Hybrid deformed algebra
Extracted source text · arXiv 1904.07843
%\documentclass[aps,prd,twocolumn,showpacs]{revtex4}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\documentclass[prd,preprint,aps,dvips,showpacs]{revtex4}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{amscd}
\usepackage{epsfig}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{latexsym}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{epsfig}
\usepackage{times}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{graphics}
\usepackage{verbatim}
\usepackage[absolute]{textpos}
\usepackage{wrapfig,times}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{setspace}
\def\l{{\bf \cal L}}
\def\p{\partial}
\def\B{\vec B}
\def\E{\vec E}
\def\grad{\vec\nabla}
\def\K{ T_3 \frac{V(T)}{\sqrt{(-X)}} }
\newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
\newcommand{\ee}{ \end{equation}}
\newcommand{\ben}{\begin{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\een}{\end{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\sech}{\rm sech}
\newcommand{\arcsinh}{\rm arcsinh}
\newcommand{\arctanh}{\rm arctanh}
\newcommand{\vs}[1]{\vspace{#1 cm}}
\newcommand{\REF}[1]{(\ref{#1})}
\newcommand{\FRAC}[2]{\mbox{\small $\frac{#1}{#2}$}}
\newcommand{\TYPO}[1]{\marginpar{\tiny {$\bf\Leftarrow$} #1} }
%\newcommand{\DOUBT}[1]{\marginpar{\tiny{$\leftarrow$ #1}}}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{document}
\title{Hybrid deformed algebra}
\author{Andre A. Marinho$^{1}$, Francisco A. Brito$^{1,2}$}
\affiliation{$^{1}$ Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de
Campina Grande, 58109-970 Campina Grande, Paraiba, Brazil
\\
$^{2}$ Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal da Paraíba,
Caixa Postal 5008, 58051-970 João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil}
\date{\today}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{abstract}
By considering $p,q$-deformed and $\mu$-deformed algebras we propose an association of them to form a hybrid deformed algebra. The increased number of
available parameters can provide us with a richer tool to investigate new scenarios within hybrid deformed statistics.
\end{abstract}
\pacs{02.20-Uw, 05.30-d}
\maketitle
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Introduction}
In conducting a study on basic hypergeometric series at the beginning of the last century, the mathematician F.H. Jackson
developed what we call $q$-calculus and its famous Jackson derivatives (JD) \cite{jak}. The emergence of deformed algebra
played a central role in the representation of quantum groups \cite{bie,mac,fuc,erz}. A concrete realization very widespread in
the literature is the deformation of the Heisenberg algebra with the introduction of the parameter of deformation $q$ through
$q$-oscillators \cite{arik,jan,ext,kul,gas,bur,dam,tru,erns,bon,anc,lav,kac,shu,ere,aba1,amg2,mir,zar,bri,dey,fak,nut}, which
obey the commutation relations that define the Lie algebra, and that in the limit $q\to 1$ we recover the original algebra. This new
mathematical structure immediately attracted interest due to its relevance to various problems in theoretical physics which includes, e.g.,
cosmology and condensed matter physics.
The statistical mechanics of bosons and fermions are strongly linked to microscopic thermodynamics, that in macroscopic level we can describe these
systems through macroscopic variables such as pressure and internal energy. The generalization comes naturally through
intermediate statistics \cite{aro,wil,che,ach,perk,nar2,lav1,rov,aba3} and non-standard quantum statistics
\cite{gen,gre,pol,abe} as well as non-extensive models \cite{tsa,kan,arp,ben,bag,gom,abr}.
In addition to the $q$-deformation parameter, the insertion of two parameters $p,q$ \cite{chak,bur1,aba4,jin,sou,amg1,chu1,sch,buk,per}
the $q_1$ and $q_2$-deformed Fibonacci oscillators \cite{arik1,aba,bri1,bri2}, as well as multiple parameters
\cite{chu,arik2,aba2,ssm,bor,bur2,hou,amg3,su} were proposed in the literature.
We also emphasize another type of deformation which, as we shall see, presents the same structure of the $q$-algebra, but with the
insertion of a new $\mu$ parameter that leads to the $\mu$-deformation \cite{jan1,amg} which presents a new definition of the so-called
\textit{basic number}. As we shall show, all these proposals allow us to generalize the polynomials and the
Fibonacci sequence. Quantum algebra with two (or more) deformation parameters may have greater flexibility when dealing with
realistic (phenomenological) applications in physical models.
In this paper, we describe the deformed oscillator models intensively investigated in literature by Jackson, Biedenharn-Macfarlane,
Arik-Coon and $p,q$-oscillators \cite{jak,bie,mac,chak,arik1}, to show that all deformed algebras satisfy Fibonacci relations. For this, we will start
with the generalized definition of the \textit{basic number} for the Fibonacci oscillators, such that when we take the appropriate values for
$q_1$ and $q_2$ we describe the aforementioned models.
For the sake of generality, we are led to propose a new model, where we associate
the well-known $q$-deformed models with the $\mu$-deformation \cite{jan1,amg}. This will produces a {\it hybrid model} that allows more flexibility
in handling it, that is, we can insert at the same time one, two or three deformation parameters to a system,
and by taking the proper limits the model returns to standard ones. We can apply the hybrid model
in various known areas of physics, such as in recent works using standard models of deformation, e.g., in the
black holes physics \cite{tsa1}, dark energy and dark matter \cite{eba,amg4,dil,tav}.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section \ref{dha} we generalize the Heisenberg algebra by initially using the Fibonacci
oscillators and in the sequel obtaining the other models of ($q$ or $p,q$)-deformation. In Section \ref{mdo}
we define our hybrid deformation model and finally, in Section \ref{con} we make our final comments.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Deformed Heisenberg Algebra}
\label{dha}
We will start with using the so-called Fibonacci oscillators, however, it is worth noting that the oscillators that will be described
below are all accommodated within the same mathematical structure of the deformed generalized oscillator, which is defined
by Heisenberg algebra in terms of operators of annihilation and creation ($c$ and $c^\dagger$, respectively),
of the operator number $N$ and structure function $\Phi(x)$, satisfying the relations
\be \label{e1} c_{i} c_{i}^\dagger - q_1^{2}c_{i}^\dagger c_i = q_2^{2n_i}\qquad\mbox{or}\qquad c_i c_{i}^\dagger -
q_2^{2}c_{i}^\dagger c_i = q_1^{2n_i},\ee
\begin{equation}\label{e1.1}[N,c^{\dagger}] = c^{\dagger}, \qquad\qquad [N,c] = -c. \end {equation}
\be \label{e2} c_{i}^\dagger c_{i} = \Phi(N) = [N],\qquad\qquad c_{i}c_{i}^\dagger = \Phi(N+1) = [N+1],\ee
where $\Phi(x)$ is a characteristic positive analytical function for the deformation regime, with $\Phi(0) = 0$.
We conclude from Eq.~(\ref{e2}) that for $N=\Phi^{-1} (c_{i}^\dagger c_{i})$, the commutation and anti-commutation relations are satisfied, i.e.,
\be [c_{i},c_{i}^\dagger] = [N+1] - [N],\qquad \{c_{i},c_{i}^\dagger\} = [N+1] + [N].\ee
The commutation relations (\ref{e1}) are valid for the definition of the Fibonacci \textit{basic number or $n$-bracket} \cite{arik1}
\be \label{e3}[n_{i,q_1,q_2}] = c_{i}^\dagger c_{i} = \frac{q_1^{2n_i}-q_2^{2n_i}}{q_1^2-q_2^{2}},\ee
where $q_1$ and $q_2$ are parameters of deformation that are real, positive, independent and at the
limit $q_1=1$ and $q_2\to 1$ (or vice versa) we have to $[n_{i,q_1,q_2}]=n_i$.
The Fock space spanned by the orthonormalized eigenstates $|n \rangle$ is constructed according to
\begin{eqnarray} {|n\rangle} =\frac{(c^{\dagger})^{n}} {\sqrt{[n]!}}{|0\rangle},\qquad\qquad c{|0\rangle}=0 ,\end {eqnarray}
and the actions of $c$, $c^{\dagger}$ and $N$ on the states $|n\rangle$ in the Fock space are known to be
\begin{equation} c^{\dagger}{|n\rangle} = [n+1]^{1/2} {|n+1\rangle},\end{equation}
\begin{equation} c{|n\rangle} = [n]^{1/2} {|n-1\rangle},\end{equation}
\begin{equation} N{|n\rangle} = n{|n\rangle}.\end{equation}
We can rewrite the general commutation relations through the following general relation % the cases of deformation through the linear second
%order homogenous difference equation
\cite{aba}
\be \label{e4} [N+2]=\alpha[N+1]+\beta[N],\ee
where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ depend on the \textit{$n$-bracket} definition and \textit{initial} conditions: $[0]=0$ and $[1]=1$.
In the case of definition (\ref{e3}), we have $\alpha=q_{1}^{2}+q_{2}^2$ and $\beta=-q_{1}^2q_{2}^2$. On the other hand,
regardless of the definition of the \textit{basic number} the relation (\ref{e4}) satisfies the Fibonacci relation.
We can write a sequence in the form
\begin{equation} [0] = 0, \nonumber\\\end{equation}
\begin{equation} [1] = 1, \nonumber\\\end{equation}
\begin{equation} [2] = \alpha, \nonumber\\\end{equation}
\begin{equation} \label{e5} [3] = \alpha^2+\beta, \end{equation}
\begin{equation} [4] = \alpha^3+2\alpha\beta, \nonumber\\\end{equation}
\begin{equation} [5] = \alpha^4+\beta^2+3\alpha^2\beta, \nonumber\\\end{equation}
\begin{equation} [6] = \alpha^5+4\alpha^3\beta+3\alpha\beta^2, \nonumber\\\end{equation}
\begin{equation} \nonumber{} \vdots \end{equation}
such that when $\alpha=\beta=1$ we obtain the famous Fibonacci sequence $0,1,1,2,3,5,8,...$ .
We will demonstrate from definition (\ref{e3}) that it is possible to describe the deformation models for $q$ or $p,q$.
We can write the \textit{basic numbers} and their
respective commutation relations by determining suitable values for $q_1$ and $q_2$:
\begin{enumerate}
\item For $q_1=\sqrt{q}$ and $q_2=1$,
\be [n]_q=\frac{q^n-1}{q-1},\qquad cc^\dagger-qc^\dagger c=1,\qquad \ee
that implies, $\alpha=1+q$ and $\beta=-q$.
\item For $q_1=\sqrt{q}$ and $q_2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{q}}$, we have symmetry
\be [n]_q=\frac{q^n-q^{-n}}{q-q^{-1}},\ee
\be cc^\dagger-qc^\dagger=q^{-n}\qquad\mbox{or}\qquad cc^\dagger-q^{-1}c^\dagger c=q^{n},\ee
then, $\alpha=q+q^{-1}$ and $\beta=-1$.
\item When $q_1=q$ and $q_2=1$,
\be [n]_{q^2}=\frac{q^{2n}-1}{q^2-1},\qquad cc^\dagger-q^{2n}c^\dagger c=1,\ee
we have, $\alpha=1+q^{2}$ and $\beta=-q^2$.
\item When $q_1=q$ and $q_2=\frac{1}{q}$, we again have a symmetry
\be [n]_{q^2}=\frac{q^{2n}-q^{-2n}}{q^2-q^{-2}},\ee
\be cc^\dagger-q^2c^\dagger c=q^{-2n},\qquad\mbox{or}\qquad cc^\dagger-q^{-2}c^\dagger c=q^{2n},\ee
and we get, $\alpha=q^2+q^{-2}$ and $\beta=-1$.
\item For the model $p,q$-deformed we take $q_1=\sqrt{q}$ and $q^2=\sqrt{p}$,
\be [n]_{p,q}=\frac{q^{n}-p^{n}}{q-p},\ee
\be cc^\dagger-qc^\dagger c=p^{n},\qquad\mbox{or}\qquad cc^\dagger-pc^\dagger c=q^{n},\ee
with $\alpha=q+p$ and $\beta=-pq$.
\end{enumerate}
All models presented above belong to the Fibonacci class of oscillators. In the literature we find various applications of these
models. Depending on the chosen definition of the \textit{basic number}, we get different generalizations of thermostatistics.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Hybrid Deformation Model}
\label{mdo}
\subsection{$\mu$-Deformation}
The $\mu$-oscillator definition \cite{jan1,amg} presents the same structure as the models presented in the previous section.
Of course, the insertion of the parameter $\mu$ presents us with a definition of the \textit{basic number} structurally different
from the previous definitions
\be c^{\dagger}c=\Phi_{\mu}(N)=\frac{N}{1+\mu N},\qquad cc^{\dagger}=\Phi_{\mu}(N+1)=\frac{N+1}{1+\mu(N+1)}.\ee
\be \label{e6} c^{\dagger}c=\Phi_{\mu}(N)=[n]^{\mu}=\frac{n}{1+n\mu},\ee
which in the limit $\mu\to 0$ we have $[n]^{\mu}=n$. The basic commutation relations for the $\mu$-oscillator are the
same as for the $q$-oscillator as we can see in (\ref{e1.1}). We have the following different \textit{initial} conditions \cite{amg}
\be [0]^{\mu}=0,\qquad [1]^{\mu}=\frac{1}{1+\mu}\neq 1.\ee
We can also write the Fibonacci sequence in the same way as in (\ref{e5}), as long as
\be \lim_{\mu\to 0}~[1]^{\mu}=1.\ee
\subsection{Association of $q$-deformation with $\mu$-deformation}
Let us now associate $q$-deformation with $\mu$-deformation.
%The term hybrid may be used to denote a type of animal or vegetable, a type of care, or a type of motor of a vehicle.
%Generally we always have a combination of different elements. Thus, nothing more appropriate than designating the term
%\textit{hybrid} deformation for the model we are proposing. As we have seen, starting from the Fibonacci oscillators, we
%describe the models of $q$ and $p,q$-deformation, a fact that is not possible for the $\mu$-deformation model, due to its
%\textit{initial} condition $[1]^{\mu} \neq [1]$.
%When we begin to work with models of $q$-deformed algebra we seek understanding the whole process to describe a generalization
%of Heisenberg algebra which, as we know, is a three-dimensional Lie algebra and then apply these tools to the Landau Diamagnetism
%problem and to the Einstein and Debye solids model, to associate the parameter $q$ \cite{bri} and the parameters $q_1$ and
%$q_2$ \cite{bri1} with the physical agents, so that the $q$-algebra is not only seen as a mathematical tool. We also apply
%these two parameters to the Hermite polynomials \cite{bri2}, where we conclude that the deformation is more effective to the
%higher order excited states. Our "power to mess up" a system has led us to conjecture that the deformation parameters are
%linked to a type of impurity or a disorder factor, as e.g. with superconducting materials which, in the presence of a
%change in pressure or temperature , they lose this characteristic.
%Believing that we can further strengthen our observations, where the deformation parameters act as some kind of impurity and
%also enable an even greater expansion of knowledge already investigated areas as well as the insertion in new areas, we
%propose this ansatz, where we associate the Fibonacci oscillators with the $\mu$ parameter.
In order to provide this we set our
\textit{basic number} as follows
\be \label{e7}[n]_{q_1,q_2}^{\mu}=\frac{q_1^{2[n]^{\mu}}-q_2^{2[n]^{\mu}}}{q_{1}^{2}-q_{2}^{2}},\ee
\be \label{e8} \lim_{\mu\to 0}~[n]_{q_1,q_2}^{\mu}=[n]_{q_1,q_2}=\frac{q_1^{2n}-q_2^{2n}}{q_{1}^{2}-q_{2}^{2}},\qquad\mbox{and}\qquad
\lim_{q_1=q_2\to 1}~[n]_{q_1,q_2}^{\mu}=[n]^{\mu}=\frac{n}{1+n\mu}.\ee
Of course, the definition given by (\ref{e7}) with the respective values adopted for $q_1$ and $q_2$ can recover the definitions written for the models we
have studied in the previous section. % but now they will be hybrid models, i.e. in the same way they will be associated with the
%$\mu$ parameter.
The commutation relations of the hybrid model and the \textit{initial} conditions are given by
\be cc^{\dagger}-q_{1}^2c^{\dagger}c=q_{2}^{2[n]_{q_1,q_2}^{\mu}}~,\qquad\mbox{or}\qquad
cc^{\dagger}-q_{2}^2c^{\dagger}c=q_{1}^{2[n]_{q_1,q_2}^{\mu}}~,\ee
\be [0]_{q_1,q_2}^{\mu}=0,\qquad\quad [1]_{q_1,q_2}^{\mu}=\frac{q_{1}^{\frac{2}{1+\mu}}-q_{2}^{\frac{2}{1+\mu}}}{q_{1}^2-q_{2}^2}.\ee
We have
\be \alpha=\frac{q_{1}^{\frac{4}{1+2\mu}}-q_{2}^{\frac{4}{1+2\mu}}}{q_{1}^2-q_{2}^2},\qquad\mbox{and}\qquad
\beta=\frac{q_{1}^{\frac{6}{1+3\mu}}-q_{2}^{\frac{6}{1+3\mu}}}{q_{1}^2-q_{2}^2}-\alpha^2.\ee
Our proposal presents %as main characteristic the independence between the two models, it is easy to notice in
%(\ref{e8}). This independence does not interfere with the insertion of deformation into a system. We have
an association between two different types of deformation, which increases our power of application to describe a system, because we have inserted a new
disturbance factor (or disorder) whose role can be played by the $\mu$-deformation in addition to the usual $q$-deformation.
% , we do not know what we can find, however, when we remove one of the
%deformations that we leave the other still present, only when we remove the two deformations, we take the system to its initial state.
Since the deformation parameters $q_1, q_2$ or $\mu$ are independent, we further increase our manipulation power to address impurities and disorders of a physical system.
More specifically, we can imagine, e.g., a nano film deposition system (sputtering or cathodic evaporation is used extensively in industry and in
semiconductor research for the deposition of thin films of various materials) \cite{ches}, in which several parameters are controllable, such as
the temperature of the substrate where the material is deposited, the power of the DC source, the working
pressure, the insertion of a gas during the process, among others. It is possible to associate the adjustable parameters
with the deformation parameters to calculate the thermodynamic quantities of the films, e.g., thermal and
electrical conductivity. %This would not only save material time-saving material, because the films are deposited in a
%vacuum chamber.
%\textbf{Acho que seria interessante chamar a atenção para o fato de associarmos um modelo de osciladores de Fibonacci (e que podemos
%descrever os modelos de deformação conhecidos na literatura) com um modelo de deformação que não obedece aos osciladores de
%Fibonacci. E que nosso modelo ao inserir os parâmetros de deformação permite manipulá-los de forma independente: podemos reduzir para
%apenas q; podemos usar a simetria; e ainda podemos inserir os 3 ao mesmo tempo, e ter um tipo de sequência de Fibonacci generalizada
%e quando se retira o $\mu$ obtemos a sequência novamente.}
%\textbf{Acho que com o exemplo de uma aplicação experimental já fica suficiente. Como você sabe vender o peixe muito melhor do eu, espero
%que estas informações ajudem.}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
\section{Conclusions}
\label{con}
In this work we show that through the Fibonacci oscillators, we can write the models for one ($q$) or two ($p,q$) deformation
parameters. And we can generically write the Fibonacci sequence, which as we know is a linear combination that encompasses
arithmetic and geometric progressions, that is a well-known way to describe a sequence of integers. The choice of which model
to use depends greatly on the physical system being investigated.
%The work on $\mu$-deformation \cite{amg} that we briefly described, but we highlight the points that motivated us to propose
We have proposed a new model of deformation, the hybrid deformation, where we associate ($q_1,q_2$)-deformation with $\mu$-deformation.
%We look for a way to write
%our model, where
This means that at the same time we insert three parameters of deformation, and that at the limit of $q_1=q_2\to 1$ we
have only the parameter $\mu$ playing the role of deformation in the system. On the other hand, at the limit of $\mu\to 0$ we recover the usual Fibonacci oscillators.
%Of course, that with these limits being considered at the same time, we have no deformation applied.
%Another important feature is that, as we have seen, with the appropriate values for $q_1$ and $q_2$ we recover the $\mu$-deformation.% associated with the other
%models in the literature.
The search for generalized statistics makes possible to solve problems where the standard statistic \cite{patt,hua} does not
work. The results obtained with the insertion of the $\mu$-deformation enlarge our field of investigation, % because, when comparing with
%standard results it is possible to associate as we suggest to
such as investigating factors of disorder or impurities in a thermodynamic system.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section*{Acknowledgments}
We would like to thank CNPq, CAPES, and PNPD/PROCAD-CAPES, for partial financial support. FAB acknowledges support from CNPq (Grant no. 312104/2018-9).
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\bibitem{jak} F.H. Jackson, Proc. Edin. Math. Soc. \textbf{22}, 28-39(1904);
F.H. Jackson, Trans. Roy Soc. Edin. \textbf{46}, 253-281 (1908);
F.H. Jackson, Mess. Math. \textbf{38}, 57 (1909);
F.H. Jackson, Q. J. Pure: Appl. Math. \textbf{41}, 193 (1910).
%groups
\bibitem{bie} L. Biedenharn, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. \textbf{22}, L873 (1989);
L.C. Biedenharn, M.A. Lohe, \textit{Quantum Group Symmetry and $q$-Tensor Algebras}, World Scientific, Singapore, (1995).
\bibitem{mac} A. Macfarlane, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. \textbf{22}, 4581 (1989).
\bibitem{fuc} J. Fuchs, Affine Lie Algebras and Quantum Groups, Cambridge University Press (1992).
\bibitem{erz} A. Erzan, Phys. Lett. A \textbf{225}, 235 (1997).
%q-def
\bibitem{arik} M. Arik, D.D. Coon, J. Math. Phys. \textbf{17}, 524 (1976)
\bibitem{jan} A. Jannussis et al., lett. Nuovo Cimento. \textbf{30}, 123 (1981)
\bibitem{ext} H. Exton, \textit{$q$-Hypergeometric Functions and Applications}, John Wiley and Sons, New York, (1983).
\bibitem{kul} P.P. Kulish and E.V. Damaskinsky, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. \textbf{23}, L415-L419 (1990).
\bibitem{gas} G. Gasper, M. Rahman, \textit{Basic Hypergeometric Functions}, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, (1991).
\bibitem{bur} I.M. Burban, A.U. Klimyk, Lett. Math. Phys. \textbf{29}, 13-18 (1993);
\bibitem{dam} E.V. Damaskinsky, P. Kulish, Zap. Nauchn. Sem. LOMI \textbf{199}, 81-90 (1992) and English version
J. Math. Sci. \textbf{77}, 3069-3075 (1995).
\bibitem{tru} T.T. Truong, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. \textbf{27}, 3829-3846 (1994).
\bibitem{erns} T. Ernst, \textit{The History of $q$-calculus and a new method}. (Dep. Math., Uppsala Univ. 1999-2000).
\bibitem {bon} D. Bonatsos, C. Daskaloyannis, Prog. Part. Nuc. Phys. \textbf{43}, 537-618 (1999).
\bibitem{anc} D.V. Anchiskin, A.M. Gavrilik and N.Z. Iorgov, Eur. Phys. J. A, \textbf{7}, 229-238 (2000).
\bibitem{lav} A. Lavagno and P.N. Swamy, Phys. Rev. E \textbf{61}, 1218 (2000);
A. Lavagno and P.N. Swamy, Phys. Rev. E \textbf{65}, 036101 (2002);
A. Lavagno, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B \textbf{23}, 235-250 (2009);
A. Lavagno, G. Gervino, J. Phys. Conf. Series \textbf{174}, 012071 (2009);
A. Lavagno, P.N. Swamy, Found Phys. \textbf{40}, 814-828 (2010).
\bibitem {kac} V. Kac, P. Cheung, \textit{Quantum Calculus}, (Universitext, Springer-verlag), (2002).
\bibitem{shu} Y. Shu, J. Chen and L. Chen, Phys. Lett. A \textbf{292}, 309-314 (2002).
\bibitem{ere} V.V. Eremin and A.A Meldianov, Theor. Math. Phys. \textbf{147}, 709-715 (2006).
\bibitem {aba1} A. Algin, E. Arslan, Phys. Lett. A \textbf{372}, 2767-2773 (2008);
A. Algin, E. Arslan, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. \textbf{41}, 365006 (2008);
A. Algin, Int. J. Theor. Phys. \textbf{50}, 1554-1568 (2011);
A. Algin and E. Ilik, Phys. Lett. A \textbf{377}, 1797-1803 (2013);
A. Algin and M. Senay, J. Phys. Conf. Series \textbf{766}, 012008 (2016);
A. Algin, M. Senay, Physica A \textbf{447}, 232-246 (2016);
W.S. Chung and A. Algin, Chaos Sol. Frac., \textbf{115}, 77-83 (2018).
\bibitem{amg2} A.M. Gavrilik and A.P. Rebesh, Ukr. J. Phys. \textbf{53}, n. 6 (2008);
\bibitem{mir} B. Mirza, H. Mohammadzadeh, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. \textbf{44}, 475003 (2011).
\bibitem{zar} S. Zare et al., Eur. Phys. J. C, \textbf{72}, 2152 (2012).
\bibitem{bri} F.A. Brito, A.A. Marinho, Physica A \textbf{390}, 2497-2503 (2011).
A.A. Marinho, F.A. Brito, C. Chesman, Physica A \textbf{391}, 3424-3434 (2012).
D. Tristant, F.A. Brito, Physica A \textbf{407}, 276-286 (2014).
\bibitem{dey} S. Dey et al., Phys. Rev. D \textbf{87}, 084033 (2013).
\bibitem{fak} H. Fakhri and A. Hashemi, Phys. Rev. E \textbf{93}, 013802 (2016).
\bibitem{nut} F. Nutku, K.D. Sen and E. Aydiner, arXiv:quant-ph/1806.09371v1.
%intermediate
\bibitem {aro} D. Arovas, R. Schrieffer, F.Wilczek, and A. Zee, Nucl. Phys. B \textbf{251}, 117 (1985).
\bibitem {wil} F. Wilczek, \textit{Fractional Statistics and Anyon Superconductivity}, World Scientific, Singapore, (1990).
\bibitem {che} S.S. Chern, et al., \textit{Physics and Mathematics of Anyons, World Scientific}, Singapore, (1991).
\bibitem {ach} R. Acharya and P. Narayana Swamy, J. Phys. A \textbf{27}, 7247 (1994);
R. Acharya and P. Narayana Swamy, J. Phys. A \textbf{37}, 2527 (2004).
\bibitem {perk} W. A. Perkins, Int. J. Theor. Phys. \textbf{41}, 823 (2002).
\bibitem {nar2} P. N. Swamy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B \textbf{20}, 697-713 (2006).
\bibitem{lav1} A. Lavagno, A. M. Scarfone and P. N. Swamy, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. \textbf{40}, 8635-8654 (2007);
A. Lavagno, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. \textbf{41}, 244014 (2008);
A. Lavagno, P.N. Swamy, Physica A \textbf{389}, 993-1001 (2010).
\bibitem {rov} A. Rovenchak, Low Temp. Phys. \textbf{35}, 400 (2009);
A. Rovenchak, Phys. Rev. A. \textbf{89}, 052116 (2014);
A. Rovenchak, Eur. Phys. J. B \textbf{87}, 175 (2014).
\bibitem {aba3} A. Algin, M. Senay, Phys. Rev. E. \textbf{85}, 041123 (2012);
A. Algin, D. Irk and G. Topcu, Phys. Rev. E. \textbf{91}, 062131 (2015).
%generalized
\bibitem {gen} G. Gentile, Nuovo Cimento \textbf{17}, 493 (1940).
\bibitem {gre} H. S. Green, Phys. Rev. \textbf{90}, 270 (1953).
\bibitem {pol} A. P. Polychronakos, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{365}, 202 (1996).
\bibitem{abe} S. Abe, Phys. Lett. A \textbf{224}, 326 (1997).
\bibitem{tsa} C. Tsallis, J. Stat. Phys. \textbf{52}, 479 (1988);
C. Tsallis, Physica A \textbf{221}, 277-290 (1995);
C. Tsallis, Braz. J. Phys. \textbf{29}, 1-35 (1999);
E.M. Curado and C. Tsallis, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. \textbf{24}, L69 (1991);
C. Tsallis, R.S. Mendes and A.R. Plastino, Physica A \textbf{261}, 534 (1998).
\bibitem{kan} G. Kaniadakis, Phys. Rev. E \textbf{66}, 056125 (2002);
G. Kaniadakis, M. Lissia, A.M. Scarfone, Physica A \textbf{340}, 410 (2004);
G. Kaniadakis, M. Lissia, A. M. Scarfone, Phys. Rev. E \textbf{71}, 046128 (2005).
\bibitem{arp} A.R. Plastino, A.M.C. Souza, F.D. Nobre and C. Tsallis, Phys. Rev. A \textbf{90}, 062134 (2014).
\bibitem{ben} E.P. Bento et at., Phys. Rev. E \textbf{91}, 022105 (2015).
\bibitem{bag} G.B. Bagci and T. Oikonomou, Phys. Rev. E \textbf{93}, 022112 (2016).
\bibitem{gom} I.S. Gomez, arXiv:math-ph/1805.11135v1.
\bibitem{abr} E.M.C. Abreu et al., Eur. Phys. Lett. \textbf{121}, 45002 (2018).
%qp
\bibitem{chak} R. Chakrabarti, R. Jagannathan, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. \textbf{24}, L711 (1991).
\bibitem{bur1} I.M. Burban, A.U. Klimyk, Integral Transforms and Special Functions \textbf{2}, 15-36 (1994).
\bibitem{aba4} A. Algin, M. Arik and A.S. Arikan, Phys. Rev. E. \textbf{65}, 026140 (2002);
\bibitem{jin} S. Jing and S.D. Silvestrov, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. \textbf{38}, 1711-1721 (2005).
\bibitem{sou} J. de Souza, E.M.F. Curado and M.A.R. Monteiro, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. \textbf{39}, 10415-10425 (2006).
\bibitem{amg1} A.M. Gavrilik, SIGMA, \textbf{2}, p 074 (2006);
A.M. Gavrilik and A.P. Rebesh, SIGMA, \textbf{3}, p 112 (2007);
A.M. Gavrilik and A.P. Rebesh, Mod. Phys. Lett. A \textbf{22}, 949-960 (2007);
A.M. Gavrilik and A.P. Rebesh, Mod. Phys. Lett. A \textbf{23}, 921-932 (2008);
A.M. Gavrilik and A.P. Rebesh, Mod. Phys. Lett. B \textbf{25}, 1150030 (2012);
A.M. Gavrilik, I.I. Kachurik and A.V. Lukash, Ukr. J. Phys. \textbf{58}, n. 11 (2013).
\bibitem{chu1} W.S. Chung and A. Algin, Phys. Lett. A, \textbf{381}, 3266-3271 (2017).
\bibitem{sch} M. Schork, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. \textbf{40}, 4207-4214 (2007).
\bibitem{buk} J.D. Bukweli Kyemba, M. Hounkonnou, J. Phys. A \textbf{45}, 225204 (2012).
\bibitem{per} C.C. Perelman, Phys. Astron. Int. J. \textbf{4}, 341-347 (2018).
%fibon
\bibitem{arik1} M. Arik, et al., Z. Phys. C \textbf{55}, 89-95 (1992).
\bibitem {aba} A. Algin, Phys. Lett. A \textbf{292}, 251-255 (2002);
A. Algin, B. Deviren, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. \textbf{38}, 5945-5956 (2005);
A. Algin , M. Arik, D. Kocabicakoglu, Int. J. Theor. Phys.\textbf{47}, 1322-1332 (2008);
A. Algin, M. Baser, Physica A \textbf{387}, 1088-1098 (2008);
A. Algin, J. Stat. Mech. Theor. Exp., 10009 (2008);
A. Algin, J. Stat. Mech. Theor. Exp., 04007 (2009);
A. Algin, J. CNSNS \textbf{15}, 1372-1377 (2010);
A. Algin, A.S. Arikan, E. Dil, Physica A \textbf{416}, 499-517 (2014);
A. Algin and A.S. Arikan, J. Stat. Mech. Theor. Exp., 043105 (2017);
A. Algin and A. Olkun, Annals Phys., \textbf{383}, 239-256 (2017).
\bibitem{bri1} A.A. Marinho, F.A. Brito, C. Chesman, Physica A \textbf{411}, 74-79 (2014);
A.A. Marinho, F.A. Brito, C. Chesman, J. Phys. Conf. Series \textbf{568}, 012009 (2014);
A.A. Marinho, F.A. Brito, C. Chesman, Physica A \textbf{443}, 324-332 (2016).
\bibitem{bri2} A.A. Marinho, F.A. Brito, arXiv:cond-mat.stat-mech/1805.03229v1.
%multi
\bibitem{chu} W.S. Chung et al., Phys. Lett. A \textbf{183}, 363 (1993).
\bibitem{arik2} M. Arik and A.S. Arikan, Eur. Phys. J. C, \textbf{20}, 389-391 (2000).
\bibitem {aba2} A. Algin, M. Arik and A.S. Arikan, Eur. Phys. J. C, \textbf{25}, 487-491 (2002).
\bibitem{ssm} S.S. Mizrahi, J.P. Camargo Lima, V.V. Dodonov, J. Phys. A \textbf{37}, 3707 (2004).
\bibitem{bor} V.V. Borzov, E.V. Damaskinsky, Zap. Nauchn. Sem. PDMI \textbf{308}, 48-66 (2004);
V.V. Borzov, E.V. Damaskinsky and S.B. Yegorov, J. Math. Sci. \textbf{100}, n 2 (2000);
V.V. Borzov and E.V. Damaskinsky, J. Math. Sci. \textbf{136}, 3564-3579 (2006).
\bibitem{bur2} I.M. Burban, Phys. Lett. A \textbf{366}, 308-314 (2007).
\bibitem{hou} M.N. Hounkonnou and E.B.Ngompe Nkouankam, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. \textbf{40}, 8835-8843 (2007).
\bibitem{amg3} A.M. Gavrilik and A.P. Rebesh, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. \textbf{43}, 24, 095203 (2010).
\bibitem{su} W.C. Su, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. \textbf{45}, 055206 (2012).
%mu
\bibitem{jan1} A. Jannussis, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. \textbf{26}, L233-L237 (1993).
\bibitem{amg} A.M. Gavrilik, I.I. Kachurik, A.P. Rebesh, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. \textbf{43}, 245204 (2010);
A.M. Gavrilik and A.P. Rebesh, Eur. Phys. J.A \textbf{47}, 55 (2011);
A.M. Gavrilik and Yu.A. Mishchenko, Phys. Lett. A \textbf{376}, 2484-2489 (2012);
A.M. Gavrilik, I.I. Kachurik, A.P. Rebesh, arXiv:cond-mat.stat-mech/1309.1363v1;
A.P. Rebesh, I.I. Kachurik, A.M. Gavrilik, Ukr. J. Phys. \textbf{58}, n. 12 (2013);
%blackhole
\bibitem{tsa1} C. Tsallis and L.J.L Cirto, Eur. Phys. J. C \textbf{73}, 2487 (2013).
%darkmatter energy
\bibitem{eba} Z. Ebadi, B. Mirza and H. Mohammadzadeh, J. Cosm. Ast. Phys., \textbf{11}, 057 (2013).
\bibitem{dil} E. Dil and E. Kolay, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D \textbf{26}, 1750177 (2017);
E. Dil, Phys. Dark Univ. \textbf{16}, 1-13 (2017).
\bibitem{amg4} A.M. Gavrilik et al., arXiv:cond-mat.stat-mech/1709.05931v2;
A.M. Gavrilik, Universe, \textbf{4}, 33 (2018);
A.M. Gavrilik et al., Physica. A, \textbf{506}, 835-843 (2018).
\bibitem{tav} M. Tavayef et al., Phys. Lett. B \textbf{781}, 195-200 (2018).
\bibitem{ches} S.M. Rezende et al., J. Appl. Phys. \textbf{85}, 5892 (1999);
C. Salvador et al., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. \textbf{41}, 20 (2008);
A.B. Oliveira et al., J. Mag. and Mag. Mat. \textbf{469}, 64 - 68 (2019).
\bibitem{patt} R.K. Patthria, \textit{Statistical Mechanics}, Pergamon press, Oxford (1972).
\bibitem{hua} K. Huang, \textit{Statistical Mechanics}, John Wiley \& Sons, (1987).
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}