Monte Carlos for tau lepton -- Standard Model and New Physics signatures
Extracted source text · arXiv 2405.12570
% =========================================================================
% SciPost LaTeX template
% Version 1e (2017-10-31)
%
% Submissions to SciPost Journals should make use of this template.
%
% INSTRUCTIONS: simply look for the `TODO:' tokens and adapt your file.
%
% - please enable line numbers (package: lineno)
% - you should run LaTeX twice in order for the line numbers to appear
% =========================================================================
\documentclass[submission, Phys]{SciPost}
\binoppenalty=10000
\relpenalty=10000
\hypersetup{
colorlinks,
linkcolor={red!50!black},
citecolor={blue!50!black},
urlcolor={blue!80!black}
}
\usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
\usepackage{pstricks,epsfig}
\urlstyle{same}
% Fix \cal and \mathcal characters look (so it's not the same as \mathscr)
\DeclareSymbolFont{usualmathcal}{OMS}{cmsy}{m}{n}
\DeclareSymbolFontAlphabet{\mathcal}{usualmathcal}
\begin{document}
% TODO: write your article's title here.
% The article title is centered, Large boldface, and should fit in two lines
\begin{center}{\Large \textbf{ Monte Carlos for tau lepton -- Standard Model \\ and New Physics signatures.
\\
}}\end{center}
% TODO: write the author list here. Use initials + surname format.
% Separate subsequent authors by a comma, omit comma at the end of the list.
% Mark the corresponding author with a superscript *.
\begin{center}
Zbigniew Was%\textsuperscript{1$\star$}
\end{center}
% TODO: write all affiliations here.
% Format: institute, city, country
\begin{center}
{\bf } IFJ PAN \\ Radzikowskiego 152 \\31-342 Cracow, Poland
% TODO: provide email address of corresponding author
%*
zbigniew.was@ifj.edu.pl
\end{center}
\begin{center}
\today
\end{center}
% For convenience during refereeing (optional),
% you can turn on line numbers by uncommenting the next line:
%\linenumbers
% You should run LaTeX twice in order for the line numbers to appear.
\definecolor{palegray}{gray}{0.95}
\begin{center}
\colorbox{palegray}{
\begin{tabular}{rr}
\begin{minipage}{0.1\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=30mm]{TAU2023_logo.png}
\end{minipage}
&
\begin{minipage}{0.81\textwidth}
\begin{center}
{\it The 17th International Workshop on Tau Lepton Physics}\\
{\it Louisville, USA, 4-8 December 2023} \\
\doi{10.21468/SciPostPhysProc.?}\\
\end{center}
\end{minipage}
\end{tabular}
}
\end{center}
\section*{Abstract}
{\bf
% TODO: write your abstract here.
One of the purposes of High Energy accelerator experiments
is confrontation of theory and measurements in ever new realms.
Any new agreement extends theory applicability domain, any discrepancy hints to unexplained, calling for better calculations or new, deeper theory.
Often
one has to search for small contributions over large Standard Model background.
Multidimensional signatures and complex background subtraction cuts imply that Monte Carlo techniques
are indispensable.
My talk included
description of: KKMC Monte Carlo for $e^+e^- \to \tau^+\tau^- (n\gamma)$ (with $\tau$ decays),
generation of additional lepton pairs of SM and New Physics, and contributions
from anomalous magnetic and electric dipole moments.
}
% TODO: include a table of contents (optional)
% Guideline: if your paper is longer that 6 pages, include a TOC
% To remove the TOC, simply cut the following block
%\vspace{10pt}
%\noindent\rule{\textwidth}{1pt}
%\tableofcontents\thispagestyle{fancy}
%\noindent\rule{\textwidth}{1pt}
%\vspace{10pt}
\section{Introduction}
\label{sec:intro}
My talk is devoted to {\tt KKMC} Precision Monte Carlo for $e^+e^- \to \tau^+\tau^- (n\gamma)$ , with $\tau$ decays included, and its associated projects.
The main design purposes, as in the past, include: (i) precision simulation of lepton pair production, (ii) flexible set up
for initialization of user defined hadronic currents used in $\tau$ decays.
Recent developments in {\tt KKMC } are particularly important for high energy applications: the {\tt C++}
version of the software is now available and includes improvements over the
{\tt FORTRAN} version, such as better arrangements for beam-spread.
But the most important aspect was to preserve continuity of
numerical tests, an essential ingredient of work see Ref.~\cite{Jadach:2022mbe}. The long road toward
enhanced precision of QED part started already ~\cite{Jadach:2023pka},
but this road toward third order matrix elements is long and perilous.
There is a need for
new contributors to enter, to preserve skills and continuity of the projects,
and at the same time to address new challenges.
% Let us now turn attention to specific projects, to their limitations too.
The {\tt C++} version of {\tt KKMC} is public, but is not yet adapted to lower energies (the
function for photon vacuum polarization $\Pi_{\gamma\gamma}(s)$ to be obtained
from dispersion relations is clearly defined, but needs to be then adjusted).
There are clear manpower issues: help in installations, set-ups and of some phenomenology applications is
not as robust as it was in the past.
For the {\tt F77} version as installed in Belle II I take care and help, but main burden is now on somebodys else's
shoulders.
%Let us turn now attention to generation of additional lepton pairs originating from SM or New Physics interactions.
Pair emission is a necessary step toward third order matrix element installation.
From the algorithmic point of view, treated as radiative corrections it is incompatible with exponentiation, because
the corresponding crude distribution does not feature conformal symmetry. This symmetry is essential in building a relation between crude level Monte Carlo with matrix elements of eikonal form. It is also important for matching
line-shape distribution (intermediate resonances) and initial state bremsstrahlung. Alternative solutions are necessary.
Real pair emission can be achieved by running of {\tt KKMC} with appropriate flags for pair
emission part of
loop vertex correction switched on. Then a simultaneous run, of four fermion final state Monte Carlo program, like
{\tt KORALW} \cite{Jadach:2001mp}, is necessary.
Alternatively, for final state pair emissions, Monte Carlo of the after-burn type, {\tt PHOTOS} is available
\cite{Davidson:2010ew}. The program enables full phase-space coverage. Although tests with Matrix element simulations
indicate that precision is sufficient for today's applications,
some studies of related systematic ambiguities are included in Ref.~\cite{Kusina:2022zfb}.
These publications do not match the FCC precision, and further work is needed.
In parallel, some extensions with the beyond Standard Model physics are available.
For $\tau$ decays see \cite{Antropov:2019ald},
and for production process, contribution to the previous TAU2021 conference \cite{Banerjee:2021rtn}.
The emission of dark photons (dark scalars) decaying to light lepton pairs is addressed.
Extensions of {\tt KKMC} Monte Carlo for four fermion final states (processes mediated by $ZH$ boson pair) is
a possible start for future, long, development path to FCC applicability.
Another pursued development direction is extension of simulation for anomalous magnetic and electric dipole moments.
Recent g-2 measurements, discussed in other talks of the conference, initiate interests in anomalous
dipole moments of $\tau$ lepton pair production.
The question arises how to simulate their impact on differential distributions. We addressed this point with
the help of
algorithms enabling calculation of event weights: ratios of matrix elements for production and decay of
tau lepton pairs
with other one, without dipole moment effects.
First it was done for lower energies $e^+e^- \to \tau^+\tau^-$ processes, as of Belle II, \cite{Banerjee:2022sgf},
later for higher energies, as of $Z$ peak and above \cite{Banerjee:2023qjc}.
In this reference elements of calculations necessary for $ p p \to \tau^+\tau^- X$ processes are discussed as well.
% Let us now turn attention to more technical aspects.
The process of migration from {\tt FORTRAN} to {\tt C++} is advancing well. The {\tt C++} Versions of {\tt PHOTOS}
Monte Carlo for radiative corrections in decays \cite{Davidson:2010ew}
and {\tt KKMC} \cite{Jadach:2022mbe}
are already published. The
{\tt TAUOLA} Monte Carlo for $\tau$ decays is prepared for such transformation too, but actual implementation
is not completed. Its internal structure was already prepared
some time ago \cite{Chrzaszcz:2016fte}. Further improvements are now in Belle II hands. Fits and evaluation of ambiguities of explored data are necessary.
The program was prepared to run with user provided hadronic currents, which could be coded in {\tt C++} and
activated with redefinition of pointers.
That solution was temporarily but partly abandoned. Step back was due to requirements of Belle software organization.
My experience with {\tt PHOTOS}, where migration to {\tt C++}, has been completed is that the best is to translate program with young researchers' participation.
They can observe that migration does not go
too fast, because existing arrangements for future and for tests could be then easily lost.
Participation of researchers with distinct profile is helpful,
and prepares us for future takeover of the projects, independent of whoever it may be.
% \centerline{\bf Arrangements for software.}
The software for Belle II is working well, and I am involved personally. Important contributor is now
Swagato Banerjee.
Installation and initialization for other platforms have recently posed problems
especially for {\tt C++} version of KKMC. For example proper loading of {\tt root} library was
bringing difficulties, and it was reported to us, but our response was slow.
That is one of the most visible aspect of the manpower issue for our community,
but passing expertise to the next generation is potentially larger issue, even if related challenges are not
imminent to see.
I will skip or cover most of these points briefly only, and will focus my presentation mostly
on anomalous dipole moments. Let me present some details in the following sections.
\section{Basics of precision Monte Carlo}
Let me stress at first
{\tt KKMC} is based on ``matrix element $\times$ full and exact phase space''.
Neither {\tt KKMC} nor {\tt PHOTOS} employ a shower-like algorithm. They are
both non-Markovian. Generation starts with Poisson distribution
in number of photon candidates. In case of {\tt KKMC} tower of
simplified/improvable structures starts from one-dimensional spectrum, then
an internal generator exploiting eikonal
matrix elements valid all over full multi-photon phase space is devised.
It was a highly non-trivial step to achieve.
Next step is exploiting bremsstrahlung part of QED matrix elements and Yennie–Frautschi–Suura exponentiation \cite{Yennie:1961ad}. That is not all that is needed:
the electroweak and strong interaction parts need to be included as well.
Finally, light lepton
pair emissions must be taken into account. I have omitted the complexity of
presamplers necessary due to collinear configurations, which are naturally
regulated by electron (or other lepton) masses.
Finally, the library of Matrix Elements devised as
input for event weight, sometimes called ``model weight'',
represents an independent module see Fig. \ref{Fig:ref}. The term ``model weight'' may be
misunderstood. There is no room for arbitrary modeling. Amplitudes in use
are the result of formal fixed order matrix elements. For details see
\cite{Jadach:2000ir}.
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
{ \resizebox*{0.49\textwidth}{0.39\textheight}{\includegraphics{flow-mcgen2.eps}} }
% {\epsfig{file=flow-mcgen2.eps,width=90mm}}
\caption{Structure of Matrix Element based Monte Carlo programs, in case of {\tt KKMC} Plot is taken from Ref.~\cite{Jadach:2000ir}.}
\label{Fig:ref}
\end{figure}
Note that for phase space organization,
in {\tt KKMC} design, conformal symmetry of multi-photon phase space and
eikonal parts of QED amplitudes is fundamental. That is why, algorithm
is suitable for many applications, path for implementation of fixed order
amplitudes is defined. At present, second order matrix elements are
installed. In case of {\tt PHOTOS} different solution is used for exact
multi-photon phase space generation. It is restricted to final state
radiations only, and solution is not explored beyond use of the first
order matrix elements. On the other hand, emission of massive particles
was easier to implement. For details seem \cite{Kusina:2022zfb,Davidson:2010ew} and references therein.
\section{Additional pairs}
\label{sec:another}
For pair emissions in final states modified algorithm of {\tt PHOTOS} Monte
Carlo can be used. In this case
phase space is treated exactly, and no approximations are used, independently
of whether the pair emission is based on QED calculated matrix element or
of New Physics model. As effects of pair
emissions are not large, matrix elements are simplified
(in improvable way though)!
Tests/comparisons with matrix element based calculations are essential part of the work. As an example Fig.~\ref{fig:ee} is provided.
\begin{figure}[h]
\begin{center}
%{ \resizebox*{0.44\textwidth}{0.22\textheight}{\includegraphics{MG5_PPP_mtautau_ee_30_noISR.eps}} }
%{ \resizebox*{0.44\textwidth}{0.35\textheight}{\includegraphics{MG5_PPP_mtautau_ee_30_ISR.eps}} }
%{ \resizebox*{0.44\textwidth}{0.22\textheight}{\includegraphics{MG5_PPP_mtautau_ee_200_noISR.eps}} }
%{ \resizebox*{0.44\textwidth}{0.35\textheight}{\includegraphics{MG5_PPP_mtautau_ee_200_ISR.eps}} }
\includegraphics[width=0.44\textwidth]{MG5_PPP_mtautau_ee_30_ISR.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.44\textwidth]{MG5_PPP_mtautau_ee_200_ISR.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{\small Belle II center of mass energies $e^-e^+ \to \tau^- \tau^+ \phi_{\rm{Dark~Scalar}} (\to e^-e^+)$. Case of dark scalar of 30 and 200 MeV. Simulation of {\tt KKMC+PHOTOS} is compared with the one based on {\tt MadGraph}.
{Emission kernel was inspired from that comparison.
At start, QED pair emission kernel was used. Spin correlations of $\tau$-s
modified by rotation of $\tau^-$ decay products. Plots taken from \cite{Was:2022nfx}.}}\label{fig:ee}
\end{figure}
\section{Anomalous dipole moments}
One of the important aspects of Monte Carlo simulations is the possibility
to imprint into precision event samples generated from Standard Model
predictions, effects of New Physics.
Such effects, which are expected to be small or non-existent were introduced
into event re-weighting algorithms of {\tt TauSpinner} \cite{Przedzinski:2018ett} for embedding of
anomalous dipole moment into $pp \to \tau^+\tau^- X$ simulated samples.
Another algorithm for weight imprinting simultaneously with run of {\tt KKMC}
Monte Carlo for $e^+e^- \to l^+ l^- (n\gamma)$ at low energies and also
for FCC center of mass energies is also available. See Ref.~\cite{Banerjee:2023qjc}.
For the simulation of New Physics effects, simplified kinematic for implementation is usually sufficient. There can be two weights calculated,
for the cross-section:
\[
wt_{ME}= \Bigl(\sum_{spin }|{\cal M}^{prod\; SM+ NP}|^2 \Bigr) / \Bigl(\sum_{spin }|{\cal M}^{prod\; SM}|^2 \Bigr)
\]
and for the spin effects related to $\tau$ lepton decays. The spin weight
depends on production and on the decay of $\tau$ leptons as well:
\[
wt_{spin} =\Bigl(\sum_{ij} R^{SM+NP}_{ij} h^i_+ h^j_-\Bigr) / \Bigl(\sum_{ij} R^{SM}_{ij} h^i_+ h^j_-\Bigr)
\]
The $R_{ij}$ depend on the kinematic of $\tau$-pair production, $h^i_\pm$ on $\tau^\pm$ decays.
{
Spin quantization frames orientation needs care. It must be
the same for production and decay.
}
We use {\tt KKMC} routines to transfer $h^i_\pm$ to lab frame and another
routines to transfer back to $\tau^\pm$ rest frame but oriented as in New Physics
calculation.
In this way reference frames are easier to control and impact of photons on
phase space parametrization is not of great complication.
Note that the solution, if weights are calculated during {\tt KKMC} run,
is valid for all $\tau$ decays, while in case of {\tt TauSpinner}, only for main
$\tau$ decay channels spin effects are included.
In { \tt KKMC} refined solution is used
for compatibility with Kleiss-Stirling spinor techniques.
See Ref.~\cite{Jadach:1998wp}
for details.
The idea was to relate $\tau$ leptons quantization frames used in production
and decay through consecutive transformation from $\tau$ rest frame to lab
frame and back to $\tau$ rest frame.
That sounds complicated for simple rotation representation, but is safe and
independent of number of bremsstrahlung photons.
The $\tau^\pm$ decay products and its $h^i_{\tau^\pm}$ vector is
transformed to the laboratory frame. Then $h^i_{\tau^\pm}$ is transformed back
to $\tau$ lepton rest-frame, but this time the axes are oriented as chosen
in Kleiss-Stirling spinor techniques.
We have explored partly this solution for { \tt KKMC} anomalous moment event re-weighting.
Use of host program frames is convenient but not essential. It helps to improve
precision, there is no need to worry about bremsstrahlung impact etc. Use of
internal program variables simplifies the tasks too.
On the other hand, this prevents re-use of events for several distinct models,
chosen after event samples are already stored in the data files.
The main achievements of the last year include:
for {\tt KKMC} usage in FCC, extension of re-weighting algorithm to FCC center of
mass energies, and electroweak corrections are then included, and
for {\tt TauSpinner} usage in LHC, $\gamma \gamma$ parton level processes added, and
explicit spin correlation matrix $R_{ij}$ prepared for
quark initialized processes as well. See Ref.~\cite{Banerjee:2023qjc}.
With the help of {\tt TauSpinner}, semi-realistic observables, see e.g. Fig.~\ref{fig:acoplanarity}, have been
studied. Later, it is straightforward to move to more realistic ones.
\begin{figure}[!htb]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.44\textwidth]{Ris_ReX.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.44\textwidth]{Ris_ReY.eps} \\
\includegraphics[width=0.44\textwidth]{Ris_ImX.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.44\textwidth]{Ris_ImY.eps}
%%\includegraphics[scale=0.35]{Ris_ReX-eps-converted-to.pdf}
%%\includegraphics[scale=0.35]{Ris_ReY-eps-converted-to.pdf}
%%\includegraphics[scale=0.35]{Ris_ImX-eps-converted-to.pdf}
%%\includegraphics[scale=0.35]{Ris_ImY-eps-converted-to.pdf}
\end{center}
\centering
\caption{\scriptsize Ratio of number of events with and without weak dipole moments,
in function of acoplanarity $\varphi$ at $\sqrt{s}=M_Z$.
The selected events of scattering angles $\cos(\theta)<0$ are taken.
The top left plot for ${\rm Re}(X) = 0.0004$, the top right plot for ${\rm Re}(Y) = 0.0004$,
the bottom left for ${\rm Im}(X) = 0.0004$, and the bottom right for ${\rm Im}(Y) = 0.0004$ are taken .
For the imaginary form-factors, additional constraint $E_{\pi^+} > E_{\bar{\nu}_\tau}$
is taken in the $\tau^+$ side.
The form-factors $A(M_Z^2)=B(M_Z^2)=0$ are set. The decays $\tau^- \to \pi^- \pi^0 \nu$ and $\tau^+\to \pi^+ \nu$ are taken. Plots taken from Ref.~\cite{Banerjee:2023qjc}.}
\label{fig:acoplanarity}
\end{figure}
\section{Conclusions and outlook }
I have presented some new developments and and new applications for Monte Carlo programs family arranged around KKMC.
Let me finally point to some possible, near future, activities.
The big issue important for systematic errors are ambiguities
of $\alpha_{QED}(s)$, the function of electromagnetic coupling. For the Monte Carlos, its values
for $s$ starting from $0$ up to beyond $m_Z^2$ are needed.
Also, the g-2 measurements revived interest in
possible signatures with $\tau$ leptons: for real productions or through loops effects.
I have presented some work relevant for that.
But what about related systematic ambiguities?
Can modified {\tt KKMC} be helpful in such studies?
For $\alpha_{QED}(s)$ dispersion relations and measurements of
$e^+e^- \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0 (\pi^+\pi^-)$ at $\sqrt{s} \sim 1$ GeV$^2$ are necessary. This energy range can be
achieved with Belle II data and events with radiative return. The invariant mass of the hadronic final state
can be small if it is accompanied by hard initial state bremsstrahlung photon.
The question arise if {\tt KKMC} can be adapted and become helpful.
The necessary steps are as follows.
Compare program predictions for $e^+e^-\to \mu^+\mu^- \gamma n(\gamma)$ at {\tt (C)EEX1} and {\tt (C)EEX2}
levels.
Replace $\mu^\pm$ with $\pi^\pm$ in {\tt KKMC} generation with QED initial state bremsstrahlung only.
Use ratio of $e^+e^-\to \pi^+\pi^- \pi^0$ to $e^+e^-\to \mu^+\mu^-$ matrix elements at interpolated phase space points
of $2 \to 2$ kinematic, to calculate event weight.
Imprint into final state $\pi^0$ using modified {\tt PHOTOS} Monte Carlo, and make tests with alternative
simulations of $e^+e^-\to \pi^+\pi^- \pi^0$ process (no bremsstrahlung photons).
Reproduce old tests with {\tt PHOKARA} \cite{Rodrigo:2002hk,Czyz:2014sag}, see. e.g.
{\tt https://indico.ph.liv.ac.uk/event/1297/contributions/7323/}~. Unfortunately authors of that works
are not any more available to help.
I have not presented further details on
arrangements for $\tau$ decays and
for software, except what was explained in the introduction.
\section*{Acknowledgments}
\paragraph{Funding information}
This research was funded in part by ``National Science Centre, Poland'', grant no. 2023/50/A/ST2/00224.
% TODO: include funding information
%\paragraph{Funding information}
%Authors are required to provide funding information, including relevant agencies and grant numbers with linked author's initials. Correctly-provided data will be linked to funders listed in the \href{https://www.crossref.org/services/funder-registry/}{Fundref registry}.
% TODO:
% Provide your bibliography here. You have two options:
% FIRST OPTION - write your entries here directly, following the example below, including Author(s), Title, Journal Ref. with year in parentheses at the end, followed by the DOI number.
%\begin{thebibliography}{99}
%\bibitem{1931_Bethe_ZP_71} H. A. Bethe, {\it Zur Theorie der Metalle. i. Eigenwerte und Eigenfunktionen der linearen Atomkette}, Zeit. f{\"u}r Phys. {\bf 71}, 205 (1931), \doi{10.1007\%2FBF01341708}.
%\bibitem{arXiv:1108.2700} P. Ginsparg, {\it It was twenty years ago today... }, \url{http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.2700}.
%\end{thebibliography}
% SECOND OPTION:
% Use your bibtex library
% \bibliographystyle{SciPost_bibstyle} % Include this style file here only if you are not using our template
\bibliography{ZWasLoui.bib}
\nolinenumbers
\end{document}
\begin{thebibliography}{10}
\providecommand{\url}[1]{\texttt{#1}}
\providecommand{\urlprefix}{URL }
\expandafter\ifx\csname urlstyle\endcsname\relax
\providecommand{\doi}[1]{doi:\discretionary{}{}{}#1}\else
\providecommand{\doi}{doi:\discretionary{}{}{}\begingroup
\urlstyle{rm}\Url}\fi
\providecommand{\eprint}[2][]{\url{#2}}
\bibitem{Jadach:2022mbe}
S.~Jadach, B.~F.~L. Ward, Z.~Was, S.~A. Yost and A.~Siodmok,
\newblock \emph{{Multi-photon Monte Carlo event generator KKMCee for lepton and
quark pair production in lepton colliders}},
\newblock Comput. Phys. Commun. \textbf{283}, 108556 (2023),
\newblock \doi{10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108556},
\newblock \eprint{2204.11949}.
\bibitem{Jadach:2023pka}
S.~Jadach, B.~F.~L. Ward and Z.~A. Was,
\newblock \emph{{Collinearly enhanced realizations of the
Yennie-Frautschi-Suura (YFS) MC approach to precision resummation theory}},
\newblock Phys. Lett. B \textbf{848}, 138361 (2024),
\newblock \doi{10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138361},
\newblock \eprint{2303.14260}.
\bibitem{Jadach:2001mp}
S.~Jadach, W.~Placzek, M.~Skrzypek, B.~F.~L. Ward and Z.~Was,
\newblock \emph{{The Monte Carlo program KoralW version 1.51 and the concurrent
Monte Carlo KoralW and YFSWW3 with all background graphs and first order
corrections to W pair production}},
\newblock Comput. Phys. Commun. \textbf{140}, 475 (2001),
\newblock \doi{10.1016/S0010-4655(01)00296-X},
\newblock \eprint{hep-ph/0104049}.
\bibitem{Davidson:2010ew}
N.~Davidson, T.~Przedzinski and Z.~Was,
\newblock \emph{{PHOTOS interface in C++: Technical and Physics
Documentation}},
\newblock Comput. Phys. Commun. \textbf{199}, 86 (2016),
\newblock \doi{10.1016/j.cpc.2015.09.013},
\newblock \eprint{1011.0937}.
\bibitem{Kusina:2022zfb}
A.~Kusina and Z.~Was,
\newblock \emph{{Evaluation of Photos Monte Carlo ambiguities in case of four
fermion final states}},
\newblock Eur. Phys. J. C \textbf{83}(1), 65 (2023),
\newblock \doi{10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11175-w},
\newblock \eprint{2207.09898}.
\bibitem{Antropov:2019ald}
S.~Antropov, S.~Banerjee, Z.~Was and J.~Zaremba,
\newblock \emph{{TAUOLA update for decay channels with e+e\ensuremath{-} pairs
in the final state}},
\newblock Comput. Phys. Commun. \textbf{283}, 108592 (2023),
\newblock \doi{10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108592},
\newblock \eprint{1912.11376}.
\bibitem{Banerjee:2021rtn}
S.~Banerjee, D.~Biswas, T.~Przedzinski and Z.~Was,
\newblock \emph{{Monte Carlo Event Generator updates, for $\tau$ pair events at
Belle II energies}},
\newblock In \emph{{16th International Workshop on Tau Lepton Physics~}}
(2021), \eprint{2111.05914}.
\bibitem{Banerjee:2022sgf}
S.~Banerjee, A.~Y. Korchin and Z.~Was,
\newblock \emph{{Spin correlations in \ensuremath{\tau}-lepton pair production
due to anomalous magnetic and electric dipole moments}},
\newblock Phys. Rev. D \textbf{106}(11), 113010 (2022),
\newblock \doi{10.1103/PhysRevD.106.113010},
\newblock \eprint{2209.06047}.
\bibitem{Banerjee:2023qjc}
S.~Banerjee, A.~Y. Korchin, E.~Richter-Was and Z.~Was,
\newblock \emph{{Electron-positron, parton-parton, and photon-photon production
of \ensuremath{\tau}-lepton pairs: Anomalous magnetic and electric dipole
moments spin effects}},
\newblock Phys. Rev. D \textbf{109}(1), 013002 (2024),
\newblock \doi{10.1103/PhysRevD.109.013002},
\newblock \eprint{2307.03526}.
\bibitem{Chrzaszcz:2016fte}
M.~Chrzaszcz, T.~Przedzinski, Z.~Was and J.~Zaremba,
\newblock \emph{{TAUOLA of $\tau$ lepton decays\textemdash{}framework for
hadronic currents, matrix elements and anomalous decays}},
\newblock Comput. Phys. Commun. \textbf{232}, 220 (2018),
\newblock \doi{10.1016/j.cpc.2018.05.017},
\newblock \eprint{1609.04617}.
\bibitem{Yennie:1961ad}
D.~R. Yennie, S.~C. Frautschi and H.~Suura,
\newblock \emph{{The infrared divergence phenomena and high-energy processes}},
\newblock Annals Phys. \textbf{13}, 379 (1961),
\newblock \doi{10.1016/0003-4916(61)90151-8}.
\bibitem{Jadach:2000ir}
S.~Jadach, B.~F.~L. Ward and Z.~Was,
\newblock \emph{{Coherent exclusive exponentiation for precision Monte Carlo
calculations}},
\newblock Phys. Rev. D \textbf{63}, 113009 (2001),
\newblock \doi{10.1103/PhysRevD.63.113009},
\newblock \eprint{hep-ph/0006359}.
\bibitem{Was:2022nfx}
Z.~Was,
\newblock \emph{{Symmetries of spin amplitudes: applications for factorization
and Monte Carlo solutions}},
\newblock PoS \textbf{CORFU2021}, 008 (2022),
\newblock \doi{10.22323/1.406.0008}.
\bibitem{Przedzinski:2018ett}
T.~Przedzinski, E.~Richter-Was and Z.~Was,
\newblock \emph{{Documentation of $TauSpinner$ algorithms: program for
simulating spin effects in $\tau$ -lepton production at LHC}},
\newblock Eur. Phys. J. C \textbf{79}(2), 91 (2019),
\newblock \doi{10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6527-0},
\newblock \eprint{1802.05459}.
\bibitem{Jadach:1998wp}
S.~Jadach, B.~F.~L. Ward and Z.~Was,
\newblock \emph{{Global positioning of spin GPS scheme for half spin massive
spinors}},
\newblock Eur. Phys. J. C \textbf{22}, 423 (2001),
\newblock \doi{10.1007/s100520100818},
\newblock \eprint{hep-ph/9905452}.
\bibitem{Rodrigo:2002hk}
G.~Rodrigo, H.~Czyz and J.~H. Kuhn,
\newblock \emph{{Radiative return at NLO: The Phokhara Monte Carlo generator}},
\newblock In \emph{{37th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and
Unified Theories}}, pp. 233--234 (2002), \eprint{hep-ph/0205097}.
\bibitem{Czyz:2014sag}
H.~Czy\.z,
\newblock \emph{{Status of Monte Carlo Generators for Energy Scan and Radiative
Return}},
\newblock Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. \textbf{35}, 1460402 (2014),
\newblock \doi{10.1142/S2010194514604025}.
\end{thebibliography}