Optogenetic switching of migration of contractile cells
Extracted source text · arXiv 2206.05915
% ****** Start of file apssamp.tex ******
%
% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4.1 distribution.
% Version 4.1r of REVTeX, August 2010
%
% Copyright (c) 2009, 2010 The American Physical Society.
%
% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
%
% TeX'ing this file requires that you have AMS-LaTeX 2.0 installed
% as well as the rest of the prerequisites for REVTeX 4.1
%
% See the REVTeX 4 README file
% It also requires running BibTeX. The commands are as follows:
%
% 1) latex apssamp.tex
% 2) bibtex apssamp
% 3) latex apssamp.tex
% 4) latex apssamp.tex
%
\documentclass[%
reprint,
%superscriptaddress,
groupedaddress,
%unsortedaddress,
%runinaddress,
%frontmatterverbose,
%preprint,
%showpacs,preprintnumbers,
%nofootinbib,
%nobibnotes,
%bibnotes,
amsmath,amssymb,
aps,
%pra,
%prb,
prc
%rmp,
%prstab,
%prstper,
%floatfix,
]{revtex4-1}
\usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
\usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
\usepackage{bm}% bold math
%\usepackage{hyperref}
\allowdisplaybreaks
\usepackage{color}
\newcommand\Peclet{\mbox{\textit{Pe}}}
\usepackage{comment}
\begin{document}
\preprint{APS/123-QED}
% Oliver 8.2.2022
%\title{Optogenetic switching of cell migration\\
%in a nonlinear active gel model for purely contractile cells}
% Ulrich 8.2.2022
\title{Optogenetic switching of migration of contractile cells}
\author{Oliver~M.~Drozdowski}
\author{Falko~Ziebert}%
\author{Ulrich~S.~Schwarz}%
\email{Corresponding author: schwarz@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de}
\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical Physics, Heidelberg University, Philosophenweg 19, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany}
\affiliation{BioQuant, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany}%
\date{\today}% It is always \today, today,
% but any date may be explicitly specified
\begin{abstract}
Cell crawling on flat substrates is based on intracellular flows of the actin
cytoskeleton that are driven by both actin polymerization at the front
and myosin contractility at the back. The new experimental tool of optogenetics
makes it possible to spatially control contraction and thereby possibly
also cell migration. Here we analyze this situation theoretically
using a one-dimensional active gel model in which the excluded volume interactions of
myosin and their aggregation into minifilaments is modeled by a
supercritical van der Waals fluid. This physically simple and transparent,
but nonlinear and thermodynamically rigorous model predicts
bistability between sessile and motile solutions.
We then show that one can switch between these two states at realistic
parameter ranges via optogenetic activation or inhibition of contractility, in agreement with recent experiments.
We also predict the required activation strengths and initiation times.
\end{abstract}
\pacs{Valid PACS appear here}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
% Classification Scheme.
%\keywords{Suggested keywords}%Use showkeys class option if keyword
%display desired
\maketitle
Crawling cell migration is an ubiquitous process in animal tissue and plays a crucial role in
e.g.\ development, wound healing, immune response and cancer metastasis
\cite{Bodor_2020_DevCell_Cell_shapes_motion_physical_basis_migration}.
In addition, an increased interest in synthetic cellular systems drives the need for
understanding the minimal components required for cell motility
\cite{Goepfrich_2018_TendsBioTech_Bottom_up_construction_synth_cells}.
The most essential element of cell migration is the symmetry break between
front and back: while the front uses actin polymerization to push
the membrane forward, the back uses myosin II contractility to
pull the rear forward. Traditionally, these processes are considered
to be coordinated by gradients in biochemical activity, most
prominently the antagonistic signaling pathways of Rac/Cdc42 and RhoA
for front and back, respectively \cite{Ridley_2003_Science_cell_mirgration_integrating_signals}.
A striking feature of locomoting cells is the bistability of their motility behavior:
sessile cells can be stimulated into migration by the application of physical
stimuli if the applied stimulus is sufficiently large to polarize their cytoskeleton
\cite{Verkhovsky_1999_CurrBiol_Selfpolarization_directional_motility,ziebert_lam}.
Very recently, it was shown that the direction of cell crawling in channels
can be reversed by optogenetic stimulation effectively decreasing myosin II
contraction at the back \cite{Hadjitheodorou_2021_NatComm_Reorientation_migrating_neutrophils}.
Because this situation is essentially one-dimensional,
here the bistability is mediated by polarization, in contrast to
cell migration on two-dimensional substrates, where bistability can
also result from cell shape changes \cite{ziebert_lam,CasademuntPRL}.
Surprisingly, the optogenetic experiments also revealed
that high myosin II activity by itself can prevent reorientation \cite{Hadjitheodorou_2021_NatComm_Reorientation_migrating_neutrophils}.
In general, optogenetic perturbations of cell contractility have
revealed that contractile cells usually do not work at saturation,
but at an intermediate setpoint of tension that allows for up- and downregulation
\cite{Oakes_2017_NatComm_Optogenetic_RhoA,Valon_2017_Nature_Optogenetic_control_cellular_forces,
Hadjitheodorou_2021_NatComm_Reorientation_migrating_neutrophils}.
These observations shed new light on a long-standing
question in the fundamental understanding
of cell migration, namely how cell migration works
and can be controlled in purely contractile cells.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{fig1.pdf}
\caption{Cell crawling depends strongly on the spatial distribution of myosin motors. A homogeneous distribution does not induce intracellular flows and therefore corresponds to a sessile cell (top). In contrast, a myosin gradient corresponds to a motile cell (bottom).
Optogenetic activation of contractility (red) can be used to switch between these two states.}
\label{fig:Schematic_model}
\end{figure}
The natural framework to understand cytoskeletal flow within cells and the role of contraction is active gel theory \cite{KrusePRL04,
Prost_2015_Nature_Review_active_gel_physics}, which has been used
early on to describe cell migration
\cite{Kruse_PhysBiol}.
However, obtaining bistability and switching is difficult within this framework.
Previous attempts have relied on
introducing nonlinear saturation terms \cite{Recho_2015_JMPS_Mechanics_motility_initiation_arrest, Lavi_2020_PRE_motiltiy_confined_droplet}, but the recent optogenetic experiments \cite{Hadjitheodorou_2021_NatComm_Reorientation_migrating_neutrophils}
demonstrate that the system is not in saturation yet. We also note that
the earlier work used an ideal gas description for the myosins, which does not reflect
its high density and its property to aggregate into large complexes.
Here we go beyond
these assumptions and propose to describe the myosins as a supercritical van der Waals (vdW) fluid, a concept suggested before for other protein systems
\cite{Wills_2005_ActCryD_vdw_phase_protein_solutions}.
In the myosin context, it accounts both for the crowdedness of the cytosol and the aggregation of myosin II into so-called
minifilaments, which are supra-molecular clusters that lead to persistent contraction of the actin cytoskeleton.
The vdW approach results in nonlinearities but is consistent concerning linear irreversible thermodynamics,
since the driving force, the gradient in chemical potential, is still in linear order. Here we show that this description
provides a physically
reasonable and transparent framework to explain the experimentally observed bistability and to predict the effect of
optogenetic control (Fig.~\ref{fig:Schematic_model}). We also parametrize our model and demonstrate that our
predictions both agree with the recent
experiments on motility reorientation \cite{Hadjitheodorou_2021_NatComm_Reorientation_migrating_neutrophils}.
Finally we use our new theory to predict different experimental protocols to achieve experimental control of cell migration.
To model the cell we assume the constitutive relation of an infinitely compressible active gel with a linear dependence of the active stress on the myosin concentration field $c(x,t)$:
\begin{equation}\label{eq:constitutive_active_gel}
\eta\partial_x{v}= \sigma - \chi c\ .
\end{equation}
Here $v(x,t)$ is the flow velocity field,
$\eta$ the shear viscosity, $\sigma(x,t)$ the total stress field and $\chi$ the contractility per motor protein.
We assume viscous drag with the substrate, $\partial_x \sigma = \xi v$, with a friction coefficient $\xi$.
The cell is considered to have a variable length, with left edge $l_-(t)$ and right edge $l_+(t)$,
and an elastic boundary condition $\sigma=-k(L-L_0)/L_0$, where $L=l_+-l_-$ is the cell length and $L_0$ its reference length.
We finally assume that the flow fields at the boundaries agree with
cell movement ($v(l_\pm)=\dot{l}_\pm$). This implies that we disregard
the effect of actin polymerization, which could be incorporated as a modified boundary condition \cite{Drozdowski_2021_PRE_Optgen_control_flow_migration}.
To determine the dynamic equation for the myosin concentration, let us start with the
chemical potential $\mu_c$ of the vdW fluid \cite{Johnston_2014_Adv_Thdyn_vdw_fluid}
\begin{multline}
\mu_c = -N_Ak_BT \log \left( \frac{1/N_\mathrm{A}-cb}{cb}\right) +N_A k_BT\ \frac{cb}{1/N_\mathrm{A}-cb} \\ - 2aN_\mathrm{A}^2 c + N_\mathrm{A} k_\mathrm{B} T \log\left(\lambda_\mathrm{th}^{3/2}\right).
\end{multline}
Here $N_\mathrm{A}$ is the Avogadro number,
$k_\mathrm{B}$ the Boltzmann constant,
$T$ temperature,
$b$ the vdW excluded volume
and $a$ the
average value of the attractive interaction energy per unit concentration. $\lambda_\mathrm{th}=(2\pi\hbar^2/mk_\mathrm{B} T)$
is the thermal wavelength.
According to linear irreversible thermodynamics \cite{deGroot_1984_Book_non-equilibrium_thermodynamics}, the diffusive particle flux $J_\mathrm{D}$ follows from the
gradient of the chemical potential,
$J_\mathrm{D} \propto \partial_x \mu $. The continuity equation $\partial_tc = -\partial_x J_\mathrm{D}$ then yields a diffusion equation
with a concentration-dependent diffusion coefficient
\begin{equation}\label{eq:diffusion_constant_nonliner}
D(c) = D \mathcal{D}(c)=D \left[ \left(1+\frac{c}{c_\infty-c}\right)^2 - e_\mathrm{A} c\right],
\end{equation}
where we identified the saturation concentration
$c_\infty = 1/N_\mathrm{A}b$ and the attractive energy
$e_\mathrm{A} = 2aN_\mathrm{A}/ k_BT$.
$D(c)$ has a singularity for $c=c_\infty$, reminiscent of
hard core repulsion, increasing diffusion at high concentrations.
The energetic term leads to a slow down of diffusion for intermediate concentrations due to the attraction.
We limit our discussion to the supercritical vdW fluid,
i.e., the temperature is above the critical temperature $k_\mathrm{B} T_\mathrm{c} = 8a/27b$ \cite{Johnston_2014_Adv_Thdyn_vdw_fluid}, corresponding
to attractive energies $e_A<e_\mathrm{A}^\mathrm{(c)}=27/4c_\infty$.
We note that the effects of this
concentration-dependent
diffusion coefficient
have been
observed experimentally \cite{Crank_1975_Book_Mathematics_Diffusion},
for instance in the context
of
binary liquids
\cite{Bardow_2005_JFluid_c_dep_diffusion_ethylacetate_cyclohexane} and
colloidal suspensions of hard spheres \cite{Peppin_2006_JFluidMech_Solidification_colloidal_suspensions}. It has been used in models for bacterial growth \cite{Muller_2002_PRE_Nonlinear_diffusion_bacterial_growth}
and very recently also for excluded volume effects of myosins in cells
\cite{recho_new}.
In addition to performing diffusion, the myosin motors are advected by the active gel,
$\partial_t c = -\partial_x( v c) + \partial_x( D(c) \partial_x c)$. We consider
no-flux boundary conditions at the edges, i.e., $\partial_xc(l_\pm)=0$.
Following earlier work along these lines \cite{Recho_2015_JMPS_Mechanics_motility_initiation_arrest, Drozdowski_2021_PRE_Optgen_control_flow_migration}, we non-dimensionalize length by $L_0$, time by $L_0^2/D$, stress by $k$, and concentration by $c_0=\int c\,dx / L_0$. We then map the problem on the interval $[0,1]$ using $u=(x-l_-)/L$ and get three dimensionless model parameters:
the hydrodynamic damping length $\mathcal{L}=\sqrt{\eta/(\xi L_0^2)}$ arising from the competition between viscous and frictional dissipation;
the P\'eclet number $\Peclet=k/\xi D$ describing the importance of advection versus diffusion; and
myosin contractility $\mathcal{P}=\chi c_0/k$. The inverse P\'eclet number $\mathcal{A}=1/\Peclet$
can also be interpreted as adhesion strength, because a large value of $\mathcal{A}$ corresponds to strong friction if $\mathcal{L}^2\mathcal{A}=D\eta/k L_0^2$ is kept fixed, which is a combination of quantities that typically cannot be changed in experiments.
In the following, adhesiveness $\mathcal{A}$ and contractility
$\mathcal{P}$ are considered as the main parameters,
as experimentally they are known to control transitions in cell state.
Defining the cell center $G=(l_++l_-)/2$ and the
advection velocity $\hat{v}(u)=-\dot{G}+\dot{L}(1/2-u)$, and rescaling $\tilde{c}=Lc$,
we finally arrive at our central equations, namely the following boundary value problem (BVP):
\begin{equation}\label{eq:nondim_full_BVP}
\begin{gathered}
\mathcal{L}^2/L^2\ \partial_u^2 \sigma - \sigma = -\mathcal{P}/L\ \tilde{c}, \\
\partial_t \tilde{c} + \frac{1}{L} \partial_u \left[\left(\frac{1}{\mathcal{A}L}\partial_u\sigma + \hat{v}\right) \tilde{c}\right] = \frac{1}{L^2} \partial_u [\mathcal{D}(\tilde{c}/L) \partial_u \tilde{c}],
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
with the boundary conditions $\sigma(l_\pm) = - (L-1)$ and $\partial_x c(l_\pm) = 0$.
As we will show below, this system can be comprehensively analyzed using a combination of
analytical and numerical methods.
The parameters of the model can be estimated from experimental data for crawling cells. Following earlier work \cite{Drozdowski_2021_PRE_Optgen_control_flow_migration}, one obtains $\mathcal{L}^2=1.25$ and $\mathcal{P}=0.1$. $\mathcal{A}$
can be determined from $k=10^4$\,Pa \cite{Drozdowski_2021_PRE_Optgen_control_flow_migration,Recho_2015_JMPS_Mechanics_motility_initiation_arrest, Loosley_2012, Barnhart_2010}, $\xi = 2\cdot10^{14}$\,Pa\,s\,$/{\rm m}^{2}$ \cite{Drozdowski_2021_PRE_Optgen_control_flow_migration,Barnhart_2011_PLOS_Adhesive_dependent_mechanisms_motile_cell_shape} and $D = 0.7\cdot10^{-12}$\,${\rm m}^{2}/$\,s to be $\mathcal{A}\approx 1/70$.
A rough estimate for the volume of one (unclustered) myosin motor is $10^2$\,nm$^2$\,$\cdot$\,$100$\,nm and the myosin concentration in cells is of the order of $c_0\approx\mu$M \cite{Robinson_2002_flux_myosin_cytokinesis_concentration}. This implies the estimate $c_\infty=100$, not accounting, however,
for crowding in the cell or finite thickness of the cortex, which
should decrease this number. Therefore here we
use $c_\infty=10$, which implies $e_\mathrm{A}^\mathrm{(c)}%=27/40
=0.675$.
Note that for the vdW fluid $e_\mathrm{A}=20\pi e_\text{min}/9c_\infty \approx 0.7 \cdot e_\text{min}$ \cite{Johnston_2014_Adv_Thdyn_vdw_fluid},
with $e_\text{min}$
(in units of $k_\mathrm{B}T$)
the binding energy in the Lennard-Jones potential of the vdW fluid.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{fig2.pdf}
\caption{Bistability of cell migration. Panel~(a) gives the cell velocities $V$ and the length differences from the sessile state, $\Delta L = L-\hat{L}_+$, for the obtained
solution branches as a function of P\'eclet number $\Peclet$ for different (supercritical) attractive energies $e_\mathrm{A}$. The
bifurcation points are marked with circles.
Stable (unstable) solutions are shown as solid (dashed).
Panel~(b) shows the state diagram for $e_\mathrm{A}=0.63$ and for $\mathcal{L}^2\mathcal{A}=1.25/77$ fixed (containing parameters, which cannot be changed by the cell, cf.~text). Depending on adhesion strength $\mathcal{A}$ and contractility $\mathcal{P}$, one finds a sessile, bistable or motile regime.
Parameter values estimated from experiments are marked with a circle and used in panel~(c). The solid/dot-dashed curves correspond to the loci of the pitchfork/saddle node bifurcation. Panel~(c) shows normalized motor concentration profiles for experimental parameters (and $V\geq0$) in the bistable regime for the stable motile, the unstable motile and stable sessile solutions,
as solid curves. The flow velocities are shown in dashed.
}
\label{fig:Bifurcation_Diagram}
\end{figure}
We will now study the effect of the nonlinear diffusion and show that it results in bistability between sessile and motile solutions.
To find the steady states one assumes $\dot{l}_\pm=V$, with velocity $V$, $\dot{L}=0$ and steady profiles, i.e., $\sigma$ and $c$ only depend on $u$. One then obtains two coupled ordinary differential equations.
The case $\mathcal{D}(c)\equiv1$ has already been studied in \cite{Recho_2013_PRL_contraction_driven_motility, Bois_2011_PRL_Pattern_formation_active_fluids}: two non-motile solution families exist with flat stress profiles $\sigma\equiv-(L-1)$ and lengths $\hat{L}_\pm=(1\pm\sqrt{1-4\mathcal{P}})/2$. More complex solutions bifurcate from these branches. However, only two were found to be asymptotically stable, the trivial branch $\hat{L}_+$ and a motile branch bifurcating from it, with a peak in the motor concentration at the trailing edge \cite{Recho_2013_PRL_contraction_driven_motility}.
For nonlinear diffusion, a flat stress profile is still a steady state solution. In the following we focus on the bifurcation from the sessile, flat-stress state ($L=\hat{L}_+$,
$\sigma=1-\hat{L}_+$, $\hat{c}=1/\hat{L}_+$)
to the first motile state, as our numerical results suggest that these are again the only stable solutions for experimentally relevant parameters.
Fig.~\ref{fig:Bifurcation_Diagram}(a) shows the continuation
in $\Peclet$ of the solutions' cell length and velocity.
We see that approaching the critical $e_\mathrm{A}^\mathrm{(c)}$ from below renders the supercritical
pitchfork bifurcation toward the motile solution
to be subcritical, implying bistability.
Analytically obtained bifurcation points (cf. SI), indicated as circles, agree with the numerics,
showing that
increasing the attraction $e_A$ in addition decreases the value of $\Peclet$ at which the bifurcation occurs.
Hence attractive interactions
both induce bistablity and reduce
the motility threshold.
We also investigated the full, time-dependent BVP numerically,
using the discontinuous Galerkin finite elements method \cite{Ern_2009_JNumAna_discon_galerkin_SWIP_advection_diffusion, Alnaes_2015_FEniCS} (see SI for details),
and found that indeed both solutions
marked in
Fig.~\ref{fig:Bifurcation_Diagram}(a)
as solid curves
are stable in the bistable regime (cf.~SI, Fig.~S1).
Using advanced continuation methods
(branch point and fold continuation
\cite{Doedel_2007_Book_Lecturenotes_Numerical_Continuation}), we determined the boundaries of the three different regimes
-- sessile, bistable and motile --
as shown by the state diagram
in Fig.~\ref{fig:Bifurcation_Diagram}(b).
Note that we now kept $\mathcal{L}^2\mathcal{A}$
fixed as explained above.
In Fig.~\ref{fig:Bifurcation_Diagram}(b)
we focused on the range around the experimentally reasonable values
$\mathcal{P}\approx 0.1$ and $\mathcal{A} \approx 1/77$
(a full diagram can be found in the SI).
Starting in the bistable regime,
increasing adhesion leads to a
transition to the non-motile state,
while increasing contractility favors
the motile regime.
Already a change in contractility of $5\%$ allows for these transitions.
Note that changing $e_\mathrm{A}$ shifts
all the boundaries
and hence, depending on $e_\mathrm{A}$,
also the opposite scenario can occur, i.e.~decreasing adhesion inducing motility.
Finally, Fig.~\ref{fig:Bifurcation_Diagram}(c) shows the normalized motor concentrations $Lc(u)$ of the three possible states in the
coexistence region. The
unstable branch displays
enrichment of motors
at the trailing edge, while the motile branch develops a boundary layer.
Importantly,
the volume exclusion of the vdW
limits the height of the concentration (and stress) peak at the
edges even for small $\mathcal{A}$
(cf.~SI Fig.~S1(e)).
This has to be contrasted
to the linear model,
where unrealistically large peaks develop \cite{Recho_2015_JMPS_Mechanics_motility_initiation_arrest}, and is
in agreement with experimental findings of moderate myosin enrichment \cite{Svitkina_Verkhovsky1997}.
The flow profiles $\dot{u}$
shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:Bifurcation_Diagram}(d) indicate the flow to the trailing edge.
The flow velocity is maximum in the
motor-enriched boundary region.
This,
together with the attraction and subsequent minimum diffusion,
promotes the formation of the myosin layer.
We stress that for $e_\mathrm{A}=0$
(no attraction, only excluded volume, i.e., the Tonks gas)
the concentration peaks are still limited, but bistability does not occur.
Thus, accelerating diffusion at high concentrations, as commonly assumed \cite{recho_new, Recho_2013_PRL_contraction_driven_motility}, is not sufficient in this thermodynamically consistent model to achieve bistability. We also find that one needs to be careful using a truncated Taylor expansion as this may result in changes in the criticality of the bifurcation for certain (unphysical)
parameters of the full excluded volume interaction (see SI for details).
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{fig3.pdf}
\caption{Reversal of cell migration by optogenetics. (a) Positive
activation strength $\mathcal{E}=0.07$ at the front and
(b) negative activation strength $\mathcal{E}=-0.07$ at the back
both lead to persistent reversal of migration.
The upper panels show kymographs, i.e.~material cell points as function of time in lab coordinates;
myosin concentration is color-coded.
The lower panels show cell velocity $V$ and length $L$ scaled by initial length $L(0)$.
Time periods of activation/inhibition are shaded.
}
\label{fig:kymograph_act_inhib}
\end{figure}
Having established that the model
displays bistability for experimentally realistic parameters, we next ask if optogenetics
can be used to switch between the sessile and motile solutions.
Optogenetic control of contractility usually exploits light-induced recruitment of a GTP-exchange factor to the cell membrane,
which in turn activates the RhoA signaling pathway and thus leads to an increase in myosin II contractility
\cite{Valon_2017_Nature_Optogenetic_control_cellular_forces, Oakes_2017_NatComm_Optogenetic_RhoA}.
An alternative way
has been described very recently: there a chemotaxis receptor was optogenetically activated in neutrophils,
which promotes
Rac/Cdc42-activity
and decreases contractility.
Both optogenetic strategies can be implemented in our model by introducing
an optogenetic contribution to contraction,
$\mathcal{P}\rightarrow \mathcal{P}+\mathcal{E}\Xi$, with a shape function $\Xi$ encoding the spatio-temporal activation
and $\mathcal{E}$ the activation strength
\cite{Drozdowski_2021_PRE_Optgen_control_flow_migration}.
$\mathcal{E}$ is positive (negative), depending on whether one activates (inhibits) myosin II contractility.
We consider a box-shaped function
within an activation region $U_\mathrm{act}$,
i.e., $\Xi(u,t)=1$ only if $u\in U_\mathrm{act}$ and $t\in [t_\mathrm{on},t_\mathrm{off}]$
with turn-on/turn-off times
$t_\mathrm{on}$ and $t_\mathrm{off}$.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{fig4.pdf}
\caption{Optogenetic initiation/arrest of motility.
(a) Motility can be initiated by optogenetically perturbing the flat motor concentration %profile
in (the left) half of the cell; activation $\mathcal{E}/\mathcal{P}=1.2\%, 0.8\%$ for A, B.
(b) Motility can be arrested or reoriented when a motile steady state is activated in the leading (right)
half; activation $\mathcal{E}/\mathcal{P}=6.7\%, 6.6\%, 4\%$ for A, B, and C. Solid curves are simulations and dashed (dotted) lines represent
stable (unstable) steady states; motile (non-motile) states
are in grey (black).
Time periods of activation are shaded.}
\label{fig:optogenetic_perturbation}
\end{figure}
Fig.~\ref{fig:kymograph_act_inhib} shows that
both activation in the front half (a) and inhibition in the back half (b)
can be used to induce reversals of direction of cell migration.
While the first protocol has not been experimentally explored yet, both the simulated trajectories and changes in length for the latter correspond well to the recent experimental results
\cite{Hadjitheodorou_2021_NatComm_Reorientation_migrating_neutrophils}. Note that initiating motility through activation would also speak in favor of contractility saturation not being central in this context.
In the activation protocol
the cell contracts as contractility is increased. The effect of the perturbation builds up throughout the activation period, since length and velocity are governed by the integrated active stress (see SI).
For the inhibition scenario
the effect is opposite, as we inhibit in the half with higher initial concentration:
an immediate length response and a more gradual velocity change is obtained.
In particular, we predict a decrease of $|V|$ after turn-off, exactly as
observed experimentally \cite{Hadjitheodorou_2021_NatComm_Reorientation_migrating_neutrophils}.
We next address the question if optogenetic control of contractility can be used to initiate or
arrest motility of cells inside the bistable regime.
In Fig.~\ref{fig:optogenetic_perturbation}(a) we started with
the non-motile steady state
and activated the cell's left half.
Motility is indeed initiated for $\mathcal{E}$ as small as 1.2\% of $\mathcal{P}$. Increasing $\mathcal{E}$
further leads to faster initiation.
For the smaller $\mathcal{E}$ shown,
the perturbation is not sufficiently strong for the induced flow to overcome diffusion and the system cannot leave the basin of attraction of the sessile state.
In Fig.~\ref{fig:optogenetic_perturbation}(b)
we started with
the motile steady state (moving to the right) and activated
the right (leading) half. Compared to the case in (a), now larger perturbations are required,
because in the motile regime the advection from motility is dominating
and has to be overcome.
Arrest is possible only when fine-tuning
the turn-off of the optogenetic signal: it has to occur in the "re-symmetrized region"
that belongs to the basin of attraction of the sessile solution;
activating beyond this point rather
induces reorientation.
Again, larger strengths $\mathcal{E}$ lead to faster arrest/reorientation.
Having demonstrated the possibility to initiate or arrest cell migration
by optogenetics, we finally predict the corresponding time scales.
In Fig.~\ref{fig:optogenetic_initiation_times} we show the time $t_\mathrm{ini}$
at which the steady state velocity is reached.
We find that $t_\mathrm{ini}$ is larger for stronger adhesion, as one would expect.
Initiation is faster for larger activation strengths, with an asymptotic dependence of $t_\mathrm{ini}\sim(\mathcal{E}/\mathcal{P})^{-1}$, cf. Fig.~\ref{fig:optogenetic_initiation_times}(a).
Using continuation of the optogenetically perturbed system (cf. SI), we determined the lower initiation boundary for different adhesions, see Fig.~\ref{fig:optogenetic_initiation_times}(b).
We find that increasing adhesion not only affects the stability of the steady states, but also slows down the dynamics and increases the necessary activation strength.
Note that this can be tested experimentally, as activation strength has
been shown to depend on the illuminated area in optogenetic experiments \cite{Oakes_2017_NatComm_Optogenetic_RhoA}.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{fig5.pdf}
\caption{Initiation times of motility in the bistable regime. (a) For different levels of adhesion the initiation time $t_\mathrm{ini}$ for motility differs, where $\mathcal{A}=0.013$ corresponds to $\Peclet=77$. Time $t_\mathrm{ini}$ decreases for larger activations $\mathcal{E}/\mathcal{P}$, asymptotically decaying as $t_\mathrm{ini}\sim(\mathcal{E}/\mathcal{P})^{-1}$. (b) For larger adhesion $t_\mathrm{ini}$ grows larger, with concomitantly increasing minimal activation $\mathcal{E}/\mathcal{P}$ necessary for motility initiation. The dashed line is the initiation threshold, obtained using continuation.}
\label{fig:optogenetic_initiation_times}
\end{figure}
\begin{comment}
In summary, we have shown that active gel theory
can explain bistability and optogenetic switching in cell crawling
when the myosins are described as supercritical vdW-fluid.
Actin polymerization could be included through boundary
conditions as done earlier \cite{ Recho_2013_PRE_pusshing_pulling_crawling_cells,Drozdowski_2021_PRE_Optgen_control_flow_migration},
but here we focused on demonstrating that myosin II contractility is sufficient
to explain bistability and switching. The model predictions agree well
with recent experiments of cell motility inside channels \cite{Hadjitheodorou_2021_NatComm_Reorientation_migrating_neutrophils}, including
the time scale of motility arrest and perturbations.
The experimental cell velocity and reorientation response
are slightly faster than predicted here.
However, the time scale of our model
is set by the myosin II effective diffusion coefficient $D$,
which in practice could be larger than for free diffusion due to processes
like polymerization that are not being considered here.
More biological details might be added in the future, but the present work
demonstrates that incorporating volume exclusion and attraction in active
gel theory is sufficient to identify the fundamental
physical processes underlying crawling of contractile cells, with far reaching consequences
also for the design of synthetic motile cells.
\end{comment}
This research was conducted within the Max Planck School Matter to Life supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
in collaboration with the Max Planck Society. We also acknowledge support
by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – Projektnummer 390978043.
USS is member of the Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing (IWR) at Heidelberg.
\bibliographystyle{apsrev4-1}
\bibliography{references}{}
\end{document}
%
% ****** End of file apssamp.tex ******
%merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked
%Control: key (0)
%Control: author (72) initials jnrlst
%Control: editor formatted (1) identically to author
%Control: production of article title (-1) disabled
%Control: page (0) single
%Control: year (1) truncated
%Control: production of eprint (0) enabled
\begin{thebibliography}{33}%
\makeatletter
\providecommand \@ifxundefined [1]{%
\@ifx{#1\undefined}
}%
\providecommand \@ifnum [1]{%
\ifnum #1\expandafter \@firstoftwo
\else \expandafter \@secondoftwo
\fi
}%
\providecommand \@ifx [1]{%
\ifx #1\expandafter \@firstoftwo
\else \expandafter \@secondoftwo
\fi
}%
\providecommand \natexlab [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \enquote [1]{``#1''}%
\providecommand \bibnamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \bibfnamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \citenamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \href@noop [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \href [0]{\begingroup \@sanitize@url \@href}%
\providecommand \@href[1]{\@@startlink{#1}\@@href}%
\providecommand \@@href[1]{\endgroup#1\@@endlink}%
\providecommand \@sanitize@url [0]{\catcode `\\12\catcode `\$12\catcode
`\&12\catcode `\#12\catcode `\^12\catcode `\_12\catcode `\%12\relax}%
\providecommand \@@startlink[1]{}%
\providecommand \@@endlink[0]{}%
\providecommand \url [0]{\begingroup\@sanitize@url \@url }%
\providecommand \@url [1]{\endgroup\@href {#1}{\urlprefix }}%
\providecommand \urlprefix [0]{URL }%
\providecommand \Eprint [0]{\href }%
\providecommand \doibase [0]{http://dx.doi.org/}%
\providecommand \selectlanguage [0]{\@gobble}%
\providecommand \bibinfo [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \bibfield [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \translation [1]{[#1]}%
\providecommand \BibitemOpen [0]{}%
\providecommand \bibitemStop [0]{}%
\providecommand \bibitemNoStop [0]{.\EOS\space}%
\providecommand \EOS [0]{\spacefactor3000\relax}%
\providecommand \BibitemShut [1]{\csname bibitem#1\endcsname}%
\let\auto@bib@innerbib\@empty
%</preamble>
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Bodor}\ \emph {et~al.}(2020)\citenamefont {Bodor},
\citenamefont {Pönisch}, \citenamefont {Endres},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Paluch}}]{Bodor_2020_DevCell_Cell_shapes_motion_physical_basis_migration}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~L.}\ \bibnamefont
{Bodor}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Pönisch}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~G.}\ \bibnamefont {Endres}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.~K.}\ \bibnamefont {Paluch}},\ }\href
{\doibase https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2020.02.013} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Dev. Cell}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {52}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {550} (\bibinfo {year} {2020})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {G\"opfrich}\ \emph {et~al.}(2018)\citenamefont
{G\"opfrich}, \citenamefont {Platzman},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Spatz}}]{Goepfrich_2018_TendsBioTech_Bottom_up_construction_synth_cells}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont
{G\"opfrich}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.}~\bibnamefont
{Platzman}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~P.}\ \bibnamefont
{Spatz}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.03.008} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Trends Biotechnol.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {36}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {938 } (\bibinfo {year}
{2018})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Ridley}\ \emph {et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont {Ridley},
\citenamefont {Schwartz}, \citenamefont {Burridge}, \citenamefont {Firtel},
\citenamefont {Ginsberg}, \citenamefont {Borisy}, \citenamefont {Parsons},\
and\ \citenamefont
{Horwitz}}]{Ridley_2003_Science_cell_mirgration_integrating_signals}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Ridley}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~A.}\ \bibnamefont
{Schwartz}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont {Burridge}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~A.}\ \bibnamefont {Firtel}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~H.}\ \bibnamefont {Ginsberg}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Borisy}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{J.~T.}\ \bibnamefont {Parsons}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{A.~R.}\ \bibnamefont {Horwitz}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1126/science.1092053}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Science}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {302}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {1704} (\bibinfo {year}
{2003})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Verkhovsky}\ \emph {et~al.}(1999)\citenamefont
{Verkhovsky}, \citenamefont {Svitkina},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Borisy}}]{Verkhovsky_1999_CurrBiol_Selfpolarization_directional_motility}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~B.}\ \bibnamefont
{Verkhovsky}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Svitkina}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.~G.}\ \bibnamefont
{Borisy}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80042-6} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Curr. Biol.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{9}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {11 } (\bibinfo {year} {1999})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Ziebert}\ \emph {et~al.}(2012)\citenamefont
{Ziebert}, \citenamefont {Swaminathan},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Aranson}}]{ziebert_lam}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont
{Ziebert}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Swaminathan}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.~S.}\ \bibnamefont
{Aranson}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1098/rsif.2011.0433} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {J. R. Soc. Interface}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{9}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {1084} (\bibinfo {year} {2012})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Hadjitheodorou}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont
{Hadjitheodorou}, \citenamefont {Bell}, \citenamefont {Ellett}, \citenamefont
{Shastry}, \citenamefont {Irimia}, \citenamefont {Collins},\ and\
\citenamefont
{Theriot}}]{Hadjitheodorou_2021_NatComm_Reorientation_migrating_neutrophils}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Hadjitheodorou}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.~R.~R.}\ \bibnamefont
{Bell}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Ellett}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Shastry}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont {Irimia}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {S.~R.}\ \bibnamefont {Collins}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {J.~A.}\ \bibnamefont {Theriot}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1038/s41467-021-26622-z} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Nat.
Commun.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {12}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {6619}
(\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Blanch-Mercader}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Casademunt}(2013)}]{CasademuntPRL}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont
{Blanch-Mercader}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{Casademunt}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.078102} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {110}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {078102} (\bibinfo {year}
{2013})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Oakes}\ \emph {et~al.}(2017)\citenamefont {Oakes},
\citenamefont {Wagner}, \citenamefont {Brand}, \citenamefont {Probst},
\citenamefont {Linke}, \citenamefont {Schwarz}, \citenamefont {Glotzer},\
and\ \citenamefont {Gardel}}]{Oakes_2017_NatComm_Optogenetic_RhoA}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~W.}\ \bibnamefont
{Oakes}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont {Wagner}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.~A.}\ \bibnamefont {Brand}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont {Probst}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Linke}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{U.~S.}\ \bibnamefont {Schwarz}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{M.}~\bibnamefont {Glotzer}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{M.~L.}\ \bibnamefont {Gardel}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1038/ncomms15817}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Nat. Commun.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {8}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {15817} (\bibinfo {year}
{2017})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Valon}\ \emph {et~al.}(2017)\citenamefont {Valon},
\citenamefont {Marín-Llaurado}, \citenamefont {Wyatt}, \citenamefont
{Charras},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Trepat}}]{Valon_2017_Nature_Optogenetic_control_cellular_forces}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Valon}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Marín-Llaurado}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont
{Wyatt}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Charras}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {X.}~\bibnamefont {Trepat}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1038/ncomms14396} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Nat. Commun.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {8}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {14396}
(\bibinfo {year} {2017})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Kruse}\ \emph {et~al.}(2004)\citenamefont {Kruse},
\citenamefont {Joanny}, \citenamefont {Jülicher}, \citenamefont {Prost},\
and\ \citenamefont {Sekimoto}}]{KrusePRL04}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont
{Kruse}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~F.}\ \bibnamefont {Joanny}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Jülicher}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Prost}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont {Sekimoto}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.078101} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {92}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{078101} (\bibinfo {year} {2004})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Prost}\ \emph {et~al.}(2015)\citenamefont {Prost},
\citenamefont {J{\"u}licher},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Joanny}}]{Prost_2015_Nature_Review_active_gel_physics}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{Prost}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {J{\"u}licher}},
\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.-F.}\ \bibnamefont {Joanny}},\
}\href {\doibase 10.1038/nphys3224} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Nat. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {11}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{111} (\bibinfo {year} {2015})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Kruse}\ \emph {et~al.}(2006)\citenamefont {Kruse},
\citenamefont {Joanny}, \citenamefont {Jülicher},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Prost}}]{Kruse_PhysBiol}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont
{Kruse}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~F.}\ \bibnamefont {Joanny}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Jülicher}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Prost}},\ }\href@noop {}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Biol.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {3}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {130} (\bibinfo {year} {2006})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Recho}\ \emph {et~al.}(2015)\citenamefont {Recho},
\citenamefont {Putelat},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Truskinovsky}}]{Recho_2015_JMPS_Mechanics_motility_initiation_arrest}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Recho}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Putelat}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Truskinovsky}},\
}\href {\doibase 10.1016/j.jmps.2015.08.006} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {J. Mech. Phys. Solids}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {84}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {469 } (\bibinfo {year} {2015})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Lavi}\ \emph {et~al.}(2020)\citenamefont {Lavi},
\citenamefont {Meunier}, \citenamefont {Voituriez},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Casademunt}}]{Lavi_2020_PRE_motiltiy_confined_droplet}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.}~\bibnamefont
{Lavi}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {N.}~\bibnamefont {Meunier}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont {Voituriez}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Casademunt}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevE.101.022404} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. E}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {101}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {022404} (\bibinfo {year} {2020})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Wills}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Winzor}(2005)}]{Wills_2005_ActCryD_vdw_phase_protein_solutions}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~R.}\ \bibnamefont
{Wills}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Winzor}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1107/S0907444905013569} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Acta Crystallogr. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{61}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {832} (\bibinfo {year} {2005})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Drozdowski}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont
{Drozdowski}, \citenamefont {Ziebert},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Schwarz}}]{Drozdowski_2021_PRE_Optgen_control_flow_migration}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {O.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Drozdowski}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Ziebert}},
\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {U.~S.}\ \bibnamefont {Schwarz}},\
}\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.024406} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. E}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {104}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {024406} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Johnston}(2014)}]{Johnston_2014_Adv_Thdyn_vdw_fluid}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont
{Johnston}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1088/978-1-627-05532-1} {\emph {\bibinfo
{title} {Advances in Thermodynamics of the van der Waals Fluid}}}\ (\bibinfo
{publisher} {Morgan \& Claypool Publishers},\ \bibinfo {address} {San Rafael,
CA},\ \bibinfo {year} {2014})\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Groot}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Mazur}(1984)}]{deGroot_1984_Book_non-equilibrium_thermodynamics}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~R.~d.}\
\bibnamefont {Groot}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{P.}~\bibnamefont {Mazur}},\ }\href@noop {} {\emph {\bibinfo {title}
{Non-Equilibrium thermodynamics}}}\ (\bibinfo {publisher} {Dover Publ.},\
\bibinfo {address} {New York},\ \bibinfo {year} {1984})\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont
{Crank}(1975)}]{Crank_1975_Book_Mathematics_Diffusion}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{Crank}},\ }\href@noop {} {\emph {\bibinfo {title} {The mathematics of
diffusion}}}\ (\bibinfo {publisher} {Clarendon Press},\ \bibinfo {address}
{Oxford},\ \bibinfo {year} {1975})\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Bardow}\ \emph {et~al.}(2005)\citenamefont {Bardow},
\citenamefont {G\"oke}, \citenamefont {Ko{\ss}}, \citenamefont {Lucas},\ and\
\citenamefont
{Marquardt}}]{Bardow_2005_JFluid_c_dep_diffusion_ethylacetate_cyclohexane}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Bardow}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.}~\bibnamefont {G\"oke}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.-J.}\ \bibnamefont {Ko{\ss}}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont {Lucas}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Marquardt}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1016/j.fluid.2004.08.017} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Fluid Ph. Equilibria}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {228-229}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {357} (\bibinfo {year} {2005})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Peppin}\ \emph {et~al.}(2006)\citenamefont {Peppin},
\citenamefont {Elliott},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Worster}}]{Peppin_2006_JFluidMech_Solidification_colloidal_suspensions}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~S.~L.}\
\bibnamefont {Peppin}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~A.~W.}\
\bibnamefont {Elliott}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~G.}\
\bibnamefont {Worster}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1017/S0022112006009268}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {J. Fluid Mech.}\ }\textbf
{\bibinfo {volume} {554}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {147–166} (\bibinfo {year}
{2006})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {M\"uller}\ and\ \citenamefont {van
Saarloos}(2002)}]{Muller_2002_PRE_Nonlinear_diffusion_bacterial_growth}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{M\"uller}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {van
Saarloos}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.061111} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. E}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{65}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {061111} (\bibinfo {year} {2002})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Chelly}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Recho}(2021)}]{recho_new}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.}~\bibnamefont
{Chelly}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont {Recho}},\
}\href@noop {} {\enquote {\bibinfo {title} {Cell motility as an energy
minimization process},}\ }\bibinfo {howpublished} {arXiv:2112.10083}
(\bibinfo {year} {2021})\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Loosley}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Tang}(2012)}]{Loosley_2012}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Loosley}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~X.}\ \bibnamefont
{Tang}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.031908} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. E}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {86}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {031908} (\bibinfo {year} {2012})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Barnhart}\ \emph {et~al.}(2010)\citenamefont
{Barnhart}, \citenamefont {Allen}, \citenamefont {J{\"u}licher},\ and\
\citenamefont {Theriot}}]{Barnhart_2010}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.~L.}\ \bibnamefont
{Barnhart}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.~M.}\ \bibnamefont {Allen}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {J{\"u}licher}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~A.}\ \bibnamefont {Theriot}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.10.058} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Biophys. J.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {98}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{933} (\bibinfo {year} {2010})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Barnhart}\ \emph {et~al.}(2011)\citenamefont
{Barnhart}, \citenamefont {Lee}, \citenamefont {Keren}, \citenamefont
{Mogilner},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Theriot}}]{Barnhart_2011_PLOS_Adhesive_dependent_mechanisms_motile_cell_shape}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.~L.}\ \bibnamefont
{Barnhart}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.-C.}\ \bibnamefont {Lee}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont {Keren}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Mogilner}}, \ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~A.}\ \bibnamefont {Theriot}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1371/journal.pbio.1001059} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{PLOS Biol.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {9}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {1}
(\bibinfo {year} {2011})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Robinson}\ \emph {et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont
{Robinson}, \citenamefont {Cavet}, \citenamefont {Warrick},\ and\
\citenamefont
{Spudich}}]{Robinson_2002_flux_myosin_cytokinesis_concentration}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~N.}\ \bibnamefont
{Robinson}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Cavet}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.~M.}\ \bibnamefont {Warrick}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~A.}\ \bibnamefont {Spudich}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1186/1471-2121-3-4} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{BMC Cell Biol.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {3}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {4}
(\bibinfo {year} {2002})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Recho}\ \emph {et~al.}(2013)\citenamefont {Recho},
\citenamefont {Putelat},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Truskinovsky}}]{Recho_2013_PRL_contraction_driven_motility}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Recho}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Putelat}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Truskinovsky}},\
}\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.108102} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {111}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {108102} (\bibinfo {year} {2013})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Bois}\ \emph {et~al.}(2011)\citenamefont {Bois},
\citenamefont {J\"ulicher},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Grill}}]{Bois_2011_PRL_Pattern_formation_active_fluids}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~S.}\ \bibnamefont
{Bois}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {J\"ulicher}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~W.}\ \bibnamefont {Grill}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.028103} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {106}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {028103} (\bibinfo {year} {2011})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Ern}\ \emph {et~al.}(2009)\citenamefont {Ern},
\citenamefont {Stephansen},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Zunino}}]{Ern_2009_JNumAna_discon_galerkin_SWIP_advection_diffusion}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Ern}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~F.}\ \bibnamefont {Stephansen}},
\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont {Zunino}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1093/imanum/drm050} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{IMA J. Numer. Anal.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {29}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{235} (\bibinfo {year} {2009})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Aln{\ae}s}\ \emph {et~al.}(2015)\citenamefont
{Aln{\ae}s}, \citenamefont {Blechta}, \citenamefont {Hake}, \citenamefont
{Johansson}, \citenamefont {Kehlet}, \citenamefont {Logg}, \citenamefont
{Richardson}, \citenamefont {Ring}, \citenamefont {Rognes},\ and\
\citenamefont {Wells}}]{Alnaes_2015_FEniCS}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Aln{\ae}s}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Blechta}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Hake}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Johansson}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {B.}~\bibnamefont {Kehlet}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{A.}~\bibnamefont {Logg}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont
{Richardson}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Ring}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~E.}\ \bibnamefont {Rognes}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.~N.}\ \bibnamefont {Wells}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.11588/ans.2015.100.20553} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Arch. Numer. Softw.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {3}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {9} (\bibinfo {year} {2015})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont
{Doedel}(2007)}]{Doedel_2007_Book_Lecturenotes_Numerical_Continuation}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.~J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Doedel}},\ }\enquote {\bibinfo {title} {Lecture notes on numerical analysis
of nonlinear equations},}\ in\ \href {\doibase 10.1007/978-1-4020-6356-5_1}
{\emph {\bibinfo {booktitle} {Numerical Continuation Methods for Dynamical
Systems: Path following and boundary value problems}}},\ \bibinfo {editor}
{edited by\ \bibinfo {editor} {\bibfnamefont {B.}~\bibnamefont {Krauskopf}},
\bibinfo {editor} {\bibfnamefont {H.~M.}\ \bibnamefont {Osinga}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {editor} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Gal{\'a}n-Vioque}}}\
(\bibinfo {publisher} {Springer Netherlands},\ \bibinfo {address}
{Dordrecht},\ \bibinfo {year} {2007})\ Chap.~\bibinfo {chapter} {1}, pp.\
\bibinfo {pages} {1--49}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Svitkina}\ \emph {et~al.}(1997)\citenamefont
{Svitkina}, \citenamefont {Verkhovsky}, \citenamefont {McQuade},\ and\
\citenamefont {Borisy}}]{Svitkina_Verkhovsky1997}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Svitkina}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~B.}\ \bibnamefont
{Verkhovsky}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{McQuade}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.~G.}\ \bibnamefont
{Borisy}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1083/jcb.139.2.397} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {J. Cell. Biol.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {139}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {397} (\bibinfo {year} {1997})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\end{thebibliography}%
%merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked
%Control: key (0)
%Control: author (72) initials jnrlst
%Control: editor formatted (1) identically to author
%Control: production of article title (-1) disabled
%Control: page (0) single
%Control: year (1) truncated
%Control: production of eprint (0) enabled
\begin{thebibliography}{8}%
\makeatletter
\providecommand \@ifxundefined [1]{%
\@ifx{#1\undefined}
}%
\providecommand \@ifnum [1]{%
\ifnum #1\expandafter \@firstoftwo
\else \expandafter \@secondoftwo
\fi
}%
\providecommand \@ifx [1]{%
\ifx #1\expandafter \@firstoftwo
\else \expandafter \@secondoftwo
\fi
}%
\providecommand \natexlab [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \enquote [1]{``#1''}%
\providecommand \bibnamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \bibfnamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \citenamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \href@noop [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \href [0]{\begingroup \@sanitize@url \@href}%
\providecommand \@href[1]{\@@startlink{#1}\@@href}%
\providecommand \@@href[1]{\endgroup#1\@@endlink}%
\providecommand \@sanitize@url [0]{\catcode `\\12\catcode `\$12\catcode
`\&12\catcode `\#12\catcode `\^12\catcode `\_12\catcode `\%12\relax}%
\providecommand \@@startlink[1]{}%
\providecommand \@@endlink[0]{}%
\providecommand \url [0]{\begingroup\@sanitize@url \@url }%
\providecommand \@url [1]{\endgroup\@href {#1}{\urlprefix }}%
\providecommand \urlprefix [0]{URL }%
\providecommand \Eprint [0]{\href }%
\providecommand \doibase [0]{http://dx.doi.org/}%
\providecommand \selectlanguage [0]{\@gobble}%
\providecommand \bibinfo [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \bibfield [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \translation [1]{[#1]}%
\providecommand \BibitemOpen [0]{}%
\providecommand \bibitemStop [0]{}%
\providecommand \bibitemNoStop [0]{.\EOS\space}%
\providecommand \EOS [0]{\spacefactor3000\relax}%
\providecommand \BibitemShut [1]{\csname bibitem#1\endcsname}%
\let\auto@bib@innerbib\@empty
%</preamble>
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Recho}\ \emph {et~al.}(2015)\citenamefont {Recho},
\citenamefont {Putelat},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Truskinovsky}}]{Recho_2015_JMPS_Mechanics_motility_initiation_arrest}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Recho}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Putelat}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Truskinovsky}},\
}\href {\doibase 10.1016/j.jmps.2015.08.006} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {J. Mech. Phys. Solids}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {84}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {469 } (\bibinfo {year} {2015})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Doedel}\ \emph {et~al.}(2007)\citenamefont {Doedel},
\citenamefont {Champneys}, \citenamefont {Dercole}, \citenamefont
{Fairgrieve}, \citenamefont {Kuznetsov}, \citenamefont {Oldeman},
\citenamefont {Paffenroth}, \citenamefont {Sandstede}, \citenamefont {Wang},\
and\ \citenamefont {Zhang}}]{Doedel_2007_AUTO07p}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.~J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Doedel}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~R.}\ \bibnamefont
{Champneys}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Dercole}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~F.}\ \bibnamefont {Fairgrieve}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Y.~A.}\ \bibnamefont {Kuznetsov}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {B.}~\bibnamefont {Oldeman}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont {Paffenroth}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {B.}~\bibnamefont {Sandstede}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {X.}~\bibnamefont {Wang}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Zhang}},\ }\href@noop {} {\enquote
{\bibinfo {title} {{AUTO-07P}: Continuation and bifurcation software for
ordinary differential equations},}\ } (\bibinfo {year} {2007})\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Ern}\ \emph {et~al.}(2009)\citenamefont {Ern},
\citenamefont {Stephansen},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Zunino}}]{Ern_2009_JNumAna_discon_galerkin_SWIP_advection_diffusion}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Ern}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~F.}\ \bibnamefont {Stephansen}},
\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont {Zunino}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1093/imanum/drm050} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{IMA J. Numer. Anal.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {29}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{235} (\bibinfo {year} {2009})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Aln{\ae}s}\ \emph {et~al.}(2015)\citenamefont
{Aln{\ae}s}, \citenamefont {Blechta}, \citenamefont {Hake}, \citenamefont
{Johansson}, \citenamefont {Kehlet}, \citenamefont {Logg}, \citenamefont
{Richardson}, \citenamefont {Ring}, \citenamefont {Rognes},\ and\
\citenamefont {Wells}}]{Alnaes_2015_FEniCS}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Aln{\ae}s}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Blechta}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Hake}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Johansson}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {B.}~\bibnamefont {Kehlet}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{A.}~\bibnamefont {Logg}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont
{Richardson}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Ring}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~E.}\ \bibnamefont {Rognes}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.~N.}\ \bibnamefont {Wells}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.11588/ans.2015.100.20553} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Arch. Numer. Softw.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {3}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {9} (\bibinfo {year} {2015})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Tonks}(1936)}]{Tonks_gas_PR}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Tonks}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRev.50.955} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {50}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {955} (\bibinfo {year} {1936})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Chelly}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Recho}(2021)}]{recho_new}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.}~\bibnamefont
{Chelly}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont {Recho}},\
}\href@noop {} {\enquote {\bibinfo {title} {Cell motility as an energy
minimization process},}\ }\bibinfo {howpublished} {arXiv:2112.10083}
(\bibinfo {year} {2021})\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Recho}\ \emph {et~al.}(2013)\citenamefont {Recho},
\citenamefont {Putelat},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Truskinovsky}}]{Recho_2013_PRL_contraction_driven_motility}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Recho}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Putelat}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Truskinovsky}},\
}\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.108102} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {111}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {108102} (\bibinfo {year} {2013})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Drozdowski}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont
{Drozdowski}, \citenamefont {Ziebert},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Schwarz}}]{Drozdowski_2021_PRE_Optgen_control_flow_migration}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {O.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Drozdowski}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Ziebert}},
\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {U.~S.}\ \bibnamefont {Schwarz}},\
}\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.024406} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. E}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {104}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {024406} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\end{thebibliography}%