Boomerang mechanism explaining the excess radio background
Extracted source text ยท arXiv 2509.03441
%% ****** Start of file apstemplate.tex ****** %
%%
%%
%% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4.2 distribution.
%% Version 4.2a of REVTeX, January, 2015
%%
%%
%% Copyright (c) 2015 The American Physical Society.
%%
%% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
%%
%
% This is a template for producing manuscripts for use with REVTEX 4.2
% Copy this file to another name and then work on that file.
% That way, you always have this original template file to use.
%
% Group addresses by affiliation; use superscriptaddress for long
% author lists, or if there are many overlapping affiliations.
% For Phys. Rev. appearance, change preprint to twocolumn.
% Choose pra, prb, prc, prd, pre, prl, prstab, prstper, or rmp for journal
% Add 'draft' option to mark overfull boxes with black boxes
% Add 'showkeys' option to make keywords appear
%\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,groupedaddress]{revtex4-2}
%\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,superscriptaddress]{revtex4-2}
\documentclass[aps,prl,reprint,superscriptaddress]{revtex4-2}
% You should use BibTeX and apsrev.bst for references
% Choosing a journal automatically selects the correct APS
% BibTeX style file (bst file), so only uncomment the line
% below if necessary.
%\bibliographystyle{apsrev4-2}
\newcommand{\bmt}{\begin{pmatrix}}
\newcommand{\emt}{\end{pmatrix}}
\newcommand{\ba}{\begin{array}{c}}
\newcommand{\ea}{\end{array}}
\newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
\newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
\newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}
\newcommand{\bi}{\begin{itemize}}
\newcommand{\ei}{\end{itemize}}
\newcommand{\nb}{\bar n}
\newcommand{\baz}{\begin{array}{cc}}
\newcommand{\besub}{\begin{subequations}}
\newcommand{\eesub}{\end{subequations}}
%==================================================
\newcommand{\vev}[1]{\langle #1 \rangle}
\newcommand{\mathsym}[1]{{}}
\newcommand{\unicode}{{}}
\newcommand{\D}{\displaystyle}
\newcommand{\dms}{\mbox{$\Delta m^2_{\odot}$}}
\newcommand{\dma}{\mbox{$\Delta m^2_{\rm A}$}}
\newcommand{\meff}{\mbox{$\langle m \rangle$}}
\newcommand{\bt}{\begin{tabular}}
\newcommand{\et}{\end{tabular}}
\newcommand{\hl}{\hline}
\newcommand{\ovl}{\overline}
\newcommand{\ul}{\underline}
\newcommand{\noi}{\noindent}
\newcommand{\benu}{\begin{enumerate}}
\newcommand{\eenu}{\end{enumerate}}
\newcommand{\fsl}[1]{\ensuremath{\mathrlap{\!\not{\phantom{#1}}}#1}}% \fsl{<symbol>}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%% Text macros %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\def\eg{ {\em e.g.\ }}
\def\etc{ {\em etc.\ }}
\def\ie{ {\em i.e.,\ }}
\def\viz{ {\em viz.\ }}
\def\etal{\!{\em et al.\ }}
\def\mpl{M_{\rm Pl}}
\def\mH{m_{H^0}}
\def\mA{m_{A^0}}
\def\mHp{m_{H^\pm}}
\def\mph{m_\phi}
\def\lc{\lambda_c}
\def\lph{\lambda_{\phi h}}
%\def\ll{\lambda_{L}}
\def\Oph{\Omega_\phi h^2}
\def\OH{\Omega_{H^0} h^2}
\def\ODM{\Omega_{DM}h^2}
\def\hw{\qquad \boxed{\mathbf {HW}}}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\def\a{\alpha}
\def\as {\alpha_s}
\def\b{\beta}
\def\g{\gamma}
\def\d{\delta}
\def\e{\epsilon}
\def\ve{\varepsilon}
\def\la{\lambda}
\def\m{\mu}
\def\n{\nu}
\def\G{\Gamma}
\def\D{\Delta}
\def\L{\Lambda}
\def\s{\sigma}
\def\p{\pi}
\def\mzs {M_Z^2}
\def\mws {M_W^2}
\def\q2 {q^2}
\def\sz {\sin^2\theta_W}
\def\cz {\cos^2\theta_W}
\def\td {\tilde}
\def\r {\rightarrow}
\def\st {\tilde{t} }
\def\sb {\tilde{b} }
\def\miss {\hspace{-0.4cm}\slash~~}
\def\photino {\tilde\gamma}
\def\neu {\chi_1^0}
\def\rslep {\tilde{e_R}}
\def\rsnu {\tilde{\nu}_R}
\def\lsnu {\tilde{\nu}_L}
\def\snu {\tilde{\nu}}
\def\lslep {\tilde{e_L}}
\def\stau {\tilde{\tau}}
\def\mer {m_{\rslep}}
\def\mmr {m_{\tilde{\mu}_R}}
\def\BibTeX{\rm B{\sc ib}\TeX}
\def\mml {m_{\tilde{\mu}_L}}
\def\mel {m_{\lslep}}
\def\mneu {m_{\neu}}
\def\bt{\begin{table}}
\def\et{\end{table}}
\def\mZ{\mathbb{Z}}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\hypersetup{
pdfnewwindow=true,
colorlinks=true,
linkcolor=blue,
citecolor=blue,
filecolor=blue,
urlcolor=blue
}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\newcommand{\BD}{\textcolor{orange}}
\newcommand{\IMS}{\textcolor{blue}}
\begin{document}
% Use the \preprint command to place your local institutional report
% number in the upper righthand corner of the title page in preprint mode.
% Multiple \preprint commands are allowed.
% Use the 'preprintnumbers' class option to override journal defaults
% to display numbers if necessary
\preprint{IPPP/25/56}
%Title of paper
\title{Boomerang mechanism explaining the excess radio background}
% repeat the \author .. \affiliation etc. as needed
% \email, \thanks, \homepage, \altaffiliation all apply to the current
% author. Explanatory text should go in the []'s, actual e-mail
% address or url should go in the {}'s for \email and \homepage.
% Please use the appropriate macro foreach each type of information
% \affiliation command applies to all authors since the last
% \affiliation command. The \affiliation command should follow the
% other information
% \affiliation can be followed by \email, \homepage, \thanks as well.
\author{P. S. Bhupal Dev}
\email{bdev@wustl.edu}
\affiliation{Department of Physics and McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences,
Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA}
\author{Pasquale Di Bari}
\email{P.Di-Bari@soton.ac.uk}
\affiliation{School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, U.K.}
\author{Ivan Martinez-Soler}
\email{ivan.j.martinez-soler@durham.ac.uk}
\affiliation{Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology, Department of Physics, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, U.K.}
\author{Rishav Roshan}
\email{roshan@soton.ac.uk}
\affiliation{School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, U.K.}
%\homepage[]{Your web page}
%\thanks{}
%\altaffiliation{}
%Collaboration name if desired (requires use of superscriptaddress
%option in \documentclass). \noaffiliation is required (may also be
%used with the \author command).
%\collaboration can be followed by \email, \homepage, \thanks as well.
%\collaboration{}
%\noaffiliation
\date{\today}
\begin{abstract}
We propose a {\em boomerang mechanism} for the explanation of the excess radio background detected by ARCADE.
In an early stage, at a temperature $T \sim 100\,{\rm keV}$, a fraction of relic neutrinos is resonantly converted
into dark neutrinos by mixing induced by a pre-existing lepton asymmetry. Dark neutrinos
decay much later into a dark photon, mixed with photon, and a dark fermion, with a lifetime longer than the age of the Universe,
as required by a solution to the excess radio background.
This scenario circumvents the upper bound on the neutrino magnetic moment but still
%requires a
%sufficiently large active-dark neutrino mixing angle,
implies a testable lower bound.
%At the same time, the scenario realises, effectively, the correct conditions for the solution of the excess radio background observed by ARCADE
%in terms of radiative neutrino decays. This solution will be tested soon by the Tenerife Microwave Spectrometer (TMS).
\end{abstract}
% insert suggested keywords - APS authors don't need to do this
%\keywords{}
%\maketitle must follow title, authors, abstract, and keywords
\maketitle
% body of paper here - Use proper section commands
% References should be done using the \cite, \ref, and \label commands
%\section{Introduction}
{\bf Introduction}. The Absolute Radiometer for Cosmology, Astrophysics and Diffuse Emission (ARCADE)~\cite{Fixsen:2009xn}
has detected an excess radio background (ERB) in the 3--10 GHz frequency range with respect to the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) thermal spectrum. The excess is statistically significant (more than $5\sigma$) and cannot be explained by known population of sources since they give a contribution to the effective temperature that is 3--10 times smaller than the measured one~\cite{Singal:2017jlh}. Moreover, different observations place a strong upper limit on the anisotropy of the ERB that is, therefore, extremely smooth~\cite{Holder:2012nm}. This represents a strong constraint for an astrophysical origin and, therefore, the ERB is currently regarded
as a mystery~\cite{Singal:2017jlh}. The Tenerife Microwave Spectrometer (TMS) will soon take data in the 10--20 GHz frequency range
\cite{2020SPIE11453E..0TR,Alonso-Arias:2021quq} and might, therefore, help to shed light on this mystery. It was noticed that radiative relic neutrino decay
can potentially explain the ARCADE excess~\cite{Chianese:2018luo}. Recently, we have shown that such a solution indeed fits very well the six
ARCADE data points between 3--10 GHz giving rise to an excess~\cite{Dev:2023wel}. It predicts an effective (radiometric) temperature for the non-thermal photons produced by the
decays of one of the relic neutrino species, given by
\be\label{Tgammanth}
T_{\gamma_{\rm nth}}(E,0) \simeq {6\,\zeta(3)\over 11 \, \sqrt{\Omega_{{\rm M}0}}}\,
{T_{0}^3 \over E^{1 / 2}\, \Delta m_1^{3 / 2} } \, {t_0 \over \tau_1}
\,\left(1 +{a_{\rm D}^3 \over a_{\rm eq}^3} \right)^{-{1 \over 2}} \, ,
\ee
where $t_0=4.35 \times 10^{17}\,{\rm s}$ is the age of the Universe, $T_0=(2.725 \pm 0.001){\rm K}$ is the photon temperature at the present time
measured by the Far Infrared Absolute Spectropho-
tometer (FIRAS) instrument~\cite{Fixsen:2009ug},
$\D m_1 \equiv m_1 - m_0 \ll m_1$ is the mass difference between the lightest active neutrino
and the new sterile state, $\tau_1$ is the neutrino lifetime, $E \leq \D m_1$ is the energy of the photon at the present time. For the definition and values of the other cosmological parameters in Eq.~\eqref{Tgammanth}, we refer the reader to Ref.~\cite{Dev:2023wel}.
This expression can be used to fit the six data points measured by ARCADE 2 in the 3--10 GHz frequency range.
The best fit is obtained for $\D m_1 \simeq 4.0 \times 10^{-5}\,{\rm eV}$ and
$\tau_1 \simeq 1.46 \times 10^{21}\,{\rm s}$. As
shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:bestfit}, it provides an excellent fit to the ERB temperature spectrum over a power-law fit
with $\chi^2/{{\rm d.o.f.}} \simeq 1$ with 4 degrees of freedom (d.o.f.)~\cite{Dev:2023wel}.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
% \psfig{file=chisq_delm.png,height=9.5cm,width=9.5cm} \hspace{5mm}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{Arcadefit.png}
\end{center}
\caption{Best fit curve for $T_{\rm ERB}$ obtained with Eq.~(\ref{Tgammanth}). The thick red curve corresponds
to the best global fit obtained for $\D m_1 = 4.0 \times 10^{-5}\,{\rm eV}$ and $ \tau_1= 1.46 \times 10^{21}\,{\rm s}$.
The ARCADE 2 data points are taken from Ref.~\cite{Fixsen:2009xn}. We also show the power-law fit
$\beta = -2.58 \pm 0.05$ (dotted line with grey shade), obtained using the Long Wavelength
Array (LWA) data at lower frequencies~\cite{Dowell:2018mdb}. The vertical dashed line shows the TMS frequency threshold.}
\label{fig:bestfit}
\end{figure}
The result of the fit, expressed in terms of the quantity $\D m_1^{3/2}\tau_1$, gives at $99\%$ confidence level (C.L.):
\be\label{ARCADE}
(\D m_1^{3/2}\tau_1)^{\rm ARCADE} = 3.8^{+7.2}_{-1.5} \times 10^{14}\,{\rm eV}^{3/2}\,{\rm s} \, .
\ee
This region is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:magnetic_moment} (blue patched regions with different shades for different frequency bands) in the plane $\D m_1$ vs. $\tau_1$, with the best-fit point indicated by an orange \textcolor{orange}{$\star$}.
\begin{figure}[htb!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{combined_magneticMoment.png}
\caption{Allowed region explaining the ARCADE 2 excess radio background (blue patches of different shades for different photon energy bands)~\cite{Dev:2023wel}
in the plane of $\D m_1$ vs. $\tau_1$. Lower bounds on the lifetime derived from the upper bound on the effective magnetic transition dipole moment [cf. Eq.~(\ref{Gammanu})] are shown by the blue and orange lines.
We also indicate the matter-radiation decoupling time $t_{\rm dec}$ and the current age of the Universe $t_0$. The lowest frequency thresholds for FIRAS, PIXIE and TMS are also indicated.}
\label{fig:magnetic_moment}
\end{figure}
In a general way, we can write the radiative decay rate of the neutrino mass eigenstate
$\nu_1$ with mass $m_1$ into another neutrino mass eigenstate $\nu_0$ with mass $m_0$
in terms of the {\em effective magnetic transition dipole moment} $\mu_{{\rm eff}}$, as~\cite{Xing:2011zza}
\bea\label{Gammanu}
\Gamma_{\nu_1 \rightarrow \nu_0 +\gamma} & = & {(m^2_1 - m^2_0)^3 \over 8\pi \, m_1^3}\, \mu_{{\rm eff}}^2 \simeq {\Delta m^3_{1} \over \pi} \, \mu^{2}_{{\rm eff}} \\ \nonumber
& \simeq & 42.5\,{\rm s}^{-1}\, \left( {m_1 - m_0 \over {\rm eV}}\right)^3 \, \left({\mu_{{\rm eff}}\over \mu_{\rm B}}\right)^2 \, .
\eea
%where we defined $\Delta m_{1} \equiv m_{1} -m_0$.
In the second expression we used $m_1 + m_0 \simeq 2\,m_1$,
since we are interested in the case of quasi-degenerate neutrinos. In the numerical
expression we normalised $\mu_{{\rm eff}}$ to the Bohr magneton
$\mu_{\rm B} = e\hbar/(2m_e) \simeq 296.3\,{\rm GeV}^{-1}$.
The effective magnetic transition dipole moment is defined as
\be
\mu_{{\rm eff}} \equiv \sqrt{|\mu_{1\rightarrow 0}|^2 + |\epsilon_{1\rightarrow 0}|^2} \, ,
\ee
where $\mu_{1\rightarrow 0}$ is the transition magnetic dipole and $\epsilon_{1\rightarrow 0}$ is the transition electric dipole moment.
The most stringent upper bound on $\mu_{{\rm eff}}$ comes from plasmon decays in globular cluster stars~\cite{Raffelt:1990pj, Capozzi:2020cbu}:
\be\label{upperbmu}
\mu_{{\rm eff}} \lesssim 1.2\times 10^{-12}\,\mu_{\rm B}.
\ee
In this case, from Eq.~(\ref{Gammanu}), one easily finds the following lower bound on the lifetime of $\nu_1$:
\be
\tau_{\nu_1\rightarrow \nu_0 +\gamma} \gtrsim 2.5 \times 10^{21}\,{\rm s}\,
\left({{\rm eV}\over \Delta m_{1}} \right)^3 \, .
\ee
One can see that for $\Delta m_{1} \lesssim 10^{-4}\,{\rm eV}$, a necessary condition to address
the ERB, one obtains
$\tau_{\nu_1\rightarrow \nu_0 +\gamma} \gtrsim 10^{33}\,{\rm s}$, an incredibly long lifetime
yielding completely negligible contribution to explain the ERB. This conclusion remains valid
even considering the less stringent laboratory upper bound from the GEMMA experiment measuring electron recoils
induced by neutrino-electron elastic scattering~\cite{Beda:2010hk},
\be
\mu_{{\rm eff}} \lesssim 3.2 \times 10^{-11}\,\mu_{\rm B} \, .
\ee
This situation is depicted in Fig.~2.
Therefore, independently irrespective of whether the final neutrino is an active or a sterile neutrino species, neutrino
radiative decay by itself cannot give any sizable contribution to explain the ERB.
%We have to consider a way to produce the radio background photons in a way to circumvent
%the stringent bound on the neutrino effective magnetic moment.
The \emph{boomerang mechanism} that we propose here provides a way to circumvent this bound, preserving at the same time
the success of Eq.~(\ref{Tgammanth}) in reproducing the ARCADE data. While in radiative neutrino decays, ordinary neutrinos
directly decay into photons, in the boomerang mechanism neutrinos are first converted into dark (sterile) neutrinos and then these
decay into an admixture of dark photon and photons, with the latter constituting the ERB\footnote{The
name boomerang scenario is because the visible sector first throws sterile neutrinos into the dark sector via mixing,
and then these, decaying, throw back photons into the visible sector. The net result is that neutrinos are converted into photons.
Trading off the effective magnetic moment of ordinary neutrinos with that of sterile neutrino to circumvent (\ref{upperbmu})
is an ingredient, the only one, in common with the model proposed in~\cite{AristizabalSierra:2018emu} to explain the EDGES anomaly.}.
We first discuss how active-dark neutrino mixing, in the presence of a sufficiently large lepton asymmetry, can
convert a fraction of relic neutrinos into (quasi-degenerate) dark neutrinos.
Second, we discuss how the dark neutrinos decay into a dark fermion species
and into an admixture of photons and dark photons. Third, we combine together all constraints and determine an allowed region
in the plane of the neutrino effective magnetic moment and resonance temperature that maps into a corresponding region
into the plane of active-dark neutrino mixing angle versus mass squared difference. Finally, we draw some final remarks.
{\bf Active-to-dark neutrino conversions in the early Universe}.
We assume the existence of a light sterile dark neutrino field almost coinciding with mass eigenstate $\nu_0$ with mass $m_0$
and quasi-degenerate with the lightest neutrino with positive $\Delta m^2 \equiv m^2_1 -m^2_0$ \footnote{We adopt a different
sign convention for $\Delta m^2$ than in~\cite{Enqvist:1990ad,DiBari:2001jk}.}.
We also assume,
for definiteness, that it just mixes with the muon neutrino but all results are valid in general. The much higher values of $m^2_{2,3}-m^2_0$ make in a way that the relevant mixing
parameters in vacuum are just $\Delta m^2$ and a very small muon-dark neutrino mixing angle $\theta_{0}$. With these assumptions and definitions
the mixing in the early Universe is described by the effective Hamiltonian $\D H$ that in the interaction basis can be written as
\bea
& & \Delta H_{\mu-{\rm dark}} =
\\ \nonumber
& & {\Delta m^2\over 4\,p} \, \left(
\begin{array}{cc}
\cos 2\theta_{0}- v(y,T_\nu,L) & -\sin 2\theta_{0} \\
-\sin 2\theta_{0} & -(\cos 2\theta_{0} - v(y,T_\nu,L)) \,
\end{array}
\right) \, ,
\eea
where we introduced the dimensionless effective potential
\be
v(y,T,L) = v_1(y,T_{\nu}) + v_2(y,T_{\nu},L) \, .
\ee
In this expression we denoted by $T_{\nu}$ the neutrino temperature,
$y\equiv p/T_{\nu}$ and by $L$ the effective (muonic) total asymmetry defined as
\be
L \equiv 2L_{\nu_\mu} + L_{\nu_e} +L_{\nu_\tau} -{1\over 2} B_n \, ,
\ee
where the neutrino asymmetries $L_{\nu_\a} \equiv (N_{\nu_\a} - N_{\bar{\nu}_\a})/N^{\rm i}_{\gamma}$
and similarly for the neutron asymmetry $B_n$, with $N^{\rm i}_{\gamma}$ the photon abundance at
some initial time $t_{\rm i}$ such that $m_{\mu} \gg T_{\rm i} \gg m_e$, with $T_{\rm i} \equiv T(t_{\rm i})$.
The term $v_1(y,T_{\nu})$ is the finite temperature contribution~\cite{Notzold:1987ik} and is given by
\be
v_1(y,T_{\nu}) = {{\rm eV}^2\over \Delta m^2}\left(T_{\nu}\over T_{\alpha}\right)^6 \,y^2 \, ,
\ee
where $T_{\mu}\simeq 23.4{\rm MeV}$. For $L=0$ and $\D m^2 >0$, there would be a resonance, both for neutrinos and antineutrinos,
at $T_{\nu}^{\rm res}(y,0) \simeq T_\alpha\,(y^2 \, \D m^2/{\rm eV^2})^{1/6}$. At this resonance relic neutrinos are not efficiently converted
into dark neutrinos, though this could be used to trigger the generation of a large lepton asymmetry~\cite{Foot:1995qk,DiBari:2001jk}, as we comment
in the final remarks. However, here we assume that there already exists an initial pre-existing effective muon asymmetry $L_{\rm i}$.
In this case one has also to consider the term $v_2(y,T_{\nu},L)$ given by~\cite{Enqvist:1990ad}
\be
v_2(y,T_{\nu},L) \simeq \mp \,v_0\,{{\rm eV}^2\over \Delta m^2}\,L \,\left({T_{\nu}\over {\rm MeV}}\right)^4\,y \, ,
\ee
where the $-$ ($+$) sign holds for neutrinos (antineutrinos) and
$v_0 = (4\sqrt{2}\zeta(3)/\pi^2) 10^{12}\,G_{\rm F}{\rm MeV}^2 \simeq 8$.
If we assume that $|L_{\rm i}| \gg L_{\star} \simeq 0.4 \times 10^{-6} (y \, \D m^2/{\rm eV^2})^{1/3}$, then
the resonance condition is satisfied for $v_2(y,T_{\nu},L) = 1$. This implies that
for positive $L_{\rm i}$ and positive $\Delta m^2$ there is a resonance only for antineutrinos
at a resonant temperature
\be\label{Tnures}
T_\nu^{\rm res}(y,L\gg L_\star) = \left({1 \over v_0 \, L \, y} {\Delta m^2 \over {\rm eV}^2}\right)^{1\over 4} {\rm MeV} < T_\nu^{\rm res}(y,0) \, .
\ee
Notice that this resonance occurs at different times for different values of $y=y_{\rm res}$. The asymmetry grows with time from the initial value
and $y_{\rm res}$ spans all neutrino distribution starting from a small value $y_{\rm res}\ll 1$ to large values $y_{\rm res} \gg 1$,
as discussed in detail in Ref.~\cite{DiBari:2001jk}. Since this process occurs, in general, during electron-positron annihilations,
the neutrino temperature get smaller than the photon temperature and, making use of entropy conservation, one has
\begin{equation}
T_{\nu}=T\,\left[{g_S(m_e/T)\over g_S(0)}\right]^{1\over 3} \, ,
\end{equation}
where $g_{\rm S}$ is the number of entropy density ultrarelativistic degrees of freedom.
For $T_\nu^{\rm res}(y_{\rm res}\ll 1, L_{\rm i}) \lesssim 1\,{\rm MeV}$, neutrino collisions can be neglected and at the resonance one
has antineutrino conversions into dark neutrinos already starting from small $y_{\rm res}\ll 1$.
If the resonance is crossed adiabatically, then all lightest antineutrinos are converted into dark neutrinos. Notice that if $L_{\rm i}< 0 $, then simply
lightest neutrinos are converted into dark neutrinos instead of antineutrinos. For definiteness, we will usually refer to the case $L_{\rm i}>0$ in the following.
More generally, to account also for non-adiabatic conversions, the fraction of converted neutrinos can be calculated using the Landau-Zener approximation
that has been shown to agree quite well with numerical results solving density matrix equation~\cite{DiBari:2001jk}:
\be
f_{\nu_\mu\rightarrow \nu_{\rm dark}} \simeq 1 - e^{-{\pi\over 2}\,\gamma_{\rm res}} \, ,
\ee
where $\gamma_{\rm res}$ is the adiabaticity parameter at the resonance and is given by
\be
\gamma_{\rm res} = {|\Delta m^2|\, \sin^2\,2\theta_0 \over 2y\, T_{\nu}^{\rm res}\,H_{\rm res}} \, ,
\ee
where $H_{\rm res} \simeq 0.2{\rm s}^{-1}\, \sqrt{g_\rho(T_{\rm res})} (T_{\rm res}/{\rm MeV})^2$
is the expansion rate at the resonance and $g_{\rho}$ is the number of energy density ultrarelativistic degrees of freedom.
For simplicity, we can make use of a monochromatic approximation equivalent to say
that all neutrinos are converted instantaneously at $T_{\nu}^{\rm res}$ corresponding at $y_{\rm res}=3.15$.
Using the prescription in Ref.~\cite{DiBari:2001jk}, in this case one has to use $\langle L \rangle \simeq L_{\rm f}/2 \simeq 0.2$
in the evaluation of the adiabaticity parameter, obtaining:
\be\label{gammares}
\gamma_{\rm res} \simeq 1.4 \, \times 10^9 \, \sqrt{10.75 \over g_\rho(T_\nu^{\rm res})}\, \left({\Delta m^2 \over {\rm eV}^2} \right)^{1\over 4} \, \sin^2 2\theta_0 \, .
\ee
We will comment in the final remarks on the validity of the monochromatic approximation.
{\bf Dark neutrino decays into a dark-standard photon admixture}.
In order to explain the ERB, we assume that the dark neutrinos produced by active-to-dark neutrino conversions
in the presence of a pre-existing asymmetry decay into a dark fermion $\psi'$ with mass $m_{\psi'}$ and a dark photon $\gamma'$
with mass $m_{\gamma'}$ kinematically mixed with the standard photon with kinetic mixing parameter $\ve = \sin^2 \chi_0$.
The dark fermion is assumed to be quasi-degenerate with $\nu_0$, while we assume
$m_{\gamma'} \lesssim 10^{-16}\,{\rm eV}$, in a way to evade any constraint for all values of $\ve$~\cite{Caputo:2021eaa}.
We also assume that the decays can be described as fully non-relativistically so that, at the decay, the dark-standard photon
admixture has an energy $E_{\rm D}\simeq \D m' \equiv m_0 - m_{\psi'}$. In this way the spectrum of non-thermal photons produced by the
decays of the dark neutrinos and detected at the present time would be described by an effective temperature given exactly by
the expression in Eq.~(\ref{Tgammanth}) multiplied by $\ve$ and also divided by a factor $2 / (1-e^{-{\pi \over 2}\gamma_{\rm res}})$,
taking into account that only relic antineutrinos are, adiabatically or non-adiabatically, converted into dark neutrinos.
The dark fermion radiative decay rate into a dark photon can be related to a dark neutrino effective magnetic moment $\mu_{\rm eff}'$
by an expression analogous to Eq.~(\ref{Gammanu}) \footnote{This ingredient of the mechanism is in common with the model proposed in~\cite{AristizabalSierra:2018emu} to explain the EDGES anomaly.}:
\bea\label{Gammanu1}\nonumber
\Gamma_{\nu_{0} \rightarrow \psi' +\gamma'} & = & {(m^{2}_0 - m^{2}_{\psi'})^3 \over 8\pi \, m_0^3}\, \mu^{'2}_{{\rm eff}}
\simeq {\D m'^{3} \over \pi} \, \mu^{'2}_{{\rm eff}} \\
& \simeq & 42.5\,{\rm s}^{-1}\, \left( {\D m' \over {\rm eV}}\right)^3 \, \left({\mu'_{{\rm eff}}\over \mu_{\rm B}}\right)^2 \, .
\eea
The important difference is that now $\mu'_{\rm eff}$ does not have direct experimental constraints.
However, because of the active-dark neutrino mixing, the active neutrino still has an effective neutrino magnetic moment
$\mu_{\rm eff} = \sin^2\theta_0 \mu'_{\rm eff}$ and for this reason the experimental constraints on $\mu_{\rm eff}$
still play a role to be taken into account.
{\bf Constraints and allowed region}. Let us now combine all constraints and determine the allowed region in the space of parameters.
Of course we have first to determine which is a minimum set of parameters to show all constraints. We can start by imposing that the
non-thermal photons produced by the decays of the dark neutrinos, and mixed with the dark photons, can reproduce the
ARCADE data. We have then to impose that the lifetime of dark neutrinos is given by the lifetime determined in~\cite{Dev:2023wel}
in the case of direct relic neutrino decays (see best fit in Fig.~\ref{fig:bestfit}), that we denote by $\tau_{\rm ARCADE}(\nu_1 \rightarrow \nu_0+\gamma)$,
shortened by a factor $\ve\,(1- e^{-\gamma_{\rm res}})/2$ to compensate the reduced photon production, explicitly:
% \be
%\Gamma_{\nu_{\rm s 2} \rightarrow \nu_{\rm s 2} +\gamma'} = 2 \times 2 {1 \over 1- e^{-\gamma}} \tau_{\rm ARCADE}^{-1}(\nu_1 \rightarrow \nu_{\rm s}+%\gamma) \lesssim t_0^{-1}
%\ee
\be\label{tauconstraint}
\tau_{\nu_{0} \rightarrow \psi' +\gamma'} = {\ve\,(1- e^{-\gamma_{\rm res}})\over 2} \tau_{\rm ARCADE}(\nu_1 \rightarrow \nu_{0}+\gamma) \gtrsim t_0 \, .
\ee
On the other hand, the lifetime cannot be shorter than $t_0$, as also indicated in (\ref{tauconstraint}), since otherwise the exponential in the decay-law kicks in and suppresses the photon effective temperature below the ARCADE measured values. Since the lifetime is the inverse of the decay rate given in
Eq.~(\ref{Gammanu}), it is clear that the constraint (\ref{tauconstraint}) allows to express $\mu'_{\rm eff}$ in terms of $\gamma_{\rm res}$. Therefore,
for a fixed value of $\gamma_{\rm res}$, one has a fixed value of $\mu'_{\rm eff}$. At the same time $\gamma_{\rm res}$ is expressed in terms
of $\sin^2 2\theta_0$ and $\Delta m^2$ from Eq.~(\ref{gammares}).
We also have to impose the constraint $T^{\rm res}_{\nu}(L_{\rm i}) \lesssim 1\,{\rm MeV}$. From Eq.~(\ref{Tnures}) one can see that,
for a fixed value of $L_{\rm i}$, this results into an upper bound on $\Delta m^2$. Higher values of $L_{\rm i}$ correspond to higher allowed values of $\Delta m^2$.
However, one has to impose an upper bound $L_{\rm i} \lesssim 10^{-2}$ from cosmological observations,
since this would affect both BBN and CMB anisotropies~\cite{Dolgov:2002ab}.
It is then clear that it is possible to express all other parameters in terms of
$\sin^2 2\theta_0$, $\Delta m^2$ and $L_{\rm i}$. Therefore, we can conveniently show all constraints in the
plane $\Delta m^2$ versus $\sin^2 2\theta_0$, as one can see in the left panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:constDm2sin2th0}
for the most conservative choice of maximal kinetic mixing corresponding to $\ve=1/2$ and highest value of
$\tau_{\rm ARCADE}(\nu_1 \rightarrow \nu_{0}+\gamma)$ allowed at $99\%$ C.L. (from Eq.~(\ref{ARCADE})).
\begin{figure*}[t!]
\begin{center}
% \psfig{file=chisq_delm.png,height=9.5cm,width=9.5cm} \hspace{5mm}
\includegraphics[scale=0.385]{delmsq_s2th.png}
\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{mu_eff-Tres_v2.png}
\end{center}
\caption{Left panel: Constraints (shaded) and allowed region (white) in the plane of $\Delta m^2$ versus $\sin^2 2\theta_0$.
The horizontal dashed lines give an upper bound on $\Delta m^2$ from $T_{\nu}^{\rm res}< 1\,{\rm MeV}$ for the indicated values of $L_{\rm i}$.
Right panel: Constraints (shaded) and allowed region (white) in the plane of $\mu_{\rm eff}$ versus $T_{\nu}^{\rm res}$.
We have used conservatively maximal kinetic mixing $\ve=1/2$.}
\label{fig:constDm2sin2th0}
\end{figure*}
All constraints are explicitly indicated and the allowed region is in white. The horizontal dashed lines
give the upper bound on $\Delta m^2$ for different values of $L_{\rm i}$. One can also notice the experimental
constraints on $\mu_{\rm eff}$ that basically translates into an upper bound on $\sin^2 2\theta_0$. The orange line
is the isocontour line for $\gamma_{\rm res}=1$, marking the border between the adiabatic and the non-adiabatic regime.
In the right panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:constDm2sin2th0} we also show constraints and allowed region in the plane
$\mu_{\rm eff}$ versus $T_{\nu}^{\rm res}$ and one can see how there is a very interesting lower bound
$\mu_{\rm eff}/\mu_{\rm B}\gtrsim 10^{-16}$.
{\bf Final remarks}.
%\item Decays $\gamma \rightarrow v_{{\rm s}1}, \nu_{{\rm s}2}$ cannot occur in red giants, because of the small
%dark photon mass implying very long oscillation time.
%\item Comparison with the model by Sheng and Diego ? Maybe before
(i) The boomerang mechanism effectively realizes a solution of the ERB mystery
obtained in terms of radiative relic neutrino decays~\cite{Dev:2023wel} but in two stages: in a first early stage
relic antineutrinos (or neutrinos, depending on the sign of $L_{\rm i}$) of one species are converted into
dark neutrinos (the visible sector throws particles into the dark sector);
in a second stage dark neutrinos decay into dark photons mixed with photons (dark sector throws back particles into the visible one).
(ii) As Fig.~\ref{fig:constDm2sin2th0} shows, it has a broad variety of phenomenological implications that make it testable in different ways.
First of all the TMS experiment will verify the ARCADE data, the existence of the ERB and the solution
proposed in~\cite{Dev:2023wel}. Notice also that this implies some non-standard deviation in the 21 cm cosmological global signal
(see~\cite{Dev:2023wel} for details).
%(though much weaker than what needed to explain the EDGES anomaly, in agreement with SARAS3 results).
Possible cosmological anomalies in BBN and/or CMB anisotropies might be addressed
by the presence of a large lepton asymmetry~\cite{Burns:2022hkq}.
Also notice that it implies non-standard relic neutrino background properties
that might be potential measured~\cite{DiBari:2001jk}.
Finally, the lower bound we found on $\mu_{\rm eff}$,
four orders of magnitude below the current upper bound,
will be tested by future experiments~\cite{Giunti:2024gec}.
(iii) The initial lepton asymmetry $L_{\rm i}$ can either be
generated by some external mechanism, such as the decays of weekly coupled seesaw neutrinos,
or, even more intriguingly, it could be generated dynamically by the same active-dark neutrino mixing~\cite{Foot:1995qk,DiBari:2001jk}.
In this case, for $L=0$, the initial resonance at $T_\nu^{\rm res}(0)\gtrsim 1\,{\rm MeV}$ occurs in the collisional regime and triggers an
initial unstable growth of the asymmetry.
This stage would then provide the value we denoted by $L_{\rm i}$ needed for the conversion of active to dark neutrinos.
This option might require a reduced allowed region in the plane $\Delta m^2$ versus $\sin^2 2\theta_0$.
(iv) The monochromatic approximation we used is well justified by numerical solution of density matrix equation
with a full momentum description~\cite{DiBari:2001jk}. This also grasps
the variation of the non-adiabaticity parameter with momentum. However, one would have small corrections to the allowed region we have derived.
(v) That allowed regions have been determined for the most conservative case $\ve=1/2$. They would clearly shrink for lower values until
they would disappear for a lower bound $\ve \sim 2\times 10^{-4}$.
(vi) We have not discussed how the boomerang mechanism could be embedded within a full model. For example, a possible direction is offered
by models incorporating quasi-Dirac neutrinos. Typically, we have maximal mixing for $\Delta m\ll m$, as $\tan2\theta\sim 2m/\Delta m$,
but arbitrary mixing is possible for a matrix structure.
%\end{itemize}
In conclusion, the boomerang mechanism shows that a solution to the ERB in terms of relic radiative neutrino decays is possible.
If the excess will be confirmed, this might provide a direct open window to explore a new dark sector.
% Put \label in argument of \section for cross-referencing
%\section{\label{}}
%\subsection{}
%\subsubsection{}
% If in two-column mode, this environment will change to single-column
% format so that long equations can be displayed. Use
% sparingly.
%\begin{widetext}
% put long equation here
%\end{widetext}
% figures should be put into the text as floats.
% Use the graphics or graphicx packages (distributed with LaTeX2e)
% and the \includegraphics macro defined in those packages.
% See the LaTeX Graphics Companion by Michel Goosens, Sebastian Rahtz,
% and Frank Mittelbach for instance.
%
% Here is an example of the general form of a figure:
% Fill in the caption in the braces of the \caption{} command. Put the label
% that you will use with \ref{} command in the braces of the \label{} command.
% Use the figure* environment if the figure should span across the
% entire page. There is no need to do explicit centering.
% \begin{figure}
% \includegraphics{}%
% \caption{\label{}}
% \end{figure}
% Surround figure environment with turnpage environment for landscape
% figure
% \begin{turnpage}
% \begin{figure}
% \includegraphics{}%
% \caption{\label{}}
% \end{figure}
% \end{turnpage}
% tables should appear as floats within the text
%
% Here is an example of the general form of a table:
% Fill in the caption in the braces of the \caption{} command. Put the label
% that you will use with \ref{} command in the braces of the \label{} command.
% Insert the column specifiers (l, r, c, d, etc.) in the empty braces of the
% \begin{tabular}{} command.
% The ruledtabular enviroment adds doubled rules to table and sets a
% reasonable default table settings.
% Use the table* environment to get a full-width table in two-column
% Add \usepackage{longtable} and the longtable (or longtable*}
% environment for nicely formatted long tables. Or use the the [H]
% placement option to break a long table (with less control than
% in longtable).
% \begin{table}%[H] add [H] placement to break table across pages
% \caption{\label{}}
% \begin{ruledtabular}
% \begin{tabular}{}
% Lines of table here ending with \\
% \end{tabular}
% \end{ruledtabular}
% \end{table}
% Surround table environment with turnpage environment for landscape
% table
% \begin{turnpage}
% \begin{table}
% \caption{\label{}}
% \begin{ruledtabular}
% \begin{tabular}{}
% \end{tabular}
% \end{ruledtabular}
% \end{table}
% \end{turnpage}
% Specify following sections are appendices. Use \appendix* if there
% only one appendix.
%\appendix
%\section{}
% If you have acknowledgments, this puts in the proper section head.
%\begin{acknowledgments}
% put your acknowledgments here.
%\end{acknowledgments}
% Create the reference section using BibTeX:
\acknowledgments
{\bf Acknowledgments.} We thank Jens Chluba, Andr\'{e} de Gouv\^{e}a, Chee Sheng Fong, Jos\`{e} Alberto Rubi\~{n}o Martin, and Anil Thapa for useful discussions. The work of BD was partly
supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under grant No. DE-SC0017987.
PDB and RR acknowledge financial support from the STFC Consolidated Grant ST/T000775/1. IMS is supported by STFC grant ST/T001011/1.
\section{Appendix: Boomerang mechanism versus neutrino oscillation constraints}
%Add some details on Fig.~\ref{fig:osc}. Constraints mainly from Borexino~\cite{Chen:2022zts}. Comment on DARWIN~\cite{} for future sensitivity. MINOS+ for current bound on $\sin^2\theta_{24}$~\cite{MINOS:2017cae}.
Having obtained an allowed region in the $\Delta m^2$ versus $\sin^2{2\theta}$ plane, we compare it with the existing constraints from neutrino oscillation
experiments. Active research is underway on sterile neutrinos with masses around the eV scale, motivated by the excess observed by LSND~\cite{LSND:2001aii}, and the intriguing results reported by MiniBooNE~\cite{MiniBooNE:2020pnu}, BEST~\cite{Barinov:2021asz}, and IceCube~\cite{IceCubeCollaboration:2024nle}. However, many other experiments have not found such evidence, leading to significant tension among data sets when combined~\cite{Dentler:2018sju,Hardin:2022muu}.
Beyond the eV-scale sterile neutrino, searches have explored a wide range of mass for oscillations between active and sterile states~\cite{Wolfenstein:1981kw, Petcov:1982ya, Bilenky:1983wt, Kobayashi:2000md, Anamiati:2017rxw, deGouvea:2009fp, Vissani:2015pss, Shoemaker:2015qul, Brdar:2018tce, DeGouvea:2020ang, Rink:2022nvw, Carloni:2022cqz}, but no evidence has been found. For nearly degenerate active and sterile states, solar~\cite{deGouvea:2009fp, Ansarifard:2022kvy, Chen:2022zts}, and reactor data~\cite{DayaBay:2024nip}, constrain $\Delta m^2 \lesssim 10^{-12}\text{eV}^2$ and $\sin^22\theta\geq 10^{-4}$, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:osc}. The disappearance bounds of muons come from long-baseline experiments~\cite{MINOS:2017cae,NOvA:2024imi} and atmospheric experiments~\cite{Beacom:2003eu}, $\Delta m^2 \lesssim 10^{-4}~\text{eV}^2$ and $\sin^22\theta\geq 10^{-2}$. Astrophysical neutrinos, with large $L/E$, probe down to $\Delta m^2 \sim 10^{-20}\text{eV}^2$ for maximal mixing~\cite{DeGouvea:2020ang,Martinez-Soler:2021unz,deGouvea:2021ymm,Carloni:2025dhv}.
Fig.~\ref{fig:osc} compares current bounds with the region predicted by the boomerang mechanism. While this work focuses on muon-sterile oscillations, the mechanism applies to all flavors, so we used the strongest bounds over the mixing. Upcoming experiments like DARWIN~\cite{deGouvea:2021ymm} and JUNO~\cite{Franklin:2023diy} will further improve sensitivity.
\begin{figure}[t!]
% \psfig{file=chisq_delm.png,height=9.5cm,width=9.5cm} \hspace{5mm}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{OscBound_ARCADE.pdf}
\caption{ Region allowed by the boomerang mechanism at 99\% C.L., along with the region excluded by oscillation experiments. We present some of the most stringent bounds on the mixing, including measurements from solar neutrino experiments such as Borexino~\cite{Chen:2022zts}, Gallex~\cite{GALLEX:1998kcz}, Chlorine~\cite{Cleveland:1998nv}, and SNO~\cite{SNO:2002tuh}, Super-Kamiokande~\cite{Super-Kamiokande:2001ljr} as well as reactor experiments like KamLAND~\cite{Chen:2022zts} and Daya Bay~\cite{DayaBay:2024nip}.}
\label{fig:osc}
\end{figure}
% \begin{eqarray}
% \gamma_{\mathrm{res}} &=& 1.4 \times 10^{9}
% \left( \frac{d_0 L y_{\mathrm{res}}}{T_{\mathrm{res}}^4} \right)^{1/4}
% \left( \frac{\mu_{\mathrm{eff}}}{\mu_B} \right)\\
% &\times \left[ 42.5 \, \Delta m' \left( \frac{1 - e^{-\gamma_{\mathrm{res}}}}{4} \tau_{\mathrm{Arcade}} \right) \right]^{1/2}
% \end{eqarray}
\bibliography{ref}
\end{document}
%
% ****** End of file apstemplate.tex ******
%apsrev4-2.bst 2019-01-14 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrev4-1.bst
%Control: key (0)
%Control: author (8) initials jnrlst
%Control: editor formatted (1) identically to author
%Control: production of article title (0) allowed
%Control: page (0) single
%Control: year (1) truncated
%Control: production of eprint (0) enabled
\begin{thebibliography}{56}%
\makeatletter
\providecommand \@ifxundefined [1]{%
\@ifx{#1\undefined}
}%
\providecommand \@ifnum [1]{%
\ifnum #1\expandafter \@firstoftwo
\else \expandafter \@secondoftwo
\fi
}%
\providecommand \@ifx [1]{%
\ifx #1\expandafter \@firstoftwo
\else \expandafter \@secondoftwo
\fi
}%
\providecommand \natexlab [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \enquote [1]{``#1''}%
\providecommand \bibnamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \bibfnamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \citenamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \href@noop [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \href [0]{\begingroup \@sanitize@url \@href}%
\providecommand \@href[1]{\@@startlink{#1}\@@href}%
\providecommand \@@href[1]{\endgroup#1\@@endlink}%
\providecommand \@sanitize@url [0]{\catcode `\\12\catcode `\$12\catcode
`\&12\catcode `\#12\catcode `\^12\catcode `\_12\catcode `\%12\relax}%
\providecommand \@@startlink[1]{}%
\providecommand \@@endlink[0]{}%
\providecommand \url [0]{\begingroup\@sanitize@url \@url }%
\providecommand \@url [1]{\endgroup\@href {#1}{\urlprefix }}%
\providecommand \urlprefix [0]{URL }%
\providecommand \Eprint [0]{\href }%
\providecommand \doibase [0]{https://doi.org/}%
\providecommand \selectlanguage [0]{\@gobble}%
\providecommand \bibinfo [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \bibfield [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \translation [1]{[#1]}%
\providecommand \BibitemOpen [0]{}%
\providecommand \bibitemStop [0]{}%
\providecommand \bibitemNoStop [0]{.\EOS\space}%
\providecommand \EOS [0]{\spacefactor3000\relax}%
\providecommand \BibitemShut [1]{\csname bibitem#1\endcsname}%
\let\auto@bib@innerbib\@empty
%</preamble>
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Fixsen}\ \emph {et~al.}(2011)\citenamefont {Fixsen}
\emph {et~al.}}]{Fixsen:2009xn}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Fixsen}} \emph {et~al.},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{ARCADE 2
Measurement of the Extra-Galactic Sky Temperature at 3-90 GHz}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/734/1/5} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Astrophys. J.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {734}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {5} (\bibinfo {year} {2011})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/0901.0555} {arXiv:0901.0555 [astro-ph.CO]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Singal}\ \emph {et~al.}(2018)\citenamefont {Singal}
\emph {et~al.}}]{Singal:2017jlh}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{Singal}} \emph {et~al.},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{The Radio
Synchrotron Background: Conference Summary and Report}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/aaa6b0} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {130}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {036001} (\bibinfo {year} {2018})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.09979} {arXiv:1711.09979 [astro-ph.HE]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Holder}(2014)}]{Holder:2012nm}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.~P.}\ \bibnamefont
{Holder}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{The unusual smoothness of
the extragalactic unresolved radio background}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/112} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Astrophys. J.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {780}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {112} (\bibinfo {year} {2014})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0856} {arXiv:1207.0856 [astro-ph.CO]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {{Rubi{\~n}o Mart{\'\i}n}}\ \emph
{et~al.}(2020)\citenamefont {{Rubi{\~n}o Mart{\'\i}n}} \emph
{et~al.}}]{2020SPIE11453E..0TR}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~A.}\ \bibnamefont
{{Rubi{\~n}o Mart{\'\i}n}}} \emph {et~al.},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo
{title} {{The Tenerife Microwave Spectrometer (TMS) experiment: studying the
absolute spectrum of the sky emission in the 10-20GHz range}},\ }in\ \href
{https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2561309} {\emph {\bibinfo {booktitle}
{Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation
for Astronomy X}}},\ \bibinfo {series} {Society of Photo-Optical
Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series}, Vol.\ \bibinfo {volume}
{11453},\ \bibinfo {editor} {edited by\ \bibinfo {editor} {\bibfnamefont
{J.}~\bibnamefont {{Zmuidzinas}}}\ and\ \bibinfo {editor} {\bibfnamefont
{J.-R.}\ \bibnamefont {{Gao}}}}\ (\bibinfo {year} {2020})\ p.\ \bibinfo
{pages} {114530T}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Alonso-Arias}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont
{Alonso-Arias}, \citenamefont {Fuerte-Rodr{\'\i}guez}, \citenamefont
{Hoyland},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Rubi{\~n}o-Mart{\'\i}n}}]{Alonso-Arias:2021quq}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Alonso-Arias}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~A.}\ \bibnamefont
{Fuerte-Rodr{\'\i}guez}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~J.}\
\bibnamefont {Hoyland}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~A.}\
\bibnamefont {Rubi{\~n}o-Mart{\'\i}n}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo
{title} {{The optical system of the Tenerife Microwave Spectrometer: a window
for observing the 10{\textendash}20 GHz sky spectra}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/16/12/P12037} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {JINST}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {16}}\bibfield
{number} {\bibinfo {number} { (12)},\ \bibinfo {pages} {P12037}},\ }\Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.15364} {arXiv:2111.15364 [astro-ph.IM]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Chianese}\ \emph {et~al.}(2019)\citenamefont
{Chianese}, \citenamefont {Di~Bari}, \citenamefont {Farrag},\ and\
\citenamefont {Samanta}}]{Chianese:2018luo}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Chianese}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont {Di~Bari}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont {Farrag}},\ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont {Samanta}},\ }\bibfield {title}
{\bibinfo {title} {{Probing relic neutrino radiative decays with 21 cm
cosmology}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.09.040}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Lett. B}\ }\textbf
{\bibinfo {volume} {790}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {64} (\bibinfo {year} {2019})},\
\Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.11717} {arXiv:1805.11717 [hep-ph]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Dev}\ \emph {et~al.}(2024)\citenamefont {Dev},
\citenamefont {Di~Bari}, \citenamefont {Mart\'\i{}nez-Soler},\ and\
\citenamefont {Roshan}}]{Dev:2023wel}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~S.~B.}\
\bibnamefont {Dev}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Di~Bari}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.}~\bibnamefont
{Mart\'\i{}nez-Soler}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{R.}~\bibnamefont {Roshan}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Relic
neutrino decay solution to the excess radio background}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/04/046} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {JCAP}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {04}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {046}},\ \Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.03082} {arXiv:2312.03082
[hep-ph]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Fixsen}(2009)}]{Fixsen:2009ug}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Fixsen}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{The Temperature of the
Cosmic Microwave Background}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/916} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Astrophys. J.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {707}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {916} (\bibinfo {year} {2009})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/0911.1955} {arXiv:0911.1955 [astro-ph.CO]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Dowell}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Taylor}(2018)}]{Dowell:2018mdb}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{Dowell}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.~B.}\ \bibnamefont
{Taylor}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{The Radio Background
Below 100 MHz}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aabf86}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Astrophys. J. Lett.}\ }\textbf
{\bibinfo {volume} {858}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {L9} (\bibinfo {year} {2018})},\
\Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.08581} {arXiv:1804.08581 [astro-ph.CO]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Xing}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Zhou}(2011)}]{Xing:2011zza}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Z.-z.}\ \bibnamefont
{Xing}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Zhou}},\
}\href@noop {} {\emph {\bibinfo {title} {{Neutrinos in particle physics,
astronomy and cosmology}}}}\ (\bibinfo {year} {2011})\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Raffelt}(1990)}]{Raffelt:1990pj}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.~G.}\ \bibnamefont
{Raffelt}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{New bound on neutrino
dipole moments from globular cluster stars}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2856} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {64}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {2856} (\bibinfo {year} {1990})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Capozzi}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Raffelt}(2020)}]{Capozzi:2020cbu}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont
{Capozzi}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont
{Raffelt}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Axion and neutrino
bounds improved with new calibrations of the tip of the red-giant branch
using geometric distance determinations}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.083007} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {102}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {083007} (\bibinfo {year} {2020})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.03694} {arXiv:2007.03694 [astro-ph.SR]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Beda}\ \emph {et~al.}(2010)\citenamefont {Beda},
\citenamefont {Brudanin}, \citenamefont {Egorov}, \citenamefont {Medvedev},
\citenamefont {Pogosov}, \citenamefont {Shirchenko},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Starostin}}]{Beda:2010hk}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~G.}\ \bibnamefont
{Beda}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.~B.}\ \bibnamefont {Brudanin}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.~G.}\ \bibnamefont {Egorov}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~V.}\ \bibnamefont {Medvedev}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {V.~S.}\ \bibnamefont {Pogosov}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {M.~V.}\ \bibnamefont {Shirchenko}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {A.~S.}\ \bibnamefont {Starostin}},\ }\bibfield {title}
{\bibinfo {title} {{Upper limit on the neutrino magnetic moment from three
years of data from the GEMMA spectrometer}},\ }\href@noop {} {\ (\bibinfo
{year} {2010})},\ \Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.2736} {arXiv:1005.2736
[hep-ex]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{Note1()}]{Note1}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibinfo {note} {The name boomerang scenario is because the visible sector
first throws sterile neutrinos into the dark sector via mixing, and then
these, decaying, throw back photons into the visible sector. The net result
is that neutrinos are converted into photons. Trading off the effective
magnetic moment of ordinary neutrinos with that of sterile neutrino to
circumvent (\ref {upperbmu}) is an ingredient, the only one, in common with
the model proposed in~\cite {AristizabalSierra:2018emu} to explain the EDGES
anomaly.}\BibitemShut {Stop}%
\bibitem [{Note2()}]{Note2}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibinfo {note} {We adopt a different sign convention for $\Delta m^2$ than
in~\cite {Enqvist:1990ad,DiBari:2001jk}.}\BibitemShut {Stop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {N{\"o}tzold}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Raffelt}(1988)}]{Notzold:1987ik}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont
{N{\"o}tzold}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont
{Raffelt}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Neutrino dispersion at
finite temperature and density}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(88)90113-7} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Nucl. Phys. B}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {307}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {924} (\bibinfo {year} {1988})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Foot}\ \emph {et~al.}(1996)\citenamefont {Foot},
\citenamefont {Thomson},\ and\ \citenamefont {Volkas}}]{Foot:1995qk}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont
{Foot}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~J.}\ \bibnamefont {Thomson}},\
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~R.}\ \bibnamefont {Volkas}},\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Large neutrino asymmetries from
neutrino oscillations}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.53.R5349}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {53}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {R5349} (\bibinfo {year} {1996})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9509327} {arXiv:hep-ph/9509327} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Di~Bari}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Foot}(2002)}]{DiBari:2001jk}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Di~Bari}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont {Foot}},\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Active sterile neutrino oscillations
in the early universe: Asymmetry generation at low |delta m**2| and the
Landau-Zener approximation}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.045003} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {65}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {045003} (\bibinfo {year} {2002})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0103192} {arXiv:hep-ph/0103192} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Enqvist}\ \emph {et~al.}(1991)\citenamefont
{Enqvist}, \citenamefont {Kainulainen},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Maalampi}}]{Enqvist:1990ad}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont
{Enqvist}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont
{Kainulainen}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{Maalampi}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Refraction and
Oscillations of Neutrinos in the Early Universe}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(91)90397-G} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Nucl. Phys. B}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {349}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {754} (\bibinfo {year} {1991})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Caputo}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont {Caputo},
\citenamefont {Millar}, \citenamefont {O'Hare},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Vitagliano}}]{Caputo:2021eaa}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Caputo}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~J.}\ \bibnamefont {Millar}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.~A.~J.}\ \bibnamefont {O'Hare}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont {Vitagliano}},\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Dark photon limits: A handbook}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.095029} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {104}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {095029} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.04565} {arXiv:2105.04565 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{Note3()}]{Note3}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibinfo {note} {This ingredient of the mechanism is in common with the model
proposed in~\cite {AristizabalSierra:2018emu} to explain the EDGES
anomaly.}\BibitemShut {Stop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Dolgov}\ \emph {et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont {Dolgov},
\citenamefont {Hansen}, \citenamefont {Pastor}, \citenamefont {Petcov},
\citenamefont {Raffelt},\ and\ \citenamefont {Semikoz}}]{Dolgov:2002ab}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~D.}\ \bibnamefont
{Dolgov}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~H.}\ \bibnamefont {Hansen}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Pastor}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~T.}\ \bibnamefont {Petcov}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {G.~G.}\ \bibnamefont {Raffelt}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {D.~V.}\ \bibnamefont {Semikoz}},\ }\bibfield {title}
{\bibinfo {title} {{Cosmological bounds on neutrino degeneracy improved by
flavor oscillations}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00274-2} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Nucl. Phys. B}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {632}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {363} (\bibinfo {year} {2002})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0201287} {arXiv:hep-ph/0201287} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Burns}\ \emph {et~al.}(2023)\citenamefont {Burns},
\citenamefont {Tait},\ and\ \citenamefont {Valli}}]{Burns:2022hkq}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.-K.}\ \bibnamefont
{Burns}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.~M.~P.}\ \bibnamefont {Tait}},\
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Valli}},\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Indications for a Nonzero Lepton Asymmetry from
Extremely Metal-Poor Galaxies}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.131001} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {130}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {131001} (\bibinfo {year} {2023})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.00693} {arXiv:2206.00693 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Giunti}\ \emph {et~al.}(2024)\citenamefont {Giunti},
\citenamefont {Kouzakov}, \citenamefont {Li},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Studenikin}}]{Giunti:2024gec}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont
{Giunti}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont {Kouzakov}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Y.-F.}\ \bibnamefont {Li}},\ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Studenikin}},\ }\bibfield {title}
{\bibinfo {title} {{Neutrino Electromagnetic Properties}}\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102122-023242}
{10.1146/annurev-nucl-102122-023242} (\bibinfo {year} {2024}),\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.03122} {arXiv:2411.03122 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Aguilar}\ \emph {et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont {Aguilar}
\emph {et~al.}}]{LSND:2001aii}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Aguilar}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {LSND}),\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Evidence for neutrino oscillations from the
observation of $\bar{\nu}_e$ appearance in a $\bar{\nu}_\mu$ beam}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.112007} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {64}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {112007} (\bibinfo {year} {2001})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/0104049} {arXiv:hep-ex/0104049} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Aguilar-Arevalo}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont
{Aguilar-Arevalo} \emph {et~al.}}]{MiniBooNE:2020pnu}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~A.}\ \bibnamefont
{Aguilar-Arevalo}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {MiniBooNE}),\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Updated MiniBooNE neutrino
oscillation results with increased data and new background studies}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.052002} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {103}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {052002} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.16883} {arXiv:2006.16883 [hep-ex]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Barinov}\ \emph {et~al.}(2022)\citenamefont {Barinov}
\emph {et~al.}}]{Barinov:2021asz}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.~V.}\ \bibnamefont
{Barinov}} \emph {et~al.},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Results
from the Baksan Experiment on Sterile Transitions (BEST)}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.232501} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {128}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {232501} (\bibinfo {year} {2022})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.11482} {arXiv:2109.11482 [nucl-ex]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Abbasi}\ \emph {et~al.}(2024)\citenamefont {Abbasi}
\emph {et~al.}}]{IceCubeCollaboration:2024nle}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont
{Abbasi}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {(IceCube
Collaboration){\ensuremath{\parallel}}, IceCube}),\ }\bibfield {title}
{\bibinfo {title} {{Search for an eV-Scale Sterile Neutrino Using Improved
High-Energy {\ensuremath{\nu}}{\ensuremath{\mu}} Event Reconstruction in
IceCube}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.201804}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf
{\bibinfo {volume} {133}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {201804} (\bibinfo {year}
{2024})},\ \Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08070} {arXiv:2405.08070
[hep-ex]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Dentler}\ \emph {et~al.}(2018)\citenamefont
{Dentler}, \citenamefont {Hern{\'a}ndez-Cabezudo}, \citenamefont {Kopp},
\citenamefont {Machado}, \citenamefont {Maltoni}, \citenamefont
{Martinez-Soler},\ and\ \citenamefont {Schwetz}}]{Dentler:2018sju}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Dentler}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {{\'A}.}~\bibnamefont
{Hern{\'a}ndez-Cabezudo}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{Kopp}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~A.~N.}\ \bibnamefont
{Machado}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Maltoni}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.}~\bibnamefont {Martinez-Soler}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Schwetz}},\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Updated Global Analysis of Neutrino Oscillations
in the Presence of eV-Scale Sterile Neutrinos}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2018)010} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {JHEP}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {08}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{010}},\ \Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.10661} {arXiv:1803.10661
[hep-ph]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Hardin}\ \emph {et~al.}(2023)\citenamefont {Hardin},
\citenamefont {Martinez-Soler}, \citenamefont {Diaz}, \citenamefont {Jin},
\citenamefont {Kamp}, \citenamefont {Arg{\"u}elles}, \citenamefont {Conrad},\
and\ \citenamefont {Shaevitz}}]{Hardin:2022muu}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Hardin}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.}~\bibnamefont
{Martinez-Soler}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Diaz}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Jin}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {N.~W.}\ \bibnamefont {Kamp}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {C.~A.}\ \bibnamefont {Arg{\"u}elles}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {J.~M.}\ \bibnamefont {Conrad}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {M.~H.}\ \bibnamefont {Shaevitz}},\ }\bibfield {title}
{\bibinfo {title} {{New Clues about light sterile neutrinos: preference for
models with damping effects in global fits}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2023)058} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {JHEP}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {09}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{058}},\ \Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.02610} {arXiv:2211.02610
[hep-ph]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Wolfenstein}(1981)}]{Wolfenstein:1981kw}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Wolfenstein}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Different Varieties
of Massive Dirac Neutrinos}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(81)90096-1} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Nucl. Phys. B}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {186}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {147} (\bibinfo {year} {1981})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Petcov}(1982)}]{Petcov:1982ya}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~T.}\ \bibnamefont
{Petcov}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{On Pseudodirac Neutrinos,
Neutrino Oscillations and Neutrinoless Double beta Decay}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)91246-1} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Lett. B}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {110}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {245} (\bibinfo {year} {1982})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Bilenky}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Pontecorvo}(1983)}]{Bilenky:1983wt}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Bilenky}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.}~\bibnamefont
{Pontecorvo}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Neutrino Oscillations
With Large Oscillation Length in Spite of Large (Majorana) Neutrino
Masses?}},\ }\href@noop {} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Sov.
J. Nucl. Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {38}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {248}
(\bibinfo {year} {1983})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Kobayashi}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Lim}(2001)}]{Kobayashi:2000md}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Kobayashi}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.~S.}\ \bibnamefont
{Lim}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Pseudo Dirac scenario for
neutrino oscillations}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.013003}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {64}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {013003} (\bibinfo {year} {2001})},\
\Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0012266} {arXiv:hep-ph/0012266}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Anamiati}\ \emph {et~al.}(2018)\citenamefont
{Anamiati}, \citenamefont {Fonseca},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Hirsch}}]{Anamiati:2017rxw}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.}~\bibnamefont
{Anamiati}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Fonseca}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Hirsch}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Quasi Dirac neutrino
oscillations}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.095008}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {97}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {095008} (\bibinfo {year} {2018})},\
\Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.06249} {arXiv:1710.06249 [hep-ph]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {de~Gouvea}\ \emph {et~al.}(2009)\citenamefont
{de~Gouvea}, \citenamefont {Huang},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Jenkins}}]{deGouvea:2009fp}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{de~Gouvea}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.-C.}\ \bibnamefont
{Huang}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{Jenkins}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Pseudo-Dirac Neutrinos
in the New Standard Model}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.073007} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {80}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {073007} (\bibinfo {year} {2009})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/0906.1611} {arXiv:0906.1611 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Vissani}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Boeltzig}(2015)}]{Vissani:2015pss}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont
{Vissani}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Boeltzig}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Supernova Neutrinos:
Risks and Opportunities}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.22323/1.244.0008}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {PoS}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{NEUTEL2015}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {008} (\bibinfo {year} {2015})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Shoemaker}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Murase}(2016)}]{Shoemaker:2015qul}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Shoemaker}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont
{Murase}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Probing BSM Neutrino
Physics with Flavor and Spectral Distortions: Prospects for Future
High-Energy Neutrino Telescopes}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.085004} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {93}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {085004} (\bibinfo {year} {2016})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.07228} {arXiv:1512.07228 [astro-ph.HE]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Brdar}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Hansen}(2019)}]{Brdar:2018tce}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.}~\bibnamefont
{Brdar}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~S.~L.}\ \bibnamefont
{Hansen}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{IceCube Flavor Ratios
with Identified Astrophysical Sources: Towards Improving New Physics
Testability}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/023}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {JCAP}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {02}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {023}},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.05541} {arXiv:1812.05541 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {De~Gouv\^ea}\ \emph {et~al.}(2020)\citenamefont
{De~Gouv\^ea}, \citenamefont {Martinez-Soler}, \citenamefont
{Perez-Gonzalez},\ and\ \citenamefont {Sen}}]{DeGouvea:2020ang}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{De~Gouv\^ea}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.}~\bibnamefont
{Martinez-Soler}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Y.~F.}\ \bibnamefont
{Perez-Gonzalez}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Sen}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Fundamental physics with the
diffuse supernova background neutrinos}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123012} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {102}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {123012} (\bibinfo {year} {2020})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.13748} {arXiv:2007.13748 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Rink}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Sen}(2024)}]{Rink:2022nvw}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont
{Rink}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Sen}},\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Constraints on pseudo-Dirac neutrinos
using high-energy neutrinos from NGC 1068}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138558} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Lett. B}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {851}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {138558} (\bibinfo {year} {2024})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.16520} {arXiv:2211.16520 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Carloni}\ \emph {et~al.}(2024)\citenamefont
{Carloni}, \citenamefont {Mart{\'\i}nez-Soler}, \citenamefont {Arguelles},
\citenamefont {Babu},\ and\ \citenamefont {Dev}}]{Carloni:2022cqz}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont
{Carloni}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.}~\bibnamefont
{Mart{\'\i}nez-Soler}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.~A.}\
\bibnamefont {Arguelles}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.~S.}\
\bibnamefont {Babu}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~S.~B.}\
\bibnamefont {Dev}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Probing
pseudo-Dirac neutrinos with astrophysical sources at IceCube}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L051702} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {109}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {L051702} (\bibinfo {year} {2024})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.00737} {arXiv:2212.00737 [astro-ph.HE]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Ansarifard}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Farzan}(2023)}]{Ansarifard:2022kvy}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Ansarifard}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Y.}~\bibnamefont
{Farzan}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Revisiting pseudo-Dirac
neutrino scenario after recent solar neutrino data}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.075029} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {107}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {075029} (\bibinfo {year} {2023})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09105} {arXiv:2211.09105 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Chen}\ \emph {et~al.}(2022)\citenamefont {Chen},
\citenamefont {Liao}, \citenamefont {Ling},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Yue}}]{Chen:2022zts}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\bibnamefont
{Chen}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Liao}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Ling}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {B.}~\bibnamefont {Yue}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo
{title} {{Constraining super-light sterile neutrinos at Borexino and
KamLAND}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2022)004} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {JHEP}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {09}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {004}},\ \Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.07574}
{arXiv:2205.07574 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {An}\ \emph {et~al.}(2024)\citenamefont {An} \emph
{et~al.}}]{DayaBay:2024nip}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.~P.}\ \bibnamefont
{An}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {Daya Bay}),\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Search for a Sub-eV Sterile Neutrino using Daya
Bay{\textquoteright}s Full Dataset}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.051801} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {133}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {051801} (\bibinfo {year} {2024})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01687} {arXiv:2404.01687 [hep-ex]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Adamson}\ \emph {et~al.}(2019)\citenamefont {Adamson}
\emph {et~al.}}]{MINOS:2017cae}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Adamson}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {MINOS+}),\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Search for sterile neutrinos in MINOS and MINOS+
using a two-detector fit}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.091803} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {122}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {091803} (\bibinfo {year} {2019})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.06488} {arXiv:1710.06488 [hep-ex]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Acero}\ \emph {et~al.}(2025)\citenamefont {Acero}
\emph {et~al.}}]{NOvA:2024imi}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~A.}\ \bibnamefont
{Acero}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {NOvA}),\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Dual-Baseline Search for Active-to-Sterile
Neutrino Oscillations in NOvA}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.081804} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {134}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {081804} (\bibinfo {year} {2025})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04553} {arXiv:2409.04553 [hep-ex]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Beacom}\ \emph {et~al.}(2004)\citenamefont {Beacom},
\citenamefont {Bell}, \citenamefont {Hooper}, \citenamefont {Learned},
\citenamefont {Pakvasa},\ and\ \citenamefont {Weiler}}]{Beacom:2003eu}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~F.}\ \bibnamefont
{Beacom}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {N.~F.}\ \bibnamefont {Bell}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.}~\bibnamefont {Hooper}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~G.}\ \bibnamefont {Learned}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Pakvasa}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {T.~J.}\ \bibnamefont {Weiler}},\ }\bibfield {title}
{\bibinfo {title} {{PseudoDirac neutrinos: A Challenge for neutrino
telescopes}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.011101}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf
{\bibinfo {volume} {92}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {011101} (\bibinfo {year}
{2004})},\ \Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0307151}
{arXiv:hep-ph/0307151} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Martinez-Soler}\ \emph {et~al.}(2022)\citenamefont
{Martinez-Soler}, \citenamefont {Perez-Gonzalez},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Sen}}]{Martinez-Soler:2021unz}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.}~\bibnamefont
{Martinez-Soler}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Y.~F.}\ \bibnamefont
{Perez-Gonzalez}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Sen}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Signs of pseudo-Dirac
neutrinos in SN1987A data}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.095019} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {105}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {095019} (\bibinfo {year} {2022})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.12736} {arXiv:2105.12736 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {de~Gouv{\^e}a}\ \emph {et~al.}(2022)\citenamefont
{de~Gouv{\^e}a}, \citenamefont {McGinness}, \citenamefont {Martinez-Soler},\
and\ \citenamefont {Perez-Gonzalez}}]{deGouvea:2021ymm}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{de~Gouv{\^e}a}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont
{McGinness}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.}~\bibnamefont
{Martinez-Soler}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Y.~F.}\
\bibnamefont {Perez-Gonzalez}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{pp
solar neutrinos at DARWIN}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.096017} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {106}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {096017} (\bibinfo {year} {2022})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.02421} {arXiv:2111.02421 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Carloni}\ \emph {et~al.}(2025)\citenamefont
{Carloni}, \citenamefont {Porto}, \citenamefont {Arg{\"u}elles},
\citenamefont {Dev},\ and\ \citenamefont {Jana}}]{Carloni:2025dhv}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont
{Carloni}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Y.}~\bibnamefont {Porto}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.~A.}\ \bibnamefont {Arg{\"u}elles}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~S.~B.}\ \bibnamefont {Dev}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont {Jana}},\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Signatures of quasi-Dirac neutrinos in diffuse
high-energy astrophysical neutrino data}},\ }\href@noop {} {\ (\bibinfo
{year} {2025})},\ \Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.19960}
{arXiv:2503.19960 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Franklin}\ \emph {et~al.}(2023)\citenamefont
{Franklin}, \citenamefont {Perez-Gonzalez},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Turner}}]{Franklin:2023diy}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{Franklin}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Y.~F.}\ \bibnamefont
{Perez-Gonzalez}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont
{Turner}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{JUNO as a probe of the
pseudo-Dirac nature using solar neutrinos}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.035010} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {108}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {035010} (\bibinfo {year} {2023})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.05418} {arXiv:2304.05418 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Hampel}\ \emph {et~al.}(1999)\citenamefont {Hampel}
\emph {et~al.}}]{GALLEX:1998kcz}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont
{Hampel}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {GALLEX}),\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{GALLEX solar neutrino observations: Results for
GALLEX IV}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(98)01579-2}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Lett. B}\ }\textbf
{\bibinfo {volume} {447}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {127} (\bibinfo {year}
{1999})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Cleveland}\ \emph {et~al.}(1998)\citenamefont
{Cleveland}, \citenamefont {Daily}, \citenamefont {Davis}, \citenamefont
{Distel}, \citenamefont {Lande}, \citenamefont {Lee}, \citenamefont
{Wildenhain},\ and\ \citenamefont {Ullman}}]{Cleveland:1998nv}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.~T.}\ \bibnamefont
{Cleveland}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Daily}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont {Davis}, \bibfnamefont
{Jr.}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~R.}\ \bibnamefont {Distel}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont {Lande}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {C.~K.}\ \bibnamefont {Lee}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {P.~S.}\ \bibnamefont {Wildenhain}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Ullman}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo
{title} {{Measurement of the solar electron neutrino flux with the Homestake
chlorine detector}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1086/305343} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Astrophys. J.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{496}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {505} (\bibinfo {year} {1998})}\BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Ahmad}\ \emph {et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont {Ahmad}
\emph {et~al.}}]{SNO:2002tuh}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Q.~R.}\ \bibnamefont
{Ahmad}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {SNO}),\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Direct evidence for neutrino flavor
transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino
Observatory}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.011301}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf
{\bibinfo {volume} {89}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {011301} (\bibinfo {year}
{2002})},\ \Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-ex/0204008}
{arXiv:nucl-ex/0204008} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Fukuda}\ \emph {et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont {Fukuda}
\emph {et~al.}}]{Super-Kamiokande:2001ljr}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Fukuda}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {Super-Kamiokande}),\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Solar B-8 and hep neutrino
measurements from 1258 days of Super-Kamiokande data}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5651} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {86}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {5651} (\bibinfo {year} {2001})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/0103032} {arXiv:hep-ex/0103032} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\end{thebibliography}%