ATLAS EFT Results in the Top Quark Sector
Extracted source text ยท arXiv 2412.09911
% =========================================================================
% SciPost LaTeX template
% Version 2024-07
%
% Submissions to SciPost Journals should make use of this template.
%
% INSTRUCTIONS: simply look for the `TODO:' tokens and adapt your file.
% ========================================================================
\documentclass{SciPost}
% Prevent all line breaks in inline equations.
\binoppenalty=10000
\relpenalty=10000
\hypersetup{
colorlinks,
linkcolor={red!50!black},
citecolor={blue!50!black},
urlcolor={blue!80!black}
}
\usepackage{subcaption}
\usepackage{pdfpages}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
\urlstyle{same}
% Fix \cal and \mathcal characters look (so it's not the same as \mathscr)
\DeclareSymbolFont{usualmathcal}{OMS}{cmsy}{m}{n}
\DeclareSymbolFontAlphabet{\mathcal}{usualmathcal}
\fancypagestyle{SPstyle}{
\fancyhf{}
\lhead{\colorbox{scipostblue}{\bf \color{white} ~SciPost Physics Proceedings }}
\rhead{{\bf \color{scipostdeepblue} ~Submission }}
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{1pt}
\fancyfoot[C]{\textbf{\thepage}}
}
\begin{document}
\renewcommand\thefootnote{}
\footnotetext{\textcopyright~Copyright 2024 CERN for the benefit of the ATLAS Collaboration. Reproduction of this article or parts of it is allowed as specified in the CC-BY-4.0 license.}
% Restore footnote numbering
\renewcommand\thefootnote{\arabic{footnote}}
%\footnotetext{\textcopyright~Copyright 2024 CERN for the benefit of the ATLAS Collaboration. Reproduction of this article or parts of it is allowed as specified in the CC-BY-4.0 license.}
\pagestyle{SPstyle}
\begin{center}{\Large \textbf{\color{scipostdeepblue}{
%%%%%%%%%% TODO: Write your article's title here
ATLAS EFT Results in the Top Quark Sector\\
%%%%%%%%%% END TODO: TITLE
}}}\end{center}
\begin{center}\textbf{
%%%%%%%%%% TODO: AUTHORS
% Write the author list here.
% Use (full) first name (+ middle name initials) + surname format.
% Separate subsequent authors by a comma, omit comma and use "and" for the last author.
% Mark the corresponding author(s) with a superscript symbol in this order
% \star, \dagger, \ddagger, \circ, \S, \P, \parallel, ...
Dongwon Kim\textsuperscript{1,2} on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration
%Dee E. Faa\textsuperscript{2} and
%Gee K. See\textsuperscript{3$\dagger$}
%%%%%%%%%% END TODO: AUTHORS
}\end{center}
\begin{center}
%%%%%%%%%% TODO: AFFILIATIONS
% Write all affiliations here.
% Format: institute, city, country
{\bf 1} Stockholm University, Sweden
\\
{\bf 2} Oskar Klein Centre, Sweden
%\\
%{\bf 3} Affiliation 3
%%%%%%%%%% END TODO: AFFILIATIONS
%%%%%%%%%% TODO: EMAIL
% Provide email address of corresponding author(s)
\\[\baselineskip]
E-mail: \href{mailto:email1}{\small dong.won.kim@cern.ch}\,%,\quad
%$\dagger$ \href{mailto:email2}{\small email2}
%%%%%%%%%% END TODO: EMAIL
\end{center}
\definecolor{palegray}{gray}{0.95}
\begin{center}
\colorbox{palegray}{
\begin{tabular}{rr}
\begin{minipage}{0.36\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=60mm,height=1.5cm]{bandeau_TP2024.jpg}
\end{minipage}
&
\begin{minipage}{0.55\textwidth}
\begin{center} \hspace{5pt}
{\it The 17th International Workshop on\\ Top Quark Physics (TOP2024)} \\
{\it Saint-Malo, France, 22-27 September 2024
}
\doi{10.21468/SciPostPhysProc.?}\\
\end{center}
\end{minipage}
\end{tabular}
}
\end{center}
\section*{\color{scipostdeepblue}{Abstract}}
\textbf{\boldmath{%
%%%%%%%%%% TODO: ABSTRACT
% Write your abstract here.
%The abstract is in boldface, and should fit in 8 lines. It should be written in a clear and accessible style, emphasizing the context, the problem(s) studied, the methods used, the results obtained, the conclusions reached, and the outlook. You can add a table contents, recommended if your paper is more than 6 pages long.
With no direct evidence for new physics at the TeV scale, deviations from the Standard Model (SM) can be explored systematically through Effective Field Theories (EFTs) such as the Standard Model EFT (SMEFT). SMEFT extends the SM by introducing higher-dimensional operators parametrized by Wilson coefficients, offering a framework to probe beyond the SM (BSM) effects. This contribution highlights three recent analyses using the ATLAS Run-2 dataset at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV with an integrated luminosity of 140 $\text{fb}^{-1}$. Combined measurements improve the sensitivity to Wilson coefficients by reducing degeneracies and tightening constraints, exploring the potential of SMEFT in the top quark sector.
%%%%%%%%%% END TODO: ABSTRACT
}}
% measurements of $t\bar{t}\gamma$ production, $tq$ production in the t-channel, and searches for charged lepton-flavour-violating interactions
\vspace{\baselineskip}
%%%%%%%%%% BLOCK: Copyright information
% This block will be filled during the proof stage, and finilized just before publication.
% It exists here only as a placeholder, and should not be modified by authors.
\noindent\textcolor{white!90!black}{%
\fbox{\parbox{0.975\linewidth}{%
\textcolor{white!40!black}{\begin{tabular}{lr}%
\begin{minipage}{0.6\textwidth}%
{\small Copyright attribution to authors. \newline
This work is a submission to SciPost Phys. Proc. \newline
License information to appear upon publication. \newline
Publication information to appear upon publication.}
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}{0.4\textwidth}
{\small Received Date \newline Accepted Date \newline Published Date}%
\end{minipage}
\end{tabular}}
}}
}
%%%%%%%%%% BLOCK: Copyright information
%%%%%%%%%% TODO: LINENO
% For convenience during refereeing we turn on line numbers:
%\linenumbers
% You should run LaTeX twice in order for the line numbers to appear.
%%%%%%%%%% END TODO: LINENO
%%%%%%%%%% TODO: TOC
% Guideline: if your paper is longer that 6 pages, include a TOC
% To remove the TOC, simply cut the following block
%\vspace{10pt}
%\noindent\rule{\textwidth}{1pt}
%\tableofcontents
%\noindent\rule{\textwidth}{1pt}
%\vspace{10pt}
%%%%%%%%%% END TODO: TOC
%%%%%%%%% TODO: CONTENTS
% Write your article contents here, starting from first \section.
% An example structure is given below.
\section{Introduction}
\label{sec:intro}
% TODO: write your article here.
The lack of direct evidence for new physics at the TeV scale by the ATLAS experiment \cite{ATLAS:2008xda} suggests that effects from physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM) could arise at energy scales beyond the current experimental reach. Small deviations from Standard Model (SM) predictions, however, can still be systematically explored using Effective Field Theories (EFTs), such as the Standard Model EFT (SMEFT). SMEFT extends the SM by introducing higher-dimensional operators parametrized by Wilson coefficients, which provide a framework for quantifying potential BSM effects and precisely measuring quantum interference between standard and effective interactions \cite{Brivio:2017vri,Englert:2014cva,Buchmuller:1985jz} in the following way:
\begin{equation*}
\mathcal{L}_{\text{SMEFT}} = \mathcal{L}_{\text{SM}} + \sum_{i, d>4} \frac{c_i^{(d)} \mathcal{O}_i^{(d)}}{\Lambda^{d-4}} = \mathcal{L}_{\text{SM}} + \sum_{i} \frac{c_i^{(6)} \mathcal{O}_i^{(6)}}{\Lambda^{2}} + \sum_{j} \frac{c_j^{(8)} \mathcal{O}_j^{(8)}}{\Lambda^{4}} + \cdots
\end{equation*}
where $\mathcal{L}_{\text{SMEFT}}$, $\mathcal{L}_{\text{SM}}$, $c_i$, $d$, $\mathcal{O}_i$, and $\Lambda$ represent the SMEFT Lagrangian, the SM Lagrangian, the Wilson coefficients, the operator dimension, the higher-dimensional operators, and the cut-off scale, respectively. As the heaviest Standard Model particle, the top quark is particularly sensitive to BSM physics, rare processes involving top quarks are essential probes in SMEFT studies. In this context, EFT interpretations of three recent ATLAS results based on the full Run-2 dataset acquired during 2016-2018 and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 140 $\text{fb}^{-1}$ are highlighted: measurements of $t\bar{t}$ production in association with a photon ($\gamma$) \cite{ATLAS:2024hmk}, $tq$ production in the t-channel \cite{ATLAS:2024ojr}, and searches for charged lepton-flavour-violating (cLFV) interactions involving $\mu \tau q t$ \cite{ATLAS:2024njy}, where $q$ denotes either $u$- or $c$-quark.
\section{Top quark measurements and searches with EFT interpretation}
\label{sec:EFTresults}
Measurements of different processes or vertices are sensitive to distinct EFT operators. In ATLAS EFT, analyses of top-quark processes primarily consider dimension-six operators ($\mathcal{O}^{(6)}$), but results are often compared against scenarios that include both SM-EFT interference ($\Lambda^{-2}$) and higher-order EFT-EFT interference ($\Lambda^{-4}$) terms to account for the potential impact of higher-dimensional contributions. The SMEFT operators are defined using the Warsaw basis and implemented through Monte Carlo tools like \textit{MadGraph5\_aMC@NLO}\cite{Alwall:2014hca} and dedicated packages such as \textit{SMEFTatNLO}\cite{Degrande:2020evl}, \textit{dim6top}\cite{Aguilar-Saavedra:2018ksv}, and \textit{TopFCNC}\cite{Degrande:2014tta}. For these studies, the new physics scale is typically fixed at $\Lambda = 1 \ \text{TeV}$, and constraints are placed on both individual and marginalised Wilson coefficients. Generally, only a small set of operators impacting relevant vertices is analyzed, though some measurements also provide joint constraints on pairs of coefficients.
\subsection{Measurement of inclusive and differential $t\bar{t}\gamma$ cross sections}
%Inclusive and differential cross-section measurements of $t\bar{t}\gamma$ production with SMEFT interpretation are performed using the single-lepton and dilepton final states with a fiducial phase space which contains the photon is radiated from an initial-state parton or one of the top quarks. In the single lepton channel, a multi-class NN is used to discriminate signal from the background while binary classification is used in case for the dilepton channel. The measurements show a good agreement with the SM. A EFT interpretation is performed using the differential $t\bar{t}\gamma$ measurement as well as an impact of combination of $t\bar{t}\gamma$ and $t\bar{t}Z$. Real and Imaginary part of two Wilson coefficients $\mathcal{C}_{tB}$ and $\mathcal{C}_{tW}$ including linear, cross-terms, and quadratic contributions are simultaneously measured from a profile likelihood fit to the photon $$p_\mathrm{T}$$ distribution at particle level (Fig. \ref{fig:ttgamma_photon_pt_distribution}). Extracted limits on $\mathcal{C}_{tB}$ and $\mathcal{C}_{tW}$ are in a good agreement with the SM as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:eft_ttgamma} (left). As $\mathcal{C}_{tB}$ and $\mathcal{C}_{tW}$ also modify $t\bar{t}Z$ production, a combination of $t\bar{t}\gamma$ and $t\bar{t}Z$ provides tighter limits, especially in $\mathcal{C}_{tW}$. In addition, a combination of different measurements provides a separation power when one measurement shows degeneracies in limit extractions (See Fig. \ref{fig:eft_ttgamma} (right), where $\mathcal{C}_{t\gamma}$ and $\mathcal{C}_{tZ}$ is a linear combination of $\mathcal{C}_{tB}$ and $\mathcal{C}_{tW}$). No deviations from the SM are found within 95\% confidence limits.
Inclusive and differential cross-section measurements of $t\bar{t}\gamma$ production with SMEFT interpretations are presented, utilizing single-lepton and dilepton final states. The fiducial phase space considers photons radiated either from an initial-state parton or from one of the top quarks. For the single-lepton channel, a multi-class neural network (NN) is employed to separate signal from background, while a binary classifier is used in the dilepton channel. The results demonstrate good agreement with the SM.
A SMEFT interpretation is performed using the differential $t\bar{t}\gamma$ measurements, with additional insights gained by combining $t\bar{t}\gamma$ and $t\bar{t}Z$ data. Both the real and imaginary components of the Wilson coefficients $\mathcal{C}_{tB}$ and $\mathcal{C}_{tW}$ are extracted, including linear, cross-term, and quadratic contributions. This is achieved through a profile likelihood fit to the photon transverse momentum ($p_\mathrm{T}$) distribution at the particle level in Figure \ref{fig:ttgamma_photon_pt_distribution}. One of the resulting limits on $\mathcal{C}_{tB}$ and $\mathcal{C}_{tW}$ are consistent with SM predictions, as shown in Figure \ref{fig:eft_ttgamma}(a).
Since $\mathcal{C}_{tB}$ and $\mathcal{C}_{tW}$ also influence $t\bar{t}Z$ production, the combination of $t\bar{t}\gamma$ and $t\bar{t}Z$ provides stronger constraints, particularly on $\mathcal{C}_{tW}$. Furthermore, combining multiple measurements offers improved discrimination power, addressing degeneracies in limit extractions (e.g., Figure \ref{fig:eft_ttgamma}(b), where $\mathcal{C}_{t\gamma}$ and $\mathcal{C}_{tZ}$ are linear combinations of $\mathcal{C}_{tB}$ and $\mathcal{C}_{tW}$). No significant deviations from the SM are observed, within the limits at 95\% confidence level (CL).
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{Figures/photon_pt_distribution.pdf}
\caption{Comparison of the photon $p_\mathrm{T}$ distribution from the combined measurement in the single-lepton and dilepton channels with the SM prediction and scenarios with one non-zero EFT parameter. The lower panel shows the ratio of predictions to the data. \cite{ATLAS:2024hmk}}
\label{fig:ttgamma_photon_pt_distribution}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.45\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Figures/ttgamma_EFT.pdf}
\caption{$\mathrm{Re}[C_{tW}]$ vs. $\mathrm{Im}[C_{tB}]$ from $t\bar{t}\gamma$ measurements alone.}
\end{subfigure}
\hspace{0.05\linewidth}
\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.45\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Figures/ttZ_ttgamma_EFT.pdf}
\caption{$\mathrm{Im}[C_{t\gamma}]$ vs. $\mathrm{Re}[C_{t\gamma}]$ from $t\bar{t}\gamma$ and $t\bar{t}Z$ measurements.}
\end{subfigure}
\caption{Two-dimensional marginalized posteriors for the EFT operators from the quadratic fits, indicating 68\% and 95\% confidence intervals. \cite{ATLAS:2024hmk}}
\label{fig:eft_ttgamma}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Measurement of $tq$($\bar{t}q$) cross sections in t-channel}
The cross-section measurements of the production of a single top-quark or top-antiquark via the t-channel exchange of a virtual $W$ boson are performed. Events are selected to include either one isolated electron or muon, significant missing transverse energy ($E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}$), and exactly two hadronic jets with high $p_\mathrm{T}$, one of which is required to be $b$-tagged. An artificial NN was employed to construct a discriminant that efficiently separates signal from background events. The distributions of the NN discriminant ($D_\mathrm{nn}$) in Figure \ref{fig:eft_singletop} are used in profile maximum-likelihood fits to extract the signal yields. These measurements are interpreted in the framework of SMEFT, setting 95\% CL constraints on the Wilson coefficients of two operators: the four-quark operator, $C_{Qq}^{3,1}/\Lambda^2$ (-0.37 < $C_{Qq}^{3,1}/\Lambda^2$ < 0.06), and the operator coupling the third quark generation to the Higgs boson doublet, $C_{\phi Q}^3/\Lambda^2$ (-0.87 < $C_{\phi Q}^3/\Lambda^2$ < 1.42).
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.45\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Figures/tq_EFT_SR_plus.pdf}
\caption{SR plus (with $l^{+}$)}
\end{subfigure}
\hspace{0.05\linewidth}
\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.45\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Figures/tq_EFT_SR_minus.pdf}
\caption{SR minus (with $l^{-}$)}
\end{subfigure}
\caption{Observed $D_\mathrm{nn}$ post-fit distributions (black markers) for (a) SR plus and (b) SR minus. The hatched band overlaid on the stacked histograms includes all uncertainties on the SM prediction, accounting for correlations from the fit. The lower panel shows the data-to-prediction ratio with uncertainties as a gray band. \cite{ATLAS:2024ojr}}
\label{fig:eft_singletop}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Search for charged-lepton-flavour violating (cLFV) in $\mu \tau q t$ interactions}
A search for cLFV interactions in $\mu \tau q t$ processes is conducted, considering both top-quark production and decay. Events with two same-sign leptons, a hadronically decaying $\tau$-lepton, and at least one $b$-tagged jet are considered (See Figure \ref{fig:CLFV_EFT_SR}). No significant excess over the SM prediction is observed, and 95\% $\text{CL}_S$ limits are set on the branching ratio of $\mathcal{B}(t \to \mu \tau q) < 8.7 \times 10^{-7}$. SMEFT interpretations are performed, yielding 95\% CL constraints on the Wilson coefficients, depending on the flavour of the associated light quark and the Lorentz structure of the coupling. These range from $|C_{\text{lequ}}^{3(2313)}| / \Lambda^2 < 0.10 \, \text{TeV}^{-2}$ for $\mu \tau u t$ to $|C_{\text{lequ}}^{3(2323)}| / \Lambda^2 < 1.8 \, \text{TeV}^{-2}$ for $\mu \tau c t$ (See Table \ref{tab:CLFV_limits}). These results complement previous EFT analyses \cite{Chala:2018agk} and provide further constraints on cLFV processes involving the top quark.
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{Figures/CLFV_EFT_SR.pdf}
\caption{Observed event yields in the SR compared with MC simulations as a function of the scalar sum of the lepton and jet transverse momenta $H_\mathrm{T}$. The signal sample is generated with all Wilson coefficients simultaneously set to 0.1 for a new physics scale of $\Lambda$ = 1 TeV. \cite{ATLAS:2024njy}}
\label{fig:CLFV_EFT_SR}
\end{figure}
\begin{table}[h!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.65\linewidth]{Figures/CLFV_EFT_CL95_upperlimit.pdf}
\caption{Expected and observed 95\% CL upper limits on Wilson coefficients corresponding to 2Q2L EFT operators that could introduce cLFV top decay in the $\mu \tau$ channel \cite{ATLAS:2024njy} with existing limits from Ref.~\cite{Chala:2018agk}.}
\label{tab:CLFV_limits}
\end{table}
\section{Conclusion}
Three analyses utilizing the full Run-2 dataset of the ATLAS detector have been summarized, focusing on searches for BSM physics in the top quark sector through an EFT framework. The combination of improved measurements and the inclusion of new channels has significantly enhanced the sensitivity to Wilson coefficients by breaking degeneracies and tightening constraints. Furthermore, since many EFT-based analyses at ATLAS assume $\Lambda$ of 1 TeV, near the current experimental energy scale, the collaboration has begun setting direct limits on $\Lambda$, exploring scenarios with varying coupling strengths ($c_i$ = 0.01, 1, 4$\pi^2$)\cite{LHCTopWGSummaryPlots}. In the top quark sector, SMEFT continues to adapt and advance, aligning with the increasing precision of experimental data from the LHC.
%\section*{Acknowledgements}
%Acknowledgements should follow immediately after the conclusion.
% TODO: include author contributions
%\paragraph{Author contributions}
%This is optional. If desired, contributions should be succinctly described in a single short paragraph, using author initials.
% TODO: include funding information
%\paragraph{Funding information}
%Authors are required to provide funding information, including relevant agencies and grant numbers with linked author's initials. Correctly-provided data will be linked to funders listed in the \href{https://www.crossref.org/services/funder-registry/}{\sf Fundref registry}.
%\begin{appendix}
%\numberwithin{equation}{section}
%\section{First appendix}
%Add material which is better left outside the main text in a series of Appendices labeled by capital letters.
%\section{About references}
%Your references should start with the comma-separated author list (initials + last name), the publication title in italics, the journal reference with volume in bold, start page number, publication year in parenthesis, completed by the DOI link (linking must be implemented before publication). If using BiBTeX, please use the style files provided on \url{https://scipost.org/submissions/author_guidelines}. If you are using our LaTeX template, simply add
%\begin{verbatim}
%\bibliography{SciPost_Example_BiBTeX_File.bib}
%\end{verbatim}
%at the end of your document. If you are not using our LaTeX template, please still use our bibstyle as
%\begin{verbatim}
%\bibliographystyle{SciPost_bibstyle}
%\end{verbatim}
%in order to simplify the production of your paper.
%\end{appendix}
%%%%%%%%% END TODO: CONTENTS
%%%%%%%%%% TODO: BIBLIOGRAPHY
% Provide your bibliography here. You have two options:
%%% FIRST OPTION
% Write your entries here directly, following the example below, including:
% Author(s), Title, Journal Ref. with year in parentheses at the end, followed by the DOI number.
% \begin{thebibliography}{99}
% \bibitem{1931_Bethe_ZP_71}
% H. A. Bethe, \textit{Zur Theorie der Metalle. i. Eigenwerte und Eigenfunktionen der linearen Atomkette}, Zeit. f{\"u}r Phys. \textbf{71}, 205 (1931), \doi{10.1007\%2FBF01341708}.
% \bibitem{arXiv:1108.2700}
% P. Ginsparg, \textit{It was twenty years ago today...}, (arXiv preprint) \doi{10.48550/arXiv.1108.2700}.
% \end{thebibliography}
%%% SECOND OPTION
% Use your bibtex library, formatted by the SciPost style file.
\bibliography{SciPost_Example_BiBTeX_File.bib}
%%%%%%%%%% END TODO: BIBLIOGRAPHY
\end{document}
\begin{thebibliography}{10}
\providecommand{\url}[1]{\texttt{#1}}
\providecommand{\urlprefix}{URL }
\expandafter\ifx\csname urlstyle\endcsname\relax
\providecommand{\doi}[1]{doi:\discretionary{}{}{}#1}\else
\providecommand{\doi}{doi:\discretionary{}{}{}\begingroup \urlstyle{rm}\Url}\fi
\providecommand{\eprint}[2][]{\url{#2}}
\bibitem{ATLAS:2008xda}
{ATLAS Collaboration},
\newblock \emph{{The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider}},
\newblock JINST \textbf{3}, S08003 (2008),
\newblock \doi{10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08003}.
\bibitem{Brivio:2017vri}
I.~Brivio and M.~Trott,
\newblock \emph{{The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory}},
\newblock Phys. Rept. \textbf{793}, 1 (2019),
\newblock \doi{10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.002},
\newblock \eprint{1706.08945}.
\bibitem{Englert:2014cva}
C.~Englert and M.~Spannowsky,
\newblock \emph{{Effective Theories and Measurements at Colliders}},
\newblock Phys. Lett. B \textbf{740}, 8 (2015),
\newblock \doi{10.1016/j.physletb.2014.11.035},
\newblock \eprint{1408.5147}.
\bibitem{Buchmuller:1985jz}
W.~Buchmuller and D.~Wyler,
\newblock \emph{{Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation}},
\newblock Nucl. Phys. B \textbf{268}, 621 (1986),
\newblock \doi{10.1016/0550-3213(86)90262-2}.
\bibitem{ATLAS:2024hmk}
{ATLAS Collaboration},
\newblock \emph{{Measurements of inclusive and differential cross-sections of $ t\overline{t}\gamma $ production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector}},
\newblock JHEP \textbf{10}, 191 (2024),
\newblock \doi{10.1007/JHEP10(2024)191},
\newblock \eprint{2403.09452}.
\bibitem{ATLAS:2024ojr}
{ATLAS Collaboration},
\newblock \emph{{Measurement of t-channel production of single top quarks and antiquarks in pp collisions at 13 TeV using the full ATLAS Run 2 data sample}},
\newblock JHEP \textbf{05}, 305 (2024),
\newblock \doi{10.1007/JHEP05(2024)305},
\newblock \eprint{2403.02126}.
\bibitem{ATLAS:2024njy}
{ATLAS Collaboration},
\newblock \emph{{Search for charged-lepton-flavor violating \ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\tau}qt interactions in top-quark production and decay in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC}},
\newblock Phys. Rev. D \textbf{110}, 012014 (2024),
\newblock \doi{10.1103/PhysRevD.110.012014},
\newblock \eprint{2403.06742}.
\bibitem{Alwall:2014hca}
J.~Alwall, R.~Frederix, S.~Frixione, V.~Hirschi, F.~Maltoni, O.~Mattelaer, H.~S. Shao, T.~Stelzer, P.~Torrielli and M.~Zaro,
\newblock \emph{{The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations}},
\newblock JHEP \textbf{07}, 079 (2014),
\newblock \doi{10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079},
\newblock \eprint{1405.0301}.
\bibitem{Degrande:2020evl}
C.~Degrande, G.~Durieux, F.~Maltoni, K.~Mimasu, E.~Vryonidou and C.~Zhang,
\newblock \emph{{Automated one-loop computations in the standard model effective field theory}},
\newblock Phys. Rev. D \textbf{103}, 096024 (2021),
\newblock \doi{10.1103/PhysRevD.103.096024},
\newblock \eprint{2008.11743}.
\bibitem{Aguilar-Saavedra:2018ksv}
D.~Barducci \emph{et~al.},
\newblock \emph{{Interpreting top-quark LHC measurements in the standard-model effective field theory}} (2018),
\newblock \eprint{1802.07237}.
\bibitem{Degrande:2014tta}
C.~Degrande, F.~Maltoni, J.~Wang and C.~Zhang,
\newblock \emph{{Automatic computations at next-to-leading order in QCD for top-quark flavor-changing neutral processes}},
\newblock Phys. Rev. D \textbf{91}, 034024 (2015),
\newblock \doi{10.1103/PhysRevD.91.034024},
\newblock \eprint{1412.5594}.
\bibitem{Chala:2018agk}
M.~Chala, J.~Santiago and M.~Spannowsky,
\newblock \emph{{Constraining four-fermion operators using rare top decays}},
\newblock JHEP \textbf{04}, 014 (2019),
\newblock \doi{10.1007/JHEP04(2019)014},
\newblock \eprint{1809.09624}.
\bibitem{LHCTopWGSummaryPlots}
{LHC Top Working Group},
\newblock \emph{{LHC Top Physics Working Group Summary Plots}},
\newblock \url{https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LHCPhysics/LHCTopWGSummaryPlots},
\newblock Accessed: 2024-11-30.
\end{thebibliography}