Quantum Phase Transitions of the Distorted Diamond Spin Chain
Extracted source text ยท arXiv 1911.06539
%% ****** Start of file template.aps ****** %
%%
%%
%% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
%% Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
%%
%%
%% Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
%%
%% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
%%
%
% This is a template for producing manuscripts for use with REVTEX 4.0
% Copy this file to another name and then work on that file.
% That way, you always have this original template file to use.
%
% Group addresses by affiliation; use superscriptaddress for long
% author lists, or if there are many overlapping affiliations.
% For Phys. Rev. appearance, change preprint to twocolumn.
% Choose pra, prb, prc, prd, pre, prl, prstab, or rmp for journal
% Add 'draft' option to mark overfull boxes with black boxes
% Add 'showpacs' option to make PACS codes appear
% Add 'showkeys' option to make keywords appear
%%\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
%\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
%%\documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
%\documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
\documentclass[aps,prb,preprint,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
%\documentclass[aps,prb,twocolumn,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
%\documentclass[aps,prb,twocolumn,groupedaddress,showpacs]{revtex4}
% You should use BibTeX and apsrev.bst for references
% Choosing a journal automatically selects the correct APS
% BibTeX style file (bst file), so only uncomment the line
% below if necessary.
%\bibliographystyle{apsrev}
\usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
\usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
\usepackage{bm}% bold math
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
\def\Vec#1{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
\def\cH{{\mathcal H}}
\def\cHeff{{\mathcal H}_{\rm eff}}
\def\vS{\mbox{\boldmath $S$}}
\def\vT{\mbox{\boldmath $T$}}
\def\JF{J_{\rm F}}
\def\JAF{J_{\rm AF}}
\def\DAF{\Delta_{\rm AF}}
\def\DF{\Delta_{\rm F}}
\def\Deltaeff{\Delta_{\rm eff}}
\def\dstyle{\displaystyle}
%\def\vS{{\Vec S}}
%\def\vT{{\Vec T}}
\def\rc{{\rm c}}
\begin{document}
% Use the \preprint command to place your local institutional report
% number in the upper righthand corner of the title page in preprint mode.
% Multiple \preprint commands are allowed.
% Use the 'preprintnumbers' class option to override journal defaults
% to display numbers if necessary
%\preprint{}
%Title of paper
\title{Quantum Phase Transitions of the Distorted Diamond Spin Chain}
% repeat the \author .. \affiliation etc. as needed
% \email, \thanks, \homepage, \altaffiliation all apply to the current
% author. Explanatory text should go in the []'s, actual e-mail
% address or url should go in the {}'s for \email and \homepage.
% Please use the appropriate macro foreach each type of information
% \affiliation command applies to all authors since the last
% \affiliation command. The \affiliation command should follow the
\author{Tomosuke \textsc{Zenda}$^{1}$, Yuta \textsc{Tachibana}$^{1}$,
Yuki \textsc{Ueno}$^1$, \\
Kiyomi \textsc{Okamoto}$^1$ and T\^oru \textsc{Sakai}$^{1,2}$}
\affiliation{
$^{1}$Graduate School of Material Science, University of Hyogo, Hyogo 678-1297, Japan \\
$^{2}$National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), SPring-8, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan
}
%Collaboration name if desired (requires use of superscriptaddress
%option in \documentclass). \noaffiliation is required (may also be
%used with the \author command).
%\collaboration can be followed by \email, \homepage, \thanks as well.
%\collaboration{}
%\noaffiliation
\date{Received September 8, 2019}
\begin{abstract}
% insert abstract here
The frustrated quantum spin system on the distorted diamond chain lattice
suitable for the alumoklyuchevskite
is investigated using the numerical diagonalization of finite-size clusters
and the level spectroscopy analysis.
It is found that this model exhibits three quantum phases;
the ferrimagnetic phase, the spin gap one, and the gapless
Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid depending on the exchange coupling parameters.
The ground state phase diagram is presented.
\end{abstract}
% insert suggested PACS numbers in braces on next line
%\pacs{75.10.Jm, 75.30.Kz, 75.40.Cx, 75.45.+j}
%\maketitle must follow title, authors, abstract, \pacs, and \keywords
\maketitle
% body of paper here - Use proper section commands
% References should be done using the \cite, \ref, and \label commands
%\section{}
% Put \label in argument of \section for cross-referencing
%\section{\label{}}
%\subsection{}
%\subsubsection{}
%***********************
%***********************
\section{Introduction}
Frustrated quantum spin systems have attracted a lot of interest in the field of strongly correlated electron systems.
The $S=1/2$ distorted diamond spin chain is one of strongly frustrated quantum spin systems.
It was proposed as a good theoretical model of the compound Cu$_3$(CO$_3$)$_2$(OH)$_2$, called azurite\cite{kikuchi}.
The previous theoretical work\cite{okamoto1} using the perturbation analysis,
the numerical exact diagonalization of finite clusters, and the level spectroscopy method,
indicated that the system exhibits various quantum phases; the spin gap phase,
the ferromagnetic one, and gapless Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid (TLL) one in the ground state, depending on the exchange coupling parameters.
Recently another candidate material of the distorted diamond spin chain was discovered.
It is the compound K$_3$Cu$_3$AlO$_2$(SO$_4$)$_4$, called alumoklyuchevskite\cite{fujihara,morita,fujihala2}.
This material has a different structure of the distortion from azurite.
Thus it would be useful to investigate the suitable theoretical model for alumoklyuchevskite.
In this paper, the $S=1/2$ distorted diamond spin chain model suitable for
alumoklyuchevskite is studied by the numerical exact diagonalization of finite-size clusters
and the level spectroscopy analysis.
\section{Model}
We investigate the model described by the Hamiltonian
\begin{eqnarray}
&&\cH = \cH_0 + \cH_1 \\
&&\cH_0 = \sum_j^L \left\{ J_2 \vS_{j,1} \cdot \vS_{j,2} + J_5 \vS_{j,2} \cdot \vS_{j,3}
+ J_1 \vS_{j,3} \cdot \vS_{j,1} \right\} \\
&&\cH_1 = J_1 \sum_j^L \left\{ \vS_{j,3} \cdot \vS_{j+1,2} + \vS_{j,3} \cdot \vS_{j+1,1} \right\}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\vS_{j,i}$ is the spin-1/2 operator, $J_1$, $J_2$, and $J_5$ are the
coupling constants of the exchange interactions.
The schematic picture of the model is shown in Fig. \ref{model}.
For alumoklyuchevskite, it is thought that the interactions corresponding to four sides of diamond
differ from one another. Since such a model, however, has many parameters, we use a simplified model
sketched in Fig.\ref{model}.
When $J_5$ is much larger than other couplings, the spins coupled by $J_5$ are going to form a singlet pairs,
which make $\vS_{j,1}$ spins nearly free.
If the direct or effective interactions between $\vS_{j,1}$ spins are antiferromagnetic,
the ground state will be the TLL state.
This is the essential mechanism for the TLL ground state observed in
almoklyuchevskite.
On the other hand, when $J_2$ is much larger than other couplings,
singlet pairs locate at the $J_2$ bonds, which yields nearly free $\vS_{j,3}$ spins.
If the direct or effective interactions between $\vS_{j,3}$ spins are antiferromagnetic,
the ground state will be the TLL state,
which is nothing but the essential mechanism for the TLL ground state of azurite.
Thus our model is a minimal model describing both TLL ground states of alumoklyuchevskite and azurite.
We note that the direct interactions between nearly free spins are very important to explain experimental results both of almoklyuchevskite and azurite \cite{jeschke}.
\begin{figure}[h]
%\centerline{\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{model-0.eps}}
\begin{center}
\scalebox{0.5}{\includegraphics{model-0.eps}}
\end{center}
\caption{The model of the $S=1/2$ distorted diamond spin chain.
}
\label{model}
\end{figure}
For $L$-unit systems,
the lowest energy of ${\cal H}_0$ in the subspace where
$\sum _j S_j^z=M$, is denoted as $E(L,M)$.
The reduced magnetization $m$ is defined as $m=M/M_{\rm s}$,
where $M_{\rm s}$ denotes the saturation of the magnetization,
namely $M_{\rm s}=2L/3$ for this system.
$E(L,M)$ is calculated by the Lanczos algorithm under the
periodic boundary condition ($\vS_{L+1,i}=\vS_{1,i}$)
for $L=$4, 6 and 8.
\section{Ground state phase diagram}
We consider the ground state phase diagram of the model (1).
Since the three different exchange interactions $J_1$, $J_2$
and $J_5$, we fix $J_1=1$ and vary $J_2$ and $J_5$
in this paper.
On the analogy of the azurite-type model,
the ferrimagnetic, the spin gap and the gapless TLL
phases are expected to appear.
\subsection{Ferrimagnetic phase}
The ferrimagnetic phase is easily distinguished from other phases.
In this phase the finite magnetization $m=1/3$ appears in the
ground state.
When $J_5=0.5$ is fixed,
the $J_2$ dependence of the lowest energies with $M=0$ and $M=4$ for $L=8$
are shown in Fig. \ref{ferri}.
The phase boundary between the ferrimagnetic and singlet
phases can be detected as the intersection of two energy levels.
Since the phase boundary is almost independent of the system size,
the phase boundary is estimated from the result for $L=8$.
\begin{figure}[tbh]
\bigskip
\centerline{\includegraphics[scale=0.35]{gseL8j110j305.eps}}
\caption{
$J_2$ dependence of $E(L=8,M=0)$ (black line) and $E(L=8,M=4)$ (red line)
for $J_5=0.5$.
The phase boundary between the ferrimagnetic and singlet
phases can be detected as the intersection of two energy levels.
}
\label{ferri}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Spin gap and TLL phases}
In order to determine the phase boundary between the
spin gap and the TLL phases,
the level spectroscopy analysis \cite{okamoto2,nomura} is one of the best methods.
According to this method, we should compare the excitation energies of the
lowest singlet excitation and the lowest triplet one.
Namely, we define two excitation energies
\begin{eqnarray}
&&\Delta(L,M=0) = E_1(L,M=0) - E_0(L,M=0), \\
&&\Delta(L,M=1) = E_0(L,M=1) - E_0(L,M=0),
\end{eqnarray}
where $E_0(L,M)$ and $E_1(L,M)$ are, respectively,
the lowest energy and first excited energy within the subspace of $M$ for the $L$-unit system,
The ground state is in the spin gap phase or the TLL phase
according as $\Delta(L,M=0) > \Delta(L,M=1)$ or $\Delta(L,M=0) < \Delta(L,M=1)$.
The $J_2$ dependences of $\Delta$'s with fixed $J_5=0.5$
for $L=4$, 6 and 8 are shown in Fig. \ref{LS}.
Assuming the finite-size correction of the cross points between
$\Delta(L,M=0)$ and $\Delta(L,M=1)$ is proportional to $1/L^2$,
we estimate the phase boundary in the thermodynamic limit.
This analysis indicates that the spin gap phase is
adjacent to the ferrimagnetic phase.
\begin{figure}[tbh]
\centerline{\includegraphics[scale=0.35]{gapj505.eps}}
\caption{
$J_2$ dependences of $\Delta(L,M=0)$ and $\Delta(L,M=1)$ with $J_5=0.5$
for $L=4$ (black lines), 6 (blue lines) and 8 (red lines).
Solid and dashed lines correspond to the $\Delta(L,M=0)$ and $\Delta(L,M=1)$,
respectively.
}
\label{LS}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Phase diagram}
According to the above analyses, the ground state phase diagram is
obtained as shown in Fig. \ref{phase}.
As expected, it includes the ferrimagnetic, the spin gap and the TLL phases.
Takano {\it et al.} \cite{takano} indicated that the dimer-monomer state with high degeneracy is
the exact ground state on the line of $J_5=1$ and $J_2>2$.
They also found that the doubly degenerate tetramer-dimer state is the ground state on the line of $J_5=1$ and $0.909 < J_2 <2$.
Reflecting this fact, our spin gap state is also doubly degenerate which is consistent with the level spectroscopy method to
determine the boundary between the spin-gap phase and the TLL phase.
\begin{figure}[tbh]
\centerline{\includegraphics[scale=0.35]{phase2.eps}}
\caption{
Ground state phase diagram of the present model.
It includes the ferrimagnetic, the spin gap and the TLL
phases.
On the line of $J_5=1$, the dimer-monomer state is the exact
ground state for $J_2>2$ and the tetramer-dimer state is the exact ground state for $0.909 < J_2 <2$ \cite{takano}.
}
\label{phase}
\end{figure}
\section{Summary}
Using the numerical exact diagonalization and the level spectroscopy
analysis, the $S=1/2$ distorted diamond spin chain suitable for the
alumoklyuchevskite is investigated.
The obtained ground state phase diagram includes
the ferrimagnetic, the spin gap and the TLL
phases.
We believe that the upper TLL state is attributed to nearly free $\vS_{j,1}$ spins (alumoklyuchevskite type),
while the lower TLL state to nearly free $\vS_{j,3}$ spins (azurite type).
More detailed analysis will be a future problem.
\section*{Acknowledgment}
This work was partly supported by JSPS KAKENHI, Grant Numbers 16K05419,
16H01080 (J-Physics) and 18H04330 (J-Physics).
A part of the computations was performed using
facilities of the Supercomputer Center,
Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Tokyo,
and the Computer Room, Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics,
Kyoto University.
\begin{thebibliography}{9}
\bibitem{kikuchi} H. Kikuchi, Y. Fujii, M. Chiba, S. Mitsudo, T. Idehara, T. Tonegawa, K. Okamoto, T. Sakai, T. Juwai, and H. Ohta, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94},
227201 (2005).
\bibitem{okamoto1} K. Okamoto T. Tonegawa, Y. Takahashi, and M. Kaburagi, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter {\bf 11}, 10485 (1999).
\bibitem{fujihara}M. Fujihala, H. Koorikawa, S. Mitsuda, M. Hagihala, H. Morodomi, T. Kawae, A. Mitsudo, and K. Kindo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 84},
073702 (2015).
\bibitem{morita}
K. Morita, M. Fujihala, H. Koorikawa, T. Sugimoto, S. Sota, S. Mitsuda and T. Tohyama,
Phys. Rev. B {\bf 95}, 184412 (2017).
\bibitem{fujihala2}
M. Fujihala, H. Koorikawa1, S. Mitsuda, K. Morita, T. Tohyama, K. Tomiyasu, A. Koda, H. Okabe,
S. Itoh, T. Yokoo, S. Ibuka, M. Tadokoro, M. Itoh, H. Sagayama, R. Kumai and Y. Murakami,
Sci. Rep. {\bf 7}, 16785 (2017)
\bibitem{jeschke}
H. Jeschke, I. Opahle, H. Kandpal, Roser Valent\'i, H. Das, T. Saha-Dasgupta, O. Janson,
H. Rosner, A. Br\"uhl, B. Wolf, M.l Lang, J. Richter, S. Hu, X. Wang, R. Peters, T. Pruschke and A. Honecker,
Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 106}, 217201 (2011)
\bibitem{okamoto2} K. Okamoto and K. Nomura, Phys. Lett. A {\bf 169},
433 (1992).
\bibitem{nomura}
K. Nomura and K. Okamoto, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. {\bf 27}, 5773 (1994).
\bibitem{takano}
K. Kubo, K. Takano and H. Sakamoto, J. Phys: Cond. Matter {\bf 8}, 6405 (1996)
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}