Yang-Baxter Deformations of the $AdS_5\times T^{1,1}$ Superstring and their Backgrounds

Extracted source text · arXiv 2010.14081

\documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{article}
\pdfoutput=1
\usepackage{jheppub} 
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} 
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{float}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{mciteplus}
\usepackage{dsfont}
\usepackage{ifpdf}
\usepackage{epsfig}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{cancel}
\usepackage{arydshln}

\allowdisplaybreaks


\DeclareMathOperator{\Jt}{\widetilde{\mathnormal{J}}}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Mp}{\widetilde{\mathnormal{M}}_+}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Mm}{\mathnormal{M}_{--}}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Jsm}{\mathnormal{J}_{--}}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Jtp}{\widetilde{\mathnormal{J}}_+}
\DeclareMathOperator{\nablat}{\widetilde{\nabla}}
\DeclareMathOperator{\E}{\mathcal{E}}
\DeclareMathOperator{\dt}{\widetilde{\mathnormal{d}}}
\DeclareMathOperator{\ahc}{\a_1^2c\eta^2}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Rgod}{\mathnormal{R}_\mathnormal{g}\o\mathnormal{d}}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Rgodt}{\mathnormal{R}_\mathnormal{g}\o\widetilde{\mathnormal{d}}}
\renewcommand{\a}{\alpha}
\renewcommand{\b}{\beta}
\newcommand{\g}{\gamma}
\newcommand{\G}{\Gamma}
\renewcommand{\k}{\kappa}
\renewcommand{\l}{\lambda}
\newcommand{\e}{\epsilon}
\renewcommand{\L}{\mathcal{L}}
\newcommand{\M}{\mathcal{M}}
\newcommand{\N}{\mathcal{N}}
\newcommand{\K}{\mathcal{K}}
\newcommand{\norm}[1]{\left\|#1\right\|}
\renewcommand{\o}{\circ}
\newcommand{\Adg}{\text{Ad}_g}
\newcommand{\Adgi}{\text{Ad}_g^{-1}}
\newcommand{\Pm}{\mathnormal{P}_{-}}
\newcommand{\Str}{\text{Str}}
\newcommand{\tr}{\text{tr}}
%\newcommand{\det}{\text{det}}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Rgd}{\mathnormal{R}_\mathnormal{g}\mathnormal{d}}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Rgdt}{\mathnormal{R}_\mathnormal{g}\widetilde{\mathnormal{d}}}

\newcommand{\Jp}[1]{\widetilde{\mathnormal{J}}_+^{(#1)}}
\newcommand{\Jm}[1]{\mathnormal{J}_{-}^{(#1)}}

\newcommand{\Ap}[1]{\mathnormal{A}_+^{(#1)}}
\newcommand{\Am}[1]{\mathnormal{A}_{-}^{(#1)}}

\newcommand{\Rg}[1]{\mathnormal{R}_\mathnormal{g}\left(#1\right)}
\newcommand{\ep}[1]{\epsilon^{(#1)}}
\newcommand{\EZ}[1]{\mathcal{E}^{(#1)}}
\newcommand{\AZ}[1]{\mathnormal{A}^{(#1)}}
\newcommand{\dds}{\mathnormal{d}^2\sigma\,}
\newcommand{\eRg}{\eta R_g}
\renewcommand{\d}{\delta}
\renewcommand{\S}{\Sigma}
\newcommand{\kpp}[2]{\kappa_{++}^{#1#2}}
\newcommand{\kmm}[2]{\kappa_{- -}^{#1#2}}

\newcommand{\Jpi}[2]{\widetilde{\mathnormal{J}}^{(#1)}_{#2+}}
\newcommand{\Jmi}[2]{\mathnormal{J}^{(#1)}_{#2-}}
\newcommand{\JZi}[2]{\mathnormal{J}^{(#1)}_{#2}}
\newcommand{\JtZi}[2]{\widetilde{\mathnormal{J}}^{(#1)}_{#2}}

\newcommand{\diag}{\text{diag}}

\newcommand{\algg}{\mathfrak{g}}
\newcommand{\alggb}{\mathfrak{g}_{\text{b}}}
\newcommand{\alggf}{\mathfrak{g}_{\text{f}}}
\newcommand{\algh}{\mathfrak{h}}
\newcommand{\algk}{\mathfrak{k}}
\newcommand{\so}{\mathfrak{so}}
\newcommand{\su}{\mathfrak{su}}
\renewcommand{\u}{\mathfrak{u}}
\newcommand{\uosp}{\mathfrak{uosp}}
\newcommand{\psu}{\mathfrak{psu}}
\newcommand{\algi}[1]{\mathfrak{g}^{(#1)}}
\newcommand{\Ai}[1]{A^{(#1)}}
\newcommand{\Mab}[1]{M_{#1}}
\newcommand{\Z}[1]{\mathbb{Z}_{#1}}

\newcommand{\Em}[1]{E^{#1}}
\newcommand{\Km}[1]{K_{#1}}
\newcommand{\Hm}[1]{H_{#1}}
\newcommand{\Cmn}[2]{C_{#1}^{\;\;#2}}
\newcommand{\Ctmn}[2]{\widetilde{C}_{#1}^{\;\;#2}}
\newcommand{\Lmn}[2]{\Lambda_{#1}^{\;\;#2}}
\newcommand{\dmn}[2]{\delta_{#1}^{\;\;#2}}
\newcommand{\Pb}[1]{P_2\left(#1\right)}
\newcommand{\jm}[1]{j^{#1}}
\newcommand{\jtm}[1]{\widetilde{j}^{#1}}
\newcommand{\Oi}{\mathcal{O}^{-1}}
\newcommand{\MAB}[1]{M_{#1}}

\newcommand{\x}[1]{x^{#1}}
\newcommand{\p}[1]{p_{#1}}
\newcommand{\xm}{x_{-}}
\newcommand{\xp}{x_{+}}

\newcommand{\dx}[1]{dx^{#1}}
\newcommand{\dxs}[1]{dx_{#1}^2}
\newcommand{\di}[1]{\partial_{#1}}
\newcommand{\dmx}[1]{\partial_{-}x^{#1}}
\newcommand{\dpx}[1]{\partial_{+}x^{#1}}
\newcommand{\dmz}{\partial_{-}z}
\newcommand{\dpz}{\partial_{+}z}
\newcommand{\dxm}{dx_{-}}
\newcommand{\dxp}{dx_{+}}
\newcommand{\dxms}{dx_{-}^2}
\newcommand{\dxps}{dx_{+}^2}

\newcommand{\AdS}[1]{AdS_{#1}}
\newcommand{\Sph}[1]{S^{#1}}
\newcommand{\CP}[1]{\mathbb{CP}^{#1}}
\newcommand{\T}[1]{T^{#1}}
\newcommand{\CFT}[1]{\text{CFT}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\Sch}[1]{Sch_{#1}}

\newcommand{\vphi}{\varphi}

\newcommand{\ELm}[1]{\textbf{L}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\EMa}[1]{\textbf{M}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\EL}{\textbf{L}}
\newcommand{\EK}[1]{\textbf{K}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\EHi}[1]{\textbf{H}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\EH}{\textbf{H}}
\newcommand{\EM}{\textbf{M}}
\newcommand{\ET}[1]{\textbf{T}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\EX}[1]{\textbf{X}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\EY}[1]{\textbf{Y}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\EP}[1]{\textbf{P}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\EF}[1]{\textbf{F}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\SOM}[1]{\textbf{M}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\Ep}[1]{\textbf{p}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\ED}{\textbf{D}}
\newcommand{\Epm}{\textbf{p}_{-}}
\newcommand{\Epp}{\textbf{p}_{+}}

\newcommand{\el}[1]{\lambda_{#1}}
\newcommand{\ef}[1]{\sigma_{#1}}
\newcommand{\es}[1]{\sigma_{#1}}

\renewcommand{\th}[1]{\theta_{#1}}
\newcommand{\dth}[1]{d\theta_{#1}}
\newcommand{\vf}[1]{\varphi_{#1}}
\newcommand{\ph}[1]{\phi_{#1}}
\newcommand{\dvf}[1]{d\varphi_{#1}}
\newcommand{\dps}{d\psi}
\newcommand{\dji}{d\xi}
\newcommand{\dph}[1]{d\phi_{#1}}

\newcommand{\Et}[1]{\eta_{#1}}
\newcommand{\fabc}[3]{f_{#1#2}^{\quad#3}}
\newcommand{\eabc}[3]{\epsilon_{#1#2}^{\quad#3}}

\newcommand{\RR}{\mathbb{R}}
\newcommand{\CC}{\mathbb{C}}

\newcommand{\gab}[1]{\gamma^{#1}}
\newcommand{\eab}[1]{\varepsilon^{#1}}

\newcommand{\Lap}{\nabla^2}

\title{\boldmath %Yang-Baxter deformed $\AdS{4}\times\CP{3}$ background}
Yang-Baxter Deformations of the $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ Superstring and their Backgrounds}

\author{Laura Rado,}
\author{Victor O. Rivelles}
\author{and Renato Sánchez}

\affiliation{Instituto de F\'{\i}sica, Universidade de S\~{a}o Paulo \\ Rua do Mat\~{a}o Travessa 1371, 05508-090 S\~{a}o Paulo, SP. Brazil}
%\affiliation[b]{Another University,\\different-address, Country}
%\affiliation[c]{A School for Advanced Studies,\\some-location, Country}

\emailAdd{laura@if.usp.br}
\emailAdd{rivelles@fma.if.usp.br}
\emailAdd{renato@if.usp.br}

\abstract{
%We find string backgrounds for Yang-Baxter deformations of the $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ superstring based on $r$-matrices satisfying the classical Yang-Baxter equation. We obtain the metric and the $B$-field for the gravitational duals of the dipole deformed Klebanov-Witten theory and a   nonrelativistic Klebanov-Witten theory.
We consider three-parameter Yang-Baxter deformations of the $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ superstring for abelian $r$-matrices which are solutions of the classical Yang-Baxter equation. We find the NSNS fields of two new backgrounds which are dual to the dipole deformed Klebanov-Witten gauge theory and to the nonrelativistic Klebanov-Witten gauge theory with Schr\"odinger symmetry. 
} 
% deformation with Schr\"odinger symmetry.
%We build string backgrounds for Yang-Baxter deformations of the $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ superstring generated by $r$-matrices satisfying the classical Yang-Baxter equation. We obtain the metric and the NS-NS two-form of the gravity dual corresponding to dipole deformations of Klebanov-Witten theory, as well as a deformed background with Schr\"odinger symmetry.


\makeatletter
\gdef\@fpheader{}
\makeatother

\begin{document}
\maketitle
\flushbottom
\section{Introduction}
The AdS/CFT correspondence conjectures that certain gauge theories have a dual description in terms of string theories. The first case of the AdS/CFT correspondence states that $\N=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory on a four-dimensional flat spacetime is dual to type IIB superstring theory propagating in $\AdS{5}\times\Sph{5}$ \cite{Maldacena1999a}. 
%The notion of integrability is 
One of the most important features of the AdS/CFT correspondence is its integrability which   %its presence o
in the string theory side is associated to the existence of a Lax connection ensuring the existence of an infinite number of conserved charges.
%One of the most important features of the AdS/CFT correspondence is its integrability.
%On the string theory side, formulated as a two-dimensional field theory, the notion of integrability is associated to the existence of a Lax connection which ensures the existence of an infinite number of conserved charges.
In the case of $\AdS{5}\times\Sph{5}$ superstring, the theory is described by a $\sigma$-model on the supercoset $\frac{PSU(2,2|4)}{SO(1,4)\times SO(5)}$ \cite{Metsaev1998} and the $\Z{4}$-grading of the $\psu(2,2|4)$ superalgebra is an essential ingredient to get a Lax connection 
%of the theory and to show its integrability 
\cite{Bena2004}. The same happens for the  $\AdS{4}\times\CP{3}$ superstrings \cite{Aharony2008}, partially described by the supercoset $\frac{UOSp(2,2|6)}{SO(1,3)\times U(3)}$ \cite{Arutyunov2008,Stefanski2009}, which also has $\Z{4}$-grading and is integrable \cite{Arutyunov2008}.

Another way to get integrable theories is to start with an integrable model and then deformed it in such a way that integrability is preserved. This is accomplished by introducing $r$-matrices that satisfy the Yang-Baxter equation \cite{Klimcik2002}. 
%Since to show the integrability of a theory is, in general, a difficult task to pursue, techniques to deform integrable theories, i.e. theories of which integrability has been demonstrated, have been developed recently.
%$Recently, techniques to deform integrable theories while keeping their integrability have been developed. One of them is based on $r$-matrices satisfying the Yang-Baxter equation \cite{Drinfeld1985,Jimbo1985,Klimcik2002,Klimcik2009,Delduc2013}.
%One of them is based on $r$-matrices that satisfy the Yang-Baxter equation. This kind of deformation was proposed by Klimcik as a way to obtain an integrable deformation of the Principal Chiral Model \cite{Klimcik2002,Klimcik2009}. He used a Drinfeld-Jimbo $r$-matrix \cite{Drinfeld1985,Jimbo1985} which satisfies the modified classical Yang-Baxter equation (mCYBE).
%This procedure was applied to 
When applied to the $\AdS{5}\times\Sph{5}$ case \cite{Delduc2014,Delduc2014a} the superstring will propagate on what is called a 
%$\sigma$-model in .
%This deformation was also applied to symmetric cosets $\sigma$-model \cite{Delduc2013} and furthermore to the $\AdS{5}\times\Sph{5}$ $\sigma$-model \cite{Delduc2014,Delduc2014a}.
%In this case the 
$\eta$-deformed background 
%named $\eta$-deformed $\AdS{5}\times\Sph{5}$ background \cite{Arutyunov2014,Arutyunov2015} 
which is not a solution of the standard type IIB supergravity equations \cite{Arutyunov2014,Arutyunov2015}, 
%The important feature of this new background was that it does not satisfy the standard type IIB supergravity equations, which 
leading to the proposal of generalized supergravities \cite{Arutyunov2016,Wulff2016}. 
%In this last case the supercoset construction was performed and the background was named $\eta$-deformed $\AdS{5}\times\Sph{5}$  \cite{Arutyunov2014,Arutyunov2015}. The important feature of this deformed background is that it does not satisfy type IIB supergravity field equations which led to a proposal for generalized supergravity equations \cite{Arutyunov2016,Wulff2016}. However, it was shown recently that the standard supergravity equations are satisfied by an $\eta$-deformed background if the Drinfeld-Jimbo $r$-matrix associated to this deformation is constructed in a specific form \cite{Hoare2019}.


%Deformations based on $r$-matrices that satisfy the classical Yang-Baxter equation (CYBE) can also be considered \cite{Matsumoto2015}. When applied to superstrings in $\AdS{5}\times\Sph{5}$ \cite{Kawaguchi2014,Matsumoto2014,Matsumoto2014a,Matsumoto2015a,Kyono2016} they generate type IIB supergravity backgrounds which were already known and were obtained by TsT transformations, like  Lunin-Maldacena-Frolov \cite{Lunin2005,Frolov2005}, Hashimoto-Itzhaki-Maldacena-Russo \cite{Hashimoto1999,Maldacena1999} \footnote{This background was also obtained as the  $\eta\rightarrow0$ limit of the $\eta$-deformed $\AdS{5}\times\Sph{5}$ background \cite{Arutyunov2014} after a rescaling \cite{Arutyunov2015,Hoare2016b}.} and Schr\"odinger spacetimes \cite{Maldacena2008,Herzog2008,Adams2008,Bobev2009}. 
Deformations based on r-matrices that satisfy the classical Yang-Baxter equation (CYBE) can also be considered \cite{Matsumoto2015}. When applied to superstrings in $\AdS{5}\times\Sph{5}$ \cite{Kawaguchi2014,Matsumoto2014,Matsumoto2014a,Matsumoto2015a,Kyono2016} they generate type IIB supergravity backgrounds like the Lunin-Maldacena-Frolov \cite{Lunin2005,Frolov2005}, Hashimoto-Itzhaki-Maldacena-Russo \cite{Hashimoto1999,Maldacena1999} \footnote{This background was also obtained as the $\eta\rightarrow0$ limit of the $\eta$-deformed $\AdS{5}\times\Sph{5}$ background \cite{Arutyunov2014} after a rescaling \cite{Arutyunov2015,Hoare2016b}.} and Schr\"odinger spacetimes \cite{Maldacena2008,Herzog2008,Adams2008,Bobev2009} which were previously obtained by TsT transformations \cite{Osten2017}
\footnote{It should be remarked that these deformations are generated by abelian r-matrices which, from the TsT side, involve commuting isometries. More general r-matrices, however, are associated to non-abelian T-dualities \cite{Matsumoto2015c,Tongeren2015,Hoare2016,Borsato2016,Borsato2017}.}.
%\footnote{{\color{red}This type of transformation involves commuting isometries, then it is possible to associate deformations based on $r$-matrices, composed by these isommetries, to TsT transformations. The converse case did not appear to be true \cite{Matsumoto2015c,Tongeren2015}: not all deformations based on solutions of the CYBE are realized as TsT transformations. Homogeneous Yang-Baxter deformations, i.e. based on solutions of the CYBE, contemplate, in general, non-abelian T-dualities \cite{Hoare2016,Borsato2016,Borsato2017}.}{\bf(Sugestao de Tongeren para evitar confusao sobre a relação entre def YB e TsT)}}
%The interesting property of these deformations is that they lead to several known backgrounds of type IIB supergravity \cite{Matsumoto2014,Matsumoto2014a,Matsumoto2015a,Kyono2016}, namely Lunin-Maldacena-Frolov \cite{Lunin2005,Frolov2005}, Hashimoto-Itzhaki-Maldacena-Russo \cite{Hashimoto1999,Maldacena1999} \footnote{This background was also obtained as a  $\eta\rightarrow0$ limit of the $\eta$-deformed $\AdS{5}\times\Sph{5}$ background \cite{Arutyunov2014} after a rescaling \cite{Arutyunov2015,Hoare2016b},  showing that there are particular limits of $\eta$-deformed theories for which we obtain a standard supergravity solution.} and Schr\"odinger spacetimes \cite{Maldacena2008,Herzog2008,Adams2008}, which can also be obtained via TsT transformations \cite{Osten2017}.
%In these cases, the $r$-matrices are all abelian. These results were extended to the nonabelian case \cite{Orlando2016} and it was conjectured \cite{Hoare2016} that deformations using solutions of the CYBE are equivalent to nonabelian T-duality transformations \cite{Borsato2016,Borsato2017}. An interesting feature of these deformations is that they can generate partial deformations, i.e. either in $\AdS{5}$ or in $\Sph{5}$ for the $\AdS{5}\times\Sph{5}$ case.
In terms of TsT transformations, these backgrounds can be obtained by considering two-tori with directions either along the brane or transverse to it, or with a direction along the brane and the other transverse to it \cite{Imeroni2008}. In the first case, the two-torus along the brane will be generated by momenta operators, which introduce noncommutativity in the dual field theory \footnote{It is argued in \cite{Tongeren2016,Tongeren2017,Araujo2017a,Araujo2018} that noncommutativity, in general, can be introduced by considering conformal twists, or in terms of Yang-Baxter deformations by taking generators of the conformal algebra.}, while the two-torus in the transverse space to the brane will be along the $U(1)$ directions generated by the Cartan generators of the isometry group. These type of $U(1)\times U(1)$-deformations are called $\b$-deformations. Now, if the two-torus has directions one along the brane and the other transverse to it, taking a momentum and a Cartan generator, in the field theory side it leads to dipole field theories \cite{Dasgupta2000,Bergman2002}. Another possibility is to take a null direction along the brane and a $U(1)$ direction transverse to it. This generates gravity duals  of nonrelativistic field theories which have Schr\"odinger symmetry \cite{Hagen1972,Niederer1972,Son2008,Balasubramanian2008,Herzog2008,Guica2017}. The TsT procedure in this latter case is actually a TsssT transformation called Melvin twist \cite{Bobev2009,Bobev2009a}. In general, having more than one $U(1)$ direction in the transverse space allow us to construct the transverse two-torus in several ways so we  get different deformations or a combinations of them.
%In terms of TsT transformations this can be explained by considering two-torii with directions either along the brane or transverse to it, or with one direction along the brane and the other transverse to it \cite{Imeroni2008}. In the first case the directions of the two-torus will be generated by momenta operators and this corresponds to a noncommutative two-torus in the field theory, i.e. a noncommutative field theory.
%By choosing one direction along the brane and one $U(1)$ direction, generated by a Cartan generator, transverse to the brane we get the so-called dipole deformation which gives nonlocal properties to the dual field theory without noncommutativity. If there are three $U(1)$ possible transverse directions, that is three Cartan generators, we can perform the deformation in three ways or more, generally a combination of them. This type of deformation breaks supersymmetry and Lorentz symmetry in the dual field theory. If the two-torus is in the transverse directions we get $U(1)\times U(1)$-type deformations called $\b$-deformations (or $\g$-deformation if the parameter is real). In general, having three $U(1)$ directions in the transverse space allow us to construct the transverse two-torus in three ways to get different deformations or a combinations of them. This type of deformations is marginal, i.e. it does not affect the conformal symmetry of the dual field theory but reduces supersymmetries from $\N=4$ to $\N=1$. There is another way of getting a deformation from the TsT perspective: the null Melvin twist or TsssT transformation \cite{Bobev2009}. This is similar to the procedure for dipole deformation and can be extended to multiple parameters if the internal space has more than one $U(1)$ direction, as it is the case of $\Sph{5}$, $\CP{3}$ and $\T{1,1}$. In general, by deforming the $AdS$ subspace we expect, by the AdS/CFT correspondence, to obtain either nonconformal or noncommutative or  nonlocal theories as duals. On the other hand, by deforming the internal subspace we expect, in general, to reduce the supersymmetries on the field theory side. Thus, a combination of these deformations in the gravity side leads to interesting dual field theories.
These Yang-Baxter deformations can also be applied to $\AdS{4}\times\CP{3}$ superstrings \cite{Negron2018,Rado2020} 
%These deformations are similar of those for $\AdS{5}\times\Sph{5}$ 
giving rise to gravity duals for the noncommutative, dipole and $\b$-deformed ABJM theory \cite{Imeroni2008}. It was also found an Yang-Baxter deformation that generates Schr\"odinger spacetimes which correspond to a family of gravity duals of nonrelativistic ABJM theory \cite{Rado2020}.

%Another important duality is that between 
In this paper we will consider the duality between 
%focus on an example of duality that appeared almost at the same time as the Maldacena's first duality, and considers the case of taking an $X_5$ Sasaki-Einstein manifold as internal space instead of the $\Sph{5}$. In particular, for $X_5=\T{1,1}$, the AdS/CFT correspondence established the equivalence between 
type IIB superstring theory in $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ and $\N=1$ $SU(N)\times SU(N)$ Yang-Mills theory in four dimensions, also known as Klebanov-Witten theory \cite{Klebanov1998}. The internal $\T{1,1}$ manifold has $SU(2)\times SU(2)\times U(1)_R$ symmetry, instead of the $SU(4)_R$ symmetry of the $\AdS{5}\times\Sph{5}$ case, leading to a less supersymmetric dual field theory. 
%The  $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ theory is not integrable \cite{Basu2011} since it presents chaotic behavior, i.e., positive Lyapunov exponents \cite{PandoZayas2010,Basu2011a}
It has been argued that $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ is non-integrable since some wrapping string configurations present chaotic behavior \cite{Basu2011,Basu2011b}
%\footnote{{\color{red}In \cite{Basu2011b} it is given a further analysis on the connection between chaos and non-integrability for $\AdS{5}\times X_5$ backgrounds with $X_5$ being am Einstein manifold. There, the method to infer non-integrability is to write the equations of motion for certain configuration as the Normal Variational Equation (NVE) and check its solvability by the Kovacic's algorithm \cite{Kovacic1986}. For the case of $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ the configuration was chosen to be wrapping/spinning strings in $\T{1,1}$, then, by looking at a equation of motion, it is argued that, since it does not have a solution this configuration is non-integrable.}{\bf(aqui tentamos explicar o artigo seguinte de Basu onde da força à conclusão de que AdS5xT11 nao é integrável mas sempre para uma configuração. O algoritmo de Kovacic diz que se não da para completar os pasos computacionais a equação não tem solução, e portanto, junto ao comportamento caótico, o sistema nao é integrável.)}}
\footnote{Notice, however, that a coset constructions for $\T{1,1}$ based on affine Gaudin models was found to be integrable \cite{Arutyunov2020}.
%Integrability in this construction requires the presence of a $B$-field with an specific value. Thus, its absence rules out the integrability in consistency with the chaotic behavior, related to the non-integrability, found in \cite{Basu2011}.
}. 
%Since there is still no supercoset formulation of superstrings in $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ 
%it is not possible to analyze its integrability as in the previous cases. In fact, it is non-integrable . {\color{red}Recently, the $\T{1,1}$ space and its {\bf (eles usam essa expressao)}(non-)integrability was studied in \cite{Arutyunov2020}}. 
%{\color{red}Despite that, it was possible to construct a new integrable background as a Yang-Baxter deformation of $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ \cite{Crichigno2014} which agreed to the gravity dual of the $\b$-deformed gauge theory obtained by TsT transformation \cite{Catal2006}.}
Even so, an integrable Yang-Baxter deformation of $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ was found \cite{Crichigno2014} which agrees with the gravity dual of the $\b$-deformed gauge theory obtained by TsT transformations \cite{Catal2006}.
%Despite that, there are Yang-Baxter deformations which are integrable \cite{Crichigno2014}. They have a $\Z{2}$-grading and give  rise to a deformed background which is dual to the $\b$-deformed gauge theory obtained by TsT transformations \cite{Catal2006}.
In this paper we will discuss two other types of Yang-Baxter deformations generated by commuting $r$-matrices. One gives rise to a background dual to a three-parameter dipole deformed Klebanov-Witten gauge theory and the other is dual to a nonrelativistic Klebanov-Witten gauge theory on a Schr\"odinger spacetime.
%{\color{red} As remarked in \cite{Crichigno2014} these results indicate that the Yang-Baxter deformations are applicable even for non-integrable backgrounds, like the one for $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$, which suggests that the gravity/CYBE correspondence can be extended beyond integrable cases.}
%{\color{red}As remarked in \cite{Crichigno2014} these results indicate that the Yang-Baxter deformations would be applicable without considering the integrability of the base background {\color{black}\bf(o background que consideramos para deformar)} as an essential feature, which suggests that the gravity/CYBE correspondence could be extended beyond integrable cases.}

This paper is organized as follows. %In \autoref{rmatrix} we present a short review on the construction of Yang-Baxter deformed $\sigma$-models. 
In \autoref{cosetconstruction} we build the coset for $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ paying attention to the relevant subalgebras that will be used. 
In \autoref{news} we discuss the new backgrounds obtained by deforming $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$. Finally, in \autoref{conclusions}, we discuss our results and present future perspectives.

%\section{Yang-Baxter Deformed \texorpdfstring{$\sigma$}{sigma}-models \label{rmatrix}} 
\iffalse
\section{Review on the Yang-Baxter deformations \label{rmatrix}}
{\color{red}In a previous work \cite{Rado2020} we reviewed the basic concepts and formulas on Yang-Baxter deformations based on $r$-matrices satisfying the Classical Yang-Baxter equation (CYBE). Let us summarize those definitions in order to apply them to our case.}
\fi

\iffalse
The action for the $\eta$-deformed Yang-Baxter $\sigma$-model on a Lie superalgebra $\algg$ of a supergroup $G$ with $\Z{4}$ grading is given by \cite{Delduc2014} 
\begin{equation}\label{Sdef}
S=-\frac{\left(1+c\eta^2\right)^2}{2\left(1-c\eta^2\right)}\int \dds\Pm^{\a\b}\Str\left(A_\a,d\,J_\b\right),
\end{equation}
where the Maurer-Cartan one-form 
%\begin{equation}
%\label{Adef}
$A=g^{-1}dg\;\in\algg$, with  $g\in G,$ 
%\end{equation}
having $\Z{4}$-grading,  splits as
\begin{equation}
A=\Ai{0}\oplus\Ai{1}\oplus\Ai{2}\oplus\Ai{3},\quad \left[\Ai{k},\Ai{m}\right]\subseteq\Ai{k+m}\:\text{mod}\:\Z{4}.
\end{equation}
Also, $\Pm^{\a\b}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\g^{\a\b}-\kappa\varepsilon^{\a\b}\right)$, where $\g^{\a\b}$ is the worldsheet metric with $\det\g=1$, and $\k^2=1$ as required by kappa symmetry. The operator $d$ and its transpose\footnote{The operators $d$ and $\dt$ are such that
%\begin{equation}
$\Str\left(M dN\right)=\Str\left(\dt MN\right)$ with $M,N\in\algg$.
%\end{equation}
} $\dt$ are
\begin{align}
\label{d1}
d&=P_1+\frac{2}{1-c\eta^2}P_2-P_3,\\
\label{d2}
\dt&=-P_1+\frac{2}{1-c\eta^2}P_2+P_3,
\end{align}
where $P_i$ $(i=1,2,3)$ are the projectors on each subalgebra of $\algg$ except $P_0$ on $\algi{0}$. This is required in order to have a $\algi{0}$-invariant action. The deformed current and its transpose are defined as
\begin{align}\label{J1}
J&=\frac{1}{1-\eta\Rgod}A,\\
\label{J2}
\Jt&=\frac{1}{1+\eta\Rgodt}A,
\end{align}
%\section{Lax pairs for some deformed backgrounds}
where the operator $R_g$ is defined as
\begin{equation}
\label{Rgdef}
\Rg{M}=\Adgi\o R\o\Adg\left(M\right)=g^{-1}R(gMg^{-1})g,\qquad g\in G.
\end{equation}
$R$ is the operator associated to the Yang-Baxter equation (YBE) which can be written, in its modified version, as
\begin{equation}\label{YBE}
\left[RM,RN\right]-R\left(\left[RM,N\right]+\left[M,RN\right]\right)=c\left[M,N\right],\left\{\begin{matrix}
c=0 & \text{CYBE}\\ 
c=\pm 1& \text{mCYBE}
\end{matrix}\right.
\end{equation}
where $M,N\in\algg$. In \eqref{Sdef} and \eqref{YBE} the parameter $c$ refers to either  the classical Yang-Baxter (CYBE) equation or to the modified classical Yang-Baxter equation (mCYBE).  
\fi
%\section{Bosonic Backgrounds \label{BCG}}
\iffalse
In order to discuss the bosonic backgrounds we switch off the fermionic generators of the $\Z{4}$-graded Lie superalgebra $\algg$ such that it reduces to $\alggb=\algi{0}\oplus\algi{2}$. The $\algi{0}$-invariant bosonic Yang-Baxter deformed action is
\begin{equation}
\label{YBdef}
S=-\frac{1}{2}\int\dds\left(\gab{\a\b}-\eab{\a\b}\right)\Str\left(A_{\a}\Pb{J_{\b}}\right),
\end{equation}
where $A_{\a}=g^{-1}\partial_{\a}g$, $\g^{\a\b}$ is the worldsheet metric with $\det\g=1$. This action is $\k$-symmetric with $\k=1$. $P_2$ is the projector on the $\algi{2}=\alggb/\algi{0}$ bosonic subsector, and the deformed current one-form is
\begin{equation}\label{J1}
J=\frac{1}{1-\eta\Rgod}A,
\end{equation}
where the operator $R_g$ is defined as
\begin{equation}
\label{Rgdef}
\Rg{M}=\Adgi\o R\o\Adg\left(M\right)=g^{-1}R(gMg^{-1})g,\qquad g\in G_{\text{bosonic}}.
\end{equation}
$R$ is the operator associated to the CYBE,
\begin{equation}\label{YBE}
\left[RM,RN\right]-R\left(\left[RM,N\right]+\left[M,RN\right]\right)=0
\end{equation}
where $M,N\in\alggb$.\\
\fi
\iffalse
Let us consider the case where $\algi{2}$ is a coset subalgebra $\algi{2}=\alggb/\algi{0}$. Thus, $\algi{0}$ has the generators of the local bosonic symmetries while $\algi{2}$ contains the generators which will allow us to construct the background. With this in mind, the projector $P_2$ can be written as
\begin{equation}
\label{P2def}
\Pb{X}=\sum_m\frac{\Str\left(\EK{m}X\right)}{S\tr\left(\EK{m}\EK{m}\right)}\EK{m},
\end{equation}
where $\EK{m}$ are the generators of $\algi{2}$.
The current in \eqref{J1} can be recast as 
\begin{equation}
\label{ARgJ}
A=\left(1-2\eRg\o P_2\right)(J),
\end{equation}
and we can find $\Pb{J}$ by projecting \eqref{ARgJ} into $\algi{2}$,
\begin{align}
%\Pb{A}&=P_2\o\left(1-2\eRg\o P_2\right)(J)\\
\label{P2A}
\Pb{J} =\Pb{A}+2\eta P_2\o R_g\o\Pb{J}.
\end{align}
We then find that $P_2$ acts as
\begin{equation}\label{PJK}
\Pb{A}=\Em{m}\EK{m}, \qquad \Pb{J}=\jm{m}\EK{m}.
\end{equation}
In addition, we are going to need the following projection
\begin{equation}\label{Lmatrix}
\Pb{\Rg{\EK{m}}}=\Lmn{m}{n}\EK{n}.
\end{equation}
To do that we define from \eqref{J1}
\begin{equation}\label{Oidef}
\Oi=\frac{1}{1-2\eta R_g\o P_2},
\end{equation}
so that
\begin{equation}\label{POi}
\Pb{\Oi\left(\EK{m}\right)}=\Cmn{m}{n}\EK{n}.
\end{equation}
From \eqref{PJK}, \eqref{Lmatrix}, \eqref{Oidef} and \eqref{POi} we find 
\begin{equation}
\EK{m}=\Cmn{m}{n}\left(\dmn{m}{p}-2\eta\Lmn{m}{p}\right)\EK{p},
\end{equation}
or
\begin{equation}\label{Cmatrix}
\mathbf{C}=\left(\mathbf{I}-2\eta\mathbf{\Lambda}\right)^{-1}.
\end{equation}
Also, \eqref{P2A} becomes
\begin{equation}
\Em{n}\EK{n}=\jm{m}\left(\dmn{m}{n}-2\eta\Lmn{m}{n}\right)\EK{n},
\end{equation}
so that 
\begin{equation}\label{Emn}
\jm{m}=\Em{n}\Cmn{n}{m}.
\end{equation}
\fi
\iffalse
We can compute $\Pb{J}$ in \eqref{YBdef} by defining the action of $P_2$ as 
\begin{equation}\label{PJK}
\Pb{A}=\Em{m}\EK{m}, \qquad \Pb{J}=\jm{m}\EK{m}.
\end{equation}
The coefficients $\jm{m}$ can be calculated from
\begin{equation}\label{Emn}
\jm{m}=\Em{n}\Cmn{n}{m},
\end{equation}
where the matrix components $\Cmn{m}{n}$ are those of
\begin{equation}\label{Cmatrix}
\mathbf{C}=\left(\mathbf{I}-2\eta\mathbf{\Lambda}\right)^{-1}.
\end{equation}
The matrix $\mathbf{\Lambda}$ has components defined as 
\begin{equation}\label{Lmatrix}
\Pb{\Rg{\EK{m}}}=\Lmn{m}{n}\EK{n}.
\end{equation}
Then, from \eqref{YBdef}, we can read off the metric and the B-field as \cite{Rado2020}
\begin{equation}\label{Gmn}
ds^2=\Str\left(A\,\Pb{J}\right)=\jm{m}\Str\left(A\EK{m}\right)=\Em{m}\Cmn{m}{n}\Str\left(A\EK{n}\right),
\end{equation} 
\begin{equation}\label{Bmn}
B=\Str\left(A\wedge\Pb{J}\right)=-\jm{m}\wedge\Str\left(A\EK{m}\right)=\Em{m}\Cmn{m}{n}\wedge\Str\left(A\EK{n}\right).
\end{equation}
\fi

\section{Coset construction of \texorpdfstring{$\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$}{AdS5xT11} \label{cosetconstruction}}
%In the same spirit of \cite{Maldacena1999a}, 
The Klebanov-Witten  gauge theory is obtained by putting $N$ $D3$-branes on the singularity of $M_{1,4}\times Y_6$, where $M_{1,4}$ is the four-dimensional Minkowski space and $Y_6$ a Ricci flat Calabi-Yau cone $C(X_5)$ with base $X_5$ \cite{Klebanov1998}. Near the horizon the geometry becomes $\AdS{5}\times X_5$, where $X_5$ is a compact Sasaki-Einstein manifold, i.e., an odd-dimensional Riemannian manifold such that its cone $C(X_5)$ is a Calabi-Yau flat manifold \cite{Sparks2011}. 
%\footnote{{\color{blue} {\bf Não acho necessário essa informação aqui} It is argued in \cite{Witten1998} that Einstein manifolds, i.e. manifolds whose Ricci tensor is proportional to their metric, should be considered in order to generalize the AdS/CFT correspondence.}}
%\footnote{{\color{blue}{\bf Necessário?} The flatness of the cone $C(X)$ leads to say that $X$ is an Einstein manifold.}}
Taking $X_5$ as $\T{1,1}$ \footnote{This space belongs to a general class of Einstein spaces called $\T{p,q}$ \cite{Romans1985} described by the coset $SU(2)\times SU(2)/U(1)$, where the $U(1)$ is generated by $p\es{3}^L+q\es{3}^R$, where $\es{i}^L$ and $\es{j}^R$ are the generators of the left and right $SU(2)$'s, respectively.} only 1/4 of the supersymmetries are preserved so that we have $\N=1$ supersymmetry in four dimensions. 
%As pointed out in \cite{Klebanov1998}, 
The superpotential has a $SU(2)\times SU(2)\times U(1)$ symmetry, with $U(1)$ being part of the R-symmetry that gives the $\N=1$ supersymmetry, and $SU(2)\times SU(2)$ being a flavor symmetry which is not included in the $\N=1$ superconformal group in four dimensions $PSU(2,2|1)$ \cite{Ceresole2000,Ceresole1999,Ceresole2000a}. Thus, the full isometry group is $PSU(2,2|1)\times SU(2)\times SU(2)$.
The bosonic part of the superalgebra $\algg=\psu(2,2|1)$ on which we construct the $\sigma$-model is $\su(2,4)\otimes\u(1)$. The generators of $\psu(2,2|1)$
%The generators of $\su(2,4)\otimes\u(1)_R$ 
can be written as supermatrices which are formed by blocks that correspond to bosonic (diagonal) and fermionic (anti-diagonal) generators,
\begin{equation}
M_{(4|1)\times(4|1)}=\left(\begin{array}{c|c}
\so(2,4) & \overline{Q}\\ 
\hline
Q & \u(1)_R
\end{array}\right).
\end{equation}

The isometry group of $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ is given by the coset
\begin{equation}
\label{isometry}
\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}\equiv\frac{SO(2,4)}{SO(1,4)}\times\frac{SU(2)\times SU(2)}{U(1)},
\end{equation}
which is not the bosonic part of any supercoset \cite{Kac1977,Nahm1978}. 
%{\bf (o denominador no coset nao pertence à subgrupo bosonica de uma supergrupo na classificacao de Kac, tampouco na lista no artigo de Nahm )}. 
Besides that, the coset for $\T{1,1}$ does not lead to the standard Sasaki-Einstein metric for $\T{1,1}$. 
%\cite{Crichigno2014} 
%{\bf (aqui devemos citar o artigo de Klebanov ou Candelas onde aparece a forma de T11 ou onde diz que esse coset nao produz T11?)}. 
This happens because neither the bosonic subalgebra $\su(2)\otimes\u(1)$ nor the isometry group \eqref{isometry} captures the full isometries of the theory. All this can be overcome by extending the coset \eqref{isometry}  to \cite{Crichigno2014}
\begin{equation}
\label{isometry2}
\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}\equiv\frac{SO(2,4)}{SO(1,4)}\times\frac{SU(2)\times SU(2)\times U(1)_R}{U(1)\times U(1)},
\end{equation}
where the $U(1)_R$ now appears as part of the global symmetries and a second $U(1)$ was added in order to preserve the number of parameters that describe the space.
%In \cite{Crichigno2014} it was argued that by including the $\su(2)\otimes\su(2)$ flavor symmetry  and two $\u(1)$'s embedded in it the correct $\T{1,1}$ metric is obtained. 
Thus, in terms of this extended $\Z{2}$-graded algebra, the symmetric coset for $\AdS{5}\times \T{1,1}$ is taken as
\begin{equation}
\label{cosetT11}
\so(2,4)\oplus\su(2)\oplus\su(2)\oplus\u(1)=\overbrace{\left(\so(1,4)\oplus\u(1)\oplus\u(1)\right)}^{\algi{0}}\oplus\overbrace{\left(\frac{\so(2,4)\oplus\su(2)\oplus\su(2)\oplus\u(1)_R}{\so(1,4)\oplus\u(1)\oplus\u(1)}\right)}^{\algi{2}=\algg/\algi{0}}.
\end{equation}
The supermatrix has the block structure 
\begin{equation}
M_{(8|1)\times(8|1)}=\left(\begin{array}{c:c|c}
\so(2,4) & 0 & \overline{Q}\\ 
\hdashline
0 & \su(2)\oplus\su(2)& 0\\ 
\hline
Q& 0 & \u(1)_R
\end{array}\right),
\end{equation}
where the dashed lines split the algebras corresponding to the subspaces $\AdS{5}$ and $\T{1,1}$, while the solid lines split the $M_{8\times 8}$ and $M_{1\times 1}$ bosonic blocks.

%\subsubsection*{Generators of the algebra}
The basis of $\so(2,4)\oplus\su(2)\oplus\su(2)\oplus\u(1)$ that we will consider is composed of $\so(2,4)$ generators denoted by $\G_\mu$, $\G_5$, $\SOM{\mu\nu}$ and $\SOM{\mu5}$, $\mu=0,1,2,3$, which, when written as supermatrices become 
\begin{equation}
\G_\mu=\left(\begin{array}{c:cc|c}
\g_\mu &  &  & \\ 
\hdashline
 & 0 &  & \\ 
 &  & 0 & \\ 
\hline
 &  &  &0
\end{array}\right)\!\!,\quad
\G_5=\left(\begin{array}{c:cc|c}
\g_5 &  &  & \\ 
\hdashline
 & 0 &  & \\ 
 &  & 0 & \\ 
\hline
 &  &  &0
\end{array}\right)\!\!,\quad
\SOM{\mu\nu}=\left(\begin{array}{c:cc|c}
m_{\mu\nu} &  &  & \\ 
\hdashline
 & 0 &  & \\ 
 &  & 0 & \\ 
\hline
 &  &  &0
\end{array}\right)\!\!,\quad
\SOM{\mu5}=\left(\begin{array}{c:cc|c}
m_{\mu5} &  &  & \\ 
\hdashline
 & 0 &  & \\ 
 &  & 0 & \\ 
\hline
 &  &  &0
\end{array}\right)\!\!,
\end{equation}
and $\su(2)\oplus\su(2)\oplus\u(1)$ generators denoted by $\EX{a},\EY{a}$, $a=1,2,3$ and $\EM$, with   supermatrices 
\begin{equation}
\EX{a}=-\frac{i}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c:cc|c}
0 &  &  & \\ 
\hdashline
 & \es{a} &  & \\ 
 &  & 0 & \\ 
\hline
 &  &  &0
\end{array}\right)\!\!,\quad
\EY{a}=-\frac{i}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c:cc|c}
0 &  &  & \\ 
\hdashline
 & 0 &  & \\ 
 &  & \es{a}& \\ 
\hline
 &  &  &0
\end{array}\right)\!\!,\quad
\EM=-\frac{i}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c:cc|c}
0 &  &  & \\ 
\hdashline
 & 0 &  & \\ 
 &  & 0 & \\ 
\hline
 &  &  & 1
\end{array}\right)\!\!,\quad
\end{equation}
where $\g_\mu$, $\g_5$, $m_{\mu\nu}$ and $m_{\mu5}$ are the fifteen $4\times 4$ matrices for the generators of isometries of $\AdS{5}$ (detailed in \autoref{ApSO24}) and $\es{a}$ are the conventional $2\times 2$ Pauli matrices of $\su(2)$. The commutation rules and supertraces are then
\begin{equation}
\left[\SOM{ij},\SOM{k\ell}\right]=\Et{i\ell}\SOM{jk}+\Et{jk}\SOM{i\ell}-\Et{ik}\SOM{j\ell}-\Et{j\ell}\SOM{ik},
\end{equation}
where $i,j,k,\ell=0,1,\dots,5$, and 
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\left[\EX{a},\EX{b}\right]=\eabc{a}{b}{c}\EX{c},\qquad\left[\EY{a},\EY{b}\right]=\eabc{a}{b}{c}\EY{c},\\
\Str\left(\EX{a}\EX{b}\right)=-\frac{1}{2}\d_{ab},\qquad\Str\left(\EY{a}\EY{b}\right)=-\frac{1}{2}\d_{ab},\\
\Str\left(\EM\EM\right)=\frac{1}{4},
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
with $\Et{ij}=\diag\left(-,+,+,+,-,+,+,+,+,+\right)$. 

%\subsubsection*{Coset representative}
The algebra for the global symmetry of the $\AdS{5}$ space is
\begin{equation}
\so(2,4)=\so(1,4)\oplus\frac{\so(2,4)}{\so(1,4)}, 
\end{equation}
with basis 
\begin{equation}
\frac{\so(2,4)}{\so(1,4)}=\text{span}\left\{\EK{m}\right\},\qquad m=0,1,2,3,4,
\end{equation}
where 
\begin{equation}
\label{EKAdS5}
\EK{0}=\frac{1}{2}\G_0,\quad\EK{1}=\frac{1}{2}\G_1,\quad\EK{2}=\frac{1}{2}\G_2,\quad\EK{3}=\frac{1}{2}\G_3,\quad\EK{4}=\frac{1}{2}\G_5,
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
\Str\left(\EK{m}\EK{n}\right)=\eta_{mn},\qquad m,n=0,1,2,3,4.
\end{equation}
The $\so(1,4)$ generators are $\left\{\SOM{01},\SOM{02},\SOM{03},\SOM{12},\SOM{13},\SOM{23},\SOM{05},\SOM{15},\SOM{25},\SOM{35}\right\}$, and an appropriate coset representative for $\AdS{5}$ is
\begin{equation}\label{gAdS5}
g_{\AdS{5}}=\exp\left(\x{0}\Ep{0}+\x{1}\Ep{1}+\x{2}\Ep{2}+\x{3}\Ep{3}\right)\exp\left(\log z\ED\right),
\end{equation}
where 
\begin{equation}
\ED=\frac{1}{2}\G_5,\qquad\Ep{\mu}=\frac{1}{2}\G_\mu+\SOM{\mu5}\,,\qquad \mu=0,1,2,3.
\end{equation}

The $\T{1,1}$ space can be written as the coset in
\begin{equation}
\su(2)\oplus\su(2)\oplus\u(1)=\u(1)\oplus\u(1)\oplus\frac{\su(2)\oplus\su(2)\oplus\u(1)}{\u(1)\oplus\u(1)}.
\end{equation}
with basis 
\begin{equation}
\frac{\su(2)\oplus\su(2)\oplus\u(1)}{\u(1)\oplus\u(1)}=\text{span}\left\{\EK{m}\right\},\qquad m=5,\dots,9,
\end{equation}
where 
\begin{equation}
\label{EKT11}
\begin{gathered}
\EK{5}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\EX{1},\quad\EK{6}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\EX{2},\quad\EK{7}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\EY{1},\\
\EK{8}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\EY{2},\quad\EK{9}=\frac{2}{3}\EH,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
with 
\begin{equation}
\EH=\EX{3}-\EY{3}+\EM.
\end{equation}
We also have
\begin{equation}
\Str\left(\EK{m}\EK{n}\right)=-\frac{1}{3}\d_{mn},\qquad m,n=5,\dots,9.
\end{equation}
The generators of $\u(1)\oplus\u(1)$ are $\left\{\ET{1},\ET{2}\right\}$ with
\begin{equation}
\ET{1}=\EX{3}+\EY{3},\qquad\ET{2}=\EX{3}-\EY{3}+4\EM,
\end{equation}
where $T_1$ generates the original $U(1)$ in \eqref{isometry}. An appropriate coset representative is then 
\begin{equation}\label{gT11}
g_{\T{1,1}}=g=\exp\left(\ph{1}\EX{1}+\ph{2}\EX{2}+2\ph{3}\EM\right)\exp\left(\th{1}\EX{2}+(\th{2}+\pi)\EY{2}\right).
\end{equation}
The coset representative that will allow use for $\AdS{4}\times\T{1,1}$ is then 
\begin{equation}
g=g_{\AdS{5}}\times g_{\T{1,1}}.
\end{equation}

\iffalse
%\subsubsection*{Undeformed background}
The Maurer-Cartan one-form is
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
A=\dx{0}\Ep{0}+\dx{1}\Ep{1}+\dx{2}\Ep{2}+\dx{3}\Ep{3}+\frac{dz}{z}\ED\\
-\sin\th{1}\dph{1}\EX{1}+\dth{1}\EX{2}+\cos\th{1}\dph{1}\EX{3}\\
+\sin\th{2}\dph{2}\EY{1}+\dth{2}\EY{2}-\cos\th{2}\dph{2}\EY{3}\\
-2\dph{3}\EM.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
\fi
The projector $P_2$ on $\algi{2}$ can be defined as
\begin{equation}
\label{P2T11}
\Pb{X}=\sum_{m=0}^4\frac{\Str\left(\EK{m}X\right)}{\Str\left(\EK{m}\EK{m}\right)}\EK{m}-\frac{1}{3}\sum_{m=5}^9\frac{\Str\left(\EK{m}X\right)}{\Str\left(\EK{m}\EK{m}\right)}\EK{m}.
\end{equation}
Applied to $A=g^{-1}dg$, the Maurer-Cartan one-form, we get 
\begin{equation}
\Pb{A}=\Em{m}\EK{m},\qquad m=0,1,\dots,9,
\end{equation}
with
\begin{equation}
\label{EmAdS5T11}
\begin{gathered}
\Em{0}=\frac{\dx{0}}{z},\quad\Em{1}=\frac{\dx{1}}{z},\quad\Em{2}=\frac{\dx{2}}{z},\quad\Em{3}=\frac{\dx{3}}{z},\quad\Em{4}=\frac{dz}{z},\\
\Em{5}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\sin\th{1}\dph{1},\quad\Em{6}=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\dth{1},\quad\Em{7}=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\sin\th{2}\dph{2},\quad\Em{8}=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\dth{2},\\
\Em{9}=-\frac{1}{3}\left(\cos\th{1}\dph{1}+\cos\th{2}\dph{2}+\dph{3}\right).
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
Then, we can compute the $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ metric from
\begin{equation}
\label{APAT11}
\Str\left(A\,\Pb{A}\right)=\Em{m}\Str\left(A\EK{m}\right),\quad m=0,\dots,9\,,
\end{equation}
to get
\begin{equation}
ds^2=ds^2_{\AdS{5}}+ds^2_{\T{1,1}},
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
ds^2_{\AdS{5}}=\frac{1}{z^2}\left(-\dxs{0}+\dxs{1}+\dxs{2}+\dxs{3}+dz^2\right), 
\end{equation}
and 
\begin{equation}
\label{T11metric}
\begin{gathered}
ds^2_{\T{1,1}}=\frac{1}{6}\left(\dth{1}^2+\sin^2\!\th{1}\dph{1}^2\right)+\frac{1}{6}\left(\dth{2}^2+\sin^2\!\th{2}\dph{2}^2\right)\\
+\frac{1}{9}\left(\cos\th{1}\dph{1}+\cos\th{2}\dph{2}+\dph{3}\right)^2,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
where $\left(\th{1},\ph{1}\right)$ and $\left(\th{2},\ph{2}\right)$ parametrize the two spheres of $\T{1,1}$ and $0\leq\ph{3}\leq2\pi$.

The metric \eqref{T11metric} was first obtained in \cite{Candelas1990} and describes the basis of a six-dimensional cone. It can be understood as the intersection of a cone and a sphere in $\CC^4$ such that its topology is $\Sph{2}\times\Sph{3}$, and that the metric is a $U(1)$ bundle over $\Sph{2}\times\Sph{2}$.  Besides that, $SO(4)\cong SU(2)\times SU(2)$ acts transitively on $\Sph{2}\times\Sph{3}$ and $U(1)$ leaves each point of it fixed so that $\T{1,1}$ is described by the coset $\left(SU(2)\times SU(2)\right)/U(1)$. 

\section{Yang-Baxter deformed backgrounds \label{news}}
In this section we present some $r$-matrices satisfying the CYBE and build the corresponding 
%$\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ 
deformed  background identifying its gravity dual. As mentioned before, the background can be deformed partially by choosing generators on each subspace.
%we can deform partially this background by choosing generators on each subspace. 
%First, the noncommutative gravity dual of the Klebanov-Witten theory can be obtained by deforming only the $\AdS{5}$ subspace. {\color{red} This was done in \cite{Matsumoto2014} {\bf (Não há T11 nesse trabalho)} and it is in agreement with \cite{Imeroni2008} where it was obtained by a TsT transformation.}
The bosonic Yang-Baxter deformed action is \cite{Delduc2014}
\begin{equation}
\label{YBdef}
S=-\frac{1}{2}\int\dds\left(\gab{\a\b}-\eab{\a\b}\right)\Str\left(A_{\a}\Pb{J_{\b}}\right),
\end{equation}
where $A=g^{-1}dg\in\algg$ , $\g^{\a\b}$ is the worldsheet metric and $\eab{\a\b}$ is the Levi-Civita symbol. $P_2$ was defined in \eqref{P2T11} and the deformed current one-form is
\begin{equation}\label{J1}
J=\frac{1}{1-2\eta R_g\o P_2}A,
\end{equation}
where $\eta$ is the deformation parameter. The dressed $R$ operator $R_g$ is defined as
\begin{equation}
\label{Rgdef}
\Rg{M}=\Adgi\o R\o\Adg\left(M\right)=g^{-1}R(gMg^{-1})g.
\end{equation}
\iffalse
$R$ is the operator associated to the CYBE,
\begin{equation}\label{YBE}
\left[RM,RN\right]-R\left(\left[RM,N\right]+\left[M,RN\right]\right)=0
\end{equation}
where $M,N\in\alggb$.
Let us consider the case where $\algi{2}$ is a coset subalgebra $\algi{2}=\alggb/\algi{0}$. Thus, $\algi{0}$ has the generators of the local bosonic symmetries while $\algi{2}$ contains the generators which will allow us to construct the background. With this in mind, the projector $P_2$ can be written as
\begin{equation}
\label{P2def}
\Pb{X}=\sum_m\frac{\Str\left(\EK{m}X\right)}{S\tr\left(\EK{m}\EK{m}\right)}\EK{m},
\end{equation}
where $\EK{m}$ are the generators of $\algi{2}$.
The current in \eqref{J1} can be recast as 
\begin{equation}
\label{ARgJ}
A=\left(1-2\eRg\o P_2\right)(J),
\end{equation}
and we can find $\Pb{J}$ by projecting \eqref{ARgJ} into $\algi{2}$,
\begin{align}
%\Pb{A}&=P_2\o\left(1-2\eRg\o P_2\right)(J)\\
\label{P2A}
\Pb{J} =\Pb{A}+2\eta P_2\o R_g\o\Pb{J}.
\end{align}
We then find that $P_2$ acts as
\begin{equation}\label{PJK}
\Pb{A}=\Em{m}\EK{m}, \qquad \Pb{J}=\jm{m}\EK{m}.
\end{equation}
In addition, we are going to need the following projection
\begin{equation}\label{Lmatrix}
\Pb{\Rg{\EK{m}}}=\Lmn{m}{n}\EK{n}.
\end{equation}
To do that we define from \eqref{J1}
\begin{equation}\label{Oidef}
\Oi=\frac{1}{1-2\eta R_g\o P_2},
\end{equation}
so that
\begin{equation}\label{POi}
\Pb{\Oi\left(\EK{m}\right)}=\Cmn{m}{n}\EK{n}.
\end{equation}
From \eqref{PJK}, \eqref{Lmatrix}, \eqref{Oidef} and \eqref{POi} we find 
\begin{equation}
\EK{m}=\Cmn{m}{n}\left(\dmn{m}{p}-2\eta\Lmn{m}{p}\right)\EK{p},
\end{equation}
or
\begin{equation}\label{Cmatrix}
\mathbf{C}=\left(\mathbf{I}-2\eta\mathbf{\Lambda}\right)^{-1}.
\end{equation}
Also, \eqref{P2A} becomes
\begin{equation}
\Em{n}\EK{n}=\jm{m}\left(\dmn{m}{n}-2\eta\Lmn{m}{n}\right)\EK{n},
\end{equation}
so that 
\begin{equation}\label{Emn}
\jm{m}=\Em{n}\Cmn{n}{m}.
\end{equation}
\fi
Moreover, we can compute $\Pb{J}$ in \eqref{YBdef} by defining the action of $P_2$ as 
\begin{equation}\label{PJK}
\Pb{A}=\Em{m}\EK{m}, \qquad \Pb{J}=\jm{m}\EK{m}.
\end{equation}
The coefficients $\jm{m}$ can be calculated from
\begin{equation}\label{Emn}
\jm{m}=\Em{n}\Cmn{n}{m},
\end{equation}
where the matrix components $\Cmn{m}{n}$ are those of
\begin{equation}\label{Cmatrix}
\mathbf{C}=\left(\mathbf{I}-2\eta\mathbf{\Lambda}\right)^{-1}.
\end{equation}
The matrix $\mathbf{\Lambda}$ has components defined as 
\begin{equation}\label{Lmatrix}
\Pb{\Rg{\EK{m}}}=\Lmn{m}{n}\EK{n}.
\end{equation}
Then, from \eqref{YBdef}, we can read off the metric and the B-field as \cite{Rado2020}
\begin{equation}\label{Gmn}
ds^2=\Str\left(A\,\Pb{J}\right)=\jm{m}\Str\left(A\EK{m}\right)=\Em{m}\Cmn{m}{n}\Str\left(A\EK{n}\right),
\end{equation} 
\begin{equation}\label{Bmn}
B=\Str\left(A\wedge\Pb{J}\right)=-\jm{m}\wedge\Str\left(A\EK{m}\right)=\Em{m}\Cmn{m}{n}\wedge\Str\left(A\EK{n}\right).
\end{equation}

The three-parameter $\b$-deformed of $\T{1,1}$ was obtained in \cite{Crichigno2014} by a Yang-Baxter deformation and in \cite{Catal2006} by a TsT transformation in perfect agreement. In this case the $r$-matrix was
\begin{equation}
\label{betadef}
r=\mu_1 \EX{3}\wedge\EM+\mu_2\EM\wedge\EY{3}+\mu_3\EX{3}\wedge\EY{3}.
\end{equation}
In the following subsections we will introduce two more $r$-matrices and the corresponding deformations they produce.
\subsection{Dipole Deformed Klebanov-Witten Theory \label{dipole}}
Let us first consider an Abelian $r$-matrix like
\begin{equation}
\label{rdipole}
r=\Ep{2}\wedge\left(\mu_1\EX{3}+\mu_2\EY{3}+\mu_3\EM\right),
\end{equation}
where $\EX{3}$, $\EY{3}$ and $\EM$ are the Cartan generators of $\su(2)\oplus\su(2)\oplus\u(1)$ and $\mu_i$, $i=1,2,3$, are the deformation parameters \footnote{The deformation parameter $\eta$ can always be absorbed in the $r$-matrix such that it is present in the $\mu_i$'s.}. In this case \eqref{rdipole} combines generators of both subspaces, which will lead to a deformation of the entire $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ background. 
\iffalse
This $r$ matrix has associated an $R$-operator defined as
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
R\left(X\right)=\mu_1\left(\Ep{2}\Str\left(\EX{3}X\right)-\EX{3}\Str\left(\Ep{2} X\right)\right)+\mu_2\left(\Ep{2}\Str\left(\EY{3}X\right)-\EY{3}\Str\left(\Ep{2} X\right)\right)\\
+\mu_3\left(\Ep{2}\Str\left(\EM X\right)-\EM\Str\left(\Ep{2} X\right)\right).
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
In order to compute the deformed background with Lagrangian \eqref{YBdef}, we need first to compute the the nonzero components $\Lmn{m}{n}$ in \eqref{Lmatrix},
\fi
The nonzero components of $\Lmn{m}{n}$ in \eqref{Lmatrix} are 
\iffalse
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\Pb{\Rg{\EK{3}}}=\Lmn{3}{5}\EK{5}+\Lmn{3}{7}\EK{7}+\Lmn{3}{9}\EK{9},\\
\Pb{\Rg{\EK{5}}}=\Lmn{5}{3}\EK{3},\quad\Pb{\Rg{\EK{7}}}=\Lmn{7}{3}\EK{3},\quad\Pb{\Rg{\EK{9}}}=\Lmn{9}{3}\EK{3},
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
with 
\fi
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\Lmn{3}{5}=-\Lmn{5}{3}=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\frac{\mu_1\sin\th{1}}{z},\\
\Lmn{3}{7}=-\Lmn{7}{3}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\frac{\mu_2\sin\th{2}}{z},\\
\Lmn{3}{9}=-\Lmn{9}{3}=\frac{1}{6}\frac{\left(\mu_3-2\mu_1\cos\th{1}-2\mu_2\cos\th{2}\right)}{z},
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
while the nonzero elements of $\Cmn{m}{n}$, from \eqref{Cmatrix}, are
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\Cmn{0}{0}=\Cmn{1}{1}=\Cmn{2}{2}=\Cmn{4}{4}=\Cmn{6}{6}=\Cmn{8}{8}=1,\\
\Cmn{3}{3}=\M,\\
\Cmn{5}{3}=-\Cmn{3}{5}=\M f_1,\\
\Cmn{7}{3}=-\Cmn{3}{7}=-\M f_2,\\
\Cmn{9}{3}=-\Cmn{3}{9}=\M f_3,\\
\Cmn{5}{5}=\M\left(1+f_2^2+f_3^2\right),\\
\Cmn{7}{5}=\Cmn{5}{7}=\M f_1 f_2,\\
\Cmn{9}{5}=\Cmn{5}{9}=-\M f_1 f_3,\\
\Cmn{7}{7}=\M\left(1+f_1^2+f_3^2\right),\\
\Cmn{9}{7}=\Cmn{7}{9}=\M f_2 f_3,\\
\Cmn{9}{9}=\M\left(1+f_1^2+f_2^2\right),
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\M^{-1}=1+f_1^2+f_2^2+f_3^2,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
with
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
f_1=\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\frac{\mu_1\sin\th{1}}{z},\quad f_2=\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\frac{\mu_2\sin\th{2}}{z},\\
f_3=\frac{\mu_3-2\mu_1\cos\th{1}-2\mu_2\cos\th{2}}{3z}.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
The deformed metric can be obtained from \eqref{Gmn}
\begin{equation}
\label{metricdipole3}
\begin{gathered}
ds^2=\frac{1}{z^2}\left(-\dxs{0}+\dxs{1}+\dxs{2}+\M\dxs{3}+dz^2\right)\\
+\frac{1}{6}\left(\dth{1}^2+\M\left(1+f_2^2+f_3^2\right)\sin^2\!\th{1}\dph{1}^2\right)+\frac{1}{6}\left(\dth{2}^2+\M\left(1+f_1^2+f_3^2\right)\sin^2\!\th{2}\dph{2}^2\right)\\
+\frac{\M}{9}\left(1+f_1^2+f_2^2\right)\left(\cos\th{1}\dph{1}+\cos\th{2}\dph{2}+\dph{3}\right)^2\\
+\frac{\sqrt{6}\M}{9}f_3\left(f_1\sin\th{1}\dph{1}+f_2\sin\th{2}\dph{2}\right)\left(\cos\th{1}\dph{1}+\cos\th{2}\dph{2}+\dph{3}\right)\\
-\frac{\M}{3}f_1f_2\sin\th{1}\sin\th{2}\dph{1}\dph{2},
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
and the $B$-field from \eqref{Bmn},
\begin{equation}
\label{Bdipole}
\begin{gathered}
B=-\frac{\M}{3z}\left(2f_3\cos\th{1}-\sqrt{6}f_1\sin\th{1}\right)\dx{3}\wedge\dph{1}\\
-\frac{\M}{3z}\left(2f_3\cos\th{2}-\sqrt{6}f_2\sin\th{2}\right)\dx{3}\wedge\dph{2}\\
-\frac{2\M}{3z}f_3\dx{3}\wedge\dph{3}.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
\iffalse
\subsubsection*{one-parameter case}
For $\mu_1=\mu_2=0$ and $\mu_3=\mu$, the last expressions reduce to
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\widetilde{ds}^2=\frac{1}{z^2}\left(-\dxs{0}+\dxs{1}+\dxs{2}+\frac{1}{1+f_3^2}\dxs{3}+dz^2\right)\\
+\frac{1}{6}\left(\dth{1}^2+\sin^2\!\th{1}\dph{1}^2\right)+\frac{1}{6}\left(\dth{2}^2+\sin^2\!\th{2}\dph{2}^2\right)\\
+\frac{1}{9}\frac{1}{1+f_3^2}\left(\cos\th{1}\dph{1}+\cos\th{2}\dph{2}+\dph{3}\right)^2,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
and 
\begin{equation}
B=-\frac{2}{3}\frac{f_3}{1+f_3^2}\dx{3}\wedge\left(\cos\th{1}\dph{1}+\cos\th{2}\dph{2}+\dph{3}\right),
\end{equation}
with $f_3=\frac{\mu}{3z}$.
\fi
It is worth mentioning that the choice of generators in \eqref{rdipole} is dictated by the place where we want put the two-tori from the TsT perspective. In the present case we have one coordinate in $\AdS{5}$ and a combination of the $U(1)$'s in $\T{1,1}$. The resulting metric \eqref{metricdipole3} has  deformations along the $\x{3}$-direction in $\AdS{5}$ and along the angles $\ph{1},\ph{2}$ and $\ph{3}$  in $\T{1,1}$.
\subsection{Nonrelativistic Klebanov-Witten Theory \label{Sch5}}
In order to construct this deformation we must write the $\AdS{5}$ space in light-cone coordinates. Thus, the coset representative is now 
\begin{equation}\label{gAdS5LC}
g_{\AdS{5}}=\exp\left(\xm\Epm+\xp\Epp+\x{1}\Ep{1}+\x{2}\Ep{2}\right)\exp\left(\log z\ED\right),
\end{equation}
with
\begin{equation}
\Ep{\pm}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\Ep{0}\pm\Ep{3}\right),\qquad x_{\pm}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\x{0}\pm\x{3}\right), 
\end{equation}
while for the $\T{1,1}$ we keep the same form as in \eqref{gT11}.
\iffalse
\begin{equation}
g_{\T{1,1}}=g=\exp\left(\ph{1}\EX{1}+\ph{2}\EX{2}+2\ph{3}\EM\right)\exp\left(\th{1}\EX{2}+(\th{2}+\pi)\EY{2}\right).
\end{equation}
The projector in the coset is \eqref{P2T11}
\begin{equation}
\Pb{X}=\sum_{m=0}^4\frac{\Str\left(\EK{m}X\right)}{\Str\left(\EK{m}\EK{m}\right)}\EK{m}-\frac{1}{3}\sum_{m=5}^9\frac{\Str\left(\EK{m}X\right)}{\Str\left(\EK{m}\EK{m}\right)}\EK{m},
\end{equation}
where the generators were defined in \eqref{EKAdS5}
\begin{equation}
\EK{0}=\frac{1}{2}\G_0,\quad\EK{1}=\frac{1}{2}\G_1,\quad\EK{2}=\frac{1}{2}\G_3,\quad\EK{3}=\frac{1}{2}\G_3,\quad\EK{4}=\frac{1}{2}\G_5,
\end{equation}
for $\AdS{5}$, and in \eqref{EKT11}
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\EK{5}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\EX{1},\quad\EK{6}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\EX{2},\quad\EK{7}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\EY{1},\\
\EK{8}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\EY{2},\quad\EK{9}=\frac{2}{3}\EH,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
for $\T{1,1}$.
\subsubsection*{Undeformed background}
In this case the coefficients $\Em{m}$ are
\begin{equation}
\label{EmAdS5T11LC}
\begin{gathered}
\Em{0}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}z}\left(\dxp+\dxm\right),\quad\Em{1}=\frac{\dx{1}}{z},\quad\Em{2}=\frac{\dx{2}}{z},\quad\Em{3}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}z}\left(\dxp-\dxm\right),\quad\Em{4}=\frac{dz}{z},\\
\Em{5}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\sin\th{1}\dph{1},\quad\Em{6}=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\dth{1},\quad\Em{7}=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\sin\th{2}\dph{2},\quad\Em{8}=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\dth{2},\\
\Em{9}=-\frac{1}{3}\left(\cos\th{1}\dph{1}+\cos\th{2}\dph{2}+\dph{3}\right).
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
Then, we can compute the undeformed metric from
\fi
The $\AdS{5}$ metric is then
\begin{equation}
ds^2=\frac{1}{z^2}\left(-2\dxp\dxm+\dxs{1}+\dxs{2}+dz^2\right), 
\end{equation}
while the $\T{1,1}$ metric is given by \eqref{T11metric}.

%\subsubsection*{Yang-Baxter deformation}
Let us now consider the $r$-matrix \eqref{rdipole} with $\Ep{2}$ replaced by $\Epm$ \footnote{In this case we identify $\xm\sim\xm+2\pi r^{-}$, such that $p^{-}=i\partial_{\xm}$ can be interpreted as the number operator $p^{-}=N/r^{-}$. Moreover, if we consider $\xp$ to be the time then $p^{+}$ is the energy \cite{Hartnoll2008}.}
\begin{equation}
\label{rSch5}
r=\Epm\wedge\left(\mu_1\EX{3}+\mu_2\EY{3}+\mu_3\EM\right),
\end{equation}
where $\EX{3}$, $\EY{3}$ and $\EM$ are Cartan generators of the algebra. Taking the same steps as in the previous case we find that the nonzero components of $\Lmn{m}{n}$ are 
% \eqref{Lmatrix},
\iffalse
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\Pb{\Rg{\EK{0}}}=\Lmn{0}{5}\EK{5}+\Lmn{0}{7}\EK{7}+\Lmn{0}{9}\EK{9},\\
\Pb{\Rg{\EK{3}}}=\Lmn{3}{5}\EK{5}+\Lmn{3}{7}\EK{7}+\Lmn{3}{9}\EK{9},\\
\Pb{\Rg{\EK{5}}}=\Lmn{5}{0}\EK{0}+\Lmn{5}{3}\EK{3},\\
\Pb{\Rg{\EK{7}}}=\Lmn{7}{0}\EK{0}+\Lmn{7}{3}\EK{3},\\
\Pb{\Rg{\EK{9}}}=\Lmn{9}{0}\EK{0}+\Lmn{9}{3}\EK{3},
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
where
\fi
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\Lmn{0}{5}=\Lmn{5}{0}=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{3}}\frac{\mu_1\sin\th{1}}{z},\\
\Lmn{0}{7}=\Lmn{7}{0}=-\frac{1}{2\sqrt{3}}\frac{\mu_2\sin\th{2}}{z},\\
\Lmn{0}{9}=\Lmn{9}{0}=\frac{1}{6\sqrt{2}}\frac{\mu_3-2\mu_1\cos\th{1}-2\mu_2\cos\th{2}}{z},\\
\Lmn{3}{5}=-\Lmn{5}{3}=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{3}}\frac{\mu_1\sin\th{1}}{z},\\
\Lmn{3}{7}=-\Lmn{7}{3}=-\frac{1}{2\sqrt{3}}\frac{\mu_2\sin\th{2}}{z},\\
\Lmn{3}{9}=-\Lmn{9}{3}=\frac{1}{6\sqrt{2}}\frac{\mu_3-2\mu_1\cos\th{1}-2\mu_2\cos\th{2}}{z},
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
while the nonzero elements of $\Cmn{m}{n}$ are now
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\Cmn{1}{1}=\Cmn{2}{2}=\Cmn{4}{4}=\Cmn{5}{5}=\Cmn{6}{6}=\Cmn{7}{7}=\Cmn{8}{8}=\Cmn{9}{9}=1,\\
\Cmn{0}{0}=1+f_1^2+f_2^2+f_3^2,\\
\Cmn{3}{0}=-\Cmn{0}{3}=-\left(f_1^2+f_2^2+f_3^2\right),\\
\Cmn{5}{0}=\Cmn{0}{5}=f_1,\\
\Cmn{7}{0}=\Cmn{0}{7}=-f_2,\\
\Cmn{9}{0}=\Cmn{0}{9}=f_3,\\
\Cmn{3}{3}=1-\left(f_1^2+f_2^2+f_3^2\right),\\
\Cmn{5}{3}=-\Cmn{3}{5}=-f_1,\\
\Cmn{7}{3}=-\Cmn{3}{7}=f_2,\\
\Cmn{9}{3}=-\Cmn{3}{9}=-f_3,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
f_1=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\frac{\mu_1\sin\th{1}}{z},\quad f_2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\frac{\mu_2\sin\th{2}}{z},\\
f_3=\frac{1}{3\sqrt{2}}\frac{\mu_3-2\mu_1\cos\th{1}-2\mu_2\cos\th{2}}{z}.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
The deformed metric is then
\begin{equation}
\label{metricSch5}
ds^2=\frac{1}{z^2}\left(-2\dxp\dxm+\dxs{1}+\dxs{2}+dz^2\right)-2\M\frac{\dxps}{z^2}+ds^2_{\T{1,1}},
\end{equation}
where now 
\begin{equation}
\M=f_1^2+f_2^2+f_3^2, 
\end{equation}
while the deformed $B$-field is 
%which can be called $\Sch{5}\times\T{1,1}$. Here,
%The $B$-field is now 
\begin{equation}
\label{BSch5}
\begin{gathered}
B=-\frac{2}{3z}\left(\sqrt{2}f_3\cos\th{1}+\sqrt{3}f_1\sin\th{1}\right)\dxp\wedge\dph{1}\\
-\frac{2}{3z}\left(\sqrt{2}f_3\cos\th{2}+\sqrt{3}f_2\sin\th{2}\right)\dxp\wedge\dph{2}\\
-\frac{2\sqrt{2}}{3z}f_3\dxp\wedge\dph{3}.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
The first two terms in \eqref{metricSch5} is the metric of a Schr\"odinger spacetime\footnote{{The Schr\"odinger symmetry is the maximal symmetry group of the free Schr\"odinger equation. It is the nonrelativistic version of the conformal algebra \cite{Hagen1972,Niederer1972}. This symmetry is realized geometrically as Schr\"odinger spacetimes.}}. 
The choice of generators in \eqref{rSch5} is very similar to the one in \eqref{rdipole}. Now, however, the two-tori defined by the TsT transformation takes the $\xm$ coordinate and a combination of the internal $U(1)$'s in ${\T{1,1}}$ and does not introduce any noncommutativity in the dual field theory. {The metric \eqref{metricSch5} coincide with the $\Sch{5}\times\T{1,1}$ obtained in \cite{Bobev2009a} for $\mu_1=n_1/2,\,\mu_2=n_2/2$ and $\mu_3=-n_3$, where $n_i$ $(i=1,2,3)$ are the deformation parameters.

The Schr\"odinger spacetime in \eqref{metricSch5} has dynamical exponent two \cite{Son2008,Balasubramanian2008} \footnote{{The dynamical $z$ factor is the exponent in the power of the radial direction in the $z^{-2z}\dxps$ term. To have Schr\"odinger symmetry we must have $z=2$. The relativistic symmetry corresponds to $z=1$.}}. Schr\"odinger backgrounds with dynamical exponent $z$ are argued to be integrable for $z=1,2,3$, and non-integrable for $z=4,5,6$ \cite{Giataganas2014}. It has been argued that there are several nonrelativistic gravity duals with Schr\"odinger symmetry \cite{Hartnoll2008}. The number of $\Sch{5}\times\T{1,1}$ spaces is equal to the degeneracy of a scalar harmonic function $\Phi_{(0)}^{(\ell_1,\ell_2,r)}$ on $\T{1,1}$, 
with quantum numbers $(\ell_1,\ell_2,r)$, for which the Laplace-Beltrami equation is $-\Lap\Phi_{(0)}^{(\ell_1,\ell_2,r)}=\l_{(\ell_1,\ell_2,r)}\Phi_{(0)}^{(\ell_1,\ell_2,r)}$ with $\l_{(\ell_1,\ell_2,r)}=6\left(\ell_1\left(\ell_1+1\right)+\ell_2\left(\ell_2+1\right)-r^2/8\right)$\footnote{{ The harmonic function is denoted in general as $\Phi_{(q)}^{(\ell_1,\ell_2,r)}$, where $\ell_1,\ell_2$ are labels for the $SU(2)$'s, and $r$ and $q$ are $U(1)$ charges \cite{Gubser1999,Ceresole2000}.}}. Since $\ell_1,\ell_2$ label standard spherical harmonics on the $\Sph{2}$'s of $\T{1,1}$ the multiplicities of $\Phi_{(0)}^{(\ell_1,\ell_2,r)}$ are $(2|\ell_1|+1)$ and $(2|\ell_2|+1)$ \cite{Hartnoll2008}. Our background has\footnote{{In \cite{Bobev2009a}, the harmonic function $\Phi$ is defined as the non-negative length square of the Killing vector $\K$ on $\T{1,1}$, $\Phi=\norm{\K}^2=g_{ij}\K^i\K^j$ with $i,j=1,2,3$, where $\K=\left(\mu_1\partial_{\ph{1}},\mu_2\partial_{\ph{2}},\mu_3\partial_{\ph{3}}\right)$.}} $\Phi=2\M z^2$  and $-\Lap\Phi_{(0)}^{(\ell_1,\ell_2,r)}=12\Phi_{(0)}^{(\ell_1,\ell_2,r)}$, so that $\left(\ell_1,\ell_2,r\right)$ takes two values, $\left(1,0,0\right)$ and $\left(0,1,0\right)$. Then the total degeneracy of $\Phi_{(0)}$ is six so that we have a family of six $\Sch{5}\times\T{1,1}$ spacetimes \cite{Hartnoll2008}. This kind of spacetimes was recently studied in \cite{Golubtsova2020a,Golubtsova2020}.
\section{Conclusions \label{conclusions}}
In this paper we have derived the metric and the $B$-field for the gravity duals of the dipole-deformed and the nonrelativistic Klebanov-Witten theory as Yang-Baxter deformations. We made use of an extended coset description of $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ which simplified the computation of the undeformed background and its deformation. We considered two abelian $r$-matrices with three-parameter satisfying the classical Yang-Baxter equation. The first $r$-matrix was composed by a momentum generator in $AdS$ and a combination of the three $U(1)$'s generators of the internal space which lead to the gravity dual of the dipole-deformed Klebanov-Witten theory which should be obtained by TsT transformation of the $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ background. In second case we have also a momentum operator in $AdS$ and a combination of the three $U(1)$ generators in $\T{1,1}$. It produced the $\Sch{5}\times\T{1,1}$ background which, having Schr\"odinger symmetry, corresponds to the nonrelativistic Klebanov-Witten theory \cite{Balasubramanian2008}. 
%{\color{red}The immediate step to complete our results is to find the RR sector of the deformed backgrounds we have computed. These field were absent in this paper because we worked out the bosonic sector only. Thus, to compute the RR fields implies to work also with the fermionic degrees of freedom as in \cite{Kyono2016}. The fact that we have not included the fermionic sector of the supercoset lead to not being able to check the supergravity equations for the new backgrounds in the standard way, but we can easily confirm that our new backgrounds satify the supergravity equations only by looking at the $r$-matrices we used to construct them. They are abelian and satisfy trivially the unimodularity condition, which is the sufficient condition for the $r$-matrix based deformed background to satify the supergravity equations \cite{Wullf2016,Arutyunov2016,Borsato2016}.}

The next step is to compute the RR fields of the deformed backgrounds. To get them we have to consider the fermionic sector as in \cite{Kyono2016}. The fact that we have not included the fermionic sector of the supercoset does not mean that we are unable to check the supergravity equations for the new backgrounds. Since the $r$-matrices that we used in the bosonic background are abelian they satisfy trivially the unimodularity condition, which is a  sufficient for the background to satisfy the supergravity equations \cite{Wulff2016,Arutyunov2016,Borsato2016}.

%{\bf (pelo que entendimos, por exemplo nesse artigo, sempre que se tenha um espaço tipo Schrodinger o dual será uma teoria nao-relativista porque a simetria de Schrodinger é o limite nao-relativista da simetria conforme)}. 
%{\color{red} As remarked in \cite{Crichigno2014} for the $\b$-deformation of $\T{1,1}$ and by our results, since the $\AdS{5}\times\T{1,1}$ background is argued to be non-integrable \cite{Basu2011}, we should put as an open question if this type of deformations that starts from a non-integrable theory can be considered as an integrable deformation stricto sensu or we should consider them as a wider concept that relates classical Yang-Baxter deformations with supergravity backgrounds.}

Another interesting case which deserves further study is the dual of the dipole deformation of $\N=1$ $SU(N)\times SU(N)$ Yang-Mills theory as well as its nonrelativistic limits.


\appendix
\section{A basis for \texorpdfstring{$\so(2,4)$}{so(2,4)} algebra \label{ApSO24}} 
\iffalse
The 10 generators of $SO(2,3)$ can be written as
\begin{equation}\label{gens}
M_{AB}=\frac{i}{4}\left[\Gamma_A,\Gamma_B\right],
\end{equation}
and satisfy
\begin{equation}
\left[M_{AB},M_{CD}\right]=i\left(\eta_{AD}M_{BC}+\eta_{BC}M_{AD}-\eta_{BD}M_{AC}-\eta_{AC}M_{BD}\right),\quad A=0,...,4,
\end{equation}
where $A,B=0,1,2,3,4$. 

We choose the following representation for the $SO(2,3)$ $\Gamma_A$ matrices,
\begin{equation}
\left\{\Gamma_A,\Gamma_B\right\}=2\eta_{AB}
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\Gamma_A=\left\{\begin{matrix}
i\gamma_5\gamma_\mu & A=\mu=0,1,2,3\\ 
\gamma_5=i\gamma_0\gamma_1\gamma_2\gamma_3 & A=4
\end{matrix}\right.,
\end{equation}
with $\eta_{AB}=\text{diag}(+---+)$, and \fi

Let us choose the following representation for $\gamma_\mu$
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\g_0=\begin{pmatrix}
 0 &  \es{3}  \\ 
 -\es{3} & 0 \\  
\end{pmatrix},\quad
\g_1=\begin{pmatrix}
 0 &  -i\es{2}  \\ 
 i\es{2}   & 0 \\  
\end{pmatrix},\\
\g_2=\begin{pmatrix}
 0 &  i\es{1}  \\ 
 -i\es{1}  & 0 \\  
\end{pmatrix},\quad
\g_3=\begin{pmatrix}
 0 &  I_2  \\ 
 -I_2 & 0 \\  
\end{pmatrix},
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
and 
\begin{equation}
\g_5=\begin{pmatrix}
I_2 & 0  \\ 
0 & -I_2 \\  
\end{pmatrix}.
\end{equation}
\iffalse
From \eqref{gens}, we get
\begin{equation}
M_{\mu\nu}=\frac{i}{4}\left[\gamma_\mu,\gamma_\nu\right],\qquad  M_{\mu4}=\frac{1}{2}\gamma_\mu,\qquad \mu,\nu=0,1,2,3.
\end{equation}
In order to explicit the conformal group, let us split the indices as
\begin{eqnarray}
M_{AB}=\left\{M_{ab},M_{a3},M_{a4},M_{34}\right\},\qquad  a,b=0,1,2,
\end{eqnarray}
such that $\eta_{ab}=\text{diag}(-,+,+)$ \footnote{This is going to be the signature on the Minkowski boundary of $AdS_4$.}. 
\fi
We can also define
\begin{equation}
m_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{4}\left[\g_\mu,\g_\nu\right],\quad m_{\mu 5}=\frac{1}{4}\left[\g_\mu,\g_5\right], 
\end{equation}
and
\begin{align}\nonumber
p_\mu&=\frac{1}{2}\g_\mu-m_{\mu 5},\\ \nonumber
k_\nu&=\frac{1}{2}\g_\mu+m_{\mu 5},\\
D&=\frac{1}{2}\g_5.
\end{align}
The conformal algebra $SO(2,4)$ is then
\begin{align}\nonumber
\left[m_{\mu\nu},m_{\rho\sigma}\right]&=\eta_{\mu\sigma}m_{\nu\rho}+\eta_{\nu\rho}m_{\mu\sigma}-\eta_{\mu\rho}m_{\nu\sigma}-\eta_{\nu\sigma}m_{\mu\rho},\\
\nonumber
\left[m_{\mu\nu},D\right]&=0,\\
\nonumber
\left[D,p_\mu\right]&=p_\mu,\\
\label{conformal4}
\left[D,k_\mu\right]&=-k_\mu,\\
\nonumber
\left[k_\mu,p_\nu\right]&=2\eta_{\mu\nu}D+2m_{\mu\nu},\\
\nonumber
\left[m_{\mu\nu},p_\rho\right]&=-\eta_{\mu\rho}P_\nu+\eta_{\nu\rho}P_\mu,\\
\nonumber
\left[m_{\mu\nu},k_\rho\right]&=-\eta_{\mu\rho}k_\nu+\eta_{\nu\rho}k_\mu.
\end{align}
\iffalse
\section{A basis for \texorpdfstring{$\su(4)$}{su(4)} algebra}

A basis for $\su(4)$ can be constructed in terms of anti-Hermitian $4\times 4$ matrices known as Gell-Mann matrices,
\begin{align}\nonumber
\lambda_1=& \begin{pmatrix}
0 &1  &0  &0 \\ 
1 &0  &0 & 0\\ 
 0& 0 &  0&0 \\ 
 0&0  &0  &0 
\end{pmatrix},   \qquad  \lambda_2=\begin{pmatrix}
0 &-i  &0  &0 \\ 
i &0  &0 & 0\\ 
 0& 0 &  0&0 \\ 
 0&0  &0  &0 
\end{pmatrix}, \qquad \lambda_3=\begin{pmatrix}
1 &0  &0  &0 \\ 
0 &-1  &0 & 0\\ 
 0& 0 &  0&0 \\ 
 0&0  &0  &0 
\end{pmatrix},
\\
\nonumber
\lambda_4=& \begin{pmatrix}
0 &0  &1  &0 \\ 
0 &0  &0 & 0\\ 
 1& 0 &  0&0 \\ 
 0&0  &0  &0 
\end{pmatrix},   \qquad  \lambda_5=\begin{pmatrix}
0 &0  &-i  &0 \\ 
0 &0  &0 & 0\\ 
 i& 0 &  0&0 \\ 
 0&0  &0  &0 
\end{pmatrix}, \qquad \lambda_6=\begin{pmatrix}
0 &0  &0  &0 \\ 
0 &0  &1 & 0\\ 
 0& 1 &  0&0 \\ 
 0&0  &0  &0 
\end{pmatrix},
\\ 
\nonumber
\lambda_7=& \begin{pmatrix}
0 &0  &0  &0 \\ 
0 &0  &-i & 0\\ 
 0& i &  0&0 \\ 
 0&0  &0  &0 
\end{pmatrix},   \qquad  \lambda_8=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\begin{pmatrix}
1 &0  &0  &0 \\ 
0 &1  &0 & 0\\ 
 0& 0 &  -2&0 \\ 
 0&0  &0  &0 
\end{pmatrix}, \qquad \lambda_9=\begin{pmatrix}
0 &0  &0  &1 \\ 
0 &0  &0 & 0\\ 
 0& 0 &  0&0 \\ 
 1&0  &0  &0 
\end{pmatrix},
\\
\nonumber
\lambda_{10}=& \begin{pmatrix}
0 &0  &0  &-i \\ 
0 &0  &0 & 0\\ 
 0& 0 &  0&0 \\ 
 i&0  &0  &0 
\end{pmatrix},   \qquad  \lambda_{11}=\begin{pmatrix}
0 &0  &0  &0 \\ 
0 &0  &0 & 1\\ 
 0& 0 &  0&0 \\ 
 0&1  &0  &0 
\end{pmatrix}, \qquad \lambda_{12}=\begin{pmatrix}
0 &0  &0  &0 \\ 
0 &0  &0 & -i\\ 
 0& 0 &  0&0 \\ 
 0&i  &0  &0 
\end{pmatrix},
\\
\lambda_{13}=& \begin{pmatrix}
0 &0  &0  &0 \\ 
0 &0  &0 & 0\\ 
 0& 0 &  0&1 \\ 
 0&0  &1 &0 
\end{pmatrix},   \qquad  \lambda_{14}=\begin{pmatrix}
0 &0  &0  &0 \\ 
0 &0  &0 & 0\\ 
 0& 0 &  0&-i \\ 
 0&0  &i  &0 
\end{pmatrix}, \qquad \lambda_{15}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\begin{pmatrix}
1 &0  &0  &0 \\ 
0 &1  &0 & 0\\ 
 0& 0 &  1&0 \\ 
 0&0  &0  &-3 
\end{pmatrix}.
\end{align}
The first $8$ matrices form a basis for $\su(3)\subset \su(4)$. Furthermore, these matrices are orthogonal and satisfy
\begin{equation}
\mathrm{Tr} \left(\lambda_m \lambda_n\right)=2\delta_{mn},\qquad m=1,...,15,
\end{equation}
and commutation relations
\begin{equation}
\left[\lambda_m,\lambda_n\right]=2i f_{mn}^{p}\lambda_p.
\end{equation}
A list of non-vanishing structure constants can be found in \cite{Pfeifer2003}. In this representation the Cartan generators are given by $\lambda_3$, $\lambda_8$ and $\lambda_{15}$.
\fi
\acknowledgments
The work of L. Rado was supported by CAPES. The work of V.O. Rivelles was supported by FAPESP grant 2019/21281-4.










\bibliographystyle{JHEP}
%\nocite{*}
\bibliography{Biblioteca}
\end{document}


\providecommand{\href}[2]{#2}\begingroup\raggedright\begin{thebibliography}{10}

\bibitem{Maldacena1999a}
J.M.~Maldacena, \emph{{The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and
  supergravity}}, \href{https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026654312961}{\emph{Int. J.
  Theor. Phys.} {\bfseries 38} (1999) 1113}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9711200}{{\ttfamily hep-th/9711200}}].

\bibitem{Metsaev1998}
R.~Metsaev and A.A.~Tseytlin, \emph{{Type IIB superstring action in AdS(5) x
  S**5 background}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00570-7}{\emph{Nucl. Phys. B}
  {\bfseries 533} (1998) 109}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9805028}{{\ttfamily hep-th/9805028}}].

\bibitem{Bena2004}
I.~Bena, J.~Polchinski and R.~Roiban, \emph{{Hidden symmetries of the AdS(5) x
  S**5 superstring}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.046002}{\emph{Phys. Rev. D}
  {\bfseries 69} (2004) 046002}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0305116}{{\ttfamily hep-th/0305116}}].

\bibitem{Aharony2008}
O.~Aharony, O.~Bergman, D.L.~Jafferis and J.~Maldacena, \emph{{$\mathcal{N}=6$
  superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity
  duals}}, \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/10/091}{\emph{JHEP}
  {\bfseries 10} (2008) 091} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/0806.1218}{{\ttfamily
  0806.1218}}].

\bibitem{Arutyunov2008}
G.~Arutyunov and S.~Frolov, \emph{{Superstrings on $AdS_4\times\mathbb{CP}^3$
  as a Coset Sigma-model}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/09/129}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries
  09} (2008) 129} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/0806.4940}{{\ttfamily
  0806.4940}}].

\bibitem{Stefanski2009}
B.~Stefanski, jr, \emph{{Green-Schwarz action for Type IIA strings on
  $AdS_4\times\mathbb{CP}^3$}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.09.015}{\emph{Nucl. Phys.}
  {\bfseries B808} (2009) 80}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/0806.4948}{{\ttfamily 0806.4948}}].

\bibitem{Klimcik2002}
C.~Klimcik, \emph{{Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2002/12/051}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries
  12} (2002) 051} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0210095}{{\ttfamily
  hep-th/0210095}}].

\bibitem{Delduc2014}
F.~Delduc, M.~Magro and B.~Vicedo, \emph{{An integrable deformation of the
  $AdS_5\times S^{5}$ superstring action}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.051601}{\emph{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
  {\bfseries 112} (2014) 051601}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.5850}{{\ttfamily 1309.5850}}].

\bibitem{Delduc2014a}
F.~Delduc, M.~Magro and B.~Vicedo, \emph{{Derivation of the action and
  symmetries of the $q$-deformed $AdS_{5} \times S^{5}$ superstring}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2014)132}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries 10}
  (2014) 132} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.6286}{{\ttfamily 1406.6286}}].

\bibitem{Arutyunov2014}
G.~Arutyunov, R.~Borsato and S.~Frolov, \emph{{S-matrix for strings on
  $\eta$-deformed $AdS_5\times S^5$}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2014)002}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries 04}
  (2014) 002} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3542}{{\ttfamily 1312.3542}}].

\bibitem{Arutyunov2015}
G.~Arutyunov, R.~Borsato and S.~Frolov, \emph{{Puzzles of $\eta$-deformed
  $AdS_5 \times S^5$}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2015)049}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries 12}
  (2015) 049} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.04239}{{\ttfamily
  1507.04239}}].

\bibitem{Arutyunov2016}
G.~Arutyunov, S.~Frolov, B.~Hoare, R.~Roiban and A.A.~Tseytlin, \emph{{Scale
  invariance of the $\eta$-deformed $AdS_5\times S^5$ superstring, T-duality
  and modified type II equations}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.12.012}{\emph{Nucl. Phys.}
  {\bfseries B903} (2016) 262}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05795}{{\ttfamily 1511.05795}}].

\bibitem{Wulff2016}
L.~Wulff and A.A.~Tseytlin, \emph{{Kappa-symmetry of superstring sigma model
  and generalized 10d supergravity equations}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2016)174}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries 06}
  (2016) 174} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04884}{{\ttfamily
  1605.04884}}].

\bibitem{Matsumoto2015}
T.~Matsumoto and K.~Yoshida, \emph{{Yang-Baxter sigma models based on the
  CYBE}}, \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.02.009}{\emph{Nucl.
  Phys.} {\bfseries B893} (2015) 287}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.03665}{{\ttfamily 1501.03665}}].

\bibitem{Kawaguchi2014}
I.~Kawaguchi, T.~Matsumoto and K.~Yoshida, \emph{{Jordanian deformations of the
  $AdS_5\times S^5$ superstring}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2014)153}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries 04}
  (2014) 153} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.4855}{{\ttfamily 1401.4855}}].

\bibitem{Matsumoto2014}
T.~Matsumoto and K.~Yoshida, \emph{{Lunin-Maldacena backgrounds from the
  classical Yang-Baxter equation - towards the gravity/CYBE correspondence}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2014)135}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries 06}
  (2014) 135} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.1838}{{\ttfamily 1404.1838}}].

\bibitem{Matsumoto2014a}
T.~Matsumoto and K.~Yoshida, \emph{{Integrability of classical strings dual for
  noncommutative gauge theories}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2014)163}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries 06}
  (2014) 163} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.3657}{{\ttfamily 1404.3657}}].

\bibitem{Matsumoto2015a}
T.~Matsumoto and K.~Yoshida, \emph{{Schrödinger geometries arising from
  Yang-Baxter deformations}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2015)180}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries 04}
  (2015) 180} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.00740}{{\ttfamily
  1502.00740}}].

\bibitem{Kyono2016}
H.~Kyono and K.~Yoshida, \emph{{Supercoset construction of Yang-Baxter deformed
  $AdS_5\times S^5$ backgrounds}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptw111}{\emph{PTEP} {\bfseries 2016}
  (2016) 083B03} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.02519}{{\ttfamily
  1605.02519}}].

\bibitem{Lunin2005}
O.~Lunin and J.M.~Maldacena, \emph{{Deforming field theories with $U(1)\times
  U(1)$ global symmetry and their gravity duals}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2005/05/033}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries
  05} (2005) 033} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0502086}{{\ttfamily
  hep-th/0502086}}].

\bibitem{Frolov2005}
S.~Frolov, \emph{{Lax pair for strings in Lunin-Maldacena background}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2005/05/069}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries
  05} (2005) 069} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0503201}{{\ttfamily
  hep-th/0503201}}].

\bibitem{Hashimoto1999}
A.~Hashimoto and N.~Itzhaki, \emph{{Noncommutative Yang-Mills and the AdS/CFT
  correspondence}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01037-0}{\emph{Phys. Lett.}
  {\bfseries B465} (1999) 142}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9907166}{{\ttfamily hep-th/9907166}}].

\bibitem{Maldacena1999}
J.M.~Maldacena and J.G.~Russo, \emph{{Large N limit of noncommutative gauge
  theories}}, \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/1999/09/025}{\emph{JHEP}
  {\bfseries 09} (1999) 025}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9908134}{{\ttfamily hep-th/9908134}}].

\bibitem{Hoare2016b}
B.~Hoare and S.J.~van Tongeren, \emph{{On jordanian deformations of AdS$_5$ and
  supergravity}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/49/43/434006}{\emph{J. Phys.}
  {\bfseries A49} (2016) 434006}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.03554}{{\ttfamily 1605.03554}}].

\bibitem{Maldacena2008}
J.~Maldacena, D.~Martelli and Y.~Tachikawa, \emph{{Comments on string theory
  backgrounds with non-relativistic conformal symmetry}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/10/072}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries
  10} (2008) 072} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/0807.1100}{{\ttfamily
  0807.1100}}].

\bibitem{Herzog2008}
C.P.~Herzog, M.~Rangamani and S.F.~Ross, \emph{{Heating up Galilean
  holography}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/11/080}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries
  11} (2008) 080} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/0807.1099}{{\ttfamily
  0807.1099}}].

\bibitem{Adams2008}
A.~Adams, K.~Balasubramanian and J.~McGreevy, \emph{{Hot Spacetimes for Cold
  Atoms}}, \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/11/059}{\emph{JHEP}
  {\bfseries 11} (2008) 059} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/0807.1111}{{\ttfamily
  0807.1111}}].

\bibitem{Bobev2009}
N.~Bobev and A.~Kundu, \emph{{Deformations of Holographic Duals to
  Non-Relativistic CFTs}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/07/098}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries
  07} (2009) 098} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/0904.2873}{{\ttfamily
  0904.2873}}].

\bibitem{Osten2017}
D.~Osten and S.J.~van Tongeren, \emph{{Abelian Yang-Baxter deformations and TsT
  transformations}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.12.007}{\emph{Nucl. Phys.}
  {\bfseries B915} (2017) 184}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.08504}{{\ttfamily 1608.08504}}].

\bibitem{Matsumoto2015c}
T.~Matsumoto and K.~Yoshida, \emph{{Yang-Baxter deformations and string
  dualities}}, \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2015)137}{\emph{JHEP}
  {\bfseries 03} (2015) 137} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.3658}{{\ttfamily
  1412.3658}}].

\bibitem{Tongeren2015}
S.J.~van Tongeren, \emph{{On classical Yang-Baxter based deformations of the
  $AdS_{5}\times S^{5}$ superstring}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2015)048}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries 06}
  (2015) 048} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.05516}{{\ttfamily
  1504.05516}}].

\bibitem{Hoare2016}
B.~Hoare and A.A.~Tseytlin, \emph{{Homogeneous Yang-Baxter deformations as
  non-abelian duals of the $AdS_5$ sigma-model}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/49/49/494001}{\emph{J. Phys.}
  {\bfseries A49} (2016) 494001}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02550}{{\ttfamily 1609.02550}}].

\bibitem{Borsato2016}
R.~Borsato and L.~Wulff, \emph{{Integrable Deformations of $T$-Dual $\sigma$
  Models}}, \href{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.251602}{\emph{Phys.
  Rev. Lett.} {\bfseries 117} (2016) 251602}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.09834}{{\ttfamily 1609.09834}}].

\bibitem{Borsato2017}
R.~Borsato and L.~Wulff, \emph{{On non-abelian T-duality and deformations of
  supercoset string sigma-models}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2017)024}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries 10}
  (2017) 024} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.10169}{{\ttfamily
  1706.10169}}].

\bibitem{Imeroni2008}
E.~Imeroni, \emph{{On deformed gauge theories and their string/M-theory
  duals}}, \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/10/026}{\emph{JHEP}
  {\bfseries 10} (2008) 026} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.1271}{{\ttfamily
  0808.1271}}].

\bibitem{Tongeren2016}
S.J.~van Tongeren, \emph{{Yang-Baxter deformations, AdS/CFT, and
  twist-noncommutative gauge theory}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.01.012}{\emph{Nucl. Phys.}
  {\bfseries B904} (2016) 148}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.01023}{{\ttfamily 1506.01023}}].

\bibitem{Tongeren2017}
S.J.~van Tongeren, \emph{{Almost abelian twists and AdS/CFT}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.12.002}{\emph{Phys. Lett.}
  {\bfseries B765} (2017) 344}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.05677}{{\ttfamily 1610.05677}}].

\bibitem{Araujo2017a}
T.~Araujo, I.~Bakhmatov, E.O.~Colg\'ain, J.~Sakamoto, M.~Sheikh-Jabbari and
  K.~Yoshida, \emph{{Yang-Baxter $\sigma$-models, conformal twists, and
  noncommutative Yang-Mills theory}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.105006}{\emph{Phys. Rev. D}
  {\bfseries 95} (2017) 105006}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.02861}{{\ttfamily 1702.02861}}].

\bibitem{Araujo2018}
T.~Araujo, I.~Bakhmatov, E.Ó.~Colgáin, J.-i.~Sakamoto, M.M.~Sheikh-Jabbari and
  K.~Yoshida, \emph{{Conformal twists, Yang-Baxter $\sigma$-models $\&$
  holographic noncommutativity}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aac195}{\emph{J. Phys.} {\bfseries
  A51} (2018) 235401} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.02063}{{\ttfamily
  1705.02063}}].

\bibitem{Dasgupta2000}
K.~Dasgupta, O.J.~Ganor and G.~Rajesh, \emph{{Vector deformations of N=4
  superYang-Mills theory, pinned branes, and arched strings}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2001/04/034}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries
  04} (2001) 034} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0010072}{{\ttfamily
  hep-th/0010072}}].

\bibitem{Bergman2002}
A.~Bergman, K.~Dasgupta, O.J.~Ganor, J.L.~Karczmarek and G.~Rajesh,
  \emph{{Nonlocal field theories and their gravity duals}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.066005}{\emph{Phys. Rev. D}
  {\bfseries 65} (2002) 066005}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0103090}{{\ttfamily hep-th/0103090}}].

\bibitem{Hagen1972}
C.~Hagen, \emph{{Scale and conformal transformations in galilean-covariant
  field theory}}, \href{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.5.377}{\emph{Phys.
  Rev. D} {\bfseries 5} (1972) 377}.

\bibitem{Niederer1972}
U.~Niederer, \emph{{The maximal kinematical invariance group of the free
  Schrodinger equation.}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-114417}{\emph{Helv. Phys. Acta}
  {\bfseries 45} (1972) 802}.

\bibitem{Son2008}
D.~Son, \emph{{Toward an AdS/cold atoms correspondence: A Geometric realization
  of the Schrodinger symmetry}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.046003}{\emph{Phys. Rev. D}
  {\bfseries 78} (2008) 046003}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/0804.3972}{{\ttfamily 0804.3972}}].

\bibitem{Balasubramanian2008}
K.~Balasubramanian and J.~McGreevy, \emph{{Gravity duals for non-relativistic
  CFTs}}, \href{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.061601}{\emph{Phys.
  Rev. Lett.} {\bfseries 101} (2008) 061601}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/0804.4053}{{\ttfamily 0804.4053}}].

\bibitem{Guica2017}
M.~Guica, F.~Levkovich-Maslyuk and K.~Zarembo, \emph{{Integrability in
  dipole-deformed $\boldsymbol{\mathcal{N}=4}$ super Yang\textendash{}Mills}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa8491}{\emph{J. Phys. A} {\bfseries
  50} (2017) 39} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.07957}{{\ttfamily
  1706.07957}}].

\bibitem{Bobev2009a}
N.~Bobev, A.~Kundu and K.~Pilch, \emph{{Supersymmetric IIB Solutions with
  Schrodinger Symmetry}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/07/107}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries
  07} (2009) 107} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/0905.0673}{{\ttfamily
  0905.0673}}].

\bibitem{Negron2018}
R.~Negrón and V.O.~Rivelles, \emph{{Yang-Baxter deformations of the
  $AdS_4\times\mathbb{CP}^3$ superstring sigma model}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2018)043}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries 11}
  (2018) 043} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.01174}{{\ttfamily
  1809.01174}}].

\bibitem{Rado2020}
L.~Rado, V.O.~Rivelles and R.~S\'anchez, \emph{{String Backgrounds of the
  Yang-Baxter Deformed $AdS_4\times\mathbb{CP}^3$ Superstring}},
  \href{https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.04397}{{\ttfamily 2009.04397}}.

\bibitem{Klebanov1998}
I.R.~Klebanov and E.~Witten, \emph{{Superconformal field theory on three-branes
  at a Calabi-Yau singularity}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00654-3}{\emph{Nucl. Phys. B}
  {\bfseries 536} (1998) 199}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9807080}{{\ttfamily hep-th/9807080}}].

\bibitem{Basu2011}
P.~Basu and L.A.~Pando~Zayas, \emph{{Chaos rules out integrability of strings
  on AdS$_5 \times T^{1,1}$}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2011.04.063}{\emph{Phys. Lett. B}
  {\bfseries 700} (2011) 243}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1103.4107}{{\ttfamily 1103.4107}}].

\bibitem{Basu2011b}
P.~Basu and L.A.~Pando~Zayas, \emph{{Analytic Non-integrability in String
  Theory}}, \href{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.046006}{\emph{Phys. Rev.
  D} {\bfseries 84} (2011) 046006}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.2540}{{\ttfamily 1105.2540}}].

\bibitem{Arutyunov2020}
G.~Arutyunov, C.~Bassi and S.~Lacroix, \emph{{New integrable coset sigma
  models}},  \href{https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.05573}{{\ttfamily 2010.05573}}.

\bibitem{Crichigno2014}
P.M.~Crichigno, T.~Matsumoto and K.~Yoshida, \emph{{Deformations of $T^{1,1}$
  as Yang-Baxter sigma models}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2014)085}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries 12}
  (2014) 085} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2249}{{\ttfamily 1406.2249}}].

\bibitem{Catal2006}
A.~Catal-Ozer, \emph{{Lunin-Maldacena deformations with three parameters}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2006/02/026}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries
  02} (2006) 026} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0512290}{{\ttfamily
  hep-th/0512290}}].

\bibitem{Sparks2011}
J.~Sparks, \emph{{Sasaki-Einstein Manifolds}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.4310/SDG.2011.v16.n1.a6}{\emph{Surveys Diff. Geom.}
  {\bfseries 16} (2011) 265} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1004.2461}{{\ttfamily
  1004.2461}}].

\bibitem{Romans1985}
L.~Romans, \emph{{New Compactifications of Chiral $N=2 d=10$ Supergravity}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(85)90479-4}{\emph{Phys. Lett. B}
  {\bfseries 153} (1985) 392}.

\bibitem{Ceresole2000}
A.~Ceresole, G.~Dall'Agata, R.~D'Auria and S.~Ferrara, \emph{{Spectrum of type
  IIB supergravity on AdS(5) x T**11: Predictions on N=1 SCFT's}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.61.066001}{\emph{Phys. Rev. D}
  {\bfseries 61} (2000) 066001}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9905226}{{\ttfamily hep-th/9905226}}].

\bibitem{Ceresole1999}
A.~Ceresole, G.~Dall'Agata and R.~D'Auria, \emph{{K K spectroscopy of type IIB
  supergravity on AdS(5) x T**11}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/1999/11/009}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries
  11} (1999) 009} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9907216}{{\ttfamily
  hep-th/9907216}}].

\bibitem{Ceresole2000a}
A.~Ceresole, G.~Dall'Agata, R.~D'Auria and S.~Ferrara, \emph{{Superconformal
  field theories from IIB spectroscopy on AdS(5) x T-11}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/17/5/311}{\emph{Class. Quant. Grav.}
  {\bfseries 17} (2000) 1017}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9910066}{{\ttfamily hep-th/9910066}}].

\bibitem{Kac1977}
V.G.~Kac, \emph{{Lie Superalgebras}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8708(77)90017-2}{\emph{Adv. Math.}
  {\bfseries 26} (1977) 8}.

\bibitem{Nahm1978}
W.~Nahm, \emph{{Supersymmetries and their Representations}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(78)90218-3}{\emph{Nucl. Phys.}
  {\bfseries B135} (1978) 149}.

\bibitem{Candelas1990}
P.~Candelas and X.C.~de~la Ossa, \emph{{Comments on Conifolds}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(90)90577-Z}{\emph{Nucl. Phys. B}
  {\bfseries 342} (1990) 246}.

\bibitem{Hartnoll2008}
S.A.~Hartnoll and K.~Yoshida, \emph{{Families of IIB duals for nonrelativistic
  CFTs}}, \href{https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/12/071}{\emph{JHEP}
  {\bfseries 12} (2008) 071} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.0298}{{\ttfamily
  0810.0298}}].

\bibitem{Giataganas2014}
D.~Giataganas and K.~Sfetsos, \emph{{Non-integrability in non-relativistic
  theories}}, \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2014)018}{\emph{JHEP}
  {\bfseries 06} (2014) 018} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.2703}{{\ttfamily
  1403.2703}}].

\bibitem{Gubser1999}
S.S.~Gubser, \emph{{Einstein manifolds and conformal field theories}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.025006}{\emph{Phys. Rev. D}
  {\bfseries 59} (1999) 025006}
  [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9807164}{{\ttfamily hep-th/9807164}}].

\bibitem{Golubtsova2020a}
A.~Golubtsova, H.~Dimov, I.~Iliev, M.~Radomirov, R.~Rashkov and T.~Vetsov,
  \emph{{More on Schrödinger holography}},
  \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2020)090}{\emph{JHEP} {\bfseries 08}
  (2020) 090} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.13802}{{\ttfamily
  2004.13802}}].

\bibitem{Golubtsova2020}
A.~Golubtsova, H.~Dimov, I.~Iliev, M.~Radomirov, R.~Rashkov and T.~Vetsov,
  \emph{{Pulsating strings in $Schr_5 \times T^{1,1}$ background}},
  \href{https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.01665}{{\ttfamily 2007.01665}}.

\end{thebibliography}\endgroup