Supersolid formation time shortcut and excitation reduction by manipulating the dynamical instability
Extracted source text · arXiv 2309.17098
\documentclass[aps,pra,reprint,superscriptaddress,floatfix]{revtex4-1}
\usepackage[colorlinks=true,urlcolor=blue]{hyperref}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,bm}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{float}
\usepackage{cancel}
\usepackage{physics}
\usepackage{tcolorbox}
\newcommand{\opt}[1]{\textcolor{purple}{#1}}
\begin{document}
\title{Supersolid formation time shortcut and excitation reduction\\
by manipulating the dynamical instability}
\author{Aitor Ala\~na}
\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48080 Bilbao, Spain}
\affiliation{EHU Quantum Center, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48940 Leioa, Biscay, Spain}
\date{\today}
\begin{abstract}
Supersolids are a phase of matter exhibiting both superfluidity and a periodic density modulation typical of crystals. When formed via quantum phase transition from a superfluid, they require a formation time before their density pattern develops. Along this paper some protocols/schemes are proposed for experimental applications, building on earlier descriptions of the role roton instability plays in the supersolid formation process and the associated formation time. In particular, the Parachutejump scheme sought to lessen the excitation produced when crossing the phase transition, and the Bang-Bang method sought to shorten the formation time. As a case study of the impact that mechanical fluctuations (noise) can have on the phase transition when conducting an experiment, the impact of a mechanical kick before the transition is also investigated. The proposed schemes are able to fulfill their objectives successfully as both the shortening of the formation process and the reduction of excitation are achieved within the framework of extended Gross Pitaevskii theory.
\end{abstract}
\maketitle
\section{Introduction}
%-----------------------------------------------------
In contrast to other Bose Einstein Condensates (BECs) in which particles only interact via short-range interactions characterized by the s-wave scattering length, ultracold dipolar gases also exhibit long-range, anisotropic interactions (see, for instance, Refs. \cite{lahaye2009,baranov2012}) thanks to their huge electric or magnetic momenta. A consequence of the dipole-dipole interaction is the so-called roton mode, a local minimum in the dispersion relation at nonzero momentum \cite{Sa03,odell2003,ronen2007,Ch18,Pe19,Sc21}. Depending on the interplay between the density of the gas, its geometry, and the strength of the interactions the roton mode may turn unstable \cite{giovanazzi2002,Ro19} and ignite behaviors such as droplet formation \cite{kadau2016}, supersolids \cite{Ta19,Bo19,Ch19} and other phenomena \cite{wenzel2017,klaus2022}.
The current paper focuses on supersolids, which combine both a superfluid nature ---linked with the phase coherence absent in the droplet crystals--- \cite{Gross62,pitaevskii2016} and a spatial modulation breaking the translational symmetry typical of cristaline structures \cite{Gross57,cristSov70,boni12,yukalov2020}. Since the first proposals of supersolidity in the past century for solid helium \cite{Le70,chester70} did not achieve a conclusive answer \cite{meisel1992supersolid}, the community has recently drawn its attention towards dipolar gases as a framework to study supersolidity \cite{Zh19,schuster20,blakie2020variational,Ro20,gallemi2020,Bl20,Te21,Zh21,He21b,He21c,alana2022crossing,roccuzzo2022,ilg2023,smith2023}, which has been experimentally proved successful \cite{pollet2019,donner2019,Ta19b,Gu19,Na19,Ta21,He21,Pe21,No21,bottcher2021,sohmen2021,biagioni2022,Bl22,sanchez2023heating}. In dipolar quantum gases the supersolid phase of matter may be reached both by a classical transition from a non-condensed gas at finite temperature to a supersolid \cite{sohmen2021} and a quantum transition from an unmodulated superfluid to a supersolid, whose character has been thoroughly researched both in theoretical and experimental works \cite{Po94,Ma13,Lu15,Ta19,Bo19,Ta19,Se08,Pe21,Ch18}, finding out that the character of the transition can vary from continuous to discontinuous by tuning the transversal trapping frequency \cite{biagioni2022,alana2022crossing}.
The aforementioned phase transition is between an ordered phase (supersolid) and a disordered one (superfluid), and as such it exhibits clearly distinct behavior when the transition is crossed towards the superfluid or towards the supersolid. Namely, one can relax the supersolid towards the superfluid almost adiabatically with ease, while on the contrary the supersolid requires a minimum formation time to develop its characteristic density pattern \cite{Bo19,biagioni2022,alana2022crossing,He21}.
This paper presents proposals to use the special characteristics of the supersolid formation process to our advantage. In an experiment we might desire to speed up the formation process and/or minimize the produced excitation. This may be achieved by altering the evolution of the roton population with a time-dependent scattering length. In particular, accelerating the formation time has a special interest, as it may assist in reducing the effect of three-body losses the condensate may suffer along the transition, effectively extending its useful lifetime.
Although these optimization targets could also be approached within the framework of Optimal Control Theory (see for instance \cite{krotov1993global,sonneborn1964bang}), this work does not aim to provide a general characterization of optimization techniques, rather focusing our efforts on providing experimentally useful and theoretically backed procedures. The shortcut approach to control even though not always optimal has proven effective and we use its general point of view \cite{schaff2011shortcuts,guery2019shortcuts}.
One of the proposals arising from this perspective, namely the Kick-Bang, can provide us insight into mechanical noise. Furthermore, it constitutes a proof of principle of how the transition may be affected by perturbation arising from sources such as small vibrations of the traps due to noise in the experimental setup or impacts the condensate may suffer due to non-condensed particles.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section \ref{sec:system}, an overview of the system under consideration is provided alongside a brief summary of the relevant formulas defining the extended Gross-Pitaevskii theory for dipolar condensates. In Sec. \ref{sec:BangBang} we present a short review of roton instability emphasizing those aspects relevant to our study \cite{blakie2020variational}.
We also propose the Bang-Bang method to reduce the total formation time of the supersolid. In Sec. \ref{sec:KickBang}
one will find how kicking the condensate before the crossing may also reduce the total formation time. Sec. \ref{sec:Parachute} presents a proposal with which the phase transition can be crossed with small excitation without requiring infeasible formation times. To recap, in Sec. \ref{sec:conclusions} the main results are summarized.
%-----------------------------------------------------
\section{System}
\label{sec:system}
%-----------------------------------------------------
In the following analysis, the system under consideration is the following: a degenerate gas of bosons with strong magnetic momentum, assuming zero temperature, and trapped in three spatial directions. In particular, we refer to the experimental setup of Ref. \cite{biagioni2022}. The effective dimensionality of the trap is essential for the transition as proved in Refs. \cite{alana2022crossing,alana2023formation}. Although all arguments presented in the current paper hold both for a quasi-2D and quasi-1D configurations only the quasi-1D is presented for the sake of briefness.
In particular, the system is
composed by $N=3\times10^{4}$ magnetic atoms of $^{162}$Dy -- with tunable s-wave scattering length $a_{s}$ and dipolar length $a_{dd}=130a_0$ ($a_0$ being the Bohr radius) -- trapped by a harmonic potential with frequencies $(\omega_{x},\omega_{y},\omega_{z})=2\pi\times(15, 101, 94)$ Hz. While the choice of these parameters is motivated by their experimental feasibility in a specific case, it is worth noting that the following analysis is conceptually general, which enables its extension to other scenarios.
This system can be described in terms of an extended Gross-Pitaevskii (GP) theory including dipolar interactions \cite{ronen2006} and the Lee-Huang-Yang (LHY) correction accounting for quantum fluctuations, within the local density approximation \cite{Li12,wachtler2016,schmitt2016}. The energy functional can be written as $E = E_{\text{GP}} + E_{\text{dd}} + E_{\text{LHY}}$ with
\begin{align}
E_{\text{GP}} &=
\int \left[\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}|\nabla \psi(\bm{r})|^2 + V(\bm{r})n(\bm{r})+\frac{g}{2} n^2(\bm{r})
\right]d\bm{r}\,,
\nonumber\\
E_{\text{dd}} &=\frac{C_{\text{dd}}}{2}\iint n(\bm{r})V_{\text{dd}}(\bm{r}-\bm{r}')n(\bm{r}') d\bm{r}d\bm{r}'\,,
\label{eq:GPenergy}\\
E_{\text{LHY}} &=\frac{2}{5}\gamma_{\text{LHY}}\int n^{5/2}(\bm{r})d\bm{r}\,,
\nonumber
\end{align}
where $E_{\text{GP}}=E_{\text{k}}+E_{\text{ho}}+E_{\text{int}}$ is the standard GP energy functional including the kinetic, potential, and contact interaction terms, $V(\bm{r})=(m/2)\sum_{\alpha=x,y,z}\omega_{\alpha}^{2}r_{\alpha}^{2}$ is the harmonic trapping potential, $n(\bm{r})=|\psi(\bm{r})|^2$ represents the condensate density (normalized to the total number of atoms $N$), $g=4\pi\hbar^2 a_{s}/m$ is the contact interaction strength, $V_{\text{dd}}(\bm{r})= (1-3\cos^{2}\theta)/(4\pi r^{3})$ the inter-particle dipole-dipole potential, $C_{\text{dd}}\equiv\mu_{0}\mu^2$ its strength, $\mu$ the modulus of the dipole moment $\bm{\mu}$, $\bm{r}$ the distance between the dipoles, and $\theta$ the angle between the vector $\bm{r}$ and the dipole axis, $\cos\theta=\bm{\mu}\cdot\bm{r}/(\mu r)$.
As in Refs. \cite{biagioni2022,alana2022crossing,alana2023formation}, the magnetic dipoles are considered to be aligned along the $z$ direction by a magnetic field $\bm{B}$.
The LHY coefficient is $\gamma_{\text{LHY}}={128\sqrt{\pi}}{\hbar^{2}a_s^{5/2}}/(3m)\left(1 + 3\epsilon_{\text{dd}}^{2}/2\right)$, with $\epsilon_{\text{dd}}=\mu_0 \mu^2 N/(3g)$.
As discussed in Refs. \cite{biagioni2022,alana2022crossing,alana2023formation}, the equilibrium configuration of the system corresponds to either a conventional superfluid state or a supersolid state ---other states such as the droplet crystal are out of the scope of this work---. The transition from one phase to the other can be induced by tuning the s-wave scattering length $a_{s}$. For the considered values of the number of atoms and trapping frequencies, the critical point is located at $a_{s}^{c} \simeq 94.4 a_{0}$ and the transition has a continuous character \cite{biagioni2022,alana2022crossing,alana2023formation}.
We present three different schemes, named Bang-Bang, Kick-Bang, and Parachutejump respectively. In order to avoid unnecessary complications and facilitate comparisons, in all three schemes we shall start at the same point above the transition, $a_s=a_s^c+1.5a_0$. The Bang-Bang and the Kick-Bang schemes are presented with the main objective of shortening the total formation time, which is relevant mainly close to the transition point, where the formation is slower. Thus, a convenient choice is to set a supersolid with the same $a_s^{obj}$ close to $a_s^c$ as end goal for both schemes for a better comparison.
The Parachutejump scheme is sought to reduce excitation, which is more relevant once the supersolid gets far from the transition point where the excitation generated by the single-quench is greater. Thus the end goal of such an approach is to finalize the process with a supersolid at a scattering length $a_s^{wait}$ smaller than $a_s^c$. Along the paper $a_s^{wait}$ is set to be both the targeted scattering length for the Parachutejump scheme and the waiting scattering length value of the Bang-Bang scheme (see Sec. \ref{sec:BangBang}), just to avoid introducing unnecessary new parameters. Note however that they are completely independent.
\begin{figure}[h]
\centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.90\columnwidth]{Fig1.pdf}}
\caption{Scheme of the presented procedures alongside single quenches for comparison.
%
In solid cyan the Bang-Bang, which goes to $a_s^{wait}$ until almost the formation time of the supersolid $\tau_{SS}(a_s^{wait})$ to then get back to $a_s^{obj}$, $\Delta\tau$ indicates how much the supersolid formation is shortened. In solid magenta the Parachutejump, after forming the supersolid by Bang-Bang the scattering length is linearly reduced back toward $a_s^{wait}$. Note that the end of the ramp for the Parachutejump scheme does not necessarily coincide with $\tau_{SS}(a_s^{obj})$.
%
In dashed blue and red a quench directly from the superfluid to $a_s^{obj}$ and $a_s^{wait}$ respectively. }
\label{fig:Scheme}
\end{figure}
Bang-Bang and Parachutejump schemes are fairly general and likely to be usefully implemented in the short term, while the Kick-Bang scheme is presented here mainly as a proof of principle and will require further elaboration. The Kick-Bang is also put forward here to highlight the need for a more in-depth investigation of the role of mechanical noise in the supersolid formation time.
%-----------------------------------------------------
\section{Bang-Bang approach to accelerate the supersolid formation}\label{sec:BangBang}
%-----------------------------------------------------
When the scattering length of a superfluid is reduced below the critical value $a_s^c$ the system starts to dynamically mute into a supersolid, nevertheless, it requires a minimum time before the density turns modulated and breaks the translational symmetry \cite{Bo19,alana2022crossing,alana2023formation}, we refer to the time between the crossing of the transition point and the appearance of a stable modulated density pattern as ``formation time of the supersolid''.
The current understanding of the supersolid formation process in the superfluid-supersolid transition indicates that it is a consequence of the roton instability. The excitation spectrum of a dipolar Bose gas in a quasi-1D geometry \cite{blakie2020variational},
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:dispersion}
\hbar\omega_k=\pm\sqrt{\frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}\left(\frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}+2n_0\tilde{V}(k) + 3\gamma_{LHY}^{(1D)}n_{0}^{3/2}\right)},
\end{equation}
%
where $\tilde{V}(k)$ denotes the total inter particle interaction potential in momentum space, exhibits (for some ranges of scattering length) a new local minimum around a finite momentum named roton momentum, $k_{\text{rot}}$ (see e.g. \cite{Pe19}). When the scattering length is reduced below a critical value $a_s^c$ the dipole-dipole interaction overcomes the repulsive contact interaction and Eq.\eqref{eq:dispersion} becomes imaginary for some momenta around $k_{\text{rot}}$, i. e., some momentum states become unstable and experience a population growth.
%
The supersolid is formed when the roton momentum state is macroscopically occupied, breaking the translational symmetry of the condensate by a close to sinusoidal pattern, whose wavelength is associated with the roton mode, $\lambda=2\pi/k_{\text{rot}}$ (see e.g. \cite{Ta19,Ta19b,Ta21,Ch18,Ch19}).
Both experimental and theoretical works \cite{Ch18,Ch19,blakie2020variational,alana2023formation} have shown that the population increase of the roton mode is exponential in the initial stages of the phase transition, slowing down once the modulation is formed and quantum fluctuations stabilize the system.
%
To study the speed of the formation one can ignore other unstable momenta and only consider the roton momentum, related to the highest value of $|\text{Im}[\omega_k]|$, which corresponds to the momentum state whose population grows the fastest. The imaginary part of the roton frequency defines a timescale $\tau_R=1/|\text{Im}[\omega_k]|$ which has been found to be proportional to the total formation time $\tau_{\text{SS}}=\alpha\tau_R(\delta a_{s})$, with $\alpha\simeq6.5$ for the system under consideration\cite{alana2023formation}, where $\delta a_{s}$ is the scattering length difference from the critical value.
\begin{figure}[t]
\centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{Fig2.pdf}}
\caption{Inverse Participation Rate (with respect to the initial value) along the time evolution. Dark-red and blue solid lines indicate the single quench scheme for final scattering value $a_s^c-3.5a_0$ and $a_s^c-1.0a_0$ respectively. The dashed-doted green line represents the Kick-Bang scheme (Sec. \ref{sec:KickBang}), the magenta dashed double-dotted line the Parachutejump (see Sec\ref{sec:Parachute}) and the dashed cyan line the Bang-bang scheme (see Sec\ref{sec:BangBang}), $a_s^{obj}=a_s^c-1.0a_0$ and $a_s^{wait}=a_s^c-3.5a_0$. $\tau$ is the time elapsed after the first quench. The 20ms before the first quench in the case of the Kick-Bang scheme, which is left to evolve after the kick some time before quenching, is not shown. The second quench for the Bang-Bang occurs at $\tau=20$ms, denoted by a color change in the background (from gray to white). The horizontal lines at the right show the IPR for the ground state configurations at $a_s^c-3.5a_0$ and $a_s^c-1.0a_0$. Note that for $\tau\ge20$ms Bang-Bang and Kick-Bang indicate supersolids at $a_s^c-1.0a_0$, while the magenta one changes the scattering length gradually between $a_s^c-1.0a_0$ (at 20ms) and $a_s^c-3.5a_0$ after the initial ``solidification''.}
\label{fig:IPR}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{Fig3.pdf}}
\caption{The behavior of the energy normalized respect to the value at the transition point, $(E[a_s] -E[a_s^c])/h$ (where $E[a_s^c]/h$ corresponds to $432.2$ Hz) for the ground state (black stars), a single quench to $a_s^{obj}$, Bang-Bang scheme and the Kick-Bang scheme following the color classification of Fig. \ref{fig:Energy}, where points have been introduced as an indication of the endpoints. The inset shows a zoom around the $a_s^{obj}$ to make the energy difference of the endpoints clear. The solid magenta line indicates the second part of the Parachutejump scheme (the reduction of the scattering length to $a_s^c-3.5a_0$ with a constant speed $da_s/dt=0.04a_0/$ms), just after the Bang-Bang. It is apparent that the Bang-Bang creates an ``excess excitation'' as its endpoint, the cyan point, is higher than the endpoint of a single quench, the blue point. Meanwhile, the transition performed after a kick exhibits a sudden high excitation due to the kick which is not able to dissipate afterward, ending the process with higher excitation (see the location of the dark-green point with respect to the others). Regarding the Parachutejump there is a significant energy reduction remarked with the double-headed dark-orange arrow between the energy after a single quench (red dot) and after the Parachutejump scheme (dark-violet dot).}
\label{fig:Energy}
\end{figure}
Now suppose we are interested in obtaining a supersolid with scattering length $a_s^{obj}$ below, but close to, the critical value $a_s^c$, which would need a long formation time since close to the transition point the imaginary part of $\omega_k$ is small. This may be interesting, for instance, to study supersolids with small spatial modulation.
Drawing from current knowledge about the formation process one can propose the following ``shortcut'' to the supersolid formation: The superfluid is quenched to a scattering length $a_s^{wait}$ smaller than the target $a_s^{obj}$, and kept at that value, $a_s^{wait}$, almost until the formation time required with such scattering length, $t\lesssim \tau_{\text{SS}}(a_s^{wait})$. After an evolution of $t$ the scattering length is quenched again to the target value (see the cyan line in Fig. \ref{fig:Scheme}).
In this scheme, the total formation time needed to form the supersolid in the condensate can be divided between $t_{wait}$, the time in which the system is with $a_s^{wait}$, and $t_{obj}$, the time in which the system is with $a_s^{obj}$. The former of both times, $t_{wait}$, is much larger than the latter, $t_{obj}$. At the time in which the scattering length is suddenly changed to the desired value $a_s^{obj}$, when $\tau=t_{wait}$, the roton mode is populated enough so as to be immediately noticeable. In the rest of the evolution period, $t_{wait}<\tau<t_{wait+t_{obj}}$, the already noticeable modulation grows until stabilizing around an equilibrium value. This ``shortcut'', called Bang-Bang because it is implemented by two quenches, allows us to create a supersolid with $a_s^{obj}$, but waiting only the duration of the formation time characteristic of $a_s^{wait}$. Although the roton momentum slightly changes at varying the scattering length, if $|a_s^{obj}-a_s^{wait}|\lesssim a_0$ the shift should be small enough so as to ensure that after the second quench the characteristic roton $k_{\text{rot}}(a_s^{obj})$ is also sufficiently populated.
After one unstable momentum state starts to be macroscopically occupied the system leaves the linear excitation regime and the computed Bogoliubov excitation spectrum of Eq.\eqref{eq:dispersion} breaks down (the approximation $n(x)\approx n_0$ does not hold anymore) \cite{Ch19,blakie2020variational}. As a consequence, the roton momentum driving the modulation instability is no longer guaranteed to be the characteristic momentum of the system ---as neither is, for instance, the wavelength of the ground state---; thus, the wavelength of the supersolid may be slightly shifted from the roton one. This is manifested by the newly created maxima moving from their creation positions, associated with the roton, and changing the relative distances (see Sec. \ref{sec:Parachute}). It is also visible in the momentum density distribution after the formation of the supersolid pattern (see e.g. \cite{alana2023formation}).
Fig. \ref{fig:IPR} shows an example of the effectiveness of the Bang-Bang approach to shorten the formation time. As in \cite{alana2023formation} the Inverse Participation Ratio, the integral over all the volume of the squared density ---proportional to the interaction term of the energy in Eq.\eqref{eq:GPenergy}---, normalized respect to the initial value, is used as a representation of supersolidity (high IPR implies high localization, typical of the closely packed clusters of the supersolid structures). Dark-red and blue solid lines represent the evolution after a single quench to $a_s^c-3.5a_0$ and $a_s^c-1.0a_0$ respectively, while the dashed cyan line is the result of the Bang-Bang scheme with $a_s^{wait}=a_s^c-3.5a_0$ and $a_s^{obj}=a_s^c-1.0a_0$. A clear shortening of the formation time is observed, as the total formation time is shorter in the Bang-Bang approach than in the simple quench approach by a factor of around 2 (around 20ms instead of around 50ms).
Energywise, as long as no dissipation methods are present, the Bang-Bang scheme is likely to get the system slightly more excited than with a single quench. This happens because the energy change of the system after a quench is \cite{alana2022crossing},
%
\begin{equation}
\Delta E \approx \Delta a_{s} {\cal E}^{int}[n],
\end{equation}
%
where ${\cal E}^{int}[n]=\int |\psi|^4 dV=\text{IPR}$. Note that only when $a_s$ changes can the system change its energy, thus, the energy is constant between the two quenches. It is straightforward to see that the Bang-Bang scheme has an excitation of,
%
\begin{equation}\label{eq:excite}
\left(a_s^{obj}-a_s^{wait}\right)\left({\cal E}^{int}[n(t_{2^{\text{nd}}\text{Bang}})-{\cal E}^{int}[n(t_{1^{\text{st}}\text{Bang}})]\right),
\end{equation}
%
additional to the excitation a single quench scheme would produce. The simple infinite quasi-1D models predict only the growth of the roton mode \cite{blakie2020variational,Ch19}, which would give near zero excess excitation as long as the second quench is applied before the macroscopical occupation of $k_{\text{rot}}$. However, a finite 3D system also exhibits dynamical responses to the quenches other than the roton mode \cite{alana2022crossing}, which can be responsible for a nonzero excess excitation \footnote{${\cal E}^{int}$ changes after the first quench, depending on its value at the moment of the second quench the excitation will vary. The excess excitation could be negative (the system will be less excited than for the single-quench scheme) if ${\cal E}^{int}[n(t_{2^{\text{nd}}\text{Bang}})]< {\cal E}^{int}[n(t_{1^{\text{st}}\text{Bang}})]$}. We depict in Fig. \ref{fig:Energy} the behaviour of the energy when this scheme ---and the schemes of Secs. \ref{sec:KickBang}-\ref{sec:Parachute}--- is applied.
\begin{figure*}[t!]
\centerline{\includegraphics[width=2\columnwidth]{Fig4.pdf}}
\caption{Comparison of the density configurations when applying a single quench (left) and the proposed shortcut schemes (center and right) for $\tau=0$ms (a, d and g), $\tau=20$ms (b, e and h), $\tau=40$ms (c, f and i). Note that for the Kick-Bang $\tau=0$ms represent $20$ms after the kick. The color scheme is weighed according to the density distribution of each case.}
\label{fig:dens_shortcut}
\end{figure*}
The scheme's efficacy resides in two properties: i) that the growth of the roton mode is faster with smaller scattering length values; ii) that the momentum states populated during the waiting time are close to (overlap significantly with) the unstable momenta at the desired scattering length. Notice that there is no need for the waiting configuration to be inside the supersolid regime; one may, for instance, implement it with $a_s^{wait}$ that would not support a supersolid, namely, if we lower further the scattering length we would find ourselves in the droplet crystal regime, where the phase coherence and superfluidity are lost.
However, keep in mind that when reducing $a_s$ the gas tends to contract, increasing the IPR, which for low values of $a_s$ could imply great excitation in the second quench (see Eq.\eqref{eq:excite}), somehow limiting the range of available $a_s^{wait}$. Another argument to limit the procedure to scattering lengths not far from $a_s^{obj}$ is that the characteristic momentum of the roton $k_{\text{rot}}$ may change more than what would be desirable.
%-----------------------------------------------------
\section{Kick-based pre-solidification (Kick-Bang approach)}\label{sec:KickBang}
%-----------------------------------------------------
The philosophy behind the Bang-Bang method is to increase the spontaneous formation rate of the roton by creating favorable conditions. An alternative path is to induce an excitation of the system before crossing the transition. The idea is to mechanically ``kick'' the system so as to excite it in such a way that the roton gets populated and quench it afterwards, thus starting the formation process with an already well populated roton mode. Within such framework the system does not strictly experience a phase transition with its spontaneous symmetry breaking, as the symmetry breaking may occur ``artificially'' in the superfluid phase in the form of a mechanical excitation. Ideally, such excited state is later stabilized by reducing the scattering length.
%
This process is presented as a proof of principle, with the view to study the characteristics of mechanical excitation and how they may affect the transition between a superfluid and a supersolid. This aim guided the choice of the ``kick'' presented in this manuscript, which instead of targeting the roton specifically has a more general shape.
There is an infinite amount of ``kicking'' protocols that could be implemented, one will expect that one of the most efficient kicks to accelerate the formation process would be to switch on a cosine like potential with $\lambda=2\pi/k_{\text{rot}}$ for some time (which would directly target the excitation of the roton).
Choosing the initial superfluid state to be close enough to the transition ---it can always be quenched close to the transition point without almost any excitation--- the excitation spectrum will have a local minimum around $k=k_{\text{rot}}$. In such a case there is no need to even target the roton specifically, as more general kicks will also be able to excite the roton significantly (although specially targeting it will obviously yield higher roton populations).
\begin{figure*}[t!]
\centerline{\includegraphics[width=2\columnwidth]{Fig5.pdf}}
\caption{Comparison of the density configurations when applying a single quench (left), the Parachutejump protocol (centre) and the Ground State configuration for $a_s$ of the corresponding Parachutejump image (right). (a-c) and (d-e) show the density distribution after the quench at $\tau=0$, $\tau=20$ms and $\tau=85$ms of the single quench and the Parachutejump respectively. (g-i) show the ground state density distribution at $a_s=a_s^c+1.5a_0$, $a_s=a_s^c-1.0a_0$ and $a_s=a_s^c-3.5a_0$, which correspond to the $a_s$ values the system has in panels d, e and f. The color distribution is the same for all panels, for a better comparison.}
\label{fig:dens_parachute}
\end{figure*}
In the example of this mechanism presented here, the system is excited by applying a force of $f/k_B\approx 6$nK$/\mu$m (where $k_B$ is the Boltzamann constant) towards positive $y$ in some range of $x$ values, between $8\mu$m and $10\mu$m, and towards negative $y$ between $-8\mu$m and $-10\mu$m \footnote{The inverse direction of the applied forces is done to keep the centre of mass stable during the evolution, it is not however necessary to see the formation acceleration}. General as it could be, the applied kick must in some way break the translational symmetry along the supersolid formation direction. Otherwise, only the dipole or scissor modes could be excited.
The force is applied for 2ms ---enough to deform the condensed gas--- and afterward switched off. The system is left to evolve for 18ms and then quenched to the ``slow'' formation value of $a_s^c-1.0a_0$. If instead of 18ms the system evolves less time before the quench the formation shortening may very well occur. However, it has been left to evolve to allow the deformation to spread and thus reduce the dependence on the specific characteristics of the applied kick in the data (see Fig. \ref{fig:dens_shortcut}(g)).
The process creates a significant excitation (see Fig. \ref{fig:Energy}). There is a first excitation period due to the applied kick and a consecutive energy reduction due to the quench. One could in principle engineer the kick to increase the IPR at the moment of the quench, thus reaching a more efficient energy reduction. Such optimization could well be done e.g. by the aforementioned cosine-like potential.
The time elapsed after the kick increases the population of the roton at the moment of the quench with respect to the case of a not kicked condensate. Such an increase in population is, in fact, accelerating the formation process (see Fig. \ref{fig:IPR}). This can be seen in the value of IPR, which for the Kick-Bang scheme reaches the equilibrium value after 20ms of being at $a_s<a_s^c$, instead of almost 50ms it would have required if it was just transferred to $a_s^{obj}$ without a previous kick. Note that although it oscillates around the equilibrium IPR value as the single quench and the Bang-Bang do, they do not reach the same state, as all of them are different excited states of the supersolid; if dissipation mechanisms were considered they could all converge to the same state after some relaxation time.
Fig. \ref{fig:dens_shortcut} enables us to make a comparison both between this ``scheme'' and the cases of a single quench to $a_s^{obj}$ and with the Bang-Bang scheme. The modulation apparent in the density distribution coincides with the IPR values of Fig. \ref{fig:IPR}, confirming the acceleration of the formation.
Note that the configuration of the condensate after the Kick-Bang scheme is slightly different, as it shows a minimum in the center instead of a maximum. This is a consequence of two almost degenerate states being realizable within these parameters. The phase of the density, i.e. where the maximum density points are located, is not relevant for infinite systems, however, when we impose a trap only two configurations survive, the ones seen in Fig. \ref{fig:dens_shortcut}. Small variations in the initial conditions of the superfluid make it select one or the other supersolid configuration.
%-----------------------------------------------------
\section{The Parachutejump approach to excitation reduction}\label{sec:Parachute}
%-----------------------------------------------------
Shortening the supersolid formation time is a relevant topic for experimental realizations of supersolids and possible applications. This is also the case for the reduction of excitation created when crossing the phase transition, as it may assist in reducing undesired effects and enable the study of subtle phenomena that could be unobservable for excited states. Adiabatically crossing the phase transition from superfluid to supersolid requires really slow scattering change rates so as to allow the system to create a supersolid pattern even for $a_s\approx a_s^{c}$, which may not be feasible due to i) experimental impossibility of a slow enough ramp speed, or ii) the length such a ramp would require to be longer than the lifespan of the condensate.
An alternative way, as we propose here, is to create a close-to-transition supersolid by the Bang-Bang shortcut (see Sec. \ref{sec:BangBang}), and to afterwards carry it towards the desired supersolid state with a finite ramp velocity. The name ``Parachutejump'' makes reference to the initial Bang-Bang shortcut, the ``jump'', and the slow $a_s$ reduction afterwards, the ``parachute''.
The initial supersolid formation carries an a priori unnecessary excitation (see Eq. \ref{eq:excite}). However, after the end of the Bang-Bang protocol the translational symmetry of the superfluid is already broken and the supersolid can continuously morph decreasing the energy through the ramp. Thus, the scheme works by compensating the excitation created by the Bang-Bang with a consequent ``adiabatic'' ramp.
Fig. \ref{fig:Energy} shows the behaviour of the energy along the protocol. The cyan dashed-dotted line is the first part, the Bang-Bang, and the magenta solid one the following ``parachute''. It is apparent that for $da_s/dt=0.04a_0/$ms the final energy is reduced below the single-quench approach. The chosen speed is just an example to show the ideal behaviour of the supersolid under the scheme, while for each experimental/technical application one should find the optimal speed (naturally, slower changes allow the system to adapt better). Indeed, previous comparisons between $a_s$ ramps carried out in experiments and numerical simulations indicate that dissipation mechanisms make the theoretical ramps accurate to describe faster experimental ramps\cite{biagioni2022}.
In Fig. \ref{fig:dens_parachute} the Parachutejump is compared both to the single quench approach and the ground state. By comparing the initial phase of the supersolid formation ---panels (b) and (e)--- with the corresponding ground state in panel (h) it is apparent that the distance between the maxima is longer for the ground state, i.e., the characteristic momentum of the supersolid is lower than the $k_{\text{rot}}$ of the superfluid. The maxima both in the single quench and the Parachutejump protocol tend to separate in the evolution, as indicated by panels (c) and (f).
The behavior of the IPR along the scheme (see magenta double dotted dashed line in Fig. \ref{fig:IPR}) shows that not only the collective oscillations are less prevalent than with a single quench ---the IPR oscillations have a significantly smaller amplitude--- but also that the finale IPR value is really close to the one of the ground state contrary to what happens after a single quench. Fig\ref{fig:dens_parachute}(c), (f) and (i) also confirm the higher resemblance to the ground state.
%-----------------------------------------------------
\section{Conclusions}
\label{sec:conclusions}
%-----------------------------------------------------
As shown, it is possible to reduce the formation time of a supersolid by changing the scattering length to lower values before arriving to the desired value. The losses in the particle number that are present along the formation process can be thus reduced, extending the time left in which to experiment with the supersolid. It also extends the range of supersolids that are experimentally viable, namely the ones really close to the transition point which would require too long times to form.
When the desired supersolid is well below the transition point, the excitation may be huge if the transition is not driven in a slow enough manner. One should ideally drive the system as slowly as needed to allow the density to redistribute, adiabatically. This, however, is hardly possible due to the slow speeds it would require close to the transition point, where the formation time gets large \cite{Ch18,alana2022crossing,alana2023formation}. The slow enough speeds could be experimentally inaccessible, or the required time so long that the three body losses would eliminate the condensate altogether. Precisely to adress this issue has the Parachutejump scheme been proposed.
Our proposal is to use the Bang-Bang approach to accelerate the formation of the supersolid close to the transition and then reduce the scattering length by a ``slow'' ramp. Once the supersolid pattern has formed the system is able to adjust to new scattering values swiftly, which allows a quasi adiabatic driving towards the endpoint.
Both the Bang-Bang and the Parachutejump schemes represent the most simple, yet effective, optimization techniques for the superfluid-supersolid phase transition. One can of course follow their philosophy with more complex schemes. Another way forward in the path of transition optimization would be to combine the dynamical change of scattering length with another dynamical change of the trapping potential.
We also investigate how a mechanical kick before the transition affects the formation time. We find that even with a kick not aimed to excite any particular momentum state the roton momentum gets populated, which accelerates the formation of the supersolid pattern. This indicates that in addition to the nonzero temperatures present in the experiments ---which would be linked to a greater roton population \cite{sanchez2023heating}---, mechanical noise may also have a role in explaining the shorter formation times respect to the mean field calculations.
Moreover, the outcomes of the Kick-Bang scheme provide a pathway to assess the impact of mechanical noise on a dipolar gas, which is challenging to estimate through theoretical means. To achieve this, one can compare the time it takes for a supersolid to form under specific scattering conditions after a sudden change, focusing on two scenarios: i) when the initial superfluid is near the transition point (displaying a distinct local minimum around the roton), and ii) when the initial superfluid possesses a scattering length significantly above the transition point and lacks a distinct local minimum apart from $k=0$. If there is a significant difference in the formation times between these cases, it may suggest that the roton mode is being influenced by mechanical noise, providing an additional check of the accurateness of the experiment.
Although the schemes have been presented only in the framework of the superfluid to supersolid phase transition, the philosophy behind them is more general and they could easily be adapted for other phase transitions driven by modulation instabilities in which the researcher, by means of experimental parameters, is able to tune one of the following: 1) the initial population of the unstable modes, 2) the imaginary part of the unstable frequency. An example outside of the dipolar atoms in which these schemes could be implemented may be the soliton creation after an interaction quench in a two component Bose condensate (see e.g. \cite{cidrim2021soliton}).
%-----------------------------------------------------
\begin{acknowledgments}
%-----------------------------------------------------
This work was supported by Grant PID2021-126273NB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and by ``ERDF A way of making Europe'', by the Basque Government through Grant No. IT1470-22, and by the European Research Council through the Advanced Grant ``Supersolids'' (No. 101055319). I thank Prof. Giovanni Modugno, Luca Tanzi, Nicolò Antolini and Giulio Biagioni alongside all people from the Dy-lab at Pisa for interesting discussions, as well as Luca Cavicchioli from the K-Rb lab at Firenze. I also thank my Ph.D. supervisors Michele Modugno and Iñigo L. Egusquiza from the University of the Basque Country for useful feedback.
\end{acknowledgments}
%merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked
%Control: key (0)
%Control: author (8) initials jnrlst
%Control: editor formatted (1) identically to author
%Control: production of article title (-1) disabled
%Control: page (0) single
%Control: year (1) truncated
%Control: production of eprint (0) enabled
\begin{thebibliography}{69}%
\makeatletter
\providecommand \@ifxundefined [1]{%
\@ifx{#1\undefined}
}%
\providecommand \@ifnum [1]{%
\ifnum #1\expandafter \@firstoftwo
\else \expandafter \@secondoftwo
\fi
}%
\providecommand \@ifx [1]{%
\ifx #1\expandafter \@firstoftwo
\else \expandafter \@secondoftwo
\fi
}%
\providecommand \natexlab [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \enquote [1]{``#1''}%
\providecommand \bibnamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \bibfnamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \citenamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \href@noop [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \href [0]{\begingroup \@sanitize@url \@href}%
\providecommand \@href[1]{\@@startlink{#1}\@@href}%
\providecommand \@@href[1]{\endgroup#1\@@endlink}%
\providecommand \@sanitize@url [0]{\catcode `\\12\catcode `\$12\catcode
`\&12\catcode `\#12\catcode `\^12\catcode `\_12\catcode `\%12\relax}%
\providecommand \@@startlink[1]{}%
\providecommand \@@endlink[0]{}%
\providecommand \url [0]{\begingroup\@sanitize@url \@url }%
\providecommand \@url [1]{\endgroup\@href {#1}{\urlprefix }}%
\providecommand \urlprefix [0]{URL }%
\providecommand \Eprint [0]{\href }%
\providecommand \doibase [0]{http://dx.doi.org/}%
\providecommand \selectlanguage [0]{\@gobble}%
\providecommand \bibinfo [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \bibfield [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \translation [1]{[#1]}%
\providecommand \BibitemOpen [0]{}%
\providecommand \bibitemStop [0]{}%
\providecommand \bibitemNoStop [0]{.\EOS\space}%
\providecommand \EOS [0]{\spacefactor3000\relax}%
\providecommand \BibitemShut [1]{\csname bibitem#1\endcsname}%
\let\auto@bib@innerbib\@empty
%</preamble>
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Lahaye}\ \emph {et~al.}(2009)\citenamefont {Lahaye},
\citenamefont {Menotti}, \citenamefont {Santos}, \citenamefont {Lewenstein},\
and\ \citenamefont {Pfau}}]{lahaye2009}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont
{Lahaye}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Menotti}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Santos}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Lewenstein}}, \ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Pfau}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1088/0034-4885/72/12/126401} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Rep. Prog. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {72}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{126401} (\bibinfo {year} {2009})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Baranov}\ \emph {et~al.}(2012)\citenamefont
{Baranov}, \citenamefont {Dalmonte}, \citenamefont {Pupillo},\ and\
\citenamefont {Zoller}}]{baranov2012}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~A.}\ \bibnamefont
{Baranov}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Dalmonte}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Pupillo}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont {Zoller}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1021/cr2003568} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Chem. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {112}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {5012}
(\bibinfo {year} {2012})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Santos}\ \emph {et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont {Santos},
\citenamefont {Shlyapnikov},\ and\ \citenamefont {Lewenstein}}]{Sa03}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Santos}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.~V.}\ \bibnamefont
{Shlyapnikov}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Lewenstein}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.250403} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {90}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {250403} (\bibinfo {year}
{2003})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {O'Dell}\ \emph {et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont {O'Dell},
\citenamefont {Giovanazzi},\ and\ \citenamefont {Kurizki}}]{odell2003}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~H.~J.}\
\bibnamefont {O'Dell}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Giovanazzi}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont
{Kurizki}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.90.110402} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {90}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {110402} (\bibinfo {year}
{2003})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Ronen}\ \emph {et~al.}(2007)\citenamefont {Ronen},
\citenamefont {Bortolotti},\ and\ \citenamefont {Bohn}}]{ronen2007}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Ronen}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~C.~E.}\ \bibnamefont
{Bortolotti}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~L.}\ \bibnamefont
{Bohn}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.98.030406} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {98}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {030406} (\bibinfo {year}
{2007})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Chomaz}\ \emph {et~al.}(2018)\citenamefont {Chomaz},
\citenamefont {van Bijnen}, \citenamefont {Petter}, \citenamefont {Faraoni},
\citenamefont {Baier}, \citenamefont {Becher}, \citenamefont {Mark},
\citenamefont {W{\"a}chtler}, \citenamefont {Santos},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Ferlaino}}]{Ch18}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Chomaz}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~M.~W.}\ \bibnamefont {van
Bijnen}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont {Petter}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Faraoni}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Baier}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {J.~H.}\ \bibnamefont {Becher}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {M.~J.}\ \bibnamefont {Mark}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {W{\"a}chtler}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Santos}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Ferlaino}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1038/s41567-018-0054-7} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Nat.
Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {14}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {442} (\bibinfo
{year} {2018})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Petter}\ \emph {et~al.}(2019)\citenamefont {Petter},
\citenamefont {Natale}, \citenamefont {van Bijnen}, \citenamefont
{Patscheider}, \citenamefont {Mark}, \citenamefont {Chomaz},\ and\
\citenamefont {Ferlaino}}]{Pe19}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont
{Petter}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Natale}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~M.~W.}\ \bibnamefont {van Bijnen}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Patscheider}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~J.}\ \bibnamefont {Mark}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Chomaz}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Ferlaino}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.183401} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {122}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{183401} (\bibinfo {year} {2019})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Schmidt}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont
{Schmidt}, \citenamefont {Hertkorn}, \citenamefont {Guo}, \citenamefont
{B\"ottcher}, \citenamefont {Schmidt}, \citenamefont {Ng}, \citenamefont
{Graham}, \citenamefont {Langen}, \citenamefont {Zwierlein},\ and\
\citenamefont {Pfau}}]{Sc21}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.-N.}\ \bibnamefont
{Schmidt}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Hertkorn}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Guo}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {B\"ottcher}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Schmidt}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{K.~S.~H.}\ \bibnamefont {Ng}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~D.}\
\bibnamefont {Graham}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont
{Langen}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Zwierlein}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Pfau}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.193002} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {126}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {193002} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Giovanazzi}\ \emph {et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont
{Giovanazzi}, \citenamefont {O'Dell},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Kurizki}}]{giovanazzi2002}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Giovanazzi}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont {O'Dell}},
\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Kurizki}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.88.130402} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {88}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {130402} (\bibinfo {year} {2002})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Roccuzzo}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Ancilotto}(2019)}]{Ro19}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Roccuzzo}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont
{Ancilotto}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.041601} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{99}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {041601(R)} (\bibinfo {year} {2019})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Kadau}\ \emph {et~al.}(2016)\citenamefont {Kadau},
\citenamefont {Schmitt}, \citenamefont {Wenzel}, \citenamefont {Wink},
\citenamefont {Maier}, \citenamefont {Ferrier-Barbut},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Pfau}}]{kadau2016}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.}~\bibnamefont
{Kadau}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Schmitt}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Wenzel}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Wink}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Maier}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{I.}~\bibnamefont {Ferrier-Barbut}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{T.}~\bibnamefont {Pfau}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1038/nature16485} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Nature}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {530}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {194} (\bibinfo {year} {2016})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Tanzi}\ \emph
{et~al.}(2019{\natexlab{a}})\citenamefont {Tanzi}, \citenamefont {Lucioni},
\citenamefont {Fam\`a}, \citenamefont {Catani}, \citenamefont {Fioretti},
\citenamefont {Gabbanini}, \citenamefont {Bisset}, \citenamefont {Santos},\
and\ \citenamefont {Modugno}}]{Ta19}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Tanzi}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont {Lucioni}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Fam\`a}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Catani}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Fioretti}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Gabbanini}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {R.~N.}\ \bibnamefont {Bisset}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Santos}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Modugno}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.130405} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {122}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{130405} (\bibinfo {year} {2019}{\natexlab{a}})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {B\"ottcher}\ \emph {et~al.}(2019)\citenamefont
{B\"ottcher}, \citenamefont {Schmidt}, \citenamefont {Wenzel}, \citenamefont
{Hertkorn}, \citenamefont {Guo}, \citenamefont {Langen},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Pfau}}]{Bo19}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont
{B\"ottcher}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.-N.}\ \bibnamefont
{Schmidt}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Wenzel}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Hertkorn}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Guo}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Langen}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Pfau}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevX.9.011051} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.
Rev. X}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {9}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {011051}
(\bibinfo {year} {2019})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Chomaz}\ \emph {et~al.}(2019)\citenamefont {Chomaz},
\citenamefont {Petter}, \citenamefont {Ilzh\"ofer}, \citenamefont {Natale},
\citenamefont {Trautmann}, \citenamefont {Politi}, \citenamefont
{Durastante}, \citenamefont {van Bijnen}, \citenamefont {Patscheider},
\citenamefont {Sohmen}, \citenamefont {Mark},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Ferlaino}}]{Ch19}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Chomaz}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont {Petter}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont {Ilzh\"ofer}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Natale}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Trautmann}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Politi}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{G.}~\bibnamefont {Durastante}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~M.~W.}\
\bibnamefont {van Bijnen}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{A.}~\bibnamefont {Patscheider}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{M.}~\bibnamefont {Sohmen}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~J.}\
\bibnamefont {Mark}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{F.}~\bibnamefont {Ferlaino}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.021012}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. X}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {9}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {021012} (\bibinfo {year}
{2019})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Wenzel}\ \emph {et~al.}(2017)\citenamefont {Wenzel},
\citenamefont {B\"ottcher}, \citenamefont {Langen}, \citenamefont
{Ferrier-Barbut},\ and\ \citenamefont {Pfau}}]{wenzel2017}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Wenzel}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {B\"ottcher}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Langen}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {I.}~\bibnamefont {Ferrier-Barbut}}, \ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Pfau}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevA.96.053630} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.
Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {96}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {053630}
(\bibinfo {year} {2017})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Klaus}\ \emph {et~al.}(2022)\citenamefont {Klaus},
\citenamefont {Bland}, \citenamefont {Poli}, \citenamefont {Politi},
\citenamefont {Lamporesi}, \citenamefont {Casotti}, \citenamefont {Bisset},
\citenamefont {Mark},\ and\ \citenamefont {Ferlaino}}]{klaus2022}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Klaus}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Bland}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont {Poli}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Politi}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{G.}~\bibnamefont {Lamporesi}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{E.}~\bibnamefont {Casotti}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~N.}\
\bibnamefont {Bisset}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~J.}\
\bibnamefont {Mark}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{F.}~\bibnamefont {Ferlaino}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1038/s41567-022-01793-8}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Nat. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {18}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {1453} (\bibinfo {year}
{2022})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Gross}(1963)}]{Gross62}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.~P.}\ \bibnamefont
{Gross}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1063/1.1703944} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {J. Math. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {4}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {195} (\bibinfo {year} {1963})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Pitaevskii}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Stringari}(2016)}]{pitaevskii2016}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Pitaevskii}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Stringari}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198758884.001.0001}
{\emph {\bibinfo {title} {{Bose-Einstein} condensation and superfluidity}}},\
Vol.\ \bibinfo {volume} {164}\ (\bibinfo {publisher} {Oxford University
Press},\ \bibinfo {year} {2016})\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Gross}(1957)}]{Gross57}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.~P.}\ \bibnamefont
{Gross}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRev.106.161} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {106}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {161} (\bibinfo {year} {1957})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Kirzhnitis}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Nepomnyashchii}(1971)}]{cristSov70}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont
{Kirzhnitis}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Y.~A.}\ \bibnamefont
{Nepomnyashchii}},\ }\href {http://jetp.ras.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_032_06_1191.pdf}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Sov. Phys. JETP}\ }\textbf
{\bibinfo {volume} {32}} (\bibinfo {year} {1971})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Boninsegni}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Prokofev}(2012)}]{boni12}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Boninsegni}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {N.~V.}\ \bibnamefont
{Prokofev}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.759} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Rev. Mod. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{84}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {759} (\bibinfo {year} {2012})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Yukalov}(2020)}]{yukalov2020}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.~I.}\ \bibnamefont
{Yukalov}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.3390/physics2010006} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Physics}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {2}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {49} (\bibinfo {year} {2020})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Leggett}(1970)}]{Le70}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Leggett}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.25.1543} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {25}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {1543} (\bibinfo {year}
{1970})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Chester}(1970)}]{chester70}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.~V.}\ \bibnamefont
{Chester}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevA.2.256} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {2}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {256} (\bibinfo {year} {1970})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Meisel}(1992)}]{meisel1992supersolid}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~W.}\ \bibnamefont
{Meisel}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Physica B: Condensed Matter}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {178}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {121} (\bibinfo {year} {1992})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Zhang}\ \emph {et~al.}(2019)\citenamefont {Zhang},
\citenamefont {Maucher},\ and\ \citenamefont {Pohl}}]{Zh19}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Y.-C.}\ \bibnamefont
{Zhang}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Maucher}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Pohl}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.015301} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {123}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {015301} (\bibinfo {year} {2019})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Schuster}\ \emph {et~al.}(2020)\citenamefont
{Schuster}, \citenamefont {Wolf}, \citenamefont {Ostermann}, \citenamefont
{Slama},\ and\ \citenamefont {Zimmermann}}]{schuster20}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~C.}\ \bibnamefont
{Schuster}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont {Wolf}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Ostermann}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Slama}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Zimmermann}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.143602} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {124}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{143602} (\bibinfo {year} {2020})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Blakie}\ \emph
{et~al.}(2020{\natexlab{a}})\citenamefont {Blakie}, \citenamefont {Baillie},\
and\ \citenamefont {Pal}}]{blakie2020variational}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~B.}\ \bibnamefont
{Blakie}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont {Baillie}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Pal}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1088/1572-9494/ab95fa} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Commun. Theor. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {72}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {085501} (\bibinfo {year} {2020}{\natexlab{a}})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Roccuzzo}\ \emph {et~al.}(2020)\citenamefont
{Roccuzzo}, \citenamefont {Gallem\'{\i}}, \citenamefont {Recati},\ and\
\citenamefont {Stringari}}]{Ro20}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Roccuzzo}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Gallem\'{\i}}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Recati}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Stringari}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.045702} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {124}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {045702} (\bibinfo {year}
{2020})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Gallem\'{\i}}\ \emph {et~al.}(2020)\citenamefont
{Gallem\'{\i}}, \citenamefont {Roccuzzo}, \citenamefont {Stringari},\ and\
\citenamefont {Recati}}]{gallemi2020}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Gallem\'{\i}}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Roccuzzo}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Stringari}},
\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Recati}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevA.102.023322} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {102}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {023322} (\bibinfo {year} {2020})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Blakie}\ \emph
{et~al.}(2020{\natexlab{b}})\citenamefont {Blakie}, \citenamefont {Baillie},
\citenamefont {Chomaz},\ and\ \citenamefont {Ferlaino}}]{Bl20}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~B.}\ \bibnamefont
{Blakie}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont {Baillie}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Chomaz}}, \ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Ferlaino}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043318} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Rev. Research}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {2}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{043318} (\bibinfo {year} {2020}{\natexlab{b}})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Tengstrand}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont
{Tengstrand}, \citenamefont {Boholm}, \citenamefont {Sachdeva}, \citenamefont
{Bengtsson},\ and\ \citenamefont {Reimann}}]{Te21}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~N.}\ \bibnamefont
{Tengstrand}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont {Boholm}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont {Sachdeva}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Bengtsson}}, \ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~M.}\ \bibnamefont {Reimann}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevA.103.013313} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {103}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{013313} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Zhang}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont {Zhang},
\citenamefont {Pohl},\ and\ \citenamefont {Maucher}}]{Zh21}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Y.-C.}\ \bibnamefont
{Zhang}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Pohl}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Maucher}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevA.104.013310} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {104}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {013310} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Hertkorn}\ \emph
{et~al.}(2021{\natexlab{a}})\citenamefont {Hertkorn}, \citenamefont
{Schmidt}, \citenamefont {Guo}, \citenamefont {B\"ottcher}, \citenamefont
{Ng}, \citenamefont {Graham}, \citenamefont {Uerlings}, \citenamefont
{B\"uchler}, \citenamefont {Langen}, \citenamefont {Zwierlein},\ and\
\citenamefont {Pfau}}]{He21b}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{Hertkorn}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.-N.}\ \bibnamefont
{Schmidt}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Guo}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {B\"ottcher}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {K.~S.~H.}\ \bibnamefont {Ng}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {S.~D.}\ \bibnamefont {Graham}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont {Uerlings}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {H.~P.}\ \bibnamefont {B\"uchler}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Langen}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{M.}~\bibnamefont {Zwierlein}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{T.}~\bibnamefont {Pfau}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.155301}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf
{\bibinfo {volume} {127}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {155301} (\bibinfo {year}
{2021}{\natexlab{a}})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Hertkorn}\ \emph
{et~al.}(2021{\natexlab{b}})\citenamefont {Hertkorn}, \citenamefont
{Schmidt}, \citenamefont {Guo}, \citenamefont {B\"ottcher}, \citenamefont
{Ng}, \citenamefont {Graham}, \citenamefont {Uerlings}, \citenamefont
{Langen}, \citenamefont {Zwierlein},\ and\ \citenamefont {Pfau}}]{He21c}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{Hertkorn}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.-N.}\ \bibnamefont
{Schmidt}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Guo}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {B\"ottcher}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {K.~S.~H.}\ \bibnamefont {Ng}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {S.~D.}\ \bibnamefont {Graham}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont {Uerlings}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Langen}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{M.}~\bibnamefont {Zwierlein}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{T.}~\bibnamefont {Pfau}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033125} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Rev. Research}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {3}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{033125} (\bibinfo {year} {2021}{\natexlab{b}})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Ala{\~n}a}\ \emph {et~al.}(2022)\citenamefont
{Ala{\~n}a}, \citenamefont {Antolini}, \citenamefont {Biagioni},
\citenamefont {Egusquiza},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Modugno}}]{alana2022crossing}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Ala{\~n}a}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {N.}~\bibnamefont {Antolini}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Biagioni}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {I.~L.}\ \bibnamefont {Egusquiza}}, \ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Modugno}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevA.106.043313} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {106}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{043313} (\bibinfo {year} {2022})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Roccuzzo}\ \emph {et~al.}(2022)\citenamefont
{Roccuzzo}, \citenamefont {Stringari},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Recati}}]{roccuzzo2022}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Roccuzzo}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Stringari}},
\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Recati}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.013086} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. Res.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {4}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {013086} (\bibinfo {year} {2022})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Ilg}\ and\ \citenamefont
{B{\"u}chler}(2023)}]{ilg2023}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont
{Ilg}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.~P.}\ \bibnamefont
{B{\"u}chler}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/physreva.107.013314} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{107}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {013314} (\bibinfo {year} {2023})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Smith}\ \emph {et~al.}(2023)\citenamefont {Smith},
\citenamefont {Baillie},\ and\ \citenamefont {Blakie}}]{smith2023}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~C.}\ \bibnamefont
{Smith}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont {Baillie}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~B.}\ \bibnamefont {Blakie}},\
}\href {\doibase 10.1103/physreva.107.033301} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {107}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {033301} (\bibinfo {year} {2023})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Pollet}(2019)}]{pollet2019}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Pollet}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1038/d41586-019-01585-w} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Nature}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {569}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {494} (\bibinfo {year} {2019})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Donner}(2019)}]{donner2019}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont
{Donner}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/physics.12.38} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Physics}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {12}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {38} (\bibinfo {year} {2019})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Tanzi}\ \emph
{et~al.}(2019{\natexlab{b}})\citenamefont {Tanzi}, \citenamefont {Roccuzzo},
\citenamefont {Lucioni}, \citenamefont {Fam{\`a}}, \citenamefont {Fioretti},
\citenamefont {Gabbanini}, \citenamefont {Modugno}, \citenamefont {Recati},\
and\ \citenamefont {Stringari}}]{Ta19b}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Tanzi}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~M.}\ \bibnamefont {Roccuzzo}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont {Lucioni}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Fam{\`a}}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Fioretti}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Gabbanini}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Modugno}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{A.}~\bibnamefont {Recati}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{S.}~\bibnamefont {Stringari}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1038/s41586-019-1568-6}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Nature}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {574}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {382} (\bibinfo {year}
{2019}{\natexlab{b}})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Guo}\ \emph {et~al.}(2019)\citenamefont {Guo},
\citenamefont {B{\"o}ttcher}, \citenamefont {Hertkorn}, \citenamefont
{Schmidt}, \citenamefont {Wenzel}, \citenamefont {B{\"u}chler}, \citenamefont
{Langen},\ and\ \citenamefont {Pfau}}]{Gu19}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Guo}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {B{\"o}ttcher}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Hertkorn}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {J.-N.}\ \bibnamefont {Schmidt}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Wenzel}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{H.~P.}\ \bibnamefont {B{\"u}chler}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{T.}~\bibnamefont {Langen}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{T.}~\bibnamefont {Pfau}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1038/s41586-019-1569-5}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Nature}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {574}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {386} (\bibinfo {year}
{2019})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Natale}\ \emph {et~al.}(2019)\citenamefont {Natale},
\citenamefont {van Bijnen}, \citenamefont {Patscheider}, \citenamefont
{Petter}, \citenamefont {Mark}, \citenamefont {Chomaz},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Ferlaino}}]{Na19}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont
{Natale}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~M.~W.}\ \bibnamefont {van
Bijnen}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Patscheider}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont {Petter}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~J.}\ \bibnamefont {Mark}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Chomaz}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Ferlaino}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.050402} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {123}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{050402} (\bibinfo {year} {2019})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Tanzi}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont {Tanzi},
\citenamefont {Maloberti}, \citenamefont {Biagioni}, \citenamefont
{Fioretti}, \citenamefont {Gabbanini},\ and\ \citenamefont {Modugno}}]{Ta21}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Tanzi}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~G.}\ \bibnamefont
{Maloberti}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Biagioni}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Fioretti}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Gabbanini}}, \ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Modugno}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1126/science.aba4309} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Science}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {371}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {1162}
(\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Hertkorn}\ \emph
{et~al.}(2021{\natexlab{c}})\citenamefont {Hertkorn}, \citenamefont
{Schmidt}, \citenamefont {B\"ottcher}, \citenamefont {Guo}, \citenamefont
{Schmidt}, \citenamefont {Ng}, \citenamefont {Graham}, \citenamefont
{B\"uchler}, \citenamefont {Langen}, \citenamefont {Zwierlein},\ and\
\citenamefont {Pfau}}]{He21}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{Hertkorn}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.-N.}\ \bibnamefont
{Schmidt}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {B\"ottcher}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Guo}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Schmidt}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{K.~S.~H.}\ \bibnamefont {Ng}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~D.}\
\bibnamefont {Graham}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.~P.}\
\bibnamefont {B\"uchler}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont
{Langen}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Zwierlein}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Pfau}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011037} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. X}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {11}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {011037} (\bibinfo {year} {2021}{\natexlab{c}})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Petter}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont {Petter},
\citenamefont {Patscheider}, \citenamefont {Natale}, \citenamefont {Mark},
\citenamefont {Baranov}, \citenamefont {van Bijnen}, \citenamefont
{Roccuzzo}, \citenamefont {Recati}, \citenamefont {Blakie}, \citenamefont
{Baillie}, \citenamefont {Chomaz},\ and\ \citenamefont {Ferlaino}}]{Pe21}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont
{Petter}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Patscheider}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Natale}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~J.}\ \bibnamefont {Mark}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {M.~A.}\ \bibnamefont {Baranov}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont {van Bijnen}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {S.~M.}\ \bibnamefont {Roccuzzo}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Recati}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{B.}~\bibnamefont {Blakie}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{D.}~\bibnamefont {Baillie}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{L.}~\bibnamefont {Chomaz}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{F.}~\bibnamefont {Ferlaino}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevA.104.L011302} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {104}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{L011302} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Norcia}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont {Norcia},
\citenamefont {Politi}, \citenamefont {Klaus}, \citenamefont {Poli},
\citenamefont {Sohmen}, \citenamefont {Mark}, \citenamefont {Bisset},
\citenamefont {Santos},\ and\ \citenamefont {Ferlaino}}]{No21}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~A.}\ \bibnamefont
{Norcia}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Politi}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Klaus}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont {Poli}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Sohmen}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{M.~J.}\ \bibnamefont {Mark}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~N.}\
\bibnamefont {Bisset}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Santos}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont
{Ferlaino}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1038/s41586-021-03725-7} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Nature}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {596}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {357} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {B{\"o}ttcher}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont
{B{\"o}ttcher}, \citenamefont {Schmidt}, \citenamefont {Hertkorn},
\citenamefont {Ng}, \citenamefont {Graham}, \citenamefont {Guo},
\citenamefont {Langen},\ and\ \citenamefont {Pfau}}]{bottcher2021}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont
{B{\"o}ttcher}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.-N.}\ \bibnamefont
{Schmidt}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Hertkorn}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.~S.~H.}\ \bibnamefont {Ng}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~D.}\ \bibnamefont {Graham}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Guo}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{T.}~\bibnamefont {Langen}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{T.}~\bibnamefont {Pfau}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1088/1361-6633/abc9ab}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Rep. Prog. Phys.}\ }\textbf
{\bibinfo {volume} {84}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {012403} (\bibinfo {year}
{2021})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Sohmen}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont {Sohmen},
\citenamefont {Politi}, \citenamefont {Klaus}, \citenamefont {Chomaz},
\citenamefont {Mark}, \citenamefont {Norcia},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Ferlaino}}]{sohmen2021}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Sohmen}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Politi}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Klaus}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Chomaz}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {M.~J.}\ \bibnamefont {Mark}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {M.~A.}\ \bibnamefont {Norcia}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Ferlaino}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.233401} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {126}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{233401} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Biagioni}\ \emph {et~al.}(2022)\citenamefont
{Biagioni}, \citenamefont {Antolini}, \citenamefont {Ala\~na}, \citenamefont
{Modugno}, \citenamefont {Fioretti}, \citenamefont {Gabbanini}, \citenamefont
{Tanzi},\ and\ \citenamefont {Modugno}}]{biagioni2022}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont
{Biagioni}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {N.}~\bibnamefont {Antolini}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Ala\~na}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Modugno}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Fioretti}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Gabbanini}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Tanzi}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Modugno}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevX.12.021019} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.
Rev. X}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {12}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {021019}
(\bibinfo {year} {2022})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Bland}\ \emph {et~al.}(2022)\citenamefont {Bland},
\citenamefont {Poli}, \citenamefont {Politi}, \citenamefont {Klaus},
\citenamefont {Norcia}, \citenamefont {Ferlaino}, \citenamefont {Santos},\
and\ \citenamefont {Bisset}}]{Bl22}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont
{Bland}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont {Poli}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Politi}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Klaus}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {M.~A.}\ \bibnamefont {Norcia}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Ferlaino}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Santos}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {R.~N.}\ \bibnamefont {Bisset}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.195302} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {128}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{195302} (\bibinfo {year} {2022})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {S{\'a}nchez-Baena}\ \emph {et~al.}(2023)\citenamefont
{S{\'a}nchez-Baena}, \citenamefont {Politi}, \citenamefont {Maucher},
\citenamefont {Ferlaino},\ and\ \citenamefont {Pohl}}]{sanchez2023heating}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{S{\'a}nchez-Baena}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont
{Politi}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Maucher}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Ferlaino}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Pohl}},\ }\href@noop {}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Nature communications}\ }\textbf
{\bibinfo {volume} {14}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {1868} (\bibinfo {year}
{2023})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Pomeau}\ and\ \citenamefont {Rica}(1994)}]{Po94}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Y.}~\bibnamefont
{Pomeau}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Rica}},\
}\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2426} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {72}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {2426} (\bibinfo {year} {1994})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Macr\`{\i}}\ \emph {et~al.}(2013)\citenamefont
{Macr\`{\i}}, \citenamefont {Maucher}, \citenamefont {Cinti},\ and\
\citenamefont {Pohl}}]{Ma13}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont
{Macr\`{\i}}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Maucher}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Cinti}}, \ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Pohl}},\ }\href {\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevA.87.061602} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.
Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {87}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {061602(R)}
(\bibinfo {year} {2013})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Lu}\ \emph {et~al.}(2015)\citenamefont {Lu},
\citenamefont {Li}, \citenamefont {Petrov},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Shlyapnikov}}]{Lu15}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Z.-K.}\ \bibnamefont
{Lu}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Y.}~\bibnamefont {Li}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~S.}\ \bibnamefont {Petrov}}, \ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {G.~V.}\ \bibnamefont {Shlyapnikov}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.075303} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {115}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {075303} (\bibinfo {year} {2015})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Sep\'ulveda}\ \emph {et~al.}(2008)\citenamefont
{Sep\'ulveda}, \citenamefont {Josserand},\ and\ \citenamefont {Rica}}]{Se08}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {N.}~\bibnamefont
{Sep\'ulveda}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont
{Josserand}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Rica}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.054513} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. B}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {77}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {054513} (\bibinfo {year} {2008})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Krotov}(1993)}]{krotov1993global}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.~F.}\ \bibnamefont
{Krotov}},\ }\href {\doibase 0.1007/978-1-4612-0349-0_3} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Advances in nonlinear dynamics and control: a
report from Russia}\ ,\ \bibinfo {pages} {74}} (\bibinfo {year}
{1993})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Sonneborn}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Van~Vleck}(1964)}]{sonneborn1964bang}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Sonneborn}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont
{Van~Vleck}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal}
{Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Series A:
Control}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {2}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {151} (\bibinfo
{year} {1964})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Schaff}\ \emph {et~al.}(2011)\citenamefont {Schaff},
\citenamefont {Capuzzi}, \citenamefont {Labeyrie},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Vignolo}}]{schaff2011shortcuts}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.-F.}\ \bibnamefont
{Schaff}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont {Capuzzi}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Labeyrie}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont {Vignolo}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1088/1367-2630/13/11/113017} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {New Journal of Physics}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {13}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {113017} (\bibinfo {year} {2011})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Gu{\'e}ry-Odelin}\ \emph {et~al.}(2019)\citenamefont
{Gu{\'e}ry-Odelin}, \citenamefont {Ruschhaupt}, \citenamefont {Kiely},
\citenamefont {Torrontegui}, \citenamefont {Mart{\'\i}nez-Garaot},\ and\
\citenamefont {Muga}}]{guery2019shortcuts}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont
{Gu{\'e}ry-Odelin}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Ruschhaupt}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Kiely}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont {Torrontegui}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Mart{\'\i}nez-Garaot}}, \ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~G.}\ \bibnamefont {Muga}},\ }\href
{\doibase 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.045001} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Reviews of Modern Physics}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {91}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {045001} (\bibinfo {year} {2019})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Ala{\~n}a}\ \emph {et~al.}(2023)\citenamefont
{Ala{\~n}a}, \citenamefont {Egusquiza},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Modugno}}]{alana2023formation}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Ala{\~n}a}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.~L.}\ \bibnamefont
{Egusquiza}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Modugno}},\ }\href {\doibase https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.033316}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Physical Review A}\ }\textbf
{\bibinfo {volume} {108}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {033316} (\bibinfo {year}
{2023})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Ronen}\ \emph {et~al.}(2006)\citenamefont {Ronen},
\citenamefont {Bortolotti},\ and\ \citenamefont {Bohn}}]{ronen2006}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Ronen}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~C.~E.}\ \bibnamefont
{Bortolotti}}, \ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~L.}\ \bibnamefont
{Bohn}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.013623} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {74}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {013623} (\bibinfo {year} {2006})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Lima}\ and\ \citenamefont {Pelster}(2012)}]{Li12}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~R.~P.}\
\bibnamefont {Lima}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Pelster}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.063609} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{86}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {063609} (\bibinfo {year} {2012})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {W\"achtler}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Santos}(2016)}]{wachtler2016}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont
{W\"achtler}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Santos}},\ }\href {\doibase 10.1103/physreva.94.043618} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{94}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {043618 } (\bibinfo {year} {2016})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Schmitt}\ \emph {et~al.}(2016)\citenamefont
{Schmitt}, \citenamefont {Wenzel}, \citenamefont {B{\"o}ttcher},
\citenamefont {Ferrier-Barbut},\ and\ \citenamefont {Pfau}}]{schmitt2016}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Schmitt}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Wenzel}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {B{\"o}ttcher}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {I.}~\bibnamefont {Ferrier-Barbut}}, \ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Pfau}},\ }\href
{https://www.nature.com/articles/nature20126} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Nature (London)}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {539}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {259} (\bibinfo {year} {2016})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{Note1()}]{Note1}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibinfo {note} {${\protect \cal E}^{int}$ changes after the first quench,
depending on its value at the moment of the second quench the excitation will
vary. The excess excitation could be negative (the system will be less
excited than for the single-quench scheme) if ${\protect \cal
E}^{int}[n(t_{2^{\protect \text {nd}}\protect \text {Bang}})]< {\protect \cal
E}^{int}[n(t_{1^{\protect \text {st}}\protect \text {Bang}})]$}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{Note2()}]{Note2}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibinfo {note} {The inverse direction of the applied forces is done to keep
the centre of mass stable during the evolution, it is not however necessary
to see the formation acceleration}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Cidrim}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont {Cidrim},
\citenamefont {Salasnich},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Macr{\`\i}}}]{cidrim2021soliton}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Cidrim}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Salasnich}}, \
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Macr{\`\i}}},\
}\href {\doibase 10.1088/1367-2630/abdbe2} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {New Journal of Physics}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {23}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {023022} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\end{thebibliography}%
\end{document}