Series of molecular-like doubly excited states of a quasi-three-body Coulomb system
Extracted source text · arXiv 2506.13495
% !TeX spellcheck = en_US
\documentclass[aps,prl,reprint,groupedaddress]{revtex4-2}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,multirow}
\usepackage{bm}
\usepackage{braket}
\usepackage[
colorlinks,
linkcolor=blue,
urlcolor=blue,
citecolor=blue
]{hyperref}
\begin{document}
\title{Series of molecular-like doubly excited states of a quasi-three-body Coulomb system}
\author{M.\,G\'en\'evriez}
\email[]{matthieu.genevriez@uclouvain.be}
\author{M.\,Jungers}
\affiliation{Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences, Universit\'e catholique de Louvain, BE-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium}
\author{C.\,Rosen}
\author{U.\,Eichmann}
\email[]{eichmann@mbi-berlin.de}
\affiliation{Max-Born-Institute, 12489 Berlin, Germany}
\date{\today}
\begin{abstract}
We investigated resonant multiphoton excitation of high-angular-momentum planetary states of the strontium atom, a quasi-three-body Coulomb system, both experimentally and theoretically. A series of highly doubly excited electronic states converging to the double ionization threshold was identified and reproduced by first-principles calculations, which provided access to the two-electron wavefunctions of the resonances. In these states, the outer electron is dynamically localized at large distances by pendulum-like oscillations of the inner electron across the nucleus. A complementary simple molecular-like adiabatic model offers a clear interpretation of the correlated two-electron motion and suggests that the series is a general feature of highly doubly excited states of atoms and molecules.
\end{abstract}
\maketitle
% Two highly excited electrons moving in the Coulomb field of a doubly charged
% nucleus form a strongly correlated quantum system with a fascinatingly rich and
% complex spectrum of resonances~\cite{tanner00,aymar96}. It is a prototype of
% the three-body Coulomb problem and, as such, stimulated intense experimental
% and theoretical work to investigate and classify the two-electron phase space
% and its dynamics. Although the phase space is mostly chaotic~\cite{richter93},
% the occurrence of sharp and regular resonances in photoexcitation
% spectra~\cite{domke91, czasch05, genevriez23, eichmann90} reveals the existence
% of longer-lived states in which the two electrons move along strongly
% correlated orbits~\cite{richter90, eichmann90, genevriez21a}. Ultrafast laser
% physics has allowed to further observe the correlated electron dynamics behind
% such resonances in the time domain~\cite{pisharody04, ott14, kaldun16}.
% Recently, the double excitation of divalent atoms in ultracold gases has
% offered a way to manipulate electron correlations in a coherent
% manner~\cite{muni22,wirth24}, allowing to, \textit{e.g.}, control the motion of
% Rydberg atoms with light~\cite{bouillon24,wirth24,lachaud24}, and paving the
% way to studying high lying doubly excited states with the exquisite resolution
% and quantum-state control offered by ultracold temperatures.
Two highly excited electrons moving in the Coulomb field of a doubly charged
nucleus form a strongly correlated quantum system with a fascinatingly rich spectrum of resonances~\cite{tanner00,aymar96}. Being a prototype of
the three-body Coulomb problem, it stimulated intense experimental and theoretical activity that revealed the existence of longer-lived resonances in a two-electron phase space that is otherwise largely
chaotic~\cite{richter93}. In such resonances the two electrons move along spectacular strongly correlated orbits~\cite{richter90, eichmann90,
genevriez21a}, including the fundamental frozen-planet orbits, collinear eZe
orbits or Langmuir orbits, that represent a backbone of theoretical analysis~\cite{richter91,genevriez21a,gremaud98}. Some resonances have been experimentally detected as
sharp lines in photoexcitation spectra~\cite{domke91, czasch05,
genevriez23, eichmann90} and, with the advent of ultrafast laser physics, their
dynamics were also unraveled in the time domain~\cite{pisharody04, ott14,
kaldun16}.
Despite sustained effort, many predicted resonances have never been observed because their transition dipole moment from the ground
state is too small and data with sufficient resolution are lacking. Multiphoton resonant excitation makes it possible to prepare doubly excited
states inaccessible by one-photon excitation from the ground
state~\cite{camus89,eichmann90}. While inadequate for helium because
of its large double-excitation energies, it is well suited to prepare doubly excited states of alkaline-earth
atoms with high-resolution table-top lasers~\cite{camus89,eichmann90,genevriez19,genevriez19b,teixeira20}. With their two valence electrons, alkaline-earth atoms are quasi-three-body Coulomb
systems~\cite{aymar96} in which the two electrons and their correlation can be manipulated with laser light, a feature that recently made such species an important tool in ultracold Rydberg physics~\cite{muni22,wirth24,bouillon24,wirth24,lachaud24}. Theoretical
calculations of high lying resonances, on the other hand, have long been limited to the pioneering work of Ref.~\citenum{wood94}. Recent effort~\cite{genevriez21,genevriez21a,genevriez23} has been made to unravel the dynamics of two highly excited electrons in these \emph{quasi}-three-body Coulomb systems in which, in contrast with the helium atom, the
third body is not so well defined (i.e., not purely Coulombic)~\cite{codling90}.
% Such studies were further motivated by the fact
% that double excitation of divalent atoms in ultracold gases has offered a way
% to coherently manipulate electron correlations~\cite{muni22,wirth24} in order
% to, \textit{e.g.}, control the motion of Rydberg atoms with
% light~\cite{bouillon24,wirth24,lachaud24}, and paving the way to studying high
% lying doubly excited states with the exquisite resolution and quantum-state
% control offered by ultracold temperatures.
% Of the major types of quasi-periodic
% orbits identified by extensive theoretical works in the helium atom, most have
% repeatedly escaped experimental observation. Such orbits, which include the
% frozen-planet orbit or the Langmuir orbit, have not been observed
% experimentally because of their negligible transition dipole moment from the
% ground state of He.
% On the theoretical side, there is no practical solution to the three body
% problem and even the approximate description of two highly excited electrons is
% challenging~\cite{genevriez21,tanner00}. $R$-matrix methods combined with
% multichannel quantum-defect theory have proven essential to investigate doubly
% excited states in which one of the two electrons is highly
% excited~\cite{aymar96}. Calculations of states in which both electrons are
% highly excited have been carried out in
% helium~\cite{tanner00,domke91,czasch05,eiglsperger12} but became available for
% different atoms only recently~\cite{genevriez21}, providing spectacular
% visualizations of the two-electron motion~\cite{genevriez21a} and making it
% possible to investigate the dynamics of two highly excited electrons in more complex systems.
%
In this letter we report the observation of a series of doubly excited states
in quasi-three-body Coulomb systems that had not been previously identified nor
observed. The series belongs to high-angular-momentum, asymmetric doubly
excited states, often called planetary states~\cite{percival77,eichmann92}, for
which the approximate individual principal quantum numbers of the two electrons
are different ($N < n$). The series is associated with a characteristic
progression of its energy levels and a remarkable type of two-electron orbit in
which the inner electron oscillates between opposite sides of the nucleus while
the outer electron is confined in a molecular-like potential at large
distances -- which is why we propose to refer to these states as pendular-planet states (PPS). Our findings are based on the comparison between experimental
spectra recorded in the Sr atom and accurate calculations from first
principles, which allows us to identify the aforementioned resonances. The
resonance wavefunctions are analyzed in detail, in the spirit of earlier
works in the helium atom~\cite{tanner00,richter91,gremaud98,burgers96}, and
rationalized with a simple adiabtic molecular-like model.
% In the helium atom, the approximate SO(4) symmetry of
% the problem implies the existence of an approximate set of good quantum
% numbers~\cite{wulfman68,herrick75,herrick83} that has been essential in
% classifying doubly excited states and understanding the underlying electronic
% dynamics~\cite{tanner00}. In \emph{any} other atomic or molecular system, the
% doubly charged ion core responsible for Coulomb attraction is no longer
% spherically symmetric and the approximate SO(4) symmetry is broken. This is for
% example the case for alkaline-earth atoms, whose planetary states have
% been extensively studied experimentally~\cite{camus89,eichmann90,teixeira20}
% because their low double-excitation energies make them far more suitable for
% sequential multiphoton excitation with table-top
% setups~\cite{genevriez19,genevriez19b} than helium.
% \begin{figure}
% \centering
% \caption{Excitation scheme}
% \label{fig:excitation_scheme}
% \end{figure}
\begin{figure*}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{fig1.pdf}
\caption{(Left) Resonant multiphoton excitation scheme. (Right) Experimental spectrum in the region of the Sr$^+(N=9-17)$ ionization thresholds. The wavenumber scale is given relative to
the Sr$^{2+}$ double ionization threshold to facilitate the analysis. The
energies of the Sr$^{+}(6dnl - Nfnl)$ transitions are shown in the upper
horizontal scale. The lines centered around those transitions and visible in
the spectrum are marked by vertical blue bars. The series of lines under
investigation is marked by the green bars. Orange bars denote a different
series (see text). Spurious sharp resonances in the Sr$^+$ ion are marked by
the full gray circles. The inset shows a comparison between the experimental
spectrum (black full line) and the theoretical spectrum (full red line) in the
$N=9-10$ region.}
\label{fig:overview_experimental_spectrum}
\end{figure*}
In the experiment, doubly excited states of Sr are prepared below the
Sr$^+(N=9-17)$ ionization thresholds following the well established sequential
resonant multiphoton excitation scheme described
elsewhere~\cite{eichmann89,eichmann92,rosen99,eichmann03} and shown in
Fig.~\ref{fig:overview_experimental_spectrum}. Note that the
independent-particle quantum numbers adopted for the states classification are
only approximate because of the high degree of electronic correlation. Briefly,
Sr atoms in an effusive beam are first excited with two pulsed dye lasers
pumped by an excimer laser from the $5s^{2}$ ground state via an intermediate
resonance to a $5sn_ik_i$ Rydberg Stark state in the presence of a ``Stark
switching'' static electric field~\cite{cooke78a,jones90}. When slowly turning
off the field, the Stark state adiabtically evolves into a $5sn_il_i$ Rydberg
state with a value of $l_i$ that is determined by the value of $k_i$. In the
present case we choose $n_i=18$ and $l_i = 15$. Nonadiabatic effects as the
field is switched off and stray electric fields in the chamber can cause the
transfer of a small part of the population to other, neighbouring $l$
values~\cite{genevriez21a,camus93}. After a time delay of about 2~$\mu$s
another two pulsed dye lasers excite the atoms to the $6d_{5/2}18l_i$ state via
the intermediate $5p_{3/2}18l_i$ state. Finally, a fifth pulsed dye laser is
scanned to excite the atoms further to doubly excited states near the
Sr$^+(N=9-17)$ thresholds. Sr$^{2+}$ ions are formed from the highy lying
doubly excited states via the combination of auto-, photo- and field-ionization
detailed in~\cite{rosen99,genevriez23}, and are then detected in a
background-free manner.
The experimental spectrum in Fig.~\ref{fig:overview_experimental_spectrum}
shows the number Sr$^{2+}$ ions recorded while scanning the wavenumber
$\tilde{\nu}_5$ of the fifth laser. As
$\tilde{\nu}_5$ increases the Sr$^+$ ions produced upon autoionization are, on
average, in higher Rydberg states. Their photoionization cross sections are
lower, which lowers the amount of Sr$^{2+}$ ions produced. To approximately
compensate for this the measured signal is scaled by $\nu^3$, with $\nu$ the
effective principal quantum number of the ion.
The spectrum shows series of lines with a rich substructure superimposed, at
higher photon energies, onto a broad continuum. Below $-3250$~cm$^{-1}$ the
most prominent features, marked by blue bars, are centered around the
Sr$^+(6d-Nf)$ dipole-allowed transitions of the isolated ion. Similar
isolated-core-excitation (ICE) lines have been investigated at a lower
threshold ($N=7$)~\cite{heber97}, and the detailed analysis of the present ones
will be given elsewhere. Above $-3250$~cm$^{-1}$ the ICE series vanishes
but the spectrum is not structureless. Two other series that first became
visible near $-5500$ cm$^{-1}$ remain present. The first series, marked by the
green bars, is the PPS series investigated in the present paper. The second series, marked by
the orange bars, is associated to high lying Rydberg-like states ($n\gtrsim
50$) located below each ionization threshold associated to a hydrogenic
manifold Sr$^+(N,L>3)$. Its analysis is ongoing.
% As may be expected for doubly excited states,
% the lines of the former (green) series do not follow Rydberg's formula and their
% intensities do not scale as $N^{-3}$, the usual scaling law for singly excited
% Rydberg states~\cite{gallagher94}.
To identify the origin of the (green) PPS series we ran extensive theoretical calculations
using the method of configuration interaction with exterior complex scaling
(CI-ECS)~\cite{genevriez21}. It treats the two-electron motion from first
principles while accounting for the effect of the Sr$^{2+}$ closed-shell ion
core with an accurate model potential. CI-ECS is capable of describing highly
doubly excited states of alkaline-earth
atoms~\cite{genevriez23,genevriez21a,genevriez19b,wehrli19}, a challenging task as the correlated motion of the two electrons must be treated
over large radial distances ($> 1000\, a_0$), the
density of states increases rapidly ($10^6$ eV$^{-1}$) and many decay channels are open. The calculations reported here correspond to a degree of excitation ($N \sim 9-10$) that is well beyond what had been previously calculated for any species other than helium ($N=6$)~\cite{wood94, genevriez21a}. Calculations details are given in the end matter.
% is located just below each Sr$^+(NL)$ threshold associated with the hydrogenic manifold of high-$L$ states ($L > 3$). It corresponds to high lying states Sr$(NLnl)$ with $L\sim N$ and $n \sim 50$.
% It is the
% objective of the present paper to identify the origin of this series through a combination of theoretical calculations from first principles and approximate model for two-electron dynamics.
% \begin{figure}
% \centering
% \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{figures/comparison_th_exp_N10-11_n18.pdf}
% \caption{Experimental and theoretical spectra in the region of the $N=10-11$ ionization threshold. The CI-ECS calculations are converged to 85000 cm$^{-1}$ only ??.}
% \label{fig:th_vs_exp}
% \end{figure}
The photoionisation spectrum calculated with CI-ECS (see~\cite{genevriez21a} for details) is compared to the experimental spectrum in the inset of Fig.~\ref{fig:overview_experimental_spectrum}. To take
into account nonadiabatic effects in the experiment, which result in small
populations of states with $l_i \neq 15$, the theoretical spectra were
calculated for several values of $l_i$ ($10-18$) and subsequently added to
reproduce as well as possible the experimental data. The agreement between
theory and experimental is excellent over the entire wavenumber range and makes
us confident that the theoretical calculations capture all relevant details of the electron dynamics.
The analysis of the individual contribution of the thousands of resonances in
the spectrum reveals that only a handful of states contribute to the lines marked by the green bars, typically one per value of $L$ and $S$. This means that the series is caused by a small ensemble of individual, isolated resonances that can be inspected one by one. The analysis of the CI
coefficients further reveals that these states have predominant $Ndnl$ character,
with $l=14$ for the resonance near $-5500$~cm$^{-1}$ and $l=16$ for those near
$-4500$~cm$^{-1}$. Their autoionization lifetimes fall in the range from 100~fs to a few
picoseconds.
% We note that calculating spectra for higher
% thresholds ($N\ge 11$) would require calculations of yet higher lying doubly
% excited states, which is not currently possible because of a prohibitively
% large computational cost.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.9\columnwidth]{fig2_v2.png}
\caption{Two-dimensional cuts of the reduced two-electron density $\rho_{L=17}$ for the states associated to the leftmost green line (a) and the central green line (b) near $-4500$~cm$^{-1}$. The left panels correspond to the electronic density $\rho_L$ integrated over $\theta_{12}$. Projections onto the $r_1$ and $r_2$ axes are also shown. The right panels show the conditional electronic density when the outer electron is fixed at a given radius, shown by the full black or red circles also shown on the left panels.}
\label{fig:wavefunctions}
\end{figure}
% \begin{equation}
% \Psi_{LM}(\bm{r}_1, \bm{r}_2) = \sum_{T=-L}^L {D^{L}_{MT}}^*(\psi, \theta, \phi)\Phi_T(r_1, r_2, \theta_{12}) ,
% \end{equation}
Electron dynamics are best visualized by investigating the six-dimensional two-electron density, $\rho_{LM}(\bm{r}_1, \bm{r}_2) =
\left|\Psi_{LM}(\bm{r}_1, \bm{r}_2)\right|^2$. To reduce the number of
dimensions we use the rotational invariance of the two-electron Hamiltonian and trace over the three
Euler angles that define the orientation of the electron--electron--Sr$^{2+}$-ion plane in space~\cite{gremaud98,genevriez21a}. The resulting
reduced two-electron density $\rho_{L}$ depends only on the two electronic radial distances $r_1$
and $r_2$ and the interelectronic angle $\theta_{12}$. Correlations between the
radial coordinates $r_1$ and $r_2$ are investigated by tracing $\rho_L$ over the
interelectronic angle $\theta_{12}$, resulting in the 2-dimensional functions
shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:wavefunctions} for the the two leftmost resonances with $L=17$ near $-4500$~cm$^{-1}$. Note that the functions do
not include antisymmetrization for clarity. Antisymmetrized densities are
obtained by mirror symmetry about the $r_1 = r_2$ axis. Correlations along the
interelectronic angle $\theta_{12}$, on the other hand, are best visualized by
fixing the outer electron at a given radius $r$ to generate the conditional
density $\rho_L(r_1, \theta_{12} | r_2 = r)$ (right panels in
Fig.~\ref{fig:wavefunctions}).
The two-electron densities in Fig.~\ref{fig:wavefunctions} do not show a strong dependency of the radial motion of one
electron on the other. The inner-electron density has $8$ minima along $r_1$, a value
compatible with the predominant $12d$ character of the inner-electron
wavefunction deduced from CI-ECS~\footnote{The quantum defect of
the Sr$^+$ $Nd$ series is $\sim 1.5$}. The outer-electron density of the
leftmost state [Fig.~\ref{fig:wavefunctions}(a)] shows no clear minima,
alluding to the fact that the outer electron is in the ground state of some
effective potential resulting from the combined action of the Coulomb
attraction of the Sr$^{2+}$ core, the centrifugal barrier and the electronic
repulsion. The state associated with the second resonance
[Fig.~\ref{fig:wavefunctions}(b)] has one minimum, suggesting that it is the
first excited state of the effective potential. Angular correlations, in contrast with radial correlations, are much stronger and the two electrons reside predominantly on
opposite sides of the nucleus. Similar observations can be made about the two-electron densities of series members with different $L$ values and located at different energies. Calculations with a limited basis set at higher energy also show reveal a similar two-electron behavior (see end matter).
% Interestingly, the mean radius of the outer electron increases
% with increasing core excitation, going from ?? at the $N=9$ threshold to ?? at
% $N=10$.
To unravel the physical origin of the resonance series we now turn to a simple
model in which (i) the electron repulsion $1/r_{12}$ is approximated by the
zeroth- and first orders of its multipole expansion, $1/r_2 + r_1 \cos
\theta_{12} / r_2^2$, and (ii) the fast motion of the inner electron is
decoupled from the one of the (comparatively slower) outer electron in an
adiabatic manner, akin to the Born-Oppenheimer approximation~\cite{heber97,feagin88}. In this framework the outer electron evolves
in an adiabatic potential $V(r_2)$ resulting from three components: the
screened Coulomb attraction of the core, the centrifugal barrier, and the Stark
shifted energy $E_1^{|\Lambda|}$ of the ``inner electron + ion core'' system.
The Stark shift is caused by the electric field that the outer
electron generates near the nucleus ($F=-1/r_2^2$) and depends on the
projection $\Lambda$ of the inner-electron angular momentum onto the adiabatic
axis. The model potential is given by
\begin{equation}
V(r_2) = -\frac{1}{r_2} + \frac{l_2(l_2+1)}{2r_2^2} + E_1^{|\Lambda|}(F=-1/r_2^2) .
\label{eq:stark_potential}
\end{equation}
%
% Note that this model is expected to be of limited accuracy, in particular because the
% adiabatic approximation is not valid everywhere and because the orbital
% angular-momentum of the outer electron $l_2$ is mixed by its dipole interaction
% with the inner electron.
Although more quantitative approximations exist~\cite{braun90,richter92,grozdanov20a}, we shall see that our simple, qualitative model captures
remarkably well the electronic dynamics at play while providing clear physical insight.
\begin{figure}[ht]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{fig3.png}
\caption{(a) Stark energies of Sr$^+$ in the $N=9-11$ region. (b) Adiabatic potentials $V(r_2)$. The colorscale shows the $Nf$ character of the inner-electron wavefunction. The radial probability densities $\left|\psi(r_2)\right|^2$ of the outer electron in the $6d18l_i$ state and in low-lying states of the potentials shown by the dashed lines are displayed as the red and purple lines, respectively. The horizontal black bars show the energy levels of the dashed-line potentials and their lengths give the transition strengths from the initial state. The right panel shows the experimental spectrum as in Fig.~\ref{fig:overview_experimental_spectrum}.}
\label{fig:adiabatic_stark_potential}
\end{figure}
The adiabatic potentials $V(r_2)$ are shown in
Fig.~\ref{fig:adiabatic_stark_potential}(b, left panel) in the same energy
range as the experimental spectrum (right panel). We take $l_2 = 16$ and
$|\Lambda|=1$ based on the analysis of the CI coefficients and wavefunctions
given above. First notice that the potentials for which the inner electron is
predominantly in the Sr$^+(Nd)$ state at large distances (dashed gray lines)
exhibit a sharp minimum. The minimum is the result of an avoided crossing
between the inner-electron Stark state correlating, at zero field, to
Sr$^+(Nd)$, and the uppermost state from the Sr$^+(N-2L)$ hydrogenic manifold
[Fig.~\ref{fig:adiabatic_stark_potential}(a), red rectangles]. Remarkably, the
lowest levels of the potential wells, calculated with a
discrete-variable-representation method~\cite{rescigno00} (purple lines), match
the energies of the resonances under scrutiny (green bars, left panel) within
less than 1\%. The series energies do \emph{not} follow the Rydberg formula one
expects for Sr$^+(Nd)$ Rydberg series (rightmost $y$ axis), nor do they follow
any other formulas describing the energies of series of doubly-excited states (see~\cite{tanner00} for a
review), but their progression is surprisingly well predicted by our simple
model. For these calculation the small avoided crossings in the repulsive part
of the potentials were assumed to be traversed diabatically.
Second, the colorscale in Fig.~\ref{fig:adiabatic_stark_potential}(b) shows
that at the minimum of the potential wells the inner-electron state has a strong
-- if not predominant -- $Nf$ character $c_{Nf}(r_2)$. Because
the lowest states are localized near the potential minimum, the electric
transition dipole moment from the $6dn_il_i$ initial state is large. As the
degree of excitation of the outer electron in the well increases the wavefunctions become
less localized and the transition moment decreases rapidly. This is illustrated
by the horizontal black bars in Fig.~\ref{fig:adiabatic_stark_potential}(b),
whose lengths are proportional to the effective, scaled transition moment
$\int_0^\infty \mathrm{d}r_2 \psi_2^*(r_2) c_{Nf}(r_2) d_{6d-Nf}N^{3/2}
\psi_{n_il_i}(r_2)$, with $d_{6d-Nf}$ the transition dipole moment of the
isolated ion and $\psi_{n_il_i}(r_2)$ and $\psi_2(r_2)$ the radial
wavefunctions of the outer electron in the initial and final states,
respectively.
% Near $N=10$, the overlap between the outer-electron wavefunctions of the
% initial (full red line) and final states (full blue lines) are large, i.e., the
% Franck-Condon factor, is also large. As the degree of inner-electron excitation
% increases, the outer-electron wavefunctions moves outwards and the overlap
% decreases. The transition dipole moment also decreases as $N^{-3/2}$. The lines
% associated to the unknown series should thus vanish from the spectrum before
% the double-ionization threshold is reached, as observed in
% Fig.~\ref{fig:overview_experimental_spectrum}.
% The avoided crossings between Stark energies repeat at each $N$ and the potential wells thus form a series converging to the double ionization
% threshold. The series energies do \emph{not} follow the Rydberg
% formula one expects for Sr$^+(Nd)$ Rydberg series (rightmost
% $y$ axis), nor do they follow any other formulas describing the energies of
% series of doubly-excited states converging to the double-ionization
% threshold~(see~\cite{tanner00} for a review). The remarkable fact that our
% simple model predicts the correct energy-level progression is a strong evidence
% that it captures the relevant electronic dynamics.
The correlated two-electron motion encoded in the electronic densities of Fig.~\ref{fig:wavefunctions} is also in agreement with, and clarified
by, the model. The most probable radius for the outer electron in the ground
state of the potential near $-4500$~cm$^{-1}$ is $r^\text{max}_2 = 243~a_0$, in
excellent agreement with the one extracted from CI-ECS
[$237~a_0$, Fig.~\ref{fig:wavefunctions}(a)]. In both
calculations the outer-electron density has no nodes, as expected for a
ground-state wavefunction, while the first excited state shows one node at $r_2 \sim 250~a_0$ [Fig.~\ref{fig:wavefunctions}(b)]. For
sufficiently large $r_2$ the inner-electron wavefunction has a predominant $Nd$
character and 8 nodes, as expected. In the
repulsive part of the potential, the dominant $Nd$ character is however lost and the inner-electron acquires some character associated to the uppermost
states of the $(N-2)$ Stark manifold
[Fig.~\ref{fig:adiabatic_stark_potential}(a)]. In such Stark states the electron
localizes on the side of the nucleus given by the direction of the electric
field~\cite{gallagher94} and the same effect is observed in the two-electron density of
Fig.~\ref{fig:wavefunctions}(a) as, for a small $r_2$ value (red circle),
the inner electron is predominantly on the same side of the nucleus as the
outer electron. The two-electron motion can thus be semi-classically
interpreted as follows: as the the outer electron oscillates in its potential
well the dipole moment of the ``inner electron + ion core'' system undergoes a
periodic pendulum-like motion such that, when $r_2$ is small, it effectively
prevents the outer electron from penetrating into the inner region. From
the lifetime of the state ($\tau\sim 300$~fs) and the
spacing between adjacent energy levels in the well ($\sim 100$~cm$^{-1}$) we
deduce that the inner electron undergoes about 6 such flip-flops before the
system spontaneously decays by autoionization.
% therefore
% $(N-2)L$ ones. As a result, the shape of the radial inner-electron density
% should depart from a typical $Nd$ density - for example the number of nodes
% should decrease - as observed in Fig.~\ref{fig:wavefunctions}(a).
% Perhaps the most stringent test of our model is achieved by comparing the ab initio wavefunctions of Fig.~\ref{fig:wavefunctions} to model predictions. In the model the charge density is given by the product
% \begin{equation}
% \rho_\alpha(r_1, r_2, \theta_{12}) = \Psi^\text{Stark}_{\alpha}(r_1, \theta_{12})\chi_{\alpha}(r_2) .
% \end{equation}
% Two-dimensional cuts through $|\rho_\alpha(r_1, r_2, \theta_{12})|^2$ are shown
% in Fig.~\ref{fig:model_wavefunction}. The agreement with the ab initio
% wavefunction of Fig.~\ref{fig:wavefunctions} (bottom panel) is quantitative
% regarding the mean value of $r_1$ and $r_2$ (?? and ??, respectively), and
% qualitative regarding the overall shape of the charge density. At large values
% of $r_2$ the inner-electron wavefunction is a polarized Sr$^+(Nd)$ orbital,
% while at lower $r_2$ values, i.e., on the other side of the avoided crossing,
% it gains a predominant high-$l$ character that change both its radial charge
% density (left panel) and its angular distribution (?? panel). The inner-electron dipole moment is in the same direction as the position of the outer electron, leading to the repulsive charge-dipole interaction that forms the inner wall of the adiabatic potential. The quantative
% differences between the ab initio and modelled wavefunctions are attributed,
% predominantly, to nonadiabatic effects that are strong in planetary states
% compared to diatomic molecules (??).
% \begin{figure}
% \centering
% \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{figures/starklike_wavefunctions.png}
% \caption{Same as Fig. 3 using the Stark-like model.}
% \label{fig:model_wavefunction}
% \end{figure}
\textit{Conclusions} - We have identified a series of molecular-like doubly excited planetary states of a quasi three-body Coulomb system both theoretically and experimentally. The states, which we call pendular-planet states because of the underlying two-electron motion, find their physical origins in avoided crossings
between Stark states, a phenomenon that occurs in all systems except
hydrogen-like atoms. For this reason, we expect the series to be a general feature of
the doubly excited states of atoms and molecules. Remarkably, a similar
mechanism is responsible for the long-range molecular binding between
an ion and a Rydberg atom~\cite{deiss21,duspayev21a,zuber22}. In the latter case the electric field is
generated by an ion in the vicinity of the Rydberg atom whereas, in the present
case, the electric field is the one of the outer electron that surrounds the
Sr$^+$ ion, itself in a Rydberg state. Both cases illustrate that the quasi-three-body Coulomb problem possesses series of resonances that, because its third body is not so well defined~\cite{codling90}, are different from the exact counterpart. Observing and
characterizing the states discussed above in other atomic and molecular systems
is an exciting perspective for future work that could be facilitated, in
particular in more complex systems, by the use of the simple model and physical
picture we developed.
% They do not follow the Rydberg states and their properties also exhibit different scalings, for example although its binding energy remains similar the radius of the outer electron \emph{increases} with $N$. The exploration of the properties of such states is an exciting perspective for future research.
\begin{acknowledgements}
This work was supported by the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique—FNRS under MIS Grant No. F.4027.24 and IISN Grant No. 4.4504.10. Computational resources have been provided by the supercomputing facilities of the Université catholique de Louvain (CISM/UCL) and the Consortium des Équipements de Calcul Intensif en Fédération Wallonie Bruxelles (CÉCI) funded by the Fond de la Recherche Scientifique de Belgique (F.R.S.-FNRS) under convention 2.5020.11 and by the Walloon Region.
\end{acknowledgements}
\bibliographystyle{apsrev4-2}
\bibliography{paper}
\appendix
\section{End matter}
\subsection{Configuration interaction with exterior complex scaling}\label{sec:ci-ecs}
The method of configuration interaction with exterior complex
scaling (CI-ECS)~\cite{genevriez21} aims at accurately describing highly
doubly excited states of alkaline-earth atoms~\cite{genevriez23,genevriez21a,genevriez19b,wehrli19}. It treats the motion of
the two highly excited electrons of Sr explicitely while the
influence of the electrons of the Sr$^{2+}$ closed-shell core is accounted for with an empirical model
potential $V_l(r)$~\cite{genevriez21,aymar96}, yielding the following two-electron Hamiltonian
\begin{equation}
H = -\frac12\bm{\nabla}_1^2 - \frac12\bm{\nabla}_2^2 + V_{l_1}(r_1) + V_{l_2}(r_2) + \frac{1}{r_{12}} .
\end{equation}
%
$\bm{r}_1$ and $\bm{r}_2$ are the coordinates of the electrons with respect to the nucleus and $r_{12} = |\bm{r}_1 - \bm{r}_2|$.
The two-electron Schrödinger equation is
solved using a basis of antisymmetrized products of one-electron spin-orbitals whose radial parts are numerical functions obtained with a finite-element discrete-variable-representation technique~\cite{rescigno00}. We use exterior complex scaling~\cite{nicolaides78,
simon79} to treat resonances and continuum processes with square integrable
functions, i.e., to be able to carry out the calculations in a box of finite
size ($1420\, a_0$). In
the present calculations, 80\,000 two-electron basis functions are used. The outer electron is described with a large set of spin-orbitals,
including in particular accurate Rydberg states up to $n=25$. The basis set
describing the inner electron is truncated to all states up to the Sr$^+(N=12)$ hydrogenic manifold. Angular momenta are $LS$ coupled and the
spin-orbit interaction is neglected because both electrons are highly excited
and thus predominantly far from the nucleus. The large, complex-symmetric
Hamiltonian matrix built from the two-electron functions is diagonalized in
the energy range of interest with a complex-symmetric Lanczos algorithm, yielding the complex-scaled wavefunctions and energies of bound
states, resonances and continuum states. We have checked that the resonances
energies and widths below the $N=11$ threshold are converged to better than a few cm$^{-1}$ with respect to the basis set size, complex-scaling radius and angle.
\subsection{Calculations at a higher threshold}
The size of the full CI-ECS basis set increases very rapidly close to the
double-ionization threshold, making converged calculations for Sr$^+(N>10)$
computationally too heavy. The analysis carried out in the main text however suggests that, to compute the resonances under
consideration, it is sufficient to consider inner-electron states associated to
the Sr$^+(N-2)$ and Sr$^+(N-1)$ hydrogenic manifold, and all states in between
with nonzero quantum defects. Such an ensemble is indeed sufficient
to reproduce the avoided crossing responsible for the potential well and the
strong $Nf$ character at its bottom.
To verify this we ran a CI-ECS calculation in
which the set of basis functions describing the inner electron is limited to
all states between, and including, the $N=12$ and $N=13$ manifolds. The
truncation of the basis set means that most decay channels are neglected, and
that the calculation is not fully converged. We do not expect to
reach quantitative agreement with experiment but aim at providing a qualitative
confirmation that the essential two-electron dynamics are well described by the
truncated basis. The calculated photoionization spectrum is compared to the experimental one in Fig.~\ref{fig:N12-13_spectra}(b). The resonance marked by the green bar is indeed well reproduced by the theoretical calculation and the underlying resonance wavefunctions [Fig.~\ref{fig:N12-13_spectra}(a)], similar to those of Fig.~\ref{fig:wavefunctions}, confirm the attribution to the series described in the main text.
\begin{figure}[ht]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{fig4.pdf}
\caption{(a) Two-dimensional cuts of the reduced two-electron density $\rho_{L=13}$ of the state associated to resonance at $-3200$~cm$^{-1}$ [green bar in panel (b)]. Figure details are the same as those of Fig.~\ref{fig:wavefunctions}. (b) Experimental and theoretical spectra in the region of the Sr$^+(N=12-13)$ ionization thresholds (full black and red lines, respectively). Figure details are the same as those of Fig.~\ref{fig:overview_experimental_spectrum} (right panel).}
\label{fig:N12-13_spectra}
\end{figure}
\end{document}
%apsrev4-2.bst 2019-01-14 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrev4-1.bst
%Control: key (0)
%Control: author (72) initials jnrlst
%Control: editor formatted (1) identically to author
%Control: production of article title (-1) disabled
%Control: page (0) single
%Control: year (1) truncated
%Control: production of eprint (0) enabled
\begin{thebibliography}{48}%
\makeatletter
\providecommand \@ifxundefined [1]{%
\@ifx{#1\undefined}
}%
\providecommand \@ifnum [1]{%
\ifnum #1\expandafter \@firstoftwo
\else \expandafter \@secondoftwo
\fi
}%
\providecommand \@ifx [1]{%
\ifx #1\expandafter \@firstoftwo
\else \expandafter \@secondoftwo
\fi
}%
\providecommand \natexlab [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \enquote [1]{``#1''}%
\providecommand \bibnamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \bibfnamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \citenamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \href@noop [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \href [0]{\begingroup \@sanitize@url \@href}%
\providecommand \@href[1]{\@@startlink{#1}\@@href}%
\providecommand \@@href[1]{\endgroup#1\@@endlink}%
\providecommand \@sanitize@url [0]{\catcode `\\12\catcode `\$12\catcode
`\&12\catcode `\#12\catcode `\^12\catcode `\_12\catcode `\%12\relax}%
\providecommand \@@startlink[1]{}%
\providecommand \@@endlink[0]{}%
\providecommand \url [0]{\begingroup\@sanitize@url \@url }%
\providecommand \@url [1]{\endgroup\@href {#1}{\urlprefix }}%
\providecommand \urlprefix [0]{URL }%
\providecommand \Eprint [0]{\href }%
\providecommand \doibase [0]{https://doi.org/}%
\providecommand \selectlanguage [0]{\@gobble}%
\providecommand \bibinfo [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \bibfield [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \translation [1]{[#1]}%
\providecommand \BibitemOpen [0]{}%
\providecommand \bibitemStop [0]{}%
\providecommand \bibitemNoStop [0]{.\EOS\space}%
\providecommand \EOS [0]{\spacefactor3000\relax}%
\providecommand \BibitemShut [1]{\csname bibitem#1\endcsname}%
\let\auto@bib@innerbib\@empty
%</preamble>
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Tanner}\ \emph {et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont {Tanner},
\citenamefont {Richter},\ and\ \citenamefont {Rost}}]{tanner00}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont
{Tanner}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont {Richter}},\
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~M.}\ \bibnamefont {Rost}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.72.497} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Rev. Mod. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {72}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {497} (\bibinfo {year} {2000})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Aymar}\ \emph {et~al.}(1996)\citenamefont {Aymar},
\citenamefont {Greene},\ and\ \citenamefont {{Luc-Koenig}}}]{aymar96}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Aymar}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.~H.}\ \bibnamefont {Greene}},\
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont {{Luc-Koenig}}},\
}\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.68.1015} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Rev. Mod. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {68}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {1015} (\bibinfo {year} {1996})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Richter}\ \emph {et~al.}(1993)\citenamefont
{Richter}, \citenamefont {Tanner},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Wintgen}}]{richter93}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont
{Richter}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Tanner}},\
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont {Wintgen}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.48.4182} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {48}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {4182} (\bibinfo {year} {1993})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Richter}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Wintgen}(1990)}]{richter90}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont
{Richter}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont
{Wintgen}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1965} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {65}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {1965} (\bibinfo {year}
{1990})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Eichmann}\ \emph {et~al.}(1990)\citenamefont
{Eichmann}, \citenamefont {Lange},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Sandner}}]{eichmann90}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {U.}~\bibnamefont
{Eichmann}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.}~\bibnamefont {Lange}},\
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Sandner}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.274} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {64}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {274} (\bibinfo {year} {1990})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {G{\'e}n{\'e}vriez}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont
{G{\'e}n{\'e}vriez}, \citenamefont {Rosen},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Eichmann}}]{genevriez21a}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{G{\'e}n{\'e}vriez}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont
{Rosen}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {U.}~\bibnamefont
{Eichmann}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.012812} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{104}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {012812} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Richter}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Wintgen}(1991)}]{richter91}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont
{Richter}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont
{Wintgen}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/24/23/002} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.}\ }\textbf
{\bibinfo {volume} {24}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {L565} (\bibinfo {year}
{1991})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Gr{\'e}maud}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Gaspard}(1998)}]{gremaud98}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.}~\bibnamefont
{Gr{\'e}maud}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Gaspard}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/31/8/017} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.}\ }\textbf
{\bibinfo {volume} {31}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {1671} (\bibinfo {year}
{1998})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Domke}\ \emph {et~al.}(1991)\citenamefont {Domke},
\citenamefont {Xue}, \citenamefont {Puschmann}, \citenamefont {Mandel},
\citenamefont {Hudson}, \citenamefont {Shirley}, \citenamefont {Kaindl},
\citenamefont {Greene}, \citenamefont {Sadeghpour},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Petersen}}]{domke91}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Domke}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Xue}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Puschmann}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Mandel}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{E.}~\bibnamefont {Hudson}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~A.}\
\bibnamefont {Shirley}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont
{Kaindl}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.~H.}\ \bibnamefont {Greene}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.~R.}\ \bibnamefont {Sadeghpour}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.}~\bibnamefont {Petersen}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1306} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {66}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {1306} (\bibinfo {year} {1991})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Czasch}\ \emph {et~al.}(2005)\citenamefont {Czasch},
\citenamefont {Sch{\"o}ffler}, \citenamefont {Hattass}, \citenamefont
{Sch{\"o}ssler}, \citenamefont {Jahnke}, \citenamefont {Weber}, \citenamefont
{Staudte}, \citenamefont {Titze}, \citenamefont {Wimmer}, \citenamefont
{Kammer}, \citenamefont {Weckenbrock}, \citenamefont {Voss}, \citenamefont
{Grisenti}, \citenamefont {Jagutzki}, \citenamefont {Schmidt}, \citenamefont
{{Schmidt-B{\"o}cking}}, \citenamefont {D{\"o}rner}, \citenamefont {Rost},
\citenamefont {Schneider}, \citenamefont {Liu}, \citenamefont {Bray},
\citenamefont {Kheifets},\ and\ \citenamefont {Bartschat}}]{czasch05}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Czasch}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Sch{\"o}ffler}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Hattass}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Sch{\"o}ssler}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont
{Jahnke}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {{\relax Th}.}~\bibnamefont
{Weber}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Staudte}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Titze}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Wimmer}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Kammer}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{M.}~\bibnamefont {Weckenbrock}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{S.}~\bibnamefont {Voss}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~E.}\
\bibnamefont {Grisenti}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {O.}~\bibnamefont
{Jagutzki}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.~{\relax Ph}.~H.}\
\bibnamefont {Schmidt}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.}~\bibnamefont
{{Schmidt-B{\"o}cking}}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont
{D{\"o}rner}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Rost}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Schneider}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.-N.}\ \bibnamefont {Liu}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {I.}~\bibnamefont {Bray}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {A.~S.}\ \bibnamefont {Kheifets}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont {Bartschat}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.243003} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {95}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {243003} (\bibinfo {year} {2005})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {G{\'e}n{\'e}vriez}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Eichmann}(2023)}]{genevriez23}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{G{\'e}n{\'e}vriez}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {U.}~\bibnamefont
{Eichmann}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.012817} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{107}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {012817} (\bibinfo {year} {2023})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Pisharody}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Jones}(2004)}]{pisharody04}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~N.}\ \bibnamefont
{Pisharody}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~R.}\ \bibnamefont
{Jones}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092220} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Science}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{303}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {813} (\bibinfo {year} {2004})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Ott}\ \emph {et~al.}(2014)\citenamefont {Ott},
\citenamefont {Kaldun}, \citenamefont {Argenti}, \citenamefont {Raith},
\citenamefont {Meyer}, \citenamefont {Laux}, \citenamefont {Zhang},
\citenamefont {Bl{\"a}ttermann}, \citenamefont {Hagstotz}, \citenamefont
{Ding}, \citenamefont {Heck}, \citenamefont {Madro{\~n}ero}, \citenamefont
{Mart{\'i}n},\ and\ \citenamefont {Pfeifer}}]{ott14}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont
{Ott}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Kaldun}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Argenti}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont {Raith}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont {Meyer}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{M.}~\bibnamefont {Laux}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Y.}~\bibnamefont
{Zhang}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Bl{\"a}ttermann}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Hagstotz}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Ding}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont {Heck}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Madro{\~n}ero}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Mart{\'i}n}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Pfeifer}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14026} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Nature}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {516}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{374} (\bibinfo {year} {2014})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Kaldun}\ \emph {et~al.}(2016)\citenamefont {Kaldun},
\citenamefont {Bl{\"a}ttermann}, \citenamefont {Stoo{\ss}}, \citenamefont
{Donsa}, \citenamefont {Wei}, \citenamefont {Pazourek}, \citenamefont
{Nagele}, \citenamefont {Ott}, \citenamefont {Lin}, \citenamefont
{Burgd{\"o}rfer},\ and\ \citenamefont {Pfeifer}}]{kaldun16}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Kaldun}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Bl{\"a}ttermann}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.}~\bibnamefont
{Stoo{\ss}}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Donsa}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.}~\bibnamefont {Wei}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont {Pazourek}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Nagele}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{C.}~\bibnamefont {Ott}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.~D.}\
\bibnamefont {Lin}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{Burgd{\"o}rfer}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont
{Pfeifer}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6972} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Science}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{354}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {738} (\bibinfo {year} {2016})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Camus}\ \emph {et~al.}(1989)\citenamefont {Camus},
\citenamefont {Gallagher}, \citenamefont {Lecomte}, \citenamefont {Pillet},
\citenamefont {Pruvost},\ and\ \citenamefont {Boulmer}}]{camus89}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Camus}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~F.}\ \bibnamefont
{Gallagher}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Lecomte}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont {Pillet}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Pruvost}},\ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Boulmer}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2365} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {62}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {2365} (\bibinfo {year} {1989})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {G{\'e}n{\'e}vriez}\ \emph
{et~al.}(2019{\natexlab{a}})\citenamefont {G{\'e}n{\'e}vriez}, \citenamefont
{Wehrli}, \citenamefont {Agner},\ and\ \citenamefont {Merkt}}]{genevriez19}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{G{\'e}n{\'e}vriez}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont
{Wehrli}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Agner}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Merkt}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2018.10.017} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Int. J. Mass Spectrom.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {435}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {209} (\bibinfo {year} {2019}{\natexlab{a}})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {G{\'e}n{\'e}vriez}\ \emph
{et~al.}(2019{\natexlab{b}})\citenamefont {G{\'e}n{\'e}vriez}, \citenamefont
{Wehrli},\ and\ \citenamefont {Merkt}}]{genevriez19b}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{G{\'e}n{\'e}vriez}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont
{Wehrli}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont
{Merkt}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.032517} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{100}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {032517} (\bibinfo {year}
{2019}{\natexlab{b}})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Teixeira}\ \emph {et~al.}(2020)\citenamefont
{Teixeira}, \citenamefont {Larrouy}, \citenamefont {Muni}, \citenamefont
{Lachaud}, \citenamefont {Raimond}, \citenamefont {Gleyzes},\ and\
\citenamefont {Brune}}]{teixeira20}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~C.}\ \bibnamefont
{Teixeira}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Larrouy}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Muni}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Lachaud}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{J.-M.}\ \bibnamefont {Raimond}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{S.}~\bibnamefont {Gleyzes}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{M.}~\bibnamefont {Brune}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.263001} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {125}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {263001} (\bibinfo {year} {2020})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Muni}\ \emph {et~al.}(2022)\citenamefont {Muni},
\citenamefont {Lachaud}, \citenamefont {Couto}, \citenamefont {Poirier},
\citenamefont {Teixeira}, \citenamefont {Raimond}, \citenamefont {Brune},\
and\ \citenamefont {Gleyzes}}]{muni22}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Muni}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Lachaud}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Couto}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Poirier}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {R.~C.}\ \bibnamefont {Teixeira}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {J.-M.}\ \bibnamefont {Raimond}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Brune}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Gleyzes}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01519-w} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Nat. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {18}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{502} (\bibinfo {year} {2022})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Wirth}\ \emph {et~al.}(2024)\citenamefont {Wirth},
\citenamefont {H{\"o}lzl}, \citenamefont {G{\"o}tzelmann}, \citenamefont
{Pultinevicius},\ and\ \citenamefont {Meinert}}]{wirth24}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Wirth}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {H{\"o}lzl}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {G{\"o}tzelmann}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont {Pultinevicius}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Meinert}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.123403} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {133}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {123403} (\bibinfo {year} {2024})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Bouillon}\ \emph {et~al.}(2024)\citenamefont
{Bouillon}, \citenamefont {{Marin-Bujedo}},\ and\ \citenamefont
{G{\'e}n{\'e}vriez}}]{bouillon24}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Bouillon}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont
{{Marin-Bujedo}}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{G{\'e}n{\'e}vriez}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.193402} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {132}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {193402} (\bibinfo {year} {2024})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Lachaud}\ \emph {et~al.}(2024)\citenamefont
{Lachaud}, \citenamefont {Muraz}, \citenamefont {Couto}, \citenamefont
{Raimond}, \citenamefont {Brune},\ and\ \citenamefont {Gleyzes}}]{lachaud24}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Lachaud}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.}~\bibnamefont {Muraz}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Couto}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {J.-M.}\ \bibnamefont {Raimond}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Brune}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Gleyzes}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.123202} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {133}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {123202} (\bibinfo {year} {2024})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Wood}\ and\ \citenamefont {Greene}(1994)}]{wood94}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~P.}\ \bibnamefont
{Wood}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.~H.}\ \bibnamefont
{Greene}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.49.1029} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{49}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {1029} (\bibinfo {year} {1994})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {G{\'e}n{\'e}vriez}(2021)}]{genevriez21}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{G{\'e}n{\'e}vriez}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2020.1861353}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Mol. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {119}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {e1861353} (\bibinfo {year}
{2021})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Codling}(1990)}]{codling90}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont
{Codling}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1038/344194a0} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Nature}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {344}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {194} (\bibinfo {year} {1990})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Percival}(1977)}]{percival77}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.~C.}\ \bibnamefont
{Percival}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1977.0035} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {353}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {289} (\bibinfo {year}
{1977})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Eichmann}\ \emph {et~al.}(1992)\citenamefont
{Eichmann}, \citenamefont {Lange},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Sandner}}]{eichmann92}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {U.}~\bibnamefont
{Eichmann}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.}~\bibnamefont {Lange}},\
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Sandner}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.21} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {68}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {21} (\bibinfo {year} {1992})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {B{\"u}rgers}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Rost}(1996)}]{burgers96}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{B{\"u}rgers}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.-M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Rost}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/29/17/009} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.}\ }\textbf
{\bibinfo {volume} {29}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {3825} (\bibinfo {year}
{1996})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Eichmann}\ \emph {et~al.}(1989)\citenamefont
{Eichmann}, \citenamefont {Brockmann}, \citenamefont {Lange},\ and\
\citenamefont {Sandner}}]{eichmann89}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {U.}~\bibnamefont
{Eichmann}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont {Brockmann}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.}~\bibnamefont {Lange}},\ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Sandner}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/22/13/003} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{22}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {L361} (\bibinfo {year} {1989})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Rosen}\ \emph {et~al.}(1999)\citenamefont {Rosen},
\citenamefont {D{\"o}rr}, \citenamefont {Eichmann},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Sandner}}]{rosen99}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont
{Rosen}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {D{\"o}rr}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {U.}~\bibnamefont {Eichmann}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Sandner}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4514} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {83}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {4514} (\bibinfo {year} {1999})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Eichmann}\ \emph {et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont
{Eichmann}, \citenamefont {Gallagher},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Konik}}]{eichmann03}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {U.}~\bibnamefont
{Eichmann}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~F.}\ \bibnamefont
{Gallagher}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Konik}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.233004} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {90}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {233004} (\bibinfo {year}
{2003})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Cooke}\ \emph {et~al.}(1978)\citenamefont {Cooke},
\citenamefont {Gallagher}, \citenamefont {Edelstein},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Hill}}]{cooke78a}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.~E.}\ \bibnamefont
{Cooke}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~F.}\ \bibnamefont
{Gallagher}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~A.}\ \bibnamefont
{Edelstein}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Hill}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.178} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {40}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {178} (\bibinfo {year} {1978})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Jones}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Gallagher}(1990)}]{jones90}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~R.}\ \bibnamefont
{Jones}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~F.}\ \bibnamefont
{Gallagher}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.42.2655} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{42}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {2655} (\bibinfo {year} {1990})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Camus}\ \emph {et~al.}(1993)\citenamefont {Camus},
\citenamefont {Cohen}, \citenamefont {Pruvost},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Bolovinos}}]{camus93}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Camus}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Cohen}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Pruvost}},\ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Bolovinos}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.48.R9} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {48}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {R9} (\bibinfo {year} {1993})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Heber}\ \emph {et~al.}(1997)\citenamefont {Heber},
\citenamefont {Seng}, \citenamefont {Halka}, \citenamefont {Eichmann},\ and\
\citenamefont {Sandner}}]{heber97}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.~D.}\ \bibnamefont
{Heber}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Seng}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Halka}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {U.}~\bibnamefont {Eichmann}},\ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Sandner}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.56.1255} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {56}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {1255} (\bibinfo {year} {1997})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Wehrli}\ \emph {et~al.}(2019)\citenamefont {Wehrli},
\citenamefont {G{\'e}n{\'e}vriez},\ and\ \citenamefont {Merkt}}]{wehrli19}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont
{Wehrli}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{G{\'e}n{\'e}vriez}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{F.}~\bibnamefont {Merkt}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.012515} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {100}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {012515} (\bibinfo {year} {2019})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{Note1()}]{Note1}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibinfo {note} {The quantum defect of the Sr$^+$ $Nd$ series is $\sim
1.5$}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Feagin}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Briggs}(1988)}]{feagin88}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Feagin}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~S.}\ \bibnamefont
{Briggs}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.37.4599} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{37}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {4599} (\bibinfo {year} {1988})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Braun}\ \emph {et~al.}(1990)\citenamefont {Braun},
\citenamefont {Ostrovsky},\ and\ \citenamefont {Prudov}}]{braun90}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~A.}\ \bibnamefont
{Braun}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.~N.}\ \bibnamefont
{Ostrovsky}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {N.~V.}\ \bibnamefont
{Prudov}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.42.6537} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{42}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {6537} (\bibinfo {year} {1990})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Richter}\ \emph {et~al.}(1992)\citenamefont
{Richter}, \citenamefont {Briggs}, \citenamefont {Wintgen},\ and\
\citenamefont {Solov'ev}}]{richter92}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont
{Richter}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~S.}\ \bibnamefont {Briggs}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont {Wintgen}},\ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {E.~A.}\ \bibnamefont {Solov'ev}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/25/19/007} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{25}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {3929} (\bibinfo {year} {1992})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Grozdanov}\ \emph {et~al.}(2020)\citenamefont
{Grozdanov}, \citenamefont {Gusev}, \citenamefont {Solov'ev},\ and\
\citenamefont {Vinitsky}}]{grozdanov20a}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~P.}\ \bibnamefont
{Grozdanov}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~A.}\ \bibnamefont
{Gusev}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.~A.}\ \bibnamefont
{Solov'ev}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~I.}\ \bibnamefont
{Vinitsky}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2020-10202-9} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Eur. Phys. J. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{74}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {161} (\bibinfo {year} {2020})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Rescigno}\ and\ \citenamefont
{McCurdy}(2000)}]{rescigno00}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~N.}\ \bibnamefont
{Rescigno}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.~W.}\ \bibnamefont
{McCurdy}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.62.032706} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{62}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {032706} (\bibinfo {year} {2000})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Gallagher}(1994)}]{gallagher94}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~F.}\ \bibnamefont
{Gallagher}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511524530} {\emph
{\bibinfo {title} {Rydberg {{Atoms}}}}}\ (\bibinfo {publisher} {Cambridge
University Press},\ \bibinfo {address} {Cambridge},\ \bibinfo {year}
{1994})\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Dei{\ss}}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont
{Dei{\ss}}, \citenamefont {Haze},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Hecker~Denschlag}}]{deiss21}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Dei{\ss}}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Haze}},\
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Hecker~Denschlag}},\
}\href {https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms9020034} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Atoms}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {9}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {34}
(\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Duspayev}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont
{Duspayev}, \citenamefont {Han}, \citenamefont {Viray}, \citenamefont {Ma},
\citenamefont {Zhao},\ and\ \citenamefont {Raithel}}]{duspayev21a}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Duspayev}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {X.}~\bibnamefont {Han}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~A.}\ \bibnamefont {Viray}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont {Ma}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Zhao}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont {Raithel}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023114} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Res.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {3}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {023114} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Zuber}\ \emph {et~al.}(2022)\citenamefont {Zuber},
\citenamefont {Anasuri}, \citenamefont {Berngruber}, \citenamefont {Zou},
\citenamefont {Meinert}, \citenamefont {L{\"o}w},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Pfau}}]{zuber22}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {N.}~\bibnamefont
{Zuber}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.~S.~V.}\ \bibnamefont
{Anasuri}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Berngruber}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Y.-Q.}\ \bibnamefont {Zou}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Meinert}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont {L{\"o}w}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Pfau}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04577-5} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Nature}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {605}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{453} (\bibinfo {year} {2022})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Nicolaides}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Beck}(1978)}]{nicolaides78}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.~A.}\ \bibnamefont
{Nicolaides}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~R.}\ \bibnamefont
{Beck}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(78)90116-0} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Lett. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{65}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {2} (\bibinfo {year} {1978})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Simon}(1979)}]{simon79}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.}~\bibnamefont
{Simon}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(79)90165-8} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Lett. A}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{71}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {211} (\bibinfo {year} {1979})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\end{thebibliography}%