Enhancements of Electron-Atom Collisions due to Pauli Repulsion in Neutron-Star Magnetic Fields
Extracted source text · arXiv 2308.11667
%Version 2.1 April 2023
% See section 11 of the User Manual for version history
%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% %%
%% Please do not use \input{...} to include other tex files. %%
%% Submit your LaTeX manuscript as one .tex document. %%
%% %%
%% All additional figures and files should be attached %%
%% separately and not embedded in the \TeX\ document itself. %%
%% %%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%\documentclass[referee,sn-basic]{sn-jnl}% referee option is meant for double line spacing
%%=======================================================%%
%% to print line numbers in the margin use lineno option %%
%%=======================================================%%
%%\documentclass[lineno,sn-basic]{sn-jnl}% Basic Springer Nature Reference Style/Chemistry Reference Style
%%======================================================%%
%% to compile with pdflatex/xelatex use pdflatex option %%
%%======================================================%%
%%\documentclass[pdflatex,sn-basic]{sn-jnl}% Basic Springer Nature Reference Style/Chemistry Reference Style
%%Note: the following reference styles support Namedate and Numbered referencing. By default the style follows the most common style. To switch between the options you can add or remove Numbered in the optional parenthesis.
%%The option is available for: sn-basic.bst, sn-vancouver.bst, sn-chicago.bst, sn-mathphys.bst. %
%%\documentclass[sn-nature]{sn-jnl}% Style for submissions to Nature Portfolio journals
%%\documentclass[sn-basic]{sn-jnl}% Basic Springer Nature Reference Style/Chemistry Reference Style
\documentclass[sn-mathphys,Numbered]{sn-jnl}% Math and Physical Sciences Reference Style
%%\documentclass[sn-aps]{sn-jnl}% American Physical Society (APS) Reference Style
%%\documentclass[sn-vancouver,Numbered]{sn-jnl}% Vancouver Reference Style
%%\documentclass[sn-apa]{sn-jnl}% APA Reference Style
%%\documentclass[sn-chicago]{sn-jnl}% Chicago-based Humanities Reference Style
%%\documentclass[default]{sn-jnl}% Default
%%\documentclass[default,iicol]{sn-jnl}% Default with double column layout
%%%% Standard Packages
%%<additional latex packages if required can be included here>
%\bibliographystyle{sn-mathphys}
%\bibliographystyle{naturemag}
\usepackage{graphicx}%
\usepackage{multirow}%
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts}%
\usepackage{amsthm}%
\usepackage{mathrsfs}%
\usepackage[title]{appendix}%
\usepackage{xcolor}%
\usepackage{textcomp}%
\usepackage{manyfoot}%
\usepackage{booktabs}%
\usepackage{algorithm}%
\usepackage{algorithmicx}%
\usepackage{algpseudocode}%
\usepackage{listings}%
\usepackage{orcidlink}
\usepackage{gensymb}
%\usepackage{lineno}
%\usepackage[style=nature]{biblatex}
%\usepackage{cite}
%\usepackage[superscript]{cite}
%\usepackage[superscript,biblabel]{cite}
%%%%
\usepackage{MnSymbol}
\usepackage{color,soul} % for highlighting
\newcommand{\mat}[3]{\displaystyle\left\langle #1 \left| #2 \right| #3 \right\rangle}
\newcommand{\OL}[2]{\displaystyle\langle #1| #2 \rangle}
\newcommand{\rmat}[3]{\displaystyle\left\langle #1 \left\| #2 \right\| #3 \right\rangle}
\newcommand{\rmatI}[3]{\displaystyle\int dr~ #1 \left[#2\right] #3}
\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\displaystyle\left\langle #1 \right|}
\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\displaystyle\left| #1 \right\rangle}
\newcommand{\braket}[2]{\displaystyle\left\langle #1|#2\right\rangle}
\newcommand{\threeJ}[6]{\begin{pmatrix}#1 & #2  \\ #4& #5 & #6\end{pmatrix}}
\newcommand{\sixJ}[6]{\begin{Bmatrix}#1 & #2  \\ #4& #5 & #6\end{Bmatrix}}
\newcommand{\X} {\it Xenomorph}
\newcommand{\EB} {\mathcal{H}}
\newcommand{\Av}[1]{\left\langle #1\right\rangle}%_{\rm{Av}}}
\newcommand\apj{{Astrophys Journal}}
\newcommand\apjl{{Astrophys Journal Letters}}
\newcommand\prl{Phys. Rev. Letters}
\newcommand\pra{Phys Rev A}% % Physical Review A: General Physics ++
\newcommand\pre{Phys Rev E}% % Physical Review A: General Physics ++
\newcommand\aap{Astron \&Astrophysics}% % Astronomy and Astrophysics
\newcommand\mnras{MNRAS}% % Monthly Notices of the RAS
\newcommand\araa{Ann Rev of Astron and Astrophys}% % Annual Review of Astron and Astrophys
\newcommand\nat{Nature}% % Nature
%%%%%=============================================================================%%%%
%%%% Remarks: This template is provided to aid authors with the preparation
%%%% of original research articles intended for submission to journals published
%%%% by Springer Nature. The guidance has been prepared in partnership with
%%%% production teams to conform to Springer Nature technical requirements.
%%%% Editorial and presentation requirements differ among journal portfolios and
%%%% research disciplines. You may find sections in this template are irrelevant
%%%% to your work and are empowered to omit any such section if allowed by the
%%%% journal you intend to submit to. The submission guidelines and policies
%%%% of the journal take precedence. A detailed User Manual is available in the
%%%% template package for technical guidance.
%%%%%=============================================================================%%%%
%\jyear{2021}%
%% as per the requirement new theorem styles can be included as shown below
\theoremstyle{thmstyleone}%
%\linenumbers
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}% meant for continuous numbers
%%\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]% meant for sectionwise numbers
%% optional argument [theorem] produces theorem numbering sequence instead of independent numbers for Proposition
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}%
%%\newtheorem{proposition}{Proposition}% to get separate numbers for theorem and proposition etc.
\theoremstyle{thmstyletwo}%
\newtheorem{example}{Example}%
\newtheorem{remark}{Remark}%
\theoremstyle{thmstylethree}%
\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}%
\raggedbottom
%%\unnumbered% uncomment this for unnumbered level heads
\begin{document}
%\title[Super Cross-Sectionality of Atomic Collisions at Neutron-Star Magnetic Field Strength]{Super Cross-Sectionality of Atomic Collisions at Neutron-Star Magnetic Field Strengths}
\title{Enhancements of Electron-Atom Collisions due to Pauli Repulsion in Neutron-Star Magnetic Fields}
%\title{Super Cross-Sectionality of Electron-Atom Collisions due to Pauli Exclusion at Neutron-Star Magnetic Field Strengths}
%%=============================================================%%
%% Prefix -> \pfx{Dr}
%% GivenName -> \fnm{Joergen W.}
%% Particle -> \spfx{van der} -> surname prefix
%% FamilyName -> \sur{Ploeg}
%% Suffix -> \sfx{IV}
%% NatureName -> \tanm{Poet Laureate} -> Title after name
%% Degrees -> \dgr{MSc, PhD}
%% \author*[1,2]{\pfx{Dr} \fnm{Joergen W.} \spfx{van der} \sur{Ploeg} \sfx{IV} \tanm{Poet Laureate}
%% \dgr{MSc, PhD}}\email{iauthor@gmail.com}
%%=============================================================%%
%\newcommand{\orcid}[1]{\href{https://orcid.org/#1}{\textcolor[HTML]{A6CE39}{\aiOrcid}}}
\author*[1,2,5]{\sur{Gomez}, \fnm{T.~A.} \orcidlink{0000-0001-8748-5466}}\email{thomas.gomez@austin.utexas.edu}
\author[3]{\sur{Zammit}, \fnm{M.~C.} \orcidlink{0000-0003-0473-379X}}
\equalcont{These authors contributed equally to this work.}
\author[4]{\sur{Bray}, \fnm{I.} \orcidlink{0000-0001-7554-8044}}
\equalcont{These authors contributed equally to this work.}
\author[3]{\sur{Fontes}, \fnm{C.~J.} \orcidlink{0000-0003-1087-2964}}
\equalcont{These authors contributed equally to this work.}
\author[1]{\sur{White}, \fnm{J.} \orcidlink{0000-0003-4052-2746}}
\equalcont{These authors contributed equally to this work.}
\affil[1]{\orgdiv{Department of Astronomy}, \orgname{University of Texas at Austin}, \city{Austin}, \state{Texas}, \postcode{78712}, \country{USA}}
\affil[2]{\orgdiv{Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences}, \orgname{University of Colorado}, \city{Boulder}, \state{Colorado}, \postcode{80305}, \country{USA}}
\affil[3]{\orgname{Los Alamos National Laboratory}, \city{Los Alamos}, \state{New Mexico}, \postcode{87545}, \country{USA}}
\affil[4]{\orgdiv{Department of Physics and Astronomy}, \orgname{Curtin University}, \city{Perth}, \state{Western Australia}, \postcode{6845}, \country{Australia}}
\affil[5]{Hale Fellow}
%%==================================%%
%% sample for unstructured abstract %%
%%==================================%%
\abstract{
Neutron star surfaces and atmospheres are unique environments that sustain the largest-known magnetic fields in the universe \cite{NSbook}.
Our knowledge of neutron star material properties, including the composition and equation of state, remains highly unconstrained.
Electron-atom collisions are integral to theoretical thermal conduction and spectral emission models that describe neutron star surfaces \citep{Potekhin99,Bergeron92}.
The theory of scattering in magnetic fields was developed in the 1970s, but focused only on bare nuclei scattering \citep{Ventura73}.
In this work, we present a quantum treatment of atom-electron collisions in magnetic fields; of significant importance is the inclusion of Pauli repulsion arising from two interacting electrons \citep{Oppenheimer28,Bray92}.
We find strange behaviors not seen in collisions without a magnetic field.
In high magnetic fields, Pauli repulsion can lead to orders of magnitude enhancements of collision cross sections.
Additionally, the elastic collision cross sections that involve the ground state become comparable to those involving excited states, and states with large orbits have the largest contribution to the collisions.
We anticipate significant changes to transport properties and spectral line broadening in neutron star surfaces and atmospheres, which will aid in spectral diagnostics of these extreme environments.
}
%%================================%%
%% Sample for structured abstract %%
%%================================%%
\keywords{Neutron Stars, Atomic Collisions, Magnetic Fields, Line Shapes}
%%\pacs[JEL Classification]{D8, H51}
%%\pacs[MSC Classification]{35A01, 65L10, 65L12, 65L20, 65L70}
\maketitle
%\section{Introduction}\label{sec1}
Neutron stars are truly unique objects, characterized by extreme states of matter seen nowhere else in the universe.
They can reach densities up to $10^{14} ~\mathrm{g/cm}^3$ in their interiors and can sustain magnetic fields from $10^9$~G to $10^{15}$~G in magnetars \cite{NSbook}.
It is largely unknown what the state of matter is at such extreme density.
Some predictions include neutron matter or even quark matter, each having their own equation of state~\citep{Lattimer01}.
One proposed method for constraining the equation of state (in the absence of experiments) is by accurately determining surface conditions, i.e. the mass and radius, of neutron stars~\citep{Lindblom92}.
Much effort has therefore been invested in trying to determine the masses and radii of neutron stars~\citep{Heinke14,Ozel16,NSbook,NICER1,NICER2}, though the results are still accompanied by significant uncertainties.
%Further, spectral observations of neutron stars are difficult largely due to their small size, meaning that their intrinsic brightness is far smaller than all other stars.
The surface conditions of neutron stars are less extreme than the interiors, but are still exotic compared to other stellar surfaces because they sustain magnetic fields above $10^{9}$~G---the only known objects in the universe known to do so.
In these extreme magnetic fields, atoms no longer have spherical symmetry and instead tend toward cylindrical symmetry \citep{Ruder94}.
To better understand the surface conditions of neutron stars, we need to understand fundamental atomic processes, in particular atomic collisions.
Collisions directly affect transport properties such as thermal and electrical conductivity~\citep{Ziman54}.
Transport is significantly affected in directions perpendicular to the magnetic field, resulting in 180\degree ~scattering \citep{Baalrud17}, though transport along the magnetic field is expected to be unaffected compared to their field free values \citep{Braginskii,LeeMore84}.
Further, collisions inform spectral line shapes~\citep{Baranger58c,Fano63,Gomez22}, which could be one of the tools to determine surface parameters from spectra \citep{Gomez23} in the same manner as is currently done with white dwarfs \citep{Bergeron92}.
Such determinations will be more feasible with future planned X-ray missions, such as XRISM \citep{XRISM} and ARCUS~\citep{Smith17_arcus}.
The theory of atomic collisions in magnetic fields is severely under-developed compared to collisions without a magnetic field.
It is important to note that current calculations of particle dynamics for transport \citep{Baalrud17} and line shapes \citep{Ferri21} treat the plasma particles classically.
If quantum behavior of the plasma particles is included, then only scattering off of bare nuclei is considered \citep{Ventura73,Lafleur19}.
\citet{Gomez23} performed the first quantum-mechanical treatment of electron-atom scattering in the context of spectral line broadening, but neglected to include the important Pauli repulsion between colliding electrons.
Pauli repulsion accounts for the fact that electrons are indistinguishable fermions, which is often referred to as the Pauli exclusion principle.
The impact of Pauli repulsion on electron-atom collisions in magnetic fields is unknown, but is expected to be different due to the change in the geometry of the scattering problem.
Since the early work of~\citet{Oppenheimer28}, Pauli repulsion has been known to be an important physical effect that needs to be included in scattering calculations.
Due to high fidelity experiments, Pauli repulsion plays an essential role in reproducing measurements, though only making (relatively) modest changes to the scattering transition $T$-matrix elements, never resulting in changes of more than factors of two.
However, as we will show, in strong magnetic fields, Pauli repulsion becomes the dominant contribution to electron-atom collisions.
Electron-atom collisions in a large magnetic field more closely resembles concentric cylinders rather than spheres, as illustrated in figure~\ref{cartoon}.
Without a magnetic field, the picture of scattering system consists of an incoming plane wave and an outgoing spherical wave.
In a magnetic field, the magnetic field significantly alters the trajectories of the projectile electrons, limiting the free motion perpendicular to the field, while still propagating freely parallel to the field.
This effectively reduces scattering in a magnetic field to a one-dimensional problem, rather than the usual three-dimensional problem.
In this effective 1D problem, we have an incoming wave and outgoing reflected and transmitted waves.
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.45,trim=0cm 0 0 0]{scatteringCartoon}
\caption{Illustration of scattering processes with (right) and without (left) a magnetic field (field lines indicated by green arrows). The target atom is shown in red with the magnetic field making the target cylindrical. The scattering process is separated into the incoming (bottom) and outgoing (top) waves, which can be thought of as the waves before and after the collision, respectively. Without a magnetic field, scattering electrons have the full three-dimensional degrees of freedom. In the presence of a magnetic field, the Lorentz force confines the motion of electrons perpendicular to the magnetic field, but electrons can still freely propagate and scatter parallel to the field. Further, after a collision, electrons can also change their orbits in the magnetic field.}
%\hl{MZ: Again the current way it reads to me is that the motion is purely in the x-y direction not z direction}. Classically, this effect causes charged particles to move on helical trajectories. The presence of the magnetic field effectively forces the scattering to occur in the $z$ direction.}
\label{cartoon}
\end{figure}
The elemental composition of neutron stars is unknown.
Predictions of the composition of non-accreting neutron star atmospheres range from light elements, such as hydrogen or helium \citep{Ho03,Guver11},
to mid-Z elements, such as carbon, oxygen, or neon~\citep{Mori06,Ho09,Alford23}.
Therefore, for this study, we will examine how magnetic fields affect electron collisions of both neutral hydrogen and highly-ionized oxygen.
The Hamiltonian for a free particle in a magnetic field (which is conventionally aligned in the $z$ direction) contains a harmonic oscillator potential in the $x$-$y$ direction \citep{Ventura73,Clark83},
%\hl{MZ: Is there are reason why it is lower case $l_z$ and upper case $S_z$? Shouldn't they both be lower case (one-electron Hamiltonian)?
%Later on in (2) and (3) 'm' is used, maybe for consistency they can all be $m$ and $m_s$?
%TG: these are supposed to be in operator form, whereas later it refers to quantum numbers}
\begin{equation}
H_0^{{p}} = -\frac{1}{2}\nabla^2 + \frac{1}{2}L_z\beta + \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\beta
}{2}\right)^2\varrho^2 + S_z\beta + V_{\mathrm{nuc}}(z,\varrho),
\end{equation}
where we have used atomic units throughout ($m_e=\hbar=e=a_0=1$ and $\beta=B/B_0$ where $B_0=2.35\times10^9$~G), the superscript ${p}$ denotes the ``projectile" in the scattering problem, and the subscript ``0" denotes that the particle is not interacting with other electrons.
Here, $L_z$ and $S_z$ are orbital and spin angular momentum operators, and $V_{\mathrm{nuc}}(z,\varrho)$ is a long-range nuclear potential.
The only direction where electrons can freely propagate is the $z$ direction.
The magnetic field states and energies are described by
\begin{align}
\braket{\vec{r}}{knm} &= N e^{ikz}e^{-\beta \varrho^2/4}\left(\frac{\beta}{2}\varrho\right)^{|m|/2} L^{|m|}_{n}(\beta\varrho^2/2) e^{im\varphi} \label{waves}\\
&~~\mathrm{and}~~\nonumber\\
\varepsilon_{knm} &= \frac{1}{2}k^2 + \frac{\beta}{2}(2n+|m|+m+1) + m_s\beta,
\end{align}
respectively, where $k$ is the momentum in the $z$ direction, $n$ is the ``Landau" number, and $m$ is the azimuthal/magnetic quantum number, defined the same way as in the field-free case.
Here, $N$ is a normalizing factor, and $L^{m}_n(x)$ is an associated Laguerre polynomial.
The presence of the magnetic field creates wavefunctions that decay to zero as $\varrho$ becomes large, i.e. the wavefunctions are bound.
This means that electrons can freely scatter is the $z$ direction as well as change to a different cylindrical orbit, i.e. scatter into states of different $n$ or $m$ quantum numbers.
Fortunately, the formulation for scattered waves is unchanged due to the presence of a magnetic field. The difference is that the set of wavefunctions to construct the scattered wave are those in Eq \eqref{waves} instead of three-dimensional plane waves.
The scattered wave is defined as~\citep[][]{Bray92}
\begin{equation}
\ket{f_{j,i}} = \delta_{j,i}\ket{k_in_im_i} + \sumint_jdk_j \frac{\ket{k_jn_jm_j}\mat{k_jn_jm_j \phi_j}{T(E)}{\phi_i k_in_im_i}}{E - \varepsilon_j-\varepsilon_{k_jn_jm_j}},
\end{equation}
where $\phi_i$ is a set of atomic states that the projectile electron is scattering from, $\varepsilon$ denotes energy, and $T(E)$ is the collision ``transition" or $T$-matrix, defined in \citep{LippmannSchwinger50}, which is closely related to the collision amplitude.
We improve over past collision calculations \citep{Gomez23} by including exchange interactions \citep{BetheSalpeter}.
Including exchange results in the important anti-symmetric property that
\begin{equation}
\braket{\phi_k}{f_{j,i}} = (-1)^S\braket{\phi_j}{f_{k,i}},
\label{antisymmetric}
\end{equation}
where $S$ is the total spin of the atom+projectile system; $S=0$ corresponds to singlet scattering where the spins of the particles are anti-symmetric, and $S=1$ is triplet scattering where the spatial wavefunctions are anti-symmetric.
To properly impose the boundary condition in Eq \eqref{antisymmetric}, we follow \citet{Bray92} by modifying the
%\hl{MZ: ``Pauli repulsion" to link this back to the text above}
Pauli repulsion terms in the atom-projectile interaction\footnote{See \citet{Gomez23} for direct terms.}
\begin{equation}
(-1)^S[H-E]P \Rightarrow
(-1)^S[H-(1-\theta)E]P - \theta EI_p,
\end{equation}
where $H$ and $E$ are the total Hamiltonian and energy, respectively, and $P$ is the ``Pauli" exchange operator. For the new form, $I_p$ is a unit operator acting on the projectile electron space, and $\theta$ is an arbitrary non-zero scalar where the $T$-matrix solutions are independent of the value of $\theta$.\footnote{We note that in low-magnetic field cases, $|\theta|$ needs to be large to satisfy Eq \eqref{antisymmetric}. We think this is required due to the competing symmetries: at low fields, the target atom is more spherical, but the projectile is still cylindrical. At high magnetic fields seen in neutron stars, such as $10^{12}$~G, both target and projectile are cylindrical and nearly any non-zero value of $\theta$ can be used.}
\begin{figure}[h!]
\includegraphics[scale=0.75,trim=0cm 0 0 0]{HTmat}
\caption{Illustration of the importance of exchange on the collision $T$-matrices of the $1s$ state of neutral hydrogen in high magnetic fields. We have three cases: zero field
(dotted line), $\beta$=1 (dot-dashed line), and $\beta=10^3$ (solid line). For these three cases, we show the imaginary part of the elastic $T$-matrix as a representation of the total cross section through the optical theorem.
%\hl{MZ: Bottom page note for the optical theorem? Or ``(see the text)" note here}.
We perform three types of calculations: direct-only, singlet scattering and triplet scattering. At $\beta=1$, the $T$-matrices decrease, but as the field goes up, then the $T$-matrices increase over their field-free values.}
\label{Hcollisions}
\end{figure}
In figure \ref{Hcollisions}, we compare elastic $T$-matrices of the $1s$ state of neutral hydrogen for $\beta=0,~1,~\mathrm{and}~10^3$ with different physics included.
These conditions were chosen to sample a range of relative importance between Coulomb and magnetic interactions.
Clearly, at $\beta=0$, the Coulomb interaction between particles is the only thing that dictates electron motion.
At $\beta=1$, the magnetic energy is of the same order as the nuclear energy; this is at the lower end of the range of magnetic fields expected to be found in neutron stars.
Finally, at $\beta=10^3$, the magnetic energy dominates over the Coulomb interactions and is a ``typical" field found on neutron star surfaces.
Examining neutral hydrogen collisions often serves as a benchmark for atomic collision calculations \citep{MottMassey,Moiseiwitsch68}.
We examine, specifically, the imaginary part of the elastic $T$-matrix, as it is representative of the total cross section through the optical theorem \citep{LippmannSchwinger50,MottMassey,Gomez21}.
We also examine the changes in singlet and triplet scattering (blue and red lines, respectively, in figure \ref{Hcollisions}) from these interactions.
For low and high energies of the projectile, exchange is a modest correction to the $T$-matrices.
However, for $k$ values that correspond to wavelengths on the order of the atom's dimension, Pauli repulsion becomes large compared to direct interactions, and $T$-matrices that include exchange \textbf{\textit{are larger by more than an order of magnitude}} than $T$-matrices that include direct-only interactions.
This increase appears as a broad contribution and is not due to dielectronic resonances.
%\hl{MZ: You mean Landau resonances?}
These significant increases in collisions amplitudes/$T$-matrices are largely due to the confining nature of magnetic fields.
In the absence of a magnetic field, when an electron starts to experience Pauli repulsion, the electron can scatter into a non-zero angle.
But in the presence of a large magnetic field, scattering into an angle away from the $z$ axis is extremely difficult.
In order to scatter into an excited Landau state, the electron must have a kinetic energy in excess of the magnetic energy.
Therefore, revisiting figure~\ref{cartoon}, when constrained to a particular trajectory, the electron is forced to interact with the atom and its only scattering options are to transmit to the other side, or completely change its direction of propagation in the form of a reflected wave.
%\textcolor{red}{[``transmit" has been changed to ``scatter", but perhaps ``transmit" is a better choice...???.]}
Therefore, the electrons are forced to experience the Pauli repulsion, which then becomes the dominant collision process.
%\textcolor{red}{[Verify that new ``constrained" lingo in previous phrase is ok.]}
\begin{figure}[h!]
\includegraphics[scale=0.75,trim=0cm 0 0 0]{OTmat}
\caption{Illustration of the impact of Pauli repulsion on the collision $T$-matrices on the $1s_{m=0}$ (red lines) and $2p_{m=-1}$ (black lines) state of H-like oxygen at $\beta=10^3$. The dotted lines neglect Pauli repulsion and the solid lines include it. The most extreme increase in the $T$-matrices is roughly a factor of $10^4$. Pauli repulsion causes the elastic $T$-matrices of the ground and excited states to become comparable.}
\label{Ocollisions}
\end{figure}
%\textcolor{red}{[It's not clear if ``Stark" should be capitalized here, i.e. are you talking about Stark broadening or are you simply using the adjective ``stark"?]}
There is a stark difference in the amount of increase seen in neutral hydrogen vs ionized H-like oxygen, the latter is demonstrated in figure \ref{Ocollisions}, where Pauli repulsion leads to increases in the $T$-matrices of \textbf{\textit{4 orders of magnitude}}.
Elastic scattering of ions has an additional complication over neutrals, namely having to include bound states of the projectile \citep{Bray94,Gomez20}.
In H~{\sc i} and even more so in O~{\sc viii}, much of the $T$-matrix enhancement is due to the slow convergence of states with high $m$ values\footnote{States of $m$ up to $150$ were used in figures \ref{Hcollisions} and \ref{Ocollisions}.}; this will be the subject of future study.
Because of the cylindrical symmetry, when $m$ is large, exchange interactions of the type
\begin{equation}
\ket{\phi_{\nu n_1 m_1} kn_2m_2} \Rightarrow \ket{\phi_{\nu n_2 m_2} kn_1m_1}
\end{equation}
become the dominant type of collision interaction and more $m$ states (both atomic and projectile) are needed to achieve convergence.
The matrix elements for the high partial waves are strongly dependent on the energy of the target atom.
The energy of the target states can significantly change depending on the mass of the nucleus \citep{Johnson83,PM93}.
And because the $T$-matrix contains energy terms in the exchange part of the interactions, the resulting $T$-matrix solutions are therefore impacted by the mass of the nucleus.
There is further unusual behavior in the collisions of different levels.
In the absence of a magnetic field, the $T$-matrices of excited states, such as $2p$, usually dwarf those of the $1s$ ground state.
This behavior is the reason why line-shape calculations can neglect the collisions of the lower state for $K$-shell transitions \citep{Gomez22}.
This same field-free behavior is repeated in the direct calculation when a magnetic field is present.
But when Pauli repulsion is included, we can see in figure \ref{Ocollisions} that the elastic collisions of $1s$ and $2p_{m=-1}$ are similar at low collision energies.
The present calculations demonstrate that magnetic fields can make Pauli exclusion (or repulsion) become the dominant collision process, resulting in large increases in the elastic collision $T$-matrices, which are representative of the total cross section.
And by large increases, we specifically mean orders of magnitude increases.
These enhancements give some unusual behavior in the $T$-matrix solutions not seen in non-magnetic cases such as the cross section of the ground state having a similar total cross sections (if not a larger cross section) than those of excited states.
These enhancements will have an effect on two important physical properties: the transport coefficients \citep{Potekhin99} and the spectral line broadening \citep{Gomez23}.
Stronger electron collisions have an inverse relationship with viscosity as well as electrical and thermal conductivity \citep{McQuarrie}, i.e. stronger collisions result in decreased transport properties.
Past work on transport properties, e.g. \citet{Potekhin99}, considered only collision frequencies off bare ion nuclei and neglected any effects from bound electrons.
The work presented here finds that should there be any bound electrons, then transport coefficients could be altered substantially compared to estimates that assume bare nuclei.
Lastly, we conclude that electron broadening would be significantly enhanced in neutron star atmospheres.
This increase may make it so that the plasma broadening is the dominant broadening mechanism, though more work is needed before emergent spectral models are mature enough to use.
The work presented here is an essential aspect of studying the spectra of neutron stars ( atmosphere models can now go beyond the LTE assumption) and---with high enough resolution measurements---allow us to determine the gravity of neutron stars and constrain the equation of state of the interior.
\backmatter
% \bmhead{Supplementary information}
% If your article has accompanying supplementary file/s please state so here.
% Authors reporting data from electrophoretic gels and blots should supply the full unprocessed scans for key as part of their Supplementary information. This may be requested by the editorial team/s if it is missing.
% Please refer to Journal-level guidance for any specific requirements.
\bmhead{Acknowledgments}
T.A.G. and J.W. acknowledge support from the United States Department of Energy under grant DR-SC0010623 and the Wootton Center for Astrophysical Plasma Properties under the United States Department of Energy collaborative agreement DE-NA0003843.
M.C.Z and C.J.F. acknowledge support from the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) ASC PEM Atomic Physics Project. LANL is operated by Triad National Security, LLC, for the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. 89233218NCA000001.
I. B. acknowledges the Australian Research Council and the support of the National Computer Infrastructure and the Pawsey Supercomputer Centre.
%%===================================================%%
%% For presentation purpose, we have included %%
%% \bigskip command. please ignore this. %%
%%===================================================%%
%Editorial Policies for:
%\bigskip\noindent
%Nature Portfolio journals: \url{https://www.nature.com/nature-research/editorial-policies}
%\bibliography{bib}% common bib file
%% BioMed_Central_Bib_Style_v1.01
\begin{thebibliography}{41}
% BibTex style file: bmc-mathphys.bst (version 2.1), 2014-07-24
\ifx \bisbn \undefined \def \bisbn #1{ISBN #1}\fi
\ifx \binits \undefined \def \binits#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \bauthor \undefined \def \bauthor#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \batitle \undefined \def \batitle#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \bjtitle \undefined \def \bjtitle#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \bvolume \undefined \def \bvolume#1{\textbf{#1}}\fi
\ifx \byear \undefined \def \byear#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \bissue \undefined \def \bissue#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \bfpage \undefined \def \bfpage#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \blpage \undefined \def \blpage #1{#1}\fi
\ifx \burl \undefined \def \burl#1{\textsf{#1}}\fi
\ifx \doiurl \undefined \def \doiurl#1{\url{https://doi.org/#1}}\fi
\ifx \betal \undefined \def \betal{\textit{et al.}}\fi
\ifx \binstitute \undefined \def \binstitute#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \binstitutionaled \undefined \def \binstitutionaled#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \bctitle \undefined \def \bctitle#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \beditor \undefined \def \beditor#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \bpublisher \undefined \def \bpublisher#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \bbtitle \undefined \def \bbtitle#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \bedition \undefined \def \bedition#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \bseriesno \undefined \def \bseriesno#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \blocation \undefined \def \blocation#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \bsertitle \undefined \def \bsertitle#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \bsnm \undefined \def \bsnm#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \bsuffix \undefined \def \bsuffix#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \bparticle \undefined \def \bparticle#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \barticle \undefined \def \barticle#1{#1}\fi
\bibcommenthead
\ifx \bconfdate \undefined \def \bconfdate #1{#1}\fi
\ifx \botherref \undefined \def \botherref #1{#1}\fi
\ifx \url \undefined \def \url#1{\textsf{#1}}\fi
\ifx \bchapter \undefined \def \bchapter#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \bbook \undefined \def \bbook#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \bcomment \undefined \def \bcomment#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \oauthor \undefined \def \oauthor#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \citeauthoryear \undefined \def \citeauthoryear#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \endbibitem \undefined \def \endbibitem {}\fi
\ifx \bconflocation \undefined \def \bconflocation#1{#1}\fi
\ifx \arxivurl \undefined \def \arxivurl#1{\textsf{#1}}\fi
\csname PreBibitemsHook\endcsname
%%% 1
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Rezzolla} et~al.}{2018}]{NSbook}
\begin{bbook}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Rezzolla}}, \binits{L.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Pizzochero}}, \binits{P.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Jones}}, \binits{D.I.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Rea}}, \binits{N.}}:
\bbtitle{{The Physics and Astrophysics of Neutron Stars}}.
\bsertitle{Astrophysics and Space Science Library},
vol. \bseriesno{457}
(\byear{2018}).
\doiurl{10.1007/978-3-319-97616-7}
\end{bbook}
\endbibitem
%%% 2
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Potekhin}}{1999}]{Potekhin99}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Potekhin}}, \binits{A.Y.}}:
\batitle{{Electron conduction in magnetized neutron star envelopes}}.
\bjtitle{\aap}
\bvolume{351},
\bfpage{787}--\blpage{797}
(\byear{1999})
\doiurl{10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9909100}
{\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9909100}{{arXiv:astro-ph/9909100}}}
{[astro-ph]}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 3
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Bergeron} et~al.}{1992}]{Bergeron92}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Bergeron}}, \binits{P.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Saffer}}, \binits{R.A.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Liebert}}, \binits{J.}}:
\batitle{{A Spectroscopic Determination of the Mass Distribution of DA White
Dwarfs}}.
\bjtitle{\apj}
\bvolume{394},
\bfpage{228}
(\byear{1992})
\doiurl{10.1086/171575}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 4
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Ventura}}{1973}]{Ventura73}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Ventura}}, \binits{J.}}:
\batitle{{Collision Frequency and Coulomb Scattering in an Intense Magnetic
Field}}.
\bjtitle{\pra}
\bvolume{8}(\bissue{6}),
\bfpage{3021}--\blpage{3031}
(\byear{1973})
\doiurl{10.1103/PhysRevA.8.3021}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 5
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Oppenheimer}}{1928}]{Oppenheimer28}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Oppenheimer}}, \binits{J.R.}}:
\batitle{{On the Quantum Theory of Electronic Impacts}}.
\bjtitle{Physical Review}
\bvolume{32}(\bissue{3}),
\bfpage{361}--\blpage{376}
(\byear{1928})
\doiurl{10.1103/PhysRev.32.361}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 6
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Bray} and {Stelbovics}}{1992}]{Bray92}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Bray}}, \binits{I.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Stelbovics}}, \binits{A.T.}}:
\batitle{{Convergent close-coupling calculations of electron-hydrogen
scattering}}.
\bjtitle{\pra}
\bvolume{46}(\bissue{11}),
\bfpage{6995}--\blpage{7011}
(\byear{1992})
\doiurl{10.1103/PhysRevA.46.6995}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 7
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Lattimer and Prakash}{2001}]{Lattimer01}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{Lattimer}, \binits{J.M.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{Prakash}, \binits{M.}}:
\batitle{Neutron star structure and the equation of state}.
\bjtitle{The Astrophysical Journal}
\bvolume{550}(\bissue{1}),
\bfpage{426}
(\byear{2001})
\doiurl{10.1086/319702}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 8
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Lindblom}}{1992}]{Lindblom92}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Lindblom}}, \binits{L.}}:
\batitle{{Determining the Nuclear Equation of State from Neutron-Star Masses
and Radii}}.
\bjtitle{\apj}
\bvolume{398},
\bfpage{569}
(\byear{1992})
\doiurl{10.1086/171882}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 9
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Heinke} et~al.}{2014}]{Heinke14}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Heinke}}, \binits{C.O.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Cohn}}, \binits{H.N.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Lugger}}, \binits{P.M.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Webb}}, \binits{N.A.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Ho}}, \binits{W.C.G.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Anderson}}, \binits{J.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Campana}}, \binits{S.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Bogdanov}}, \binits{S.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Haggard}}, \binits{D.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Cool}}, \binits{A.M.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Grindlay}}, \binits{J.E.}}:
\batitle{{Improved mass and radius constraints for quiescent neutron stars in
{\ensuremath{\omega}} Cen and NGC 6397}}.
\bjtitle{\mnras}
\bvolume{444}(\bissue{1}),
\bfpage{443}--\blpage{456}
(\byear{2014})
\doiurl{10.1093/mnras/stu1449}
{\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.1497}{{arXiv:1406.1497}}}
{[astro-ph.HE]}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 10
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{{\"O}zel} and {Freire}}{2016}]{Ozel16}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{{\"O}zel}}, \binits{F.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Freire}}, \binits{P.}}:
\batitle{{Masses, Radii, and the Equation of State of Neutron Stars}}.
\bjtitle{\araa}
\bvolume{54},
\bfpage{401}--\blpage{440}
(\byear{2016})
\doiurl{10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023322}
{\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.02698}{{arXiv:1603.02698}}}
{[astro-ph.HE]}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 11
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Bogdanov} et~al.}{2019a}]{NICER1}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Bogdanov}}, \binits{S.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Guillot}}, \binits{S.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Ray}}, \binits{P.S.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Wolff}}, \binits{M.T.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Chakrabarty}}, \binits{D.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Ho}}, \binits{W.C.G.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Kerr}}, \binits{M.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Lamb}}, \binits{F.K.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Lommen}}, \binits{A.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Ludlam}}, \binits{R.M.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Milburn}}, \binits{R.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Montano}}, \binits{S.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Miller}}, \binits{M.C.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Baub{\"o}ck}}, \binits{M.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{{\"O}zel}}, \binits{F.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Psaltis}}, \binits{D.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Remillard}}, \binits{R.A.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Riley}}, \binits{T.E.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Steiner}}, \binits{J.F.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Strohmayer}}, \binits{T.E.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Watts}}, \binits{A.L.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Wood}}, \binits{K.S.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Zeldes}}, \binits{J.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Enoto}}, \binits{T.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Okajima}}, \binits{T.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Kellogg}}, \binits{J.W.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Baker}}, \binits{C.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Markwardt}}, \binits{C.B.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Arzoumanian}}, \binits{Z.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Gendreau}}, \binits{K.C.}}:
\batitle{{Constraining the Neutron Star Mass-Radius Relation and Dense Matter
Equation of State with NICER. I. The Millisecond Pulsar X-Ray Data Set}}.
\bjtitle{\apjl}
\bvolume{887}(\bissue{1}),
\bfpage{25}
(\byear{2019})
\doiurl{10.3847/2041-8213/ab53eb}
{\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.05706}{{arXiv:1912.05706}}}
{[astro-ph.HE]}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 12
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Bogdanov} et~al.}{2019b}]{NICER2}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Bogdanov}}, \binits{S.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Lamb}}, \binits{F.K.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Mahmoodifar}}, \binits{S.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Miller}}, \binits{M.C.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Morsink}}, \binits{S.M.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Riley}}, \binits{T.E.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Strohmayer}}, \binits{T.E.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Tung}}, \binits{A.K.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Watts}}, \binits{A.L.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Dittmann}}, \binits{A.J.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Chakrabarty}}, \binits{D.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Guillot}}, \binits{S.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Arzoumanian}}, \binits{Z.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Gendreau}}, \binits{K.C.}}:
\batitle{{Constraining the Neutron Star Mass-Radius Relation and Dense Matter
Equation of State with NICER. II. Emission from Hot Spots on a Rapidly
Rotating Neutron Star}}.
\bjtitle{\apjl}
\bvolume{887}(\bissue{1}),
\bfpage{26}
(\byear{2019})
\doiurl{10.3847/2041-8213/ab5968}
{\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.05707}{{arXiv:1912.05707}}}
{[astro-ph.HE]}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 13
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Ruder} et~al.}{1994}]{Ruder94}
\begin{bbook}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Ruder}}, \binits{H.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Wunner}}, \binits{G.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Herold}}, \binits{H.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Geyer}}, \binits{F.}}:
\bbtitle{{Atoms in Strong Magnetic Fields. Quantum Mechanical Treatment and
Applications in Astrophysics and Quantum Chaos}},
(\byear{1994})
\end{bbook}
\endbibitem
%%% 14
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Ziman}}{1954}]{Ziman54}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Ziman}}, \binits{J.M.}}:
\batitle{{The Electrical and Thermal Conductivities of Monovalent Metals}}.
\bjtitle{Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A}
\bvolume{226}(\bissue{1167}),
\bfpage{436}--\blpage{454}
(\byear{1954})
\doiurl{10.1098/rspa.1954.0267}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 15
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Baalrud} and {Daligault}}{2017}]{Baalrud17}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Baalrud}}, \binits{S.D.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Daligault}}, \binits{J.}}:
\batitle{{Transport regimes spanning magnetization-coupling phase space}}.
\bjtitle{\pre}
\bvolume{96}(\bissue{4}),
\bfpage{043202}
(\byear{2017})
\doiurl{10.1103/PhysRevE.96.043202}
{\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.05420}{{arXiv:1709.05420}}}
{[physics.plasm-ph]}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 16
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Braginskii}}{1965}]{Braginskii}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Braginskii}}, \binits{S.I.}}:
\batitle{{Transport Processes in a Plasma}}.
\bjtitle{Reviews of Plasma Physics}
\bvolume{1},
\bfpage{205}
(\byear{1965})
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 17
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Lee} and {More}}{1984}]{LeeMore84}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Lee}}, \binits{Y.T.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{More}}, \binits{R.M.}}:
\batitle{{An electron conductivity model for dense plasmas}}.
\bjtitle{Physics of Fluids}
\bvolume{27}(\bissue{5}),
\bfpage{1273}--\blpage{1286}
(\byear{1984})
\doiurl{10.1063/1.864744}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 18
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Baranger}}{1958}]{Baranger58c}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Baranger}}, \binits{M.}}:
\batitle{{General Impact Theory of Pressure Broadening}}.
\bjtitle{Physical Review}
\bvolume{112}(\bissue{3}),
\bfpage{855}--\blpage{865}
(\byear{1958})
\doiurl{10.1103/PhysRev.112.855}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 19
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Fano}}{1963}]{Fano63}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Fano}}, \binits{U.}}:
\batitle{{Pressure Broadening as a Prototype of Relaxation}}.
\bjtitle{Physical Review}
\bvolume{131}(\bissue{1}),
\bfpage{259}--\blpage{268}
(\byear{1963})
\doiurl{10.1103/PhysRev.131.259}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 20
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Gomez} et~al.}{2022}]{Gomez22}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Gomez}}, \binits{T.A.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Nagayama}}, \binits{T.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Cho}}, \binits{P.B.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Kilcrease}}, \binits{D.P.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Fontes}}, \binits{C.J.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Zammit}}, \binits{M.C.}}:
\batitle{{Introduction to spectral line shape theory}}.
\bjtitle{Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics}
\bvolume{55}(\bissue{3}),
\bfpage{034002}
(\byear{2022})
\doiurl{10.1088/1361-6455/ac4f31}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 21
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Gomez} et~al.}{2023}]{Gomez23}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Gomez}}, \binits{T.A.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Zammit}}, \binits{M.C.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Fontes}}, \binits{C.J.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{White}}, \binits{J.R.}}:
\batitle{{A Quantum-mechanical Treatment of Electron Broadening in Strong
Magnetic Fields}}.
\bjtitle{\apj}
\bvolume{951}(\bissue{2}),
\bfpage{143}
(\byear{2023})
\doiurl{10.3847/1538-4357/acda28}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 22
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{XRISM Science Team}}{2022}]{XRISM}
\begin{botherref}
\oauthor{\bsnm{{XRISM Science Team}}}:
{XRISM Quick Reference}.
arXiv e-prints,
2202--05399
(2022)
\doiurl{10.48550/arXiv.2202.05399}
{\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.05399}{{arXiv:2202.05399}}}
{[astro-ph.IM]}
\end{botherref}
\endbibitem
%%% 23
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Smith et~al.}{2017}]{Smith17_arcus}
\begin{bchapter}
\bauthor{\bsnm{Smith}, \binits{R.K.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{Abraham}, \binits{M.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{Allured}, \binits{R.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{Bautz}, \binits{M.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{Bookbinder}, \binits{J.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{Bregman}, \binits{J.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{Brenneman}, \binits{L.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{Brickhouse}, \binits{N.S.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{Burrows}, \binits{D.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{Burwitz}, \binits{V.}}, \betal:
\bctitle{Arcus: exploring the formation and evolution of clusters, galaxies,
and stars}.
In: \bbtitle{UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XX},
vol. \bseriesno{10397},
pp. \bfpage{194}--\blpage{204}
(\byear{2017}).
\bcomment{SPIE}
\end{bchapter}
\endbibitem
%%% 24
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Ferri et~al.}{2022}]{Ferri21}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{Ferri}, \binits{S.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{Peyrusse}, \binits{O.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{Calisti}, \binits{A.}}:
\batitle{Stark-zeeman line-shape model for multi-electron radiators in hot
dense plasmas subjected to large magnetic fields}.
\bjtitle{Matter and Radiation at Extremes}
\bvolume{7},
\bfpage{015901}
(\byear{2022})
\doiurl{10.1063/5.0058552}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 25
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Lafleur} and {Baalrud}}{2019}]{Lafleur19}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Lafleur}}, \binits{T.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Baalrud}}, \binits{S.D.}}:
\batitle{{Transverse force induced by a magnetized wake}}.
\bjtitle{Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion}
\bvolume{61}(\bissue{12}),
\bfpage{125004}
(\byear{2019})
\doiurl{10.1088/1361-6587/ab45d4}
{\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.03121}{{arXiv:1909.03121}}}
{[physics.plasm-ph]}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 26
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Ho} et~al.}{2003}]{Ho03}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Ho}}, \binits{W.C.G.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Lai}}, \binits{D.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Potekhin}}, \binits{A.Y.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Chabrier}}, \binits{G.}}:
\batitle{{Atmospheres and Spectra of Strongly Magnetized Neutron Stars. III.
Partially Ionized Hydrogen Models}}.
\bjtitle{\apj}
\bvolume{599}(\bissue{2}),
\bfpage{1293}--\blpage{1301}
(\byear{2003})
\doiurl{10.1086/379507}
{\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0309261}{{arXiv:astro-ph/0309261}}}
{[astro-ph]}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 27
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{G{\"u}ver} et~al.}{2011}]{Guver11}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{G{\"u}ver}}, \binits{T.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{G{\"o}{\v{g}}{\"u}{\c{s}}}}, \binits{E.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{{\"O}zel}}, \binits{F.}}:
\batitle{{A magnetar strength surface magnetic field for the slowly spinning
down SGR 0418+5729}}.
\bjtitle{\mnras}
\bvolume{418}(\bissue{4}),
\bfpage{2773}--\blpage{2778}
(\byear{2011})
\doiurl{10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19677.x}
{\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1103.3024}{{arXiv:1103.3024}}}
{[astro-ph.HE]}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 28
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Mori} and {Hailey}}{2006}]{Mori06}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Mori}}, \binits{K.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Hailey}}, \binits{C.J.}}:
\batitle{{Detailed Atmosphere Modeling for the Neutron Star 1E1207.4-5209:
Evidence of Oxygen/Neon Atmosphere}}.
\bjtitle{\apj}
\bvolume{648}(\bissue{2}),
\bfpage{1139}--\blpage{1155}
(\byear{2006})
\doiurl{10.1086/506008}
{\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0301161}{{arXiv:astro-ph/0301161}}}
{[astro-ph]}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 29
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Ho} and {Heinke}}{2009}]{Ho09}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Ho}}, \binits{W.C.G.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Heinke}}, \binits{C.O.}}:
\batitle{{A neutron star with a carbon atmosphere in the Cassiopeia A supernova
remnant}}.
\bjtitle{\nat}
\bvolume{462}(\bissue{7269}),
\bfpage{71}--\blpage{73}
(\byear{2009})
\doiurl{10.1038/nature08525}
{\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/0911.0672}{{arXiv:0911.0672}}}
{[astro-ph.HE]}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 30
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Alford} and {Halpern}}{2023}]{Alford23}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Alford}}, \binits{J.A.J.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Halpern}}, \binits{J.P.}}:
\batitle{{Do Central Compact Objects have Carbon Atmospheres?}}
\bjtitle{\apj}
\bvolume{944}(\bissue{1}),
\bfpage{36}
(\byear{2023})
\doiurl{10.3847/1538-4357/acaf55}
{\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05893}{{arXiv:2302.05893}}}
{[astro-ph.HE]}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 31
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Clark}}{1983}]{Clark83}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Clark}}, \binits{C.W.}}:
\batitle{{Low-energy electron-atom scattering in a magnetic field}}.
\bjtitle{\pra}
\bvolume{28}(\bissue{1}),
\bfpage{83}--\blpage{90}
(\byear{1983})
\doiurl{10.1103/PhysRevA.28.83}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 32
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Lippmann} and
{Schwinger}}{1950}]{LippmannSchwinger50}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Lippmann}}, \binits{B.A.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Schwinger}}, \binits{J.}}:
\batitle{{Variational Principles for Scattering Processes. I}}.
\bjtitle{Physical Review}
\bvolume{79}(\bissue{3}),
\bfpage{469}--\blpage{480}
(\byear{1950})
\doiurl{10.1103/PhysRev.79.469}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 33
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Bethe} and {Salpeter}}{1957}]{BetheSalpeter}
\begin{bbook}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Bethe}}, \binits{H.A.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Salpeter}}, \binits{E.E.}}:
\bbtitle{{Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms}},
(\byear{1957})
\end{bbook}
\endbibitem
%%% 34
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Mott} and {Massey}}{1949}]{MottMassey}
\begin{bbook}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Mott}}, \binits{N.F.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Massey}}, \binits{H.S.W.}}:
\bbtitle{{The Theory of Atomic Collisions}},
(\byear{1949})
\end{bbook}
\endbibitem
%%% 35
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Moiseiwitsch} and
{Smith}}{1968}]{Moiseiwitsch68}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Moiseiwitsch}}, \binits{B.L.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Smith}}, \binits{S.J.}}:
\batitle{{Electron Impact Excitation of Atoms}}.
\bjtitle{Reviews of Modern Physics}
\bvolume{40}(\bissue{2}),
\bfpage{238}--\blpage{353}
(\byear{1968})
\doiurl{10.1103/RevModPhys.40.238}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 36
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Gomez} et~al.}{2021}]{Gomez21}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Gomez}}, \binits{T.A.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Nagayama}}, \binits{T.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Cho}}, \binits{P.B.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Zammit}}, \binits{M.C.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Fontes}}, \binits{C.J.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Kilcrease}}, \binits{D.P.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Bray}}, \binits{I.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Hubeny}}, \binits{I.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Dunlap}}, \binits{B.H.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Montgomery}}, \binits{M.H.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Winget}}, \binits{D.E.}}:
\batitle{{All-Order Full-Coulomb Quantum Spectral Line-Shape Calculations}}.
\bjtitle{\prl}
\bvolume{127}(\bissue{23}),
\bfpage{235001}
(\byear{2021})
\doiurl{10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.235001}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 37
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Bray}}{1994}]{Bray94}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Bray}}, \binits{I.}}:
\batitle{{Convergent close-coupling method for the calculation of electron
scattering on hydrogenlike targets}}.
\bjtitle{\pra}
\bvolume{49}(\bissue{2}),
\bfpage{1066}--\blpage{1082}
(\byear{1994})
\doiurl{10.1103/PhysRevA.49.1066}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 38
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Gomez} et~al.}{2020}]{Gomez20}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Gomez}}, \binits{T.A.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Nagayama}}, \binits{T.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Fontes}}, \binits{C.J.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Kilcrease}}, \binits{D.P.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Hansen}}, \binits{S.B.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Zammit}}, \binits{M.C.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Fursa}}, \binits{D.V.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Kadyrov}}, \binits{A.S.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Bray}}, \binits{I.}}:
\batitle{{Effect of Electron Capture on Spectral Line Broadening in Hot Dense
Plasmas}}.
\bjtitle{\prl}
\bvolume{124}(\bissue{5}),
\bfpage{055003}
(\byear{2020})
\doiurl{10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.055003}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 39
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Johnson} et~al.}{1983}]{Johnson83}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Johnson}}, \binits{B.R.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Hirschfelder}}, \binits{J.O.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Yang}}, \binits{K.-H.}}:
\batitle{{Interaction of atoms, molecules, and ions with constant electric and
magnetic fields}}.
\bjtitle{Reviews of Modern Physics}
\bvolume{55}(\bissue{1}),
\bfpage{109}--\blpage{153}
(\byear{1983})
\doiurl{10.1103/RevModPhys.55.109}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 40
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Pavlov} and {Meszaros}}{1993}]{PM93}
\begin{barticle}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Pavlov}}, \binits{G.G.}},
\bauthor{\bsnm{{Meszaros}}, \binits{P.}}:
\batitle{{Finite-Velocity Effects on Atoms in Strong Magnetic Fields and
Implications for Neutron Star Atmospheres}}.
\bjtitle{\apj}
\bvolume{416},
\bfpage{752}
(\byear{1993})
\doiurl{10.1086/173274}
\end{barticle}
\endbibitem
%%% 41
\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{McQuarrie}}{2003}]{McQuarrie}
\begin{bbook}
\bauthor{\bsnm{{McQuarrie}}, \binits{D.A.}}:
\bbtitle{{Statistical Mechanics}}.
\bpublisher{{University Science Books}}, \blocation{???}
(\byear{2003})
\end{bbook}
\endbibitem
\end{thebibliography}
%% if required, the content of .bbl file can be included here once bbl is generated
%%\input sn-article.bbl
% \appendix
% \section{Supplemental Material}
% {\color{red} is this even necessary?}\\
% The $T$-matrix is defined as
% \begin{equation}
% T(E) = V + V\frac{1}{E-H_0}T(E)
% \end{equation}
% and is evaluated exactly using linear algebra techniques \citep{Bray92,Gomez21}, using matrix solve, i.e. $Ax=b$, routines.
% The only modification to this work is the inclusion of Pauli exclusion.
% Strangely, simply including exchange terms in interaction potential did not lead to wild behavior off the energy shell in magnetic field scattering unlike what is well known in field-free scattering \citep{Seaton53,Norcross69,Stelbovics97}.
% In other words, the magnetic field case resulted in stable and unique scattered waves.
% However, to ensure that the property in Eq \eqref{antisymmetric} was satisfied, we needed to use the method of \citet{Bray92}, where the interaction potential is given by
% \begin{equation}
% V = V_{ap} + V_p + (-1)^S[H-(1-\theta)E]P - \theta EI_p,
% \end{equation}
% where $V_{ap}$ and $V_p$ are the electron-electron and electron-nuclear Coulomb interactions, respectively, $H$ and $E$ are the total Hamiltonian and energy, respectively, $P$ is the exchange operator, $I_p$ is a unit operator acting on the projectile electron space, and $\theta$ is an arbitrary non-zero scalar\footnote{We note that in low-magnetic field cases, $|\theta|$ needs to be large. We think this is required due to the competing spherical symmetry of the target atom and the cylindrical symmetry of the projectile atom. At high magnetic fields seen in neutron stars, such as $10^{12}$G, both target and projectile are cylindrical and nearly any non-zero value of $\theta$ can be used.} used to ensure condition Eq \eqref{antisymmetric}.
% Due to the symmetries of the magnetic-field problem, the Coulomb interactions are evaluated using a cylindrical integral; see \citet{Gomez23}.
%%===========================================================================================%%
%% If you are submitting to one of the Nature Portfolio journals, using the eJP submission %%
%% system, please include the references within the manuscript file itself. You may do this %%
%% by copying the reference list from your .bbl file, paste it into the main manuscript .tex %%
%% file, and delete the associated \verb+\bibliography+ commands. %%
%%===========================================================================================%%
\end{document}
% Atmosphere models of neutron stars treat the variation of the magnetic field across the neutron star and the motional Stark effect as the dominant broadening mechanism of spectral lines \citep{Potekhin97,Mori06,Ho08}.
% So far, research of atoms in high magnetic fields has concentrated on generating atomic data to calculate positions and strengths of spectral lines.
% However, even the accuracy of basic quantities such as the energy levels and dipole moments are not a solved problem due to the additional complexity of the problem.
% These complexities stems from the lack of spherical symmetry and because the motion of the nucleus is not separate from the internal electronic states \citep{Johnson83}, giving rise to the so-called motional Stark effect.
% These atmosphere models assume that the atomic populations are in Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium or use an ideal equation of state \citep{Mori06,Rajagopal97,VanAdelsberg06}.
% Building a non-LTE radiative model is not currently possible because there is no adequate model for collision cross sections in high magnetic fields.
% Only a handful of studies have developed the formalism for scattering \citep{Ventura73,Clark83,Lamb90,Kostenko19,Zarcone}, but none have included all relevant physics of scattering.
% Further, spectral line broadening, which require collision data \citep{Baranger58c,Fano63}, did not get a rigorous treatment until \citet{Gomez23}.
%Only recently has the formalism for line shapes in extreme magnetic fields even been developed.
% \citet{Gomez23} formulated a quantum-mechanical treatment for line-shape calculations in magnetized plasmas, a necessity in neutron star atmospheres.
% Initial results of our previous investigation indicates that---at least for mid-Z elements---the motional Stark effect is severely overestimated, meaning that outside the narrow region of the core, the wings (which dictate the opacity in an atmosphere) is dominated by pressure broadening.
% This has significant implications, because if neutron star atmospheric spectral lines are sensitive to pressure broadening (modulo the magnetic field distribution), then the gravity of the neutron star can be obtained directly from the widths of spectral lines as they are in white dwarfs \citep{Bergeron92}.
% This could be a tool to distinguish the equation of states of neutron star interiors \citep{Lattimer01}.
% While a significant step forward, \citep{Gomez23} has omitted exchange interactions between the radiator/target and perturbing/projectile electrons.
% We can expect that the Pauli-exclusion principle would have significantly different impact in a magnetized environment, yet to our knowledge, it has only been included between bound electrons in atomic structure calculations.
% In field-free scattering where perturbing electrons have 3-dimensional degrees of freedom to avoid the radiator electron and exchange is usually a necessary, but modest correction to the $T$-matrices, collision amplitudes, and cross sections.
% In these extreme magnetic fields, two out of three of these degrees of freedom have vanished and electrons in some quantized Landau states will be forced to travel through the same space as the bound electrons.
% Therefore, the effect of exchange on the $T$-matrices can be substantially different in neutron-star magnetic fields.
%Neutron star surfaces and atmospheres are unique environments that sustain the largest-known magnetic fields in the universe.
%Understanding surface conditions of neutron stars will aid in determining properties of the state of matter found in their interiors.
%Our knowledge of material properties is still highly uncertain due to the limited research on such environments.
% Electron-atom collisions play a key role in building models for thermal conduction as well as spectral analysis.
% The formulae for collisions in high magnetic fields were developed in the 1970s, though those were focused on collisions with bare ion nuclei.
% In this work, we include all of the important physics that one would include in electron-atom collision calculations; of note is the inclusion of Pauli repulsion arising from two interacting electrons.
% Ordinarily, Pauli repulsion is usually a necessary, but modest correction to collision cross sections. We find that in neutron-star magnetic fields, Pauli repulsion can lead to enhancements of collision cross sections by orders of magnitude.
% Further, these large magnetic fields lead to some unusual behavior.
% First, elastic collision cross sections that involve the ground state are comparable to those involving excited states, rather than the {latter} dwarfing the {former}.
% Secondly, including Pauli repulsion leads to states with large orbits having the largest contribution to the collisions.
% We anticipate significant changes to transport properties and spectral line broadening in neutron star surfaces and atmospheres, which could aid in spectral diagnostics of these extreme environments.