Crossover from interaction to driven regimes in quantum vortex reconnections
Extracted source text · arXiv 1812.00473
\documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,superscriptaddress,showpacs,nofootinbib]{revtex4-1}
\bibliographystyle{apsrev4-1}
\usepackage{graphicx,lipsum}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,color}
\usepackage{pgfplots}
\usepackage[export]{adjustbox}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{bm}
\usepackage{pifont}
\newcommand{\boldr}{{\bf{r}}}
\newcommand{\bolds}{{\bf{s}}}
\newcommand{\boldR}{{\bf{R}}}
\newcommand{\boldv}{{\bf{v}}}
\newcommand\bom{\boldsymbol{\omega}}
\newcommand\bos{\bm{\sigma}}
\definecolor{cyan1}{RGB}{51 153 255}
\definecolor{magenta1}{RGB}{255 0 102}
\definecolor{dark_blue2}{RGB}{0 0 153}
\definecolor{black1}{RGB}{0 0 0}
\definecolor{violet1}{RGB}{153 0 204}
\definecolor{orange1}{RGB}{255 51 0}
\definecolor{dark_red}{RGB}{204 0 0}
\definecolor{dark_green2}{RGB}{0 102 0}
\definecolor{light_yellow}{RGB}{255 255 204}
\definecolor{brown1}{RGB}{102 51 0}
\definecolor{dark_yellow}{RGB}{204 102 0}
\def\red#1{\textcolor{red}{#1}}
\def\blue#1{\textcolor{blue}{#1}}
\def\orange#1{\textcolor{orange1}{#1}}
\def\cyan#1{\textcolor{cyan1}{#1}}
\def\magenta#1{\textcolor{magenta1}{#1}}
\def\dblue#1{\textcolor{dark_blue2}{#1}}
\def\black#1{\textcolor{black1}{#1}}
\def\violet#1{\textcolor{violet1}{#1}}
\def\dred#1{\textcolor{dark_red}{#1}}
\def\dgreen#1{\textcolor{dark_green2}{#1}}
\def\lyellow#1{\textcolor{light_yellow}{#1}}
\def\brown#1{\textcolor{brown1}{#1}}
\def\dyellow#1{\textcolor{dark_yellow}{#1}}
\begin{document}
\title{Crossover from interaction to driven regimes\\
in quantum vortex reconnections}
\author{Luca Galantucci}
\email[]{luca.galantucci@newcastle.ac.uk}
\affiliation{Joint Quantum Centre (JQC) Durham--Newcastle, and
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Newcastle University,
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom}
\author{A.~W.~Baggaley}
\affiliation{Joint Quantum Centre (JQC) Durham--Newcastle, and
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Newcastle University,
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom}
\author{N.~G.~Parker}
\affiliation{Joint Quantum Centre (JQC) Durham--Newcastle, and
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Newcastle University,
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom}
\author{C.~F. Barenghi}
\affiliation{Joint Quantum Centre (JQC) Durham--Newcastle, and
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Newcastle University,
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom}
\date{\today}
\begin{abstract}
%Please provide an abstract of no more than 250 words in a single
%paragraph. Abstracts should explain to the general reader the major
%contributions of the article. References in the abstract must be
%cited in full within the abstract itself and cited in the text.
Reconnections of coherent filamentary structures
play a key role in the dynamics of fluids,
redistributing energy and helicity among the length scales,
triggering dissipative effects and inducing fine-scale mixing.
Unlike ordinary (classical) fluids where vorticity is a continuous field,
in superfluid helium and in atomic Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs)
vorticity takes the form of isolated quantised vortex lines, which are
conceptually easier to study.
New experimental techniques now allow visualisation of individual
vortex reconnections in helium and condensates.
It has long being suspected that reconnections obey universal
laws, particularly a universal scaling with time of the minimum distance between
vortices $\delta$. Here we perform a comprehensive analysis of this scaling across a range of scenarios relevant to superfluid helium and trapped condensates,
combining our own numerical simulations with the previous results in the literature. We reveal that the scaling exhibit two distinct
fundamental regimes: a $\delta \sim t^{1/2}$ scaling arising from the mutual interaction of the reconnecting strands and a $\delta \sim t$ scaling when extrinsic factors drive the individual vortices.
\end{abstract}
\keywords{Reconnections $|$ Superfluid $|$
Bose Einstein condensates $|$ Quantum vortices}
\maketitle
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%\noindent
\section*{Reconnections in classical and quantum systems}
Reconnections of coherent filamentary structures
(Fig.~\ref{fig:schematic}) play
%change the geometry and topology of the system play
a fundamental role in the dynamics of plasmas (from astrophysics
\cite{priest-forbes-2007,che-etal-2011,cirtain-etal-2013} to confined nuclear
fusion), nematic liquid crystals \cite{chuang-etal-1991}, polymers and
macromolecules \cite{sumners-1995} (including DNA \cite{vazquez-sumners-2004}), optical beams \cite{dennis-etal-2010,berry-dennis-2012}, ordinary
(classical) fluids
\cite{kida-takaoka-1994,pumir-kerr-1987,kleckner-irvine-2013}
and quantum fluids \cite{barenghi-donnelly-vinen-2001,schwarz-1988}.
In fluids, the coherent structures consist of concentrated vorticity,
whose character depends on the classical or quantum nature of the fluid:
in classical fluids (air, water etc.), vorticity is a continuous field
and the interacting structures are {\it vortex tubes}
of arbitrary core size around which the circulation of the velocity
field is unconstrained; in quantum fluids (atomic
Bose-Einstein Condensates (BECs), and superfluid $^4$He and $^3$He), the
structures are isolated one-dimensional {\it vortex lines},
corresponding to topological defects of the governing order parameter
around which the velocity's circulation is quantized \cite{onsager-1949,feynman-1955,vinen-1961,donnelly-1991}.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.9\columnwidth]{fig_1.pdf}
\caption{{\bf Reconnecting vortex lines exchanging strands.}
Schematic vortex configurations before the reconnection (left)
and after (right); the vortices' shape is as
determined analytically by Nazarenko and West \cite{nazarenko-west-2003}.
Color gradient along the vortices and blue/red arrows indicate the directions
of the vorticity along the vortices and the direction of the flow
velocity around them.
Dashed black arrows indicate the vortex motion, first towards each others,
then away from each others.}
\label{fig:schematic}
\end{figure}
The discrete nature of quantum vortices makes them ideal
for the study of vortex reconnections, which assume the form of
isolated, dramatic events, strongly localised in space and time.
First conjectured by Feynman \cite{feynman-1955} and then numerically
predicted \cite{koplik-levine-1993}, quantum vortex reconnections
been observed only recently, both in superfluid
$^4$He \cite{bewley-etal-2008} (indirectly, using tracer particles)
and in BECs \cite{serafini-etal-2017} (directly, using an
innovative stroboscopic visualisation technique).
Vortex reconnections are crucial in redistributing the kinetic
energy of turbulent superfluids. In some regimes, they
trigger a turbulent energy cascade \cite{barenghi-lvov-roche-2014}
in which vortex lines self-organise in bundles
\cite{baggaley-laurie-barenghi-2012}, generating the same Kolmogorov
spectrum of classical turbulence
\cite{barenghi-lvov-roche-2014,nore-abid-brachet-1997,skrbek-sreenivasan-2012,maurer-tabeling-1998,salort-etal-2010}. By altering the topology of
the flow \cite{kleckner-kauffman-irvine-2016}, reconnections also
seem to redistribute its helicity
\cite{scheeler-etal-2014,dileoni-etal-2016},
although the precise definition of helicity in superfluids is
currently debated
\cite{dileoni-etal-2016,salman-2017,barenghi-etal-2018},
and the effects of reconnections
\cite{laing-etal-2015,zuccher-ricca-2015,zuccher-ricca-2017,hanninen-etal-2016}
on its geometric ingredients (link, writhe and twist) are
still discussed.
In the low-temperature limit, losses due to viscosity or mutual friction are
negligible, and reconnections are the ultimate
mechanism for the dissipation of the incompressible kinetic energy
of the superfluid via sound radiation at
the reconnecting event \cite{leadbeater-etal-2001,zuccher-etal-2012}
followed by further sound emission by the Kelvin wave cascade
\cite{kivotides-etal-2001,kozik-svistunov-2004, kozik-svistunov-2005}
which follows the relaxation of the reconnection cusps.
\section*{Is there a universal route to reconnection ?}
Many authors have focused on the possibility
that there is a {\it universal route} to reconnection, which may take
the form of a vortex ring cascade \cite{kerr-2011,kursa-etal-2011},
a particular rule for the cusp angles \cite{dewaele-aarts-1994,tebbs-etal-2011},
or, more promising, a special scaling with time
of the minimum distance $\delta(t)$ between the reconnecting
vortex strands. It is on the last property that we concentrate our
attention.
Several studies have observed a symmetrical
pre/post reconnection scaling of $\delta(t)$
\cite{dewaele-aarts-1994,nazarenko-west-2003,paoletti-etal-2010,dossantos-2016,villois-etal-2017};
others have suggested an asymmetrical scaling possibly ascribed to
acoustic energy losses
\cite{zuccher-etal-2012,allen-etal-2014,rorai-etal-2016},
similar to the asymmetry observed in classical Navier-Stokes
fluids \cite{hussain-duraisamy-2011}.
In Fig.~\ref{fig:all_data} (top) and (bottom) we present a comprehensive
summary of the scaling of $\delta(t)$, combining previous numerical and experimental
results with data computed in the present study; this spans an impressive eight orders of magnitude.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centering
%\includegraphics[width=0.99\columnwidth]{fig_2_rev_top.eps}\\
%\includegraphics[width=0.99\columnwidth]{fig_2_rev_bottom.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.99\columnwidth]{fig_2.pdf}
\caption{{\bf Minimum distance between reconnecting vortices:
past and present results.}
(top): All data reported describe the behaviour of the rescaled minimum
distance $\delta^*$ between vortices as a function
of the rescaled temporal distance to the reconnection event $t^*$.
Empty (filled) symbols refer to pre (post) - reconnection dynamics.
{\bf GP simulations}:
\dred{$\bm{\lozenge}$} Ref.~\cite{rorai-etal-2016};
%\dblue{$\bm{\medstar}$} Ref.~\cite{villois-etal-2017};
\dblue{{\bf \ding{73}}} Ref.~\cite{villois-etal-2017};
\cyan{$\bm{\triangle}$} Ref.~\cite{zuccher-etal-2012};
\dgreen{$\bm{\circ}$} and \dgreen{$\bm{\square}$}, present simulations,
ring-vortex collision and orthogonal reconnection, respectively.
{\bf VFM simulations}:
\violet{$\bm{\vartriangleleft}$} Ref.~\cite{dewaele-aarts-1994};
\dgreen{$\bm{\lozenge}$} present simulations,
ring-line collision.
{\bf Experiments:} $\bigstar$ Ref.~\cite{fonda-etal-2019}.
% See {\it Methods} in Supplemental Material for details on the numerical methods employed.}
(bottom): zoom on GP simulations.
}
\label{fig:all_data}
\end{figure}
The aim of this paper is to reveal that there are
{\it two} distinct fundamental scaling regimes for
$\delta(t)$. In addition to the known
\cite{dewaele-aarts-1994,nazarenko-west-2003,paoletti-etal-2010,dossantos-2016,villois-etal-2017,fonda-etal-2019,fonda-etal-2014,lipniacki-2000}
$\delta \sim t^{1/2}$ scaling,
we predict and observe a new linear scaling $\delta(t) \sim t $.
We show how the two scalings arise from rigorous
dimensional arguments, then demonstrate them
in numerical simulations of vortex reconnections
%in a variety of geometries relevant to superfluid helium and trapped condensates. \red{We identify that the $\delta \sim t^{1/2}$ behaviour arises when the interaction between the two reconnecting strands is dominant. Meanwhile, the $\delta \sim t$ behaviour can arise at larger time and lengthscales when the vortices become driven by external factors such as density gradients, boundaries and vortex curvature. We term these the {\it interaction} and {\it drive} regimes, respectively. }
%Finally, we demonstrate that the crossover between the two scalings is determined
%by the balance between interaction-driven dynamics and individual
%vortex dynamics.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section*{Dimensional analysis}
%In order to explore the potential existence of two distinct scalings for the minimum distance $\delta$ between reconnecting
%vortices, we first formulate a simple argument on dimensional grounds.
We conjecture that, in the system under consideration (superfluid helium,
atomic BECs), $\delta$ depends only upon the following physical
variables: the time $t$ from the reconnection,
the quantum of circulation $\kappa$ of the superfluid, a characteristic
lengthscale $\ell$ associated to the geometry of the vortex configuration,
%to the individual vortex velocity ({\it e.g.} the radius of curvare for a vortex ring, the distance from the boundaries in a box trap),
the fluid's density $\rho$, and
%(density plays a role as it emerges from the inset of Fig.~S5 (right) in Supplemental Material) and
the density gradient $\nabla\rho$.
%(as density gradients drive vortices in non homogeneous trapped BECs \cite{jackson-etal-1999,svidzinsky-fetter-2000}).
We hence postulate the following functional form
\begin{equation}
\displaystyle
f (\delta, t, \kappa, \ell, \rho, \nabla\rho) = 0 \; .\label{eq:dim} %= C t^\alpha \kappa^\beta \ell^\eta \; , \label{eq:dim}
\end{equation}
Following the standard procedure of the Buckingham $\pi$-theorem \cite{buckingham-1914} (see SI Appendix SI.1
for details),
%with the chosen physical variables it is possible to define only three independent dimensionless quantities, $\pi_1$, $\pi_2$ and $\pi_3$,
%which we choose as follows: $\pi_1=\delta^2/(\kappa t)$, $\pi_2=\delta \ell/(\kappa t)$ and $\pi_3=\delta\rho/(\kappa t \nabla\rho)$
%(it is worth emphasising that other dimensionless quantities can be assembled from the same physical variables,
%as there are three free parameters \cite{buckingham-1914}, but they would
%be dependent on $\pi_1$, $\pi_2$ and $\pi_3$). The functional form (\ref{eq:dim})
%can hence be rewritten as $\pi_1=F_1(\pi_2,\pi_3)$ or, equivalently, $\pi_2=F_2(\pi_1,\pi_3)$ or $\pi_3=F_3(\pi_1,\pi_2)$.
%Choosing $F_1(\pi_2,\pi_3)=C_1$, $F_2(\pi_1,\pi_3))=C_2$ and $F_3(\pi_1,\pi_2)=C_3$ ($C_1,C_2, C_3=\text{const}$),
we derive the following scalings:
\begin{eqnarray}
\displaystyle
\delta(t) &=& (C_1\kappa)^{1/2}t^{1/2}~~~~ \textrm{\it interaction regime}\label{eq:dim.1/2},\\[2mm]
\delta(t) &=& C_2 \left ( \frac{\kappa}{\ell} \right ) t ~~~~~~~~ \textrm{\it driven regime}\label{eq:dim.ell}, \;\;\;\;\\[2mm]
\delta(t) &=& C_3 \left (\kappa\frac{\nabla\rho}{\rho} \right ) t ~~~~ \textrm{\it driven regime}\label{eq:dim.rho},
\end{eqnarray}
where $C_1$, $C_2$ and $C_3$ are dimensionless constants.
%Thus, the existence of two distinct scalings for $\delta$ is straightforwardly predicted by
%dimensional analysis.
%$(C_1\kappa)^{1/2}$ is the dimensional quantity corresponding to
%of $a_{_{1/2}}$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:scal.0.5}), and $v_{_\ell}=C_2(\kappa/\ell)$ and $v_{_{\nabla\!\rho}}=C_3(\kappa\nabla\rho/\rho)$
%correspond dimensionally to coefficient $a_{_{1}}$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:scal.1}).
Physically, the $\delta \sim t^{1/2}$ scaling of Eq. (\ref{eq:dim.1/2})
identifies
the quantum of circulation $\kappa$ as the only relevant parameter
driving the reconnection
dynamics \cite{bewley-etal-2008};
this scaling
corresponds to a vortex dynamics driven by the mutual interaction between vortex strands, as illustrated more in detail in
section A.
Equations (\ref{eq:dim.ell}, \ref{eq:dim.rho}), on the other hand, introduce the new $\delta \sim t$ scaling. This scaling suggests the presence of a characteristic velocity which drives the approach/separation of the vortex lines.
%Both $v_{\ell}=C_2(\kappa/\ell)$ and
%$v_{_{\nabla\!\rho}}=C_3(\kappa\nabla\rho/\rho)$ \red{are}, in fact,
%\red{velocity scales} possessed by vortices when they are
%self-driven, {\it i.e.} velocities independent of the presence of the
%other vortex. For instance,
%if $\ell$ coincides with the radius of a vortex ring, $v_{\ell}$ represents,
%in first approximation, the self-induced velocity of a vortex ring; if
%$\ell$ is equal to the distance of a vortex from the boundary of a
%box-trapped BEC, $v_{\ell}$ corresponds to the self-induced vortex
%velocity arising from the presence of an image vortex;
%if the BEC is trapped by an inhomogeneous, harmonic potential,
%$v_{_{\nabla\!\rho}}$ is
%precisely the individual velocity of a vortex induced by the
%density gradients, $C_3$ depending on the trap geometry
%\cite{jackson-etal-1999,svidzinsky-fetter-2000}.
Indeed, we can offer some physical examples of these velocities. If
$\ell$ is the radius of a vortex ring, then
$v_{\ell}=C_2(\kappa/\ell)$ is,
to a first approximation, the self-induced velocity of the ring. Alternatively, if
$\ell$ is equal to the distance of a vortex to a sharp boundary in an otherwise
homogeneous BEC (such as arises for BEC confined by box traps), then $v_{\ell}$ is the self-induced vortex
velocity arising from the presence of an image vortex. Finally,
if the BEC density is smoothly-varying (such as arises for BECs confined by harmonic traps)
then $v_{_{\nabla\!\rho}}=C_3(\kappa\nabla\rho/\rho)$ is
precisely the individual velocity of a vortex induced by the
density gradients, $C_3$ depending on the trap's geometry
\cite{jackson-etal-1999,svidzinsky-fetter-2000}.
%In a turbulent vortex tangle of observed vortex line density $L$,
%$\ell \approx L^{-1/2}$ is probably the typical intervortex distance which is also
%the typical curvature,
%but hereafter we limit ourselves to the simpler cases of the interaction
%between two relatively isolated vortex lines.
In the next section we will see how these scalings, and the crossover, emerge in typical scenarios through numerical simulations.
%numerical simulations which
%confirm these two scalings,
%$\delta \sim t^{1/2}$ and $\delta \sim t$, and their crossover.
%In order to identify the range of validity of the scalings (\ref{eq:dim.1/2}) - (\ref{eq:dim.rho}), interpret the underlying physics and
%understand the mechanisms responsible for potential crossovers between them, we performed a vast campaign of numerical experiments, illustrated in the
%next paragraphs.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section*{Numerical simulations}
There are two established models of quantum vortex dynamics:
the Gross-Pitaevskii (GP) model and the Vortex Filament (VF) method.
The former describes a weakly-interacting BEC in the zero-temperature
limit \cite{pitaevskii-stringari-2003}, the latter is based on the
classical Biot-Savart law describing the velocity field of a given
vorticity distribution, which in our case is concentrated on space curves
\cite{schwarz-1985,hanninen-baggaley-2014}.
%Past numerical studies of quantum vortex reconnections have relied on two distinct models:
%the Eulerian quantum mean-field Gross-Pitaevskii (GP) model \cite{pitaevskii-stringari-2003}, a well established method for
%simulating dilute, weakly-interacting BECs in the zero-temperature limit;
%the Lagrangian classical fluid dynamics Vortex Filament (VF) method
%y1
%\cite{schwarz-1985,hanninen-baggaley-2014}, based on the Biot-Savart integral
%accounting for the velocity field generated by the singular quantum vorticity distribution. This last model accurately describes vortex dynamics in superfluid
%$^4$He \cite{schwarz-1985,schwarz-1988} and superfluid $^3$He \cite{baggaley-etal-2015}.
The main difference between GP and VF models is the probed
lengthscales of the flow. The GP equation is a {\it microscopic},
compressible model,
capable of describing density fluctuations
and lengthscales smaller than
the vortex core $a_0$
(defined as the diameter of the cylindrical tube around the superfluid vortex-line
where the density is within $75\%$ of the bulk density).
In the GP model, vortices are identified
as topological phase defects of the condensate wavefunction $\Psi$, and
reconnections are solutions of the GP equation itself.
On the other hand, the VF method is a {\it mesoscopic} incompressible model,
probing the features of the flow at lengthscales much larger
than the vortex core, typically
%$10^4\,a_0\div 10^5\,a_0$,
$10^4\,a_0$ or $10^5\,a_0$, neglecting
any density perturbation created by moving vortices and the density
depletions represented by the vortex cores themselves.
In the VF model, vortex lines
are discretised employing a set of Lagrangian points whose dynamics is
governed by the classical Biot-Savart law, and vortex reconnections are
performed by an
{\it ad hoc} `cut-and-paste' algorithm \cite{schwarz-1985,baggaley-2012b}.
%which reconnects lines when their distance is smaller than
%a cut-off determined by the spatial discretisation $\Delta \zeta$
%along the arc length.
In the present study, we employ both GP and VF models to investigate
the scaling with time of the minimum distance $\delta$ between
reconnecting vortices. Technical details of these methods are described in SI Appendix SI.6 and SI.7.
Distinctive of our simulations is the larger initial distance $\delta_0$ compared to past numerical studies (5 to 20 times larger in GP simulations,
100 to 2000 larger in VF ones). We also extend the use of the GP model
to inhomogeneous, confined BECs where vortex reconnections
can now be investigate experimentally with
unprecedented resolution \cite{serafini-etal-2017}.
% (past numerical studies have been performed on homogeneous and unbounded condensates).
\begin{figure*}[htbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.99\textwidth]{fig_3.pdf}
%\begin{minipage}{0.47\textwidth}
% \centering
% \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{fig_3_left.eps}%{./figs/superflow-lam.eps}
% \end{minipage}
% \hspace{0.004\textwidth}
% \begin{minipage}{0.47\textwidth}
% \centering
% \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{fig_3_right.eps}%{./figs/superflow-turb-fake.eps}
%\end{minipage}
\caption{{\bf GP simulations: homogeneous unbounded BECs.}
Evolution of the rescaled minimum distance $\delta^*$ between reconnecting vortices as a function of the rescaled temporal distance to reconnection $t^*$.
%Distance and time are normalised with the healing length $\xi_0$ and $\tau_0=\xi_0/c_0$ respectively, where $c_0$ is the speed of sound in a homogeneous BEC.
Empty (filled) symbols correspond to pre (post) reconnection dynamics. {\bf Left}: orthogonal vortices reconnection with rescaled initial distance $\delta^*_0$ equal to
$10$ (\violet{$\bm{\vartriangleright}$}), $20$ (\cyan{$\bm{\vartriangleleft}$}) and $30$ (\dred{$\bm{\square}$}).
{\bf Right}: ring-line reconnection for constant initial distance $\delta^*_0=100$ and vortex ring radii $R^*_0$ equal to $5$
(\orange{$\bm{\circ}$}), $7.5$ (\dyellow{$\bm{\vartriangleleft}$}) and $10$ (\brown{$\bm{\vartriangleright}$}). {\bf Inset}: pre-reconnection dynamics only, the distance is rescaled with $f(\widetilde{R}_0)$.
In both sub figures: the horizontal dashed black line indicates the width of the vortex core ($\approx 5\,\xi$), the blue-dashed line shows the $t^{*^{1/2}}$ scaling and the bottom insets show the initial
vortex configuration. Color gradient on vortices indicates direction of the superfluid vorticity (from light to dark). Dot-dashed violet line in the
right panel indicates the $t^{\ast}$ scaling. Green arrows indicate the direction of time.}
\label{fig:GP_homog}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{Homogeneous unbounded systems}
To make progress in the understanding of vortex reconnections in homogenous
quantum fluids, we identify two limiting initial vortex configurations
which generate the two fundamental types of reconnections. The first
configuration consists of
two initially straight and orthogonal vortices, corresponding to the limit
where the curvatures $K_1$ and $K_2$ of the two vortices are small and
comparable ({\it i.e.} $K_1 \sim K_2$ and $K_1, K_2 \ll 1$);
the second configuration is
a vortex ring interacting with an isolated vortex line,
which is the limiting case of
two vortices of significantly different
curvatures ($K_1 \ll K_2$ or $K_1 \gg K_2$). The
third limiting case of large and comparable curvatures ($K_1 \sim K_2$ and $K_1, K_2 \gg 1$),
{\it i.e.} the collision of small vortex rings, is neglected in the present study as it refers to an extremely unlikely event, due to the small cross section.
%The first case which we consider is when
%reconnecting vortices are initially orthogonal to each other.
The orthogonal reconnection configuration, and the corresponding results for $\delta(t)$,
are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:GP_homog} (left) and reported in movies S1-S4.
Previous GP simulations of this geometry used
initial distances $\delta_0 \lesssim 6\,\xi$, where $\xi=\hbar/\sqrt{2 m g n}$
is the healing length of the system ($a_0\approx 4\,\xi$ to $5\,\xi$),
and $m$, $g$ and $n$ are the boson mass,
the repulsive strength of boson interaction and the bulk
density of bosons respectively.
%(see Supplemental Material for further details on the role played by these quantities in the GP model).
Here we extend the investigations to initial distances
$\delta_0 \approx 30\,\xi$.
Introducing the rescaled distance $\delta^*=\delta/\xi$ and
time $t^*=|t-t_r|/\tau$ (where $t_r$ is the
reconnection instant and $\tau=\xi/c$, $c=\sqrt{g n/m}$ being
the speed of sound in a homogeneous BEC),
we observe that for $\delta^*\lesssim 2.5$
%(when the vortex cores start merging)
%\red{(when the condensates density between the vortex-lines drops
%significantly with respect to the bulk density)}
(when the two vortex lines are so close to each other that the
condensate's density in the region between them is significantly less
than the bulk density)
a symmetrical $t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling emerges clearly for both pre- and post-reconnection dynamics. This is consistent with the most recent
GP simulations \cite{villois-etal-2017} and inconsistent with other numerical GP studies \cite{zuccher-etal-2012,rorai-etal-2016},
adding further evidence to a $t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ symmetrical scaling at small distances for orthogonal reconnections.
\begin{table}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ c | c | c | c |}
& $\delta^*< 2.5$ & $2.5 < \delta^* < 10$ & $\delta^*> 10$ \\
\hline
\hline
$\alpha^-$ & 0.48 & 0.40 & 0.43 \\
$\alpha^+$ & 0.49 & 0.60 & 0.50 \\
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{{\bf GP simulations: homogeneous unbounded BECs, orthogonal reconnection}.
\textmd{\footnotesize Scaling exponents $\alpha^-$ ($\alpha^+$) for power law behaviour $\delta^* \sim t^{*^{\alpha}}$ for pre (post) reconnection
dynamics for initial separation $\delta_0^*=20$.}}
\label{tab:fits}
\end{table}
To map quantitatively
the emergence of the
$t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ behaviour in distinct intervals of $\delta$, in Table \ref{tab:fits}
we report the scaling exponents $\alpha$ of the power-law fits $\delta^*\sim t^{*^{\alpha}}$ for the intermediate initial distance $\delta_0^*=20$.
From the table it clearly emerges that
the $t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling also holds in the post-reconnection dynamics at large distances, while in the intermediate region $2.5 < \delta^* < 10$ (both pre- and post
reconnection) and at large distances
during the approach, the scalings deviate from $t^{\ast^{1/2}}$.
In order to investigate these deviations,
we calculate the
velocity
contribution of the local
vortex curvature, $v_{\gamma}$, to the approach/separation velocity $d \delta^*/d t^*$ for the intermediate initial distance $\delta_0^*=20$,
displaying the corresponding results in Fig.~\ref{fig:GP_curv_contr} (top)
(see SI Appendix SI.2 for the calculation of $v_{\gamma}$).
The figure clearly shows that
the observed deviations from the
$t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling depend on the relative curvature contribution $\sigma~=~v_{\gamma}/(d \delta^*/d t^*)$:
the larger $\sigma$, the more prominent the deviations from the $t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ behaviour. This implies that the $t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling
observed at large distances in the separation dynamics originates from an interaction-dominated motion of the reconnecting strands. If
the dynamics is governed by the mutual interaction of the two vortices, in fact,
$d \delta^*/d t^* \propto \kappa/(4\pi\delta^*)$ \cite{dewaele-aarts-1994},
leading straightforwardly to the scaling $\delta^*\sim t^{\ast^{1/2}}$, derived in Eq. (\ref{eq:dim.1/2}).
This argument
%is likely to justify
corroborates
the experimentally observed $t^{\ast^{1/2}}$
scaling \cite{paoletti-etal-2010,fonda-etal-2019}.
Concluding our
study of orthogonal reconnections, we note that vortex
lines move faster after the
reconnection than before it, as pointed out in past studies \cite{zuccher-etal-2012,allen-etal-2014,rorai-etal-2016,villois-etal-2017}, and
that the post-reconnection curves show a slight sensitivity to the initial distance $\delta_0^*$.
The second homogeneous system which we consider is a vortex ring reconnecting with
an isolated initially straight vortex line (see movies S5-S8).
This scenario is notably relevant in superfluid helium turbulence at low temperatures, where the low density
of thermal excitations is not able to quickly damp out small
vortex structures.
In fact, the methods used to generate turbulence at low
temperatures involve
either injecting vortex rings
\cite{walmsley-golov-2008,walmsley-etal-2014,zmeev-etal-2015,
walmsley-etal-2017} or vibrating small
structures ({\it e.g.} spheres, wires and grids) which trigger a great number of ring - line collisions
\cite{hanninen-etal-2007,goto-etal-2008,nakatsuji-etal-2014}. Similarly, also inhomogeneous quantum turbulence
\cite{nemirovskii-2010,barenghi-samuels-2002} and boundary layer turbulence \cite{stagg-parker-barenghi-2017}
display conspicuous vortex loop - vortex line collisions.
Figure~\ref{fig:GP_homog} (right) illustrates this vortex set-up and presents the behaviour of $\delta(t)$.
We vary the initial radius of the ring ($R^*_0=R_0/\xi=5,7.5$ and $10$), while keeping constant its
initial distance $\delta^*_0=100$ to the line.
We first focus on the pre-reconnection evolution of $\delta(t)$. This
clearly reveals the two distinct scalings predicted by the
dimensional analysis:
%The temporal evolutions of the minimum distance calculated for these
%ring-line collisions are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:GP_homog} (right) where two clear scalings emerge for the pre-reconnection dynamics (open symbols):
\begin{eqnarray}
\displaystyle
\delta^*\!(t^*) & \sim & a_{_{1/2}} t^{\ast^{1/2}} \;\;\; \text{for} \;\;\; t^* \lesssim 5 \; ,\label{eq:scal.0.5}\\\nonumber\\
\delta^*\!(t^*) & \sim & a_{_1} t^{\ast} \,\;\;\; \;\; \;\; \text{for} \;\;\; t^* \gtrsim 20 \; ,\label{eq:scal.1}
\end{eqnarray}
%for $\tilde{t} \lesssim 10$, $\tilde{\delta} = A \, \tilde{t}^{\,^{1/2}}$; for $\displaystyle \tilde{t} \gtrsim 20$, $\tilde{\delta} = B \, \tilde{t}$.
\noindent
where $a_{_{1/2}}$ and $a_{_{1}}$ are
constant prefactors corresponding, respectively, to $(C_1\kappa)^{1/2}$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:dim.1/2}) and $v_\ell$ or $v_{_{\nabla\!\rho}}$
in Eqs.~(\ref{eq:dim.ell}) or (\ref{eq:dim.rho}).
To our knowledge, the linear scaling has
not been reported in previous studies. We also note that the crossover between these two regimes occurs at a distance of $\delta_c \sim 3-4 \, \xi$;
we will revisit the importance of this scale later.
The linear scaling
implies that $d \delta^*/d t^*$ is constant:
at large distances, the relative velocity between the two points at
minimum distance, $\mathbf{x}_{\rm ring}$ (on the vortex ring)
and $\mathbf{x}_{\rm line}$ (on the vortex line),
projected on the separation vector
$\bm{\delta}=\mathbf{x}_{\rm ring}-\mathbf{x}_{\rm line}$,
is constant with respect to time. We argue that, at large
separation distances
%(for which the radius of the vortex ring is still constant and equal to $R_0$),
$d \delta^*/d t^*$ is approximately equal to the initial speed
of the vortex ring
%, which, in dimensionless units, is
%$v_{ring}^\ast=v_{ring}/c$
\cite{roberts-grant-1971}:
\begin{equation}
\displaystyle \frac{d \delta^*}{d t^*} = v_{\rm ring}^* = \frac{\kappa}{4\pi \xi c R_0^*}\bigg [ \ln (8 R_0^*) - 0.615 \bigg ]\,\,\, \label{eq:delta.der}.
\end{equation}
The self-induced velocity of the vortex ring $v_{\rm ring}$ thus plays
the role of the characteristic velocity $v_\ell$
in
Eq.~(\ref{eq:dim.ell}).
We make the notation compact and rewrite Eq.~(\ref{eq:delta.der}) as
$v_{\rm ring}^*~=~Cf(\widetilde{R}_0)$, where $C~=~\kappa/(4\pi c\overline{R}_0)$,
%$\displaystyle f(\widetilde{R}_0)~=~\frac{1}{\widetilde{R}_0}[\ln(\widetilde{R}_0) + 3.48]$,
$f(\widetilde{R}_0)~=~[\ln(\widetilde{R}_0) + 3.48] /\widetilde{R}_0$,
$\overline{R}_0=7.5\,\xi$ is
the average radius of the three simulations,
and $\widetilde{R}_0=R_0/\bar{R}_0$. We then arrive at the result that Eq.~(\ref{eq:scal.1})
%(approach dynamics for $\displaystyle t^* \gtrsim 20$)
takes the form
$\displaystyle \delta^*\!(t^*) \sim C f(\widetilde{R}_0)\, t^*$.
%where we have introduced the average radius amongst the three simulations $\overline{R}=7.5\,\xi_0$ and $\widetilde{R}_0=R_0/\bar{R}$.
This is confirmed in Fig.~\ref{fig:GP_homog} (right, inset): when $\delta^*$ is rescaled as
$\delta^*/f(\widetilde{R}_0)$
%vs of $t^*$ for the three different values
%of $R_0$:
the curves collapse onto a single curve in the $\delta \sim t$ regime.
The clear $t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling for $\delta^*\lesssim \delta_c^*$ is consistent with the interpretation put forward for the orthogonal reconnection,
as at such small distances, the approach/separation is likely to be governed by the mutual interaction of the two vortices
given that $\delta$ is smaller than the ring's radius of curvature.
%$d \delta^*/d t^* \propto \kappa/(4\pi\delta^*)$ \cite{dewaele-aarts-1994},
%leading
%straightforwardly to the scaling $\delta^*\sim t^{\ast^{1/2}}$.
We hence suggest that these two scalings correspond to a crossover from
a dynamics predominantly driven by mutual vortex interaction
%interaction-dominated motion of the reconnecting strands
($\delta^\ast \sim t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling)
to the self-driven (curvature-driven) motion of the ring ($\delta^\ast \sim t^\ast$ scaling).
To check this conjecture, we again refer to the contribution of the local vortex curvature:
Fig.~\ref{fig:GP_curv_contr} (bottom) shows the relative curvature contribution for the ring-line pre-reconnection dynamics.
%of the local
%vortex curvature $v_{\gamma}$
%to the approach velocity $d \delta^*/d t^*$ for ring-line reconnections
%(see Supporting Information SI.2 for the calculation of $v_{\gamma}$).
%
%In order to calculate the local curvature contribution $v_{\gamma\parallel\delta}$, we proceed as follows. First,
%in the two points at minimum distance $\mathbf{x}_{ring}$ and $\mathbf{x}_{line}$, we compute the velocities $\mathbf{v}_{\gamma,ring}$ and $\mathbf{v}_{\gamma,line}$
%arising from the local vortex curvature, assuming the latter can be approximated with the velocity of a vortex ring \cite{roberts-grant-1971} of corresponding curvature,
%{\it i.e.} for the velocity $\mathbf{v}_{\gamma,line}$ of the point $\mathbf{x}_{line}$) we have
%$\displaystyle \mathbf{v}_{\gamma,line}~=~\frac{\kappa}{4\pi R_c}\left [ \ln \left ( \frac{8 R_c}{\xi_0}\right ) - 0.615 \right ]\!\!\hat{\mathbf{b}}$,
%\begin{equation}
%\displaystyle
%\mathbf{v}_{\gamma,line}=\frac{\kappa}{4\pi R_c}\left [ \ln \left ( \frac{8 R_c}{\xi_0}\right ) - 0.615 \right ] \;\; ,
%\end{equation}
%where $R_c$ is the local radius of curvature and $\hat{\mathbf{b}}$ is the unit binormal vector.
%Second, we project $(\mathbf{v}_{\gamma,ring} - \mathbf{v}_{\gamma,line})$ on the separation vector $\bm{\delta}=\mathbf{x}_{ring}-\mathbf{x}_{line}$
%obtaining the seeked contribution $v_{\gamma\parallel\delta}$ of the local curvature to the approach dynamics:
%$v_{\gamma\parallel\delta}~=~(\mathbf{v}_{\gamma,ring}~-~\mathbf{v}_{\gamma,line})\cdot\hat{\bm{\delta}}$.
%
%The computed temporal evolution of the ratio
%$\sigma= v_{\gamma}/(d \delta^*/d t^*)$ proves
%that the approach velocity stemming from the
We see that the contribution from the local vortex curvature to the approach velocity
drops dramatically for $t^*\lesssim 5$,
corresponding exactly to the onset of the $t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling, supporting this picture.
%visible in Figs.~\ref{fig:GP_homog} (right) and \ref{fig:GP_curv_contr}.
%We conclude that the $\delta^{\ast} \sim t^{\ast^{1/2}}$
%scaling occurs when the mutual interaction of the vortex lines
%dominates the dynamics.
%Conversely, when the pre-reconnection dynamics is dictated by
%the constant individual motion of the vortices
%(in this case the self-induced velocity of the vortex ring)
%we observe the linear scaling $\delta^{\ast} \sim t^{\ast}$.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
%\includegraphics[width=0.98\columnwidth]{fig_4_top.eps}\\
%\centering
%\includegraphics[width=0.98\columnwidth]{fig_4_bottom.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.99\columnwidth]{fig_4.pdf}
\caption{{\bf Curvature contribution.}
(Top): Temporal evolution of the ratio $\sigma$ for the orthogonal reconnection with initial separation distance
$\delta_0^*~=~20$; red (blue) symbols correspond to pre (post) reconnection dynamics.
(Bottom): Temporal evolution of $\sigma$ (green solid line) and rescaled minimum distance $\delta^*$ (orange circles)
for the ring-line pre-reconnection, with $R^*_0~=~5$. The blue-dashed line shows the $t^{*^{1/2}}$ scaling, while dot-dashed violet line
indicates the $t^{\ast}$ scaling.}
\label{fig:GP_curv_contr}
\end{figure}
The crossover between the two scalings, however,
is less apparent in the post-reconnection dynamics, and for two main reasons. Firstly, both vortices become perturbed by propagating Kelvin-waves;
secondly, the travelling velocity of the perturbed vortex ring is not constant
\cite{arms-hama-1965,dhanak-debernardinis-1981,barenghi-hanninen-tsubota-2006}.
These Kelvin waves
generate sound waves \cite{kopiev-Chernyshev-1997,parker-etal-2004}
dissipating the incompressible kinetic energy, leading to a decrease of
the length of the vortex ring and a damping of the oscillations' amplitude.
%(see video SM1 and Fig.~S1 in the Supplemental Material).
When these oscillations die out
({\it e.g.} in the simulation with $R^*_0=5$, see Fig. \ref{fig:GP_homog} (right)),
and the vortex ring regains its circular shape travelling at
constant velocity away from the vortex line, we
recover the expected $\delta^{\ast} \sim t^{\ast}$ scaling.
This wobbling dynamics and the recovery of the linear scaling are addressed in more detail in
SI Appendix SI.3.
%The oscillating dynamics does not prevent the post-reconnection
%$t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling for $\delta^*\lesssim 5$,
%again confirming that at these distances the interaction-driven dynamics
%is predominant.
The same qualitative behaviour for the orthogonal vortices and ring-line scenario is recovered in
VF simulations (see SI Appendix SI.4, Fig.~S2). In the latter scenario,
the crossover from $t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ to $t^{\ast}$ scaling occurs at much larger lengthscales than in the GP simulations,
given the range of scales involved ($\approx 10^5 a_0 - 10^8 a_0$).
%of these same reconnecting vortex configurations
%(initially orthogonal vortices and ring-line reconnections)
%at large lengthscales (see Supporting Information SI.3, Fig.~S1).
%In fact, we observe a sole pre/post $t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling for
%orthogonal vortices (see Supporting Information SI.3, Fig.~S1 (left))
%with a cross-over from $t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ to $t^{\ast}$ scaling
%for ring-line reconnections (see Supporting Information SI.3, Fig.~S1 (right)).
%while the nature of this cross-over still arises from the balance between
%interaction- {\it vs.} self-driven dynamics,
However, as for GP simulations, the distance $\delta_{\rm c}$ at which the crossover takes place is determined by
the balance between interaction-dominated motion and curvature-driven dynamics, {\it i.e.} by the comparison
between $\delta(t)$ and the radius of curvature $R_c(t)$ of the vortex ring.
%by the spatial resolution $\Delta \zeta$ used to discretize the
%vortex lines, which constrains the
%smallest numerically-resolved radius of curvature to
%$R_{\rm c,min}\sim 5\Delta \zeta$, hence limiting
%the maximum curvature-driven velocity. As a consequence,
%when the minimum distance $\delta$ is smaller than the threshold
%distance $\delta_{\rm c}\sim R_{\rm c,min} \gg \xi$,
%the interaction regimes still prevails, producing
%$t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling even at distances much larger than the
%healing length.
\begin{figure}[ht]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.9\columnwidth]{fig_5.pdf}
\caption{{\bf GP simulations: harmonically trapped BECs, initial conditions}.
{\bf (a), (b)}: Lateral and top view of initial vortex configuration.
Light green surfaces are isosurfaces of condensate density at $5\%$ of trap-center density. Color gradient on vortices indicates the direction of the superfluid vorticity (from light to dark).
Unit of length is the healing length $\xi_c$ evaluated in the center of the trap.}
\label{fig:harm.traps.ic}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Trapped systems}
%The cross-over between $t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ and $t^{\ast}$ scalings and the corresponding underlying dynamics can be precisely observed also in trapped BECs
%in both recently designed {\it box-traps} \cite{gaunt-etal-2013,navon-etal-2016} and harmonic traps \cite{dalfovo-etal-1999} (see Fig g.~S3 and S4 and relative discussion in Supplemental Material).
Since it is now experimentally
possible to visualise individual quantum reconnections
in trapped atomic BECs \cite{serafini-etal-2015,serafini-etal-2017}, we
test the above results under such realistic
experimental set-ups.
We consider two classes of traps:
the widely-employed {\it harmonic traps} \cite{dalfovo-etal-1999}
(Figs.~\ref{fig:harm.traps.ic} and \ref{fig:harm.traps} and movies S9 and S10)
and the recently-designed {\it box-traps}
\cite{gaunt-etal-2013,navon-etal-2016} (see SI Appendix SI.5 and movies S11 and S12).
We employ GP simulations throughout this analysis (the VF model is not suitable for inhomogeneous systems).
In harmonic traps the condensate is inhomogeneous (the density
is larger near the centre) and individual motion of the vortices
(responsible for the linear scaling) is determined
by their curvature, density gradients and, possibly, vortex images
\cite{svidzinsky-fetter-2000,fetter-svidzinsky-2001,jackson-etal-1999,fetter-2009}.
In box-traps the condensate's density is constant (with the
exception of a thin layer of width of the order of the healing length near
the boundary), and
the individual vortex motion is believed to be driven by image vortices with respect to
the boundaries, according to two-dimensional studies \cite{mason-berloff-fetter-2006}.
We exploit these self-driven vortex motions to analyse reconnections
starting from initial distances significantly larger
than previous numerical simulations (up to 20 times larger).
\begin{figure*}[ht]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{fig_6.pdf}
%\begin{minipage}{0.47\textwidth}
% \centering
% \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{fig_6_left.eps}%{./figs/superflow-lam.eps}
% \end{minipage}
% \hspace{0.004\textwidth}
% \begin{minipage}{0.47\textwidth}
% \centering
% \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{fig_6_right.eps}%{./figs/superflow-turb-fake.eps}
% \end{minipage}
\caption{{\bf GP simulations: harmonically trapped BECs}.
Evolution of the minimum distance $\delta^*$ between reconnecting vortices as a function of the temporal distance to reconnection $t^*$.
%Distance and time are normalised with the healing length $\xi_0$ and $\tau_0=\xi_0/c_0$ respectively, where $c_0$ is the speed of sound in a homogeneous BEC.
Open (filled) symbols correspond to pre (post) reconnection dynamics. {\bf Left}: pre-reconnection scaling of $\delta^*$ for initially
imprinted orthogonal vortices with corresponding orbit parameter $\chi=0.35$ (\dyellow{$\bm{\circ}$}), $\chi=0.5$ (\dred{$\bm{\square}$}) and $\chi=0.6$ (\cyan{$\bm{\bigtriangledown}$}).
Inset: short-time pre-(open symbols) and post-(filled symbols) reconnection scaling of $\delta^*$ for $\chi=0.35$ (\dyellow{$\bm{\circ}$}), and $\chi=0.5$ (\dred{$\bm{\square}$}).
{\bf Right}: temporal evolution of the minimum distance $\delta^*$ rescaled with $f(\chi)$. Symbols as in left panel.
Inset: short-time pre-reconnection scaling of rescaled minimum distance $\delta^*_r=\delta/\xi_r$.
In both subfigures, the dashed blue and dot-dashed violet lines show the $t^{*^{1/2}}$ and $t^{\ast}$
scalings, respectively. The horizontal dashed line indicates the width of the vortex core at the center of the trap ($\approx 5\,\xi$). Green arrows indicate the direction of time.}
\label{fig:harm.traps}
\end{figure*}
Consider first the harmonic trap case; the initial configuration is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:harm.traps.ic}.
The condensate is taken to be cigar-shaped, with the long axis along $x$ (the trapping
frequency $\omega_x$ along $x$ is smaller than those in the transverse directions,
$\omega_y=\omega_z=\omega_{\perp}$).
In this geometry, a single straight vortex line imprinted off center
on a radial plane is known to orbit around the center of the condensate
\cite{anderson-etal-cornell-2000,freilich-etal-2010}
along an elliptical orbit perpendicular to itself. The vortex follows
a trajectory of constant energy \cite{svidzinsky-fetter-2000} which
is uniquely determined by the orbit parameter $\chi=x_0/R_x=r_0/R_\perp$,
where $x_0$ and $r_0$ are the axial and radial semi-axes of the ellipse,
and $R_x$ and $R_\perp$ are the axial and radial Thomas-Fermi radii
respectively. The period $T$ of this orbit decreases with increasing
$\chi$ \cite{serafini-etal-2015,svidzinsky-fetter-2000,lundh-ao-2000,sheehy-radzihovsky-2004,fetter-2009},
$\displaystyle T=\frac{8 \pi \left ( 1 - \chi^2 \right ) \mu}{3\hbar \omega_\perp \omega_x \ln (R_\perp/\xi_c)}$, where $\xi_c$ is the
healing length at the center of the trap. Hence, outer vortices (with larger values of $\chi$) move faster.
%\begin{figure*}[ht]
%\centering
%\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{fig_S3_small_compr.png}
%\caption{{\bf GP simulations: harmonically trapped BECs}.
%Evolution of the minimum distance $\delta^*$ between reconnecting vortices as a function of the temporal distance to reconnection $t^*$.
%%Distance and time are normalised with the healing length $\xi_0$ and $\tau_0=\xi_0/c_0$ respectively, where $c_0$ is the speed of sound in a homogeneous BEC.
%Open (filled) symbols correspond to pre (post) reconnection dynamics. {\bf Left}: pre-reconnection scaling of $\delta^*$ for initially
%imprinted orthogonal vortices with corresponding orbit parameter $\chi=0.35$ (\dyellow{$\bm{\circ}$}), $\chi=0.5$ (\dred{$\bm{\square}$}) and $\chi=0.6$ (\cyan{$\bm{\bigtriangledown}$}).
%Inset: short-time pre-(open symbols) and post-(filled symbols) reconnection scaling of $\delta^*$ for $\chi=0.35$ (\dyellow{$\bm{\circ}$}), and $\chi=0.5$ (\dred{$\bm{\square}$}).
%{\bf Right}: temporal evolution of the minimum distance $\delta^*$ rescaled with $f(\chi)$. Symbols as in left panel.
%Inset: short-time pre-reconnection scaling of rescaled minimum distance $\delta^*_r=\delta/\xi_r$.
%In both subfigures, the dashed blue and dot-dashed violet lines show the $t^{*^{1/2}}$ and $t^{\ast}$
%scalings, respectively. The horizontal dashed line indicates the width of the vortex core at the center of the trap ($\approx 5\,\xi_0$). Green arrows indicate the direction of time.}
%\label{fig:harm.traps}
%\end{figure*}
If two orthogonal vortices are imprinted on radial planes,
intersecting the (long) $x$ axis at opposite positions $\pm x_0$,
distinct vortex interactions can occur (vortex rebounds, vortex
reconnections, double reconnections, ejections)
depending on the value of the orbit parameter
$\chi$ \cite{serafini-etal-2017}.
Results presented here refer to
three different values of $\chi$, all engendering vortex reconnections:
$\chi=0.35,\, 0.5,\, 0.6$. The pre-reconnection evolution of $\delta^*=\delta/\xi_c$ is reported in
Fig.~\ref{fig:harm.traps} (left). As for the ring-line reconnection, we observe a cross-over from
$t^*{^{1/2}}$ to $t^{\ast}$ scaling. This occurs for all values of $\chi$. Moreover, the $t^{*^{1/2}}$ scaling again occurs in the region $\delta^*\lesssim 5$,
suggesting that this feature is indeed universal
for vortex reconnections in BECs.
If we rescale the minimum distance $\delta$ with the
healing length $\xi_r$ evaluated at the reconnection point $\mathbf{x}_r$,
$\displaystyle \xi_r=\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2 g m n_{_{\rm TF}}(\mathbf{x}_r)}}$ ($n_{_{\rm TF}}(\mathbf{x}_r)$ being the condensate particle density according to the Thomas-Fermi approximation), the curves corresponding to
distinct values of $\chi$ overlap for $\delta_r^*=\delta/\xi_r \lesssim 5$
(see the inset of the right panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:harm.traps}).
This result implies that $\xi_r$ (hence the radius of the
vortex core) is the correct lengthscale which characterises
the approach dynamics when vortex cores start merging.
Furthermore, the dependence of $\xi_r$ on $m n_{_{\rm TF}}(\mathbf{x}_r)$
indicates that mass density $\rho= m n$ itself plays a significant role in
determining the minimum distance $\delta$ - this is exactly why we
included $\rho$ in the set of physical variables when applying
Buckingham's $\pi$-Theorem.
Another similarity between reconnections in harmonic traps and
other geometries is the faster post-reconnection dynamics,
as seen in the inset of Fig.~\ref{fig:harm.traps} (left). This velocity difference
between approach and separation (related to an increase of the local vortex
curvature in the reconnection process and to an emission of
acoustic energy) seems
a universal feature of quantum vortex reconnections
\cite{villois-etal-2017}
and also observed in simulations of reconnecting
classical vortex tubes \cite{hussain-duraisamy-2011}.
Figure~\ref{fig:harm.traps} (left) shows that
$\displaystyle \, \frac{d \delta^*}{d t^*}$ is constant
for $t^*\gtrsim 20$ before the reconnection, increasing with
increasing values of the orbital parameter $\chi$
(this is not surprising since isolated vortices move faster on
outer orbits).
It seems reasonable to assume that
$\displaystyle \, \frac{d \delta^*}{d t^*} = C f(\chi)$,
where $\displaystyle f(\chi) = \frac{\chi}{1-\chi^2}$ and $C$
is a constant which depends on the trap's geometry. Indeed,
the magnitude of the vortex velocity induced by both density gradients
\cite{svidzinsky-fetter-2000,svidzinsky-fetter-2000PRA,fetter-svidzinsky-2001}
and vortex curvature (assuming, for simplicity, that the shape of the
vortex is an arc of a circle) are proportional to $f(\chi)$.
As a consequence, we expect that
$\delta^*(t^*)\sim C f(\chi)\, t^*$ for $t^*\gtrsim 20$.
This conjecture is confirmed in Fig.~\ref{fig:harm.traps} (right):
when plotted as $\delta^*/f(\chi)$, the curves for different $\chi$ collapse onto a universal curve in this region.
%show the evolution of $\delta^*/f(\chi)$ for
%$\chi=0.35$ (dark yellow circles),
%$\chi=0.5$ (red squares) and $\chi=0.6$ (cyan triangles):
%the three curves clearly overlap for $t^*\gtrsim 20$.
We stress that the observed linear scaling at large distances is a novel result. However,
although we have numerically
identified the dependence of $d \delta^*/d t^*$ on $\chi$ at large
distances, we still lack a simple physical justification of this result.
In harmonic traps,
the predominant effect driving the approach of the vortices at large
distances is hence the individual vortex motion driven by curvature and
density gradients (the role of vortex images still remains unclear \cite{fetter-2009} in this trap geometry),
independent of the presence of the other vortex.
The scaling crossover in harmonic traps
is thus governed by the balance between the interaction of the reconnecting strands and the driving of the individual vortices,
as it occurs for the ring - line reconnection in homogeneous BECs described previously.
The nature of this scaling crossover is confirmed by the investigation of vortex reconnections
in box-trapped BECs, outlined in SI Appendix SI.5 (see, in particular, Fig.~S4). In these
trapped systems, the motion of individual vortices is found to be driven by vortex images, leading to a linear scaling
at large distances. At small distance we again recover the $\delta \sim t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling.
The results obtained in all the trapped BECs investigated in this work, hence, always show a $\delta \sim t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ to $\delta \sim t^{\ast}$ scaling
crossover which, we stress, has not been observed in past studies. In addition, the always observed small scale $\delta \sim t^{\ast^{1/2}}$
behaviour supports the argument for
the existence of a universal scaling law at length scales
close to the reconnection point.
%The scaling crossover appears hence to be a universal feature of quantum vortex reconnections when
%extrinsic factors driving individual vortices exists.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.94\columnwidth]{fig_7.pdf}
\caption{{\bf The role of density depletions.}
Plot of the condensate density along the line containing the
separation vector $\bm{\delta}$ between the colliding vortices,
as a function of the distance $r^*$ to the mid-point
of the separation segment and the rescaled temporal
distance to reconnection $t^*$, for the vortex ring - vortex line
pre-reconnection dynamics with $R^*_0=5$. In the initial phase of
the approach (top part of the figure), $\delta \sim t^{\ast}$; the
cross-over to the $\delta \sim t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling occurs when
the vortex cores start to merge (bottom part) for
$t^*\lesssim 5$ (dashed line).}
\label{fig:GP_dens}
\end{figure}
\subsection{The role of density depletions}%on the $t^{1/2}$ scaling}
Current and previous GP simulations of reconnections in homogeneous and trapped BECs, see a clear
symmetric pre/post-reconnection $t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling in the
region $\delta^*\lesssim 5$, irrespective of the initial condition. The effect is robust and mostly went unnoticed, as
the prefactors $a_{_{1/2}}$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:scal.0.5}) may vary
depending on the conditions and between the approach/separation.
%\cite{villois-etal-2018}).
Figure~\ref{fig:GP_dens} shows the condensate density along the line
containing the separation vector between two reconnecting vortices (taken to be the ring-line scenario in a homogeneous system),
as a function of $t^*$
and the distance $r^*=r/\xi$ to the mid-point of the separation segment.
%In the figure, yellow corresponds to the bulk density and black to zero density, hence the dark regions represent the vortex cores.
It is clear that
for $t^*\lesssim 5$, which is when the $t^{*^{1/2}}$ scaling appears,
%cfr. Fig.~\ref{fig:GP_homog} (right),
the density between the two vortices drops dramatically.
This behaviour is generic - we obtain it also for any vortex reconnection set-up and across homogeneous and trapped BECs.
%We can hence conclude that in BECs the $t^{*^{1/2}}$ scaling is
%tightly linked with a vanishing density, consistently with a past analytical study performed neglecting the non-linear density dependent term \cite{nazarenko-west-2003}.
This result confirms
the analytical work of Nazarenko and West \cite{nazarenko-west-2003}, who
Taylor-expanded the solution of the GP for reconnecting vortex lines and
predicted the observed $t^{1/2}$ scaling in this limit of
vanishing density (in this limit the cubic nonlinear term
vanishes, reducing the GP equation to the linear Schr\"odinger equation).
There are hence two different arguments for the observation of the
$t^{1/2}$ scaling:
the interaction-driven dynamics argument,
underlying the dimensional scaling of Eq. (\ref{eq:dim.1/2}),
and the vanishing density argument from
the GP equation. The arguments
are both valid
at small lengthscales, consistently with the $t^{1/2}$ scaling observed close to reconnection in all GP simulations.
%where $(\alpha, \beta, \eta)$ are the seeked exponents and $C$ a dimensionless constant. The physical dimensions of the r.h.s of
%Eq.~(\ref{eq:dim}) are $T^{\alpha-\beta} L^{2\beta+\eta}$ where $T$ is time and $L$ is length, leading to the following
%relations (since $\delta$ has dimensions of length):
%\begin{eqnarray}
%\displaystyle
%\left \{
%\begin{array}{c}
%\alpha - \beta = 0 \label{eq:dim.2} \\[1mm]
%2\beta+\eta = 1
%\end{array}
%\right .
%\end{eqnarray}
%The set of equations (\ref{eq:dim.2}) has formally infinite solutions as there is one free parameter. However, only two set of exponents
%have a physical
%\begin{figure}[htbp]
%\centering
%\includegraphics[width=0.99\columnwidth]{fig_curvature.png}
%\caption{{\bf Curvature jump at reconnection.}
%}
%\label{fig:GP_curv}
%\end{figure}
\section*{Conclusions}
We have addressed the question of whether there is
a universal route to quantum vortex reconnections by
performing an extensive campaign of numerical simulations
using the two main mathematical models available
(the Gross-Pitaevskii equation and Vortex Filament method).
What distinguishes our work from previous studies is that, firstly, we have studied
the {\it two} main physical systems which display
quantised vorticity (trapped atomic condensates and superfluid helium),
and, secondly, that we have considered the behaviour over distances one order of magnitude
larger.
%Peculiar to our work is the study of quantum reconnections
%across geometries relevant to trapped condensates and
%superfluid helium and over distances one order of magnitude
%larger than in previous works.}
By applying rigorous dimensional arguments, we have found that
the minimum distance between reconnecting vortex lines may obey
two fundamental scaling law regimes: the already observed
$\delta^{\ast} \sim t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling
and a new $\delta^{\ast} \sim t^{\ast}$ scaling.
At small lengthscales, we always observe the
$\delta^{\ast} \sim t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling; this arises from either the mutual interaction between reconnecting strands
or from
the depleted density/nonlinearity in the reconnection region. The observation of this scaling
in all GP simulations, independently
of the precise nature of the system (homogeneous or trapped)
and initial vortex configuration,
%and on
%from the system analysed (homogeneous or trapped)
%and the initial vortex configuration
adds
futher evidence for the existence of this universal $\delta^{\ast} \sim t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling law
close to reconnection.
At larger lengthscales, two fundamental limiting cases
appear: the continuation of the $\delta^{\ast} \sim t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling if
the dynamics is still governed by the vortex mutual interaction,
or a linear $\delta^{\ast} \sim t^{\ast}$ behaviour if vortices
are individually driven
by extrinsic factors, such as curvature, density gradients and boundaries/images. In the
latter case, the crossover between the two scaling regimes is determined by the balance
between interaction-dominated motion and individually driven dynamics.
This scaling behaviour is summarised schematically in Fig.~\ref{fig:universal}.
We stress that these two fundamental scaling laws represent limiting behaviours:
%\red{We would like to stress that these are fundamental limiting behaviours:
intermediate scalings can arise due to additional physics, {\it e.g.} Kelvin waves.
We also stress that the $\delta^{\ast} \sim t^{\ast}$ cannot arise from a uniform flow,
which would simply advect both vortices in the same direction.
Instead, it arises in distinct systems, both homogeneous and inhomogeneous,
from the different illustrated physical mechanisms, and has not yet been reported in the literature.
While in homogeneous systems the $t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ behaviour can persist to arbitrary separations
(e.g. for initially orthogonal and weakly-curved vortices), we find that in trapped condensates the scaling crossover always arises.
Indeed, the current technological ability to directly image vortex lines
in trapped condensates suggests that full 3D reconstructions will soon be
available putting the detection of this crossover within experimental reach.
% in the reconnection of initially orthogonal vortices in a
%homogeneous quantum fluid,
%\red{the vortex interaction is the only source of motion
%at large distances, and so the $\delta^{\ast} \sim t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling
%persists throughout the whole dynamics. \cyan{In trapped condensates, we always observe a scaling crossover. With }}
%, as it occurs in the homogeneous ring-line reconnection.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.98\columnwidth]{fig_8.pdf}
\caption{
{\bf Fundamental scalings for the reconnection of two vortex lines.}
At small lengthscales the $\delta^{\ast} \sim t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling (in red) is observed as
the dynamics is determined by the mutual interaction of the two reconnecting vortex strands.
This scaling appears to be universal. At larger distances, we observe two fundamental limiting scenarios:
if the motion is still predominantly driven by the interaction, the $\delta^{\ast} \sim t^{\ast^{1/2}}$ scaling (in red)
still holds; if the dynamics is governed by extrinsic factors driving the individual vortices
a linear $\delta^{\ast} \sim t^{\ast}$ behaviour is established (in blue). In this last case, a scaling crossover occurs.
At large distances, intermediate scalings can arise due to additional physics, {\it e.g.} Kelvin waves (in red-blue color gradient).}
\label{fig:universal}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%
%\begin{figure}[htbp]
%\centering
%%\includegraphics[width=0.99\columnwidth]{universal.jpg}
%\begin{minipage}{0.40\columnwidth}
% \centering
% \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{interacting5.ps}%{./figs/superflow-lam.eps}
% \end{minipage}
% \hspace{0.004\textwidth}
% \begin{minipage}{0.40\columnwidth}
% \centering
% \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{driven7.ps}%{./figs/superflow-turb-fake.eps}
%\end{minipage}\\
%\centering
%\begin{minipage}{0.90\columnwidth}
% \centering
% \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{schematic_scaling3.ps}%{./figs/superflow-lam.eps}
% \end{minipage}
%\caption{
%{\bf Universal routes to the reconnection of two vortex lines.}
%Top left (red): In the interacting case, the vortex separation $\delta$ is determined
%by the mutual interaction of the two reconnecting vortex strands.
%Top right (blue): In the driven case, the separate motion of each vortex, hence $\delta$, is set by the background density gradient,
%or by the presence of images, or by the curvature of
%the vortex lines. In some vortex configurations, a crossover occurs between these two regimes.}
%\label{fig:universal}
%\end{figure}
\begin{acknowledgments}
L.G., C.F.B. and N.G.P. acknowledge the support of
the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
(Grant No. EP/R005192/1).
\end{acknowledgments}
%\newpage
\begin{thebibliography}{10}
\bibitem{priest-forbes-2007}
Priest E, Forbes T (2007) {\em Magnetic Reconnection: MHD Theory and
Applications}.
\newblock (Cambridge University Press).
\bibitem{che-etal-2011}
Che H, Drake J, Swisdak M (2011) A current filamentation mechanism for breaking
magnetic field lines during reconnection.
\newblock {\em Nature} 474(7350):184.
\bibitem{cirtain-etal-2013}
Cirtain JW, et~al. (2013) Energy release in the solar corona from spatially
resolved magnetic braids.
\newblock {\em Nature} 493(7433):501--503.
\bibitem{chuang-etal-1991}
Chuang I, Durrer R, Turok N, Yurke B (1991) Cosmology in the laboratory: Defect
dynamics in liquid crystals.
\newblock {\em Science} 251(4999):1336--1342.
\bibitem{sumners-1995}
Sumners D (1995) Lifting the curtain:using topology to probe the hidden action
of enzymes.
\newblock {\em Notice AMS} 42:528.
\bibitem{vazquez-sumners-2004}
Vazques M, Sumners D (2004) Tangles analysis of gin recombination.
\newblock {\em Math Pr Cam Ph Soc} 136:565.
\bibitem{dennis-etal-2010}
Dennis M, King R, Jack B, O'Holleran K, Padgett M (2010) Isolated optical
vortex knots.
\newblock {\em Nat Phys} 6:118.
\bibitem{berry-dennis-2012}
Berry M, Dennis M (2012) Reconnections of wave vortex lines.
\newblock {\em Eur J Phys} 33:723.
\bibitem{kida-takaoka-1994}
Kida S, Takaoka M (1994) Vortex reconnection.
\newblock {\em Annu Rev Fluid Mech} 26(1):169.
\bibitem{pumir-kerr-1987}
Pumir A, Kerr R (1987) Numerical simulation of interacting vortex tubes.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 58:1636.
\bibitem{kleckner-irvine-2013}
Kleckner D, Irvine WT (2013) Creation and dynamics of knotted vortices.
\newblock {\em Nat Phys} 9(4):253.
\bibitem{barenghi-donnelly-vinen-2001}
Barenghi C, Donnelly R, Vinen W (2001) {\em Quantized vortex dynamics and
superfluid turbulence}.
\newblock (Springer).
\bibitem{schwarz-1988}
Schwarz K (1988) Three-dimensional vortex dynamics in superfluid he4.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev B} 38(4):2398.
\bibitem{onsager-1949}
Onsager L (1949) Statistical hydrodynamics.
\newblock {\em Nuovo Cim} 6(Suppl. 2):249.
\bibitem{feynman-1955}
Feynmann R (1955) {\em Application of quantum mechanics to liquid helium}.
\newblock (N Holland Publ Co) Vol.{}~1, p.~36.
\bibitem{vinen-1961}
Vinen W (1961) The detection of single quanta of circulation in liquid helium
ii.
\newblock {\em Proc Roy Soc London} 260(1301):218--236.
\bibitem{donnelly-1991}
Donnelly RJ (1991) {\em Quantized Vortices in Helium II}.
\newblock (Cambridge University Press).
\bibitem{nazarenko-west-2003}
Nazarenko S, West R (2003) Analytical solution for nonlinear schr{\"o}dinger
vortex reconnection.
\newblock {\em J Low Temp Phys} 132:1.
\bibitem{koplik-levine-1993}
Koplik J, Levine H (1993) Vortex reconnection in superfluid helium.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 71:1375.
\bibitem{bewley-etal-2008}
Bewley G, Paoletti M, Sreenivasan K, Lathrop D (2008) Characterization of
reconnecting vortices in superfluid helium.
\newblock {\em Proc Natl Acad Sci USA} 105:13707.
\bibitem{serafini-etal-2017}
Serafini S, et~al. (2017) Vortex reconnections and rebounds in trapped atomic
bose-einstein condensates.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev X} 7:021031.
\bibitem{barenghi-lvov-roche-2014}
Barenghi C, L'vov V, Roche P (2014) Experimental, numerical and analytical
velocity spectra in turbulent quantum fluid.
\newblock {\em Proc Natl Acad Sci USA} 111(1):supp 1, 4683.
\bibitem{baggaley-laurie-barenghi-2012}
Baggaley A, Laurie J, Barenghi C (2012) Vortex-density fluctuations, energy
spectra, and vortical regions in superfluid turbulence.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 109:205304.
\bibitem{nore-abid-brachet-1997}
Nore C, Abid M, Brachet M (1997) Kolmogorov turbulence in low-temperature
superflows.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 78(20):3896.
\bibitem{skrbek-sreenivasan-2012}
Skrbek L, Sreenivasan K (2012) Developed quantum turbulence and its decay.
\newblock {\em Phys Fluids} 24:011301.
\bibitem{maurer-tabeling-1998}
Maurer J, Tabeling P (1998) Local investigation of superfluid turbulence.
\newblock {\em Europhys Lett} 43:29.
\bibitem{salort-etal-2010}
Salort J, et~al. (2010) Turbulent velocity spectra in superfluid flows.
\newblock {\em Phys Fluids} 22:125102.
\bibitem{kleckner-kauffman-irvine-2016}
Kleckner D, Kauffman L, Irvine W (2016) How superfluid vortex knots untie.
\newblock {\em Nat Phys} 12:650.
\bibitem{scheeler-etal-2014}
Scheeler M, Kleckner D, Proment D, Kindlmann G, Irvine W (2014) Helicity
conservation by flow across scales in reconnecting vortex links and knots.
\newblock {\em Proc Natl Acad Sci USA} 111:15350.
\bibitem{dileoni-etal-2016}
Di~Leoni P, Mininni PD, Brachet ME (2016) Helicity, topology and kelvin waves
in reconnecting quantum knots.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev A} 94:043605.
\bibitem{salman-2017}
Salman H (2017) Helicity conservation and twisted seifert surfaces for
superfluid vortices.
\newblock {\em Proc. R. Soc. A} 473(2200):20160853.
\bibitem{barenghi-etal-2018}
Barenghi CF, Galantucci L, Parker NG, Baggaley AW (2018) Classical helicity of
superfluid helium.
\newblock {\em arXiv:1805.09005}.
\bibitem{laing-etal-2015}
Laing C, Ricca R, Sumners D (2015) Conservation of writhe helicity under
anti-parallel reconnection.
\newblock {\em Sci Rep} 5:9224.
\bibitem{zuccher-ricca-2015}
Zuccher S, Ricca R (2015) Helicity conservation under quantum reconnection of
vortex rings.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev E} 92(6):061001.
\bibitem{zuccher-ricca-2017}
Zuccher S, Ricca RL (2017) Relaxation of twist helicity in the cascade process
of linked quantum vortices.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev E} 95(5):053109.
\bibitem{hanninen-etal-2016}
H\"{a}nninen R, Hietala N, Salman H (2016) Helicity within the vortex filament
model.
\newblock {\em Sci Rep} 6:37571.
\bibitem{leadbeater-etal-2001}
Leadbeater M, Winiecki T, Samuels D, Barenghi C, Adams C (2001) Sound emission
due to superfluid vortex reconnections.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 86(8):1410.
\bibitem{zuccher-etal-2012}
Zuccher S, Caliari M, Baggaley A, Barenghi C (2012) Quantum vortex
reconnections.
\newblock {\em Phys Fluids} 24:125108.
\bibitem{kivotides-etal-2001}
Kivotides D, Vassilicos J, Samuels D, Barenghi C (2001) Kelvin waves cascade in
superfluid turbulence.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 86:3080.
\bibitem{kozik-svistunov-2004}
Kozik E, Svistunov B (2004) Kelvin-wave cascade and decay of superfluid
turbulence.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 92:035301.
\bibitem{kozik-svistunov-2005}
Kozik E, Svistunov B (2005) Scale-separation scheme for simulating superfluid
turbulence: Kelvin-wave cascade.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 94:025301.
\bibitem{kerr-2011}
Kerr R (2011) Vortex stretching as a mechanism for quantum kinetic energy
decay.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 106(22):224501.
\bibitem{kursa-etal-2011}
Kursa M, Bajer K, Lipniaki T (2011) Cascade of vortex loops initiated by a
single reconnection of quantum vortices.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev B} 83:014515.
\bibitem{dewaele-aarts-1994}
De~Waele A, Aarts R (1994) Route to vortex reconnection.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 72(4):482.
\bibitem{tebbs-etal-2011}
Tebbs R, Youd AJ, Barenghi C (2011) The approach to vortex reconnection.
\newblock {\em J Low Temp Phys} 162(3-4):314.
\bibitem{paoletti-etal-2010}
Paoletti M, Fisher ME, Lathrop D (2010) Reconnection dynamics for quantized
vortices.
\newblock {\em Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena} 239(14):1367--1377.
\bibitem{dossantos-2016}
dos Santos FEA (2016) Hydrodynamics of vortices in bose-einstein condensates: A
defect-gauge field approach.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev A} 94(6):063633.
\bibitem{villois-etal-2017}
Villois A, Proment D, Krstulovic G (2017) Universal and nonuniversal aspects of
vortex reconnections in superfluids.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Fluids} 2(4):044701.
\bibitem{allen-etal-2014}
Allen A, et~al. (2014) Vortex reconnections in atomic condensates at finite
temperature.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev A} 90:013601.
\bibitem{rorai-etal-2016}
Rorai C, Skipper J, Kerr R, Sreenivasan K (2016) Approach and separation of
quantum vortices with balanced cores.
\newblock {\em J Fluid Mech} 808:641.
\bibitem{hussain-duraisamy-2011}
Hussain F, Duraisamy K (2011) Mechanics of viscous vortex reconnection.
\newblock {\em Phys Fluids} 23:021701.
\bibitem{fonda-etal-2019}
Fonda E, Sreenivasan K, Lathrop D (2019) Reconnection scaling in quantum
fluids.
\newblock {\em Proc Nat Acad Sci} 116(6):1924--1928.
\bibitem{fonda-etal-2014}
Fonda E, Meichle D, Ouellette N, Hormoz S, Lathrop D (2014) Direct observation
of kelvin waves excited by quantized vortex reconnection.
\newblock {\em Proc Natl Acad Sci USA} 111(Supp 1):4707.
\bibitem{lipniacki-2000}
Lipniacki T (2000) Evolution of quantum vortices following reconnection.
\newblock {\em Eur J Mech B Fluids} 19(3):361--378.
\bibitem{buckingham-1914}
Buckingham E (1914) On physically similar systems; illustrations of the use of
dimensional equations.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev} 4(4):345--376.
\bibitem{jackson-etal-1999}
Jackson B, McCann J, Adams C (1999) Vortex line and ring dynamics in a trapped
bose-einstein condensate.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev A} 61:013604.
\bibitem{svidzinsky-fetter-2000}
Svidzinsky A, Fetter A (2000) Stability of a vortex in a trapped bose-einstein
condensate.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 84(26):5919.
\bibitem{pitaevskii-stringari-2003}
Pitaevskii LP, Stringari S (2003) {\em Bose-Einstein condensation}.
\newblock (Ox Univ Pr).
\bibitem{schwarz-1985}
Schwarz K (1985) Three-dimensional vortex dynamics in superfluid he 4:
Line-line and line-boundary interactions.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev B} 31(9):5782.
\bibitem{hanninen-baggaley-2014}
H{\"a}nninen R, Baggaley A (2014) Vortex filament method as a tool for
computational visualization of quantum turbulence.
\newblock {\em Proc Natl Acad Sci USA} p. 201312535.
\bibitem{baggaley-2012b}
Baggaley A (2012) The sensitivity of the vortex filament method to different
reconnection models.
\newblock {\em J Low Temp Phys} 168(1-2):18--30.
\bibitem{walmsley-golov-2008}
Walmsley P, Golov A (2008) Quantum and quasiclassical types of superfluid
turbulence.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 100(24):245301.
\bibitem{walmsley-etal-2014}
Walmsley P, Tompsett P, Zmeev D, Golov A (2014) Reconnections of quantized
vortex rings in superfluid he 4 at very low temperatures.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 113(12):125302.
\bibitem{zmeev-etal-2015}
Zmeev D, et~al. (2015) Dissipation of quasiclassical turbulence in superfluid
he 4.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 115(15):155303.
\bibitem{walmsley-etal-2017}
Walmsley P, Golov A (2017) Coexistence of quantum and classical flows in
quantum turbulence in the t= 0 limit.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 118(13):134501.
\bibitem{hanninen-etal-2007}
H{\"a}nninen R, Tsubota M, Vinen W (2007) Generation of turbulence by
oscillating structures in superfluid helium at very low temperatures.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev B} 75(6):064502.
\bibitem{goto-etal-2008}
Goto R, et~al. (2008) Turbulence in boundary flow of superfluid he 4 triggered
by free vortex rings.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 100(4):045301.
\bibitem{nakatsuji-etal-2014}
Nakatsuji A, Tsubota M, Yano H (2014) Statistics of vortex loops emitted from
quantum turbulence driven by an oscillating sphere.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev B} 89(17):174520.
\bibitem{nemirovskii-2010}
Nemirovskii SK (2010) Diffusion of inhomogeneous vortex tangle and decay of
superfluid turbulence.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev B} 81(6):064512.
\bibitem{barenghi-samuels-2002}
Barenghi CF, Samuels DC (2002) Evaporation of a packet of quantized vorticity.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 89(15):155302.
\bibitem{stagg-parker-barenghi-2017}
Stagg G, Parker N, Barenghi C (2017) Superfluid boundary layer.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 118(13):135301.
\bibitem{roberts-grant-1971}
Roberts PH, Grant J (1971) Motions in a bose condensate. i. the structure of
the large circular vortex.
\newblock {\em J Phys A: Gen Phys} 4(1):55.
\bibitem{arms-hama-1965}
Arms R, Hama FR (1965) Localized-induction concept on a curved vortex and
motion of an elliptic vortex ring.
\newblock {\em Phys Fluids} 8(4):553--559.
\bibitem{dhanak-debernardinis-1981}
Dhanak M, Bernardinis BD (1981) The evolution of an elliptic vortex ring.
\newblock {\em J Fluid Mech} 109:189--216.
\bibitem{barenghi-hanninen-tsubota-2006}
Barenghi C, H{\"a}nninen R, Tsubota M (2006) Anomalous translational velocity
of vortex ring with finite-amplitude kelvin waves.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev E} 74(4):046303.
\bibitem{kopiev-Chernyshev-1997}
Kopiev V, Chernyshev S (1997) Vortex ring eigen-oscillations as a source of
sound.
\newblock {\em J Fluid Mech} 341:19--57.
\bibitem{parker-etal-2004}
Parker N, Proukakis N, Barenghi C, Adams C (2004) Controlled vortex-sound
interactions in atomic bose-einstein condensates.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 92(16):160403.
\bibitem{serafini-etal-2015}
Serafini S, et~al. (2015) Dynamics and interaction of vortex lines in an
elongated bose-einstein condensate.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 115(17):170402.
\bibitem{dalfovo-etal-1999}
Dalfovo F, Giorgini S, Pitaevskii LP, Stringari S (1999) Theory of
bose-einstein condensation in trapped gases.
\newblock {\em Rev Mod. Phys} 71(3):463.
\bibitem{gaunt-etal-2013}
Gaunt A, Schmidutz T, Gotlibovych I, Smith, R~P.Hadzibabic Z (2013)
Bose-einstein condensation of atoms in a uniform potential.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 110:200406.
\bibitem{navon-etal-2016}
Navon N, Gaunt A, Smith, R~P.Hadzibabic Z (2016) Emergence of a turbulent
cascade in a quantum gas.
\newblock {\em Nature} 539:72.
\bibitem{fetter-svidzinsky-2001}
Fetter A, Svidzinsky A (2001) Vortices in a trapped dilute bose–einstein
condensate.
\newblock {\em J. Phys.: Condens. Matter} 13:R135.
\bibitem{fetter-2009}
Fetter A (2009) Rotating trapped bose-einstein condensates.
\newblock {\em Rev Mod Phys} 81(2):647.
\bibitem{mason-berloff-fetter-2006}
Mason P, Berloff N, Fetter A (2006) Motion of a vortex line near the boundary
of a semi-infinite uniform condensate.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev A} 74:043611.
\bibitem{anderson-etal-cornell-2000}
Anderson B, Haljan P, Wieman C, Cornell E (2000) Vortex precession in
bose-einstein condensates: Observations with filled and empty cores.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev Lett} 85:2857.
\bibitem{freilich-etal-2010}
Freilich D, Bianchi D, Kaufman AM, Langin T, Hall D (2010) Real-time dynamics
of single vortex lines and vortex dipoles in a bose-einstein condensate.
\newblock {\em Science} 329:1182.
\bibitem{lundh-ao-2000}
Lundh E, Ao P (2000) Hydrodynamic approach to vortex lifetimes in trapped bose
condensates.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev A} 61(6):063612.
\bibitem{sheehy-radzihovsky-2004}
Sheehy D, Radzihovsky L (2004) Vortices in spatially inhomogeneous superfluids.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev A} 70:063620.
\bibitem{svidzinsky-fetter-2000PRA}
Svidzinsky A, Fetter A (2000) Dynamics of a vortex in a trapped bose-einstein
condensate.
\newblock {\em Phys Rev A} 62:063617.
\end{thebibliography}
%\bibliography{../../../mybib4.bib}
%\begin{thebibliography}{99}
%\bibitem{Skrbek}
%Skrbek L, Sreenivasan KR (2012)
% Developed quantum turbulence and its decay. {\it Phys. Fluids} 24:011301-47.
%
%\bibitem{Vinen}
%Vinen WF, Niemela JJ (2002)
%Quantum turbulence. {\it J. Low Temp. Phys.} 128:167-231.
%\end{thebibliography}
%\newpage
%\centerline{\bf Supporting Information}
%\centerline{\bf L. Galantucci, A.W. Baggaley, N.G. Parker and C.F. Barenghi}
%\section{Dimensional analysis}
\end{document}