True Zero-Shot Inference of Dynamical Systems Preserving Long-Term Statistics
Extracted source text · arXiv 2505.13192
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[nonatbib,preprint]{neurips_2025}
\input{math_commands}
\usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,bm}
\usepackage{dsfont}
\usepackage{caption}
\usepackage{subcaption}
\usepackage{verbatim}
\usepackage[dvipsnames]{xcolor}
\definecolor{orange}{rgb}{0.93725,0.52549,0.2117647}
\definecolor{blue}{rgb}{0.23137,0.4588,0.68627}
\usepackage{dirtytalk}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{color, colortbl}
\usepackage{microtype}
\usepackage{stfloats}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{siunitx}
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{caption}
\usepackage{subcaption}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{caption}
\usepackage{geometry}
\usepackage{lscape}
\usepackage{adjustbox}
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{array}
\sisetup{output-exponent-marker=\ensuremath{\mathrm{e}}}
\newcommand{\thickhline}{
\noalign {\ifnum 0=`}\fi \hrule height 1pt
\futurelet \reserved@a \@xhline
}
\newcolumntype{"}{@{\hskip\tabcolsep\vrule width 1pt\hskip\tabcolsep}}
\newcommand\norm[1]{\left\lVert#1\right\rVert}
\usepackage{upquote,textcomp,amsmath}
\newcommand{\upquote}{\text{\textquotesingle}}
\usepackage[pagebackref=false,breaklinks=true,letterpaper=true,colorlinks,bookmarks=false]{hyperref}
\hypersetup{colorlinks,breaklinks,
urlcolor=[rgb]{0.93725,0.52549,0.2117647},
citecolor=[rgb]{0.23137,0.4588,0.68627},
linkcolor=[rgb]{0.93725,0.52549,0.2117647}}
\usepackage[numbers]{natbib}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{nicefrac}
\usepackage{microtype}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\title{True Zero-Shot Inference of Dynamical Systems Preserving Long-Term Statistics}
\author{
Christoph Jürgen Hemmer\textsuperscript{1,3} ,
Daniel Durstewitz\textsuperscript{1,2,3}\vspace{0.15cm} \\
\textsuperscript{1}Dept. of Theoretical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, \\
Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany \\
\textsuperscript{2}Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing (IWR), Heidelberg University, Germany \\
\textsuperscript{3}Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany \\
\texttt{\{christoph.hemmer, daniel.durstewitz\}@zi-mannheim.de}\\
}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\begin{abstract}
Complex, temporally evolving phenomena, from climate to brain activity, are governed by dynamical systems (DS). DS reconstruction (DSR) seeks to infer generative surrogate models of these from observed data, reproducing their long-term behavior. Existing DSR approaches require purpose-training for any new system observed, lacking the zero-shot and in-context inference capabilities known from LLMs. Here we introduce \textit{DynaMix}, a novel multivariate ALRNN-based mixture-of-experts architecture pre-trained for DSR, the first DSR model able to generalize zero-shot to out-of-domain DS. Just from a provided context signal, without any re-training, DynaMix faithfully forecasts the long-term evolution of novel DS where existing time series (TS) foundation models, like Chronos, fail -- at a fraction of the number of parameters and orders of magnitude faster inference times. DynaMix outperforms TS foundation models in terms of long-term statistics, and often also short-term forecasts, even on real-world time series, like traffic or weather data, typically used for training and evaluating TS models, \textit{but not at all part of DynaMix' training corpus}. We illustrate some of the failure modes of TS models for DSR problems, and conclude that models built on DS principles may bear a huge potential also for advancing the TS prediction field.
\end{abstract}
\section{Introduction}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.99\linewidth]{figures/Intro.pdf}
\caption{DynaMix achieves zero-shot DSR of attractor geometry and long-term temporal properties (power spectrum) from a short context signal while Chronos \cite{ansari2024chronos} fails.}
\label{fig:intro}
\end{figure*}
Most real-world processes, from atmospheric phenomena and stock markets to brain activity or ecological networks, can be described as dynamical systems (DS) \cite{mandelbrot_misbehavior_2007,buzsaki_rhythms_2006,tziperman-97,ecology1}. Reconstructing these from observational data, called \textit{dynamical systems reconstruction} (DSR), has been a long-standing challenge in scientific modeling \cite{yu2024learning,durstewitz_reconstructing_2023,gilpin_generative_2024}. DSR goes beyond conventional time series (TS) modeling, as we wish to have a \textit{generative} model of the underlying process which exhibits long-term behavior with the same temporal and geometrical signatures (Fig. \ref{fig:intro}), i.e. the same invariant or `climate' statistics \cite{patel_using_2023,platt2023constraining}, as important in scientific applications. Achieving this usually requires special control-theoretic training techniques \cite{mikhaeil_difficulty_2022,hess_generalized_2023} or loss objectives \cite{platt_systematic_2022,platt2023constraining,jiang2023training,pmlr-v235-schiff24b} which accentuate the system's long-term dynamics. Numerous deep learning approaches for DSR, based on recurrent neural networks (RNNs; \cite{trischler_synthesis_2016, durstewitz_state_2017,vlachas_data-driven_2018, cestnik_inferring_2019, brenner_tractable_2022, rusch_long_2022, hess_generalized_2023,brenner_almost_2024,platt2023constraining}), neural ODEs \cite{chen_neural_2018, karlsson_modelling_2019, alvarez_dynode_2020, ko_homotopy-based_2023}, Koopman operators \cite{brunton_modern_2021, lusch_deep_2018, otto_linearly-recurrent_2019, azencot_forecasting_2020, naiman_koopman_2021, geneva_transformers_2022, wang_koopman_2022}, or library-based methods \cite{brunton_discovering_2016, loiseau_constrained_2018, kaiser_sparse_2018, cortiella_sparse_2021, messenger_weak_2021}, have been advanced over the years. However, all of these require purpose-training on the specific system observed and struggle to generalize beyond their training distribution \cite{pmlr-v235-goring24a}.
Inspired by the strong in-context and zero-shot generalization abilities of LLMs \cite{brown2020language,garg2022can,dong2022survey,coda2023meta}, there has been a push recently to develop models with likewise properties for the time series domain. Time series foundation models like Chronos \cite{ansari2024chronos} or Mamba4Cast \cite{bhethanabhotla2024mamba4cast} are pre-trained on a huge database of real-world and artificial time series, and then tasked to forecast novel time series from which snippets are presented in-context, without any parameter fine-tuning. They are not built for DSR, however, and -- as we show here -- typically fail to properly capture a system's long-term behavior and the structure of its attractors (Fig. \ref{fig:intro}; \cite{zhang2025zeroshotforecastingchaoticsystems}).
To address this gap, we introduce \textit{DynaMix}, a novel mixture-of-experts model designed for DSR and zero-shot forecasting. By training across a diverse range of DS, DynaMix learns transferable representations, enabling it to forecast previously unseen systems without retraining, including their underlying attractor geometries and invariant statistics (Fig. \ref{fig:intro}). The core features of DynaMix are:
\begin{itemize}
\item \textbf{Accurate zero-shot DSR:} DynaMix achieves strong generalization across diverse DS, eliminating the need for extensive fine-tuning while maintaining accuracy in reproducing attractor geometry and long-term statistics.
\item \textbf{Multivariate information transfer:} Due to its multivariate architecture, the model efficiently captures dependencies among multiple system dimensions, enabling accurate reconstruction of their coupled dynamics. Further, it is neither bound to a specific dimensionality, but can flexibly adapt to other dimensions through specific embeddings, nor to a specific context length.
\item \textbf{Computational and parameter efficiency:} The model achieves high performance with a very lightweight architecture, enabling orders of magnitude faster inference than other foundation models.
\item \textbf{Interpretable dynamics composition:} The model provides insight into the dynamical composition of reconstructed systems, elucidating similarities between different DS.
\item \textbf{Time series forecasting:} Beyond DSR, our model is applicable to general time series forecasting where we employ different embedding techniques to obtain data representations accessible to DSR.
\end{itemize}
We evaluate our model on multiple benchmark DS and real-world time series, demonstrating superior zero-shot generalization on DSR problems compared to current TS foundation models.
\section{Related work}
\paragraph{Dynamical systems reconstruction (DSR)}
In DSR we seek to learn generative models from time series data that represent the underlying system dynamics with all its topological, geometrical, and temporal properties \cite{durstewitz_reconstructing_2023,pmlr-v235-goring24a,platt2023constraining,gilpin_model_2023,brunton_chaos_2017,brunton_data-driven_2019}, in that sense providing an approximation to the underlying system's governing equations. By definition, such a model should not only render viable short-term forecasts, but also reproduce the long-term evolution of the DS it has been trained on, both in state space and in the time domain. Methods approaching this goal have been founded on predefined function libraries, such as Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics (SINDy; \cite{brunton_discovering_2016, loiseau_constrained_2018, cortiella_sparse_2021,kaiser_sparse_2018, messenger_weak_2021}), on reservoir computers \cite{pathak_using_2017, platt_systematic_2022, platt2023constraining}, neural ODEs \cite{chen_neural_2018, karlsson_modelling_2019, alvarez_dynode_2020, ko_homotopy-based_2023}, Koopman operators \cite{brunton_modern_2021, lusch_deep_2018, otto_linearly-recurrent_2019, azencot_forecasting_2020, naiman_koopman_2021, geneva_transformers_2022, wang_koopman_2022}, or different types of RNNs \cite{trischler_synthesis_2016, durstewitz_state_2017, vlachas_data-driven_2018, cestnik_inferring_2019, brenner_tractable_2022, rusch_long_2022, hess_generalized_2023, brenner_almost_2024}. More important than the architecture itself seems to be their proper training in order to ensure long-term (invariant) statistics of the underlying system are met: Methods like sparse \cite{mikhaeil_difficulty_2022, brenner_tractable_2022} or generalized \cite{hess_generalized_2023} teacher forcing allow RNN-generated trajectories to `explore the future' whilst training, yet keep loss gradients in check. Alternatively, long-term statistics based on the observed system's Lyapunov spectrum, fractal geometry, or invariant measures may be added to regularize the loss \cite{platt_systematic_2022,platt2023constraining,jiang2023training,pmlr-v235-schiff24b}, but require to compute these properties from the data first. Despite these advances, out-of-domain generalization remains a key challenge in DSR \cite{pmlr-v235-goring24a}. Meta- and hierarchical learning models, trained across many DS simultaneously, have recently been designed as steps toward foundation models for DSR \cite{brenner2024learning,nzoyem2025towards,kirchmeyer2022generalizing,yin2021leads}, but still require parameter fine-tuning and lack in-context inference capabilities.
\paragraph{Time series foundation models}
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit an impressive ability to infer patterns from prompts (context) and generalize to novel situations without retraining \cite{brown2020language,garg2022can,dong2022survey,coda2023meta}, although the underlying reasons for this are still a matter of debate \cite{lin2024dual,von2023transformers,xie2021explanation}. This inspired the development of general-purpose time series (TS) foundation models which could accurately forecast time series from a short segment provided `in-context' \cite{ansari2024chronos,ekambaram2024tiny}, without the need of task-specific fine-tuning \cite{das2024decoder}. One idea is to simply use pretrained LLMs directly as TS forecasters \cite{gruver2023large,rasul2023lag,sun2023test,williams2024context,tang2025time}, but the inherent differences between textual and many temporal data, such as continuity, present significant challenges \cite{tan2024language}. To overcome these, transformer-based architectures, similar in design to LLMs, such as Chronos \cite{ansari2024chronos} or Moirai \cite{liu2024moirai}, were specifically pretrained on a large corpus of time series data. Promising zero-shot forecasting capabilities have also been achieved with alternative architectural designs, such as Tiny Time Mixers \cite{ekambaram2024tiny} or state-space models like Mamba \cite{bhethanabhotla2024mamba4cast}.
The success of TS foundation models raised hope these could also be utilized for zero-shot DSR, but the -- to our knowledge -- so far only previous study on this, based on Chronos, had mixed outcomes and fell short of a full DSR evaluation \cite{zhang2025zeroshotforecastingchaoticsystems}: Successful DSR, if present at all, heavily depended on the initial conditions, and mechanisms such as context parroting visually gave the wrong illusion that features of the dynamics had been captured. In fact, here we show that existing TS foundation models are generally \textit{not} capable of producing valid DSRs (Fig. \ref{fig:intro}), and highlight some of their failure modes. This is in contrast to the zero-shot DSR foundation architecture we develop here, based on models \cite{brenner_almost_2024} and training algorithms \cite{mikhaeil_difficulty_2022} successful in DSR.
\section{Methods}
\subsection{Model architecture}
To enable zero-shot reconstruction of novel DS, here we develop a specific mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture that can be pretrained across many diverse DS (Fig. \ref{fig:training_data}), with different \textit{experts} possibly specializing in different dynamical regimes. As a base model for the experts, we leverage a recent parameter-friendly RNN designed to yield topologically parsimonious and interpretable representations of DS it is being trained on, the \textit{Almost-Linear RNN} (AL-RNN; \cite{brenner_almost_2024}):
\begin{align}\label{eq:alrnn}
\bm{z}_t = \bm{A} \bm{z}_{t-1} + \bm{W} \Phi^*(\bm{z}_{t-1}) + \bm{h}\;.
\end{align}
The model describes the evolution of an $M$-dimensional latent process $\bm{z}_{t} \in \mathbb{R}^M$, with linear self-connections $\bm{A} \in \text{diag}(\mathbb{R}^M)$, weight matrix $\bm{W} \in \mathbb{R}^{M \times M}$, bias term $\bm{h} \in \mathbb{R}^{M}$, and $\Phi^*(\bm{z}_{t})$ defined as
\begin{equation}
\Phi^*(\bm{z}_{t}) := \left[ z_{1,t}, \cdots, z_{M-P,t}, \max(0, z_{M-P+1,t}), \cdots, \max(0, z_{M,t}) \right]^T,
\end{equation}
i.e. with a ReLU nonlinearity on only $P<<M$ out of the $M$ AL-RNN units. The first $N$ units are interpreted as the network's readouts and provide the predicted observations, $\bm{\hat{X}}=\{\bm{\hat{x}}_t=\bm{z}_{1:N,t}\}\in\mathbb{R}^{N\times T}$, where $N$ is the observation dimension.
The selection of AL-RNN experts is achieved through a gating network (Fig. \ref{fig:model_architecure}), which receives as inputs the (generally multivariate) context time series $\bm{C}=\{\bm{c}_t\}\in\mathbb{R}^{N\times T}$ as well as the current latent state $\bm{z}_t$. Both are passed into a state attention mechanism defined as
\begin{equation}
\bm{w}^{att}_t = \sigma\left(
\frac{\left| \bm{C} - \left( \bm{Dz}_t + \bm{\epsilon} \right)\bm{1}_T^\top \right|^\top\bm{1}_N}{T_{\text{att}}}
\right) \in \mathbb{R}^T\;,
\end{equation}
where $\bm{D}\in\mathbb{R}^{N\times M}$ is a learnable matrix which maps the latent state into observation space, $\bm{\epsilon}\sim\mathcal{N}(0,\bm{\Sigma})$ exploration noise with a learnable covariance $\bm{\Sigma}$, $T_{\text{att}}$ a learnable temperature parameter, $\bm{1}_{\{T,N\}}$ column vectors of ones of length $T, N$, respectively, and $\sigma(\cdot)$ the softmax returning normalized weights. Hence, this mechanism computes attention weights based on some distance between projected latent states and actual context observations. At the same time, the context signal $\bm{C}$ is processed by a CNN, yielding temporal features $\tilde{\bm{C}}\in\mathbb{R}^{N\times T}$. These features are then weighted with the attention weights $\bm{w}^{att}_t$, and together with the current state $\bm{z}_t$ further processed by a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) followed by a softmax, yielding a set of expert weights at any time $t$:
\begin{equation}
\bm{w}^{exp}_t=\sigma\left(\frac{\text{MLP}(\tilde{\bm{C}}{\bm{w}^{att}_t},\bm{z}_t)}{T_{\text{exp}}}\right)\in\mathbb{R}^J\;,
\end{equation}
where $T_{\text{exp}}$ is another learnable temperature parameter. The forward-iterated latent states $\bm{z}_{t+1}^j$ of the individual experts $ j\in\{1,...,J\}$ are then weighted by $\bm{w}^{exp}_t$ to yield the next time step prediction $\bm{z}_{t+1}=\sum_{j=1}^J w^{exp}_{j,t}\cdot\bm{z}_{t+1}^j$. Fig. \ref{fig:model_architecure} illustrates the whole approach. Note that one key advantage of this compared to other TS foundation architectures is that the \textit{context length is flexible by design}, i.e. the CNN and the attention mechanism may take as input a context signal of arbitrary length.
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.98\linewidth]{figures/architecture.pdf}
\caption{Illustration of the DynaMix architecture. At test time, only a context signal $\bm{C}$ is provided and guides the selection of experts to yield arbitrarily long forward predictions of the dynamics.}
\label{fig:model_architecure}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{Model training}\label{sec:training}
For training, a collection of just $34$ different chaotic and cyclic DS is used \cite{gilpin_chaos_2022}, see Appx. \ref{sec:data} for full specification. From each, multivariate time series $\bm{X}\in\mathbb{R}^{N\times T}$ are simulated ($\approx1.6$ million in total) and then standardized (dimension-wise), of which the first $T_C<T$ column entries are defined as the context signal $\bm{C}=\bm{X}_{1:T_C}$. The experts are initialized at $t_0=T_C-\Delta t+1$ and forward-iterated until time $T$, such that they overlap for a period $\Delta t$ with the context. This is to ensure that the model learns to optimally utilize the context for generalization. A MSE loss is then computed across ground truth, $\bm{X}_{T_C-\Delta t+1:T}$, and respective model-generated time series $\hat{\bm{X}}$. The model is trained by \textit{sparse teacher forcing} (STF; \cite{brenner_tractable_2022,mikhaeil_difficulty_2022}), a control-theoretic technique specifically designed for DSR. STF replaces part of the forward-iterated latent states $\bm{z}_t$ by data-inferred states $\hat{\bm{z}}_t$ at optimally chosen intervals $\tau$, to avoid exploding gradients even for chaotic systems while enabling the DSR model ``to explore the future'' (see \cite{mikhaeil_difficulty_2022} for detailed theoretical motivation). As shown in Fig. \ref{fig:ablation_TF}, STF with optimal $\tau$ is essential for achieving good zero-shot DSR results. Note that STF is \textit{only used for training} and turned off at test time.
\subsection{DSR evaluation \& time series forecasting} \label{sec:TS_forecasting}
We used two established measures to assess DSR quality \cite{koppe_identifying_2019,brenner_tractable_2022,hess_generalized_2023,wood_statistical_2010,zhang2025zeroshotforecastingchaoticsystems,platt2023constraining,mikhaeil_difficulty_2022,pals2024inferring,gilpin_model_2023}: First, to quantify agreement in \textit{state space (attractor) geometry}, we employed a Kullback-Leibler divergence defined across \textit{space}, $D_{stsp}$ (see Appx. \ref{sec:performance_measures} for details). For assessing agreement in \textit{long-term temporal properties}, we used the Hellinger distance $D_H$ defined across power spectra of the true and model-generated trajectories. In addition, a \textit{short-term}, $n$-step-ahead mean absolute prediction error was evaluated. As has been emphasized repeatedly in the statistical and DSR literature \cite{wood_statistical_2010,koppe_identifying_2019,brenner_tractable_2022,mikhaeil_difficulty_2022,platt2021robust,gilpin_model_2023}, prediction errors defined on time series are often only sensible on \textit{short} time scales, because of the well known exponentially fast divergence of trajectories in chaotic DS (see Fig. \ref{fig:traj_divergence}).
Empirically observed time series are often just one-dimensional ($N^*=1$), but come from an inherently much higher-dimensional underlying DS. Our approach can in principle handle context signals of dimension $N^*<N$ smaller than those used in training by, e.g., just filling up $N-N^*$ dimensions in $\bm{C}$ with zeros. However, to work efficiently in a DSR setting, the context signal should represent the underlying DS as good as possible, for which it commonly needs to be lifted into a higher-dimensional space where sets explored by the dynamics ideally become diffeomorphic to those in the system's true state space. Temporal delay embedding is the most popular technique to achieve this \cite{takens_detecting_1981,sauer_embedology_1991}. For a $1d$ time series $\{x_t\}$, a $d$-dimensional embedding can be defined as \cite{kraemer_unified_2021}
\begin{equation}\label{eq:TDE}
\bm{x}^{emb}_t=(x_t,x_{t-\tau_1},...,x_{t-\tau_{d-1}})\;,
\end{equation}
where the $\tau_i$ are time lags, commonly estimated from the autocorrelation of the time series. Alternatively, if the delay embedding would become too large ($d>N$), we augment the empirically observed time series by a variant of the positional encoding common in transformers, defined here as
\begin{equation}\label{eq:pos_embedding}
\bm{x}^{emb}_t=\left(x_t, \sin{\left(\frac{2\pi t}{\tau}+\phi_1\right)},...,\sin{\left(\frac{2\pi t}{\tau}+\phi_{N-1}\right)}\right)
\end{equation}
where $\tau:=\argmax_{\tau>\tau_{min}}\mathbb{E}[x_tx_{t+\tau}]$ is given -- provided it exceeds a threshold $\tau_{min}$ -- by the maximal autocorrelation, and a random phase $\phi_i\in\left[0,\frac{\pi}{2}\right]$ is assigned to each dimension.
\section{Results}
\subsection{Zero-shot DSR}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/DS_reconstructions.pdf}
\caption{\textbf{a}) DynaMix zero-shot DSR (red) compared to ground truth (blue) using a $500$-step context (gray) for the Sprott M system. \textbf{b}) Zero-shot forecasts (red) for the Selkov DS (true vector field in blue) from different initial conditions outside the context range (gray). \textbf{c}) DSR quality as a function of context length. \textbf{d}) DSR quality as a function of the temporal resolution $\Delta t$ of the context signal.}
\label{fig:DS_reconstructions}
\end{figure*}
Figs. \ref{fig:intro} (top) \& \ref{fig:DS_reconstructions}\textbf{a} present example zero-shot DSRs of new chaotic DS, which were not part of DynaMix' training domain, from just a provided context signal $\bm{C}$ (see Figs. \ref{fig:zero_shot_DSR}-\ref{fig:recon_6} for further examples). Despite the inherent challenge of predicting chaotic systems, where small differences in initial conditions lead to rapidly diverging trajectories (Fig. \ref{fig:traj_divergence}), DynaMix successfully captures the system’s temporal \& geometrical behavior, i.e. accurately reconstructs the underlying state space and faithfully recovers the true system's power spectrum. Fig. \ref{fig:DS_reconstructions}\textbf{b} highlights further aspects of DynaMix' reconstructions: Even though not trained on any $2d$ systems, the model successfully recreates the limit cycle from the $2d$ Selkov system \cite{sel1968self}. Notably, the model even \textit{generalizes to new initial conditions outside the scope of the context data}, i.e. correctly infers properties of the state space beyond the short context trajectory. As further shown in Fig. \ref{fig:DS_reconstructions}\textbf{c}, the context length necessary to achieve good DSR quickly converges, with as few as $500$ time steps often sufficient. Fig. \ref{fig:DS_reconstructions}\textbf{d} illustrates that our approach also works across a surprisingly wide range (about an order of magnitude) of temporal resolutions at which the underlying DS was sampled, confirming its robustness w.r.t. sampling frequency.
We next compared the zero-shot, out-of-domain DSR performance of DynaMix to that of a number of recent TS foundation models, including various versions of Chronos \cite{ansari2024chronos}, Mamba4Cast \cite{bhethanabhotla2024mamba4cast}, and Tiny Time Mixers \cite{ekambaram2024tiny}, using the long-term statistics $D_{stsp}$ and $D_H$ for evaluation (see sect. \ref{sec:performance_measures}). As seen in Fig. \ref{fig:performance}\textbf{a}-\textbf{b}, DynaMix clearly and significantly outperforms all of these. In terms of \textit{short-term} ($10$-step ahead) forecasts, for which TS foundation models (unlike DynaMix) are optimized, DynaMix performs on par with the (strongest in our batch) Chronos-t5 models (t-tests, all $p>0.37$), as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:performance}\textbf{c}. Table \ref{tab:performance_DSR} assembles further results on performance comparisons, while Figs. \ref{fig:forecast_start}-\ref{fig:forecast_end} provide specific examples. Moreover, a significant limitation of particularly the large Chronos models with millions of parameters is their extreme inefficiency in both inference time and computational costs, as compared in Fig. \ref{fig:cost}. In fact, their inference time can even exceed that of a custom-trained model. In contrast, DynaMix provides a highly efficient alternative, offering superior DSR performance while using much less parameters and computation time.
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.99\linewidth]{figures/DS_performance_comparison.pdf}
\caption{
Zero-shot DSR performance across all 54 test set DS for DynaMix and various TS foundation models for context length $T_C=2000$ (see Fig. \ref{fig:performance_comparison_CL512} for results with $T_C=512$). Median$\pm$MAD of \textbf{a}) $D_{stsp}$ (geometrical disagreement), \textbf{b}) $D_H$ (temporal disagreement), and \textbf{c}) short-term prediction error.}
\label{fig:performance}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{figures/inference_time.pdf}
\caption{Inference times for zero-shot generation of Lorenz-63 DS with $10000$ forecasting steps. All models were provided the exact same context and run on the same hardware. Note the log-scale on the $x$-axis. For comparison, also the time needed for training and inference of a custom-trained AL-RNN is shown in red.}
\label{fig:cost}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{Reasons for the failure of TS foundation models on DSR}
Why do TS foundation models perform so poorly on DSR problems? Essentially, they face three key issues: First, most TS foundation models cannot efficiently deal with \textit{multivariate} time series, but treat dimensions independently. However, in a nonlinear DS all variables are usually coupled, and their joint evolution is actually \textit{defining} for the system's (long-term) dynamics and attractor states. Thus, ignoring this, as illustrated in Fig. \ref{fig:TSFproblems}\textbf{a}, results in poor long-term accuracy (see also Figs. \ref{fig:forecast_start}-\ref{fig:forecast_end}). This highlights a fundamental limitation: Univariate approaches are \textit{inherently} insufficient for reconstructing multivariate, interacting DS. Second, TS foundation models are \textit{trained for short-term prediction, but not for DSR}, providing another reason why they fail to reconstruct the correct long-term behavior. As illustrated in Figs. \ref{fig:intro} \& \ref{fig:TSFproblems}\textbf{b}, in the longer run they often converge to fixed points or simple cycles where the true dynamics is chaotic, not reflecting the context anymore. Third, \textit{context parroting}, a phenomenon originally identified in LLMs \cite{bender2021dangers}, has also been observed in TS foundation models \cite{zhang2025zeroshotforecastingchaoticsystems}, where they tend to repetitively reproduce the exact input pattern rather than dynamically adapting to the system’s true evolution. Thus, TS foundation models simply produce oscillations, where the true dynamics is chaotic and therefore by definition \textit{irregular} and \textit{non-repeating} (Fig. \ref{fig:TSFproblems}\textbf{c}). This is illustrated in more detail in Fig. \ref{fig:TSFproblems}\textbf{d} for Chronos-t5-base, the best of the TS foundation models in our batch. It is particularly evident in the power spectrum (Fig. \ref{fig:TSFproblems}\textbf{d} right), where Chronos' sharp, narrow peaks wrongly suggest periodicity, while the true spectrum is usually rather broad and smeared out for chaotic systems, as the one exhibited by DynaMix. We further quantified this by calculating from the forecast time series the maximum Lyapunov exponent \cite{mikhaeil_difficulty_2022}, a measure for the exponential divergence rate of trajectories (see Appx. \ref{sec:lyapunov}). For Chronos, the value $\lambda_{Chronos}\approx0.06$ close to zero confirms the nearly periodic behavior, while DynaMix produces exponentially diverging trajectories with $\lambda_{DynaMix}\approx1.48$ close to the ground truth value of $\lambda_{Lorenz63}\approx1.37$. Hence, unlike DynaMix, Chronos does not reconstruct the underlying dynamics but just repeats the context. On the other hand, if the underlying dynamics truly \textit{is cyclic}, DynaMix settles into a cyclic pattern as well, exhibiting no intrinsic bias, as illustrated in Fig. \ref{fig:TSFproblems}\textbf{e}.
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.99\linewidth]{figures/TSF_Problems.pdf}
\caption{
Common problems in TS foundation models (red: forecast, gray: context, blue: ground truth). \textbf{a}) Dimensions are dynamically decoupled. \textbf{b}) Long-term forecasts often converge to simple fixed points or cycles unrelated to the true dynamics. \textbf{c}) Context parroting covers up the true dynamics. \textbf{d}) Example forecasts for the chaotic Lorenz-63 system with DynaMix and Chronos-t5-base. Chronos' context parroting results in cyclic repetition of a fixed pattern, thus inherently missing the true aperiodic, chaotic dynamics. This is evident in the close-to-0 max. Lyapunov exponent (center) and peaked power spectrum (right). \textbf{e}) For comparison, if the underlying behavior is truly cyclic with prominent peaks in the power spectrum, both Chronos and DynaMix are able to capture it.
}
\label{fig:TSFproblems}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{Dynamical similarity}
DynaMix' mixture-of-experts design produces a natural similarity measure for comparing the dynamics of different systems, by evaluating the relative contribution of each of the experts to the forecast dynamics. As shown in Fig. \ref{fig:similarity}\textbf{a} (bottom), different experts specialize in specific dynamical patterns or regimes. Hence, we can utilize the average expert usage $\bm{e}=\frac{1}{T}\sum_{t=1}^T\bm{w}^{exp}_t$ across the generated time series to construct a similarity metric
\begin{equation} \label{eq:similarity}
S=\frac{1}{S_{max}}\left(||\bm{e}_1-\bm{e}_2||_1\right)^{-1}\;,
\end{equation}
defined here as the inverse $L_1$ norm of the $\bm{e}$ vectors between any two systems, rescaled to the range $[0,1]$.
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.99\linewidth]{figures/Dynamical_Similarity.pdf}
\caption{
\textbf{a}) Top: Vector fields of different experts which in combination determine the attractor. Bottom plot illustrates the dominant expert in each time window. \textbf{b}) Similarity matrix among all $84$ types of attractor dynamics in our dataset, determined by computing $S$ from the reconstructed time series. \textbf{c}) Examples of two pairs of attractors classified as similar (top), and one dissimilar pair.
}
\label{fig:similarity}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{Time series forecasting from a DS perspective}
\begin{figure*}[!hb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.99\linewidth]{figures/TSF.pdf}
\caption{Time series forecasts for different data domains (gray: context, blue: ground truth, other colors: various model predictions): Forecasts of \textbf{a}) partially ($1$d) observed Lorenz-63 DS, \textbf{b}) electricity transformer temperature data, \textbf{c}) hourly car traffic data with weekly cycle, \textbf{d}) Huawei cloud request data, \textbf{e}) soil temperature development, \textbf{f}) air pressure data, \textbf{g}) human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, \textbf{h}) human electroencephalogram (EEG) data.}
\label{fig:TSF}
\end{figure*}
\input{TS_table}
We next tested and compared DynaMix on a variety of real-world datasets often used to probe time series models. As discussed in sect. \ref{sec:TS_forecasting}, for DynaMix we used a multivariate embedding of the typically $1d$ empirical time series, to better reflect the underlying DS properties. Fig. \ref{fig:TSF}\textbf{a} confirms for a $1d$ time series from the $3d$ chaotic Lorenz-63 system that this works well and DynaMix, in contrast to all other models, is still able to reconstruct the chaotic behavior. When applied to real-world time series, such as traffic, weather, or cloud request data, where previous TS foundation models have shown inconsistent results \cite{toner2025performance}, our model produces accurate forecasts which reflect the dynamics well (Fig. \ref{fig:TSF}\textbf{b}-\textbf{f}, see Appx. \ref{sec:data} for further details on the datasets). Our model seems to particularly excel on human physiological signals, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings, where all other models essentially produce meaningless dynamics, at best capturing the mean trend (Fig. \ref{fig:TSF}\textbf{g},\textbf{h}).
Table \ref{tab:TSF} quantitatively confirms that DynaMix mostly outperforms the other models tested on the DSR measures. Surprisingly, it often even outperforms them in terms of the forecasting error MAE (mean-absolute error), \textit{although its training corpus consisted purely of the simulated DS shown in Fig. \ref{fig:training_data}}, i.e. did not include \textit{any} empirical data at all, let alone traffic, cloud usage, electricity, or temperature data! This is in stark contrast to the other TS foundation models tested here, which mostly had examples of such empirical data in their training corpus and hence might be expected to have an edge over DynaMix. Many real-world data, like weather, human fMRI, or EEG data, are known to bear signatures of deterministic chaos \cite{mikhaeil_difficulty_2022,kramer22a}, potentially at least partly explaining DynaMix' strongly competitive forecasts, although it has never seen such type of data in training.
\section{Conclusions}
Here we introduce the first DSR foundation architecture that achieves zero-shot reconstructions of novel DS, accurately reproducing their long-term statistics, just from a provided context signal without any retraining or fine-tuning. It hugely outperforms current TS foundation models like Chronos in terms of DSR quality, although much more lightweight with only a fraction (0.1\%) of the number of parameters. Consequently, DynaMix features inference times about an order of magnitude faster than the closest competitor. Most surprisingly, it even outperforms current TS foundation models on empirical data of types it has -- in contrast to its competitors -- never seen in training, often producing also better short-term forecasts. All of this is achieved with a fairly narrow training corpus consisting mainly of $3d$ synthetic data from chaotic systems, which suggests there may be considerable room for further improvement by extending DynaMix' training to include, e.g., various empirical time series.
One important take-home from this work therefore is that foundation models built based on principles of DS theory may be able to profoundly improve performance of current zero-shot TS forecasters. Most (if not all) empirically observed time series come from some underlying DS, and acknowledging this fact in model training and construction may help to advance the field. Besides DynaMix' specific DSR architecture, control-theoretically motivated training techniques, and embedding principles, also the fact that it has seen many \textit{chaotic} systems in training may play a role. Most complex DS in nature \cite{buzsaki_rhythms_2006,tziperman-97,ecology1}, engineering \cite{strogatz2024nonlinear}, and society \cite{mandelbrot_misbehavior_2007, watts_collective_1998} are likely chaotic, featuring an infinite spectrum of potential temporal patterns (unstable periodic orbits; \cite{guckenheimer_nonlinear_1983}).
\paragraph{Limitations} For now, we have mainly focused on rather stationary synthetic and empirical time series (but see Fig. \ref{fig:TSF}\textbf{b}). Changes in statistical properties over time, discontinuities, or widely differing time scales in the data observed, impose severe difficulties for zero-shot forecasting, as illustrated in Fig. \ref{fig:TS_limitations}\textbf{a},\textbf{b}, which also plague other TS foundation models. However, this may partly be amended by explicitly including non-stationary DS or DS evolving on many different time scales, featuring sharp transitions, etc., in the training corpus. Incorrect embeddings, which may not be immediately obvious, can also lead to forecast failures (Fig. \ref{fig:TS_limitations}\textbf{c}).
\section*{Acknowledgements}
This work was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within Germany’s Excellence Strategy EXC 2181/1 – 390900948 (STRUCTURES), and through DFG individual grant Du 354/15-1 to DD.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\bibliography{bibliography.bib}
\bibliographystyle{plainnat}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\newpage
\clearpage
\appendix
\section{Appendix}
\subsection{Methodological details} \label{sec:method_details}
\paragraph{Training method}
For training our model, we used a variant of sparse teacher forcing (STF), a control-theoretic method for DSR, with the theoretical background and rationale developed in \cite{mikhaeil_difficulty_2022}. STF and related training methods \cite{brenner_tractable_2022,brenner_integrating_2024,hess_generalized_2023,mikhaeil_difficulty_2022,eisenmann2023bifurcations} circumvent the exploding gradient problem when training on chaotic systems, while still enabling the DSR model to sufficiently forward-iterate trajectories into the future to capture long-term properties (see \cite{mikhaeil_difficulty_2022} for details), and produces state-of-the-art results for DSR \cite{brenner_almost_2024,brenner2024learning}. In STF, current latent states states $\bm{z}_t$ are replaced with states inferred from the data at fixed intervals $\tau$ by (pseudo-)inversion of the decoder model, $\tilde{\bm{z}}_t=g^{-1}(\bm{x}_t)$, thus recalibrating the trajectory at times ideally chosen based on the system's Lyapunov spectrum \cite{mikhaeil_difficulty_2022} (or simply treating $\tau$ as a hyper-parameter). In our case of an identity mapping from a latent subspace to the observations, $\hat{\bm{x}}_t = \mathcal{I}_{(N \times M)} \bm{z}_t$, this inversion becomes trivial, where $N$ is the number of observations (and thus readout neurons) and $\mathcal{I}_{(N \times M)}$ an $N \times M$ matrix with $\mathcal{I}_{(N \times M),rr} = 1$ for $r \leq N$ and zeros else. Thus, during training, we force
\begin{align}\label{eq:forcing}
\bm{z}_{t+1} =
\begin{cases}
F_{\bm{\theta}}(\tilde{\bm{z}}_{t},\bm{C}) & \text{if } t \in \mathcal{T} = \{ l\tau +1 \}_{l \in \mathbb{N}_0} \\
F_{\bm{\theta}}(\bm{z}_{t},\bm{C}) & \text{otherwise, }
\end{cases}
\end{align}
where $\tilde{\bm{z}}_{t} = (\bm{x}_t, \bm{z}_{N+1:M,t})^T$, $F_\theta$ is the mixture of experts using the context $\bm{C}$, and $\tau=10$ here (see Fig. \ref{fig:ablation_TF}). Importantly, STF is \textit{only used for training} the model, applied after calculating the loss, and is turned off at test time.
For the loss, we simply use the standard mean squared error (MSE) between model predictions $\hat{\bm{X}}$ and ground truth observations $\bm{X}$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:mse_loss}
\mathcal{L}_{MSE}(\hat{\bm{X}}, \bm{X}) = \frac{1}{N \cdot (T-T_C+\Delta t)}\sum_{t=T_C-\Delta t+1}^{T} \left\lVert \hat{\bm{x}}_t - \bm{x}_t \right\rVert_2^2.
\end{equation}
To this we add a regularization term meant to encourage the model to explore a wider region of state space based on the context, by enhancing the variance $\bm{\Sigma}$ of the exploration noise in the state attention:
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{L}_{reg}=\lambda \left(1+\sum_i\Sigma_{ii}\right)^{-1}\;,
\end{equation}
where we chose $\lambda=0.01$. Rectified adaptive moment estimation (RADAM) \cite{Liu2020On} was employed as the optimizer, with $L = 50$ batches of $S_B = 16$ sequences per epoch, each of length $T=550$, and $2000$ epochs in total. We used a learning rate exponentially decaying from $\eta_{\text{start}}=2\cdot10^{-3}$ to $\eta_{\text{end}}=10^{-5}$. The context length used in training was set to $T_C=500$, and the window of overlap with the model-generated time series to $\Delta t=50$, see sect. \ref{sec:training}. Training was performed on a single CPU (18-Core Xeon Gold 6254), and a single epoch took $60$ seconds depending on sequence length and model size. At test time, no retraining or fine-tuning is performed, but utilizing the context $\bm{C}$ the model just forward-iterates from the last context time step. Hyperparameters for training were partly selected according to previous results in \cite{brenner_almost_2024,brenner_tractable_2022}, and partly a few different parameter settings were tested, namely $\lambda=\{0.0,0.01,0.02\}$, $\Delta t =\{0,50,100\}$, and $T_C=\{250,500\}$, as extensive grid search was not necessary to obtain a well-performing model.
\paragraph{Model details}
We use $J=20$ AL-RNN experts for our model. Each expert has a latent dimension of $M=20$, of which $P=7$ are rectified-linear units (ReLUs). As suggested in \cite{brenner_almost_2024}, we only use the first $N$ of the $M-P$ linear units for the readout. We followed the initialization protocol in \cite{brenner_tractable_2022, talathi_improving_2016}, drawing $\bm{W}$ from a Gaussian with mean $\bm{0}$ and $\bm{\sigma} = 0.01 \mathds{1}$, setting $\bm{h}=\mathbf{0}$, and $\bm{A}$ to the diagonal of a normalized positive-definite random matrix. The initial latent state was estimated as
\begin{equation}
\bm{z}_1 = \begin{bmatrix} \bm{x}_1 \\ \bm{Lx}_1 \end{bmatrix},
\end{equation}
where $\bm{L} \in \mathbb{R}^{(M-N) \times N}$ is jointly learned with other model parameters.
The gating network is implemented using a single-layer CNN with three channels and a kernel size of 2, stride of 1, and zero padding, with the identity as activation function. The MLP, which takes as inputs the concatenated weighted CNN outputs and current latent state, consists of two layers with ReLU activation. We initialize the temperature weights $T_{\text{att}}$ and $T_{\text{exp}}$ to $0.1$, the covariance matrix $\bm{\Sigma}=0.05\cdot\mathds{1}$, matrix $\bm{D}=\mathcal{I}_{(N\times M)}$, and draw all other CNN and MLP matrices from a Gaussian with standard deviation $0.01$. Model hyperparameters were selected according to previous results in \cite{brenner_almost_2024} and by probing a few relevant parameter settings, namely $J=\{10,15,20\}$, $\#\text{CNN-layers}=\{1,2\}$, $\text{CNN-kernel-size}=\{2,3,5\}$, $\#\text{MLP-layers}=\{1,2,3\}$, and different activation functions $\{\mathds{1},\tanh{},\text{ReLU}\}$ for the MLP/CNN. We found that an extensive grid search was not necessary to obtain a well-performing model.
\paragraph{Performance measures} \label{sec:performance_measures}
As in \cite{koppe_identifying_2019,mikhaeil_difficulty_2022,hess_generalized_2023,brenner_integrating_2024,pals2024inferring,gilpin_model_2023,zhang2025zeroshotforecastingchaoticsystems}, we assess the geometric (dis)similarity between true and model-generated attractors using a Kullback-Leibler divergence ($D_{\text{stsp}}$) defined across state space. Specifically, $D_{\text{stsp}}$ determines the overlap between the distributions of true trajectory points, $p_{true}(\bm{x})$, and of model-generated trajectories, $p_{gen}(\bm{x}|\bm{z})$, given by
\begin{equation} \label{eq:KL-divergence}
D_{\text{stsp}}(p_{true}(\bm{x})\lVert p_{gen}(\bm{x}|\bm{z})) = \int p_{true}(\bm{x}) \log \frac{p_{true}(\bm{x})}{p_{gen}(\bm{x}|\bm{z})} d\bm{x}.
\end{equation}
While especially for higher-dimensional state spaces these distributions may be approximated by Gaussian mixture models \cite{koppe_identifying_2019}, here a discretized version was sufficient, with the state space parcellated into $K = m^N$ bins, where $m$ is the number of bins per dimension and $N$ the dimensionality of the system. We estimate the occupation probabilities $p_i$ of each bin via the relative frequencies $\hat{p}_i$ of trajectory visits and approximate $D_{\text{stsp}}$ as
\begin{equation}
D_{\text{stsp}} \approx \sum_{i=1}^{K} \hat{p}_{true;i} \log\frac{\hat{p}_{true;i}}{\hat{p}_{gen;i}}.
\end{equation}
We set $m=30$ bins per dimension, following \cite{hemmer_optimal_2024}. To ensure a steady-state distribution is reached, long trajectories of $T=10,000$ time steps are sampled.
To evaluate the agreement in long-term temporal dynamics, we compute the \textit{Hellinger distance} $D_H$ between the power spectra of the true and model-generated time series \cite{mikhaeil_difficulty_2022,hess_generalized_2023}, defined as
\begin{equation} \label{eq:hellinger_distance}
H(F(\omega),G(\omega)) = \sqrt{1 - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \sqrt{F(\omega) G(\omega)} d \omega}\; \in [0,1],
\end{equation}
where $F(\omega)$ and $G(\omega)$ are the power spectra of the true and generated time series, respectively. Power spectra are obtained via the dimension-wise Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), smoothed using a Gaussian kernel (with $\sigma=20$ for DS and $\sigma=2$ for the short empirical time series), and normalized to ensure comparability. High-frequency tails dominated by noise are truncated as described in \cite{hess_generalized_2023}. The aggregated Hellinger distance $D_H$ is then computed as the average across all dimension-wise spectral comparisons.
The $n$-step ahead prediction error to assess short-term forecast quality (with $n=10$ in our evaluation) is given by
\begin{equation}
\text{PE}(n) = \left\| \bm{x}_{T_C+n} - \hat{\bm{x}}_{T_C+n} \right\|_1.
\end{equation}
The MAE for evaluating short term predictions on the empirical time series \cite{hewamalage2023forecast} is given by
\begin{equation}
\text{MAE} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{t=T_C+1}^{T_C+n} \left| x_t - \hat{x}_t \right|\;,
\end{equation}
where we chose $n$ according to the data's temporal scale and resolution (\{ETTh1,fMRI\}: $n=40$,\{traffic, cloud requests, partially obs. DS\}: $n=80$, \{human EEG, weather air pressure\}: $n=120$, \{weather temperature\}: $n=200$).
\paragraph{Lyapunov exponent}\label{sec:lyapunov}
For numerically estimating the \textit{maximum Lyapunov exponent} $\lambda_{\text{max}}$ from a one-dimensional empirical time series $\{x_t\}, t=1 \dots T$, one common approach is the \textit{Rosenstein algorithm} \cite{rosenstein1993practical}. First, the time series is embedded into a state space using time-delay embedding as in eq. \ref{eq:TDE} (here using the PECUZAL algorithm \cite{kraemer_unified_2021}). For each embedded point $\bm{x}_i$, the nearest neighbor $\bm{x}_{j}$ is found under the constraints $|i - j| > l_t$, with $l_t$ a threshold to remove purely temporal neighbors (living on the same piece of trajectory), and a minimal initial state space separation $\|\bm{x}_i - \bm{x}_{j}\|_2 > l_s$, where we chose $l_t=150$ (according to the mean periodicity \cite{rosenstein1993practical}) and $l_s=0.2$. The local divergence between initially nearby trajectories is then tracked over a range of time steps $k=0 \dots k_{max}$,
\begin{equation}
d_i(k) = \| \bm{x}_{i + k} - \bm{x}_{j(i) + k} \|_2\;.
\end{equation}
The maximum Lyapunov exponent is given by
\begin{equation}
d_i(k)\approx d_i(0)e^{\lambda_{\text{max}}k\Delta t}\;,
\end{equation}
where $\Delta t$ is the temporal resolution of the series. Taking the logarithm and averaging over all pairs leads to
\begin{equation}
\langle \ln d(k) \rangle \approx \lambda_{\max} k \Delta t + C.
\end{equation}
In chaotic systems, for a suitable choice of $k_{max}$ (here: $50$), this quantity initially grows approximately linearly with time \cite{kantz_nonlinear_2004}, with the slope given by $\lambda_{\max}>0$. In contrast, periodic (cyclic) systems have $\lambda_{\max}=0$.
\subsection{Datasets} \label{sec:data}
\paragraph{Training data}
DynaMix is trained on about $1.6$ million simulated time series of length $T=550$ sampled from $34$ different $3d$ DS with cyclic or chaotic attractors, collected in \cite{gilpin_chaos_2022}. Gaussian noise of $5\%$ of the data standard deviation was added to all dimensions, and time series were standardized to ensure comparable scaling of all data. Attractor dynamics were chosen to reflect different types of behavior, see Fig. \ref{fig:training_data}.
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.85\linewidth]{figures/all_training_reconstructions.jpg}
\caption{Training data (blue) and their reconstruction in red.}
\label{fig:training_data}
\end{figure*}
\paragraph{Test data}
Our test set for DS consists of simulated time series of length $10^5$ sampled from $54$ different $3d$ DS collected in \cite{gilpin_chaos_2022}, which are not part of the training set. Furthermore, we evaluated the Selkov 2d DS \cite{sel1968self} describing a kinetic model of an open monosubstrate enzyme reaction given by the equations
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\frac{dx}{dt} &= -x + ay + x^2y, \\
\frac{dy}{dt} &= b -ay - x^2y ,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where we chose $a=0.1$ and $b=0.5$.
For evaluation of time series forecasting, different real-world data were used. The \textit{traffic data} are hourly recordings of the number of cars passing road junctions (\url{https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/fedesoriano/traffic-prediction-dataset/data}). The \textit{cloud data}, also used in \cite{toner2025performance} to evaluate TS foundation models, are publicly available from Huawei Cloud \url{https://github.com/sir-lab/data-release}. It consists of function requests from Huawei’s serverless cloud platform. The \textit{weather data} consists of daily sampled soil temperature and air pressure measured in the city of Mannheim, Germany (source: Deutscher Wetterdienst [German weather service]), and can be accessed via \url{https://www.dwd.de/EN/ourservices/cdc/cdc_ueberblick-klimadaten_en.html}. The \textit{functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data} comes from human subjects performing cognitive tasks and is publicly available on GitHub \cite{kramer22a}. We followed \citet{kramer22a} and selected the first principal component of BOLD activity in each of the $20$ brain regions. \citet{kramer22a} report a positive maximum Lyapunov exponent for models reconstructed from these time series, indicating their chaotic nature (see also \cite{volkmann2024scalable}). The \textit{ETTh1 dataset} is part of the Electricity Transformer Temperature (ETT) benchmark, which is widely used for evaluating TS forecasting models. It contains hourly data collected from a power transformer station \cite{haoyietal_informer_2021} and can be accessed at \url{https://github.com/zhouhaoyi/ETDataset}. \textit{Electroencephalogram (EEG) data} were taken from a study by \citet{schalk_bci2000_2004}, comprising 64-channel data collected from human subjects performing various motor and imagery tasks. Following the approach of \citet{brenner_tractable_2022}, the signals were smoothed using a Hann window of length $15$. As for the training data, all test data were standardized for processing by the models.
\subsection{TS foundation models} \label{sec:TS_models}
\paragraph{Chronos}
Chronos is a recent TS foundation framework that adapts a transformer-based LLM architecture for probabilistic time series forecasting \cite{ansari2024chronos}. Key to this approach is the tokenization of real-valued time series observations through scaling and quantization, transforming them into token sequences accessible to language models. The model is pretrained on extensive datasets, including both synthetic data generated via Gaussian processes, as well as an extensive batch of empirical time series from \cite{ansari2024chronos,godahewa2021monash}, including traffic, weather/ climate, electricity and web data, enabling it to achieve strong zero-shot performance across diverse datasets without task-specific fine-tuning. For our evaluation we used the standard pipeline as described in \url{https://github.com/amazon-science/chronos-forecasting}.
\paragraph{Mamba4Cast}
Mamba4Cast is a zero-shot time series forecasting model based on the Mamba architecture \cite{gu_mamba_2023}, a type of linear (`state-space') RNN with nonlinear input \& output gating, and inspired by Prior-data Fitted Networks (PFNs) \cite{bhethanabhotla2024mamba4cast}. Trained exclusively on synthetic data, Mamba4Cast can generate zero-shot forecasts when provided with time series context information. For evaluation we follow \url{https://github.com/automl/Mamba4Cast}.
\paragraph{Tiny Time Mixers}
Tiny Time Mixers is another time series foundation model using a non-transformer architecture \cite{ekambaram2024tiny}. It builds upon the TSMixer backbone \cite{ekambaram2023tsmixer} to which it adds several key innovations such as adaptive patching, diverse resolution sampling, and multi-resolution prefix tuning to improve generalization across datasets with varying temporal resolutions. Evaluation here is performed as in \url{https://github.com/glehet/TTM1}.
For comparability, all models were evaluated on the exact same CPU (18-Core Xeon Gold 6254) and GPU (Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti) using 512GB of RAM.
\clearpage
\subsection{Further results}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.85\linewidth]{figures/all_reconstructions.jpg}
\caption{Zero-shot DSR (red) from a $2000$-step context of unseen DS not contained in the training corpus (ground truth in blue).
}
\label{fig:zero_shot_DSR}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.99\linewidth]{figures/recon_3.pdf}
\caption{Zero-shot DSR of chaotic Lorenz-63 system (gray: context, blue: ground truth, red: model-generated). Left: State space, center: time graphs, right: power spectrum.}
\label{fig:recon_3}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.99\linewidth]{figures/recon_4.pdf}
\caption{Zero-shot DSR of Lorenz-63 system in cyclic regime (gray: context, blue: ground truth, red: model-generated). Left: State space, center: time graphs, right: power spectrum.}
\label{fig:recon_4}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.99\linewidth]{figures/recon_5.pdf}
\caption{Zero-shot DSR of chaotic finance system (gray: context, blue: ground truth, red: model-generated). Left: State space, center: time graphs, right: power spectrum.}
\label{fig:recon_5}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.99\linewidth]{figures/recon_6.pdf}
\caption{Zero-shot DSR of chaotic Genesio Tesi system (gray: context, blue: ground truth, red: model-generated). Left: State space, center: time graphs, right: power spectrum.}
\label{fig:recon_6}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{figures/forecast1.jpg}
\caption{Comparison of zero-shot forecasting of finance system for DynaMix vs. different TS foundation models.}
\label{fig:forecast_start}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{figures/forecast2.jpg}
\caption{Comparison of zero-shot forecasting of Sprott D system for DynaMix vs. different TS foundation models.}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{figures/forecast3.jpg}
\caption{Comparison of zero-shot forecasting of Sprott M system for DynaMix vs. different TS foundation models.}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{figures/forecast4.jpg}
\caption{Comparison of zero-shot forecasting of Vallise El Nino system for DynaMix vs. different TS foundation models.}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{figures/forecast5.jpg}
\caption{Comparison of zero-shot forecasting of Sprott C system for DynaMix vs. different TS foundation models.}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{figures/forecast6.jpg}
\caption{Comparison of zero-shot forecasting of Sprott A system for DynaMix vs. different TS foundation models.}
\label{fig:forecast_end}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.99\linewidth]{figures/DS_performance_comparison_CL512.pdf}
\caption{Zero-shot DSR performance across all 54 test set DS for DynaMix and various TS foundation models as in Fig. \ref{fig:performance}, but for context length $T_C=512$. Detailed values in Table \ref{tab:performance_DSR_CL512}.}
\label{fig:performance_comparison_CL512}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{figures/trajectory_divergence.pdf}
\caption{Exponential divergence of two initially nearby trajectories (in blue and red) illustrated for the chaotic Lorenz-63 system. The prediction error is still sensible on a short time scale ($\text{MAE}=0.09$), but then rapidly increases and breaks down as a suitable metric in the longer-term ($\text{MAE}=1.12$), \textit{although both trajectories were drawn from the exact same system with the very same parameters}.}
\label{fig:traj_divergence}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{figures/TS_limitations.pdf}
\caption{
Failure of proper zero-shot DSR. \textbf{a}) DynaMix struggles with sharp peaks in an otherwise much more slowly evolving time series. \textbf{b}) As quantified in Fig. \ref{fig:DS_reconstructions}, selecting a too broad temporal resolution of the context time series can lead to improper reconstructions with, in this case, temporal disalignment w.r.t. the true signal. However, this is a general problem for any TS foundation model, and Chronos fares even much worse in this example. \textbf{c}) Zero-shot DSR may fail (red) as well if the context time series is not properly embedded. In this example, the required embedding dimension exceeded the model capacity. However, as shown in orange, this can be amended by using the positional encoding, eq. \ref{eq:pos_embedding}.
}
\label{fig:TS_limitations}
\end{figure*}
\clearpage
\begin{figure*}[!ht]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.65\linewidth]{figures/ablation_TF.pdf}
\caption{DSR performance for different teacher forcing intervals $\tau$, illustrating an optimal value is essential for successful training, see \cite{mikhaeil_difficulty_2022,brenner_tractable_2022}.}
\label{fig:ablation_TF}
\end{figure*}
\include{performance_table}
\include{performance_table_CL512}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Appendix end
\end{document}
%%%%% NEW MATH DEFINITIONS %%%%%
\usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,bm}
% Mark sections of captions for referring to divisions of figures
\newcommand{\figleft}{{\em (Left)}}
\newcommand{\figcenter}{{\em (Center)}}
\newcommand{\figright}{{\em (Right)}}
\newcommand{\figtop}{{\em (Top)}}
\newcommand{\figbottom}{{\em (Bottom)}}
\newcommand{\captiona}{{\em (a)}}
\newcommand{\captionb}{{\em (b)}}
\newcommand{\captionc}{{\em (c)}}
\newcommand{\captiond}{{\em (d)}}
% Highlight a newly defined term
\newcommand{\newterm}[1]{{\bf #1}}
% Figure reference, lower-case.
\def\figref#1{figure~\ref{#1}}
% Figure reference, capital. For start of sentence
\def\Figref#1{Figure~\ref{#1}}
\def\twofigref#1#2{figures \ref{#1} and \ref{#2}}
\def\quadfigref#1#2#3#4{figures \ref{#1}, \ref{#2}, \ref{#3} and \ref{#4}}
% Section reference, lower-case.
\def\secref#1{section~\ref{#1}}
% Section reference, capital.
\def\Secref#1{Section~\ref{#1}}
% Reference to two sections.
\def\twosecrefs#1#2{sections \ref{#1} and \ref{#2}}
% Reference to three sections.
\def\secrefs#1#2#3{sections \ref{#1}, \ref{#2} and \ref{#3}}
% Reference to an equation, lower-case.
\def\eqref#1{equation~\ref{#1}}
% Reference to an equation, upper case
\def\Eqref#1{Equation~\ref{#1}}
% A raw reference to an equation---avoid using if possible
\def\plaineqref#1{\ref{#1}}
% Reference to a chapter, lower-case.
\def\chapref#1{chapter~\ref{#1}}
% Reference to an equation, upper case.
\def\Chapref#1{Chapter~\ref{#1}}
% Reference to a range of chapters
\def\rangechapref#1#2{chapters\ref{#1}--\ref{#2}}
% Reference to an algorithm, lower-case.
\def\algref#1{algorithm~\ref{#1}}
% Reference to an algorithm, upper case.
\def\Algref#1{Algorithm~\ref{#1}}
\def\twoalgref#1#2{algorithms \ref{#1} and \ref{#2}}
\def\Twoalgref#1#2{Algorithms \ref{#1} and \ref{#2}}
% Reference to a part, lower case
\def\partref#1{part~\ref{#1}}
% Reference to a part, upper case
\def\Partref#1{Part~\ref{#1}}
\def\twopartref#1#2{parts \ref{#1} and \ref{#2}}
\def\ceil#1{\lceil #1 \rceil}
\def\floor#1{\lfloor #1 \rfloor}
\def\1{\bm{1}}
\newcommand{\train}{\mathcal{D}}
\newcommand{\valid}{\mathcal{D_{\mathrm{valid}}}}
\newcommand{\test}{\mathcal{D_{\mathrm{test}}}}
\def\eps{{\epsilon}}
% Random variables
\def\reta{{\textnormal{$\eta$}}}
\def\ra{{\textnormal{a}}}
\def\rb{{\textnormal{b}}}
\def\rc{{\textnormal{c}}}
\def\rd{{\textnormal{d}}}
\def\re{{\textnormal{e}}}
\def\rf{{\textnormal{f}}}
\def\rg{{\textnormal{g}}}
\def\rh{{\textnormal{h}}}
\def\ri{{\textnormal{i}}}
\def\rj{{\textnormal{j}}}
\def\rk{{\textnormal{k}}}
\def\rl{{\textnormal{l}}}
% rm is already a command, just don't name any random variables m
\def\rn{{\textnormal{n}}}
\def\ro{{\textnormal{o}}}
\def\rp{{\textnormal{p}}}
\def\rq{{\textnormal{q}}}
\def\rr{{\textnormal{r}}}
\def\rs{{\textnormal{s}}}
\def\rt{{\textnormal{t}}}
\def\ru{{\textnormal{u}}}
\def\rv{{\textnormal{v}}}
\def\rw{{\textnormal{w}}}
\def\rx{{\textnormal{x}}}
\def\ry{{\textnormal{y}}}
\def\rz{{\textnormal{z}}}
% Random vectors
\def\rvepsilon{{\mathbf{\epsilon}}}
\def\rvtheta{{\mathbf{\theta}}}
\def\rva{{\mathbf{a}}}
\def\rvb{{\mathbf{b}}}
\def\rvc{{\mathbf{c}}}
\def\rvd{{\mathbf{d}}}
\def\rve{{\mathbf{e}}}
\def\rvf{{\mathbf{f}}}
\def\rvg{{\mathbf{g}}}
\def\rvh{{\mathbf{h}}}
\def\rvu{{\mathbf{i}}}
\def\rvj{{\mathbf{j}}}
\def\rvk{{\mathbf{k}}}
\def\rvl{{\mathbf{l}}}
\def\rvm{{\mathbf{m}}}
\def\rvn{{\mathbf{n}}}
\def\rvo{{\mathbf{o}}}
\def\rvp{{\mathbf{p}}}
\def\rvq{{\mathbf{q}}}
\def\rvr{{\mathbf{r}}}
\def\rvs{{\mathbf{s}}}
\def\rvt{{\mathbf{t}}}
\def\rvu{{\mathbf{u}}}
\def\rvv{{\mathbf{v}}}
\def\rvw{{\mathbf{w}}}
\def\rvx{{\mathbf{x}}}
\def\rvy{{\mathbf{y}}}
\def\rvz{{\mathbf{z}}}
% Elements of random vectors
\def\erva{{\textnormal{a}}}
\def\ervb{{\textnormal{b}}}
\def\ervc{{\textnormal{c}}}
\def\ervd{{\textnormal{d}}}
\def\erve{{\textnormal{e}}}
\def\ervf{{\textnormal{f}}}
\def\ervg{{\textnormal{g}}}
\def\ervh{{\textnormal{h}}}
\def\ervi{{\textnormal{i}}}
\def\ervj{{\textnormal{j}}}
\def\ervk{{\textnormal{k}}}
\def\ervl{{\textnormal{l}}}
\def\ervm{{\textnormal{m}}}
\def\ervn{{\textnormal{n}}}
\def\ervo{{\textnormal{o}}}
\def\ervp{{\textnormal{p}}}
\def\ervq{{\textnormal{q}}}
\def\ervr{{\textnormal{r}}}
\def\ervs{{\textnormal{s}}}
\def\ervt{{\textnormal{t}}}
\def\ervu{{\textnormal{u}}}
\def\ervv{{\textnormal{v}}}
\def\ervw{{\textnormal{w}}}
\def\ervx{{\textnormal{x}}}
\def\ervy{{\textnormal{y}}}
\def\ervz{{\textnormal{z}}}
% Random matrices
\def\rmA{{\mathbf{A}}}
\def\rmB{{\mathbf{B}}}
\def\rmC{{\mathbf{C}}}
\def\rmD{{\mathbf{D}}}
\def\rmE{{\mathbf{E}}}
\def\rmF{{\mathbf{F}}}
\def\rmG{{\mathbf{G}}}
\def\rmH{{\mathbf{H}}}
\def\rmI{{\mathbf{I}}}
\def\rmJ{{\mathbf{J}}}
\def\rmK{{\mathbf{K}}}
\def\rmL{{\mathbf{L}}}
\def\rmM{{\mathbf{M}}}
\def\rmN{{\mathbf{N}}}
\def\rmO{{\mathbf{O}}}
\def\rmP{{\mathbf{P}}}
\def\rmQ{{\mathbf{Q}}}
\def\rmR{{\mathbf{R}}}
\def\rmS{{\mathbf{S}}}
\def\rmT{{\mathbf{T}}}
\def\rmU{{\mathbf{U}}}
\def\rmV{{\mathbf{V}}}
\def\rmW{{\mathbf{W}}}
\def\rmX{{\mathbf{X}}}
\def\rmY{{\mathbf{Y}}}
\def\rmZ{{\mathbf{Z}}}
% Elements of random matrices
\def\ermA{{\textnormal{A}}}
\def\ermB{{\textnormal{B}}}
\def\ermC{{\textnormal{C}}}
\def\ermD{{\textnormal{D}}}
\def\ermE{{\textnormal{E}}}
\def\ermF{{\textnormal{F}}}
\def\ermG{{\textnormal{G}}}
\def\ermH{{\textnormal{H}}}
\def\ermI{{\textnormal{I}}}
\def\ermJ{{\textnormal{J}}}
\def\ermK{{\textnormal{K}}}
\def\ermL{{\textnormal{L}}}
\def\ermM{{\textnormal{M}}}
\def\ermN{{\textnormal{N}}}
\def\ermO{{\textnormal{O}}}
\def\ermP{{\textnormal{P}}}
\def\ermQ{{\textnormal{Q}}}
\def\ermR{{\textnormal{R}}}
\def\ermS{{\textnormal{S}}}
\def\ermT{{\textnormal{T}}}
\def\ermU{{\textnormal{U}}}
\def\ermV{{\textnormal{V}}}
\def\ermW{{\textnormal{W}}}
\def\ermX{{\textnormal{X}}}
\def\ermY{{\textnormal{Y}}}
\def\ermZ{{\textnormal{Z}}}
% Vectors
\def\vzero{{\bm{0}}}
\def\vone{{\bm{1}}}
\def\vmu{{\bm{\mu}}}
\def\vtheta{{\bm{\theta}}}
\def\va{{\bm{a}}}
\def\vb{{\bm{b}}}
\def\vc{{\bm{c}}}
\def\vd{{\bm{d}}}
\def\ve{{\bm{e}}}
\def\vf{{\bm{f}}}
\def\vg{{\bm{g}}}
\def\vh{{\bm{h}}}
\def\vi{{\bm{i}}}
\def\vj{{\bm{j}}}
\def\vk{{\bm{k}}}
\def\vl{{\bm{l}}}
\def\vm{{\bm{m}}}
\def\vn{{\bm{n}}}
\def\vo{{\bm{o}}}
\def\vp{{\bm{p}}}
\def\vq{{\bm{q}}}
\def\vr{{\bm{r}}}
\def\vs{{\bm{s}}}
\def\vt{{\bm{t}}}
\def\vu{{\bm{u}}}
\def\vv{{\bm{v}}}
\def\vw{{\bm{w}}}
\def\vx{{\bm{x}}}
\def\vy{{\bm{y}}}
\def\vz{{\bm{z}}}
% Elements of vectors
\def\evalpha{{\alpha}}
\def\evbeta{{\beta}}
\def\evepsilon{{\epsilon}}
\def\evlambda{{\lambda}}
\def\evomega{{\omega}}
\def\evmu{{\mu}}
\def\evpsi{{\psi}}
\def\evsigma{{\sigma}}
\def\evtheta{{\theta}}
\def\eva{{a}}
\def\evb{{b}}
\def\evc{{c}}
\def\evd{{d}}
\def\eve{{e}}
\def\evf{{f}}
\def\evg{{g}}
\def\evh{{h}}
\def\evi{{i}}
\def\evj{{j}}
\def\evk{{k}}
\def\evl{{l}}
\def\evm{{m}}
\def\evn{{n}}
\def\evo{{o}}
\def\evp{{p}}
\def\evq{{q}}
\def\evr{{r}}
\def\evs{{s}}
\def\evt{{t}}
\def\evu{{u}}
\def\evv{{v}}
\def\evw{{w}}
\def\evx{{x}}
\def\evy{{y}}
\def\evz{{z}}
% Matrix
\def\mA{{\bm{A}}}
\def\mB{{\bm{B}}}
\def\mC{{\bm{C}}}
\def\mD{{\bm{D}}}
\def\mE{{\bm{E}}}
\def\mF{{\bm{F}}}
\def\mG{{\bm{G}}}
\def\mH{{\bm{H}}}
\def\mI{{\bm{I}}}
\def\mJ{{\bm{J}}}
\def\mK{{\bm{K}}}
\def\mL{{\bm{L}}}
\def\mM{{\bm{M}}}
\def\mN{{\bm{N}}}
\def\mO{{\bm{O}}}
\def\mP{{\bm{P}}}
\def\mQ{{\bm{Q}}}
\def\mR{{\bm{R}}}
\def\mS{{\bm{S}}}
\def\mT{{\bm{T}}}
\def\mU{{\bm{U}}}
\def\mV{{\bm{V}}}
\def\mW{{\bm{W}}}
\def\mX{{\bm{X}}}
\def\mY{{\bm{Y}}}
\def\mZ{{\bm{Z}}}
\def\mBeta{{\bm{\beta}}}
\def\mPhi{{\bm{\Phi}}}
\def\mLambda{{\bm{\Lambda}}}
\def\mSigma{{\bm{\Sigma}}}
% Tensor
\DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathsfit}{\encodingdefault}{\sfdefault}{m}{sl}
\SetMathAlphabet{\mathsfit}{bold}{\encodingdefault}{\sfdefault}{bx}{n}
\newcommand{\tens}[1]{\bm{\mathsfit{#1}}}
\def\tA{{\tens{A}}}
\def\tB{{\tens{B}}}
\def\tC{{\tens{C}}}
\def\tD{{\tens{D}}}
\def\tE{{\tens{E}}}
\def\tF{{\tens{F}}}
\def\tG{{\tens{G}}}
\def\tH{{\tens{H}}}
\def\tI{{\tens{I}}}
\def\tJ{{\tens{J}}}
\def\tK{{\tens{K}}}
\def\tL{{\tens{L}}}
\def\tM{{\tens{M}}}
\def\tN{{\tens{N}}}
\def\tO{{\tens{O}}}
\def\tP{{\tens{P}}}
\def\tQ{{\tens{Q}}}
\def\tR{{\tens{R}}}
\def\tS{{\tens{S}}}
\def\tT{{\tens{T}}}
\def\tU{{\tens{U}}}
\def\tV{{\tens{V}}}
\def\tW{{\tens{W}}}
\def\tX{{\tens{X}}}
\def\tY{{\tens{Y}}}
\def\tZ{{\tens{Z}}}
% Graph
\def\gA{{\mathcal{A}}}
\def\gB{{\mathcal{B}}}
\def\gC{{\mathcal{C}}}
\def\gD{{\mathcal{D}}}
\def\gE{{\mathcal{E}}}
\def\gF{{\mathcal{F}}}
\def\gG{{\mathcal{G}}}
\def\gH{{\mathcal{H}}}
\def\gI{{\mathcal{I}}}
\def\gJ{{\mathcal{J}}}
\def\gK{{\mathcal{K}}}
\def\gL{{\mathcal{L}}}
\def\gM{{\mathcal{M}}}
\def\gN{{\mathcal{N}}}
\def\gO{{\mathcal{O}}}
\def\gP{{\mathcal{P}}}
\def\gQ{{\mathcal{Q}}}
\def\gR{{\mathcal{R}}}
\def\gS{{\mathcal{S}}}
\def\gT{{\mathcal{T}}}
\def\gU{{\mathcal{U}}}
\def\gV{{\mathcal{V}}}
\def\gW{{\mathcal{W}}}
\def\gX{{\mathcal{X}}}
\def\gY{{\mathcal{Y}}}
\def\gZ{{\mathcal{Z}}}
% Sets
\def\sA{{\mathbb{A}}}
\def\sB{{\mathbb{B}}}
\def\sC{{\mathbb{C}}}
\def\sD{{\mathbb{D}}}
% Don't use a set called E, because this would be the same as our symbol
% for expectation.
\def\sF{{\mathbb{F}}}
\def\sG{{\mathbb{G}}}
\def\sH{{\mathbb{H}}}
\def\sI{{\mathbb{I}}}
\def\sJ{{\mathbb{J}}}
\def\sK{{\mathbb{K}}}
\def\sL{{\mathbb{L}}}
\def\sM{{\mathbb{M}}}
\def\sN{{\mathbb{N}}}
\def\sO{{\mathbb{O}}}
\def\sP{{\mathbb{P}}}
\def\sQ{{\mathbb{Q}}}
\def\sR{{\mathbb{R}}}
\def\sS{{\mathbb{S}}}
\def\sT{{\mathbb{T}}}
\def\sU{{\mathbb{U}}}
\def\sV{{\mathbb{V}}}
\def\sW{{\mathbb{W}}}
\def\sX{{\mathbb{X}}}
\def\sY{{\mathbb{Y}}}
\def\sZ{{\mathbb{Z}}}
% Entries of a matrix
\def\emLambda{{\Lambda}}
\def\emA{{A}}
\def\emB{{B}}
\def\emC{{C}}
\def\emD{{D}}
\def\emE{{E}}
\def\emF{{F}}
\def\emG{{G}}
\def\emH{{H}}
\def\emI{{I}}
\def\emJ{{J}}
\def\emK{{K}}
\def\emL{{L}}
\def\emM{{M}}
\def\emN{{N}}
\def\emO{{O}}
\def\emP{{P}}
\def\emQ{{Q}}
\def\emR{{R}}
\def\emS{{S}}
\def\emT{{T}}
\def\emU{{U}}
\def\emV{{V}}
\def\emW{{W}}
\def\emX{{X}}
\def\emY{{Y}}
\def\emZ{{Z}}
\def\emSigma{{\Sigma}}
% entries of a tensor
% Same font as tensor, without \bm wrapper
\newcommand{\etens}[1]{\mathsfit{#1}}
\def\etLambda{{\etens{\Lambda}}}
\def\etA{{\etens{A}}}
\def\etB{{\etens{B}}}
\def\etC{{\etens{C}}}
\def\etD{{\etens{D}}}
\def\etE{{\etens{E}}}
\def\etF{{\etens{F}}}
\def\etG{{\etens{G}}}
\def\etH{{\etens{H}}}
\def\etI{{\etens{I}}}
\def\etJ{{\etens{J}}}
\def\etK{{\etens{K}}}
\def\etL{{\etens{L}}}
\def\etM{{\etens{M}}}
\def\etN{{\etens{N}}}
\def\etO{{\etens{O}}}
\def\etP{{\etens{P}}}
\def\etQ{{\etens{Q}}}
\def\etR{{\etens{R}}}
\def\etS{{\etens{S}}}
\def\etT{{\etens{T}}}
\def\etU{{\etens{U}}}
\def\etV{{\etens{V}}}
\def\etW{{\etens{W}}}
\def\etX{{\etens{X}}}
\def\etY{{\etens{Y}}}
\def\etZ{{\etens{Z}}}
% The true underlying data generating distribution
\newcommand{\pdata}{p_{\rm{data}}}
% The empirical distribution defined by the training set
\newcommand{\ptrain}{\hat{p}_{\rm{data}}}
\newcommand{\Ptrain}{\hat{P}_{\rm{data}}}
% The model distribution
\newcommand{\pmodel}{p_{\rm{model}}}
\newcommand{\Pmodel}{P_{\rm{model}}}
\newcommand{\ptildemodel}{\tilde{p}_{\rm{model}}}
% Stochastic autoencoder distributions
\newcommand{\pencode}{p_{\rm{encoder}}}
\newcommand{\pdecode}{p_{\rm{decoder}}}
\newcommand{\precons}{p_{\rm{reconstruct}}}
\newcommand{\laplace}{\mathrm{Laplace}} % Laplace distribution
\newcommand{\E}{\mathbb{E}}
\newcommand{\Ls}{\mathcal{L}}
\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}}
\newcommand{\emp}{\tilde{p}}
\newcommand{\lr}{\alpha}
\newcommand{\reg}{\lambda}
\newcommand{\rect}{\mathrm{rectifier}}
\newcommand{\softmax}{\mathrm{softmax}}
\newcommand{\sigmoid}{\sigma}
\newcommand{\softplus}{\zeta}
\newcommand{\KL}{D_{\mathrm{KL}}}
\newcommand{\Var}{\mathrm{Var}}
\newcommand{\standarderror}{\mathrm{SE}}
\newcommand{\Cov}{\mathrm{Cov}}
% Wolfram Mathworld says $L^2$ is for function spaces and $\ell^2$ is for vectors
% But then they seem to use $L^2$ for vectors throughout the site, and so does
% wikipedia.
\newcommand{\normlzero}{L^0}
\newcommand{\normlone}{L^1}
\newcommand{\normltwo}{L^2}
\newcommand{\normlp}{L^p}
\newcommand{\normmax}{L^\infty}
\newcommand{\parents}{Pa} % See usage in notation.tex. Chosen to match Daphne's book.
\DeclareMathOperator*{\argmax}{arg\,max}
\DeclareMathOperator*{\argmin}{arg\,min}
\DeclareMathOperator{\sign}{sign}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Tr}{Tr}
\let\ab\allowbreak
\begingroup
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.96}
\setlength{\tabcolsep}{3.4pt}
\begin{table}[htbp]
\small
\centering
\caption{Performance comparison on empirical time series in terms of geometrical divergence ($D_{\text{stsp}}$), long-term temporal distance ($D_H$), and forecast error (MAE). Best in \textcolor{red}{red}, second-best in \textcolor{blue}{blue}.}
\label{tab:TSF}
\begin{tabular}{l ccc ccc ccc ccc}
\toprule
\textbf{System} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{DynaMix}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-base}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Mamba4Cast}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{TTM}} \\
& $D_{\text{stsp}}$ & $D_H$ & MAE & $D_{\text{stsp}}$ & $D_H$ & MAE & $D_{\text{stsp}}$ & $D_H$ & MAE & $D_{\text{stsp}}$ & $D_H$ & MAE \\
\midrule
Partially obs. DS &
\textcolor{red}{0.11} & \textcolor{red}{0.25} & \textcolor{red}{0.32} &
\textcolor{blue}{0.11} & \textcolor{blue}{0.32} & \textcolor{blue}{0.39} &
8.14 & 0.35 & 0.76 &
6.54 & 0.46 & 0.89 \\
ETTh1 &
\textcolor{blue}{0.8} & \textcolor{red}{0.08} & 5.97 &
\textcolor{red}{0.33} & \textcolor{blue}{0.09} & \textcolor{red}{3.22} &
0.94 & 0.1 & \textcolor{blue}{3.63} &
6.15 & 0.09 & 4.64 \\
Traffic &
\textcolor{blue}{0.68} & \textcolor{blue}{0.21} & 8.42 &
\textcolor{red}{0.35} & \textcolor{red}{0.1} & \textcolor{red}{3.16} &
1.4 & 0.34 & 7.68 &
1.77 & 0.25 & \textcolor{blue}{5.25} \\
Cloud Requests &
\textcolor{red}{0.17} & \textcolor{red}{0.14} & \textcolor{red}{147.28} &
1.57 & 0.3 & 557.35 &
7.91 & \textcolor{blue}{0.16} & 282.95 &
\textcolor{blue}{1.39} & 0.26 & \textcolor{blue}{147.54} \\
Weather (Temp.) &
\textcolor{red}{0.59} & \textcolor{red}{0.09} & \textcolor{red}{2.24} &
\textcolor{blue}{4.72} & \textcolor{blue}{0.22} & 4.14 &
6.96 & 0.58 & 9.39 &
5.39 & 0.3 & \textcolor{blue}{2.76} \\
Weather (Press.) &
\textcolor{red}{0.41} & \textcolor{red}{0.19} & \textcolor{blue}{8.85} &
\textcolor{blue}{6.62} & \textcolor{blue}{0.23} & 9.05 &
7.03 & 0.52 & \textcolor{red}{8.6} &
7.27 & 0.25 & 10.03 \\
Human fMRI &
\textcolor{red}{0.63} & \textcolor{red}{0.09} & \textcolor{red}{0.56} &
\textcolor{blue}{5.77} & 0.12 & \textcolor{blue}{0.85} &
7.99 & \textcolor{blue}{0.11} & 1.35 &
6.66 & 0.21 & 0.9 \\
Human EEG &
\textcolor{red}{0.78} & \textcolor{red}{0.23} & \textcolor{blue}{1.09} &
10.17 & \textcolor{blue}{0.24} & 1.1 &
6.0 & 0.62 & 1.12 &
\textcolor{blue}{2.48} & 0.37 & \textcolor{red}{0.92} \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\endgroup
\begingroup
\begin{landscape}
\begin{center}
\tiny
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.8}
\setlength{\tabcolsep}{1pt}
\begin{longtable}{l*{36}{c}}
\caption{Performance comparison for zero-shot inference across all DS in the dataset from \cite{gilpin_chaos_2022} using $T_C=2000$. Best value in red, second best in blue.}\label{tab:performance_DSR}\\
\toprule
\textbf{System} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{DynaMix}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-large}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-base}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-small}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-mini}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-tiny}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-bolt-base}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-bolt-small}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-bolt-mini}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-bolt-tiny}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Mamba4Cast}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{TTM}} \\
& \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE \\
\midrule
\endfirsthead
\toprule
\textbf{System} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{DynaMix}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-large}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-base}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-small}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-mini}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-tiny}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-bolt-base}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-bolt-small}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-bolt-mini}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-bolt-tiny}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Mamba4Cast}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{TTM}} \\
& \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE \\
\midrule
\endhead
Atmospheric Regime & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.7}} & 0.6 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{9.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.4}} & 0.2 & 10.5 & 0.4 & 0.2 & 12.0 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 13.3 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & 13.7 & 0.5 & 0.3 & 11.6 & 0.9 & 0.3 & 12.3 & 0.8 & 0.2 & 12.3 & 0.9 & 0.3 & 11.7 & 0.7 & 0.3 & 11.2 & 0.8 & 0.6 & 13.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 1.3 \\
BeerRNN & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{8.2}} & 0.4 & 3.6 & 12.1 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.8}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.3}} & 0.4 & 1.3 & 13.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 1.6 & 10.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 1.3 & 13.1 & 0.5 & 1.5 & 12.4 & 0.9 & 1.7 & 12.7 & 0.8 & 2.1 & 11.9 & 0.9 & 2.0 & 11.7 & 0.8 & 1.9 & 11.4 & 0.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{1.1}} & 14.2 & 0.4 & 2.5 \\
Bouali & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.7}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{7.0}} & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.5}} & 12.1 & 0.2 & 0.6 & 11.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 0.6 & 13.1 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 13.5 & 0.4 & 1.5 & 11.2 & 0.7 & 2.2 & 12.0 & 0.6 & 3.4 & 12.3 & 0.5 & 2.2 & 9.8 & 0.5 & 1.5 & 12.9 & 0.7 & 2.6 & 14.0 & 0.3 & 2.5 \\
Burke Shaw & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 8.0 & 0.1 & 0.3 & 5.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{5.1}} & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 11.1 & 0.2 & 0.4 & 13.2 & 0.6 & 1.0 & 11.0 & 0.6 & 0.9 & 11.0 & 0.7 & 0.5 & 11.7 & 0.8 & 0.2 & 10.0 & 0.7 & 1.1 & 10.2 & 0.7 & 0.6 & 12.9 & 0.4 & 0.8 \\
Ca Two Plus Quasip. & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 9.6 & 0.5 & 1.2 & 9.5 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 12.6 & 0.2 & 0.9 & 12.7 & 0.4 & 0.6 & 13.2 & 0.4 & 1.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.4}} & 0.7 & 0.8 & 9.4 & 0.6 & 1.5 & 9.6 & 0.7 & 0.8 & 11.5 & 0.5 & 0.9 & 11.1 & 0.6 & 2.0 & 13.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 5.2 \\
Chen Lee & 5.1 & 0.4 & 0.1 & 4.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.6}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.0}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{3.9}} & 0.2 & 0.0 & 5.3 & 0.3 & 0.0 & 12.0 & 0.8 & 0.3 & 4.5 & 0.8 & 0.3 & 8.8 & 0.7 & 1.1 & 7.7 & 0.7 & 0.5 & 7.2 & 0.7 & 0.5 & 11.3 & 0.8 & 0.2 & 8.9 & 0.4 & 0.6 \\
Chua & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.0}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.4 & 12.9 & 0.2 & 0.4 & 12.4 & 0.4 & 0.4 & 13.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 13.5 & 0.4 & 0.4 & 13.5 & 0.3 & 0.9 & 11.9 & 0.6 & 1.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{11.7}} & 0.4 & 0.6 & 11.7 & 0.4 & 0.6 & 12.0 & 0.4 & 0.7 & 12.1 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 13.4 & 0.3 & 1.0 \\
Coullet & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.8}} & 0.0 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.6}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & 0.1 & 6.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.0}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 3.9 & 0.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 13.7 & 0.3 & 0.1 & 14.6 & 0.3 & 0.6 & 11.4 & 0.7 & 0.6 & 12.8 & 0.7 & 0.4 & 11.8 & 0.6 & 0.7 & 10.7 & 0.6 & 1.1 & 13.3 & 0.6 & 0.7 & 15.0 & 0.2 & 1.8 \\
Dadras & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.0}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 13.9 & 10.0 & 0.5 & 9.2 & 9.2 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.2}} & 11.8 & 0.4 & 7.5 & 11.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{4.7}} & 12.9 & 0.8 & 9.0 & 10.5 & 0.8 & 8.9 & 9.4 & 0.7 & 9.0 & 11.0 & 0.6 & 8.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.8}} & 0.5 & 8.9 & 13.1 & 0.8 & 7.9 & 12.2 & 0.4 & 9.2 \\
Dequan Li & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{10.0}} & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 12.6 & 0.5 & 0.1 & 13.2 & 0.4 & 0.1 & 13.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 12.9 & 0.4 & 0.5 & 13.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 0.4 & 12.4 & 0.4 & 0.4 & 12.7 & 0.4 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{12.2}} & 0.4 & 0.3 & 12.6 & 0.4 & 0.6 & 12.3 & 0.4 & 1.1 & 13.0 & 0.4 & 0.4 \\
Finance & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.0}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 0.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.5}} & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 9.4 & 0.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 13.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 0.5 & 12.2 & 0.4 & 0.3 & 13.6 & 0.5 & 0.3 & 12.0 & 0.7 & 1.3 & 11.7 & 0.6 & 2.3 & 12.4 & 0.7 & 1.3 & 11.8 & 0.6 & 1.4 & 12.6 & 0.8 & 2.3 & 14.0 & 0.3 & 2.1 \\
Genesio Tesi & 10.5 & 0.2 & 0.3 & 8.9 & 0.1 & 0.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.7}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.0}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{7.7}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & 11.8 & 0.4 & 0.2 & 12.3 & 0.3 & 0.3 & 10.7 & 0.3 & 0.2 & 11.4 & 0.9 & 0.8 & 10.6 & 0.6 & 1.1 & 10.0 & 0.4 & 1.6 & 10.4 & 0.8 & 0.4 & 12.3 & 0.2 & 0.7 \\
Guckenheimer Holmes & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{7.9}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & 0.2 & 10.6 & 0.4 & 0.1 & 11.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & 11.3 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 13.2 & 0.7 & 0.1 & 12.5 & 0.2 & 0.1 & 10.7 & 0.6 & 0.1 & 10.6 & 0.6 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.2}} & 0.6 & 0.1 & 10.3 & 0.6 & 0.1 & 10.4 & 0.5 & 0.5 & 11.6 & 0.3 & 0.6 \\
Hadley & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{8.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 10.8 & 0.5 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.3}} & 0.6 & 0.2 & 11.9 & 0.4 & 0.2 & 12.5 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 12.5 & 0.3 & 0.4 & 10.9 & 0.7 & 0.4 & 10.7 & 0.7 & 1.0 & 9.5 & 0.6 & 0.3 & 10.2 & 0.4 & 0.4 & 11.7 & 0.7 & 0.8 & 12.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 1.6 \\
Halvorsen & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.8}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.2 & 6.0 & 0.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 8.4 & 0.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{5.9}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 0.3 & 12.6 & 0.2 & 0.3 & 13.3 & 0.3 & 1.3 & 11.8 & 0.8 & 1.1 & 9.5 & 0.7 & 0.8 & 8.9 & 0.8 & 0.4 & 10.4 & 0.5 & 0.4 & 12.2 & 0.6 & 1.3 & 13.2 & 0.3 & 1.5 \\
Hindmarsh Rose & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{6.8}} & 0.5 & 0.6 & 9.7 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{6.7}} & 0.5 & 0.3 & 8.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 11.5 & 0.4 & 0.7 & 13.8 & 0.6 & 1.0 & 12.7 & 0.7 & 1.3 & 12.5 & 0.7 & 1.5 & 13.9 & 0.6 & 1.1 & 13.4 & 0.7 & 1.1 & 13.9 & 0.6 & 0.7 & 14.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 1.6 \\
Isothermal Chemical & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 0.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{3.7}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.0 & 7.9 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.0}} & 9.7 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & 9.0 & 0.3 & 0.0 & 13.8 & 0.5 & 0.2 & 7.9 & 0.8 & 0.3 & 5.9 & 0.8 & 0.2 & 8.4 & 0.8 & 0.2 & 8.5 & 0.8 & 0.2 & 12.8 & 0.8 & 0.5 & 15.6 & 0.2 & 2.8 \\
Itik Banks tumor & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 1.2 & 10.0 & 0.6 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{8.4}} & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 10.5 & 0.4 & 0.3 & 12.8 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 12.1 & 0.7 & 0.4 & 9.2 & 0.7 & 1.2 & 9.5 & 0.7 & 1.2 & 9.7 & 0.8 & 1.2 & 9.6 & 0.7 & 1.0 & 13.3 & 0.9 & 0.5 & 13.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 1.7 \\
Jerk Circuit & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.7}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 0.4 & 10.1 & 0.4 & 1.0 & 9.7 & 0.4 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{7.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 11.1 & 0.4 & 0.4 & 12.3 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 10.8 & 0.8 & 1.6 & 10.9 & 0.5 & 2.0 & 10.5 & 0.9 & 1.9 & 10.1 & 0.9 & 1.8 & 11.1 & 0.9 & 1.8 & 13.9 & 0.4 & 2.1 \\
Laser & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{6.5}} & 0.3 & 0.1 & 11.1 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{10.8}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 12.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 0.2 & 13.8 & 0.5 & 0.4 & 14.1 & 0.5 & 0.3 & 11.8 & 0.7 & 0.3 & 11.5 & 0.7 & 0.4 & 11.0 & 0.7 & 0.5 & 11.9 & 0.7 & 1.6 & 13.3 & 0.6 & 0.7 & 13.8 & 0.2 & 1.2 \\
Lorenz & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{1.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.7 & 6.6 & 0.2 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{6.0}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 0.3 & 10.0 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 12.0 & 0.4 & 0.3 & 13.0 & 0.5 & 0.3 & 10.9 & 0.7 & 0.3 & 11.3 & 0.5 & 0.6 & 12.7 & 0.6 & 0.9 & 12.8 & 0.3 & 1.8 & 11.4 & 0.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 13.0 & 0.3 & 1.9 \\
Lorenz 84 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{6.9}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 4.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.5}} & 0.4 & 5.2 & 11.0 & 0.4 & 4.8 & 11.5 & 0.4 & 3.2 & 12.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 2.5 & 12.9 & 0.5 & 4.4 & 12.9 & 0.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{2.4}} & 12.9 & 0.8 & 2.5 & 11.5 & 0.9 & 2.4 & 12.3 & 0.7 & 2.4 & 13.4 & 0.8 & 3.3 & 13.4 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.4}} \\
Lu Chen & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.4}} & 0.5 & 0.8 & 6.3 & 0.4 & 0.2 & 5.3 & 0.3 & 0.3 & 8.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 7.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{4.9}} & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 11.6 & 0.9 & 1.3 & 11.9 & 1.0 & 1.2 & 11.3 & 1.0 & 1.9 & 11.4 & 1.0 & 1.4 & 9.7 & 0.8 & 0.7 & 13.7 & 0.4 & 3.4 \\
Moore Spiegel & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{5.9}} & 0.4 & 1.0 & 10.4 & 0.6 & 1.0 & 10.0 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & 12.5 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 9.9 & 0.5 & 0.6 & 12.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 0.9 & 10.5 & 0.9 & 2.8 & 11.4 & 0.9 & 1.8 & 10.1 & 0.9 & 2.5 & 9.8 & 0.7 & 3.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.4}} & 0.8 & 4.6 & 12.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 3.6 \\
Multi Chua & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{7.8}} & 0.3 & 0.8 & 9.3 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & 9.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{7.1}} & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 13.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 0.4 & 14.0 & 0.3 & 1.2 & 11.5 & 0.6 & 1.8 & 12.2 & 0.4 & 3.1 & 9.5 & 0.5 & 2.6 & 10.1 & 0.4 & 2.4 & 10.6 & 0.4 & 1.2 & 14.0 & 0.3 & 2.8 \\
Nose Hoover & 10.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.9}} & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{9.6}} & 0.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 11.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 0.5 & 12.5 & 0.7 & 0.5 & 13.0 & 0.5 & 0.5 & 10.6 & 0.9 & 0.8 & 10.6 & 0.9 & 0.7 & 10.1 & 0.7 & 0.7 & 10.2 & 0.5 & 0.4 & 10.2 & 0.7 & 0.5 & 12.9 & 0.4 & 0.4 \\
Pehlivan Wei & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.0}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.5}} & 0.4 & 0.4 & 10.1 & 0.4 & 0.3 & 11.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 10.8 & 0.4 & 0.3 & 12.6 & 0.5 & 0.7 & 9.2 & 0.7 & 1.0 & 10.1 & 0.8 & 1.0 & 9.2 & 0.7 & 0.6 & 10.6 & 0.8 & 1.3 & 9.3 & 0.7 & 1.0 & 12.2 & 0.6 & 1.9 \\
Sakarya & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{1.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 0.3 & 5.6 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{5.0}} & 0.3 & 0.2 & 7.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 0.3 & 11.1 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 12.5 & 0.4 & 0.4 & 10.2 & 0.9 & 0.4 & 10.0 & 0.6 & 1.4 & 7.7 & 0.9 & 0.9 & 9.1 & 0.4 & 0.8 & 13.1 & 0.8 & 0.8 & 12.6 & 0.4 & 0.7 \\
San Um Srisuchinwong & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 12.9 & 0.4 & 1.0 & 12.7 & 0.5 & 1.6 & 11.4 & 0.5 & 1.0 & 13.3 & 0.5 & 1.2 & 13.0 & 0.6 & 1.1 & 12.7 & 0.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.9}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{10.4}} & 0.7 & 0.9 & 13.4 & 0.6 & 1.2 & 11.7 & 0.7 & 1.5 & 10.7 & 0.7 & 1.6 & 13.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 2.4 \\
Sprott A & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.7}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.3 & 8.0 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 8.9 & 0.3 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{6.6}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 11.8 & 0.3 & 0.3 & 12.3 & 0.3 & 1.1 & 10.5 & 0.8 & 1.0 & 8.1 & 0.5 & 1.6 & 10.0 & 0.7 & 0.7 & 10.4 & 0.7 & 1.0 & 9.9 & 0.7 & 0.8 & 12.0 & 0.3 & 3.0 \\
Sprott B & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{4.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 0.8 & 5.6 & 0.4 & 1.6 & 11.7 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 12.7 & 0.4 & 0.6 & 13.2 & 0.7 & 1.7 & 11.8 & 0.8 & 0.8 & 11.5 & 0.6 & 0.6 & 12.3 & 0.8 & 1.2 & 10.6 & 0.7 & 1.4 & 12.5 & 0.8 & 1.8 & 12.6 & 0.4 & 1.5 \\
Sprott C & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.6}} & 11.6 & 0.4 & 1.2 & 12.4 & 0.4 & 0.7 & 11.9 & 0.4 & 1.2 & 13.3 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 13.1 & 0.4 & 2.4 & 10.0 & 0.5 & 4.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.2}} & 0.5 & 3.9 & 10.7 & 0.5 & 5.3 & 9.3 & 0.5 & 4.3 & 12.8 & 0.6 & 2.9 & 13.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 2.4 \\
Sprott D & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.0}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.8}} & 0.6 & 0.1 & 10.3 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 12.9 & 0.3 & 0.2 & 13.4 & 0.5 & 0.4 & 13.4 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 12.2 & 0.7 & 0.2 & 10.9 & 0.6 & 0.2 & 9.9 & 0.5 & 0.6 & 11.5 & 0.6 & 0.6 & 12.9 & 0.7 & 0.2 & 14.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 1.4 \\
Sprott F & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.0}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 9.6 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.2}} & 0.5 & 0.6 & 12.3 & 0.3 & 0.4 & 12.6 & 0.4 & 0.7 & 12.7 & 0.4 & 0.6 & 9.9 & 0.7 & 1.5 & 10.4 & 0.7 & 1.3 & 10.4 & 0.6 & 1.0 & 12.1 & 0.5 & 1.1 & 11.4 & 0.8 & 1.1 & 13.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 0.9 \\
Sprott G & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{7.0}} & 0.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 7.7 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 10.0 & 0.3 & 0.3 & 7.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 0.4 & 13.0 & 0.3 & 0.6 & 10.9 & 0.9 & 1.2 & 11.4 & 0.6 & 1.3 & 9.2 & 0.8 & 1.4 & 10.8 & 0.8 & 1.7 & 14.1 & 0.8 & 0.7 & 13.1 & 0.2 & 1.3 \\
Sprott I & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.7}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.5 & 9.7 & 0.5 & 0.4 & 11.3 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.4}} & 9.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 11.9 & 0.3 & 0.5 & 13.7 & 0.2 & 1.1 & 10.2 & 0.9 & 2.1 & 9.8 & 0.9 & 3.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.4}} & 0.6 & 2.9 & 9.1 & 0.6 & 2.8 & 12.2 & 0.7 & 1.9 & 14.4 & 0.2 & 6.2 \\
Sprott L & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 0.4 & 8.0 & 0.5 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{6.8}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.3 & 8.2 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 11.6 & 0.3 & 0.2 & 13.0 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 10.5 & 0.9 & 1.2 & 10.4 & 0.8 & 1.8 & 11.4 & 0.9 & 1.2 & 12.1 & 0.7 & 1.0 & 10.8 & 0.8 & 1.3 & 14.2 & 0.3 & 3.1 \\
Sprott M & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.8}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.8}} & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & 10.5 & 0.4 & 0.1 & 12.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 12.9 & 0.2 & 0.2 & 14.0 & 0.6 & 0.6 & 9.8 & 0.8 & 1.4 & 10.3 & 0.6 & 1.6 & 9.9 & 0.8 & 1.5 & 11.8 & 0.6 & 1.6 & 11.6 & 0.7 & 1.5 & 14.3 & 0.2 & 3.2 \\
Sprott O & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{1.3}} & 0.1 & 0.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{3.6}} & 0.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 4.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & 0.5 & 9.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 0.4 & 12.4 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 12.9 & 0.4 & 0.9 & 10.8 & 1.0 & 1.3 & 12.6 & 0.9 & 1.3 & 10.4 & 0.8 & 1.6 & 11.5 & 0.9 & 1.1 & 10.7 & 0.8 & 0.6 & 14.0 & 0.4 & 2.0 \\
Sprott P & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{5.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.6}} & 10.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 2.2 & 11.9 & 0.3 & 1.3 & 12.7 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{1.1}} & 12.7 & 0.3 & 1.2 & 13.3 & 0.3 & 2.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{7.3}} & 0.5 & 3.1 & 10.6 & 0.6 & 4.5 & 8.3 & 0.6 & 4.2 & 10.0 & 0.6 & 5.0 & 11.1 & 0.7 & 2.7 & 12.2 & 0.3 & 5.7 \\
Sprott Q & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.5}} & 0.1 & 0.5 & 10.1 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 7.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{7.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.3 & 11.6 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 13.2 & 0.3 & 0.8 & 11.8 & 0.8 & 2.5 & 11.6 & 0.7 & 1.1 & 11.9 & 0.6 & 0.5 & 11.2 & 0.6 & 2.8 & 10.9 & 0.7 & 0.7 & 13.1 & 0.4 & 4.3 \\
Sprott R & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 0.4 & 9.3 & 0.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{6.7}} & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 11.0 & 0.5 & 0.4 & 12.6 & 0.5 & 0.6 & 13.1 & 0.4 & 0.3 & 10.6 & 0.8 & 0.4 & 10.4 & 0.5 & 0.3 & 9.6 & 0.7 & 0.8 & 10.5 & 0.7 & 0.8 & 11.8 & 0.8 & 0.8 & 13.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 1.3 \\
Sprott S & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{5.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.6 & 10.1 & 0.9 & 1.7 & 9.9 & 0.6 & 0.7 & 12.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 0.9 & 12.6 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.4}} & 13.1 & 0.3 & 1.1 & 10.6 & 0.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.6}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.7}} & 0.8 & 3.5 & 11.0 & 0.6 & 1.8 & 10.4 & 0.4 & 3.7 & 11.8 & 0.8 & 1.8 & 11.6 & 0.3 & 4.6 \\
Sprott Torus & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 5.4 & 0.7 & 0.4 & 10.4 & 0.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 14.3 & 0.6 & 0.2 & 14.5 & 0.6 & 0.4 & 13.8 & 0.7 & 0.3 & 6.2 & 0.8 & 2.9 & 8.3 & 0.6 & 5.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{5.3}} & 0.8 & 5.4 & 5.8 & 0.7 & 4.1 & 13.6 & 0.8 & 1.0 & 15.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 2.1 \\
Thomas & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{1.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 2.1 & 10.6 & 0.5 & 3.8 & 10.1 & 0.8 & 3.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.9}} & 0.3 & 3.7 & 13.9 & 0.5 & 2.6 & 13.9 & 0.7 & 2.8 & 12.6 & 0.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{1.9}} & 12.6 & 0.8 & 2.0 & 12.8 & 0.8 & 2.0 & 12.9 & 0.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{2.0}} & 10.7 & 0.5 & 3.0 & 13.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 2.6 \\
Thomas Labyrinth & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{1.8}} & 12.5 & 0.2 & 2.8 & 12.5 & 0.3 & 2.9 & 12.4 & 0.4 & 3.1 & 12.5 & 0.4 & 2.9 & 12.5 & 0.3 & 3.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{11.4}} & 0.5 & 2.7 & 12.5 & 0.5 & 2.2 & 11.9 & 0.5 & 2.5 & 11.7 & 0.5 & 2.1 & 12.3 & 0.5 & 3.1 & 12.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{1.8}} \\
Torus & 11.5 & 0.9 & 2.7 & 9.8 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 0.2 & 10.9 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 12.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 0.3 & 12.4 & 0.5 & 0.3 & 12.1 & 0.9 & 1.9 & 10.5 & 1.0 & 2.0 & 11.6 & 0.9 & 1.8 & 11.9 & 0.5 & 1.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{9.1}} & 0.8 & 1.9 & 12.6 & 0.5 & 3.2 \\
Tsucs 2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{5.7}} & 0.6 & 0.4 & 11.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 10.3 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 10.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 0.3 & 11.6 & 0.6 & 0.2 & 13.8 & 0.7 & 0.9 & 10.6 & 0.7 & 0.4 & 11.2 & 0.8 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.2}} & 0.7 & 0.4 & 10.5 & 0.8 & 0.4 & 11.1 & 0.7 & 0.4 & 8.4 & 0.4 & 0.5 \\
Vallise El Nino & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{1.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.6}} & 11.2 & 0.5 & 1.2 & 12.5 & 0.3 & 1.3 & 12.7 & 0.5 & 1.9 & 13.5 & 0.6 & 3.2 & 12.3 & 0.7 & 2.5 & 13.4 & 0.5 & 2.7 & 12.3 & 0.7 & 3.3 & 12.6 & 0.5 & 1.2 & 13.9 & 0.8 & 2.9 & 13.7 & 0.3 & 3.7 \\
Wang Sun & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.8}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 13.2 & 0.5 & 0.5 & 12.2 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 11.8 & 0.5 & 0.5 & 11.1 & 0.4 & 0.5 & 14.6 & 0.7 & 1.2 & 13.9 & 0.7 & 0.9 & 10.9 & 0.7 & 0.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{10.8}} & 0.6 & 1.1 & 10.9 & 0.7 & 0.8 & 13.3 & 0.7 & 0.6 & 11.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 0.8 \\
Winsmi Reduced & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{6.5}} & 0.4 & 0.2 & 11.4 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 10.7 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 13.5 & 0.6 & 1.1 & 13.7 & 0.6 & 0.1 & 14.0 & 0.4 & 1.3 & 11.9 & 0.9 & 3.7 & 12.2 & 0.8 & 4.0 & 10.5 & 0.6 & 3.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 2.3 & 12.0 & 0.8 & 3.2 & 14.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 3.3 \\
Yu Wang & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{5.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 0.6 & 9.8 & 0.7 & 0.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.4}} & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 12.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 12.4 & 0.5 & 0.7 & 13.0 & 0.6 & 0.9 & 12.4 & 0.9 & 3.6 & 12.5 & 0.7 & 3.2 & 12.8 & 0.8 & 3.3 & 11.9 & 0.9 & 3.9 & 12.5 & 0.8 & 2.3 & 13.5 & 0.4 & 2.9 \\
Yu Wang 2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.8}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & 0.1 & 9.6 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 10.0 & 0.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 12.4 & 0.3 & 0.2 & 12.2 & 0.3 & 0.1 & 14.1 & 0.7 & 0.2 & 9.9 & 0.2 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.5}} & 0.7 & 0.4 & 9.9 & 0.6 & 0.6 & 10.4 & 0.4 & 0.3 & 10.6 & 0.7 & 0.6 & 12.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 0.4 \\
Zhou Chen & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.9}} & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 11.1 & 0.3 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{5.9}} & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 11.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 0.9 & 14.2 & 0.4 & 0.7 & 10.3 & 0.3 & 0.8 & 12.8 & 0.4 & 0.7 & 12.7 & 0.5 & 0.9 & 13.5 & 0.4 & 1.0 & 12.9 & 0.5 & 1.2 & 13.1 & 0.5 & 0.6 & 13.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 2.1 \\
%\bottomrule
\end{longtable}
\end{center}
\end{landscape}
\endgroup
\begingroup
\begin{landscape}
\begin{center}
\tiny
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.8}
\setlength{\tabcolsep}{1pt}
\begin{longtable}{l*{36}{c}}
\caption{Performance comparison for zero-shot inference across all DS in the dataset from \cite{gilpin_chaos_2022} using $T_C=512$. Best value in red, second best in blue.}\label{tab:performance_DSR_CL512}\\
\toprule
\textbf{System} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{DynaMix}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-large}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-base}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-small}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-mini}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-tiny}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-bolt-base}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-bolt-small}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-bolt-mini}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-bolt-tiny}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Mamba4Cast}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{TTM}} \\
& \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE \\
\midrule
\endfirsthead
\toprule
\textbf{System} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{DynaMix}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-large}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-base}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-small}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-mini}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-t5-tiny}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-bolt-base}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-bolt-small}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-bolt-mini}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Chronos-bolt-tiny}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Mamba4Cast}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{TTM}} \\
& \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE & \(D_{\text{stsp}}\) & \(D_H\) & MAE \\
\midrule
\endhead
Atmospheric Regime & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{8.4}} & 0.6 & 2.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.7}} & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.4}} & 11.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 0.6 & 10.5 & 0.6 & 0.6 & 10.1 & 0.5 & 1.3 & 12.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.5}} & 11.9 & 0.9 & 3.6 & 12.0 & 0.9 & 3.8 & 13.5 & 0.9 & 2.7 & 12.7 & 0.8 & 4.9 & 11.3 & 0.9 & 1.2 & 14.2 & 0.6 & 3.6 \\
BeerRNN & 11.7 & 0.8 & 4.7 & 8.0 & 0.5 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 0.4 & 9.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{7.3}} & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 11.9 & 0.4 & 0.3 & 12.3 & 0.9 & 1.4 & 12.5 & 0.9 & 2.2 & 12.1 & 0.9 & 1.8 & 12.6 & 0.8 & 1.4 & 13.0 & 0.9 & 1.9 & 14.1 & 0.6 & 4.1 \\
Bouali & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.2 & 8.3 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{7.3}} & 0.3 & 0.1 & 8.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.0}} & 11.1 & 0.3 & 0.1 & 13.2 & 0.5 & 0.1 & 10.6 & 0.8 & 0.9 & 9.6 & 0.7 & 1.1 & 12.2 & 0.7 & 1.2 & 12.3 & 0.8 & 0.8 & 12.9 & 0.8 & 1.5 & 13.4 & 0.4 & 1.1 \\
Burke Shaw & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.6}} & 10.8 & 0.5 & 1.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.0}} & 0.5 & 2.4 & 13.0 & 0.4 & 2.0 & 13.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 1.9 & 13.3 & 0.6 & 1.8 & 11.5 & 0.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.6}} & 12.1 & 0.6 & 1.0 & 12.2 & 0.7 & 1.2 & 10.5 & 0.7 & 2.9 & 12.2 & 0.9 & 1.3 & 13.7 & 0.5 & 2.6 \\
Ca Two Plus Quasip. & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.3}} & 0.1 & 0.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{7.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 8.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 9.2 & 0.4 & 0.1 & 13.1 & 0.4 & 0.1 & 13.2 & 0.4 & 0.2 & 11.3 & 0.9 & 0.8 & 11.6 & 0.8 & 1.2 & 12.8 & 0.6 & 0.3 & 8.9 & 0.6 & 1.6 & 11.1 & 0.8 & 1.6 & 13.8 & 0.7 & 1.6 \\
Chen Lee & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.9}} & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 4.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 0.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{4.0}} & 0.5 & 1.6 & 4.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 4.6 & 0.3 & 1.0 & 8.9 & 0.7 & 1.3 & 7.2 & 0.9 & 3.6 & 7.9 & 0.7 & 2.1 & 8.0 & 0.7 & 1.7 & 4.8 & 0.5 & 1.4 & 11.0 & 0.9 & 1.2 & 6.4 & 0.5 & 4.0 \\
Chua & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{5.9}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 7.4 & 0.2 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{5.9}} & 0.2 & 0.2 & 7.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.2 & 11.7 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 13.1 & 0.3 & 0.4 & 11.8 & 0.6 & 1.0 & 12.2 & 0.5 & 1.3 & 11.7 & 0.6 & 0.6 & 12.0 & 0.6 & 1.4 & 11.3 & 0.5 & 1.5 & 13.4 & 0.4 & 0.8 \\
Coullet & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{1.2}} & 0.0 & 0.4 & 4.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.0}} & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.7}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 2.8 & 0.0 & 0.1 & 7.5 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & 14.6 & 0.4 & 0.3 & 13.0 & 0.8 & 1.7 & 11.2 & 0.8 & 2.4 & 11.8 & 0.8 & 2.3 & 11.6 & 0.7 & 2.4 & 12.3 & 0.8 & 1.7 & 14.9 & 0.5 & 1.9 \\
Dadras & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 1.5 & 7.7 & 0.6 & 0.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{4.7}} & 0.5 & 1.2 & 13.1 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.5}} & 12.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 10.2 & 0.7 & 1.0 & 12.7 & 0.8 & 2.6 & 12.9 & 0.7 & 2.4 & 13.0 & 0.8 & 2.7 & 8.8 & 0.8 & 4.2 & 11.9 & 0.8 & 2.5 & 12.8 & 0.4 & 2.8 \\
Dequan Li & 12.7 & 0.5 & 0.3 & 11.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 11.0 & 0.4 & 0.4 & 12.1 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 12.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 0.5 & 13.0 & 0.3 & 1.5 & 11.7 & 0.4 & 1.1 & 11.3 & 0.4 & 1.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{9.6}} & 0.4 & 0.7 & 11.0 & 0.4 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{10.7}} & 0.4 & 0.6 & 13.5 & 0.4 & 2.5 \\
Finance & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.5}} & 0.6 & 0.9 & 8.6 & 0.4 & 0.7 & 9.1 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 12.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 13.8 & 0.4 & 1.4 & 11.6 & 0.9 & 1.8 & 10.7 & 0.8 & 2.0 & 13.4 & 0.8 & 1.5 & 11.8 & 0.8 & 1.1 & 11.1 & 0.9 & 0.8 & 13.7 & 0.5 & 1.3 \\
Genesio Tesi & 8.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{7.9}} & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.7}} & 8.5 & 0.2 & 0.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{7.7}} & 0.2 & 0.7 & 9.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 0.8 & 13.0 & 0.3 & 1.6 & 10.4 & 0.7 & 0.7 & 10.6 & 0.7 & 0.8 & 10.3 & 0.8 & 1.0 & 9.6 & 0.8 & 1.5 & 11.0 & 0.9 & 0.9 & 12.6 & 0.6 & 4.1 \\
Guckenheimer Holmes & 9.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 11.8 & 0.1 & 0.4 & 12.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 0.4 & 12.6 & 0.3 & 0.2 & 12.5 & 0.4 & 0.6 & 12.1 & 0.4 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.6}} & 0.7 & 0.2 & 9.6 & 0.7 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{9.4}} & 0.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 11.8 & 0.6 & 0.4 & 10.2 & 0.7 & 0.5 & 12.7 & 0.5 & 0.6 \\
Hadley & 11.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.6}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{10.7}} & 0.5 & 2.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{9.7}} & 0.5 & 1.3 & 12.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{1.1}} & 12.6 & 0.6 & 2.1 & 12.6 & 0.4 & 3.2 & 11.4 & 0.8 & 3.2 & 11.9 & 0.7 & 3.3 & 11.9 & 0.6 & 2.9 & 11.5 & 0.8 & 3.4 & 11.4 & 0.8 & 3.5 & 12.5 & 0.5 & 3.6 \\
Halvorsen & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.3}} & 0.3 & 1.0 & 9.7 & 0.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 8.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 0.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{7.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 0.8 & 13.1 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.6}} & 13.3 & 0.4 & 1.3 & 10.0 & 0.8 & 4.7 & 10.3 & 0.7 & 4.4 & 9.7 & 0.8 & 4.4 & 10.9 & 0.7 & 4.3 & 11.3 & 0.9 & 3.4 & 13.4 & 0.5 & 3.5 \\
Hindmarsh Rose & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{6.5}} & 0.4 & 0.5 & 9.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 0.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.9}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & 9.6 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.0}} & 12.7 & 0.6 & 0.2 & 13.7 & 0.6 & 0.5 & 12.9 & 0.7 & 1.1 & 14.3 & 0.8 & 1.3 & 12.9 & 0.8 & 1.1 & 14.0 & 0.8 & 1.4 & 13.2 & 0.8 & 0.6 & 14.6 & 0.4 & 1.1 \\
Isothermal Chemical & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.0}} & 0.2 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{2.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.2 & 5.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 0.1 & 8.3 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 7.0 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 11.6 & 0.5 & 0.2 & 11.7 & 0.9 & 0.6 & 11.7 & 0.9 & 1.0 & 10.8 & 0.8 & 0.8 & 12.5 & 0.9 & 0.8 & 10.1 & 0.9 & 0.9 & 15.6 & 0.6 & 2.5 \\
Itik Banks tumor & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{5.7}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.5}} & 0.1 & 10.8 & 0.6 & 0.2 & 9.8 & 0.5 & 0.1 & 11.8 & 0.6 & 0.2 & 13.3 & 0.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 10.8 & 0.6 & 0.9 & 11.2 & 0.8 & 1.7 & 11.9 & 0.9 & 0.9 & 12.0 & 0.8 & 2.4 & 12.0 & 0.9 & 1.4 & 12.9 & 0.7 & 1.5 \\
Jerk Circuit & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.8}} & 0.6 & 1.1 & 9.1 & 0.4 & 0.8 & 10.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 1.0 & 11.7 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 9.8 & 0.6 & 1.1 & 12.5 & 0.9 & 1.9 & 13.5 & 0.9 & 1.6 & 12.9 & 0.9 & 0.7 & 13.1 & 1.0 & 1.5 & 10.3 & 0.8 & 0.5 & 14.1 & 0.5 & 3.1 \\
Laser & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.5}} & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{7.5}} & 0.5 & 5.0 & 8.2 & 0.3 & 1.9 & 11.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.6}} & 12.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 0.7 & 13.9 & 0.6 & 1.3 & 12.6 & 0.7 & 2.4 & 12.8 & 0.5 & 1.7 & 13.0 & 0.7 & 1.3 & 12.8 & 0.7 & 2.7 & 11.8 & 0.8 & 2.4 & 13.3 & 0.5 & 2.2 \\
Lorenz & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 0.6 & 9.8 & 0.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 0.6 & 13.0 & 0.4 & 0.7 & 12.6 & 0.7 & 0.8 & 13.3 & 0.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 12.8 & 0.8 & 1.0 & 13.0 & 0.7 & 1.9 & 13.2 & 0.6 & 1.4 & 13.0 & 0.6 & 1.3 & 11.8 & 0.8 & 1.3 & 13.4 & 0.5 & 1.1 \\
Lorenz 84 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{7.9}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{1.6}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{10.7}} & 0.5 & 3.3 & 11.0 & 0.4 & 4.4 & 12.6 & 0.4 & 4.8 & 11.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.8}} & 13.2 & 0.6 & 1.8 & 11.8 & 0.9 & 2.0 & 12.2 & 0.9 & 2.6 & 11.5 & 0.9 & 2.4 & 12.3 & 0.9 & 2.5 & 11.2 & 0.9 & 2.2 & 13.4 & 0.6 & 2.9 \\
Lu Chen & 9.5 & 0.8 & 1.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{5.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 1.0 & 9.0 & 0.3 & 1.3 & 8.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 9.7 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.8}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.3}} & 0.3 & 1.0 & 12.2 & 1.0 & 1.0 & 13.8 & 0.9 & 1.4 & 12.2 & 0.9 & 1.7 & 13.1 & 1.0 & 0.9 & 10.1 & 0.8 & 1.4 & 14.2 & 0.5 & 2.2 \\
Moore Spiegel & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.2}} & 0.6 & 0.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{9.1}} & 0.6 & 0.9 & 10.9 & 0.7 & 0.9 & 12.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.8}} & 11.5 & 0.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.8}} & 11.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.4}} & 0.9 & 11.4 & 0.9 & 2.6 & 11.7 & 0.8 & 3.6 & 12.7 & 0.9 & 3.6 & 12.0 & 0.8 & 3.3 & 10.5 & 0.9 & 4.6 & 13.1 & 0.7 & 4.0 \\
Multi Chua & 12.5 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 12.0 & 0.6 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{11.9}} & 0.6 & 0.3 & 13.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.4}} & 0.5 & 13.0 & 0.4 & 0.3 & 13.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 0.4 & 12.5 & 0.5 & 0.5 & 12.6 & 0.5 & 0.4 & 13.6 & 0.5 & 0.3 & 13.0 & 0.5 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{10.7}} & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 13.5 & 0.5 & 0.8 \\
Nose Hoover & 11.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.5}} & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{10.2}} & 0.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 10.8 & 0.7 & 0.6 & 10.8 & 0.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 12.9 & 0.8 & 0.6 & 13.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.5}} & 0.6 & 11.2 & 0.9 & 1.6 & 11.3 & 0.9 & 1.4 & 12.7 & 0.7 & 2.2 & 11.0 & 0.9 & 2.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{10.5}} & 0.9 & 2.3 & 13.3 & 0.5 & 3.1 \\
Pehlivan Wei & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{4.8}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 3.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.6}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.4}} & 6.8 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.5}} & 9.0 & 0.3 & 0.6 & 10.7 & 0.3 & 0.9 & 12.4 & 0.5 & 1.5 & 11.1 & 0.9 & 5.8 & 12.0 & 0.6 & 6.1 & 12.6 & 0.8 & 6.1 & 12.3 & 0.8 & 5.5 & 10.0 & 0.9 & 2.3 & 12.7 & 0.4 & 6.3 \\
Sakarya & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{3.1}} & 0.3 & 1.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.6}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.5}} & 5.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 0.5 & 8.2 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.5}} & 10.2 & 0.7 & 1.0 & 12.9 & 0.8 & 1.8 & 10.7 & 0.9 & 1.5 & 12.7 & 0.9 & 1.9 & 11.8 & 0.8 & 2.0 & 12.8 & 0.8 & 2.1 & 12.4 & 0.7 & 1.4 & 14.0 & 0.5 & 2.9 \\
San Um Srisuchinwong & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{5.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{5.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 1.5 & 10.5 & 0.8 & 1.5 & 12.6 & 0.4 & 1.5 & 13.0 & 0.5 & 1.4 & 13.1 & 0.6 & 0.7 & 11.8 & 0.8 & 1.4 & 13.0 & 0.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 12.0 & 0.6 & 1.1 & 11.9 & 0.7 & 0.6 & 10.7 & 0.5 & 1.7 & 12.6 & 0.5 & 0.5 \\
Sprott A & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.9}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.6 & 9.3 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 8.5 & 0.4 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{7.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 11.7 & 0.3 & 0.6 & 12.6 & 0.5 & 0.8 & 10.7 & 0.9 & 2.9 & 11.8 & 0.7 & 2.9 & 11.5 & 0.8 & 3.1 & 11.1 & 0.7 & 3.5 & 9.8 & 0.9 & 0.6 & 12.4 & 0.6 & 3.5 \\
Sprott B & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.6}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 2.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{1.1}} & 11.0 & 0.6 & 1.3 & 13.2 & 0.5 & 2.0 & 13.4 & 0.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.9}} & 13.4 & 0.7 & 2.3 & 12.6 & 0.8 & 1.2 & 13.2 & 0.8 & 1.9 & 12.5 & 0.8 & 2.0 & 12.6 & 0.7 & 1.8 & 13.9 & 0.8 & 1.9 & 12.9 & 0.6 & 1.5 \\
Sprott C & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.9}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.5}} & 0.6 & 1.2 & 12.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 1.2 & 13.3 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.5}} & 12.6 & 0.4 & 0.6 & 11.8 & 0.5 & 2.4 & 12.4 & 0.7 & 2.2 & 13.0 & 0.6 & 2.1 & 11.9 & 0.6 & 2.9 & 11.8 & 0.6 & 2.1 & 13.3 & 0.7 & 2.2 & 13.5 & 0.5 & 2.9 \\
Sprott D & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.8}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 0.3 & 7.6 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 5.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{5.5}} & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 12.9 & 0.4 & 0.5 & 13.1 & 0.5 & 0.6 & 12.1 & 0.7 & 0.5 & 12.0 & 0.8 & 3.1 & 12.1 & 0.7 & 1.8 & 12.0 & 0.6 & 2.0 & 12.9 & 0.7 & 0.7 & 13.8 & 0.5 & 1.1 \\
Sprott F & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{4.9}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 1.1 & 10.8 & 0.4 & 0.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.9}} & 0.5 & 0.7 & 12.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.5}} & 13.0 & 0.5 & 0.5 & 13.1 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.4}} & 12.3 & 0.9 & 1.8 & 12.2 & 0.6 & 2.1 & 13.2 & 0.8 & 2.0 & 12.4 & 0.7 & 2.4 & 11.8 & 0.9 & 1.0 & 13.4 & 0.6 & 1.3 \\
Sprott G & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{4.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 6.2 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 7.1 & 0.2 & 0.2 & 7.7 & 0.3 & 0.7 & 12.9 & 0.3 & 0.6 & 12.3 & 0.8 & 3.5 & 12.4 & 0.7 & 3.9 & 12.9 & 0.8 & 2.9 & 11.2 & 0.9 & 4.4 & 11.0 & 0.9 & 2.3 & 14.0 & 0.5 & 1.6 \\
Sprott I & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.0}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 0.6 & 8.6 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 10.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{7.4}} & 0.3 & 0.3 & 10.1 & 0.3 & 0.3 & 13.1 & 0.4 & 0.2 & 12.1 & 0.9 & 1.1 & 11.9 & 0.8 & 2.9 & 9.4 & 0.9 & 1.0 & 13.4 & 0.9 & 2.2 & 10.9 & 0.9 & 1.0 & 14.4 & 0.6 & 2.7 \\
Sprott L & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.7}} & 0.2 & 1.4 & 9.2 & 0.3 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.3 & 10.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 11.3 & 0.2 & 0.3 & 13.6 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 12.3 & 0.9 & 1.0 & 12.3 & 0.9 & 0.4 & 13.3 & 0.9 & 1.6 & 13.1 & 0.9 & 2.0 & 12.2 & 0.8 & 0.5 & 14.2 & 0.5 & 3.1 \\
Sprott M & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 0.4 & 10.9 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 12.4 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 12.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 0.3 & 13.5 & 0.3 & 0.3 & 14.0 & 0.8 & 0.5 & 12.1 & 0.8 & 0.9 & 11.1 & 0.7 & 1.3 & 13.0 & 0.8 & 0.9 & 12.3 & 0.8 & 0.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{10.7}} & 0.9 & 0.8 & 14.3 & 0.6 & 2.3 \\
Sprott O & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 0.4 & 9.2 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{6.7}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.4 & 8.1 & 0.2 & 0.6 & 11.6 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.4}} & 13.2 & 0.3 & 0.5 & 11.8 & 1.0 & 0.9 & 12.7 & 0.8 & 1.6 & 11.4 & 1.0 & 1.8 & 12.6 & 1.0 & 3.9 & 10.4 & 0.9 & 0.9 & 14.0 & 0.7 & 3.5 \\
Sprott P & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{5.7}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 1.2 & 9.2 & 0.6 & 0.8 & 10.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.5}} & 11.1 & 0.8 & 1.0 & 13.3 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.7}} & 13.5 & 0.6 & 1.6 & 9.6 & 0.8 & 4.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{7.6}} & 0.6 & 3.3 & 8.7 & 0.8 & 3.4 & 9.6 & 0.8 & 3.0 & 10.8 & 0.8 & 1.5 & 10.4 & 0.5 & 1.8 \\
Sprott Q & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{5.8}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 1.1 & 9.5 & 0.5 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.4}} & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.4}} & 10.0 & 0.7 & 0.5 & 12.9 & 0.5 & 1.3 & 12.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 1.3 & 11.1 & 0.9 & 0.8 & 13.0 & 0.7 & 1.8 & 12.5 & 0.7 & 0.6 & 11.5 & 0.8 & 1.7 & 9.7 & 0.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 13.2 & 0.4 & 4.0 \\
Sprott R & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{5.1}} & 0.3 & 0.5 & 6.9 & 0.4 & 0.1 & 6.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{6.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & 12.5 & 0.3 & 0.3 & 14.2 & 0.5 & 0.4 & 11.0 & 0.9 & 1.4 & 8.8 & 0.7 & 1.0 & 10.6 & 0.9 & 1.0 & 9.4 & 0.9 & 0.9 & 11.4 & 0.9 & 1.7 & 13.8 & 0.6 & 2.3 \\
Sprott S & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.9}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.0}} & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.6}} & 0.4 & 0.3 & 10.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 11.7 & 0.3 & 0.3 & 13.0 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.3}} & 13.3 & 0.4 & 0.7 & 10.2 & 0.9 & 0.6 & 10.2 & 0.8 & 1.6 & 11.2 & 0.9 & 1.7 & 11.0 & 0.8 & 2.0 & 10.7 & 0.9 & 1.9 & 12.8 & 0.5 & 4.0 \\
Sprott Torus & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.6}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{6.8}} & 0.6 & 0.2 & 12.0 & 0.5 & 0.2 & 13.0 & 0.5 & 0.3 & 14.3 & 0.7 & 0.3 & 14.7 & 0.6 & 0.7 & 7.0 & 0.9 & 0.6 & 12.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 0.8 & 7.9 & 0.9 & 0.6 & 12.5 & 0.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 12.2 & 0.9 & 0.3 & 14.9 & 0.5 & 1.0 \\
Thomas & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.3}} & 0.2 & 6.7 & 12.4 & 0.6 & 4.1 & 12.1 & 0.3 & 3.6 & 13.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 2.5 & 13.4 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{1.9}} & 13.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{1.1}} & 12.3 & 0.8 & 4.9 & 12.0 & 0.8 & 6.6 & 13.7 & 0.7 & 4.9 & 13.1 & 0.7 & 5.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{11.9}} & 0.8 & 4.9 & 13.6 & 0.4 & 5.4 \\
Thomas Labyrinth & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{6.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 5.2 & 12.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 4.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.8}} & 0.4 & 5.6 & 11.8 & 0.3 & 3.4 & 12.2 & 0.3 & 4.6 & 12.5 & 0.4 & 4.0 & 11.5 & 0.6 & 4.4 & 12.3 & 0.6 & 4.2 & 11.5 & 0.6 & 4.2 & 11.5 & 0.6 & 3.8 & 12.5 & 0.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{3.3}} & 12.5 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{2.6}} \\
Torus & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{10.9}} & 0.9 & 2.3 & 12.4 & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 11.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 12.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 0.2 & 12.9 & 0.5 & 1.0 & 12.9 & 0.7 & 1.5 & 12.0 & 1.0 & 2.1 & 12.6 & 0.8 & 2.3 & 12.6 & 1.0 & 2.0 & 12.4 & 1.0 & 3.1 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{8.7}} & 0.9 & 1.7 & 13.1 & 0.6 & 4.6 \\
Tsucs 2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{7.2}} & 0.6 & 1.7 & 10.9 & 0.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{1.0}} & 10.3 & 0.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{1.2}} & 10.0 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 1.6 & 12.0 & 0.6 & 1.7 & 13.3 & 0.7 & 2.2 & 8.5 & 0.8 & 2.2 & 12.3 & 0.8 & 2.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{7.5}} & 0.7 & 2.4 & 9.4 & 0.7 & 2.3 & 11.5 & 0.8 & 2.6 & 9.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.5}} & 2.1 \\
Vallise El Nino & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{1.8}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 0.4 & 10.1 & 0.4 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{5.5}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 7.4 & 0.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & 12.7 & 0.5 & 0.5 & 13.4 & 0.6 & 1.7 & 11.6 & 0.8 & 1.8 & 12.5 & 0.8 & 1.0 & 13.6 & 0.7 & 1.1 & 12.4 & 0.8 & 1.9 & 13.6 & 0.7 & 1.3 & 13.7 & 0.6 & 2.1 \\
Wang Sun & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{5.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 0.7 & 11.8 & 0.5 & 1.2 & 10.3 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.4}} & 13.2 & 0.5 & 2.0 & 10.4 & 0.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 10.5 & 0.7 & 0.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{9.3}} & 0.7 & 1.9 & 11.9 & 0.7 & 1.8 & 11.2 & 0.7 & 1.8 & 9.9 & 0.6 & 1.7 & 13.3 & 0.7 & 1.5 & 12.6 & 0.5 & 1.0 \\
Winsmi Reduced & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{5.0}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & 1.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.9}} & 0.4 & 1.8 & 11.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 1.6 & 13.6 & 0.4 & 1.6 & 13.6 & 0.5 & 1.5 & 14.0 & 0.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{1.0}} & 11.7 & 0.9 & 2.1 & 11.7 & 0.8 & 2.4 & 11.9 & 0.9 & 1.4 & 10.4 & 0.8 & 2.7 & 11.4 & 0.9 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.9}} & 14.3 & 0.6 & 2.1 \\
Yu Wang & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{6.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{3.2}} & 9.8 & 0.7 & 3.3 & 11.3 & 0.6 & 3.4 & 10.3 & 0.6 & 3.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.1}} & 0.6 & 3.3 & 12.8 & 0.6 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.2}} & 12.3 & 0.9 & 7.6 & 12.0 & 0.8 & 5.7 & 12.8 & 0.7 & 6.6 & 12.8 & 0.8 & 7.2 & 12.0 & 0.7 & 5.0 & 13.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.5}} & 4.6 \\
Yu Wang 2 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{3.4}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 0.3 & 10.0 & 0.2 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.1}} & 10.6 & 0.4 & 0.2 & 12.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.2}} & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.1}} & 12.2 & 0.2 & 0.5 & 13.8 & 0.4 & 0.5 & 10.8 & 0.9 & 1.4 & 9.4 & 0.8 & 2.5 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{8.6}} & 0.7 & 1.6 & 10.0 & 0.7 & 1.4 & 11.6 & 0.9 & 1.8 & 10.7 & 0.3 & 1.2 \\
Zhou Chen & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{10.0}} & 0.4 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.2}} & 10.4 & 0.4 & 1.3 & 13.7 & 0.5 & 3.0 & 12.7 & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 0.9 & 12.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{0.3}} & \textbf{\textcolor{blue}{0.4}} & 12.8 & 0.4 & 0.9 & 13.2 & 0.5 & 1.6 & 11.6 & 0.5 & 2.0 & 13.5 & 0.5 & 1.8 & \textbf{\textcolor{red}{9.7}} & 0.5 & 2.2 & 12.8 & 0.6 & 2.7 & 11.6 & 0.4 & 2.9 \\
%\bottomrule
\end{longtable}
\end{center}
\end{landscape}
\endgroup
\begin{thebibliography}{94}
\providecommand{\natexlab}[1]{#1}
\providecommand{\url}[1]{\texttt{#1}}
\expandafter\ifx\csname urlstyle\endcsname\relax
\providecommand{\doi}[1]{doi: #1}\else
\providecommand{\doi}{doi: \begingroup \urlstyle{rm}\Url}\fi
\bibitem[Alvarez et~al.(2020)Alvarez, Roşca, and Fălcuţescu]{alvarez_dynode_2020}
Victor M.~Martinez Alvarez, Rareş Roşca, and Cristian~G. Fălcuţescu.
\newblock {DyNODE}: {Neural} {Ordinary} {Differential} {Equations} for {Dynamics} {Modeling} in {Continuous} {Control}, September 2020.
\bibitem[Ansari et~al.(2024)Ansari, Stella, Turkmen, Zhang, Mercado, Shen, Shchur, Rangapuram, Pineda~Arango, Kapoor, Zschiegner, Maddix, Mahoney, Torkkola, Gordon~Wilson, Bohlke-Schneider, and Wang]{ansari2024chronos}
Abdul~Fatir Ansari, Lorenzo Stella, Caner Turkmen, Xiyuan Zhang, Pedro Mercado, Huibin Shen, Oleksandr Shchur, Syama~Syndar Rangapuram, Sebastian Pineda~Arango, Shubham Kapoor, Jasper Zschiegner, Danielle~C. Maddix, Michael~W. Mahoney, Kari Torkkola, Andrew Gordon~Wilson, Michael Bohlke-Schneider, and Yuyang Wang.
\newblock Chronos: Learning the language of time series.
\newblock \emph{Transactions on Machine Learning Research}, 2024.
\newblock ISSN 2835-8856.
\newblock URL \url{https://openreview.net/forum?id=gerNCVqqtR}.
\bibitem[Azencot et~al.(2020)Azencot, Erichson, Lin, and Mahoney]{azencot_forecasting_2020}
Omri Azencot, N.~Benjamin Erichson, Vanessa Lin, and Michael~W. Mahoney.
\newblock Forecasting {Sequential} {Data} using {Consistent} {Koopman} {Autoencoders}.
\newblock In \emph{Proceedings of the 37th {International} {Conference} on {Machine} {Learning}}, 2020.
\newblock URL \url{http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.02236}.
\bibitem[Bender et~al.(2021)Bender, Gebru, McMillan-Major, and Shmitchell]{bender2021dangers}
Emily~M Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell.
\newblock On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?
\newblock In \emph{Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency}, pages 610--623, 2021.
\bibitem[Bhethanabhotla et~al.(2024)Bhethanabhotla, Swelam, Siems, Salinas, and Hutter]{bhethanabhotla2024mamba4cast}
Sathya~Kamesh Bhethanabhotla, Omar Swelam, Julien Siems, David Salinas, and Frank Hutter.
\newblock Mamba4cast: Efficient zero-shot time series forecasting with state space models.
\newblock \emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.09385}, 2024.
\bibitem[Brenner et~al.(2022)Brenner, Hess, Mikhaeil, Bereska, Monfared, Kuo, and Durstewitz]{brenner_tractable_2022}
Manuel Brenner, Florian Hess, Jonas~M. Mikhaeil, Leonard~F. Bereska, Zahra Monfared, Po-Chen Kuo, and Daniel Durstewitz.
\newblock Tractable {Dendritic} {RNNs} for {Reconstructing} {Nonlinear} {Dynamical} {Systems}.
\newblock In \emph{Proceedings of the 39th {International} {Conference} on {Machine} {Learning}}, pages 2292--2320. PMLR, June 2022.
\newblock URL \url{https://proceedings.mlr.press/v162/brenner22a.html}.
\newblock ISSN: 2640-3498.
\bibitem[Brenner et~al.(2024{\natexlab{a}})Brenner, Hemmer, Monfared, and Durstewitz]{brenner_almost_2024}
Manuel Brenner, Christoph~J\"{u}rgen Hemmer, Zahra Monfared, and Daniel Durstewitz.
\newblock Almost-linear rnns yield highly interpretable symbolic codes in dynamical systems reconstruction.
\newblock In A.~Globerson, L.~Mackey, D.~Belgrave, A.~Fan, U.~Paquet, J.~Tomczak, and C.~Zhang, editors, \emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, volume~37, pages 36829--36868. Curran Associates, Inc., 2024{\natexlab{a}}.
\newblock URL \url{https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2024/file/40cf27290cc2bd98a428b567ba25075c-Paper-Conference.pdf}.
\bibitem[Brenner et~al.(2024{\natexlab{b}})Brenner, Hess, Koppe, and Durstewitz]{brenner_integrating_2024}
Manuel Brenner, Florian Hess, Georgia Koppe, and Daniel Durstewitz.
\newblock Integrating {Multimodal} {Data} for {Joint} {Generative} {Modeling} of {Complex} {Dynamics}.
\newblock In \emph{Proceedings of the 41st {International} {Conference} on {Machine} {Learning}}, pages 4482--4516. PMLR, July 2024{\natexlab{b}}.
\newblock URL \url{https://proceedings.mlr.press/v235/brenner24a.html}.
\newblock ISSN: 2640-3498.
\bibitem[Brenner et~al.(2025)Brenner, Weber, Koppe, and Durstewitz]{brenner2024learning}
Manuel Brenner, Elias Weber, Georgia Koppe, and Daniel Durstewitz.
\newblock Learning interpretable hierarchical dynamical systems models from time series data.
\newblock In \emph{The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)}, 2025.
\newblock URL \url{https://openreview.net/forum?id=Vp2OAxMs2s}.
\bibitem[Brown et~al.(2020)Brown, Mann, Ryder, Subbiah, Kaplan, Dhariwal, Neelakantan, Shyam, Sastry, Askell, et~al.]{brown2020language}
Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared~D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et~al.
\newblock Language models are few-shot learners.
\newblock \emph{Advances in neural information processing systems}, 33:\penalty0 1877--1901, 2020.
\bibitem[Brunton and Kutz(2019)]{brunton_data-driven_2019}
Steven~L Brunton and J~Nathan Kutz.
\newblock \emph{Data-driven science and engineering: {Machine} learning, dynamical systems, and control}.
\newblock Cambridge University Press, 2019.
\bibitem[Brunton et~al.(2016)Brunton, Proctor, and Kutz]{brunton_discovering_2016}
Steven~L. Brunton, Joshua~L. Proctor, and J.~Nathan Kutz.
\newblock Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems.
\newblock \emph{Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA}, 113\penalty0 (15):\penalty0 3932--3937, 2016.
\newblock ISSN 0027-8424.
\newblock \doi{10.1073/pnas.1517384113}.
\bibitem[Brunton et~al.(2017)Brunton, Brunton, Proctor, Kaiser, and Kutz]{brunton_chaos_2017}
Steven~L. Brunton, Bingni~W. Brunton, Joshua~L. Proctor, Eurika Kaiser, and J.~Nathan Kutz.
\newblock Chaos as an intermittently forced linear system.
\newblock \emph{Nature Communications}, 8\penalty0 (1):\penalty0 19, May 2017.
\newblock ISSN 2041-1723.
\newblock \doi{10.1038/s41467-017-00030-8}.
\newblock URL \url{https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-00030-8}.
\newblock Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
\bibitem[Brunton et~al.(2021)Brunton, Budišić, Kaiser, and Kutz]{brunton_modern_2021}
Steven~L. Brunton, Marko Budišić, Eurika Kaiser, and J.~Nathan Kutz.
\newblock Modern {Koopman} {Theory} for {Dynamical} {Systems}, October 2021.
\newblock arXiv:2102.12086 [cs, eess, math].
\bibitem[Buzsaki(2006)]{buzsaki_rhythms_2006}
Gyorgy Buzsaki.
\newblock \emph{Rhythms of the {Brain}}.
\newblock Oxford University Press, August 2006.
\newblock ISBN 978-0-19-804125-2.
\newblock Google-Books-ID: ldz58irprjYC.
\bibitem[Cestnik and Abel(2019)]{cestnik_inferring_2019}
Rok Cestnik and Markus Abel.
\newblock Inferring the dynamics of oscillatory systems using recurrent neural networks.
\newblock \emph{Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science}, 29\penalty0 (6):\penalty0 063128, June 2019.
\newblock ISSN 1054-1500.
\newblock \doi{10.1063/1.5096918}.
\newblock URL \url{https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5096918}.
\bibitem[Chen et~al.(2018)Chen, Rubanova, Bettencourt, and Duvenaud]{chen_neural_2018}
Ricky T.~Q. Chen, Yulia Rubanova, Jesse Bettencourt, and David Duvenaud.
\newblock Neural {Ordinary} {Differential} {Equations}.
\newblock In \emph{Advances in {Neural} {Information} {Processing} {Systems} 31}, 2018.
\newblock URL \url{http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.07366}.
\bibitem[Coda-Forno et~al.(2023)Coda-Forno, Binz, Akata, Botvinick, Wang, and Schulz]{coda2023meta}
Julian Coda-Forno, Marcel Binz, Zeynep Akata, Matt Botvinick, Jane Wang, and Eric Schulz.
\newblock Meta-in-context learning in large language models.
\newblock \emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 36:\penalty0 65189--65201, 2023.
\bibitem[Cortiella et~al.(2021)Cortiella, Park, and Doostan]{cortiella_sparse_2021}
Alexandre Cortiella, Kwang-Chun Park, and Alireza Doostan.
\newblock Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems via reweighted l1-regularized least squares.
\newblock \emph{Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering}, 376:\penalty0 113620, April 2021.
\newblock ISSN 0045-7825.
\newblock \doi{10.1016/j.cma.2020.113620}.
\bibitem[Das et~al.(2024)Das, Kong, Sen, and Zhou]{das2024decoder}
Abhimanyu Das, Weihao Kong, Rajat Sen, and Yichen Zhou.
\newblock A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecasting.
\newblock In \emph{Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning}, 2024.
\bibitem[Dong et~al.(2022)Dong, Li, Dai, Zheng, Ma, Li, Xia, Xu, Wu, Liu, et~al.]{dong2022survey}
Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce~Zheng, Jingyuan Ma, Rui Li, Heming Xia, Jingjing Xu, Zhiyong Wu, Tianyu Liu, et~al.
\newblock A survey on in-context learning.
\newblock \emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00234}, 2022.
\bibitem[Durstewitz(2017)]{durstewitz_state_2017}
Daniel Durstewitz.
\newblock A state space approach for piecewise-linear recurrent neural networks for identifying computational dynamics from neural measurements.
\newblock \emph{PLoS Comput. Biol.}, 13\penalty0 (6):\penalty0 e1005542, 2017.
\newblock ISSN 1553-7358.
\newblock \doi{10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005542}.
\bibitem[Durstewitz et~al.(2023)Durstewitz, Koppe, and Thurm]{durstewitz_reconstructing_2023}
Daniel Durstewitz, Georgia Koppe, and Max~Ingo Thurm.
\newblock Reconstructing computational system dynamics from neural data with recurrent neural networks.
\newblock \emph{Nature Reviews. Neuroscience}, 24\penalty0 (11):\penalty0 693--710, November 2023.
\newblock ISSN 1471-0048.
\newblock \doi{10.1038/s41583-023-00740-7}.
\bibitem[Eisenmann et~al.(2024)Eisenmann, Monfared, Göring, and Durstewitz]{eisenmann2023bifurcations}
Lukas Eisenmann, Zahra Monfared, Niclas Göring, and Daniel Durstewitz.
\newblock Bifurcations and loss jumps in {RNN} training.
\newblock \emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 36, 2024.
\bibitem[Ekambaram et~al.(2023)Ekambaram, Jati, Nguyen, Sinthong, and Kalagnanam]{ekambaram2023tsmixer}
Vijay Ekambaram, Arindam Jati, Nam Nguyen, Phanwadee Sinthong, and Jayant Kalagnanam.
\newblock Tsmixer: Lightweight mlp-mixer model for multivariate time series forecasting.
\newblock In \emph{Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining}, pages 459--469, 2023.
\bibitem[Ekambaram et~al.(2024)Ekambaram, Jati, Dayama, Mukherjee, Nguyen, Gifford, Reddy, and Kalagnanam]{ekambaram2024tiny}
Vijay Ekambaram, Arindam Jati, Pankaj Dayama, Sumanta Mukherjee, Nam Nguyen, Wesley~M Gifford, Chandra Reddy, and Jayant Kalagnanam.
\newblock Tiny time mixers (ttms): Fast pre-trained models for enhanced zero/few-shot forecasting of multivariate time series.
\newblock \emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 37:\penalty0 74147--74181, 2024.
\bibitem[Garg et~al.(2022)Garg, Tsipras, Liang, and Valiant]{garg2022can}
Shivam Garg, Dimitris Tsipras, Percy~S Liang, and Gregory Valiant.
\newblock What can transformers learn in-context? a case study of simple function classes.
\newblock \emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 35:\penalty0 30583--30598, 2022.
\bibitem[Geneva and Zabaras(2022)]{geneva_transformers_2022}
Nicholas Geneva and Nicholas Zabaras.
\newblock Transformers for modeling physical systems.
\newblock \emph{Neural Networks}, 146:\penalty0 272--289, February 2022.
\newblock ISSN 0893-6080.
\newblock \doi{10.1016/j.neunet.2021.11.022}.
\bibitem[Gilpin(2022)]{gilpin_chaos_2022}
William Gilpin.
\newblock Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling.
\newblock In \emph{Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2)}, 2022.
\newblock URL \url{https://openreview.net/forum?id=enYjtbjYJrf}.
\bibitem[Gilpin(2023)]{gilpin_model_2023}
William Gilpin.
\newblock Model scale versus domain knowledge in statistical forecasting of chaotic systems.
\newblock \emph{Physical Review Research}, 5\penalty0 (4):\penalty0 043252, December 2023.
\newblock \doi{10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.043252}.
\newblock Publisher: American Physical Society.
\bibitem[Gilpin(2024)]{gilpin_generative_2024}
William Gilpin.
\newblock Generative learning for nonlinear dynamics.
\newblock \emph{Nature Reviews Physics}, 6\penalty0 (3):\penalty0 194--206, March 2024.
\newblock ISSN 2522-5820.
\newblock \doi{10.1038/s42254-024-00688-2}.
\newblock URL \url{https://www.nature.com/articles/s42254-024-00688-2}.
\newblock Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
\bibitem[Godahewa et~al.(2021)Godahewa, Bergmeir, Webb, Hyndman, and Montero-Manso]{godahewa2021monash}
Rakshitha Godahewa, Christoph Bergmeir, Geoffrey~I Webb, Rob~J Hyndman, and Pablo Montero-Manso.
\newblock Monash time series forecasting archive.
\newblock \emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.06643}, 2021.
\bibitem[G\"{o}ring et~al.(2024)G\"{o}ring, Hess, Brenner, Monfared, and Durstewitz]{pmlr-v235-goring24a}
Niclas~Alexander G\"{o}ring, Florian Hess, Manuel Brenner, Zahra Monfared, and Daniel Durstewitz.
\newblock Out-of-domain generalization in dynamical systems reconstruction.
\newblock In Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Zico Kolter, Katherine Heller, Adrian Weller, Nuria Oliver, Jonathan Scarlett, and Felix Berkenkamp, editors, \emph{Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning}, volume 235 of \emph{Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, pages 16071--16114. PMLR, 21--27 Jul 2024.
\newblock URL \url{https://proceedings.mlr.press/v235/goring24a.html}.
\bibitem[Gruver et~al.(2023)Gruver, Finzi, Qiu, and Wilson]{gruver2023large}
Nate Gruver, Marc Finzi, Shikai Qiu, and Andrew~G Wilson.
\newblock Large language models are zero-shot time series forecasters.
\newblock \emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 36:\penalty0 19622--19635, 2023.
\bibitem[Gu and Dao(2023)]{gu_mamba_2023}
Albert Gu and Tri Dao.
\newblock Mamba: {Linear}-{Time} {Sequence} {Modeling} with {Selective} {State} {Spaces}, December 2023.
\newblock arXiv:2312.00752 [cs].
\bibitem[Guckenheimer and Holmes(1983)]{guckenheimer_nonlinear_1983}
John Guckenheimer and Philip Holmes.
\newblock \emph{Nonlinear {Oscillations}, {Dynamical} {Systems}, and {Bifurcations} of {Vector} {Fields}}, volume~42 of \emph{Applied {Mathematical} {Sciences}}.
\newblock Springer, New York, NY, 1983.
\newblock ISBN 978-1-4612-7020-1 978-1-4612-1140-2.
\newblock \doi{10.1007/978-1-4612-1140-2}.
\newblock URL \url{http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4612-1140-2}.
\bibitem[Hemmer et~al.(2024)Hemmer, Brenner, Hess, and Durstewitz]{hemmer_optimal_2024}
Christoph~Jürgen Hemmer, Manuel Brenner, Florian Hess, and Daniel Durstewitz.
\newblock Optimal {Recurrent} {Network} {Topologies} for {Dynamical} {Systems} {Reconstruction}.
\newblock In \emph{Proceedings of the 41st {International} {Conference} on {Machine} {Learning}}, pages 18174--18204. PMLR, July 2024.
\newblock URL \url{https://proceedings.mlr.press/v235/hemmer24a.html}.
\newblock ISSN: 2640-3498.
\bibitem[Hess et~al.(2023)Hess, Monfared, Brenner, and Durstewitz]{hess_generalized_2023}
Florian Hess, Zahra Monfared, Manuel Brenner, and Daniel Durstewitz.
\newblock Generalized {Teacher} {Forcing} for {Learning} {Chaotic} {Dynamics}.
\newblock In \emph{Proceedings of the 40th {International} {Conference} on {Machine} {Learning}}, pages 13017--13049. PMLR, July 2023.
\newblock URL \url{https://proceedings.mlr.press/v202/hess23a.html}.
\newblock ISSN: 2640-3498.
\bibitem[Hewamalage et~al.(2023)Hewamalage, Ackermann, and Bergmeir]{hewamalage2023forecast}
Hansika Hewamalage, Klaus Ackermann, and Christoph Bergmeir.
\newblock Forecast evaluation for data scientists: common pitfalls and best practices.
\newblock \emph{Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery}, 37\penalty0 (2):\penalty0 788--832, 2023.
\bibitem[Jiang et~al.(2023)Jiang, Lu, Orlova, and Willett]{jiang2023training}
Ruoxi Jiang, Peter~Y Lu, Elena Orlova, and Rebecca Willett.
\newblock Training neural operators to preserve invariant measures of chaotic attractors.
\newblock \emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 36:\penalty0 27645--27669, 2023.
\bibitem[Kaiser et~al.(2018)Kaiser, Kutz, and Brunton]{kaiser_sparse_2018}
E.~Kaiser, J.~N. Kutz, and S.~L. Brunton.
\newblock Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for model predictive control in the low-data limit.
\newblock \emph{Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences}, 474\penalty0 (2219):\penalty0 20180335, November 2018.
\newblock \doi{10.1098/rspa.2018.0335}.
\newblock Publisher: Royal Society.
\bibitem[Kantz and Schreiber(2004)]{kantz_nonlinear_2004}
Holger Kantz and Thomas Schreiber.
\newblock \emph{Nonlinear time series analysis}, volume~7.
\newblock Cambridge university press, 2004.
\bibitem[Karlsson and Svanström(2019)]{karlsson_modelling_2019}
Daniel Karlsson and Olle Svanström.
\newblock Modelling {Dynamical} {Systems} {Using} {Neural} {Ordinary} {Differential} {Equations}, 2019.
\newblock URL \url{https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/256887}.
\bibitem[Kirchmeyer et~al.(2022)Kirchmeyer, Yin, Don{\`a}, Baskiotis, Rakotomamonjy, and Gallinari]{kirchmeyer2022generalizing}
Matthieu Kirchmeyer, Yuan Yin, J{\'e}r{\'e}mie Don{\`a}, Nicolas Baskiotis, Alain Rakotomamonjy, and Patrick Gallinari.
\newblock Generalizing to new physical systems via context-informed dynamics model.
\newblock In \emph{International Conference on Machine Learning}, pages 11283--11301. PMLR, 2022.
\bibitem[Ko et~al.(2023)Ko, Koh, Park, and Jhe]{ko_homotopy-based_2023}
Joon-Hyuk Ko, Hankyul Koh, Nojun Park, and Wonho Jhe.
\newblock Homotopy-based training of {NeuralODEs} for accurate dynamics discovery, May 2023.
\newblock URL \url{http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01407}.
\newblock arXiv:2210.01407 [physics].
\bibitem[Koppe et~al.(2019)Koppe, Toutounji, Kirsch, Lis, and Durstewitz]{koppe_identifying_2019}
Georgia Koppe, Hazem Toutounji, Peter Kirsch, Stefanie Lis, and Daniel Durstewitz.
\newblock Identifying nonlinear dynamical systems via generative recurrent neural networks with applications to {fMRI}.
\newblock \emph{PLOS Computational Biology}, 15\penalty0 (8):\penalty0 e1007263, 2019.
\newblock ISSN 1553-7358.
\newblock \doi{10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007263}.
\bibitem[Kraemer et~al.(2021)Kraemer, Datseris, Kurths, Kiss, Ocampo-Espindola, and Marwan]{kraemer_unified_2021}
K.~H. Kraemer, G.~Datseris, J.~Kurths, I.~Z. Kiss, J.~L. Ocampo-Espindola, and N.~Marwan.
\newblock A unified and automated approach to attractor reconstruction.
\newblock \emph{New Journal of Physics}, 23\penalty0 (3):\penalty0 033017, March 2021.
\newblock ISSN 1367-2630.
\newblock \doi{10.1088/1367-2630/abe336}.
\newblock URL \url{https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/abe336}.
\newblock Publisher: IOP Publishing.
\bibitem[Kramer et~al.(2022)Kramer, Bommer, Tombolini, Koppe, and Durstewitz]{kramer22a}
Daniel Kramer, Philine~L Bommer, Carlo Tombolini, Georgia Koppe, and Daniel Durstewitz.
\newblock Reconstructing nonlinear dynamical systems from multi-modal time series.
\newblock In \emph{Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning}, volume 162 of \emph{Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, pages 11613--11633. PMLR, 17--23 Jul 2022.
\newblock URL \url{https://proceedings.mlr.press/v162/kramer22a.html}.
\bibitem[Lin and Lee(2024)]{lin2024dual}
Ziqian Lin and Kangwook Lee.
\newblock Dual operating modes of in-context learning.
\newblock In \emph{Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning}, 2024.
\bibitem[Liu et~al.(2020)Liu, Jiang, He, Chen, Liu, Gao, and Han]{Liu2020On}
Liyuan Liu, Haoming Jiang, Pengcheng He, Weizhu Chen, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, and Jiawei Han.
\newblock On the variance of the adaptive learning rate and beyond.
\newblock In \emph{International Conference on Learning Representations}, 2020.
\newblock URL \url{https://openreview.net/forum?id=rkgz2aEKDr}.
\bibitem[Liu et~al.(2024)Liu, Liu, Woo, Aksu, Liang, Zimmermann, Liu, Savarese, Xiong, and Sahoo]{liu2024moirai}
Xu~Liu, Juncheng Liu, Gerald Woo, Taha Aksu, Yuxuan Liang, Roger Zimmermann, Chenghao Liu, Silvio Savarese, Caiming Xiong, and Doyen Sahoo.
\newblock Moirai-moe: Empowering time series foundation models with sparse mixture of experts.
\newblock \emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10469}, 2024.
\bibitem[Loiseau and Brunton(2018)]{loiseau_constrained_2018}
Jean-Christophe Loiseau and Steven~L. Brunton.
\newblock Constrained sparse {Galerkin} regression.
\newblock \emph{Journal of Fluid Mechanics}, 838:\penalty0 42--67, March 2018.
\newblock ISSN 0022-1120, 1469-7645.
\newblock \doi{10.1017/jfm.2017.823}.
\newblock Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
\bibitem[Lusch et~al.(2018)Lusch, Kutz, and Brunton]{lusch_deep_2018}
Bethany Lusch, J.~Nathan Kutz, and Steven~L. Brunton.
\newblock Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamics.
\newblock \emph{Nat Commun}, 9\penalty0 (1):\penalty0 4950, December 2018.
\newblock ISSN 2041-1723.
\newblock \doi{10.1038/s41467-018-07210-0}.
\newblock URL \url{http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.09707}.
\newblock arXiv: 1712.09707.
\bibitem[Mandelbrot and Hudson(2007)]{mandelbrot_misbehavior_2007}
Benoit Mandelbrot and Richard~L. Hudson.
\newblock \emph{The {Misbehavior} of {Markets}: {A} {Fractal} {View} of {Financial} {Turbulence}}.
\newblock Basic Books, March 2007.
\newblock ISBN 978-0-465-00468-3.
\newblock Google-Books-ID: GMKeUqufPQ0C.
\bibitem[Messenger and Bortz(2021)]{messenger_weak_2021}
Daniel~A. Messenger and David~M. Bortz.
\newblock Weak {SINDy}: {Galerkin}-{Based} {Data}-{Driven} {Model} {Selection}.
\newblock \emph{Multiscale Modeling \& Simulation}, 19\penalty0 (3):\penalty0 1474--1497, January 2021.
\newblock ISSN 1540-3459.
\newblock \doi{10.1137/20M1343166}.
\newblock URL \url{https://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/20M1343166}.
\newblock Publisher: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
\bibitem[Mikhaeil et~al.(2022)Mikhaeil, Monfared, and Durstewitz]{mikhaeil_difficulty_2022}
Jonas Mikhaeil, Zahra Monfared, and Daniel Durstewitz.
\newblock On the difficulty of learning chaotic dynamics with {RNNs}.
\newblock \emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 35:\penalty0 11297--11312, December 2022.
\newblock URL \url{https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/hash/495e55f361708bedbab5d81f92048dcd-Abstract-Conference.html}.
\bibitem[Mumby et~al.(2007)Mumby, Hastings, and Edwards]{ecology1}
Peter~J. Mumby, Alan Hastings, and Helen~J. Edwards.
\newblock Thresholds and the resilience of caribbean coral reefs.
\newblock \emph{Nature}, 450\penalty0 (7166):\penalty0 98--101, 2007.
\newblock \doi{10.1038/nature06252}.
\newblock URL \url{https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06252}.
\bibitem[Naiman and Azencot(2021)]{naiman_koopman_2021}
Ilan Naiman and Omri Azencot.
\newblock A {Koopman} {Approach} to {Understanding} {Sequence} {Neural} {Models}.
\newblock \emph{arXiv:2102.07824 [cs, math]}, October 2021.
\newblock URL \url{http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.07824}.
\newblock arXiv: 2102.07824.
\bibitem[Nzoyem et~al.(2025)Nzoyem, Barton, and Deakin]{nzoyem2025towards}
Roussel~Desmond Nzoyem, David~AW Barton, and Tom Deakin.
\newblock Towards foundational models for dynamical system reconstruction: Hierarchical meta-learning via mixture of experts.
\newblock \emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.05335}, 2025.
\bibitem[Otto and Rowley(2019)]{otto_linearly-recurrent_2019}
Samuel~E. Otto and Clarence~W. Rowley.
\newblock Linearly-{Recurrent} {Autoencoder} {Networks} for {Learning} {Dynamics}, January 2019.
\newblock URL \url{http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.01378}.
\newblock arXiv:1712.01378 [cs, math, stat].
\bibitem[Pals et~al.(2024)Pals, Sa{\u{g}}tekin, Pei, Gloeckler, and Macke]{pals2024inferring}
Matthijs Pals, A~Erdem Sa{\u{g}}tekin, Felix~C Pei, Manuel Gloeckler, and Jakob~H. Macke.
\newblock Inferring stochastic low-rank recurrent neural networks from neural data.
\newblock In \emph{The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems}, 2024.
\newblock URL \url{https://openreview.net/forum?id=C0EhyoPpTN}.
\bibitem[Patel and Ott(2023)]{patel_using_2023}
Dhruvit Patel and Edward Ott.
\newblock Using machine learning to anticipate tipping points and extrapolate to post-tipping dynamics of non-stationary dynamical systems.
\newblock \emph{Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)}, 33\penalty0 (2):\penalty0 023143, February 2023.
\newblock ISSN 1089-7682.
\newblock \doi{10.1063/5.0131787}.
\bibitem[Pathak et~al.(2017)Pathak, Lu, Hunt, Girvan, and Ott]{pathak_using_2017}
Jaideep Pathak, Zhixin Lu, Brian~R. Hunt, Michelle Girvan, and Edward Ott.
\newblock Using {Machine} {Learning} to {Replicate} {Chaotic} {Attractors} and {Calculate} {Lyapunov} {Exponents} from {Data}.
\newblock \emph{Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science}, 27\penalty0 (12):\penalty0 121102, December 2017.
\newblock ISSN 1054-1500, 1089-7682.
\newblock \doi{10.1063/1.5010300}.
\newblock URL \url{http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.07313}.
\newblock arXiv: 1710.07313.
\bibitem[Platt et~al.(2021)Platt, Wong, Clark, Penny, and Abarbanel]{platt2021robust}
Jason~A Platt, Adrian Wong, Randall Clark, Stephen~G Penny, and Henry~DI Abarbanel.
\newblock Robust forecasting using predictive generalized synchronization in reservoir computing.
\newblock \emph{Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science}, 31\penalty0 (12), 2021.
\bibitem[Platt et~al.(2022)Platt, Penny, Smith, Chen, and Abarbanel]{platt_systematic_2022}
Jason~A. Platt, Stephen~G. Penny, Timothy~A. Smith, Tse-Chun Chen, and Henry D.~I. Abarbanel.
\newblock A {Systematic} {Exploration} of {Reservoir} {Computing} for {Forecasting} {Complex} {Spatiotemporal} {Dynamics}, January 2022.
\newblock URL \url{http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08910}.
\newblock arXiv:2201.08910 [cs].
\bibitem[Platt et~al.(2023)Platt, Penny, Smith, Chen, and Abarbanel]{platt2023constraining}
Jason~A Platt, Stephen~G Penny, Timothy~A Smith, Tse-Chun Chen, and Henry~DI Abarbanel.
\newblock Constraining chaos: Enforcing dynamical invariants in the training of reservoir computers.
\newblock \emph{Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science}, 33\penalty0 (10), 2023.
\bibitem[Rasul et~al.(2023)Rasul, Ashok, Williams, Khorasani, Adamopoulos, Bhagwatkar, Bilo{\v{s}}, Ghonia, Hassen, Schneider, et~al.]{rasul2023lag}
Kashif Rasul, Arjun Ashok, Andrew~Robert Williams, Arian Khorasani, George Adamopoulos, Rishika Bhagwatkar, Marin Bilo{\v{s}}, Hena Ghonia, Nadhir Hassen, Anderson Schneider, et~al.
\newblock Lag-llama: Towards foundation models for time series forecasting.
\newblock In \emph{R0-FoMo: Robustness of Few-shot and Zero-shot Learning in Large Foundation Models}, 2023.
\bibitem[Rosenstein et~al.(1993)Rosenstein, Collins, and De~Luca]{rosenstein1993practical}
Michael~T Rosenstein, James~J Collins, and Carlo~J De~Luca.
\newblock A practical method for calculating largest lyapunov exponents from small data sets.
\newblock \emph{Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena}, 65\penalty0 (1-2):\penalty0 117--134, 1993.
\bibitem[Rusch et~al.(2022)Rusch, Mishra, Erichson, and Mahoney]{rusch_long_2022}
T~Konstantin Rusch, Siddhartha Mishra, N~Benjamin Erichson, and Michael~W Mahoney.
\newblock Long expressive memory for sequence modeling.
\newblock In \emph{International Conference on Learning Representations}, 2022.
\bibitem[Sauer et~al.(1991)Sauer, Yorke, and Casdagli]{sauer_embedology_1991}
Tim Sauer, James~A Yorke, and Martin Casdagli.
\newblock Embedology.
\newblock \emph{Journal of statistical Physics}, 65\penalty0 (3):\penalty0 579--616, 1991.
\bibitem[Schalk et~al.(2000)Schalk, {McFarland}, Hinterberger, Birbaumer, and Wolpaw]{schalk_bci2000_2004}
Gerwin Schalk, Dennis~J. {McFarland}, Thilo Hinterberger, Niels Birbaumer, and Jonathan~R. Wolpaw.
\newblock {BCI}2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface ({BCI}) system.
\newblock \emph{{IEEE} transactions on bio-medical engineering}, 51\penalty0 (6):\penalty0 1034--1043, 2000.
\newblock ISSN 0018-9294.
\newblock \doi{10.1109/TBME.2004.827072}.
\bibitem[Schiff et~al.(2024)Schiff, Wan, Parker, Hoyer, Kuleshov, Sha, and Zepeda-N\'{u}\~{n}ez]{pmlr-v235-schiff24b}
Yair Schiff, Zhong~Yi Wan, Jeffrey~B. Parker, Stephan Hoyer, Volodymyr Kuleshov, Fei Sha, and Leonardo Zepeda-N\'{u}\~{n}ez.
\newblock {D}y{SLIM}: Dynamics stable learning by invariant measure for chaotic systems.
\newblock In Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Zico Kolter, Katherine Heller, Adrian Weller, Nuria Oliver, Jonathan Scarlett, and Felix Berkenkamp, editors, \emph{Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning}, volume 235 of \emph{Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, pages 43649--43684. PMLR, 21--27 Jul 2024.
\bibitem[SEL'KOV(1968)]{sel1968self}
Evgeni~E SEL'KOV.
\newblock Self-oscillations in glycolysis 1. a simple kinetic model.
\newblock \emph{European Journal of Biochemistry}, 4\penalty0 (1):\penalty0 79--86, 1968.
\bibitem[Strogatz(2024)]{strogatz2024nonlinear}
Steven~H Strogatz.
\newblock \emph{Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: with applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering}.
\newblock Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2024.
\bibitem[Sun et~al.(2023)Sun, Li, Li, and Hong]{sun2023test}
Chenxi Sun, Hongyan Li, Yaliang Li, and Shenda Hong.
\newblock Test: Text prototype aligned embedding to activate llm's ability for time series.
\newblock \emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08241}, 2023.
\bibitem[Takens(1981)]{takens_detecting_1981}
Floris Takens.
\newblock Detecting strange attractors in turbulence.
\newblock In \emph{Dynamical {Systems} and {Turbulence}, {Warwick} 1980}, volume 898, pages 366--381. Springer, 1981.
\newblock ISBN 978-3-540-11171-9 978-3-540-38945-3.
\newblock URL \url{http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BFb0091924}.
\bibitem[Talathi and Vartak(2016)]{talathi_improving_2016}
Sachin~S. Talathi and Aniket Vartak.
\newblock Improving performance of recurrent neural network with relu nonlinearity.
\newblock In \emph{Proceedings of the 4th {International} {Conference} on {Learning} {Representations}}, 2016.
\newblock URL \url{http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.03771}.
\bibitem[Tan et~al.(2024)Tan, Merrill, Gupta, Althoff, and Hartvigsen]{tan2024language}
Mingtian Tan, Mike Merrill, Vinayak Gupta, Tim Althoff, and Tom Hartvigsen.
\newblock Are language models actually useful for time series forecasting?
\newblock \emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 37:\penalty0 60162--60191, 2024.
\bibitem[Tang et~al.(2025)Tang, Zhang, Jin, Yu, Wang, Jin, Zhang, and Du]{tang2025time}
Hua Tang, Chong Zhang, Mingyu Jin, Qinkai Yu, Zhenting Wang, Xiaobo Jin, Yongfeng Zhang, and Mengnan Du.
\newblock Time series forecasting with llms: Understanding and enhancing model capabilities.
\newblock \emph{ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter}, 26\penalty0 (2):\penalty0 109--118, 2025.
\bibitem[Toner et~al.(2025)Toner, Lee, Joosen, Singh, and Asenov]{toner2025performance}
William Toner, Thomas~L Lee, Artjom Joosen, Rajkarn Singh, and Martin Asenov.
\newblock Performance of zero-shot time series foundation models on cloud data.
\newblock \emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12944}, 2025.
\bibitem[Trischler and D’Eleuterio(2016)]{trischler_synthesis_2016}
Adam~P. Trischler and Gabriele~M.T. D’Eleuterio.
\newblock Synthesis of recurrent neural networks for dynamical system simulation.
\newblock \emph{Neural Networks}, 80:\penalty0 67--78, 2016.
\newblock ISSN 08936080.
\newblock \doi{10.1016/j.neunet.2016.04.001}.
\newblock URL \url{https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0893608016300314}.
\bibitem[Tziperman et~al.(1997)Tziperman, Scher, Zebiak, and Cane]{tziperman-97}
Eli Tziperman, Harvey Scher, Stephen~E. Zebiak, and Mark~A. Cane.
\newblock Controlling spatiotemporal chaos in a realistic el ni\~no prediction model.
\newblock \emph{Phys. Rev. Lett.}, 79:\penalty0 1034--1037, Aug 1997.
\newblock \doi{10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1034}.
\newblock URL \url{https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1034}.
\bibitem[Vlachas et~al.(2018)Vlachas, Byeon, Wan, Sapsis, and Koumoutsakos]{vlachas_data-driven_2018}
Pantelis~R. Vlachas, Wonmin Byeon, Zhong~Y. Wan, Themistoklis~P. Sapsis, and Petros Koumoutsakos.
\newblock Data-driven forecasting of high-dimensional chaotic systems with long short-term memory networks.
\newblock \emph{Proc. R. Soc. A.}, 474\penalty0 (2213):\penalty0 20170844, 2018.
\newblock ISSN 1364-5021, 1471-2946.
\newblock \doi{10.1098/rspa.2017.0844}.
\newblock URL \url{https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.2017.0844}.
\bibitem[Volkmann et~al.(2024)Volkmann, Br{\"a}ndle, Durstewitz, and Koppe]{volkmann2024scalable}
Eric Volkmann, Alena Br{\"a}ndle, Daniel Durstewitz, and Georgia Koppe.
\newblock A scalable generative model for dynamical system reconstruction from neuroimaging data.
\newblock \emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 37:\penalty0 80328--80362, 2024.
\bibitem[Von~Oswald et~al.(2023)Von~Oswald, Niklasson, Randazzo, Sacramento, Mordvintsev, Zhmoginov, and Vladymyrov]{von2023transformers}
Johannes Von~Oswald, Eyvind Niklasson, Ettore Randazzo, Jo{\~a}o Sacramento, Alexander Mordvintsev, Andrey Zhmoginov, and Max Vladymyrov.
\newblock Transformers learn in-context by gradient descent.
\newblock In \emph{International Conference on Machine Learning}, pages 35151--35174. PMLR, 2023.
\bibitem[Wang et~al.(2022)Wang, Dong, Arik, and Yu]{wang_koopman_2022}
Rui Wang, Yihe Dong, Sercan~Ö Arik, and Rose Yu.
\newblock Koopman {Neural} {Forecaster} for {Time} {Series} with {Temporal} {Distribution} {Shifts}, October 2022.
\newblock URL \url{http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03675}.
\newblock arXiv:2210.03675 [cs, stat].
\bibitem[Watts and Strogatz(1998)]{watts_collective_1998}
Duncan~J. Watts and Steven~H. Strogatz.
\newblock Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks.
\newblock \emph{Nature}, 393\penalty0 (6684):\penalty0 440--442, 1998.
\newblock \doi{10.1038/30918}.
\bibitem[Williams et~al.(2024)Williams, Ashok, Marcotte, Zantedeschi, Subramanian, Riachi, Requeima, Lacoste, Rish, Chapados, et~al.]{williams2024context}
Andrew~Robert Williams, Arjun Ashok, {\'E}tienne Marcotte, Valentina Zantedeschi, Jithendaraa Subramanian, Roland Riachi, James Requeima, Alexandre Lacoste, Irina Rish, Nicolas Chapados, et~al.
\newblock Context is key: A benchmark for forecasting with essential textual information.
\newblock \emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.18959}, 2024.
\bibitem[Wood(2010)]{wood_statistical_2010}
Simon~N. Wood.
\newblock Statistical inference for noisy nonlinear ecological dynamic systems.
\newblock \emph{Nature}, 466\penalty0 (7310):\penalty0 1102--1104, August 2010.
\newblock ISSN 1476-4687.
\newblock \doi{10.1038/nature09319}.
\newblock URL \url{https://www.nature.com/articles/nature09319}.
\newblock Number: 7310 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
\bibitem[Xie et~al.(2021)Xie, Raghunathan, Liang, and Ma]{xie2021explanation}
Sang~Michael Xie, Aditi Raghunathan, Percy Liang, and Tengyu Ma.
\newblock An explanation of in-context learning as implicit bayesian inference.
\newblock \emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.02080}, 2021.
\bibitem[Yin et~al.(2021)Yin, Ayed, de~B{\'e}zenac, Baskiotis, and Gallinari]{yin2021leads}
Yuan Yin, Ibrahim Ayed, Emmanuel de~B{\'e}zenac, Nicolas Baskiotis, and Patrick Gallinari.
\newblock Leads: Learning dynamical systems that generalize across environments.
\newblock \emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 34:\penalty0 7561--7573, 2021.
\bibitem[Yu and Wang(2024)]{yu2024learning}
Rose Yu and Rui Wang.
\newblock Learning dynamical systems from data: An introduction to physics-guided deep learning.
\newblock \emph{Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, 121\penalty0 (27):\penalty0 e2311808121, 2024.
\bibitem[Zhang and Gilpin(2025)]{zhang2025zeroshotforecastingchaoticsystems}
Yuanzhao Zhang and William Gilpin.
\newblock Zero-shot forecasting of chaotic systems.
\newblock In \emph{The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations}, 2025.
\newblock URL \url{https://openreview.net/forum?id=TqYjhJrp9m}.
\bibitem[Zhou et~al.(2021)Zhou, Zhang, Peng, Zhang, Li, Xiong, and Zhang]{haoyietal_informer_2021}
Haoyi Zhou, Shanghang Zhang, Jieqi Peng, Shuai Zhang, Jianxin Li, Hui Xiong, and Wancai Zhang.
\newblock Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting.
\newblock In \emph{The Thirty-Fifth {AAAI} Conference on Artificial Intelligence, {AAAI} 2021, Virtual Conference}, volume~35, pages 11106--11115. {AAAI} Press, 2021.
\end{thebibliography}