Contribution of Wiggler to Radiation Integral in an Electron Storage Ring
Extracted source text · arXiv 2410.12863
%++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
% Don't modify this section unless you know what you're doing!
\documentclass[letterpaper,12pt]{article}
\usepackage{tabularx} % extra features for tabular environment
\usepackage{amsmath} % improve math presentation
\usepackage{graphicx} % takes care of graphic including machinery
\usepackage[margin=1in,letterpaper]{geometry} % decreases margins
\usepackage{cite} % takes care of citations
\usepackage[final]{hyperref} % adds hyper links inside the generated pdf file
\hypersetup{
colorlinks=true, % false: boxed links; true: colored links
linkcolor=blue, % color of internal links
citecolor=blue, % color of links to bibliography
filecolor=magenta, % color of file links
urlcolor=blue
}
%++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
\usepackage{mathrsfs}%花体字母
\usepackage{float}
\usepackage{revsymb}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{exscale}
\usepackage{relsize}
\usepackage{gensymb}
%\tiny
%\scriptsize
%\footnotesize
%\small
%\normalsize
%\large
%\Large
%\LARGE
%\huge
%\Huge
\geometry{a4paper}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{2}
\begin{document}
%\title{Impact of Intrinsic $\mathcal{H}_{x}$ Wiggling on Coherent wiggler Radiation from Microbunching}
%\title{Microbunching Formation and Coherent Radiation Generation in SSMB Proof-of-principle Experiment in a Transverse-Longitudinal Coupled Lattice}
\title{Contribution of Wiggler to Radiation Integral\\ in an Electron Storage Ring}
\author{Xiujie Deng,\\ Tsinghua University, Beijing, China\\~\\
Ji Li, Yujie Lu,\\ Zhangjiang Laboratory, Shanghai, China}
\date{\today}
\maketitle
%
\begin{abstract}
With the advancement of accelerator light sources, the application of wiggler becomes more and more important, for example to speed up damping or generate synchrotron radiation. The quantum excitation contribution of such a wiggler to the electron beam emittance in a storage ring should be carefully evaluated when small emittance is desired. What found in literature is an approximate formula. Here we present a more exact result, which is of value for future light source development.
\end{abstract}
\thispagestyle{empty}
%\begin{equation}
%\frac{d^{2}W}{d\omega d\Omega}(\theta,\varphi,\omega)\Bigg|_{\text{beam}}=N_{e}^{2}{|b(\theta,\varphi,\omega)|^{2}\frac{d^{2}W}{d\omega d\Omega}}(\theta,\varphi,\omega)\Bigg|_{\text{point}}.
%\end{equation}
%\clearpage
%\tableofcontents
%\thispagestyle{empty}
%Attraction in positive time direction can be viewed as repulsion in reversed time direction. It is spin that stir up space and time, Mankowski's spacetime.
%
%Spectral correlation.
%
%Topology
%
%What's the topological invariant?
%
%A laser modulation creates
%\clearpage
%Microbunching enables laser-like radiation generation from charged particle beam, and is one of the main driving forces advancing accelerator light sources in the past decades. The most prominent example is free-electron laser. A natural approach of microbunching creation is to imprint a coherent phase space correlation on the electron beam using a conventional quantum laser. In this paper, we study laser-induced microbunching in a systematic way, including both energy modulation and angular modulation-based schemes. A highlight of the analysis is that it applies to a general coupled magnet lattice, either a single-pass one like a linear accelerator or a periodic one like a storage ring. Harmonic generations schemes like HGHG, EEHG, PEHG, ADM, and angular modulation schemes are briefly discussed along with the analysis. These various schemes, together with a few or single-cycle modulation laser, can be used to generate ultrashort microbunched electron beam and thus ultrashort radiation pulse. Ideas in this respect are briefly reviewed in this paper. The presented work is expected to be of pedagogic value and useful for accelerator-based coherent light source development.
%\section{Introduction}
%\section{Reference Orbit}
%
%\subsection{Projected bunch length in the wiggling reference orbit direct}
%
%\subsection{Projected bunch length in the forward direction}
%
%\subsection{Microbunching tilted angle}
%\section{General Formula}
This paper aims to give an accurate formula to evaluate the quantum excitation of a wiggler to beam emittance in an electron storage ring. The motivation is based on the fact that wiggler may become an essential part in future storage ring-based light source, for example to fight against intra-beam scattering by significantly increasing the natural radiation damping rate, where ultrasmall transverse or longitudinal emittance and high beam current is desired. Along with the radiation damping is the quantum excitation of the wiggler, which may not be negligible in determining the equilibrium beam emittance, especially when the wiggler field is strong and length is long. An approximate radiation integral formula can be found in literature to describe the wiggler's quantum excitation contribution. With the desired emittance becomes smaller smaller, an accurate formula which gives the exact dependence of the radiation integral on various optical functions at the wiggler is needed and here we fill this gap.
In the following discussion, we focus on the case of a planar uncoupled ring which is the typical setup for present synchrotron radiation sources. Note that the presented method however applies to a general coupled lattice~\cite{OSCSSMB2024}. Similarly, although we use horizontal plane for an example analysis, the method also applies to the vertical and longitudinal plane. Further, the method can also be used to evaluated the quantum excitation contribution of other bending-related elements.
Now we present the details. Usually the central part of the wiggler has a sinusoidal field strength pattern along the longitudinal axis $s$. We set $s=0$ to be the location of the peak magnetic field closest to the wiggler center. Then the vertical magnetic field of a horizontal planar wiggler is
\begin{equation}
B_{y}=B_{0w}\cosh(k_{x}x)\cosh(k_{y}y)\cos(k_{w}s),
\end{equation}
with $B_{0w}$ the peak magnetic field and $k_{w}=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda_{w}}$ the wavenumber of wiggler, and $k_{x}^{2}+k_{y}^{2}=k_{w}^{2}$.
Particle state vector
$
{\bf X}\equiv\left(
\begin{matrix}
x&
x'&
y&
y'&
z&
\delta
\end{matrix}
\right)^{T}
$ is used in this paper, with its components meaning horizontal location, angle, vertical location, angle, longitudinal location, and relative energy deviation with respect to the reference particle, respectively. $^{T}$ means transpose. The linear transfer matrix of ${\bf X}$ from $s=0$ to $s\in[-\frac{L_{w}}{2},\frac{L_{w}}{2}]$ with $L_{w}$ the wiggler length is then~\cite{Zhao2023}
\begin{equation}
{\bf W}(s|0)=\left(
\begin{matrix}
1&s&0&0&0&-\frac{K}{\gamma k_{w}}[1-\cos(k_{w}s)]\\
0&1&0&0&0&-\frac{K}{\gamma}\sin(k_{w}s)\\
0&0&\cos(k_{y}s)&\frac{\sin(k_{y}s)}{k_{y}}&0&0\\
0&0&-k_{y}\sin(k_{y}s)&\cos(k_{y}s)&0&0\\
W_{51}&W_{52}&0&0&1&W_{56}\\
0&0&0&0&0&1
\end{matrix}
\right)
\end{equation}
%$k_{y}=\sqrt{\frac{K^2}{2\gamma^{2}}(k_{w}^{2}-k_{x}^{2})}$,
where $W_{51}=-W_{26}$, $W_{52}=-sW_{26}+W_{16}$ and
$
W_{56}
%&=\frac{K^{2}}{\gamma^{2}}\left[\frac{\sin(2k_{w}s)-4\sin(k_{w}s)}{4k_{w}}+\frac{s}{2}\right]+\frac{s}{\gamma^{2}}\\
%&=2\frac{1+K^{2}/2}{2\gamma^{2}}\lambda_{w}\frac{s}{\lambda_{w}}+\frac{K^{2}}{\gamma^{2}}\left[\frac{\sin(2k_{w}s)-4\sin(k_{w}s)}{4k_{w}}\right]\\
=\frac{2\lambda_{0}}{\lambda_{w}}s+\frac{K^{2}}{\gamma^{2}}\left[\frac{\sin(2k_{w}s)-4\sin(k_{w}s)}{4k_{w}}\right],
$
with $\lambda_{0}=\frac{1+K^{2}/2}{2\gamma^{2}}\lambda_{w}$ being the fundamental on-axis resonant wavelength, $\gamma$ is the Lorentz factor and for our interested relativistic cases is much larger than 1, $K=\frac{eB_{0w}}{m_{e}ck_{w}}$ is the dimensionless undulator parameter of the wiggler, with $e$ the elementary charge, $m_{e}$ the electron mass, $c$ the speed of light in free space.
In a planar uncoupled ring, the normalized eigenvector of the storage ring one-turn map corresponding to the horizontal eigenmode at $s=0$ can be expressed as
\begin{equation}\label{eq:eigen}
{\bf E}_{I}(0)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(
\begin{matrix}
\sqrt{\beta_{x0}}\\
\frac{-\alpha_{x0}+i}{\sqrt{\beta_{x0}}}\\
0\\
0\\
\frac{-\left(\alpha_{x0}D_{x0}+\beta_{x0}D_{x0}'\right)+iD_{x0}}{\sqrt{\beta_{x0}}}\\
0
\end{matrix}
\right)e^{i\Phi_{I0}},
\end{equation}
where $\alpha_{x0},\beta_{x0}$ are the Courant-Snyder functions and $D_{x0},D_{x0}'$ are the dispersion and dispersion angle corresponding to the horizontal plane at $s=0$, $i$ is the imaginary unit.
Then the chromatic function $\mathcal{H}_{x0}$ at $s=0$ is
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{H}_{x0}\equiv2|E_{I5}(0)|^{2}=\frac{D_{x0}^{2}+\left(\alpha_{x0}D_{x0}+\beta_{x0}D_{x0}'\right)^2}{\beta_{x0}}.
\end{equation}
The evolution of $\mathcal{H}_{x}$ from $s=0$ to $s\in[-\frac{L_{w}}{2},\frac{L_{w}}{2}]$ is
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{H}_{x}(s)&\equiv2|E_{I5}(s)|^{2}=2|\left({\bf W}(s|0){\bf E}_{I}(0)\right)_{5}|^{2}\\
%&=\bigg|W_{53}\sqrt{\beta_{x0}}+W_{54}\frac{i-\alpha_{x0}}{\sqrt{\beta_{x0}}}-\sqrt{\beta_{x0}}D_{x0}'+\frac{i-\alpha_{x0}}{\sqrt{\beta_{x0}}}D_{x0}\bigg|^{2}\\
%&=\frac{(D_{x0}+W_{52})^{2}+\left[\alpha_{x0}(D_{x0}+W_{52})+\beta_{x0}(D_{x0}'-W_{51})\right]^2}{\beta_{x0}}\\
&=\frac{(D_{x0}+W_{16}-W_{26}s)^{2}+\left[\alpha_{x0}(D_{x0}+W_{16}-W_{26}s)+\beta_{x0}(D_{x0}'+W_{26})\right]^2}{\beta_{x0}},
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where $W_{ij}$ means the $i$-th row and $j$-th column matrix term of ${\bf W}(s|0)$.
Put in the explicit expression of the wiggler matrix terms, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq:Hx}
\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{H}_{x}(s)&=\frac{1}{\rho _w^2 k_w^4 \beta _{x0}}\left\{[D_{x0}\rho_{w}k_{w}^{2}+\sin \left(k_{w}s\right)k_{w}s+\cos(k_{w}s)-1]^2\right.\\
&\left.+[\beta _{x0}k_w\left(\rho_{w}k_{w}D_{x0}'- \sin \left(k_{w}s\right)\right)+\alpha_{x0}\left(D_{x0}\rho_{w}k_{w}^{2}+\sin \left(k_{w}s\right)k_{w}s+\cos(k_{w}s)-1\right)]^2\right\}.\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
We assume that the quantum excitation contribution from the entrance and exit region of the wiggler, where the field strength in reality deviates from the ideal sinusoidal pattern, is much smaller than that of the central sinusoidal field region. Then the quantum excitation of a wiggler to the horizontal beam emittance can be evaluated by the integral~\cite{Sands}
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
I_{5w}&=\int_{-\frac{L_{w}}{2}}^{\frac{L_{w}}{2}}\frac{\mathcal{H}_{x}(s)}{|\rho(s)|^{3}}ds=\frac{1}{\rho_{w}^{3}}\int_{-\frac{L_{w}}{2}}^{\frac{L_{w}}{2}}\mathcal{H}_{x}(s)|\cos(k_{w}s)|^{3}ds,
% &=\frac{K L_w \lambda _w \left(3150 \pi \gamma \alpha _{\text{x0}} \beta _{x0} D_{\text{x0}}'+3150 \pi \gamma D_{\text{x0}} \left(\alpha _{\text{x0}}^2+1\right)-2183 K \lambda _w \left(\alpha _{\text{x0}}^2+1\right)\right)}{14400 \pi ^2 \gamma ^2 \beta _{x0}}
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where $\rho_{w}=\frac{\gamma m_{e}\beta c}{eB_{0w}}$ corresponds to the bending radius at the location of peak magnetic field $B_{0w}$, with $\beta=\sqrt{1-\frac{1}{\gamma^{2}}}$.
Put Eq.~(\ref{eq:Hx}) in, we have
%\begin{equation}\label{eq:I5wNew}
%\begin{aligned}
%I_{5w}
%%&=\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{\beta_{x0} L_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}\left(1+\frac{15\pi}{4 L_{w}}\frac{1}{k_w^2 \beta _{x0}^{2}}\int_{-\frac{L_{w}}{2}}^{\frac{L_{w}}{2}}[\sin \left(k_{w}s\right)k_{w}s+\cos(k_{w}s)-1]^2|\cos(k_{w}s)|^{3}ds\right)\\
%% &=\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{\beta_{x0} L_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}\left(1+\frac{15}{8 N_{w}}\frac{1}{(k_w \beta _{x0})^{2}}\int_{-N_{w}\pi}^{N_{w}\pi}[\sin \left(x\right)x+\cos(x)-1]^2|\cos(x)|^{3}dx\right)\\
%&=\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{\beta_{x0} L_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}\left[1+5\rho_{w}^{2}k_{w}^{2}\frac{\mathcal{H}_{x0}}{\beta_{x0}}-\left(10+\frac{15\pi}{8}\right)\frac{\rho_{w}\left(D_{x0}+\alpha_{x0}D_{x0}+\beta_{x0}D_{x0}'\right)}{\beta_{x0}^{2}}+(1+\alpha_{x0}^{2})\mathcal{R}\right],
%\end{aligned}
%\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{eq:I5wmost}
\begin{aligned}
I_{5w}
%&=\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{\beta_{x0} L_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}\left(1+\frac{15\pi}{4 L_{w}}\frac{1}{k_w^2 \beta _{x0}^{2}}\int_{-\frac{L_{w}}{2}}^{\frac{L_{w}}{2}}[\sin \left(k_{w}s\right)k_{w}s+\cos(k_{w}s)-1]^2|\cos(k_{w}s)|^{3}ds\right)\\
% &=\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{\beta_{x0} L_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}\left(1+\frac{15}{8 N_{w}}\frac{1}{(k_w \beta _{x0})^{2}}\int_{-N_{w}\pi}^{N_{w}\pi}[\sin \left(x\right)x+\cos(x)-1]^2|\cos(x)|^{3}dx\right)\\
&=\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{ L_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}\left[\beta_{x0}+\gamma_{x0}L_{w}^{2}\mathcal{R}+5\rho_{w}^{2}k_{w}^{2}\mathcal{H}_{x0}-\left(10+\frac{15\pi}{8}\right)\frac{\rho_{w}\left(D_{x0}+\alpha_{x0}D_{x0}+\beta_{x0}D_{x0}'\right)}{\beta_{x0}}\right],
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
%+2\rho_{w}k_{w}^{2}\left(D_{x0}+\alpha_{x0}D_{x0}+\beta_{x0}D_{x0}'\right)\mathcal{R}_{1}
where $\gamma_{x0}=\frac{1+\alpha_{x0}^{2}}{\beta_{x0}}$ and
\begin{equation}\label{eq:correction0}
\mathcal{R}=\frac{15}{32\pi^{2} }\frac{1}{N_{w}^{3}}\int_{-N_{w}\pi}^{N_{w}\pi}[\sin \left(x\right)x+\cos(x)-1]^2|\cos(x)|^{3}dx,
\end{equation}
%and
%\begin{equation}\label{eq:correction1}
%\mathcal{R}_{1}=\frac{15}{8 }\frac{1}{(k_w \beta _{x0})^{2}}\frac{1}{N_{w}}\int_{-N_{w}\pi}^{N_{w}\pi}[\sin \left(x\right)x+\cos(x)-1]|\cos(x)|^{3}dx=-\left(\frac{8}{3}+\frac{\pi}{2}\right),
%\end{equation}
with $N_{w}=\frac{L_{w}}{\lambda_{w}}$ the number of wiggler period which is assumed to be an integer. Equation~(\ref{eq:I5wmost}) above is the exact formula for the radiation integral $I_{5}$ of a wiggler in an electron storage ring.
Given a specific $N_{u}$, $\mathcal{R}$ can be straightforwardly obtained by integration in Eq.~(\ref{eq:correction0}). When $N_{w}\gg1$, we have
$
\mathcal{R}\approx\frac{1}{12},
%\left(\frac{L_{w}}{\beta_{x0}}\right)^{2}.
$
and
\begin{equation}\label{eq:I5waccurate}
\begin{aligned}
I_{5w}
%&\approx\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{ L_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}\left[\beta_{x0}+\frac{\gamma_{x0}L_{w}^{2}}{12}+5\rho_{w}^{2}k_{w}^{2}\mathcal{H}_{x0}-\left(10+\frac{15\pi}{8}\right)\frac{\rho_{w}\left(D_{x0}+\alpha_{x0}D_{x0}+\beta_{x0}D_{x0}'\right)}{\beta_{x0}}\right]\\
&\approx\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{ L_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}\left[\langle\beta_{x}\rangle_{w}+5\rho_{w}^{2}k_{w}^{2}\mathcal{H}_{x0}-\left(10+\frac{15\pi}{8}\right)\frac{\rho_{w}\left(D_{x0}+\alpha_{x0}D_{x0}+\beta_{x0}D_{x0}'\right)}{\beta_{x0}}\right],
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where $\langle\beta_{x}\rangle_{w}$ is the average $\beta_{x}$ along the wiggler
\begin{equation}
\langle\beta_{x}\rangle_{w}=\frac{1}{L_{w}}\int_{-\frac{L_{w}}{2}}^{\frac{L_{w}}{2}}\beta_{x}(s)ds=\beta_{x0}+\frac{\gamma_{x0}L_{w}^{2}}{12}.
\end{equation}
%Using
%\begin{equation}
%\begin{aligned}
%D_{x0}&=\sqrt{\mathcal{H}_{x0}\beta_{x0}}\cos\chi_{x0},\\
%D_{x0}'&=-\sqrt{\mathcal{H}_{x0}/\beta_{x0}}\left(\cos\chi_{x0}+\sin\chi_{x0}\right),\\
%\end{aligned}
%\end{equation}
%where $\chi_{x0}=-\arctan\left(\frac{\alpha_{x0}D_{x0}+\beta_{x0}D_{x0}'}{D_{x0}}\right)$,
Denote $\chi_{x0}=\text{arg}\left(\frac{E_{I5}(0)}{E_{I1}(0)}\right)$, where $E_{I5}(0)$ and $E_{I1}(0)$ represent the fifth and first term of the eigenvector Eq.~(\ref{eq:eigen}) and arg() means the angle of a complex number, then
Eq.~(\ref{eq:I5waccurate}) can be written as
\begin{equation}\label{eq:I5wNew2}
\begin{aligned}
I_{5w}
&\approx\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{ L_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}\left[\langle\beta_{x}\rangle_{w}+5\rho_{w}^{2}k_{w}^{2}\mathcal{H}_{x0}-\left(10+\frac{15\pi}{8}\right)\rho_{w}\sqrt{\frac{2\mathcal{H}_{x0}}{\beta_{x0}}}\sin\left(\chi_{x0}-\frac{\pi}{4}\right)\right].
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
The first term in the above bracket corresponds to the approximate formula found in literature
\begin{equation}
I_{5w,\text{intrinsic}}\approx\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{ L_{w}\langle\beta_{x}\rangle_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}.
\end{equation}
It can be viewed as the intrinsic contribution of a wiggler to the radiation integral $I_{5}$, since there will be intrinsic dispersion and dispersion angle generated inside the wiggler even if $D_{x0}=0$ and $D_{x0}'=0$ as can be seen from the matrix term $W_{16}$ and $W_{26}$ of the wiggler. The second and third term in the bracket arise from a nonzero $\mathcal{H}_{x0}$. When $D_{x0}'$ or $\frac{D_{x0}}{\beta_{x0}}$ is of the order $\frac{K}{\gamma}=\frac{1}{\rho_{w}k_{w}}$, which can easily be the case in a real lattice, the contribution from this nonzero $\mathcal{H}_{x0}$ in the bracket could be comparable or even larger than the first term and cannot be neglected. The more accurate formula derived here should then be invoked to calculate the wiggler's quantum excitation of beam emittance. When the third term is much smaller than the second term, i.e., roughly when $\mathcal{H}_{x0}\beta_{x0}\gg\left(\frac{K}{\gamma}\lambda_{w}\right)^{2}$, Eq.~(\ref{eq:I5wNew2}) can be further approximated as
\begin{equation}\label{eq:I5wNew3}
\begin{aligned}
I_{5w}
&\approx\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{ L_{w}\langle\beta_{x}\rangle_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}+\frac{4}{3\pi}\frac{ L_{w}\mathcal{H}_{x0}}{\rho_{w}^{3}},
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where the first term accounts for the intrinsic contribution, and the second term for the nonzero $\mathcal{H}_{x0}$.
%As can be seen, this formula applies only when $N_{w}\gg1$ and $\mathcal{H}_{x0}=0$ ($D_{x0}=0$, $D_{x0}'=0$).
%\end{scriptsize}
%\begin{equation}
%\frac{11}{4} \sin \left(\pi N_w\right)-\frac{5}{4} \sin \left(2 \pi N_w\right)+\frac{101}{216} \sin \left(3 \pi N_w\right)-\frac{5}{32} \sin \left(4 \pi N_w\right)+\frac{37 \sin \left(5 \pi N_w\right)}{1000}+\frac{\pi N_w \left(900 \cos \left(2 \pi N_w\right)-500 \cos \left(3 \pi N_w\right)+225 \cos \left(4 \pi N_w\right)-108 \left(\cos \left(5 \pi N_w\right)+25\right)+120 \pi N_w \sin ^3\left(\pi N_w\right) \left(3 \cos \left(2 \pi N_w\right)+7\right)\right)}{1800}
%\end{equation}
From the above analysis, we can see that the minimum $I_{5w}$ is realized when
\begin{equation}
\alpha_{x0}=0,\ \beta_{x0}=\frac{L_{w}}{2\sqrt{3}},\ D_{x0}=0,\ D_{x0}'=0,\ \left(\mathcal{H}_{x0}=0\right),
\end{equation}
and the minimal value is
\begin{equation}
I_{5w,\text{min}}\approx\frac{4}{15\sqrt{3}\pi}\frac{L_{w}^{2}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}.
%\approx\frac{(ec)^{5}}{15\sqrt{3}\pi^{3}}\frac{B_{0w}^{5}L_{w}^{4}}{E_{0}^{5}N_{w}^{2}},
\end{equation}
%where $E_{0}$ is the particle energy.
We believe the calculation method and analysis presented here can be useful in optimizing wiggler in future accelerator light source to realize an ultrasmall beam emittance.
\iffalse
So the condition of neglecting the correction term $\mathcal{R}$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:I5w}) is $\beta_{x0}\gtrsim L_{w}$. Considering this correction term, the minimum $I_{5w}$ is realized when $\beta_{x0}=\frac{L_{w}}{2\sqrt{3}}$, and
\begin{equation}
I_{5w,\text{min}}\approx\frac{4}{15\sqrt{3}\pi}\frac{L_{w}^{2}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}\approx\frac{(ec)^{5}}{15\sqrt{3}\pi^{3}}\frac{B_{0w}^{5}L_{w}^{4}}{E_{0}^{5}N_{w}^{2}},
\end{equation}
where $e$ is the elementary charge, $c$ is the speed of light in free space, $E_{0}$ is the particle energy, $B_{0w}$ is the peak magnetic field of the wiggler.
\section{Impact of Optical Functions}
\subsection{$\beta_{x0}$}
Now we conduct more detailed discussion to see the impact of $\beta_{x0},\alpha_{x0},D_{x0},D_{x0}'$.
First, if $\alpha_{x0}=0$, $D_{x0}=0$ and $D_{x0}'=0$, and using $\frac{K}{\gamma}=\frac{1}{\rho_{w}k_{w}}$, we have
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{H}_{x}(s)=\frac{[\beta _{x0}k_w \sin \left(k_{w}s\right)]^2+[\sin \left(k_{w}s\right)k_{w}s+\cos(k_{w}s)-1]^2}{\rho _w^2 k_w^4 \beta _{x0}}.
\end{equation}
Most literature keeps only the first term in the above expression of $\mathcal{H}_{x}$, and get the approximate radiation integral found in literature
\begin{equation}\label{eq:I5wa}
I_{5w}\approx\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{\beta_{x0} L_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}.
\end{equation}
%Here we point out that this approximate formula underestimate the quantum excitation contribution of wiggler to the emittance, for example in the case of damping wiggler, where the magnetic field strength is strong and wiggler period length is long.
Now we use the exact formula of $\mathcal{H}_{x}$ and get the more accurate radiation integral
%\begin{scriptsize}
\begin{equation}\label{eq:I5w}
\begin{aligned}
I_{5w}
%&=\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{\beta_{x0} L_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}\left(1+\frac{15\pi}{4 L_{w}}\frac{1}{k_w^2 \beta _{x0}^{2}}\int_{-\frac{L_{w}}{2}}^{\frac{L_{w}}{2}}[\sin \left(k_{w}s\right)k_{w}s+\cos(k_{w}s)-1]^2|\cos(k_{w}s)|^{3}ds\right)\\
% &=\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{\beta_{x0} L_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}\left(1+\frac{15}{8 N_{w}}\frac{1}{(k_w \beta _{x0})^{2}}\int_{-N_{w}\pi}^{N_{w}\pi}[\sin \left(x\right)x+\cos(x)-1]^2|\cos(x)|^{3}dx\right)\\
&=\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{\beta_{x0} L_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}\left(1+\mathcal{R}\right),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
with the correction factor
\begin{equation}\label{eq:correction}
\mathcal{R}=\frac{15}{8 }\frac{1}{(k_w \beta _{x0})^{2}}\frac{1}{N_{w}}\int_{-N_{w}\pi}^{N_{w}\pi}[\sin \left(x\right)x+\cos(x)-1]^2|\cos(x)|^{3}dx,
\end{equation}
where $N_{w}$ is the number of wiggler period.
When $N_{w}\gg1$, we have
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{R}\approx\frac{1}{12}\left(\frac{L_{w}}{\beta_{x0}}\right)^{2}.
\end{equation}
%\end{scriptsize}
%\begin{equation}
%\frac{11}{4} \sin \left(\pi N_w\right)-\frac{5}{4} \sin \left(2 \pi N_w\right)+\frac{101}{216} \sin \left(3 \pi N_w\right)-\frac{5}{32} \sin \left(4 \pi N_w\right)+\frac{37 \sin \left(5 \pi N_w\right)}{1000}+\frac{\pi N_w \left(900 \cos \left(2 \pi N_w\right)-500 \cos \left(3 \pi N_w\right)+225 \cos \left(4 \pi N_w\right)-108 \left(\cos \left(5 \pi N_w\right)+25\right)+120 \pi N_w \sin ^3\left(\pi N_w\right) \left(3 \cos \left(2 \pi N_w\right)+7\right)\right)}{1800}
%\end{equation}
So the condition of neglecting the correction term $\mathcal{R}$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:I5w}) is $\beta_{x0}\gtrsim L_{w}$. Considering this correction term, the minimum $I_{5w}$ is realized when $\beta_{x0}=\frac{L_{w}}{2\sqrt{3}}$, and
\begin{equation}
I_{5w,\text{min}}\approx\frac{4}{15\sqrt{3}\pi}\frac{L_{w}^{2}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}\approx\frac{(ec)^{5}}{15\sqrt{3}\pi^{3}}\frac{B_{0w}^{5}L_{w}^{4}}{E_{0}^{5}N_{w}^{2}},
\end{equation}
where $e$ is the elementary charge, $c$ is the speed of light in free space, $E_{0}$ is the particle energy, $B_{0w}$ is the peak magnetic field of the wiggler.
%Now let us put in some numbers to get a feeling, for example if $L_{w}=0.9$ m, $\beta_{x0}=1.2$ m, then the correction factor
%$
%\mathcal{R}\approx0.05.
%$
%So it seems that the main problem is not the approximation.
\subsection{$\alpha_{x0}$}
If $D_{x0}=0$ and $D_{x0}'=0$, $\alpha_{x0}\neq0$, then
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{H}_{x}(s)=\frac{[-\beta _{x0}k_w \sin \left(k_{w}s\right)+\alpha_{x0}\left(\sin \left(k_{w}s\right)k_{w}s+\cos(k_{w}s)-1\right)]^2+[\sin \left(k_{w}s\right)k_{w}s+\cos(k_{w}s)-1]^2}{\rho _w^2 k_w^4 \beta _{x0}}.
\end{equation}
Then the correction factor Eq.~(\ref{eq:correction}) now becomes a factor of $(1+\alpha_{x0}^{2})$ larger. We have used the fact that the integration of an odd function of $s$ from $[-\frac{L_{w}}{2},\frac{L_{w}}{2}]$ is zero.
\subsection{$D_{x0}'$}
If $\alpha_{x0}=0$, $D_{x0}=0$ and $D_{x0}'\neq0$, then
%In the above analysis, we have assumed that $D_{x0}=0$ and $D_{x0}'=0$. Now we conduct some discussions to get a feeling of their impact. When $D_{x0}'\neq0$ ($\alpha_{x0}=0$, $D_{x0}=0$ assumed) , the chromatic $\mathcal{H}_{x}$ is then
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{H}_{x}(s)=\frac{[\beta _{x0}k_w (\rho_{w}k_{w}D_{x0}'-\sin \left(k_{w}s\right)) ]^2+[\sin \left(k_{w}s\right)k_{w}s+\cos(k_{w}s)-1]^2}{\rho _w^2 k_w^4 \beta _{x0}}.
\end{equation}
Then similar to the above discussion, the relative correction factor to $I_{5w}$ given in Eq.~(\ref{eq:I5wa}) due to this nonzero $D_{x0}'$ is
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{R}_{D_{x0}'}=5\left(\rho_{w}k_{w}D_{x0}'\right)^{2}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
If $D_{x0}'\sim\frac{K}{\gamma}=\frac{1}{\rho_{w}k_{w}}$, then this correction factor can be $\mathcal{R}_{D_{x0}'}\sim5$, which is a large value.
\subsection{$D_{x0}$}
If $\alpha_{x0}=0$, $D_{x0}'=0$ and $D_{x0}\neq0$, then
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{H}_{x}(s)=\frac{[\beta _{x0}k_w\sin \left(k_{w}s\right)]^2+[D_{x0}\rho_{w}k_{w}^{2}+\sin \left(k_{w}s\right)k_{w}s+\cos(k_{w}s)-1]^2}{\rho _w^2 k_w^4 \beta _{x0}}.
\end{equation}
Then the correction factor to $I_{5w}$ due to $D_{x0}$ is
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{R}_{D_{x0}}=5\left(\rho_{w}k_{w}\frac{D_{x0}}{\beta_{x0}}\right)^{2}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
When $\frac{D_{x0}}{\beta_{x0}}$ is at the order of $\frac{K}{\gamma}$, this correction value can also be a large value.
%So to minimize the radiation integral $I_{5w}$, we need to minimize $D_{x0}$ and $D_{x0}'$. The impact of $\alpha_{x0}$ can also be analyzed in a similar way.
\subsection{All Together}
Now we give the most accurate formula for the case of $\beta_{x0}\neq0$, $\alpha_{x0}\neq0$, $D_{x0}\neq0$ and $D_{x0}'\neq0$. In this case we have
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{H}_{x}(s)&=\frac{1}{\rho _w^2 k_w^4 \beta _{x0}}\left\{[D_{x0}\rho_{w}k_{w}^{2}+\sin \left(k_{w}s\right)k_{w}s+\cos(k_{w}s)-1]^2\right.\\
&\left.+[\beta _{x0}k_w\left(\rho_{w}k_{w}D_{x0}'- \sin \left(k_{w}s\right)\right)+\alpha_{x0}\left(D_{x0}\rho_{w}k_{w}^{2}+\sin \left(k_{w}s\right)k_{w}s+\cos(k_{w}s)-1\right)]^2\right\}.\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Then
\begin{equation}\label{eq:I5wNew}
\begin{aligned}
I_{5w}
%&=\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{\beta_{x0} L_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}\left(1+\frac{15\pi}{4 L_{w}}\frac{1}{k_w^2 \beta _{x0}^{2}}\int_{-\frac{L_{w}}{2}}^{\frac{L_{w}}{2}}[\sin \left(k_{w}s\right)k_{w}s+\cos(k_{w}s)-1]^2|\cos(k_{w}s)|^{3}ds\right)\\
% &=\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{\beta_{x0} L_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}\left(1+\frac{15}{8 N_{w}}\frac{1}{(k_w \beta _{x0})^{2}}\int_{-N_{w}\pi}^{N_{w}\pi}[\sin \left(x\right)x+\cos(x)-1]^2|\cos(x)|^{3}dx\right)\\
&=\frac{4}{15\pi}\frac{\beta_{x0} L_{w}}{\rho_{w}^{5}k_{w}^{2}}\left[1+5\rho_{w}^{2}k_{w}^{2}\frac{\mathcal{H}_{x0}}{\beta_{x0}}+(1+\alpha_{x0}^{2})\mathcal{R}_{0}+2\rho_{w}k_{w}^{2}\left(D_{x0}+\alpha_{x0}D_{x0}+\beta_{x0}D_{x0}'\right)\mathcal{R}_{1}\right],
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
with the correction factor
\begin{equation}\label{eq:correction0}
\mathcal{R}_{0}=\frac{15}{8 }\frac{1}{(k_w \beta _{x0})^{2}}\frac{1}{N_{w}}\int_{-N_{w}\pi}^{N_{w}\pi}[\sin \left(x\right)x+\cos(x)-1]^2|\cos(x)|^{3}dx,
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{eq:correction1}
\mathcal{R}_{1}=\frac{15}{8 }\frac{1}{(k_w \beta _{x0})^{2}}\frac{1}{N_{w}}\int_{-N_{w}\pi}^{N_{w}\pi}[\sin \left(x\right)x+\cos(x)-1]|\cos(x)|^{3}dx.
\end{equation}
\section{Optimal Condition to Minimize $I_{5w}$}
\fi
%\section{Impact on coherent wiggler radiation}
%
%
%The best way to study this is to implement the 6D phase space distribution and its impact on coherent radiation.
%\section*{Acknowledgements}
%
%This work is supported by the Tsinghua University Dushi program.
%++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
% References section will be created automatically
% with inclusion of "thebibliography" environment
% as it shown below. See text starting with line
% \begin{thebibliography}{99}
% Note: with this approach it is YOUR responsibility to put them in order
% of appearance.
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\bibitem{OSCSSMB2024}
Deng, Xiujie. Application of Optical Stochastic Cooling in Future Accelerator Light Sources. \href{https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16098}{arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16098 (2024)}.
\bibitem{Zhao2023}
Zhao, Jingyuan. Undulator in SLIM. Unpublished Note. Oct. 2023.
% \bibitem{DengSpringer2024}
% Deng, Xiujie. Theoretical and experimental studies on steady-state microbunching. Springer Nature, 2024.
%
% \bibitem{Wang1945}
% Wang, Ming Chen, and George Eugene Uhlenbeck. "On the theory of the Brownian motion II." Reviews of modern physics 17.2-3 (1945): 323.
% \bibitem{Chao1979}
% Chao, Alexander W. "Evaluation of beam distribution parameters in an electron storage ring." Journal of Applied Physics 50.2 (1979): 595-598.
%
\bibitem{Sands}
Sands, Matthew. PHYSICS OF ELECTRON STORAGE RINGS: AN INTRODUCTION. No. SLAC-121. SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States), 1970.
% \bibitem{Elegant}
% Borland, Michael. Elegant: A flexible SDDS-compliant code for accelerator simulation. No. LS-287. Argonne National Lab., IL (US), 2000.
%
% \bibitem{Chao1979}
% Chao, Alexander W. \href{https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.326070}{Evaluation of beam distribution parameters in an electron storage ring}. Journal of Applied Physics 50.2 (1979): 595-598.
% \bibitem{Courant1958}
% Courant, Ernest D., and Hartland S. Snyder. \href{https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491658900125}{Theory of the alternating-gradient synchrotron}. Annals of physics 3.1 (1958): 1-48.
% \bibitem{Deng2023per}
% Deng, X. Storage Ring Physics from a Modern Perspective. in preparation.
%
% \bibitem{Robinson1958}
% Robinson, Kenneth W. \href{https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.111.373}{Radiation effects in circular electron accelerators}. Physical Review 111.2 (1958): 373.
% \bibitem{Sands1970}
% Sands, M. The physics of electron storage rings: an introduction. No. SLAC-121. 1970.
% \bibitem{DengOSC2023}
% Deng, X. J. \href{https://fls2023.vrws.de/papers/tu4p30.pdf}{Optical Stochastic Cooling in a General Coupled Lattice}. Proc. of FLS2023.
% \bibitem{Deng2023Springer}
% Deng, X. \href{https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-99-5800-9}{Theoretical and Experimental Studies on Steady-State Microbunching}. Springer Nature, 2023.
%
% \bibitem{Deng2023JSR}
% Deng, X. J., et al. \href{https://journals.iucr.org/s/issues/2023/01/00/ju5047/index.html}{Average and statistical properties of coherent radiation from steady-state microbunching}. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 30.1 (2023): 35-50.
%
% \bibitem{DengOSCSSMB2024}
% Deng, Xiujie. \href{https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16098}{Application of Optical Stochastic Cooling in Future Accelerator Light Sources}. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16098 (2024).
% \bibitem{Deng2023per}
% Deng, X. Storage Ring Physics from a Modern Perspective. in preparation.
% \bibitem{Yu1991}
% Yu, Li Hua. \href{https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.44.5178}{Generation of intense uv radiation by subharmonically seeded single-pass free-electron lasers}. Physical Review A 44.8 (1991): 5178.
%
% \bibitem{Li2023GLSF}
% Li, Zizheng, et al. \href{https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.26.110701}{Generalized longitudinal strong focusing in a steady-state microbunching storage ring}. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams 26.11 (2023): 110701.
%
% \bibitem{DengTLCSSMB2024}
% Deng, Xiujie. \href{https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.06920}{Steady-State Micro-Bunching based on Transverse-Longitudinal Coupling}. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.06920 (2024).
%
% \bibitem{Deng2013}
% Deng, Haixiao, and Chao Feng. \href{https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.084801}{Using off-resonance laser modulation for beam-energy-spread cooling in generation of short-wavelength radiation}. Physical review letters 111.8 (2013): 084801.
%
% \bibitem{Feng2014}
% Feng, Chao, et al. \href{https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/4/043021}{Phase-merging enhanced harmonic generation free-electron laser}. New Journal of Physics 16.4 (2014): 043021.
%
% \bibitem{Feng2017}
% Feng, Chao, and Zhentang Zhao. \href{https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-04962-5}{A storage ring based free-electron laser for generating ultrashort coherent EUV and X-ray radiation}. Scientific reports 7.1 (2017): 4724.
%
% \bibitem{Deng2021NIMA}
% Deng, X. J., et al. \href{https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900221008445}{Harmonic generation and bunch compression based on transverse-longitudinal coupling}. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 1019 (2021): 165859.
%
%
% \bibitem{Deng2021Nature}
% Deng, Xiujie, et al. \href{https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03203-0}{Experimental demonstration of the mechanism of steady-state microbunching}. Nature 590.7847 (2021): 576-579.
%
% \bibitem{Kruschinski2023NP}
% Kruschinski, Arnold, et al. \href{https://www.nature.com/articles/s42005-024-01657-y}{Confirming the theoretical foundation of steady-state microbunching}. Communications Physics 7.1 (2024): 160.
%
%
% \bibitem{Stupakov2009}
% Stupakov, Gennady. \href{https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.074801}{Using the beam-echo effect for generation of short-wavelength radiation}. Physical review letters 102.7 (2009): 074801.
%
% \bibitem{Xiang2009}
% Xiang, Dao, and Gennady Stupakov. \href{https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.12.030702}{Echo-enabled harmonic generation free electron laser}. Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams 12.3 (2009): 030702.
%
%
% \bibitem{Xiang2010}
% Xiang, Dao, and W. Wan. \href{https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.084803}{Generating ultrashort coherent soft X-ray radiation in storage rings using angular-modulated electron beams}. Physical review letters 104.8 (2010): 084803.
%
%
% \bibitem{Jia2008eHGHG}
%
% Jia, Qika. \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.09.019}{Enhanced high-gain harmonic generation for x-ray free-electron laser}. Applied Physics Letters 93.14 (2008).
%
%
% \bibitem{Hemsing2013Adiabatic}
% Hemsing, Erik, and Dao Xiang. \href{10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.16.010706}{Cascaded modulator-chicane modules for optical manipulation of relativistic electron beams}. Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams 16.1 (2013): 010706.
%
% \bibitem{Sudar2018Adiabatic}
% Sudar, N., et al. \href{10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.114802}{Demonstration of cascaded modulator-chicane microbunching of a relativistic electron beam}. Physical review letters 120.11 (2018): 114802.
% \bibitem{LandauMechanics}
% Landau, L. D., and E. M. Lifshitz. Mechanics: Volume 1. Vol. 1. Elsevier, 1982.
% \bibitem{Zhang2017Slice}
% Zhang, Zhen, et al. "Generation of high-power, tunable terahertz radiation from laser interaction with a relativistic electron beam." Physical Review Accelerators and Beams 20.5 (2017): 050701.
%
% \bibitem{Yampolsky2011}
% Yampolsky, Nikolai A. "Description of modulated beam dynamics." arXiv preprint arXiv:1112.0553 (2011).
% \bibitem{Li2024Echo}
% Changliang Li, Bocheng Jiang, Yao Zhang. High harmonic generation in a storage ring based on transverse echo effect. 2024. to be published.
% \bibitem{Chao1979}
% Chao, Alexander W. \href{https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.326070}{Evaluation of beam distribution parameters in an electron storage ring}. Journal of Applied Physics 50.2 (1979): 595-598.
%\bibitem{Nash2006}
%Nash, Boaz. "Analytical Approach to Eigen-Emittance in Storage Rings." Stanford University, PhD. thesis, 2006.
% \bibitem{ChaoLSFSSMB}
% Chao's note on HGHG longitudinal strong focusing SSMB.
\end{thebibliography}
%
\end{document}