymptotic form of the neutron wavefunction at the last mesh point $N_n$ and the point just beyond the edge of the mesh $N_{n+1}$.
For a pole of the $S$-matrix, the wavefunction is asymptotically purely outgoing with a complex wavenumber $ k$, i.e, $u(r) \to B( k) e^{i k r}$ for large $r$. This form implies that, at the edge of the mesh,
\be
u(N_{n+1}) = u(N_n) e^{ik\Delta r}\;.
\ee
The Schr\"odinger equation consequently yields
\be\label{eq:poles}
\left(\mathbf{H} - te^{i k \Delta r} \mathbf{C} - \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2\mu}\right)\vec u = 0\;,
\ee
where ${\bf C}_{i j} = \delta_{i j}\delta_{i N_n}$ and $\vec u$ is an $(N_n+ N_c)$-component vector that represents the wavefunction in the model space. We solve Eq.~(\ref{eq:poles}) iteratively to obtain the complex resonance wavenumbers $k_r$. The resonance energies and total widths are then determined from $E_r - (i/2)\Gamma_r = \hbar^2 k_r^2/2\mu$, and the partial neutron widths are found from $\Gamma_{n,r} = \Gamma_r - \Gamma_\gamma$. All calculations shown here used $(\Delta r, N_n, N_c) = (0.01\text{ fm}, 1500, 360)$. More details can be found in the Supplemental Material of Ref.~\cite{Fanto2018}.
To calculate cross sections, one uses instead the asymptotic boundary condition $u(r) \to e^{-ikr} - S_{nn}(k) e^{ikr}$, where $S_{nn}(k)$ is the elastic neutron scattering amplitude (see Supplemental Material of Ref.~\cite{Fanto2018}). The model discussed here was introduced by G.~F. Bertsch in his computer code Mazama~\cite{Bertsch2018}.
\section{Results}\label{sec:results}
\subsection{Model parameter sets}
The model described above has the following physical parameters: the parameters $(V_0, r_0, a)$ of the Woods-Saxon neutron channel potential, the average resonance spacing $D$ and their total gamma decay width $\Gamma_\gamma$, and the channel-CN coupling parameter $v_0$. For the $n + ^{194}$Pt reaction, we used $(r_0,a) = (1.27,0.67)$ fm from Ref.~\cite{Bohr1969}, and $D = 82$ eV, $\Gamma_\gamma = 72$ meV from the RIPL-3 database~\cite{ripl}. %These parameters were fixed in all our calculations.
%We varied the neutron channel potential depth $V_0$ and the average coupling parameter $v_0$. %The former controls the presence of the near-threshold state crucial to explanation (i) of Sec.~\ref{sec:intro}. The latter sets the strength of the non-statistical interactions and thus allows investigation of explanation (ii) of Sec.~\ref{sec:intro}.
In Table~\ref{table:models}, we list the parameter sets $(V_0, v_0)$ used in our calculations. The baseline set corresponds to $V_0 = -44.54$ MeV taken from Ref.~\cite{Bohr1969} and $v_0$ tuned to reproduce the RIPL-3 neutron strength function parameter $S_0 = 2 \times 10^{-4}$ eV$^{-1/2}$ at 8 keV of neutron energy (which is in the middle of the experimental range of Ref.~\cite{Koehler2010}). In sets M2 and M3, we take $v_0$ to be, respectively, half and twice its value for the baseline set. In sets M4--M6 with $V_0 = -41.15$ MeV, a near-threshold bound state with energy $E_0 \approx -2$ keV exists in the neutron channel. In M4 $v_0$ is tuned to reproduce the RIPL-3 neutron strength function parameter, while M5 and M6 correspond, respectively, to half and twice the value of $v_0$ for the M4 set. %The values of $\chi^2$, $\nu_{\rm fit}$, and $\chi^2_{\rm fit}$ are discussed in more detail below.
%Table \ref{table:models} also includes results from the calculations described in detail below.
\begin{table}[h!]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{| c c c c c c c |}
\hline
Model & Baseline & M2 & M3 & M4 & M5 & M6 \\ \hline
$V_0$ (MeV) & -44.54 & -44.54 & -44.54 & -41.15 & -41.15 & -41.15 \\
$v_0$ (keV-fm$^{1/2}$) & 11.0 & 5.5 & 22.0 & 1.6 & 0.8 & 3.2 \\ \hline
$\overline \sigma_{\rm el}$ (b) & 30. & 19.0 & 23. & 279. & 288. & 249. \\
$\overline \sigma_{\rm cap}$ (b) & 0.44 & 0.32 & 0.50 & 0.47 & 0.39 & 0.53 \\
$\chi^2_r$ A & 0.9 & 1.0 & 1.1 & 0.9 & 1.0 &1.4 \\
$\chi^2_r$ B & 1.0 & 1.0 & 1.3 & 5.8 & 6.0 & 6.1 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{\label{table:models} Various parameter sets used to study the $n + ^{194}$Pt reaction. The average elastic scattering cross section $\overline \sigma_{\rm el}$ was evaluated at $E = 8$ keV, and the average neutron capture cross section $\overline \sigma_{\rm cap}$ was evaluated over the interval 5-7.5 keV. The experimental value for $\overline \sigma_{\rm cap}$ over this interval from Ref.~\cite{Koehler2013} is 0.6 b. $\chi^2_r$ is the reduced $\chi$-squared parameter from comparing the reduced partial neutron width distributions with the PTD. Reductions A and B are discussed in the text. Adapted from Table 1 of Ref.~\cite{Fanto2018}.}
\end{table}
\subsection{Cross sections}
In Fig.~\ref{fig:xs-base}, we show the cross sections for the baseline model, compared with evaluated data from the JEFF-3.2 database \cite{jeff} and experimental data from Ref.~\cite{Koehler2013}. For the model calculations, the cross sections were averaged over 10 realizations of the GOE and over energy bins of 1 keV. The agreement between our model calculations and the available data is reasonably good.
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{xs.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:xs-base} Elastic (top panel) and capture (bottom panel) cross sections. Baseline model calculations (black circles connected by dashed lines) are compared with evaluated data from the JEFF-3.2 library (blue squares connected by dashed-dotted lines). Error bars represent standard deviations from the 10 GOE realizations. The red histogram is experimental data from Ref.~\cite{Koehler2013}. Taken from Fig.~1 of Ref.~\cite{Fanto2018}.}
\end{figure}
In Fig.~\ref{fig:xs-M4}, we compare the average cross sections of the baseline parameter set and of the set M4 (see Table \ref{table:models}). The presence of a near-threshold bound or virtual state in the neutron channel enhances significantly the elastic scattering cross section, but does not affect much the capture cross section. As is seen in Table~\ref{table:models}, the cross sections are not very sensitive to the coupling parameter $v_0$.
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{xs_baseM4_comp_new.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:xs-M4} Elastic (top panel) and capture (bottom panel) cross sections. Baseline model calculations (black solid circles connected by dashed lines) are compared with calculations based on parameter set M4 of Table \ref{table:models} (green open circles connected by dashed-dotted lines). The error bars represent standard deviations using 10 GOE realizations (see text).}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Partial neutron width fluctuations}
For each parameter set in Table~\ref{table:models}, we calculated a set of resonance energies and partial neutron widths from 100 GOE realizations, taking from each realization 160 resonances whose real energies are at the center of the resonance spectrum. This restriction to the center is necessary to avoid edge effects due to the finite number of resonances in the model. In Fig.~\ref{fig:average-width}, we show the average partial neutron width $\langle \Gamma_n \rangle$ as a function of the neutron energy for the baseline and M4 sets. We compare with the $\sqrt{E}$ dependence, as well as with the squared neutron wavefunction at the entrance point $u^2_E(r_{\rm ent})$. This latter quantity is expected to describe the energy dependence of the average width within the statistical theory. In the right-hand panel, we also compare the formula derived by Weidenm\"uller~\cite{Weidenmuller2010}
\be\label{eq:wei}
\langle \Gamma_n \rangle (E) \propto \frac{\sqrt{E}}{E + | E_0 |} \;,
\ee
where $E_0$ is the energy of the near-threshold bound or virtual state. This formula is in excellent agreement with our model calculations using $E_0 \approx -2$ keV. We find similar results to those shown in the left and right panels of Fig.~\ref{fig:average-width} for other parameter sets of Table~\ref{table:models} with $V_0 = -44.54$ MeV and $V_0 = -41.15$ MeV, respectively.
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{gnbar_proceedings.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:average-width} Average neutron widths $\langle \Gamma_n\rangle$ as a function of neutron energy $E$. The black solid histograms are the model calculations, the blue solid lines are proprotional to $\sqrt{E}$, and the red dashed lines are the squared neutron wavefunction $u^2_E(r_{\rm ent})$. The green dashed-dotted line describes Eq.~(\ref{eq:wei}) with $E_0 \approx -2$ keV. See text for further details.}
\end{figure}
The reduced partial neutron width for each resonance $r$ is defined as
\be\label{eq:red-widths}
\hat \Gamma_{n,r} = \Gamma_{n,r}/\langle \Gamma_{n}\rangle(E_r)\;.
\ee
According to the statistical theory, the fluctuations of the normalized reduced width $x = \hat \Gamma_n / \langle \hat \Gamma_n\rangle$ should follow the PTD. We consider the distribution $P(y)$ of $y = \ln x$. The PTD for y is given by
\be
\mathcal{P}_{\rm PTD} (y) = \sqrt{\frac{x}{2\pi}} e^{-x/2} \;.
\ee
We extracted the reduced widths (\ref{eq:red-widths}) in two ways. In reduction A, we used the average widths calculated in the model as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:average-width}, while in reduction B, we used the ansatz $\langle \Gamma_n \rangle (E)\propto \sqrt{E}$. In Fig.~\ref{fig:dists}, we compare the distributions obtained using these two reductions with the PTD for various parameter sets. For the baseline case, excellent agreement is obtained in both reductions A and B. For set M4, in which there is a near-threshold state in the neutron channel, the reduced width distribution obtained with reduction B is broader than the PTD. For a goodness-of-fit test, we calculated the reduced $\chi$-squared value $\chi^2_r$~\cite{chi-squared}, using $\chi^2_r \approx 1$ as the metric for a good fit. The results in Fig.~\ref{fig:dists} are consistent with the $\chi^2_r$ values shown in Table~\ref{table:models}. For set M4, we also show a best-fit $\chi$-squared distribution in $\nu$ degrees of freedom. The PTD corresponds to $\nu = 1$. For set M4 in reduction B, we find $\nu_{\rm fit} = 0.92$, and the fitted distribution differs noticeably from the model results. Similar results were found for different values of the coupling parameter $v_0$. This parameter controls the strength of the non-statistical interactions among the resonances. Thus, within our parameter range, these interactions do not significantly affect the partial neutron width fluctuations.
Eq.~(\ref{eq:wei}) indicates that the deviation between the correct average width energy dependence and the $\sqrt{E}$ form will be largest for $E_0 \approx 0$. In our model, this occurs for $V_0 = -41$ MeV. The bottom panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:dists} shows results from the parameter set $(V_0, v_0) = (-41\text{ MeV}, 1.4\text{ keV-fm$^{1/2}$}$). The reduced width distribution obtained with reduction B is noticeably broader than in set M4.
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{dists_proceedings.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:dists} Reduced partial neutron width distributions calculated from the model (blue histograms) are compared with the PTD (black solid lines) for various parameter sets. The grey dashed lines are fits of a $\chi$-squared distribution in $\nu$ degrees of freedom to the model results. Shown are results for reductions A (left panels) and B (right panels). These reductions are discussed in the text.}
\end{figure}
\section{Conclusions}\label{sec:conclusions}
We have studied the partial neutron width statistics for the $n + ^{194}$Pt reaction within a model that combines a realistic description of the neutron channel with the GOE description of the CN. Our main conclusion is that the PTD describes the reduced width distributions for a reasonably large range of physical model parameters, provided the energy dependence of the average width is correctly described. Thus, explanation (ii) of Sec.~\ref{sec:intro} is ruled out. Within our parameter space, there can be a near-threshold bound or virtual state of the neutron channel that modifies the energy dependence of the average neutron width from the $\sqrt{E}$ dependence used in the experimental data analysis, as proposed by Weidenm\"uller~\cite{Weidenmuller2010}. If the $\sqrt{E}$ dependence is used to extract the reduced widths in such a case, broader distributions than the PTD are obtained.
In order to explain the findings of Ref.~\cite{Koehler2010}, the bound or virtual state must have an energy of only a few keV from threshold in all three platinum isotopes studied. The experimentalists found that using Eq.~(\ref{eq:wei}) in their analysis did not improve the agreement between their data and the PTD~\cite{comment}. However, they note that their data fitting might break down in the presence of such a state. As shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:xs-M4}, the existence of this state enhances significantly the elastic scattering cross section. A measurement of this cross section could thus shed light on the possible existence of a near threshold bound or virtual state.
%could therefore confirm or fully rule out explanation (i) of Sec.~\ref{sec:intro}.
%In conclusion, the experiment of Ref.~\cite{Koehler2010} poses a serious challenge to the statistical model. Nearly every theoretical explanation for it within the statistical model framework has been ruled out. More experimental work investigating breakdowns of the PTD in neutron widths would be useful.
\section*{Acknowledgements}
This work was supported in part by the U.S. DOE grant
Nos.~DE-FG02-00ER411132 and DE-FG02-91ER40608, and by the DOE NNSA Stewardship Science Graduate Fellowship under cooperative agreement No.~DE-NA0003864.
We would like to thank H.~A. Weidenm\"uller for useful discussions. PF and YA acknowledge the hospitality of the Institute for Nuclear Theory at the University of Washington, where part of this work was completed during the program INT-17-1a, ``Toward Predictive Theories of Nuclear Reactions Across the Isotopic Chart.'' This work was supported by the HPC facilities operated by, and the staff of, the Yale Center for Research Computing.
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\bibitem{Weidenmuller2010} H.~A. Weidenm\"uller, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 105}, 232501 (2010).
\bibitem{Mitchell2010} G.~E. Mitchell, A. Richter, and H.~A. Weidenm\"uller, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 82}, 2845 (2010).
\bibitem{Alhassid2000} Y. Alhassid, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 72}, 895 (2000).
\bibitem{Hauser1952} W. Hauser and H. Feshbach, Phys. Rev. {\bf 87}, 366 (1952).
%\bibitem{Bohr1936} N. Bohr, Nature {\bf 137}, 344 (1936).
\bibitem{Kawano2015} T. Kawano, P. Talou, and H.~A. Weidenm\"uller, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 92}, 044617 (2015).
\bibitem{Koning2012} A.~J. Koning and D. Rochman, Nucl. Data Sheets {\bf 113}, 2841 (2012).
%\bibitem{Herman2007} M. Herman {\em et al.}, Nucl. Data Sheets {\bf 108}, 2655 (2007).
\bibitem{Porter1956} C.~E. Porter and R.~G. Thomas, Phys. Rev. {\bf 104}, 483 (1956).
\bibitem{Koehler2010} P.~E. Koehler, F. Be\v{c}v\'a\v{r}, M. Krti\v{c}ka, J.~A. Harvey, and K.~H. Guber, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 105}, 072502 (2010).
\bibitem{Celardo2011} G.~L. Celardo, N.~Auerbach, F.~M. Izrailev, and V.~G. Zelevinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 106}, 042501 (2011).
\bibitem{Fyodorov2015} Y.~V. Fyodorov and D.~V. Savin, Euro. Phys. Lett. {\bf 110}, 40006 (2015).
\bibitem{Volya2015} A. Volya, H.~A. Weidenm\"{u}ller, and V. Zelevinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 115}, 052501 (2015).
\bibitem{Bogomolny2017} E. Bogomolny, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 118}, 022501 (2017).
\bibitem{Fanto2018} P. Fanto, G.~F. Bertsch, and Y. Alhassid, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 98}, 014604 (2018).
\bibitem{Bertsch2018} G.~F. Bertsch, D. Brown, and E.~D. Davis, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 98}, 014611 (2018).
\bibitem{Bohr1969} A.~Bohr and B.~R. Mottelson, {\it Nuclear Structure} Vol.~I (W.~A. Benjamin, New York, 1975).
\bibitem{Taylor1972} J.R. Taylor, {\it Scattering Theory: the Quantum Theory of Nonrelativistic Collisions} (Wiley, New York, 1972).
\bibitem{ripl} R. Capote {\it et.~al.}~, Nucl.~ Data Sheets {\bf 110}, 3107 (2009).
\bibitem{jeff} OECD/NEA Data Bank, ``The JEFF-3.2 Nuclear Data Library" (2014).
%The specific URL link is given in the Supplementary Material.
\bibitem{Koehler2013} P.E.~Koehler and K.H.~Guber, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 88}, 035802 (2013).
\bibitem{chi-squared} P.R. Bevington and D.K. Robinson, {\it Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences} (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003).
\bibitem{comment} P.~E. Koehler, F. Be\v{c}v\'a\v{r}, M. Krti\v{c}ka, J.~A. Harvey, and K.~H. Guber, arXiv:1101.4533 (2011).
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}
\section{Introduction}
Authors must observe the following instructions to ensure consistency
and uniformity in the style and layout of CERN Reports. Wherever
possible, each contribution will go directly to be printed, without
any editing, and should therefore be in its final form.
Although the typesetting rules that are described are of a general
nature, the present document emphasizes their use with
\LaTeX. Templates and more detailed information for \emph{Word} users
are available on the DTP Web site (\emph{Word} Section at the page
\url{http://cern.ch/DTP/dtpcernreport.htm}).
Note that it is the author's responsibility to obtain permission from
the copyright holder if material taken from other sources is included
in the source submitted as a CERN Report.
\section{Generalities on typing}
When submitting your electronic source in \LaTeX{}, you must use the
\texttt{cernrep} class file, which is available from the DTP Web site
(\url{http://cern.ch/DTP}). Moreover, specific instructions for preparing
your \LaTeX{} contribution are given in the appendices.
\subsection{Format for the text}
Take care that your material stays inside the text frame which is
16~cm $\times$ 24~cm (\ie a A4 sized paper has 3.0~cm margins at the
top and at the bottom, and 2.5~cm left and right). This is expecially
true for figures and tabular content.
\section{Parts of the text}
\subsection{Abstract}
xxx.
\subsection{Sectioning commands and paragraphs}
\label{sec:sections}
The standard \LaTeX{} commands \Lcs{section} (level 1),
\Lcs{subsection} (level 2), \Lcs{subsubsection} (level 3),
\Lcs{subsubsubsection} (level 4), should be used for headings. Do not
start a new section on a new page, but continue on the same page.
In the text, leave a blank line after each paragraph.
\subsection{Equations}
\label{sec:equations}
Equations should be treated as part of the text, and therefore
punctuated (with a space between the end of the equation and the
punctuation mark). Equations are numbered consecutively throughout
the report.
An unnumbered single formula is delimited by \Lcs{[} and \Lcs{]}
(alternatively a \Lenv{displaymath} environment can be used), while a
numbered equation is generated with the \Lenv{equation} environment.
You should \textbf{never} use the \texttt{\$\$} construct. The CERN
\LaTeX{} classes automatically load the \texttt{amsmath} class, which
offers a large choice of constructs for typesetting
mathematics~\cite{bib:voss2005}. See also Appendix~\ref{app:amsmath}
for some hints about using the \texttt{amsmath} extensions in an
optimal way.
For cross-referencing equations use the \LaTeX{} commands \Lcs{label}
and \Lcs{ref}, as explained in \Sref{sec:crossref}.
A simple example, with a cross-reference to a formula, follows.
\begin{verbatim}
\section{Section title}
\label{sec:mysection}
Einstein has expressed the relation between energy $E$
and mass $m$ in his famous equation~(\ref{eq:einstein}):
\begin{equation}
E=mc^2 \label{eq:einstein}
\end{equation}
\end{verbatim}
\subsection{Figures}
\label{sec:figures}
\subsubsection{How to supply figures}
Where possible, figures should be prepared electronically. Make sure
that the image is of high quality when printed (in black and white)
and is of high enough resolution (min. 300 dots per inch). We accept
PICT, TIFF, PNG,and JPEG files. Encapsulated PostScript (EPS) files
are preferred, but in any case, send us your illustrations in their
\emph{original} format (PNG, JPEG, \etc), there is no need for you to
reprocess them yourself.
If you cannot provide electronic copies, or if we consider that your
files do not print out well, you should provide a good-quality paper
original. In this case we will arrange for it to be scanned at CERN
and included in the report.
Do not use free-hand lettering for the labelling of figures. All lines
should be drawn in red or black ink and be heavy enough (min. 0.75
point) and all figures, decimal points, symbols, \etc, large enough
and sufficiently spaced to ensure clarity when printed \emph{at the
final size}. If using colour, please ensure that the figure prints
clearly in greyscale and adapt your text knowing that the difference
between coloured items when reproduced in grey is not obvious.
As already mentioned, before using material such as illustrations
taken from other sources, do not forget to obtain permission from the
copyright holder.
\subsubsection{Positioning and layout}
All figures must remain within the page area (\Unit{16}{cm} $\times$
\Unit{24}{cm}), where, if necessary, the page may be turned 90$^\circ$
to accommodate the figure. When this is done, the caption must be
oriented in the same way as the figure, and no other text may appear
on that page. The bottom of the turned illustrations should be at the
right-hand side of the page.
\subsubsection{Including your figure}
Figures are included with the \Lenv{figure} environment. In the
example that follows we include an EPS graphics file
(\texttt{myfig.eps}, where the extension \texttt{.eps} does not need
to be specified since it is the default) with the
\Lcs{includegraphics} command, which is defined in the
\texttt{graphicx} package that is loaded by default by the CERN
\LaTeX{} classes.
The figure caption (specified as argument of the \Lcs{caption}
command), must \emph{follow} the figure body, and should be brief. No
full stop is necessary unless the caption is more that one sentence
long, in which case full punctuation should be used.
\subsubsubsection{Example}
An example with a cross-reference to a figure follows. The reference
is defined by the \Lcs{label} command \emph{following} the
\Lcs{caption} command. A cross-reference is generated with the
\Lcs{ref} command on the second line. Note the cross-reference key
(\texttt{fig:myfig}) which clearly indicates that it refers to a
figure (see \Sref{sec:crossref} for a discussion of the importance of
using good keys).
\begin{verbatim}
\section{Section title}
In Fig.~\ref{fig:myfig} we see that ...
\begin{figure}
\centering\includegraphics[width=.9\linewidth]{myfig}
\caption{Description of my figure}
\label{fig:myfig}
\end{figure}
\end{verbatim}
\subsubsection{References to figures}
\LaTeX's cross-reference mechanism can be used to refer to figures. A
figure is defined with the \Lcs{label} command, which must
\emph{follow} the \Lcs{caption} command.
Figures must be referenced in the text in consecutive numerical order
with the help of the \Lcs{ref} command. Examples of references to
figures and how to produce them follow (see also \Tref{tab:predef}).
\begin{itemize}
\item `Fig. 3' produced by, \eg \verb!\Fref{fig:myfig}!,
\item `Figs. 3--5' produced by, \eg
\verb!\Figures~\ref{fig:myfiga}--\ref{fig:myfigb}!,
\item `Figure 3', produced by, \eg \verb!\Figure[b]~\ref{fig:myfig}!.
Note the use of the optional argument \texttt{[b]}, which
indicates that the word `Figure' should be typeset in full,
in particular at the beginning of a sentence.
\end{itemize}
Figures with several parts are cited as follows: `Fig. 2(a) and (b),
Figs. 3(a)--(c)'.
Figures and illustrations \emph{should follow} the paragraph in which
they are first discussed. If this is not feasible, they may be placed
on the following page (\LaTeX{}'s float mechanism takes care of this
automatically, in principle). If it is not possible to place
\emph{all} numbered figures in the text, then they should \emph{all}
be placed at the end of the paper.
\subsection{Tables}
Tables are defined the the \texttt{table} environment. Each table
should be centred on the page width, with a brief caption (specified
as argument of the \Lcs{caption} command) \emph{preceding} the table
body.
In general, tables should be open, drawn with a double thin horizontal
line (0.4~pt) at the top and bottom, and single horizontal line
(0.4~pt) separating column headings from data.
Like figures, tables must be referenced in the text in consecutive
numerical order with \LaTeX's \Lcs{ref} command. Examples of
cross-references to tables follow (commands that can be used to
generate the given text strings are shown between parentheses): `Table
5' (\eg \verb!\Tref{tab:mytab}! or \verb!\Table~\ref{tab:mytab}!),
`Tables 2--3' (\eg
\verb!\Tables~\ref{tab:mytaba}--\ref{tab:mytabb}!). The word `Table'
should never be abbreviated.
\subsubsection{Formatting and layout within the table}
Write the headings in sentence case but do not use full stops. Units
should be entered in parentheses on a separate line below the column
heading. (If the same unit is used throughout the table, it should be
written in parentheses on a separate line below the caption.)
Unsimilar items should be aligned on the left, whereas similar items
should be aligned on the operator or decimal point. All decimal points
must be preceded by a digit.
\subsubsubsection{Table captions}
Table captions should be brief and placed centrally \emph{above} the
table. No full stop is necessary unless the caption is more that one
sentence long, in which case full punctuation should be used.
\subsubsubsection{Notes in the table}
Notes in tables should be designated by superscript lower-case
letters, and begun anew for each table. The superscript letter should
be placed in alphabetical order moving from left to right across the
first row and down to the last. The notes should then be listed
directly under the table.
References cited in tables should appear in consecutive numerical
order, following the order explained above for notes (left to right,
top to bottom). They should appear exactly as references cited in the
main body of the document (and be treated as part of the text in terms
of numbering, so be careful when moving tables containing references).
\subsubsubsection{Example}
An instance of a simple table, following the proposed rules follows.
Notice the \Lcs{hline} commands at the beginning and end of the
\texttt{tabular} environment to generate the double lines at the top
and the bottom of the table, as well as the single \Lcs{hline} command
to separate the heading from the data.
\begin{verbatim}
\section{Section title}
Table~\ref{tab:famous} shows three famous mathematical constants.
\begin{table}
\caption{Famous constants}
\label{tab:famous}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{lll}\hline\hline
symbol & description & approximate value\\\hline
$e$ & base of natural logarithm & $2.7182818285$ \\
$\pi$ & ratio circle circumference to diameter &
$3.1415926536$ \\
$\phi$ & golden ratio & $1.6180339887$ \\\hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\end{verbatim}
\subsection{Bibliographical references}
\label{sec:biblioref}
References should be cited in the text using numbers within square
brackets: `example~[1], example~[1, 2], example~[1--5]'. This is
achieved with the \Lcs{cite} command. One can also write `see
Ref.~[1]', `Refs.~[1]--[5]', and, at the beginning of a sentence,
`Reference~[2]'. These strings can be produced as follows (see also
\Tref{tab:predef}).
\begin{itemize}
\item \verb!\Bref{bib:mybiba}! or \verb!\Ref~\cite{bib:mybiba}!
typeset, \eg `Ref.~[1]'.
\item \verb!\Refs~\cite{bib:mybiba}--\cite{tab:mybibb}!,
typesets, \eg `Refs~[1--5].
\item \verb!\Bref[b]~\ref{bib:mybibc}! typesets, \eg `Reference~[3]'.
The optional argument \texttt{[b]} indicates that the word
`Reference' should be typeset in full, in particular at the
beginning of a sentence.
\end{itemize}
Bibliographical references should appear in consecutive numerical
order and should be listed in numerical order at the end of the
text. Punctuation can be used either within or outside the brackets,
but please ensure one method is used consistently throughout the
contribution.
\subsubsection{List of references}
The list of references (the \Lcs{bibitem} entries) must all be grouped
inside a \Lenv{thebibliography} environment, as follows.
\begin{verbatim}
\section{Section title}
Work by Einstein~\cite{bib:einstein} as well as \Bref{bib:gravitation}
explains the theory of relativity.
...
\begin{thebibliography}
\bibitem{bib:einstein}} ...
\bibitem{bib:gravitation} ...
...
\end{thebibliography}
\end{verbatim}
As shown, each \Lcs{bibitem} is identified with a reference key
(\texttt{bib:einstein}, \texttt{bib:gravitation}, \etc), which allows
one to refer to the relevant bibliography entry with a
\verb|\cite{bib:einstein}| command in the text. The information about
each entry can be specified in a separate file, \eg
\texttt{mybib.bbl}, which can be read by the \BibTeX{} program for
generating the list of references (see a \LaTeX{} manual or Chapter~12
of Ref.~\cite{bib:mittelbach2004} for details).
Unless you are near the bottom of the last page of text, do \emph{not}
start a new page for the list of references, but continue on the same
page. Note that in the list of references it is unnecessary to state
the title of an article or chapter in proceedings or in a collection
of papers unless a page number cannot be quoted, \eg for forthcoming
publications.
For abbreviations of names of journals quoted in the references, see
the \emph{Journal abbreviations} entry available from the Web page at
the URL \url{http://cern.ch/DTP/dtpgrammar.htm}\footnote{% The Reviews
of Modern Physics site: \url{http://rmp.aps.org/info/manprep.html}
also has a list.}. The entry \emph{Citation of references} on the same
Web page shows more details on how to present references.
If you need to provide a bibliography, this should come after the list
of references.
\subsection{Footnotes}
Footnotes are to be avoided. If absolutely necessary, they should be
brief, and placed at the bottom of the page on which they are referred
to. Take care when citing references in the footnotes to ensure that
these are correctly numbered.
\subsection{Referencing structural elements}
\label{sec:crossref}
In this section we give a general overview of \LaTeX's reference
mechanism which makes it easy to reference structural elements. First
a \Lcs{label} command, with a unique \emph{key} as its argument to
identify the structural element in question, must be placed in the
source, as follows.
\begin{itemize}
\item For sectioning commands, such as \Lcs{section},
\Lcs{subsection}, \Lcs{subsubsection}, the \Lcs{label} command
must \emph{follow} it.
\item Inside \texttt{figure} and \texttt{table} environments, the
\Lcs{label} command must be placed \emph{after} the \Lcs{caption}
command.
\item Inside an \texttt{equation} environment the \Lcs{label} command
can be placed anywhere.
\item Inside an \texttt{eqnarray} environment, the \Lcs{label} command
can be used to identify each line, so that it must be placed
\emph{before} each end-of-line \Lcs{\bs}. If for a given line no
line-number has to be produced, a \Lcs{nonumber} command should
be used.
\item Inside an \texttt{enumerate} environment a \Lcs{label} command
can be associated with each \Lcs{item} command.
\item Inside a \texttt{footnote} a \Lcs{label} command can be placed
anywhere.
\end{itemize}
As seen in all the examples in this document, for reasons of clarity
it is best to place the \Lcs{label} command immediately
\emph{following} the element if refers to (rather than inserting it
inside its contents).
From any place in the document one can refer to a structural element
identified with a \Lcs{label} command with the help of a \Lcs{ref}
command. An example follows.
\begin{verbatim}
\section{My first section}\label{sec:first}
Figure~\ref{fig:fdesc} in Section~\ref{sec:second} shows \dots
\begin{table}
\caption{table caption text}\label{tab:tdesc}
...
\end{table}
\begin{equation}
\exp{i\pi}+1=0\label{eq:euler}
\end{equation}
\section{My second section}\label{sec:second}
In Section~\ref{sec:first} contains Table~\ref{tab:tdesc} and
Eq.~\ref{eq:euler}
\begin{figure}
\centering\includegraphics[...]{...}
caption{Text of figure caption}
\label{fig:fdesc}
\end{figure}
\end{verbatim}
To easily differentiate between references to the various structural
elements it is good practice to start the key with a few characters
identifying it (\eg \texttt{sec:} for a sectioning command, such as
\Lcs{section}, \Lcs{subsection}, \etc, \texttt{fig:} for figures,
\texttt{tab:} for tables, and \texttt{eq:} for equations, including
\texttt{eqnarray} environments (which should have a \Lcs{label}
command placed before the \Lcs{\bs} if you want to identify the line
in question). The second part of the key should identify the
particular element clearly, \eg use of a mnemonic component, such as
\texttt{eq:euler} in the example of the equation reference
above. Avoid using keys with only digits, such as \texttt{f1},
\texttt{f2}, \etc, since, if for any reason structural elements are
eliminated or change position in the source, confusion can result.
\subsection{Appendices}
Each appendix should be laid out as the sections in the text.
Appendices should be labelled alphabetically and be referred to as
Appendix A, Appendices A--C, \etc Equations, figures and tables should
be quoted as Eq. (A.1) and Fig. A.1, \etc
\subsection{Acknowledgements}
If required, acknowledgements should appear as an unnumbered
subsection immediately before the references section.
\section{Spelling and grammar}
For more information on English grammar rules and commonly misused
words and expressions (including a guide to avoiding `franglais'),
please see the files available from the DTP Web pages.
\subsection{Spelling}
CERN uses British English spelling, and `-ize' rather that
`-ise'. Here we provide a few examples for guidance:
\begin{flushleft}
\begin{tabularx}{\linewidth}{@{}lX}
-il: & fulfil (not fulfill) \\
-re: & centre (not center) \\
-our: & colour (not color) \\
-gue: & catalogue (not catalog, but analog is used in electronics) \\
-mme: & programme (not program, unless referring to a computer
program) \\
-ell-: & labelled (not labeled) \\
-ce/-se: & licence (noun), license (verb), practice (noun), practise (verb) \\
-ize: & organization, authorize. \\
& Exceptions to this rule include advise, comprise, compromise,
concise, demise, devise, enterprise, exercise, improvise,
incise, precise, revise, supervise, surmise, surprise, televise.\\
\end{tabularx}
\end{flushleft}
\subsection{Punctuation}
\subsubsection{Hyphen}
Hyphens are used to avoid ambiguity, \ie in attributive compound
adjectives (compare `a little used car' and `a little-used car'), to
distinguish between words such as `reform' (change for the better) and
`re-form' (form again), and to separate double letters to aid
comprehension and pronunciation (\eg co-operate).
Hyphens are also used if a prefix or suffix is added to a proper noun,
symbol, or numeral, and in fractions: \eg non-Fermi, 12-fold,
three-quarters.
\subsubsection{En dash}
En dashes are used to mean `and' (\eg space--time, Sourian--Lagrange)
or `to' (\eg 2003--2004, input--output ratio).
\subsubsection{Em dash}
An em dash is used as a parenthetical pause. Simply type with no space
on either side (\emph{Word} will automatically insert a thin space),
\eg `the experiment\,---\,due to begin in 2007\,---\,represents a
major advance...'. In \LaTeX{} you can use \texttt{{-}{-}} and
\texttt{{-}{-}{-}} for entering an en dash, and an em dash,
respectively.
\subsubsection{Quotation marks}
Double for true quotations, single for anything else. Single within
double for a quotation within a quotation. Our preferred method of
punctuation around quotation marks is to place punctuation marks
outside the quotation marks, to avoid any ambiguity: Oxford has been
called a `Home of lost causes'.
\subsubsection{Apostrophe}
Do not use in plural acronyms (\eg JFETs), decades (1990s). Do use
in plural Greek letters and symbols (\eg $\pi$'s).
\subsubsection{Colon, semi-colon, exclamation mark, question mark}
Please note that in English these punctuation marks do not require a
space before them.
\subsection{Lists}
In a series of three or more terms, use a comma (sometimes called the
serial comma) before the final `and' or `or' (\eg gold, silver, or
copper coating). In a run-on list, do not introduce a punctuation mark
between the main verb and the rest of the sentence. Avoid the use of
bullet points.
For a displayed list there are two options:
\begin{itemize}
\item[i)] finish the introductory sentence with a colon, start the
first item of the list with a lower-case letter, finish it
with a semi-colon, and do the same for all items until the
last, where a full stop is placed at the end of the text
(as here);
\item[ii)] finish the introductory sentence with a full stop, start
the first item with a capital letter and finish it with a
full stop, and the same for the remaining items.
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Capitalization}
Capitalize adjectives and nouns formed from proper names,
\eg Gaussian. Exceptions to this rule include units of measure
(amperes), particles (fermion), elements (einsteinium), and minerals
(fosterite) derived from names. Capitalize only the name in
Avogadro's number, Debye temperature, Ohm's law, Bohr radius.
Never capitalize lower-case symbols or abbreviations. When referring
to article, paper, or report, column, sample, counter, curve, or type,
do not capitalize.
Do capitalize Theorem I, Lemma 2, Corollary 3, \etc
\subsubsection{Acronyms}
In the first instance, spell out the acronym using capital letters for
each letter used in the acronym, and provide the acronym in
parentheses, \eg Quark--Gluon Plasma (QGP).
\subsection{Numbers}
Spell out numbers 1 to 9 unless they are followed by a unit or are
part of a series containing the number 10 or higher (as here); numbers
are always in roman type. Numbers should always be written out at the
beginning of a sentence.
\subsection{Symbols}
Names of particles, chemicals, waves or states, covariant couplings
and monopoles, and mathematical abbreviations are written in roman
type.
Symbols of variables (\ie anything that can be replaced by a number)
should be typed in \emph{italics}.
Take care that this is consistent throughout the contribution.
\subsection{Units}
Symbols for units are printed in roman type. Symbols for units derived
from proper names are written with capital letters (\eg coulomb, 6~C).
Write the unit out in full in cases such as `a few centimetres'. When
using symbols insert a \emph{non-breaking space} between the number
and the unit, unless it is $\%$ or superscript, \eg \verb!10~cm!,
\verb!100~GeV!, \verb!15~nb!, but \verb!20\%!, \verb!27$^\circ$C!. To
help you typeset units correctly, \Tref{tab:predef} shows a set of
predefined commands that are defined in the CERN \LaTeX{} class files.
For instance, the examples above could have been entered
\verb!\Unit{10}{cm}!, \verb!100\UGeV!, \etc, where these commands work
both in text or math mode. These \verb!\U...! commands typeset a
non-breaking space preceding the unit. Each of these commands have a
partner ending in `\texttt{Z}', which omits this space, \eg
\verb!100~\UGeVZ!. These variants can be useful when combining several
units.
Please see the file on symbols and units, available from the DTP Web
pages, for a list of abbreviations for the most commonly used
units\footnote{NIST also has a useful summary on the subject, see
\url{http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/.}}.
\newpage
\appendix
\section{The \texttt{cernrep} class file}
The Web page at the URL \url{http://cern.ch/DTP/dtpcernreport.htm}
contains a class file (\texttt{cernrep.cls}) that authors should
download to prepare their contribution. There is also an example file
(\texttt{cernrepexa.tex}), which can be used as a model. The \LaTeX{}
source of the present document (\texttt{cernrep.tex}), as well as its
typeset result (\texttt{cernrep.pdf}) are available as well.
\subsection{Predefined commands}
The CERN \LaTeX{} class files have predefined commands for
often-occurring abbreviations of markup entities. \Tref{tab:predef}
gives a list. The unit commands provide the non-breaking space between
the value and the unit's name.
\begin{table}[h]
\caption{Examples of predefined commands in the CERN \LaTeX{} classes}
\label{tab:predef}
\centering\small
\begin{tabular}{@{}>{\ttfamily}ll@{}}
\hline\hline
\textrm{\emph{Commands available in text mode}} &
\emph{Result as printed}\\\hline
\verb|text \eg more text| & text \eg more text \\
text \Lcs{etc}, more text & text \etc, more text \\
text \Lcs{ie} more text & text \ie more text \\\hline
\textrm{\emph{Commands for cross-referencing (text mode)}}
& \emph{Result as printed}\\\hline
\verb|\Eq[b]~(\ref{eq:einstein}) and \Eref{eq:euler}| &
Equation~(1) and Eq.~(2) \\
\verb|\Figure[b]~\ref{fig:cern} and \Fref{fig:fermi}| &
Figure~3 and Fig.~4 \\
\verb|\Bref[b]{bib:top} and \Refs~\cite{bib:ref1,bib:ref2}| &
Reference~[3] and Refs~[6--7] \\
\verb|\Sref{sec:intro} and \Sections~\ref{sec:sun}--\ref{sec:moon}| &
Section 1 and Sections 3.4--3.6\\
\verb|\Tref{tab:sym} and \Tables~\ref{tab:top}--\ref{tab:charm}| &
Table 4 and Tables 5--6 \\\hline
\textrm{\emph{Commands available in math and text mode}}
& \emph{Result as printed}\\\hline
\multicolumn{2}{@{}l}{\emph{Units}}\\
\verb!\Unit{3}{Tm} and $\Unit{3}{Tm}$! & \Unit{3}{Tm} and $\Unit{3}{Tm}$ \\
\verb!\Unit{1}{PeV} and $\Unit{1}{PeV}$!
& \Unit{1}{PeV} and $\Unit{1}{PeV}$\\
\verb|3\UeV{} and $3\UeV$| & 3\UeV{} and $3\UeV$ \\
\verb|3\UkeV{} and $3\UkeV$| & 3\UkeV{} and $3\UkeV$ \\
\verb|3\UMeV{} and $3\UMeV$| & 3\UMeV{} and $3\UMeV$ \\
\verb|3\UGeV{} and $3\UGeV$| & 3\UGeV{} and $3\UGeV$ \\
\verb|3\UTeV{} and $3\UTeV$| & 3\UTeV{} and $3\UTeV$ \\
\verb|3\UPeV{} and $3\UPeV$| & 3\UPeV{} and $3\UPeV$ \\
\verb|3\UGeVcc{} and $3\UGeVcc$| & 3\UGeVcc{} and $3\UGeVcc$ \\
\hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\subsection{Obtaining the class file and making your contribution available}
The \texttt{cernrep} class file loads a number of external packages,
as well as some CERN-specific extensions. You need a recent \LaTeX{}
setup (such as \TeX{}live 2004, see the TUG Web site
\url{http://www.tug.org} for details) to fully exploit its
possibilities.
In the CERN Linux environment these CERN-specific classes become
available if you include the latest \texttt{texlive} in your
\texttt{PATH} (see
\url{http://xml.cern.ch/textproc/texliveunixcern.html}). For the
convenience of off-site users a {\small ZIP} file \texttt{cernrep.zip}
contains a set of files to supplement their (recent) setup.
Please contact the editors to determine the best way to submit your
contribution. Please submit the \LaTeX{} file and separate files for
each of the figures and the bibliography if using \verb|bibtex| to
generate the list of references. Figures or photographs that are not
available in electronic form should be sent to the editors by post.
\newpage
\section{Things to do and not do when preparing your \LaTeX{}
contribution}
\label{app:donotdo}
Authors accumulate over time a certain experience and habits for
preparing their scientific documents electronically using their
preferred text editor and document processing system. When submitting
a \LaTeX{} source file to an editor for publication, it is very
important that the source of the contribution be readable and
understandable to the various people who have to intervene in the
production process.
\subsection{Make your source easy to read and maintain}
In order to make life easier for yourself as well as for the
professionals who will have to deal with your source file, we invite
authors to take into account the following general suggestions.
\begin{itemize}
\item Use, as far as possible, only basic \LaTeX{} commands, including
those of the packages that are loaded by the
\texttt{cernrep.cls}. In particular, for graphics inclusion, use the
\Lcs{includegraphics} command rather than its deprecated precursors
(\Lcs{epsffile}, \Lcs{epsfig}, \etc). For math expressions, see
\Sref{app:amsmath}.
\item Do not use \TeX{} commands, but their \LaTeX{} equivalents. In
particular, \Lcs{def} should never be used to (re)define commands,
since there exists \Lcs{newcommand}, or \Lcs{providecommand}, which
will issue an error message if the command name is already in use.
Basic \LaTeX{} commands or environment should \textbf{never} be
redefined.
\item Do not use \texttt{\$\$} for delimiting a display math formula,
but use the \LaTeX{} construct \Lcs{[} \dots \Lcs{]}, instead. More
generally, numbered equations can be produced with the
\texttt{equation} environment, with \texttt{equation*} its
unnumbered variant.
\item Do not use one-letter (or even two-letter) lower-case commands as
command definitions, since \TeX{}, \LaTeX{}, or some extension
packages define these already. Indeed, many hours have been lost, to
understand that the redefinition of, for instance, \Lcs{r} on one of
the several thousands of lines of a \LaTeX{} source of an author
upset the typesetting several pages downstream. In general, it is
good practice to define new commands starting with an upper-case
letter and giving it a name with a mnemonic meaning, \ie one which
is three or more characters long.
\item Do not replace \LaTeX{} environments by commands, \eg \Lcs{be},
\Lcs{ee}, and \Lcs{bee} and \Lcs{eee} for delimiting the
\Lenv{equation} and \Lenv{eqnarray} environments, \Lcs{bi},
\Lcs{ei}, to delimit the \Lenv{itemize} environment, \etc Saving a
few keystrokes can be no excuse for obfuscating the source
unnecessarily, thus making it more difficult to understand and
maintain. Authors spend, in general, many weeks, preparing an
article or a report. Hence it is certainly worth while to use, as far
as possible, standard \LaTeX{} commands, and to define new ones only
to make the source \emph{easier} to read and re-use.
\item Do not use \TeX's state changing font commands \verb!{\rm ...}!,
\verb!{\it ...}!, \verb!{\bf ...}!, \etc, but use the \LaTeX{}
equivalents: in text mode \verb!\textrm{...}!, \verb!\emph{...}!,
\verb!\textbf{...}!, and inside math mode, \verb!\mathrm{...}!,
\verb!\mathit{...}!, \verb!\mathbf{...}!, \etc
\item Do not reference equations, sectioning commands, figures, or
tables by explicit, hard-coded numbers in your source, but use
\LaTeX's cross-reference mechanism, using a mnemonic key to identify
each structural element clearly (see \Sref{sec:crossref}).
\item Do not redefine \LaTeX's basic counters, such as
\texttt{equation}, \texttt{section}, \etc Numbering of such
elements is defined by the \texttt{cernrep} class file and should
not be modified by the authors, who should use only \LaTeX{}'s
cross-reference mechanism to refer to equations, figures, tables,
\etc (see \Sref{sec:crossref}).
\end{itemize}
\subsection{The \texttt{amsmath} extensions}
\label{app:amsmath}
Recent developments around \LaTeX{}, often sponsored and driven by
scientific publishers, have ensured that structural elements and math
constructs in particular are easily delimited and their sense made
clear. The American Mathematical Society have done a great job with
their \texttt{amsmath} extension, which is loaded by default in the
\texttt{cernrep.cls} class. Therefore, we would like our authors to
use the conventions and \LaTeX{} constructs of that package, rather
than the pure \TeX{} primitives. This is all the more important as we
want to take full advantage of the possibilities of hypertext and the
Web, where \TeX{} primitives, because they are not clearly delimited,
are much more difficult to handle (see previous paragraph).
Below we give a few often-occurring mathematics constructs, first in
their \TeX{} form (to be avoided), their \LaTeX{} equivalent (to be
preferred), and the typeset result.
\begin{itemize}
\item \Lcs{over} to be replaced by \Lcs{frac}.
\begin{description}
\item[\TeX{}] \verb!${Z^\nu_{i}\over 2 \Lambda_{\rm ext}}$!
\item[\LaTeX] \verb!$\frac{Z^\nu_{i}}{2 \Lambda_{\text{ext}}}$!
\item[Result] $\displaystyle\frac{Z^\nu_{i}}{2 \Lambda_{\text{ext}}}$
\end{description}
\item \Lcs{choose} to be replaced by \Lcs{binom}.
\begin{description}
\item[\TeX{}] \verb!${m + k \ choose k}$!
\item[\LaTeX] \verb!$\binom{m + k}{k}$!
\item[Result] $\binom{m + k}{k}$
\end{description}
\item \Lcs{matrix} family to be replaced by corresponding environments.
\begin{description}
\item[\TeX{}] \verb!$\matrix{a & b \cr c & d\cr}$!
\item[\LaTeX] \verb!$\begin{matrix}a & b\\c & d\end{matrix}$!
\item[Result] $\begin{matrix}a & b\\c & d\end{matrix}$
\item[\TeX{}] \verb!$\pmatrix{a & b \cr c & d\cr}$!
\item[\LaTeX] \verb!$\begin{pmatrix}a & b\\c & d\end{pmatrix}$!
\item[Result] $\begin{pmatrix}a & b\\c & d\end{pmatrix}$
\item[\TeX{}] \verb!$\bmatrix{a & b \cr c & d\cr}$!
\item[\LaTeX] \verb!$\begin{bmatrix}a & b\\c & d\end{bmatrix}$!
\item[Result] $\begin{bmatrix}a & b\\c & d\end{bmatrix}$
\end{description}
\item Cases construct: use the \texttt{cases} environment.
\begin{description}
\item[\LaTeX{} without \texttt{amsmath}]
\begin{minipage}[t]{.7\linewidth}
\begin{verbatim}
$$
{\rm curvature~} R = {6K\over a^2(t)} \quad
\left\{\begin{array}{ll}
K=-1\quad&{\rm open}\\
K=0 &{\rm flat}\\
K=+1 &{\rm closed}
\end{array}\right.
$$
\end{verbatim}
\end{minipage}
\item[\LaTeX{} with \texttt{amsmath}]
\begin{minipage}[t]{.7\linewidth}
\begin{verbatim}
\[
\text{curvature } R = \frac{6K}{a^2(t)} \quad
\begin{cases}
K=-1\quad&\text{open}\\
K=0 &\text{flat}\\
K=+1 &\text{closed}
\end{cases}
\]
\end{verbatim}
\end{minipage}
\item[Result]
\begin{minipage}[t]{.7\linewidth}
\[
\text{curvature } R = \frac{6K}{a^2(t)} \quad
\begin{cases}
K=-1\quad&\text{open}\\
K=0 &\text{flat}\\
K=+1 &\text{closed}
\end{cases}
\]
\end{minipage}
\end{description}
\item \texttt{amsmath} offers symbols for multiple integrals.
\begin{description}
\item[\TeX{}] \verb/$\int\!\!\int\!\!\int {\rm div}~\vec{\rm E}\,{\rm d}V/\\
\verb/ = \int\!\!\int\vec{\rm E}\,{\rm d}\vec{\rm S}$/
\item[\LaTeX{}] \verb/$\iiint \text{div}~\vec{\mathrm{E}}\,\mathrm{d}V/\\
\verb/ = \iint\vec{\mathrm{E}}\,\mathrm{d}\vec{\mathrm{S}}$/
\item[Result] $\iiint \text{div}~\vec{\mathrm{E}}\,\mathrm{d}V
= \iint\vec{\mathrm{E}}\,\mathrm{d}\vec{\mathrm{S}}$
\end{description}
\end{itemize}
The \texttt{cernrep} class loads, amongst others, the \texttt{amsmath}
and the \texttt{amssymb} packages. The latter package defines many
supplementary commands and symbols that with \TeX{} would have to be
constructed from more basic components. See \Refs~\cite{bib:voss2005}
and \cite{bib:pakin2003}, or Chapter~8 of~\Bref{bib:mittelbach2004}
for more details.
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\bibitem{bib:voss2005} Herbert Vo{\ss},
\emph{Math mode}, available at the URL
\url{http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/info/math/voss/mathmode/Mathmode.pdf}.
\bibitem{bib:mittelbach2004} Frank Mittelbach and Michel Goossens,
\emph{The \LaTeX{} Companion}, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, Boston,
2004).
\bibitem{bib:pakin2003} Scatt Pakin,
\emph{The Comprehensive \LaTeX{} Symbol List}, available at the URL
\url{http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/info/symbols/comprehensive/symbols-a4.pdf}.
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}