Measurement of $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}$ baryons and ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions with ALICE
Extracted source text · arXiv 1910.11738
% Please make sure you insert your
% data according to the instructions in PoSauthmanual.pdf
\documentclass{PoS}
%\usepackage{lineno}
%\linenumbers
\title{Measurement of $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}$ baryons and ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$ mesons in Pb--Pb collisions with ALICE}
\ShortTitle{$\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}$ baryons and ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$ mesons in Pb--Pb collisions with ALICE}
\author{\speaker{Luuk Vermunt} for the ALICE Collaboration\\
Institute for Subatomic Physics, Utrecht University\\
E-mail: \email{luuk.vermunt@cern.ch}}
\abstract{
The study of heavy-flavour (charm and beauty) production is important to understand the properties of the Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) formed in ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions, since heavy quarks are produced in the initial stages of the collisions and subsequently interact with the medium throughout its evolution. In the QGP, strange quarks are expected to be abundantly produced and may recombine with charm quarks leading to an enhancement of the nuclear modification factor ($R_{\rm AA}$) of ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$ mesons compared to that of other charmed meson states at low and intermediate $p_{\rm T}$. The measurement of elliptic flow ($v_{2}$) of ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$ mesons is useful to determine the degree of thermalisation of charm quarks in the collective expansion of the QGP. In addition, charm quarks could recombine with light di-quark states in the medium, which would lead to an enhancement of the $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}/{\rm D}^{0}$ baryon-to-meson ratio as compared to that in pp collisions. Precise measurements of these particle species in Pb--Pb collisions, therefore, give a deeper insight into the hadronisation mechanisms that heavy quarks undergo in the strongly-interacting medium. In this contribution, the latest results measured with ALICE for ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$-meson and $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}$-baryon production in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02$~TeV, using data from Run 2 of the LHC are discussed.
}
\FullConference{
European Physical Society Conference on High Energy Physics - EPS-HEP2019 -\\
10-17 July, 2019\\
Ghent, Belgium}
\begin{document}
\section{Introduction}
Under extreme temperatures and/or densities, lattice QCD calculations predict a phase transition of nuclear matter to a colour-deconfined medium, the so-called Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP)~\cite{Karsch:2006xs, Borsanyi:2010bp, Borsanyi:2013bia, Bazavov:2011nk}. Ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions provide suitable conditions for the QGP formation and for characterising its properties. Ideal probes are heavy quarks (charm and beauty), as they are predominantly produced in the early stage of the collisions in hard-scattering processes. Their formation time (approximate 0.1 and 0.03~${\rm fm}/c$ for charm and beauty~\cite{Andronic:2015wma}) is shorter than the production time of the QGP (between 0.3-1.5~${\rm fm}/c$~\cite{Liu:2012ax}) at LHC energies. In contrast, the thermal production and annihilation rates of charm and beauty quarks are expected to be negligible~\cite{BraunMunzinger:2007tn}.
In this contribution, recent measurement of strange open-charm meson, ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$, and open-charm baryon, $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}$, production by the ALICE Collaboration in the LHC Pb--Pb run of 2018 are discussed. These measurements provide unique insights into the charm quark hadronisation processes in the QGP, probing the interplay between the fragmentation and coalescence mechanisms. In the QGP, strange quarks are expected to be abundantly produced in the medium~\cite{Rafelski:1982pu, Koch:1986ud}, which may recombine with charm quarks. In addition, charm quarks could recombine with light di-quark states in the medium~\cite{Donoghue:1988ec, Sateesh:1991jt, Lee:2007wr}. If the coalescence mechanism plays an important role, as experimental data is suggesting for low and intermediate $p_{\rm T}$~\cite{Acharya:2018hre, Acharya:2018ckj}, an enhanced production of ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$ and $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}$ is expected compared to non-strange ${\rm D}$ mesons and their production in pp collisions.
The ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$-meson and $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}$-baryon production in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02$~TeV was measured by ALICE via exclusive reconstruction at mid-rapidity ($|y|<0.8$) in the hadronic decay channels $\rm D^{+}_{s} \to \phi \pi^{+} \to K^{+} K^{-} \pi^{+}$ ($c\tau \simeq$ 150~$\mu$m, ${\rm BR}=2.27\pm 0.08\%$) and $\rm \Lambda_{c}^{+} \to p K^{0}_{S} \to p \pi^{+} \pi^{-}$ ($c\tau \simeq$ 60~$\mu$m, ${\rm BR}=1.10\pm 0.21\%$)~\cite{Tanabashi:2018oca}. The raw yields were extracted via an invariant-mass analysis after having applied topological and particle-identification selections to enhance the signal-over-background ratio. These selections are performed independently for the different variables in the ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$-meson analysis, where for the $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}$-baryon analysis two BDT machine-learning algorithms were exploited. The AdaBoost and XGBoost machine-learning classifiers were used in parallel, averaging the fully corrected $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}$ $p_{\rm T}$-differential yields using a similar strategy as used in Ref.~\cite{Acharya:2017kfy}. Monte-Carlo simulations based on HIJING~\cite{Wang:1991hta} and PYTHIA6~\cite{Sjostrand:2006za} event generators and the GEANT3 transport package~\cite{Brun:1994aa} were used for the efficiency-times-acceptance corrections, as well as for the machine-learning training\footnote{Background candidates for the machine-learning training are taken from invariant-mass sideband regions in data.}. The fraction of prompt ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$ mesons and $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}$ baryons was estimated using a FONLL-based approach~\cite{Cacciari:1998it,Acharya:2017qps}. The centrality and the direction of the event plane were provided by the V0 scintillators. The measurement of the ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$ meson $v_{2}$ was performed with the scalar-product (SP) method~\cite{Voloshin:2008dg}.
Both analyses benefit from the tracking and particle identification capabilities of the ALICE central barrel detectors. A complete description of the ALICE apparatus and its performance can be found in Refs.~\cite{Aamodt:2008zz, Abelev:2014ffa}. The main detectors used in this analysis include the Inner Tracking System (ITS)~\cite{Aamodt:2010aa}, the Time Projection Chamber (TPC)~\cite{Alme:2010ke}, the Time-Of-Flight detector (TOF)~\cite{Akindinov:2013tea}, and the V0 detector~\cite{Abbas:2013taa} located inside a solenoidal magnet.
\section{Results}
Figure~\ref{fig:RaaDs} shows the nuclear modification factor, $R_{\rm AA}$, of prompt ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$ mesons measured in central (0-10\%) and semi-central (30-50\%) Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02$~TeV. This observable is defined as the ratio between the $p_{\rm T}$-differential yield measured in nucleus-nucleus collisions (${\rm d}N_{\rm AA}/{\rm d}p_{\rm T}$) and the $p_{\rm T}$-differential production cross section in pp collisions (${\rm d}\sigma_{\rm pp}/{\rm d}p_{\rm T}$), scaled by the average nuclear overlap function $\langle T_{\rm AA} \kern-0.1em\rangle$. It is compared to the average $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt non-strange ${\rm D}$ mesons. The $R_{\rm AA}$ of ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$ mesons is in general higher than that of non-strange ${\rm D}$ mesons, although the uncertainties are relatively large. The strange and non-strange ${\rm D}$-meson $R_{\rm AA}$ are compared to models that provide both observables. These three models, PHSD~\cite{Song:2015ykw}, TAMU~\cite{He:2014cla}, and Catania~\cite{Plumari:2017ntm}, all predict a similar increase in the common $p_{\rm T}$-range of the ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$-meson $R_{\rm AA}$ as seen in data. This increase is induced by hadronisation via coalescence in combination with the strangeness-rich QCD medium, taking also into account the different interaction cross sections in the hadronic phase of the system evolution.
\begin{figure}[!tb]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=.45\textwidth]{figures/2019-06-05-DmesonAverageDsvsmodels0105dot02.pdf}
\hspace{0.04\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=.45\textwidth]{figures/2019-06-05-DmesonAverageDsvsmodels30505dot02.pdf}
\caption{Average $R_{\rm AA}$ of ${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, and ${\rm D}^{*+}$ mesons and the $R_{\rm AA}$ of ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$ mesons in the 0-10\% (left) and 30-50\% (right) centrality class compared with the PHSD~\cite{Song:2015ykw}, TAMU~\cite{He:2014cla}, and Catania~\cite{Plumari:2017ntm} model calculations.}
\label{fig:RaaDs}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
An alternative way to display the modification of the charm-quark hadronisation in the presence of a QGP is to compare the ratios between the measured yields of ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$ and ${\rm D}^{0}$ mesons in Pb--Pb and pp collisions (see left panel of Figure~\ref{fig:v2DsandDsoverD0}). A hint of a larger ratio up to $p_{\rm T} = 8$~GeV$/c$ in Pb--Pb than in pp collisions is found. This observation points to the same concept of hadronisation of charm quarks via coalescence in the QGP as for light quarks.
In the right panel of Figure~\ref{fig:v2DsandDsoverD0}, the prompt ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$-meson elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, in mid-central (30-50\%) Pb--Pb collisions is compared to that of non-strange ${\rm D}$-mesons and the PHSD~\cite{Song:2015ykw} and TAMU~\cite{He:2014cla} model predictions. The measurement of these azimuthal anisotropies, defined\footnote{In this definition, the $\phi$ is the particle-momentum azimuthal angle, $\Psi_{\rm n}$ is the symmetry-plane angle relative to the n$^{\rm th}$ harmonic, and the brackets denote the average over all the measured particles in the considered events.} as $v_{\rm n} = \langle \cos{n (\phi - \Psi_{\rm n})} \kern-0.1em\rangle$, are sensitive to the fraction hadronising via coalescence. In addition, the participation of the charm quark in the collective dynamics of the underlying medium and the degree of thermalisation in the medium can be probed at low $p_{\rm T}$, while at high $p_{\rm T}$ the $v_{2}$ is dominated by the path-length dependence of the partons' in-medium energy loss mechanisms. In the common $p_{\rm T}$-range, the measured $v_{2}$ is found to be compatible within uncertainties for ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$ mesons, non-strange ${\rm D}$ mesons, as well as with both theoretical calculations. With the current uncertainties it is not yet possible to conclude about the underlying processes that can cause a difference in the elliptic flow of strange and non-strange ${\rm D}$ mesons.
\begin{figure}[!tb]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=.443\textwidth]{figures/2019-06-06-DsoverD0PbPb20180103050.pdf}
\hspace{0.04\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=.45\textwidth]{figures/2019-06-06-PromptDsV2SPPbPb5TeVwModels.pdf}
\caption{Left: The ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+} / {\rm D}^{0}$ ratio of prompt yields as function of $p_{\rm T}$ for pp and Pb--Pb collisions. Right: Average prompt ${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, and ${\rm D}^{*+}$ $v_{2}$ and the ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$-meson $v_{2}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02$~TeV in the 30-50\% centrality class, compared to the PHSD~\cite{Song:2015ykw} and TAMU~\cite{He:2014cla} model calculations.}
\label{fig:v2DsandDsoverD0}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The left panel of Figure~\ref{fig:RaaLc} reports the results on the $R_{\rm AA}$ of the $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}$ baryon for $2 < p_{\rm T} < 24$~GeV$/c$ in central (0-10\%) and semi-central (30-50\%) Pb--Pb collisions, which significantly improves those based on the 2015 Pb--Pb data sample~\cite{Acharya:2018ckj}. Similar as for the ${\rm D}$ mesons, a suppression is observed for the $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}$ in Pb--Pb collisions, with a hint of a larger suppression for central collisions up to a factor 1.5. In the right panel of Figure~\ref{fig:RaaLc}, the $R_{\rm AA}$ for the 10\% most central collisions is compared to two theoretical calculations of the Catania model~\cite{Plumari:2017ntm}, providing two different treatments of hadronisation. The comparison favours a scenario where fragmentation and coalescence are present in both Pb--Pb and pp collisions, indicating how crucial it is to also have a better understanding of the $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}$-production mechanisms in pp collisions.
\begin{figure}[!tb]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=.47\textwidth]{figures/2019-06-07-RAAPbPb180103050shift0.pdf}
\hspace{0.04\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=.47\textwidth]{figures/2019-06-07-RAAPbPb18010theory0.pdf}
\caption{Left: The $R_{\rm AA}$ of the $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}$ baryon in the 0-10\% and 30-50\% centrality classes. Right: The $R_{\rm AA}$ of the $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}$ baryon in the 10\% most central collisions compared to two theoretical calculations of the Catania model~\cite{Plumari:2017ntm}.}
\label{fig:RaaLc}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
In Figure~\ref{fig:LcoverD0}, the baryon-to-meson $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}/{\rm D}^{0}$ ratio in Pb--Pb collisions is compared to the one obtained in pp and p--Pb collisions (left panel) and to different theoretical predictions (right panel). There is a hint of a higher $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}/{\rm D}^{0}$ ratio in Pb--Pb with respect to pp collisions at intermediate $p_{\rm T}$ (for both the 0-10\% and 30-50\% centrality classes). More precision is needed to investigate a trend between pp, p--Pb, and Pb--Pb collisions. The measured ratio in the 0-10\% centrality class is compared to the Catania model~\cite{Plumari:2017ntm}, the statistical hadronisation model~\cite{Andronic:2019wva}, and PYTHIA8 simulations with colour reconnection~\cite{Christiansen:2015yqa}. Both the Catania and statistical hadronisation model are qualitatively describing the data, despite the different implemented hadronisation procedures. The prediction by PYTHIA8, which is intended for pp collisions, underestimates the data. Also for this observable it is fundamental to improve the understanding of $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}$ production in pp collisions, where many models are significantly underestimating the measured $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}/{\rm D}^{0}$ ratio (see Ref.~\cite{Acharya:2017kfy} for more details).
\begin{figure}[!tb]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=.47\textwidth]{figures/2019-09-15-LcDPbPb180103050pppPbLogxshift0.pdf}
\hspace{0.04\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=.47\textwidth]{figures/2019-07-12-LcDPbPb18010theorywithPythia.pdf}
\caption{Left: The $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}/{\rm D}^{0}$ baryon-to-meson ratio in pp, p-Pb, and Pb--Pb collisions. Right: The $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}/{\rm D}^{0}$ baryon-to-meson ratio in the 10\% most central collisions compared with the Catania~\cite{Plumari:2017ntm}, statistical hadronisation model~\cite{Andronic:2019wva}, and PYTHIA8 with colour reconnection~\cite{Christiansen:2015yqa} model calculations.}
\label{fig:LcoverD0}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\section{Conclusions}
In this contribution, the most recent results on the production of ${\rm D}_{\rm s}^{+}$ mesons and $\Lambda_{\rm c}^{+}$ baryons in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02$~TeV were presented. These new measurements were performed on the latest Pb--Pb collision data sample, collected in 2018. With respect to earlier ALICE publications~\cite{Acharya:2018hre, Acharya:2018ckj}, the measurements are more differential in $p_{\rm T}$ and centrality and have an improved statistical precision. The results show hints of coalesence being an important hadronisation mechanism for heavy-flavour particles in Pb--Pb collisions and triggered again the need of a better understanding of charmed baryon production in pp collisions.
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
%QGP in lattice QCD
\bibitem{Karsch:2006xs}
F.~Karsch,
%``Lattice simulations of the thermodynamics of strongly interacting elementary particles and the exploration of new phases of matter in relativistic heavy ion collisions,''
J.\ Phys.\ Conf.\ Ser.\ {\bf 46} (2006) 122
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/46/1/017
[hep-lat/0608003].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1088/1742-6596/46/1/017;%%
%79 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Borsanyi:2010bp}
S.~Borsanyi {\it et al.} [Wuppertal-Budapest Collaboration],
%``Is there still any T_c mystery in lattice QCD? Results with physical masses in the continuum limit III,''
JHEP {\bf 1009} (2010) 073
doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2010)073
[arXiv:1005.3508 [hep-lat]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2010)073;%%
%812 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Borsanyi:2013bia}
S.~Borsanyi {\it et al.},
%``Full result for the QCD equation of state with 2+1 flavors,''
Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 730} (2014) 99
doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.01.007
[arXiv:1309.5258 [hep-lat]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.01.007;%%
%530 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Bazavov:2011nk}
A.~Bazavov {\it et al.},
%``The chiral and deconfinement aspects of the QCD transition,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 85} (2012) 054503
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.054503
[arXiv:1111.1710 [hep-lat]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.054503;%%
%836 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
%Times HF and QGP
\bibitem{Andronic:2015wma}
A.~Andronic {\it et al.},
%``Heavy-flavour and quarkonium production in the LHC era: from proton–proton to heavy-ion collisions,''
Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 76} (2016) no.3, 107
doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3819-5
[arXiv:1506.03981 [nucl-ex]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3819-5;%%
%316 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Liu:2012ax}
F.~M.~Liu and S.~X.~Liu,
%``Quark-gluon plasma formation time and direct photons from heavy ion collisions,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 89} (2014) no.3, 034906
doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.89.034906
[arXiv:1212.6587 [nucl-th]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.89.034906;%%
%63 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
%thermal production charm / annihilation charm
\bibitem{BraunMunzinger:2007tn}
P.~Braun-Munzinger,
%``Quarkonium production in ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions: Suppression versus enhancement,''
J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 34} (2007) S471
doi:10.1088/0954-3899/34/8/S36
[nucl-th/0701093].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1088/0954-3899/34/8/S36;%%
%25 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
%Strangeness enhancement
\bibitem{Rafelski:1982pu}
J.~Rafelski and B.~Muller,
%``Strangeness Production in the Quark - Gluon Plasma,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 48} (1982) 1066.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1066
%%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1066, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.2334;%%
%1082 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Koch:1986ud}
P.~Koch, B.~Muller and J.~Rafelski,
%``Strangeness in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions,''
Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 142} (1986) 167.
doi:10.1016/0370-1573(86)90096-7
%%CITATION = doi:10.1016/0370-1573(86)90096-7;%%
%971 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
%di-quark bound states
\bibitem{Donoghue:1988ec}
J.~F.~Donoghue and K.~S.~Sateesh,
%``Diquark Clusters in the Quark Gluon Plasma,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 38} (1988) 360.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.38.360
%%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.38.360;%%
%52 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Sateesh:1991jt}
K.~S.~Sateesh,
%``An Experimental signal for diquarks in quark gluon plasma,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 45} (1992) 866.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.866
%%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.866;%%
%18 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Lee:2007wr}
S.~H.~Lee {\it et al.},
%``Lambda(c) enhancement from strongly coupled quark-gluon plasma,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 100} (2008) 222301
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.222301
[arXiv:0709.3637 [nucl-th]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.222301;%%
%45 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
%Old ALICE Ds and Lc papers
\bibitem{Acharya:2018hre}
S.~Acharya {\it et al.} [ALICE Collaboration],
%``Measurement of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ and D$_{s}^{+}$ production in Pb-Pb collisions at $ \sqrt{{\mathrm{s}}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02 $ TeV,''
JHEP {\bf 1810} (2018) 174
doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2018)174
[arXiv:1804.09083 [nucl-ex]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2018)174;%%
%40 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Acharya:2018ckj}
S.~Acharya {\it et al.} [ALICE Collaboration],
%``$\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^+$ production in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV,''
Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 793} (2019) 212
doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.04.046
[arXiv:1809.10922 [nucl-ex]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.04.046;%%
%15 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
%PDG
\bibitem{Tanabashi:2018oca}
M.~Tanabashi {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group],
%``Review of Particle Physics,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 98} (2018) no.3, 030001.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001
%%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001;%%
%2431 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
%Lc averaging
\bibitem{Acharya:2017kfy}
S.~Acharya {\it et al.} [ALICE Collaboration],
%``$\Lambda_{\rm c}^+$ production in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV and in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV,''
JHEP {\bf 1804} (2018) 108
doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2018)108
[arXiv:1712.09581 [nucl-ex]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2018)108;%%
%44 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
%MC event generators/transport package
\bibitem{Wang:1991hta}
X.~N.~Wang and M.~Gyulassy,
%``HIJING: A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production in p p, p A and A A collisions,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 44} (1991) 3501.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3501
%%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3501;%%
%1581 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Sjostrand:2006za}
T.~Sjostrand, S.~Mrenna and P.~Z.~Skands,
%``PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual,''
JHEP {\bf 0605} (2006) 026
doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026
[hep-ph/0603175].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026;%%
%10327 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Brun:1994aa}
R.~Brun {\it et al.},
%``GEANT Detector Description and Simulation Tool,''
doi:10.17181/CERN.MUHF.DMJ1
%%CITATION = doi:10.17181/CERN.MUHF.DMJ1;%%
%1430 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
%FONLL feed-down subtraction
\bibitem{Cacciari:1998it}
M.~Cacciari, M.~Greco and P.~Nason,
%``The P(T) spectrum in heavy flavor hadroproduction,''
JHEP {\bf 9805} (1998) 007
doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/05/007
[hep-ph/9803400].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/05/007;%%
%698 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Acharya:2017qps}
S.~Acharya {\it et al.} [ALICE Collaboration],
%``$D$-meson azimuthal anisotropy in midcentral Pb-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02}$ TeV,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 120} (2018) no.10, 102301
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.102301
[arXiv:1707.01005 [nucl-ex]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.102301;%%
%47 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
%v2 estimation
\bibitem{Voloshin:2008dg}
S.~A.~Voloshin, A.~M.~Poskanzer and R.~Snellings,
%``Collective phenomena in non-central nuclear collisions,''
Landolt-Bornstein {\bf 23} (2010) 293
doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01539-7\_10
[arXiv:0809.2949 [nucl-ex]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01539-7_10;%%
%369 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
%ALICE experiment
\bibitem{Aamodt:2008zz}
K.~Aamodt {\it et al.} [ALICE Collaboration],
%``The ALICE experiment at the CERN LHC,''
JINST {\bf 3} (2008) S08002.
doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08002
%%CITATION = doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08002;%%
%2166 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Abelev:2014ffa}
B.~B.~Abelev {\it et al.} [ALICE Collaboration],
%``Performance of the ALICE Experiment at the CERN LHC,''
Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 29} (2014) 1430044
doi:10.1142/S0217751X14300440
[arXiv:1402.4476 [nucl-ex]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1142/S0217751X14300440;%%
%456 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Aamodt:2010aa}
K.~Aamodt {\it et al.} [ALICE Collaboration],
%``Alignment of the ALICE Inner Tracking System with cosmic-ray tracks,''
JINST {\bf 5} (2010) P03003
doi:10.1088/1748-0221/5/03/P03003
[arXiv:1001.0502 [physics.ins-det]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1088/1748-0221/5/03/P03003;%%
%191 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Alme:2010ke}
J.~Alme {\it et al.},
%``The ALICE TPC, a large 3-dimensional tracking device with fast readout for ultra-high multiplicity events,''
Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 622} (2010) 316
doi:10.1016/j.nima.2010.04.042
[arXiv:1001.1950 [physics.ins-det]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1016/j.nima.2010.04.042;%%
%364 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Akindinov:2013tea}
A.~Akindinov {\it et al.},
%``Performance of the ALICE Time-Of-Flight detector at the LHC,''
Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ Plus {\bf 128} (2013) 44.
doi:10.1140/epjp/i2013-13044-x
%%CITATION = doi:10.1140/epjp/i2013-13044-x;%%
%67 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Abbas:2013taa}
E.~Abbas {\it et al.} [ALICE Collaboration],
%``Performance of the ALICE VZERO system,''
JINST {\bf 8} (2013) P10016
doi:10.1088/1748-0221/8/10/P10016
[arXiv:1306.3130 [nucl-ex]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1088/1748-0221/8/10/P10016;%%
%143 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Sep 2019
%Ds models
\bibitem{Song:2015ykw}
T.~Song {\it et al.},
%``Charm production in Pb + Pb collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 93} (2016) no.3, 034906
doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.034906
[arXiv:1512.00891 [nucl-th]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.034906;%%
%63 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 12 Sep 2019
\bibitem{He:2014cla}
M.~He, R.~J.~Fries and R.~Rapp,
%``Heavy Flavor at the Large Hadron Collider in a Strong Coupling Approach,''
Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 735} (2014) 445
doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.05.050
[arXiv:1401.3817 [nucl-th]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.05.050;%%
%114 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 12 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Plumari:2017ntm}
S.~Plumari {\it et al.},
%``Charmed Hadrons from Coalescence plus Fragmentation in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC and LHC,''
Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 78} (2018) no.4, 348
doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5828-7
[arXiv:1712.00730 [hep-ph]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5828-7;%%
%35 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 12 Sep 2019
%Lc/D0 model calculations
\bibitem{Andronic:2019wva}
A.~Andronic {\it et al.},
%``Transverse momentum distributions of charmonium states with the statistical hadronization model,''
Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 797} (2019) 134836
doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134836
[arXiv:1901.09200 [nucl-th]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134836;%%
%7 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 12 Sep 2019
\bibitem{Christiansen:2015yqa}
J.~R.~Christiansen and P.~Z.~Skands,
%``String Formation Beyond Leading Colour,''
JHEP {\bf 1508} (2015) 003
doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2015)003
[arXiv:1505.01681 [hep-ph]].
%%CITATION = doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2015)003;%%
%98 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 12 Sep 2019
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}