Attractive Interaction between Fully Charged Lipid Bilayers in a Strongly-Confined Geometry
Extracted source text · arXiv 1910.09611
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,groupedaddress]{revtex4-1}
\documentclass[onecolumn,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
%\usepackage{epsfig}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{epstopdf}
\usepackage{latexsym}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{txfonts}
\usepackage{pxfonts}
%\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage[usenames,dvipsnames]{xcolor}
\usepackage{pdfpages}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{bbding}
\newcommand*\mycommand[1]{\texttt{\emph{#1}}}
\def\mybullet{\scalerel*{\addvbuffer[-.15pt -.6pt]{$\bullet$}}{\blacksquare}}
\DeclareRobustCommand\solid {\tikz[baseline=-0.6ex]\draw[thick] (0,0)--(0.5,0);}
\DeclareRobustCommand\dotted{\tikz[baseline=-0.6ex]\draw[thick,dotted] (0,0)--(0.54,0);}
\DeclareRobustCommand\dashed{\tikz[baseline=-0.6ex]\draw[thick,dashed] (0,0)--(0.54,0);}
\DeclareRobustCommand\chain {\tikz[baseline=-0.6ex]\draw[thick,dash dot dot] (0,0)--(0.5,0);}
\definecolor{newgreen}{rgb}{0.0, 0.5, 0.0}
%\graphicspath{{figures/}}
\newcommand{\dd}{\textrm{d}}
\begin{document}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% The document title should be given as usual. Some journals require
%% a running title from the author: this should be supplied as an
%% optional argument to \title.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\title[An \textsf{achemso} demo]
{Attractive Interaction between Fully Charged Lipid Bilayers in a Strongly-Confined Geometry}
\author{Tetiana Mukhina}
\affiliation{UPR 22/CNRS, Institut Charles Sadron, Universit\'e de Strasbourg, 23 rue du Loess, BP 84047 67034 Strasbourg Cedex 2, France}
%\alsoaffiliation{Institut Laue-Langevin, 71 av. des Martyrs, BP 156, 38042 Grenoble Cedex, France}
\author{Arnaud Hemmerle}
\affiliation{UPR 22/CNRS, Institut Charles Sadron, Universit\'e de Strasbourg, 23 rue du Loess, BP 84047 67034 Strasbourg Cedex 2, France}
%\altaffiliation{Current address: Synchrotron SOLEIL, L'Orme des Merisiers, Saint-Aubin, BP 48, F-91192 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France}
\author{Valeria Rondelli}
\affiliation{Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Mediche e Medicina Traslazionale, Universit\'a degli Studi di Milano, LITA, Via F.lli Cervi 93, 20090 Segrate, Italy}
\author{Yuri Gerelli}
\affiliation{Institut Laue-Langevin, 71 av. des Martyrs, BP 156, 38042 Grenoble Cedex, France}
\author{Giovanna Fragneto}
\affiliation{Institut Laue-Langevin, 71 av. des Martyrs, BP 156, 38042 Grenoble Cedex, France}
\author{Jean Daillant}
\affiliation{Synchrotron SOLEIL, L'Orme des Merisiers, Saint-Aubin, BP 48, F-91192 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France}
\author{Thierry Charitat}
\email{thierry.charitat@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr}
%\phone{+123 (0)123 4445556}
%\fax{+123 (0)123 4445557}
\affiliation{UPR 22/CNRS, Institut Charles Sadron, Universit\'e de Strasbourg, 23 rue du Loess, BP 84047 67034 Strasbourg Cedex 2, France}
\begin{abstract}
We investigate the interaction between highly charged lipid bilayers in the presence of monovalent counterions. Neutron and X-ray reflectivity experiments show that the water layer between like-charged bilayers is thinner than for zwitterionic lipids, demonstrating the existence of counterintuitive electrostatic attractive interaction between bilayers. Such attraction can be explained by taking into account the correlations between counterions within the Strong Coupling limit, which falls beyond the classical Poisson-Boltzmann theory of electrostatics. Our results show the limit of the Strong Coupling continuous theory in a highly confined geometry and are in agreement with a decrease in the water dielectric constant due to a surface charge-induced orientation of water molecules.
\end{abstract}
\maketitle
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% Some journals require a list of abbreviations or keywords to be
%% supplied. These should be set up here, and will be printed after
%% the title and author information, if needed.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% The manuscript does not need to include \maketitle, which is
%% executed automatically.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% The "tocentry" environment can be used to create an entry for the
%% graphical table of contents. It is given here as some journals
%% require that it is printed as part of the abstract page. It will
%% be automatically moved as appropriate.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% The abstract environment will automatically gobble the contents
%% if an abstract is not used by the target journal.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% Start the main part of the manuscript here.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%\section{Introduction}
Understanding electrostatic interactions between charged confined surfaces across aqueous electrolytes is important in many fundamental and applied research areas. For example, these interactions are crucial for controlling properties of colloidal suspension \cite{Norrish(nature1954),Belloni(jphyscondmat2000)}. In biology, many specific functions of cell membranes strongly depend on electrostatic interactions, such as interactions with biomolecules, membrane adhesion and cell-cell interactions \cite{andelman(revue)}. Electrostatic interactions between charged surfaces in water (dielectric permittivity $\epsilon_{\rm w}$) have been widely investigated both theoretically and experimentally in the case of two infinitely large planar walls with uniform surface charge density $\sigma_{s}$ and positively charged counterions of charge $qe$, where $q$ is the counterion valence, at temperature $T$. The Bjerrum length $\ell_{\rm B} = e^2/4\pi\epsilon_{\rm w} k_{\rm B} T \sim 0.7$ nm compares the electrostatic interaction between counter-ions to thermal energy. The Gouy-Chapman length $b=1/(2 \pi q \ell_{\rm B} \sigma_{s})$ characterizes the thickness of the diffuse counterion layer close to the membrane, without added salt, as a function of the charge density $\sigma_{s}$. The coupling constant $\Xi = \ell_{\rm B} q^2 /b = 2 \pi q^{3} \ell_{\rm B}^{2} \sigma_{s}$ quantifies the competition between the counterion-counterion interaction and thermal agitation $k_{\rm B}T$. For low coupling constant values, i.e. $\Xi \ll 1$, ion correlations are negligible and the ions distribution can be evaluated by the Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) theory in the mean-field approximation \cite{andelman(revue)}. PB theory predicts a repulsive pressure between similarly charged surfaces, and has been confirmed by numerous experiments (for a review see \cite{Belloni(jphyscondmat2000)}). For high coupling constant values, i.e. $\Xi \gg 1$, the PB theory fails and correlations between ions start to be non-negligible. Indeed, strong-coupling (SC) theory and numerical simulations were developed to describe electrostatic interactions in this regime \cite{rouzina(jphyschem1996),Netz(epje2001),moreira(PRL2001),Moreira2002, Naji(PhysicaA2005),Samaj(PRL2011),trizac(softmatter2018)}, showing that identically charged plates can attract each other for large coupling parameters $\Xi \geq 20$. Most of experimental investigations of SC limit have been carried out using divalent counterions to increase the coupling constant $\Xi$. In such conditions, an attraction, in good agreement with the strong coupling limit, was observed between mica surfaces \cite{kekicheff(Jchemphys1993)}, lamellar systems \cite{khan(jphyscem1985)} and between two charged vesicles \cite{salditt(2018)}. Recently, surface force apparatus experiments were performed to measure the compressibility modulus of charged membranes in presence of monovalent counterions. For large water separation distances ($d > 5$ nm), where effects related to the structure of water are negligible, a good agreement with weak coupling corrections, still in the repulsive regime ($\Xi\sim3$), was obtained \cite{herrmann(PRL2014)}. In this paper, we explore the poorly understood limit of strong confinement, where continuous theories reach their limits, as already highlighted numerically \cite{netz(langmuir2019)} and first evidenced by pioneering works on black films \cite{sonneville(langmuir2000)}.
Samples consisted in two supported bilayers deposited consecutively on ultra-flat silicon substrates \cite{charitat1999,daillant2005,Hemmerle(PNAS2012)} (see inset Fig. \ref{figref}). Highly charged double bilayers were prepared using DPPS (1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-L-serine (sodium salt), Avanti Polar Lipids, Lancaster, Alabama, main transition temperature $T_{\rm m}=54^\circ$C). This system is denoted DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$ in the following. Zwitterionic double bilayers were prepared using DSPC (1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, Avanti Polar Lipids, Lancaster, Alabama, main transition temperature $T_{\rm m}=55^\circ$C) and the resulting system is denoted DSPC$_2$-DSPC$_2$. A double asymmetric bilayer, denoted DPPC/DPPS-DPPS/DPPC, and a triple DPPS bilayer, denoted DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$, were also investigated. All the samples were prepared using the Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) and Langmuir-Schaefer (LS) deposition techniques (see more details in Supplementary Informations).
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% BEGIN FIGURE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}[h]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{figure1.eps}
\caption{(Bottom) Neutron reflectivity (NR, \textcolor{red}{$\square$}) and X-ray reflectivity (XRR, \textcolor{red}{$\bullet$}) for double DPPS bilayers at $T=40^\circ$C (in the gel phase). Dashed and solid lines are the best fits corresponding to the SLD profiles reported in Fig. \ref{figSLDED}. (Top) NR data in 3 different contrasts: (\textcolor{blue}{$\circ$}) in D$_2$O shifted of 4 decades for sake of clarity; (\textcolor{red}{$\circ$}) in SiMW and (\textcolor{newgreen}{$\circ$}) in H$_2$O for a DPPS triple bilayers at $T=25^\circ$C.}
\label{figref}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% END FIGURE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% BEGIN FIGURE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}[h]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{figure2.eps}
%\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{figzoomdw.png}
\caption{SLD for NR (solid lines, left axis) and XRR (dashed lines, right axis) profiles corresponding to the best fits reported in Fig. \ref{figref}. (Bottom) DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$ at $T=40^\circ$C. (Top) DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$ at $T=25^\circ$C in D$_2$O, SiMW and H$_2$O contrast (shifted by 8.10$^{-4}$ nm$^{-2}$ for sake of clarity).}
\label{figSLDED}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% END FIGURE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
We have combined neutron reflectivity (NR) and X-ray reflectivity (XRR) to characterize with a high resolution ($\sim 0.1$ nm) the structure of double bilayers. NR measurements were performed on the D17 reflectometer \cite{Cubitt2002} at the Institut Laue-Langevin (ILL, Grenoble, France).
The neutron beam was configured to illuminate through the silicon substrate the interface at which the sample was deposited. In order to apply the contrast variation method \cite{Crowley1991} to reduce ambiguities of the fits \cite{charitat1999,Koenig1996}, each system was measured against three different water solutions, namely 100\% H$_2$O (Scattering Length Density, SLD = $-0.56\cdot 10^{-6}$ \AA$^{-2}$), silicon-match water (SiMW, i.e. 62\% H$_2$O and 38\% D$_2$O by volume, SLD = $2.07\cdot 10^{-6}$ \AA$^{-2}$) and 100\% D$_2$O (SLD = $6.35\cdot 10^{-6}$ \AA$^{-2}$). XRR experiments were performed at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF, French CRG-IF, Grenoble, France) using a ${27}$ keV X-ray beam (wavelength ${\lambda=0.0459}$ nm). For both NR and XRR, specular reflectivity $R(q_z)$ is defined as the ratio between the specularly reflected and incoming intensities of a beam. $R(q_z)$ is expressed as a function of the wave vector transfer, $q_z=4\pi/\lambda\sin\theta$ in the direction perpendicular to the sample surface, where $\theta$ is the grazing angle of incidence and reflection (see Fig. \ref{figref}). NR data was fitted with the AURORE software according to a discrete SLD profile \cite{Gerelli2016}, while XRR data was fitted using a hybrid gaussian continuous SLD profile (see \cite{daillant2005,malaquin10}).
Fig. \ref{figref} shows NR and XRR data for DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$ and the best fits corresponding to the SLD profiles are shown in Fig. \ref{figSLDED}. Both NR and XRR profiles are in good quantitative agreement. We define the water thicknesses between the substrate and the first bilayer ($d_{{\rm w},1}$) and between the two bilayers ($d_{{\rm w},2}$) by the distance between inflection points in the SLD profiles (see dashed line Fig. \ref{figSLDED}). We have investigated the variation of $d_{{\rm w},1}$, the thickness of the water layer between the silicon oxide and the bilayer, and $d_{{\rm w},2}$, the interbilayer water thickness, as a function of the temperature (see Fig. \ref{figdw1dw2vsT}(a) and (b)) and as a function of the Debye length $\ell_{\rm D}=\left(\epsilon_{\rm w} k_BT/2e^2 c\right)^{1/2}$ upon changes in NaCl concentration $c$ (0.01-0.3 M) (see Fig. \ref{figdw1dw2vsld}(a) and (b)) for DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$ and DSPC/DPPS-DPPS/DSPC samples. The obtained result was compared to our previous work on DSPC$_2$-DSPC$_2$ in absence and in presence of NaCl (0.5 M) \cite{Fragneto2003,Hemmerle(PNAS2012)}.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% BEGIN FIGURE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=.5\textwidth]{figure3.eps}
\caption{(a) $d_{{\rm w},1}$ and (b) $d_{{\rm w},2}$ obtained from NR (open symbols) and XRR (closed symbols): DSPC$_2$-DSPC$_2$ with ($\bullet$) and without salt ($\textcolor{blue}{\blacksquare}$, $\textcolor{blue}{\Box}$); DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$ double bilayer (XRR, 4 different samples \textcolor{red}{$\blacksquare$}, \textcolor{red}{$\blacktriangle$}, \textcolor{red}{$\bullet$}, \textcolor{red}{$\blacklozenge$}) and (NR, 2 different samples \textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangleup$}, \textcolor{red}{$\lozenge$}); DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$ (\textcolor{red}{$\bigcirc$}); DSPC/DPPS-DPPS/DSPC double asymmetric bilayer (\textcolor{red}{\FiveStarOpen}). (a) Dashed lines are guide for the eye corresponding to average values. (b) Black dashed line ($\dashed$) corresponds to $d_{w, vdW}=1.9$ nm and solid red line ($\textcolor{red}{\solid}$) corresponds to $d_{w,SC}=0.7$ nm. Dotted lines corresponds to the gel to fluid transition temperature for DSPC ($\textcolor{blue}{\dotted}$) and DPPS ($\textcolor{red}{\dotted}$) bilayers.}
\label{figdw1dw2vsT}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% END FIGURE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% BEGIN FIGURE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=.5\textwidth]{figure4.eps}
\caption{(a) $d_{{\rm w},1}$ and (b) $d_{{\rm w},2}$ vs $1/\ell_D^2$ (same notations as Fig. \ref{figdw1dw2vsT}). (a) Blue dotted line ($\textcolor{blue}{\dotted}$) corresponds to $d_{w, 1}=0.5$ nm, average value for DSPC case and ($\textcolor{red}{\dashed}$) to osmotic pressure effect; (b) Red solid line ($\textcolor{red}{\solid}$) corresponds to strong coupling theory $d_{w,SC}=0.7$ nm.}
\label{figdw1dw2vsld}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% END FIGURE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
As expected, $d_{{\rm w},1}$ is larger when the first bilayer is charged ($d_{{\rm w},1}\sim 1.0 \pm 0.1$ nm for DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$) than when it is composed of zwitterionic phospholipids ($d_{{\rm w},1}\sim 0.6 \pm 0.1$ nm for DSPC$_2$-DSPC$_2$). $d_{{\rm w},1}$ is mainly controlled by the weak electrostatic repulsive interaction between the first monolayer and the silicon oxide layer of the substrate that is negatively charged, because of the experimental conditions and the surface treatment prior to the deposition (see more details in Supplementary Informations). With the exception of a small variation around the transition temperature, within the resolution limit of the techniques, we did not observe a significant variation of $d_ {{\rm w}, 1}$ with temperature. This shows that the entropic contributions related to membrane fluctuations are negligible. Finally, we observed that $d_{{\rm w},1}$ decreases as the salt concentration increases (see Fig. \ref{figdw1dw2vsld}(a)), reaching values close to those observed for DSPC$_2$-DSPC$_2$ case ($d_{{\rm w},1}\sim 0.5$ nm). This is in good qualitative agreement with an osmotic pressure effect as described in \cite{Hishida(2017)} (see also Supplementary Information).
We now discuss the case of $d_{{\rm w},2}$ (see Fig. \ref{figdw1dw2vsT}(b)). As in the case of $d_{{\rm w},1}$, $d_{{\rm w},2}$ values obtained from NR and XRR data are in good agreement. In the case of DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$ charged systems (red symbols in Fig. \ref{figdw1dw2vsT}(b)), we observe that $d_{{\rm w},2}\simeq 0.6\pm 0.1$ nm is smaller than in the case of the zwitterionic DSPC$_2$-DSPC$_2$ systems, for which $d_{{\rm w},2}\simeq 1.8-2.5$ nm (blue and black symbols). Contrary to the case of zwitterionic lipids, we did not observe variations of $d_{{\rm w},2}$ with temperature, indicating that entropic contributions related to membrane fluctuations are negligible. The decrease of $d_{{\rm w},2}$ in the fully charged systems clearly indicates that the attractive contribution to the interaction potential is increased in the case of two highly like-charged membranes. We exploited this result to deposit, by means of the LB technique, up to 5 DPPS monolayers (see more details in Supplementary Information), leading to a triple bilayer systems (DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$, see NR data in Fig. \ref{figref}). The corresponding SLD profiles, shown in Fig. \ref{figSLDED}, demonstrate the high quality and structural integrity of all bilayers. If zwitterionic molecules such as phosphocholine are used, the deposition of more than three successive monolayers by LB is not possible. Try to deposit a fourth monolayer usually leads to the partial removal of the third one (see Supplementary Information). DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$ was also used to quantify attractive interactions between bilayers that are far from the solid substrate. In this case, the interbilayer water thickness $d_{{\rm w},2}$ was found to be constant ($d_{{\rm w},2}=0.3\pm 0.2$ nm), demonstrating that the substrate has only a minor influence on the deposition after the first monolayer. The role of electrostatic interactions is confirmed by complementary experiments on asymmetric sample DSPC/DPPS-DPPS/DSPC for which we obtained $d_{{\rm w},2}\simeq 0.5\pm 0.1$ nm, a value in agreement with those obtained for the DPPS$_2$-DPPS$_2$ samples (see Fig. \ref{figdw1dw2vsT}(b)). Finally, an increasing of NaCl concentration in the solution has a negligible effect on the value of $d_{{\rm w},2}$, as clearly evidenced in Fig. \ref{figdw1dw2vsld}(b).
To compare our experimental results with existing theoretical models, we have to take into account the different contributions to the interactions between adjacent bilayers. First, the short range hydration repulsion is described by a potential $U_{\rm hyd}=P_h\lambda_h \exp{\left(-d_{\rm w}/\lambda_h\right)}$ with a hydration pressure $P_h = 4\cdot10^9$ Pa and a decay length $\lambda_h = 0.1-0.2$ nm. We model the van der Waals attractive contribution as $U_{\rm vdW} = -H/12\pi\left(d_{\rm w}+2d_{\rm head}\right)$ with the Hamaker constant $H=5.3\cdot 10^{-21}$ J and a head thickness $d_{\rm head}\sim 0.5$ nm. Finally, as described in our previous work \cite{Hemmerle(PNAS2012)}, the small amount of charges due to the amphoteric character of the phosphatidylcholine group ($\sigma\sim 0.001$ e/nm$^2$), leads to a weak electrostatic repulsion corresponding to the Ideal Gas limit of the mean-field PB theory $U_{\rm PB}\left(z\right)=-2k_{\rm B}T\sigma_S\log{z}$ \cite{andelman(revue)}. In gel phase, neglecting entropic contribution, the minimization of $U_{\rm vdW}\left(z\right) + U_{\rm hyd}\left(z\right) + U_{\rm PB}\left(z\right)$, leads to an equilibrium value for the water thickness $d_{w, {\rm PB}}\simeq 1.9$ nm (black dashed line in Fig. \ref{figdw1dw2vsT}(b)). Such a value is in good agreement with those obtained for a DSPC$_2$-DSPC$_2$ system in gel phase. As demonstrated in our previous work \cite{Hemmerle(PNAS2012)}, the increase of $d_{{\rm w},2}$ close to the gel-fluid transition shown in Fig. \ref{figdw1dw2vsT}(b) is well described by taking into account entropic contribution and electrostatic repulsion in the framework of PB theory.
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=.5\textwidth]{figure5.eps}
\caption{Phase diagram showing attraction and repulsion regimes in terms of the rescaled water thickness $\tilde{d}=d_{{\rm w},2}/b$ and as a function of the coupling constant $\Xi$ (figure adapted from \cite{Samaj(PRL2011)}). The dashed-dotted line is the original Virial Strong Coupling theory from \cite{Netz(epje2001)} and black squares are the Monte Carlo simulation data from \cite{moreira(PRL2001)}. Solid line corresponds to Wigner Strong Coupling theory from \cite{Samaj(PRL2011)}. Our experiments corresponds to the red area using $\epsilon_{\rm w}=80\epsilon_0$ ($\Xi\sim 2.5-4, {\tilde d}\sim 2-4$) and by the blue one, taking into account renormalization induced by water orientation ($10 \leq \epsilon_{\rm w} \leq 30 \Leftrightarrow 20 \leq \Xi_{\rm eff} \leq 300$, $5 \leq \tilde{d}_{\rm eff} \leq 30$).}
\label{figTrizacNetz}
\end{figure}
For DPPS double and triple bilayers, the entropic contribution is clearly negligible, as we observe no significant variation of $d_{{\rm w},2}$ with the temperature. Regarding electrostatic interaction between charged surfaces, the area per molecule of DPPS can be estimated to be equal to 0.55 nm$^2$ \cite{thurmond(BiophysJ1991)}. At pH=5-6, taking into account the respective pKa of the phosphate, ammonium and carboxylate groups \cite{marsh2013handbook}, we obtain a charge density $\sigma\sim 0.8-1.5$ e/nm$^2$. By estimating the coupling constant with $\epsilon_{\rm w}\simeq80\epsilon_0$ we obtain $\Xi \simeq 2.5-4$, which is outside the attractive zone described by the SC theory \cite{Netz(epje2001),Samaj(PRL2011)} (see red area on Fig. \ref{figTrizacNetz}). In this limit, using realistic values of $P_h$, $\lambda_h$ and $H$ it is not possible to access equilibrium values of $d_{{\rm w},2}$ smaller than 1.5 nm. In such strongly confined limit, the rotational degrees of freedom of water dipoles are expected to be frozen near surfaces, inducing a strong decrease of the dielectric permittivity. Fumagalli {\it et al.} \cite{Fumagalli1339} experimentally demonstrated the presence of an interfacial two to three molecules thick layer with $\epsilon_{\rm w}\sim 2\epsilon_0$, a value close to the limit for water at optical frequencies ($\epsilon_{\rm w}\sim1.8\epsilon_0$). Since $\Xi\sim 1/\epsilon^2$, this leads to a strong increase of the coupling constant. Recently, using water-explicit numerical simulations of decanol bilayers with variable charge density, Schlaich {\it et al.} \cite{netz(langmuir2019)} demonstrated that an attractive behavior can appear at a moderate surface density ($\sim 0.77$ e/nm$^2$, $\Xi\sim 3$), a value close to the lowest estimation of the charge density in our experiments. Their numerical results are in good agreement with an effective coupling constant $\Xi_{\rm eff}\sim 20$, corresponding to a decrease of $\epsilon_{\rm w} $ to 30. For the upper limit of charge density ($\sim 1.5$ e/nm$^2$), we can extrapolate an effective dielectric constant of the order of 10. The blue area in Fig. \ref{figTrizacNetz} give the corresponding effective values of $\Xi_{\rm eff}$ ($10<\Xi_{\rm eff}<300$) and ($5<\tilde{d}_{\rm eff}<15$), taking into account the effective dielectric constant. It is clear that our experiments fall in the attractive regime, well described by SC theory where it is valid to use the analytical expression for the electrostatic pressure $P_{\rm SC} = 2\pi\ell_{\rm B}\sigma_S^2\left(2b/z-1\right)k_{\rm B} T$ \cite{Netz(epje2001),Naji(PhysicaA2005)}. The decrease of $\epsilon_{\rm w}$ also induced a decrease of the Hamaker constant by one order of magnitude \cite{parsegian2005van} and it is possible to neglect the van der Waals interactions compared to the SC term. By minimizing the potential $U\left(z\right)$ ~:
\begin{equation}
U\left(z\right) =U_{\rm vdW}\left(z\right) + U_{\rm hyd}\left(z\right) - 2\pi\ell_{\rm B}b\sigma_S^2k_{\rm B} T\left(2\log{\left(\frac{z}{b}\right)}-\frac{z}{b}\right)
\label{USC}
\end{equation}
we obtain an equilibrium value of $d_{w,{\rm SC}}=0.7$ nm, in very good agreement with our experimental data as shown in Fig. \ref{figdw1dw2vsT}(b) and Fig. \ref{figdw1dw2vsld}(b).
Electrostatic interactions between highly charged double bilayers, in presence of monovalent counterions and in strong confinement, have been investigated by measuring the equilibrium distance between like-charged bilayers. In a consistent set of experimental data obtained on a model system close to an ideal theoretical configuration (planar geometry, negligible fluctuations), we have demonstrated the presence of an attractive electrostatic interaction, which is in contradiction to continuous theories. Our results are in agreement with recent water-explicit numerical simulations \cite{netz(langmuir2019)} predicting that ion correlations can have tremendous effects even for moderate surface charge densities and in the presence of monovalent counterions. The obtained results provide a deeper understanding of electrostatic interactions in strong confinement beyond the continuous models, where the discrete nature of charges must be taken into account explicitly.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% The "Acknowledgement" section can be given in all manuscript
%% classes. This should be given within the "acknowledgement"
%% environment, which will make the correct section or running title.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section*{Acknowledgement}
The authors thanks L. Malaquin and S. Micha for assistance during the experiments, P. K\'ekicheff, A. Johner, C. Loison and R. Netz for fruitful discussions. Awarded beamtime at the ILL (10.5291/ILL-DATA.EASY-341) and at the ESRF is gratefully acknowledged. Supports from the Labex NIE 11-LABX-0058-NIE (Investissement d'Avenir programme ANR-10- IDEX-0002-02) and PSCM facilities at the ILL for sample preparation are gratefully acknowledged. T. Mukhina thanks ILL for a PhD grant.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% The same is true for Supporting Information, which should use the
%% suppinfo environment.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section*{Supplementary Informations}
Supporting Information Available: Detailed description of sample preparation and data analysis. Detailed description of the osmotic pressure effect (PDF).
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% The appropriate \bibliography command should be placed here.
%% Notice that the class file automatically sets \bibliographystyle
%% and also names the section correctly.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%\bibliography{charitat_jphyschemletter.bib}
\begin{thebibliography}{30}
\expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname bibnamefont\endcsname\relax
\def\bibnamefont#1{#1}\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname bibfnamefont\endcsname\relax
\def\bibfnamefont#1{#1}\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname citenamefont\endcsname\relax
\def\citenamefont#1{#1}\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
\def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
\providecommand{\bibinfo}[2]{#2}
\providecommand{\eprint}[2][]{\url{#2}}
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Norrish and Quirk}(1954)}]{Norrish(nature1954)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Norrish}} \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~P.} \bibnamefont{Quirk}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Nature} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{173}},
\bibinfo{pages}{255} (\bibinfo{year}{1954}).
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Belloni}(2000)}]{Belloni(jphyscondmat2000)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Belloni}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter}
\textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{12}}, \bibinfo{pages}{R549} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}),
\urlprefix\url{https://doi.org/10.1088%2F0953-8984%2F12%2F46%2F201}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Andelman}(1995)}]{andelman(revue)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Andelman}}, in
\emph{\bibinfo{booktitle}{Structure and Dynamics of Membranes}}, edited by
\bibinfo{editor}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Lipowsky}} \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{editor}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Sackmann}}
(\bibinfo{publisher}{North-Holland}, \bibinfo{year}{1995}),
vol.~\bibinfo{volume}{1} of \emph{\bibinfo{series}{Handbook of Biological
Physics}}, pp. \bibinfo{pages}{603--642},
\urlprefix\url{http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383812106800059}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Rouzina and Bloomfield}(1996)}]{rouzina(jphyschem1996)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{I.}~\bibnamefont{Rouzina}} \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.~A.} \bibnamefont{Bloomfield}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Journal of Physical Chemistry}
\textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{100}}, \bibinfo{pages}{9977} (\bibinfo{year}{1996}).
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Netz}(2001)}]{Netz(epje2001)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Netz}}, \bibinfo{journal}{The
European Physical Journal E} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{5}},
\bibinfo{pages}{557} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}), ISSN \bibinfo{issn}{1292-8941},
\urlprefix\url{https://doi.org/10.1007/s101890170039}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Moreira and Netz}(2001)}]{moreira(PRL2001)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~G.} \bibnamefont{Moreira}} \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~R.} \bibnamefont{Netz}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{87}},
\bibinfo{pages}{078301} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Moreira and Netz}(2002)}]{Moreira2002}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Moreira}} \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Netz}}, \bibinfo{journal}{The
European Physical Journal E} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{8}},
\bibinfo{pages}{33} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}), ISSN \bibinfo{issn}{1292-8941},
\urlprefix\url{https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2001-10091-9}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Naji et~al.}(2005)\citenamefont{Naji, Jungblut,
Moreira, and Netz}}]{Naji(PhysicaA2005)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Naji}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Jungblut}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~G.} \bibnamefont{Moreira}},
\bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~R.} \bibnamefont{Netz}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications}
\textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{352}}, \bibinfo{pages}{131 } (\bibinfo{year}{2005}),
ISSN \bibinfo{issn}{0378-4371}, \bibinfo{note}{physics Applied to Biological
Systems},
\urlprefix\url{http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037843710401619X}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Samaj and Trizac}(2011)}]{Samaj(PRL2011)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Samaj}} \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Trizac}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{106}},
\bibinfo{pages}{078301} (\bibinfo{year}{2011}),
\urlprefix\url{https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.078301}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Samaj et~al.}(2018)\citenamefont{Samaj, Trulsson, and
Trizac}}]{trizac(softmatter2018)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Samaj}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Trulsson}}, \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Trizac}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Soft Matter} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{14}},
\bibinfo{pages}{4040} (\bibinfo{year}{2018}),
\urlprefix\url{http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8SM00571K}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{K\'ekicheff et~al.}(1993)\citenamefont{K\'ekicheff,
Marcelja, Senden, and Shubin}}]{kekicheff(Jchemphys1993)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{K\'ekicheff}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Marcelja}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~J.} \bibnamefont{Senden}},
\bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.~E.}
\bibnamefont{Shubin}}, \bibinfo{journal}{The Journal of Chemical Physics}
\textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{99}}, \bibinfo{pages}{6098} (\bibinfo{year}{1993}),
\eprint{https://doi.org/10.1063/1.465906},
\urlprefix\url{https://doi.org/10.1063/1.465906}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Khan et~al.}(1985)\citenamefont{Khan, Joensson, and
Wennerstroem}}]{khan(jphyscem1985)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Khan}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Joensson}}, \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Wennerstroem}},
\bibinfo{journal}{The Journal of Physical Chemistry}
\textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{89}}, \bibinfo{pages}{5180} (\bibinfo{year}{1985}),
\eprint{https://doi.org/10.1021/j100270a012},
\urlprefix\url{https://doi.org/10.1021/j100270a012}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Komorowski et~al.}(2018)\citenamefont{Komorowski,
Salditt, Xu, Yavuz, Brennich, Jahn, and Salditt}}]{salditt(2018)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Komorowski}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Salditt}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.}~\bibnamefont{Xu}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Yavuz}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Brennich}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Jahn}}, \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Salditt}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Biophysical Journal} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{114}},
\bibinfo{pages}{1908 } (\bibinfo{year}{2018}), ISSN
\bibinfo{issn}{0006-3495},
\urlprefix\url{http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006349518303412}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Herrmann et~al.}(2014)\citenamefont{Herrmann, Johner,
and K\'ekicheff}}]{herrmann(PRL2014)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Herrmann}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Johner}}, \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{K\'ekicheff}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{113}},
\bibinfo{pages}{268302} (\bibinfo{year}{2014}),
\urlprefix\url{https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.268302}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Schlaich et~al.}(2019)\citenamefont{Schlaich, dos
Santos, and Netz}}]{netz(langmuir2019)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Schlaich}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~P.} \bibnamefont{dos Santos}},
\bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~R.} \bibnamefont{Netz}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Langmuir} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{35}},
\bibinfo{pages}{551} (\bibinfo{year}{2019}),
\eprint{https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03474},
\urlprefix\url{https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03474}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Sonneville-Aubrun
et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont{Sonneville-Aubrun, Bergeron, Gulik-Krzywicki,
Jönsson, Wennerström, Lindner, and Cabane}}]{sonneville(langmuir2000)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{O.}~\bibnamefont{Sonneville-Aubrun}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.}~\bibnamefont{Bergeron}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Gulik-Krzywicki}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Jönsson}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Wennerström}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Lindner}}, \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Cabane}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Langmuir} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{16}},
\bibinfo{pages}{1566} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}),
\eprint{https://doi.org/10.1021/la990599k},
\urlprefix\url{https://doi.org/10.1021/la990599k}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Charitat et~al.}(1999)\citenamefont{Charitat,
Bellet-Amalric, Fragneto, and Graner}}]{charitat1999}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Charitat}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Bellet-Amalric}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Fragneto}}, \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{Graner}},
\bibinfo{journal}{European Physical Journal B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{8}},
\bibinfo{pages}{583} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}).
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Daillant et~al.}(2005)\citenamefont{Daillant,
Bellet-Amalric, Braslau, Charitat, Fragneto, Graner, Mora, Rieutord, and
Stidder}}]{daillant2005}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Daillant}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Bellet-Amalric}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Braslau}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Charitat}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Fragneto}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{Graner}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Mora}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{Rieutord}}, \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Stidder}},
\bibinfo{journal}{The Proceding of the National Academy of Sciences USA}
\textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{102}}, \bibinfo{pages}{11639}
(\bibinfo{year}{2005}).
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Hemmerle et~al.}(2012)\citenamefont{Hemmerle, Malaquin,
Charitat, Lecuyer, Fragneto, and Daillant}}]{Hemmerle(PNAS2012)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Hemmerle}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Malaquin}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Charitat}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Lecuyer}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Fragneto}}, \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Daillant}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}
\textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{109}}, \bibinfo{pages}{19938}
(\bibinfo{year}{2012}),
\eprint{http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/11/14/1211669109.full.pdf+html},
\urlprefix\url{http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/11/14/1211669109.abstract}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Cubitt and Fragneto}(2002)}]{Cubitt2002}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Cubitt}} \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Fragneto}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Applied Physics A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{74}},
\bibinfo{pages}{s329} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}), ISSN \bibinfo{issn}{1432-0630},
\urlprefix\url{https://doi.org/10.1007/s003390201611}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Crowley et~al.}(1991)\citenamefont{Crowley, Lee,
Simister, and Thomas}}]{Crowley1991}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Crowley}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Lee}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Simister}}, \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Thomas}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Physica B: Condensed Matter}
\textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{173}}, \bibinfo{pages}{143 } (\bibinfo{year}{1991}),
ISSN \bibinfo{issn}{0921-4526},
\urlprefix\url{http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/092145269190044F}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Koenig et~al.}(1996)\citenamefont{Koenig, Krueger,
Orts, Majkrzak, Berk, Silverton, and Gawrisch}}]{Koenig1996}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.~W.} \bibnamefont{Koenig}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Krueger}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~J.} \bibnamefont{Orts}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~F.} \bibnamefont{Majkrzak}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.~F.} \bibnamefont{Berk}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~V.} \bibnamefont{Silverton}},
\bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Gawrisch}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Langmuir} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{12}},
\bibinfo{pages}{1343} (\bibinfo{year}{1996}),
\eprint{http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/la950580r},
\urlprefix\url{http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/la950580r}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Gerelli}(2016)}]{Gerelli2016}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.}~\bibnamefont{Gerelli}}, \bibinfo{journal}{J.
Appl. Crystallogr.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{49}}, \bibinfo{pages}{330}
(\bibinfo{year}{2016}), ISSN \bibinfo{issn}{1600-5767},
\urlprefix\url{http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S1600576716000108}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Malaquin et~al.}(2010)\citenamefont{Malaquin, Charitat,
and Daillant}}]{malaquin10}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Malaquin}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Charitat}}, \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Daillant}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Eur. Phys. J. E} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{31}},
\bibinfo{pages}{285} (\bibinfo{year}{2010}),
\urlprefix\url{http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2010-10578-2}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Fragneto et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont{Fragneto, Charitat,
Bellet-Amalric, Cubitt, and Graner}}]{Fragneto2003}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Fragneto}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Charitat}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Bellet-Amalric}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Cubitt}}, \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{Graner}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Langmuir} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{19}},
\bibinfo{pages}{7695} (\bibinfo{year}{2003}).
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Hishida et~al.}(2017)\citenamefont{Hishida, Nomura,
Akiyama, Yamamura, and Saito}}]{Hishida(2017)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Hishida}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.}~\bibnamefont{Nomura}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Akiyama}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.}~\bibnamefont{Yamamura}}, \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Saito}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. E} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{96}},
\bibinfo{pages}{040601} (\bibinfo{year}{2017}),
\urlprefix\url{https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.040601}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Thurmond et~al.}(1991)\citenamefont{Thurmond, Dodd, and
Brown}}]{thurmond(BiophysJ1991)}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Thurmond}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Dodd}}, \bibnamefont{and}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Brown}},
\bibinfo{journal}{Biophysical journal} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{59}},
\bibinfo{pages}{108—113} (\bibinfo{year}{1991}), ISSN
\bibinfo{issn}{0006-3495},
\urlprefix\url{http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1281123}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Marsh}(2013)}]{marsh2013handbook}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Marsh}},
\emph{\bibinfo{title}{Handbook of Lipid Bilayers, Second Edition}}
(\bibinfo{publisher}{Taylor \& Francis}, \bibinfo{year}{2013}), ISBN
\bibinfo{isbn}{9781420088328},
\urlprefix\url{https://books.google.fr/books?id=4AEiQk4VfsUC}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Fumagalli et~al.}(2018)\citenamefont{Fumagalli,
Esfandiar, Fabregas, Hu, Ares, Janardanan, Yang, Radha, Taniguchi, Watanabe
et~al.}}]{Fumagalli1339}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Fumagalli}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Esfandiar}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Fabregas}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Hu}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Ares}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Janardanan}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Q.}~\bibnamefont{Yang}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Radha}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Taniguchi}},
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Watanabe}},
\bibnamefont{et~al.}, \bibinfo{journal}{Science}
\textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{360}}, \bibinfo{pages}{1339} (\bibinfo{year}{2018}),
ISSN \bibinfo{issn}{0036-8075},
\eprint{https://science.sciencemag.org/content/360/6395/1339.full.pdf},
\urlprefix\url{https://science.sciencemag.org/content/360/6395/1339}.
\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Parsegian}(2005)}]{parsegian2005van}
\bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.}~\bibnamefont{Parsegian}},
\emph{\bibinfo{title}{Van der Waals Forces: A Handbook for Biologists,
Chemists, Engineers, and Physicists}} (\bibinfo{publisher}{Cambridge
University Press}, \bibinfo{year}{2005}), ISBN \bibinfo{isbn}{9781139444163},
\urlprefix\url{https://books.google.fr/books?id=K4F7uHJVEOoC}.
\end{thebibliography}
\newpage
%\includepdf[pagecommand={\thispagestyle{fancy}}]{SM_fiber-stacks.pdf}
%\includepdf[pages=-]{SM_fiber-stacks.pdf}
\pagestyle{empty}
\includepdf[pages=-,pagecommand={},width=\textwidth]{Supp_JPhysChem_charitat_charged.pdf}
\end{document}