A weak inequality in fractional homogeneous Sobolev spaces

Extracted source text · arXiv 2312.14662

\documentclass[12pt,reqno]{amsart}

\usepackage[colorlinks=true,citecolor=blue,linkcolor=blue]{hyperref}
\usepackage{amsmath,amsthm,amssymb,amsfonts,mathrsfs,latexsym}
\usepackage{amsaddr,csquotes}
\usepackage{tikz}
%\usetikzlibrary{calc}
\usepackage{graphicx}
%\usepackage[pagewise]{lineno}\linenumbers
%\usepackage[toc,page]{appendix}


%Do not change or remove the commands below.
\theoremstyle{definition}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{conjecture}[theorem]{Conjecture}
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
\newtheorem*{problem}{Open Problem}
\newtheorem*{notation}{Notation}
\newcommand{\ep}{\varepsilon}
\newcommand{\eps}[1]{{#1}_{\varepsilon}}


%Simple Math Notation
\newcommand{\bbbr}{\mathbb R}
\newcommand{\bbbg}{\mathbb G}
\newcommand{\bbbh}{\mathbb H}
\newcommand{\bbbc}{\mathbb C}
\newcommand{\bbbz}{\mathbb Z}
\newcommand{\bbbn}{\mathbb N}
\newcommand{\Lps}{\dot{L}^p_s(\bbbr^n)}
\newcommand{\Fspq}{\dot{F}^s_{p,q}(\bbbr^n)}
\newcommand{\Fspinf}{\dot{F}^s_{p,\infty}(\bbbr^n)}
\newcommand{\Bspq}{\dot{B}^s_{p,q}(\bbbr^n)}
\newcommand{\Bspinf}{\dot{B}^s_{p,\infty}(\bbbr^n)}
\newcommand{\Bsinfq}{\dot{B}^s_{\infty,q}(\bbbr^n)}
\newcommand{\Bsifif}{\dot{B}^s_{\infty,\infty}(\bbbr^n)}
\newcommand{\Wspq}{W^s_{p,q}(\bbbr^n)}
\newcommand{\FT}{\mathcal{F}}
\newcommand{\iFT}{\mathcal{F}^{-1}}
\newcommand{\Haus}{\mathcal{H}}
\newcommand{\Lebes}{\mathcal{L}}
\newcommand{\unitsph}{\mathbb{S}^{n-1}}
\newcommand{\HLmax}{\mathcal{M}}
\newcommand{\PFSmax}{\mathcal{P}}
\newcommand{\Pint}{\mathscr{P}}
\newcommand{\Sw}{\mathcal{S}}
\newcommand{\Ccinfty}{\mathcal{C}^{\infty}_0}
\newcommand{\Remain}{\mathcal{R}}
\newcommand{\Lift}{\mathcal{I}}
\newcommand{\Diff}{\mathcal{D}}
\newcommand{\LPG}{\mathcal{G}}
\newcommand{\LPg}{\mathfrak{g}}
\newcommand{\num}{\mathfrak{n}}
\newcommand{\den}{\mathfrak{d}}
\newcommand{\multi}{\mathfrak{m}}
\newcommand{\bfarIm}{b^{(f.m.)}}
\newcommand{\bnearIm}{b^{(n.m.)}}
\newcommand{\Rez}{\operatorname{Re}}
\newcommand{\Imz}{\operatorname{Im}}
\def\esssup{\mathop{\rm ess\,sup\,}}
\def\dist{{\rm dist\,}}
\def\mvint_#1{\mathchoice
          {\mathop{\vrule width 6pt height 3 pt depth -2.5pt
                  \kern -8pt \intop}\nolimits_{\kern -3pt #1}}%
          {\mathop{\vrule width 5pt height 3 pt depth -2.6pt
                  \kern -6pt \intop}\nolimits_{#1}}%
          {\mathop{\vrule width 5pt height 3 pt depth -2.6pt
                  \kern -6pt \intop}\nolimits_{#1}}%
          {\mathop{\vrule width 5pt height 3 pt depth -2.6pt
                  \kern -6pt \intop}\nolimits_{#1}}}



\begin{document}

% Place the running head in [], and the full title of the article in {}.
\title[A weak inequality in Sobolev spaces]
% Running head is the full title or shortened version of the full title. This will appear at the top of odd pages. It should be no more than 40 characters to fit within the width limit.
{A weak inequality in fractional homogeneous Sobolev spaces}% Only the first word and proper nouns should be capitalized.

\author{Lifeng Wang}
%\thanks{Department of Mathematics, 301 Thackeray Hall, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA}
%\address[Lifeng Wang]{Department of Mathematics, 301 Thackeray Hall, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA}
\address[Lifeng Wang]{Department of Mathematics\\University of Pittsburgh\\Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA}
\email{lifeng.wang.1987@outlook.com}
\subjclass[2020]{42B35.}
\keywords{Fractional Sobolev spaces, generalized Littlewood-Paley functions, Whitney decomposition, homogeneous Triebel-Lizorkin spaces, Peetre-Fefferman-Stein maximal functions.}





\begin{abstract}
In this paper, we prove the following inequality
\begin{equation*}
\|\big(\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{|f(\cdot+y)-f(\cdot)|^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy\big)^{\frac{1}{q}}\|_{L^{p,\infty}(\bbbr^n)}\lesssim\|f\|_{\dot{L}^p_s(\bbbr^n)},
\end{equation*}
where $\|\cdot\|_{L^{p,\infty}(\bbbr^n)}$ is the weak $L^p$ quasinorm and $\|\cdot\|_{\Lps}$ is the homogeneous Sobolev norm, and parameters satisfy the condition that $1<p<q$, $2\leq q<\infty$, and $0<s=n(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{q})<1$. Furthermore, we prove the estimate $\|\LPg_{s,q}(f)\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\lesssim\|f\|_{\Fspq}$ when $0<p,q<\infty$, $-1<s<1$, $\|\cdot\|_{\Fspq}$ denotes the homogeneous Triebel-Lizorkin quasinorm and the Littlewood-Paley-Poisson function $\LPg_{s,q}(f)(\cdot)$ is a generalization of the classical Littlewood-Paley $g$-function. Moreover, we prove the weak type $(p,p)$ boundedness of the $\LPG_{\lambda,q}$-function and the $\Remain_{s,q}$-function, where the $\LPG_{\lambda,q}$-function is a generalization of the well-known classical Littlewood-Paley $g_{\lambda}^*$-function.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\tableofcontents

\section{Introduction}\label{Introduction}

In this paper, we will flexibly use the following notations for inequalities. Let $X,Y$ be two expressions, then ``$X\lesssim Y$'' means $X$ is dominated by a constant multiple of $Y$ and the constant is determined by some fixed parameters. In particular, ``$X\lesssim 1$'' means $X$ is bounded from above by a positive finite constant whose value is determined by some fixed parameters. If $X\lesssim Y$ and $Y\lesssim X$, then we consider $X$ and $Y$ are equivalent and write $X\sim Y$. Furthermore, when we want to emphasize the existence of a constant and the dependence of this constant on some fixed parameters, we usually write it like ``$X\leq C\cdot Y$ where $C=C(n,p)$'' and it means $X$ is dominated by the product of the constant $C$ and the expression $Y$, and the value of the constant $C$ only depends on the parameters $n$ and $p$. Moreover, unless otherwise stated, we will number constants in different sections independently. For example, we may have constants $C_1=C_1(n,p)$, $C_2=C_2(n,p,q)$, $C_3=C_3(q,s)$ in section $1$ and we may also have constants $C_1=C_1(n,p)$, $C_2=C_2(p,q,s)$, $C_3=C_3(s,\lambda)$ in section $2$. However the constant $C_1$ of section $1$ may be different from the constant $C_1$ of section $2$ even though they depend on the same parameters $n$ and $p$. And the value of $C_2$ in section $1$ depends only on parameters $n,p,q$ while the value of $C_2$ in section $2$ depends only on parameters $p,q,s$. In this way, a change in the numbering of constants in one section will not affect the numbering of constants in other sections of the paper.\\

We denote the $n$-dimensional Fourier transform of an integrable function $f\in L^1(\bbbr^n)$ by
$$\FT_n f(\xi)=\int_{\bbbr^n}f(x)e^{-2\pi ix\cdot\xi}dx,$$
and the $n$-dimensional inverse Fourier transform is denoted by
$$\iFT_n f(\xi)=\int_{\bbbr^n}f(x)e^{2\pi ix\cdot\xi}dx,$$
where for $x\in\bbbr^n$ and $\xi\in\bbbr^n$, $x\cdot\xi$ is the inner product. Recall the definition of the gamma function below
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-1}
\varGamma(z)=\int_0^{\infty}t^{z-1}e^{-t}dt\quad\text{for a complex number $z$ with $\operatorname{Re}z>0$,}
\end{equation}
and the gamma function has a meromorphic extension for all $z\in\bbbc$ (cf. \cite[Appendix A.5]{14classical}). We denote the Poisson kernel by $P(x)=C_0(1+|x|^2)^{-\frac{n+1}{2}}$ for $x\in\bbbr^n$, and we also designate here that throughout the whole paper, we denote
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-2}
C_0:=\frac{\varGamma(\frac{n+1}{2})}{\pi^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\quad\text{(cf. \cite[section 2.1.2]{14classical}).}
\end{equation}
Furthermore, we use the notation $P_t(x)=\frac{1}{t^n}P(\frac{x}{t})=C_0 t(t^2+|x|^2)^{-\frac{n+1}{2}}$ for $x\in\bbbr^n$ and $t>0$ then it is a well-known result that 
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-3}
\FT_n P_t(\xi)=\FT_n P(t\xi)=e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}.
\end{equation}
For $1\leq k\leq n$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-3-1}
\partial_k[P_t(x)]=\frac{\partial}{\partial x_k}[P_t(x)]=\frac{-(n+1)C_0tx_k}{(t^2+|x|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}},
\end{equation}
and we can use integration by parts with respect to $x_k$ and (\ref{eq1-3}) to find that the Fourier transform $\FT_n[\partial_k[P_t(x)]](\xi)$ is given by the formula
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-81}
\FT_n[\partial_k[P_t(x)]](\xi)=2\pi i\xi_k\cdot e^{-2\pi t|\xi|},
\end{equation}
furthermore, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.60}
\int_{\bbbr^n}\partial_k[P_t(x)]dx=\FT_n[\partial_k[P_t(x)]](0)=0.
\end{equation}
When $k=n+1$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-3-2}
\partial_{n+1}[P_t(x)]=\frac{\partial}{\partial t}[P_t(x)]=
\frac{C_0}{(t^2+|x|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}-\frac{C_0(n+1)t^2}{(t^2+|x|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}},
\end{equation}
and we can use the dominated convergence theorem to exchange the differentiation with respect to $t\in(0,\infty)$ and the Fourier transform with respect to $x\in\bbbr^n$ and then we can obtain
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-82}
\FT_n[\partial_{n+1}[P_t(x)]](\xi)=\partial_{n+1}[\FT_n P_t](\xi)=-2\pi|\xi|\cdot e^{-2\pi t|\xi|},
\end{equation}
moreover, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.61}
\int_{\bbbr^n}\partial_{n+1}[P_t(x)]dx=\FT_n[\partial_{n+1}[P_t(x)]](0)=0.
\end{equation}
Given an appropriate function $f$ defined on $\bbbr^n$, the Poisson integral of this function is a function defined on $\bbbr^{n+1}_+:=\{(x,t):x\in\bbbr^n,t>0\}$ and is denoted by 
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-4}
\Pint(f;x,t):=f*P_t(x)=\int_{\bbbr^n}f(y)\cdot\frac{C_0 t}{(t^2+|x-y|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dy.
\end{equation}
When $f\in L^p(\bbbr^n)$ for $1\leq p\leq\infty$, as demonstrated in the proof of Lemma \ref{lemma10}, we can use the dominated convergence theorem and some direct calculations to obtain
\begin{align}
&\partial_k\Pint(f;x,t):=\frac{\partial}{\partial x_k}(\Pint(f;x,t))\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}f(y)\cdot\frac{(n+1)C_0 t(y_k-x_k)}{(t^2+|y-x|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dy,\label{eq1-5}
\end{align}
where $x_k$ and $y_k$ are the $k$-th coordinates of $x$ and $y$ respectively and $1\leq k\leq n$, and we also have
\begin{align}
&\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t):=\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(\Pint(f;x,t))\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}f(y)\cdot
\big(\frac{C_0}{(t^2+|x-y|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}-\frac{C_0(n+1)t^2}{(t^2+|x-y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big)dy.
\label{eq1-6}
\end{align}
Furthermore, $\nabla_n\Pint(f;x,t)$ represents the $n$-dimensional gradient vector of the Poisson integral $\Pint(f;x,t)$ with respect to $x\in\bbbr^n$, and $\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)$ represents the $(n+1)$-dimensional gradient vector of the Poisson integral $\Pint(f;x,t)$ with respect to both $x\in\bbbr^n$ and $t>0$.\\

If $E$ is a subset of $\bbbr^n$, then $\Ccinfty(E)$ represents the set of all the smooth functions whose support sets are compact sets contained in $E$. We denote $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ is the space of Schwartz functions defined on $\bbbr^n$ and $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$ is the space of tempered distributions on $\bbbr^n$. The space $\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ is a subspace of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ that inherits the same topology as $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$, and a Schwartz function $\phi\in\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ is in $\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ if and only if $\phi$ satisfies the condition
\begin{equation}\label{Sw0.condition.1}
\int_{\bbbr^n}x^{\gamma}\phi(x)dx=0\qquad\text{for all multi-indices $\gamma$},
\end{equation}
or equivalently, the condition
\begin{equation}\label{Sw0.condition.2}
(\partial^{\gamma}\iFT_n\phi)(0)=0\qquad\text{for all multi-indices $\gamma$}.
\end{equation}
Furthermore, if $\omega$ and $\omega'$ are multi-indices, then we can deduce from Taylor's formula for the Schwartz function $\partial^{\omega}\iFT_n\phi(\xi)$ at $\xi=0$ with integral form of the remainder the following estimate
\begin{align}
|\partial^{\omega}\iFT_n\phi(\xi)|
&\leq\int_0^1\frac{(1-t)^{M-1}}{(M-1)!}\cdot\bigg|\sum_{|\omega'|=M}\xi^{\omega'}
 (\partial^{\omega+\omega'}\iFT_n\phi)(t\xi)\bigg|dt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{|\omega'|=M}\sup_{x\in\bbbr^n}|(\partial^{\omega+\omega'}\iFT_n\phi)(x)|\cdot|\xi|^M,
 \label{Sw0.condition.3}
\end{align}
where $M$ is an arbitrarily large positive integer and the implicit constant depends on $M$. By \cite[Proposition 1.1.3]{14modern}, the dual space of $\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ under the topology inherited from $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ is the space of tempered distributions modulo polynomials, and because the topology of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ is the only topology we will consider in this paper when it comes to the matters of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ and $\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$, we denote the space of tempered distributions modulo polynomials by $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$. Another important subspace of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ is the space $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ defined below,
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.62}
\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)=\{g\in\Sw(\bbbr^n):\partial^{\gamma}g(0)=0\quad\text{for all multi-indices $\gamma$}\}.
\end{equation}
If $\omega$, $\omega'$ are multi-indices and $g\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, then we can deduce from Taylor's formula for the Schwartz function $\partial^{\omega}g(\xi)$ at $\xi=0$ with integral form of the remainder the following estimate
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.63}
|\partial^{\omega}g(\xi)|
\lesssim\sum_{|\omega'|=M}\sup_{x\in\bbbr^n}|(\partial^{\omega+\omega'}g)(x)|\cdot|\xi|^M,
\end{equation}
where $M$ is an arbitrarily large positive integer and the implicit constant depends on $M$. From the definitions of $\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ and $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, we see that a Schwartz function $\phi$ is in $\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ if and only if $\iFT_n\phi$ is in $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$. We have the following proposition related to $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$.
\begin{proposition}\label{proposition1}
Assume that $f$ is a tempered distribution in $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$, and $\multi(\xi)$ is a smooth function on $\bbbr^n\setminus\{0\}$, and for every multi-index $\alpha=(\alpha_1,\cdots,\alpha_n)$, there exist nonnegative real numbers $L_1^{\alpha}$ and $L_2^{\alpha}$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.64}
|\partial^{\alpha}\multi(\xi)|\lesssim\max\{|\xi|^{-L_1^{\alpha}},|\xi|^{L_2^{\alpha}}\}\quad
\text{for $\xi\in\bbbr^n\setminus\{0\}$},
\end{equation}
where the values of $L_1^{\alpha}$ and $L_2^{\alpha}$ depend on $\alpha$ and are independent of $\xi$, and the implicit constant in (\ref{eq1.64}) depends on fixed parameters. Then we have the following conclusions. If $g$ is an arbitrary function in $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, then the product $\multi(\xi)\cdot g(\xi)$ is a function in $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$. And the product $\multi(\xi)\cdot f$ of the function $\multi(\xi)$ and the tempered distribution $f\in\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$ is a well-defined bounded linear functional on the subspace $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ in the topology of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$, and its action on functions in $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ is given by
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.65}
<\multi(\xi)\cdot f,g>=<f,\multi\cdot g>\quad\text{for $g\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$}.
\end{equation}
Therefore we can apply Hahn-Banach theorem to obtain an extended tempered distribution defined on all of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ and written in the same notation as $\multi(\xi)\cdot f$. The restriction of this extended tempered distribution on the subspace $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ is given by equation (\ref{eq1.65}). Furthermore, the distributional inverse Fourier transform of the extended tempered distribution $\multi(\xi)\cdot f$ is well-defined and its action on a general Schwartz function $\varphi\in\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ is given by
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.66}
<\iFT_n[\multi(\xi)\cdot f],\varphi>=<\multi(\xi)\cdot f,\iFT_n\varphi>.
\end{equation}
Moreover, if $\varphi$ belongs to the subspace $\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$, then $\iFT_n\varphi$ belongs to the subspace $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ and we can continue from (\ref{eq1.66}) as follows,
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.67}
<\iFT_n[\multi(\xi)\cdot f],\varphi>=<\multi(\xi)\cdot f,\iFT_n\varphi>
=<f,\multi\cdot\iFT_n\varphi>.
\end{equation}  
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Proposition \ref{proposition1}]
Let $|\alpha|=\alpha_1+\alpha_2+\cdots+\alpha_n$ and $g\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$. For a real number $L$, $[L]$ denotes the greatest integer that is less than or equal to $L$. Denote $\lambda(\xi)=\multi(\xi)\cdot g(\xi)$, then condition (\ref{eq1.64}) implies that we can find $0\leq L_1,L_2\in\bbbr$ so that $|\multi(\xi)|\lesssim|\xi|^{-L_1}$ if $0<|\xi|\leq1$, and $|\multi(\xi)|\lesssim|\xi|^{L_2}$ if $1<|\xi|<\infty$, thus we apply estimate (\ref{eq1.63}) with $\omega=(0,\cdots,0)=\vec{0}$ and $M=[L_1]+1$ to obtain
\begin{equation*}
0\leq\lim_{|\xi|\rightarrow0}|\lambda(\xi)|\lesssim\lim_{|\xi|\rightarrow0}|\xi|^{-L_1}\cdot|\xi|^{[L_1]+1}=0,
\end{equation*}
hence we can let $\lambda(0)=0$ so that $\lambda(\xi)$ is a continuous function on all of $\bbbr^n$ and has a fast decay rate when $|\xi|$ is large because of $g(\xi)\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ and the condition (\ref{eq1.64}) placed upon $\multi(\xi)$. We investigate the differentiability property of $\lambda(\xi)$ at $\xi=0$. For $1\leq j\leq n$, let $0\neq h\in\bbbr$ and $\vec{e_j}$ be the unit elementary vector whose $j$-th coordinate is $1$ and all the other coordinates are $0$. Then the difference quotient can be estimated from above when $|h|\rightarrow0$ as follows,
\begin{align}
&\bigg|\frac{\lambda(h\vec{e_j})-\lambda(0)}{h}\bigg|
=\frac{|\multi(h\vec{e_j})|\cdot|g(h\vec{e_j})|}{|h|}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\frac{|h|^{-L_1}}{|h|}\cdot|g(h\vec{e_j})|
\lesssim\frac{|h|^{-L_1}}{|h|}\cdot|h|^{[L_1]+2},\label{eq1.68}
\end{align}
where in (\ref{eq1.68}), we also use estimate (\ref{eq1.63}) with $\omega=\vec{0}$ and $M=[L_1]+2$. The above estimate shows that
\begin{equation*}
\partial_j\lambda(0)=\frac{\partial}{\partial\xi_j}[\lambda(\xi)]\bigg|_{\xi=0}=\lim_{h\rightarrow0}
\frac{\lambda(h\vec{e_j})-\lambda(0)}{h}=0.
\end{equation*}
Therefore all the first order partial derivatives of $\lambda(\xi)$ at $\xi=0$ exist and equal zero. Let $\xi\neq0$ and we can use Leibniz rule to obtain
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.69}
\partial_j\lambda(\xi)=\partial_j\multi(\xi)\cdot g(\xi)+\multi(\xi)\cdot\partial_j g(\xi),	
\end{equation}
furthermore condition (\ref{eq1.64}) implies that we can find $0\leq L_3,L_4\in\bbbr$ so that $|\partial_j\multi(\xi)|\lesssim|\xi|^{-L_3}$ if $0<|\xi|\leq1$, and $|\partial_j\multi(\xi)|\lesssim|\xi|^{L_4}$ if $1<|\xi|<\infty$, then applying estimate (\ref{eq1.63}) with $\omega=\vec{0}$ and $M=[L_3]+1$ yields
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.70}
|\partial_j\multi(\xi)\cdot g(\xi)|\lesssim|\xi|^{-L_3}\cdot|\xi|^{[L_3]+1}\quad\text{if $0<|\xi|\leq1$},
\end{equation}
and applying estimate (\ref{eq1.63}) with $\omega=\vec{e_j}$ and $M=[L_1]+1$ yields
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.71}
|\multi(\xi)\cdot\partial_j g(\xi)|\lesssim|\xi|^{-L_1}\cdot|\xi|^{[L_1]+1}\quad\text{if $0<|\xi|\leq1$}.
\end{equation}
We deduce from (\ref{eq1.69}), (\ref{eq1.70}), (\ref{eq1.71}) the following estimate
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.72}
|\partial_j\lambda(\xi)|\lesssim|\xi|^{[L_1]+1-L_1}+|\xi|^{[L_3]+1-L_3},
\end{equation}
and hence $\lim_{|\xi|\rightarrow0}\partial_j\lambda(\xi)=0=\partial_j\lambda(0)$ for $1\leq j\leq n$. Therefore all the first order partial derivatives of $\lambda(\xi)$ are continuous at $\xi=0$, and hence are continuous on all of $\bbbr^n$, and have fast decay rates when $|\xi|$ is large because of $g(\xi)\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ and the condition (\ref{eq1.64}) placed upon $\multi(\xi)$. We can continue these computations and find that all the partial derivatives of the function $\lambda(\xi)$ at $\xi=0$ exist and equal $0$. Moreover, applying Leibniz rule yields that a typical partial derivative of $\lambda(\xi)=\multi(\xi)\cdot g(\xi)$ is estimated pointwise from above by a finite linear combination, with coefficients depending on some fixed parameters, of terms of the following form
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.73}
|\partial^{\alpha}\multi(\xi)|\cdot|\partial^{\omega}g(\xi)|,
\end{equation}
where $\alpha$ and $\omega$ are multi-indices. Applying condition (\ref{eq1.64}) and estimate (\ref{eq1.63}) with $M=[L_1^{\alpha}]+1$ shows that $(\ref{eq1.73})\rightarrow0$ as $|\xi|\rightarrow0$. Hence all the partial derivatives of $\lambda(\xi)$ are continuous at $\xi=0$, and thus are continuous on all of $\bbbr^n$, and have fast decay rates when $|\xi|$ is large due to $g(\xi)\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ and condition (\ref{eq1.64}). Therefore we conclude that the function $\lambda(\xi)=\multi(\xi)\cdot g(\xi)$ is a Schwartz function in $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$. The product $\multi(\xi)\cdot f$ of the function $\multi(\xi)$ and the tempered distribution $f\in\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$, whose action on functions in $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ is given by (\ref{eq1.65}), is a well-defined linear functional on the subspace $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, because the right side of equation (\ref{eq1.65}) is a well-defined action of the tempered distribution $f\in\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$ on the Schwartz function $\multi\cdot g\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$. We show that $\multi(\xi)\cdot f$ is a bounded linear functional on the subspace $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ in the topology of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$. By \cite[Proposition 2.3.4 (b)]{14classical}, we can find nonnegative integers $k,m$ such that for $g\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.74}
|<\multi(\xi)\cdot f,g>|=|<f,\multi\cdot g>|\lesssim\sum_{\substack{|\beta|\leq m\\|\gamma|\leq k}}
\sup_{\xi\in\bbbr^n}\big|\xi^{\beta}\partial_{\xi}^{\gamma}[\multi(\xi)\cdot g(\xi)]\big|,
\end{equation}
where $\beta$, $\gamma$ are multi-indices. A direct application of Leibniz rule tells us that each term on the right side of (\ref{eq1.74}) can be estimated from above by a finite linear combination of terms of the following form,
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.75}
\sup_{\xi\in\bbbr^n}|\xi|^{|\beta|}\cdot\big|(\partial^{\alpha}\multi)(\xi)\big|
\cdot\big|(\partial^{\omega}g)(\xi)\big|,
\end{equation}
and the multi-indices satisfy $\alpha+\omega=\gamma$. The condition (\ref{eq1.64}) implies that we can find $0\leq L_1^{\alpha},L_2^{\alpha}\in\bbbr$ so that $|(\partial^{\alpha}\multi)(\xi)|\lesssim|\xi|^{-L_1^{\alpha}}$ if $0<|\xi|\leq1$, and $|(\partial^{\alpha}\multi)(\xi)|\lesssim|\xi|^{L_2^{\alpha}}$ if $1<|\xi|<\infty$. Applying estimate (\ref{eq1.63}) with $M_1=[\big||\beta|-L_1^{\alpha}\big|]+1>\big||\beta|-L_1^{\alpha}\big|$ yields the following
\begin{align}
&\sup_{|\xi|\leq1}|\xi|^{|\beta|}\cdot\big|(\partial^{\alpha}\multi)(\xi)\big|
\cdot\big|(\partial^{\omega}g)(\xi)\big|\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sup_{|\xi|\leq1}|\xi|^{|\beta|-L_1^{\alpha}}\cdot\sum_{|\omega'|=M_1}\sup_{x\in\bbbr^n}|(\partial^{\omega+\omega'}g)(x)|\cdot|\xi|^{M_1}\nonumber\\
&\leq\sup_{|\xi|\leq1}|\xi|^{M_1-\big||\beta|-L_1^{\alpha}\big|}\cdot
\sum_{|\omega'|=M_1}\sup_{x\in\bbbr^n}|(\partial^{\omega+\omega'}g)(x)|,\label{eq1.76}
\end{align}
and (\ref{eq1.76}) can be estimated from above by a finite sum of Schwartz seminorms of function $g$. Also, we let $M_2=[|\beta|+L_2^{\alpha}]+1>|\beta|+L_2^{\alpha}$, then we have
\begin{align}
&\sup_{|\xi|>1}|\xi|^{|\beta|}\cdot\big|(\partial^{\alpha}\multi)(\xi)\big|
\cdot\big|(\partial^{\omega}g)(\xi)\big|\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sup_{|\xi|>1}\frac{|\xi|^{|\beta|+L_2^{\alpha}}}{(1+|\xi|)^{M_2}}\cdot(1+|\xi|)^{M_2}
\cdot\big|(\partial^{\omega}g)(\xi)\big|\nonumber\\
&\leq\sup_{|\xi|>1}(1+|\xi|)^{M_2}\cdot\big|(\partial^{\omega}g)(\xi)\big|,\label{eq1.77}
\end{align}
and (\ref{eq1.77}) can be estimated from above by a finite sum of Schwartz seminorms of function $g$. Combining (\ref{eq1.74}), (\ref{eq1.75}), (\ref{eq1.76}), and (\ref{eq1.77}), we see that the term $|<\multi(\xi)\cdot f,g>|$ can be estimated from above by a finite sum of Schwartz seminorms of function $g$ whenever $f\in\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$ and $g\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, therefore the linear functional $\multi(\xi)\cdot f$ defined by equation (\ref{eq1.65}) is a bounded linear functional on the subspace $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ under the topology inherited from $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$. According to the Hahn-Banach theorem, i.e. \cite[3.3 Theorem]{Rudin.Funct.Anal}, this linear functional $\multi(\xi)\cdot f$ has a bounded linear extension to all of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ in the topology of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$, and we still denote the extended tempered distribution by $\multi(\xi)\cdot f$. The action of the extended tempered distribution $\multi(\xi)\cdot f$ on functions in $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ is given by (\ref{eq1.65}). And the distributional inverse Fourier transform of the extended tempered distribution $\multi(\xi)\cdot f$, as given in \cite[Definition 2.3.7.]{14classical}, is well-defined by the following equation
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.78}
<\iFT_n[\multi(\xi)\cdot f],\varphi>=<\multi(\xi)\cdot f,\iFT_n\varphi>
\end{equation}
for a general Schwartz function $\varphi\in\Sw(\bbbr^n)$. Furthermore, if $\varphi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ then $\iFT_n\varphi\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, and we can combine (\ref{eq1.78}) and (\ref{eq1.65}) together to deduce that
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.79}
<\iFT_n[\multi(\xi)\cdot f],\varphi>=<\multi(\xi)\cdot f,\iFT_n\varphi>
=<f,\multi\cdot\iFT_n\varphi>.
\end{equation}
The proof of Proposition \ref{proposition1} is now complete.
\end{proof}
We review the definition of homogeneous Triebel-Lizorkin spaces. We fix through out the whole paper the function $\psi\in\Sw(\bbbr^n)$, and $\psi$ satisfies the following conditions
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-7}
0\leq\FT_n\psi(\xi)\leq 1,\quad spt.\FT_n\psi\subseteq\{\frac{1}{2}\leq|\xi|<2\},
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-8}
\sum_{j\in\bbbz}\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)=1\quad\text{if }\xi\neq 0.
\end{equation}
Define for $f\in\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$, $j\in\bbbz$ and $x\in\bbbr^n$, the function $f_j(x):=\psi_{2^{-j}}*f(x)$ where $\psi_{2^{-j}}(x)=2^{jn}\psi(2^j x)$ and thus we have the following decomposition
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-9}
f=\sum_{j\in\bbbz}f_j,
\end{equation}
where the sum in (\ref{eq1-9}) converges in the space of tempered distributions modulo polynomials (cf. \cite[section 1.1.1]{14modern}). In addition, given a sequence $\{f_k(x)\}_{k\in\bbbz}$ of functions defined on $\bbbr^n$ and $0<p,q\leq\infty$, we use the notation $\|\{f_k\}_{k\in\bbbz}\|_{L^p(l^q)}$ to denote the $\|\cdot\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}$-quasinorm of the $\|\cdot\|_{l^q}$-quasinorm of the sequence $\{f_k(x)\}_{k\in\bbbz}$.
\begin{definition}\label{definition1}
For $0<p<\infty$, $0<q\leq\infty$ and $s\in\bbbr$, the homogeneous Triebel-Lizorkin space $\Fspq$ is a subspace of the space of tempered distributions modulo polynomials, and an element $f\in\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$ is in $\Fspq$ if and only if the quasinorm $\|f\|_{\Fspq}:=\|\{2^{ks}f_k\}_{k\in\bbbz}\|_{L^p(l^q)}$ is finite.
\end{definition}
For an appropriate function $f$ so that the expressions in (\ref{eq1-10}) and (\ref{eq1-11}) make sense, $s,q\in\bbbr$ and $q>0$, we use the following notations
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-10}
\Diff_{s,q}f(x):=\big(\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{|f(x+y)-f(x)|^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy\big)^{\frac{1}{q}},
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-11}
\Lift_s f(x):=\iFT_n(|\xi|^s\FT_n f(\xi))(x).
\end{equation}
In \cite{Wang2023}, the following known inequality is proven.
\begin{theorem}[cf. Corollary 1.7 (i) of \cite{Wang2023}]\label{theorem1}
If $0<p,q<\infty$, $\max\{0,n(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{q})\}<s<1$, and $f\in\Fspq$ has a function representative, then we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-12}
\|\Diff_{s,q}f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\lesssim\|f\|_{\Fspq}.
\end{equation}
\end{theorem}
Many other authors also studied the counterpart of this inequality for the inhomogeneous Triebel-Lizorkin space $F^s_{p,q}(\bbbr^n)$. In \cite[section 2.5.10]{1983functionspaces}, H. Triebel gave an equivalence characterization theorem of the inhomogeneous Triebel-Lizorkin space $F^s_{p,q}(\bbbr^n)$ in terms of iterated difference, where the conditions for the parameters are $0<p<\infty$, $0<q\leq\infty$, $\frac{n}{\min\{p,q\}}<s<M$ and $M$ is the iteration number. In \cite[Theorem 1 pp. 102]{Stein1961}, E. M. Stein gave the equivalence characterization
$$\|(\int_{\bbbr^n}|h|^{-2\alpha}|f(\cdot+h)-f(\cdot)|^2\frac{dh}{|h|^n})^{\frac{1}{2}}\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}    +\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\sim\|f\|_{L^p_{\alpha}(\bbbr^n)}$$ where the restrictions $0<\alpha<1$, $1<p<\infty$ and $\frac{2n}{n+2\alpha}<p<\infty$ were considered essentially sharp. And for $1<p<\infty$, $\alpha\in\bbbr$ and $f\in\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$, the inhomogeneous Sobolev norm of $f$ (cf. \cite[section 1.3.1]{14modern}) is defined to be
\begin{equation}\label{Wang2023-eq45}
\|f\|_{L_{\alpha}^p(\bbbr^n)}:=\|\iFT_n((1+|\xi|^2)^{\alpha/2}\FT_n f)\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)},
\end{equation}
where $\|\cdot\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}$ is considered via duality. Since the inhomogeneous Triebel-Lizorkin space satisfies $L^p_{\alpha}(\bbbr^n)\sim F^{\alpha}_{p,2}(\bbbr^n)$ if $1<p<\infty$, we consider E. M. Stein's result is an improvement of H. Triebel's. Furthermore in \cite[Theorem 1 pp. 393]{seeger1989note}, A. Seeger provided an equivalence characterization for the homogeneous anisotropic space
$$\|f\|_{\dot{F}^{\alpha}_{p,q}(\bbbr^n)}\sim\|S^{\alpha}_{q,r,m}f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}$$
where $0<p<\infty$, $0<q\leq\infty$, $m>\alpha/a_0$, $r\geq 1$ with
$$\alpha>\max\{0,\nu(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{r}),\nu(\frac{1}{q}-\frac{1}{r})\},$$
and
$$S^{\alpha}_{q,r,m}f(x)=(\int_0^{\infty}[\mvint_{\varrho(h)\leq t}
|(\varDelta^m_{h}f)(x)|^r dh]^{q/r}\frac{dt}{t^{1+\alpha q}})^{1/q}.$$
If we consider the isotropic case of A. Seeger's result, in which $\varrho(h)$ above can be deemed as $|h|$ and $a_0$ can be deemed as $1$, then by letting $r=q$ and changing the order of integration we can obtain
\begin{align*}
\|f\|_{\dot{F}^{\alpha}_{p,q}(\bbbr^n)}
&\sim\|(\int_0^{\infty}\int_{|h|\leq t}t^{-1-n-q\alpha}\cdot|(\varDelta^m_h f)(\cdot)|^q dhdt)^{\frac{1}{q}}\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\\
&\sim\|(\int_{\bbbr^n}|h|^{-q\alpha}\cdot|(\varDelta^m_h f)(\cdot)|^q\frac{dh}{|h|^n})^{\frac{1}{q}}\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)},
\end{align*}
for $0<p<\infty$, $1\leq q\leq\infty$ and $\max\{0,\nu(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{q})\}<\alpha<m$. Recently in \cite[Theorem 1.2 pp. 693]{Prats19} M. Prats proves an equivalence characterization theorem of the inhomogeneous norm $\|f\|_{F^s_{p,q}(\Omega)}$ in terms of the sum of $\|f\|_{W^{k,p}(\Omega)}$ and
\begin{equation}\label{Wang2023-eq1}
\sum_{|\alpha|=k}\big(\int_{\Omega}\big(\int_{\Omega}
\frac{|D^{\alpha}f(x)-D^{\alpha}f(y)|^q}{|x-y|^{\sigma q+d}}
dy\big)^{\frac{p}{q}}dx\big)^{\frac{1}{p}}
\end{equation}
when parameters satisfy $1\leq p<\infty,1\leq q\leq\infty,s=k+\sigma$, $\max\{0,d(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{q})\}<\sigma<1$ and $\Omega$ is a uniform domain in $\bbbr^d$. Furthermore, M. Prats also shows under the same conditions on parameters, the equivalence relation stands if (\ref{Wang2023-eq1}) is replaced by
\begin{equation}\label{Wang2023-eq2}
\sum_{|\alpha|=k}\big(\int_{\Omega}\big(\int_{\mathbf{Sh}(x)}
\frac{|D^{\alpha}f(x)-D^{\alpha}f(y)|^q}{|x-y|^{\sigma q+d}}
dy\big)^{\frac{p}{q}}dx\big)^{\frac{1}{p}}
\end{equation}
where $\mathbf{Sh}(x):=\{y\in\Omega:|y-x|\leq c_{\Omega}\delta(x)\}$ is the Carleson box centered at $x$, $\delta(x)=\dist(x,\partial\Omega)$ and $c_{\Omega}>1$ is a constant. Moreover when $1\leq q\leq p<\infty$, the set $\mathbf{Sh}(x)$ in (\ref{Wang2023-eq2}) can be improved and replaced by the Whitney ball $B(x,\rho\delta(x))$ for $0<\rho<1$. Now to relate our main result with the known inequality (\ref{eq1-12}), we review the definition of homogeneous Sobolev spaces below.
\begin{definition}[cf. section 1.3.3 of \cite{14modern}]\label{definition2}
Let $s\in\bbbr$ and $1<p<\infty$. The homogeneous Sobolev space $\Lps$ is a subspace of the space of tempered distributions modulo polynomials, and an element $f\in\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$ is in $\Lps$ if and only if the unique function representative in the sense of tempered distributions modulo polynomials, of the well-defined functional $\Lift_s f=\iFT_n(|\xi|^s\cdot\FT_n f)$ that is considered as an element of the space $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$ of tempered distributions modulo polynomials, is in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$ and the homogeneous Sobolev norm of $f$ is given by
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-13}
\|f\|_{\Lps}:=\big(\int_{\bbbr^n}|\Lift_s f|^p dx\big)^{\frac{1}{p}}.
\end{equation}
\end{definition}
In the theory of tempered distributions, suppose $f$ is an element in $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$ or in $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$, and suppose $g$ is a function defined on $\bbbr^n$, then we say that the function $g$ is the function representative of $f\in\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$ in the sense of tempered distributions modulo polynomials, i.e. in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$, if and only if
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.80}
<f,\phi>=<g,\phi>=\int_{\bbbr^n}g(x)\phi(x)dx\text{ for all $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$}.
\end{equation}
We say that the function $g$ is the function representative of $f\in\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$ in the sense of tempered distributions, i.e. in the sense of $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$, if and only if the above equation (\ref{eq1.80}) is true for all $\phi\in\Sw(\bbbr^n)$. Because Schwartz functions in $\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ satisfy the condition (\ref{Sw0.condition.1}), then for the same functional $f$, its function representative in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$ and its function representative in the sense of $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$ are generally different, with the possible difference of a polynomial. Furthermore, the integral of an equivalence class in $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$ or a tempered distribution in $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$ is justified when the equivalence class or the tempered distribution has a function representative and integrals of distinct representatives in the same sense are identified. And when integrating an element in the space of tempered distributions modulo polynomials, we integrate its function representative in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$. When integrating an element in the space of tempered distributions, we integrate its function representative in the sense of $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$. Moreover, the same principle also applies to the supremum of an equivalence class in $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$ or a tempered distribution in $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$. Integrals and supremums included in this paper are all considered this way.
\begin{remark}\label{remark3}
We remark that if $f$ is a tempered distribution, then the distributional Fourier transform $\FT_n f$ is also a tempered distribution. The function $\multi(\xi)=|\xi|^s$ for $s\in\bbbr$ satisfies condition (\ref{eq1.64}), hence the theory in Proposition \ref{proposition1} tells us that the bounded linear functional $|\xi|^s\cdot\FT_n f$ initially defined on the subspace $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ by the following equation
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-58}
<|\xi|^s\cdot\FT_n f,g>=<\FT_n f,|\xi|^s\cdot g>
\end{equation}
for $g\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, can extend to a tempered distribution on all of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ by the Hahn-Banach theorem, i.e. \cite[3.3 Theorem]{Rudin.Funct.Anal}. And hence $\Lift_s f=\iFT_n(|\xi|^s\cdot\FT_n f)$ is the distributional inverse Fourier transform of the extended tempered distribution $|\xi|^s\cdot\FT_n f$. Since $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ whenever $\iFT_n\phi\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, the action of $\Lift_s f$ on a Schwartz function $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ is given by
\begin{align}
&<\Lift_s f,\phi>=<\iFT_n(|\xi|^s\cdot\FT_n f),\phi>=<|\xi|^s\cdot\FT_n f,\iFT_n\phi>\nonumber\\
&=<\FT_n f,|\xi|^s\cdot\iFT_n\phi>=<f,\FT_n[|\xi|^s\cdot\iFT_n\phi]>,\label{eq1-59}
\end{align}
where in the last equation of (\ref{eq1-59}), we use \cite[Definition 2.3.7.]{14classical} for the distributional Fourier transform of $f\in\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$.
\end{remark}
We can use Definition \ref{definition1} and the formula
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-14}
(\sum_{k\in\bbbz}a_k)^{\theta}\leq\sum_{k\in\bbbz}a_k^{\theta}	
\end{equation}
for a sequence $\{a_k\}_{k\in\bbbz}$ of nonnegative real numbers and for $0\leq\theta\leq 1$ to deduce that $\|f\|_{\Fspq}\leq\|f\|_{\dot{F}^s_{p,2}(\bbbr^n)}$ for any $s\in\bbbr$ when $2\leq q<\infty$. And we can combine this observation with the known equivalence relation
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-15}
\|f\|_{\dot{F}^s_{p,2}(\bbbr^n)}\sim\|\Lift_s f\|_{\dot{F}^0_{p,2}(\bbbr^n)}\sim
\|\Lift_s  f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}=\|f\|_{\Lps}
\end{equation}
for $s\in\bbbr$ and $1<p<\infty$ to further deduce from Theorem \ref{theorem1} the following inequality
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-16}
\|\Diff_{s,q}f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\lesssim\|f\|_{\Lps},
\end{equation}
where $1<p<q$, $2\leq q<\infty$ and $n(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{q})<s<1$ and $f$ is a function in $\Lps$. In \cite[Theorem 1']{fefferman1970}, C. Fefferman stated that the following inequality
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-17}
\|\Diff_{s,2}f\|_{L^{p,\infty}(\bbbr^n)}\lesssim\|f\|_{\Lps}
\end{equation}
is true when $1<p<2$ and $0<s=n(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{2})<1$, and $\|\cdot\|_{L^{p,\infty}(\bbbr^n)}$ denotes the weak $L^p$ quasinorm. We can consider that inequality (\ref{eq1-17}) is the case of inequality (\ref{eq1-16}) under the critical condition $s=n(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{2})$ when $q=2$. In this paper, we will state and prove the generalization of inequality (\ref{eq1-17}) below.
\begin{theorem}\label{theorem2}
If $1<p<q$, $2\leq q<\infty$, and $0<s=n(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{q})<1$, and if $f\in\dot{L}^p_s(\bbbr^n)$ is a bounded real-valued function defined on $\bbbr^n$ and has first-order continuous derivatives, then we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-18}
\|\Diff_{s,q}f\|_{L^{p,\infty}(\bbbr^n)}\lesssim\|f\|_{\dot{L}^p_s(\bbbr^n)}.
\end{equation}
\end{theorem}
In the above theorem, the condition that $f$ is a bounded real-valued function and has first-order continuous derivatives, is necessary to guarantee the subharmonicity of $|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;x,t)|^q$ when $q\neq 2$, where $\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;x,t)$ is the Poisson integral of the functional $$\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f\in\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$$ and $\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})$ is the evaluation of the meromorphic extension of the gamma function at $\frac{-s}{2}$. For more details about this requirement, see Lemma \ref{lemma9}, Remark \ref{remark1}, Lemma \ref{lemma10}, Lemma \ref{lemma11}, and inequality (\ref{eq6.22}) in the proof of Theorem \ref{theorem2} where we use this subharmonicity.\\

Assume $f$ is a function in $L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ for some $p_0$ satisfying $1\leq p_0\leq\infty$, then Minkowski's integral inequality and formula (\ref{eq1-6}) tell us that $\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;\cdot,t)$ is also a function in $L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ for every $0<t<\infty$ and hence is a tempered distribution on $\bbbr^n$. By the dominated convergence theorem, we have
\begin{equation*}
\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)=f*\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)](x),
\end{equation*}
and the Fourier transform of $\partial_{n+1}[P_t(x)]$ is given in (\ref{eq2-82}). Let $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$, then $\phi$ satisfies conditions (\ref{Sw0.condition.1}), (\ref{Sw0.condition.2}), and (\ref{Sw0.condition.3}). Because $\partial_{n+1}[P_t(x)]$ is a radial function in $x\in\bbbr^n$, we have
\begin{align}
&<\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;\cdot,t),\phi>=<f*\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)],\phi>\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}f*\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)](x)\cdot\phi(x)dx\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_{\bbbr^n}f(y)\cdot\partial_{n+1}[P_t(y-x)]\cdot\phi(x)dydx.\label{eq1-40}
\end{align}
Because $|\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)]|\in L^1(\bbbr^n)$ and $|\phi(\cdot)|\in L^{p_0'}(\bbbr^n)$ where $\frac{1}{p_0}+\frac{1}{p_0'}=1$, then we have $|\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)]|*|\phi|\in L^{p_0'}(\bbbr^n)$. We can use H\"{o}lder's inequality to obtain
$$\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_{\bbbr^n}|f(y)|\cdot|\partial_{n+1}[P_t(y-x)]|\cdot|\phi(x)|dxdy<\infty,$$
thus we apply Fubini's theorem to (\ref{eq1-40}) and obtain
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-41}
(\ref{eq1-40})=\int_{\bbbr^n}f(y)\cdot\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)]*\phi(y)dy.
\end{equation}
Notice that $\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)]\in L^1(\bbbr^n)$ is a tempered distribution for every $t\in(0,\infty)$ and $\phi(\cdot)$ is a Schwartz function, then we can use \cite[Proposition 2.3.22 (11)]{14classical} and (\ref{eq2-82}) to obtain
\begin{align}
&\iFT_n(\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)]*\phi)(\xi)\nonumber\\
&=\iFT_n(\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)])(\xi)\cdot\iFT_n\phi(\xi)\nonumber\\
&=-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\iFT_n\phi(\xi).\label{eq1-42}
\end{align}
The observation is that derivatives of the function 
\begin{equation}\label{eq1.81}
\multi(\xi)=-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\quad\text{for $0<t<\infty$}
\end{equation}
are not continuous at $\xi=0$, and this function $\multi(\xi)$ satisfies condition (\ref{eq1.64}) of Proposition \ref{proposition1}. Therefore the conclusions of Proposition \ref{proposition1} tell us that the following function
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-43}
\xi\in\bbbr^n\longmapsto-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\iFT_n\phi(\xi)
\end{equation}
belongs to $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$. Since the Fourier transform is a homeomorphism from $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ onto itself, we have $\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)]*\phi(y)\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ and (\ref{eq1-41}) is a well-defined action of the tempered distribution $f$ on the Schwartz function $\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)]*\phi$, and hence we have
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq1-41})
&=<f,\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)]*\phi>=<\FT_n f,\iFT_n(\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)]*\phi)>\nonumber\\
&=<\FT_n f,-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\iFT_n\phi>\nonumber\\
&=<f,\FT_n[-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\iFT_n\phi(\xi)]>,\label{eq1-44}
\end{align}
and the penultimate line of (\ref{eq1-44}) makes sense because it is a well-defined action of the tempered distribution $\FT_n f$ on the Schwartz function (\ref{eq1-43}), and the last line of (\ref{eq1-44}) is due to the definition of the distributional Fourier transform. Since $f\in L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ is a tempered distribution and so is its distributional Fourier transform $\FT_n f$, then Proposition \ref{proposition1} indicates that the linear functional $-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n f$, which is initially defined on $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ by the following equation
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-55}
<-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n f,g>
=<\FT_n f,-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}g>
\end{equation}
for $g\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, is a bounded linear functional on $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ in the topology of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$. According to the Hahn-Banach theorem, i.e. \cite[3.3 Theorem]{Rudin.Funct.Anal}, this linear functional defined in (\ref{eq1-55}) has a bounded linear extension on all of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ in the topology of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$, and we still denote the extended tempered distribution by $-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n f$. The action of the extended tempered distribution $-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n f$ on functions in $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ is given by (\ref{eq1-55}). And the distributional inverse Fourier transform of the extended tempered distribution $-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n f$, as given in \cite[Definition 2.3.7.]{14classical}, is well-defined by the following equation
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-56}
<\iFT_n[-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n f],\phi>
=<-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n f,\iFT_n\phi>
\end{equation}
for a general Schwartz function $\phi\in\Sw(\bbbr^n)$. Furthermore, if $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ then $\iFT_n\phi\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, and we can deduce from equation (\ref{eq1.67}) that
\begin{align}
&<\iFT_n[-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n f],\phi>\nonumber\\
&=<\FT_n f,-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\iFT_n\phi>\nonumber\\
&=<f,\FT_n[-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\iFT_n\phi(\xi)]>,\label{eq1-57}
\end{align}
where in the last line of (\ref{eq1-57}), we use the definition of distributional Fourier transforms. Combining (\ref{eq1-40}), (\ref{eq1-41}), (\ref{eq1-44}), (\ref{eq1-57}) together, we have obtained the equation
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-35}
\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)=\iFT_n[-2\pi|\xi| e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n f]
\end{equation}
for every $0<t<\infty$ in the sense of tempered distributions modulo polynomials whenever $f$ is a function in the union
\begin{equation}\label{union}
\bigcup_{1\leq p_0\leq\infty}L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n),
\end{equation}
and $-2\pi|\xi| e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n f$ is considered as the tempered distribution that is initially defined on $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ by equation (\ref{eq1-55}) and extends to all of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ by the Hahn-Banach theorem. Similarly, we have the equation
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-36}
\partial_{k}\Pint(f;x,t)=\iFT_n[2\pi i\xi_k e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n f]
\end{equation}
for $1\leq k\leq n$ and every $0<t<\infty$ in the sense of tempered distributions modulo polynomials if $f$ is a function in the union (\ref{union}), and the extended tempered distribution $2\pi i\xi_k e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n f$ is considered in the same way as above. Equations (\ref{eq2-35}) and (\ref{eq2-36}) have been used in the proof of the following Theorem \ref{theorem3}.\\

In order to prove Theorem \ref{theorem2}, we investigate the boundedness property of the generalized Littlewood-Paley $\LPg_{s,q}$-function given by
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-19}
\LPg_{s,q}(f)(x)=\big(\int_0^{\infty}t^{q-sq-1}\big|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)\big|^q dt\big)^{\frac{1}{q}},
\end{equation}
and we prove the following theorem.
\begin{theorem}\label{theorem3}
Let $0<p,q<\infty$, $s\in\bbbr$ and $|s|<1$. If $f\in\Fspq$ is a function in the union (\ref{union}), then we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-20}
\|\LPg_{s,q}(f)\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\lesssim\|f\|_{\Fspq},
\end{equation}
where $\LPg_{s,q}(f)$ is the generalized Littlewood-Paley function defined in (\ref{eq1-19}).
\end{theorem}
With a more general nonzero integrable kernel that satisfies some additional conditions, replacing derivatives of the Poisson kernel in (\ref{eq1-19}), D. Fan and F. Zhao have proven the inequality (\ref{eq1-20}) for $1<p,q<\infty$ and $s=0$ in their recent development \cite[Theorem 2.1]{FZ2021}. When the kernel $\Phi$ is a compactly supported function in $L^q(\bbbr^n)$ for some $q>1$ and satisfies $\int_{\bbbr^n}\Phi(x)dx=0$, H. Al-Qassem, L. Cheng and Y. Pan have proven in \cite[Theorem 1.1]{AQCP2018} the estimate
\begin{equation}\label{weak.eq13}
\|\mathcal{S}_{\Phi}^{(\lambda)}(f)\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\lesssim\|\Phi\|_{L^q(\bbbr^n)}\cdot
\|f\|_{\dot{F}^0_{p,\lambda}(\bbbr^n)},
\end{equation}
where $\mathcal{S}_{\Phi}^{(\lambda)}(f)(x)$ is their generalized Littlewood-Paley function given by
\begin{equation}\label{weak.eq14}
\mathcal{S}_{\Phi}^{(\lambda)}(f)(x)=\big(\int_0^{\infty}
|\Phi_t*f(x)|^{\lambda}\frac{dt}{t}\big)^{\frac{1}{\lambda}}\quad\text{for}\quad\lambda>1,
\end{equation}
and $1/\big(1+\frac{1}{\lambda}-\max\{\frac{1}{\lambda},\frac{1}{q}\}\big)<p<\infty$. In the same paper \cite[Theorem 1.2 and Theorem 1.3]{AQCP2018}, the authors also have shown if additionally the kernel $\Phi$ has a radial majorant in $L^q(\bbbr^n)$ for $1<q<\lambda$, then the operator $\mathcal{S}_{\Phi}^{(\lambda)}(f)$ given in (\ref{weak.eq14}) is a bounded operator on $L^p(\bbbr^n)$ for $(\lambda nq)/(\lambda nq-\lambda+q)<p<\infty$, and in the case when $q=1$, the lower bound for the range of $p$ becomes $(\lambda n)/(\lambda n-1)$. Imposing more conditions on the kernel in \cite[Theorem 1.4]{AQCP2018}, the inequality (\ref{weak.eq13}) is proven for $1<\lambda,p<\infty$. In \cite{AQCP2021}, H. Al-Qassem, L. Cheng and Y. Pan generalize their results in \cite{AQCP2018} to the case of the product generalized Littlewood-Paley function defined on $\bbbr^n\times\bbbr^m$ and the homogeneous Triebel-Lizorkin space $\dot{F}^{\vec{s}}_{p,q}(\bbbr^n\times\bbbr^m)$. Indeed, early in the year 2018, F. Liu and Q. Xue published their results about the boundedness properties of the multiple Littlewood–Paley operator on the product space $L^2(\bbbr^m\times\bbbr^n)$ in \cite{LX2018}. The boundedness of the multiple Littlewood–Paley function with a rough kernel on $L^2(\bbbr^m\times\bbbr^n)$ was also studied in \cite{LW2014} by F. Liu and H. Wu. The $L^p(\bbbr^n\times\bbbr^m)$ $(1<p<\infty)$ boundedness property of the multiple Littlewood–Paley operator, where the kernel of the multiple Littlewood–Paley operator is the product of a function defined on $\bbbr^n$ and a function defined on $\bbbr^m$, was studied in \cite[(2.1)]{FS1982} by R. Fefferman and E. M. Stein. And the $L^p(\bbbr^n)$-boundedness property of the operator $\mathcal{S}_{\Phi}^{(2)}(f)$ defined by (\ref{weak.eq14}) has been studied in \cite{Sato2008} by S. Sato. The proof of \cite[Lemma 4]{Sato2008} has been used extensively by H. Al-Qassem, L. Cheng and Y. Pan in their paper \cite{AQCP2018} to achieve the boundedness from $\dot{F}^0_{p,\lambda}(\bbbr^n)$ into $L^p(\bbbr^n)$. In \cite{FS2002}, D. Fan and S. Sato defined their generalized Littlewood-Paley function on $\bbbr^{n+1}$ for a Schwartz function $f$ defined on $\bbbr^{n+1}$, and they have
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-33}
S_{\psi,\gamma}(f)(x,z)=\bigg(\int_0^{\infty}|\psi_t\sharp f(x,z)|^2\frac{dt}{t}\bigg)^{\frac{1}{2}},
\end{equation}
where $x\in\bbbr^n,z\in\bbbr$ and
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-34}
\psi_t\sharp f(x,z)=\int_{\bbbr^n}b(y)\psi_t(y)f(x-y,z-\gamma(|y|))dy,
\end{equation}
and $b(y)$ is a measurable function on $\bbbr^n$ and $\gamma(\cdot)$ is a continuous function defined on the interval $[0,\infty)$, and they have proven that the operator defined in (\ref{eq1-33}) is bounded on $L^p(\bbbr^{n+1})$ for certain ranges of $p$. In \cite{DFP2000}, Y. Ding, D. Fan, and Y. Pan studied the $L^p(\bbbr^n)$-boundedness property of the Littlewood-Paley operator $\mathcal{S}_{\Phi}^{(2)}(f)$ given in (\ref{weak.eq14}) when the function $\Phi$ satisfies the rough kernel condition which says there exist $\alpha>0$ and $\beta>0$ such that 
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-35}
|\FT_n\Phi(\xi)|\lesssim\min\{|\xi|^{\alpha},|\xi|^{-\beta}\}\qquad\text{for all $0\neq\xi\in\bbbr^n$}.
\end{equation}
Another well-known result about the boundedness property of operator $\mathcal{S}_{\Phi}^{(2)}(f)$ given in (\ref{weak.eq14}) is by A. Benedek, A. P. Calder\'{o}n and R. Panzone in \cite{BCP1962}, which says the operator $\mathcal{S}_{\Phi}^{(2)}(f)$ is bounded on $L^p(\bbbr^n)$ for all $p\in(1,\infty)$ if the kernel $\Phi$ satisfies the following conditions that $\FT_n\Phi(0)=0$ and
\begin{align*}
&|\Phi(x)|\lesssim(1+|x|)^{-n-\varepsilon}\qquad&\text{for some $\varepsilon>0$},\\
&\int_{\bbbr^n}|\Phi(x-y)-\Phi(x)|dx\lesssim|y|^{\varepsilon}\qquad&\text{for some $\varepsilon>0$}.
\end{align*}
The interested reader can refer to \cite{HLYY2019,TW2014,BM2022,MY2008,JYYZ2022,Cheng2007,Lerner2019,Bourgain1989,Javier2013,HouWu2019,GM2022,GM2023} for more studies on the classical Littlewood-Paley square function and its variations.\\

Comparing Theorem \ref{theorem3} with previous results about the boundedness properties of generalized Littlewood-Paley functions with different kernels, we find that Theorem \ref{theorem3} is outstanding due to the following reasons. First, the generalized Littlewood-Paley $\LPg_{s,q}$-function defined in (\ref{eq1-19}) uses derivatives of the Poisson kernel $P_t(x)$ as its kernel function and $|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)|^q$ inherits the subharmonicity, as shown in Lemma \ref{lemma10}. The subharmonicity is an important property in harmonic analysis, and plays a crucial role in the proof of our main Theorem \ref{theorem2}. Second, the derivatives of the Poisson kernel satisfy the H\"{o}rmander type condition as given in Lemma \ref{lemma4}. This good property is used repeatedly in the proof of Lemma \ref{lemma7} and hence in the proofs of Theorem \ref{theorem4} and Theorem \ref{theorem5}. In many cases, the H\"{o}rmander type condition is a desirable condition. Third, the derivatives of the Poisson kernel frequently appear in the process of the pointwise convergence to a function $f(x)$ by its Poisson integral $\Pint(f;x,t)=f*P_t(x)$ as $t\rightarrow0$. The almost everywhere pointwise convergence property of the Poisson integral is a well-established result given in \cite[chapter I, Theorem 1.25]{SteinWeissFourier}. As shown in (\ref{eq1.60}) and (\ref{eq1.61}), the derivatives of the Poisson kernel $P_t(x)$ have their integrals on $\bbbr^n$ equal to zero, while at the same time the Poisson kernel has its integral on $\bbbr^n$ equal to $1$ and hence the family of functions $\{P_t(\cdot)\}_{t>0}$ constitutes an approximate identity as $t\rightarrow0$. Fourth, with all the above advantages inherited from the Poisson kernel, Theorem \ref{theorem3} achieves advantageous ranges for the involved parameters $p$, $q$, $s$. In particular, the applicability of Theorem \ref{theorem3} to negative values of $s$ has a significant place in (\ref{eq4.25}) in the proof of Theorem \ref{theorem4}. Because of these reasons, we name the generalized Littlewood-Paley $\LPg_{s,q}$-function defined in (\ref{eq1-19}) is the Littlewood-Paley-Poisson function $\LPg_{s,q}(f)(x)$.\\

An immediate consequence of Theorem \ref{theorem3} is the following corollary.
\begin{corollary}\label{corollary1}
Let $0<p<\infty$ and $2\leq q<\infty$. If $f\in\dot{F}^0_{p,2}(\bbbr^n)$ is a function in $L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ for some $p_0$ satisfying $1\leq p_0\leq\infty$, then we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-21}
\|\LPg_{0,q}(f)\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\lesssim\|f\|_{\dot{F}^{0}_{p,2}(\bbbr^n)},
\end{equation}
where $\LPg_{0,q}(f)$ is given by
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-22}
\LPg_{0,q}(f)(x)=\big(\int_0^{\infty}t^{q-1}\big|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)\big|^q dt\big)^{\frac{1}{q}}.	
\end{equation}
\end{corollary}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Corollary \ref{corollary1}]
We can use the formula (\ref{eq1-14}) to deduce that $$\|f\|_{\dot{F}^0_{p,q}(\bbbr^n)}\leq\|f\|_{\dot{F}^0_{p,2}(\bbbr^n)}$$ when $2\leq q<\infty$, and Corollary \ref{corollary1} is proved if we apply Theorem \ref{theorem3} with $s=0$. Furthermore, if we use the equivalence relations, $\|\cdot\|_{\dot{F}^0_{p,2}(\bbbr^n)}\sim\|\cdot\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}$ when $1<p<\infty$ and $\|\cdot\|_{\dot{F}^0_{p,2}(\bbbr^n)}\sim\|\cdot\|_{H^p(\bbbr^n)}$ when $0<p\leq 1$, then we can obtain the following inequalities. The first inequality is the following
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-23}
\|\LPg_{0,q}(f)\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\lesssim\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)},
\end{equation}
if $1<p<\infty$, $2\leq q<\infty$, and $f$ is a function in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$. The second inequality is the following
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-24}
\|\LPg_{0,q}(f)\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\lesssim\|f\|_{H^p(\bbbr^n)},
\end{equation}
if $0<p\leq 1$, $2\leq q<\infty$, and $f$ is a function in $L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ for some $p_0\in[1,\infty]$, and $\|\cdot\|_{H^p(\bbbr^n)}$ represents the Hardy quasinorm. In particular, when $p=1$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-24-1}
\|\LPg_{0,q}(f)\|_{L^1(\bbbr^n)}\lesssim\|f\|_{H^1(\bbbr^n)}
\end{equation}
for $2\leq q<\infty$ and $f$ is a function in $H^1(\bbbr^n)$. And we recall the known fact that $H^1(\bbbr^n)$ is a proper subspace of $L^1(\bbbr^n)$ (cf. \cite[Theorem 2.1.2 and Corollary 2.4.8]{14modern}), then we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-24-2}
\|f\|_{L^1(\bbbr^n)}\leq\|f\|_{H^1(\bbbr^n)}.
\end{equation}
In \cite[Corollary of Theorem 3]{Stein1958}, E. M. Stein proves that the classical Littlewood-Paley $g$-function, which can be recovered from (\ref{eq1-19}) by setting $s=0,q=2$, is a bounded operator from $L^1(\bbbr^n)$ into $L^{1,\infty}(\bbbr^n)$. In \cite[Theorem 3.1]{JL2018}, H. Jiao and H. Lin prove that the classical Littlewood-Paley $g$-function defined on a non-homogeneous metric measure space is bounded from $L^1(\mu)$ into $L^{1,\infty}(\mu)$ assuming the boundedness on $L^2(\mu)$, where $\mu$ is a Borel measure satisfying the upper doubling condition. In \cite[Remark 5.1 (ii), Theorem 5.1, and Theorem 5.2]{JL2018}, the authors also prove that the classical Littlewood-Paley $g$-function defined on a non-homogeneous metric measure space is bounded from the atomic Hardy space $\tilde{H}^1(\mu)$ into $L^1(\mu)$, and is bounded from the molecular Hardy space $\tilde{H}^{p,q,\gamma,\epsilon_1}_{mb,\rho}(\mu)$ into $L^p(\mu)$ for some $p\in(0,1)$, assuming the boundedness on $L^2(\mu)$. The boundedness property of the generalized homogeneous Littlewood–Paley $g$-function from Hardy space $H^1(\mu)$ into $L^1(\mu)$ is also studied in \cite{FZ2016} by X. Fu and J. M. Zhao. Moreover, when we let $2\leq p=q<\infty$ and $f$ is a function in $L^q(\bbbr^n)$, the inequality (\ref{eq1-23}) yields
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-25}
\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_0^{\infty}t^{q-1}|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)|^q dtdx\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}|f(x)|^q dx,
\end{equation}
and this inequality has been used in the proofs of other important results in this paper. Theorem \ref{theorem3} is also used in the significant estimate (\ref{eq4.26}) in the proof of Theorem \ref{theorem4}.
\end{proof}
When $q=2$ and $s=0$, we recover from (\ref{eq1-19}) the classical Littlewood-Paley $g$-function introduced in \cite[section 1 of chapter IV]{Stein1971} by E. M. Stein, and Corollary \ref{corollary1} and its consequential estimates (\ref{eq1-23}), (\ref{eq1-24}) turn out to be partial generalizations of \cite[Theorem 1 in section 1 of chapter IV]{Stein1971}. The special case of (\ref{eq1-25}) when $p=q=2$ can be obtained by using routine calculations and Plancherel's identity, and it has been used to prove the weak type $(p,p)$ boundedness of the classical Littlewood-Paley $g_{\lambda}^*$-function under the critical condition $\lambda=\frac{2}{p}$ in \cite[Theorem 1]{fefferman1970}. To prove the more challenging case of (\ref{eq1-25}) when $p=q\neq 2$ and the more general Theorem \ref{theorem3}, where the absence of Plancherel's identity poses a major difficulty, we use the illuminating method introduced in \cite[section 2.6.4]{1992functionspaces} by H. Triebel. Indeed, H. Triebel provided a harmonic characterization of the inhomogeneous Triebel-Lizorkin space $F^s_{p,q}(\bbbr^n)$ in \cite[section 2.6.4]{1992functionspaces} with a rough condition $$k>\frac{n}{\min\{p,q\}}+\max\{s,n(\frac{1}{p}-1),0\},$$ where $k$ is the order of derivatives of the Poisson integral $\Pint(f;x,t)$.\\

We also study the weak type $(p,p)$ boundedness of the following operators. Let $0<s,q,\lambda<\infty$ and $f$ be an appropriate function, then we define the generalized Littlewood-Paley $\LPG_{\lambda,q}$-function is given by
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-26}
\LPG_{\lambda,q}(f)(x):=\big(\!\!\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{\bbbr^n}\!\!\big(\frac{t}{t+|x-y|}\big)^{\lambda n} \cdot t^{q-n-1}|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(f;y,t)|^q dydt\big)^{\frac{1}{q}},
\end{equation}
and the $\Remain_{s,q}$-function is given by
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-27}
\Remain_{s,q}(f)(x):=\big(\!\!\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+sq}}\cdot(\int_0^{2|x-y|}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;y,t)|t^s dt)^q dy\big)^{\frac{1}{q}}.
\end{equation}
As another consequence of Theorem \ref{theorem3}, the boundedness properties of the above operators are given below.
\begin{corollary}\label{corollary2}
For $2\leq q<\infty$, $1<\lambda<\infty$ and $0<s<1$, the operators $\LPG_{\lambda,q}$ and $\Remain_{s,q}$ defined in (\ref{eq1-26}) and (\ref{eq1-27}) are bounded from $L^q(\bbbr^n)$ to $L^q(\bbbr^n)$.
\end{corollary}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Corollary \ref{corollary2}]
Let $f\in L^q(\bbbr^n)$ be a function. By using the defining expression (\ref{eq1-26}) and the condition $1<\lambda<\infty$, we have
\begin{align}
&\|\LPG_{\lambda,q}(f)\|_{L^q(\bbbr^n)}^q\nonumber\\
&=\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_{\bbbr^n}
 \big(\frac{1}{1+\frac{|x-y|}{t}}\big)^{\lambda n}\cdot t^{-n}dx\cdot t^{q-1}
 |\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(f;y,t)|^q dydt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\int_{\bbbr^n}t^{q-1}|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(f;y,t)|^q dydt
 \lesssim\|f\|_{L^q(\bbbr^n)}^q,\label{eq1-28}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq1-28}) depend on $n$, $\lambda$, and some fixed parameters due to the application of estimate (\ref{eq1-25}). If we pick a positive constant $A$ satisfying $\frac{1}{q'}<A<s+\frac{1}{q'}$ for $\frac{1}{q}+\frac{1}{q'}=1$, then we can use H\"{o}lder's inequality to obtain
\begin{align}
&(\int_0^{2|x-y|}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;y,t)|t^A\cdot t^{s-A}dt)^q\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_0^{2|x-y|}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;y,t)|^q t^{qA}dt\cdot|x-y|^{q(1+s-A)-1},\label{eq1-29}
\end{align}
and the constant depends on $q,s,A$. Now we use the defining expression (\ref{eq1-27}), inequality (\ref{eq1-29}), Fubini's theorem, and estimate (\ref{eq1-25}) in a sequence to obtain
\begin{align}
&\|\Remain_{s,q}(f)\|_{L^q(\bbbr^n)}^q\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+sq}}\cdot(\int_0^{2|x-y|}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;y,t)|t^s 
 dt)^q dydx\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_{\bbbr^n}|x-y|^{q-qA-n-1}\cdot
 \int_0^{2|x-y|}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;y,t)|^q t^{qA}dtdydx\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_0^{\infty}\int_{\frac{t}{2}\leq|x-y|}|x-y|^{q-qA-n-1}dx\cdot
 |\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;y,t)|^q t^{qA}dtdy\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_0^{\infty}t^{q-1}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;y,t)|^q dtdy
 \lesssim\|f\|_{L^q(\bbbr^n)}^q,\label{eq1-30}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq1-30}) depend on $n,s,q,A$, and some other fixed parameters due to the application of estimate (\ref{eq1-25}).
\end{proof}
We now propose the weak type $(p,p)$ boundedness theorems for the generalized Littlewood-Paley $\LPG_{\lambda,q}$-function and the $\Remain_{s,q}$-function.
\begin{theorem}\label{theorem4}
For $1<p<q$, $2\leq q<\infty$, $\lambda=\frac{q}{p}>1$, and $0<n(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{q})<1$, the operator $\LPG_{\lambda,q}$ defined in (\ref{eq1-26}) is of weak type $(p,p)$ for functions in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$ and satisfies the inequality
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-31}
\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\LPG_{\lambda,q}(f)(x)>\alpha\})\lesssim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p,
\end{equation}
where the constant only depends on some fixed parameters, $\alpha$ is a positive number and $f$ is a function in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$.
\end{theorem}
We notice that when $q=2$ in (\ref{eq1-26}), the function $\LPG_{\lambda,2}(f)(x)$ is the classical Littlewood-Paley $g_{\lambda}^*$-function, which was introduced and studied in \cite{Stein1961-2,Stein1971,fefferman1970}, and Theorem \ref{theorem4} is a generalization of \cite[Theorem 1]{fefferman1970}. Comparing Theorem \ref{theorem4} with \cite[Theorem 1]{fefferman1970}, we find that the extra condition $0<n(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{q})<1$ in Theorem \ref{theorem4} is due to the requirement of Theorem \ref{theorem3}, which has been used to overcome the absence of Plancherel's identity in the case $q\neq 2$. The weak type $(1,1)$ boundedness of the classical Littlewood-Paley $g_{\lambda}^*$-function is given in \cite[Lemma 2]{Stein1961-2}. In \cite{SXY2014}, S. Shi, Q. Xue, and K. Yabuta study the multilinear generalization of the classical Littlewood-Paley $g_{\lambda}^*$-function given by
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-36}
g_{\lambda}^*(\vec{f})(x)=\big(\!\!\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{\bbbr^n}\!\!\big(\frac{t}{t+|x-z|}\big)^{\lambda n} \cdot|G_t(\vec{f})(z)|^2\frac{dzdt}{t^{n+1}}\big)^{\frac{1}{2}},
\end{equation}
where $x\in\bbbr^n$, $\vec{f}=(f_1,f_2,\cdots,f_m)\in\Sw(\bbbr^n)\times\Sw(\bbbr^n)\times\cdots\times\Sw(\bbbr^n)$, and
\begin{equation*}
G_t(\vec{f})(z)=\frac{1}{t^{mn}}\int_{(\bbbr^n)^m}K\bigg(\frac{z-y_1}{t},\cdots,\frac{z-y_m}{t}\bigg)
\prod_{i=1}^m f_i(y_i)dy_i,
\end{equation*}
and the function $K$ defined on $(\bbbr^n)^m$ is a multilinear standard kernel. These authors prove in \cite[Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.2]{SXY2014} that the multilinear Littlewood-Paley $g_{\lambda}^*$-function given in (\ref{eq1-36}) is bounded from $L^1\times\cdots\times L^1$ to $L^{\frac{1}{m},\infty}$, and also possesses the strong type weighted estimate from $L^{p_1}(\omega_1)\times\cdots\times L^{p_m}(\omega_m)$ to $L^p(\gamma_{\vec{\omega}})$ if each $p_i>1$ and the weak type weighted estimate from $L^{p_1}(\omega_1)\times\cdots\times L^{p_m}(\omega_m)$ to $L^{p,\infty}(\gamma_{\vec{\omega}})$ if at least one $p_i=1$, where $$\gamma_{\vec{\omega}}=\prod_{i=1}^m\omega_i^{\frac{p}{p_i}}$$ and each $\omega_i$ is a nonnegative weight function on $\bbbr^n$, and $p_1,\cdots,p_m\in[1,\infty)$ and $p$ satisfy the condition
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-37}
\frac{1}{p}=\frac{1}{p_1}+\cdots+\frac{1}{p_m}.
\end{equation}
In \cite[Theorem 1.3]{HX2019}, S. He and Q. Xue prove that the multilinear Littlewood-Paley $g_{\lambda}^*$-function given in (\ref{eq1-36}) is bounded from $H^{p_1}(\bbbr^n)\times\cdots\times H^{p_m}(\bbbr^n)$ to $L^p(\bbbr^n)$, where $p,p_1,\cdots,p_m$ satisfy the condition (\ref{eq1-37}) and
\begin{equation*}
\frac{nm}{nm+\gamma}<p_i\leq1\qquad\text{for $i=1,\cdots,m$},
\end{equation*}
and $\gamma$ is a positive number determined by the multilinear standard kernel $K$, and $H^{p_i}(\bbbr^n)$ $(i=1,\cdots,m)$ are Hardy spaces. The interested reader can refer to \cite{HLYY2019,MNY2010,LuTao2017,TW2014,MY2008,JYYZ2022,CLYY2017,CWYZ2020,MW1974,CX2021,HYY2016,HYY2018,CHIFRRSY,CLX2017} for more studies on the classical Littlewood-Paley $g_{\lambda}^*$-function.\\

In order to complete the proof of Theorem \ref{theorem2}, we will need the following Theorem \ref{theorem5}. From Step 6 of the proof of Theorem \ref{theorem2} given in section \ref{proof.of.theorem2}, we see that the condition $s=n(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{q})$ in Theorem \ref{theorem2} is due to the weak type $(p,p)$ boundedness of the $\Remain_{s,q}$-function.
\begin{theorem}\label{theorem5}
For $1<p<q$, $2\leq q<\infty$, and $0<s=n(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{q})<1$, the operator $\Remain_{s,q}$ defined in (\ref{eq1-27}) is of weak type $(p,p)$ for functions in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$ and satisfies the inequality
\begin{equation}\label{eq1-32}
\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\Remain_{s,q}(f)(x)>\alpha\})\lesssim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p,
\end{equation}
where the constant only depends on some fixed parameters, $\alpha$ is a positive number and $f$ is a function in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$.
\end{theorem}
Other useful notations in this paper include the following. For two nonempty sets $A$ and $B$ in $\bbbr^n$, we use $\Lebes^n(A)$ to denote the $n$-dimensional Lebesgue measure of $A$ and $\dist(A,B)=\inf_{x\in A,y\in B}|x-y|$. We use $B^n(x,r)$ to denote the ball in $\bbbr^n$ centered at $x\in\bbbr^n$ with radius $r>0$, then the unit ball in $\bbbr^n$ is given as $B^n(0,1)$ and its volume is $\nu_n=\Lebes^n(B^n(0,1))$ and also $\Lebes^n(B^n(x,r))=\nu_n r^n$. The unit sphere in $\bbbr^n$ is written as $\unitsph$ and its surface area is denoted by $\omega_{n-1}$. If a ball in $\bbbr^{n+1}$ is centered at $(x,t)\in\bbbr^{n+1}$ and has radius $r$, we denote such a ball by $B^{n+1}((x,t),r)$, then the unit ball in $\bbbr^{n+1}$ is given as $B^{n+1}((0,0),1)$ and its volume is $\nu_{n+1}=\Lebes^{n+1}(B^{n+1}((0,0),1))$ and also $\Lebes^{n+1}(B^{n+1}((x,t),r))=\nu_{n+1}r^{n+1}$. A cone in $\bbbr^{n+1}_+$, whose vertex is the point $(x,0)\in\bbbr^{n+1}$ for some $x\in\bbbr^n$ and whose aperture is the positive number $a>0$, is denoted by $\gamma_a(x):=\{(z,t)\in\bbbr^{n+1}_+:|z-x|<at\}$. If the set $I$ represents a cube in $\bbbr^n$ with sides parallel to the coordinate axes, then we denote the center of cube $I$ by $c(I)$ and the side length of cube $I$ by $l(I)$. And ``$\mvint_{}$'' denotes the mean value integral.\\

The layout of this paper is given below. In section \ref{Introduction} we introduce the basic definitions, notations and the main results. In section \ref{Preliminaries} we provide important lemmas that will be useful in the proofs of our main results. In section \ref{proof.of.theorem3}, we provide a proof for Theorem \ref{theorem3}. And proofs for Theorem \ref{theorem4} and Theorem \ref{theorem5} can be found in section \ref{proof.of.theorem4} and section \ref{proof.of.theorem5} respectively. Finally, Theorem \ref{theorem2} is proved in section \ref{proof.of.theorem2}. 





\section{Preliminaries}\label{Preliminaries}
In order to write this paper in a more self-included fashion, we also cite useful results directly from the literature and the proofs of cited results can be found from their respective source. The following lemma is the famous Whitney decomposition lemma of open sets in $\bbbr^n$.
\begin{lemma}[cf. Appendix J of \cite{14classical}]\label{lemma1}
Let $\Omega$ be an open nonempty proper subset of $\bbbr^n$. Then there exists a family of closed dyadic cubes $\{Q_j\}_j$ (called the Whitney cubes of $\Omega$) such that\\
(a) $\bigcup_j Q_j=\Omega$ and the $Q_j$'s have disjoint interiors.\\
(b) $\sqrt{n}l(Q_j)\leq\dist(Q_j,\Omega^c)\leq 4\sqrt{n}l(Q_j)$. Thus $10\sqrt{n}Q_j$ meets $\Omega^c$.\\
(c) If the boundaries of two cubes $Q_j$ and $Q_k$ touch, then $$\frac{1}{4}\leq\frac{l(Q_j)}{l(Q_k)}\leq 4.$$
(d) For a given $Q_j$, there exist at most $12^n-4^n$ cubes $Q_k$ that touch it.\\
(e) Let $0<\varepsilon<\frac{1}{4}$. If $Q_j^*$ has the same center as $Q_j$ and $l(Q_j^*)=(1+\varepsilon)l(Q_j)$ then 
$$\chi_{\Omega}=\sum_j\chi_{Q_j^*}\leq 12^n-4^n+1.$$
\end{lemma}
In the Lemma \ref{lemma2} below we show that if two Whitney cubes produced by Lemma \ref{lemma1} are sufficiently far away from each other, then the distance between one arbitrary point in one cube and another arbitrary point in the other cube is comparable to the distance between the two centers of these cubes.
\begin{lemma}\label{lemma2}
Let $\Omega$ be an open nonempty proper subset of $\bbbr^n$ and the collection $\{Q_j\}_j$ of Whitney cubes of $\Omega$ satisfies the conclusions of Lemma \ref{lemma1}. Then for two cubes $Q_j$ and $Q_m$ in this collection we further have the following properties.\\
(1) If $|c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|>11(\sqrt{n}+1)l(Q_m)$, and if $y\in Q_m$, $z\in Q_j$ are arbitrary points in the respective cube, then we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq.lemma2-1}
|y-c(Q_j)|\geq\frac{\sqrt{n}+1}{2}l(Q_j),
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{eq.lemma2-2}
C_1|y-c(Q_j)|\leq|y-z|\leq C_2|y-c(Q_j)|,
\end{equation}
where $C_1=1-\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\sqrt{n}+1}$, $C_2=1+\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\sqrt{n}+1}$ and $0<C_1<1<C_2$. Furthermore, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq.lemma2-3}
C_3|c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|\leq|y-z|\leq C_4|c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|,
\end{equation}
where $C_3=(1-\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\sqrt{n}+1})(1-\frac{\sqrt{n}}{22(\sqrt{n}+1)})$, $C_4=(1+\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\sqrt{n}+1})(1+\frac{\sqrt{n}}{22(\sqrt{n}+1)})$, and $0<C_3<1<C_4$.\\
(2) If $|c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|\leq 11(\sqrt{n}+1)l(Q_m)$, then the cube $Q_j$ is contained in the $n$-dimensional ball that has the same center with $Q_m$ and has radius $11(\sqrt{n}+1)^2 l(Q_m)$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma \ref{lemma2}]
\begin{figure}[!htbp]
\begin{tikzpicture}
\begin{scope}[xshift=7.5cm,yshift=1cm]
\node[below] at (0,0) {$c(Q_m)$};
\fill (0,0) circle[radius=0.05];
\draw[line width=1] (1.25,1.25) -- node[right] {$l(Q_m)$} (1.25,-1.25);
\draw[line width=1] (1.25,-1.25) -- (-1.25,-1.25);
\draw[line width=1] (-1.25,-1.25) -- (-1.25,1.25);
\draw[line width=1] (-1.25,1.25) -- (1.25,1.25);
\node[left] at (0.8,0.6) {$y$};
\fill (0.8,0.6) circle[radius=0.05];
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\node[below] at (0,0) {$c(Q_j)$};
\fill (0,0) circle[radius=0.05];
\draw[line width=1] (-0.75,0.75) -- node[above] {$l(Q_j)$} (0.75,0.75);
\draw[line width=1] (0.75,0.75) -- (0.75,-0.75);
\draw[line width=1] (0.75,-0.75) -- (-0.75,-0.75);
\draw[line width=1] (-0.75,-0.75) -- (-0.75,0.75);
\node[left] at (-0.25,0.45) {$z$};
\fill (-0.25,0.45) circle[radius=0.05];
\end{scope}
\end{tikzpicture}
\caption{Lemma \ref{lemma2} (1). Point $y$ is an arbitrary point in the cube $Q_m$, and point $z$ is an arbitrary point in the cube $Q_j$.} 
\label{figure1}
\end{figure}
First we prove Lemma \ref{lemma2} (1). If $|c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|>11(\sqrt{n}+1)l(Q_m)$ and $l(Q_j)<20l(Q_m)$, then for $y\in Q_m$ we have
	\begin{align}
		|y-c(Q_j)|
		&\geq |c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|-|c(Q_m)-y|\nonumber\\
		&>11(\sqrt{n}+1)l(Q_m)-\frac{\sqrt{n}}{2}l(Q_m)\nonumber\\
		&>(\frac{21}{2}\sqrt{n}+11)\cdot\frac{l(Q_j)}{20}>\frac{\sqrt{n}+1}{2}\cdot l(Q_j).\label{eq17}
	\end{align}
	If $|c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|>11(\sqrt{n}+1)l(Q_m)$ and $l(Q_j)\geq 20l(Q_m)$, then we pick $w\in\Omega^c$ and $y'\in Q_m$ such that
	\begin{equation}\label{eq18}
	\dist(Q_m,\Omega^c)\leq|w-y'|<\frac{3}{2}\dist(Q_m,\Omega^c)\leq 6\sqrt{n}l(Q_m),
	\end{equation}
	by Lemma \ref{lemma1} (b) and the definition of $\dist(Q_m,\Omega^c)$. Since both $y$ and $y'$ belong to $Q_m$, we have
	\begin{equation}\label{eq19}
		|w-y|\leq|w-y'|+|y'-y|<7\sqrt{n}l(Q_m).
	\end{equation}
	Because the ball centered at $c(Q_j)$ and inscribed in the cube $Q_j$ has radius $\frac{1}{2}l(Q_j)$, we can obtain
	\begin{align}
		|y-c(Q_j)|
		&\geq|w-c(Q_j)|-|w-y|\nonumber\\
		&>\dist(Q_j,\Omega^c)+\frac{1}{2}l(Q_j)-7\sqrt{n}l(Q_m)\nonumber\\
		&\geq(\sqrt{n}+\frac{1}{2})l(Q_j)-\frac{7\sqrt{n}}{20}l(Q_j)>\frac{\sqrt{n}+1}{2}\cdot l(Q_j).\label{eq20}
	\end{align}
	Therefore (\ref{eq.lemma2-1}) is proved. If $z\in Q_j$, then we use (\ref{eq.lemma2-1}) to obtain
	\begin{align}
		|y-z|&\leq|y-c(Q_j)|+|c(Q_j)-z|\nonumber\\
		&\leq|y-c(Q_j)|+\frac{\sqrt{n}}{2}l(Q_j)\nonumber\\
		&\leq(1+\frac{\sqrt{n}}{1+\sqrt{n}})|y-c(Q_j)|,\nonumber
	\end{align}
	and
	\begin{align}
		|y-z|&\geq|y-c(Q_j)|-|c(Q_j)-z|\nonumber\\
		&\geq|y-c(Q_j)|-\frac{\sqrt{n}}{2}l(Q_j)\nonumber\\
		&\geq(1-\frac{\sqrt{n}}{1+\sqrt{n}})|y-c(Q_j)|.\nonumber
	\end{align}
	Thus (\ref{eq.lemma2-2}) is proved. When $|c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|>11(\sqrt{n}+1)l(Q_m)$ and $y\in Q_m$, we have
	\begin{align}
		|y-c(Q_j)|&\leq|y-c(Q_m)|+|c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|\nonumber\\
		&\leq\frac{\sqrt{n}}{2}l(Q_m)+|c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|\nonumber\\
		&<(1+\frac{\sqrt{n}}{22(\sqrt{n}+1)})|c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|,\label{eq21}
	\end{align}
	and
	\begin{align}
		|y-c(Q_j)|&\geq|c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|-|y-c(Q_m)|\nonumber\\
		&\geq|c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|-\frac{\sqrt{n}}{2}l(Q_m)\nonumber\\
		&>(1-\frac{\sqrt{n}}{22(\sqrt{n}+1)})|c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|.\label{eq22}
	\end{align}
Applying (\ref{eq21}) to the right side of (\ref{eq.lemma2-2}) and applying (\ref{eq22}) to the left side of (\ref{eq.lemma2-2}) yields the desired inequality (\ref{eq.lemma2-3}).\\

\begin{figure}[!htbp]
\begin{tikzpicture}
\begin{scope}[xshift=4.25cm,yshift=-1.8cm]
\node[right] at (0,0) {$c(Q_m)$};
\fill (0,0) circle[radius=0.05];
\draw[line width=1] (2,2) -- node[right] {$l(Q_m)$} (2,-2);
\draw[line width=1] (2,-2) -- (-2,-2);
\draw[line width=1] (-2,-2) -- (-2,2);
\draw[line width=1] (-2,2) -- (2,2);
\draw[dotted] (0,0) -- (0,2);
\draw[domain=0:360,smooth,variable=\t] plot ({2*cos(\t)},{2*sin(\t)});
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\node[below] at (0,0) {$c(Q_j)$};
\fill (0,0) circle[radius=0.05];
\draw[line width=1] (-1,-1) -- node[left] {$l(Q_j)$} (-1,1);
\draw[line width=1] (-1,1) -- (1,1);
\draw[line width=1] (1,1) -- (1,-1);
\draw[line width=1] (1,-1) -- (-1,-1);
\draw[dotted] (0,0) -- (0,1);
\draw[domain=0:360,smooth,variable=\t] plot ({1*cos(\t)},{1*sin(\t)});
\end{scope}
\draw[dotted] (0,0) -- (4.25,-1.8);
\end{tikzpicture}
\caption{Lemma \ref{lemma2} (2). If cubes $Q_j$ and $Q_m$ have disjoint interiors, then the two $n$-dimensional balls inscribed in $Q_j$ and $Q_m$ are disjoint balls, and thus the sum of radii of these two balls is less than or equal to the distance between the centers of these two balls.}
\label{figure2}
\end{figure}
Now we prove Lemma \ref{lemma2} (2). If $|c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|\leq 11(\sqrt{n}+1)l(Q_m)$, then the conclusion is trivial if $Q_m=Q_j$. If $Q_m\neq Q_j$, then they must have disjoint interiors and hence the two $n$-dimensional balls inscribed in $Q_m$ and $Q_j$, i.e. the balls $B^n(c(Q_m),\frac{1}{2}l(Q_m))$ and $B^n(c(Q_j),\frac{1}{2}l(Q_j))$, must be disjoint balls and we have
	\begin{equation}
		\frac{1}{2}l(Q_m)+\frac{1}{2}l(Q_j)\leq|c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|\leq 11(\sqrt{n}+1)l(Q_m),
	\end{equation}
	and thus
	\begin{equation}\label{eq23}
		l(Q_j)<22(\sqrt{n}+1)l(Q_m).
	\end{equation}
	For $z\in Q_j$ we can obtain the following inequality
	\begin{align*}
		|z-c(Q_m)|&\leq|z-c(Q_j)|+|c(Q_j)-c(Q_m)|\\
		&\leq\frac{\sqrt{n}}{2}l(Q_j)+11(\sqrt{n}+1)l(Q_m)\\
		&<11(\sqrt{n}+1)^2 l(Q_m),
	\end{align*}
	therefore the cube $Q_j$ is contained in the ball $B^n(c(Q_m),11(\sqrt{n}+1)^2 l(Q_m))$.
\end{proof}
According to the above Lemma \ref{lemma2}, for two Whitney cubes $Q_j$ and $Q_m$ of the set $\Omega$ we define the following relations:
\begin{align}
\text{``$Q_j$ near $Q_m$''}&\text{ means }
	|c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|\leq 11(\sqrt{n}+1)l(Q_m),\label{near}\\
\text{``$Q_j$ far from $Q_m$''}&\text{ means }
	|c(Q_m)-c(Q_j)|>11(\sqrt{n}+1)l(Q_m),\label{far}
\end{align}
where $c(Q_j)$ and $c(Q_m)$ represent the centers of cubes $Q_j$ and $Q_m$ respectively and $l(Q_m)$ is the side length of cube $Q_m$. Lemma \ref{lemma3} below is cited from \cite{fefferman1970} and it has been used frequently through out the proofs of our main results so we also include a detailed proof for this lemma. For a locally integrable function $f$, we denote the uncentered Hardy-Littlewood maximal function by
\begin{equation*}
M(f)(x)=\sup_{x\in I}\mvint_I|f(y)|dy,
\end{equation*}
where the supremum is taken over all the cubes containing $x$ in $\bbbr^n$ with sides parallel to the coordinate axes.
\begin{lemma}[cf. \cite{fefferman1970}]\label{lemma3}
For $0<p<\infty$, let $f\in L^p(\bbbr^n)$ be a function and $\alpha$ is a real number satisfying $0<\alpha<\esssup_{x\in\bbbr^n}|f(x)|$. Then the set $\Omega:=\{x\in\bbbr^n:M(|f|^p)(x)>\alpha^p\}$ is an open nonempty proper subset of $\bbbr^n$, and there exist a collection of cubes $\{I_j\}_j$ and two functions, the ``good'' function $g$ and the ``bad'' function $b$, satisfying the following conditions.\\
(i) The $I_j$'s are pairwise disjoint, $\Omega=\bigcup_j I_j$ and $$\sum_j\Lebes^n(I_j)\leq C_5\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p.$$
(ii) For almost every $x\notin\Omega$, $|f(x)|\leq\alpha$.\\
(iii) For any one of the cubes $\{I_j\}_j$, $\mvint_{I_j}|f(y)|^p dy\leq C_6\alpha^p$.\\
(iv) For any cube $I_j$ of the collection, if $\tilde{I_j}$ denotes the cube concentric with $I_j$ but with twice the side length of $I_j$. Then every point of $\bbbr^n$ lies in at most $[\nu_n(40n)^n]+1$ cubes of the collection $\{\tilde{I_j}\}_j$.\\
(v) $f=g+b$ and $b$ is supported in $\Omega$.\\
(vi) If $1\leq p<\infty$, then $\mvint_{I_j}|b(y)|^p dy\leq C_7\alpha^p$ and hence $\int_{I_j}|b(y)|dy\leq C_8\alpha\Lebes^n(I_j)$ for each cube $I_j$.\\
(vii) $\int_{I_j}b(y)dy=0$ for each cube $I_j$.\\
(viii) If $1\leq p<\infty$, then for almost every $x\in\bbbr^n$, $|g(x)|\leq C_9\alpha$ and $\|g\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\leq\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}$.\\
The dependence of the above constants on parameters is given as follows: $C_5=C_5(n)$, $C_6=C_6(n)$, $C_7=C_7(n,p)$, $C_8=C_8(n,p)$ and $C_9=C_9(n,p)$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma \ref{lemma3}]
	First we prove $\Omega=\{x\in\bbbr^n:M(|f|^p)(x)>\alpha^p\}$ is an open nonempty proper subset of $\bbbr^n$. If for all $x\in\bbbr^n$, $M(|f|^p)(x)\leq\alpha^p$, then by Lebesgue differentiation theorem, we have $|f(x)|^p=\lim_{x\in I,l(I)\rightarrow 0}\mvint_I|f(y)|^p dy\leq\alpha^p$ for almost every $x\in\bbbr^n$. Thus $\esssup_{x\in\bbbr^n}|f(x)|\leq\alpha<\esssup_{x\in\bbbr^n}|f(x)|$ and this is a contradiction, and hence $\Omega$ is nonempty. If $x\in\Omega$ and the uncentered Hardy-Littlewood maximal function satisfies $M(|f|^p)(x)>\alpha^p$, then there exists a cube $I_x\ni x$ such that $\mvint_{I_x}|f(y)|^p dy>\alpha^p$. And for every $z\in I_x$, we have $M(|f|^p)(z)\geq\mvint_{I_x}|f(y)|^p dy>\alpha^p$ and thus the cube $I_x$ is included in $\Omega$ and this shows the set $\Omega$ is an open set. If $\Omega$ is all of $\bbbr^n$ and $\Lebes^n(\Omega)=\infty$, because the uncentered Hardy-Littlewood maximal function $M$ is a bounded operator from $L^1(\bbbr^n)$ into $L^{1,\infty}(\bbbr^n)$, then by \cite[Theorem 2.1.6]{14classical} we have
	\begin{equation}\label{eq24}
		\alpha^p\Lebes^n(\Omega)\leq C_5\| |f|^p \|_{L^1(\bbbr^n)}=C_5\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p<\infty,
	\end{equation}
	where $C_5=C_5(n)$. This is a contradiction, therefore $\Omega$ must be a proper subset of $\bbbr^n$. Now because $\Omega$ satisfies all the conditions of Lemma \ref{lemma1}, we apply Lemma \ref{lemma1} to $\Omega$ and obtain a collection of pairwise disjoint cubes $\{I_j\}_j$ and $\Omega=\bigcup_j I_j$. By (\ref{eq24}), we have
	\begin{equation}\label{eq25}
		\sum_j\Lebes^n(I_j)=\Lebes^n(\Omega)\leq C_5\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p,
	\end{equation}
	and Lemma \ref{lemma3} (i) is proved. To prove Lemma \ref{lemma3} (ii), since $|f|^p\in L^1(\bbbr^n)$ and almost every point in $\bbbr^n$ is a Lebesgue point of $|f|^p$, thus if $x\notin\Omega$ is such a point then $|f(x)|^p=\lim_{x\in I,l(I)\rightarrow 0} \mvint_I|f(y)|^p dy\leq M(|f|^p)(x)\leq\alpha^p$. To prove Lemma \ref{lemma3} (iii), let $I_j$ be a cube in the collection, by Lemma \ref{lemma1} we have
	\begin{equation}\label{eq26}
		\sqrt{n}l(I_j)\leq\dist(I_j,\Omega^c)\leq 4\sqrt{n}l(I_j),
	\end{equation}
	thus if $\bar{I_j}$ is the cube concentric with $I_j$ but with the side length $l(\bar{I_j})=10\sqrt{n}l(I_j)$ then the set $\bar{I_j}\bigcap\Omega^c$ is nonempty. Otherwise $\bar{I_j}$ is contained in $\Omega$ and hence
	\begin{equation}\label{eq27}
		\dist(I_j,\Omega^c)\geq\dist(I_j,\bar{I_j}^c)\geq \frac{1}{2}l(\bar{I_j})-\frac{1}{2}l(I_j)>4\sqrt{n}l(I_j),
	\end{equation}
	and (\ref{eq27}) poses a contradiction to (\ref{eq26}). And if $w$ is a point in the set $\bar{I_j}\bigcap\Omega^c$, then we have
	\begin{equation}\label{eq28}
		\frac{\int_{I_j}|f(y)|^p dy}{(10\sqrt{n})^n\Lebes^n(I_j)}\leq
		\mvint_{\bar{I_j}}|f(y)|^p dy\leq M(|f|^p)(w)\leq\alpha^p.
	\end{equation}
	This inequality proves Lemma \ref{lemma3} (iii) with $C_6=(10\sqrt{n})^n$. To prove Lemma \ref{lemma3} (iv), let $x\in\bbbr^n$ and $x\in\tilde{I_j}$ for some $j$, then $|x-c(I_j)|\leq\sqrt{n}l(I_j)$. This tells $x$ must belong to $\Omega$, otherwise $$\sqrt{n}l(I_j)\leq \dist(I_j,\Omega^c)<|c(I_j)-x|\leq\sqrt{n}l(I_j),$$ and we obtain a contradiction. Therefore $x\in\Omega$ and $\dist(\{x\},\Omega^c)>0$. Let $y\in\Omega^c$, $z\in I_j$ satisfy
	\begin{equation}\label{eq29}
		\sqrt{n}l(I_j)\leq\dist(I_j,\Omega^c)\leq|y-z|<\frac{3}{2}\dist(I_j,\Omega^c)\leq 6\sqrt{n}l(I_j).
	\end{equation}
	Then $|y-c(I_j)|\leq|y-z|+|z-c(I_j)|<6\sqrt{n}l(I_j)+\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{n}l(I_j)$, and we have
	\begin{equation}\label{eq30}
		\dist(\{x\},\Omega^c)\leq|x-y|\leq|x-c(I_j)|+|y-c(I_j)|<8\sqrt{n}l(I_j).
	\end{equation}
	Furthermore if $w\in\Omega^c$ satisfies
	\begin{equation}\label{eq31}
		\dist(\{x\},\Omega^c)\leq|w-x|<\frac{3}{2}\dist(\{x\},\Omega^c),
	\end{equation}
	then because the ball centered at $c(I_j)$ with radius $\frac{1}{2}l(I_j)$ is inscribed in the cube $I_j$, we have
	\begin{align}
	|w-x|&\geq|w-c(I_j)|-|x-c(I_j)|\nonumber\\
		 &\geq\dist(I_j,\Omega^c)+\frac{1}{2}l(I_j)-\sqrt{n}l(I_j)\geq\frac{1}{2}l(I_j).\label{eq32}
	\end{align}
	Inequalities (\ref{eq30}), (\ref{eq31}), (\ref{eq32}) tell us that the condition $x\in\tilde{I_j}$ implies
	\begin{equation}\label{eq33}
		\frac{\dist(\{x\},\Omega^c)}{8\sqrt{n}}\leq l(I_j)\leq 3\cdot\dist(\{x\},\Omega^c).
	\end{equation}
	Hence the cube $I_j$ is contained in a ball centered at $x$ with radius $5\sqrt{n}\cdot \dist(\{x\},\Omega^c)$ and the side length $l(I_j)$ is at least $\frac{\dist(\{x\},\Omega^c)}{8\sqrt{n}}$. There can be at most $[\nu_n(40n)^n]+1$ such cubes that satisfy this condition, and Lemma \ref{lemma3} (iv) is proved. Now we define
	\begin{align}
		g(x)=
		\begin{cases}
			\mvint_{I_j}f(y)dy &\text{ if }x\in I_j\\
			f(x)               &\text{ if }x\notin\Omega
		\end{cases}
		&\quad\text{ and }
		b(x)=f(x)-g(x),\label{eq34}
	\end{align}
	then $b(x)$ is supported in $\Omega$ and Lemma \ref{lemma3} (vii) is obvious by definition. To prove Lemma \ref{lemma3} (vi), we use Lemma \ref{lemma3} (iii) and Jensen's inequality for $1\leq p<\infty$ to obtain
	\begin{align}
		\mvint_{I_j}|b(y)|^p dy
		&\leq \mvint_{I_j}2^{p-1}(|f(y)|^p+|g(y)|^p)dy\nonumber\\
		&\leq 2^{p-1}(C_6\alpha^p+(\mvint_{I_j}|f(y)|dy)^p)\nonumber\\
		&\leq 2^{p-1}(C_6\alpha^p+\mvint_{I_j}|f(y)|^p dy)\leq C_7\alpha^p,\nonumber
	\end{align}
	where $C_7=2^p C_6=2^p(10\sqrt{n})^n$. And the estimate for $\int_{I_j}|b(y)|dy$ is obtained by H\"{o}lder's inequality. To prove Lemma \ref{lemma3} (viii), when $x\notin\Omega$, we have $|g(x)|=|f(x)|\leq\alpha$ by (\ref{eq34}) and Lemma \ref{lemma3} (ii). When $x\in I_j$ for some $j$, we use (\ref{eq34}), Jensen's inequality for $1\leq p<\infty$ and Lemma \ref{lemma3} (iii) to obtain
	\begin{equation}\label{eq35}
		|g(x)|\leq\mvint_{I_j}|f(y)|dy\leq(\mvint_{I_j}|f(y)|^p dy)^{\frac{1}{p}}\leq C_9\alpha,
	\end{equation}
	where $C_9=(10\sqrt{n})^{\frac{n}{p}}$. Furthermore we have
	\begin{align}
		\|g\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p
		&=\int_{\Omega^c}|f(x)|^p dx+\sum_j\int_{I_j}|g(x)|^p dx\nonumber\\
		&=\int_{\Omega^c}|f(x)|^p dx+\sum_j\Lebes^n(I_j)(\mvint_{I_j}|f(y)|dy)^p\nonumber\\
		&\leq\int_{\Omega^c}|f(x)|^p dx+\sum_j\Lebes^n(I_j)\mvint_{I_j}|f(y)|^p dy\nonumber\\
		&=\int_{\Omega^c}|f(x)|^p dx+\int_{\bigcup_j I_j}|f(y)|^p dy=\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p.\nonumber
	\end{align}
	The proof of Lemma \ref{lemma3} is now complete.
\end{proof}
The next Lemma \ref{lemma4} shows that derivatives of the Poisson kernel $P_t(x)$ satisfy the H\"{o}rmander type condition.
\begin{lemma}\label{lemma4}
	Let $\beta\in\bbbr$ and $\beta>1$. Then for $1\leq k\leq n$, the following quantities can be estimated from above by a positive finite constant whose value only depends on $n$ and $\beta$, 
	\begin{align}
		&\sup_{x\in\bbbr^n}\int_0^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\bigg|\frac{t(y_k-x_k)}{(t^2+|y-x|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}-
		\frac{ty_k}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\bigg|dydt,\label{eq.lemma4-1}\\
		&\sup_{x\in\bbbr^n}\int_0^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\bigg|\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-x|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}-
		\frac{1}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\bigg|dydt,\label{eq.lemma4-2}\\
		&\sup_{x\in\bbbr^n}\int_0^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\bigg|\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-x|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}-
		\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\bigg|dydt,\label{eq.lemma4-3}
	\end{align}
	where $x_k$ and $y_k$ are the $k$-th coordinates of $x,y\in\bbbr^n$ respectively.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma \ref{lemma4}]
	When $|y|>\beta|x|$, $\beta>1$ and $0\leq r\leq 1$, we have
	\begin{align}
		|y-rx|&\geq|y|-r|x|\geq|y|-|x|>(1-\frac{1}{\beta})|y|,\nonumber\\
		|y-rx|&\leq|y|+r|x|\leq|y|+|x|<(1+\frac{1}{\beta})|y|,\nonumber
	\end{align}
	hence we obtain
	\begin{equation}\label{eq46}
		(1-\frac{1}{\beta})|y|<|y-rx|<(1+\frac{1}{\beta})|y|.
	\end{equation}
	If we let $h_1(r)=(t^2+|y-rx|^2)^{-\frac{n+3}{2}}$ and $h_2(r)=(t^2+|y-rx|^2)^{-\frac{n+1}{2}}$ and let $h_1'(r)$ and $h_2'(r)$ denote their respective derivatives, then by the fundamental theorem of calculus, we have the following estimates,
	\begin{align}
		&\bigg|\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-x|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}-\frac{1}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\bigg|\nonumber\\
		&\leq\int_0^1|h_1'(r)|dr\leq\int_0^1\frac{(n+3)|y-rx|\cdot|x|}{(t^2+|y-rx|^2)^{\frac{n+5}{2}}}dr
		 \nonumber\\
		&\leq\frac{C_{10}|y|\cdot|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+5}{2}}},\label{eq47}
	\end{align}
	and
	\begin{align}
		&\bigg|\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-x|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}-\frac{1}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\bigg|\nonumber\\
		&\leq\int_0^1|h_2'(r)|dr\leq\int_0^1\frac{(n+1)|y-rx|\cdot|x|}{(t^2+|y-rx|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dr
		 \nonumber\\
		&\leq\frac{C_{11}|y|\cdot|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}},\label{eq48}
	\end{align}
	where $C_{10}=C_{10}(n,\beta)$ and $C_{11}=C_{11}(n,\beta)$. To prove (\ref{eq.lemma4-1}) for $1\leq k\leq n$, we use (\ref{eq46}) and (\ref{eq47}) and calculate as follows,
	\begin{align}
		&\int_0^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\bigg|\frac{t(y_k-x_k)}{(t^2+|y-x|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}-
		\frac{ty_k}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\bigg|dydt\nonumber\\
		&\leq\int_0^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\bigg|\frac{t(y_k-x_k)}{(t^2+|y-x|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}-
		\frac{ty_k}{(t^2+|y-x|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\bigg|\nonumber\\
		&\quad+\bigg|\frac{ty_k}{(t^2+|y-x|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}-\frac{ty_k}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\bigg|dydt\nonumber\\
		&\leq C_{12}\int_0^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{t|x|}{(t^2+|y-x|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}+
		\frac{t|y|^2\cdot|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+5}{2}}}dydt\nonumber\\
		&\leq C_{13}\int_0^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{t|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dydt,
		\label{eq49}
	\end{align}
	where $C_{12}=C_{12}(n,\beta)$ and $C_{13}=C_{13}(n,\beta)$. We write the double integral in the last line of (\ref{eq49}) as below
	\begin{equation}\label{eq50}
		\int_0^{|x|}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{t|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dydt+
		\int_{|x|}^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{t|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dydt.
	\end{equation}
	For the first term in (\ref{eq50}), we apply the inequality $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}\geq|y|^{n+3}$ and obtain
	\begin{align}
		&\int_0^{|x|}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{t|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dydt\nonumber\\
		&\leq\int_0^{|x|}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{t|x|}{|y|^{n+3}}dydt\nonumber\\
		&=C_{14}|x|^2\cdot|x|\cdot|x|^{-3}\lesssim 1,\label{eq51}
	\end{align}
	where $C_{14}=C_{14}(n,\beta)$. For the second term in (\ref{eq50}), we consider $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}$ is the $(n+3)$-fold product of the term $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}$ and in this product, we apply the inequality $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}\geq t$ twice, apply the inequality $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}\geq(2t|y|)^{\frac{1}{2}}$ once and apply the inequality $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}\geq|y|$ for $n$ times and obtain
	\begin{align}
		&\int_{|x|}^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{t|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dydt\nonumber\\
		&\leq\int_{|x|}^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{t|x|}{t^2\cdot(2t|y|)^{\frac{1}{2}}\cdot|y|^n}dydt
		\nonumber\\
		&=C_{15}|x|\cdot|x|^{-\frac{1}{2}}\cdot|x|^{-\frac{1}{2}}\lesssim 1,\label{eq52}
	\end{align}
	where $C_{15}=C_{15}(n,\beta)$. Combining (\ref{eq49}), (\ref{eq50}), (\ref{eq51}) and (\ref{eq52}) yields (\ref{eq.lemma4-1}) can be estimated from above by a positive finite constant whose value only depends on $n$ and $\beta$. To prove (\ref{eq.lemma4-2}), we use (\ref{eq48}) and estimate as below
	\begin{align}
		&\int_0^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\bigg|\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-x|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}-
		\frac{1}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\bigg|dydt\nonumber\\
		&\leq C_{11}\int_0^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{|y|\cdot|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dydt
		\nonumber\\
		&=C_{11}\int_0^{|x|}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{|y|\cdot|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dydt\nonumber\\
		&\quad+C_{11}\int_{|x|}^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{|y|\cdot|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dydt.\label{eq53}
	\end{align}
	For the first term of (\ref{eq53}), we use the inequality $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}\geq|y|^{n+3}$ and obtain
	\begin{align}
		&\int_0^{|x|}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{|y|\cdot|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dydt\nonumber\\
		&\leq\int_0^{|x|}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{|x|}{|y|^{n+2}}dydt\nonumber\\
		&=C_{16}|x|\cdot|x|\cdot|x|^{-2}\lesssim 1,\label{eq54}
	\end{align}
	where $C_{16}=C_{16}(n,\beta)$. For the second term of (\ref{eq53}), we consider $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}$ is the $(n+3)$-fold product of the term $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}$ and in this product, we apply the inequality $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}\geq t$ once, apply the inequality $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}\geq(2t|y|)^{\frac{1}{2}}$ once and apply the inequality $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}\geq|y|$ for $(n+1)$ times and obtain
	\begin{align}
		&\int_{|x|}^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{|y|\cdot|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dydt\nonumber\\
		&\leq\int_{|x|}^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{|y|\cdot|x|}{t\cdot(2t|y|)^{\frac{1}{2}}\cdot|y|^{n+1}}dydt\nonumber\\
		&=C_{17}|x|\cdot|x|^{-\frac{1}{2}}\cdot|x|^{-\frac{1}{2}}\lesssim 1,\label{eq55}
	\end{align}
	where $C_{17}=C_{17}(n,\beta)$. Combining (\ref{eq53}), (\ref{eq54}) and (\ref{eq55}) yields (\ref{eq.lemma4-2}) can be estimated from above by a positive finite constant whose value only depends on $n$ and $\beta$. To prove (\ref{eq.lemma4-3}), we use (\ref{eq47}) and estimate as below
	\begin{align}
		&\int_0^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\bigg|\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-x|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}-
		\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\bigg|dydt\nonumber\\
		&\leq C_{10}\int_0^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{t^2|y|\cdot|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+5}{2}}}dydt
		\nonumber\\
		&=C_{10}\int_0^{|x|}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{t^2|y|\cdot|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+5}{2}}}dydt
		\nonumber\\
		&\quad+C_{10}\int_{|x|}^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{t^2|y|\cdot|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+5}{2}}}dydt.\label{eq56}
	\end{align}
	To estimate the first term of (\ref{eq56}), we apply the inequality $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+5}{2}}\geq|y|^{n+5}$ and obtain
	\begin{align}
		&\int_0^{|x|}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{t^2|y|\cdot|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+5}{2}}}dydt\nonumber\\
		&\leq\int_0^{|x|}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{t^2|x|}{|y|^{n+4}}dydt\nonumber\\
		&=C_{18}|x|\cdot|x|^3\cdot|x|^{-4}\lesssim 1,\label{eq57}
	\end{align}
	where $C_{18}=C_{18}(n,\beta)$. For the second term of (\ref{eq56}), we consider $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+5}{2}}$ is the $(n+5)$-fold product of the term $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}$ and in this product, we apply the inequality $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}\geq t$ for three times, apply the inequality $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}\geq(2t|y|)^{\frac{1}{2}}$ once and apply the inequality $(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}\geq|y|$ for $(n+1)$ times and obtain
	\begin{align}
		&\int_{|x|}^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{t^2|y|\cdot|x|}{(t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+5}{2}}}dydt
		\nonumber\\
		&\leq\int_{|x|}^{\infty}\int_{|y|>\beta|x|}\frac{t^2|y|\cdot|x|}{t^3\cdot(2t|y|)^{\frac{1}{2}}\cdot|y|^{n+1}}dydt\nonumber\\
		&=C_{19}|x|\cdot|x|^{-\frac{1}{2}}\cdot|x|^{-\frac{1}{2}}\lesssim 1,\label{eq58}
	\end{align}
	where $C_{19}=C_{19}(n,\beta)$. Combining (\ref{eq56}), (\ref{eq57}) and (\ref{eq58}) yields (\ref{eq.lemma4-3}) can be estimated from above by a positive finite constant whose value only depends on $n$ and $\beta$.
\end{proof}
In the following Lemma \ref{lemma5}, we cite the famous Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality from \cite[chapter VIII, 4.2]{SteinHarmonic}.
\begin{lemma}\label{lemma5}
	For $0<\gamma<n$, $1<p<q<\infty$, and $\frac{1}{q}=\frac{1}{p}-\frac{n-\gamma}{n}$, we have
	\begin{equation*}
		\|f*(|y|^{-\gamma})\|_{L^q(\bbbr^n)}\leq C_{20}\cdot\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)},
	\end{equation*}
	where $C_{20}=C_{20}(p,q)$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{lemma}\label{lemma6}
Let $f\in L^p(\bbbr^n)$ for $1\leq p<\infty$, and assume $0<\alpha<\esssup_{x\in\bbbr^n}|f(x)|$ and $\Omega=\{x\in\bbbr^n:M(|f|^p)(x)>\alpha^p\}$ are given by Lemma \ref{lemma3}. And let $\{I_j\}_j$ be the associated Whitney cubes and $f=g+b$ as in Lemma \ref{lemma3}. Let $\chi_{I_j}$ denote the characteristic function of the cube $I_j$ and $b_j=b\cdot\chi_{I_j}$. Then the following estimates are true.\\
(1) For $1\leq k\leq n+1$ and $y\in\Omega^c$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-1}
\big|\partial_k\Pint(\sum_j b_j;y,t)\big|\lesssim\frac{\alpha}{t},
\end{equation}
where the constant depends on $n,p$.\\
(2) For $1\leq k\leq n+1$, $I_m$ is a Whitney cube and $y\in I_m$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-2}
\big|\partial_k\Pint(\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}} b_j;y,t)\big|\lesssim\frac{\alpha}{t},
\end{equation}
where the constant depends on $n,p$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma \ref{lemma6}](1) If $1\leq k\leq n$, $y\in\Omega^c$ and $z\in I_j$, by Lemma \ref{lemma1} (b) and the fact that the $n$-dimensional ball centered at $c(I_j)$ and inscribed in the Whitney cube $I_j$ has radius $\frac{1}{2}l(I_j)$, we can obtain
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-3}
|y-c(I_j)|\geq\dist(I_j,\Omega^c)+\frac{1}{2}l(I_j)>\frac{\sqrt{n}+1}{2}\cdot l(I_j),
\end{equation}
and thus
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-4}
(1-\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\sqrt{n}+1})\cdot|y-c(I_j)|\leq|y-z|
\leq(1+\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\sqrt{n}+1})\cdot|y-c(I_j)|.
\end{equation}
Furthermore we also have
\begin{align}
&\sum_j\Lebes^n(I_j)\cdot\frac{t|y-c(I_j)|}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\nonumber\\
&=\sum_j\int_{I_j}\frac{t|y-c(I_j)|}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dz\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_j\int_{I_j}\frac{t|y-z|}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dz\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{t|y-z|}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dz\lesssim t^{-1},\label{eq2-5}
\end{align}
where we use the fact that $\{I_j\}_j$ have disjoint interiors and $\bigcup_j I_j=\Omega\subseteq\bbbr^n$, and the fact that the integral $$\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{|z|}{(1+|z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dz$$ converges to a positive finite constant whose value only depends on the dimension $n$. Applying (\ref{eq1-5}), (\ref{eq2-4}), (\ref{eq2-5}), and Lemma \ref{lemma3} (vi) yields
\begin{align}
&\big|\partial_k\Pint(\sum_j b_j;y,t)\big|\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_j\int_{I_j}|b(z)|\cdot\frac{t|y-z|}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dz\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_j\int_{I_j}|b(z)|dz\cdot\frac{t|y-c(I_j)|}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_j\alpha\Lebes^n(I_j)\cdot\frac{t|y-c(I_j)|}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}
 \lesssim\frac{\alpha}{t},\label{eq2-6}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq2-6}) depend on $n,p$. If $k=n+1$, $y\in\Omega^c$ and $z\in I_j$, then we still use (\ref{eq2-3}) and (\ref{eq2-4}) to obtain
\begin{align}
&\sum_j\Lebes^n(I_j)\cdot\big(\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
 +\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big)\nonumber\\
&=\sum_j\int_{I_j}\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
+\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dz\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_j\int_{I_j}\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
+\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dz\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
+\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dz\lesssim t^{-1},\label{eq2-7}
\end{align}
where we use the fact that the Whitney cubes $\{I_j\}_j$ have disjoint interiors and $\bigcup_j I_j=\Omega\subseteq\bbbr^n$, and the fact that both integrals 
$$\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{1}{(1+|z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dz\quad\text{and}\quad \int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{1}{(1+|z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dz$$ converge to positive finite constants whose values only depend on the dimension $n$. Applying (\ref{eq1-6}), (\ref{eq2-4}), (\ref{eq2-7}), and Lemma \ref{lemma3} (vi) yields
\begin{align}
&\big|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\sum_j b_j;y,t)\big|\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_j\int_{I_j}|b(z)|\cdot\big(\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
 +\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big)dz\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_j\int_{I_j}|b(z)|dz\cdot\big(\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
 +\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big)\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_j\alpha\Lebes^n(I_j)\cdot\big(\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
+\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big)\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\frac{\alpha}{t},\label{eq2-8}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq2-8}) depend on $n,p$. The proof of Lemma \ref{lemma6} (1) is now complete.\\

(2) Assume $1\leq k\leq n$, $I_m$ is a Whitney cube and $y\in I_m$, and if $I_j$ is another Whitney cube satisfying the relation (\ref{far}) between the two cubes $I_j$ and $I_m$, then we can use inequality (\ref{eq.lemma2-3}) of Lemma \ref{lemma2} for $y\in I_m$ and $z\in I_j$ to obtain the following estimate
\begin{align}
&\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}}\Lebes^n(I_j)\cdot
 \frac{t|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|}{(t^2+|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\nonumber\\
&=\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}}\int_{I_j}
 \frac{t|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|}{(t^2+|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dz\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}}\int_{I_j}
 \frac{t|y-z|}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dz\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{t|y-z|}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dz\lesssim t^{-1},\label{eq2-9}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq2-9}) depend on $n$. Applying (\ref{eq1-5}), inequality (\ref{eq.lemma2-3}) of Lemma \ref{lemma2}, Lemma \ref{lemma3} (vi), and (\ref{eq2-9}) yields the following
\begin{align}
&\big|\partial_k\Pint(\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}} b_j;y,t)\big|\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}}\int_{I_j}|b(z)|\cdot
 \frac{t|y-z|}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dz\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}}\int_{I_j}|b(z)|dz\cdot
 \frac{t|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|}{(t^2+|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}}\alpha\Lebes^n(I_j)\cdot
\frac{t|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|}{(t^2+|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\lesssim\frac{\alpha}{t},\label{eq2-10}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq2-10}) depend on $n,p$. Assume $k=n+1$, $I_m$ is a Whitney cube and $y\in I_m$, and if $I_j$ is another Whitney cube satisfying the relation (\ref{far}) between the two cubes $I_j$ and $I_m$, then we can use inequality (\ref{eq.lemma2-3}) of Lemma \ref{lemma2} for $y\in I_m$ and $z\in I_j$ to obtain the following estimate
\begin{align}
&\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}}
 \Lebes^n(I_j)\big(\frac{1}{(t^2+|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\nonumber\\
&\quad+\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big)\nonumber\\
&=\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}}
 \int_{I_j}\frac{1}{(t^2+|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\nonumber\\
&\quad+\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dz\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}}\int_{I_j}\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
 +\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dz\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
 +\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dz\lesssim t^{-1},\label{eq2-11}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq2-11}) depend on the dimension $n$. Applying (\ref{eq1-6}), inequality (\ref{eq.lemma2-3}) of Lemma \ref{lemma2}, Lemma \ref{lemma3} (vi), and (\ref{eq2-11}) yields
\begin{align}
&\big|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}} b_j;y,t)\big|\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}}\!\!\!\!\int_{I_j}|b(z)|
 \big\{\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}+\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big\}dz\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}}\int_{I_j}|b(z)|dz\cdot
 \big\{\frac{1}{(t^2+|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\nonumber\\
&\quad+\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big\}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}}\alpha\Lebes^n(I_j)\cdot
 \big\{\frac{1}{(t^2+|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\nonumber\\
&\quad+\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big\}\lesssim\frac{\alpha}{t},\label{eq2-12}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq2-12}) depend on $n,p$. The proof of Lemma \ref{lemma6} (2) is now complete.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}\label{lemma7}
Let $f\in L^p(\bbbr^n)$ for $1\leq p<\infty$, and assume $0<\alpha<\esssup_{x\in\bbbr^n}|f(x)|$ and $\Omega=\{x\in\bbbr^n:M(|f|^p)(x)>\alpha^p\}$ are given by Lemma \ref{lemma3}. And let $\{I_j\}_j$ be the associated Whitney cubes and $f=g+b$ as in Lemma \ref{lemma3}. Let $\chi_{I_j}$ denote the characteristic function of the cube $I_j$ and $b_j=b\cdot\chi_{I_j}$. Then for $1\leq k\leq n+1$, we have the following estimates,
\begin{align}
\int_0^{\infty}\int_{\Omega^c}\big|\partial_k\Pint(\sum_j b_j;y,t)\big|dydt
&\lesssim\sum_j\int_{I_j}|b(z)|dz,\label{eq2-13}\\
\sum_m\int_0^{\infty}\int_{I_m}\big|\partial_k\Pint(\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}} b_j;y,t)\big|dydt
&\lesssim\sum_j\int_{I_j}|b(z)|dz,\label{eq2-14}
\end{align}
and the constants in (\ref{eq2-13}) and (\ref{eq2-14}) only depend on $n$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma \ref{lemma7}]First we prove (\ref{eq2-13}) and (\ref{eq2-14}) when $1\leq k\leq n$. Due to Lemma \ref{lemma3} (vii) and (\ref{eq1-5}), $\int_{I_j}b(z)dz=0$ and we can write $\partial_k\Pint(b_j;y,t)$ identically as
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-15}
(n+1)C_0\int_{I_j}b(z)\big\{\frac{t(y_k-c(I_j)_k)}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}
-\frac{t(y_k-z_k)}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big\}dz,
\end{equation}
where $1\leq k\leq n$, and $y_k$, $z_k$, $c(I_j)_k$ are the $k$-th coordinates of $y$, $z$, $c(I_j)$ in $\bbbr^n$ respectively. Since the Whitney cubes have disjoint interiors, then by applying (\ref{eq2-15}) and by exchanging the order of integration, we can rewrite the left side of (\ref{eq2-13}) equivalently as below
\begin{align}
&\int_0^{\infty}\int_{\Omega^c}\big|\sum_j\partial_k\Pint(b_j;y,t)\big|dydt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_j\int_{I_j}|b(z)|\int_0^{\infty}\int_{\Omega^c}
\big|\frac{t(y_k-c(I_j)_k)}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\nonumber\\
&\quad-\frac{t(y_k-z_k)}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big|dydtdz,\label{eq2-16}
\end{align}
where the constant depends on $n$. If we use the change of variable $w=y-c(I_j)$ for $y\in\Omega^c$ and if $z\in I_j$, then from Lemma \ref{lemma1} (b) and the fact that the $n$-dimensional ball centered at $c(I_j)$ and inscribed in $I_j$ has radius $\frac{1}{2}l(I_j)$, we can deduce the inequality $|z-c(I_j)|\leq\frac{\sqrt{n}}{2}l(I_j)$ and furthermore we can obtain
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-17}
|w|\geq\dist(I_j,\Omega^c)+\frac{1}{2}l(I_j)\geq(\sqrt{n}+\frac{1}{2})l(I_j)>2|z-c(I_j)|.
\end{equation}
Now we can invoke Lemma \ref{lemma4} (\ref{eq.lemma4-1}) with $\beta=2$ and obtain the following estimate for the inside double integral of (\ref{eq2-16}) as below
\begin{align}
&\int_0^{\infty}\int_{\Omega^c}\big|\frac{t(y_k-c(I_j)_k)}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}} -\frac{t(y_k-z_k)}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big|dydt\nonumber\\
&\leq\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{|w|>2|z-c(I_j)|}\big|\frac{t w_k}{(t^2+|w|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}} -\frac{t(w_k-z_k+c(I_j)_k)}{(t^2+|w-z+c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big|dwdt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim1,\label{eq2-18}
\end{align}
where the constant in (\ref{eq2-18}) only depends on $n$. Inserting (\ref{eq2-18}) into (\ref{eq2-16}) yields the estimate (\ref{eq2-13}) for $1\leq k\leq n$. To prove (\ref{eq2-14}) for $1\leq k\leq n$, we can still use (\ref{eq2-15}) and exchange the order of integrations and the summation over $j$ to estimate the left side of (\ref{eq2-14}) from above by the following
\begin{align}
&\sum_m\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}}\int_0^{\infty}\int_{I_m}\big|\partial_k\Pint( b_j;y,t)\big|dydt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_m\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}}\int_{I_j}|b(z)|\int_0^{\infty}\int_{I_m}
\big|\frac{t(y_k-c(I_j)_k)}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\nonumber\\
&\quad-\frac{t(y_k-z_k)}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big|dydtdz,\label{eq2-19}
\end{align}
and the constant depends on $n$. Notice that after exchanging the order of the summation over $m$ and the summation over $j$ in the above expression (\ref{eq2-19}), we can rewrite (\ref{eq2-19}) identically as the expression below
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-20}
\sum_j\!\!\int_{I_j}\!\!|b(z)|\!\!\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{U_j}\!\!\big|\frac{t(y_k-c(I_j)_k)}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}-\frac{t(y_k-z_k)}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big|dydtdz,
\end{equation}
where the set $U_j$ is the union of all the Whitney cube $I_m$'s that satisfy the condition ``$I_j$ far from $I_m$'' for some fixed $j$. By the definition (\ref{far}), when $y\in U_j$, $y$ belongs to some Whitney cube $I_m$ and the centers of $I_m$ and $I_j$ satisfy the condition $|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|>11(\sqrt{n}+1)l(I_m)$. By Lemma \ref{lemma2} (1), we can further deduce that $|y-c(I_j)|\geq\frac{\sqrt{n}+1}{2}\cdot l(I_j)$. Moreover, if $z\in I_j$ for this $j$ then $|z-c(I_j)|\leq\frac{\sqrt{n}}{2}\cdot l(I_j)$. From the above analysis, we can conclude that
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-21}
|y-c(I_j)|\geq(1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}})|z-c(I_j)|
\end{equation}
if $y\in U_j$ and $z\in I_j$ for some fixed $j$. Therefore applying the change of variable $w=y-c(I_j)$, the above conclusion (\ref{eq2-21}) and Lemma \ref{lemma4} (\ref{eq.lemma4-1}) with $\beta=1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}$, we can estimate the inside double integral of (\ref{eq2-20}) as follows
\begin{align}
&\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{U_j}\big|\frac{t(y_k-c(I_j)_k)}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}-\frac{t(y_k-z_k)}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big|dydt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{\bar{U}_j}\big|\frac{tw_k}{(t^2+|w|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}-\frac{t[w_k-(z_k-c(I_j)_k)]}{(t^2+|w-(z-c(I_j))|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big|dwdt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim 1,\label{eq2-22}
\end{align}
where $\bar{U}_j=\{w\in\bbbr^n:|w|\geq(1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}})\cdot|z-c(I_j)|\}$ and the constants in (\ref{eq2-22}) depend on $n$. Inserting (\ref{eq2-22}) into (\ref{eq2-20}) and combining the result with (\ref{eq2-19}) yield the estimate (\ref{eq2-14}) for $1\leq k\leq n$.\\

Second, we prove (\ref{eq2-13}) and (\ref{eq2-14}) when $k=n+1$. Since $\int_{I_j}b(z)dz=0$, we can use formula (\ref{eq1-6}) to rewrite $\partial_{n+1}\Pint(b_j;y,t)$ equivalently as the sum of the following two terms,
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-23}
\int_{I_j}b(z)\cdot\big(\frac{C_0}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
-\frac{C_0}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\big)dz
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-24}
\int_{I_j}b(z)\cdot\big(\frac{(n+1)C_0 t^2}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}
-\frac{(n+1)C_0 t^2}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big)dz.
\end{equation}
Inserting (\ref{eq2-23}) and (\ref{eq2-24}) into the left side of (\ref{eq2-13}) yields that the term $$\int_0^{\infty}\int_{\Omega^c}\big|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\sum_j b_j;y,t)\big|dydt$$
can be estimated from above by a constant multiple of the sum of the following two terms,
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-25}
\sum_j\!\!\int_{I_j}\!\!|b(z)|\!\!\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{\Omega^c}\!\!\big|
\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}-\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\big|dydtdz
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-26}
\sum_j\!\!\int_{I_j}\!\!|b(z)|\!\!\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{\Omega^c}\!\!\big|
\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}-\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big|dydtdz,
\end{equation}
and the constant depends on $n$. If we use the change of variable $w=y-c(I_j)$ for $y\in\Omega^c$ and if $z\in I_j$, then with the same reason we still have the inequality (\ref{eq2-17}). Applying Lemma \ref{lemma4} (\ref{eq.lemma4-2}) with $\beta=2$, we can estimate the inside double integral of (\ref{eq2-25}) as follows
\begin{align}
&\int_0^{\infty}\int_{\Omega^c}\big|\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
-\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\big|dydt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{|w|>2|z-c(I_j)|}\big|\frac{1}{(t^2+|w-(z-c(I_j))|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
-\frac{1}{(t^2+|w|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\big|dwdt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim 1,\label{eq2-27}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq2-27}) only depend on $n$. Applying Lemma \ref{lemma4} (\ref{eq.lemma4-3}) with $\beta=2$, we can estimate the inside double integral of (\ref{eq2-26}) as follows
\begin{align}
&\int_0^{\infty}\int_{\Omega^c}\big|\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}
-\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big|dydt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{|w|>2|z-c(I_j)|}\big|\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|w|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}
-\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|w-(z-c(I_j))|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big|dwdt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim 1,\label{eq2-28}
\end{align}
and the constants in (\ref{eq2-28}) depend on $n$. Inserting (\ref{eq2-27}), (\ref{eq2-28}) into (\ref{eq2-25}), (\ref{eq2-26}) respectively and combining the results with the left side of (\ref{eq2-13}) yield the estimate (\ref{eq2-13}) for $k=n+1$. To prove estimate (\ref{eq2-14}) when $k=n+1$, we still rewrite $\partial_{n+1}\Pint(b_j;y,t)$ equivalently as the sum of (\ref{eq2-23}) and (\ref{eq2-24}), and estimate the term $$\sum_m\int_0^{\infty}\int_{I_m}\big|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}} b_j;y,t)\big|dydt$$ from above by a constant multiple of the sum of the following two terms,
\begin{align}
&\sum_m\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}}\int_{I_j}|b(z)|\nonumber\\
&\cdot\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{I_m}\big|\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
-\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\big|dydtdz\label{eq2-29}
\end{align}
and
\begin{align}
&\sum_m\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}}\int_{I_j}|b(z)|\nonumber\\
&\cdot\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{I_m}\big|\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}
-\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big|dydtdz,\label{eq2-30}
\end{align}
and the constant depends on $n$. Notice that after exchanging the order of the summation over $m$ and the summation over $j$ in the two expressions above, we can rewrite (\ref{eq2-29}) and (\ref{eq2-30}) identically as the expressions below,
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-31}
\sum_j\!\!\int_{I_j}\!\!|b(z)|\!\!\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{U_j}\!\!\big|\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}-\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\big|dydtdz
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-32}
\sum_j\!\!\int_{I_j}\!\!|b(z)|\!\!\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{U_j}\!\!\big|\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}-\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big|dydtdz,
\end{equation}
where $U_j$ is the union of all the Whitney cube $I_m$'s that satisfy the condition ``$I_j$ far from $I_m$'' for some fixed $j$. By the definition (\ref{far}), when $y\in U_j$, $y$ belongs to some Whitney cube $I_m$ and the centers of $I_m$ and $I_j$ satisfy the condition $|c(I_m)-c(I_j)|>11(\sqrt{n}+1)l(I_m)$. By inequality (\ref{eq.lemma2-1}) of Lemma \ref{lemma2}, we can deduce that $|y-c(I_j)|\geq\frac{\sqrt{n}+1}{2}\cdot l(I_j)$. Moreover, if $z\in I_j$ for this $j$ then $|z-c(I_j)|\leq\frac{\sqrt{n}}{2}\cdot l(I_j)$. From the above analysis, we can conclude that (\ref{eq2-21}) is still true for the variables $y$ and $z$ appearing in (\ref{eq2-31}) and (\ref{eq2-32}). Recall that $$\bar{U}_j=\{w\in\bbbr^n:|w|\geq(1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}})|z-c(I_j)|\}.$$
Applying the change of variable $w=y-c(I_j)$ and Lemma \ref{lemma4} (\ref{eq.lemma4-2}) with $\beta=1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}$, we can estimate the inside double integral of (\ref{eq2-31}) as below
\begin{align}
&\int_0^{\infty}\int_{U_j}\big|\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
-\frac{1}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\big|dydt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_0^{\infty}\int_{\bar{U}_j}\big|\frac{1}{(t^2+|w-(z-c(I_j))|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
-\frac{1}{(t^2+|w|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\big|dwdt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim 1,\label{eq2-33}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq2-33}) depend on $n$. Applying the change of variable $w=y-c(I_j)$ and Lemma \ref{lemma4} (\ref{eq.lemma4-3}) with $\beta=1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}$, we can estimate the inside double integral of (\ref{eq2-32}) as below
\begin{align}
&\int_0^{\infty}\int_{U_j}\big|\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-c(I_j)|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}
-\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|y-z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big|dydt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_0^{\infty}\int_{\bar{U}_j}\big|\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|w|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}
-\frac{t^2}{(t^2+|w-(z-c(I_j))|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big|dwdt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim 1,\label{eq2-34}
\end{align}
and the constants in (\ref{eq2-34}) depend on $n$. Inserting (\ref{eq2-33}), (\ref{eq2-34}) into (\ref{eq2-31}), (\ref{eq2-32}) respectively and combining the results with (\ref{eq2-29}), (\ref{eq2-30}) yield the estimate (\ref{eq2-14}) for $k=n+1$. Now we finish the proof of Lemma \ref{lemma7}.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}\label{lemma8}
Let $f$ be a function in $L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ for some $p_0\in[1,\infty]$ and an element in the space $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$, and $f_j=\psi_{2^{-j}}*f$, where $\psi\in\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ satisfies the conditions (\ref{eq1-7}) and (\ref{eq1-8}). Then we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-37}
\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)=\sum_{j\in\bbbz}\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f_j;x,t),
\end{equation}
and the series converges in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma \ref{lemma8}]
Let $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ satisfy conditions (\ref{Sw0.condition.1}), (\ref{Sw0.condition.2}), (\ref{Sw0.condition.3}). By using Young's inequality (cf. \cite[Theorem 1.2.12]{14classical}), we see that $f_j\in L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ for all $j\in\bbbz$ whenever $f\in L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ and hence the equation (\ref{eq2-35}) holds in the sense of tempered distributions modulo polynomials with $f_j$ in place of $f$. To prove the series in (\ref{eq2-37}) converges in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$, we need to prove the following limit
\begin{align}
&\lim_{N\rightarrow+\infty}<\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;\cdot,t)-\sum_{|j|\leq N}\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f_j;\cdot,t), \phi>\nonumber\\
&=\lim_{N\rightarrow+\infty}<\FT_n[f-\sum_{|j|\leq N}f_j],-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\iFT_n\phi>
\nonumber\\
&=\lim_{N\rightarrow+\infty}<f-\sum_{|j|\leq N}f_j,\FT_n[-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\iFT_n\phi(\xi)]>
\label{eq2-63}
\end{align}
equals zero, where the first equation of (\ref{eq2-63}) is due to (\ref{eq2-35}) and the fact that $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ if and only if $\iFT_n\phi\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, and the second equation of (\ref{eq2-63}) is by the definition of distributional Fourier transform. We use the fact that the series in (\ref{eq1-9}) converges in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$, and we observe that for each $0<t<\infty$, the function $\multi(\xi)=-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}$ satisfies the condition (\ref{eq1.64}), thus Proposition \ref{proposition1} implies that $\iFT_n\Phi(\xi)=\multi(\xi)\cdot\iFT_n\phi(\xi)$ belongs to $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, where $\Phi$ is the function given below
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-64}
\Phi(x)=\FT_n[-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\iFT_n\phi(\xi)](x)\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n).
\end{equation}
The proof of Lemma \ref{lemma8} is now complete.
\end{proof}
The following lemma is cited from \cite[section 2.4.4]{14modern} and is also introduced in \cite[Theorem 4.14, Chapter VI]{SteinWeissFourier}. It lays the foundation for the justification of subharmonicity needed in this paper.
\begin{lemma}[cf. Lemma 2.4.9 of \cite{14modern}]\label{lemma9}
Let $u_j$ be real-valued harmonic functions on $\bbbr^{n+1}$ satisfying the system of equations
\begin{align}
&\sum_{j=1}^{n+1}\frac{\partial u_j}{\partial x_j}=0,\label{eq2-50}\\
&\frac{\partial u_j}{\partial x_k}-\frac{\partial u_k}{\partial x_j}=0,\quad\text{for }k,j\in\{1,\cdots,n+1\} \text{ and }k\neq j,\label{eq2-51}
\end{align}
and let $F=(u_1,\cdots,u_{n+1})$. Then the function
\begin{equation*}
|F|^q=(\sum_{j=1}^{n+1}|u_j|^2)^{\frac{q}{2}}
\end{equation*}
is subharmonic when $q\geq\frac{n-1}{n}$, i.e. it satisfies $\Delta(|F|^q)\geq 0$, on $\bbbr^{n+1}_+$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{remark}\label{remark1}
From the proof of Lemma \ref{lemma9} given in \cite{14modern}, we know the condition that $u_j$ is a real-valued function on $\bbbr^{n+1}$ for every $1\leq j\leq n+1$, is a necessary condition. This is because the proof relies on the diagonalization of the $(n+1)\times(n+1)$ matrix
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-52}
A:=\bigg\{\frac{\partial u_k}{\partial x_j}\bigg\}^{n+1}_{k,j=1},
\end{equation}
and the condition (\ref{eq2-51}) shows that the matrix $A$ is real symmetric and thus is a Hermitian matrix if $u_j$'s ($1\leq j\leq n+1$) are all real-valued functions on $\bbbr^{n+1}$, hence the diagonalization of a Hermitian matrix is justified. However if $u_j$'s ($1\leq j\leq n+1$) are complex-valued functions, then (\ref{eq2-51}) only tells us that the matrix $A$ defined in (\ref{eq2-52}) is a complex symmetric matrix, and may not be a Hermitian matrix since a Hermitian matrix is a complex conjugate symmetric matrix.
\end{remark}
\begin{lemma}\label{lemma10}
If $1\leq p\leq\infty$ and $f\in L^p(\bbbr^n)$ is a real-valued function, and if $F(x,t)=\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)$, then $|F|^q=|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)|^q$ is subharmonic on $\bbbr^{n+1}_+$ when $q\geq\frac{n-1}{n}$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma \ref{lemma10}]
If $f$ is real-valued, then the component functions of $F(x,t)$ are all real-valued harmonic functions on $\bbbr^{n+1}_+$. To apply Lemma \ref{lemma9}, we need to check the component functions of $F(x,t)$ satisfy the system of equations (\ref{eq2-50}) and (\ref{eq2-51}). Because the Poisson integral $\Pint(f;x,t)$ is harmonic on $\bbbr^{n+1}_+$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-53}
\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}\partial_k[\partial_k\Pint(f;x,t)]=\Delta\Pint(f;x,t)=0,
\end{equation}
and thus condition (\ref{eq2-50}) is satisfied. Now we prove formulae (\ref{eq1-5}) and (\ref{eq1-6}) when $f$ is a function in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$ for some $1\leq p\leq\infty$. We will only prove formula (\ref{eq1-5}) when $k=1$. The proof for the other cases of (\ref{eq1-5}) when $k=2,\cdots,n$ will be similar. Let $\vec{e}_1$ be the unit elementary vector in $\bbbr^n$ whose first coordinate is $1$ and all the other coordinates are $0$. For $x=(x_1,x_2,\cdots,x_n)\in\bbbr^n$ and $y=(y_1,y_2,\cdots,y_n)\in\bbbr^n$, we denote $x'=(x_2,\cdots,x_n)\in\bbbr^{n-1}$ and $y'=(y_2,\cdots,y_n)\in\bbbr^{n-1}$. Let $h\neq0$ be a real number, then we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-151}
\partial_1\Pint(f;x,t)=\lim_{h\rightarrow0}\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{f(y)}{h}\cdot\big[P_t(x+h\vec{e}_1-y)-P_t(x-y)\big]dy
\end{equation}
for every $x\in\bbbr^n$ and every $0<t<\infty$. Denote
\begin{align}
&E^{(1)}:=\{y\in\bbbr^n:t<|x_1-y_1|\},\label{eq2-152}\\
&E^{(2)}:=\{y\in\bbbr^n:t\geq|x_1-y_1|\},\label{eq2-153}
\end{align}
and the characteristic functions associated with these two sets are denoted as $\chi_{E^{(1)}}$ and $\chi_{E^{(2)}}$ respectively. We claim that the dominating function for the integrand on the right side of (\ref{eq2-151}) is given by
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-154}
\Upsilon_1(y)=\frac{\chi_{E^{(1)}}(y)\cdot|f(y)|}{(t^2+\frac{1}{4}|x-y|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
+\frac{\chi_{E^{(2)}}(y)\cdot|f(y)|}{(t^2+|x'-y'|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
\end{equation} 
uniformly for $h\in\bbbr$ with $0<|h|<\frac{t}{2}$. We use the mean value theorem and formula (\ref{eq1-3-1}) and find a real number $h^*$ between $0$ and $h$ so that
\begin{align}
&\bigg|\frac{f(y)}{h}\cdot\big[P_t(x+h\vec{e}_1-y)-P_t(x-y)\big]\bigg|\nonumber\\
&=\big|f(y)\cdot\partial_1[P_t(x+h^*\vec{e}_1-y)]\big|\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\frac{|f(y)|}{(t^2+|x'-y'|^2+(h^*+x_1-y_1)^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\nonumber\\
&\leq\frac{|f(y)|}{(t^2+|x'-y'|^2+g(|h^*|))^{\frac{n+1}{2}}},\label{eq2-155}
\end{align}
where the implicit constant depends on $n$, and $g(|h^*|)$ is the evaluation of the nonnegative quadratic function
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-156}
g(u)=u^2-2|x_1-y_1|u+|x_1-y_1|^2
\end{equation}
at $u=|h^*|$. When $y\in E^{(1)}$, we have $0<|h^*|<|h|<\frac{t}{2}<\frac{1}{2}|x_1-y_1|$. On the closed and bounded interval $[0,\frac{1}{2}|x_1-y_1|]$, the nonnegative quadratic function $g(u)$ defined in (\ref{eq2-156}) is decreasing and achieves a nonnegative minimum value at $u=\frac{1}{2}|x_1-y_1|$, and this nonnegative minimum value is $\frac{1}{4}|x_1-y_1|^2$. Recall that
$$|x'-y'|^2=\sum_{j=2}^n(x_j-y_j)^2,$$
and then we have
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq2-155})
&\leq\frac{|f(y)|}{(t^2+|x'-y'|^2+\frac{1}{4}|x_1-y_1|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\nonumber\\
&\leq\frac{|f(y)|}{(t^2+\frac{1}{4}|x'-y'|^2+\frac{1}{4}|x_1-y_1|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}=\Upsilon_1(y),
\label{eq2-157}
\end{align}
if $y\in E^{(1)}$. By using the nonnegativity of the function $g(u)$, we also have
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-158}
(\ref{eq2-155})\leq\frac{|f(y)|}{(t^2+|x'-y'|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}=\Upsilon_1(y)
\end{equation}
if $y\in E^{(2)}$. Inequalities (\ref{eq2-155}), (\ref{eq2-157}), (\ref{eq2-158}) together prove the claim (\ref{eq2-154}). It is not hard to see that we can use H\"{o}lder's inequality with $\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{p'}=1$ to obtain
\begin{align}
&\int_{E^{(1)}}\frac{|f(y)|}{(t^2+\frac{1}{4}|x-y|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dy\nonumber\\
&\leq\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\cdot\|\frac{1}{(t^2+\frac{1}{4}|y|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\|_{L^{p'}(\bbbr^n)}<\infty,
\label{eq2-159}
\end{align}
where $1\leq p\leq\infty$. Recall the definition of the set $E^{(2)}$ given in (\ref{eq2-153}) and also that $dy'=dy_2\cdots dy_n$, then we have
$$E^{(2)}=[x_1-t,x_1+t]\times\bbbr^{n-1},$$
and we use H\"{o}lder's inequality with $\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{p'}=1$ to obtain
\begin{align}
&\int_{E^{(2)}}\frac{|f(y)|}{(t^2+|x'-y'|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dy\nonumber\\
&\leq\|f\|_{L^p(E^{(2)})}\cdot\bigg[\int_{E^{(2)}}\frac{1}{(t^2+|x'-y'|^2)^{\frac{(n+1)p'}{2}}}dy
\bigg]^{\frac{1}{p'}}\nonumber\\
&=\|f\|_{L^p(E^{(2)})}\cdot\bigg[2t\int_{\bbbr^{n-1}}\frac{1}{(t^2+|y'|^2)^{\frac{(n+1)p'}{2}}}dy'
\bigg]^{\frac{1}{p'}}\nonumber\\
&\leq\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\cdot(2t)^{\frac{1}{p'}}\cdot\bigg[\int_{\bbbr^{n-1}}
\frac{1}{(t^2+|y'|^2)^{\frac{(n+1)p'}{2}}}dy'\bigg]^{\frac{1}{p'}}<\infty,\label{eq2-160}
\end{align}
where $1<p\leq\infty$ in (\ref{eq2-160}). For the case where $p=1$, we have
\begin{align}
&\int_{E^{(2)}}\frac{|f(y)|}{(t^2+|x'-y'|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dy\nonumber\\
&\leq\|f\|_{L^1(E^{(2)})}\cdot\esssup_{y\in E^{(2)}}\frac{1}{(t^2+|x'-y'|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\nonumber\\
&=\|f\|_{L^1(E^{(2)})}\cdot\esssup_{y'\in\bbbr^{n-1}}\frac{1}{(t^2+|y'|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\leq
\frac{\|f\|_{L^1(\bbbr^n)}}{t^{n+1}}<\infty.\label{eq2-161}
\end{align}
Inequalities (\ref{eq2-159}), (\ref{eq2-160}), (\ref{eq2-161}) show that the dominating function $\Upsilon_1(y)$ is in $L^1(\bbbr^n)$ whenever $f$ is a function in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$ for some $1\leq p\leq\infty$. Hence by invoking the dominated convergence theorem, we can bring the limit into the integral sign on the right side of (\ref{eq2-151}) and obtain the formula (\ref{eq1-5}) when $k=1$. Now we prove formula (\ref{eq1-6}). Let $h\in\bbbr$, then we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-162}
\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)=\lim_{h\rightarrow0}\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{f(x-y)}{h}\cdot\big[P_{t+h}(y)-P_t(y)\big]
dy
\end{equation}
for every $x\in\bbbr^n$ and every $0<t<\infty$. We claim that the dominating function for the integrand on the right side of (\ref{eq2-162}) is given by
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-163}
\Upsilon_2(y)=\frac{|f(x-y)|}{(\frac{1}{4}t^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
\end{equation} 
uniformly for $h\in\bbbr$ with $0<|h|<\frac{t}{2}$. We use the mean value theorem and formula (\ref{eq1-3-2}) and find a real number $h^*$ between $0$ and $h$ so that
\begin{align}
&\bigg|\frac{f(x-y)}{h}\cdot\big[P_{t+h}(y)-P_t(y)\big]\bigg|\nonumber\\
&=\big|f(x-y)\cdot\partial_{n+1}[P_{t+h^*}(y)]\big|\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\frac{|f(x-y)|}{((t+h^*)^2+|y|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}},\label{eq2-164}
\end{align}
where the implicit constant in (\ref{eq2-164}) depends on $n$. When $0<|h^*|<|h|<\frac{t}{2}$, we have $\frac{1}{2}t<t+h^*<\frac{3}{2}t$ and hence (\ref{eq2-164}) can be dominated by the function $\Upsilon_2(y)$ for every $y\in\bbbr^n$. And a simple application of H\"{o}lder's inequality with $\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{p'}=1$ shows that the dominating function $\Upsilon_2(y)$ is in $L^1(\bbbr^n)$ whenever $f$ is a function in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$ for some $1\leq p\leq\infty$. Hence by invoking the dominated convergence theorem, we can bring the limit into the integral sign on the right side of (\ref{eq2-162}) and obtain the formula (\ref{eq1-6}).\\

If $k,j\in\{1,\cdots,n\}$ and $k\neq j$, we can use the same method as above but with a small number of modifications, and the dominated convergence theorem, and the assumption that $f\in L^p(\bbbr^n)$ for some $p$ with $1\leq p\leq\infty$, and the formula (\ref{eq1-5}) to obtain
\begin{align}
&\partial_j\partial_k\Pint(f;x,t)\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}f(y)\cdot\frac{(n+1)(n+3)C_0 t(y_k-x_k)(y_j-x_j)}{(t^2+|x-y|^2)^{\frac{n+5}{2}}}dy,
\label{eq2-54}
\end{align}
and similarly, $\partial_k\partial_j\Pint(f;x,t)$ has the same expression as given in (\ref{eq2-54}). Therefore we have $\partial_j\partial_k\Pint(f;x,t)=\partial_k\partial_j\Pint(f;x,t)$ for $k,j\in\{1,\cdots,n\}$ and $k\neq j$. If $1\leq k\leq n$, we use the same method, the dominated convergence theorem, the assumption that $f\in L^p(\bbbr^n)$ with $1\leq p\leq\infty$, and the formula (\ref{eq1-6}) to obtain
\begin{align}
&\partial_k\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}f(y)\cdot\big[\frac{(n+1)(n+3)C_0 t^2(x_k-y_k)}{(t^2+|x-y|^2)^{\frac{n+5}{2}}}\nonumber\\
&\quad-\frac{(n+1)C_0(x_k-y_k)}{(t^2+|x-y|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}\big]dy,\label{eq2-55}
\end{align}
and similarly, $\partial_{n+1}\partial_k\Pint(f;x,t)$ has the same expression as given in (\ref{eq2-55}). Hence we also have $\partial_k\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)=\partial_{n+1}\partial_k\Pint(f;x,t)$ for $1\leq k\leq n$. By now we have shown $F(x,t)=\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)$ satisfies all the conditions of Lemma \ref{lemma9} and thus $|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)|^q$ is subharmonic on $\bbbr^{n+1}_+$ when $q\geq\frac{n-1}{n}$.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}\label{lemma11}
Let $0<s<1<p<\infty$. Assume that $f\in\Lps$ is a bounded real-valued function defined on $\bbbr^n$ and has first-order continuous derivatives, then $\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f$ has a real-valued function representative in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$ and this function representative is in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$, where $\Lift_s f=\iFT_n(|\xi|^s\FT_n f)$ is considered as an element of the space $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$ of tempered distributions modulo polynomials and $\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})$ is the evaluation of the meromorphic extension of the gamma function at $\frac{-s}{2}$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma \ref{lemma11}]
From Definition \ref{definition2}, we know that $f$ is an element of $\Lps$ if and only if $\Lift_s f$ has a unique function representative (in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$) in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$. Now we show that the product $\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f$ has a real-valued function representative in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$. Let $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ satisfy conditions (\ref{Sw0.condition.1}), (\ref{Sw0.condition.2}), (\ref{Sw0.condition.3}). We recall the distribution $u_z$ defined in \cite[Definition 2.4.5]{14classical}. If $z\in\bbbc$ is a complex number with $\Rez z>-n$, then
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-57}
<u_z,g>=\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{\pi^{\frac{z+n}{2}}}{\varGamma(\frac{z+n}{2})}\cdot|x|^z g(x)dx.
\end{equation}
And from \cite[7. of Examples 2.3.5.]{14classical}, we see that $u_z$ defined in (\ref{eq2-57}) is a tempered distribution on $\bbbr^n$ whenever $\Rez z>-n$. Indeed, if $g\in\Sw(\bbbr^n)$, then
\begin{align}
&|<u_z,g>|\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{|x|<1}|x|^{\Rez z}\cdot|g(x)|dx\nonumber\\
&\quad+\int_{|x|\geq1}\frac{|x|^{\Rez z}}{(1+|x|)^M}\cdot(1+|x|)^M|g(x)|dx\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{|x|<1}|x|^{\Rez z}dx\cdot\|g\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}\nonumber\\
&\quad+\int_{|x|\geq1}\frac{|x|^{\Rez z}}{(1+|x|)^M}dx\cdot\|(1+|\cdot|)^M|g(\cdot)|\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)},
\label{eq2-115}
\end{align}
and both integrals on the right end of (\ref{eq2-115}) converge since we can choose $M$ to be a sufficiently large positive integer so that $M>n+\Rez z>0$, and $\|(1+|\cdot|)^M|g(\cdot)|\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}$ can be estimated from above by a finite sum of Schwartz seminorms of $g$. Furthermore, given an arbitrary nonnegative integer $N$, \cite[expression (2.4.8)]{14classical} yields an analytic extension of $<u_z,g>$ for $g\in\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ to the case where $z\in\bbbc$ satisfies $\Rez z>-N-n-1$, and we have
\begin{align}
&<u_z,g>\nonumber\\
&=\int_{|x|\geq 1}\frac{\pi^{\frac{z+n}{2}}}{\varGamma(\frac{z+n}{2})}\cdot|x|^z g(x)dx\nonumber\\
&\quad+\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\frac{\pi^{\frac{z+n}{2}}}{\varGamma(\frac{z+n}{2})}\cdot
 \frac{\frac{1}{\alpha!}\int_{\unitsph}\theta^{\alpha}d\theta}{|\alpha|+z+n}\cdot
 (\partial^{\alpha}g)(0)\nonumber\\
&\quad+\int_{|x|<1}\frac{\pi^{\frac{z+n}{2}}}{\varGamma(\frac{z+n}{2})}\cdot
\bigg\{g(x)-\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\frac{(\partial^{\alpha}g)(0)}{\alpha!}\cdot x^{\alpha}\bigg\}
\cdot|x|^z dx,\label{eq2-58}
\end{align}
where $\alpha!=\alpha_1!\cdots\alpha_n!$ for the multi-index $\alpha=(\alpha_1,\cdots,\alpha_n)$ and $\varGamma(\frac{z+n}{2})$ in the expression (\ref{eq2-58}) is the evaluation of the meromorphic extension of the gamma function at $\frac{z+n}{2}$. We can use Taylor's formula for the Schwartz function $g(x)$ at $x=0$ with integral form of the remainder to deduce that the expression
$$g(x)-\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\frac{(\partial^{\alpha}g)(0)}{\alpha!}\cdot x^{\alpha}$$
in the last term on the right side of (\ref{eq2-58}), can be bounded from above by the product of $|x|^{N+1}$ and a finite sum of Schwartz seminorms of $g$, and thus the term $<u_z,g>$ as given in (\ref{eq2-58}) can be estimated from above by a finite sum of Schwartz seminorms of $g$ and hence defines a tempered distribution on $\bbbr^n$ if $\Rez z>-N-n-1$. By \cite[Theorem 2.4.6]{14classical}, we have the distributional identity $\FT_n u_z=u_{-n-z}$ for all $z\in\bbbc$. Now we apply this identity to the case where $z=s\in(0,1)$ then we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-59}
\frac{\pi^{\frac{s+n}{2}}}{\varGamma(\frac{s+n}{2})}\cdot\FT_n(|\xi|^s)=\FT_n(u_s)=u_{-n-s},
\end{equation}
and $\FT_n(|\xi|^s)$ is the tempered distribution $\varGamma(\frac{s+n}{2})\pi^{-\frac{s+n}{2}}u_{-n-s}$, which can be obtained from (\ref{eq2-58}) by choosing $N=0$, since $-n>-n-s>-n-1$. For an arbitrary Schwartz function $g\in\Sw(\bbbr^n)$, we apply \cite[Proposition 2.3.22. (11)]{14classical} to obtain
\begin{align}
&<\FT_n(|\xi|^s)*\phi,g>\nonumber\\
&=<\iFT_n[\FT_n(|\xi|^s)*\phi],\FT_n g>\nonumber\\
&=<|\xi|^s\cdot\iFT_n\phi,\FT_n g>\nonumber\\
&=<\FT_n(|\xi|^s\iFT_n\phi(\xi)),g>,\label{eq2-116}
\end{align}
where the last equation in (\ref{eq2-116}) is because $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ and $\iFT_n\phi\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, and the function $\multi(\xi)=|\xi|^s$ satisfies condition (\ref{eq1.64}), and thus $|\xi|^s\iFT_n\phi(\xi)$ is a function in $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ by Proposition \ref{proposition1}. Furthermore, from \cite[Theorem 2.3.20.]{14classical} and \cite[6. of Examples 2.3.5.]{14classical}, we can deduce that the smooth function $\FT_n(|\xi|^s)*\phi$ is a tempered distribution whose function representative in the sense of $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$ is the Schwartz function
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-117}
x\in\bbbr^n\longmapsto\FT_n(|\xi|^s\iFT_n\phi(\xi))(x),
\end{equation}
and we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-118}
\FT_n(|\xi|^s)*\phi(x)=<\FT_n(|\xi|^s),\phi(x-\cdot)>.
\end{equation}
Now we combine (\ref{eq2-118}), (\ref{eq2-59}), and (\ref{eq2-58}) with $N=0$ to obtain the following
\begin{align}
&\FT_n(|\xi|^s)*\phi(x)\nonumber\\
&=\frac{\varGamma(\frac{s+n}{2})}{\pi^{\frac{s+n}{2}}}\cdot<u_{-n-s},\phi(x-\cdot)>\nonumber\\
&=\frac{\varGamma(\frac{s+n}{2})}{\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\pi^{s+\frac{n}{2}}}\cdot\big\{
\int_{|y|\geq 1}\phi(x-y)\cdot|y|^{-n-s}dy-\frac{\phi(x)}{s}\cdot\omega_{n-1}\nonumber\\
&\quad+\int_{|y|<1}(\phi(x-y)-\phi(x))\cdot|y|^{-n-s}dy\big\}.\label{eq2-60}
\end{align}
The tempered distribution $\Lift_s f$ is considered as an element of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$ and according to Remark \ref{remark3}, its action on the Schwartz function $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ is given by
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-56}
<\Lift_s f,\phi>=<f,\FT_n(|\xi|^s\iFT_n\phi(\xi))>=<f,\FT_n(|\xi|^s)*\phi>.
\end{equation}
Inserting (\ref{eq2-60}) into (\ref{eq2-56}) and applying a proper change of variables yield
\begin{align}
&<\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f,\phi>\nonumber\\
&=\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\cdot<f,\FT_n(|\xi|^s)*\phi>\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}f(x)\cdot\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\FT_n(|\xi|^s)*\phi(x)dx\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{\varGamma(\frac{s+n}{2})}{\pi^{s+\frac{n}{2}}}\cdot\big\{
\int_{|y|\geq 1}f(x+y)\cdot|y|^{-n-s}dy-\frac{\omega_{n-1}f(x)}{s}\nonumber\\
&\quad+\int_{|y|<1}(f(x+y)-f(x))\cdot|y|^{-n-s}dy\big\}\cdot\phi(x)dx,\label{eq2-61}
\end{align}
where we notice that $\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})$ has been canceled out in the process, and $\phi$ is an arbitrary Schwartz function in $\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$. Equation (\ref{eq2-61}) shows that the functional $\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f$ can be identified with the following function
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-62}
\frac{\varGamma(\frac{s+n}{2})}{\pi^{s+\frac{n}{2}}}\cdot\big\{\!\!\!
\int_{|y|\geq 1}\!\!\!\frac{f(x+y)}{|y|^{n+s}}dy-\frac{\omega_{n-1}f(x)}{s}
+\!\!\int_{|y|<1}\!\!\!\!\!\!\frac{f(x+y)-f(x)}{|y|^{n+s}}dy\big\}
\end{equation}
in the sense of tempered distributions modulo polynomials. Because $f$ is a bounded real-valued function and has first-order continuous derivatives, both integrals in (\ref{eq2-62}) converge absolutely in the Riemann sense for almost every $x\in\bbbr^n$ and have real values. Because $\frac{s+n}{2}>0$, the definition (\ref{eq1-1}) tells us that $\varGamma(\frac{s+n}{2})$ is a well-defined positive finite real number. Therefore the function representative (\ref{eq2-62}) of $\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f$ in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$ is a real-valued function.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}\label{lemma14}
Let $p,q,s$ and the function $f$ satisfy conditions of Theorem \ref{theorem2}, then the following equation
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.3}
\Pint(f;x,t)=\frac{(2\pi)^s}{\varGamma(s)}\int_0^{\infty}\Pint(\Lift_s f;x,t+r)r^{s-1}dr
\end{equation}
is true in the sense of tempered distributions modulo polynomials for almost every $x\in\bbbr^n$ and every $t>0$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma \ref{lemma14}]
Under the conditions of Theorem \ref{theorem2}, $f$ is a bounded function and thus both $f$ and $\FT_n f$ are tempered distributions. We observe that derivatives of the function
\begin{equation}\label{eq2.165}
\xi\in\bbbr^n\longmapsto e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}
\end{equation}
are not continuous at $\xi=0$, and direct calculations show that this function (\ref{eq2.165}) satisfies the condition (\ref{eq1.64}), hence we can deduce from Proposition \ref{proposition1} that the linear functional $e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n f$, defined as
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-122}
<e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n f,g>=<\FT_n f,e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot g>\quad\text{for $g\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$},
\end{equation}
is a bounded linear functional on $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ in the topology of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$, and hence extends to a tempered distribution on all of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ by the Hahn-Banach theorem, i.e. \cite[3.3 Theorem]{Rudin.Funct.Anal}. We still denote this extended tempered distribution by $e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n f$. The action of the extended tempered distribution $e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n f$ on functions in $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ is given by (\ref{eq2-122}). And the distributional inverse Fourier transform of the extended tempered distribution $e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n f$, as given in \cite[Definition 2.3.7.]{14classical}, is well-defined by the following equation
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-124}
<\iFT_n[e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n f],\phi>=<e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n f,\iFT_n\phi>
\end{equation}
for a general Schwartz function $\phi\in\Sw(\bbbr^n)$. And if $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ then $\iFT_n\phi\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, and we can use (\ref{eq2-122}), (\ref{eq2-124}), and the definition of distributional Fourier transforms together to deduce that
\begin{align}
&<\iFT_n[e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n f],\phi>\nonumber\\
&=<\FT_n f,e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\iFT_n\phi>\nonumber\\
&=<f,\FT_n[e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\iFT_n\phi(\xi)]>.\label{eq2-125}
\end{align}
Furthermore, if $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$, we use an argument similar to the argument given for (\ref{eq1-40}), (\ref{eq1-41}), (\ref{eq1-42}), (\ref{eq1-44}) with $P_t(x)$ in place of $\partial_{n+1}[P_t(x)]$ and $e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}$ in place of $-2\pi|\xi|\cdot e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}$ to obtain that
\begin{align}
&<\Pint(f;\cdot,t),\phi>\nonumber\\
&=<\FT_n f,e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\iFT_n\phi>\nonumber\\
&=<f,\FT_n[e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\iFT_n\phi(\xi)]>,\label{eq2-120}
\end{align}
and the right side of (\ref{eq2-120}) makes sense since it is the well-defined action of the tempered distribution $f$ on the Schwartz function
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-121}
\FT_n[e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\iFT_n\phi(\xi)]\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n).
\end{equation}
Combining (\ref{eq2-120}) and (\ref{eq2-125}) together, we can obtain the equation 
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-119}
\Pint(f;x,t)=\iFT_n[e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n f]
\end{equation}
in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$ for every $t>0$, whenever $f$ is a bounded function.\\

Let $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$, we use (\ref{eq2-119}) and Proposition \ref{proposition1} to obtain the following
\begin{align}
&<\Pint(f;\cdot,t),\phi>\nonumber\\
&=<e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n f,\iFT_n\phi>\nonumber\\
&=<|\xi|^{-s}\cdot e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot|\xi|^{s}\cdot\FT_n f,\iFT_n\phi>.\label{eq2-126}
\end{align}
Notice that since $\iFT_n\phi\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, $e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n f$ in the penultimate line of (\ref{eq2-126}) is the product of the function $e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}$ and the tempered distribution $\FT_n f$, and $|\xi|^{s}\cdot\FT_n f$ in the last line of (\ref{eq2-126}) is the product of the function $|\xi|^{s}$ and the tempered distribution $\FT_n f$. From the discussion in Remark \ref{remark3}, we see that the distributional Fourier transform $\FT_n\Lift_s f$ yields the extended tempered distribution denoted as $|\xi|^{s}\cdot\FT_n f$, and this extended tempered distribution coincides with the product of the function $|\xi|^{s}$ and the tempered distribution $\FT_n f$ when it is acting on functions in $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$. The function
\begin{equation}\label{eq2.166}
\xi\in\bbbr^n\longmapsto|\xi|^{-s}\cdot e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}
\end{equation}
satisfies condition (\ref{eq1.64}), and we deduce from Proposition \ref{proposition1} that the product of the function (\ref{eq2.166}) and the tempered distribution $\FT_n\Lift_s f$ is a well-defined bounded linear functional on the subspace $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ in the topology of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$, and we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-127}
<|\xi|^{-s}\cdot e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n\Lift_s f,g>=
<\FT_n\Lift_s f,|\xi|^{-s}\cdot e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot g>,
\end{equation}
whenever $g\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$. Furthermore, the function $|\xi|^{-s}\cdot e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot g(\xi)$ also belongs to the subspace $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ by Proposition \ref{proposition1}, then we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-128}
<\FT_n\Lift_s f,|\xi|^{-s}\cdot e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot g>=
<|\xi|^{s}\cdot\FT_n f,|\xi|^{-s}\cdot e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot g>,
\end{equation}
where on the right side of (\ref{eq2-128}), $|\xi|^{s}\cdot\FT_n f$ is considered as the product of the function $|\xi|^{s}$ and the tempered distribution $\FT_n f$. Combining equations (\ref{eq2-127}) and (\ref{eq2-128}) and replacing $g$ by $\iFT_n\phi\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, we can establish the following equation
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq2-126})
&=<|\xi|^{-s}\cdot e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot|\xi|^{s}\cdot\FT_n f,\iFT_n\phi>\nonumber\\
&=<|\xi|^{-s}\cdot e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n\Lift_s f,\iFT_n\phi>.\label{eq2-129}
\end{align}
We use the gamma function identity
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.2}
|\xi|^{-s}=\frac{(2\pi)^s}{\varGamma(s)}\int_0^{\infty}e^{-2\pi|\xi|r}r^{s-1}dr,
\end{equation}
then we have
\begin{align}
&<\Pint(f;\cdot,t),\phi>\nonumber\\
&=<|\xi|^{-s}\cdot e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n\Lift_s f,\iFT_n\phi>\nonumber\\
&=<\frac{(2\pi)^s}{\varGamma(s)}\int_0^{\infty}e^{-2\pi|\xi|(r+t)}r^{s-1}dr\cdot\FT_n\Lift_s f,\iFT_n\phi>.\label{eq2-86}
\end{align}
We use a simple change of variable $u=|\xi|r$ and we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-95}
\rho(\xi):=\frac{(2\pi)^s}{\varGamma(s)}\int_0^{\infty}e^{-2\pi|\xi|(r+t)}r^{s-1}dr=|\xi|^{-s}\cdot e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}.
\end{equation}
Notice that $\rho(\xi)$ is not continuous at $\xi=0$ and satisfies the condition (\ref{eq1.64}). Thus Proposition \ref{proposition1} tells us that
\begin{align}
&<\frac{(2\pi)^s}{\varGamma(s)}\int_0^{\infty}e^{-2\pi|\xi|(r+t)}r^{s-1}dr\cdot\FT_n\Lift_s f,\iFT_n\phi>
\nonumber\\
&=<\FT_n\Lift_s f,\frac{(2\pi)^s}{\varGamma(s)}\int_0^{\infty}e^{-2\pi|\xi|(r+t)}r^{s-1}dr\cdot\iFT_n\phi>
\label{eq2-94}
\end{align}
is a well-defined expression. The easily observed integrability of $\rho(\xi)$ on $\bbbr^n$ justifies the application of Fubini's theorem, and we can use formula (\ref{eq1-3}) to obtain
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-87}
\iFT_n\rho(x)=\frac{(2\pi)^s}{\varGamma(s)}\int_0^{\infty}P_{r+t}(x)r^{s-1}dr,
\end{equation}
where $P_{r+t}(x)=C_0(r+t)((r+t)^2+|x|^2)^{-\frac{n+1}{2}}$. Since $\rho(\xi)\in L^1(\bbbr^n)$ is a tempered distribution and $\iFT_n\phi(\xi)$ is a Schwartz function in $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$, and furthermore $\rho\cdot\iFT_n\phi\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ by Proposition \ref{proposition1}, then we can apply \cite[Proposition 2.3.22 (12)]{14classical} to obtain $$\FT_n(\rho\cdot\iFT_n\phi)=\FT_n\rho*\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n).$$ From Definition \ref{definition2} and the conditions of Theorem \ref{theorem2}, we deduce that the unique function representative in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$, of the tempered distribution $\Lift_s f$ deemed as an element of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$, is a function in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$. Therefore we have
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq2-94})
&=<\FT_n\Lift_s f,\rho\cdot\iFT_n\phi>=<\Lift_s f,\FT_n(\rho\cdot\iFT_n\phi)>\nonumber\\
&=<\Lift_s f,\FT_n\rho*\phi>=\int_{\bbbr^n}\Lift_s f(x)\cdot\FT_n\rho*\phi(x)dx\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_{\bbbr^n}\Lift_s f(x)\cdot\iFT_n\rho(y-x)\cdot\phi(y)dydx,\label{eq2-98}
\end{align}
where we use the fact that $\rho(\cdot)$ is a radial function in $L^1(\bbbr^n)$ then $\FT_n\rho(\cdot)$ is a radial function in $L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)$. We consider the convolution
\begin{align}
\iFT_n\rho*\Lift_s f(y)
&=\frac{(2\pi)^s}{\varGamma(s)}\int_{\bbbr^n}\Lift_s f(y-x)\int_0^{\infty}P_{r+t}(x)r^{s-1}drdx\nonumber\\
&=\frac{(2\pi)^s}{\varGamma(s)}\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_0^{\infty}\Lift_s f(y-x)P_{r+t}(x)r^{s-1}drdx.\label{eq2-89}
\end{align}
To justify the exchanging of the order of integration in (\ref{eq2-89}), we show that (\ref{eq2-89}) converges absolutely. First, we have
\begin{align}
&\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_0^{t}|\Lift_s f(y-x)|\cdot\frac{C_0(r+t)}{((r+t)^2+|x|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\cdot
 r^{s-1}drdx\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_0^{t}|\Lift_s f(y-x)|\cdot\frac{t}{(t^2+|x|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\cdot
 r^{s-1}drdx\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}|\Lift_s f(y-x)|\cdot\frac{t^{1+s}}{(t^2+|x|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dx\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\|\Lift_s f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\cdot
\bigg(\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{t^{(1+s)p'}}{(t^2+|x|^2)^{\frac{(n+1)p'}{2}}}dx\bigg)^{\frac{1}{p'}}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\|f\|_{\Lps}<\infty,\label{eq2-90}
\end{align}
where the implicit constants depend on $n,s,t,p$, and we use H\"{o}lder's inequality with $\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{p'}=1$. Second, we pick a positive number $\delta$ satisfying the condition
$$1+n(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{q})=1+s<\delta<1+\frac{n}{p},$$
and we have
\begin{align}
&\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_t^{\infty}|\Lift_s f(y-x)|\cdot\frac{C_0(r+t)}{((r+t)^2+|x|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\cdot
r^{s-1}drdx\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_t^{\infty}\frac{|\Lift_s f(y-x)|\cdot r^s}
{((r+t)^2+|x|^2)^{\frac{\delta}{2}}\cdot((r+t)^2+|x|^2)^{\frac{n+1-\delta}{2}}}drdx\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_t^{\infty}
\frac{|\Lift_s f(y-x)|\cdot r^{s-\delta}}{(t^2+|x|^2)^{\frac{n+1-\delta}{2}}}drdx,\label{eq2-91}
\end{align}
where the implicit constants depend on $n$. The choice of $\delta$ implies both of the following integrals,
\begin{equation*}
\int_t^{\infty}r^{s-\delta}dr\qquad\text{and}\qquad\int_{\bbbr^n}
\frac{1}{(t^2+|x|^2)^{\frac{(n+1-\delta)p'}{2}}}dx,
\end{equation*}
converge. Thus we have
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq2-91})
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{|\Lift_s f(y-x)|}{(t^2+|x|^2)^{\frac{n+1-\delta}{2}}}dx\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\|\Lift_s f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\cdot
\bigg(\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{1}{(t^2+|x|^2)^{\frac{(n+1-\delta)p'}{2}}}dx\bigg)^{\frac{1}{p'}}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\|f\|_{\Lps}<\infty,\label{eq2-92}
\end{align}
where the implicit constants depend on $n,t,s,\delta,p$, and we use H\"{o}lder's inequality with $\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{p'}=1$. Estimates (\ref{eq2-90}), (\ref{eq2-91}), and (\ref{eq2-92}) also show that both of the function $|\iFT_n\rho|*|\Lift_s f|(y)$ and the function $\iFT_n\rho*\Lift_s f(y)$ are bounded functions in $y\in\bbbr^n$, and we have
\begin{equation*}
\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_{\bbbr^n}|\Lift_s f(x)|\cdot|\iFT_n\rho(y-x)|\cdot|\phi(y)|dxdy<\infty.
\end{equation*}
We apply Fubini's theorem to (\ref{eq2-98}) and obtain
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-99}
(\ref{eq2-98})=\int_{\bbbr^n}\iFT_n\rho*\Lift_s f(y)\cdot\phi(y)dy.
\end{equation}
Combining (\ref{eq2-90}), (\ref{eq2-91}), and (\ref{eq2-92}) together justifies the application of Fubini's theorem to (\ref{eq2-89}), and hence we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-93}
\iFT_n\rho*\Lift_s f(y)=\frac{(2\pi)^s}{\varGamma(s)}\int_0^{\infty}\Pint(\Lift_s f;y,r+t)\cdot r^{s-1}dr.
\end{equation}
Combining (\ref{eq2-86}), (\ref{eq2-94}), (\ref{eq2-98}), (\ref{eq2-99}), and (\ref{eq2-93}) all together yields
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-100}
<\Pint(f;\cdot,t),\phi>=<\frac{(2\pi)^s}{\varGamma(s)}\int_0^{\infty}\Pint(\Lift_s f;\cdot,r+t)\cdot r^{s-1}dr,\phi>
\end{equation}
for an arbitrary Schwartz function $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$. The proof of Lemma \ref{lemma14} is now complete.
\end{proof}
\begin{remark}\label{remark2}
Equation (\ref{eq6.3}) has been used in the proof of Theorem \ref{theorem2} to deduce equations (\ref{eq6.41}), (\ref{eq6.43}), (\ref{eq6.44}), and hence obtain the important equations (\ref{eq.lemma15.1}), (\ref{eq.lemma15.3}), (\ref{eq.lemma15.2}) by Lemma \ref{lemma15} below. Equation (\ref{eq6.3}) can also be obtained by assuming additionally that $f$ is an integrable function and using Fubini's theorem. By applying Lemma \ref{lemma14}, we do not assume that $f$ is an integrable function in Theorem \ref{theorem2}.
\end{remark}
\begin{lemma}\label{lemma15}
Under the conditions of Theorem \ref{theorem2}, we can bring the differentiations in (\ref{eq6.41}), (\ref{eq6.43}), and (\ref{eq6.44}) into the improper integral with respect to variable $r$ by applying the dominated convergence theorem.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma \ref{lemma15}]
Notice that when passing the differentiations in (\ref{eq6.41}), (\ref{eq6.43}), and (\ref{eq6.44}) into the improper integral with respect to variable $r$ under the conditions of Theorem \ref{theorem2}, we consider $x,y\in\bbbr^n$ and $0<u<|y|$ are fixed variables. First, we consider (\ref{eq6.41}) and we have
\begin{align}
&\frac{\partial}{\partial u}\bigg[\int_0^{\infty}\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+y,u+r)r^{s-1}dr\bigg]\nonumber\\
&=\lim_{h\rightarrow0}\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\frac{\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+y,u+r+h)-\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+y,u+r)}{h}
 \cdot r^{s-1}dr,\label{eq2-130}
\end{align}
and we claim that the dominating function for the integrand on the right side of (\ref{eq2-130}) is given by
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-131}
\Upsilon_1(r)=\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{|\Lift_s f(x+y-z)|\cdot r^{s-1}}
{((\frac{u}{2}+r)^2+|z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dz
\end{equation}
for every $r\in(0,\infty)$ and uniformly for all $h\in\bbbr$ with $0<|h|<\frac{u}{2}$. We use formula (\ref{eq1-6}) and the mean value theorem to find a real number $h^*$ between $0$ and $h$ so that
\begin{align}
&\bigg|\frac{\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+y,u+r+h)-\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+y,u+r)}{h}\cdot r^{s-1}\bigg|\nonumber\\
&=\bigg|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+y,u+r+h^*)\cdot r^{s-1}\bigg|\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{|\Lift_s f(x+y-z)|\cdot r^{s-1}}
{((u+r+h^*)^2+|z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dz,\label{eq2-132}
\end{align}
where the implicit constant depends on $n$. When $0<r<\infty$ and $0<|h^*|<|h|<\frac{u}{2}$, we have $u+h^*\in(\frac{u}{2},\frac{3u}{2})$ and thus
$$(u+r+h^*)^2+|z|^2>(\frac{u}{2}+r)^2+|z|^2.$$
Inserting this inequality into (\ref{eq2-132}) yields
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-133}
\bigg|\frac{\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+y,u+r+h)-\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+y,u+r)}{h}\cdot r^{s-1}\bigg|\lesssim\Upsilon_1(r)
\end{equation}
for every $r\in(0,\infty)$ and uniformly for all $h\in\bbbr$ with $0<|h|<\frac{u}{2}$, and the implicit constant depends on $n$. The dominating function $\Upsilon_1(r)$ is integrable with respect to $r$ on the interval $(0,\infty)$. This is because we can use H\"{o}lder's inequality with $\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{p'}=1$, Minkowski's integral inequality, and a proper change of variable in a sequence to estimate $\int_0^{\infty}\Upsilon_1(r)dr$ from above by the following
\begin{align}
&\int_{\bbbr^n}|\Lift_s f(x+y-z)|\cdot\int_0^{\infty}\frac{r^{s-1}}
{((\frac{u}{2}+r)^2+|z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}drdz\nonumber\\
&\leq\|\Lift_s f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\cdot\|\int_0^{\infty}\frac{r^{s-1}}
{((\frac{u}{2}+r)^2+|z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dr\|_{L^{p'}(\bbbr^n)}\nonumber\\
&\leq\|\Lift_s f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\cdot\int_0^{\infty}\|\frac{r^{s-1}}
{((\frac{u}{2}+r)^2+|z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\|_{L^{p'}(\bbbr^n)}dr\nonumber\\
&=\|\Lift_s f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\|(1+|z|^2)^{-\frac{n+1}{2}}\|_{L^{p'}(\bbbr^n)}
\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\frac{r^{s-1}}{(\frac{u}{2}+r)^{\frac{n}{p}+1}}dr<\infty,\label{eq2-134}
\end{align}
since $0<u<|y|$ is fixed and $0<s<1$. Therefore we can use the dominated convergence theorem to bring the limit in (\ref{eq2-130}) into the integral sign and obtain the following equation
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq6.41})
&=-C_1\int_0^{|y|}\frac{\partial}{\partial u}\bigg[\int_0^{\infty}\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+y,u+r)r^{s-1}dr\bigg]du
 \nonumber\\
&=-C_1\int_0^{|y|}\int_0^{\infty}\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+y,u+r)r^{s-1}drdu.\label{eq.lemma15.1}
\end{align}
In a similar way, we can also obtain the following equation
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq6.43})
&=C_1\int_0^{|y|}\frac{\partial}{\partial u}\bigg[\int_0^{\infty}\Pint(\Lift_s f;x,u+r)r^{s-1}dr\bigg]du
\nonumber\\
&=C_1\int_0^{|y|}\int_0^{\infty}\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\Lift_s f;x,u+r)r^{s-1}drdu.\label{eq.lemma15.3}
\end{align}
Now we consider (\ref{eq6.44}). For each $k\in\{1,\cdots,n\}$, we denote that $\vec{e}_k$ is the unit elementary vector in $\bbbr^n$ whose $k$-th coordinate is $1$ and all the other coordinates are $0$, $\bar{y}_k$ is the $k$-th coordinate of $\bar{y}$ and $\bar{y}_k=\frac{y_k}{|y|}$, furthermore we also denote
\begin{align}
&E_k^{(1)}:=\{z\in\bbbr^n:|y|<|x_k+u\bar{y}_k-z_k|\},\label{eq2-135}\\
&E_k^{(2)}:=\{z\in\bbbr^n:|y|\geq|x_k+u\bar{y}_k-z_k|\}.\label{eq2-136}
\end{align}
Then we have
\begin{align}
&\frac{\partial}{\partial x_k}\bigg[\int_0^{\infty}\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+u\bar{y},|y|+r)r^{s-1}dr\bigg]\nonumber\\
&=\lim_{h\rightarrow0}\int_0^{\infty}\!\!
\frac{\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+u\bar{y}+h\vec{e}_k,|y|+r)-\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+u\bar{y},|y|+r)}{h}\nonumber\\
&\quad\cdot r^{s-1}dr,\label{eq2-137}
\end{align}
and we claim that the dominating function for the integrand on the right side of (\ref{eq2-137}) is
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-138}
\Upsilon_2(r)+\Upsilon_3(r)
\end{equation}
for every $r\in(0,\infty)$ and uniformly for all $h\in\bbbr$ with $0<|h|<\frac{|y|}{2}$, where
\begin{align}
&\Upsilon_2(r)=\int_{z\in E_k^{(1)}}|\Lift_s f(z)|\cdot
\frac{r^{s-1}}{\big[(|y|+r)^2+\frac{1}{4}|x+u\bar{y}-z|^2\big]^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dz,\label{eq2-139}\\
&\Upsilon_3(r)=\int_{z\in E_k^{(2)}}|\Lift_s f(z)|\cdot
\frac{r^{s-1}}{\big[(|y|+r)^2+|x'+u\bar{y}'-z'|^2\big]^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dz,\label{eq2-140}
\end{align}
and $x'=(x_1,\cdots,x_{k-1},x_{k+1},\cdots,x_n)$, $\bar{y}'=(\bar{y}_1,\cdots,\bar{y}_{k-1},\bar{y}_{k+1},\cdots,\bar{y}_n)$, $z'=(z_1,\cdots,z_{k-1},z_{k+1},\cdots,z_n)$, and we have
\begin{align}
&|x+u\bar{y}-z|^2=\sum_{j=1}^n(x_j+u\bar{y}_j-z_j)^2,\label{eq2-141}\\
&|x'+u\bar{y}'-z'|^2=\sum_{j=1,j\neq k}^n(x_j+u\bar{y}_j-z_j)^2.\label{eq2-142}
\end{align}
By using formula (\ref{eq1-5}) and the mean value theorem, we can find a real number $h^*$ between $0$ and $h$ so that the integrand on the right side of (\ref{eq2-137}) can be estimated from above as below,
\begin{align}
&\bigg|\frac{\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+u\bar{y}+h\vec{e}_k,|y|+r)-\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+u\bar{y},|y|+r)}{h}\cdot r^{s-1}\bigg|
\nonumber\\
&=\bigg|\partial_k\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+u\bar{y}+h^*\vec{e}_k,|y|+r)\cdot r^{s-1}\bigg|\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}\!\!\frac{|\Lift_s f(z)|\cdot r^{s-1}}
{\big[(|y|+r)^2+|x'+u\bar{y}'-z'|^2+(h^*+x_k+u\bar{y}_k-z_k)^2\big]^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dz\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}\!\!\frac{|\Lift_s f(z)|\cdot r^{s-1}}
{\big[(|y|+r)^2+|x'+u\bar{y}'-z'|^2+g(|h^*|)\big]^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dz,\label{eq2-143}
\end{align}
where the implicit constants in (\ref{eq2-143}) depend on $n$, and $g(|h^*|)$ is the evaluation of the nonnegative quadratic function
\begin{equation}\label{eq2-144}
g(t)=t^2-2|x_k+u\bar{y}_k-z_k|t+|x_k+u\bar{y}_k-z_k|^2
\end{equation}
at $t=|h^*|$. When $0<|h|<\frac{|y|}{2}$ and $z\in E_k^{(1)}$, we have $0<|h^*|<|h|<\frac{1}{2}|x_k+u\bar{y}_k-z_k|$. And on the closed and bounded interval $[0,\frac{1}{2}|x_k+u\bar{y}_k-z_k|]$, the nonnegative quadratic function $g(t)$ defined in (\ref{eq2-144}) is decreasing and achieves a nonnegative minimum value at $t=\frac{1}{2}|x_k+u\bar{y}_k-z_k|$, and this nonnegative minimum value is $\frac{1}{4}|x_k+u\bar{y}_k-z_k|^2$. Therefore we have
\begin{align}
&\int_{E_k^{(1)}}\!\!\frac{|\Lift_s f(z)|\cdot r^{s-1}}
{\big[(|y|+r)^2+|x'+u\bar{y}'-z'|^2+g(|h^*|)\big]^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dz\nonumber\\
&\leq\int_{E_k^{(1)}}\!\!\frac{|\Lift_s f(z)|\cdot r^{s-1}}
{\big[(|y|+r)^2+|x'+u\bar{y}'-z'|^2+\frac{1}{4}|x_k+u\bar{y}_k-z_k|^2\big]^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dz\nonumber\\
&\leq\int_{E_k^{(1)}}\!\!\frac{|\Lift_s f(z)|\cdot r^{s-1}}
{\big[(|y|+r)^2+\frac{1}{4}|x+u\bar{y}-z|^2\big]^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dz=\Upsilon_2(r).\label{eq2-145}
\end{align}
When $z\in E_k^{(2)}$, we use the nonnegativity of the quadratic function $g(t)$ defined in (\ref{eq2-144}) and obtain
\begin{align}
&\int_{E_k^{(2)}}\!\!\frac{|\Lift_s f(z)|\cdot r^{s-1}}
{\big[(|y|+r)^2+|x'+u\bar{y}'-z'|^2+g(|h^*|)\big]^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dz\nonumber\\
&\leq\int_{E_k^{(2)}}\!\!\frac{|\Lift_s f(z)|\cdot r^{s-1}}
{\big[(|y|+r)^2+|x'+u\bar{y}'-z'|^2\big]^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dz=\Upsilon_3(r).\label{eq2-146}
\end{align}
Combining (\ref{eq2-143}), (\ref{eq2-145}), (\ref{eq2-146}), we have proven the claim (\ref{eq2-138}). Next we prove that $\int_0^{\infty}\Upsilon_2(r)+\Upsilon_3(r)dr<\infty$. We use H\"{o}lder's inequality with $\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{p'}=1$, Minkowski's integral inequality, and a proper change of variable in a sequence to estimate $\int_0^{\infty}\Upsilon_2(r)dr$ from above by the following
\begin{align}
&\int_{\bbbr^n}\!\!|\Lift_s f(z)|\int_0^{\infty}\frac{r^{s-1}}
{\big[(|y|+r)^2+\frac{1}{4}|x+u\bar{y}-z|^2\big]^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}drdz\nonumber\\
&\leq\|\Lift_s f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\cdot\|\int_0^{\infty}\frac{r^{s-1}}
{\big[(|y|+r)^2+\frac{1}{4}|x+u\bar{y}-z|^2\big]^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dr\|_{L^{p'}(\bbbr^n)}\nonumber\\
&\leq\|\Lift_s f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\cdot\int_0^{\infty}\|\frac{r^{s-1}}
{\big[(|y|+r)^2+\frac{1}{4}|z|^2\big]^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\|_{L^{p'}(\bbbr^n)}dr\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\|\Lift_s f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\|(1+|z|^2)^{-\frac{n+1}{2}}\|_{L^{p'}(\bbbr^n)}
\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\frac{r^{s-1}}{(|y|+r)^{\frac{n}{p}+1}}dr<\infty,\label{eq2-147}
\end{align}
where the implicit constant depends on $n,p$. Recall the definition of the set $E_k^{(2)}$ given in (\ref{eq2-136}), and also $dz'=dz_1\cdots dz_{k-1}dz_{k+1}\cdots dz_n$. We use H\"{o}lder's inequality with $\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{p'}=1$ to estimate $\int_0^{\infty}\Upsilon_3(r)dr$ from above by the following
\begin{align}
&\int_{E_k^{(2)}}\!\!|\Lift_s f(z)|\cdot\int_0^{\infty}\frac{r^{s-1}}
{\big[(|y|+r)^2+|x'+u\bar{y}'-z'|^2\big]^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}drdz\nonumber\\
&\leq\|\Lift_s f\|_{L^p(E_k^{(2)})}\big(\!\!\int_{E_k^{(2)}}\!\!\big\{\!\!     
\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\frac{r^{s-1}}{\big[(|y|+r)^2+|x'+u\bar{y}'-z'|^2\big]^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dr
\big\}^{p'}\!\!dz\big)^{\frac{1}{p'}}\nonumber\\
&=\|\Lift_s f\|_{L^p(E_k^{(2)})}\nonumber\\
&\quad\cdot\big(\!\!\int_{\bbbr^{n-1}}\!\!2|y|\cdot\big\{\!\!     
\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\frac{r^{s-1}}{\big[(|y|+r)^2+|x'+u\bar{y}'-z'|^2\big]^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}dr
\big\}^{p'}\!\!dz'\big)^{\frac{1}{p'}}.\label{eq2-148}
\end{align}
And then we apply Minkowski's integral inequality with the $L^{p'}(\bbbr^{n-1})$-norm, and a proper change of variable to estimate (\ref{eq2-148}) from above by the following
\begin{align}
&\|\Lift_s f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\big(2|y|\big)^{\frac{1}{p'}}\cdot
\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\|\frac{r^{s-1}}{\big[(|y|+r)^2+|z'|^2\big]^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}\|_{L^{p'}(\bbbr^{n-1})}dr
\nonumber\\
&\leq\|\Lift_s f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\|(1+|z'|^2)^{-\frac{n+1}{2}}\|_{L^{p'}(\bbbr^{n-1})}\nonumber\\
&\quad\cdot\int_0^{\infty}\frac{(2|y|)^{\frac{1}{p'}}r^{s-1}}{(|y|+r)^{\frac{n-1}{p}+2}}dr<\infty.
\label{eq2-149}
\end{align}
Combining (\ref{eq2-147}), (\ref{eq2-148}), (\ref{eq2-149}), we have proven that the dominating function $\Upsilon_2(r)+\Upsilon_3(r)$ is integrable with respect to $r$ on the interval $(0,\infty)$, and hence we can bring the limit on the right side of (\ref{eq2-137}) into the integral sign by invoking the dominated convergence theorem and obtain the following equation
\begin{align}
&\frac{\partial}{\partial x_k}\bigg[\int_0^{\infty}\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+u\bar{y},|y|+r)r^{s-1}dr\bigg]\nonumber\\
&=\int_0^{\infty}\partial_k\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+u\bar{y},|y|+r)r^{s-1}dr\label{eq2-150}
\end{align}
for $k=1,\cdots,n$. Inserting (\ref{eq2-150}) into (\ref{eq6.44}) yields
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq6.44})
&=C_1\int_0^{|y|}\nabla_{n}\bigg[\int_0^{\infty}\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+u\bar{y},|y|+r)r^{s-1}dr\bigg]\cdot\bar{y}du
\nonumber\\
&=C_1\int_0^{|y|}\int_0^{\infty}\big(\nabla_{n}\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+u\bar{y},|y|+r)\cdot\bar{y}\big)r^{s-1}drdu.
\label{eq.lemma15.2}
\end{align}
The proof of Lemma \ref{lemma15} is now complete.
\end{proof}







\section{The boundedness of the Littlewood-Paley-Poisson function}\label{proof.of.theorem3}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{theorem3}]
Step 1: First we notice that it suffices to prove
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.1}
\|(\int_0^{\infty}t^{q-sq-1}|\partial_l\Pint(f;\cdot,t)|^q dt)^{\frac{1}{q}}\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}
\lesssim\|f\|_{\Fspq},
\end{equation}
for $1\leq l\leq n+1$, $0<p,q<\infty$, $-1<s<1$, and $f\in\Fspq$ is a function in $L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ for some $p_0\in[1,\infty]$, and we will only provide a detailed proof for (\ref{eq3.1}) in the case of $l=n+1$, and the proof for (\ref{eq3.1}) in the case where $l=1,2,\cdots,n$ will be very much alike and hence is omitted. Since $f$ is a function in the union (\ref{union}), by Minkowski's integral inequality, so is
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.37}
f_j(\cdot)=\psi_{2^{-j}}*f(\cdot)=\iFT_n[\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)\FT_n f](\cdot)
\end{equation}
for every $j\in\bbbz$, where $\psi\in\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ satisfies conditions (\ref{eq1-7}) and (\ref{eq1-8}). Equation (\ref{eq3.37}) is true in the sense of $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$. For every $j\in\bbbz$, we use the following notations,
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.4}
f_j^{\num}=\iFT_n[2^{-j}|\xi|\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)\FT_n f]
\end{equation}
where ``$\num$'' means the factor $2^{-j}|\xi|$ appears in the numerator, and
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.5}
f_j^{\den}=\iFT_n[\frac{\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)\FT_n f}{2^{-j}|\xi|}]
\end{equation}
where ``$\den$'' means the factor $2^{-j}|\xi|$ appears in the denominator. Due to the support condition of $\FT_n\psi$, both functions $2^{-j}|\xi|\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)$ and $\frac{\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)}{2^{-j}|\xi|}$ belong to $\Ccinfty(\bbbr^n)$. By \cite[Theorem 2.3.20.]{14classical} and \cite[6. of Examples 2.3.5.]{14classical}, $f_j^{\num}$ is the tempered distribution whose function representative in the sense of $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$ is the smooth function
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.38}
x\in\bbbr^n\longmapsto\iFT_n[2^{-j}|\xi|\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)]*f(x),
\end{equation}
and $f_j^{\den}$ is the tempered distribution whose function representative in the sense of $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$ is the smooth function
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.39}
x\in\bbbr^n\longmapsto\iFT_n[\frac{\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)}{2^{-j}|\xi|}]*f(x).
\end{equation}
Now we pick a function $\eta\in\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ satisfying
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.6}
0\leq\FT_n\eta\leq 1,\quad spt.\FT_n\eta\subseteq\{\xi\in\bbbr^n:\frac{1}{4}\leq|\xi|<4\},
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.7}
\FT_n\eta(\xi)=1\text{ on the annulus }\{\xi\in\bbbr^n:\frac{1}{2}\leq|\xi|<2\},
\end{equation}
then $\FT_n\eta=1$ on the support set of $\FT_n\psi$. We claim that
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.40}
\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f_j;x,t)=2^j\iFT_n[-2\pi e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\cdot\FT_n f_j^{\num}](x)
\end{equation}
in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$ for almost every $x\in\bbbr^n$, every $t\in(0,\infty)$ and $j\in\bbbz$. Let $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$, and recall the subspace $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ defined in (\ref{eq1.62}). We can use the equation (\ref{eq2-35}) with $f_j$ in place of $f$ to write
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.49}
\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f_j;x,t)=\iFT_n[-2\pi|\xi| e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n f_j]
\end{equation}
for every $0<t<\infty$ in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$. Then since $\iFT_n\phi\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ and the function
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.122}
\xi\in\bbbr^n\longmapsto-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}
\end{equation}
satisfies the condition (\ref{eq1.64}), we use Proposition \ref{proposition1} to obtain that $$-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\iFT_n\phi(\xi)\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n),$$ and
\begin{align}
&<\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f_j;\cdot,t),\phi>
=<\iFT_n[-2\pi|\xi| e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n f_j],\phi>\nonumber\\
&=<-2\pi|\xi| e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n f_j,\iFT_n\phi>
=<\FT_n f_j,-2\pi|\xi| e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\iFT_n\phi>\nonumber\\
&=2^j<\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)\cdot\FT_n f,2^{-j}|\xi|\cdot-2\pi e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\iFT_n\phi>\nonumber\\
&=2^j<\FT_n f,2^{-j}|\xi|\cdot\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)\cdot-2\pi e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\iFT_n\phi>\nonumber\\
&=2^j<\FT_n f,2^{-j}|\xi|\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)\cdot-2\pi e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)
\cdot\iFT_n\phi>.\label{eq3.50}
\end{align}
On the other hand, we have $\FT_n f_j^{\num}=2^{-j}|\xi|\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)\cdot\FT_n f$ in the sense of $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$, and $2^{-j}|\xi|\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)\in\Ccinfty(\bbbr^n)$ is compactly supported in the annulus $\{\xi\in\bbbr^n:2^{j-1}\leq|\xi|\leq2^{j+1}\}$, and $-2\pi e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\in\Ccinfty(\bbbr^n)$ is compactly supported in the annulus $\{\xi\in\bbbr^n:2^{j-2}\leq|\xi|\leq2^{j+2}\}$, thus $2^j\iFT_n[-2\pi e^{-2\pi t|\xi|} \FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\cdot\FT_n f_j^{\num}]$ is the tempered distribution whose function representative in the sense of $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$ is the smooth function
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.126}
x\in\bbbr^n\longmapsto
2^j\iFT_n[-2\pi e^{-2\pi t|\xi|} \FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)]*f_j^{\num}(x),
\end{equation}
and we have
\begin{align}
&<2^j\iFT_n[-2\pi e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\cdot\FT_n f_j^{\num}],\phi>\nonumber\\
&=2^j<-2\pi e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\cdot\FT_n f_j^{\num},\iFT_n\phi>\nonumber\\
&=2^j<\FT_n f_j^{\num},-2\pi e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\cdot\iFT_n\phi>\nonumber\\
&=2^j<2^{-j}|\xi|\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)\cdot\FT_n f,-2\pi e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi) \cdot\iFT_n\phi>\nonumber\\
&=2^j<\FT_n f,2^{-j}|\xi|\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)\cdot-2\pi e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi) \cdot\iFT_n\phi>.\label{eq3.127}
\end{align}
Equations (\ref{eq3.50}) and (\ref{eq3.127}) prove equation (\ref{eq3.40}). In a similar way, we can prove that $2^{-j}\iFT_n[-2\pi|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\cdot\FT_n f_j^{\den}]$ is the tempered distribution whose function representative in the sense of $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$ is the smooth function
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.128}
x\in\bbbr^n\longmapsto
2^{-j}\iFT_n[-2\pi|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)]*f_j^{\den}(x),
\end{equation}
and the equation
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.51}
\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f_j;x,t)=2^{-j}\iFT_n[-2\pi|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)
\cdot\FT_n f_j^{\den}](x)
\end{equation}
holds true in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$ for almost every $x\in\bbbr^n$, every $t\in(0,\infty)$ and $j\in\bbbz$. By Lemma \ref{lemma8}, we have that the series in (\ref{eq2-37}) converges in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$. From (\ref{eq3.40}) and (\ref{eq3.51}), we can deduce that for each fixed $k\in\bbbz$, and $2^{-k-1}\leq t\leq2^{-k}$, we have
\begin{align}
\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)=
&\sum_{k\leq j}2^{-j}\iFT_n[-2\pi|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\FT_n f_j^{\den}](x)
\nonumber\\
&+\sum_{j<k}2^j\iFT_n[-2\pi e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\FT_n f_j^{\num}](x),\label{eq3.123}
\end{align}
and the series in (\ref{eq3.123}) converges in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$. To prove (\ref{eq3.1}) in the case where the partial derivative of the Poisson integral is with respect to $t$, we consider the following series of nonnegative real numbers,
\begin{align}
&\sum_{k\leq j}2^{-j}\big|\iFT_n[-2\pi|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)
\FT_n f_j^{\den}](x)\big|\nonumber\\
&+\sum_{j<k}2^j\big|\iFT_n[-2\pi e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\FT_n f_j^{\num}](x)\big|,
\label{eq3.124}
\end{align}
and we begin with estimating the following term,
\begin{align}
&\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{-k(q-sq-1)}\int_{2^{-k-1}}^{2^{-k}}
\bigg\{\text{the series (\ref{eq3.124})}\bigg\}^q dt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{-k(q-sq)}\esssup_{2^{-k-1}\leq t\leq 2^{-k}}
\bigg\{\text{the series (\ref{eq3.124})}\bigg\}^q.\label{eq3.125}
\end{align}
Furthermore, the expression (\ref{eq3.125}), into which we insert the series (\ref{eq3.124}), can be estimated from above by a constant multiple of the sum of the following two terms,
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.10}
\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{ksq}\!\!\!\!\esssup_{2^{-k-1}\leq t\leq 2^{-k}}\!\!\big\{
\sum_{k>j}2^{j-k}|\iFT_n[e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\FT_n f_j^{\num}](x)|\big\}^q
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.11}
\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{ksq}\!\!\!\!\esssup_{2^{-k-1}\leq t\leq 2^{-k}}\!\!\big\{
\sum_{k\leq j}2^{-k-j}|\iFT_n[|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\FT_n f_j^{\den}](x)|\big\}^q,
\end{equation}
and the constant only depends on $q$.\\

Step 2: We estimate the term (\ref{eq3.10}). When $k>j$ and $2^{-k-1}\leq t\leq 2^{-k}$, we recall \cite[Definition 2.2]{Wang2023} of the Peetre-Fefferman-Stein maximal function and observe that the $n$-dimensional distributional Fourier transform of the function $f_j^{\num}$ is supported in the annulus $\{\xi\in\bbbr^n:2^{j-1}\leq|\xi|\leq 2^{j+1}\}$ and the associated Peetre-Fefferman-Stein maximal function is given by $$\PFSmax_n f_j^{\num}(x)=\esssup_{z\in\bbbr^n}\frac{|f_j^{\num}(x-z)|}{(1+2^{j+1}|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}},$$ where in the proof of this theorem, $r$ is a positive real number chosen to satisfy $0<r<\min\{p,q\}$. Then we have
\begin{align}
&|\iFT_n[e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\FT_n f_j^{\num}](x)|\nonumber\\
&=|\iFT_n[e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)]*f_j^{\num}(x)|\nonumber\\
&\leq\int_{\bbbr^n}|\iFT_n[e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)](z)|\cdot|f_j^{\num}(x-z)|dz\nonumber\\
&\leq\int_{\bbbr^n}|\iFT_n[e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{t\xi}{2^j t})](z)|\cdot(1+2^{j+1}|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}dz\cdot\PFSmax_n f_j^{\num}(x)\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}|\iFT_n[e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})](\frac{z}{t})|\cdot(1+2^{j+1}t\cdot|\frac{z}{t}|)^{\frac{n}{r}}\frac{dz}{t^n}\cdot\PFSmax_n f_j^{\num}(x)\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}|\iFT_n[e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})](z)|\cdot(1+2^{j+1}t|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}dz\cdot\PFSmax_n f_j^{\num}(x),\label{eq3.12}
\end{align}
where we also use the formula $$\iFT_n[e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{t\xi}{2^j t})](z)=t^{-n}\cdot\iFT_n[e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})](\frac{z}{t})$$ and an appropriate change of variable. We can split the integral in the last line of (\ref{eq3.12}) into two parts, one is an integral over the domain $\{z\in\bbbr^n:2^j t|z|\leq 1\}$ and the other is an integral over the domain $\{z\in\bbbr^n:2^j t|z|\geq 1\}$. For the first part, we estimate as follows
\begin{align}
&\int_{2^j t|z|\leq 1}|\iFT_n[e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})](z)|\cdot(1+2^{j+1}t|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}dz\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{2^j t|z|\leq 1}\int_{\bbbr^n}e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\cdot|\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})|d\xi dz
 \nonumber\\
&\lesssim 2^{-jn}t^{-n}\cdot\int_{2^{j-2}t\leq|\xi|<2^{j+2}t}e^{-2\pi|\xi|}d\xi
\cdot\|\FT_n\eta\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}\cdot 2^j t}\lesssim 1,\label{eq3.13}
\end{align}
where the implicit constants in (\ref{eq3.13}) depend on $n,r,\eta$ and we also use the support condition of $\FT_n\eta$ given in (\ref{eq3.6}). For the second part, when $k>j$, $2^{-k-1}\leq t\leq 2^{-k}$, and $2^j t|z|\geq 1$, we can assume without loss of generality that $z=(z_1,z_2,\cdots,z_n)=(z_1,z')$, $z'=(z_2,\cdots,z_n)$, and $|z_1|=\max\{|z_1|,|z_2|,\cdots,|z_n|\}$. Therefore we have $|z_1|\cdot\sqrt{n}\geq|z|>0$ and we can use integration by parts with respect to $\xi_1$ repeatedly to obtain the following
\begin{align}
&|\iFT_n[e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})](z)|\nonumber\\
&=|\int_{\bbbr^{n-1}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{\partial^M}{\partial\xi_1^M}\big(
 e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})\big)\cdot\frac{e^{2\pi i\xi_1 z_1}\cdot e^{2\pi i\xi'\cdot z'}}{(-2\pi iz_1)^M}d\xi_1 d\xi'|\nonumber\\
&\lesssim|z|^{-M}\int_{\bbbr^n}\big|\frac{\partial^M}{\partial\xi_1^M}\big(
e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})\big)\big|d\xi,\label{eq3.14}
\end{align}
where $M$ is a sufficiently large positive integer and the constant in (\ref{eq3.14}) depends on $n,M$. Combining some direct and trivial calculations with the fact that the support condition of $\FT_n\eta$ given in (\ref{eq3.6}) restricts the range of $\xi$ in the integral in the last line of (\ref{eq3.14}) to a domain where $|\xi|\sim 2^j t$, we can obtain
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.15}
(\ref{eq3.14})\lesssim\frac{e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}\cdot 2^j t}}{|z|^M}\cdot\sum_{l=0}^M (2^j t)^{n-l},
\end{equation}
where the constant in (\ref{eq3.15}) depends on $n,M,\eta$. Combining (\ref{eq3.14}) and (\ref{eq3.15}) and inserting the result into the expression below yield
\begin{align}
&\int_{2^j t|z|\geq 1}|\iFT_n[e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})](z)|\cdot(1+2^{j+1}t|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}dz\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{2^j t|z|\geq 1}\frac{(1+2^{j+1}t|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}}{|z|^M}dz\cdot e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}\cdot 2^j t}
 \cdot\sum_{l=0}^M (2^j t)^{n-l}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{2^j t|z|\geq 1}\frac{(2^{j}t|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}}{(2^j t|z|)^M}dz\cdot e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}\cdot 2^j t}\cdot\sum_{l=0}^M (2^j t)^{n+l}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim e^{-\frac{\pi}{4}\cdot 2^{j-k}}\cdot\sum_{l=0}^M 2^{(j-k)l}
 \lesssim(M+1)e^{-\frac{\pi}{4}\cdot 2^{j-k}}\lesssim 1,\label{eq3.16}
\end{align}
where we pick $M$ so that $\frac{n}{r}+n<M$ and thus the integral $\int_{|z|\geq 1}|z|^{\frac{n}{r}-M}dz$ converges and we also use the conditions that $k>j$ and $2^{-k-1}\leq t\leq 2^{-k}$. The implicit constants in (\ref{eq3.16}) depend on $n,r,M,\eta$ and are independent of $k,j,t$. Combining estimates (\ref{eq3.13}) and (\ref{eq3.16}), we can conclude that the integral in the last line of (\ref{eq3.12}) can be bounded from above by a constant solely depending on the parameters $n,r,M,\eta$, therefore we have obtained the following pointwise estimate
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.17}
|\iFT_n[e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\FT_n f_j^{\num}](x)|\lesssim\PFSmax_n f_j^{\num}(x),
\end{equation}
for $k>j$ and $2^{-k-1}\leq t\leq 2^{-k}$. Inserting (\ref{eq3.17}) into (\ref{eq3.10}) yields
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq3.10})
&\lesssim\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{ksq}\big\{\sum_{k>j}2^{j-k}\PFSmax_n f_j^{\num}(x)\big\}^q\nonumber\\
&=\sum_{k\in\bbbz}\big(\sum_{l<0}2^l\cdot 2^{ks}\PFSmax_n f_{k+l}^{\num}(x)\big)^q\nonumber\\
&=\sum_{k\in\bbbz}\big(\sum_{l<0}2^{l(1-s)}\cdot 2^{(k+l)s}\PFSmax_n f_{k+l}^{\num}(x)\big)^q.\label{eq3.18}
\end{align}
If $0<q<1$, then we can have the following inequality directly and exchange the order of summations to obtain
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq3.18})
&\leq\sum_{k\in\bbbz}\sum_{l<0}2^{l(1-s)q}\cdot 2^{(k+l)sq}\PFSmax_n f_{k+l}^{\num}(x)^q\nonumber\\
&=\sum_{l<0}2^{l(1-s)q}\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{(k+l)sq}\PFSmax_n f_{k+l}^{\num}(x)^q\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{ksq}\PFSmax_n f_{k}^{\num}(x)^q.\label{eq3.19}
\end{align}
If $1\leq q<\infty$, then we use the Minkowski's inequality for $\|\cdot\|_{l^q}$-norm with respect to $k\in\bbbz$ to obtain
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq3.18})
&=\|\sum_{l<0}2^{l(1-s)}\cdot\{2^{(k+l)s}\PFSmax_n f_{k+l}^{\num}(x)\}_{k\in\bbbz}\|_{l^q}^q\nonumber\\
&\leq\big(\sum_{l<0}2^{l(1-s)}\cdot(\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{ksq}\PFSmax_n f_{k}^{\num}(x)^q)^{\frac{1}{q}}\big)^q
 \nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{ksq}\PFSmax_n f_{k}^{\num}(x)^q.\label{eq3.20}
\end{align}
In (\ref{eq3.19}) and (\ref{eq3.20}), we use the condition $s<1$ and the constants depend on $s,q$. Combining (\ref{eq3.18}), (\ref{eq3.19}), and (\ref{eq3.20}), we have obtained
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.21}
(\ref{eq3.10})\lesssim\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{ksq}\PFSmax_n f_{k}^{\num}(x)^q
\quad\text{for $s<1$ and $0<q<\infty$},
\end{equation}
and the constant only depends on $n,r,M,\eta,s,q$.\\

Step 3: We estimate the term (\ref{eq3.11}). When $k\leq j$ and $2^{-k-1}\leq t\leq 2^{-k}$, we notice that the $n$-dimensional distributional Fourier transform of the function $f_j^{\den}$ is supported in the annulus $\{\xi\in\bbbr^n:2^{j-1}\leq|\xi|<2^{j+1}\}$ and hence the associated Peetre-Fefferman-Stein maximal function is given by $$\PFSmax_n f_j^{\den}(x)=\esssup_{z\in\bbbr^n}\frac{|f_j^{\den}(x-z)|}{(1+2^{j+1}|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}},$$ where in the proof of this theorem, $r$ is a positive real number chosen to satisfy $0<r<\min\{p,q\}$. Then we have
\begin{align}
&|\iFT_n[|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\FT_n f_j^{\den}](x)|\nonumber\\
&=|\iFT_n[|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)]*f_j^{\den}(x)|\nonumber\\
&\leq\int_{\bbbr^n}\!\!\!\!|\iFT_n[|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)](z)|
 \cdot|f_j^{\den}(x-z)|dz\nonumber\\
&\leq\int_{\bbbr^n}\!\!\!\!|\iFT_n[|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)](z)|
 (1+2^{j+1}|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}dz\cdot\PFSmax_n f_j^{\den}(x)\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}\!\!\!\! t^{-2}|\iFT_n[|t\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{t\xi}{2^j t})](z)|
 (1+2^{j+1}|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}dz\cdot\PFSmax_n f_j^{\den}(x)\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}\!\!\!\! t^{-2}|\iFT_n[|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})](\frac{z}{t})|
 (1+2^{j+1}t\cdot|\frac{z}{t}|)^{\frac{n}{r}}\frac{dz}{t^n}\cdot\PFSmax_n f_j^{\den}(x)\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}\!\!\!\! |\iFT_n[|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})](z)|
 (1+2^{j+1}t|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}dz\cdot t^{-2}\PFSmax_n f_j^{\den}(x),\label{eq3.22}
\end{align}
where we also use the formula $$\iFT_n[|t\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{t\xi}{2^j t})](z)=t^{-n}\cdot\iFT_n[|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})](\frac{z}{t})$$ and an appropriate change of variable. We can split the integral in the last line of (\ref{eq3.22}) into two parts, one is an integral over the domain $\{z\in\bbbr^n:2^j t|z|\leq 1\}$ and the other is an integral over the domain $\{z\in\bbbr^n:2^j t|z|\geq 1\}$. For the first part, we estimate as follows
\begin{align}
&\int_{2^j t|z|\leq 1}|\iFT_n[|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})](z)|\cdot(1+2^{j+1}t|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}dz\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{2^j t|z|\leq 1}\int_{\bbbr^n}|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\cdot|\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})|d\xi dz
\nonumber\\
&\lesssim 2^{-jn}t^{-n}\cdot\int_{2^{j-2}t\leq|\xi|<2^{j+2}t}|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi|\xi|}d\xi
\cdot\|\FT_n\eta\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim 2^{2(j-k)} e^{-\frac{\pi}{4}\cdot 2^{j-k}}\lesssim 1,\label{eq3.23}
\end{align}
where the implicit constants in (\ref{eq3.23}) depend on $n,r,\eta$ and we also use the support condition of $\FT_n\eta$ given in (\ref{eq3.6}). The last inequality of (\ref{eq3.23}) is due to the fact that $\lim_{x\rightarrow+\infty}\frac{2^{2x}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4}\cdot 2^x}}=0$, which can be easily verified by repeatedly applying L'Hospital's rule. For the second part, when $k\leq j$, $2^{-k-1}\leq t\leq 2^{-k}$, and $2^j t|z|\geq 1$, we can assume without loss of generality that $z=(z_1,z_2,\cdots,z_n)=(z_1,z')$, $z'=(z_2,\cdots,z_n)$, and $|z_1|=\max\{|z_1|,|z_2|,\cdots,|z_n|\}$. Therefore we have $|z_1|\cdot\sqrt{n}\geq|z|>0$ and we can use integration by parts with respect to $\xi_1$ repeatedly to obtain the following
\begin{align}
&|\iFT_n[|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})](z)|\nonumber\\
&=|\int_{\bbbr^{n-1}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{\partial^M}{\partial\xi_1^M}\big(|\xi|^2
e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})\big)\cdot\frac{e^{2\pi i\xi_1 z_1}\cdot e^{2\pi i\xi'\cdot z'}}{(-2\pi iz_1)^M}d\xi_1 d\xi'|\nonumber\\
&\lesssim|z|^{-M}\int_{\bbbr^n}\big|\frac{\partial^M}{\partial\xi_1^M}\big(|\xi|^2
e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})\big)\big|d\xi,\label{eq3.24}
\end{align}
where $M$ is a sufficiently large positive integer satisfying the condition $\frac{n}{r}+n<M$ and the constant in (\ref{eq3.24}) depends on $n,M$. Combining some direct and trivial calculations with the fact that the support condition of $\FT_n\eta$ given in (\ref{eq3.6}) restricts the range of $\xi$ in the integral in the last line of (\ref{eq3.24}) to a domain where $|\xi|\sim 2^j t$, we can obtain
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.25}
(\ref{eq3.24})\lesssim\frac{e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}\cdot 2^j t}}{|z|^M}\cdot\sum_{l=0}^M (2^j t)^{n+2-l},
\end{equation}
where the constant in (\ref{eq3.25}) depends on $n,M,\eta$. Combining (\ref{eq3.24}) and (\ref{eq3.25}) and inserting the result into the expression below yield
\begin{align}
&\int_{2^j t|z|\geq 1}|\iFT_n[|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(\frac{\xi}{2^j t})](z)| \cdot(1+2^{j+1}t|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}dz\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{2^j t|z|\geq 1}\frac{(1+2^{j+1}t|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}}{|z|^M}dz\cdot e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}\cdot 2^j t}
\cdot\sum_{l=0}^M (2^j t)^{n+2-l}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{2^j t|z|\geq 1}\frac{(2^{j}t|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}}{(2^j t|z|)^M}dz\cdot e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}\cdot 2^j t}\cdot\sum_{l=0}^M (2^j t)^{n+2+l}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim(M+1)2^{(j-k)(M+2)}\cdot e^{-\frac{\pi}{4}\cdot 2^{j-k}}\lesssim 1,\label{eq3.26}
\end{align}
where we use the conditions that $k\leq j$, $2^{-k-1}\leq t\leq 2^{-k}$, and the fact that the integral $\int_{|z|\geq 1}|z|^{\frac{n}{r}-M}dz$ converges since $\frac{n}{r}+n<M$, and the implicit constants in (\ref{eq3.26}) depend on $n,r,M,\eta$. The last inequality of (\ref{eq3.26}) is due to the fact that $\lim_{x\rightarrow+\infty}\frac{2^{(M+2)x}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4}\cdot 2^x}}=0$, which can be verified by repeatedly applying L'Hospital's rule. Combining (\ref{eq3.23}) and (\ref{eq3.26}), we can conclude that the integral in the last line of (\ref{eq3.22}) can be bounded from above by a constant whose value only depends on the parameters $n,r,M,\eta$ and in particular, is independent of $k,j,t$. Therefore we have obtained the following pointwise estimate
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.27}
|\iFT_n[|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\FT_n f_j^{\den}](x)|\lesssim
t^{-2}\PFSmax_n f_j^{\den}(x)\lesssim 2^{2k}\PFSmax_n f_j^{\den}(x),
\end{equation}
for $k\leq j$ and $2^{-k-1}\leq t\leq 2^{-k}$. Inserting (\ref{eq3.27}) into (\ref{eq3.11}) yields
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq3.11})
&\lesssim\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{ksq}\big\{\sum_{k\leq j}2^{k-j}\PFSmax_n f_j^{\den}(x)\big\}^q\nonumber\\
&=\sum_{k\in\bbbz}\big(\sum_{l\geq 0}2^{-l}\cdot 2^{ks}\PFSmax_n f_{k+l}^{\den}(x)\big)^q\nonumber\\
&=\sum_{k\in\bbbz}\big(\sum_{l\geq 0}2^{-l(1+s)}\cdot 2^{(k+l)s}
 \PFSmax_n f_{k+l}^{\den}(x)\big)^q.\label{eq3.28}
\end{align}
If $0<q<1$, then we can have the following inequality directly and exchange the order of summations to obtain
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq3.28})
&\leq\sum_{k\in\bbbz}\sum_{l\geq 0}2^{-l(1+s)q}\cdot 2^{(k+l)sq}\PFSmax_n f_{k+l}^{\den}(x)^q\nonumber\\
&=\sum_{l\geq 0}2^{-l(1+s)q}\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{(k+l)sq}\PFSmax_n f_{k+l}^{\den}(x)^q\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{ksq}\PFSmax_n f_{k}^{\den}(x)^q.\label{eq3.29}
\end{align}
If $1\leq q<\infty$, then we use the Minkowski's inequality for $\|\cdot\|_{l^q}$-norm with respect to $k\in\bbbz$ to obtain
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq3.28})
&=\|\sum_{l\geq 0}2^{-l(1+s)}\cdot\{2^{(k+l)s}\PFSmax_n f_{k+l}^{\den}(x)\}_{k\in\bbbz}\|_{l^q}^q\nonumber\\
&\leq\big(\sum_{l\geq 0}2^{-l(1+s)}\cdot
(\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{ksq}\PFSmax_n f_{k}^{\den}(x)^q)^{\frac{1}{q}}\big)^q\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{ksq}\PFSmax_n f_{k}^{\den}(x)^q.\label{eq3.30}
\end{align}
In (\ref{eq3.29}) and (\ref{eq3.30}), we use the condition $-1<s$ and the constants there depend on $s,q$. Combining (\ref{eq3.28}), (\ref{eq3.29}), and (\ref{eq3.30}), we have obtained
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.31}
(\ref{eq3.11})\lesssim\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{ksq}\PFSmax_n f_{k}^{\den}(x)^q
\quad\text{for $-1<s$ and $0<q<\infty$},
\end{equation}
and the constant only depends on $n,r,M,\eta,s,q$.\\

Step 4: Now we combine the expression (\ref{eq3.125}), into which we insert the series (\ref{eq3.124}), with the estimates (\ref{eq3.10}), (\ref{eq3.11}), (\ref{eq3.21}), (\ref{eq3.31}) all together, raise both sides of the resulting inequality to the power of $\frac{1}{q}$, and put the subsequent result into $\|\cdot\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}$-quasinorm, then we can obtain the estimate below
\begin{align}
&\|\big[\text{the expression (\ref{eq3.125})}\big]^{\frac{1}{q}}\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim
\|(\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{ksq}\PFSmax_n f_{k}^{\num}(x)^q)^{\frac{1}{q}}\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}+
\|(\sum_{k\in\bbbz}2^{ksq}\PFSmax_n f_{k}^{\den}(x)^q)^{\frac{1}{q}}\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\|\{2^{ks}f_k^{\num}\}_{k\in\bbbz}\|_{L^p(l^q)}+\|\{2^{ks}f_k^{\den}\}_{k\in\bbbz}\|_{L^p(l^q)},
\label{eq3.32}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq3.32}) depend on $n,r,M,\eta,s,p,q$, and the last inequality in (\ref{eq3.32}) is due to \cite[Remark 2.13]{Wang2023} since we choose $0<r<\min\{p,q\}$ and the $n$-dimensional distributional Fourier transforms of $f_k^{\num}$ and $f_k^{\den}$ are both compactly supported in the annulus $\{\xi\in\bbbr^n:2^{k-1}\leq|\xi|<2^{k+1}\}$ for each $k\in\bbbz$. Recall the defining expression of $f_k^{\num}$ given in (\ref{eq3.4}), the condition that $\FT_n\eta=1$ on the support set of $\FT_n\psi$ due to (\ref{eq3.6}) and (\ref{eq3.7}), and the notation $f_k=\psi_{2^{-k}}*f$ for every $k\in\bbbz$, then we use (\ref{eq3.38}) to obtain 
\begin{align*}
f_k^{\num}
&=\iFT_n[2^{-k}|\xi|\FT_n\psi(2^{-k}\xi)]*f(x)\\
&=\iFT_n[2^{-k}|\xi|\FT_n\eta(2^{-k}\xi)\FT_n\psi(2^{-k}\xi)]*f(x)\\
&=\iFT_n[2^{-k}|\xi|\FT_n\eta(2^{-k}\xi)]*f_k(x)
\end{align*}
in the sense of $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$. Furthermore, we also have
\begin{align}
&|\iFT_n[2^{-k}|\xi|\FT_n\eta(2^{-k}\xi)]*f_k(x)|\nonumber\\
&\leq\int_{\bbbr^n}|\iFT_n[2^{-k}|\xi|\FT_n\eta(2^{-k}\xi)](z)|\cdot|f_k(x-z)|dz\nonumber\\
&\leq\int_{\bbbr^n}2^{kn}|\iFT_n[|\xi|\FT_n\eta(\xi)](2^k z)|\cdot(1+2^{k+1}|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}dz
 \PFSmax_n f_k(x)\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}|\iFT_n[|\xi|\FT_n\eta(\xi)](z)|\cdot(1+2|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}dz\PFSmax_n 
 f_k(x)\lesssim\PFSmax_n f_k(x),\label{eq3.33}
\end{align}
where we recall that the Peetre-Fefferman-Stein maximal function for the function $f_k$ whose $n$-dimensional distributional Fourier transform is compactly supported in the annulus $\{\xi\in\bbbr^n:2^{k-1}\leq|\xi|<2^{k+1}\}$, is given by $$\PFSmax_n f_k(x)=\esssup_{z\in\bbbr^n}\frac{|f_k(x-z)|}{(1+2^{k+1}|z|)^{\frac{n}{r}}}.$$
In (\ref{eq3.33}), we also use the formula $$\iFT_n[2^{-k}|\xi|\FT_n\eta(2^{-k}\xi)](z)=2^{kn}\iFT_n[|\xi|\FT_n\eta(\xi)](2^k z),$$
and the integral in the last line of (\ref{eq3.33}) converges to a positive finite constant whose value depends on $n,r,\eta$, due to the fact that the mapping $$z\in\bbbr^n\rightarrow\iFT_n[|\xi|\FT_n\eta(\xi)](z)$$ defines a Schwartz function on $\bbbr^n$. Recall the defining expression of $f_k^{\den}$ given in (\ref{eq3.5}), the conditions (\ref{eq3.6}) and (\ref{eq3.7}), and the notation $f_k=\psi_{2^{-k}}*f$ for every $k\in\bbbz$, then we use (\ref{eq3.39}) to obtain 
\begin{align*}
f_k^{\den}
&=\iFT_n[\frac{\FT_n\psi(2^{-k}\xi)}{2^{-k}|\xi|}]*f(x)\\
&=\iFT_n[\frac{\FT_n\eta(2^{-k}\xi)\FT_n\psi(2^{-k}\xi)}{2^{-k}|\xi|}]*f(x)\\
&=\iFT_n[\frac{\FT_n\eta(2^{-k}\xi)}{2^{-k}|\xi|}]*f_k(x)
\end{align*}
in the sense of $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$. Furthermore, we also have
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.34}
|\iFT_n[\frac{\FT_n\eta(2^{-k}\xi)}{2^{-k}|\xi|}]*f_k(x)|\lesssim\PFSmax_n f_k(x)\quad\text{for every $k\in\bbbz$ and $x\in\bbbr^n$,}
\end{equation}
in a similar way as given by (\ref{eq3.33}), since the mapping $$z\in\bbbr^n\rightarrow\iFT_n[\frac{\FT_n\eta(\xi)}{|\xi|}](z)$$ defines a Schwartz function on $\bbbr^n$. And the implicit constant in (\ref{eq3.34}) depends only on $n,r,\eta$ and is independent of $k$ and $x$. Inserting (\ref{eq3.33}) and (\ref{eq3.34}) into (\ref{eq3.32}) and invoking \cite[Remark 2.13]{Wang2023} again, we can obtain
\begin{align}
&\|\big[\text{the expression (\ref{eq3.125})}\big]^{\frac{1}{q}}\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\|\{2^{ks}\PFSmax_n f_k\}_{k\in\bbbz}\|_{L^p(l^q)}\lesssim\|f\|_{\Fspq}<\infty,\label{eq3.35}
\end{align}
where $0<p,q<\infty$, $-1<s<1$ and $f\in\Fspq$ is a function in $L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ for some $p_0\in[1,\infty]$. Inequality (\ref{eq3.35}) implies that the series (\ref{eq3.124}) converges for almost every $x\in\bbbr^n$, every $k\in\bbbz$, and almost every $t\in[2^{-k-1},2^{-k}]$. And for each fixed $k\in\bbbz$ and $2^{-k-1}\leq t\leq2^{-k}$, from equation (\ref{eq3.123}), we see that the partial sum 
\begin{align}
&\sum_{k\leq j\leq N}2^{-j}\iFT_n[-2\pi|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\FT_n f_j^{\den}](x)
\nonumber\\
&+\sum_{-N\leq j<k}2^j\iFT_n[-2\pi e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\FT_n f_j^{\num}](x)\label{eq3.61}
\end{align}
converges to $\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)$ in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$ as $N\rightarrow\infty$, and this partial sum also converges to a function $H(x)$ pointwisely for almost every $x\in\bbbr^n$ and $0<t<\infty$. We claim that
\begin{equation}\label{claim1}
\begin{split}
&\text{the pointwise limit $H(x)$ is the function representative of the}\\
&\text{tempered distribution $\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,t)$ in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$.}
\end{split}
\end{equation}
We will assume the claim (\ref{claim1}) is true for now and postpone its proof to Step 5 of the current section. Furthermore, we have justified the inequality
\begin{align}
&\|(\int_0^{\infty}t^{q-sq-1}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;\cdot,t)|^q dt)^{\frac{1}{q}}\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\|\big[\text{the expression (\ref{eq3.125})}\big]^{\frac{1}{q}}\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)},\label{eq3.36}
\end{align}
and the implicit constant depends on $s,q$. Inequalities (\ref{eq3.35}) and (\ref{eq3.36}) together complete the proof of (\ref{eq3.1}) when $l=n+1$. The proof of (\ref{eq3.1}) where $1\leq l\leq n$ can be obtained in a similar way with minor differences generated from using identity (\ref{eq2-36}) in place of (\ref{eq2-35}).\\

Step 5: In this step, we prove the claim (\ref{claim1}). Let $k\in\bbbz$ be fixed and $t\in[2^{-k-1},2^{-k}]$, and we use the notation
\begin{equation*}
F_j(x,t)=
\begin{cases}
2^{-j}\iFT_n[-2\pi|\xi|^2 e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\FT_n f_j^{\den}](x)\quad&\text{if $k\leq j$,}\\
2^j\iFT_n[-2\pi e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\FT_n\eta(2^{-j}\xi)\FT_n f_j^{\num}](x)\quad&\text{if $j<k$.}
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}
Let $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$, then by (\ref{eq3.61}), we have
\begin{align}
&<\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;\cdot,t),\phi>
=\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty}<\sum_{|j|\leq N}F_j(\cdot,t),\phi>\nonumber\\
&=\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty}\int_{\bbbr^n}\sum_{|j|\leq N}F_j(x,t)\cdot\phi(x)dx,\label{eq3.62}
\end{align}
since $f$ is a function in the union (\ref{union}) and so are the functions $f_j(x)=\psi_{2^{-j}}*f(x)$ and $\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f_j;x,t)=f_j*\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)](x)$ for every $j\in\bbbz$. Furthermore, if $f$ is a function in $L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ for some $p_0$ with $1\leq p_0\leq\infty$, then we can deduce from (\ref{eq3.4}), (\ref{eq3.5}), (\ref{eq3.6}), (\ref{eq3.7}), (\ref{eq3.40}), (\ref{eq3.51}) that the following equation
\begin{align}
&F_j(x,t)=\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f_j;x,t)\nonumber\\
&=\iFT_n[\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)\cdot-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n f](x)\label{eq3.71}
\end{align}
is true in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$ for almost every $x\in\bbbr^n$, every $0<t<\infty$ and every $j\in\bbbz$. We denote the real-valued pointwise limit of the series is
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.64}
\bar{H}(x)=\sum_{j\in\bbbz}|F_j(x,t)|,
\end{equation}
and its partial sum is given by 
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.63}
S_N(x)=\sum_{|j|\leq N}|F_j(x,t)|,
\end{equation}
then by inequality (\ref{eq3.35}), $S_N(x)\rightarrow\bar{H}(x)$ as $N\rightarrow\infty$, $\bar{H}(x)$ exists and is finite for almost every $x\in\bbbr^n$. Then the dominating function for the integrand in the last line of (\ref{eq3.62}) is given by
\begin{equation*}
\bigg|\sum_{|j|\leq N}F_j(x,t)\cdot\phi(x)\bigg|\leq\bar{H}(x)\cdot|\phi(x)|
\end{equation*}
for every $x\in\bbbr^n$ and uniformly for all $N\geq0$. Our goal is to prove that
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.72}
\int_{\bbbr^n}\bar{H}(x)\cdot|\phi(x)|dx<\infty
\end{equation}
if $f$ is a function in $L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ for some $p_0$ with $1\leq p_0\leq\infty$. Then we can apply the dominated convergence theorem and pass the limit under the integral sign in (\ref{eq3.62}) to obtain that
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.70}
<\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;\cdot,t),\phi>=\int_{\bbbr^n}H(x)\cdot\phi(x)dx
\end{equation}
whenever $\phi$ is a Schwartz function in $\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$, and hence justify the aforementioned claim (\ref{claim1}).\\

If $f\in L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ and $p_0=1$, we can use formula (\ref{eq1-3-2}) to deduce that
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.67}
C_1:=\|\psi\|_{L^1(\bbbr^n)}\cdot\|f\|_{L^{1}(\bbbr^n)}\cdot
\|\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)]\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}<\infty
\end{equation}
for each fixed $t\in(0,\infty)$, and then we use \cite[Theorem 1.2.12. (Young's inequality)]{14classical} to obtain
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.68}
\sup_{x\in\bbbr^n}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f_j;x,t)|
=\sup_{x\in\bbbr^n}|\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)]*f*\psi_{2^{-j}}(x)|\leq C_1
\end{equation}
uniformly for all $j\in\bbbz$. The above estimate and (\ref{eq3.71}) also show that $S_N(x)\in L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)$ for each $N\geq0$. For every $j\in\bbbz$, we denote the multiplier is
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.73}
m_j(\xi)=\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)\cdot-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\in\Ccinfty(\bbbr^n),
\end{equation}
and $m_j(\xi)$ is compactly supported in the annulus $\{\xi\in\bbbr^n:2^{j-1}\leq|\xi|\leq2^{j+1}\}$. Then we can use (\ref{eq3.71}) and the conditions (\ref{eq1-7}), (\ref{eq1-8}) to obtain the following estimate
\begin{align}
&\|F_j(\cdot,t)\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}=\|\iFT_n[m_j(\xi)\FT_n f]\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}
 \nonumber\\
&\leq\int_{\bbbr^n}|m_j(\xi)|\cdot|\FT_n f(\xi)|d\xi\leq\int_{\bbbr^n}|m_j(\xi)|d\xi\cdot\|f\|_{L^1(\bbbr^n)}
 \nonumber\\
&\lesssim2^{j(n+1)}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}\|f\|_{L^1(\bbbr^n)},\label{eq3.74}
\end{align}
where the implicit constant depends on $n$ and $\psi$, and estimate (\ref{eq3.74}) is true for all $j\in\bbbz$. Therefore we have
\begin{align}
&\|\bar{H}-S_N\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}\leq\sum_{|j|>N}\|F_j(\cdot,t)\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{|j|>N}2^{j(n+1)}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}\|f\|_{L^1(\bbbr^n)}\longrightarrow0\label{eq3.75}
\end{align}
as $N\longrightarrow\infty$, since both of the following series
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.76}
\sum_{j\leq-1}2^{j(n+1)}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}\qquad\text{and}\qquad
\sum_{j\geq1}2^{j(n+1)}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}
\end{equation}
converge, and the convergence of the former series is because $n+1>0$ and $e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}\leq1$ for all $j\leq-1$, and the convergence of the latter series is justified by using the ratio test. Hence the sequence $\{S_N(x)\}_{N=0}^{\infty}$ of partial sums converges to the function $\bar{H}(x)$ in $\|\cdot\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}$-norm, and by the completeness of the space $L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)$, we have $\bar{H}(x)\in L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)$ and (\ref{eq3.72}) is proven in the case where $f\in L^1(\bbbr^n)$.\\

If $f\in L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ and $1<p_0<\infty$, then we use (\ref{eq3.71}) and (\ref{eq3.73}) to obtain
\begin{align}
&\|\bar{H}-S_N\|_{L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)}\leq\sum_{|j|>N}\|F_j(\cdot,t)\|_{L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)}\nonumber\\
&=\sum_{|j|>N}\|\iFT_n[m_j(\xi)\FT_n f]\|_{L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)}.\label{eq3.77}
\end{align}
To estimate each term in the summation of (\ref{eq3.77}), we would like to use the Mihlin-H\"{o}rmander multiplier theorem, i.e. \cite[Theorem 6.2.7.]{14classical}, and for every $j\in\bbbz$, we will find $\|m_j\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}$ and a positive finite constant $A_j$ so that
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.78}
\sup_{0<R<\infty}R^{2|\alpha|-n}\int_{\frac{R}{2}<|\xi|<2R}|\partial_{\xi}^{\alpha}m_j(\xi)|^2 d\xi\leq A_j^2<
\infty
\end{equation}
for all multi-indices $\alpha$ with $|\alpha|\leq[\frac{n}{2}]+1$ and $[\frac{n}{2}]$ is the greatest integer less than or equal to $\frac{n}{2}$, and then by invoking \cite[Theorem 6.2.7.]{14classical}, we can obtain
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.79}
\|\iFT_n[m_j(\xi)\FT_n f]\|_{L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)}\lesssim\big(A_j+\|m_j\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}\big)\cdot
\|f\|_{L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)},
\end{equation}
where the implicit constant in (\ref{eq3.79}) depends on $n$ and $p_0$. By using the defining expression (\ref{eq3.73}) and the support condition (\ref{eq1-7}) of $\FT_n\psi$, we can obtain
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.80}
\|m_j\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}\lesssim2^je^{-\pi t\cdot2^j},
\end{equation}
and the implicit constant in (\ref{eq3.80}) depends on $\psi$. To estimate $A_j$, we let $\alpha$, $\beta_1$, $\beta_2$, $\beta_3$, $\beta_4$, $\gamma_1$, $\gamma_2$, $\gamma_3$, $\gamma_4$, $\omega_1$, $\omega_3$ all be multi-indices satisfying the conditions that
\begin{align}
&|\alpha|\leq[\frac{n}{2}]+1,\qquad|\omega_1|>0,\qquad|\omega_3|>0,\label{eq3.81}\\
&\alpha=\beta_1+\gamma_1+\omega_1=\beta_3+\gamma_3+\omega_3,\label{eq3.82}\\
&\alpha=\beta_2+\gamma_2=\beta_4+\gamma_4.\label{eq3.83}
\end{align}
Then we can use the Leibniz rule to estimate $|\partial_{\xi}^{\alpha}m_j(\xi)|$ from above by a constant multiple of the sum of the following terms,
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.84}
\sum_{\alpha=\beta_1+\gamma_1+\omega_1}2^{-j|\beta_1|}\big|(\partial^{\beta_1}\FT_n\psi)(2^{-j}\xi)\big|\cdot
\big|\partial^{\gamma_1}(|\xi|)\big|\cdot\big|\partial^{\omega_1}(e^{-2\pi t|\xi|})\big|
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.85}
\sum_{\alpha=\beta_2+\gamma_2}2^{-j|\beta_2|}\big|(\partial^{\beta_2}\FT_n\psi)(2^{-j}\xi)\big|\cdot
\big|\partial^{\gamma_2}(|\xi|)\big|\cdot e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}.
\end{equation}
The above estimate is still true if we replace $\beta_1,\gamma_1,\omega_1$ in (\ref{eq3.84}) by $\beta_3,\gamma_3,\omega_3$, and $\beta_2,\gamma_2$ in (\ref{eq3.85}) by $\beta_4,\gamma_4$. Hence we can estimate $$|\partial_{\xi}^{\alpha}m_j(\xi)|^2$$ from above by a constant multiple of the sum of terms of the following forms,
\begin{align}
&2^{-j|\beta_1|-j|\beta_3|}\big|(\partial^{\beta_1}\FT_n\psi)(2^{-j}\xi)\big|\cdot
\big|\partial^{\gamma_1}(|\xi|)\big|\cdot\big|\partial^{\omega_1}(e^{-2\pi t|\xi|})\big|\nonumber\\
&\cdot\big|(\partial^{\beta_3}\FT_n\psi)(2^{-j}\xi)\big|\cdot
\big|\partial^{\gamma_3}(|\xi|)\big|\cdot\big|\partial^{\omega_3}(e^{-2\pi t|\xi|})\big|,\label{eq3.86}
\end{align}
and
\begin{align}
&2^{-j|\beta_1|-j|\beta_4|}\big|(\partial^{\beta_1}\FT_n\psi)(2^{-j}\xi)\big|\cdot
\big|\partial^{\gamma_1}(|\xi|)\big|\cdot\big|\partial^{\omega_1}(e^{-2\pi t|\xi|})\big|\nonumber\\
&\cdot\big|(\partial^{\beta_4}\FT_n\psi)(2^{-j}\xi)\big|\cdot
\big|\partial^{\gamma_4}(|\xi|)\big|\cdot e^{-2\pi t|\xi|},\label{eq3.87}
\end{align}
and
\begin{align}
&2^{-j|\beta_3|-j|\beta_2|}\big|(\partial^{\beta_3}\FT_n\psi)(2^{-j}\xi)\big|\cdot
\big|\partial^{\gamma_3}(|\xi|)\big|\cdot\big|\partial^{\omega_3}(e^{-2\pi t|\xi|})\big|\nonumber\\
&\cdot\big|(\partial^{\beta_2}\FT_n\psi)(2^{-j}\xi)\big|\cdot
\big|\partial^{\gamma_2}(|\xi|)\big|\cdot e^{-2\pi t|\xi|},\label{eq3.88}
\end{align}
and
\begin{align}
&2^{-j|\beta_2|-j|\beta_4|}\big|(\partial^{\beta_2}\FT_n\psi)(2^{-j}\xi)\big|\cdot
\big|\partial^{\gamma_2}(|\xi|)\big|\nonumber\\
&\cdot\big|(\partial^{\beta_4}\FT_n\psi)(2^{-j}\xi)\big|\cdot
\big|\partial^{\gamma_4}(|\xi|)\big|\cdot e^{-4\pi t|\xi|},\label{eq3.89}
\end{align}
where the constant depends on $\alpha$. Due to the support condition (\ref{eq1-7}) of $\FT_n\psi$, each of the above expressions (\ref{eq3.86}), (\ref{eq3.87}), (\ref{eq3.88}), (\ref{eq3.89}) is supported in the annulus
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.90}
\{\xi\in\bbbr^n:2^{j-1}\leq|\xi|\leq2^{j+1}\},
\end{equation}
and hence if $R<2^{j-2}$ or $R>2^{j+2}$ in (\ref{eq3.78}), the annulus
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.91}
\{\xi\in\bbbr^n:\frac{R}{2}<|\xi|<2R\}
\end{equation}
will not intersect the annulus (\ref{eq3.90}). Therefore after putting expressions (\ref{eq3.86}), (\ref{eq3.87}), (\ref{eq3.88}), (\ref{eq3.89}) into (\ref{eq3.78}), the range of $R$ in (\ref{eq3.78}) is restricted to the closed and bounded interval $[2^{j-2},2^{j+2}]$. By direct computations, we have the formulae
\begin{align}
&|\partial^{\gamma'}(|\xi|)|\lesssim|\xi|^{1-|\gamma'|},\label{eq1-47}\\
&|\partial^{\gamma''}(e^{-2\pi t|\xi|})|\lesssim e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\sum_{l=0}^{|\gamma''|-1} \frac{1}{|\xi|^l},\label{eq1-48}
\end{align}
where $\gamma'$ and $\gamma''$ are multi-indices, and the implicit constant in (\ref{eq1-48}) depends on $t$. Inserting (\ref{eq3.86}) into (\ref{eq3.78}) and invoking formulae (\ref{eq1-47}), (\ref{eq1-48}) yields the following estimate
\begin{align}
&\sup_{2^{j-2}\leq R\leq2^{j+2}}R^{2|\alpha|-n}\int_{\frac{R}{2}<|\xi|<2R}\big[\text{expression (\ref{eq3.86})}\big]d\xi\nonumber\\
&\leq\sup_{2^{j-2}\leq R\leq2^{j+2}}R^{2|\alpha|-n}\int_{2^{j-1}\leq|\xi|\leq2^{j+1}}\big[\text{expression (\ref{eq3.86})}\big]d\xi\nonumber\\
&\lesssim2^{j(2|\alpha|-n)}\cdot2^{jn}\cdot2^{-j(|\beta_1|+|\beta_3|)}\cdot2^{j(2-|\gamma_1|-|\gamma_3|)}
 \nonumber\\
&\quad\cdot\sum_{l_1=0}^{|\omega_1|-1}2^{-jl_1}\cdot\sum_{l_3=0}^{|\omega_3|-1}2^{-jl_3}
 \cdot e^{-2\pi t\cdot2^j}\nonumber\\
&=\sum_{l_1=0}^{|\omega_1|-1}\sum_{l_3=0}^{|\omega_3|-1}2^{j(2+2|\alpha|-|\beta_1|-|\beta_3|-|\gamma_1|
 -|\gamma_3|-l_1-l_3)}\cdot e^{-2\pi t\cdot2^j},\label{eq3.92}
\end{align}
where the implicit constant in (\ref{eq3.92}) depends on $\alpha,n,t,\psi$ and is independent of $j\in\bbbz$. Conditions (\ref{eq3.81}) and (\ref{eq3.82}) imply
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.93}
2\leq2|\alpha|-|\beta_1|-|\beta_3|-|\gamma_1|-|\gamma_3|-l_1-l_3\leq2|\alpha|\leq n+2.
\end{equation}
Therefore we have obtained the following estimate
\begin{align}
&\sup_{2^{j-2}\leq R\leq2^{j+2}}R^{2|\alpha|-n}\int_{\frac{R}{2}<|\xi|<2R}\big[\text{expression (\ref{eq3.86})}\big]d\xi\nonumber\\
&\lesssim
\begin{cases}
2^{j(n+4)}\cdot e^{-2\pi t\cdot2^j} &\text{if}\quad j\geq0,\\
2^{4j}\cdot e^{-2\pi t\cdot2^j} &\text{if}\quad j<0,
\end{cases}
\label{eq3.94}
\end{align}
where the implicit constant depends on $\alpha,n,t,\psi$ and is independent of $j\in\bbbz$. Inserting (\ref{eq3.89}) into (\ref{eq3.78}) and invoking formula (\ref{eq1-47}) yields the following estimate
\begin{align}
&\sup_{2^{j-2}\leq R\leq2^{j+2}}R^{2|\alpha|-n}\int_{\frac{R}{2}<|\xi|<2R}\big[\text{expression (\ref{eq3.89})}\big]d\xi\nonumber\\
&\leq\sup_{2^{j-2}\leq R\leq2^{j+2}}R^{2|\alpha|-n}\int_{2^{j-1}\leq|\xi|\leq2^{j+1}}\big[\text{expression (\ref{eq3.89})}\big]d\xi\nonumber\\
&\lesssim2^{j(2|\alpha|-n)}\cdot2^{jn}\cdot2^{-j(|\beta_2|+|\beta_4|)}\cdot2^{j(2-|\gamma_2|-|\gamma_4|)}
\cdot e^{-2\pi t\cdot2^j}=2^{2j}\cdot e^{-2\pi t\cdot2^j},\label{eq3.95}
\end{align}
where we use the condition (\ref{eq3.83}), and the implicit constant in (\ref{eq3.95}) depends on $\alpha,n,\psi$ and is independent of $j\in\bbbz$. Estimate (\ref{eq3.95}) is true for all $j\in\bbbz$. Inserting (\ref{eq3.87}) into (\ref{eq3.78}) and invoking formulae (\ref{eq1-47}) and (\ref{eq1-48}) yields the following estimate
\begin{align}
&\sup_{2^{j-2}\leq R\leq2^{j+2}}R^{2|\alpha|-n}\int_{\frac{R}{2}<|\xi|<2R}\big[\text{expression (\ref{eq3.87})}\big]d\xi\nonumber\\
&\leq\sup_{2^{j-2}\leq R\leq2^{j+2}}R^{2|\alpha|-n}\int_{2^{j-1}\leq|\xi|\leq2^{j+1}}\big[\text{expression (\ref{eq3.87})}\big]d\xi\nonumber\\
&\lesssim2^{j(2|\alpha|-n)}\cdot2^{jn}\cdot2^{-j(|\beta_1|+|\beta_4|)}\cdot2^{j(2-|\gamma_1|-|\gamma_4|)}
\cdot\sum_{l_1=0}^{|\omega_1|-1}2^{-jl_1}\cdot e^{-2\pi t\cdot2^j}\nonumber\\
&=\sum_{l_1=0}^{|\omega_1|-1} 2^{j(2+2|\alpha|-|\beta_1|-|\beta_4|-|\gamma_1|
-|\gamma_4|-l_1)}\cdot e^{-2\pi t\cdot2^j},\label{eq3.96}
\end{align}
where the implicit constant in (\ref{eq3.96}) depends on $\alpha,n,t,\psi$ and is independent of $j\in\bbbz$. Conditions (\ref{eq3.81}), (\ref{eq3.82}), and (\ref{eq3.83}) imply
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.97}
1\leq2|\alpha|-|\beta_1|-|\beta_4|-|\gamma_1|-|\gamma_4|-l_1\leq2|\alpha|\leq n+2.
\end{equation}
Therefore we have obtained the following estimate
\begin{align}
&\sup_{2^{j-2}\leq R\leq2^{j+2}}R^{2|\alpha|-n}\int_{\frac{R}{2}<|\xi|<2R}\big[\text{expression (\ref{eq3.87})}\big]d\xi\nonumber\\
&\lesssim
\begin{cases}
2^{j(n+4)}\cdot e^{-2\pi t\cdot2^j} &\text{if}\quad j\geq0,\\
2^{3j}\cdot e^{-2\pi t\cdot2^j} &\text{if}\quad j<0,
\end{cases}
\label{eq3.98}
\end{align}
where the implicit constant depends on $\alpha,n,t,\psi$ and is independent of $j\in\bbbz$. Since (\ref{eq3.88}) can be obtained from (\ref{eq3.87}) by replacing $\beta_1,\gamma_1,\omega_1$ in (\ref{eq3.87}) by $\beta_3,\gamma_3,\omega_3$ and replacing $\beta_4,\gamma_4$ in (\ref{eq3.87}) by $\beta_2,\gamma_2$, we can insert (\ref{eq3.88}) into (\ref{eq3.78}) and use an argument that is similar to the above to obtain the following estimate
\begin{align}
&\sup_{2^{j-2}\leq R\leq2^{j+2}}R^{2|\alpha|-n}\int_{\frac{R}{2}<|\xi|<2R}\big[\text{expression (\ref{eq3.88})}\big]d\xi\nonumber\\
&\lesssim
\begin{cases}
2^{j(n+4)}\cdot e^{-2\pi t\cdot2^j} &\text{if}\quad j\geq0,\\
2^{3j}\cdot e^{-2\pi t\cdot2^j} &\text{if}\quad j<0,
\end{cases}
\label{eq3.99}
\end{align}
and the implicit constant in (\ref{eq3.99}) depends on $\alpha,n,t,\psi$ and is independent of $j\in\bbbz$. We can combine (\ref{eq3.94}), (\ref{eq3.95}), (\ref{eq3.98}), (\ref{eq3.99}) with (\ref{eq3.78}) and notice that $|\alpha|\leq[\frac{n}{2}]+1$ in (\ref{eq3.78}), then we can estimate $A_j$ from above as follows,
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.100}
A_j\lesssim
\begin{cases}
2^{j(\frac{n}{2}+2)}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}+2^{j}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j} &\text{if}\quad j\geq0,\\
2^{2j}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}+2^{j}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}+2^{\frac{3j}{2}}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j} &\text{if}\quad j<0,
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
where the implicit constant depends on $n,t,\psi$. We use the inequalities
\begin{align*}
&2^j\leq2^{j(\frac{n}{2}+2)}\qquad\text{if $j\geq0$},\\
&2^{2j}\leq2^j,\qquad2^{\frac{3j}{2}}\leq2^j,\qquad\text{if $j<0$},
\end{align*}
and recall the estimate (\ref{eq3.80}), then we can obtain the following estimate
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.101}
A_j+\|m_j\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}\lesssim
\begin{cases}
2^{j(\frac{n}{2}+2)}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j} &\text{if}\quad j\geq0,\\
2^{j}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j} &\text{if}\quad j<0,
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
where the implicit constant in (\ref{eq3.101}) depends on $n,t,\psi$ and is independent of $j\in\bbbz$. Now we can combine (\ref{eq3.79}) and (\ref{eq3.101}), and insert the result into (\ref{eq3.77}) to obtain
\begin{align*}
&\|\bar{H}-S_N\|_{L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)}\leq
\sum_{|j|>N}\|\iFT_n[m_j(\xi)\FT_n f]\|_{L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{j<-N}2^{j}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}\cdot\|f\|_{L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)}
+\sum_{j>N}2^{j(\frac{n}{2}+2)}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}\cdot\|f\|_{L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)}.
\end{align*}
Both of the following series
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.102}
\sum_{j\leq-1}2^{j}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}\qquad\text{and}\qquad
\sum_{j\geq1}2^{j(\frac{n}{2}+2)}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}
\end{equation}
converge, and the convergence of the former series is because $e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}\leq1$ for all $j\leq-1$, and the convergence of the latter series is justified by using the ratio test. Estimates (\ref{eq3.79}) and (\ref{eq3.101}) also show that $S_N(x)\in L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ for each $N\geq0$. Hence the sequence $\{S_N(x)\}_{N=0}^{\infty}$ of partial sums converges to the function $\bar{H}(x)$ in $\|\cdot\|_{L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)}$-norm, and by the completeness of the space $L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$, we have $\bar{H}(x)\in L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ and (\ref{eq3.72}) is proven by applying the H\"{o}lder's inequality with $\frac{1}{p_0}+\frac{1}{p_0'}=1$ in the case where $f\in L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ for some $p_0\in(1,\infty)$.\\

If $f\in L^{p_0}(\bbbr^n)$ and $p_0=\infty$, then we can use formula (\ref{eq1-3-2}) to deduce that
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.103}
C_2:=\|\psi\|_{L^1(\bbbr^n)}\cdot\|f\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}\cdot
\|\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)]\|_{L^{1}(\bbbr^n)}<\infty
\end{equation}
for each fixed $t\in(0,\infty)$, and then we use \cite[Theorem 1.2.12. (Young's inequality)]{14classical} to obtain
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.104}
\sup_{x\in\bbbr^n}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f_j;x,t)|
=\sup_{x\in\bbbr^n}|\partial_{n+1}[P_t(\cdot)]*f*\psi_{2^{-j}}(x)|\leq C_2
\end{equation}
uniformly for all $j\in\bbbz$. The above estimate and (\ref{eq3.71}) also show that $S_N(x)\in L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)$ for each $N\geq0$. Furthermore, we have
\begin{align}
&\|\bar{H}-S_N\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}\leq\sum_{|j|>N}\|F_j(\cdot,t)\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}\nonumber\\
&\leq\sum_{|j|>N}\|\iFT_n m_j\|_{L^{1}(\bbbr^n)}\cdot\|f\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}.\label{eq3.105}
\end{align}
To estimate each term in the summation of (\ref{eq3.105}), we pick a positive finite real number $\delta_j$ for every $j\in\bbbz$ and the value of $\delta_j$ will be determined later, then we can use (\ref{eq3.73}) to write
\begin{align}
&\|\iFT_n m_j\|_{L^{1}(\bbbr^n)}\nonumber\\
&=\int_{|x|<\delta_j}\big|\iFT_n[-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)](x)\big|dx\nonumber\\
&\quad+\int_{|x|\geq\delta_j}\big|\iFT_n[-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)](x)\big|dx.
\label{eq3.107}
\end{align}
We can use the support condition (\ref{eq1-7}) of $\FT_n\psi$ and estimate the first term on the right side of (\ref{eq3.107}) as follows,
\begin{align}
&\int_{|x|<\delta_j}\big|\iFT_n[-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)](x)\big|dx\nonumber\\
&\leq2\pi\nu_n\delta_j^n\int_{\bbbr^n}|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot|\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)|d\xi\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\delta_j^n\cdot2^{j(n+1)}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j},\label{eq3.108}
\end{align}
where $\nu_n$ is the volume of the unit ball in $\bbbr^n$, and the implicit constant in (\ref{eq3.108}) depends on $n,\psi$ and is independent of $j\in\bbbz$. To estimate the second term on the right side of (\ref{eq3.107}) when $|x|\geq\delta_j$, we can assume without loss of generality that $x=(x_1,x_2,\cdots,x_n)$ and $|x_1|=\max\{|x_1|,|x_2|,\cdots,|x_n|\}$, then we have $0<\delta_j\leq|x|\leq\sqrt{n}|x_1|$. Furthermore, we can use the integration by parts formula with respect to $\xi_1$ repeatedly for $n+1$ times to obtain the following equation
\begin{align}
&\iFT_n[-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)](x)\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{\partial^{n+1}}{\partial\xi_1^{n+1}}\bigg[-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}
\cdot\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)\bigg]\cdot\frac{e^{2\pi i\xi\cdot x}}{(-2\pi ix_1)^{n+1}}d\xi,\label{eq3.109}
\end{align}
and hence we have
\begin{align}
&\int_{|x|\geq\delta_j}\big|\iFT_n[-2\pi|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}\cdot\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)](x)\big|dx\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{|x|\geq\delta_j}\frac{1}{|x|^{n+1}}dx\cdot
\int_{\bbbr^n}\big|\partial^{\alpha}[|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}
\cdot\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)]\big|d\xi\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\frac{1}{\delta_j}\int_{\bbbr^n}\big|\partial^{\alpha}[|\xi|e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}
\cdot\FT_n\psi(2^{-j}\xi)]\big|d\xi,\label{eq3.110}
\end{align}
where the implicit constants in (\ref{eq3.110}) depend on $n$, and $\alpha$ is the multi-index
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.111}
\alpha=(n+1,0,\cdots,0),\qquad|\alpha|=n+1.
\end{equation}
Now we let $\beta_1$, $\beta_2$, $\gamma_1$, $\gamma_2$, $\omega_1$ be multi-indices satisfying the following conditions
\begin{align}
&\alpha=\beta_1+\gamma_1+\omega_1,\qquad|\omega_1|>0,\label{eq3.112}\\
&\alpha=\beta_2+\gamma_2,\label{eq3.113}
\end{align}
then we can use Leibniz rule to estimate the integral over $\bbbr^n$ in the last line of (\ref{eq3.110}) from above by a constant multiple of the sum of terms of the following forms,
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.114}
\int_{\bbbr^n}2^{-j|\beta_1|}|(\partial^{\beta_1}\FT_n\psi)(2^{-j}\xi)|\cdot|\partial^{\gamma_1}(|\xi|)|\cdot
|\partial^{\omega_1}(e^{-2\pi t|\xi|})|d\xi
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.115}
\int_{\bbbr^n}2^{-j|\beta_2|}|(\partial^{\beta_2}\FT_n\psi)(2^{-j}\xi)|\cdot|\partial^{\gamma_2}(|\xi|)|\cdot
e^{-2\pi t|\xi|}d\xi,
\end{equation}
and the constant depends on $n$. We use the support condition (\ref{eq1-7}) of $\FT_n\psi$ and formulae (\ref{eq1-47}), (\ref{eq1-48}) to estimate (\ref{eq3.114}) from above by the following
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq3.114})
&\lesssim2^{jn}\cdot2^{j(1-|\beta_1|-|\gamma_1|)}\cdot\sum_{l_1=0}^{|\omega_1|-1}2^{-jl_1}e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}
\nonumber\\
&=\sum_{l_1=0}^{|\omega_1|-1}2^{j(n+1-|\beta_1|-|\gamma_1|-l_1)}e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j},\label{eq3.116}
\end{align}
where the implicit constant depends on $n,t,\psi$. Due to the conditions (\ref{eq3.111}) and (\ref{eq3.112}), we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.117}
1\leq n+1-|\beta_1|-|\gamma_1|-l_1\leq n+1,
\end{equation}
and hence we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.118}
(\ref{eq3.114})\lesssim
\begin{cases}
2^{j(n+1)}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j} &\text{if}\quad j\geq0,\\
2^{j}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j} &\text{if}\quad j<0,
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
where the implicit constant depends on $n,t,\psi$. We use the support condition (\ref{eq1-7}) of $\FT_n\psi$ and formula (\ref{eq1-47}) to estimate (\ref{eq3.115}) from above by the following
\begin{equation}\label{eq3.119}
(\ref{eq3.115})\lesssim2^{j(n+1-|\beta_2|-|\gamma_2|)}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}=e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j},
\end{equation}
where the implicit constant depends on $n,\psi$, and we also use the equation $n+1=|\beta_2|+|\gamma_2|$ due to the conditions (\ref{eq3.111}) and (\ref{eq3.113}), and estimate (\ref{eq3.119}) is true for all $j\in\bbbz$. We combine (\ref{eq3.107}), (\ref{eq3.108}), (\ref{eq3.110}), (\ref{eq3.114}), (\ref{eq3.115}), (\ref{eq3.118}), (\ref{eq3.119}) all together and obtain the following estimate
\begin{align}
&\|\iFT_n m_j\|_{L^{1}(\bbbr^n)}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim
\begin{cases}
\delta_j^n\cdot2^{j(n+1)}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}+\frac{2^{j(n+1)}}{\delta_j}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}
+\frac{1}{\delta_j}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j} &\text{if}\quad j\geq0,\\
\delta_j^n\cdot2^{j(n+1)}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j}+\frac{2^{j}}{\delta_j}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j} +\frac{1}{\delta_j}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j} &\text{if}\quad j<0,
\end{cases}
\label{eq3.120}
\end{align}
and the implicit constant in (\ref{eq3.120}) depends on $n,t,\psi$ and is independent of $j\in\bbbz$. We want to make sure that all of the following $6$ series converge,
\begin{align*}
&\sum_{j\geq1}\delta_j^n\cdot2^{j(n+1)}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j},\quad
\sum_{j\geq1}\frac{2^{j(n+1)}}{\delta_j}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j},\quad
\sum_{j\geq1}\frac{1}{\delta_j}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j},\\
&\sum_{j\leq-1}\delta_j^n\cdot2^{j(n+1)}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j},\quad
\sum_{j\leq-1}\frac{2^{j}}{\delta_j}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j},\quad 
\sum_{j\leq-1}\frac{1}{\delta_j}\cdot e^{-\pi t\cdot2^j},
\end{align*}
therefore choosing $\delta_j=2^{-j}$ will suffice. Inserting estimate (\ref{eq3.120}) with $\delta_j=2^{-j}$ into (\ref{eq3.105}) yields that the sequence $\{S_N(x)\}_{N=0}^{\infty}$ of partial sums converges to the function $\bar{H}(x)$ in $\|\cdot\|_{L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)}$-norm as $N\rightarrow\infty$, and by the completeness of the space $L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)$, we have $\bar{H}(x)\in L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)$ and (\ref{eq3.72}) is proven in the case where $f\in L^{\infty}(\bbbr^n)$.\\

We now conclude the proof of Theorem \ref{theorem3}.
\end{proof}





\section{The weak type $(p,p)$ boundedness of the $\LPG_{\lambda,q}$-function}\label{proof.of.theorem4}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{theorem4}]
Step 1: Assume $f$ is a function in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$. If $$\esssup_{x\in\bbbr^n}|f(x)|\leq\alpha<\infty,$$ then since $2\leq q<\infty$ and $\lambda>1$, we can use Corollary \ref{corollary2} to obtain the following inequality
\begin{align}
&\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\LPG_{\lambda,q}(f)(x)>\alpha\})\nonumber\\
&\leq\alpha^{-q}\|\LPG_{\lambda,q}(f)\|_{L^q(\bbbr^n)}^q\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\alpha^{-q}\int_{\bbbr^n}|f(x)|^{q-p}\cdot|f(x)|^p dx\leq\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p,
 \label{eq4.1}
\end{align}
and hence inequality (\ref{eq1-31}) is proved in this case. If $$0<\alpha<\esssup_{x\in\bbbr^n}|f(x)|,$$ we apply Lemma \ref{lemma3} to the function $f\in L^p(\bbbr^n)$ and the set $\Omega=\{x\in\bbbr^n:M(|f|^p)(x)>\alpha^p\}$, and obtain a collection of Whitney cubes $\{I_j\}_j$ and two functions, the ``good'' function $g$ and the ``bad'' function $b$, where $\{I_j\}_j$, $g$ and $b$ satisfy all the conclusions of Lemma \ref{lemma3}. Then by Lemma \ref{lemma3} (v), we have the pointwise estimate $\LPG_{\lambda,q}(f)(x)\lesssim\LPG_{\lambda,q}(g)(x)+\LPG_{\lambda,q}(b)(x)$ and hence the following inequality
\begin{align*}
&\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\LPG_{\lambda,q}(f)(x)>\alpha\})\\
&\leq\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\frac{\alpha}{2}\lesssim\LPG_{\lambda,q}(g)(x)\})
 +\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\frac{\alpha}{2}\lesssim\LPG_{\lambda,q}(b)(x)\}),
\end{align*}
where the implicit constants in the above inequalities only depend on $q$. Therefore to prove (\ref{eq1-31}), it suffices to prove the following two inequalities,
\begin{align}
&\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\frac{\alpha}{2}\lesssim\LPG_{\lambda,q}(g)(x)\})
 \lesssim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p,\label{eq4.2}\\
&\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\frac{\alpha}{2}\lesssim\LPG_{\lambda,q}(b)(x)\})
 \lesssim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p,\label{eq4.3}
\end{align}
where the values of implicit constants only depend on some fixed parameters. By Lemma \ref{lemma3} (viii), we have 
\begin{equation}\label{eq4.4}
\|g\|_{L^q(\bbbr^n)}^q\lesssim\alpha^{q-p}\|g\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p
\lesssim\alpha^{q-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p,
\end{equation}
where the constants in (\ref{eq4.4}) depend on $n,p,q$. Inequality (\ref{eq4.4}) shows that $g$ is a function in $L^q(\bbbr^n)$, and hence we can apply Corollary \ref{corollary2} to obtain
\begin{align}
&\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\frac{\alpha}{2}\lesssim\LPG_{\lambda,q}(g)(x)\})\nonumber\\
&\lesssim(\frac{2}{\alpha})^q\|\LPG_{\lambda,q}(g)\|_{L^q(\bbbr^n)}^q
 \lesssim\alpha^{-q}\|g\|_{L^q(\bbbr^n)}^q\lesssim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p,\label{eq4.6}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq4.6}) depend on $n,p,q$ and the implicit constant coming from Corollary \ref{corollary2}. Inequality (\ref{eq4.2}) is proved. Now we prove inequality (\ref{eq4.3}). We consider the following equation
\begin{align}
&\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\frac{\alpha}{2}\lesssim\LPG_{\lambda,q}(b)(x)\})\nonumber\\
&=\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\alpha^q\lesssim\LPG_{\lambda,q}(b)(x)^q\}),\label{eq4.7}
\end{align}
where the implicit constants depend on $q$. We recall the relations between two Whitney cubes given in (\ref{near}) and (\ref{far}), and we also use the decomposition
\begin{equation}\label{eq4.8}
\bbbr^n=\Omega^c\bigcup\Omega=\Omega^c\bigcup\bigg(\bigcup_m I_m\bigg).
\end{equation}
By Lemma \ref{lemma3} (v), the function $b$ is supported in $\Omega$ and if $\chi_{I_j}$ denotes the characteristic function of the cube $I_j$ and if $b_j=b\cdot\chi_{I_j}$, then we have the equation
\begin{equation}\label{eq4.9}
b=\sum_j b_j=\bnearIm+\bfarIm,
\end{equation}
and for each $m$, we denote
\begin{equation}\label{eq4.10}
\bnearIm=\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ near }I_m}}b_j\quad\text{and}\quad
\bfarIm=\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ far from }I_m}}b_j,
\end{equation}
where ``$(n.m.)$'' comes from the phrase ``near $I_m$'' while ``$(f.m.)$'' comes from the phrase ``far from $I_m$''. By using the defining expression (\ref{eq1-26}), we can estimate $\LPG_{\lambda,q}(b)(x)^q$ from above by a constant multiple of the sum of the following $(2n+3)$ terms,
\begin{align}
&A_k(x):=\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{\Omega^c}\!\!\big(\frac{t}{t+|x-y|}\big)^{\lambda n} \cdot t^{q-n-1}|\partial_k\Pint(b;y,t)|^q dydt,\label{eq4.11}\\
&B_k(x):=\sum_m\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{I_m}\!\!\big(\frac{t}{t+|x-y|}\big)^{\lambda n}
 \cdot t^{q-n-1}|\partial_k\Pint(\bfarIm;y,t)|^q dydt,\label{eq4.12}\\
&D(x):=\sum_m\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{I_m}\!\!\big(\frac{t}{t+|x-y|}\big)^{\lambda n} \cdot t^{q-n-1}|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\bnearIm;y,t)|^q dydt,\label{eq4.13}
\end{align}
where $1\leq k\leq n+1$ in (\ref{eq4.11}) and (\ref{eq4.12}), and the constant depends on $n,q$. Combining the above pointwise estimate with (\ref{eq4.7}), we can obtain
\begin{equation}\label{eq4.14}
\alpha^q\leq C_1\cdot(\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}A_k(x)+\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}B_k(x)+D(x)),
\end{equation}
where $C_1=C_1(n,q)$ and $x$ belongs to the set $\{x\in\bbbr^n:\alpha^q\lesssim\LPG_{\lambda,q}(b)(x)^q\}$. Inequality (\ref{eq4.14}) says that at least one of the terms $D(x)$, $A_k(x)$ and $B_k(x)$ for $1\leq k\leq n+1$ is greater than or equal to $\frac{\alpha^q}{C_1(2n+3)}$, therefore we can estimate (\ref{eq4.7}) from above by the sum of the following,
\begin{align}
&\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\alpha^q\lesssim A_k(x)\}),\label{eq4.15}\\
&\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\alpha^q\lesssim B_k(x)\}),\label{eq4.16}\\
&\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\alpha^q\lesssim D(x)\}),\label{eq4.17}
\end{align}
and the implicit constants in (\ref{eq4.15}), (\ref{eq4.16}), (\ref{eq4.17}) depend only on $n,q$. Therefore to prove (\ref{eq4.3}), it suffices to prove that each and every one of (\ref{eq4.15}), (\ref{eq4.16}), (\ref{eq4.17}) is dominated by a constant multiple of $\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p$. We use the following notations for $1\leq k\leq n+1$,
\begin{align}
&\bar{A}_k(x):=\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{\Omega^c}\!\!\big(\frac{t}{t+|x-y|}\big)^{\lambda n} \cdot t^{-n}|\partial_k\Pint(b;y,t)|dydt,\label{eq4.18}\\
&\bar{B}_k(x):=\sum_m\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{I_m}\!\!\big(\frac{t}{t+|x-y|}\big)^{\lambda n}
\cdot t^{-n}|\partial_k\Pint(\bfarIm;y,t)|dydt.\label{eq4.19}
\end{align}\\

Step 2: We estimate the term (\ref{eq4.15}). From (\ref{eq4.11}) and (\ref{eq4.18}), we can apply Lemma \ref{lemma6} (1) to the term $|\partial_k\Pint(b;y,t)|^{q-1}$ and obtain $$\alpha^q\lesssim A_k(x)\lesssim\alpha^{q-1}\bar{A}_k(x),$$ where $x$ belongs to the set $\{x\in\bbbr^n:\alpha^q\lesssim A_k(x)\}$ and $1\leq k\leq n+1$, and the constants depend on $n,p,q$. Therefore invoking Chebyshev's inequality, Fubini's theorem, Lemma \ref{lemma7} (\ref{eq2-13}), Lemma \ref{lemma3} (vi) and (i) in a sequence yields the following estimate
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq4.15})
&\lesssim\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\alpha\lesssim\bar{A}_k(x)\})\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}\frac{1}{\alpha}\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{\Omega^c}\!\!\int_{\bbbr^n}
 \big(\frac{t}{t+|x-y|}\big)^{\lambda n}\frac{dx}{t^n}\cdot |\partial_k\Pint(b;y,t)|dydt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}\frac{1}{\alpha}\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{\Omega^c}|\partial_k\Pint(b;y,t)|dydt
 \nonumber\\
&\lesssim\frac{1}{\alpha}\cdot\sum_j\int_{I_j}|b(z)|dz\lesssim\sum_j\Lebes^n(I_j)
 \lesssim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p,\label{eq4.20}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq4.20}) depend on $n,p,q,\lambda$, and we also use the fact that for $1<p<q$ and $\lambda=\frac{q}{p}>1$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq4.42}
\int_{\bbbr^n}(1+|x|)^{-n\lambda}dx<\infty.
\end{equation}

Step 3: We estimate the term (\ref{eq4.16}). From (\ref{eq4.12}) and (\ref{eq4.19}), we can apply Lemma \ref{lemma6} (2) to the term $|\partial_k\Pint(\bfarIm;y,t)|^{q-1}$ and obtain $$\alpha^q\lesssim B_k(x)\lesssim\alpha^{q-1}\bar{B}_k(x),$$ where $x$ belongs to the set $\{x\in\bbbr^n:\alpha^q\lesssim B_k(x)\}$ and $1\leq k\leq n+1$, and the constants depend on $n,p,q$. Therefore invoking Chebyshev's inequality, Fubini's theorem, Lemma \ref{lemma7} (\ref{eq2-14}), Lemma \ref{lemma3} (vi) and (i) in a sequence yields the following estimate
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq4.16})
&\lesssim\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\alpha\lesssim\bar{B}_k(x)\})\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}\frac{1}{\alpha}\sum_m\!\!\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{I_m}\!\!\int_{\bbbr^n}
 \big(\frac{t}{t+|x-y|}\big)^{\lambda n}\frac{dx}{t^n}|\partial_k\Pint(\bfarIm;y,t)|dydt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}\frac{1}{\alpha}\sum_m\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{I_m}|\partial_k\Pint(\bfarIm;y,t)|
 dydt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\frac{1}{\alpha}\cdot\sum_j\int_{I_j}|b(z)|dz\lesssim\sum_j\Lebes^n(I_j)
 \lesssim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p,\label{eq4.21}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq4.21}) depend on $n,p,q,\lambda$, and we also use the fact (\ref{eq4.42}).\\

Step 4: Finally, we prove that (\ref{eq4.17}) can be estimated from above by a constant multiple of $\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p$. By Lemma \ref{lemma3} (i) and Chebyshev's inequality, we have
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq4.17})
&=\Lebes^n(\{x\in\Omega:\alpha^q\lesssim D(x)\})+\Lebes^n(\{x\notin\Omega:\alpha^q\lesssim D(x)\})\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\Lebes^n(\Omega)+\alpha^{-q}\int_{\Omega^c}D(x)dx\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p+\alpha^{-q}\int_{\Omega^c}D(x)dx,\label{eq4.22}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq4.22}) depend on $n,q$. If $I_m$ is a Whitney cube and $x\in\Omega^c$, $y\in I_m$, then we can use Lemma \ref{lemma1} (b) to obtain $$|x-y|\geq\dist(I_m,\Omega^c)\geq\sqrt{n}\cdot l(I_m).$$ Therefore we recall the defining expression (\ref{eq4.13}) and use Fubini's theorem to estimate the term $\alpha^{-q}\int_{\Omega^c}D(x)dx$ from above by the following expression
\begin{align}
&\alpha^{-q}\sum_m\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{I_m}\!\!\int_{\Omega^c}
\frac{t^{\lambda n+q-n-1}}{(t+|x-y|)^{\lambda n}}dx\cdot|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\bnearIm;y,t)|^q dydt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\alpha^{-q}\sum_m\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{I_m}\!\!\int_{|z|\geq\sqrt{n}l(I_m)}
\big(\frac{t}{t+|z|}\big)^{\lambda n}dz\nonumber\\
&\quad\cdot t^{q-n-1}|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\bnearIm;y,t)|^q dydt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\alpha^{-q}\sum_m\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{I_m}\!\!\int_{|z|\geq\frac{\sqrt{n}l(I_m)}{t}}
\frac{t^{q-1}}{|z|^{\lambda n}}dz\cdot|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\bnearIm;y,t)|^q dydt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\alpha^{-q}\sum_m\Lebes^n(I_m)^{1-\lambda}\!\!\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{I_m}\!\!
t^{\lambda n-n+q-1}\big|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\bnearIm;y,t)\big|^q dydt,\label{eq4.23}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq4.23}) depend on $n,\lambda$, and we also use the formula $\Lebes^n(I_m)=l(I_m)^n$. For every $m$, the iterated integral in the last line of (\ref{eq4.23}) can be estimated from above by the following expression
\begin{equation}\label{eq4.24}
\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_0^{\infty}t^{q+qn(\frac{\lambda}{q}-\frac{1}{q})-1}
\big|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\bnearIm;y,t)\big|^q dtdy,
\end{equation}
and we can identify (\ref{eq4.24}) as $$\|\LPg_{-n(\frac{\lambda}{q}-\frac{1}{q}),q}(\bnearIm)\|_{L^q(\bbbr^n)}^q,$$ where $\LPg_{-n(\frac{\lambda}{q}-\frac{1}{q}),q}(\bnearIm)(\cdot)$ is the Littlewood-Paley-Poisson function defined in (\ref{eq1-19}). From our assumption $\lambda=\frac{q}{p}$ and $0<n(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{q})<1$, we see that
\begin{equation}\label{eq4.25}
-1<\kappa:=-n(\frac{\lambda}{q}-\frac{1}{q})=-n(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{q})<0.
\end{equation}
Assume for now that $\bnearIm$ is a function in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$ for $1<p<q<\infty$ and an element in the homogeneous Triebel-Lizorkin space $\dot{F}^{\kappa}_{q,q}(\bbbr^n)$ and this assumption will be verified later, then all the conditions of Theorem \ref{theorem3} are satisfied and we can apply Theorem \ref{theorem3} to obtain
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq4.24})
&=\|\LPg_{\kappa,q}(\bnearIm)\|_{L^q(\bbbr^n)}^q\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\|\bnearIm\|_{\dot{F}^{\kappa}_{q,q}(\bbbr^n)}^q\sim
 \|\Lift_{\kappa}(\bnearIm)\|_{\dot{F}^{0}_{q,q}(\bbbr^n)}^q,\label{eq4.26}
\end{align}
where the last step is due to the well-known lifting property introduced in \cite[section 5.2.3]{1983functionspaces} by H. Triebel, and $\Lift_{\kappa}(\bnearIm)$ is the operator given by (\ref{eq1-11}). Since $2\leq q<\infty$, we can use formula (\ref{eq1-14}) to deduce
\begin{equation}\label{eq4.27}
\|\Lift_{\kappa}(\bnearIm)\|_{\dot{F}^{0}_{q,q}(\bbbr^n)}\leq
\|\Lift_{\kappa}(\bnearIm)\|_{\dot{F}^{0}_{q,2}(\bbbr^n)}\sim
\|\Lift_{\kappa}(\bnearIm)\|_{L^q(\bbbr^n)}.
\end{equation}
Furthermore we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq4.28}
\Lift_{\kappa}(\bnearIm)=\iFT_n[|\xi|^{\kappa}\FT_n\bnearIm]=\iFT_n[|\xi|^{\kappa}]*\bnearIm
\end{equation}
in the sense of tempered distributions modulo polynomials. Due to our assumption on the parameters, both inequalities $0>\kappa>-1\geq-n$ and $-n-\kappa>-n$ are true. Therefore from \cite[Definition 2.4.5 and Theorem 2.4.6]{14classical}, we can deduce that the distributional inverse Fourier transform of the tempered distribution $u_{\kappa}$ that is defined in (\ref{eq2-57}) and coincides with the locally integrable function $$\xi\in\bbbr^n\longmapsto
\frac{\pi^{\frac{\kappa+n}{2}}}{\varGamma(\frac{\kappa+n}{2})}\cdot|\xi|^{\kappa},$$
is the tempered distribution $u_{-n-\kappa}$ given by (\ref{eq2-57}), and this tempered distribution $u_{-n-\kappa}$ can be identified with the locally integrable function $$y\in\bbbr^n\longmapsto
\frac{\pi^{\frac{-\kappa}{2}}}{\varGamma(\frac{-\kappa}{2})}\cdot|y|^{-n-\kappa}.$$ 
Hence we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq4.34}
\iFT_n[|\xi|^{\kappa}]*\bnearIm=C_2\cdot|y|^{-n-\kappa}*\bnearIm,
\end{equation}
where $C_2=C_2(n,p,q)$. Indeed, from estimates (\ref{eq4.30}) and (\ref{eq4.32}) below, we see that $\bnearIm$ is a function in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$, and $C_2\cdot|y|^{-n-\kappa}*\bnearIm$ is a function in $L^q(\bbbr^n)$, thus the right side of (\ref{eq4.34}) makes sense and both $\bnearIm$ and $\iFT_n[|\xi|^{\kappa}]*\bnearIm$ are tempered distributions. By Proposition \ref{proposition1}, we see that the function 
\begin{equation}\label{eq4.41}
\xi\in\bbbr^n\longmapsto|\xi|^{\kappa}
\end{equation}
satisfies condition (\ref{eq1.64}) and the linear functional $|\xi|^{\kappa}\FT_n\bnearIm$, initially defined on the subspace $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ by the following equation
\begin{equation}\label{eq4.38}
<|\xi|^{\kappa}\FT_n\bnearIm,g>=<\FT_n\bnearIm,|\xi|^{\kappa}g>\quad\text{for $g\in\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$,}
\end{equation}
is a bounded linear functional on $\Sw_{00}(\bbbr^n)$ in the topology of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$, and extends to a tempered distribution on all of $\Sw(\bbbr^n)$ by the Hahn-Banach theorem, i.e. \cite[3.3 Theorem]{Rudin.Funct.Anal}. Analogous to the discussion in Remark \ref{remark3}, the action of the tempered distribution $\Lift_{\kappa}(\bnearIm)$ on an arbitrary Schwartz function $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$ is then given by the following equation
\begin{align}
&<\Lift_{\kappa}(\bnearIm),\phi>\nonumber\\
&=<\iFT_n[|\xi|^{\kappa}\FT_n\bnearIm],\phi>\nonumber\\
&=<\bnearIm,\FT_n[|\xi|^{\kappa}\iFT_n\phi]>.\label{eq4.39}
\end{align}
On the other hand, we have
\begin{align}
&<\iFT_n[|\xi|^{\kappa}]*\bnearIm,\phi>\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_{\bbbr^n}\bnearIm(y)\cdot C_2|x-y|^{-n-\kappa}\cdot\phi(x)dydx\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}\bnearIm(y)\int_{\bbbr^n}C_2|y-x|^{-n-\kappa}\cdot\phi(x)dxdy\nonumber\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}\bnearIm(y)\cdot\iFT_n[|\xi|^{\kappa}]*\phi(y)dy\nonumber\\
&=<\bnearIm,\FT_n[|\xi|^{\kappa}]*\phi>,\label{eq4.40}
\end{align}
and the application of Fubini's theorem is justified because
\begin{align*}
&\int_{\bbbr^n}\int_{\bbbr^n}|\bnearIm(y)|\cdot C_2|x-y|^{-n-\kappa}\cdot|\phi(x)|dydx\\
&=\int_{\bbbr^n}C_2|y|^{-n-\kappa}*|\bnearIm|(x)\cdot|\phi|(x)dx<\infty,
\end{align*}
where we see that $|y|^{-n-\kappa}*|\bnearIm|(\cdot)\in L^q(\bbbr^n)$ by estimate (\ref{eq4.30}) below with $|\bnearIm|$ in place of $\bnearIm$. Now we can use the same argument as in the justification of equation (\ref{eq2-116}) in the proof of Lemma \ref{lemma11}, and we know that the smooth function $\FT_n[|\xi|^{\kappa}]*\phi(x)$ is a tempered distribution whose function representative in the sense of $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$ is the Schwartz function $\FT_n[|\xi|^{\kappa}\iFT_n\phi](x)$ whenever $\phi\in\Sw_0(\bbbr^n)$, since the locally integrable function $|\xi|^{\kappa}$ for $-1<\kappa<0$ is a tempered distribution in $\Sw'(\bbbr^n)$ and satisfies condition (\ref{eq1.64}) of Proposition \ref{proposition1}. Therefore both equations (\ref{eq4.39}) and (\ref{eq4.40}) make sense and are equal, and we have obtained the equation (\ref{eq4.28}) in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$. Combining (\ref{eq4.28}) and (\ref{eq4.34}), and inserting the result into (\ref{eq4.27}), and then invoking the famous Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality, i.e. Lemma \ref{lemma5}, yield
\begin{equation}\label{eq4.30}
(\ref{eq4.27})\lesssim\||y|^{-n-\kappa}*\bnearIm\|_{L^q(\bbbr^n)}\lesssim\|\bnearIm\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)},
\end{equation}
and the implicit constants only depend on $n,p,q$. Now we recall (\ref{eq4.10}) and (\ref{near}). Since Whitney cubes have disjoint interiors and since Lemma \ref{lemma2} (2) implies that the total volume of all the Whitney cube $I_j$'s, which satisfy the condition ``$I_j$ near $I_m$'' for some fixed $m$, is bounded by the volume of the ball $B^n(c(I_m),11(\sqrt{n}+1)^2 l(I_m))\subseteq\bbbr^n$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq4.31}
\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ near }I_m}}\Lebes^n(I_j)\lesssim l(I_m)^n\sim\Lebes^n(I_m),
\end{equation}
and the implicit constant depends only on $n$. We can apply Lemma \ref{lemma3} (vi) to obtain
\begin{equation}\label{eq4.32}
\|\bnearIm\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p=\!\!\!\!\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ near }I_m}}\int_{I_j}|b(z)|^p dz\lesssim
\alpha^p\!\!\!\!\sum_{\substack{j\\I_j\text{ near }I_m}}\Lebes^n(I_j)\lesssim\alpha^p\Lebes^n(I_m),
\end{equation}
where the constants depend on $n,p$. Estimate (\ref{eq4.32}) shows $\bnearIm$ is a function in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$ for $1<p<q<\infty$. Combining (\ref{eq4.26}), (\ref{eq4.27}), (\ref{eq4.30}), (\ref{eq4.32}) and the condition $\lambda=\frac{q}{p}$ yields
\begin{equation}\label{eq4.33}
\|\bnearIm\|_{\dot{F}^{\kappa}_{q,q}(\bbbr^n)}^q\lesssim\|\bnearIm\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^q
\lesssim\alpha^q\Lebes^n(I_m)^{\lambda},
\end{equation}
and since $\alpha^q\Lebes^n(I_m)^{\lambda}$ is controlled by $\alpha^q\Lebes^n(\Omega)^{\lambda}\lesssim\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^q<\infty$, the estimate (\ref{eq4.33}) also shows that $\bnearIm$ is an element of $\dot{F}^{\kappa}_{q,q}(\bbbr^n)$ and hence justifies the application of Theorem \ref{theorem3} in (\ref{eq4.26}). Combining (\ref{eq4.22}), (\ref{eq4.23}), (\ref{eq4.24}), (\ref{eq4.26}), (\ref{eq4.33}) all together and invoking Lemma \ref{lemma3} (i), we can conclude that (\ref{eq4.17}) can be estimated from above by a constant multiple of $\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p$. Inequalities (\ref{eq4.20}), (\ref{eq4.21}) and the above conclusion complete the proof of Theorem \ref{theorem4}.
\end{proof}





\section{The weak type $(p,p)$ boundedness of the $\Remain_{s,q}$-function}\label{proof.of.theorem5}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{theorem5}]
Step 1: Assume $f$ is a function in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$. If $$\esssup_{x\in\bbbr^n}|f(x)|\leq\alpha<\infty,$$ then since $2\leq q<\infty$ and $0<s<1$, we can use Corollary \ref{corollary2} and the same method as given in (\ref{eq4.1}), with $\Remain_{s,q}(f)$ in place of $\LPG_{\lambda,q}(f)$, to obtain inequality (\ref{eq1-32}). If 
\begin{equation}\label{eq5.23}
0<\alpha<\esssup_{x\in\bbbr^n}|f(x)|,
\end{equation}
we apply Lemma \ref{lemma3} to the function $f\in L^p(\bbbr^n)$ and the set $\Omega=\{x\in\bbbr^n:M(|f|^p)(x)>\alpha^p\}$, and obtain a collection of Whitney cubes $\{I_j\}_j$ and two functions, the ``good'' function $g$ and the ``bad'' function $b$, where $\{I_j\}_j$, $g$ and $b$ satisfy all the conclusions of Lemma \ref{lemma3}. Then by Lemma \ref{lemma3} (v), we have the following inequality
\begin{align*}
&\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\Remain_{s,q}(f)(x)>\alpha\})\\
&\leq\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\frac{\alpha}{2}\lesssim\Remain_{s,q}(g)(x)\})
+\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\frac{\alpha}{2}\lesssim\Remain_{s,q}(b)(x)\}),
\end{align*}
where the implicit constants only depend on $q$. Therefore to prove (\ref{eq1-32}), it suffices to prove the following two inequalities,
\begin{align}
&\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\frac{\alpha}{2}\lesssim\Remain_{s,q}(g)(x)\})
\lesssim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p,\label{eq5.1}\\
&\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\frac{\alpha}{2}\lesssim\Remain_{s,q}(b)(x)\})
\lesssim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p,\label{eq5.2}
\end{align}
where the values of implicit constants only depend on some fixed parameters. By Lemma \ref{lemma3} (viii), we see that when $\alpha$ satisfies (\ref{eq5.23}) and $f\in L^p(\bbbr^n)$, inequality (\ref{eq4.4}) is still true and hence $g$ is a function in $L^q(\bbbr^n)$, therefore we can apply Corollary \ref{corollary2} to obtain
\begin{align}
&\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\frac{\alpha}{2}\lesssim\Remain_{s,q}(g)(x)\})\nonumber\\
&\lesssim(\frac{2}{\alpha})^q\|\Remain_{s,q}(g)\|_{L^q(\bbbr^n)}^q
\lesssim\alpha^{-q}\|g\|_{L^q(\bbbr^n)}^q\lesssim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p,\label{eq5.3}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq5.3}) depend on $n,p,q$ and the implicit constant coming from Corollary \ref{corollary2}. Inequality (\ref{eq5.1}) is proved. Now we prove inequality (\ref{eq5.2}). We consider the following equation
\begin{align}
&\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\frac{\alpha}{2}\lesssim\Remain_{s,q}(b)(x)\})\nonumber\\
&=\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\alpha^q\lesssim\Remain_{s,q}(b)(x)^q\}),\label{eq5.4}
\end{align}
where the implicit constants depend on $q$. We recall the relations between two Whitney cubes given in (\ref{near}) and (\ref{far}), and we also use the decomposition (\ref{eq4.8}). If $\chi_{I_j}$ denotes the characteristic function of the cube $I_j$ and if $b_j=b\cdot\chi_{I_j}$, then we can continue using the equation (\ref{eq4.9}) and $\bnearIm$, $\bfarIm$ have the same meaning as in (\ref{eq4.10}). By using the defining expression (\ref{eq1-27}), we can estimate $\Remain_{s,q}(b)(x)^q$ from above by a constant multiple of the sum of the following three terms,
\begin{align}
&\Remain_{s,q}^1(b)(x):=\!\!\int_{\Omega^c}\!\!\!|x-y|^{-n-sq}(\int_0^{2|x-y|}\!\!\!\!\!\!
|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(b;y,t)|t^s dt)^q dy,\label{eq5.5}\\
&\Remain_{s,q}^2(b)(x):=\!\!\sum_m\!\!\int_{I_m}\!\!\!|x-y|^{-n-sq}(\int_0^{2|x-y|}\!\!\!\!\!\!
|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\bfarIm;y,t)|t^s dt)^q dy,\label{eq5.6}\\
&\Remain_{s,q}^3(b)(x):=\!\!\sum_m\!\!\int_{I_m}\!\!\!|x-y|^{-n-sq}(\int_0^{2|x-y|}\!\!\!\!\!\!
|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\bnearIm;y,t)|t^s dt)^q dy,\label{eq5.7}
\end{align}
and the constant depends on $q$. Therefore we can estimate (\ref{eq5.4}) from above by the sum of the following,
\begin{align}
&\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\alpha^q\lesssim\Remain_{s,q}^1(b)(x)\}),\label{eq5.8}\\
&\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\alpha^q\lesssim\Remain_{s,q}^2(b)(x)\}),\label{eq5.9}\\
&\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\alpha^q\lesssim\Remain_{s,q}^3(b)(x)\}),\label{eq5.10}
\end{align}
and the implicit constants in (\ref{eq5.8}), (\ref{eq5.9}), (\ref{eq5.10}) depend only on $q$. Therefore to prove (\ref{eq5.2}), it suffices to prove that each and every one of (\ref{eq5.8}), (\ref{eq5.9}), (\ref{eq5.10}) is dominated by a constant multiple of $\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p$. We use the following notations in the proof below,
\begin{align}
&\bar{\Remain}_{s,q}^1(b)(x):=\int_{\Omega^c}\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+s}}\int_0^{2|x-y|}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(b;y,t)|t^s dtdy,\label{eq5.11}\\
&\bar{\Remain}_{s,q}^2(b)(x):=\sum_m\int_{I_m}\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+s}}\int_0^{2|x-y|}
|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\bfarIm;y,t)|t^s dtdy.\label{eq5.12}
\end{align}\\

Step 2: To estimate (\ref{eq5.8}), we use Lemma \ref{lemma6} (1) for $k=n+1$ and $y\in\Omega^c$ to obtain
\begin{align}
&(\int_0^{2|x-y|}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(b;y,t)|t^s dt)^{q-1}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim(\int_0^{2|x-y|}\alpha t^{s-1}dt)^{q-1}\lesssim\alpha^{q-1}|x-y|^{s(q-1)},\label{eq5.13}
\end{align} 
and the constants depend on $n,p,q$. Inserting (\ref{eq5.13}) into (\ref{eq5.5}) yields 
$$\alpha^q\lesssim\Remain_{s,q}^1(b)(x)\lesssim\alpha^{q-1}\bar{\Remain}_{s,q}^1(b)(x),$$ where $x$ belongs to the set $\{x\in\bbbr^n:\alpha^q\lesssim\Remain_{s,q}^1(b)(x)\}$. Therefore invoking Chebyshev's inequality, Fubini's theorem, Lemma \ref{lemma7} (\ref{eq2-13}) for $k=n+1$, Lemma \ref{lemma3} (vi) and (i) in a sequence yields the following estimate
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq5.8})
&\lesssim\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\alpha\lesssim\bar{\Remain}_{s,q}^1(b)(x)\})
 \lesssim\alpha^{-1}\int_{\bbbr^n}\bar{\Remain}_{s,q}^1(b)(x)dx\nonumber\\
&=\alpha^{-1}\int_0^{\infty}\int_{\Omega^c}\int_{\frac{t}{2}\leq|x-y|}\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+s}}dx
 \big|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(b;y,t)\big|t^s dydt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\alpha^{-1}\int_0^{\infty}\int_{\Omega^c}t^{-s}\cdot
 \big|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(b;y,t)\big|t^s dydt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\alpha^{-1}\sum_j\int_{I_j}|b(z)|dz\lesssim\sum_j\Lebes^n(I_j)
 \lesssim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p,\label{eq5.14}
\end{align}
where the implicit constants in (\ref{eq5.14}) depend on $n,p,q$.\\

Step 3: To estimate (\ref{eq5.9}), we use Lemma \ref{lemma6} (2) for $k=n+1$ and $y\in I_m$ for some Whitney cube $I_m$ to obtain
\begin{align}
&(\int_0^{2|x-y|}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\bfarIm;y,t)|t^s dt)^{q-1}\nonumber\\
&\lesssim(\int_0^{2|x-y|}\alpha t^{s-1}dt)^{q-1}\lesssim\alpha^{q-1}|x-y|^{s(q-1)},\label{eq5.15}
\end{align} 
and the constants depend on $n,p,q$. Inserting (\ref{eq5.15}) into (\ref{eq5.6}) yields 
$$\alpha^q\lesssim\Remain_{s,q}^2(b)(x)\lesssim\alpha^{q-1}\bar{\Remain}_{s,q}^2(b)(x),$$ where $x$ belongs to the set $\{x\in\bbbr^n:\alpha^q\lesssim\Remain_{s,q}^2(b)(x)\}$. Therefore invoking Chebyshev's inequality, Fubini's theorem, Lemma \ref{lemma7} (\ref{eq2-14}) for $k=n+1$, Lemma \ref{lemma3} (vi) and (i) in a sequence yields the following estimate
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq5.9})
&\lesssim\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\alpha\lesssim\bar{\Remain}_{s,q}^2(b)(x)\})
\lesssim\alpha^{-1}\int_{\bbbr^n}\bar{\Remain}_{s,q}^2(b)(x)dx\nonumber\\
&=\alpha^{-1}\sum_m\!\!\int_0^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{I_m}\!\!\int_{\frac{t}{2}\leq|x-y|}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
|x-y|^{-n-s}dx\big|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\bfarIm;y,t)\big|t^s dydt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\alpha^{-1}\sum_m\int_0^{\infty}\int_{I_m}t^{-s}\cdot|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\bfarIm;y,t)|t^s dydt
\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\alpha^{-1}\sum_j\int_{I_j}|b(z)|dz\lesssim\sum_j\Lebes^n(I_j)
\lesssim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p,\label{eq5.16}
\end{align}
where the implicit constants in (\ref{eq5.16}) depend on $n,p,q$.\\

Step 4: Finally we estimate the term (\ref{eq5.10}). By Lemma \ref{lemma3} (i) and Chebyshev's inequality, we have
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq5.10})
&=\Lebes^n(\{x\in\Omega:\alpha^q\lesssim\Remain_{s,q}^3(b)(x)\})\nonumber\\
&\quad+\Lebes^n(\{x\notin\Omega:\alpha^q\lesssim \Remain_{s,q}^3(b)(x)\})\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\Lebes^n(\Omega)+\alpha^{-q}\int_{\Omega^c}\Remain_{s,q}^3(b)(x)dx\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p+\alpha^{-q}\int_{\Omega^c}\Remain_{s,q}^3(b)(x)dx,\label{eq5.17}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq5.17}) depend on $n,q$. Now we estimate the term $\alpha^{-q}\int_{\Omega^c}\Remain_{s,q}^3(b)(x)dx$. Recall (\ref{eq1-6}), which is applicable due to (\ref{eq4.32}), then we have
\begin{align}
&\int_0^{2|x-y|}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\bnearIm;y,t)|t^s dt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}|\bnearIm(y-z)|\int_0^{\infty}\frac{t^s}{(t^2+|z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}
+\frac{t^{2+s}}{(t^2+|z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dtdz,\label{eq5.18}
\end{align}
where the constant depends on $n$. We apply the change of variable $u=\frac{t}{|z|}$ in the integral with respect to $t$ and get
\begin{align}
&\int_0^{\infty}\frac{t^s}{(t^2+|z|^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}+\frac{t^{2+s}}{(t^2+|z|^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}dt
\nonumber\\
&=|z|^{s-n}\cdot\int_0^{\infty}\frac{u^s}{(1+u^2)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}}+\frac{u^{2+s}}{(1+u^2)^{\frac{n+3}{2}}}du
\lesssim|z|^{s-n},\label{eq5.19}
\end{align}
where the last integral with respect to $u$ in (\ref{eq5.19}) converges since $0<s<1\leq n$, and the constant in (\ref{eq5.19}) depends on $n,p,q$. We put (\ref{eq5.19}) into (\ref{eq5.18}), insert the resulting estimate into the defining expression (\ref{eq5.7}) of $\Remain_{s,q}^3(b)(x)$ and apply Fubini's theorem, then we can estimate the term $\alpha^{-q}\int_{\Omega^c}\Remain_{s,q}^3(b)(x)dx$ from above by a constant multiple of the following expression
\begin{equation}\label{eq5.20}
\alpha^{-q}\sum_m\!\!\int_{I_m}\int_{\Omega^c}\!\!|x-y|^{-n-sq}dx\cdot
\big(\!\!\int_{\bbbr^n}\!\!|\bnearIm(y-z)|\cdot|z|^{s-n}dz\big)^q dy,
\end{equation}
and the constant depends only on $n,p,q$. By Lemma \ref{lemma1} (b), when $y\in I_m$ and $x\in\Omega^c$, we have $|x-y|\geq\dist(I_m,\Omega^c)\geq\sqrt{n}\cdot l(I_m)$ and thus
\begin{equation}\label{eq5.21}
\int_{\Omega^c}\!\!|x-y|^{-n-sq}dx\leq\int_{|x|\geq\sqrt{n}\cdot l(I_m)}\!\!|x|^{-n-sq}dx\lesssim
\Lebes^n(I_m)^{-\frac{sq}{n}},
\end{equation}
where we also use the formula $\Lebes^n(I_m)=l(I_m)^n$. Inserting (\ref{eq5.21}) into (\ref{eq5.20}) and invoking the famous Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality, i.e. Lemma \ref{lemma5}, yield
\begin{align}
(\ref{eq5.20})
&\lesssim\alpha^{-q}\sum_m\Lebes^n(I_m)^{-\frac{sq}{n}}\int_{I_m}
\big(\!\!\int_{\bbbr^n}\!\!|\bnearIm(y-z)|\cdot|z|^{s-n}dz\big)^q dy\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\alpha^{-q}\sum_m\Lebes^n(I_m)^{-\frac{sq}{n}}\int_{\bbbr^n}
\big(\!\!\int_{\bbbr^n}\!\!|\bnearIm(y-z)|\cdot|z|^{s-n}dz\big)^q dy\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\alpha^{-q}\sum_m\Lebes^n(I_m)^{-\frac{sq}{n}}\|\bnearIm\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^q
 \lesssim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p,\label{eq5.22}
\end{align}
where we also use the condition that $1<p<q<\infty$ and $0<s=n(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{q})<1$, and the last inequality in (\ref{eq5.22}) is due to estimate (\ref{eq4.32}) and Lemma \ref{lemma3} (i). The implicit constants in (\ref{eq5.22}) depend on $n,p,q$. Combining (\ref{eq5.17}), (\ref{eq5.20}), and (\ref{eq5.22}), we find that the term (\ref{eq5.10}) can be estimated from above by a constant multiple of $\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p$, and the constant only depends on $n,p,q$. The proof of Theorem \ref{theorem5} is now complete.
\end{proof}





\section{Proof of the main theorem}\label{proof.of.theorem2}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{theorem2}]
Step 1: It is sufficient to prove that
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.0}
\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\Diff_{s,q}f(x)>\alpha\})\lesssim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{\Lps}^p
\end{equation}
for $\alpha\in\bbbr$ and $0<\alpha<\infty$. To provide a pointwise estimate for $\Diff_{s,q}f(x)$, we follow the method given in \cite[Appendix A]{Piero2019} and the hint in \cite[chapter V, 6.12]{Stein1971}. By the almost everywhere pointwise convergence property of Poisson integrals (cf. \cite[chapter I, Theorem 1.25]{SteinWeissFourier}) and the fundamental theorem of calculus, we can denote $\bar{y}=\frac{y}{|y|}$ and rewrite $f(x+y)-f(x)$ identically as
\begin{align*}
&\lim_{t\rightarrow 0}\big\{\Pint(f;x+y,t)-\Pint(f;x+y,|y|)\\
&+\Pint(f;x+y,|y|)-\Pint(f;x,|y|)+\Pint(f;x,|y|)-\Pint(f;x,t)\big\},
\end{align*}
and the above expression is equivalent to
\begin{align}
&-\int_0^{|y|}\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;x+y,u)du+\int_0^{|y|}\nabla_n\Pint(f;x+u\bar{y},|y|)\cdot\bar{y}du
 \nonumber\\
&+\int_0^{|y|}\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,u)du.\label{eq6.1}
\end{align}
Furthermore, we can deduce from equation (\ref{eq6.3}) of Lemma \ref{lemma14} that there is a polynomial $Q(x)$ of $x\in\bbbr^n$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.40}
\Pint(f;x,t)=C_1\int_0^{\infty}\Pint(\Lift_s f;x,t+r)r^{s-1}dr+Q(x)
\end{equation}
for almost every $x\in\bbbr^n$ and every $t>0$, and $C_1=\frac{(2\pi)^s}{\varGamma(s)}$. Hence, by applying differentiation on both sides of the equation, we can write each term in (\ref{eq6.1}) as follows,
\begin{align}
&-\int_0^{|y|}\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;x+y,u)du\nonumber\\
&=-C_1\int_0^{|y|}\frac{\partial}{\partial u}\bigg[\int_0^{\infty}\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+y,u+r)r^{s-1}dr\bigg]du,
\label{eq6.41}
\end{align}
\begin{align}
&\int_0^{|y|}\nabla_n\Pint(f;x+u\bar{y},|y|)\cdot\bar{y}du\nonumber\\
&=\sum_{k=1}^n\int_0^{|y|}C_1\frac{\partial}{\partial x_k}\bigg[
 \int_0^{\infty}\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+u\bar{y},|y|+r)r^{s-1}dr\bigg]\bar{y}_k\nonumber\\
&\quad+\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x_k}(x+u\bar{y})\bar{y}_k du\nonumber\\
&=C_1\int_0^{|y|}\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{\partial}{\partial x_k}\bigg[
 \int_0^{\infty}\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+u\bar{y},|y|+r)r^{s-1}dr\bigg]\bar{y}_k du\nonumber\\
&\quad+\int_0^{|y|}\nabla_{n}Q(x+u\bar{y})\cdot\bar{y}du,\label{eq6.42}
\end{align}
where $\bar{y}_k$ is the $k$-th coordinate of $\bar{y}$ and $\bar{y}_k=\frac{y_k}{|y|}$, and we also have
\begin{align}
&\int_0^{|y|}\partial_{n+1}\Pint(f;x,u)du\nonumber\\
&=C_1\int_0^{|y|}\frac{\partial}{\partial u}\bigg[\int_0^{\infty}\Pint(\Lift_s f;x,u+r)r^{s-1}dr\bigg]du.
\label{eq6.43}
\end{align}
Because $\int_0^{|y|}\nabla_{n}Q(x+u\bar{y})\cdot\bar{y}du$ is a polynomial in both variables $x\in\bbbr^n$ and $y\in\bbbr^n$, the term $f(x+y)-f(x)$ can be identified with the sum of (\ref{eq6.41}), (\ref{eq6.43}), and the following expression (\ref{eq6.44}) in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.44}
C_1\int_0^{|y|}\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{\partial}{\partial x_k}\bigg[
\int_0^{\infty}\Pint(\Lift_s f;x+u\bar{y},|y|+r)r^{s-1}dr\bigg]\bar{y}_k du.
\end{equation}
From Lemma \ref{lemma15}, we know that we can bring the differentiations in (\ref{eq6.41}), (\ref{eq6.43}), and (\ref{eq6.44}) into the improper integral with respect to variable $r$ by applying the dominated convergence theorem and obtain equations (\ref{eq.lemma15.1}), (\ref{eq.lemma15.3}), (\ref{eq.lemma15.2}). Under the given conditions, we can use Lemma \ref{lemma11} to identify $\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f$ with a real-valued function in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$. And by Lemma \ref{lemma10}, we know $|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;x,t)|^q$ is subharmonic on $\bbbr^{n+1}_+$ for $2\leq q<\infty$. We will use this subharmonicity and hence from now on, we work with the function $\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})f(x)$. Combining (\ref{eq6.1}) with the equations (\ref{eq.lemma15.1}), (\ref{eq.lemma15.3}), (\ref{eq.lemma15.2}) with an appropriate change of variable, and multiplying the result by $\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})$, we can estimate the term $|\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})f(x+y)-\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})f(x)|$ from above by the sum of the following three terms,
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.7}
C_1\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_u^{\infty}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;x+y,v)|
\cdot(v-u)^{s-1}dvdu,
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.8}
C_1\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_u^{\infty}\!\!\!\!|\nabla_n\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;x+u\bar{y},|y|+v-u)|\cdot(v-u)^{s-1}dvdu,
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
C_1\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_u^{\infty}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;x,v)|
\cdot(v-u)^{s-1}dvdu.\label{eq6.9}
\end{equation}
We observe that when $0\leq u\leq|y|$, $2|y|\leq v$ and $u\leq v$, the three points $(x+y,v)$, $(x+u\bar{y},|y|+v-u)$, $(x,v)$ belong to the common cone $\gamma_{\frac{1}{2}}(x)\subseteq\bbbr^{n+1}_+$ whose vertex is $(x,0)$ for some $x\in\bbbr^n$, and whose aperture is $\frac{1}{2}$. Therefore we can split the integrals in (\ref{eq6.7}), (\ref{eq6.8}), (\ref{eq6.9}), and rearrange the summation, then we can obtain
\begin{align}
&|\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})f(x+y)-\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})f(x)|\nonumber\\
&\leq(\ref{eq6.7})+(\ref{eq6.8})+(\ref{eq6.9})\nonumber\\
&=C_1\cdot\big\{F_1(x,y)+F_2(x,y)+F_3(x,y)+F_4(x,y)\big\},\label{eq6.10}
\end{align}
where
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.11}
F_1(x,y)=\!\!\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_u^{2|y|}\!\!\!\!|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;x+y,v)|\frac{dvdu}{(v-u)^{1-s}},
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.12}
F_2(x,y)=\!\!\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_u^{2|y|}\!\!\!\!|\nabla_n\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;x+u\bar{y},|y|+v-u)|\frac{dvdu}{(v-u)^{1-s}},
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.13}
F_3(x,y)=\!\!\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_u^{2|y|}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;x,v)|
\frac{dvdu}{(v-u)^{1-s}},
\end{equation}
and
\begin{align}
F_4(x,y)
&=\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_{2|y|}^{\infty}\big\{|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;x+y,v)|\nonumber\\
&\quad+|\nabla_n\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;x+u\bar{y},|y|+v-u)|\nonumber\\
&\quad+|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;x,v)|\big\}
\cdot\frac{dvdu}{(v-u)^{1-s}}.\label{eq6.14}
\end{align}
Furthermore, we recall the defining expression (\ref{eq1-10}) and obtain
\begin{align}
\Diff_{s,q}f(x)^q
&=\frac{1}{|\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})|^q}\cdot\int_{\bbbr^n}
 \frac{|\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})f(x+y)-\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})f(x)|^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{F_1(x,y)^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy+\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{F_2(x,y)^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy
 \nonumber\\
&\quad+\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{F_3(x,y)^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy+\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{F_4(x,y)^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy,
 \label{eq6.15}
\end{align}
where the implicit constant is real-valued and depends on $q,s$. We will estimate each term on the right side of inequality (\ref{eq6.15}).\\

Step 2: We begin with the term $\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{F_4(x,y)^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy$. Observe that the three points $(x+y,v)$, $(x+u\bar{y},|y|+v-u)$, $(x,v)$ in the iterated integral of (\ref{eq6.14}) belong to the set
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.16}
\{(\xi,\eta)\in\bbbr^{n+1}_+:\xi\in\bbbr^n,\eta>0,|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\frac{1}{2}\eta\}.
\end{equation}
If we pick a positive real number $A$ so that $0<s<A<1$, then the condition $0\leq u\leq|y|\leq\frac{1}{2}v$ implies $v^{s-1}\leq(v-u)^{s-1}\leq 2^{1-s}v^{s-1}$, and thus
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.17}
\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_{2|y|}^{\infty}\frac{(v-u)^{s-1}}{v^A}dvdu\lesssim
\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_{2|y|}^{\infty}v^{s-A-1}dvdu\lesssim|y|^{1+s-A},
\end{equation}
and the constants in (\ref{eq6.17}) depend on $s,A$. First, we have
\begin{align}
&\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_{2|y|}^{\infty}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;x+y,v)|v^A\cdot
 \frac{(v-u)^{s-1}}{v^A}dvdu\nonumber\\
&\leq\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\frac{1}{2}\eta}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;\xi,\eta)| 
 \eta^A\cdot\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_{2|y|}^{\infty}\frac{(v-u)^{s-1}}{v^A}dvdu\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\frac{1}{2}\eta}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;\xi,\eta)|\eta^A\cdot|y|^{1+s-A}.\label{eq6.18}
\end{align}
Second, we have
\begin{align}
&\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_{2|y|}^{\infty}|\nabla_n\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;x+u\bar{y},|y|+v-u)|(|y|+v-u)^A\nonumber\\
&\quad\cdot\frac{(v-u)^{s-1}}{(|y|+v-u)^A}dvdu\nonumber\\
&\leq\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\frac{1}{2}\eta}|\nabla_n\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;\xi,\eta)|\eta^A
 \nonumber\\
&\quad\cdot\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_{2|y|}^{\infty}\frac{(v-u)^{s-1}}{(|y|+v-u)^A}dvdu\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\frac{1}{2}\eta}|\nabla_n\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;\xi,\eta)|\eta^A\cdot\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_{2|y|}^{\infty}v^{s-A-1}dvdu\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\frac{1}{2}\eta}|\nabla_n\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;\xi,\eta)|\eta^A\cdot|y|^{1+s-A},\label{eq6.19}
\end{align}
and the constants in (\ref{eq6.19}) depend on $s,A$. Third, we have
\begin{align}
&\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_{2|y|}^{\infty}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;x,v)|v^A
 \cdot\frac{(v-u)^{s-1}}{v^A}dvdu\nonumber\\
&\leq\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\frac{1}{2}\eta}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;\xi,\eta)|\eta^A\cdot\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_{2|y|}^{\infty}\frac{(v-u)^{s-1}}{v^A}dvdu\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\frac{1}{2}\eta}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;\xi,\eta)|\eta^A\cdot|y|^{1+s-A}.\label{eq6.20}
\end{align}
Inserting (\ref{eq6.18}), (\ref{eq6.19}), (\ref{eq6.20}) into (\ref{eq6.14}) yields
\begin{align}
&F_4(x,y)^q\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\frac{1}{2}\eta}|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;\xi,\eta)|^q\eta^{qA}\cdot|y|^{q(1+s-A)},\label{eq6.21}
\end{align}
where the constant in (\ref{eq6.21}) is real-valued and depends on $q,s,A$. Now we apply Lemma \ref{lemma11} and Lemma \ref{lemma10}, then $\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f$ can be identified with a real-valued function in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$ and hence $$|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;\xi,\eta)|^q$$ is subharmonic on $\bbbr^{n+1}_+$ when $2\leq q<\infty$. We consider the $(n+1)$-dimensional ball $B^{n+1}((\xi,\eta),\frac{1}{2}\eta)\subseteq\bbbr^{n+1}_+$ centered at $(\xi,\eta)$ with radius $\frac{1}{2}\eta$, where $\xi\in\bbbr^n$ and $\eta>0$, and we have
\begin{align}
&|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;\xi,\eta)|^q\nonumber\\
&\leq\mvint_{B^{n+1}((\xi,\eta),\frac{1}{2}\eta)}|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;z,t)|^q d(z,t),\label{eq6.22}
\end{align}
where the right side of this inequality is a mean value integral over the aforementioned $(n+1)$-dimensional ball. We also observe that if $(\xi,\eta)$ belongs to the set (\ref{eq6.16}) and $(z,t)$ belongs to the ball $B^{n+1}((\xi,\eta),\frac{1}{2}\eta)$ for $z\in\bbbr^n$ and $t>0$, then we have $|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\frac{1}{2}\eta$, $|z-\xi|\leq\frac{1}{2}\eta$, $\frac{1}{2}\eta\leq t\leq\frac{3}{2}\eta$, and these inequalities indicate that $|y|\leq\frac{1}{2}\eta\leq t$, $\frac{2}{3}t\leq\eta\leq 2t$, and $|z-x|\leq|z-\xi|+|\xi-x|\leq\eta\leq 2t$. Therefore we combine the above indications with (\ref{eq6.21}), (\ref{eq6.22}) and apply Fubini's theorem, and then we can estimate the term $\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{F_4(x,y)^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy$ from above by a constant multiple of the following,
\begin{align}
&\int_{\bbbr^n}|y|^{q-qA-n}\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\frac{1}{2}\eta}\frac{\eta^{qA-n-1}}{\nu_{n+1}}\nonumber\\
&\quad\cdot\int_{B^{n+1}((\xi,\eta),\frac{1}{2}\eta)}\!\!\!\!
 |\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;z,t)|^q d(z,t)dy\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}|y|^{q-qA-n}\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\frac{1}{2}\eta}
 \int_{B^{n+1}((\xi,\eta),\frac{1}{2}\eta)}\!\!\!\!
 |\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;z,t)|^q\nonumber\\
&\quad\cdot t^{qA-n-1}d(z,t)dy\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}\!\!|y|^{q-qA-n}\!\!\int_{|y|}^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{|z-x|\leq 2t}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
 |\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;z,t)|^q\cdot t^{qA-n-1}dzdtdy\nonumber\\
&=\int_{0}^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{|y|\leq t}\!\!\!\!|y|^{q-qA-n}dy\int_{|z-x|\leq 2t}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
 |\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;z,t)|^q t^{qA-n-1}dzdt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{0}^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{|z-x|\leq 2t}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!1\cdot
 |\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;z,t)|^q t^{q-n-1}dzdt,\label{eq6.23}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq6.23}) depend on $n,q,s,A$, and $0<s<A<1$, and $\nu_{n+1}$ denotes the volume of the unit ball in $\bbbr^{n+1}$. Notice that when $|z-x|\leq 2t$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.24}
1\leq 3^{\lambda n}\cdot\big(\frac{t}{t+|z-x|}\big)^{\lambda n}\quad\text{for any }\lambda>0.
\end{equation}
Inserting (\ref{eq6.24}) into (\ref{eq6.23}) yields the following pointwise estimate
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.25}
\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{F_4(x,y)^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy\lesssim\LPG_{\lambda,q}(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f)(x)^q
\end{equation}
for every $x\in\bbbr^n$, where the implicit constant depends on $n,q,s,A,\lambda$, and $\LPG_{\lambda,q}(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f)(x)$ is the generalized Littlewood-Paley $\LPG_{\lambda,q}$-function defined in (\ref{eq1-26}).\\

Step 3: We estimate the term $\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{F_3(x,y)^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy$. We notice that when $0\leq v\leq 2|y|$, the point $(x,v)$ is in the set
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.26}
\{(\xi,\eta)\in\bbbr^{n+1}_+:\xi\in\bbbr^n,\eta>0,|\xi-x|\leq\eta\leq 2|y|\},
\end{equation}
then we can exchange the order of integrations in the defining expression (\ref{eq6.13}) of $F_3(x,y)$ and obtain
\begin{align}
&F_3(x,y)^q\nonumber\\
&\lesssim(\int_0^{2|y|}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;x,v)|v^B\cdot v^{s-B}dv)^q
 \nonumber\\
&\leq\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq\eta\leq 2|y|}\!\!\!\!|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;\xi,\eta)|^q\eta^{Bq}
 \cdot(\int_0^{2|y|}\!\!\!\! v^{s-B}dv)^q\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq\eta\leq 2|y|}\!\!\!\!|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;\xi,\eta)|^q\eta^{Bq}\cdot|y|^{q(1+s-B)},\label{eq6.27}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq6.27}) depend on $s,q,B$, and $B$ is a positive real number that satisfies $1<B<1+s$. We use the subharmonicity of $|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;\xi,\eta)|^q$ given by Lemma \ref{lemma11} and Lemma \ref{lemma10}, and consider the $(n+1)$-dimensional ball $B^{n+1}((\xi,\eta),\frac{1}{2}\eta)\subseteq\bbbr^{n+1}_+$, then we still have the inequality (\ref{eq6.22}). Observe that if $(\xi,\eta)$ is in the set (\ref{eq6.26}) and $(z,t)$ belongs to the ball $B^{n+1}((\xi,\eta),\frac{1}{2}\eta)$ for $z\in\bbbr^n$ and $t>0$, we have $|\xi-x|\leq\eta\leq2|y|$, $|z-\xi|\leq\frac{1}{2}\eta$, $|t-\eta|\leq\frac{1}{2}\eta$, and these inequalities indicate that $\frac{2}{3}t\leq\eta\leq2t$, $t\leq3|y|$, $|z-x|\leq|z-\xi|+|\xi-x|\leq\frac{3}{2}\eta\leq3t$. Therefore we can combine the above indications with (\ref{eq6.27}), (\ref{eq6.22}), and apply Fubini's theorem, and then we can estimate the term $\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{F_3(x,y)^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy$ from above by a constant multiple of the following,
\begin{align}
&\int_{\bbbr^n}|y|^{q-qB-n}\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq\eta\leq2|y|}\frac{\eta^{qB-n-1}}{\nu_{n+1}}\nonumber\\
&\quad\cdot\int_{B^{n+1}((\xi,\eta),\frac{1}{2}\eta)}\!\!\!\!
 |\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;z,t)|^q d(z,t)dy\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}|y|^{q-qB-n}\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq\eta\leq2|y|}
 \int_{B^{n+1}((\xi,\eta),\frac{1}{2}\eta)}\!\!\!\!
 |\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;z,t)|^q\nonumber\\
&\quad\cdot t^{qB-n-1}d(z,t)dy\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}\!\!|y|^{q-qB-n}\!\!\int_{0}^{3|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_{|z-x|\leq3t}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
 |\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;z,t)|^q\cdot t^{qB-n-1}dzdtdy\nonumber\\
&=\int_{0}^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{\frac{t}{3}\leq|y|}\!\!\!\!|y|^{q-qB-n}dy\int_{|z-x|\leq3t}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
 |\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;z,t)|^q t^{qB-n-1}dzdt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{0}^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{|z-x|\leq3t}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!1\cdot
 |\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;z,t)|^q t^{q-n-1}dzdt,\label{eq6.28}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq6.28}) depend on $n,q,s,B$, and $1<B<1+s$, and $\nu_{n+1}$ is the volume of the unit ball in $\bbbr^{n+1}$. Notice that when $|z-x|\leq3t$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.29}
1\leq 4^{\lambda n}\cdot\big(\frac{t}{t+|z-x|}\big)^{\lambda n}\quad\text{for any }\lambda>0.
\end{equation}
Inserting (\ref{eq6.29}) into (\ref{eq6.28}) yields the following pointwise estimate
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.30}
\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{F_3(x,y)^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy\lesssim\LPG_{\lambda,q}(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f)(x)^q
\end{equation}
for every $x\in\bbbr^n$, where the implicit constant depends on $n,q,s,B,\lambda$.\\

Step 4: We estimate the term $\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{F_2(x,y)^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy$. Observe that when $0\leq u\leq|y|$ and $u\leq v\leq2|y|$, and $\bar{y}=\frac{y}{|y|}$, the point $(x+u\bar{y},|y|+v-u)$ belongs to the set
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.31}
\{(\xi,\eta)\in\bbbr^{n+1}_+:\xi\in\bbbr^n,\eta>0,|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\eta\}.
\end{equation}
Furthermore, we continue using the positive number $A$ satisfying $0<s<A<1$ and we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.32}
\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_u^{2|y|}\frac{(v-u)^{s-1}}{(|y|+v-u)^A}dvdu\leq\!\!
\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_u^{2|y|}\frac{(v-u)^{s-1}}{|y|^A}dvdu\lesssim|y|^{1+s-A}.
\end{equation}
Now we recall the defining expression (\ref{eq6.12}), multiply the integrand of (\ref{eq6.12}) by the factor $(|y|+v-u)^A$ and divide it by the same factor, and then we apply the above observation and the estimate (\ref{eq6.32}) to obtain the following
\begin{align}
F_2(x,y)^q
&\leq\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\eta}\!\!\!\!|\nabla_{n}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;\xi,\eta)|^q\eta^{Aq}\nonumber\\
&\quad\cdot(\int_0^{|y|}\!\!\!\!\int_u^{2|y|}\frac{(v-u)^{s-1}}{(|y|+v-u)^A}dvdu)^q
\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\eta}\!\!\!\!|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;\xi,\eta)|^q\eta^{Aq}\cdot|y|^{q(1+s-A)},\label{eq6.33}
\end{align}
and the constant depends on $n,p,q$. We use the subharmonicity of $$|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;\xi,\eta)|^q$$ over the $(n+1)$-dimensional ball $B^{n+1}((\xi,\eta),\frac{1}{2}\eta)\subseteq\bbbr^{n+1}_+$ where $\xi\in\bbbr^n$, $\eta>0$, and $2\leq q<\infty$, and this subharmonicity is due to Lemma \ref{lemma11} and Lemma \ref{lemma10}, then we still have the inequality (\ref{eq6.22}). When $(\xi,\eta)$ belongs to the set (\ref{eq6.31}) and $(z,t)$ belongs to the ball $B^{n+1}((\xi,\eta),\frac{1}{2}\eta)$ for $z\in\bbbr^n$ and $t>0$, we have $|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\eta$, $|z-\xi|\leq\frac{1}{2}\eta$, $\frac{1}{2}\eta\leq t\leq\frac{3}{2}\eta$, and these inequalities indicate that $\frac{2}{3}t\leq\eta\leq2t$, $|y|\leq2t$, and $|z-x|\leq|z-\xi|+|\xi-x|\leq\frac{3}{2}\eta\leq3t$. Therefore we can combine the above indications with (\ref{eq6.33}), (\ref{eq6.22}), and apply Fubini's theorem, and then we can estimate the term $\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{F_2(x,y)^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy$ from above by a constant multiple of the following,
\begin{align}
&\int_{\bbbr^n}|y|^{q-qA-n}\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\eta}\frac{\eta^{qA-n-1}}{\nu_{n+1}}\nonumber\\
&\quad\cdot\int_{B^{n+1}((\xi,\eta),\frac{1}{2}\eta)}\!\!\!\!
|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;z,t)|^q d(z,t)dy\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}|y|^{q-qA-n}\sup_{|\xi-x|\leq|y|\leq\eta}
\int_{B^{n+1}((\xi,\eta),\frac{1}{2}\eta)}\!\!\!\!
|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;z,t)|^q\nonumber\\
&\quad\cdot t^{qA-n-1}d(z,t)dy\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{\bbbr^n}\!\!|y|^{q-qA-n}\!\!\int_{\frac{|y|}{2}}^{\infty}\!\!\!\!
 \int_{|z-x|\leq3t}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;z,t)|^q\cdot t^{qA-n-1}dzdtdy\nonumber\\
&=\int_{0}^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{|y|\leq2t}\!\!\!\!|y|^{q-qA-n}dy\int_{|z-x|\leq3t}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;z,t)|^q t^{qA-n-1}dzdt\nonumber\\
&\lesssim\int_{0}^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\int_{|z-x|\leq3t}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!1\cdot
|\nabla_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;z,t)|^q t^{q-n-1}dzdt,\label{eq6.34}
\end{align}
where the constants in (\ref{eq6.34}) depend on $n,q,s,A$, and $0<s<A<1$, and $\nu_{n+1}$ denotes the volume of the unit ball in $\bbbr^{n+1}$. Inserting (\ref{eq6.29}) into (\ref{eq6.34}) yields the following pointwise estimate
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.35}
\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{F_2(x,y)^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy\lesssim\LPG_{\lambda,q}(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f)(x)^q
\end{equation}
for every $x\in\bbbr^n$, where the implicit constant depends on $n,q,s,A,\lambda$, and $\LPG_{\lambda,q}(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f)(x)$ is the generalized Littlewood-Paley $\LPG_{\lambda,q}$-function defined in (\ref{eq1-26}).\\

Step 5: We estimate the term $\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{F_1(x,y)^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy$. We can exchange the order of integrations in the defining expression (\ref{eq6.11}) and obtain
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.36}
F_1(x,y)\lesssim\int_0^{2|y|}|\partial_{n+1}\Pint(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f;x+y,v)|v^s dv,
\end{equation} 
where the constant in (\ref{eq6.36}) depends on $0<s<1$. Therefore with a proper change of variables, we have obtained the pointwise estimate
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.37}
\int_{\bbbr^n}\frac{F_1(x,y)^q}{|y|^{n+sq}}dy\lesssim\Remain_{s,q}(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f)(x)^q,
\end{equation}
where the constant in (\ref{eq6.37}) depends on $s,q$, and $\Remain_{s,q}(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f)(x)$ is the $\Remain_{s,q}$-function given by (\ref{eq1-27}).\\

Step 6: From inequalities (\ref{eq6.15}), (\ref{eq6.25}), (\ref{eq6.30}), (\ref{eq6.35}), (\ref{eq6.37}), we can deduce the pointwise estimate
\begin{equation}\label{eq6.38}
\Diff_{s,q}f(x)\lesssim\LPG_{\lambda,q}(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f)(x)
+\Remain_{s,q}(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f)(x)
\end{equation}
for every $x\in\bbbr^n$, and the implicit constant in (\ref{eq6.38}) only depends on some fixed parameters. Furthermore, we have obtained
\begin{align}
&\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\Diff_{s,q}f(x)>\alpha\})\nonumber\\
&\leq\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\frac{\alpha}{2}\lesssim\LPG_{\lambda,q}(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f)(x)\}) 
 \nonumber\\
&\quad+\Lebes^n(\{x\in\bbbr^n:\frac{\alpha}{2}\lesssim\Remain_{s,q}(\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f)(x)\}),
 \label{eq6.39}
\end{align}
for any positive finite real number $\alpha$. The assumption that $f\in\dot{L}^p_s(\bbbr^n)$ is a bounded real-valued function defined on $\bbbr^n$ and has first-order continuous derivatives and Lemma \ref{lemma11} indicate that the tempered distribution $\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f$ has a unique real-valued function representative (in the sense of $\Sw_0'(\bbbr^n)$) in $L^p(\bbbr^n)$. Therefore Theorem \ref{theorem4} and Theorem \ref{theorem5} are applicable. The first term on the right side of (\ref{eq6.39}) can be estimated from above by a constant multiple of $\alpha^{-p}\|\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p\sim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{\Lps}^p$ due to Theorem \ref{theorem4} and Definition \ref{definition2}. The second term on the right side of (\ref{eq6.39}) can be estimated from above by a constant multiple of $\alpha^{-p}\|\varGamma(\frac{-s}{2})\Lift_s f\|_{L^p(\bbbr^n)}^p\sim\alpha^{-p}\|f\|_{\Lps}^p$ due to Theorem \ref{theorem5} and Definition \ref{definition2}. The proof of Theorem \ref{theorem2} is now complete.
\end{proof}






%The acknowledgments section should not be numbered.
\section*{Acknowledgments}
The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewer for the review of this article.

\section*{Statements and Declarations}
The author has no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


\bibliographystyle{plain}
%\bibliographystyle{abbrv}
\bibliography{bibliography}
%{\textit{E-mail address:}\\
%lifeng.wang.1987@outlook.com,\\
%lifeng.wang.1987@gmail.com}
\end{document}

\begin{thebibliography}{10}

\bibitem{AQCP2018}
H.~Al-Qassem, L.~Cheng, and Y.~Pan.
\newblock {On generalized Littlewood–Paley functions}.
\newblock {\em Collectanea Mathematica}, 69(2):297--314, 2018.

\bibitem{AQCP2021}
Hussain Al-Qassem, Leslie Cheng, and Yibiao Pan.
\newblock {Generalized Littlewood-Paley functions on product spaces}.
\newblock {\em Turkish Journal of Mathematics}, 45(1):319--345, 2021.

\bibitem{BM2022}
Cristina Benea and Camil Muscalu.
\newblock {Multiple vector-valued, mixed-norm estimates for Littlewood–Paley
  square functions}.
\newblock {\em Publicacions Matemàtiques}, 66(2):631--681, 2022.

\bibitem{BCP1962}
A.~Benedek, A.~P. Calderón, and R.~Panzone.
\newblock {Convolution operators on Banach space valued functions}.
\newblock {\em Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},
  48(3):356--365, 1962.

\bibitem{Bourgain1989}
Jean Bourgain.
\newblock {\em On the behavior of the constant in the Littlewood-Paley
  inequality}, pages 202--208.
\newblock Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1989.

\bibitem{CHIFRRSY}
Mingming Cao, Mahdi Hormozi, Gonzalo Ibañez-Firnkorn, Israel~P. Rivera-Ríos,
  Zengyan Si, and Kôzô Yabuta.
\newblock {Weak and strong type estimates for the multilinear
  Littlewood–Paley operators}.
\newblock {\em Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications}, 27(4):62, 2021.

\bibitem{CLX2017}
Mingming Cao, Kangwei Li, and Qingying Xue.
\newblock {A characterization of two-weight norm inequality for
  Littlewood-Paley $g_{\lambda}^{*}$-function}.
\newblock {\em The Journal of Geometric Analysis}, 28(2):842--865, 2018.

\bibitem{CX2021}
Mingming Cao and Qingying Xue.
\newblock {Multilinear Littlewood-Paley-Stein operators on non-homogeneous
  spaces}.
\newblock {\em The Journal of Geometric Analysis}, 31(9):9295--9337, 2021.

\bibitem{CLYY2017}
Der-Chen Chang, Jun Liu, Dachun Yang, and Wen Yuan.
\newblock {Littlewood-Paley characterizations of Haj\l{}asz-Sobolev and
  Triebel-Lizorkin spaces via averages on balls}.
\newblock {\em Potential Analysis}, 46(2):227--259, 2017.

\bibitem{CWYZ2020}
Der-Chen Chang, Songbai Wang, Dachun Yang, and Yangyang Zhang.
\newblock {Littlewood-Paley characterizations of Hardy-type spaces associated
  with ball quasi-Banach function spaces}.
\newblock {\em Complex Analysis and Operator Theory}, 14(3):40, 2020.

\bibitem{Cheng2007}
Leslie~C. Cheng.
\newblock {On Littlewood-Paley Functions}.
\newblock {\em Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society},
  135(10):3241--3247, 2007.

\bibitem{Piero2019}
Piero D'Ancona.
\newblock {A short proof of commutator estimates}.
\newblock {\em Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications}, 25(3):1134--1146,
  2019.

\bibitem{DFP2000}
Yong Ding, Dashan Fan, and Yibiao Pan.
\newblock {On Littlewood-Paley functions and singular integrals}.
\newblock {\em Hokkaido Mathematical Journal}, 29(3):537--552, 2000.

\bibitem{Javier2013}
Javier Duoandikoetxea.
\newblock {Sharp $L^p$ boundedness for a class of square functions}.
\newblock {\em Revista Matemática Complutense}, 26(2):535--548, 2013.

\bibitem{FS2002}
Dashan Fan and Shuichi Sato.
\newblock {Remarks on Littlewood-Paley functions and singular integrals}.
\newblock {\em Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan}, 54(3):565--585,
  2002.

\bibitem{FZ2021}
Dashan Fan and Fayou Zhao.
\newblock {Littlewood-Paley functions and Triebel-Lizorkin spaces, Besov
  spaces}.
\newblock {\em Analysis in Theory and Applications}, 37(3):267--288, 2021.

\bibitem{fefferman1970}
Charles Fefferman.
\newblock {Inequalities for strongly singular convolution operators}.
\newblock {\em Acta Mathematica}, 124:9--36, 1970.

\bibitem{FS1982}
Robert Fefferman and Elias~M. Stein.
\newblock {Singular integrals on product spaces}.
\newblock {\em Advances in Mathematics}, 45(2):117--143, 1982.

\bibitem{LX2018}
Liu Feng and Xue Qingying.
\newblock {Characterizations of the multiple Littlewood–Paley operators on
  product domains}.
\newblock {\em Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen}, 92/3-4:419--439, 2018.

\bibitem{FZ2016}
Xing Fu and Ji~Man Zhao.
\newblock {Endpoint estimates of generalized homogeneous Littlewood–Paley
  g-functions over non-homogeneous metric measure spaces}.
\newblock {\em Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series}, 32(9):1035--1074,
  2016.

\bibitem{GM2022}
Arash Ghorbanalizadeh and Monire Mikaeili~Nia.
\newblock {Strong- and weak-type estimate for Littlewood–Paley operators
  associated with Laplace–Bessel differential operator}.
\newblock {\em Banach Journal of Mathematical Analysis}, 16(2):21, 2022.

\bibitem{GM2023}
Arash Ghorbanalizadeh and Monire Mikaeili~Nia.
\newblock {Weak-type estimate for the Littlewood-Paley operators associated
  with Laplace-Bessel differential operator}.
\newblock {\em The Journal of Geometric Analysis}, 33(11):353, 2023.

\bibitem{14classical}
Loukas Grafakos.
\newblock {\em Classical {F}ourier analysis}, volume 249 of {\em Graduate Texts
  in Mathematics}.
\newblock Springer, New York, third edition, 2014.

\bibitem{14modern}
Loukas Grafakos.
\newblock {\em Modern {F}ourier analysis}, volume 250 of {\em Graduate Texts in
  Mathematics}.
\newblock Springer, New York, third edition, 2014.

\bibitem{HX2019}
Sha He and Qingying Xue.
\newblock {Parametrized multilinear Littlewood-Paley operators on Hardy
  spaces}.
\newblock {\em Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics}, 23(1):87--101, 2019.

\bibitem{HYY2016}
Ziyi He, Dachun Yang, and Wen Yuan.
\newblock {Littlewood-Paley characterizations of second-order Sobolev spaces
  via averages on balls}.
\newblock {\em Canadian Mathematical Bulletin}, 59(1):104--118, 2016.

\bibitem{HYY2018}
Ziyi He, Dachun Yang, and Wen Yuan.
\newblock {Littlewood-Paley characterizations of higher-order Sobolev spaces
  via averages on balls}.
\newblock {\em Mathematische Nachrichten}, 291(2-3):284--325, 2018.

\bibitem{HouWu2019}
Xianming Hou and Huoxiong Wu.
\newblock {Limiting weak-type behaviors for certain Littlewood-Paley
  functions}.
\newblock {\em Acta Mathematica Scientia}, 39(1):11--25, 2019.

\bibitem{HLYY2019}
Long Huang, Jun Liu, Dachun Yang, and Wen Yuan.
\newblock {Atomic and Littlewood–Paley Characterizations of Anisotropic
  Mixed-Norm Hardy Spaces and Their Applications}.
\newblock {\em The Journal of Geometric Analysis}, 29(3):1991--2067, 2019.

\bibitem{JYYZ2022}
Hongchao Jia, Dachun Yang, Wen Yuan, and Yangyang Zhang.
\newblock {Estimates for Littlewood–Paley operators on ball Campanato-type
  function spaces}.
\newblock {\em Results in Mathematics}, 78:37, 2022.

\bibitem{JL2018}
Huaye Jiao and Haibo Lin.
\newblock {Boundedness of Littlewood-Paley g-functions on non-homogeneous
  metric measure spaces}.
\newblock {\em New York Journal of Mathematics}, 24:815--847, 2018.

\bibitem{Lerner2019}
Andrei~K. Lerner.
\newblock {Quantitative weighted estimates for the Littlewood–Paley square
  function and Marcinkiewicz multipliers}.
\newblock {\em Mathematical Research Letters}, 26(2):537--556, 2019.

\bibitem{LW2014}
Feng Liu and Huoxiong Wu.
\newblock {On the $L^2$ boundedness for the multiple Littlewood–Paley
  functions with rough kernels}.
\newblock {\em Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications},
  410(1):403--410, 2014.

\bibitem{LuTao2017}
Guanghui Lu and Shuangping Tao.
\newblock {Commutators of Littlewood-Paley $g_{\kappa}^*$-functions on
  non-homogeneous metric measure spaces}.
\newblock {\em Open Mathematics}, 15(1):1283--1299, 2017.

\bibitem{MNY2010}
Yan Meng, Eiichi Nakai, and Dachun Yang.
\newblock {Estimates for Lusin-area and Littlewood-Paley $g_{\lambda}^*$
  functions over spaces of homogeneous type}.
\newblock {\em Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods \& Applications},
  72(5):2721--2736, 2010.

\bibitem{MY2008}
Yan Meng and Dachun Yang.
\newblock {Estimates for Littlewood–Paley operators in $BMO(\mathbb{R}^n)$}.
\newblock {\em Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications},
  346(1):30--38, 2008.

\bibitem{MW1974}
Benjamin Muckenhoupt and Richard~L. Wheeden.
\newblock {Norm inequalities for the Littlewood-Paley function
  $g_{\lambda}^*$}.
\newblock {\em Transactions of the American Mathematical Society}, 191:95--111,
  1974.

\bibitem{Prats19}
Martí Prats.
\newblock {Measuring Triebel-Lizorkin fractional smoothness on domains in terms
  of first-order differences}.
\newblock {\em Journal of the London Mathematical Society}, 100(2):692--716,
  2019.

\bibitem{Rudin.Funct.Anal}
Walter Rudin.
\newblock {\em {Functional analysis}}.
\newblock International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics. McGraw-Hill
  Science/Engineering/Math, second edition, 1991.

\bibitem{Sato2008}
Shuichi Sato.
\newblock {Estimates for Littlewood-Paley functions and extrapolation}.
\newblock {\em Integral Equations and Operator Theory}, 62(3):429--440, 2008.

\bibitem{seeger1989note}
Andreas Seeger.
\newblock {A note on Triebel-Lizorkin spaces}.
\newblock {\em Banach Center Publications}, 22(1):391--400, 1989.

\bibitem{SXY2014}
Shaoguang Shi, Qingying Xue, and Kôzô Yabuta.
\newblock {On the boundedness of multilinear Littlewood-Paley $g_{\lambda}^*$
  function}.
\newblock {\em Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées},
  101(3):394--413, 2014.

\bibitem{Stein1958}
Elias~M. Stein.
\newblock {On the functions of Littlewood-Paley, Lusin, and Marcinkiewicz}.
\newblock {\em Transactions of the American Mathematical Society},
  88(2):430--466, 1958.

\bibitem{Stein1961}
Elias~M. Stein.
\newblock The characterization of functions arising as potentials.
\newblock {\em Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society}, 67(1):102--104,
  01 1961.

\bibitem{Stein1961-2}
Elias~M. Stein.
\newblock {On some functions of Littlewood-Paley and Zygmund}.
\newblock {\em Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society}, 67(1):99--101,
  1961.

\bibitem{Stein1971}
Elias~M. Stein.
\newblock {\em Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions
  (PMS-30), Volume 30}.
\newblock Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1970.

\bibitem{SteinHarmonic}
Elias~M. Stein.
\newblock {\em {Harmonic analysis: real-variable methods, orthogonality, and
  oscillatory integrals (PMS-43)}}.
\newblock Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1993.

\bibitem{SteinWeissFourier}
Elias~M. Stein and Guido Weiss.
\newblock {\em Introduction to Fourier Analysis on Euclidean Spaces (PMS-32)}.
\newblock Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1971.

\bibitem{TW2014}
Shuangping Tao and Lijuan Wang.
\newblock {Boundedness of Littlewood-Paley operators and their commutators on
  Herz-Morrey spaces with variable exponent}.
\newblock {\em Journal of Inequalities and Applications}, 2014(1):227, 2014.

\bibitem{1983functionspaces}
Hans Triebel.
\newblock {\em Theory of Function Spaces}.
\newblock Monographs in Mathematics. Springer Basel, 1983.

\bibitem{1992functionspaces}
Hans Triebel.
\newblock {\em Theory of Function Spaces II}.
\newblock Monographs in Mathematics. Springer Basel, 1992.

\bibitem{Wang2023}
Lifeng Wang.
\newblock {Inequalities in homogeneous Triebel-Lizorkin and Besov-Lipschitz
  spaces}.
\newblock {\em Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis}, 22(4):1318--1393,
  2023.

\end{thebibliography}