de Sitter Fractional Quantum Cosmology
Extracted source text · arXiv 2206.07818
% ****** Start of file apssamp.tex ******
%
% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4.2 distribution.
% Version 4.2a of REVTeX, December 2014
%
% Copyright (c) 2014 The American Physical Society.
%
% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
%
% TeX'ing this file requires that you have AMS-LaTeX 2.0 installed
% as well as the rest of the prerequisites for REVTeX 4.2
%
% See the REVTeX 4 README file
% It also requires running BibTeX. The commands are as follows:
%
% 1) latex apssamp.tex
% 2) bibtex apssamp
% 3) latex apssamp.tex
% 4) latex apssamp.tex
%
\documentclass[reprint,
%superscriptaddress,
%groupedaddress,
%unsortedaddress,
%runinaddress,
%frontmatterverbose,
%preprint,
%preprintnumbers,
%nofootinbib,
%nobibnotes,
%bibnotes,
amsmath,amssymb,
aps,
%pra,
prd,
%rmp,
%prstab,
%prstper,
%floatfix,
showpacs
]{revtex4-1}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{physics}
\usepackage{amssymb}
%\usepackage{mcite}
%\usepackage{caption}
%\usepackage{setspace}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
%\usepackage{subfig}
%\usepackage{physics}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\newcommand{\red}[1]{\textcolor{red}{#1}}
\newcommand{\bl}[1]{\textcolor{blue}{#1}}
\newcommand{\ma}[1]{\textcolor{magenta}{#1}}
\newcommand{\gr}[3]{\textcolor{green}{#1}}
\usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
\usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
\usepackage{bm}% bold math
%\usepackage{hyperref}% add hypertext capabilities
%\usepackage[mathlines]{lineno}% Enable numbering of text and display math
%\linenumbers\relax % Commence numbering lines
%\usepackage[showframe,%Uncomment any one of the following lines to test
%%scale=0.7, marginratio={1:1, 2:3}, ignoreall,% default settings
%%text={7in,10in},centering,
%%margin=1.5in,
%%total={6.5in,8.75in}, top=1.2in, left=0.9in, includefoot,
%%height=10in,a5paper,hmargin={3cm,0.8in},
%]{geometry}
\begin{document}
\preprint{APS/123-QED}
\date{\today}% It is always \today, today,
% but any date may be explicitly specified
\title{ de Sitter
Fractional Quantum Cosmology}
\author{S. Jalalzadeh$^{a1}$, E.W. Oliveira Costa$^{a2}$ and P.V. Moniz$^{b3}$}
\affiliation{$^{a}$ {\it Departamento de F\'{i}sica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco,
Recife, PE, 52171-900, Brazil}\\
$^b$ {\it Departmento de F\'{i}sica, }
Centro de Matem\'atica e Aplica\c c\~oes (CMA-UBI),\\ Universidade da Beira Interior, 6200 Covilh\~a, Portugal\\
$^1${\tt shahram.jalalzadeh@ufpe.br}\\
$^2${\tt emanuel.wcosta@ufpe.br}\\
$^3${\tt pmoniz@ubi.pt}\\}
\date{\today}
\vskip -.5truecm
\begin{abstract}
We employ Riesz's fractional derivative into the Wheeler--DeWitt equation for a closed de Sitter geometry and obtain the no-boundary and tunneling wavefunctions. From the corresponding probability distributions, the event horizon of the nucleated universe can be a fractal surface with dimensions between $2\leq D<3$. Concretely, the tunneling wavefunction favors fractal dimensions less than $2.5$ and an accelerated power-law phase. Differently, the no-boundary proposal conveys fractal dimensions close to $3$, with the universe instead entering a decelerated phase.
Subsequently, we extend our discussion towards (non-trivial compact) flat and open scenarios. Results suggest that given the probability of creation of a closed inflationary universe in the tunneling proposal is exponentially suppressed, a flat or an open universe becomes favored within fractional inflationary quantum universe.
\end{abstract}
\pacs{98.80.Qc, 04.60.-m, 05.40.Fb, 05.45.Df}
%\keywords{Suggested keywords}%Use showkeys class option if keyword
%display desired
\maketitle
%\tableofcontents
%\section{Introduction}\label{S1}
%\indent
\section{Introduction}
The entire visible universe appears to be highly unique in a way that is not suggested solely by known dynamical laws.
Being more specific, from displaying a small large-scale curvature and approximate homogeneity and isotropy of the matter distribution on the largest current scales, the universe seems to demand judicious boundary conditions for its emergence. Namely, an exceptionally high degree of order in its very early stage. From such, it will then be evolving with increasing entropy, aligned with the second law of thermodynamics. The Hartle--Hawking `no-boundary' proposal \cite{Hawking1,Hawking12} and the {Linde--Vilenkin `tunneling' proposal \cite{1984ZhETF,Linde:1983mx,Linde1984,Vilenkin1,Vilenkin14,Vilenkin15,Vilenkin16}} are two popular proposals for quantum states of the model universes that accommodate this perspective \footnote{Let us remind that Vilenkin's original 1982 paper \cite{Vilenkin1} claimed that $P \sim e^{S}$, thus Vilenkin's original result coincided with Hartle and Hawking's subsequent 1983 result \cite{Hawking1}. Linde first obtained the result $P \sim e^{-S}$ in a series of papers, beginning with his first article \cite{1984ZhETF} and continuing with his subsequent papers \cite{Linde:1983mx,Linde1984}. It was stated there that Vilenkin's original result was incorrect. Vilenkin came to the same conclusion a few months later. Thus, the $P \sim e^{S}$ result obtained by Hartle and Hawking was first obtained by Vilenkin, and the $P \sim e^{-S}$ result attributed to Vilenkin was first obtained by Linde.}.
Herewith, we will consider the above context with the assistance of a new probe, not yet given widespread use. More concretely, a series of arguments and findings using fractional calculus in quantum physics have been recently presented \cite{par1}. The primary rationale is that if we limit the path integral description of quantum mechanics to Brownian paths exclusively, explaining concrete essential quantum phenomena would be complicated \cite{Laskin1}.
Due to these issues, extended variants of the Schr\"odinger equation (SE),
%especially from a broader path integral,
have been considered, where derivatives of fractional order, e.g., $\partial^\alpha / \partial x^\alpha$, $1<\alpha\leq 2$, $\alpha$ being a rational number, are used.
Such tool from fractional calculus assists
fractional quantum mechanics (FQM), where space-fractional \cite{space}, time-fractional \cite{time}, and space-time-fractional \cite{space-time} variants of the ordinary SE have been the subject of attention.
%, allowing to incorporate non-Brownian trajectories in the path integral formalism of quantum physics.
Furthermore, in the last few years, FQM has been
%proposed and
employed as a means to explore features within
quantum field theory and gravity for fractional space-time \cite{FQ1,calcagni2010quantum}, and the fractional quantum field theory at positive temperature \cite{lim2012casimir,lim2006fractional}.
It has pointed to exciting opportunities; %and sidelong connections between unexpected mathematics and physics domains.
please see \cite{FQ1,FQ2,FQ3}, for a recent survey. %about engaging FQM within a canonical route towards quantum gravity and cosmology.
%In some theories, a tentative context is that the foam structure of space-time also endorses the emergent space-time with a fractal structure. This occurs both in the case of asymptotic security \cite{Lauscher:2002sq} and in the method of causal dynamical triangulations \cite{Carlip:2015mra}. On the other hand, fractional calculus can be used to precisely change or even control the fractal dimension of any random or deterministic fractal with coordinates that can be represented as functions of an independent variable \cite{tatom1995relationship}. Therefore and
%within a constructive suppositional stand, by inserting fractional calculus features into the Wheeler--DeWitt (WDW) equation, we can prospect and extract unforeseen insights that may assist us towards quantum gravity.
%Before proceeding, let us clarify what we propose to discuss herewith.
The purpose of this paper is therefore to employ a
particular fractional WDW equation of the de Sitter (deS) space, embracing it as a probe model. We are aware of the restrictive scope but absorbing features can be retrieved. More concretely,
{for a closed de Sitter geometry,} we obtain the fractional tunneling (Linde--Vilenkin) wavefunction and the fractional extension of the no-boundary wavefunction (Hartle--Hawking), followed by computing the corresponding probability distributions. Subsequently comparing those
expressions with the corresponding usual nucleation rates of the Linde--Vilenkin and %probability
for the Hartle--Hawking deS wavefunction, our results suggest that a fractal behavior for the de Sitter horizon can be estimated: the tunneling (Linde--Vilenkin) wavefunction favors fractal dimensions less than $2.5$; whereas in the no-boundary proposal (Hartle--Hawking)
case, the corresponding wavefunction selects a fractal horizon with dimensions close to $3$. Furthermore, after nucleating, the universe may either enter an accelerated power-law phase (Linde--Vilenkin wavefunction) or may instead proceed into a decelerated phase (Hartle--Hawking case). In addition, our analysis allows to
discuss (non-trivial compact) flat and open scenarios. Since the probability of creation of a closed inflationary universe in the tunneling proposal is exponentially suppressed, a flat or an open universe emerges favored within fractional inflationary quantum universe.
%\ma{(as the Schwarzschild black hole.)}
Let us start by briefly summarizing the canonical quantization of a deS universe.
\section{Canonical quantization of a de Sitter universe}\label{S2}
%\indent
The minisuperspace ADM action for a deS universe with a positive constant curvature geometry is given by \cite{MonizBook}
\begin{multline}
\label{2-1}
S_\text{ADM}=\frac{3\pi}{4 G}\int\Big(-\frac{a(t)}{N(t)}\dot a(t)^2+\\a(t)N(t)-\frac{\Lambda}{3}N(t)a(t)^3\Big)dt,
\end{multline}
where $G$ is the gravitational constant, $\Lambda$ is the cosmological constant, $N(t)$ is the lapse function, and $a(t)$ represents the scale factor.
The minisuperspace ADM Hamiltonian for the deS universe with a positive constant curvature geometry is then given by \cite{MonizBook}
\begin{multline}
\label{2-2}
H_\text{ADM}=\\-N\left\{\frac{1}{3\pi m_\text{P}^2a(t)}\Pi^2+ \frac{3\pi m_\text{P}^2}{4}a(t)\left(1-\frac{\Lambda}{3}a(t)^2\right)\right\},
\end{multline}
where $m_\text{P}=1/\sqrt{G}$ is the Planck mass \footnote{Throughout this paper we shall work in natural units, $\hbar=c = k_B = 1$.},
and
\begin{equation}
\label{2-3}
\Pi=-\frac{3\pi m_\text{P}^2}{2}\frac{a(t)\dot a(t)}{N(t)},
\end{equation}
is the conjugate momentum of the scale factor, $a(t)$.
The WDW equation for the wavefunction of the deS universe is retrieved as \cite{Darabi}
\begin{equation}
\label{2-4}
\left\{-a^{-p}\frac{d}{da}a^p\frac{d}{da} +\left(\frac{3\pi m_\text{P}^2}{2} \right)^2a^2\left(1-\frac{\Lambda}{3}a^2\right)\right\}\Psi(a)=0,
\end{equation}
where the parameter $p$ represents the factor-ordering ambiguity \cite{Vilenkin}. In this paper, we are interested in a
%simple
semi-classical approximation, so we neglect the operator-ordering, and hence we set $p=0$. The WKB Linde--Vilenkin wavefunction of the above one-dimensional WDW equation, disregarding the preexponential factor,
is \cite{Vilenkin}
\begin{equation}
\label{2-5}
\psi_\text{LV}(a)=
\begin{cases}
e^{\int_a^L|\Pi(a')|da'},~~~~~~~~~~a<L,\\
e^{- i\int^a_{L}\Pi(a')da'+ i\frac{\pi}{4}},~~~~a\geq L,
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
where $L=\sqrt{3/\Lambda}$ is the deS horizon radius. The wavefunction decays exponentially toward $a=L$ and after that, it oscillates, describing an expanding deS universe. On the other hand, the Hartle--Hawking wavefunction is \cite{Hawking1}
\begin{equation}\label{Hartle}
\psi_\text{HH}(x)= \begin{cases}
e^{\int_a^L|\Pi(a')|da'},\hspace{2cm}a<L,\\
\cos\left(\int^a_{L}\Pi(a')da'-\frac{\pi}{4} \right), ~~~~~a\geq L.
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
The nucleation rate for the Linde--Vilenkin wavefunction in this WKB approximation is given by \cite{Vilenkin1,Vilenkin14,Vilenkin15,Vilenkin16}
\begin{multline}
\label{2-6}
\mathcal P_\text{LV} =\frac{|\psi_\text{Tun}(L)|^2}{|\psi_\text{Tun}(0)|^2}\propto e^{-2\int_0^{L}|\Pi(a')|da'}=e^{-\mathcal S_\text{DS}},
\end{multline}
where $\mathcal S_\text{DS}$ is the entropy of deS space-time \cite{Padman}
\begin{equation}
\label{2-7a}
\mathcal S_\text{DS}=\frac{4\pi L^2}{4G}=\frac{A_\text{DS}}{4G},
\end{equation}
in which $A_\text{DS}$ is the area of the horizon. According to the tunneling approach to quantum cosmology, our universe is thought to have begun in a tunneling event. The universe instantly begins a deS inflationary expansion when it nucleates \cite{Vilenkin1}.
On the other hand, the unnormalized
bare probability density for Hartle--Hawking wavefunction
can be computed from (\ref{Hartle}), bringing
\begin{multline}\label{2-7b}
\mathcal P_\text{HH}=|\psi(a<L)|^2\propto e^{2\int_0^{L}|\Pi(a')|da'}=e^{\mathcal S_\text{DS}}.
\end{multline}
It can be further added that our deS setting can be taken as a background upon quantum fluctuations may be considered. Albeit
somewhat descriptive at this
perspective,
we can take $\Lambda$ as an effective cosmological constant, associated as
$\Lambda_\text{eff}=8\pi GV_0=8\pi V_0/m_\text{P}^2$ to some
potential of some field and in a
maximum. Quantum fluctuations may
then push such field away from the maximum; such vacuum energy remains essentially constant, $V=V(0):=V_0$, if the potential is suitably flat, and the universe then expands exponentially $a(t)=\exp(t/L)$, where
\begin{equation}\label{2-16}
L:=\sqrt{\frac{3m_\text{P}^2}{8\pi V_0}}.
\end{equation}
%\ma{Now, the effective cosmological constant is given by the value
%of the inflaton scalar field, $\Lambda_\text{eff}=8\pi GV_0=8\pi V_0/m_\text{P}^2$. }
From Eqs.(\ref{2-7a}) and (\ref{2-7b}), it is clear that the tunneling and the no-boundary states lead to different
physical implications. According to the tunneling proposal, the highest probability is obtained for the smallest entropy values. Thus, the tunneling wavefunction `predicts' that the universe is likely to nucleate with the smallest possible entropy. On the contrary, the Hartle--Hawking probability is peaked at the smallest values of the cosmological constant, and thus the corresponding wavefunction tends to predict initial conditions with maximum possible entropy.
Or, in other words, the Linde--Vilenkin wavefunction `predicts' that the universe will nucleate with a large vacuum energy \cite{Vilenkin1}. Due to the negative sign in (\ref{2-7b}), the no-boundary state instead increases the contribution of empty universes with $V_0=0$ in the entire quantum state, leading to the seemingly contradictory conclusion that indefinitely huge universes are infinitely more likely than finite-sized universes. The probability in equation (\ref{2-7a}), on the other hand, promotes large values of $V_0$ capable of causing deS inflationary scenarios. As a result, it appears that the Linde--Vilenkin prescription is physically more alluring than the no-boundary prescription, as far as a deS inflation is remarked in this reduced scope of discussion.
{Nonetheless, suppose we extend
{the above as to include an explicit }
%the idea to the
inflaton scalar field. In that case, the situation changes drastically. There is a general {domain}
%constraint
$V_0\leq10^{-8}m_P^4$ derived from the amplitude constraint on gravitational waves generated during inflation in all
%inflationary
models where the effective potential does not change significantly during the final stages of inflation. Many inflationary models, including new inflation, hybrid inflation
%, and so on,
predict {that} inflation will occur at $V_0\ll10^{-8}m_P^4$.
{Subsequently,}
%After tunneling,
the minimal size of a closed inflationary universe is given by $1/H=\frac{3m_P}{8\pi\sqrt{V_0}}$. The probability of quantum creation of an inflationary universe is suppressed by a factor of $10^{-10^{10}}$ in a specific example with $V_0=10^{-12}m_P^4$ \cite{Linde:2004nz,Linde:2017pwt}. As
{remarkably} shown in Refs. \cite{Linde:2004nz,Linde:2017pwt,Coule:1999wg,Linde:2014nna}, {the} tunneling proposal, {allows the creation of a topologically compact nontrivial} open or flat universe. {Moreover, it seems more
likely to occur than the emergence of a} closed universe. Since such processes are unaffected by exponential factors, the universe can be created even if the energy density during inflation is much lower than the Planck density. After a long period of inflation, such universes become indistinguishable from isotropic flat universes.}
\section{de sitter fractional quantum cosmology}
%\ma{To be more clear, let us add to the ADM Hamiltonian (\ref{2-17}) a minimally coupled scalar field $\Phi(t)$ with potential $V(\Phi)$, as a source of slow rolling down inflation, in which $\dot\Phi^2/2\ll V(\Phi)$ and $|\ddot\Phi|\ll |dV/d\Phi|$. The inflation field, $\Phi$, is supposed to begin near the maximum of its effective potential, $V(\Phi)$. Quantum fluctuations then push the field away from the maximum. The vacuum energy remains essentially constant, $V=V(0):=V_0$, if the potential is suitably flat, and the universe expands exponentially $a(t)=\exp(t/L)$, where}
%\begin{equation}\label{2-16}
% L:=\sqrt{\frac{3m_\text{P}^2}{8\pi V_0}}.
%\end{equation}
%\ma{Now, the effective cosmological constant is given by the value
%of the inflaton scalar field, $\Lambda_\text{eff}=8\pi GV_0=8\pi V_0/m_\text{P}^2$. The probability distribution for the initial values of the scalar field in the ensemble of nucleated universes may be understood as Eq.(\ref{2-13}). The most significant values of the scalar field potential have the highest likelihood (and most minor initial size $L$). As a result, the tunneling wavefunction `predicts' that the universe will nucleate with the most incredible possible vacuum energy. This is the ideal starting point for inflation \cite{Vilenkin1}. Due to the negative sign in (\ref{2-7b}), the no-boundary state greatly increases the contribution of empty universes with $V_0=0$ in the entire quantum state, leading to the seemingly contradictory conclusion that indefinitely huge universes are infinitely more likely than finite-sized universes. The tunneling probability in equation (\ref{2-7a}), on the other hand, promotes large values of $V_0$ capable of causing inflationary scenarios. As a result, it appears that the tunneling prescription is physically superior than the no-boundary prescription.}
%\red{Paulo: maybe the transition from standard to FQC is too sudden, maybe say a bit more (\textbf{what?})of FQM and the Riesz(?) }
{Recent quantum gravity results have given a significant boost to the growing use of fractional calculus in quantum cosmology. %Despite significant differences in these inequivalent quantum gravity models, various approaches to quantum gravity, such as asymptotically safe quantum gravity
In \cite{Lauscher:2005qz,
%causal dynamical triangulations
Ambjorn:2005db,
%loop quantum gravity and spin foams
Modesto:2008jz,
%Hořava--Lifshitz gravity
Horava:2009if,
%nonlocal quantum gravity
Biswas:2011ar},
%and so on, all lead to the same result:
the dimension of space-time changes with scale. Because fractional integro-differential operators can describe these processes, using fractal processes in quantum physics is a precursor to incorporating fractional calculus into quantum theory
%The first fractal process used in quantum theory was Brownian motion. Brownian motion trajectories are extensively used in the Feynman path integral approach to quantum mechanics. Nelson's stochastic mechanics
\cite{1966PhRv79N}.
%, an attempt to provide an alternative formulation to quantum mechanics, extensively used Brownian motion.
}
%{Recent quantum gravity results have given a significant boost to the growing use of fractional calculus in quantum cosmology. Despite significant differences in these inequivalent quantum gravity models, various approaches to quantum gravity, such as asymptotically safe quantum gravity \cite{Lauscher:2005qz}, causal dynamical triangulations \cite{Ambjorn:2005db}, loop quantum gravity and spin foams \cite{Modesto:2008jz}, Hořava--Lifshitz gravity \cite{Horava:2009if}, nonlocal quantum gravity \cite{Biswas:2011ar}, and so on, all lead to the same result: the dimension of space-time changes with scale. Because fractional integro-differential operators can describe these processes, using fractal processes in quantum physics is a precursor to incorporating fractional calculus into quantum theory. The first fractal process used in quantum theory was Brownian motion. Brownian motion trajectories are extensively used in the Feynman path integral approach to quantum mechanics. Nelson's stochastic mechanics \cite{1966PhRv79N}, an attempt to provide an alternative formulation to quantum mechanics, extensively used Brownian motion.}
Let us now convey our discussion towards a fractional quantum formulation of deS space-time.
To obtain a fractional WDW equation, let us see how a fractional SE can be expressed. %Consider
{An analogy can be drawn from the diffusion equation, which is extended to the fractional diffusion equation to describe anomalous diffusion in the case of fractional generalization of quantum mechanics. Because the Schr\"odinger equation is identical to the diffusion equation up to a few constants, fractional generalization of the Schr\"odinger equation is also possible. Consider the Hamiltonian of a classical system, $H=\frac{\mathbf{p}^2}{2m}+V(\mathbf{r})$, where $\mathbf{r}$ and $\mathbf{p}$ denote the space coordinates and momentum associated with a particle of mass $m$, respectively. As previously stated, the Brownian-like quantum mechanical trajectories used in Feynman's framework are replaced by L\'evy-like ones in the Laskin approach. Applying a natural generalization of the preceding classical Hamiltonian as $H_\alpha(\mathbf p, \mathbf r) := D_\alpha |\mathbf p|^\alpha+ V(\mathbf r)$, where $1< \alpha\leq 2$ is the L\'evy's fractional parameter and it is associated to the concept of L\'evy path \cite{par1}, $D_\alpha$ is a scale coefficient. Applying the standard canonical quantization procedure, $(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{p})\rightarrow (\mathbf{r},\mathbf{-i\hbar\nabla})$, to this extended Hamiltonian gives the corresponding quantum Hamiltonian of the system $H_\alpha= D_\alpha
(-\hbar^2 \Delta)^{\alpha/2}+V(\mathbf{r})$. }
{Therefore, to obtain a fractional extension of the Schr\"odinger equation},
\begin{equation}
i\hbar \frac{\partial
\psi(\mathbf{r},t)}{\partial t}=
-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\Delta \psi(\mathbf{r},t)
+ V(\mathbf{r},t) \psi(\mathbf{r},t),
\label{7-0a}
\end{equation}
we may replace the ordinary Laplacian, $\Delta$, with the
fractional Riesz, $(-\hbar^2 \Delta)^{\alpha/2}$, namely
\begin{equation}
-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\Delta\longrightarrow D_\alpha
(-\hbar^2 \Delta)^{\alpha/2}.
\end{equation}
The
fractional Laplacian in the Riesz form, $(-\hbar^2 \Delta)^{\alpha/2}$, for 3-dimensional
Euclidean space is defined in terms of the Fourier transformation \cite{Rie}
\begin{equation}
\begin{array}{cc}
(-\hbar^2 \Delta)^{\alpha/2} \psi(\mathbf{r},t)
=\mathcal F^{-1}|\mathbf{p}|^\alpha\mathcal F\psi(\mathbf{r},t)\\
\\
=\displaystyle\frac{1}{(2\pi\hbar)^3}
\int d^3 p e^{i\frac{\mathbf{p}\cdot \mathbf{r}}{\hbar}}
|\mathbf{p}|^\alpha
\int e^{-i\frac{\mathbf{p}\cdot \mathbf{r}'}{\hbar}}\psi(\mathbf{r}',t)d^3r',
%\label{2ref8}
\end{array}
\end{equation}
in which $\mathbf{p}=\sqrt{p_1^2+p_2^2+p_3^2}$.
The result is the fractional SE
\begin{equation}
i\hbar \frac{\partial \psi(\mathbf{r},t)}{\partial t}=
D_\alpha
(-\hbar^2 \Delta)^{\alpha/2} \psi(\mathbf{r},t)
+ V(\mathbf{r},t) \psi(\mathbf{r},t).
\label{7-0}
\end{equation}
Returning to our case study, the supermomentum constraint $H_i$ is identically zero in homogeneous cosmological models, %which truly depict the primordial Universe,
and the shift function $N_i$ can be adjusted to zero without neglecting any of Einstein's equations. As a result, the superspace WDW equation is simplified to the minisuperspace WDW equation:
\begin{equation}\label{WDW}
\left\{\frac{1}{2}\Box+U(q^\nu)\right\}\Psi(q^\nu)=0,~~~\nu=0,...,N-1,
\end{equation}
where $q^\alpha$ are coordinates of $N-$dimensional minisuperspace, $\Box=\frac{1}{\sqrt{-f}}\partial_\alpha(\sqrt{-f}f^{\alpha\beta}\partial_\beta)$ is the d’Alembertian operator, $f_{\alpha\beta}$ denotes the corresponding minisuperspace metric with signature $(-,+,+,...,+)$ and $U(q^\nu)$ is the potential.
%particularization of the
%Ricci scalar of the
%hypersurface and matter fields.
To obtain a fractional extension of the above WDW equation we may replace the ordinary d'Alembertian operator in (\ref{WDW}) as
%to the fractional Riesz d'Alembertian
\cite{Rie,Tarasov:2018zjg,Calcagni_2021,Calcagni:2011kn}, namely
\begin{equation}
% \begin{array}{cc}
(-\Box)^{\alpha/2} \Psi(q^\alpha)
=\mathcal F^{-1}(|\mathbf{p}|^\alpha(\mathcal F\Psi(\mathbf p)),
%\end{array}
\end{equation}
where $|\mathbf p|=\sqrt{-p_0^2+p_ip^i}$, $i=1,2,...,N$, and $\mathcal F$ is a Fourier transformation.
Let us be more clear and specific. The WDW equation (\ref{2-4}) is a one-dimensional ES with zero energy. Thus, to construct a particular fractional WDW equation, we may, similarly to the SE case, replace the ordinary derivative for the fractional Riesz derivative, namely \cite{FQ2,FQ3,FracBH}
\begin{equation}
\label{2-8}
-\frac{d^2}{da^2}\longrightarrow m_\text{P}^{2-\alpha} (-\frac{d^2}{da^2})^\frac{\alpha}{2},~~~~1<\alpha\leq2.
\end{equation}
We remind that the fractional Riesz derivative is further defined in terms of the Fourier transformation \cite{Rie}
\begin{equation}
\begin{array}{cc}
(-\frac{d^2}{da^2})^{\alpha/2} \Psi(a)
%=\mathcal F^{-1}|\Pi|^\alpha\mathcal F\Psi(a)\\
=\displaystyle\frac{1}{2\pi}
\int d\Pi e^{i{\Pi a}}
|\Pi|^\alpha
\int e^{-i{\Pi a'}}\Psi(a')da'.
\label{2ref8}
\end{array}
\end{equation}
Therefore, our fractional WDW equation of a deS space-time is
\begin{equation}
\label{2-9}
\left(-\frac{d^2}{da^2}\right)^\frac{\alpha}{2}\Psi(x)+\frac{9\pi^2m_\text{P}^{\alpha+2}}{4}\left(a^2-\frac{\Lambda}{3}a^4\right)\Psi(a)=0.
\end{equation}
To obtain a WKB approximation, we rewrite the wavefunction as the exponential of another function, $f$,
namely
\begin{equation}
\label{2-10}
\Psi(x)=e^{f(x)},~~~~f(x)\in \mathbb C.
\end{equation}
Using (\ref{2-10}) and (\ref{2ref8}) in (\ref{2-9}) and assuming the wavefunction is square-integrable, we find
\begin{equation}
\label{2-11}
\frac{d^2f}{dx^2}+\left(\frac{df}{dx} \right)^2+|\Pi|^2=0,
\end{equation}
where $\Pi$ satisfies the following classical fractional superHamiltonian constraint \cite{par1}
\begin{equation}
\label{2-12}
|\Pi|^\alpha+\frac{9\pi^2}{4}m_\text{P}^{2+\alpha}a^2\left(1-\frac{a^2}{L^2}\right)=0.
\end{equation}
Within our chosen WKB approximation procedure, we can show that the corresponding WKB wavefunctions in the
fractional tunneling or no-boundary case still bear the formal structure as in (\ref{2-5}) or (\ref{Hartle}).
Of course, the explicit presence of $\alpha$ as induced from the use of the Riesz derivative, conveys
significant modifications.
The WKB Linde--Vilenkin wavefunction of the above one-dimensional fractional WDW equation, disregarding the preexponential factor,
is
\begin{equation}
\label{2-5frac}
% \begin{array}{cc}
\psi_\text{LV}(a)\simeq\begin{cases}
e^{Ca^{D}F(\frac{D}{2},\frac{1-D}{2};1+\frac{D}{2};(\frac{a}{L})^2)},~~~~~~~~~a<L,
\\
\\
e^{-iCa^{D}F(\frac{D}{2},\frac{1-D}{2};1+\frac{D}{2};(\frac{a}{L})^2)+i\frac{\pi}{4}},~~a\geq L,
\end{cases}
%\end{array}
\end{equation}
where $C:=(\frac{3\pi}{2})^{D-1}m_\text{P}^D$, and $F(a,b;c;z)$ is the hypergeometric function and $D=1+2/\alpha$. It is likewise possible to write the Hartle--Hawking wavefunction in terms of hypergeometric functions.
Consider now the Linde--Vilenkin and Hartle--Hawking probability distributions.
These are subsequently written as
\begin{equation}
\label{2-13}
\mathcal P_\text{LV}=e^{-\left(\frac{3\pi}{4}\right)^{D-1}\frac{\sqrt{\pi}\Gamma(D)}{\Gamma(D+\frac{1}{2})}\left(\frac{3}{8\pi G^2V_0} \right)^\frac{D}{2}},~~
\mathcal P_\text{HH}={\mathcal P^{-1}_\text{LV}},
%\mathcal P_\text{Tun}\propto e^{-2\left(\frac{3\pi}{4} \right)^\frac{2}{\alpha}\left(\frac{L}{l_\text{P}} \right)^{1+\frac{2}{\alpha}}\frac{\sqrt{\pi}\Gamma\left(\frac{2}{\alpha}\right)}{\alpha\Gamma\left(\frac{3\alpha+4}{2\alpha}\right)}},
\end{equation}
%where $l_\text{P}=1/m_\text{P}$ is the Planck length.
Comparing Eqs.(\ref{2-6}) and (\ref{2-7a}) with the above result, it suggest us to define a fractional
entropy \footnote{ In
Ref.\cite{FracBH} a space-fractional formulation for the Schwarzschild black hole allowed to formulate that the horizon unveiled a fractal
structure and
$\alpha$-dependent.
The proposed fractional entropy of the black hole is
%\begin{equation}
$\mathcal S_\text{BH} = \left(\frac{A_\text{BH}}{4G}\right)^\frac{2+\alpha}{2\alpha} = \frac{A_\text{fractal}}{4G}$,
%\end{equation}
by means of which we hence defined $A_\text{fractal}$.
In the herewith deS space-time, we have proposed a definition of the entropy which is similar: $
%\begin{equation}
\mathcal S_\text{DS}=\frac{A_\text{DS}}{4G}.
$
%\end{equation}
We think it is admissible to ask whether the results for the fractal structure of the event horizon (and the corresponding entropy) are a general behavior.}
as
\begin{equation}
\label{2-14}
\mathcal S_\text{Frac}:=\frac{A_\text{Frac}}{4G},
\end{equation}
where
\begin{multline}
\label{2-15}
A_\text{Frac}:=4\sqrt{\pi} \left(\frac{3\pi}{4} \right)^{D-1}\frac{\Gamma(D)}{\Gamma(D+1/2)}l_\text{P}^2\left(\frac{L}{l_\text{P}}\right)^D,
\end{multline}
would be the fractal area of the deS horizon, $D$ is the fractal dimension of the horizon
%defined by relation (\ref{Dimension2}),
and $l_\text{P}=1/m_\text{P}$ is the Planck length.
Specifically, in the above expression the horizon surface is a fractal surface whose dimension, $D$, is dependent in
the L\'evy's fractional parameter $\alpha$
\begin{equation}\label{Dimension2}
D=\frac{2+\alpha}{\alpha},~~~~~2\leq D<3.
\end{equation}
Note that for $\alpha=2$ (or equivalently, $D=2$) the fractal area of the horizon will reduce the original smooth area of the deS space. Eqs.(\ref{2-14}) and (\ref{2-15}) show that increasing the L\'evy's fractional parameter, $\alpha$, also increases the fractality of the horizon area, which in turns causes the change of the effective
Gibbons--Hawking entropy, making it larger than in the smooth standard case.
%From Eqs. (\ref{2-7a}) and (\ref{2-7b}), it is clear that the tunneling and the no-boundary states lead to \bl{distinct
%physical implications}.
{Let us further elaborate on the implications from (\ref{2-9})-(\ref{2-11}), or instead, just (\ref{2-12}), and
establish how the situation in the fractional cases become quite} different. %\ma{If we consider again the slow-roll inflation conditions for the scalar field, after nucleating the universe into classical area,}
Eq.(\ref{2-12}) allows to extract and write that the effective fractional ADM Hamiltonian is given by
\begin{equation}\label{2-17}
H_\text{ADM}(\alpha)=-N\Big\{\frac{1}{3\pi m_\text{P}^\alpha a(t)}|\Pi|^\alpha+U(a)\Big\},
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
\label{2-18}
U(a):= \frac{3\pi m_\text{P}^2}{4}a(t)\left(1-\frac{8\pi V_0}{3m_\text{P}^2}a(t)^2\right).
\end{equation}
Then, the Hamilton's equations, $\dot a=\partial H_\text{ADM}(\alpha)/\partial\Pi$, $\dot\Pi=-\partial H_\text{ADM}(\alpha)/\partial a$ together with the Hamiltonian constraint $\mathcal H(\alpha)= H_\text{ADM}(\alpha)/N=0$ lead us to the fractional Friedmann equations in comoving frame ($N=1$):
\begin{multline}\label{2-19}
% \begin{split}
\left(\frac{\dot a}{a}\right)^2=\frac{a^{2(1-D)}}{(D-1)^2}\left(\frac{2\sqrt{G}}{3\pi} \right)^{2(D-2)}\left(\frac{a^2}{L^2}-1 \right)^{3-D},\\ \frac{\ddot a}{a}=\frac{(5-2D)\left(-U\right)^{2-D}}{(D-1)^2(3\pi)^{D-2}a^D}\left( \frac{a^2}{L^2}+\frac{D-2}{5-2D}\right),
% \end{split}
\end{multline}
where $L$ is defined by (\ref{2-16}).
Note as well that for $D=2$ the above field equations reduce the original usual Friedmann equations. Furthermore, as the above field equations show, for $D\neq2$ (or equivalently $\alpha\neq2$, see Fig.(\ref{Fig1})), our deS model universe does not expand exponentially. The universe nucleated from nothing and is accelerated only for $D<2.5$, increasing as a power-law expansion:
\begin{equation}\label{2-20}
a(t)\propto t^\frac{1}{2(D-2)}.
\end{equation}
\begin{figure}[ht]
\includegraphics[width=6cm]{plot2.eps}
\caption{Plot of the scale factor of the nucleated closed universe for three values of fractal dimension, $D=2.1$ (dash-dot), $D=2.5$ (dash) and $D=2.9$ (dot). The asymptotic behavior of the corresponding scale factors is also indicated in the plot. We used units in which, $m_\text{P}=L=1$. }\label{Fig1}
\centering
\end{figure}
The number of e-foldings before the $t_\text{end}$ of a suitable inflation
period and from a time $t_*$ becomes $N_*=\ln(t_\text{end}/t_*)/(2(D-1))$. For example, for $D=2.001$, we find $N_*=50\ln(t_\text{end}/t_*)>50$; Nb. the scale we observe from the cosmic microwave background data conforms to the e-folding in the range $50 < N_* < 60$ \cite{Planck:2013jfk}.
Usually, this kind of power-law expansion may be realized if a scalar field with an exponential potential %$V(\Phi)=\exp(-\lambda\Phi)$
dominates the universe's energy density at an early stage \cite{yokoyama}. As we saw, in the fractional extension of quantum cosmology, for $D\neq 2$, the probability of having a power-law expansion is real and without such exponential potential. This allows to raise the possibility that
inflation, an early accelerated stage of expansion, may happen from fractional quantum mechanical perspective. This is of interest and the usual form of the deS inflation will take place only for $D=2$.
%\bl{Let us summarize.}
%the probability of two proposals.
%As we found
%\begin{equation}\label{2-21}
%\begin{split}
% \mathcal P_\text{Tun}=e^{-\left(\frac{3\pi}{4}\right)^{D-1}\frac{\sqrt{\pi}\Gamma(D)}{\Gamma(D+\frac{1}{2})}\left(\frac{3}{8\pi G^2V_0} \right)^\frac{D}{2}},~~
% \mathcal P_\text{HH}={\mathcal P^{-1}_\text{Tun}},
%\end{split}
%\end{equation}
Let us add that due to the negative sign in (\ref{2-13}), the no-boundary state increases not only the contribution of empty universes with $V_0=0$ in the entire quantum state, but also highly fractal horizons with dimension close to three, $D\rightarrow3$. This two effects lead to the seemingly contradictory conclusion that quite huge and decelerating universes are infinitely more likely than finite-sized universes. The tunneling wavefunction probability as in equation (\ref{2-13}), on the other hand, promotes large values of $V_0$ simultaneously with fractal horizon with dimension close to two, $D\rightarrow2$, and capable of
inducing power law accelerated expansion scenarios. As a result, it appears that the tunneling prescription becomes more alluring within the fractional quantum cosmology herewith, when contrasting with the no-boundary prescription.
{Similarly to the ending paragraph in the previous section, let us like re-address the points therein introduced. However, we will discuss them extending the context towards fractional quantum cosmology. More precisely, remind}
{
%However, if we consider
the general {range} $V_0\leq10^{-8}m_P^4$ as derived from the amplitude constraint on gravitational waves generated during inflation.
%, then by assuming a specific example
From $V_0=10^{-12}m_P^4$, the probability distribution (\ref{2-13}), {yields}
$10^{-10^{17}}< \mathcal P_\text{LV}\leq 10^{-10^{10}}$,
where the lower limit is obtained for $D\simeq 3$ and the upper limit in calculated for $D=2$. Thus, the {herewith} closed fractional universe
{may not be favored}.
%not favorite of inflation models.
{In fact,} if we consider {instead} creating a compact topologically nontrivial open or flat universes {(see Refs. \cite{Linde:2004nz,Linde:2017pwt,Coule:1999wg,Linde:2014nna}),} then the fractional WDW equation (\ref{2-9}) {becomes}}
\begin{equation}
\label{jadid1}
\left(-\frac{d^2}{da^2}\right)^\frac{\alpha}{2}\Psi(x)+\frac{3\mathcal V_k^2m_\text{P}^{\alpha+2}}{16\pi^2}\left(ka^2-\frac{\Lambda}{3}a^4\right)\Psi(a)=0,
\end{equation}
{where $k=-1,0$, and $\mathcal V_k$ denotes the finite volume of the non-trivial compact spatial hypersurfaces \cite{doi:10.1142/8540}. Besides, the effective fractional ADM Hamiltonian (\ref{2-17}) will generalize to
\begin{multline}\label{jadid2}
H_\text{ADM}(\alpha)=-N\Big\{\frac{2\pi}{3\mathcal V_km_P^\alpha a}|\Pi|^\alpha+\\\frac{2\mathcal V_km_P^2}{8\pi}a\left(k-\frac{\Lambda}{3}a^2\right)\Big\}.
\end{multline}
The
%first
fractional Friedmann equation obtained for
{such universe}
%flat and open universes in (\ref{2-19})
will be
\begin{equation}\label{jadid3}
\left(\frac{\dot a}{a}\right)^2=\frac{a^{2(1-D)}}{(D-1)^2}\left(\frac{3\mathcal V_km_P}{4\pi} \right)^{2(D-2)}\left(\frac{a^2}{L^2}-k \right)^{3-D}.
\end{equation}
The semiclassical solution of (\ref{jadid1}) for open universe, $(k=-1)$, disregarding
the pre-exponential factor is
\begin{equation}
\label{jadid4}
\Psi(a)\simeq\exp{\pm iCa^{D}F(\frac{D}{2},\frac{1-D}{2};1+\frac{D}{2};-(\frac{a}{L})^2)},
\end{equation}
where $C=(\frac{3\mathcal V_k}{4\pi})^{D-1}m_P^D$, and a positive sign corresponds to
an expanding universe.
It is easy to show that for flat fractional quantum cosmology, $(k=0)$, the semiclassical wavefunction is given by}
\begin{equation}
\Psi(a)\simeq a^{-1}\exp{\pm\frac{im_P}{2D-1}\left( \frac{3{\mathcal V}_k^2V_0}{2\pi}\right)^{\frac{D-1}{2}}a^{2D-1}},
\end{equation}
{where a positive sign corresponds to
an expanding universe. Note that for $D=2$ the above expression reduce to the semiclassical wavefunction obtained by Linde in \cite{Linde:2004nz}. This approximation breaks
down at $a\leq (m_P V_0^{(D-1)/2})^{1/(1-2D)}$. Similar to the closed universe, for scale factors much larger than this value, the classical scale factor satisfies (\ref{2-20}). This shows that the {discussion as} proposed in Refs.\cite{Linde:1983mx,Linde:2017pwt},
{can also be of value within our appraisal of de Sitter fractional quantum cosmology.}
for the flat universe is also correct for our model. }
\section{Conclusions}
Our simple model brings about a new perspective, whereby FQM features could have played an influence at the early stages of inflation of the universe.
%In many extensions of the Standard Model (SM), the hypothetical inflaton particle may exist in a natural or not so natural fashion.
The properties of an inflaton field are restricted by observations of fluctuations in the CMB and the universe's matter distribution. Despite the fact that the mass of such inflaton and its interaction with matter fields are not determined, well-known arguments favor a heavy (scalar) field with a mass of $10^{13}$ GeV \cite{1983PhLB}, near to the GUT scale, which is frequently used as evidence for the presence of new physics at the junction of the electroweak and Planck scales. {Our findings suggest that inflation within fractional quantum cosmology may emerge
through a different perspective. Namely, taking into consideration the event horizon of the nucleated universe as a fractal surface with dimension $D$. Our analysis is broaden when we consider that inflation occurs at energy densities lower than the Planck density. As the the tunneling proposal indicates an exponentially suppression of the probability of quantum creation of a closed inflationary universe, results suggest that a fractional inflationary quantum universe may
favour instead a flat or open universes.}
\centerline{\bf Acknowledgments}
%PVM acknowledges DAMTP and Clare Hall, Cambridge for kind hospitality and
%a Visiting Fellowship during his sabbatical, during which this work was initiated.
This research work was supported by Grants No. Project: UIDB/00212/2020 and
Project (Programmatic): UIDP/00212/2020 at CMA-UBI (FCT), plus
%COST Action CA15117 (CANTATA)
the COST Action CA18108 (Quantum gravity phenomenology in the multi-me\-ssen\-ger approach).
\bibliography{xsamp}% Produces the bibliography via BibTeX.
\end{document}
%\bibliography{apssamp}% Produces the bibliography via BibTeX.
%\end{document}
%
% ****** End of file apssamp.tex ******
%merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked
%Control: key (0)
%Control: author (8) initials jnrlst
%Control: editor formatted (1) identically to author
%Control: production of article title (-1) disabled
%Control: page (0) single
%Control: year (1) truncated
%Control: production of eprint (0) enabled
\begin{thebibliography}{46}%
\makeatletter
\providecommand \@ifxundefined [1]{%
\@ifx{#1\undefined}
}%
\providecommand \@ifnum [1]{%
\ifnum #1\expandafter \@firstoftwo
\else \expandafter \@secondoftwo
\fi
}%
\providecommand \@ifx [1]{%
\ifx #1\expandafter \@firstoftwo
\else \expandafter \@secondoftwo
\fi
}%
\providecommand \natexlab [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \enquote [1]{``#1''}%
\providecommand \bibnamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \bibfnamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \citenamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \href@noop [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \href [0]{\begingroup \@sanitize@url \@href}%
\providecommand \@href[1]{\@@startlink{#1}\@@href}%
\providecommand \@@href[1]{\endgroup#1\@@endlink}%
\providecommand \@sanitize@url [0]{\catcode `\\12\catcode `\$12\catcode
`\&12\catcode `\#12\catcode `\^12\catcode `\_12\catcode `\%12\relax}%
\providecommand \@@startlink[1]{}%
\providecommand \@@endlink[0]{}%
\providecommand \url [0]{\begingroup\@sanitize@url \@url }%
\providecommand \@url [1]{\endgroup\@href {#1}{\urlprefix }}%
\providecommand \urlprefix [0]{URL }%
\providecommand \Eprint [0]{\href }%
\providecommand \doibase [0]{http://dx.doi.org/}%
\providecommand \selectlanguage [0]{\@gobble}%
\providecommand \bibinfo [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \bibfield [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \translation [1]{[#1]}%
\providecommand \BibitemOpen [0]{}%
\providecommand \bibitemStop [0]{}%
\providecommand \bibitemNoStop [0]{.\EOS\space}%
\providecommand \EOS [0]{\spacefactor3000\relax}%
\providecommand \BibitemShut [1]{\csname bibitem#1\endcsname}%
\let\auto@bib@innerbib\@empty
%</preamble>
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Hartle}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Hawking}(1983)}]{Hawking1}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~B.}\ \bibnamefont
{Hartle}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~W.}\ \bibnamefont
{Hawking}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.
Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {28}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {2960}
(\bibinfo {year} {1983})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Hawking}(1984)}]{Hawking12}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~W.}\ \bibnamefont
{Hawking}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90093-2} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Nucl. Phys. B}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{239}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {257} (\bibinfo {year} {1984})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {{Linde}}(1984)}]{1984ZhETF}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~D.}\ \bibnamefont
{{Linde}}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Z.
Eksp. Teor. Fiz.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {87}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {369}
(\bibinfo {year} {1984})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Linde}(1984{\natexlab{a}})}]{Linde:1983mx}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~D.}\ \bibnamefont
{Linde}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1007/BF02790571} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Lett. Nuovo Cim.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {39}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {401} (\bibinfo {year} {1984}{\natexlab{a}})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Linde}(1984{\natexlab{b}})}]{Linde1984}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~D.}\ \bibnamefont
{Linde}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1088/0034-4885/47/8/002} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Rept. Prog. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {47}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {925} (\bibinfo {year} {1984}{\natexlab{b}})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Vilenkin}(1982)}]{Vilenkin1}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Vilenkin}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1016/0370-2693(82)90866-8} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Lett. B}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{117}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {25} (\bibinfo {year} {1982})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Vilenkin}(1986)}]{Vilenkin14}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Vilenkin}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {33}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {3560}
(\bibinfo {year} {1986})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Vilenkin}(1994)}]{Vilenkin15}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Vilenkin}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.2581} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{50}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {2581} (\bibinfo {year} {1994})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Vilenkin}(1998)}]{Vilenkin16}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Vilenkin}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.067301} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{58}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {067301} (\bibinfo {year} {1998})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{Note1()}]{Note1}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibinfo {note} {Let us remind that Vilenkin's original 1982 paper \cite
{Vilenkin1} claimed that $P \sim e^{S}$, thus Vilenkin's original result
coincided with Hartle and Hawking's subsequent 1983 result \cite {Hawking1}.
Linde first obtained the result $P \sim e^{-S}$ in a series of papers,
beginning with his first article \cite {1984ZhETF} and continuing with his
subsequent papers \cite {Linde:1983mx,Linde1984}. It was stated there that
Vilenkin's original result was incorrect. Vilenkin came to the same
conclusion a few months later. Thus, the $P \sim e^{S}$ result obtained by
Hartle and Hawking was first obtained by Vilenkin, and the $P \sim e^{-S}$
result attributed to Vilenkin was first obtained by Linde.}\BibitemShut
{Stop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Laskin}(2018)}]{par1}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {N.}~\bibnamefont
{Laskin}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1142/10541} {\emph {\bibinfo {title}
{Fractional Quantum Mechanics}}}\ (\bibinfo {publisher} {World Scientific},\
\bibinfo {year} {2018})\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {{Laskin}}(2000)}]{Laskin1}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {N.}~\bibnamefont
{{Laskin}}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.3135} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {\pre}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {62}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {3135} (\bibinfo {year} {2000})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Laskin}(2000)}]{space}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {N.}~\bibnamefont
{Laskin}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00201-2} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Lett. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{268}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {298} (\bibinfo {year} {2000})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {{Laskin}}(2017)}]{time}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {N.}~\bibnamefont
{{Laskin}}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Chaos Solitons and Fractals}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {102}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {16} (\bibinfo {year} {2017})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {{Wang}}\ and\ \citenamefont
{{Xu}}(2007)}]{space-time}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{{Wang}}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {{Xu}}},\
}\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {J. Math. Phys.}\
}\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {48}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {043502} (\bibinfo
{year} {2007})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Calcagni}(2010{\natexlab{a}})}]{FQ1}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont
{Calcagni}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {104}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{251301} (\bibinfo {year} {2010}{\natexlab{a}})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Calcagni}(2010{\natexlab{b}})}]{calcagni2010quantum}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont
{Calcagni}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{JHEP}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {2010}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {1} (\bibinfo
{year} {2010}{\natexlab{b}})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Lim}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Teo}(2012)}]{lim2012casimir}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Lim}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Teo}},\ }in\
\href@noop {} {\emph {\bibinfo {booktitle} {Fractional Dynamics: Recent
Advances}}}\ (\bibinfo {publisher} {World Scientific},\ \bibinfo {year}
{2012})\ pp.\ \bibinfo {pages} {483--506}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Lim}(2006)}]{lim2006fractional}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Lim}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Physica
A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {363}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {269} (\bibinfo
{year} {2006})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Moniz}\ and\ \citenamefont {Jalalzadeh}(2020)}]{FQ2}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~V.}\ \bibnamefont
{Moniz}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Jalalzadeh}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.3390/math8030313} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Mathematics}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {8}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {313} (\bibinfo {year} {2020})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Rasouli}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont
{Rasouli}, \citenamefont {Jalalzadeh},\ and\ \citenamefont {Moniz}}]{FQ3}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~M.~M.}\
\bibnamefont {Rasouli}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Jalalzadeh}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~V.}\ \bibnamefont
{Moniz}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Mod.
Phys. Lett. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {36}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{2140005} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Rubakov}(1984)}]{MonizBook}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.~A.}\ \bibnamefont
{Rubakov}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.
Lett. B}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {148}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {280}
(\bibinfo {year} {1984})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{Note2()}]{Note2}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibinfo {note} {Throughout this paper we shall work in natural units, $\hbar
=c = k_B = 1$.}\BibitemShut {Stop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Jalalzadeh}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Darabi}(2013)}]{Darabi}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Jalalzadeh}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont
{Darabi}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1007/s11232-013-0056-7} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Theor. Math. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{175}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {710} (\bibinfo {year} {2013})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Vilenkin}(1988)}]{Vilenkin}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Vilenkin}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {37}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {888}
(\bibinfo {year} {1988})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Padmanabhan}(2002)}]{Padman}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont
{Padmanabhan}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Class. Quant. Grav.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {19}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{5387} (\bibinfo {year} {2002})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Linde}(2004)}]{Linde:2004nz}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~D.}\ \bibnamefont
{Linde}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1088/1475-7516/2004/10/004} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {JCAP}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {10}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {004} (\bibinfo {year} {2004})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0408164} {arXiv:hep-th/0408164} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Linde}(2018)}]{Linde:2017pwt}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Linde}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1007/s10701-018-0177-9} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Found. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {48}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {1246} (\bibinfo {year} {2018})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.04278} {arXiv:1710.04278 [hep-th]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Coule}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Martin}(2000)}]{Coule:1999wg}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~H.}\ \bibnamefont
{Coule}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Martin}},\
}\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.063501} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {61}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {063501} (\bibinfo {year} {2000})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9905056} {arXiv:gr-qc/9905056} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Linde}(2015)}]{Linde:2014nna}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Linde}},\ }in\ \href {\doibase 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198728856.003.0006}
{\emph {\bibinfo {booktitle} {{100e Ecole d'Ete de Physique: Post-Planck
Cosmology}}}}\ (\bibinfo {year} {2015})\ pp.\ \bibinfo {pages} {231--316},\
\Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0526} {arXiv:1402.0526 [hep-th]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Lauscher}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Reuter}(2005)}]{Lauscher:2005qz}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {O.}~\bibnamefont
{Lauscher}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Reuter}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1088/1126-6708/2005/10/050} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {JHEP}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {10}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {050} (\bibinfo {year} {2005})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0508202} {arXiv:hep-th/0508202} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Ambjorn}\ \emph {et~al.}(2005)\citenamefont
{Ambjorn}, \citenamefont {Jurkiewicz},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Loll}}]{Ambjorn:2005db}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{Ambjorn}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Jurkiewicz}},
\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont {Loll}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.171301} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {95}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {171301} (\bibinfo {year} {2005})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0505113} {arXiv:hep-th/0505113} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Modesto}(2009)}]{Modesto:2008jz}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Modesto}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1088/0264-9381/26/24/242002} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Class. Quant. Grav.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {26}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {242002} (\bibinfo {year} {2009})},\
\Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2214} {arXiv:0812.2214 [gr-qc]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Horava}(2009)}]{Horava:2009if}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Horava}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.161301} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {102}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {161301} (\bibinfo {year} {2009})},\
\Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.3657} {arXiv:0902.3657 [hep-th]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Biswas}\ \emph {et~al.}(2012)\citenamefont {Biswas},
\citenamefont {Gerwick}, \citenamefont {Koivisto},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Mazumdar}}]{Biswas:2011ar}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont
{Biswas}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont {Gerwick}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Koivisto}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Mazumdar}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.031101} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {108}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {031101} (\bibinfo {year} {2012})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.5249} {arXiv:1110.5249 [gr-qc]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {{Nelson}}(1966)}]{1966PhRv79N}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont
{{Nelson}}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRev.150.1079} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Physical Review}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{150}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {1079} (\bibinfo {year} {1966})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Riesz}(1949)}]{Rie}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Riesz}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Acta
Mathematica}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {81}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {1 }
(\bibinfo {year} {1949})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Tarasov}(2018)}]{Tarasov:2018zjg}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.~E.}\ \bibnamefont
{Tarasov}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Adv.
High Energy Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {2018}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{7612490} (\bibinfo {year} {2018})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Calcagni}(2021)}]{Calcagni_2021}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont
{Calcagni}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Class. Quantum Grav.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {38}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{165005} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Calcagni}(2012)}]{Calcagni:2011kn}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont
{Calcagni}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Adv.
Theor. Math. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {16}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{549} (\bibinfo {year} {2012})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Jalalzadeh}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont
{Jalalzadeh}, \citenamefont {da~Silva},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Moniz}}]{FracBH}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Jalalzadeh}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.~R.}\ \bibnamefont
{da~Silva}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~V.}\ \bibnamefont
{Moniz}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09438-5} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Eur. Phys. J. C}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{81}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {632} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{Note3()}]{Note3}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibinfo {note} {In Ref.\cite {FracBH} a space-fractional formulation for the
Schwarzschild black hole allowed to formulate that the horizon unveiled a
fractal structure and $\alpha $-dependent. The proposed fractional entropy of
the black hole is $\protect \mathcal S_\protect \text {BH} = \left (\protect
\frac {A_\protect \text {BH}}{4G}\right )^\protect \frac {2+\alpha }{2\alpha
} = \protect \frac {A_\protect \text {fractal}}{4G}$, by means of which we
hence defined $A_\protect \text {fractal}$. In the herewith deS space-time,
we have proposed a definition of the entropy which is similar: $ \protect
\mathcal S_\protect \text {DS}=\protect \frac {A_\protect \text {DS}}{4G}. $
We think it is admissible to ask whether the results for the fractal
structure of the event horizon (and the corresponding entropy) are a general
behavior.}\BibitemShut {Stop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Ade}\ \emph {et~al.}(2014)\citenamefont {Ade} \emph
{et~al.}}]{Planck:2013jfk}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~A.~R.}\
\bibnamefont {Ade}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {Planck}),\
}\href {\doibase 10.1051/0004-6361/201321569} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Astron. Astrophys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {571}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {A22} (\bibinfo {year} {2014})},\ \Eprint
{http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5082} {arXiv:1303.5082 [astro-ph.CO]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Yokoyama}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Maeda}(1988)}]{yokoyama}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{Yokoyama}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.-i.}\ \bibnamefont
{Maeda}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.
Lett. B}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {207}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {31}
(\bibinfo {year} {1988})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Jalalzadeh}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Moniz}(2022)}]{doi:10.1142/8540}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Jalalzadeh}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~V.}\ \bibnamefont
{Moniz}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1142/8540} {\emph {\bibinfo {title}
{Challenging Routes in Quantum Cosmology}}}\ (\bibinfo {publisher} {World
Scientific},\ \bibinfo {year} {2022})\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {{Linde}}(1983)}]{1983PhLB}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{{Linde}}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.
Lett. B}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {129}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {177}
(\bibinfo {year} {1983})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\end{thebibliography}%