A Gridless Fourth-order Cumulant-Based DOA Estimation Method under Unknown Colored Noise
Extracted source text · arXiv 2112.13948
%% bare_jrnl.tex
%% V1.4b
%% 2015/08/26
%% by Michael Shell
%% see http://www.michaelshell.org/
%% for current contact information.
%%
%% This is a skeleton file demonstrating the use of IEEEtran.cls
%% (requires IEEEtran.cls version 1.8b or later) with an IEEE
%% journal paper.
%%
%% Support sites:
%% http://www.michaelshell.org/tex/ieeetran/
%% http://www.ctan.org/pkg/ieeetran
%% and
%% http://www.ieee.org/
%%*************************************************************************
%% Legal Notice:
%% This code is offered as-is without any warranty either expressed or
%% implied; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
%% FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE!
%% User assumes all risk.
%% In no event shall the IEEE or any contributor to this code be liable for
%% any damages or losses, including, but not limited to, incidental,
%% consequential, or any other damages, resulting from the use or misuse
%% of any information contained here.
%%
%% All comments are the opinions of their respective authors and are not
%% necessarily endorsed by the IEEE.
%%
%% This work is distributed under the LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL)
%% ( http://www.latex-project.org/ ) version 1.3, and may be freely used,
%% distributed and modified. A copy of the LPPL, version 1.3, is included
%% in the base LaTeX documentation of all distributions of LaTeX released
%% 2003/12/01 or later.
%% Retain all contribution notices and credits.
%% ** Modified files should be clearly indicated as such, including **
%% ** renaming them and changing author support contact information. **
%%*************************************************************************
% *** Authors should verify (and, if needed, correct) their LaTeX system ***
% *** with the testflow diagnostic prior to trusting their LaTeX platform ***
% *** with production work. The IEEE's font choices and paper sizes can ***
% *** trigger bugs that do not appear when using other class files. *** ***
% The testflow support page is at:
% http://www.michaelshell.org/tex/testflow/
%\documentclass[journal]{IEEEtran}
\documentclass[draftclsnofoot,onecolumn]{IEEEtran}
%
% If IEEEtran.cls has not been installed into the LaTeX system files,
% manually specify the path to it like:
% \documentclass[journal]{../sty/IEEEtran}
% Some very useful LaTeX packages include:
% (uncomment the ones you want to load)
\usepackage{ifpdf}
\usepackage{cite}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts}
\interdisplaylinepenalty=2500
\usepackage{bm}
\usepackage{algorithmic}
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{fixltx2e}
\usepackage{stfloats}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{booktabs}
%\usepackage[caption=false,font=footnotesize]{subfig}
\usepackage{subfigure}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{enumerate}
\usepackage{lineno}
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{setspace}
\usepackage{color}
% *** MISC UTILITY PACKAGES ***
%
%\usepackage{ifpdf}
% Heiko Oberdiek's ifpdf.sty is very useful if you need conditional
% compilation based on whether the output is pdf or dvi.
% usage:
% \ifpdf
% % pdf code
% \else
% % dvi code
% \fi
% The latest version of ifpdf.sty can be obtained from:
% http://www.ctan.org/pkg/ifpdf
% Also, note that IEEEtran.cls V1.7 and later provides a builtin
% \ifCLASSINFOpdf conditional that works the same way.
% When switching from latex to pdflatex and vice-versa, the compiler may
% have to be run twice to clear warning/error messages.
% *** CITATION PACKAGES ***
%
%\usepackage{cite}
% cite.sty was written by Donald Arseneau
% V1.6 and later of IEEEtran pre-defines the format of the cite.sty package
% \cite{} output to follow that of the IEEE. Loading the cite package will
% result in citation numbers being automatically sorted and properly
% "compressed/ranged". e.g., [1], [9], [2], [7], [5], [6] without using
% cite.sty will become [1], [2], [5]--[7], [9] using cite.sty. cite.sty's
% \cite will automatically add leading space, if needed. Use cite.sty's
% noadjust option (cite.sty V3.8 and later) if you want to turn this off
% such as if a citation ever needs to be enclosed in parenthesis.
% cite.sty is already installed on most LaTeX systems. Be sure and use
% version 5.0 (2009-03-20) and later if using hyperref.sty.
% The latest version can be obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/pkg/cite
% The documentation is contained in the cite.sty file itself.
% *** GRAPHICS RELATED PACKAGES ***
%
\ifCLASSINFOpdf
% \usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx}
% declare the path(s) where your graphic files are
% \graphicspath{{../pdf/}{../jpeg/}}
% and their extensions so you won't have to specify these with
% every instance of \includegraphics
% \DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.pdf,.jpeg,.png}
\else
% or other class option (dvipsone, dvipdf, if not using dvips). graphicx
% will default to the driver specified in the system graphics.cfg if no
% driver is specified.
% \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
% declare the path(s) where your graphic files are
% \graphicspath{{../eps/}}
% and their extensions so you won't have to specify these with
% every instance of \includegraphics
% \DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.eps}
\fi
% graphicx was written by David Carlisle and Sebastian Rahtz. It is
% required if you want graphics, photos, etc. graphicx.sty is already
% installed on most LaTeX systems. The latest version and documentation
% can be obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/pkg/graphicx
% Another good source of documentation is "Using Imported Graphics in
% LaTeX2e" by Keith Reckdahl which can be found at:
% http://www.ctan.org/pkg/epslatex
%
% latex, and pdflatex in dvi mode, support graphics in encapsulated
% postscript (.eps) format. pdflatex in pdf mode supports graphics
% in .pdf, .jpeg, .png and .mps (metapost) formats. Users should ensure
% that all non-photo figures use a vector format (.eps, .pdf, .mps) and
% not a bitmapped formats (.jpeg, .png). The IEEE frowns on bitmapped formats
% which can result in "jaggedy"/blurry rendering of lines and letters as
% well as large increases in file sizes.
%
% You can find documentation about the pdfTeX application at:
% http://www.tug.org/applications/pdftex
% *** MATH PACKAGES ***
%
%\usepackage{amsmath}
% A popular package from the American Mathematical Society that provides
% many useful and powerful commands for dealing with mathematics.
%
% Note that the amsmath package sets \interdisplaylinepenalty to 10000
% thus preventing page breaks from occurring within multiline equations. Use:
%\interdisplaylinepenalty=2500
% after loading amsmath to restore such page breaks as IEEEtran.cls normally
% does. amsmath.sty is already installed on most LaTeX systems. The latest
% version and documentation can be obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/pkg/amsmath
% *** SPECIALIZED LIST PACKAGES ***
%
%\usepackage{algorithmic}
% algorithmic.sty was written by Peter Williams and Rogerio Brito.
% This package provides an algorithmic environment fo describing algorithms.
% You can use the algorithmic environment in-text or within a figure
% environment to provide for a floating algorithm. Do NOT use the algorithm
% floating environment provided by algorithm.sty (by the same authors) or
% algorithm2e.sty (by Christophe Fiorio) as the IEEE does not use dedicated
% algorithm float types and packages that provide these will not provide
% correct IEEE style captions. The latest version and documentation of
% algorithmic.sty can be obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/pkg/algorithms
% Also of interest may be the (relatively newer and more customizable)
% algorithmicx.sty package by Szasz Janos:
% http://www.ctan.org/pkg/algorithmicx
% *** ALIGNMENT PACKAGES ***
%
%\usepackage{array}
% Frank Mittelbach's and David Carlisle's array.sty patches and improves
% the standard LaTeX2e array and tabular environments to provide better
% appearance and additional user controls. As the default LaTeX2e table
% generation code is lacking to the point of almost being broken with
% respect to the quality of the end results, all users are strongly
% advised to use an enhanced (at the very least that provided by array.sty)
% set of table tools. array.sty is already installed on most systems. The
% latest version and documentation can be obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/pkg/array
% IEEEtran contains the IEEEeqnarray family of commands that can be used to
% generate multiline equations as well as matrices, tables, etc., of high
% quality.
% *** SUBFIGURE PACKAGES ***
%\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc
% \usepackage[caption=false,font=normalsize,labelfont=sf,textfont=sf]{subfig}
%\else
%\usepackage[caption=false,font=footnotesize]{subfig}
%\fi
% subfig.sty, written by Steven Douglas Cochran, is the modern replacement
% for subfigure.sty, the latter of which is no longer maintained and is
% incompatible with some LaTeX packages including fixltx2e. However,
% subfig.sty requires and automatically loads Axel Sommerfeldt's caption.sty
% which will override IEEEtran.cls' handling of captions and this will result
% in non-IEEE style figure/table captions. To prevent this problem, be sure
% and invoke subfig.sty's "caption=false" package option (available since
% subfig.sty version 1.3, 2005/06/28) as this is will preserve IEEEtran.cls
% handling of captions.
% Note that the Computer Society format requires a larger sans serif font
% than the serif footnote size font used in traditional IEEE formatting
% and thus the need to invoke different subfig.sty package options depending
% on whether compsoc mode has been enabled.
%
% The latest version and documentation of subfig.sty can be obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/pkg/subfig
% *** FLOAT PACKAGES ***
%
%\usepackage{fixltx2e}
% fixltx2e, the successor to the earlier fix2col.sty, was written by
% Frank Mittelbach and David Carlisle. This package corrects a few problems
% in the LaTeX2e kernel, the most notable of which is that in current
% LaTeX2e releases, the ordering of single and double column floats is not
% guaranteed to be preserved. Thus, an unpatched LaTeX2e can allow a
% single column figure to be placed prior to an earlier double column
% figure.
% Be aware that LaTeX2e kernels dated 2015 and later have fixltx2e.sty's
% corrections already built into the system in which case a warning will
% be issued if an attempt is made to load fixltx2e.sty as it is no longer
% needed.
% The latest version and documentation can be found at:
% http://www.ctan.org/pkg/fixltx2e
%\usepackage{stfloats}
% stfloats.sty was written by Sigitas Tolusis. This package gives LaTeX2e
% the ability to do double column floats at the bottom of the page as well
% as the top. (e.g., "\begin{figure*}[!b]" is not normally possible in
% LaTeX2e). It also provides a command:
%\fnbelowfloat
% to enable the placement of footnotes below bottom floats (the standard
% LaTeX2e kernel puts them above bottom floats). This is an invasive package
% which rewrites many portions of the LaTeX2e float routines. It may not work
% with other packages that modify the LaTeX2e float routines. The latest
% version and documentation can be obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/pkg/stfloats
% Do not use the stfloats baselinefloat ability as the IEEE does not allow
% \baselineskip to stretch. Authors submitting work to the IEEE should note
% that the IEEE rarely uses double column equations and that authors should try
% to avoid such use. Do not be tempted to use the cuted.sty or midfloat.sty
% packages (also by Sigitas Tolusis) as the IEEE does not format its papers in
% such ways.
% Do not attempt to use stfloats with fixltx2e as they are incompatible.
% Instead, use Morten Hogholm'a dblfloatfix which combines the features
% of both fixltx2e and stfloats:
%
% \usepackage{dblfloatfix}
% The latest version can be found at:
% http://www.ctan.org/pkg/dblfloatfix
%\ifCLASSOPTIONcaptionsoff
% \usepackage[nomarkers]{endfloat}
% \let\MYoriglatexcaption\caption
% \renewcommand{\caption}[2][\relax]{\MYoriglatexcaption[#2]{#2}}
%\fi
% endfloat.sty was written by James Darrell McCauley, Jeff Goldberg and
% Axel Sommerfeldt. This package may be useful when used in conjunction with
% IEEEtran.cls' captionsoff option. Some IEEE journals/societies require that
% submissions have lists of figures/tables at the end of the paper and that
% figures/tables without any captions are placed on a page by themselves at
% the end of the document. If needed, the draftcls IEEEtran class option or
% \CLASSINPUTbaselinestretch interface can be used to increase the line
% spacing as well. Be sure and use the nomarkers option of endfloat to
% prevent endfloat from "marking" where the figures would have been placed
% in the text. The two hack lines of code above are a slight modification of
% that suggested by in the endfloat docs (section 8.4.1) to ensure that
% the full captions always appear in the list of figures/tables - even if
% the user used the short optional argument of \caption[]{}.
% IEEE papers do not typically make use of \caption[]'s optional argument,
% so this should not be an issue. A similar trick can be used to disable
% captions of packages such as subfig.sty that lack options to turn off
% the subcaptions:
% For subfig.sty:
% \let\MYorigsubfloat\subfloat
% \renewcommand{\subfloat}[2][\relax]{\MYorigsubfloat[]{#2}}
% However, the above trick will not work if both optional arguments of
% the \subfloat command are used. Furthermore, there needs to be a
% description of each subfigure *somewhere* and endfloat does not add
% subfigure captions to its list of figures. Thus, the best approach is to
% avoid the use of subfigure captions (many IEEE journals avoid them anyway)
% and instead reference/explain all the subfigures within the main caption.
% The latest version of endfloat.sty and its documentation can obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/pkg/endfloat
%
% The IEEEtran \ifCLASSOPTIONcaptionsoff conditional can also be used
% later in the document, say, to conditionally put the References on a
% page by themselves.
% *** PDF, URL AND HYPERLINK PACKAGES ***
%
%\usepackage{url}
% url.sty was written by Donald Arseneau. It provides better support for
% handling and breaking URLs. url.sty is already installed on most LaTeX
% systems. The latest version and documentation can be obtained at:
% http://www.ctan.org/pkg/url
% Basically, \url{my_url_here}.
% *** Do not adjust lengths that control margins, column widths, etc. ***
% *** Do not use packages that alter fonts (such as pslatex). ***
% There should be no need to do such things with IEEEtran.cls V1.6 and later.
% (Unless specifically asked to do so by the journal or conference you plan
% to submit to, of course. )
% correct bad hyphenation here
\hyphenation{op-tical net-works semi-conduc-tor}
\begin{document}
%
% paper title
% Titles are generally capitalized except for words such as a, an, and, as,
% at, but, by, for, in, nor, of, on, or, the, to and up, which are usually
% not capitalized unless they are the first or last word of the title.
% Linebreaks \\ can be used within to get better formatting as desired.
% Do not put math or special symbols in the title.
%\title{A Gridless Fourth-order Cumulant-Based DOA Estimation Method under Unknown Colored Noise}
\title{\makebox[\linewidth]{\parbox{\dimexpr\textwidth+1.0cm\relax}{\centering A Gridless Fourth-order Cumulant-Based DOA Estimation Method under Unknown Colored Noise}}}
%
%
% author names and IEEE memberships
% note positions of commas and nonbreaking spaces ( ~ ) LaTeX will not break
% a structure at a ~ so this keeps an author's name from being broken across
% two lines.
% use \thanks{} to gain access to the first footnote area
% a separate \thanks must be used for each paragraph as LaTeX2e's \thanks
% was not built to handle multiple paragraphs
%
\author{Jiawen~Yuan% <-this % stops a space
\thanks{This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant nos. 61871218 and 61701046, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University of China under Grant nos. 3082019NC2019002 and 3082017NP2017421, Funding of Postgraduate Research Practice \& Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX20\_0201).}% <-this % stops a space
\thanks{J. Yuan is with the College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China}% <-this % stops a space
}
% note the % following the last \IEEEmembership and also \thanks -
% these prevent an unwanted space from occurring between the last author name
% and the end of the author line. i.e., if you had this:
%
% \author{....lastname \thanks{...} \thanks{...} }
% ^------------^------------^----Do not want these spaces!
%
% a space would be appended to the last name and could cause every name on that
% line to be shifted left slightly. This is one of those "LaTeX things". For
% instance, "\textbf{A} \textbf{B}" will typeset as "A B" not "AB". To get
% "AB" then you have to do: "\textbf{A}\textbf{B}"
% \thanks is no different in this regard, so shield the last } of each \thanks
% that ends a line with a % and do not let a space in before the next \thanks.
% Spaces after \IEEEmembership other than the last one are OK (and needed) as
% you are supposed to have spaces between the names. For what it is worth,
% this is a minor point as most people would not even notice if the said evil
% space somehow managed to creep in.
% The paper headers
\markboth{Journal of \LaTeX\ Class Files,~Vol.~14, No.~8, August~2015}%
{Shell \MakeLowercase{\textit{et al.}}: Bare Demo of IEEEtran.cls for IEEE Journals}
% The only time the second header will appear is for the odd numbered pages
% after the title page when using the twoside option.
%
% *** Note that you probably will NOT want to include the author's ***
% *** name in the headers of peer review papers. ***
% You can use \ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview for conditional compilation here if
% you desire.
% If you want to put a publisher's ID mark on the page you can do it like
% this:
%\IEEEpubid{0000--0000/00\$00.00~\copyright~2015 IEEE}
% Remember, if you use this you must call \IEEEpubidadjcol in the second
% column for its text to clear the IEEEpubid mark.
% use for special paper notices
%\IEEEspecialpapernotice{(Invited Paper)}
% make the title area
\maketitle
% As a general rule, do not put math, special symbols or citations
% in the abstract or keywords.
\begin{abstract}
To reduce the adverse impacts of the unknown colored noise on the performance degradation of the direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation, we propose a new gridless DOA estimation method based on fourth-order cumulant (FOC) in this letter. We first introduce the non-redundancy single measurement vector (SMV) through FOC, which is capable of suppressing the Gaussian colored noise. Next, we analyze the distribution of the estimation error and design an estimation error tolerance scheme for it. We then combine the atomic norm minimization of the non-redundancy SMV with the above constraint scheme. This combination poses the stability of the sparsest solution. Finally, the DOA estimation is retrieved through rotational invariance techniques. Moreover, this method extends the gridless DOA estimation to the sparse linear array. Numerical simulations validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
\end{abstract}
% Note that keywords are not normally used for peerreview papers.
\begin{IEEEkeywords}
gridless DOA estimation method, FOC, SMV, atomic norm minimization, sparse linear array.
\end{IEEEkeywords}
% For peer review papers, you can put extra information on the cover
% page as needed:
% \ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview
% \begin{center} \bfseries EDICS Category: 3-BBND \end{center}
% \fi
%
% For peerreview papers, this IEEEtran command inserts a page break and
% creates the second title. It will be ignored for other modes.
\IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle
\section{Introduction}
% The very first letter is a 2 line initial drop letter followed
% by the rest of the first word in caps.
%
% form to use if the first word consists of a single letter:
% \IEEEPARstart{A}{demo} file is ....
%
% form to use if you need the single drop letter followed by
% normal text (unknown if ever used by the IEEE):
% \IEEEPARstart{A}{}demo file is ....
%
% Some journals put the first two words in caps:
% \IEEEPARstart{T}{his demo} file is ....
%
% Here we have the typical use of a "T" for an initial drop letter
% and "HIS" in caps to complete the first word.
\IEEEPARstart{D}{irection-of-arrival} (DOA) estimation algorithms have received extensive research attention in many engineering fields such as radar $\left[1\right]$, $\left[2\right]$ and wireless communication $\left[3\right]$, $\left[4\right]$. These algorithms commonly assume that the background noise is white Gaussian. However, it is a noteworthy phenomenon that occurs in these fields, where colored noise is output as white noise after passing through linear components. This phenomenon inevitably mismatches the signal model proposed by second-order statistics-based DOA estimation methods $\left[5\right]$,$\left[6\right]$, which is the primary cause of the performance deterioration in practical applications.
Numerous efforts have been made to deal with DOA estimation in unknown colored noise $\left[7\right]$-$\left[14\right]$. Based on the assumption that the noise covariance matrix follows a certain symmetric structure $\left[7\right]$, $\left[8\right]$, it is feasible to alleviate the influence of these noises by obtaining the covariance difference matrix. However, this assumption is hard to satisfy and it fails to work in the circumstance with more sources than antennas. To overcome the above deficiencies, an algorithm based on fourth-order cumulant (FOC) $\left[9\right]$ and its variants $\left[10\right]$-$\left[14\right]$ have been proposed. All these methods have the ability to expand the effective aperture and to increase the degrees of freedom without any assumption on the structure of the noise covariance matrix. In particular, the FOC matrix-based atomic norm minimization (FOC-ANM) $\left[14\right]$ algorithm associates sparsity with the FOC matrix to offer reliable estimates under the uniform linear array (ULA) for it fundamentally eliminates the effect of basis mismatch. Compared with the grid-based DOA estimation methods $\left[4\right]$, $\left[15\right]$, FOC-ANM achieves a satisfactory estimation performance. However, FOC-ANM ignores the influence of the FOC matrix estimation error caused by the limited number of snapshots.
In this letter, we propose a new gridless FOC-based method, named error-tolerant FOC-ANM (ET-FOCANM), to enhance resolution capability and estimation accuracy under unknown colored noise. \textcolor{red}{Compared with the existing FOC-based methods, we analyze the distribution of the estimation error due to the limited number of snapshots and attach the estimation error tolerance constraint to an ANM-based model for ensuring a stable and sufficiently sparse solution. The merits of the ET-FOCANM include robustness to the Gaussian colored noise, an increased number of detectable sources in the ULA and sparse linear array (SLA) case, expanded virtual array aperture, and no requirement of user-parameter in the estimation error tolerance constraint.}
$Notations$: $\mathbb{R}$ and $\mathbb{C}$ denote the sets of numbers in real
and complex domains respectively. For a matrix $\boldsymbol{A}$, $vec$($\boldsymbol{A}$) represents the vectorization operator by taking column-wise from $\boldsymbol{A}$ and $diag$($\boldsymbol{A}$) returns a column vector of the main diagonal elements of $\boldsymbol{A}$. $\boldsymbol{A}\geq$ 0 implies that $\boldsymbol{A}$ is positive semidefinite. $\boldsymbol{A} \in \{0,1\}^{M \times N}$ means that each element of $M\times N$ dimensional matrix $\boldsymbol{A}$ is contained in the binary set $\{$0,1$\}$. For a vector $\boldsymbol{x}$, $diag$($\boldsymbol{x}$) is a diagonal matrix with $\boldsymbol{x}$ on the diagonal. $\|\cdot\|_{2}$ and $\|\cdot\|_{\mathcal{A}}$ are the $l_{2}$ and atom norms respectively. ($\cdot$)$^{T}$, ($\cdot$)$^{H}$, ($\cdot$)$^{*}$, and ($\cdot$)$^{-1}$ are the transpose, conjugate transpose, complex conjugate, and inverse operation respectively. $\otimes$ and $\odot$ denote the Kronecker and Khatri-Rao products respectively. $E\{\cdot\}$ and $cum\left(\cdot\right)$ indicate the mathematical expectation and FOC operation respectively.
\section{Signal Model and Preliminaries}
\subsection{Signal Model}
Suppose that a linear array simultaneously receives signals from $P$ narrowband far-field sources with unknown complex amplitude $s_{p}$ and distinct DOA $\theta_{p}$, $p=1,...,P$. The antenna index set of this array is defined as $\Omega=\{\Omega_{1},...,\Omega_{M}\}\subseteq\{1,...,N\}$ . For convenience, we consider two linear arrays in this letter, one is ULA with $\Omega=\{1,...,N\}$, and the other is SLA with $\Omega=\{\Omega_{1},...,\Omega_{M}\}$ of $\Omega_{1}=1$ and $\Omega_{M}=N \left[5\right], \left[6\right]$. Fig. 1 shows a configuration of the 4-element ULA with $\Omega=\{1,2,3,4\}$, 4-element SLA with $\Omega=\{1,2,5,7\}$, and 7-element ULA with $\Omega=\{1,...,7\}$, where the inter-antenna spacing is taken as equaling half of the wavelength.
\begin{figure}[!t]
\centering
\includegraphics[height=1.27cm,width=5.77cm]{fig1}
\caption{An example of the 7-element ULA, 4-element ULA and SLA.}
\label{fig1}
\end{figure}
\textcolor{red}{The received signals $\boldsymbol{Y}_{\Omega}=\left[\boldsymbol{y}_{\Omega}(1),...,\boldsymbol{y}_{\Omega}(J)\right]\in\mathbb{C}^{M \times J}$ with multiple snapshots $J$ in the $M$-element SLA case can be expressed as follows
\begin{equation}
\boldsymbol{Y}_{\Omega}=\boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega} \boldsymbol{Y}=\boldsymbol{A}_{\Omega} \boldsymbol{S}+\boldsymbol{N}_{\Omega} \quad with \quad \boldsymbol{Y}=\boldsymbol{A} \boldsymbol{S}+\boldsymbol{N},
\end{equation}
where $\boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega}\in\!\!\{0,1\}^{M \times N}$, $\boldsymbol{A}_{\Omega}=\left[\boldsymbol{a}_{\Omega}(\theta_{1}),..., \boldsymbol{a}_{\Omega}(\theta_{P})\right] \in \mathbb{C}^{M \times P}$, $\!\!\boldsymbol{S}=\left[\boldsymbol{s}(1),..., \boldsymbol{s}(J)\right] \in \mathbb{C}^{P \times J}$, and $\boldsymbol{N}_{\Omega}=\left[\boldsymbol{n}_{\Omega}(\theta_{1}),..., \boldsymbol{n}_{\Omega}(\theta_{J})\right] \in \mathbb{C}^{M \times J}$ denote the selection matrix, the array manifold matrix, the source signal, and the additive noise, respectively.} Let $\boldsymbol{a}_{\Omega}(\theta_{p})=\left[e^{j\pi(\Omega_{1}-1)\sin\theta_{p}},...,e^{j\pi(\Omega_{M}-1)\sin\theta_{p}}\right]^{T}$ be the $p$-th steering vector. In the $N$-element ULA, the definitions of $\boldsymbol{Y}, \boldsymbol{N} \in \mathbb{C}^{N \times J}$, and $\boldsymbol{A} \in \mathbb{C}^{N \times P}$ are similar to the previous ones. Moreover, we assume that the source is uncorrelated stationary non-Gaussian with zero-mean, and the noise is the zero-mean colored Gaussian independent of the sources.
\subsection{Definition of reduce-complexity FOC (RC-FOC) matrix}
Based on the above assumptions, the received signals are considered as stationary non-Gaussian processes with zero mean. Since the FOC is blind to Gaussian processes $\left[16\right]$, we construct the FOC matrix $\boldsymbol{C}_{4} \in \mathbb{C}^{N^{2} \times N^{2}}$ of $\boldsymbol{y}(t)\in \mathbb{C}^{N}$ as
\begin{IEEEeqnarray}{Rl}
\boldsymbol{C}_{4}&=E\left\{\left(\boldsymbol{Y}\otimes\boldsymbol{Y}^{*}\right)\left(\boldsymbol{Y}\otimes\boldsymbol{Y}^{*}\right)^{H}\right\}-E\left\{\boldsymbol{Y}\otimes\boldsymbol{Y}^{*}\right\} \IEEEnonumber\\
&\quad\times E\left\{\boldsymbol{Y}\otimes\boldsymbol{Y}^{*}\right\}^{H}-E\left\{\boldsymbol{Y} \boldsymbol{Y}^{H}\right\}\otimes E\left\{\boldsymbol{Y} \boldsymbol{Y}^{H}\right\}^{*}.
\end{IEEEeqnarray}
Then $\boldsymbol{C}_{4}$ can be decomposed as
\begin{IEEEeqnarray}{Rl}
\boldsymbol{C}_{4}=\left(\boldsymbol{A} \odot \boldsymbol{A}^{*} \right)\boldsymbol{C}_{\boldsymbol{S}} \left(\boldsymbol{A} \odot \boldsymbol{A}^{*}\right)^{H} = \overline{\boldsymbol{B}}\boldsymbol{C}_{\boldsymbol{S}} \overline{\boldsymbol{B}}^{H},
\end{IEEEeqnarray}
where $\boldsymbol{C}_{\boldsymbol{S}}=diag(\boldsymbol{\gamma})\in\mathbb{C}^{P\times P}$, $\boldsymbol{\gamma}=\left[\gamma_{4 s_{p}},...,\gamma_{4 s_{P}}\right]^{T} \in \mathbb{C}^{P}$, and its $p$-th element $\gamma_{4s_{p}}=cum\left(s_{p},s_{p}^{*}, s_{p}^{*}, s_{p}\right)$.
Due to a large number of redundant elements in $\boldsymbol{C}_{4}$, the RC-FOC matrix $\boldsymbol{R}_{4}\in\mathbb{C}^{(2N-1)\times (2N-1)}$ is designed in $\left[14\right]$
\begin{IEEEeqnarray}{Rl}
\boldsymbol{R}_{4}&=\overline{\boldsymbol{G}}^{-1}\overline{\boldsymbol{H}}^{T}\boldsymbol{C}_{4}\overline{\boldsymbol{H}} \overline{\boldsymbol{G}}^{-1}\IEEEnonumber\\
&=\overline{\boldsymbol{G}}^{-1} \overline{\boldsymbol{H}}^{T}\overline{\boldsymbol{B}} \boldsymbol{C}_{\boldsymbol{S}}\overline{\boldsymbol{B}}^{H} \overline{\boldsymbol{H}} \overline{\boldsymbol{G}}^{-1}=\boldsymbol{B} \boldsymbol{C}_{\boldsymbol{S}} \boldsymbol{B}^{H},
\end{IEEEeqnarray}
where $\overline{\boldsymbol{G}}=\overline{\boldsymbol{H}}^{T} \overline{\boldsymbol{H}}=diag \left\{1,..., N,N-1,...,1\right\}$ and $\overline{\boldsymbol{H}}^{T}=\left[\overline{\boldsymbol{H}}_{1}^{T}, \overline{\boldsymbol{H}}_{2}^{T}, ..., \overline{\boldsymbol{H}}_{N}^{T}\right] \in \mathbb{R}^{(2N-1) \times N^{2}}$ is an orthogonal matrix. Moreover, the definition of $\overline{\boldsymbol{H}}_{n}$ is represented as
\begin{equation}
\!\overline{\boldsymbol{H}}_{n}=\left\{\begin{array}{cc}{\left[\mathbf{0}_{N \times(N-1)}, \boldsymbol{I}_{N}\right]} & \!n=1 \\ {\left[\mathbf{0}_{N \times(N-n)}, \boldsymbol{I}_{N}, \mathbf{0}_{N \times(n-1)}\right]} & \!\quad 2 \!\leq\! n \leq \!\!N\!\!-\!\!1\!\! \\ {\left[\boldsymbol{I}_{N}, \mathbf{0}_{N \times(N-1)}\right]} & \!n=N.\end{array}\right.
\end{equation}
$\boldsymbol{B}=\left[\boldsymbol{b}(\theta_{1}),...,\boldsymbol{b}(\theta_{P})\right] \in \mathbb{C}^{(2N-1) \times P}$ is the new array manifold matrix with the $p$-th column vector $\boldsymbol{b}(\theta_{p})=\left[e^{-j\pi(N-1)\sin\theta_{p}},...,e^{j\pi(N-1)\sin\theta_{p}}\right]^{T}$.
% needed in second column of first page if using \IEEEpubid
%\IEEEpubidadjcol
\section{The ET-FOCANM Algorithm}
\subsection{Introduction of non-redundancy SMV}
Consider a ULA composed of $N$ omnidirectional antennas, since rank($\boldsymbol{R}_{4}$) is tied to the number of sources in the ULA case, the condition $P < (4N-3)$ can be taken as a priori information. Given $\boldsymbol{R}_{4}$ as in $\left(4\right)$, let us define the vector $\overline{\boldsymbol{z}}$.
\begin{IEEEeqnarray}{Rl}
\overline{\boldsymbol{z}} &=vec\left(\boldsymbol{R}_{4}\right)=\left(\boldsymbol{B}^{*} \odot \boldsymbol{B}\right) \boldsymbol{\gamma}\IEEEnonumber\\
&=\sum\nolimits_{p = 1}^P \gamma_{4 s_{p}} \boldsymbol{b}\left(\theta_{p}\right)^{*} \odot \boldsymbol{b}\left(\theta_{p}\right)=\boldsymbol{HD\gamma},
\end{IEEEeqnarray}
where $\boldsymbol{D}=\left[\boldsymbol{d}(\theta_{1}),...,\boldsymbol{d}(\theta_{P})\right]\in \mathbb{C}^{(4N-3) \times P}$, and $\boldsymbol{d}(\theta_{p})=\left[e^{-j\pi(2N-2)\sin\theta_{p}},...,e^{j\pi(2N-2)\sin\theta_{p}}\right]^{T}$. It can be seen that $\overline{\boldsymbol{z}}$ still has the repeating entries. Therefore, we choose a new orthogonal matrix $\boldsymbol{H} \in \mathbb{C}^{(2N-1)^{2} \times (4N-3)}$ whose form is consistent with $\overline{\boldsymbol{H}}$ to perform the linear transformation on $\overline{\boldsymbol{z}}$
\begin{equation}
\boldsymbol{z}=\boldsymbol{G}^{-1} \boldsymbol{H}^{T} \overline{\boldsymbol{z}}=\boldsymbol{D\gamma}=\sum\nolimits_{p = 1}^P \gamma_{4 s_{p}} \boldsymbol{d}\left(\theta_{p}\right),
\end{equation}
\noindent where $\boldsymbol{z} \in \mathbb{C}^{4N-3}$ is the non-redundancy single measurement vector (SMV) and $\boldsymbol{G} = \boldsymbol{H}^{T}\boldsymbol{H}$. As a byproduct, it can generate $O\left\{4N-3\right\}$ degrees of freedom from only $O\left\{N\right\}$ antennas, which is beneficial to detect more sources.
\subsection{Estimation error tolerance scheme}
Since finite snapshots inevitably lead to estimation error in the actual situation, it has the potential to relax the above equality constraint $\left(7\right)$ and demand instead
\begin{equation}
\boldsymbol{z}=\boldsymbol{D}\boldsymbol{\gamma}+\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}=\boldsymbol{x}+\boldsymbol{\varepsilon},
\end{equation}
in which $\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}$ is the estimation error vector from non-redundancy SMV. As shown in $\left[5\right]$, the sparse model $\boldsymbol{x}$ can be linearly represented by $P$ atoms in a set of the continuous atoms, so we make the following optimization to reconstruct $\boldsymbol{x}$
\begin{equation}
\hat{\boldsymbol{x}}=\underset{\boldsymbol{x}}{\arg \min }\|\boldsymbol{x}\|_{\mathcal{A}} \quad s.t.\quad \|\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}\|_{2}^{2}=\|\boldsymbol{z}-\boldsymbol{x}\|_{2}^{2} \leq \xi,
\end{equation}
\noindent where $\xi$ denotes the tolerance of error energy. Unlike the constraint in $\left[14\right]$, this inequality is controlled by $\xi$, where $\xi$ is a result of multiple factors, including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and snapshot. Thus, it is hard to select a proper value of $\xi$ for the final DOAs.
To proceed, we innovatively propose a new estimation error tolerance scheme that does not depend on $\xi$ but on the statistical property. First, let $\Delta \boldsymbol{C}_{4}=\hat{\boldsymbol{C}_{4}}-\boldsymbol{C}_{4}$ be the estimation error matrix of FOC and $\hat{\boldsymbol{C}_{4}}$ denote the sample observation of $\boldsymbol{C}_{4}$. \textcolor{red}{Inspired by $\left[17\right]$, we deduce the distribution of error component $vec(\Delta\boldsymbol{C}_{4})$ in the complex domain, which is expressed by
\begin{equation}
vec\left(\Delta \boldsymbol{C}_{4}\right) \sim AsN(\boldsymbol{0}, \boldsymbol{V}).
\end{equation}
$AsN(\boldsymbol{0}, \boldsymbol{V})$ denotes asymptotic normal distribution with zero mean and the covariance matrix $\boldsymbol{V}$.} Meanwhile, the element of $\boldsymbol{V}$ can be determined by
\begin{equation}
\label{eqn_dbl_y}
\begin{array}{l}
\!\!\!\!cov\left\{\hat{c}_{4}(\tau),\hat{c}_{4}(\rho)\right\}\!\!=\!\!\frac{1}{J}\!\!\left\{Q_{44}(\tau ; \rho)
-\sum_{v=1}^{3}\!\!\left[\!\!\begin{array}{l}
Q_{42}\left(\tau ; k_{1}^{\prime}, k_{v 1}^{\prime}\right)\!\!E\{k_{v 2}^{\prime}k_{v 3}^{\prime}\}\!+\!Q_{42}\left(\tau ; k_{v 2}^{\prime}, k_{v 3}^{\prime}\right)\!\! E\{k_{1}^{\prime}k_{v 1}^{\prime}\} \\
+Q_{42}^{*}\left(\rho ; k_{1}^{\prime}, k_{v 1}^{\prime}\right)\!\!E\{k_{v 2}k_{v 3}\}^{*}\!+\!Q_{42}^{*}\left(\rho ; k_{v 2}^{\prime}, k_{v 3}^{\prime}\right)\!\!E\{k_{1}k_{v 1}\}^{\!*}
\end{array}\!\!\right]\right. \\
\!\!+\!\!\left.\sum_{\mu,\!v=\!1}^{3}\!\!\!\left[\!\!\!\!\begin{array}{l}
Q_{22}\left(k_{1}, k_{v1} ; k_{1}^{\prime}, k_{\mu 1}^{\prime}\right)\!\!E\{k_{v2}k_{v3}\}^{*}\!\!E\{k_{\mu2}^{\prime}k_{\mu 3}^{\prime}\}^{\!*}\!\!+\!\!Q_{22}\left(k_{v2}, k_{v3} ; k_{1}^{\prime}, k_{\mu1}^{\prime}\right)\!\!E\{k_{1} k_{v1}\}^{\!*}\!\!E\{k_{\mu2}^{\prime}k_{\mu3}^{\prime}\}^{\!*} \\
\!+\!Q_{22}\left(k_{1}, k_{v1} ; k_{\mu2}^{\prime}, k_{\mu3}^{\prime}\right)\!\!E\{k_{v2}k_{v3}\}^{\!*}\!\!E\{k_{1}^{\prime}k_{\mu1}^{\prime}\}^{\!*}\!\!+\!\!Q_{22}\left(k_{v2}, k_{v3} ; k_{\mu 2}^{\prime}, k_{\mu3}^{\prime}\right)\!\!E\{k_{1}k_{v 1}\}^{\!*}E\{k_{1}^{\prime}k_{\mu 1}^{\prime}\}^{\!*}
\end{array}\!\!\right]\!\!\right\}\!\!.
\end{array}
\end{equation}
where $\tau\!=\!\left\{k_{1},\!k_{2},\!k_{3},\!k_{4}\right\}$, $\rho\!\!=\!\!\left\{\!k_{1}^{'},\!k_{2}^{'},\!k_{3}^{'},\!k_{4}^{'}\!\right\}$, $k_{11}\!=\!k_{2}$, $k_{12}\!=\!k_{3}$, $k_{13}\!=\!k_{4}$, $k_{21}\!=\!k_{3}$, $k_{22}\!=\!k_{2}$, $k_{23}\!=\!k_{4}$, $k_{31}\!=\!k_{4}$, $k_{32}\!=\!k_{3}$, $k_{33}\!=\!k_{2}$ and the same as $k^{'}$. \textcolor{red}{$E\{k_{1}k_{v1}\}$ is the expectation of $y_{k_{1}}y_{k_{v1}}$ and the same as $E\{k_{1}^{'}k_{v1}^{'}\}$, $E\{k_{v2}k_{v3}\}$, $E\{\!k_{v2}^{'}k_{v3}^{'}\!\}$, $E\{\!k_{1}^{'}k_{\mu1}^{'}\!\}$, $E\{\!k_{\mu2}^{'}k_{\mu3}^{'}\!\}$. The definition of $Q_{ij}$ is as follows
\begin{IEEEeqnarray}{Rl}
\!\!Q_{ij} \!=\! \mathop {\lim }\limits_{J \to \infty} \!\! Jcov \{\hat{m}_{i},\hat{m}_{j}\}\!=\!\!\!\!\sum\limits_{\xi=-\infty }^{\infty}\!\!\!cov \{{f_k}(t),f_{{k^{'}}}(t + \xi)\},
\end{IEEEeqnarray}
where ${f_k}(t) = {y_{{k_1}}}(t)y_{{k_2}}^{*}(t) \cdots {y_{{k_i}}}(t)$ and ${f_{{k^{'}}}}(t) = {y_{k_1^{'}}}(t)y_{k_2^{'}}^{*}(t) \cdots {y_{k_j^{'}}}(t)$, $i,j \le 4$. $y_{{k_i}}(t)$ denotes the $k_i$-th element of $\boldsymbol{y}(t)$ with $k_i \in \left[1,N\right]$, and the same as $y_{k_j^{'}}(t)$.}
Next, utilizing the orthogonal invariance property of Gaussian random matrix, it can be inferred as
\begin{IEEEeqnarray}{Rl}
\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}=& \boldsymbol{G}^{-1} \boldsymbol{H}^{T} vec\left(\Delta \boldsymbol{R}_{4}\right)=\boldsymbol{G}^{-1} \boldsymbol{H}^{T} vec\left(\widehat{\boldsymbol{R}}_{4}-\boldsymbol{R}_{4}\right) \IEEEnonumber\\
=& \boldsymbol{G}^{-1} \boldsymbol{H}^{T}\left(\overline{\boldsymbol{G}}^{-1} \overline{\boldsymbol{H}}^{T}\right) \otimes\left(\overline{\boldsymbol{G}}^{-1} \overline{\boldsymbol{H}}^{T}\right) vec\left(\Delta \boldsymbol{C}_{4}\right) \IEEEnonumber\\
=& \boldsymbol{W} vec\left(\Delta \boldsymbol{C}_{4}\right) \sim AsN\left(0, \boldsymbol{W} \boldsymbol{V} \boldsymbol{W}^{H}\right).
\end{IEEEeqnarray}
\noindent It directly results in
\begin{equation}
\left\|\boldsymbol{W}^{-\frac{1}{2}} \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}\right\|_{2}^{2} \sim As\chi^{2}(4N-3),
\end{equation}
\noindent where $As\chi^{2}(4N-3)$ denotes the asymptotic chi-square distribution with $4N-3$ degrees of freedom.
Finally, based on the property of $\chi^{2}$ distribution, the following inequality holds with a high probability $1-\delta$ where $\delta=0.001$ is enough:
\begin{equation}
\left\|\boldsymbol{W}^{-\frac{1}{2}} \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}\right\|_{2}^{2} \leq \eta.
\end{equation}
\noindent The choice of $\eta$ is easily calculated by the code $chi2inv(1-\delta, 4N-3)$ in Matlab.
\subsection{ANM-based model attached to the above constraint}
We propose the error-tolerant problem by substituting the (15) into the constraint term of (9)
\begin{equation}
\hat{\boldsymbol{x}}=\underset{\boldsymbol{x}}{\arg \min }\|\boldsymbol{x}\|_{\mathcal{A}} \quad s.t.\quad \left\|\boldsymbol{W}^{-\frac{1}{2}} \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}\right\|_{2}^{2} \leq \eta.
\end{equation}
\noindent This problem must always yield the optimal solution at least as sparse as that in (9). \textcolor{red}{Further, the result of (16) can be solved by the SDP problem $\left[18\right]$
\begin{IEEEeqnarray}{c}
\{\hat{\boldsymbol{x}}, \hat{q}, \boldsymbol{T}(\hat{\boldsymbol{\mu}})\}=\underset{\boldsymbol{x}, q, T(\boldsymbol{\mu})}{\arg \min } \frac{1}{2} q+\frac{1}{2} \mu_{1} \IEEEnonumber\\
s.t. \left\|\boldsymbol{W}^{-\frac{1}{2}} \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}\right\|_{2}^{2} \leq \eta,\left[\begin{array}{cc}\boldsymbol{T}(\boldsymbol{\mu}) & \quad \boldsymbol{x} \\ \boldsymbol{x}^{H} & \quad q\end{array}\right] \geq 0,
\end{IEEEeqnarray}
where $q$ denotes the smallest dilation factor and $\boldsymbol{T}\left(\boldsymbol{\mu}\right)$ represents the Hermitian Toeplitz matrix with its first column $\boldsymbol{\mu}=\left[\mu_{1},...,\mu_{4N-3}\right]^{T}$ and rank($\boldsymbol{T}\left(\boldsymbol{\mu}\right))=P \le (4N-4) $. Hence, when the convex optimization toolbox called CVX $\left[19\right]$ produces the optimal solution $\boldsymbol{T}\left(\boldsymbol{\mu}\right)$ of (17), it is easy to estimate the DOAs through some general techniques such as Vandermonde decomposition $\left[5\right]$, rotational invariance techniques (ESPRIT) $\left[20\right]$, spectral peak search $\left[9\right]$ and its variant root-MUSIC $\left[21\right]$. To simplify the calculation, we perform rotational invariance techniques on the ensuing DOA estimation.}
\section{The Extension to an SLA}
In this subsection, we extend ET-FOCANM method to the SLA case. For simplicity, we mainly focus on one type of the SLA, which is the minimum redundancy array (MRA) $\left[5\right]$, $\left[6\right]$. Therefore, according to the signal model (1) and the definition of $\boldsymbol{C}_{4}$, the FOC matrix $\boldsymbol{C}_{4\Omega} \in \mathbb{C}^{M^{2} \times M^{2}}$ is designed as follows
\begin{IEEEeqnarray}{Rl}
\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\boldsymbol{C}_{4 \Omega}&=E\left\{\left(\boldsymbol{Y}_{\Omega} \otimes \boldsymbol{Y}_{\Omega}^{*}\right)\left(\boldsymbol{Y}_{\Omega} \otimes \boldsymbol{Y}_{\Omega}^{*}\right)^{H}\right\}\!-\!E\left\{\boldsymbol{Y}_{\Omega} \otimes \boldsymbol{Y}_{\Omega}^{*}\right\} \IEEEnonumber\\
&\!\quad\!\times\! E\left\{\boldsymbol{Y}_{\Omega} \!\otimes\! \boldsymbol{Y}_{\Omega}^{*}\right\}^{H}\!-\!E\left\{\boldsymbol{Y}_{\Omega} \boldsymbol{Y}_{\Omega}^{H}\right\} \otimes E\left\{\boldsymbol{Y}_{\Omega} \boldsymbol{Y}_{\Omega}^{H}\right\}^{*}.
\end{IEEEeqnarray}
\noindent Then we derive $\boldsymbol{R}_{4}$ under the SLA case
\begin{equation}
\!\!\!\boldsymbol{R}_{4}=\boldsymbol{G}_{\Omega}^{-1}\left[\left(\boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega} \otimes \boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega}\right) \overline{\boldsymbol{H}}\right]^{T} \!\boldsymbol{C}_{4 \Omega}\!\left[\left(\boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega} \otimes \boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega}\right) \overline{\boldsymbol{H}}\right] \boldsymbol{G}_{\Omega}^{-1},
\end{equation}
where $\boldsymbol{G}_{\Omega}=\left[\left(\boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega} \otimes \boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega}\right) \overline{\boldsymbol{H}}\right]^{T}\left[\left(\boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega} \otimes \boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega}\right) \overline{\boldsymbol{H}}\right]$. The acquisition of $\boldsymbol{z}$ is the same as in (8) and let $\Delta \boldsymbol{C}_{4\Omega}=\hat{\boldsymbol{C}}_{4\Omega}-\boldsymbol{C}_{4\Omega}$ be the FOC matrix error in the SLA case. \textcolor{red}{Since $vec(\boldsymbol{C}_{4\Omega})$ is equal to $\left[\left(\boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega} \otimes \boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega}\right)\otimes \left(\boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega} \otimes \boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega}\right)\right]vec(\boldsymbol{C}_{4})$, which reveals that $vec(\boldsymbol{C}_{4\Omega})\sim AsN(\boldsymbol{0}, \boldsymbol{V}_{\Omega})$. Further, we conclude the link between $\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}$ and $\Delta \boldsymbol{C}_{4\Omega}$
\begin{IEEEeqnarray}{c}
\!\!\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}=\boldsymbol{W}_{\Omega}vec\left(\Delta \boldsymbol{C}_{4 \Omega}\right) \sim AsN\left(\boldsymbol{0}, \boldsymbol{W}_{\Omega} \boldsymbol{V}_{\Omega} \boldsymbol{W}_{\Omega}^{H}\right),
\end{IEEEeqnarray}
where $\boldsymbol{W}_{\Omega}\!\!\!\!=\!\!\!\!\boldsymbol{G}^{-1}\boldsymbol{\!H}^{T}(\boldsymbol{G}_{\Omega}^{-1}\left(\left(\boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega}\otimes\boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega}\right)\overline{\boldsymbol{H}}\right)^{T}\otimes\boldsymbol{G}_{\Omega}^{-1}\left(\left(\boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega}\otimes\boldsymbol{\Gamma}_{\Omega}\right)\overline{\boldsymbol{H}}\right)^{T})$. }Similarly, we have
\begin{equation}
\left\|\boldsymbol{W}_{\Omega}^{-\frac{1}{2}} \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}\right\|_{2}^{2} \sim A s \chi^{2}(4N-3).
\end{equation}
\noindent The denoising problem in the SLA case is rewritten as follows:
\begin{equation}
\widehat{\boldsymbol{x}}=\underset{\boldsymbol{x}}{\arg \min }\|\boldsymbol{x}\|_{\mathcal{A}} \quad s.t. \left\|\boldsymbol{W}_{\Omega}^{-\frac{1}{2}} \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}\right\|_{2}^{2} \leq \eta,
\end{equation}
\noindent and the problem (22) is equivalent to
\begin{IEEEeqnarray}{c}
\{\hat{\boldsymbol{x}}, \hat{q}, \boldsymbol{T}(\hat{\boldsymbol{\mu}})\}=\underset{\boldsymbol{x}, q, T(\boldsymbol{\mu})}{\arg \min } \frac{1}{2} q+\frac{1}{2} \mu_{1} \IEEEnonumber\\
s.t. \left\|\boldsymbol{W}_{\Omega}^{-\frac{1}{2}} \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}\right\|_{2}^{2} \leq \eta,\left[\begin{array}{cc}\boldsymbol{T}(\boldsymbol{\mu}) & \quad \boldsymbol{x} \\ \boldsymbol{x}^{H} & \quad q\end{array}\right] \geq 0.
\end{IEEEeqnarray}
To get an accurate estimate of $\boldsymbol{T}(\boldsymbol{\mu})$ through CVX, we use rotational invariance techniques again to retrieve the DOAs.
\section{Simulation Results}
In this subsection, compared with MUSIC-LIKE $\left[9\right]$, JDS-FOC $\left[11\right]$ and FOC-ANM $\left[14\right]$ algorithms, we provide several simulations to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Consider the ULA and redundancy SLA composed of $4$ omnidirectional antennas in Fig. 1. Furthermore, the non-Gaussian sources are modeled as $\boldsymbol{s}\left(t\right)=\boldsymbol{F}\left(t\right)\boldsymbol{e}\left(t\right)$ where $\boldsymbol{F}(t)=diag\{f_1(t),...,f_P(t)\}$ and $\boldsymbol{e}(t)=\left[e_1(t),...,e_P(t)\right]^{T}$. The zero-mean Gaussian processes $f_p(t)$ and $e_p(t)$ are with unit-variance and $\sigma_{s}^{2}$-variance $\left[13\right]$, respectively. The noise is generated by Gaussian white noise through a second-order autoregressive filter $\left[22\right]$ with the coefficients $\left[1,-1,0.8\right]$. For each simulation, $100$ Monte Carlo trials are collected.
\begin{figure}[!h]
\begin{spacing}{0.01}
\centering
\includegraphics[height=4.77cm,width=5.57cm]{fig2a.eps}
\caption{RMSE of DOA estimation versus SNR with $J=300$.}
\label{fig1}
\end{spacing}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[!h]
\begin{spacing}{0.01}
\centering
\includegraphics[height=4.77cm,width=5.59cm]{fig2b.eps}
\caption{RMSE of DOA estimation versus snapshots with SNR = $-3$ dB.}
\label{fig1}
\end{spacing}
\end{figure}
To illustrate the estimation precision performance of ET-FOCANM, we employ the root mean square error (RMSE) as a metric to evaluate estimation precision. The DOAs of the uncorrelated signals are $\theta_{1}=-23^{\circ}$ and $\theta_{2}=17^{\circ}$ in the first simulation. Fig. 2 plots the RMSE curve as SNR varies from $-6$ dB to $12$ dB with $3$ dB as the step. Fig. 3 depicts the RMSE curve as snapshots $J$ varies from $100$ to $600$ with $100$ as the step. It is indicated in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 that ET-FOCANM outperforms the other methods in the ULA case due to its appropriate error energy constraints. Moreover, the resulting RMSEs verify that the estimation error of ET-FOCANM applied to SLAs is much smaller than that applied to ULAs under the same antenna scale.
\section{Conclusion}
In this letter, we propose a gridless FOC-based method, named ET-FOCANM, for DOA estimation in the two linear arrays. After suppressing the colored noise by FOC, ET-FOCANM implements the practicable estimation error tolerance scheme and is converted into an ANM-based form. The experimental results indicate that ET-FOCANM can achieve better angular precision and resolution capability than the traditional algorithms. For future work, it will be worth applying the alternating direction method of multipliers to speed up the solution of the ANM-based form in ET-FOCANM.
% An example of a floating figure using the graphicx package.
% Note that \label must occur AFTER (or within) \caption.
% For figures, \caption should occur after the \includegraphics.
% Note that IEEEtran v1.7 and later has special internal code that
% is designed to preserve the operation of \label within \caption
% even when the captionsoff option is in effect. However, because
% of issues like this, it may be the safest practice to put all your
% \label just after \caption rather than within \caption{}.
%
% Reminder: the "draftcls" or "draftclsnofoot", not "draft", class
% option should be used if it is desired that the figures are to be
% displayed while in draft mode.
%
%\begin{figure}[!t]
%\centering
%\includegraphics[width=2.5in]{myfigure}
% where an .eps filename suffix will be assumed under latex,
% and a .pdf suffix will be assumed for pdflatex; or what has been declared
% via \DeclareGraphicsExtensions.
%\caption{Simulation results for the network.}
%\label{fig_sim}
%\end{figure}
% Note that the IEEE typically puts floats only at the top, even when this
% results in a large percentage of a column being occupied by floats.
% An example of a double column floating figure using two subfigures.
% (The subfig.sty package must be loaded for this to work.)
% The subfigure \label commands are set within each subfloat command,
% and the \label for the overall figure must come after \caption.
% \hfil is used as a separator to get equal spacing.
% Watch out that the combined width of all the subfigures on a
% line do not exceed the text width or a line break will occur.
%
%\begin{figure*}[!t]
%\centering
%\subfloat[Case I]{\includegraphics[width=2.5in]{box}%
%\label{fig_first_case}}
%\hfil
%\subfloat[Case II]{\includegraphics[width=2.5in]{box}%
%\label{fig_second_case}}
%\caption{Simulation results for the network.}
%\label{fig_sim}
%\end{figure*}
%
% Note that often IEEE papers with subfigures do not employ subfigure
% captions (using the optional argument to \subfloat[]), but instead will
% reference/describe all of them (a), (b), etc., within the main caption.
% Be aware that for subfig.sty to generate the (a), (b), etc., subfigure
% labels, the optional argument to \subfloat must be present. If a
% subcaption is not desired, just leave its contents blank,
% e.g., \subfloat[].
% An example of a floating table. Note that, for IEEE style tables, the
% \caption command should come BEFORE the table and, given that table
% captions serve much like titles, are usually capitalized except for words
% such as a, an, and, as, at, but, by, for, in, nor, of, on, or, the, to
% and up, which are usually not capitalized unless they are the first or
% last word of the caption. Table text will default to \footnotesize as
% the IEEE normally uses this smaller font for tables.
% The \label must come after \caption as always.
%
%\begin{table}[!t]
%% increase table row spacing, adjust to taste
%\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}
% if using array.sty, it might be a good idea to tweak the value of
% \extrarowheight as needed to properly center the text within the cells
%\caption{An Example of a Table}
%\label{table_example}
%\centering
%% Some packages, such as MDW tools, offer better commands for making tables
%% than the plain LaTeX2e tabular which is used here.
%\begin{tabular}{|c||c|}
%\hline
%One & Two\\
%\hline
%Three & Four\\
%\hline
%\end{tabular}
%\end{table}
% Note that the IEEE does not put floats in the very first column
% - or typically anywhere on the first page for that matter. Also,
% in-text middle ("here") positioning is typically not used, but it
% is allowed and encouraged for Computer Society conferences (but
% not Computer Society journals). Most IEEE journals/conferences use
% top floats exclusively.
% Note that, LaTeX2e, unlike IEEE journals/conferences, places
% footnotes above bottom floats. This can be corrected via the
% \fnbelowfloat command of the stfloats package.
% if have a single appendix:
%\appendix[Proof of the Zonklar Equations]
% or
%\appendix % for no appendix heading
% do not use \section anymore after \appendix, only \section*
% is possibly needed
% use appendices with more than one appendix
% then use \section to start each appendix
% you must declare a \section before using any
% \subsection or using \label (\appendices by itself
% starts a section numbered zero.)
%
% Can use something like this to put references on a page
% by themselves when using endfloat and the captionsoff option.
\ifCLASSOPTIONcaptionsoff
\newpage
\fi
% trigger a \newpage just before the given reference
% number - used to balance the columns on the last page
% adjust value as needed - may need to be readjusted if
% the document is modified later
%\IEEEtriggeratref{8}
% The "triggered" command can be changed if desired:
%\IEEEtriggercmd{\enlargethispage{-5in}}
% references section
% can use a bibliography generated by BibTeX as a .bbl file
% BibTeX documentation can be easily obtained at:
% http://mirror.ctan.org/biblio/bibtex/contrib/doc/
% The IEEEtran BibTeX style support page is at:
% http://www.michaelshell.org/tex/ieeetran/bibtex/
%\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}
% argument is your BibTeX string definitions and bibliography database(s)
%\bibliography{IEEEabrv,../bib/paper}
%
% <OR> manually copy in the resultant .bbl file
% set second argument of \begin to the number of references
% (used to reserve space for the reference number labels box)
\begin{thebibliography}{1}
\bibitem{1}
Y.~Fang, S.~Zhu and Y.~Gao, “Direction Finding by Covariance Matrix Sparse Representation With Sensor Gain and Phase Uncertainties in Unknown Non-Uniform Noise,” \emph{IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett.}, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 175-179, Jan. 2021.
\bibitem{2}
Y.~Zhang, G.~Zhang and H.~Leung, “Gridless coherent DOA estimation based on fourth-order cumulants with Gaussian colored noise,” \emph{IET Radar Sonar Navig.}, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 677-685, Feb. 2020.
\bibitem{3}
H.~Chen, W.~Wang and W.~Liu, “Joint DOA, Range, and Polarization Estimation for Rectilinear Sources With a COLD Array,” \emph{IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett.}, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1398-1401, Oct. 2019.
\bibitem{4}
Y.~Tian and H.~Xu, “Calibration nested arrays for underdetermined DOA estimation using fourth-order cumulant,” \emph{IEEE Commun. Lett.}, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1949-1952, Sept. 2020.
\bibitem{5}
Z.~Yang and L.~Xie, “On gridless sparse methods for line spectral estimation from complete and incomplete data,” \emph{IEEE Trans. Signal Process.}, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 3139–3153, Jul. 2015.
\bibitem{6}
X.~Wu, W.~Zhu and J.~Yan, “A Toeplitz covariance matrix reconstruction approach for direction-of-arrival estimation,” \emph{IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.}, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 8223-8237, Apr. 2017.
\bibitem{7}
S.~Prasad et al., “A transform-based covariance differencing approach for some classes of parameter estimation problems,” \emph{IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process.}, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 631–641, May 1988.
\bibitem{8}
F.~Wen, J.~Shi, and Z.~Zhang, “Direction finding for bistatic MIMO radar with unknown spatially colored noise,” \emph{Circuits Syst. Signal Process.}, vol. 39, no. 4, Feb. 2020.
\bibitem{9}
B.~Porat and B.~Friedlander, “Direction finding algorithms based on high-order statistics,” \emph{IEEE Trans. Signal Process.}, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2016–2024, Sep. 1991.
\bibitem{10}
C.~Liu, Z.~Ye, and Y.~Zhang, “DOA estimation based on fourth-order cumulants with unknown mutual coupling,” \emph{Signal Process.}, vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 1839-1843, Sep. 2009.
\bibitem{11}
W.~Zeng, X.~Li, and X.~Zhang, “Direction-of-arrival estimation based on the joint diagonalization structure of multiple fourth-order cumulant matrices,” \emph{IEEE Signal Process. Lett.}, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 164-167, Mar. 2009.
\bibitem{12}
B.~Liao and S.~Chan, “A cumulant-based method for direction finding in uniform linear arrays with mutual coupling,” \emph{IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett.}, vol. 13, pp. 1717-1720, Nov. 2014.
\bibitem{13}
J.~Liu, W.~Zhou, and X.~Wang, “Fourth-order cumulants-based sparse representation approach for DOA estimation in MIMO radar with unknown mutual coupling,” \emph{Signal Process.}, vol. 128, pp. 123–130, Nov. 2016.
\bibitem{14}
Y.~Zhang, G.~Zhang and H.~Leung, “Gridless sparse methods based on fourth-order cumulant for DOA estimation,” in \emph{Proc. IGARSS}, Yokohama, Japan, 2019, pp. 3416-3419.
\bibitem{15}
B.~Wang, J.~Liu and X.~Sun, “Mixed sources localization based on sparse signal reconstruction,” \emph{IEEE Signal Process. Lett.}, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 487-490, Aug. 2012.
\bibitem{16}
N.~Yuen and B.~Friedlander, “DOA estimation in multipath: an approach using fourth-order cumulants,” \emph{IEEE Trans. Signal Process.}, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1253-1263, May 1997.
\bibitem{17}
A.~V. Dandawate and G.~B. Giannakis, “Asymptotic properties and covariance expressions of kth-order sample moments and cumulants,” in \emph{Proc. ACSSC}, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, 1993, pp. 1186-1190.
\bibitem{18}
G.~Tang et al., “Compressed sensing off the grid,” \emph{IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory}, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 7465-7490, Nov. 2013.
\bibitem{19}
M.~Grant and S.~Boyd, “CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.0 beta,” \emph{Available online at http://cvxr.com/cvx}, Sep. 2013.
\bibitem{20}
J.~Lin et al., “Time-Frequency Multi-Invariance ESPRIT for DOA Estimation,” \emph{IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett.}, vol. 15, pp. 770-773, Mar. 2016.
\textcolor{red}{\bibitem{21}
B.~D.~Rao and K.~V.~S.~Hari, “Performance analysis of Root-Music,” \emph{IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Proces.}, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1939-1949, Dec. 1989.}
\bibitem{22}
H.~Jiang, J.~Zhang, and K.~Wong, “Joint DOD and DOA estimation for bistatic MIMO radar in unknown correlated noise,” \emph{IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.}, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 5113–5125, Nov. 2015.
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}