Terahertz Channel Measurement and Analysis on a University Campus Street
Extracted source text · arXiv 2211.11185
\begin{abstract}
Owning abundant bandwidth resource, the Terahertz (0.1-10~THz) band is a promising spectrum to support sixth-generation (6G) and beyond communications. As the foundation of channel study in the spectrum, channel measurement is ongoing in covering representative 6G communication scenarios and promising THz frequency bands. In this paper, a wideband channel measurement in an L-shaped university campus street is conducted at 306-321~GHz and 356-371~GHz.
%\rev{The sounder system consists of a vector network analyzer (VNA)-based channel sounder, and a directional antenna equipped at the receiver to resolve multi-path components (MPCs) in the angular domain.}
In particular, ten line-of-sight (LoS) and eight non-line-of-sight (NLoS) points are measured at the two frequency bands, respectively. In total, 6480 channel impulse responses (CIRs) are obtained from the measurement, based on which multi-path propagation in the L-shaped roadway in the THz band is elaborated to identify major scatterers of walls, vehicles, etc. in the environment and their impact on multi-path components (MPCs). Furthermore, outdoor THz channel characteristics in the two frequency bands are analyzed, including path losses, shadow fading, cluster parameters, delay spread and angular spread. In contrast with the counterparts in the similar outdoor scenario at lower frequencies, the results verify the sparsity of MPCs at THz frequencies and indicate smaller power spreads in both temporal and spatial domains in the THz band.
\end{abstract}
\section{Channel Measurement Campaign} \label{section: campaign}
In this section, we introduce our VNA-based channel measurement platform, and describe the THz measurement campaign at 306-321~GHz and 356-371~GHz in a L-shaped street on the campus of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU).
\subsection{Channel Measurement System}
Our channel measurement platform supports the frequency ranging from 260~GHz to 400~GHz. As detailed in~\cite{wang2022thz}, the system is composed of THz transmitter (Tx) and receiver (Rx) modules and the Ceyear 3672C VNA. The system calibration procedure is described in detail in our previous works~\cite{wang2022thz, li2022channel}.
\begin{comment}
The VNA generates radio frequency (RF) and local oscillator (LO) sources.
%The RF signal is multiplied by 27 to reach the carrier frequencies ranging from 260~GHz to 400~GHz. The LO signal is multiplied by 24 to reach the frequencies ranging from 260.0076~GHz to 400.0076~GHz. As a result, the mixed intermediate frequency (IF) signal has the frequency of 7.6~MHz.
The signals from RF and LO sources are multiplied by 27 and 24, respectively. As a result, the transmitted signal reaches the carrier frequencies ranging from 260~GHz to 400~GHz, and the mixed intermediate frequency (IF) signal has the frequency of 7.6~MHz.
%and therefore is free of the error caused by the cables when they carry high-frequency signals.
The IF signals at Tx and Rx modules are both sent back to the VNA, and the transfer function of the channel is calculated as the ratio of the two frequency responses. Interestingly, power of the sounder systems is supplied by a hybrid vehicle parking in ....
\end{comment}
In this measurement campaign, we investigate two frequency bands, 306-321~GHz and 356-371 GHz, which both cover the bandwidth of 15~GHz. The frequency sweeping interval is 2.5~MHz, resulting in 6001 sweeping points for each pair of Tx-Rx directions. Therefore, the space resolution is 2~cm and the maximum detectable path length is 120~m.
To compensate for the high path loss in the THz band, waveguides and WR2.8 horn antenna are installed, with gains around 7~dBi (3-dB beamwidth around 60$^\circ$) at the Tx side and 25-26~dBi (3-dB beamwidth around 8$^\circ$) at the Rx side, respectively.
Regarding the mechanical part of the measurement system, the Tx and Rx are lifted to reach the height of 3~m and 1.75~m, respectively. The Tx is static, while by contrast, to receive MPCs, the Rx is driven by the rotator to scan the complete azimuth domain and from $-20^\circ$ to $20^\circ$ in the elevation domain, with the step of $10^\circ$. Key parameters of the measurement are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:system_parameter}.
% \begin{figure}
% \centering
% \subfigure[The RF part.]{
% \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{figures/RF_system.png}
% }
% \\
% \subfigure[The mechanical part.]{
% \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{figures/platform.png}
% }
% \caption{The 260-400~GHz channel measurement system.}
% \label{fig:platform}
% \end{figure}
\begin{table}
\centering
\caption{Parameters of the measurement.}
\begin{tabular}{ll}
\toprule
Parameter & Value \\
\midrule
Frequency band & 306-321, 356-371~GHz \\
Bandwidth & 15~GHz \\
Sweeping interval & 2.5~MHz \\
Sweeping points & 6001 \\
Time resolution & 66.7~ps \\
Space resolution & 2~cm \\
Maximum excess delay & 400~ns \\
Maximum path length & 120~m \\
Tx antenna gain & 7~dBi \\
Tx 3-dB beamwidth & 60$^\circ$ \\
Rx antenna gain & 25-26~dBi \\
Rx 3-dB beamwidth & 8$^\circ$ \\
Tx height & 3~m \\
Rx height & 1.75~m \\
Rx azimuth angles & $[0^\circ:10^\circ:360^\circ]$ \\
Rx elevation angles & $[-20^\circ:10^\circ:20^\circ]$ \\
Average noise floor & -180~dBm \\
Dynamic range & 119~dB \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:system_parameter}
\end{table}
\subsection{Measurement Deployment}
As shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:environment}, the measurement campaign is conducted in the outdoor street bounded by Wenbo Building, Longbin Building, and Nanyang Road on the SJTU campus. Specifically, we focus on the L-shaped turning at the crossroad, depicted as the yellow region, with buildings, vehicles, pedestrians, plants, etc. The west street (Street~A) is parallel to Nanyang Road, and is between the west wall of Wenbo Building and a parking area. Vehicles, lamp poles and traffic signs are found along Street~A, and one lamp pole is at the southwest corner of Wenbo Building. The other street canyon (Street~B) between two buildings is about 22.32~m wide. Plants and a non-automobile parking area are located in the south of Wenbo Building along Street~B.
The measurement deployment is illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:deployment}. We set west when the horizontal angle $\varphi$ equals to 0$^\circ$, while the value of $\varphi$ increases clockwise. Tx is located at the northwest corner in Street~A, i.e., 29.66~m away from the junction of two streets. The directivity of Tx points to the southeast direction, with the fixed horizontal angle of $\varphi$ = 230$^\circ$ and elevation angle of $\theta$ = 0$^\circ$. The positions of Rx are distributed along two segments of the L-shaped street, labeled as Rx1-Rx8 and Rx9-Rx16. The farthest point is about 20~m away from the junction of two streets. Moreover, two additional Rx points, Rx17 and Rx18, are located in the non-automobile parking area, to simulate user equipment in the shadow of a building. To classify, Rx1 to Rx10 belong to the LoS case, while Rx11 to Rx18 belong to the NLoS case.
Interestingly, the source power of the sounder systems is supplied by a hybrid vehicle, which is parked in the parking area in Street~A in the LoS case. By contrast, due to the limit of cable length, it is parked at the southwest corner of Wenbo Building when we measure channel responses at NLoS points, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:environment}(b). Note that this vehicle creates transmission, reflection and scattering in the measurement.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\subfigure[The top view of the measurement campaign.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.46\linewidth]{figures/topview.png}
}
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.5\linewidth}
\centering
\subfigure[The photo of the environment.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.95\linewidth]{figures/environment1.png}
}\\
\subfigure[The photo of the west street (Street~A).]{
\includegraphics[width=0.95\linewidth]{figures/environment2.png}
}
\end{minipage}
\caption{Measurement campaign in the L-shaped street on the SJTU campus.}
\label{fig:environment}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.95\linewidth]{figures/deployment.jpg}
\caption{Measurement deployment in the L-shaped street on the SJTU campus (Tx, red; LoS Rx, blue; NLoS Rx, violet).}
\label{fig:deployment}
\end{figure}
%\subsection{\rev{Calibration and Data Post-processing}}
\section{Conclusion} \label{section: conclusion}
In this paper, we conducted a wideband channel measurement campaign in an L-shaped street on the university campus at 306-321~GHz and 356-371~GHz.
The scenario contains one street along the parking area, and another perpendicular street canyon between two buildings.
The characteristics of multi-path propagation are elaborated to identify major scatterers in the environment and their impact on MPCs. We analyze the outdoor THz channel characteristics in the two frequency bands, and draw the following observations.
\begin{itemize}
\item First, reflected and scattered rays on the wall are well observed. Forward-reflected rays endure extra loss about 5-15~dB, while back-reflected rays endure extra loss about 20-30~dB. Besides, the abundance of scattering on the wall is demonstrated by PDAP results.
\item Second, other major scatterers, i.e., traffic signs, lamps, and vehicles, are identified in this outdoor scenario. For instance, the traffic sign and the lamp result in additional reflection losses about several decibels and 15~dB, respectively.
\item Third, the interaction on the vehicle is investigated. While transmission or reflection renders an extra loss less than 10~dB, the scattering on vehicles are much less significant.
\item Fourth, as the receiving point moves from LoS positions into the street canyon (Street B) between two high buildings, the LoS is blocked by the building. For NLoS receiving points as far as 20~m away from the open crossroad, i.e., the entrance of the street canyon, the received power is 20~dB lower than that of the LoS point at the crossroad.
\item Fifth, we further analyzed THz channel characteristics in the outdoor scenario, and compared our results with those in the UMi-street canyon scenario below 100~GHz, which indicates the sparsity of MPCs and smaller power spreads in both temporal and spatial domains in the THz band.
\end{itemize}
%including path losses, shadow fading, cluster parameters, delay spread and angular spread, and compared them with the counterparts of the street canyon scenario in lower frequency bands, as summarized in Table~\ref{tab:parameters}.
%Acknowledgement: Chong Han acknowledges the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant 62027806.
\section{Introduction}
As a promising spectrum band for sixth-generation (6G) communications, the Terahertz (0.1-10~THz) band is anticipated to meet the demand of wireless systems for data rates to reach terabits per second (Tbps)~\cite{akyildiz2022terahertz,chen2021terahertz,rappaport2019wireless}.
In this new spectrum, the design of wireless systems relies on the study of THz wireless channels, which includes physical measurement of channels, analysis of channel characteristics, among others~\cite{channel_tutorial}.
Compared with well investigated centimeter-wave (cmWave) and millimeter-wave (mmWave) bands, the exploration of THz wireless channels, especially the physical measurement of THz wireless channels, is far from sufficient to cover all representative 6G communication scenarios and promising THz frequencies.
Channel measurement campaigns have been conducted mainly at 140~GHz, 190~GHz, and 220~GHz~\cite{channel_tutorial,abbasi2022thz,ju2022sub}, i.e., in the ``sub-THz'' band that overlaps with the mmWave band~\cite{rappaport2019wireless}.
By contrast, wireless channel measurements above 300~GHz are still inadequate.
In the up-to-date acts of the World Radiocommunication Conference 2019 (WRC-19), the frequency bands from 275~GHz to 450~GHz have identified for the implementation of fixed and land mobile service applications~\cite{WRC-19-FINAL-ACTS}.
Some existing measurement studies in these frequency bands are conducted in indoor hallways~\cite{wang2022thz, li2022channel}, an aircraft carbin~\cite{doeker2022channel}, a courtyard~\cite{undi2021angle}, and railway and vehicular communication scenarios~\cite{guan2021channel,eckhardt2021channel}.
Nevertheless, channel measurement campaigns above 300~GHz hardly go to outdoor scenarios. Besides, most of these studies use correlation-based channel sounder with measuring bandwidth no more than 8~GHz.
%As the foundation of channel study, physical channel measurement in the THz band is supported by wideband channel sounders.
%at 140~GHz~\cite{chen2021channel,abbasi2022thz,ju2022sub}, 190~GHz~\cite{dupleich2020characterization}, and 220~GHz~\cite{he2021channel}, i.e., in the ``sub-THz'' band that overlaps with the mmWave band~\cite{rappaport2019wireless}.
% =======================================================
% ====================== < 300 GHz ======================
% =======================================================
% SJTU(140 office) chen2021channel
% SJTU(220 conference) he2021channel
% Aalto(140 shopping) nguyen2018comparing
% Aalto(140 airport) nguyen2021large
% USC(140-220 LoS) abbasi2020channel
% USC(140-220 urban) abbasi2020double, abbasi2021double, abbasi2021ultra, abbasi2022double(street canyon), abbasi2022thz-TWC(courtyard, crossroad)
% NYU(140) [multiple indoor] xing2012propagation, xing2019indoor, ju2021millimeter, ju2022sub(InF)
% NYU(140) [urban microcell, satellite and backhaul] xing2021propagation, kanhere2021outdoor, ju2021140, ju2021sub
% TU Ilmenau(190) [conference room] dupleich2020characterization
% TU Braunschweig & BJTU(60-300) [T2T,I2I,T2I,inside-station,intra-wagon] guan2021channel(summary), guan2019channel_EuCAP, guan2019measurement, guan2020channel, guan2019channel_TVT
% TU Berlin(158) schultze2022observations(shopping mall), keusgen2022sub(street canyon)
% =======================================================
% =======================================================
% ===================== short-range =====================
% =======================================================
% TUBS(300) [(a) short-range (0.2-1 m) desktop, (b) a small indoor office (2.43 × 4.15 m) was scanned in the horizontal plane, with the Tx/Rx distance of about 1.67~m] priebe2011channel
% Duisburg-Essen(300) [LoS (1-5 m)] zantah2019channel
% Georgia Tech. (300) [(a) desktop (0.1-0.7 m), (b) motherboard (< 0.3 m), (c) data center (0.4-2.1 m)] kim2014statistical, kim2016characterization, cheng2019characterization, cheng2020thz
% POSTECH(300) [LoS (0.1-1 m)] song2020los
% Koc Univ.(260-400) [LoS (0.01-0.95 m)] khalid2019statistical
% Univ. of Surrey & NPL(500-750) [LoS (0-0.2286 m)] serghiou2020ultra
% TUBS & Univ. of Tampere(300) [data center] eckhardt2019measurements
% TUBS & Univ. of Tampere(300) [material; Boeing 737] /
% TUBS(300) [aircraft carbin (<10 m)] doeker2022channel-TAP
% TUBS & Brown University(60-1T) [reflection and scattering coefficients of various indoor materials] /
% =======================================================
% ==================== site-scale =======================
% =======================================================
% HHI(300) [courtyard (urban microcell)] undi2021angle
% TU Braunschweig & Univ. of Tampere(300) [vehicular] petrov2020measurements, eckhardt2021channel
% TU Berlin(300) [street canyon] keusgen2022sub
% =======================================================
To fill this research gap, the contributions of this work include that we present a wideband vector network analyzer (VNA)-based channel measurement campaign conducted in a typical outdoor scenario in two frequency bands above 300~GHz, with measuring bandwidth of 15~GHz.
In specific, the measurement campaign is conducted in an L-shaped street on a university campus at 306-321~GHz and 356-371~GHz. The scenario features one street along the parking area, and the other perpendicular street canyon between two buildings.
%The sounder system consists of a VNA-based sounder and a directional antenna to resolve multi-path components (MPCs) in the angular domain.
Both line-of-sight (LoS) and non-line-of-sight (NLoS) cases are investigated, with 18 measuring positions and 6480 channel impulse responses (CIRs) in total. In light of the measurement results, we retrive the propagation of multi-path components (MPCs) in the L-shaped street. Major MPC contributors in the environment, namely walls, vehicles, traffic signs and lamp poles, are identified, and their impacts by means of transmission, reflection, and scattering of MPCs are explored. Channel characteristics in the two frequency bands are analyzed in depth, including the path losses, shadow fading, cluster parameters, delay spread and angular spreads. Furthermore, we compare our results with those in the Urban Micro (UMi)-street canyon scenario specified in 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Technical Report (TR)~38.901~\cite{3gpp38901}, which indicates the sparsity of MPCs and smaller power spreads in both temporal and spatial domains in the THz band.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.
The wideband VNA-based channel sounder system and the measurement campaign are introduced in Sec.~\ref{section: campaign}. We then present channel measurement results in Sec.~\ref{section: results}. Specifically, major scatterers in the environment and their impact on MPCs are investigated, and channel characteristics are analyzed.
Finally, the paper is concluded in Sec.~\ref{section: conclusion}.
\section{Channel Analysis and Characterization} \label{section: results}
In this section, power-delay-angle profile (PDAP) is analyzed for multi-path characterization in the L-shaped street. Moreover, channel features in two frequency bands are analyzed in depth, including path losses, shadow fading, cluster parameters, delay spread and angular spread.
\subsection{Power-Delay-Angle-Profile (PDAP) Analysis} \label{sec:MPC_analysis}
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\subfigure[PDAP at Rx1-4.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.75\linewidth]{figures/Rx1-4_PDAP_compare.png}
}
\subfigure[Multi-path at Rx1-4.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.2\linewidth]{figures/Rx1-4.png}
}
\caption{PDAPs and multi-path propagation analysis at Rx1-4.}
\label{fig:Rx1-4}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\subfigure[PDAP at Rx5.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.37\linewidth]{figures/Rx6_PDAP.png}
}
\subfigure[PDAP at Rx6.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.37\linewidth]{figures/Rx5_PDAP.png}
}
\subfigure[Multi-path at Rx5-6.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.17\linewidth]{figures/Rx5-6.png}
}
\caption{PDAPs and multi-path propagation analysis at Rx5-6.}
\label{fig:Rx5-6}
\end{figure*}
The PDAP results at 306-321~GHz are taken as examples, while the results in the two bands are summarized and compared in Table~\ref{tab:parameters}.
First, for Rx1 to Rx4, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:Rx1-4}, three categories of MPCs are detected, namely, LoS, forward-reflected, and back-reflected rays from the wall. First, the LoS ray with azimuth angle of arrival (AoA, $\varphi$) equals to 60-70$^\circ$, travels 34.27~ns, 40.53~ns, 49.87~ns, and 55.93~ns, to reach Rx1-4. These LoS time-of-arrival (ToAs) correspond to the path length of 10.28~m, 12.16~m, 14.96~m, and 16.78~m, respectively. The power value varies from -104~dB to -113~dB.
Second, the forward-reflected rays are attributed to the reflection on the west wall of Wenbo Building, with $\varphi$ ranges over 120-130$^\circ$. The traveling path length is around 3~m longer than the LoS ray. The extra loss of wall forward-reflection is measured about 5-15~dB. By contrast, the third type of rays back-reflect from the west wall of Wenbo Building, with $\varphi$ ranges over 250-260$^\circ$, and propagate over 30.6~m to 23.7~m. The power is around -140~dB, which denotes that the extra loss of wall back-reflection is about 20-30~dB, i.e., noticeably higher than the forward-reflection. In our measurement, due to the geometry, the back-reflected rays from Wenbo Building can only be observed at Rx1-4.
Interestingly, between the two wall reflected rays, we observe a tail in PDAP with an increasing delay, a larger AoA and decreasing power, which demonstrates the continuous scattering from the wall. This phenomena occurs since the Tx and Rx positions are close to the wall of Wenbo Building. Therefore, the power of scattered rays from the wall material is above the noise floor. Moreover, as Rx1-4 are distributed in parallel with the wall, we can also observe continuous change of delays (and thus the values of power) and AoAs of scattering rays among PDAPs.
As shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:Rx5-6}, besides the LoS ray and the forward-reflected ray from the wall, reflected rays from the lamp pole and the traffic sign are detected at Rx5 and Rx6. Reflected from the lamp pole at the southwest corner of Wenbo Building, the reflected ray is observed at Rx5 with $\varphi$ equals to 200$^\circ$.
Moreover, coming from the traffic sign beside the parking lot, the reflected ray is observed at Rx6 with $\varphi$ equals to 30$^\circ$. To compare the reflection losses, the lamp pole reflection loss is about 15~dB, while the traffic sign, as a flat metal plane, results in much lower loss, e.g., around 6-8~dB.
Moving to the south direction further, Rx7-10 are the last four LoS positions, where the received MPCs are similar. Fig.~\ref{fig:Rx7-10} takes Rx8 and Rx10 as examples. First, the LoS ray and the back-reflected rays from Longbin Building can be observed. The back-reflection of the wall causes additional loss of 28-30~dB. Similar to other LoS Rx positions, sporadic rays from the parking lot are detected, i.e., with $\varphi$ in the range of 0-90$^\circ$. The scatterers include vehicles, lamp poles (30$^\circ$- 40$^\circ$), traffic signs (50$^\circ$- 60$^\circ$), and plants. However, unlike strong reflected rays (e.g., with power around -130~dB) at Rx5 and Rx6, these scattering rays are much weaker, with power around -150~dB, i.e., additional 20~dB losses.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\subfigure[PDAP at Rx8.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.35\linewidth]{figures/Rx8_PDAP.png}
}
\subfigure[PDAP at Rx10.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.35\linewidth]{figures/Rx10_PDAP.png}
}
\subfigure[The photo of the vehicle.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.23\linewidth]{figures/vehicle.png}
}
\caption{PDAPs at Rx8, Rx10 and the vehicle reflection in the south.}
\label{fig:Rx7-10}
\end{figure*}
%\begin{figure}
% \centering
% \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figures/strip250-270.png}
% \caption{PDAP strips around 260$^\circ$ at Rx1-8.}
% \label{fig:strip}
%\end{figure}
%Furthermore, we observe successive rays around 270$^\circ$ at Rx7 and Rx8, but not at Rx9 or Rx10. The reason is that Rx7 and Rx8 are located on the north-south street, while Rx9 and Rx10 are on the other street. For all points on the north-south street, Rx1 to Rx8, the same phenomena exist. As depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:strip}, the rays occur at the same angle around 260$^\circ$ and 270$^\circ$ (rarely at 250$^\circ$), and travels shorter distance (i.e., with smaller delay) to reach the receiver as the Rx moves from Rx1 to Rx8, which indicates that the scatterer is in the south. According to the photos that we take at that day as Fig.~\ref{fig:Rx7-10}(c), the vehicle parked near Longbin Building is likely the scatterer, and the minimal reflection loss is 16~dB. Note that the delay value is recorded cyclically with the duration of 400~ns, and therefore, MPCs with delay smaller than 50~ns actually travels 400-450~ns.
When the receiver moves to NLoS positions, as noted in Section~\ref{section: campaign}, a hybrid vehicle is parked at the southwest corner of Wenbo Building to outsource power for the channel sounder system. As summarized in Fig.~\ref{fig:Rx11-18}, the rays mainly come from (i) the first-order forward-reflection from Longbin Building, (ii) the higher-order reflection between two buildings, (iii) the transmission through the vehicle, and (iv) the scattering from vehicles in the parking area and near Longbin Building. First, the highest received power is -130~dB in the NLoS case. Second, the reflection loss caused by the wall of Longbin Building varies from 18~dB to 30~dB, depending on the angle of incidence. Third, the transmission loss through the vehicle is less than 10~dB, deduced
based on the comparison with the reflected ray from the traffic sign at Rx6. By contrast, the power of the scattering rays from vehicles is as low as -150~dB at NLoS Rx points, which indicates less significance of scattering (compared to reflection) on vehicles.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\subfigure[Multi-path at Rx11-16.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.43\linewidth]{figures/Rx11-16.png}
}
\subfigure[Multi-path at Rx17-18.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.43\linewidth]{figures/Rx17-18.png}
}
\caption{Multi-path analysis at Rx11-18 (NLoS Rx points).}
\label{fig:Rx11-18}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Characteristic Analysis}
Based on the data post-processing procedures as detailed in~\cite{li2022modifiedSAGE}, we present the channel characteristics in depth. We clarify that we only focus on MPCs within the dynamic range of 30~dB, in order to be compatible with the lower dynamic range of general THz devices~\cite{channel_tutorial}.
In Table~\ref{tab:parameters}, statistical channel parameters in two frequency bands are summarized and compared with those in the UMi-street canyon scenario specified in 3GPP TR~38.901~\cite{3gpp38901}, which are discussed as follows.
\subsubsection{Path loss and shadow fading}
The best direction path loss and the omni-directional path loss~\cite{wang2022thz} are investigated.
The close-in (CI) and $\alpha$-$\beta$ path loss models are invoked, which are expressed respectively as
\begin{subequations}
\begin{align}
\text{PL}^{\rm CI} &= 10\times\text{PLE}\times\log_{10}\frac{d}{d_0}+\text{FSPL}(d_0)+X^{\rm CI}_{\sigma_{\rm SF}},\\
\text{PL}^{\alpha\beta} &= 10\times\alpha\times\log_{10}d+\beta+X^{\alpha\beta}_{\sigma_{\rm SF}},
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
where PLE is the path loss exponent and $d$ denotes the distance between Tx and Rx. The reference distance $d_0$ is equal to 1~m. The free-space path loss (FSPL) is given by the Friis’ law. Moreover, $\alpha$ is the slope coefficient and $\beta$ represents the optimized path loss offset in dB. $X^{\rm CI}_{\sigma_{\rm SF}}$ and $X^{\rm \alpha\beta}_{\sigma_{\rm SF}}$ are zero-mean Gaussian random variables with standard deviation $\sigma^{\rm CI}_{\rm SF}$ and $\sigma^{\alpha\beta}_{\rm SF}$ in dB, respectively, indicating the fluctuation caused by shadow fading.
The observations are drawn as follows.
First, the omni-directional PLEs are smaller since the power of all MPCs are added up, resulting in a lower omni-directional path loss.
Second, compared with the UMi-street canyon scenario specified in 3GPP TR~38.901, the omni-directional PLE in the THz band is smaller in the LoS case but larger in the NLoS case.
Third, compared to large-scale characteristics at 306-321~GHz, the path losses at 356-371~GHz are higher by 4-6~dB, and the shadow fading effect at 356-371~GHz is more significant, as expected.
\subsubsection{Cluster parameters}
The numbers of clusters in the outdoor L-shaped street in the THz band are much smaller than that is specified in 3GPP UMi-street canyon scenario in frequency bands lower than 100~GHz. This fact indicates the strong sparsity in THz bands. To be specific, the average number of clusters at 300~GHz and 350~GHz is about 2-3 in LoS cases and 5-6 in NLoS cases. Furthermore, due to the sparsity of MPCs under the target 30~dB dynamic range, MPCs inside each cluster are more confined, and thus the intra-cluster delay and angular spreads are also much smaller.
\subsubsection{Delay and angular spreads}
We use the root-mean-square (RMS) delay spread (DS), azimuth spread of angle (ASA) and elevation spread of angle (ESA) to measure the power dispersion of MPCs in temporal and spatial domains~\cite{wang2022thz}.
First, the values of DS, ASA, and ESA in the NLoS case are noticeably larger than the counterparts in the LoS case.
Second, in the LoS case, DS and ASA are normally smaller than 10~ns and 20$^\circ$. For Rx points where the long vehicle-reflected ray is detected, the value of DS increases, which is still smaller than 20~ns at 306-321~GHz.
Furthermore, the higher frequency band over 356-371 GHz has smaller DS and ASA.
Besides, the values of spreads in the L-shaped street in the THz band are smaller than those in the UMi-street canyon scenario in 3GPP TR~38.901 in frequency bands lower than 100~GHz. Compared to results in the indoor L-shaped hallway\footnote{The preliminary results in the indoor L-shaped hallway are presented in~\cite{wang2022thz}. The measurement campaign is later extended to both 306-321~GHz and 356-371~GHz, and the complete characteristic analysis results are updated according to the same data processing procedure as this paper.}, DS in the outdoor L-shaped street is smaller in the LoS case, while DS values in the NLoS case are comparable, in both frequency bands. ASAs are smaller in the outdoor L-shaped street for both cases and both frequency bands. Smaller power spreads in the outdoor L-shaped street in both temporal and spatial domains are attributed to the absence of walls that surround the scenario and thus confine MPCs with diverse delays and AoAs to the scenario.
\begin{table}
\caption{Summary of statistical channel parameters.}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figures/new_parameter_distribution.png}
\label{tab:parameters}
\end{table}
%\subsubsection{Comparison between L-shaped indoor and outdoor scenarios}
\documentclass[conference]{IEEEtran}
%\IEEEoverridecommandlockouts
% The preceding line is only needed to identify funding in the first footnote. If that is unneeded, please comment it out.
\setlength{\topmargin}{-0.7in}
\usepackage{cite}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage{authblk}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{epsfig}
\usepackage{latexsym}
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{stfloats}
\usepackage{epstopdf}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{enumerate}
\usepackage{array}
\graphicspath{{./Figures/}}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{bbm}
\usepackage{caption}
\usepackage{bm}
\usepackage[tight,footnotesize]{subfigure}
\usepackage{balance}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{verbatim}
\allowdisplaybreaks[4]
\usepackage{dsfont}
\usepackage{verbatim}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{setspace}
\usepackage{diagbox}
\usepackage[framemethod=tikz]{mdframed}
\usepackage{multicol}
\usepackage{environ}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{stfloats}
\usepackage{algpseudocode}
\usepackage{graphics}
\usepackage{epsfig}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{authblk}
\newcommand{\rev}[1]{\textcolor{blue}{{#1}}}
\newcommand{\ch}[1]{\textcolor{red}{{CH:#1}}}
% ==============================================================
% ========================== [add] =============================
% ==============================================================
\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc
\usepackage[caption=false, font=normalsize, labelfont=sf, textfont=sf]{subfig}
\else
\usepackage[caption=false, font=footnotesize]{subfig}
\usepackage{bm}
% ==============================================================
\def\BibTeX{{\rm B\kern-.05em{\sc i\kern-.025em b}\kern-.08em
T\kern-.1667em\lower.7ex\hbox{E}\kern-.125emX}}
\begin{document}
\title{Terahertz Channel Measurement and Analysis on a University Campus Street}
\author{Yiqin Wang}
\author{Yuanbo Li}
\author[2]{Yi Chen}
\author[2]{Ziming Yu}
\author{Chong Han}
\affil{Terahertz Wireless Communications (TWC) Laboratory, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.\authorcr Email: \{wangyiqin, yuanbo.li, chong.han\}@sjtu.edu.cn}
\affil[2]{Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., China. Email: \{chenyi171, yuziming\}@huawei.com}
%\author{\IEEEauthorblockN{Yiqin Wang}
%\IEEEauthorblockA{\textit{University of Michigan-Shanghai}\\
%\textit{Jiao Tong University Joint Institute}\\
%\textit{Shanghai Jiao Tong University}, Shanghai, China\\
%Email: wangyiqin@sjtu.edu.cn}
%\and
%\IEEEauthorblockN{Chong Han}
%\IEEEauthorblockA{\textit{University of Michigan-Shanghai}\\
%\textit{Jiao Tong University Joint Institute}\\
%\textit{Shanghai Jiao Tong University}, Shanghai, China\\
%Email: chong.han@sjtu.edu.cn}}
\maketitle
%\let\thefootnote\relax\footnotetext{Chong Han acknowledges the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant 62027806.}
\input{contents/Abstract}
\input{contents/Introduction}
\input{contents/Campaign}
\input{contents/Results}
\input{contents/Conclusion}
%\balance
\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}
\bibliography{bibliography}
\end{document}
\section{Introduction}
This document is a model and instructions for \LaTeX.
Please observe the conference page limits.
\section{Ease of Use}
\subsection{Maintaining the Integrity of the Specifications}
The IEEEtran class file is used to format your paper and style the text. All margins,
column widths, line spaces, and text fonts are prescribed; please do not
alter them. You may note peculiarities. For example, the head margin
measures proportionately more than is customary. This measurement
and others are deliberate, using specifications that anticipate your paper
as one part of the entire proceedings, and not as an independent document.
Please do not revise any of the current designations.
\section{Prepare Your Paper Before Styling}
Before you begin to format your paper, first write and save the content as a
separate text file. Complete all content and organizational editing before
formatting. Please note sections \ref{AA}--\ref{SCM} below for more information on
proofreading, spelling and grammar.
Keep your text and graphic files separate until after the text has been
formatted and styled. Do not number text heads---{\LaTeX} will do that
for you.
\subsection{Abbreviations and Acronyms}\label{AA}
Define abbreviations and acronyms the first time they are used in the text,
even after they have been defined in the abstract. Abbreviations such as
IEEE, SI, MKS, CGS, ac, dc, and rms do not have to be defined. Do not use
abbreviations in the title or heads unless they are unavoidable.
\subsection{Units}
\begin{itemize}
\item Use either SI (MKS) or CGS as primary units. (SI units are encouraged.) English units may be used as secondary units (in parentheses). An exception would be the use of English units as identifiers in trade, such as ``3.5-inch disk drive''.
\item Avoid combining SI and CGS units, such as current in amperes and magnetic field in oersteds. This often leads to confusion because equations do not balance dimensionally. If you must use mixed units, clearly state the units for each quantity that you use in an equation.
\item Do not mix complete spellings and abbreviations of units: ``Wb/m\textsuperscript{2}'' or ``webers per square meter'', not ``webers/m\textsuperscript{2}''. Spell out units when they appear in text: ``. . . a few henries'', not ``. . . a few H''.
\item Use a zero before decimal points: ``0.25'', not ``.25''. Use ``cm\textsuperscript{3}'', not ``cc''.)
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Equations}
Number equations consecutively. To make your
equations more compact, you may use the solidus (~/~), the exp function, or
appropriate exponents. Italicize Roman symbols for quantities and variables,
but not Greek symbols. Use a long dash rather than a hyphen for a minus
sign. Punctuate equations with commas or periods when they are part of a
sentence, as in:
\begin{equation}
a+b=\gamma\label{eq}
\end{equation}
Be sure that the
symbols in your equation have been defined before or immediately following
the equation. Use ``\eqref{eq}'', not ``Eq.~\eqref{eq}'' or ``equation \eqref{eq}'', except at
the beginning of a sentence: ``Equation \eqref{eq} is . . .''
\subsection{\LaTeX-Specific Advice}
Please use ``soft'' (e.g., \verb|\eqref{Eq}|) cross references instead
of ``hard'' references (e.g., \verb|(1)|). That will make it possible
to combine sections, add equations, or change the order of figures or
citations without having to go through the file line by line.
Please don't use the \verb|{eqnarray}| equation environment. Use
\verb|{align}| or \verb|{IEEEeqnarray}| instead. The \verb|{eqnarray}|
environment leaves unsightly spaces around relation symbols.
Please note that the \verb|{subequations}| environment in {\LaTeX}
will increment the main equation counter even when there are no
equation numbers displayed. If you forget that, you might write an
article in which the equation numbers skip from (17) to (20), causing
the copy editors to wonder if you've discovered a new method of
counting.
{\BibTeX} does not work by magic. It doesn't get the bibliographic
data from thin air but from .bib files. If you use {\BibTeX} to produce a
bibliography you must send the .bib files.
{\LaTeX} can't read your mind. If you assign the same label to a
subsubsection and a table, you might find that Table I has been cross
referenced as Table IV-B3.
{\LaTeX} does not have precognitive abilities. If you put a
\verb|\label| command before the command that updates the counter it's
supposed to be using, the label will pick up the last counter to be
cross referenced instead. In particular, a \verb|\label| command
should not go before the caption of a figure or a table.
Do not use \verb|\nonumber| inside the \verb|{array}| environment. It
will not stop equation numbers inside \verb|{array}| (there won't be
any anyway) and it might stop a wanted equation number in the
surrounding equation.
\subsection{Some Common Mistakes}\label{SCM}
\begin{itemize}
\item The word ``data'' is plural, not singular.
\item The subscript for the permeability of vacuum $\mu_{0}$, and other common scientific constants, is zero with subscript formatting, not a lowercase letter ``o''.
\item In American English, commas, semicolons, periods, question and exclamation marks are located within quotation marks only when a complete thought or name is cited, such as a title or full quotation. When quotation marks are used, instead of a bold or italic typeface, to highlight a word or phrase, punctuation should appear outside of the quotation marks. A parenthetical phrase or statement at the end of a sentence is punctuated outside of the closing parenthesis (like this). (A parenthetical sentence is punctuated within the parentheses.)
\item A graph within a graph is an ``inset'', not an ``insert''. The word alternatively is preferred to the word ``alternately'' (unless you really mean something that alternates).
\item Do not use the word ``essentially'' to mean ``approximately'' or ``effectively''.
\item In your paper title, if the words ``that uses'' can accurately replace the word ``using'', capitalize the ``u''; if not, keep using lower-cased.
\item Be aware of the different meanings of the homophones ``affect'' and ``effect'', ``complement'' and ``compliment'', ``discreet'' and ``discrete'', ``principal'' and ``principle''.
\item Do not confuse ``imply'' and ``infer''.
\item The prefix ``non'' is not a word; it should be joined to the word it modifies, usually without a hyphen.
\item There is no period after the ``et'' in the Latin abbreviation ``et al.''.
\item The abbreviation ``i.e.'' means ``that is'', and the abbreviation ``e.g.'' means ``for example''.
\end{itemize}
An excellent style manual for science writers is \cite{b7}.
\subsection{Authors and Affiliations}
\textbf{The class file is designed for, but not limited to, six authors.} A
minimum of one author is required for all conference articles. Author names
should be listed starting from left to right and then moving down to the
next line. This is the author sequence that will be used in future citations
and by indexing services. Names should not be listed in columns nor group by
affiliation. Please keep your affiliations as succinct as possible (for
example, do not differentiate among departments of the same organization).
\subsection{Identify the Headings}
Headings, or heads, are organizational devices that guide the reader through
your paper. There are two types: component heads and text heads.
Component heads identify the different components of your paper and are not
topically subordinate to each other. Examples include Acknowledgments and
References and, for these, the correct style to use is ``Heading 5''. Use
``figure caption'' for your Figure captions, and ``table head'' for your
table title. Run-in heads, such as ``Abstract'', will require you to apply a
style (in this case, italic) in addition to the style provided by the drop
down menu to differentiate the head from the text.
Text heads organize the topics on a relational, hierarchical basis. For
example, the paper title is the primary text head because all subsequent
material relates and elaborates on this one topic. If there are two or more
sub-topics, the next level head (uppercase Roman numerals) should be used
and, conversely, if there are not at least two sub-topics, then no subheads
should be introduced.
\subsection{Figures and Tables}
\paragraph{Positioning Figures and Tables} Place figures and tables at the top and
bottom of columns. Avoid placing them in the middle of columns. Large
figures and tables may span across both columns. Figure captions should be
below the figures; table heads should appear above the tables. Insert
figures and tables after they are cited in the text. Use the abbreviation
``Fig.~\ref{fig}'', even at the beginning of a sentence.
\begin{table}[htbp]
\caption{Table Type Styles}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
\textbf{Table}&\multicolumn{3}{|c|}{\textbf{Table Column Head}} \\
\cline{2-4}
\textbf{Head} & \textbf{\textit{Table column subhead}}& \textbf{\textit{Subhead}}& \textbf{\textit{Subhead}} \\
\hline
copy& More table copy$^{\mathrm{a}}$& & \\
\hline
\multicolumn{4}{l}{$^{\mathrm{a}}$Sample of a Table footnote.}
\end{tabular}
\label{tab1}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centerline{\includegraphics{fig1.png}}
\caption{Example of a figure caption.}
\label{fig}
\end{figure}
Figure Labels: Use 8 point Times New Roman for Figure labels. Use words
rather than symbols or abbreviations when writing Figure axis labels to
avoid confusing the reader. As an example, write the quantity
``Magnetization'', or ``Magnetization, M'', not just ``M''. If including
units in the label, present them within parentheses. Do not label axes only
with units. In the example, write ``Magnetization (A/m)'' or ``Magnetization
\{A[m(1)]\}'', not just ``A/m''. Do not label axes with a ratio of
quantities and units. For example, write ``Temperature (K)'', not
``Temperature/K''.
\section*{Acknowledgment}
The preferred spelling of the word ``acknowledgment'' in America is without
an ``e'' after the ``g''. Avoid the stilted expression ``one of us (R. B.
G.) thanks $\ldots$''. Instead, try ``R. B. G. thanks$\ldots$''. Put sponsor
acknowledgments in the unnumbered footnote on the first page.
\section*{References}
Please number citations consecutively within brackets \cite{b1}. The
sentence punctuation follows the bracket \cite{b2}. Refer simply to the reference
number, as in \cite{b3}---do not use ``Ref. \cite{b3}'' or ``reference \cite{b3}'' except at
the beginning of a sentence: ``Reference \cite{b3} was the first $\ldots$''
Number footnotes separately in superscripts. Place the actual footnote at
the bottom of the column in which it was cited. Do not put footnotes in the
abstract or reference list. Use letters for table footnotes.
Unless there are six authors or more give all authors' names; do not use
``et al.''. Papers that have not been published, even if they have been
submitted for publication, should be cited as ``unpublished'' \cite{b4}. Papers
that have been accepted for publication should be cited as ``in press'' \cite{b5}.
Capitalize only the first word in a paper title, except for proper nouns and
element symbols.
For papers published in translation journals, please give the English
citation first, followed by the original foreign-language citation \cite{b6}.
\begin{abstract}
Owning abundant bandwidth resource, the Terahertz (0.1-10~THz) band is a promising spectrum to support sixth-generation (6G) and beyond communications. As the foundation of channel study in the spectrum, channel measurement is ongoing in covering representative 6G communication scenarios and promising THz frequency bands. In this paper, a wideband channel measurement in an L-shaped university campus street is conducted at 306-321~GHz and 356-371~GHz.
%\rev{The sounder system consists of a vector network analyzer (VNA)-based channel sounder, and a directional antenna equipped at the receiver to resolve multi-path components (MPCs) in the angular domain.}
In particular, ten line-of-sight (LoS) and eight non-line-of-sight (NLoS) points are measured at the two frequency bands, respectively. In total, 6480 channel impulse responses (CIRs) are obtained from the measurement, based on which multi-path propagation in the L-shaped roadway in the THz band is elaborated to identify major scatterers of walls, vehicles, etc. in the environment and their impact on multi-path components (MPCs). Furthermore, outdoor THz channel characteristics in the two frequency bands are analyzed, including path losses, shadow fading, cluster parameters, delay spread and angular spread. In contrast with the counterparts in the similar outdoor scenario at lower frequencies, the results verify the sparsity of MPCs at THz frequencies and indicate smaller power spreads in both temporal and spatial domains in the THz band.
\end{abstract}
\section{Channel Measurement Campaign} \label{section: campaign}
In this section, we introduce our VNA-based channel measurement platform, and describe the THz measurement campaign at 306-321~GHz and 356-371~GHz in a L-shaped street on the campus of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU).
\subsection{Channel Measurement System}
Our channel measurement platform supports the frequency ranging from 260~GHz to 400~GHz. As detailed in~\cite{wang2022thz}, the system is composed of THz transmitter (Tx) and receiver (Rx) modules and the Ceyear 3672C VNA. The system calibration procedure is described in detail in our previous works~\cite{wang2022thz, li2022channel}.
\begin{comment}
The VNA generates radio frequency (RF) and local oscillator (LO) sources.
%The RF signal is multiplied by 27 to reach the carrier frequencies ranging from 260~GHz to 400~GHz. The LO signal is multiplied by 24 to reach the frequencies ranging from 260.0076~GHz to 400.0076~GHz. As a result, the mixed intermediate frequency (IF) signal has the frequency of 7.6~MHz.
The signals from RF and LO sources are multiplied by 27 and 24, respectively. As a result, the transmitted signal reaches the carrier frequencies ranging from 260~GHz to 400~GHz, and the mixed intermediate frequency (IF) signal has the frequency of 7.6~MHz.
%and therefore is free of the error caused by the cables when they carry high-frequency signals.
The IF signals at Tx and Rx modules are both sent back to the VNA, and the transfer function of the channel is calculated as the ratio of the two frequency responses. Interestingly, power of the sounder systems is supplied by a hybrid vehicle parking in ....
\end{comment}
In this measurement campaign, we investigate two frequency bands, 306-321~GHz and 356-371 GHz, which both cover the bandwidth of 15~GHz. The frequency sweeping interval is 2.5~MHz, resulting in 6001 sweeping points for each pair of Tx-Rx directions. Therefore, the space resolution is 2~cm and the maximum detectable path length is 120~m.
To compensate for the high path loss in the THz band, waveguides and WR2.8 horn antenna are installed, with gains around 7~dBi (3-dB beamwidth around 60$^\circ$) at the Tx side and 25-26~dBi (3-dB beamwidth around 8$^\circ$) at the Rx side, respectively.
Regarding the mechanical part of the measurement system, the Tx and Rx are lifted to reach the height of 3~m and 1.75~m, respectively. The Tx is static, while by contrast, to receive MPCs, the Rx is driven by the rotator to scan the complete azimuth domain and from $-20^\circ$ to $20^\circ$ in the elevation domain, with the step of $10^\circ$. Key parameters of the measurement are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:system_parameter}.
% \begin{figure}
% \centering
% \subfigure[The RF part.]{
% \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{figures/RF_system.png}
% }
% \\
% \subfigure[The mechanical part.]{
% \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{figures/platform.png}
% }
% \caption{The 260-400~GHz channel measurement system.}
% \label{fig:platform}
% \end{figure}
\begin{table}
\centering
\caption{Parameters of the measurement.}
\begin{tabular}{ll}
\toprule
Parameter & Value \\
\midrule
Frequency band & 306-321, 356-371~GHz \\
Bandwidth & 15~GHz \\
Sweeping interval & 2.5~MHz \\
Sweeping points & 6001 \\
Time resolution & 66.7~ps \\
Space resolution & 2~cm \\
Maximum excess delay & 400~ns \\
Maximum path length & 120~m \\
Tx antenna gain & 7~dBi \\
Tx 3-dB beamwidth & 60$^\circ$ \\
Rx antenna gain & 25-26~dBi \\
Rx 3-dB beamwidth & 8$^\circ$ \\
Tx height & 3~m \\
Rx height & 1.75~m \\
Rx azimuth angles & $[0^\circ:10^\circ:360^\circ]$ \\
Rx elevation angles & $[-20^\circ:10^\circ:20^\circ]$ \\
Average noise floor & -180~dBm \\
Dynamic range & 119~dB \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:system_parameter}
\end{table}
\subsection{Measurement Deployment}
As shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:environment}, the measurement campaign is conducted in the outdoor street bounded by Wenbo Building, Longbin Building, and Nanyang Road on the SJTU campus. Specifically, we focus on the L-shaped turning at the crossroad, depicted as the yellow region, with buildings, vehicles, pedestrians, plants, etc. The west street (Street~A) is parallel to Nanyang Road, and is between the west wall of Wenbo Building and a parking area. Vehicles, lamp poles and traffic signs are found along Street~A, and one lamp pole is at the southwest corner of Wenbo Building. The other street canyon (Street~B) between two buildings is about 22.32~m wide. Plants and a non-automobile parking area are located in the south of Wenbo Building along Street~B.
The measurement deployment is illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:deployment}. We set west when the horizontal angle $\varphi$ equals to 0$^\circ$, while the value of $\varphi$ increases clockwise. Tx is located at the northwest corner in Street~A, i.e., 29.66~m away from the junction of two streets. The directivity of Tx points to the southeast direction, with the fixed horizontal angle of $\varphi$ = 230$^\circ$ and elevation angle of $\theta$ = 0$^\circ$. The positions of Rx are distributed along two segments of the L-shaped street, labeled as Rx1-Rx8 and Rx9-Rx16. The farthest point is about 20~m away from the junction of two streets. Moreover, two additional Rx points, Rx17 and Rx18, are located in the non-automobile parking area, to simulate user equipment in the shadow of a building. To classify, Rx1 to Rx10 belong to the LoS case, while Rx11 to Rx18 belong to the NLoS case.
Interestingly, the source power of the sounder systems is supplied by a hybrid vehicle, which is parked in the parking area in Street~A in the LoS case. By contrast, due to the limit of cable length, it is parked at the southwest corner of Wenbo Building when we measure channel responses at NLoS points, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:environment}(b). Note that this vehicle creates transmission, reflection and scattering in the measurement.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\subfigure[The top view of the measurement campaign.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.46\linewidth]{figures/topview.png}
}
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.5\linewidth}
\centering
\subfigure[The photo of the environment.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.95\linewidth]{figures/environment1.png}
}\\
\subfigure[The photo of the west street (Street~A).]{
\includegraphics[width=0.95\linewidth]{figures/environment2.png}
}
\end{minipage}
\caption{Measurement campaign in the L-shaped street on the SJTU campus.}
\label{fig:environment}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.95\linewidth]{figures/deployment.jpg}
\caption{Measurement deployment in the L-shaped street on the SJTU campus (Tx, red; LoS Rx, blue; NLoS Rx, violet).}
\label{fig:deployment}
\end{figure}
%\subsection{\rev{Calibration and Data Post-processing}}
\section{Conclusion} \label{section: conclusion}
In this paper, we conducted a wideband channel measurement campaign in an L-shaped street on the university campus at 306-321~GHz and 356-371~GHz.
The scenario contains one street along the parking area, and another perpendicular street canyon between two buildings.
The characteristics of multi-path propagation are elaborated to identify major scatterers in the environment and their impact on MPCs. We analyze the outdoor THz channel characteristics in the two frequency bands, and draw the following observations.
\begin{itemize}
\item First, reflected and scattered rays on the wall are well observed. Forward-reflected rays endure extra loss about 5-15~dB, while back-reflected rays endure extra loss about 20-30~dB. Besides, the abundance of scattering on the wall is demonstrated by PDAP results.
\item Second, other major scatterers, i.e., traffic signs, lamps, and vehicles, are identified in this outdoor scenario. For instance, the traffic sign and the lamp result in additional reflection losses about several decibels and 15~dB, respectively.
\item Third, the interaction on the vehicle is investigated. While transmission or reflection renders an extra loss less than 10~dB, the scattering on vehicles are much less significant.
\item Fourth, as the receiving point moves from LoS positions into the street canyon (Street B) between two high buildings, the LoS is blocked by the building. For NLoS receiving points as far as 20~m away from the open crossroad, i.e., the entrance of the street canyon, the received power is 20~dB lower than that of the LoS point at the crossroad.
\item Fifth, we further analyzed THz channel characteristics in the outdoor scenario, and compared our results with those in the UMi-street canyon scenario below 100~GHz, which indicates the sparsity of MPCs and smaller power spreads in both temporal and spatial domains in the THz band.
\end{itemize}
%including path losses, shadow fading, cluster parameters, delay spread and angular spread, and compared them with the counterparts of the street canyon scenario in lower frequency bands, as summarized in Table~\ref{tab:parameters}.
%Acknowledgement: Chong Han acknowledges the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant 62027806.
\section{Introduction}
As a promising spectrum band for sixth-generation (6G) communications, the Terahertz (0.1-10~THz) band is anticipated to meet the demand of wireless systems for data rates to reach terabits per second (Tbps)~\cite{akyildiz2022terahertz,chen2021terahertz,rappaport2019wireless}.
In this new spectrum, the design of wireless systems relies on the study of THz wireless channels, which includes physical measurement of channels, analysis of channel characteristics, among others~\cite{channel_tutorial}.
Compared with well investigated centimeter-wave (cmWave) and millimeter-wave (mmWave) bands, the exploration of THz wireless channels, especially the physical measurement of THz wireless channels, is far from sufficient to cover all representative 6G communication scenarios and promising THz frequencies.
Channel measurement campaigns have been conducted mainly at 140~GHz, 190~GHz, and 220~GHz~\cite{channel_tutorial,abbasi2022thz,ju2022sub}, i.e., in the ``sub-THz'' band that overlaps with the mmWave band~\cite{rappaport2019wireless}.
By contrast, wireless channel measurements above 300~GHz are still inadequate.
In the up-to-date acts of the World Radiocommunication Conference 2019 (WRC-19), the frequency bands from 275~GHz to 450~GHz have identified for the implementation of fixed and land mobile service applications~\cite{WRC-19-FINAL-ACTS}.
Some existing measurement studies in these frequency bands are conducted in indoor hallways~\cite{wang2022thz, li2022channel}, an aircraft carbin~\cite{doeker2022channel}, a courtyard~\cite{undi2021angle}, and railway and vehicular communication scenarios~\cite{guan2021channel,eckhardt2021channel}.
Nevertheless, channel measurement campaigns above 300~GHz hardly go to outdoor scenarios. Besides, most of these studies use correlation-based channel sounder with measuring bandwidth no more than 8~GHz.
%As the foundation of channel study, physical channel measurement in the THz band is supported by wideband channel sounders.
%at 140~GHz~\cite{chen2021channel,abbasi2022thz,ju2022sub}, 190~GHz~\cite{dupleich2020characterization}, and 220~GHz~\cite{he2021channel}, i.e., in the ``sub-THz'' band that overlaps with the mmWave band~\cite{rappaport2019wireless}.
% =======================================================
% ====================== < 300 GHz ======================
% =======================================================
% SJTU(140 office) chen2021channel
% SJTU(220 conference) he2021channel
% Aalto(140 shopping) nguyen2018comparing
% Aalto(140 airport) nguyen2021large
% USC(140-220 LoS) abbasi2020channel
% USC(140-220 urban) abbasi2020double, abbasi2021double, abbasi2021ultra, abbasi2022double(street canyon), abbasi2022thz-TWC(courtyard, crossroad)
% NYU(140) [multiple indoor] xing2012propagation, xing2019indoor, ju2021millimeter, ju2022sub(InF)
% NYU(140) [urban microcell, satellite and backhaul] xing2021propagation, kanhere2021outdoor, ju2021140, ju2021sub
% TU Ilmenau(190) [conference room] dupleich2020characterization
% TU Braunschweig & BJTU(60-300) [T2T,I2I,T2I,inside-station,intra-wagon] guan2021channel(summary), guan2019channel_EuCAP, guan2019measurement, guan2020channel, guan2019channel_TVT
% TU Berlin(158) schultze2022observations(shopping mall), keusgen2022sub(street canyon)
% =======================================================
% =======================================================
% ===================== short-range =====================
% =======================================================
% TUBS(300) [(a) short-range (0.2-1 m) desktop, (b) a small indoor office (2.43 × 4.15 m) was scanned in the horizontal plane, with the Tx/Rx distance of about 1.67~m] priebe2011channel
% Duisburg-Essen(300) [LoS (1-5 m)] zantah2019channel
% Georgia Tech. (300) [(a) desktop (0.1-0.7 m), (b) motherboard (< 0.3 m), (c) data center (0.4-2.1 m)] kim2014statistical, kim2016characterization, cheng2019characterization, cheng2020thz
% POSTECH(300) [LoS (0.1-1 m)] song2020los
% Koc Univ.(260-400) [LoS (0.01-0.95 m)] khalid2019statistical
% Univ. of Surrey & NPL(500-750) [LoS (0-0.2286 m)] serghiou2020ultra
% TUBS & Univ. of Tampere(300) [data center] eckhardt2019measurements
% TUBS & Univ. of Tampere(300) [material; Boeing 737] /
% TUBS(300) [aircraft carbin (<10 m)] doeker2022channel-TAP
% TUBS & Brown University(60-1T) [reflection and scattering coefficients of various indoor materials] /
% =======================================================
% ==================== site-scale =======================
% =======================================================
% HHI(300) [courtyard (urban microcell)] undi2021angle
% TU Braunschweig & Univ. of Tampere(300) [vehicular] petrov2020measurements, eckhardt2021channel
% TU Berlin(300) [street canyon] keusgen2022sub
% =======================================================
To fill this research gap, the contributions of this work include that we present a wideband vector network analyzer (VNA)-based channel measurement campaign conducted in a typical outdoor scenario in two frequency bands above 300~GHz, with measuring bandwidth of 15~GHz.
In specific, the measurement campaign is conducted in an L-shaped street on a university campus at 306-321~GHz and 356-371~GHz. The scenario features one street along the parking area, and the other perpendicular street canyon between two buildings.
%The sounder system consists of a VNA-based sounder and a directional antenna to resolve multi-path components (MPCs) in the angular domain.
Both line-of-sight (LoS) and non-line-of-sight (NLoS) cases are investigated, with 18 measuring positions and 6480 channel impulse responses (CIRs) in total. In light of the measurement results, we retrive the propagation of multi-path components (MPCs) in the L-shaped street. Major MPC contributors in the environment, namely walls, vehicles, traffic signs and lamp poles, are identified, and their impacts by means of transmission, reflection, and scattering of MPCs are explored. Channel characteristics in the two frequency bands are analyzed in depth, including the path losses, shadow fading, cluster parameters, delay spread and angular spreads. Furthermore, we compare our results with those in the Urban Micro (UMi)-street canyon scenario specified in 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Technical Report (TR)~38.901~\cite{3gpp38901}, which indicates the sparsity of MPCs and smaller power spreads in both temporal and spatial domains in the THz band.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.
The wideband VNA-based channel sounder system and the measurement campaign are introduced in Sec.~\ref{section: campaign}. We then present channel measurement results in Sec.~\ref{section: results}. Specifically, major scatterers in the environment and their impact on MPCs are investigated, and channel characteristics are analyzed.
Finally, the paper is concluded in Sec.~\ref{section: conclusion}.
\section{Channel Analysis and Characterization} \label{section: results}
In this section, power-delay-angle profile (PDAP) is analyzed for multi-path characterization in the L-shaped street. Moreover, channel features in two frequency bands are analyzed in depth, including path losses, shadow fading, cluster parameters, delay spread and angular spread.
\subsection{Power-Delay-Angle-Profile (PDAP) Analysis} \label{sec:MPC_analysis}
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\subfigure[PDAP at Rx1-4.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.75\linewidth]{figures/Rx1-4_PDAP_compare.png}
}
\subfigure[Multi-path at Rx1-4.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.2\linewidth]{figures/Rx1-4.png}
}
\caption{PDAPs and multi-path propagation analysis at Rx1-4.}
\label{fig:Rx1-4}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\subfigure[PDAP at Rx5.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.37\linewidth]{figures/Rx6_PDAP.png}
}
\subfigure[PDAP at Rx6.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.37\linewidth]{figures/Rx5_PDAP.png}
}
\subfigure[Multi-path at Rx5-6.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.17\linewidth]{figures/Rx5-6.png}
}
\caption{PDAPs and multi-path propagation analysis at Rx5-6.}
\label{fig:Rx5-6}
\end{figure*}
The PDAP results at 306-321~GHz are taken as examples, while the results in the two bands are summarized and compared in Table~\ref{tab:parameters}.
First, for Rx1 to Rx4, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:Rx1-4}, three categories of MPCs are detected, namely, LoS, forward-reflected, and back-reflected rays from the wall. First, the LoS ray with azimuth angle of arrival (AoA, $\varphi$) equals to 60-70$^\circ$, travels 34.27~ns, 40.53~ns, 49.87~ns, and 55.93~ns, to reach Rx1-4. These LoS time-of-arrival (ToAs) correspond to the path length of 10.28~m, 12.16~m, 14.96~m, and 16.78~m, respectively. The power value varies from -104~dB to -113~dB.
Second, the forward-reflected rays are attributed to the reflection on the west wall of Wenbo Building, with $\varphi$ ranges over 120-130$^\circ$. The traveling path length is around 3~m longer than the LoS ray. The extra loss of wall forward-reflection is measured about 5-15~dB. By contrast, the third type of rays back-reflect from the west wall of Wenbo Building, with $\varphi$ ranges over 250-260$^\circ$, and propagate over 30.6~m to 23.7~m. The power is around -140~dB, which denotes that the extra loss of wall back-reflection is about 20-30~dB, i.e., noticeably higher than the forward-reflection. In our measurement, due to the geometry, the back-reflected rays from Wenbo Building can only be observed at Rx1-4.
Interestingly, between the two wall reflected rays, we observe a tail in PDAP with an increasing delay, a larger AoA and decreasing power, which demonstrates the continuous scattering from the wall. This phenomena occurs since the Tx and Rx positions are close to the wall of Wenbo Building. Therefore, the power of scattered rays from the wall material is above the noise floor. Moreover, as Rx1-4 are distributed in parallel with the wall, we can also observe continuous change of delays (and thus the values of power) and AoAs of scattering rays among PDAPs.
As shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:Rx5-6}, besides the LoS ray and the forward-reflected ray from the wall, reflected rays from the lamp pole and the traffic sign are detected at Rx5 and Rx6. Reflected from the lamp pole at the southwest corner of Wenbo Building, the reflected ray is observed at Rx5 with $\varphi$ equals to 200$^\circ$.
Moreover, coming from the traffic sign beside the parking lot, the reflected ray is observed at Rx6 with $\varphi$ equals to 30$^\circ$. To compare the reflection losses, the lamp pole reflection loss is about 15~dB, while the traffic sign, as a flat metal plane, results in much lower loss, e.g., around 6-8~dB.
Moving to the south direction further, Rx7-10 are the last four LoS positions, where the received MPCs are similar. Fig.~\ref{fig:Rx7-10} takes Rx8 and Rx10 as examples. First, the LoS ray and the back-reflected rays from Longbin Building can be observed. The back-reflection of the wall causes additional loss of 28-30~dB. Similar to other LoS Rx positions, sporadic rays from the parking lot are detected, i.e., with $\varphi$ in the range of 0-90$^\circ$. The scatterers include vehicles, lamp poles (30$^\circ$- 40$^\circ$), traffic signs (50$^\circ$- 60$^\circ$), and plants. However, unlike strong reflected rays (e.g., with power around -130~dB) at Rx5 and Rx6, these scattering rays are much weaker, with power around -150~dB, i.e., additional 20~dB losses.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\subfigure[PDAP at Rx8.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.35\linewidth]{figures/Rx8_PDAP.png}
}
\subfigure[PDAP at Rx10.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.35\linewidth]{figures/Rx10_PDAP.png}
}
\subfigure[The photo of the vehicle.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.23\linewidth]{figures/vehicle.png}
}
\caption{PDAPs at Rx8, Rx10 and the vehicle reflection in the south.}
\label{fig:Rx7-10}
\end{figure*}
%\begin{figure}
% \centering
% \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figures/strip250-270.png}
% \caption{PDAP strips around 260$^\circ$ at Rx1-8.}
% \label{fig:strip}
%\end{figure}
%Furthermore, we observe successive rays around 270$^\circ$ at Rx7 and Rx8, but not at Rx9 or Rx10. The reason is that Rx7 and Rx8 are located on the north-south street, while Rx9 and Rx10 are on the other street. For all points on the north-south street, Rx1 to Rx8, the same phenomena exist. As depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:strip}, the rays occur at the same angle around 260$^\circ$ and 270$^\circ$ (rarely at 250$^\circ$), and travels shorter distance (i.e., with smaller delay) to reach the receiver as the Rx moves from Rx1 to Rx8, which indicates that the scatterer is in the south. According to the photos that we take at that day as Fig.~\ref{fig:Rx7-10}(c), the vehicle parked near Longbin Building is likely the scatterer, and the minimal reflection loss is 16~dB. Note that the delay value is recorded cyclically with the duration of 400~ns, and therefore, MPCs with delay smaller than 50~ns actually travels 400-450~ns.
When the receiver moves to NLoS positions, as noted in Section~\ref{section: campaign}, a hybrid vehicle is parked at the southwest corner of Wenbo Building to outsource power for the channel sounder system. As summarized in Fig.~\ref{fig:Rx11-18}, the rays mainly come from (i) the first-order forward-reflection from Longbin Building, (ii) the higher-order reflection between two buildings, (iii) the transmission through the vehicle, and (iv) the scattering from vehicles in the parking area and near Longbin Building. First, the highest received power is -130~dB in the NLoS case. Second, the reflection loss caused by the wall of Longbin Building varies from 18~dB to 30~dB, depending on the angle of incidence. Third, the transmission loss through the vehicle is less than 10~dB, deduced
based on the comparison with the reflected ray from the traffic sign at Rx6. By contrast, the power of the scattering rays from vehicles is as low as -150~dB at NLoS Rx points, which indicates less significance of scattering (compared to reflection) on vehicles.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\subfigure[Multi-path at Rx11-16.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.43\linewidth]{figures/Rx11-16.png}
}
\subfigure[Multi-path at Rx17-18.]{
\includegraphics[width=0.43\linewidth]{figures/Rx17-18.png}
}
\caption{Multi-path analysis at Rx11-18 (NLoS Rx points).}
\label{fig:Rx11-18}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Characteristic Analysis}
Based on the data post-processing procedures as detailed in~\cite{li2022modifiedSAGE}, we present the channel characteristics in depth. We clarify that we only focus on MPCs within the dynamic range of 30~dB, in order to be compatible with the lower dynamic range of general THz devices~\cite{channel_tutorial}.
In Table~\ref{tab:parameters}, statistical channel parameters in two frequency bands are summarized and compared with those in the UMi-street canyon scenario specified in 3GPP TR~38.901~\cite{3gpp38901}, which are discussed as follows.
\subsubsection{Path loss and shadow fading}
The best direction path loss and the omni-directional path loss~\cite{wang2022thz} are investigated.
The close-in (CI) and $\alpha$-$\beta$ path loss models are invoked, which are expressed respectively as
\begin{subequations}
\begin{align}
\text{PL}^{\rm CI} &= 10\times\text{PLE}\times\log_{10}\frac{d}{d_0}+\text{FSPL}(d_0)+X^{\rm CI}_{\sigma_{\rm SF}},\\
\text{PL}^{\alpha\beta} &= 10\times\alpha\times\log_{10}d+\beta+X^{\alpha\beta}_{\sigma_{\rm SF}},
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
where PLE is the path loss exponent and $d$ denotes the distance between Tx and Rx. The reference distance $d_0$ is equal to 1~m. The free-space path loss (FSPL) is given by the Friis’ law. Moreover, $\alpha$ is the slope coefficient and $\beta$ represents the optimized path loss offset in dB. $X^{\rm CI}_{\sigma_{\rm SF}}$ and $X^{\rm \alpha\beta}_{\sigma_{\rm SF}}$ are zero-mean Gaussian random variables with standard deviation $\sigma^{\rm CI}_{\rm SF}$ and $\sigma^{\alpha\beta}_{\rm SF}$ in dB, respectively, indicating the fluctuation caused by shadow fading.
The observations are drawn as follows.
First, the omni-directional PLEs are smaller since the power of all MPCs are added up, resulting in a lower omni-directional path loss.
Second, compared with the UMi-street canyon scenario specified in 3GPP TR~38.901, the omni-directional PLE in the THz band is smaller in the LoS case but larger in the NLoS case.
Third, compared to large-scale characteristics at 306-321~GHz, the path losses at 356-371~GHz are higher by 4-6~dB, and the shadow fading effect at 356-371~GHz is more significant, as expected.
\subsubsection{Cluster parameters}
The numbers of clusters in the outdoor L-shaped street in the THz band are much smaller than that is specified in 3GPP UMi-street canyon scenario in frequency bands lower than 100~GHz. This fact indicates the strong sparsity in THz bands. To be specific, the average number of clusters at 300~GHz and 350~GHz is about 2-3 in LoS cases and 5-6 in NLoS cases. Furthermore, due to the sparsity of MPCs under the target 30~dB dynamic range, MPCs inside each cluster are more confined, and thus the intra-cluster delay and angular spreads are also much smaller.
\subsubsection{Delay and angular spreads}
We use the root-mean-square (RMS) delay spread (DS), azimuth spread of angle (ASA) and elevation spread of angle (ESA) to measure the power dispersion of MPCs in temporal and spatial domains~\cite{wang2022thz}.
First, the values of DS, ASA, and ESA in the NLoS case are noticeably larger than the counterparts in the LoS case.
Second, in the LoS case, DS and ASA are normally smaller than 10~ns and 20$^\circ$. For Rx points where the long vehicle-reflected ray is detected, the value of DS increases, which is still smaller than 20~ns at 306-321~GHz.
Furthermore, the higher frequency band over 356-371 GHz has smaller DS and ASA.
Besides, the values of spreads in the L-shaped street in the THz band are smaller than those in the UMi-street canyon scenario in 3GPP TR~38.901 in frequency bands lower than 100~GHz. Compared to results in the indoor L-shaped hallway\footnote{The preliminary results in the indoor L-shaped hallway are presented in~\cite{wang2022thz}. The measurement campaign is later extended to both 306-321~GHz and 356-371~GHz, and the complete characteristic analysis results are updated according to the same data processing procedure as this paper.}, DS in the outdoor L-shaped street is smaller in the LoS case, while DS values in the NLoS case are comparable, in both frequency bands. ASAs are smaller in the outdoor L-shaped street for both cases and both frequency bands. Smaller power spreads in the outdoor L-shaped street in both temporal and spatial domains are attributed to the absence of walls that surround the scenario and thus confine MPCs with diverse delays and AoAs to the scenario.
\begin{table}
\caption{Summary of statistical channel parameters.}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figures/new_parameter_distribution.png}
\label{tab:parameters}
\end{table}
%\subsubsection{Comparison between L-shaped indoor and outdoor scenarios}
\documentclass[conference]{IEEEtran}
%\IEEEoverridecommandlockouts
% The preceding line is only needed to identify funding in the first footnote. If that is unneeded, please comment it out.
\setlength{\topmargin}{-0.7in}
\usepackage{cite}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage{authblk}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{epsfig}
\usepackage{latexsym}
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{stfloats}
\usepackage{epstopdf}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{enumerate}
\usepackage{array}
\graphicspath{{./Figures/}}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{bbm}
\usepackage{caption}
\usepackage{bm}
\usepackage[tight,footnotesize]{subfigure}
\usepackage{balance}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{verbatim}
\allowdisplaybreaks[4]
\usepackage{dsfont}
\usepackage{verbatim}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{setspace}
\usepackage{diagbox}
\usepackage[framemethod=tikz]{mdframed}
\usepackage{multicol}
\usepackage{environ}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{stfloats}
\usepackage{algpseudocode}
\usepackage{graphics}
\usepackage{epsfig}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{authblk}
\newcommand{\rev}[1]{\textcolor{blue}{{#1}}}
\newcommand{\ch}[1]{\textcolor{red}{{CH:#1}}}
% ==============================================================
% ========================== [add] =============================
% ==============================================================
\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc
\usepackage[caption=false, font=normalsize, labelfont=sf, textfont=sf]{subfig}
\else
\usepackage[caption=false, font=footnotesize]{subfig}
\usepackage{bm}
% ==============================================================
\def\BibTeX{{\rm B\kern-.05em{\sc i\kern-.025em b}\kern-.08em
T\kern-.1667em\lower.7ex\hbox{E}\kern-.125emX}}
\begin{document}
\title{Terahertz Channel Measurement and Analysis on a University Campus Street}
\author{Yiqin Wang}
\author{Yuanbo Li}
\author[2]{Yi Chen}
\author[2]{Ziming Yu}
\author{Chong Han}
\affil{Terahertz Wireless Communications (TWC) Laboratory, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.\authorcr Email: \{wangyiqin, yuanbo.li, chong.han\}@sjtu.edu.cn}
\affil[2]{Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., China. Email: \{chenyi171, yuziming\}@huawei.com}
%\author{\IEEEauthorblockN{Yiqin Wang}
%\IEEEauthorblockA{\textit{University of Michigan-Shanghai}\\
%\textit{Jiao Tong University Joint Institute}\\
%\textit{Shanghai Jiao Tong University}, Shanghai, China\\
%Email: wangyiqin@sjtu.edu.cn}
%\and
%\IEEEauthorblockN{Chong Han}
%\IEEEauthorblockA{\textit{University of Michigan-Shanghai}\\
%\textit{Jiao Tong University Joint Institute}\\
%\textit{Shanghai Jiao Tong University}, Shanghai, China\\
%Email: chong.han@sjtu.edu.cn}}
\maketitle
%\let\thefootnote\relax\footnotetext{Chong Han acknowledges the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant 62027806.}
\input{contents/Abstract}
\input{contents/Introduction}
\input{contents/Campaign}
\input{contents/Results}
\input{contents/Conclusion}
%\balance
\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}
\bibliography{bibliography}
\end{document}
\section{Introduction}
This document is a model and instructions for \LaTeX.
Please observe the conference page limits.
\section{Ease of Use}
\subsection{Maintaining the Integrity of the Specifications}
The IEEEtran class file is used to format your paper and style the text. All margins,
column widths, line spaces, and text fonts are prescribed; please do not
alter them. You may note peculiarities. For example, the head margin
measures proportionately more than is customary. This measurement
and others are deliberate, using specifications that anticipate your paper
as one part of the entire proceedings, and not as an independent document.
Please do not revise any of the current designations.
\section{Prepare Your Paper Before Styling}
Before you begin to format your paper, first write and save the content as a
separate text file. Complete all content and organizational editing before
formatting. Please note sections \ref{AA}--\ref{SCM} below for more information on
proofreading, spelling and grammar.
Keep your text and graphic files separate until after the text has been
formatted and styled. Do not number text heads---{\LaTeX} will do that
for you.
\subsection{Abbreviations and Acronyms}\label{AA}
Define abbreviations and acronyms the first time they are used in the text,
even after they have been defined in the abstract. Abbreviations such as
IEEE, SI, MKS, CGS, ac, dc, and rms do not have to be defined. Do not use
abbreviations in the title or heads unless they are unavoidable.
\subsection{Units}
\begin{itemize}
\item Use either SI (MKS) or CGS as primary units. (SI units are encouraged.) English units may be used as secondary units (in parentheses). An exception would be the use of English units as identifiers in trade, such as ``3.5-inch disk drive''.
\item Avoid combining SI and CGS units, such as current in amperes and magnetic field in oersteds. This often leads to confusion because equations do not balance dimensionally. If you must use mixed units, clearly state the units for each quantity that you use in an equation.
\item Do not mix complete spellings and abbreviations of units: ``Wb/m\textsuperscript{2}'' or ``webers per square meter'', not ``webers/m\textsuperscript{2}''. Spell out units when they appear in text: ``. . . a few henries'', not ``. . . a few H''.
\item Use a zero before decimal points: ``0.25'', not ``.25''. Use ``cm\textsuperscript{3}'', not ``cc''.)
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Equations}
Number equations consecutively. To make your
equations more compact, you may use the solidus (~/~), the exp function, or
appropriate exponents. Italicize Roman symbols for quantities and variables,
but not Greek symbols. Use a long dash rather than a hyphen for a minus
sign. Punctuate equations with commas or periods when they are part of a
sentence, as in:
\begin{equation}
a+b=\gamma\label{eq}
\end{equation}
Be sure that the
symbols in your equation have been defined before or immediately following
the equation. Use ``\eqref{eq}'', not ``Eq.~\eqref{eq}'' or ``equation \eqref{eq}'', except at
the beginning of a sentence: ``Equation \eqref{eq} is . . .''
\subsection{\LaTeX-Specific Advice}
Please use ``soft'' (e.g., \verb|\eqref{Eq}|) cross references instead
of ``hard'' references (e.g., \verb|(1)|). That will make it possible
to combine sections, add equations, or change the order of figures or
citations without having to go through the file line by line.
Please don't use the \verb|{eqnarray}| equation environment. Use
\verb|{align}| or \verb|{IEEEeqnarray}| instead. The \verb|{eqnarray}|
environment leaves unsightly spaces around relation symbols.
Please note that the \verb|{subequations}| environment in {\LaTeX}
will increment the main equation counter even when there are no
equation numbers displayed. If you forget that, you might write an
article in which the equation numbers skip from (17) to (20), causing
the copy editors to wonder if you've discovered a new method of
counting.
{\BibTeX} does not work by magic. It doesn't get the bibliographic
data from thin air but from .bib files. If you use {\BibTeX} to produce a
bibliography you must send the .bib files.
{\LaTeX} can't read your mind. If you assign the same label to a
subsubsection and a table, you might find that Table I has been cross
referenced as Table IV-B3.
{\LaTeX} does not have precognitive abilities. If you put a
\verb|\label| command before the command that updates the counter it's
supposed to be using, the label will pick up the last counter to be
cross referenced instead. In particular, a \verb|\label| command
should not go before the caption of a figure or a table.
Do not use \verb|\nonumber| inside the \verb|{array}| environment. It
will not stop equation numbers inside \verb|{array}| (there won't be
any anyway) and it might stop a wanted equation number in the
surrounding equation.
\subsection{Some Common Mistakes}\label{SCM}
\begin{itemize}
\item The word ``data'' is plural, not singular.
\item The subscript for the permeability of vacuum $\mu_{0}$, and other common scientific constants, is zero with subscript formatting, not a lowercase letter ``o''.
\item In American English, commas, semicolons, periods, question and exclamation marks are located within quotation marks only when a complete thought or name is cited, such as a title or full quotation. When quotation marks are used, instead of a bold or italic typeface, to highlight a word or phrase, punctuation should appear outside of the quotation marks. A parenthetical phrase or statement at the end of a sentence is punctuated outside of the closing parenthesis (like this). (A parenthetical sentence is punctuated within the parentheses.)
\item A graph within a graph is an ``inset'', not an ``insert''. The word alternatively is preferred to the word ``alternately'' (unless you really mean something that alternates).
\item Do not use the word ``essentially'' to mean ``approximately'' or ``effectively''.
\item In your paper title, if the words ``that uses'' can accurately replace the word ``using'', capitalize the ``u''; if not, keep using lower-cased.
\item Be aware of the different meanings of the homophones ``affect'' and ``effect'', ``complement'' and ``compliment'', ``discreet'' and ``discrete'', ``principal'' and ``principle''.
\item Do not confuse ``imply'' and ``infer''.
\item The prefix ``non'' is not a word; it should be joined to the word it modifies, usually without a hyphen.
\item There is no period after the ``et'' in the Latin abbreviation ``et al.''.
\item The abbreviation ``i.e.'' means ``that is'', and the abbreviation ``e.g.'' means ``for example''.
\end{itemize}
An excellent style manual for science writers is \cite{b7}.
\subsection{Authors and Affiliations}
\textbf{The class file is designed for, but not limited to, six authors.} A
minimum of one author is required for all conference articles. Author names
should be listed starting from left to right and then moving down to the
next line. This is the author sequence that will be used in future citations
and by indexing services. Names should not be listed in columns nor group by
affiliation. Please keep your affiliations as succinct as possible (for
example, do not differentiate among departments of the same organization).
\subsection{Identify the Headings}
Headings, or heads, are organizational devices that guide the reader through
your paper. There are two types: component heads and text heads.
Component heads identify the different components of your paper and are not
topically subordinate to each other. Examples include Acknowledgments and
References and, for these, the correct style to use is ``Heading 5''. Use
``figure caption'' for your Figure captions, and ``table head'' for your
table title. Run-in heads, such as ``Abstract'', will require you to apply a
style (in this case, italic) in addition to the style provided by the drop
down menu to differentiate the head from the text.
Text heads organize the topics on a relational, hierarchical basis. For
example, the paper title is the primary text head because all subsequent
material relates and elaborates on this one topic. If there are two or more
sub-topics, the next level head (uppercase Roman numerals) should be used
and, conversely, if there are not at least two sub-topics, then no subheads
should be introduced.
\subsection{Figures and Tables}
\paragraph{Positioning Figures and Tables} Place figures and tables at the top and
bottom of columns. Avoid placing them in the middle of columns. Large
figures and tables may span across both columns. Figure captions should be
below the figures; table heads should appear above the tables. Insert
figures and tables after they are cited in the text. Use the abbreviation
``Fig.~\ref{fig}'', even at the beginning of a sentence.
\begin{table}[htbp]
\caption{Table Type Styles}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
\textbf{Table}&\multicolumn{3}{|c|}{\textbf{Table Column Head}} \\
\cline{2-4}
\textbf{Head} & \textbf{\textit{Table column subhead}}& \textbf{\textit{Subhead}}& \textbf{\textit{Subhead}} \\
\hline
copy& More table copy$^{\mathrm{a}}$& & \\
\hline
\multicolumn{4}{l}{$^{\mathrm{a}}$Sample of a Table footnote.}
\end{tabular}
\label{tab1}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centerline{\includegraphics{fig1.png}}
\caption{Example of a figure caption.}
\label{fig}
\end{figure}
Figure Labels: Use 8 point Times New Roman for Figure labels. Use words
rather than symbols or abbreviations when writing Figure axis labels to
avoid confusing the reader. As an example, write the quantity
``Magnetization'', or ``Magnetization, M'', not just ``M''. If including
units in the label, present them within parentheses. Do not label axes only
with units. In the example, write ``Magnetization (A/m)'' or ``Magnetization
\{A[m(1)]\}'', not just ``A/m''. Do not label axes with a ratio of
quantities and units. For example, write ``Temperature (K)'', not
``Temperature/K''.
\section*{Acknowledgment}
The preferred spelling of the word ``acknowledgment'' in America is without
an ``e'' after the ``g''. Avoid the stilted expression ``one of us (R. B.
G.) thanks $\ldots$''. Instead, try ``R. B. G. thanks$\ldots$''. Put sponsor
acknowledgments in the unnumbered footnote on the first page.
\section*{References}
Please number citations consecutively within brackets \cite{b1}. The
sentence punctuation follows the bracket \cite{b2}. Refer simply to the reference
number, as in \cite{b3}---do not use ``Ref. \cite{b3}'' or ``reference \cite{b3}'' except at
the beginning of a sentence: ``Reference \cite{b3} was the first $\ldots$''
Number footnotes separately in superscripts. Place the actual footnote at
the bottom of the column in which it was cited. Do not put footnotes in the
abstract or reference list. Use letters for table footnotes.
Unless there are six authors or more give all authors' names; do not use
``et al.''. Papers that have not been published, even if they have been
submitted for publication, should be cited as ``unpublished'' \cite{b4}. Papers
that have been accepted for publication should be cited as ``in press'' \cite{b5}.
Capitalize only the first word in a paper title, except for proper nouns and
element symbols.
For papers published in translation journals, please give the English
citation first, followed by the original foreign-language citation \cite{b6}.
% Generated by IEEEtran.bst, version: 1.14 (2015/08/26)
\begin{thebibliography}{10}
\providecommand{\url}[1]{#1}
\csname url@samestyle\endcsname
\providecommand{\newblock}{\relax}
\providecommand{\bibinfo}[2]{#2}
\providecommand{\BIBentrySTDinterwordspacing}{\spaceskip=0pt\relax}
\providecommand{\BIBentryALTinterwordstretchfactor}{4}
\providecommand{\BIBentryALTinterwordspacing}{\spaceskip=\fontdimen2\font plus
\BIBentryALTinterwordstretchfactor\fontdimen3\font minus
\fontdimen4\font\relax}
\providecommand{\BIBforeignlanguage}[2]{{%
\expandafter\ifx\csname l@#1\endcsname\relax
\typeout{** WARNING: IEEEtran.bst: No hyphenation pattern has been}%
\typeout{** loaded for the language `#1'. Using the pattern for}%
\typeout{** the default language instead.}%
\else
\language=\csname l@#1\endcsname
\fi
#2}}
\providecommand{\BIBdecl}{\relax}
\BIBdecl
\bibitem{akyildiz2022terahertz}
I.~F. Akyildiz, C.~Han, Z.~Hu, S.~Nie, and J.~M. Jornet, ``{Terahertz Band
Communication: An Old Problem Revisited and Research Directions for the Next
Decade},'' \emph{IEEE Transactions on Communications}, vol.~70, no.~6, pp.
4250--4285, Jun. 2022.
\bibitem{chen2021terahertz}
Z.~Chen, C.~Han, Y.~Wu, L.~Li, C.~Huang, Z.~Zhang, G.~Wang, and W.~Tong,
``{Terahertz Wireless Communications for 2030 and Beyond: A Cutting-Edge
Frontier},'' \emph{IEEE Communications Magazine}, vol.~59, pp. 66--72, Nov.
2021.
\bibitem{rappaport2019wireless}
T.~S. Rappaport, Y.~Xing, O.~Kanhere, S.~Ju, A.~Madanayake, S.~Mandal,
A.~Alkhateeb, and G.~C. Trichopoulos, ``{Wireless Communications and
Applications Above 100 GHz: Opportunities and Challenges for 6G and
Beyond},'' \emph{IEEE Access}, vol.~7, pp. 78\,729--78\,757, Jun. 2019.
\bibitem{channel_tutorial}
C.~Han, Y.~Wang, Y.~Li, Y.~Chen, N.~A. Abbasi, T.~Kürner, and A.~F.~Molisch,
``{Terahertz Wireless Channels: A Holistic Survey on Measurement, Modeling,
and Analysis},'' \emph{IEEE Communications Surveys \& Tutorials}, vol.~24,
no.~3, pp. 1670--1707, Jun. 2022.
\bibitem{abbasi2022thz}
N.~A. Abbasi, J.~Gomez-Ponce, R.~Kondaveti, S.~M. Shaikbepari, S.~Rao,
S.~Abu-Surra, G.~Xu, C.~Zhang, and A.~F. Molisch, ``{THz Band Channel
Measurements and Statistical Modeling for Urban D2D Environments},''
\emph{IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications (Early Access)}, Jun.
2022.
\bibitem{ju2022sub}
S.~Ju, Y.~Xing, O.~Kanhere, and T.~S. Rappaport, ``{Sub-Terahertz Channel
Measurements and Characterization in a Factory Building},'' \emph{in Proc. of
IEEE ICC Workshops}, May 2022.
\bibitem{WRC-19-FINAL-ACTS}
{International Telecommunication Union - Radiocommunication Sector}, ``{World
Radiocommunication Conference 2019 (WRC-19) - Final Acts},'' {ITU
Publications}, Geneva, Switzerland, Mar. 2020.
\bibitem{wang2022thz}
Y.~Wang, Y.~Li, Y.~Chen, Z.~Yu, and C.~Han, ``{0.3 THz Channel Measurement and
Analysis in an L-shaped Indoor Hallway},'' \emph{in Proc. of IEEE ICC}, pp.
1--6, Jun. 2022.
\bibitem{li2022channel}
Y.~Li, Y.~Wang, Y.~Chen, Z.~Yu, and C.~Han, ``{Channel Measurement and Analysis
in an Indoor Corridor Scenario at 300 GHz},'' \emph{in Proc. of IEEE ICC},
pp. 1--6, Jun. 2022.
\bibitem{doeker2022channel}
T.~Doeker, J.~M. Eckhardt, and T.~K{\"u}rner, ``{Channel Measurements and
Modeling for Low Terahertz Communications in an Aircraft Cabin},'' \emph{IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation}, Jul. 2022.
\bibitem{undi2021angle}
F.~Undi, A.~Schultze, W.~Keusgen, M.~Peter, and T.~Eichler, ``{Angle-Resolved
THz Channel Measurements at 300 GHz in an Outdoor Environment},'' \emph{in
Proc. of IEEE ICC Workshops}, pp. 1--7, Jun. 2021.
\bibitem{guan2021channel}
K.~Guan, D.~He, B.~Ai, Y.~Chen, C.~Han, B.~Peng, Z.~Zhong, and T.~K{\"u}rner,
``{Channel Characterization and Capacity Analysis for THz Communication
Enabled Smart Rail Mobility},'' \emph{IEEE Transactions on Vehicular
Technology}, vol.~70, no.~5, pp. 4065--4080, Apr. 2021.
\bibitem{eckhardt2021channel}
J.~M. Eckhardt, V.~Petrov, D.~Moltchanov, Y.~Koucheryavy, and T.~K\"urner,
``{Channel Measurements and Modeling for Low Terahertz Band Vehicular
Communications},'' \emph{IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications},
vol.~39, no.~6, pp. 1590--1603, Apr. 2021.
\bibitem{3gpp38901}
3GPP, ``{Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz},'' {3rd
Generation Partnership Project (3GPP)}, Technical Report (TR) 38.901, Dec.
2019, version 16.1.0.
\bibitem{li2022modifiedSAGE}
Y.~Li, Y.~Wang, Y.~Chen, Z.~Yu, and C.~Han, ``{Channel Measurement and
Characterization with Modified SAGE Algorithm in an Indoor Corridor at 300
GHz},'' \emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.16745}, 2022.
\end{thebibliography}
% Generated by IEEEtran.bst, version: 1.14 (2015/08/26)
\begin{thebibliography}{10}
\providecommand{\url}[1]{#1}
\csname url@samestyle\endcsname
\providecommand{\newblock}{\relax}
\providecommand{\bibinfo}[2]{#2}
\providecommand{\BIBentrySTDinterwordspacing}{\spaceskip=0pt\relax}
\providecommand{\BIBentryALTinterwordstretchfactor}{4}
\providecommand{\BIBentryALTinterwordspacing}{\spaceskip=\fontdimen2\font plus
\BIBentryALTinterwordstretchfactor\fontdimen3\font minus
\fontdimen4\font\relax}
\providecommand{\BIBforeignlanguage}[2]{{%
\expandafter\ifx\csname l@#1\endcsname\relax
\typeout{** WARNING: IEEEtran.bst: No hyphenation pattern has been}%
\typeout{** loaded for the language `#1'. Using the pattern for}%
\typeout{** the default language instead.}%
\else
\language=\csname l@#1\endcsname
\fi
#2}}
\providecommand{\BIBdecl}{\relax}
\BIBdecl
\bibitem{akyildiz2022terahertz}
I.~F. Akyildiz, C.~Han, Z.~Hu, S.~Nie, and J.~M. Jornet, ``{Terahertz Band
Communication: An Old Problem Revisited and Research Directions for the Next
Decade},'' \emph{IEEE Transactions on Communications}, vol.~70, no.~6, pp.
4250--4285, Jun. 2022.
\bibitem{chen2021terahertz}
Z.~Chen, C.~Han, Y.~Wu, L.~Li, C.~Huang, Z.~Zhang, G.~Wang, and W.~Tong,
``{Terahertz Wireless Communications for 2030 and Beyond: A Cutting-Edge
Frontier},'' \emph{IEEE Communications Magazine}, vol.~59, pp. 66--72, Nov.
2021.
\bibitem{rappaport2019wireless}
T.~S. Rappaport, Y.~Xing, O.~Kanhere, S.~Ju, A.~Madanayake, S.~Mandal,
A.~Alkhateeb, and G.~C. Trichopoulos, ``{Wireless Communications and
Applications Above 100 GHz: Opportunities and Challenges for 6G and
Beyond},'' \emph{IEEE Access}, vol.~7, pp. 78\,729--78\,757, Jun. 2019.
\bibitem{channel_tutorial}
C.~Han, Y.~Wang, Y.~Li, Y.~Chen, N.~A. Abbasi, T.~Kürner, and A.~F.~Molisch,
``{Terahertz Wireless Channels: A Holistic Survey on Measurement, Modeling,
and Analysis},'' \emph{IEEE Communications Surveys \& Tutorials}, vol.~24,
no.~3, pp. 1670--1707, Jun. 2022.
\bibitem{abbasi2022thz}
N.~A. Abbasi, J.~Gomez-Ponce, R.~Kondaveti, S.~M. Shaikbepari, S.~Rao,
S.~Abu-Surra, G.~Xu, C.~Zhang, and A.~F. Molisch, ``{THz Band Channel
Measurements and Statistical Modeling for Urban D2D Environments},''
\emph{IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications (Early Access)}, Jun.
2022.
\bibitem{ju2022sub}
S.~Ju, Y.~Xing, O.~Kanhere, and T.~S. Rappaport, ``{Sub-Terahertz Channel
Measurements and Characterization in a Factory Building},'' \emph{in Proc. of
IEEE ICC Workshops}, May 2022.
\bibitem{WRC-19-FINAL-ACTS}
{International Telecommunication Union - Radiocommunication Sector}, ``{World
Radiocommunication Conference 2019 (WRC-19) - Final Acts},'' {ITU
Publications}, Geneva, Switzerland, Mar. 2020.
\bibitem{wang2022thz}
Y.~Wang, Y.~Li, Y.~Chen, Z.~Yu, and C.~Han, ``{0.3 THz Channel Measurement and
Analysis in an L-shaped Indoor Hallway},'' \emph{in Proc. of IEEE ICC}, pp.
1--6, Jun. 2022.
\bibitem{li2022channel}
Y.~Li, Y.~Wang, Y.~Chen, Z.~Yu, and C.~Han, ``{Channel Measurement and Analysis
in an Indoor Corridor Scenario at 300 GHz},'' \emph{in Proc. of IEEE ICC},
pp. 1--6, Jun. 2022.
\bibitem{doeker2022channel}
T.~Doeker, J.~M. Eckhardt, and T.~K{\"u}rner, ``{Channel Measurements and
Modeling for Low Terahertz Communications in an Aircraft Cabin},'' \emph{IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation}, Jul. 2022.
\bibitem{undi2021angle}
F.~Undi, A.~Schultze, W.~Keusgen, M.~Peter, and T.~Eichler, ``{Angle-Resolved
THz Channel Measurements at 300 GHz in an Outdoor Environment},'' \emph{in
Proc. of IEEE ICC Workshops}, pp. 1--7, Jun. 2021.
\bibitem{guan2021channel}
K.~Guan, D.~He, B.~Ai, Y.~Chen, C.~Han, B.~Peng, Z.~Zhong, and T.~K{\"u}rner,
``{Channel Characterization and Capacity Analysis for THz Communication
Enabled Smart Rail Mobility},'' \emph{IEEE Transactions on Vehicular
Technology}, vol.~70, no.~5, pp. 4065--4080, Apr. 2021.
\bibitem{eckhardt2021channel}
J.~M. Eckhardt, V.~Petrov, D.~Moltchanov, Y.~Koucheryavy, and T.~K\"urner,
``{Channel Measurements and Modeling for Low Terahertz Band Vehicular
Communications},'' \emph{IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications},
vol.~39, no.~6, pp. 1590--1603, Apr. 2021.
\bibitem{3gpp38901}
3GPP, ``{Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz},'' {3rd
Generation Partnership Project (3GPP)}, Technical Report (TR) 38.901, Dec.
2019, version 16.1.0.
\bibitem{li2022modifiedSAGE}
Y.~Li, Y.~Wang, Y.~Chen, Z.~Yu, and C.~Han, ``{Channel Measurement and
Characterization with Modified SAGE Algorithm in an Indoor Corridor at 300
GHz},'' \emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.16745}, 2022.
\end{thebibliography}