Alexei Starobinsky and wormhole physics
Extracted source text · arXiv 2503.12088
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% author.tex %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%
% sample root file for your "contribution" to a contributed volume
%
% Use this file as a template for your own input.
%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Springer %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% RECOMMENDED %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\documentclass[graybox]{svmult}
% choose options for [] as required from the list
% in the Reference Guide
%\usepackage{type1cm} % activate if the above 3 fonts are
% not available on your system
%
\usepackage{makeidx} % allows index generation
\usepackage{graphicx} % standard LaTeX graphics tool
% when including figure files
%\usepackage{multicol} % used for the two-column index
%\usepackage[bottom]{footmisc}% places footnotes at page bottom
%\usepackage{newtxtext} %
%\usepackage[varvw]{newtxmath} % selects Times Roman as basic font
% see the list of further useful packages
% in the Reference Guide
\makeindex % used for the subject index
% please use the style svind.ist with
% your makeindex program
\usepackage{color,cite}
%% Authors' definitions
%% aligning, numbering
\def\nq{\hspace*{-1em}}
\def\nqq{\hspace*{-2em}}
\def\nhq{\hspace*{-0.5em}}
\def\nhh{\hspace*{-0.3em}}
\def\cm{\hspace*{1cm}}
\def\inch{\hspace*{1in}}
\def\wide{\mbox{$\dst\vphantom{\int}$}}
\def\Wide{\mbox{$\dst\vphantom{\intl_a^a}$}}
\def\ten#1{\mbox{$\cdot 10^{#1}$}}
% -------------------------------------
\def\al{&\nhq}
\def\lal{&&\nqq {}}
\def\eq{Eq.\,}
\def\eqs{Eqs.\,}
\def\beq{\begin{equation}}
\def\eeq{\end{equation}}
\def\bear{\begin{eqnarray}}
\def\bearr{\begin{eqnarray} \lal}
\def\ear{\end{eqnarray}}
\def\earn{\nonumber \end{eqnarray}}
\def\nn{\nonumber\\ {}}
\def\nnv{\nonumber\\[5pt] {}}
\def\nnn{\nonumber\\ \lal }
\def\nnnv{\nonumber\\[5pt] \lal }
\def\yy{\\[5pt] {}}
\def\yyy{\\[5pt] \lal }
\def\eql{\al =\al}
\def\eqv{\al \equiv \al}
\def\sequ#1{\setcounter{equation}{#1}}
\def\qq{\qquad}
%% fractions
\def\dst{\displaystyle}
\def\tst{\textstyle}
\def\fracd#1#2{{\dst\frac{#1}{#2}}}
\def\fract#1#2{{\tst\frac{#1}{#2}}}
\def\Half{{\fracd{1}{2}}}
\def\half{{\fract{1}{2}}}
%% other
\def\e{{\,\rm e}}
\def\D{\partial}
\def\re{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits}
\def\im{\mathop{\rm Im}\nolimits}
\def\arg{\mathop{\rm arg}\nolimits}
\def\tr{\mathop{\rm tr}\nolimits}
\def\sign{\mathop{\rm sign}\nolimits}
\def\diag{\mathop{\rm diag}\nolimits}
\def\dim{\mathop{\rm dim}\nolimits}
\def\const{{\rm const}}
\def\eps{\varepsilon}
\def\ep{\epsilon}
\def\then{\ \Rightarrow\ }
\newcommand{\toas}{\mathop {\ \longrightarrow\ }\limits }
\newcommand{\aver}[1]{\langle \, #1 \, \rangle \mathstrut}
\newcommand{\vars}[1]{\left\{\begin{array}{ll}#1\end{array}\right.}
\def\suml{\sum\limits}
\def\intl{\int\limits}
% --------------------------
\def\red#1{{\color{red} #1}}
\def\blue#1{{\color{blue} #1}}
\def\eqn#1{\eq\eqref{#1}}
\def\rf#1{(\ref{#1})}
% -------------------------
\def\mn{_{\mu\nu}}
\def\MN{^{\mu\nu}}
\def\mN{_\mu^\nu}
\def\nM{_\nu^\mu}
\def\chg{\ \leftrightarrow\ }
% -----------------------------
\def\M{{\bf M}}
\def\R{{\bf R}}
\def\S{{\bf S}}
\def\oR{\overline{R}}
\def\og{\overline{g}}
\def\ME {\mbox{$\M_{\rm E}$}}
\def\MJ {\mbox{$\M_{\rm J}$}}
% ------------------------
\def\GR{general relativity}
\def\sph{spherically symmetric}
\def\ssph{static, spherically symmetric}
\def\bh{black hole}
\def\bhs{black holes}
\def\wh{wormhole}
\def\whs{wormholes}
\def\asflat{asymptotically flat}
\def\emag{electromagnetic}
\def\Scw{Schwarz\-schild}
\def\Schr{Schr\"odinger}
\def\RN{Reiss\-ner-Nord\-str\"om}
\def\pb{perturbation}
\def\pbs{perturbations}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{document}
\title*{Alexei Starobinsky and wormhole physics}
% Use \titlerunning{Short Title} for an abbreviated version of
% your contribution title if the original one is too long
\author{Kirill A. Bronnikov\orcidID{0000-0001-9392-7558} and\\
Milena V. Skvortsova\orcidID{0000-0003-0812-3171}}
% Use \authorrunning{Short Title} for an abbreviated version of
% your contribution title if the original one is too long
\institute{Kirill A. Bronnikov \at Rostest, Ozyornaya ul. 46, Moscow 119361, Russia;\\
RUDN University, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya 6, Moscow 117198, Russia;\\
National Research Nuclear University ``MEPhI'',
Kashirskoe sh. 31, Moscow 115409, Russia.
\email{kb20@yandex.ru}
\and Milena V. Skvortsova \at
RUDN University, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya 6, Moscow 117198, Russia.
\email{milenas577@mail.ru}}
%
% Use the package "url.sty" to avoid
% problems with special characters
% used in your e-mail or web address
%
\maketitle
% ==============================================
\abstract*{Alexei Starobinsky is most famous for his great contribution to cosmology, but
he has considerable achievements in other branches of gravitational physics and
astrophysics, such as the theory of compact objects including black holes and wormholes.
In this note, we give a brief review of Alexei's papers devoted to wormhole physics.
They mostly concern such issues of common interest as the necessary conditions for
wormhole existence in general relativity and its extensions as well as generic properties
of some kinds of wormholes.}
\vspace{-1cm}
\abstract{\\
Alexei Starobinsky is most famous for his great contribution to cosmology, but
he has considerable achievements in other branches of gravitational physics and
astrophysics, such as the theory of compact objects including black holes and wormholes.
In this note, we give a brief review of Alexei's papers devoted to wormhole physics.
They mostly concern such issues of common interest as the necessary conditions for
wormhole existence in general relativity and its extensions as well as generic properties
of some kinds of wormholes. We also extend one of the no-go theorems on thin-shell
wormholes to a wider choice of their symmetry and matter content.}
% ==================================
\section{Introduction} \label{sec:1}
% ==================================
We would like to begin our paper with some memories of Alexei Alexandrovich
Starobinsky. He has been not only an outstanding scientist but a very attractive person,
he paid very much attention to young scientists, students and postgraduates, when necessary,
he helped them organizationally (for example, to take part in a school or conference of
interest). It was a typical practice for him to suggest a problem of interest to a young colleague
even if the latter worked in quite a different institute but showed a potential to solve it.
Alexei took part in a lot of conferences and was there very active, his talks did not only
contain the results of new research but always had an educational function, and he was always
ready to answer questions, even if quite trivial for him. When he listened to talks by
his colleagues, he usually sat in front of his computer, probably reading something there or
answering messages, but when a talk was over, he used to ask questions and make comments
that were always appropriate and often deep.
His interests were not restricted to cosmology, his main area: he had also outstanding
results in black hole physics (see, e.g, \cite{star5}), in quantum field theory in curved
space-time \cite{zeld}, and he expressed interest in many others areas. Among them
was \wh\ physics, a subject on which we had the honor and pleasure to be his co-authors.
Wormholes are nowadays quite a popular subject of both science fiction and serious
theoretical studies. These are hypothetic configurations of curved space-time having
the shape of ``bridges'' between distant regions of the same universe or even between
different universes. The possible existence of such objects in our Universe would lead
to diverse remarkable effects, beginning with observation of the sky of another universe
through a \wh\ throat and ending with such a fantastic construct as a time machine.
It is therefore not too surprising that, although nobody has ever confidently observed
any \wh, many researchers study and discuss both the conditions of \wh\ emergence
and existence and their possible observational signatures.
As already said, Alexei Starobinsky expressed active interest in \wh\ physics. His papers in
this area, written together with the present authors \cite{star1,star2,star3}, are as a whole
not devoted to obtaining or discussion of particular \wh\ solutions of different theories of
gravity (whose list is now extremely rich) but to such questions of general interest as the
\wh\ existence conditions and their main properties that do not depend on a particular
model. The main purpose of the present paper is to recall the main results of those papers,
emphasizing Alexei's contribution to this intriguing sector of gravitational physics. For one
of the no-go theorems of \cite{star1,star2,star3}, that on \ssph\ thin-shell wormholes,
we present an extension to wider symmetry properties and arbitrary matter sources.
% =================================================
\section{Throats and asympotic regions}\label{sec:2}
% =================================================
It is quite well known that the existence of static \wh\ throats (2-surfaces of minimum area
in these space-time tunnels) in \GR\ inevitably requires a material source of gravity whose
stress-energy tensor (SET) $T\mN$ violates the weak and null energy conditions (WEC and
NEC) \cite{MS88,HV97}, and such sources have acquired the name of ``exotic matter,''
also often called phantom or ghost matter (we use the words `ghost' and `phantom' as
synonyms). There are strong reasons to suppose that Nature,
if not completely forbids the existence of such matter, still tries to avoid its emergence.
Therefore, much effort is devoted to a search for \wh\ models without such matter.
One can point out two ways in attempts to achieve this goal: either consider nonstatic
models in \GR\ (for example, in the framework of simple cosmological models), or use
theories of gravity other than \GR. Both ways are widely used and discussed by the
researchers. The second way certainly implies that the corresponding theory alternative
to \GR\ is sufficiently well founded and supported by observations.
Scalar-tensor theories (STT) of gravity are among the most promising alternative theories,
and their numerous models sufficiently well agree with observations (see \cite{stt-rev1,stt-rev2}
for recent reviews). By the year 2005, when we began our work \cite{star1}, the analysis
of current cosmological observations revealed some evidence that the Dark Energy (DE),
responsible for the acceleration expansion of the Universe if the Einstein equations are
assumed to hold, may be well described by a phantom matter equation of state parameter
$w \equiv p_{\rm DE}/\rho_{\rm DE}$, slightly smaller than $-1$. (Let us note that this estimate
remains relevant today, even though models with a cosmological constant $\Lambda$
($w=-1$) remain most popular and comprise the `standard' ($\Lambda$CDM) cosmological
paradigm.) It was, however, clear that the possibly observed $w < -1$ does not necessarily
mean the existence of ghosts in Nature since there are STT models without ghosts that admit
a phantom DE behavior and even a super-acceleration of the present Universe, such that
$dH/dt > 0$, where $H(t)$ is the Hubble parameter in Friedmann-Robertson-Walker
cosmological models. For example, this may take place in the framework of the
Brans-Dicke STT with a nonzero scalar field potential. Thus, as was shown explicitly
\cite{star-BD}, such a model possesses sufficient freedom to account for all observations
justifying the presently possible phantom-driven expansion as well as those concerning
the luminosity distances and inhomogeneity growth in the Universe.
So, if a nonphantom scalar field in STT can provide a phantom behavior in cosmology, a
natural question is: can such a field create local entities also usually associated with phantoms,
i.e., wormholes? Our paper \cite{star1} gives a negative answer to this question, thus
extending some previous results \cite{vac5, BG05},
To begin the discussion, it is necessary to define its subject.
We here, following \cite{star1, star2, star3}, consider static space-times and say that that the
geometry is that of a {\bf \wh}\ if (i) the space-time is globally regular and free from horizons,
(ii) its spatial sections contain a 2D surface of minimum area, called a {\bf throat}, and (iii)
the throat is a member of a family of 2D surfaces whose area is not bounded above on
both sides from the throat. In the simplest case of spherical symmetry this means that a throat
is a sphere of minimum spherical radius $r$, and that $r \to \infty$ on both sides far from this
sphere. Asymptotic flatness on one or both `ends' is not necessary though often desirable.
This definition is more narrow than those used by a number of authors but covers the cases
of interest in many studies.
Now let us briefly recall the main points of our reasoning in \cite{star1}.
The main feature of general (Bergman-Wagoner-Nordtvedt) STT
is a nonminimal coupling between a scalar field $\Phi$ and the curvature.
The Lagrangian in a (physically preferred) Jordan-frame manifold \MJ\ with
the metric $g\mn$ may be written as\footnote
{We use the following conventions: the metric signature $(+{}-{}-{}-)$;
the Riemann and Ricci tensors defined as
$R^{\sigma}{}_{\mu\rho\nu} = \D_\nu\Gamma^{\sigma}_{\mu\rho}-\ldots$ and
$R\mn = R^{\sigma}{}_{\mu\sigma\nu}$, so that the Ricci scalar
$R = g\MN R\mn$ is positive for both de Sitter space-time and matter-dominated
cosmology; the system of units $8\pi G = c = 1$.}
\beq
2L= f(\Phi) R + h(\Phi)g^{\mu\nu}\Phi_{,\mu} \Phi_{,\nu}
- 2U(\Phi) - F\MN F\mn, \label{Lagr}
\eeq
where $R$ is the Ricci scalar and $F\mn$ the electromagnetic field tensor;
the functions $f$, $h$ and $U$ are arbitrary. The fermion matter Lagrangian
is assumed to have no coupling with $\Phi$, hence fermion masses are constant,
and atomic clocks measure the proper time $t$ in \MJ. It is, however, useful
to also consider the Einstein frame, defined as a manifold \ME\ with the metric
\beq
\og\mn = |f(\Phi)| g\mn, \label{conf}
\eeq
in which the Lagrangian \rf{Lagr} takes the form
\beq
2L_E = (\sign f) \bigl[\oR
+ (\sign \ell) \og\MN \phi_{,\mu}\phi_{,\nu}\bigr]
- 2V(\phi) - F\MN F\mn, \label{LE}
\eeq
where overbars mark quantities obtained from or with $\og\mn$, indices are raised
and lowered with $\og\MN$ and $\og\mn$, and the functions involved are related by
\beq
\ell(\Phi) := fh + \frac{3}{2}\biggl(\frac{df}{d\Phi}\biggr)^2,
\qq
\frac{d\phi}{d\Phi} = \frac{\sqrt{|\ell(\Phi)|}}{f(\Phi)},
\qq
V(\phi) = |f|^{-2} U(\Phi). \label{trans}
\eeq
Let us require that the theory has no ghosts, hence $f(\Phi) > 0$
(the graviton is not a ghost) and $\ell(\Phi) > 0$ (the $\Phi$ field is not a ghost).
Moreover, let us assume that $f(\Phi)$ and $\ell(\phi)$ are smooth and
bounded above and below by positive constants. According to \cite{HV97},
a static \wh\ throat (defined as a minimal 2D surface in a 3D manifold) necessarily
requires that the matter source the Einstein equations violates the NEC
that requires $T\mn \xi^\mu \xi^\nu \geq 0$, where $T\mn$ is the SET of matter,
and $\xi^\mu$ is an arbitrary null vector. Since the matter sources in (\ref{LE}) satisfy
the NEC, we can assert that \whs\ (and even \wh\ throats) are impossible in \ME.
Now we notice that under our assumptions, the conformal mapping
$\og\mn = f(\Phi)g\mn$ transfers a flat spatial infinity in one frame to a flat spatial
infinity in the other. Therefore, if there is a \wh\ in \MJ, which is \asflat\ on each
side of the throat, then its each flat infinity maps to its counterpart in \ME, the
whole manifold is smooth, and we thus obtain a \wh\ in \ME, contrary to the
above-stated impossibility. This contradiction makes us conclude that static
\asflat\ \whs\ are absent in the Jordan frame as well.
In this simple reasoning, no spatial symmetry assumption was made, hence any
static \whs\ are ruled out in the theory (\ref{Lagr}), if everywhere $f > 0$ and $\ell > 0$.
Moreover, no assumption was made on $U(\Phi)$ (apart from smoothness
and compatibility with asymptotic flatness). So the result is quite general.
The no-\wh\ statement for \MJ\ can be further generalized in a few respects \cite{star1}:
\begin{description}[\hspace{5mm}]
\item[(i)]
our inferences remain valid in the presence of any other ghost-free (respecting the NEC)
matter;
\item[(ii)]
instead of asymptotic flatness, we can simply require the existence of two spatial infinities
(defined in terms of infinitely growing areas of closed 2-surfaces in the spatial sections of
\ME\ and \MJ);
\item[(iii)]
the no-\wh\ statement holds not only in STT but in any metric theory of gravity
(e.g., $F(R)$ or $F(R, \Phi)$ \cite{F(R), maeda}) admitting a conformal mapping of the
physical manifold \MJ\ to \ME\ where GR holds with ghost-free matter,
provided that the conformal factor is everywhere smooth and positive;
\item[(iv)]
under certain restrictions, our statement can even be extended to dynamic \whs\
based on the no-\wh\ results for \ME\ obtained by Hochberg and Visser in \cite{HV98}.
\end{description}
The latter results rest on the definition of a dynamic wormhole throat as a marginally
anti-trapped surface. There are other definitions (see, e.g, \cite{dyn-def} for a review),
some of them are less restrictive than that of \cite{HV98}. Thus, a number of dynamic
\wh\ solutions in GR have been obtained using an intuitively clear definition of a throat
referring to a physically preferable set of constant-time spacelike surfaces, see, e.g.,
solutions describing \whs\ in a cosmological background in the framework of GR, sourced
by such ghost-free kinds of matter as nonlinear electrodynamics \cite{NED-lobo, NED-kb}
and dust \cite{BKS23}, but none of such objects can exist eternally and have initial and/or
final singularities.
Returning to static systems in (not only) STT, we should stress that throats are not ruled
out in \MJ\ (see an example below in this paper): it is a \wh\ as a global entity that is ruled
out. Therefore, nothing prevents one from constructing, for instance, composite \wh\
models where a neighborhood of the throat is described by an appropriate STT solution,
while the rest of space is either empty or has some other ghost-free matter as a source,
admitting asymptotic flatness.
A further discussion in \cite{star1} concerned possible weakening of the assumptions on the
function $f(\Phi)$. It is shown that if $f(\Phi)$ somewhere reaches zero, there can be exceptional
twice \asflat\ \wh\ solutions in some STT, conformally mapped to solutions with extremal
horizons in \ME, but such explicit examples are yet to be found. Furthermore, if $f(\Phi)$ is
allowed to become negative (the effective gravitational constant is negative in such regions),
then \wh\ solutions are not ruled out, and a few examples of such solutions are known
\cite{kb73, barc00, step02}, with sources in the form of nonminimally coupled massless
scalar fields and possible inclusion of an \emag\ field, such that in \rf{Lagr} we have
$f(\Phi) = 1 - \xi \Phi^2$ ($\xi = \const$), $h(\Phi) \equiv 1, \ U(\Phi) \equiv 0$.
All such solutions involve the phenomenon of conformal continuation \cite{kb02}. The
point is that the surface where $f =0$ is a singularity in \ME\ but regular in \MJ, and the
conformal mapping \rf{conf} from the whole \ME\ leads to only a part of \MJ, which
therefore has to be continued to a new region with another sign of $f$. Apart from
a special nature of such constructs with respect to the whole set of solutions of a particular
theory, it also happens that such wormhole solutions are generically unstable under
spherically symmetric (monopole) perturbations \cite{BG05, step02}.
Thus we have the following {\bf no-go theorem} \cite{star1}: in any STT (or $F(R)$, or
$F(R, \Phi)$ theories of gravity ), in any systems free of ghosts, no complete, infinitely
extended static \wh\ solutions are allowed in the physical Jordan conformal frame \MJ,
even though throats, in general, can be present.
If the no-ghost conditions are weakened as described above, then special \wh\ solutions
can exist, but none of them can be regarded realistic.
It remains to add that if the scalar $\Phi$ is phantom, that is, if in \rf{trans} $\ell(\Phi) < 0$,
\wh\ solutions in STT are readily obtained, as confirmed by numerous examples beginning
with \cite{kb73}.
% ======================================
\section{Thin shells and wormholes}
% ======================================
After the publication of \cite{star1}, attempts to obtain static phantom-free \wh\ models
continued. In particular, it was claimed that at least in some cases, if a \wh\ throat is
provided by a thin shell of matter (e.g., in the Brans-Dicke STT in a certain range of
the coupling constant $\omega$), the model may satisfy the NEC and WEC \cite{eir08}.
Our paper \cite{star2}, aimed at making clear this issue, was a kind of response to such
claims. As was explicitly shown in \cite{star2}, in {\it any\/} STT with a massless
non-ghost scalar field, in {\it any\/} thin-shell \wh\ constructed from two identical
regions of vacuum \ssph\ space-times, the shell that makes the throat has a negative
surface energy density. We here extend this result, remaining in the framework of static
spherical symmetry but canceling the requirement of vacuum ($L_m =0$),
that of $U(\Phi)=0$, and that of identity of the two regions.
The proof in \cite {star2} again uses the mapping \rf{trans} and the fact that in the Einstein
frame \ME, trying to build a thin-shell \wh, we inevitably obtain a negative surface density
of the shell. Under the assumptions made in \cite{star2} (a massless non-ghost scalar
field and no other matter), in \ME\ we are dealing with Fisher's scalar-vacuum solution
\cite{fish} with the metric
\bearr \label{ds-fish}
ds^2 = P^a dt^2 - P^{-a} dx^2 - P^{1-a}r^2 d\Omega^2,
\nnn
P = P(x) := 1 - \frac{2k}{x},\qq d\Omega^2 = d\theta^2 + \sin^2\theta d\varphi^2,
\ear
where $a$ and $k > 0$ are constants, $|a| < 1$, and $x$ is the so-called quasiglobal
(or Buchdahl) radial coordinate chosen so that $g_{tt} g_{xx} = -1$. The range of $x$ is
$2k < x < \infty)$, and $x=2k$ is a central (since the spherical radius
$r = \sqrt{-g_{\theta\theta}}$ has there a zero value) naked singularity.
A thin-shell \wh\ is obtained from \rf{ds-fish} as follows: (i) consider a region (A)
of the space-time \rf{ds-fish} where $x > x_0$, and $x_0 = \const > 2k$, so that
$r(x_0) > 0$; (ii) consider one more copy (B) of the same region; (iii) introduce the new
coordinate $y$ such that $y = x - x_0$ in region (A) and $y = x_0 -x$ in region (B);
(iv) unify the two regions by identifying their spheres $y =0$. Then it is directly verified
by a substitution to the Einstein equations that the obtained geometry corresponds
to the SET in which the energy density component has the form
\beq \label{E-shell}
T^t_t = -\frac{4\delta(y)}{x_0^2}
\bigg(1 - \frac{2k}{x_0}\bigg)^{a-1} [x_0 - (1+a)k]
+ \mbox{a finite quantity},
\eeq
where $\delta(y)$ is Dirac's delta function. This clearly means that the junction
surface $y =0$ has a negative surface density. The same result is obtained if we
construct a thin-shell \wh\ using the electrically or magnetically charged extension
of Fisher's space-time obtained by Penney \cite{penney}.
Suppose that we have a \ssph\ thin-shell \wh\ solution in an STT \rf{Lagr} with $U = L_m =0$.
Then, after the mapping \rf{trans}, we obtain the (electro)vacuum problem in GR,
on each side of the throat, hence these both regions will be desccribed in \ME\ by the
Fisher metric or its charged extension due to Penney. Now, it is necessary to take into
consideration that the stress-energy tensor $T\mN$ of any kind of matter (other than the
nonminimally coupled scalar $\Phi$) present in \MJ\ transforms into \ME\ by the simple law
\beq \label{trans-T}
T\mN{}^{(J)} = f^2(\Phi) T\mN{}^{(E)},
\eeq
where the superscripts $(J)$ and $(E)$ mark the SETs in the corresponding conformal frames.
In particular, this law is valid for the surface SET of the thin shell.
Assuming, as before, that $f(\Phi)$ is everywhere finite and positive, we come to the
conclusion that due to \eq \rf{E-shell} (where $T\mN = T\mN{}^{(E)}$), the surface energy
density of the shell is also negative in \MJ. Thus we obtain that, in fact, the no-go theorem
of Section 2 is valid as well for thin-shell \whs, though a proof \cite{star2} has been obtained
under rather strong restrictions (static spherical symmetry, vacuum or electrovacuum, and
identity of regions on different sides of the throat).
Let us now try to weaken these restrictions: assuming, as before, static spherical symmetry,
let us only suppose that we are working in GR (or, equivalently, in \ME\ of some STT) with
matter respecting the NEC, and use the corresponding metric to obtain a thin-shell \wh\ by
the cut-and-paste method as described above.
To obtain the proof, let us notice that for the general \ssph\ metric written in terms of the
quasiglobal coordinate $x$,
\beq
ds^2 = A(x) dt^2 - \frac {dx^2}{A(x)} - r^2(x) d\Omega^2,
\eeq
the difference of the $({}^t_t)$ and $({}^x_x)$ components of the Einstein equations reads
\beq \label{01}
2 A \frac{r''}{r} = - (\rho + p_r),
\eeq
where the prime means $d/dx$, $\rho$ and $p_r$ are the energy density and radial
pressure of matter, respectively, and we have $A(x) >0$ and $r(x) > 0$ at regular points.
The NEC component with the radial null vector $\xi^\mu$
requires $\rho + p_r \geq 0$, therefore, \eq \rf{01} leads to $r'' \leq 0$ in any regular static
region with non-phantom matter.
Now suppose that there is a thin-shell \wh\ with the throat at $x=0$ (without loss of
generality), where $A$ and $r$ are finite, and two spatial infinities ($r\to \infty$) at
$x \to \pm \infty$. Then, since $r'' \leq 0$, at negative $x$ the function $r(x)$ decreases
from infinity with an everywhere negative derivative $r'(x)$, while at $x>0$ there is
everywhere $r'(x) > 0$. It means that at $x =0$, where they meet, we have inevitably a
finite jump of $r'(x)$ from a negative value to a positive one, which implies that
$r''(x) \propto \delta(x)$ with
some positive proportionality factor. Then, according to \rf{01}, the quantity $\rho + p_r$
is a multiple of $\delta(x)$ with a negative factor. However, the whole SET of a thin shell
of fixed radius $r$ has the form
\beq
T\mN{}^{\rm (shell)} = N\delta(x) \diag (\sigma,\ 0,\ -p_\bot,\ -p_\bot),
\eeq
where $\sigma$ is the surface density, $p_\bot$ is the tangential pressure of the shell
matter, and $N>0$ is a factor depending on the particular values of $A(0)$ and $r(0)$.
The radial pressure is zero since the shell is not extended in the radial direction.
From $\rho + p_r < 0$ we conclude that the shell has a negative surface density, $\sigma < 0$.
At this point we can actually repeat the reasoning used in Section 2: if the corresponding
solution of any metric theory of gravity (STT or any other) whose metric is connected
with ours by an everywhere finite and positive conformal factor $f$, due to \rf{trans-T}
there will be again a thin shell with negative surface density, violating the WEC and NEC.
We conclude that in all such theories it is impossible to construct a \ssph\ thin-shell \wh\
without NEC and WEC violation.
A curious feature of our proof is that we did not apply the well-known Darmois-Israel
formalism for describing thin shells dynanics: the present method is simpler and quite
sufficient for static shells and is rather similar to the method applied in \cite{star-sok}
to the case of cosmic strings described by conical singularities.
This proof did not suppose any particular form of matter filling the space-time, only assuming
its non-phantom nature. Moreover, the matter and the metric can be quite different `to the left'
and `to the right' of the throat. Thus we have significantly strengthened the no-go theorem
under consideration for thin-shell \whs.
% ========================================
\section{More observations on STT and $F(R)$ theories}
% ========================================
Our third paper \cite{star3} was also first motivated by some wrong or doubtful claims met in
the literature that required making clear some subtle points of \wh\ theory. As often happens
in such cases, the study has led to some more general observations of interest.
Such statements mostly concerned the Brans-Dicke (BD) STT \cite{BD} that corresponds
to the choice
\beq \label{BD}
f(\Phi) = \Phi, \qq h(\Phi) = \frac{\omega}{\Phi}
\eeq
in the Lagrangian \rf{Lagr}, where $\omega$ is a coupling constant. According to \rf{trans},
the $\Phi$ field is phantom if $\omega < -3/2$, it is canonical if $\omega > -3/2$, and it
has no dynamics if $\omega = -3/2$. Thus, as is clear, e.g., already from \cite{kb73}, vacuum
static \wh\ solutions of BD theory exist for all $\omega < -3/2$ and can only emerge in
exceptional cases if $\omega > -3/2$. Meanwhile,
\begin{itemize}
\item
In \cite{BD1} it was asserted that vacuum wormhole solutions can be found in the BD theory
at $\omega$ belonging to the non-ghost range $(-3/2,-4/3)$.
\item
A similar conclusion was made in \cite{BD2} for a wider non-ghost range of $\omega$,
including $\omega =0$.
\item
In \cite{BD1}, it was also asserted that vacuum BD wormholes are possible for
$\omega < -2$ without mentioning the range $(-2, -3/2)$.
\item
In \cite{BD3}, wormhole solutions were indicated for some $F(R)$ theories, which are
known to be equivalent to the BD theory with $\omega=0$ and a nonzero potential
$U(\Phi)$.
\end{itemize}
Apart from general objections such as that some authors use (unlike us) the term `\wh' for
any space-time containing a throat, the above-mentioned statements of \cite{BD1, BD2, BD3}
required a closer analysis of BD vacuum solutions and a comparison of their different
parametrizations. Let us reproduce the main points.
First of all, recalling \cite{kb73}, we can write the general vacuum \ssph\ solution
of any STT \rf{Lagr} with $U \equiv 0$ as follows:
\bearr \label{sol-J}
ds^2_J = \frac 1 {f(\Phi)} \bigg\{\e^{-2mu} dt^2 - \frac{\e^{2mu}}{s^2(k,u)}
\bigg[\frac{du^2}{s^2(k,u)} + d\Omega^2\bigg]\bigg\},
\nnn
\phi = Cu, \qq s(k,u) := \vars {
k^{-1}\sinh ku, \ & k > 0, \\
u, \ & k = 0, \\
k^{-1}\sin ku, \ & k < 0, }
\ear
where the fields $\Phi$ (involved in the Lagrangian \rf{Lagr} written for \MJ) and $\phi$
(involved in \rf{LE} written for \ME) are related as indicated in \rf{trans}.
The index $J$ points out that it is the Jordan-frame metric. The integration
constants $C$ (scalar charge), $m$ and $k$ are connected by the relation
\beq \label{int}
2k^2 \sign k = 2m^2 + \eps C^2, \qq \eps = \sign \ell.
\eeq
The coordinate $u$ used in \rf{sol-J} is the harmonic radial coordinate in \ME,
defined by the coordinate condition $\og_{uu} = \og_{tt} \og^2_{\theta\theta}$, and the
expression in the curly brackets is nothing else than the metric in \ME.
The branch $k < 0$ of the solution (existing only in the phantom case $\eps =-1$)
describes \whs\ as long as $f(\Phi)$ is everywhere positive and finite since two adjacent
zeros of the function $\sin ku$ (e.g., $u=0$ and $u = \pi/|k|$) describe flat spatial
infinities, and this fact is not spoiled by the regular conformal factor $1/f(\Phi)$. This is true,
in particular, for the BD solution in which $\eps = \sign (\omega + 3/2)$ and
\beq \label{Phi}
f(\Phi) = \Phi = \Phi_0\exp (\phi/\sqrt{|\omega+3/2|}), \qq
\Phi_0 = \const,
\eeq
is finite at any finite $\phi = Cu$. This removes any doubt concerning the \wh\ existence
at any $\omega < -3/2$. A more detailed description of \ssph\ BD solutions
(not only \wh\ ones) with $\omega < -3/2$ may be found in \cite{cold1, cold2}.
Let us now consider the canonical case $\eps = +1$, $\omega > -3/2$. In this case, the
expression in curly brackets in \rf{sol-J}, in which $k>0$, is Fisher's metric written
using the harmonic coordinate $u$, as verified by the substitution
\beq
\e^{-2ku} = 1 - \frac{2k}{x} \equiv P(x), \qq a = \frac mk < 1,
\eeq
which leads the metric in \ME\ to the form \rf{ds-fish}. For the BD scalar field we then
obtain
\beq
\Phi = P^\xi, \qq \xi = -C/\big(2k\sqrt{\omega + 3/2}\big),
\eeq
and the relation (\ref{int}) turns into
\beq \label{int+}
(2\omega + 3) \xi^2 = 1 - a^2.
\eeq
The BD metric in \MJ, defined and regular at $x > 2k >0$, has the form
\beq \label{ds-BD}
ds^2_J = P^{-\xi} \Big[ P^a dt^2 - P^{-a} dx^2 - P^{1-a} x^2 d\Omega^2 \Big].
\eeq
To answer the question, whether or not this metric can describe a \wh, one should find
out (1) whether there can be a minimum of the radius $r_J = x P^{(1-a-\xi)/2}$, and
(ii) if yes, is such a manifold globally regular and have an infinite radius at both ends.
Since the metric \rf{ds-BD} is \asflat\ at $x \to \infty$, it remains to study its behavior
as $x \to 2k$.
The first question has been answered as follows \cite{star2}: throats certainly do not
exist in all cases, but still appear at arbitrarily large values of the parameter $\omega$
(even though the limit $\omega \to \infty$ corresponds to GR). To prove that, let us single
out the subfamily of solutions given by $\xi = 2(1-a)$. Then it is easy to obtain that
$r_J(x)$ has a minimum at $x = k(3-a) > 2k$ (because $a <1 \then 3-a >2$). Also,
from (\ref{int+}) we find
\beq \label{BD-thr}
2\omega + 3 = \frac{1+a}{4(1-a)},
\eeq
and taking $a$ close enough to unity, the constant $\omega$ can be made arbitrarily large.
The metric behavior at $x=2k$ is rather diverse but is generically singular in some sense,
see details in \cite{star2}. The only exception, making the sphere $x=2k$ regular, is the
case $a = \xi =1/2 \ \then \ \omega=0$. The metric (\ref{ds-BD}) then
has the so-called `spatial Schwarzschild' form
\beq \label{spa-S}
ds_J^2 = dt^2 - \frac{dx^2}{1 - 2k/x} - x^2 d\Omega^2
\equiv dt^2 - 4(2k + y^2)dy^2 - (2k + y^2)^2 d\Omega^2,
\eeq
where $y^2 = x - 2k$. The range of $y$ is $y \in \R$, so that the manifold \MJ\ consists
of two copies ($y >0$ and $y < 0$) of a region mapped from \ME\ defined for $x > 2k$,
joined by the regular sphere $y=0$, the throat. It is a \wh\ obtained owing to the
conformal continuation phenomenon \cite{kb73, kb02}. For the scalar field we have
$\Phi = y/\sqrt{y^2 + 2k}$, it is zero at the transition sphere $y=0$ and negative beyond it,
which means that the effective gravitational constant is negative there.
Thus in BD theory we have a full confirmation of the results of \cite{star1} on \whs\
in STT. As to $F(R)$ theories of gravity, the results obtained for STT are easily
reformulated for them using the well-known correspondence between these two classes
of theories. Specifically, if we write the Lagrangian of $F(R)$ theory as
$L = F(R)/2 + L_m$, then, assuming
\beq
f(\Phi) = \Phi = F_R, \qq h(\Phi) =0, \qq 2U(\Phi) = R F_R -F
\eeq
(where $F_R \equiv dF/dR$),
we obtain an equivalent representation of the same theory as the BD theory with the
coupling constant $\omega =0$, where the parametrization of the $\Phi$ field is chosen
as $f(\Phi) \equiv \Phi$. Note that these both form of the theory are presented in the
same Jordan frame \MJ, with the same metric $g\mn$, and they have a common Einstein
frame \ME. The condition $f >0$ in STT transforms into $F_R > 0$; furthermore, the function
$\ell (\Phi)$ in \rf{trans} is nonnegative but can become zero at special values of $R$,
where $F_{RR} \equiv d^2F/dR^2 =0$; at such points, the parametrization $f = \Phi$
is lost. Moreover, translating the results of \cite{star1} (and Section 2 in the present paper)
to the `language' of $F(R)$ theory, we can assert that \wh\ solutions are only possible if
$F(R)$ has an extremum at some $R=R_0$ and may be obtained by a conformal continuation
through such a surface, which is regular in \MJ\ but singular in \ME\ \cite{kb-ch05}. Beyond
such a surface there is a region where $\Phi = F_R <0$, with a negative effective
gravitational constant.
There is a subtle point \cite{star3} if at some value of $R$ there is $F_{RR}=0$ while
$F_R \ne 0$: such cases are generically singular, with finite algebraic curvature invariants
but diverging differential invariants. A similar situation in cosmological solutions is discussed
in \cite{star6}. In exceptional cases such surfaces can be regular, but global \wh\ solutions
are still impossible by the no-go theorem of \cite{star1}.
What about examples of \wh\ solutions in $F(R)$ theory that can be found in
the literature? In most of them, only the existence of throats is considered, and, as discussed
above (see especially \eq \rf {BD-thr}), they are not at all excluded even in ghost-free cases.
Ref. \cite{BD3} discusses some examples of \wh\ solutions of $F(R)$ theory in the presence
of matter with anisotropic pressure, but in some of these examples there is $F_R <0$
in certain regions, while others contain singularities on the throat \cite{star3}.
\vspace{-3mm}
% ===============================================
\section{Conclusion}
% ===============================================
In our opinion, our joint studies with Alexei Starobinsky, briefly reviewed in the present
paper, are sufficiently rich in general observations of common interest. His more specific
results concern subtle points of Brans-Dicke solutions (\cite{star3} and Section 4 here)
and the existence and nature of singularities outside \wh\ throats in solutions with a
phantom Chaplygin gas \cite{star4}, they are also instructive and show Alexei's high
level of understanding the physical picture under mathematical complexities.
As to the possible reality of \whs\ in nature, our general impression is that despite the
various no-go theorems, this reality is not too strongly suppressed because if throats
in ghost-free theories are not ruled out, it is an easy task (at least theoretically) to
take a certain neighborhood of a throat and to match it with \asflat\ regions of vacuum
or common ghost-free matter distributions. We can recall, in addition, that there can
be dynamic \whs\ whose lifetime is finite but comparable with the age of the Universe
\cite{BKS23}.
To conclude this paper, we would like to mention some developments that may be said
to complement the results described above and (among many others) widen the
landscape of \wh\ physics. Thus, Ref.\,\cite{trapped} presented a class of \wh\ models
with so-called {\it trapped ghosts\/} where a scalar field with a nonzero potential is
phantom in a strong-field region near the throat but is canonical outside it.
In \cite{cy1, cy2} it was demonstrated that stationary
rotating cylindrical \whs\ in GR may be in principle made of phantom-free matter
though require rather special conditions for their construction. Lastly, there is a significant
progress in `\wh\ astronomy', for example, Ref.\,\cite{nov} describes how the sky of
another universe or a remote part of our own universe could be observed through the
throat of a large cosmic \wh.
\vspace{-3mm}
\subsection*{Acknowledgments}
{Our cordial thanks to Sergei Bolokhov for numerous helpful discussions and remarks.
This work was supported by the RUDN University Project No. FSSF-2023-0003.}
\vspace{-3mm}
% ============================================
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\bibitem{star5}
Starobinsky, A.A.: Amplification of waves during reflection from a rotating ublack hole,
Sov. Phys.--- JETP {\bf 37}, 28 (1973).
\bibitem{zeld}
Zeldovich, Ya.B., Starobinsky, A.A.:
Particle creation and vacuum polarization in an anisotropic gravitational field,
Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., {\bf 61}, 2161 (1971); Sov. Phys.--- JETP {\bf 34}, 1159 (1972).
\bibitem{star1}
Bronnikov, K.A. Starobinsky, A.A.:
No realistic wormholes from ghost-free scalar-tensor phantom dark energy.
Pis'ma v ZhETF {\bf 85}, 1, 3-8 (2007); JETP Lett. {\bf 85}, 1, 1-5 (2007);
arXiv: gr-qc/0612032.
\bibitem{star2}
Bronnikov, K.A., Starobinsky, A.A.:
Once again on thin-shell wormholes in scalar-tensor gravity.
Mod. Phys. Lett. A {\bf 24}, 20, 1559--1564 (2009); arXiv: 0903.5173.
\bibitem{star3}
Bronnikov, K.A., Skvortsova, M.V., Starobinsky, A.A.:
Notes on wormhole existence in scalar-tensor and F(R) gravity.
Grav. Cosmol. {\bf 16}, 3, 216--222 (2010); arXiv: 1005.3262.
\bibitem{MS88}
Morris, M,, Thorne, K.S.,:
Wormholes in spacetime and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for
teaching general relativity.
Am. J. Phys. {\bf 56}, 395 (1988).
\bibitem{HV97}
Hochberg, D., Visser, M.:
Geometric structure of the generic static traversable wormhole throat.
Phys. Rev. D {\bf 56}, 4745-4755 (1997); arXiv: gr-qc/9704082.
\bibitem{stt-rev1}
Mironov, S.,Volkova, V.:
Non-singular cosmological scenarios in scalar-tensor theories and their stability: a review
arXiv: 2409.16108.
\bibitem{stt-rev2}
Faraoni, V., Giusti, A., Fahim, B.H.:
Spherical inhomogeneous solutions of Einstein and scalar-tensor gravity: a map of the land.
arXiv: 2101.00266
\bibitem{star-BD}
Gannouji, R., Polarski, D., Ranquet, A,, Starobinsky, A.A.:
JCAP {\bf 0609}, 016 (2006).
\bibitem{vac5}
Bronnikov, K.A., Fadeev, S.B., Michtchenko, A.V.:
Scalar fields in multidimensional gravity. No-hair and other no-go theorems.
Gen. Rel. Grav. {\bf 35}, 505-525 (2003).
\bibitem{BG05}
Bronnikov, K.A., Grinyok, S.V.:
Electrically charged and neutral wormhole instability in scalar-tensor gravity,
Grav. Cosmol. {\bf 11}, 75-81 (2005); arXiv: gr-qc/0509062.
\bibitem{F(R)}
Barrow, J.D., Cotsakis, S.:
Inflation and the conformal structure of higher-order gravity theories,
Phys. Lett. B {214} 515 (1988).
\bibitem{maeda}
Maeda, K.: Towards the Einstein-Hilbert action via conformal transformation,
Phys. Rev. D {\bf 39}, 3159 (1989).
\bibitem{HV98}
Hochberg, D., Visser, M.:
Dynamic wormholes, anti-trapped surfaces, and energy conditions.
Phys. Rev. D {\bf 58}, 044021 (1998); arXiv: gr-qc/9802046.
\bibitem{dyn-def}
Bittencourt, E., Klippert, R., Santos, G.B.:
Dynamical wormhole definitions confronted.
Class. Quantum Grav. {\bf 35}, 155009 (2018); arXiv: 1707.01078.
\bibitem{NED-lobo}
Arellano, A.V.B., Breton, N., Garcia-Salcedo, R.:
Some properties of evolving wormhole geometries within nonlinear electrodynamics
Gen. Rel. Grav. {\bf 41}, 2561-2578 (2009); arXiv: 0804.3944.
\bibitem{NED-kb}
Bronnikov, K.A.: Nonlinear electrodynamics, regular black holes and wormholes.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. D {\bf 27}, 1841005 (2018); arXiv: 1711.00087.
\bibitem{BKS23}
Bronnikov, K.A., Kashargin, P.E., Sushkov, S.V.:
Possible wormholes in a Friedmann universe,
Universe {\bf 9}, 465 (2023); arXiv: 2309.03166.
\bibitem{kb73}
Bronnikov, K.A.: Scalar-tensor theory and scalar charge.
Acta Phys. Polon. B {\bf 4}, 251 (1973).
\bibitem{barc00}
C. Barcel\'o and M. Visser,
Scalar fields, energy conditions, and traversable wormholes.
Class. Quantum Grav. 17, 3843 (2000); arXiv: gr-qc/0003025.
\bibitem{step02}
Bronnikov, K.A., Grinyok, S.V.:
Charged wormholes with non-minimally coupled scalar fields. Existence and stability.
In: Festschrift in honour of Prof. Mario Novello, Rio de Janeiro, 2002; gr-qc/0205131.
\bibitem{kb02}
Bronnikov, K.A.: Scalar-tensor gravity and conformal continuations,
J. Math. Phys. {\bf 43}, 6096-6115 (2002); arXiv: gr-qc/0204001.
\bibitem{eir08}
Eiroa, E. F., Richarte, M. G., Simeone, C.:
Thin-shell wormholes in Brans-Dicke gravity.
Phys. Lett. A {\bf 373},1 (2008); arXiv: 0809.1623.
\bibitem{fish}
Fisher, I.Z.:
Scalar mesostatic field with regard for gravitational effects,
Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. {\bf 18}, 636 (1948); arXiv: gr-qc/9911008.
\bibitem{penney}
Penney, R.:
Generalization of the Reissner-Nordstr\"om solution to the Einstein field equations,
Phys. Rev. {\bf 182}, 1383 (1969).
\bibitem{star-sok}
Sokolov, D.D., Starobinsky, A.A.:
Structure of the curvature tensor at conical singularities,
Sov. Phys.--- Doklady {\bf 22}, 312-314 (1977).
\bibitem{BD}
Brans, C., Dicke, R.H.:
Mach's principle and a relativistic theory of gravitation.
Phys. Rev. {\bf 124}, 925 (1961).
\bibitem{BD1}
Bhattacharia, A., Nigmatzyanov, I., Izmailov, R., Nandi, K.K.:
Brans-Dicke wormhole revisited.
Class. Quantum Grav. {\bf 26}, 235017 (2009); arXiv: 0910.1109.
\bibitem{BD2}
Lobo, F.S.N., Oliveira, M.A.:
General class of vacuum Brans-Dicke wormholes.
Phys. Rev. D {\bf 81}, 067501 (2010); arXiv: 1001.0995.
\bibitem{BD3}
Lobo, F.S.N., Oliveira, M.A.:
Wormhole geometries in $f(R)$ modified theories of gravity.
Phys. Rev. D {\bf 80}, 104012 (2009); arXiv: 0909.5539.
\bibitem{cold1}
Bronnikov, K.A., Clement, G., Constantinidis, C.P., Fabris, J.C.:
Cold scalar-tensor black holes: causal structure, geodesics, stability.
Grav. Cosmol., {\bf 4}, No. 2, 128--138 (1998).
\bibitem{cold2}
Bronnikov, K.A., Constantinidis, C.P., Evangelista, R.L., Fabris, J.C.:
Electrically charged cold black holes in scalar-tensor theories.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. D {\bf 8}, 481-505. (1999); arXiv: gr-qc/9902050;
\bibitem{kb-ch05}
Bronnikov, K.A., Chernakova, M.S.:
F(R) theory of gravity and conformal continuations.
Izv. Vuzov, Fizika 9, 46–51 (2005); Russ. Phys. J. 48, 940 (2005);
arXiv: gr-qc/0503025.
\bibitem{star6}
Appleby, S.A., Battye, R.A., Starobinsky, A.A.:
Curing singularities in cosmological evolution of F(R) gravity.
JCAP 1006, 005 (2010) arXiv: 0909.1737v2.
\bibitem{star4}
Gorini, V., Kamenshchik, A.Yu., Moschella, U, Pasquier, V., Starobinsky, A.A.:
Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations in presence of the Chaplygin gas:
stars and wormhole-like solutions.
Phys. Rev. D {\bf 78}, 064064 (2008); arXiv: 0807.2740.
\bibitem{trapped}
Bronnikov, K.A., Sushkov, S.V.:
Trapped ghosts: a new class of wormholes,
Class. Quantum Grav. {\bf 27}, 095022 (2010); arXiv: 1001.3511.
\bibitem{cy1}
Bronnikov, K.A., and V.G. Krechet,. V.G.:
Potentially observable cylindrical wormholes without exotic matter in GR.
Phys. Rev. D {\bf 99}, 084051 (2019); arXiv: 1807.03641.
\bibitem{cy2}
S.V. Bolokhov, K.A. Bronnikov, and M.V. Skvortsova,
Cylindrical wormholes: A search for viable phantom-free models in GR..
Int. J. Mod. Phys. D {\bf 28}, 1941008 (2019); arXiv: 1903.09862.
\bibitem{nov}
Bugaev, M., Novikov, I., Repin, S., Samorodskaya, P., Novikov, I., jr.:
Observing of background electromagnetic radiation of the real sky through the throat of a
wormhole. arXiv: 2412.06872.
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}