Reprocessing of X-rays emission in Ultra-Luminous X-ray sources
Extracted source text · arXiv 2509.09133
%\documentclass[twocolumn,linenumbers,trackchanges]{aastex701}
\documentclass[twocolumn,trackchanges]{aastex701}
\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
\newcommand\aastex{AAS\TeX}
\newcommand\latex{La\TeX}
\usepackage{graphicx} % Including figure files
\usepackage{amsmath} % Advanced maths commands
\usepackage{amssymb} % Extra maths symbols
%\usepackage{rotating}
%\usepackage{pdflscape}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{soul}
%\usepackage{tabular}
%\usepackage{ulem}
%\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
%\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{tabularx}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%% AUTHORS - PLACE YOUR OWN COMMANDS HERE %%%%%
% Please keep new commands to a minimum, and use \newcommand not \def to avoid
\newcommand{\pcm}{\,cm$^{-2}$} % per cm-squared
\newcommand{\ps}{\,s$^{-1}$} % per second
\newcommand{\erg}{erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$} % Unit for flux
\newcommand{\lum}{erg s$^{-1}$} % Unit for Luminosity
\newcommand{\nustar}{NuSTAR} % Nustar
\newcommand{\xmm}{XMM-Newton} % XMM
\newcommand{\rahul}[1]{\textbf{\textcolor{cyan}{#1}}}
\newcommand{\manish}[1]{\textbf{\textcolor{magenta}{#1}}}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{document}
\title[X-ray reprocessing in ULXs]{Reprocessing of X-rays emission in Ultra-Luminous X-ray sources}
%\author[orcid=0000-0000-0000-0001,sname='North America']{Tundra North America}
%\altaffiliation{Kitt Peak National Observatory}
%\affiliation{University of Saskatchewan}
%\email[show]{fakeemail1@google.com}
% The list of authors, and the short list which is used in the headers.
% If you need two or more lines of authors, add an extra line using \newauthor
\author{Manish Kumar}
\affiliation{Raman Research Institute, C.V. Raman Avenue, Bangalore 560080 Karnataka, India}
\email[show]{manishk@rrimail.rri.res.in}
\author{Rahul Sharma}
\email{rahul.sharma@iucaa.in}
\affiliation{Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics (IUCAA), Ganeshkhind, Pune 411007, India}
\affiliation{Raman Research Institute, C.V. Raman Avenue, Bangalore 560080 Karnataka, India}
\author{Biswajit Paul}
\affiliation{Raman Research Institute, C.V. Raman Avenue, Bangalore 560080 Karnataka, India}
\email{bpaul@rri.res.in}
\begin{abstract}
With the discovery of pulsations in some of the ultra-luminous X-ray sources (ULXs), it is quite clear that most of the ULXs harbor either a neutron star or a stellar mass black hole as a compact object accreting at super-Eddington rates. In spite of having such a high accretion rate, the reprocessed emission in the ULX sources is quite meagre compared to that observed in Galactic X-ray binaries, except for some absorption lines in the winds. In this work, we investigate the extent of reprocessed emission in ULXs using three diagnostics: (i) searches for Fe $\rm K\alpha$ lines in bright well-known ULXs and Ultra luminous X-ray Pulsars (ULXPs), (ii) evolution of hardness ratio around the eclipse transitions in the eclipsing ULXs, and (iii) the flux ratio between eclipse and out-of-eclipse (OOE) phases in eclipsing ULXs. We placed the most stringent constraints to date on the upper limits on EW of the iron line, 11--20 eV. Furthermore, we have not observed any significant changes in the hardness ratio during the ingress or egress, while in Galactic eclipsing X-ray binaries, an increase in the hardness ratio is observed during the transitions. Finally, the reprocessing efficiency (eclipse to OOE flux ratio) is found to be larger in ULXs compared to Galactic eclipsing X-ray binaries. Based on these results, we discuss the possibility of a metal-poor or highly ionized environment surrounding the ULXs, which suppresses reprocessed emission features.
%The flux drops approximately 3-5 times while transitioning from OOE to eclipse phase for M51 S1/S2 and ~23 times for CG X-1. The minimum flux ratio, OOE to Eclipse phase, is obtained $\sim 20.7$ and $\sim 11.0$, for the M51 ULX1 and M51 ULX2, respectively.
\end{abstract}
%\keywords{
% accretion, accretion disc -- stars: neutron -- X-rays: binaries -- pulsars: general -- X-rays: individual: NGC 5907 ULX1, M51 ULX-7, NGC 300 ULX-1, NGC 7793 P13, NGC 1313 X-2
%accretion, accretion disc -- stars: neutron -- X-rays: binaries -- pulsars: general -- X-rays}
\keywords{accretion, accretion disc -- stars: neutron -- X-rays: binaries -- pulsars: general -- X-rays: ultraluminous x-ray sources}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% BODY OF PAPER %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Introduction}
X-ray sources with extremely high luminosities, positioned off-center in nearby galaxies and exceeding the Eddington luminosity for stellar-mass compact objects, were first observed by the Einstein Observatory \citep{Fabbiano1989}. Follow-up observations conducted with the \emph{ROSAT}, \xmm, and \emph{Chandra} X-Ray Observatories established that these highly luminous X-ray sources are different from active galactic nuclei (AGN). This pivotal finding led to the classification of a new category of X-ray sources, now referred to as Ultra Luminous X-ray sources (ULXs) \citep{Makishima_2000, Fabrika, King2023}. So far, approximately 1800 ULX sources have been identified \citep{walton_2022}.
The luminosity of the persistent ULX sources and transient ULXs in their bright state is in the range of $10^{39} - 10^{41}$ erg s$^{-1}$ in the X-ray energy band, which is much greater than the Eddington luminosity for stellar mass compact objects. In some of the ULX sources, like M82 X-2, NGC 5907 ULX1, NGC 7793 P13, NGC 300 ULX1, M51 ULX7, NGC 1313 X2, coherent pulsations have been detected, identifying them as Ultra-Luminous X-ray Pulsars (ULXPs) \citep{Bachheti2014, Israel_5907, Israel_7793, Carpano, sathyapraksh_1313x2}. The most common interpretation is that many of the ULX sources are stellar-mass compact objects, either a black hole (BH) or a neutron star (NS), accreting at the super-Eddington rate. In some ULXPs, orbital parameters have been measured, allowing estimation of the mass function and, consequently, the minimum companion mass. For instance, in M82 X-2, \cite{Bachheti2014} calculated the mass function $f=2.1 \, M_{\rm \odot}$ and hence the minimum mass for the companion star is $\rm M_{c} \, > \, 5.2 \,M_{\rm \odot} $ suggesting a high mass X-ray binary (HMXB). Similarly, M51 ULX-7 is also inferred to have a high mass companion with a minimum mass $\rm M_{c} \, > \, 8 \, M_{\rm \odot} $ \citep{Rodríguez_Castillo_2020}. \cite{5907_ulx1_orbit_belfiore} suggested that NGC 5907 ULX1 is a HMXB system viewed nearly face-on, with an orbital inclination $i < 5^{\rm^{o}}$. Furthermore, the presence of long-duration eclipses in some ULX sources suggests that high-mass companions may be a common feature among many, if not all, ULXs \citep{Urquhart2016}. The high X-ray luminosity, and presence of high mass companion star indicate ULXs to have large amount of material surrounding the X-ray source and ULXs are therefore expected to show strong signatures of X-ray reprocessing in the surroundings of the compact object.
%The presence of long-duration eclipses in ULXs sources suggests that high mass companions may be a common feature among many, if not all, ULXs \citep{Urquhart2016}.
One common approach to study the environment surrounding a compact object is to examine the Fe $\rm K\alpha$ line, which arises from the fluorescence of iron atoms in the reprocessing environment when illuminated by X-rays. Previously, this iron line feature has been studied for many Galactic X-ray binaries, and the equivalent width (EW) of the iron line varies from a few eV to keV \citep{Torrejon_2010_iron_line, C_Ng_LMXB, garcia_xmm_newton_Fe_k_alpha_HMXB, Pradhan_SFXT_SGHMXB}. The surrounding material that produces the iron emission line can also cause absorption. Galactic classical supergiant high-mass X-ray binaries (SG HMXBs) exhibit a clear correlation between the column density and the equivalent width of the iron line. This is expected, as the primary accretion mechanism in these systems is the stellar wind from the companion star. At larger column density, more material is exposed to X-ray illumination, leading to a stronger iron line and a higher EW \citep{Torrejon_2010_iron_line, garcia_xmm_newton_Fe_k_alpha_HMXB, Pradhan_SFXT_SGHMXB}. However, the average EW of the iron line in supergiant fast X-ray transients (SFXTs) is generally lower than that observed in classical SG HMXBs \citep{Pradhan_SFXT_SGHMXB}. \cite{C_Ng_LMXB} found the EW of the iron line for low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) ranging between 17 eV and 189 eV, which is, on average, smaller than that observed in HMXBs.
Another way to study the reprocessing of X-rays from a compact object is to study them during the eclipses and eclipse transitions, as the emission of X-rays that come directly from the compact object is mostly suppressed by the companion star. Galactic eclipsing HMXBs show an increase in hardness ratio during ingress/egress \citep{Ajith_Cen_X3, Tamang_Vela_X1}, which indicates a larger absorption column density, hence more absorption of soft photons near the compact object, during ingress/egress. In addition, the X-ray flux in Galactic HMXBs significantly drops during the eclipse phase. \cite{Nafisa_HMXB_eclipsing, Aftab_LMXB} found that the ratio of flux for out-of-eclipse (OOE) to eclipse varies between $\sim$8--237 in HMXBs and $\sim$6--54 in LMXBs, varying from source to source.
In this work, we aim to study the above three aspects of X-ray reprocessing in the ULX systems: the Fe $\rm K\alpha$ emission line, the hardness ratio around the eclipse transitions, and the flux ratio during the eclipse to OOE phase. To study the iron line, we selected five known ULXPs and six well-known bright ULX sources mentioned in table \ref{tab:total_GTE}. To study the hardness ratio and flux ratio, we selected five known eclipsing ULX sources: CG X-1, CXOM51 J132943.3+471135 (M51 S1), CXOM51 J132946.1+471042 (M51 S2), CXOM51 J132940.0+471237 (M51 ULX1), and CXOM51 J132939.5+471244 (M51 ULX2). Archival data from \xmm\ and Chandra observatories are used in this study.
\section{Observations \& Source Selection}
We investigate the iron line aspect for the well-known bright ULX sources having a long time exposure for the XMM-Newton instrument. We utilized all available XMM-Newton observations for the 6 ULX sources and 5 ULXPs. A similar study was done previously for sources Ho IX X1 and NGC 1313 X1 by \cite{NGC_1313_X1_Ho_IX_X1_walton}, which reported the upper limit on the EW of iron line $\sim$30 eV and $\sim$50 eV for Ho IX X1 and NGC 1313 X1, respectively. The summary of exposure time is mentioned in Table \ref{tab:total_GTE}, and the detailed observations log is mentioned in Table \ref{tab:observation_log}. The source NGC 300 ULX1 was also observed in 2010 and showed a prominent iron line feature near 6.4 keV \citep{Carpano}. The spectrum obtained from this data is remarkably different from that of other ULXs, and no pulsations were observed for that source. Therefore, this dataset is excluded from the present analysis.
%\textcolor{red}{Also, a similar study was done previously for sources Ho IX X1 and NGC 1313 X1 by \cite{NGC_1313_X1_Ho_IX_X1_walton}, which reported the upper limit on the EW of iron line $\sim$30 eV and $\sim$50 eV for Ho IX X1 and NGC 1313 X1, respectively.} The summary of exposure time is mentioned in Table \ref{tab:total_GTE} and detailed observations log is mentioned in Table \ref{tab:observation_log}.\\
\begin{table}
%\caption{\textbf{Search for iron emission lines:} Total good-time exposure for each ULX and ULXP included in this study, based on all available XMM-Newton observations used in the analysis.}
\caption{Total good-time exposure (GTE) for each ULX and ULXP included in the search for iron emission line, based on all available XMM-Newton observations used in the analysis.}
\label{tab:total_GTE}
\fontsize{10}{10}\selectfont
\resizebox{\columnwidth}{!}{
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
\hskip-2.0cm\begin{tabular}{ccccc}
%\hline
\hline
\textbf{Source Name} & \textbf{RA} & \textbf{Dec} & \textbf{GTE(ks)} & $N_{\rm H}$ ($\rm 10^{22} \, cm^{-2}$) \\
%\hline
\hline
M51 ULX7$^{\rm a1}$ & $\rm 13^{h}30^{m}1.02^{s}$ & $\rm 47^{\circ}13^{'}43.80^{''}$ & 493.53 & $\rm 0.099^{b1}$ \\
NGC 300 ULX1$^{\rm a2}$ & $\rm 00^{h}55^{m}4.85^{s}$ & $\rm -37^{\circ}41^{'}43.50^{''}$ & 141.07 & $\rm 0.066^{b1}$ \\
NGC 1313 X2$^{\rm a3}$ & $\rm 3^{h}18^{m}22.00^{s}$ & $\rm -66^{\circ}36^{'}4.30^{''}$ & 883.13 & $\rm 0.218^{b1}$ \\
NGC 5907 ULX1$^{\rm a4}$ & $\rm 15^{h}15^{m}58.62^{s}$ & $\rm 56^{\circ}18^{'}10.30^{''}$ & 779.24 & $\rm 0.725^{b1}$ \\
NGC 7793 P13$^{\rm a5}$ & $\rm 23^{h}57^{m}50.90^{s}$ & $\rm -32^{\circ}37^{'}26.60^{''}$ & 412.84 & $\rm 0.091^{b1}$ \\
Circ ULX5$^{\rm a6}$ & $\rm 14^{h}12^{m}39.00^{s}$ & $\rm -65^{\circ}23^{'}34.00^{''}$ & 301.67 & $\rm 0.610^{b2}$ \\
Holmberg II X-1$^{\rm a7}$ & $\rm 08^{h}19^{m}28.99^{s}$ & $\rm 70^{\circ}42^{'}19.37^{''}$ & 232.64 & $\rm 0.059^{b3}$ \\
Holmberg IX X-1$^{\rm a8}$ & $\rm 09^{h}57^{m}53.20^{s}$ & $\rm 69^{\circ}03^{'}48.30^{''}$ & 156.46 & $\rm 0.119^{b3}$ \\
NGC 1313 X1$^{\rm a9}$ & $\rm 03^{h}18^{m}20.00^{s}$ & $\rm -66^{\circ}29^{'}11.00^{''}$ & 884.82 & $\rm 0.253^{b4}$ \\
M33 X8$^{\rm a10}$ & $\rm 01^{h}33^{m}50.60^{s}$ & $\rm 30^{\circ}39^{'}31.00^{''}$ & 264.53 & $\rm 0.187^{b5}$ \\
NGC 4559 ULX7$^{\rm a11}$ & $\rm 12^{h}35^{m}51.71^{s}$ & $\rm 27^{\circ}56^{'}4.10^{''}$ & 164.60 & $\rm 0.150^{b6}$ \\
\hline
\multicolumn{5}{p{0.7\textwidth}}{1. References for the source co-ordinates and previous detailed studies: $^{\rm a1}$\citep{Rodríguez_Castillo_2020, Brightman_2022},
$^{\rm a2}$\citep{Carpano},
$^{\rm a3}$\citep{Robba},
$^{\rm a4}$\citep{Furst_5907, Israel_5907},
$^{\rm a5}$\citep{Furst_7793, Israel_7793},
$^{\rm a6}$\citep{Circ_ULX5_Mondal},
$^{\rm a7}$\citep{Ho_II_X1_Barra},
$^{\rm a8}$\citep{NGC_1313_X1_Ho_IX_X1_walton, Ho_IX_X1_Walton_2017},
$^{\rm a9}$\citep{NGC_1313_X1_Ho_IX_X1_walton},
$^{\rm a10}$\citep{M33_X8_West_2018},
$^{\rm a11}$\citep{NGC_4559_X7_rare_flaring_Pintore}} \\
\multicolumn{5}{p{0.7\textwidth}}{2. Column density ($\rm N_{H}$) values for the curve of growth are adopted from the previous literature as follows: $^{\rm b1}$\citet{Manish_ULXPs},
$^{\rm b2}$\citet{Circ_ULX5_Mondal},
$^{\rm b3}$\citet{Pintore_ULX_2014},
$^{\rm b4}$\citet{NGC1313_X1_Walton_2020},
$^{\rm b5}$\citet{M33_X8_West_2018},
$^{\rm b6}$\citet{NGC_4559_X7_rare_flaring_Pintore}}\\
\end{tabular}}
\end{table}
We selected five known eclipsing ULX sources (CG X-1, M51 S1, M51 S2, M51 ULX1, and M51 ULX2) for studying the hardness ratio with orbital phase, mainly during the ingress/egress of the eclipses and flux ratio between the eclipse and OOE phases. As M51 S1 and M51 S2 are very well resolved in \xmm\ instrument, we utilized the \xmm\ observations for these two sources. For CG X-1, M51 ULX1, and M51 ULX2, we used Chandra observations, as mentioned in Table \ref{tab:eclipsing_obs_log}.
\begin{table}
% \caption{\textbf{HR with Orbital Phase:} The observation log for eclipsing ULX sources used in this work.}
\caption{Observation log for the eclipsing ULX sources analyzed in this work, including the datasets used for studying hardness ratio evolution and flux variations between eclipse and OOE phases.}
\label{tab:eclipsing_obs_log}
\fontsize{10}{10}\selectfont
\resizebox{\columnwidth}{!}{
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
\hskip-3.0cm\begin{tabular}{cccccccc}
\hline
\hline
\textbf{Source} & \textbf{Co-ordinates} & \textbf{Instrument} & \textbf{Obs Id} & \textbf{MJD} & \textbf{Source} & \textbf{Total} \\
\textbf{Name} & & & & & \textbf{Region} & \textbf{GTE (ks)} \\
\hline
\hline
CG X-1$^1$ & RA = $\rm 14^{h}13^{m}12.21^{s}$ & Chandra (ACIS-S) & 12823 & 55547.75 & $4^{''}$ & 142.87 \\
& Dec = $\rm -65^{\circ}20^{'}13.7^{''}$ & & & & \\
\hline
M51 S1$^2$ & RA = $\rm 13^{h}29^{m}43.32^{s}$ & XMM-Newton & 0824450901 & 58251.92 & $20^{''}$ & 64.73 \\
& Dec = $\rm +47^{\circ}11^{'}34.9^{''}$ & XMM-Newton & 0852030101 & 58675.49 & $20^{''}$ & 58.78 \\
\hline
M51 S2$^2$ & RA = $\rm 13^{h}29^{m}46.13^{s}$ & XMM-Newton & 0830191501 & 58282.10 & $15^{''}$ & 51.59 \\
& Dec = $\rm +47^{\circ}10^{'}42.3^{''}$ & XMM-Newton & 0830191601 & 58284.09 & $15^{''}$ & 51.66 \\
& & XMM-Newton & 0852030101 & 58675.49 & $20^{''}$ & 58.78 \\
\hline
M51 ULX1$^3$ & RA = $\rm 13^{h}29^{m}39.94^{s}$ & Chandra (ACIS-S) & 13813 & 56179.74 & $4^{''}$ & 166.07 \\
& Dec = $\rm +47^{\circ}12^{'}36.6^{''}$ & & & & \\
\hline
M51 ULX2$^3$ & RA = $\rm 13^{h}29^{m}39.44^{s}$ & Chandra (ACIS-S) & 13813 & 56179.74 & $4^{''}$ & 166.07 \\
& Dec = $\rm +47^{\circ}12^{'}43.3^{''}$ & & & & \\
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{l}{$^1$\citet{Cg_X1_Qiu_2019}, $^2$\citet{M51_S1_S2_Wang}, $^3$\citet{Urquhart2016}.}
\end{tabular}}
\end{table}
\section{Data Reduction}
\subsection{XMM-Newton}
\xmm\ is a space X-ray observatory of the European Space Agency. There are three scientific instruments onboard \xmm\ \citep{Jansen2001}: European Photon Imaging Camera (EPIC), Reflection Grating Spectrometer (RGS), and an Optical Monitor (OM). There are three EPIC cameras: two MOS-CCD cameras and one PN-CCD camera, and the energy range for EPIC is 0.3--10 keV \citep{Struder2001, Turner2001}. In this work, we used only EPIC-pn data for our spectral analysis.
For the reduction of \xmm\ data, we used \xmm\ Science Analysis System (SAS) version 20.0.0 and followed SAS Data analysis threads. First, the raw event files were extracted using \texttt{epproc} for the listed observations. Then we performed the background flaring correction depending on the observations, if required. The clean event files are barycenter corrected using the SAS task \texttt{barycen}. The source events were extracted from the circular region of radius, centered at the source coordinates, mentioned in Table \ref{tab:observation_log} and \ref{tab:eclipsing_obs_log}. The background events were extracted from a circular region of radius 1.5 times the radius of the source region, except for M51 S1 and S2, where a region twice the radius of the source region was used, positioned away from the source location. Instrument response files (rmf) are generated using the tasks \texttt{rmfgen}\footnote{\url{https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/xmm-newton/sas-thread-epatplot}}, which also include the pile-up corrections (if any), and ancillary response files (arf) are generated using the tasks \texttt{arfgen}. We use the tool \texttt{epiccombine} and \texttt{addspec} for combining the spectra and \texttt{ftgrouppha} for grouping of the combined spectra. We extracted the source and background light curves for all good single and double events ($\rm PATTERN<=4 $) using \texttt{evselect} and obtained final background-subtracted light curves using \texttt{epiclccorr}. Although, in some of the observations, the source is on-chip gap, but that does not affect the spectra around 6.4 keV much, except some flux loss that is taken care by the task \texttt{arfgen}, hence for studying the iron $\rm K\alpha$ line, those observations are also included \citep{XMM_SAS2025}.
\subsection{Chandra}
The Chandra X-ray observatory, a flagship mission of NASA, is dedicated to exploring the high-energy universe through X-ray observations with a very high angular resolution \citep{chandra_Weisskopf_2002, chandra_acis_garmire}. Its primary instrument is the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS), which provides imaging and spectroscopic capabilities. For high-resolution X-ray spectroscopy, the High-Energy Transmission Grating (HETG) can be placed in front of ACIS.
For event file extraction, we used the Chandra Interactive Analysis of Observations (\texttt{CIAO}) software package version $4.15$ together with the corresponding \texttt{CALDB} calibration database version 4.10.7 \citep{ciao_chandra_Fruscione}. We reprocessed the data using the \texttt{CIAO} task \texttt{chandra\_repro}. We performed the flaring and barycenter correction using task \texttt{deflare} and \texttt{axbary}, respectively. Source light curves were extracted with \texttt{dmextract} from circular regions of radius $4^{\prime\prime}$ centered on the source coordinates listed in Table \ref{tab:eclipsing_obs_log}. Background regions were selected as circles of radius $15^{''}$ for CG X-1 and $10^{''}$ for M51 ULX1/ULX2, positioned away from the source location. Energy spectra were extracted from the reprocessed event files using the \texttt{specextract} task.
\section{Analysis and Results}
\subsection{Search for iron emission line}
To examine the possible presence of an iron line feature in the combined spectra of individual sources, we utilizing only EPIC-pn data, owing to its large effective area in the relevant energy band and restrict the analysis to the energy range from 5.0 keV to 8.0 keV, which encompasses the Fe K$\alpha$ band (6.4--7 keV) while minimizing contamination from softer spectral components. Spectral fitting was performed using the \textsc{xspec} software package \citep{Arnaud96}. Previous studies suggest that the spectra of most ULX sources are likely dominated by a power-law in the energy range considered above \citep{walton_2022, King2023}. Accordingly, we consider an absorbed power-law model to describe the continuum. Although the absorption from the interstellar medium is mostly dominated in the lower energy range, \texttt{tbabs} was used for a fixed value of the column density ($N_{\rm H} = \rm 0.15 \times 10^{22} \, cm^{-2}$, which is the median of the previously reported values as mentioned in table \ref{tab:total_GTE}), with the abundances set to \texttt{wilm} \citep{Wilms2000} and cross-sections set to \texttt{vern} \citep{Verner1996}.
To investigate the presence of an iron emission line, we added a Gaussian component to the continuum model, resulting in the final \textsc{xspec} model \texttt{tbabs*(powerlaw+gauss)}. The top panels of Fig. \ref{all_sources_added_spectrum} show the combined spectra from \xmm\ observations of individual ULX (left) and ULXP (right) sources. In all cases, the spectra in the 5--8 keV range are well-fitted with this simple model and the best-fit spectral parameters with $\chi^2$/dof values for each source are summarized in Table \ref{tab:fit_en_5_8}. The powerlaw photon index is found to lie between 1.68 and 3.14 for these 11 sources.
Since no significant detection of the line was found, we estimated the 90\% confidence upper limits on the EW by fixing the Gaussian centroid at 6.4 keV and the line width at 0.1 keV. The resulting upper limits on the EW range from 16.1 eV to 60.4 eV across the individual ULX and ULXP spectra (Table \ref{tab:fit_en_5_8}). %The best-fit spectral parameters are summarized in Table \ref{tab:fit_en_5_8}.
We also attempted to fit the spectra by slightly adjusting the energy range, both narrowing and widening it, to observe the effect on the EW based on the selected energy range. The narrower range used was 5.5--7.5 keV, while the wider range extended from 4.0--9.0 keV. The results, summarized in Table \ref{tab:fit_all_en}, demonstrate that for most sources, the chosen energy range does not significantly influence the upper limit for the EW of the iron line. For all cases, continuum is fitted using a powerlaw model except for M51 ULX-7 in the energy range 4.0--9.0 keV, in which a powerlaw with high-energy cutoff is used for the continuum fitting. $\rm E_{cut}$ and $\rm E_{fold} $ are frozen to values 7.2 keV and 3.5 keV, respectively, which are obtained from fitting the full spectrum in the energy range 0.3--10 keV. Fig. \ref{fig:spec} shows the residuals from the best-fit absorbed powerlaw model in the energy range of 5.5--7.5 keV, 5--8 keV, and 4--9 keV for individual ULX sources.
Additionally, we fit the combined spectra of all sources, with the best-fit parameters given in Table \ref{tab:fit_en_5_8}. The bottom panel of Fig. \ref{all_sources_added_spectrum} shows the combined spectra (left) obtained from all observations of the selected sources, along with the residuals (right) from the best-fit absorbed powerlaw model in the energy range of 5.5--7.5 keV, 5--8 keV, and 4--9 keV. Based on these analyses, we constrain the upper limit on EW of the iron line for the ULX sources to be in the range 11.1--20 eV (Table \ref{tab:fit_all_en}), marking a significant improvement over previous studies.
%\textcolor{red}{Mention about the validation of finding the upper limit in the spectrum}
To validate the upper limit on the EW of the iron line obtained from the combined spectrum of all sources, we simulated the spectrum for each source by adding an iron line with an EW of 30 eV. Then combined the simulated spectra of all sources and determined the EW of the iron line by fitting the combined spectrum in the energy range 5.0--8.0 keV. This process is repeated for 10,000 sets of simulated spectra, and the histogram of the obtained EW values is shown in Fig. \ref{fig:simulated_EQW_validation}. A similar process is also repeated by adding the iron line of EW of 15 eV and 20 eV. As illustrated in Fig. \ref{fig:simulated_EQW_validation}, the recovered EWs for the combined spectra are very well Gaussian distributed around the simulated value of the EW, which validates our results on the upper limit on EW obtained using the combined spectrum for all sources.
\begin{table}
%\caption{\textbf{Search for iron emission line:} Fitted Parameters Result (Energy Range: 5.0-8.0 keV). Model Used : \textbf{\texttt{tbabs*(po+gaus)}}}
\caption{Values of spectral parameters from fit in the energy range of 5.0--8.0 keV with \texttt{tbabs*(powerlaw+gauss)} model. $N_{\rm H}$ was fixed at $0.15 \times 10^{22} \, \rm cm^{-2}$. The Gaussian line center and line width ($\sigma$) were fixed at 6.4 keV and 0.1 keV, respectively.}
\label{tab:fit_en_5_8}
\resizebox{\columnwidth}{!}{
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}
\hskip-2.0cm\begin{tabular}{cccccc}
%\hline
\hline
Source & $\Gamma$ & $\rm norm $ ($10^{-3}$) & $\rm Gauss\,\,norm^{*}$ ($10^{-7}$) & EW (eV) & $\chi^{2}$/dof \\
%\hline
\hline
M51 ULX7 & $ \rm 1.68 \pm 0.20 $ & $ 0.11_{-0.03}^{+0.05} $ & $ < 1.70 $ & $ < 34.1 $ & 178.8/164 \\
NGC 300 ULX1 & $ \rm 2.08 \pm 0.15 $ & $ 1.76_{-0.41}^{+0.55} $ & $ < 14.74 $ & $ < 40.1 $ & 330.9/345 \\
NGC 1313 X2 & $ \rm 2.80 \pm 0.13 $ & $ 1.91_{-0.40}^{+0.51} $ & $ < 5.24 $ & $ < 49.2 $ & 196.8/215 \\
NGC 5907 ULX1 & $ \rm 1.85 \pm 0.13 $ & $ 0.22_{-0.05}^{+0.06} $ & $ < 3.23 $ & $ < 44.5 $ & 534.6/495 \\
NGC 7793 P13 & $ \rm 1.79 \pm 0.10 $ & $ 0.61_{-0.10}^{+0.12} $ & $ < 6.51 $ & $ < 30.0 $ & 573.8/555 \\
Circ ULX5 & $ \rm 2.57 \pm 0.12 $ & $ 4.47_{-0.84}^{+1.04} $ & $ < 12.36 $ & $ < 32.8 $ & 485.5/480 \\
Ho II X1 & $ \rm 3.08 \pm 0.21 $ & $ 2.92_{-0.90}^{+1.34} $ & $ < 3.94 $ & $ < 41.3 $ & 224.9/254 \\
Ho IX X1 & $ \rm 2.40 \pm 0.09 $ & $ 6.05_{-0.94}^{+1.12} $ & $ < 15.34 $ & $ < 21.8 $ & 483.1/551 \\
NGC 1313 X1 & $ \rm 2.24 \pm 0.07 $ & $ 1.49_{-0.17}^{+0.20} $ & $ < 4.35 $ & $ < 18.5 $ & 629.9/596 \\
M33 X8 & $ \rm 3.14 \pm 0.10 $ & $ 20.84_{-3.32}^{+4.12} $ & $ < 9.88 $ & $ < 16.1 $ & 406.7/459 \\
NGC 4559 X7 & $ \rm 2.80 \pm 0.20 $ & $ 2.45_{-0.73}^{+1.05} $ & $ < 8.26 $ & $ < 60.4 $ & 286.6/258 \\
\hline
Combined & $2.37 \pm 0.03 $ & $1.59_{-0.09}^{+0.10}$ & $ < 2.77 $ & $<14.2$ & 584.2/596 \\
\hline
%\multicolumn{6}{l}{$\rm ^{a}$ : $N_{H}$ is fixed to value $\rm 0.15 \times 10^{22} \, cm^{-2}$} \\
%\multicolumn{6}{l}{$\rm ^{*}$ : Line Center and Sigma are fixed to values 6.4 keV and 0.1 keV, respectively.} \\
\end{tabular}
}
\end{table}
\begin{table}
\caption{Comparison of the upper limits on the equivalent width (EW) of the iron line derived from spectral fits across different energy ranges: Range 1 (5.5--7.5 keV), Range 2 (5.0--8.0 keV), and Range 3 (4.0--9.0 keV).} %Model used: \texttt{tbabs*(po+gaus)}}
\label{tab:fit_all_en}
\resizebox{\columnwidth}{!}{
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.2}
\begin{tabular}{cccc}
\hline
%\hline
Source & Range 1 (eV) & Range 2 (eV) & Range 3 (eV) \\
%\hline
\hline
M51 ULX7 & $ < 19.8 $ & $ < 34.1 $ & $ < 25.9 $ \\
NGC 300 ULX1 & $ < 30.4 $ & $ < 40.1 $ & $ < 59.1 $ \\
NGC 1313 X2 & $ < 47.3 $ & $ < 49.2 $ & $ < 44.7 $ \\
NGC 5907 ULX1 & $ < 47.7 $ & $ < 44.5 $ & $ < 52.7 $ \\
NGC 7793 P13 & $ < 20.5 $ & $ < 30.0 $ & $ < 42.3 $ \\
Circ ULX5 & $ < 27.9 $ & $ < 32.8 $ & $ < 38.9 $ \\
Ho II X1 & $ < 42.0 $ & $ < 41.3 $ & $ < 40.2 $ \\
Ho IX X1 & $ < 24.1 $ & $ < 21.8 $ & $ < 26.2 $ \\
NGC 1313 X1 & $ < 15.4 $ & $ < 18.5 $ & $ < 26.2 $ \\
M33 X8 & $ < 15.4 $ & $ < 16.1 $ & $ < 16.4 $ \\
NGC 4559 X7 & $ < 60.0 $ & $ < 60.4 $ & $ < 61.6 $ \\
\hline
Combined & $ < 11.1 $ & $ < 14.2 $ & $ < 20.0 $ \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
}
\end{table}
%\begin{table}
% \caption{\textbf{Search for iron emission line:} Fitted Parameters Result for the combined spectrum of all sources. Model Used : \textbf{\texttt{tbabs*(po+gaus)}}}
% \label{tab:fit_all_source}
% \resizebox{\columnwidth}{!}{
% \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.8}
% \begin{tabular}{cccccc}
% \hline
% \hline
% Energy Range & $\Gamma$ & $\rm norm $ ($10^{-3}$) & $\rm Gauss\,\,norm^{*}$ ($10^{-7}$) & EW (eV) & $\chi^{2}$/dof \\
% \hline
% \hline
% 5.5-7.5 keV & $2.36 \pm 0.06 $ & $ 1.58_{-0.17}^{+0.19} $ & $ < 2.17 $ & $ <11.1 $ & 398.8/396 \\
% \hline
% 5.0-8.0 keV & $2.37 \pm 0.03 $ & $1.59_{-0.09}^{+0.10}$ & $ < 2.77 $ & $<14.2$ & 584.2/596 \\
% \hline
% 4.0-9.0 keV & $ 2.35 \pm 0.02 $ & $1.52 \pm 0.04 $ & $ < 3.84 $ & $<20.0$ & 1124.6/996 \\
% \hline
% \multicolumn{6}{l}{$\rm ^{a}$: $N_{H}$ is fixed to value $\rm 0.15 \times 10^{22} \, cm^{-2}$} \\
% \multicolumn{6}{l}{$\rm ^{*}$: Line Center and Sigma are fixed to values 6.4 keV and 0.1 keV, respectively.} \\
%\end{tabular}
%}
%\end{table}
%\begin{figure*}
% \includegraphics[height=7cm, width=15cm]{plot_spectrum_iron_line_300_10000eV.pdf}
%\caption{\textbf{Search for iron emission line:} Spectrum of the ULXs/ULXPs combined for all the XMM-Newton observations.}
%\label{N_h_calculation_ajit}
%\end{figure*}
%\begin{figure*}
% \includegraphics[ height=7cm, width=15cm]{plot_spectrum_all_sources_added.pdf}
%\caption{\textbf{Search for iron emission line:} Combined Spectrum for the ULXs/ULXPs and residuals after fitting the spectrum.}
% \caption{\rahul{Top panel presents the combined spectra from \xmm\ observations of individual ULX (left) and ULXP (right) sources. The bottom panel (on the left) presents the combined spectra from all observations of 6 ULXs and 5 ULXPs analyzed in this work. On the right, residuals from the best-fit absorbed powerlaw model are shown for the combined spectra in the energy range of 5.5--7.5 keV, 5--8 keV, and 4--9 keV.}}
% \label{all_sources_added_spectrum}
%\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}
\includegraphics[height=15cm, width=18cm]{plot_spectrum_iron_line_all_together.pdf}
\caption{Top panel presents the combined spectra from \xmm\ observations of individual ULX (left) and ULXP (right) sources. The bottom panel (on the left) presents the combined spectra from all observations of 6 ULXs and 5 ULXPs analyzed in this work. On the right, residuals from the best-fit absorbed powerlaw model are shown for the combined spectra in the energy range of 5.5--7.5 keV, 5--8 keV, and 4--9 keV.}
\label{all_sources_added_spectrum}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[height=7.5cm, width=\columnwidth]{test_simulated_EQW.pdf}
\caption{Histogram for the EW recovered from fits to the combined simulated spectra of all sources. Different colors represent simulations in which artificial iron lines with EW values of 15 eV, 20 eV, and 30 eV were inserted into the individual source spectra before combining.}
\label{fig:simulated_EQW_validation}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Hardness Ratio around the eclipse transitions}
We investigated the hardness ratio during the eclipse and the eclipse transitions for five eclipsing ULX sources. For calculating the hardness ratio\footnote{\( \mathrm{HR} = \frac{H - S}{H + S} \), where \( H \) and \( S \) are the count rates in the hard and soft X-ray bands, respectively.}, we selected the soft and hard X-ray energy bands such that the total counts in both bands are approximately similar. %Two energy bands of 0.3--0.57 keV and 0.57--2 keV, 0.3--0.7 keV and 0.7--2.0 keV, 0.3--2.25 keV and 2.25--7.0 keV, 0.3--1.0keV and 1.0--4.0keV, 0.3--1.4 keV and 1.4--4.0 keV were selected for the five sources: M51 S1, M51 S2, CG X1, M51 ULX1 and M51 ULX2, respectively.
The selected energy bands were: 0.3--0.57 keV and 0.57--2.0 keV for M51 S1, 0.3--0.7 keV and 0.7--2.0 keV for M51 S2, 0.3--2.25 keV and 2.25--7.0 keV for CG X-1, 0.3--1.0 keV and 1.0--4.0 keV for M51 ULX1, and 0.3--1.4 keV and 1.4--4.0 keV for M51 ULX2. The eclipse profiles and respective hardness ratios are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:HR with Orbital Phase}. For M51 S1, M51 S2, M51 ULX1, and M51 ULX2, only a single eclipse/partial eclipse cycle is covered in the observation, so the hardness ratio is plotted as a function of time.
In contrast, for CG X-1, the observation spans approximately six orbital cycles \citep{Cg_X1_Qiu_2019}. To examine the hardness ratio around the eclipse transitions, the light curve was folded using the \texttt{HEASARC} tool \texttt{efold} with the best orbital period $\rm P=26175\,sec $, determined using the epoch-folding method with \texttt{efsearch}. The resulting folded light curve and hardness ratio with orbital phase is also shown in Fig. \ref{fig:HR with Orbital Phase}.
To compare the hardness ratio pattern with known Galactic eclipsing HMXBs, we also plotted the hardness ratio for LMC X--4 and SMC X--1 using the \xmm\ observations, with Obs-Ids 0142800101 and 011450101, respectively (see Fig. \ref{fig:HR with Orbital Phase}). For LMC X--4, the energy ranges 0.3--1.5 keV and 1.5--10.0 keV were selected as soft and hard energy bands, respectively, while for SMC X--1, 0.3--2.0 keV and 2.0--10.0 keV were selected as soft and hard energy bands, respectively.
%As it is clear from the figure, there is a clear increase in HR during the ingress/egress for the known HMXBs, but there is no change in HR for the ULX sources during the ingress/egress.
As shown in Fig. \ref{fig:HR with Orbital Phase}, both LMC X--4 and SMC X--1 exhibit a pronounced increase in hardness ratio during eclipse ingress and egress, consistent with the expected additional absorption as the compact object moves behind the stellar companion. In contrast, no significant changes in hardness ratio are observed for the ULX sources during eclipse transitions, suggesting that their spectral evolution across eclipses differs fundamentally from that of typical HMXBs. %This lack of hardness ratio variability could imply that the X-ray emission in ULXs arises from an extended or scattering-dominated region, rather than a compact inner accretion flow alone, such that eclipses obscure both soft and hard emission similarly. This scenario is consistent with the presence of powerful winds and large-scale outflows inferred in many ULXs.
\subsection{Flux Ratio during Eclipse to Out-of-Eclipse Phase}
During X-ray eclipses, most X-ray binaries exhibit residual X-ray emission, which is generally attributed to reprocessed emission from the stellar wind \citep{Nafisa_HMXB_eclipsing, Aftab_LMXB, Ketan_2024_eclipse_flare}. The ratio of OOE to eclipse flux shows a wide range in Galactic binaries, typically between $\sim 8-237$ for HMXBs, and $\sim 6-54$ for LMXBs. It is therefore of particular interest to examine this flux ratio for the ULXs, where mass accretion rates are expected to be much higher and the accretion geometry potentially more complex.
For calculating the flux, the spectra are fitted using the \texttt{xspec} model \texttt{tbabs*(diskbb)} for M51 S1 and S2, and \texttt{tbabs*(powerlaw)} for CG X-1, M51 ULX1, and M51 ULX2. The results are summarized in Table \ref{tab:fit_eclipse_flux_ratio}, and the corresponding spectrum with residuals is shown in Fig. \ref{fig:eclipse_spectrum}. The flux is calculated in the energy range 0.3--2.0 keV for M51 S1/S2 and 0.3--8.0 keV for CG X-1. %As there are not enough statistics during the eclipse phase for sources M51 ULX1 and M51 ULX2 to fit the spectrum, we have put an upper limit on the flux. For putting the upper limit, we fitted the OOE eclipse spectrum first, then utilized the same parameters for the fitting of the eclipse spectrum except the varying the \texttt{powerlaw-norm} values. As there are no significant counts above 1.4 keV in the eclipse spectrum, the flux is calculated in the energy range 0.3-1.4 keV for M51 ULX1/ULX2.
For M51 ULX1 and ULX2, insufficient statistics during eclipse prevented a reliable spectral fit. In these cases, we estimated the eclipse flux by first fitting the OOE spectrum and then refitting the eclipse spectrum with all spectral parameters fixed except for the normalization of the powerlaw component. Since no significant counts were detected above 1.4 keV during eclipse, fluxes were computed in the 0.3--1.4 keV energy range.
As indicated in Table \ref{tab:fit_eclipse_flux_ratio}, the flux drops approximately 3--5 times while transitioning from OOE to eclipse phase for M51 S1/S2 and $\sim$23 times for CG X-1. For M51 ULX1 and M51 ULX2, the OOE-to-eclipse flux ratios are estimated to be in the ranges $\sim$13.5--52.3 and $\sim$8.1--27.3, respectively, although these values are limited by the available statistics. When compared to most Galactic HMXBs, where flux ratios typically span $\sim$8--237 \citep{Nafisa_HMXB_eclipsing}, the ULXs generally exhibit equal or lower OOE-to-eclipse flux ratios. This suggests that the reprocessing efficiency (eclipse to OOE flux ratio) is larger for the ULX sources as compared to the Galactic HMXBs.
%Whereas \cite{Nafisa_HMXB_eclipsing} reported that the flux drops $\sim 8-237$ times transitioning from OOE to eclipse phase in Galactic HMXBs. This suggests that the reprocessing efficiency (eclipse to OOE flux ratio) \sout{during eclipse} is larger for the ULX sources as compared to the Galactic HMXBs.}
%\rahul{Compared to Galactic HMXBs, where flux ratios typically span $\sim$8--237 \citep{Nafisa_HMXB_eclipsing}, the ULXs generally show equal or lower? OOE-to-eclipse flux ratios??}
\begin{figure*}
\centering
% Row 1
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{light_curve_src_LMC_X4_0142800101.pdf}
\end{minipage}
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{light_curve_src_SMC_X1_011450101.pdf}
\end{minipage}
% Row 2
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{light_curve_src_s1_0824450901.pdf}
\end{minipage}
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{light_curve_src_s1_0852030101.pdf}
\end{minipage}
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{light_curve_src_cgx1_012823.pdf}
\end{minipage}
% Row 3
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{light_curve_src_s2_0830191501.pdf}
\end{minipage}
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{light_curve_src_s2_0830191601.pdf}
\end{minipage}
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{light_curve_src_s2_0852030101.pdf}
\end{minipage}
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{light_curve_src_ulx1_013813.pdf}
\end{minipage}
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{light_curve_src_ulx2_013813.pdf}
\end{minipage}
\caption{Light curves and hardness ratios around the eclipse transitions. The top row shows results for the well-known HMXBs (LMC X--4 and SMC X--1), while the subsequent rows present the eclipsing ULX sources.}
\label{fig:HR with Orbital Phase}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}
\centering
% Row 1
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_CG_X1_12823.pdf}
\end{minipage}
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_M51_S1_0824450901.pdf}
\end{minipage}
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_M51_S1_0852030101.pdf}
\end{minipage}
\vspace{0.2em} % Optional vertical space between rows
% Row 2
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_M51_S2_0830191501.pdf}
\end{minipage}
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_M51_S2_0830191601.pdf}
\end{minipage}
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_M51_S2_0852030101.pdf}
\end{minipage}
% Row 2
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_M51_ULX1_13813.pdf}
\end{minipage}
\begin{minipage}{0.32\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_M51_ULX2_13813.pdf}
\end{minipage}
\caption{Spectrum during eclipse and OOE phase for the CG X1 (Chandra), M51 S1 (\xmm), M51 S2 (\xmm), M51 ULX1 (Chandra) and M51 ULX2 (Chandra). Bottom panels shows the best-fit residuals.}
\label{fig:eclipse_spectrum}
\end{figure*}
\begin{table*}
\caption{Best-fit spectral parameters for selected eclipsing ULX sources, comparing Eclipse and OOE spectra. For CG X1, M51 ULX1 and M51 ULX2, the spectra were fitted with the \texttt{tbabs*(powerlaw)} model,
whereas for M51 S1 and M51 S2, the \texttt{tbabs*(diskbb)} model was used.}
\label{tab:fit_eclipse_flux_ratio}
\fontsize{10}{10}\selectfont
\resizebox{\linewidth}{!}{
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}
\hskip-3.0cm\begin{tabular}{ccccccccccc}
\hline
\hline
& & & \texttt{tbabs} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\texttt{powerlaw}} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{\texttt{diskbb}} & & Flux $^{*}$ & Flux Ratio \\
Source & Obs Id& Phase & $N_{\mathrm{H}}$ ($10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$) & $\Gamma$ & norm$_\texttt{po}$ ($10^{-5}$) & $kT$ (keV) & norm$_\texttt{diskbb}$ & $\chi^2$/dof & ($10^{-14}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$) & (OOE/Eclipse) \\
\hline
\hline
CG X1 & 12823 & OOE & $ 1.54\pm0.10 $ & $1.68_{-0.07}^{+0.08} $ & $51 \pm 5 $ & - & - & 228.6/197 & $182.8 \pm 5.1 $ & $23.4_{-3.7}^{+3.4}$ \\
& & Eclipse & $0.97_{-0.25}^{+0.29}$ & $2.06_{-0.34}^{+0.38}$ & $3_{-1}^{+2}$ & - & - & 30.4/33 & $7.8_{-1.1}^{+1.2}$ & \\
\hline
M51 S1 & 0824450901 & OOE & $0.19_{-0.05}^{+0.06}$ & - & - & $0.13 \pm 0.01 $ & $191_{-103}^{+270}$ & 32.2/20 & $9.0 \pm 0.5 $ & $ 4.5 \pm 0.5 $ \\
& & Eclipse & $<0.17$ & - & - & $0.19 \pm 0.04$ & $<8.5$ & 35.9/23 & $2.0 \pm 0.2 $ & \\
& & & & & & & & & & \\
& 0852030101 & OOE & $0.09 \pm 0.03$ & - & - & $0.16 \pm 0.01 $ & $36_{-15}^{+28}$ & 65.5/36 & $10.4 \pm 0.5 $ & $ 5.2 \pm 0.8 $ \\
& & Eclipse & $<0.20$ & - & - & $0.19 \pm 0.05$ & $<15.4$ & 16.1/23 & $2.0 \pm 0.3 $ & \\
\hline
M51 S2 & 0830191501 & OOE & $<0.06$ & - & - & $0.32 \pm 0.05 $ & $0.38_{-0.16}^{+0.53}$ & 27.2/19 & $6.1 \pm 0.6 $ & $ 4.4 \pm 0.8 $ \\
& & Eclipse & $0.25_{-0.14}^{+0.21}$ & - & - & $0.14 \pm 0.04 $ & $<409$ & 18.1/21 & $1.4 \pm 0.2 $ & \\
& & & & & & & & & & \\
& 0830191601 & OOE & $<0.03$ & - & - & $0.37 \pm 0.04 $ & $0.18_{-0.06}^{+0.14}$ & 31.6/31 & $5.4 \pm 0.4 $ & $ 3.9_{-0.9}^{+0.6}$ \\
& & Eclipse & $<0.28$ & - & - & $0.18 \pm 0.06 $ & $<36.5$ & 20.8/13 & $1.4_{-0.2}^{+0.3}$ & \\
& & & & & & & & & \\
& 0852030101 & OOE & $<0.04$ & - & - & $0.33 \pm 0.04 $ & $0.36_{-0.13}^{+0.35}$ & 32.8/34 & $6.4_{-0.5}^{+0.4}$ & $ 3.0_{-0.4}^{+0.3} $ \\
& & Eclipse & $0.11_{-0.08}^{+0.11}$ & - & - & $0.17_{-0.03}^{+0.04} $ & $<32.6$ & 30.4/23 & $2.1 \pm 0.2 $ & \\
\hline
M51 ULX1 & 13813 & OOE & $ 0.36\pm0.05 $ & $3.81_{-0.19}^{+0.21} $ & $6.5_{-0.7}^{+0.9}$ & - & - & 105.4/106 & $5.6 \pm 0.2 $ & $ 32.9 \pm 19.4 $ \\
& & Eclipse & $0.36 \, ^{\rm a}$ & $3.81 \, ^{\rm a}$ & $ 0.20 \pm 0.11 $ & - & - & 2.65/5 & $ 0.17 \pm 0.10 $ & \\
\hline
M51 ULX2 & 13813 & OOE & $ 0.33_{-0.07}^{+0.08} $ & $2.22_{-0.18}^{+0.19} $ & $3.1_{-0.4}^{+0.5}$ & - & - & 81.7/76 & $2.3 \pm 0.1 $ & $ 17.7 \pm 9.6 $ \\
& & Eclipse & $0.33 \, ^{\rm a}$ & $2.22 \, ^{\rm a}$ & $ 0.18 \pm 0.10 $ & - & - & 2.29/5 & $ 0.13 \pm 0.07 $ & \\
\hline
\multicolumn{9}{l}{$\rm ^{*}$ : Flux is calculated for the energy range 0.3-8.0 keV for CG X1, 0.3-2.0 keV for M51 S1/S2 and 0.3-1.4 keV for M51 ULX1/ULX2 .} \\
\multicolumn{9}{l}{$\rm ^{a}$ : parameters are frozen to corresponding values during the fit.} \\
% Data rows go here
\end{tabular}
}
\end{table*}
\section{Discussion}
%\textcolor{gray}{1. X-ray absorption/reprocessing is a well-known and well-studied phenomenon in XRBs. Go deeper into the different reprocessing signatures in XRBs with appropriate references.\\
%a. Iron Line Emission.\citep{Torrejon_2010_iron_line, Pradhan_2020, garcia_xmm_newton_Fe_k_alpha_HMXB, C_Ng_LMXB}\\
%b. Hardness Ratio for Eclipsing X-ray Binary.\cite{Ajith_Cen_X3, Tamang_Vela_X1}\\
%c. Flux Ratio Eclipse to OOE as all emission during the eclipse phase is completely due to Secondary emission reprocessed by the surrounding\citep{Nafisa_HMXB_eclipsing, Aftab_LMXB}.\\}
X-ray absorption/reprocessing is a well-known and well-studied phenomenon in X-ray binaries. There are many characteristics of the X-ray emission from which we can know about the reprocessed emission of X-ray binary: emission/absorption lines in X-ray spectra, the spectral and timing properties during the eclipse or ingress/egress phases for eclipsing X-ray binaries, etc. One important outcome of X-ray reprocessing is studying the Fe $\rm K\alpha$ line, which is fluorescent emission from the material in the environment of the compact object when illuminated with the X-rays from the compact star. Both HMXBs and LMXBs clearly show the iron line emission having EW varying from a few eV to keV \citep{Torrejon_2010_iron_line, C_Ng_LMXB, Pradhan_SFXT_SGHMXB, garcia_xmm_newton_Fe_k_alpha_HMXB}. Another manifestation of the reprocessing is an increase in the hardness ratio for eclipsing X-ray binaries during the ingress and egress in Galactic eclipsing X-ray binaries \citep{ eclipsing_LMXB_X2127+119_Ioannou, Eclipsing_LMXB_XTE_J1710-281_Gayathri, Ajith_Cen_X3, Tamang_Vela_X1}, attributed to the absorption of softer photons by the dense stellar wind near the surface of the companion star. Furthermore, during the eclipse phase, most of the observed X-ray emission is secondary emission reprocessed by a larger region compared to the size of the compact object.
%Galactic X-ray binaries show an increase in the hardness ratio during ingress/egress \citep{ eclipsing_LMXB_X2127+119_Ioannou, Eclipsing_LMXB_XTE_J1710-281_Gayathri, Ajith_Cen_X3, Tamang_Vela_X1}, which is well understood that the softer photons are absorbed by the dense wind near the surface of the companion star. Also, during the eclipse phase, most of the emission is secondary emission reprocessed by a larger region compared to the size of the compact object. For HMXBs, the OOE to eclipse flux ratio varies from $\sim 8-237$, while for the LMXBs, the OOE to eclipse flux ratio is found to be $\sim 6-54$ \citep{Nafisa_HMXB_eclipsing, Aftab_LMXB}.
%2. Nominally, one would expect similar reprocessing phenomena in the ULXs because ULXs are also compact objects power by accretion from a binary companion star (give appropriate references, especially the cases of eclipse and mass function determination).\\
%3. However, signatures of X-ray reprocessing in ULXs has been meagre (appropriate references), except for the cases of absorption lines in the winds (references). \\
Nominally, one would expect similar reprocessing phenomena in the ULXs because they are also compact objects powered by accretion from a binary companion star \citep{Rodríguez_Castillo_2020, 5907_ulx1_orbit_belfiore, Qiu2021}. However, signatures of X-ray reprocessing in ULXs have been meagre, except for the cases of absorption lines in the winds \citep{kosec_blueshifted, Pinto_blueshifted, Walton_2016}. So far, only two ULX sources, M82 X1 and NGC 7456 ULX1, have shown tentative detections of iron emission lines. In M82 X-1, a weak and broadened iron line with an EW of $\rm 59^{+25}_{-27} \, eV$ has been reported \citep{Caballero_M82_X1}. A possible detection of an iron emission line has also been reported in NGC 7456 ULX1, with an EW of $\rm 2000^{+1500}_{-1100} \, eV$ \citep{Monda_NGC7456_ULX1}, which is significantly higher than that observed in M82 X-1. Additionally, only during the 2010 epoch, an iron emission line with an EW of $\rm 343 \pm 93 \, eV$ was reported from the ULXP NGC 300 ULX1 \citep{Carpano}; however, no pulsations were detected during that observation. Overall, iron emission lines remain largely absent in most ULX sources.
%Also there in only in one observation of NGC 300 ULX1 during epoch 2010, iron K-alpha emission line is reported with EW of $343 \pm 93 eV$ \citep{Carpano}, but after that there is no significant detection of the iron line.
To look more into the reprocessed emission from ULXs, we have carried out the following three types of investigations: (i) search for Iron $\rm K\alpha$ emission line feature, (ii) hardness ratio evolution during ingress and egress, and (iii) flux ratio between OOE and eclipse phases. We have investigated a large volume of data carefully selected from all existing XMM-Newton and Chandra databases. For studying the iron $\rm K\alpha$ emission line, we selected all \xmm\ observations of six bright, well-known ULXs and five ULXPs. For studying the hardness ratio during ingress/egress of eclipse and flux ratio during OOE to eclipse phase, we have selected known eclipsing ULXs: CG X-1, M51 S1, M51 S2, M51 ULX1, and M51 ULX2. Since M51 S1 and M51 S2 are well resolved with \xmm\ instrument, we used \xmm\ observations for these two sources, while Chandra data were utilized for the sources CG X-1, M51 ULX1, and M51 ULX2.
In our analysis, we did not detect any significant iron K$\alpha$ line feature. For the individual sources, the 90\% confidence upper limit on the EW lies in the range of 15--60 eV, whereas for the combined spectra we obtained a much tighter constraint of 11--20 eV, which is a significant improvement from the previous studies, by a factor of a few.
%As presented in the results section, the 90 percent upper limit on the EW of the iron line is of the order of $\rm \sim 12-20 \,eV$, which is an order of significant improvement from the previous studies.
For instance, \cite{NGC_1313_X1_Ho_IX_X1_walton} obtained the upper limit on the iron $\rm K\alpha$ line of $\sim$30 eV for Ho IX X1 and $\sim$50 eV for NGC 1313 X1. In comparison, Galactic X-ray binaries almost ubiquitously show the iron K$\alpha$ emission in a majority of the sources, with EW varying between a few eV to keV depending on the system type. In classical SG HMXBs, the EW can vary from a few eV to keV, while in SFXTs, it is typically observed up to the order of 100 eV \citep{garcia_xmm_newton_Fe_k_alpha_HMXB, Pradhan_SFXT_SGHMXB}. In LMXBs, the EW typically ranges between 17--189 eV \citep{C_Ng_LMXB}.
Next, we constructed a curve of growth for the ULX sources by utilizing the EW values from the Table \ref{tab:fit_en_5_8} and column density values from the previous literature as mentioned in Table \ref{tab:total_GTE} \citep{Circ_ULX5_Mondal, Pintore_ULX_2014, NGC1313_X1_Walton_2020, M33_X8_West_2018, NGC_4559_X7_rare_flaring_Pintore, Manish_ULXPs}. For comparison, we also included measurements from classical SG HMXBs, SFXTs \citep{Pradhan_SFXT_SGHMXB}, LMXBs \citep{C_Ng_LMXB}, accreting disk-fed X-ray pulsars \citep{Paul2002, naik_her_x-1, Sharma2023b}, the Galactic stellar-mass black hole binary XTE J1650–500 \citep{Walton_XTEJ1650_500}, and the two ULXs with previously reported iron lines, M82 X-1 \citep{Caballero_M82_X1} and NGC 7456 ULX1 \citep{Monda_NGC7456_ULX1}. The resulting plot (Fig. \ref{Nh_vs_EQW}) clearly demonstrates that ULXs occupy the low $N_{\rm H}$ regime compared to Galactic binaries. This is somewhat counterintuitive that despite their extreme luminosities and expected presence of dense reprocessing material, ULXs consistently exhibit relatively low absorbing column densities.
%Along with ULX sources, we also added information from the previous studies for classical SG HMXB, SFXTs \citep{Pradhan_SFXT_SGHMXB}, LMXBs \citep{C_Ng_LMXB}, Galactic stellar mass black hole binary XTE J1650-500 \citep{Walton_XTEJ1650_500}, and two previously reported ULX sources M82 X-1 \citep{Caballero_M82_X1} and NGC 7456 ULX1 \citep{Monda_NGC7456_ULX1}. From this plot, it is clear that the column densities for the ULX sources are on the lower side compared to the galactic binaries. It is quite surprising that, having such high luminosity, ULXs exhibit low absorption column density.
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[ height=8cm, width=\columnwidth]{test.pdf}
\caption{Comparative studies of hydrogen column density ($N_H$: number of hydrogen atoms cm$^{-2}$ along the line of sight) and equivalent width (EW) of iron K$\alpha$ line for SgHMXBs, SFXTs \citep{Pradhan_SFXT_SGHMXB}, LMXBs \citep{C_Ng_LMXB}, LMC X-4, SMC X-1 \citep{Paul2002}, Her X-1 \citep{naik_her_x-1}, 4U 1626-67 \citep{Sharma2023b}, M82 X-1 \citep{Caballero_M82_X1}, NGC 7456 ULX1 \citep{Monda_NGC7456_ULX1}, XTE J1650-500 \citep{Walton_XTEJ1650_500} and ULXPs. %The SgHMXBs are indicated in orange, SXFTs in green, LMXBs in blue, LMC X-4 in cyan, SMC X-1 in red, Her X-1 in dark green, 4U 1626-67 in black, M82 X-1 in purple, XTE J1650-500 in red (different point type), and NGC 7456 ULX1 in midnight-blue color. The ULXPs/ULX sources (this work) measurements are indicated in magenta points.
The column density values are taken from previous studies mentioned in Table \ref{tab:total_GTE}. The black dashed line corresponds to the expected EW value for a given column density ($\rm EW = 0.00329 \, N_{H}^{22} \, keV $) assuming the spherical reprocessing geometry around the X--ray source \citep{Torrejon_2010_iron_line}. }
\label{Nh_vs_EQW}
\end{figure}
We also estimated the expected absorption in the ULX binary environment assuming a spherical symmetric radiation-driven wind from the companion star, following the model given by \cite{Radiation_driven_wind_model_Castor_1975}. For this, we adopted binary parameters from previous studies, in a manner similar to \cite{Ajith_Cen_X3} and \cite{Tamang_Vela_X1} for Galactic HMXBs. The wind velocity profile is given by:
\begin{equation}
v(r) = v_{\infty} \left( 1 - \frac{R_*}{r} \right)^{\beta}
\end{equation}
where $v_{\infty}$ is the terminal wind velocity, $R_*$ is the companion star radius, $\beta$ velocity gradient parameter fixed to a value 0.8 \citep{Friend_Abbott_1986}. Assuming the donor star is losing the mass isotropically with a mass loss rate $\dot{M}$, the radial mass density profile of the wind is given by:
\begin{equation}
\rho(r) = \frac{\dot{M}}{4\pi r^2 v(r)} = \frac{\dot{M}}{4\pi r^2 v_{\infty}} \frac{1}{\left(1 - \frac{R_*}{r}\right)^{\beta}}
\end{equation}
The hydrogen mass density is $\rm \rho_H(r) = x_H \, \rho(r) $, $x_H$ is the hydrogen mass fraction (adopted as $x_H \approx 0.7$ from \citep{Wilms2000}). The equivalent hydrogen column density is calculated by integrating the above equation along the line of sight.
\begin{equation}
N_H(\phi') = \kappa \int_{x_{\phi'}}^{\infty} \rho_H(r(x',y_{\phi'},z_{\phi'})) \, dx'
\end{equation}
where $\phi'$ is the orbital phase, $\kappa$ is the conversion factor for mass density to particle density, $r$ is the radial distance from the donor star center, and $x'$ is the line-of-sight coordinate. We adopted the binary parameter values for the ULXP M82 X-2 reported by \citet{M82_X2_orbital_decay_Bachetti}.
%Based on the binary parameter values reported by \citet{M82_X2_orbital_decay_Bachetti} for the ULXP M82 X-2, we approximately calculated the corresponding parameters for our study.
Assuming a circular binary orbit of radius $R_{\rm orbit} = 18.0 R_{\odot}$ with the terminal velocity $ v_{\infty} = 1500 $ km/s, the companion star radius $R_* = 8.0 R_{\odot}$, and the mass loos rate from the companion star is $\dot{M} = 4.7 \, \rm x\, 10^{-6} \, M_{\odot} yr^{-1}$, we calculated the expected column density for viewing the binary at three different angles: edge-on (inclination angle; i = $90^{\rm o}$), face-on (i = $0^{\rm o}$), and an intermediate angle i = $45^{\rm o}$. These results are shown in the Fig. \ref{fig:N_h_calculation_istotropic_wind}, where the observed column density ($\rm N_{H}$) values for the ULX sources are shaded in gray color. The measured column densities for ULX sources are systematically lower than the values predicted from wind accretion onto the compact object.
%\textcolor{magenta}{8. Conclusion.. is it possible that the companion star in the ULXs have low metallicity? Quote if you find optical spectral measurements giving metallicity of ULX optical counterparts.\\}
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[ height=7.5cm, width=\columnwidth]{test_M82_X2_final_draft.pdf}
\caption{Expected column density calculations assuming the accretion through a spherically symmetric wind around the companion. The horizontal gray region denotes the range for measured column densities reported in previous studies (Table \ref{tab:total_GTE}) for ULXPs/ULX sources.}
\label{fig:N_h_calculation_istotropic_wind}
\end{figure}
Also, we do not observe any significant change in the hardness ratio during eclipse ingress or egress in ULXs (Fig. \ref{fig:HR with Orbital Phase}), whereas eclipsing Galactic X-ray binaries exhibit a clear increase in hardness ratio near these phases. Additionally, the flux drops by approximately 3--5 times while transitioning from OOE to eclipse phase for M51 S1/S2 and $\sim$23 times for CG X-1. The flux ratio (OOE to eclipse phase) is obtained in ranges $\sim$13.5--52.3 and $\sim$8.1--27.3 for M51 ULX1 and M51 ULX2, respectively, given the limited statistics. In contrast, the eclipse to OOE flux ratio is larger for the ULX sources as compared to Galactic X-ray binaries \citep{Nafisa_HMXB_eclipsing, Aftab_LMXB}. Also, it is intriguing that for M51 S1, the OOE and eclipse spectra almost overlap above 1.3 keV (Fig \ref{fig:eclipse_spectrum}).
%ULXs exhibit a higher eclipse/OOE flux ratio compared to HMXBs \citep{Nafisa_HMXB_eclipsing}.
Unlike HMXBs, which show a wide range of $N_{\rm H}$ values and prominent iron emission lines with varying equivalent widths, ULXs typically exhibit lower $N_{\rm H}$ and a lack of detectable iron emission lines. Furthermore, ULXs do not display any significant increase in hardness ratio during eclipses that is commonly observed in HMXBs, which commonly exhibit absorption effects due to the dense stellar winds of the companion during egress and ingress phases. The higher eclipse to OOE flux ratio in ULXs suggests the presence of strong scattering. Considering this, the absence of detectable iron emission lines and the lack of increased hardness during eclipse could be indicative of lower metallicity in the winds of ULX companion stars or a very high level of ionisation of the metallic composition of the stellar wind.
Population studies show that metal-poor galaxies with $\rm Z < 0.2Z_{\odot}$ host a significantly larger number of ULXs compared to metal-rich systems of similar star-formation rate \citep{more_ULX_in_metal_poor_Mapelli_2010}, suggesting that the environments surrounding most ULXs are metal-poor \citep{ULX_optical_pakull_mirioni_2002, ULX_metal_poor_cartwheel_galaxy_Maprlli_2009, Maritza_NGC_925_ULX_optical}. For example, \citet{Maritza_NGC_925_ULX_optical} found that ULX-1 in NGC 925 lies in a region of very low gas metallicity, while \citet{NGC_4559_Optical_Soria_2005} suggested that the ultra luminous source NGC 4559 X7 also resides in a metal-poor environment. These results reinforce the general trend that ULXs are preferentially associated with low-metallicity surroundings. However, in the same galaxy NGC 925, ULX-3 is located in a region of comparatively higher metallicity \citep{Maritza_NGC_925_ULX_optical}. In addition to metallicity, there is strong evidence for a highly ionized medium around many ULXs, inferred from characteristic emission and absorption lines detected both in X-rays \citep{Kosec_ionized_emission_absorption_2021} and in the optical \citep{ULX_optical_pakull_mirioni_2002, NGC_1313_X2_Optical_Zampieri_2004, Maritza_NGC_925_ULX_optical}. Taken together, these findings suggest that the surroundings of most ULXs are either metal-poor or dominated by highly ionized gas.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section*{Acknowledgements}
We sincerely thank Ajith Balu and Abhishek Tamang for providing code and assistance in calculating the expected column density in the ULX binary environment, assuming a spherically symmetric radiation-driven wind from the companion star.
This research has made use of data obtained with XMM-Newton, an ESA science mission with instruments and contributions directly funded by ESA Member States. This research also made use of the data obtained with the Chandra X-ray observatory, a flagship mission of NASA. This research has made use of archival data and software provided by NASA’s High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC), which is a service of the Astrophysics Science Division at NASA/GSFC.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section*{Data Availability}
Data used in this work can be accessed through the HEASARC archive at \url{https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/W3Browse/w3browse.pl}.
\bibliography{ULX_references}{}
\bibliographystyle{aasjournalv7}
%\bibliographystyle{aasjournal.bst}
\clearpage
%\newpage
%\onecolumn
\appendix
%\onecolumn
\renewcommand{\thetable}{A\arabic{table}} % Table A1, A2...
\setcounter{table}{0} % Reset counter
\renewcommand{\thefigure}{A\arabic{figure}} % Table A1, A2...
\setcounter{figure}{0} % Reset counter
\section{Supplementary Information}
%\renewcommand{\thetable}{A\arabic{table}}
\begin{table*} % span both columns in ApJ
\centering
\caption{Detailed list of XMM-Newton observations used in this work for the selected bright well-known ULX Sources and ULXPs in the search for iron emission line.}
\label{tab:observation_log}
\resizebox{0.96\columnwidth}{!}{
\fontsize{6}{7}\selectfont
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{X X}
\begin{tabular}{|ccccc|}
\hline
\textbf{Source} & \textbf{ObsID} & \textbf{MJD} & \textbf{Src Rgn} & \textbf{GTE (ks)} \\
\hline
M51 ULX7 & 0112840201 & 52654.57 & $20^{''}$ & 17.12 \\
& 0212480801 & 53552.29 & $20^{''}$ & 20.86 \\
& 0303420101 & 53875.29 & $20^{''}$ & 28.85 \\
& 0303420201 & 53879.48 & $20^{''}$ & 20.66 \\
& 0677980701 & 55719.22 & $20^{''}$ & 3.84 \\
& 0824450901 & 58251.92 & $20^{''}$ & 64.73 \\
& 0830191501 & 58282.10 & $20^{''}$ & 51.59 \\
& 0830191601 & 58284.09 & $20^{''}$ & 51.66 \\
& 0852030101 & 58675.49 & $20^{''}$ & 58.78 \\
& 0883550201 & 59542.39 & $20^{''}$ & 70.49 \\
& 0883550301 & 59586.26 & $20^{''}$ & 104.95 \\
\hline
%NGC 300 ULX1 & 0656780401 & 55344.62 & $30^{''}$ & 11.18 \\
NGC 300 ULX1 & 0791010101 & 57739.40 & $30^{''}$ & 96.29 \\
& 0791010301 & 57741.39 & $30^{''}$ & 44.78 \\
\hline
NGC 1313 X2 & 0150280301 & 52994.10 & $30^{''}$ & 7.23 \\
& 0150280601 & 53012.16 & $30^{''}$ & 5.86 \\
& 0205230301 & 53161.27 & $30^{''}$ & 8.69 \\
& 0205230501 & 53332.31 & $30^{''}$ & 12.49 \\
& 0205230601 & 53408.50 & $30^{''}$ & 8.48 \\
& 0301860101 & 53800.71 & $30^{''}$ & 17.18 \\
& 0405090101 & 54024.01 & $30^{''}$ & 71.01 \\
& 0693850501 & 56277.68 & $30^{''}$ & 67.83 \\
& 0693851201 & 56283.67 & $30^{''}$ & 54.29 \\
& 0722650101 & 56451.24 & $30^{''}$ & 9.09 \\
& 0742490101 & 57111.19 & $30^{''}$ & 66.46 \\
& 0742590301 & 56843.97 & $30^{''}$ & 53.52 \\
& 0764770101 & 57361.20 & $30^{''}$ & 32.88 \\
& 0764770401 & 57470.95 & $30^{''}$ & 13.25 \\
& 0782310101 & 57669.90 & $30^{''}$ & 73.97 \\
& 0794580601 & 57841.25 & $30^{''}$ & 13.97 \\
& 0803990101 & 57918.89 & $30^{''}$ & 106.32 \\
& 0803990201 & 57924.91 & $30^{''}$ & 109.23 \\
& 0803990301 & 57996.68 & $30^{''}$ & 28.89 \\
& 0803990401 & 57998.75 & $30^{''}$ & 24.19 \\
& 0803990501 & 58094.47 & $30^{''}$ & 53.65 \\
& 0803990601 & 58096.46 & $30^{''}$ & 44.65 \\
\hline
NGC 5907 ULX1 & 0145190101 & 52698.59 & $30^{''}$ & 7.07 \\
& 0145190201 & 52690.67 & $30^{''}$ & 10.14 \\
& 0673920301 & 55966.59 & $30^{''}$ & 12.82 \\
& 0729561301 & 56847.95 & $30^{''}$ & 37.57 \\
& 0804090401 & 57939.02 & $30^{''}$ & 31.30 \\
& 0804090501 & 57942.79 & $30^{''}$ & 32.27 \\
& 0804090601 & 57949.26 & $30^{''}$ & 32.47 \\
& 0804090801 & 58656.78 & $30^{''}$ & 15.40 \\
& 0804090901 & 58658.79 & $30^{''}$ & 14.87 \\
& 0804091001 & 58663.83 & $30^{''}$ & 35.53 \\
& 0804091101 & 58669.41 & $30^{''}$ & 29.99 \\
& 0804091201 & 58670.76 & $30^{''}$ & 9.62 \\
& 0824320201 & 58646.82 & $30^{''}$ & 42.85 \\
& 0824320301 & 58653.21 & $30^{''}$ & 40.64 \\
& 0824320401 & 58660.79 & $30^{''}$ & 41.60 \\
& 0824320601 & 59053.74 & $30^{''}$ & 26.45 \\
& 0824320701 & 59159.90 & $30^{''}$ & 24.89 \\
& 0851180701 & 58705.51 & $30^{''}$ & 48.35 \\
& 0851180801 & 58707.45 & $30^{''}$ & 41.14 \\
& 0884220201 & 59265.10 & $30^{''}$ & 19.87 \\
& 0884220301 & 59271.09 & $30^{''}$ & 44.50 \\
& 0891801501 & 59453.39 & $30^{''}$ & 49.44 \\
& 0893810301 & 59585.18 & $30^{''}$ & 27.02 \\
& 0913080201 & 59889.87 & $30^{''}$ & 55.30 \\
& 0931410101 & 60152.77 & $30^{''}$ & 22.58 \\
& 0953011001 & 60521.89 & $30^{''}$ & 25.56 \\
\hline
NGC 7793 P13 & 0693760401 & 56621.21 & $30^{''}$ & 41.1 \\
& 0748390901 & 57002.00 & $30^{''}$ & 41.97 \\
& 0781800101 & 57528.58 & $30^{''}$ & 15.61 \\
& 0804670301 & 57893.66 & $30^{''}$ & 39.89 \\
& 0804670401 & 57904.90 & $30^{''}$ & 24.99 \\
& 0804670601 & 57924.11 & $30^{''}$ & 21.05 \\
& 0804670701 & 58083.00 & $30^{''}$ & 41.81 \\
& 0823410301 & 58449.79 & $30^{''}$ & 19.35 \\
& 0823410401 & 58479.60 & $30^{''}$ & 18.78 \\
& 0840990101 & 58619.99 & $30^{''}$ & 10.24 \\
& 0853981001 & 58809.36 & $30^{''}$ & 30.43 \\
& 0861600101 & 59027.79 & $30^{''}$ & 42.42 \\
& 0883780101 & 59363.72 & $30^{''}$ & 33.33 \\
& 0883780201 & 59538.40 & $30^{''}$ & 13.12 \\
& 0922840101 & 60100.91 & $30^{''}$ & 13.17 \\
& 0922840201 & 60284.30 & $30^{''}$ & 5.58 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
&
\begin{tabular}{|ccccc|}
\hline
\textbf{Source} & \textbf{ObsID} & \textbf{MJD} & \textbf{Src Rgn} & \textbf{GTE (ks)} \\
\hline
Circ ULX5 & 0111240101 & 52127.40 & $30^{''}$ & 63.96 \\
& 0656580601 & 56717.44 & $30^{''}$ & 20.95 \\
& 0701981001 & 56326.32 & $30^{''}$ & 28.29 \\
& 0792382701 & 57623.73 & $30^{''}$ & 13.34 \\
& 0824450301 & 58377.73 & $30^{''}$ & 86.30 \\
& 0932990101 & 60342.30 & $30^{''}$ & 88.83 \\
\hline
Holmberg II X-1 & 0112520601 & 52374.60 & $30^{''}$ & 4.64 \\
& 0112520901 & 52535.11 & $30^{''}$ & 3.69 \\
& 0200470101 & 53110.86 & $30^{''}$ & 32.73 \\
& 0561580401 & 55281.41 & $30^{''}$ & 21.63 \\
& 0724810101 & 56544.29 & $30^{''}$ & 4.65 \\
& 0724810301 & 56552.27 & $30^{''}$ & 5.81 \\
& 0864550201 & 59281.06 & $30^{''}$ & 18.97 \\
& 0864550301 & 59285.05 & $30^{''}$ & 19.58 \\
& 0864550401 & 59289.07 & $30^{''}$ & 17.60 \\
& 0864550501 & 59293.02 & $30^{''}$ & 11.30 \\
& 0864550601 & 59297.01 & $30^{''}$ & 17.77 \\
& 0864550701 & 59301.00 & $30^{''}$ & 14.05 \\
& 0864550801 & 59308.98 & $30^{''}$ & 19.55 \\
& 0864550901 & 59313.00 & $30^{''}$ & 17.66 \\
& 0864551101 & 59304.99 & $30^{''}$ & 10.02 \\
& 0864551201 & 59316.96 & $30^{''}$ & 12.99 \\
\hline
Holmberg IX X-1 & 0112521001 & 52374.74 & $30^{''}$ & 7.05 \\
& 0112521101 & 52380.73 & $30^{''}$ & 7.64 \\
& 0200980101 & 53274.31 & $30^{''}$ & 48.21 \\
& 0657802201 & 55888.05 & $30^{''}$ & 12.17 \\
& 0693850801 & 56223.20 & $30^{''}$ & 5.69 \\
& 0693851001 & 56227.19 & $30^{''}$ & 3.73 \\
& 0693851101 & 56247.14 & $30^{''}$ & 2.67 \\
& 0693851701 & 56243.15 & $30^{''}$ & 7.14 \\
& 0693851801 & 56245.14 & $30^{''}$ & 6.59 \\
& 0870900201 & 59169.40 & $30^{''}$ & 17.87 \\
& 0870930101 & 59139.51 & $30^{''}$ & 15.50 \\
& 0870930301 & 59151.44 & $30^{''}$ & 7.70 \\
& 0870930501 & 59171.38 & $30^{''}$ & 14.50 \\
\hline
NGC 1313 X1 & 0150280301 & 52994.10 & $30^{''}$ & 7.22 \\
& 0150280601 & 53012.16 & $30^{''}$ & 5.85 \\
& 0205230301 & 53161.27 & $30^{''}$ & 8.69 \\
& 0205230501 & 53332.31 & $30^{''}$ & 12.48 \\
& 0205230601 & 53408.50 & $30^{''}$ & 8.33 \\
& 0301860101 & 53800.71 & $30^{''}$ & 17.12 \\
& 0405090101 & 54024.01 & $30^{''}$ & 71.63 \\
& 0693850501 & 56277.68 & $30^{''}$ & 67.84 \\
& 0693851201 & 56283.67 & $30^{''}$ & 54.31 \\
& 0722650101 & 56451.24 & $30^{''}$ & 9.09 \\
& 0742490101 & 57111.19 & $30^{''}$ & 66.40 \\
& 0742590301 & 56843.97 & $30^{''}$ & 53.68 \\
& 0764770101 & 57361.20 & $30^{''}$ & 32.74 \\
& 0764770401 & 57470.95 & $30^{''}$ & 13.15 \\
& 0782310101 & 57669.90 & $30^{''}$ & 73.99 \\
& 0794580601 & 57841.25 & $30^{''}$ & 14.01 \\
& 0803990101 & 57918.89 & $30^{''}$ & 106.81 \\
& 0803990201 & 57924.91 & $30^{''}$ & 109.70 \\
& 0803990301 & 57996.68 & $30^{''}$ & 29.13 \\
& 0803990401 & 57998.75 & $30^{''}$ & 24.41 \\
& 0803990501 & 58094.47 & $30^{''}$ & 53.58 \\
& 0803990601 & 58096.46 & $30^{''}$ & 44.66 \\
\hline
M33 X8 & 0102640601 & 52095.66 & $40^{''}$ & 2.31 \\
& 0102642001 & 52136.35 & $40^{''}$ & 8.02 \\
& 0102642101 & 52299.50 & $40^{''}$ & 8.97 \\
& 0141980301 & 52845.33 & $40^{''}$ & 5.68 \\
& 0141980601 & 52662.84 & $40^{''}$ & 10.61 \\
& 0141980801 & 52682.65 & $40^{''}$ & 5.57 \\
& 0650510101 & 55386.31 & $40^{''}$ & 68.08 \\
& 0650510201 & 55388.31 & $40^{''}$ & 65.46 \\
& 0800350101 & 57955.35 & $40^{''}$ & 17.40 \\
& 0800350201 & 57957.79 & $40^{''}$ & 18.34 \\
& 0800350301 & 57967.32 & $40^{''}$ & 18.98 \\
& 0831590201 & 58681.68 & $40^{''}$ & 10.78 \\
& 0831590401 & 58677.73 & $40^{''}$ & 15.35 \\
& 0102642301 & 52301.43 & $40^{''}$ & 8.98 \\
\hline
NGC 4559 ULX7 & 0152170501 & 52786.13 & $30^{''}$ & 32.33 \\
& 0842340201 & 58650.8 & $30^{''}$ & 56.42 \\
& 0883960201 & 59743.86 & $30^{''}$ & 75.85 \\
%\hline
& & & & \\
& & & & \\
& & & & \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{tabularx}
}
\end{table*}
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[height=4.8cm, width=0.32\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_M51_ULX7.pdf}
\includegraphics[height=4.8cm, width=0.32\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_NGC_300_ULX1.pdf}
\vspace{0.1cm}
\includegraphics[height=4.8cm, width=0.32\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_NGC_1313_X2.pdf}
\includegraphics[height=4.8cm, width=0.32\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_NGC_5907_ULX1.pdf}
\vspace{0.1cm}
\includegraphics[height=4.8cm, width=0.32\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_NGC_7793_P13.pdf}
\includegraphics[height=4.8cm, width=0.32\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_Circ_ULX5.pdf}
\vspace{0.1cm}
\includegraphics[height=4.8cm, width=0.32\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_Ho_II_X1.pdf}
\includegraphics[height=4.8cm, width=0.32\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_Ho_IX_X1.pdf}
\vspace{0.1cm}
\includegraphics[height=4.8cm, width=0.32\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_NGC_1313_X1.pdf}
\includegraphics[height=4.8cm, width=0.32\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_M33_X8.pdf}
\vspace{0.1cm}
\includegraphics[height=4.8cm, width=0.32\linewidth]{plot_spectrum_NGC_4559_X7.pdf}
\caption{Residuals from the best-fit absorbed powerlaw model for the combined spectra of individual sources, shown over three energy ranges: 5.5--7.5 keV, 5--8 keV, and 4--9 keV.}
\label{fig:spec}
\end{figure*}
\clearpage
%\newpage
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%\bsp % typesetting comment
%\label{lastpage}
\end{document}
% End of file `sample7.tex'.
\begin{table}
\caption{\textbf{Search for iron emission line:} Coloumn Density ($\rm N_{H}$) Values reported in previous literature used for plotting curve of growth for ULX/ULXPs}
\label{tab:N_h_previous_literature}
\resizebox{!}{!}{
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.2}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
\hline
Sources & $N_{H}$ ($\rm 10^{22} \, cm^{-2}$) & References \\
\hline
M51 ULX7 & 0.099 & \cite{Manish_ULXPs} \\
NGC 300 ULX1 & 0.066 & \cite{Manish_ULXPs} \\
NGC 1313 X2 & 0.218 & \cite{Manish_ULXPs} \\
NGC 5907 ULX1 & 0.725 & \cite{Manish_ULXPs} \\
NGC 7793 P13 & 0.091 & \cite{Manish_ULXPs} \\
Circ ULX5 & 0.610 & \cite{Circ_ULX5_Mondal}\\
Ho II X1 & 0.059 & \cite{Pintore_ULX_2014} \\
Ho IX X1 & 0.119 & \cite{Pintore_ULX_2014}\\
NGC 1313 X1 & 0.253 & \cite{NGC1313_X1_Walton_2020} \\
M33 X8 & 0.187 & \cite{M33_X8_West_2018} \\
NGC 4559 X7 & 0.150 & \cite{NGC_4559_X7_rare_flaring_Pintore} \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
}
\end{table}
\begin{table*}
\caption{\textbf{Ratio of Flux During Eclipse to Out-of-Eclipse:} Fitted spectral parameters for selected eclipsing ULX sources, comparing Eclipse and Out-of-Eclipse spectra. For the source CG X1, M51 ULX1 and M51 ULX2, we used \texttt{xspec} model \textbf{\texttt{tbabs*(po)}} and \textbf{\texttt{tbabs*(diskbb)}} is used for M51 S1/S2.}
\label{tab:fit_eclipse_flux_ratio}
\fontsize{10}{10}\selectfont
\resizebox{\linewidth}{!}{
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.8}
\begin{tabular}{ccccccccccc}
\hline
\hline
& & & \texttt{tbabs} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{\texttt{powerlaw}} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{\texttt{diskbb}} & & Flux $^{*}$ & Flux Ratio \\
Source & Obs Id& Phase & $N_{\mathrm{H}}$ ($10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$) & $\Gamma$ & norm$_\texttt{po}$ ($10^{-5}$) & $kT$ (keV) & norm$_\texttt{diskbb}$ & $\chi^2$/dof & ($10^{-14}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$) & (OOE/Eclipse) \\
\hline
\hline
CG X1 & 12823 & OOE & $ 1.54\pm0.10 $ & $1.68_{-0.07}^{+0.08} $ & $51 \pm 5 $ & - & - & 228.6/197 & $182.8 \pm 5.1 $ & $\rm 23.4 $ \\
& & Eclipse & $0.97_{-0.25}^{+0.29}$ & $2.06_{-0.34}^{+0.38}$ & $3_{-1}^{+2}$ & - & - & 30.4/33 & $7.8_{-1.1}^{+1.2}$ & \\
\hline
M51 S1 & 0824450901 & OOE & $0.19_{-0.05}^{+0.06}$ & - & - & $0.13 \pm 0.01 $ & $191_{-103}^{+270}$ & 32.2/20 & $9.0 \pm 0.5 $ & $\rm 4.5 $ \\
& & Eclipse & $<0.17$ & - & - & $0.19 \pm 0.04$ & $<8.5$ & 35.9/23 & $2.0 \pm 0.2 $ & \\
& & & & & & & & & & \\
& 0852030101 & OOE & $0.09 \pm 0.03$ & - & - & $0.16 \pm 0.01 $ & $36_{-15}^{+28}$ & 65.5/36 & $10.4 \pm 0.5 $ & $\rm 5.2 $ \\
& & Eclipse & $<0.20$ & - & - & $0.19 \pm 0.05$ & $<15.4$ & 16.1/23 & $2.0 \pm 0.3 $ & \\
\hline
M51 S2 & 0830191501 & OOE & $<0.06$ & - & - & $0.32 \pm 0.05 $ & $0.38_{-0.16}^{+0.53}$ & 27.2/19 & $6.1 \pm 0.6 $ & $ 4.4 $ \\
& & Eclipse & $0.25_{-0.14}^{+0.21}$ & - & - & $0.14 \pm 0.04 $ & $<409$ & 18.1/21 & $1.4 \pm 0.2 $ & \\
& & & & & & & & & & \\
& 0830191601 & OOE & $<0.03$ & - & - & $0.37 \pm 0.04 $ & $0.18_{-0.06}^{+0.14}$ & 31.6/31 & $5.4 \pm 0.4 $ & $ 3.9 $ \\
& & Eclipse & $<0.28$ & - & - & $0.18 \pm 0.06 $ & $<36.5$ & 20.8/13 & $1.4_{-0.2}^{+0.3}$ & \\
& & & & & & & & & \\
& 0852030101 & OOE & $<0.04$ & - & - & $0.33 \pm 0.04 $ & $0.36_{-0.13}^{+0.35}$ & 32.8/34 & $6.4_{-0.5}^{+0.4}$ & $ 3.0 $ \\
& & Eclipse & $0.11_{-0.08}^{+0.11}$ & - & - & $0.17_{-0.03}^{+0.04} $ & $<32.6$ & 30.4/23 & $2.1 \pm 0.2 $ & \\
\hline
M51 ULX1 & 13813 & OOE & $ 0.36\pm0.05 $ & $3.81_{-0.19}^{+0.21} $ & $6.5_{-0.7}^{+0.9}$ & - & - & 105.4/106 & $5.6 \pm 0.2 $ & $\rm > 20.7 $ \\
& & Eclipse & $0.36 \, ^{\rm a}$ & $3.81 \, ^{\rm a}$ & $ < 0.32 $ & - & - & 2.65/5 & $ < 0.27 $ & \\
\hline
M51 ULX2 & 13813 & OOE & $ 0.33_{-0.07}^{+0.08} $ & $2.22_{-0.18}^{+0.19} $ & $3.1_{-0.4}^{+0.5}$ & - & - & 81.7/76 & $2.3 \pm 0.1 $ & $\rm > 11.0 $ \\
& & Eclipse & $0.33 \, ^{\rm a}$ & $2.22 \, ^{\rm a}$ & $ < 0.28 $ & - & - & 2.29/5 & $ < 0.21 $ & \\
\hline
\multicolumn{9}{l}{$\rm ^{*}$ : Flux is calculated for the energy range 0.3-8.0 keV for CG X1, 0.3-2.0 keV for M51 S1/S2 and 0.3-1.4 keV for M51 ULX1/ULX2 .} \\
\multicolumn{9}{l}{$\rm ^{a}$ : parameters are frozen to corresponding values during the fit.} \\
% Data rows go here
\end{tabular}
}
\end{table*}
\begin{thebibliography}{}
\expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
\providecommand{\url}[1]{\href{#1}{#1}}
\providecommand{\dodoi}[1]{doi:~\href{http://doi.org/#1}{\nolinkurl{#1}}}
\providecommand{\doeprint}[1]{\href{http://ascl.net/#1}{\nolinkurl{http://ascl.net/#1}}}
\providecommand{\doarXiv}[1]{\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/#1}{\nolinkurl{https://arxiv.org/abs/#1}}}
% type= article
\bibitem[{N. {Aftab} \& B. {Paul}(2024){Aftab} \& {Paul}}]{Aftab_LMXB}
{Aftab}, N., \& {Paul}, B. 2024, \bibinfo{title}{{X-ray reprocessing: Through the eclipse spectra of low mass X-ray binaries with XMM-Newton},} \na, 106, 102109, \dodoi{10.1016/j.newast.2023.102109}
% type= article
\bibitem[{N. {Aftab} {et~al.}(2019){Aftab}, {Paul}, \& {Kretschmar}}]{Nafisa_HMXB_eclipsing}
{Aftab}, N., {Paul}, B., \& {Kretschmar}, P. 2019, \bibinfo{title}{{X-Ray Reprocessing: Through the Eclipse Spectra of High-mass X-Ray Binaries with XMM-Newton},} \apjs, 243, 29, \dodoi{10.3847/1538-4365/ab2a77}
% type= inproceedings
\bibitem[{K.~A. {Arnaud}(1996){Arnaud}}]{Arnaud96}
{Arnaud}, K.~A. 1996, \bibinfo{title}{{XSPEC: The First Ten Years},} in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G.~H. {Jacoby} \& J.~{Barnes}, 17
% type= article
\bibitem[{M. {Bachetti} {et~al.}(2014){Bachetti}, {Harrison}, {Walton}, {Grefenstette}, {Chakrabarty}, {F{\"u}rst}, {Barret}, {Beloborodov}, {Boggs}, {Christensen}, {Craig}, {Fabian}, {Hailey}, {Hornschemeier}, {Kaspi}, {Kulkarni}, {Maccarone}, {Miller}, {Rana}, {Stern}, {Tendulkar}, {Tomsick}, {Webb}, \& {Zhang}}]{Bachheti2014}
{Bachetti}, M., {Harrison}, F.~A., {Walton}, D.~J., {et~al.} 2014, \bibinfo{title}{{An ultraluminous X-ray source powered by an accreting neutron star},} \nat, 514, 202, \dodoi{10.1038/nature13791}
% type= article
\bibitem[{M. {Bachetti} {et~al.}(2022){Bachetti}, {Heida}, {Maccarone}, {Huppenkothen}, {Israel}, {Barret}, {Brightman}, {Brumback}, {Earnshaw}, {Forster}, {F{\"u}rst}, {Grefenstette}, {Harrison}, {Jaodand}, {Madsen}, {Middleton}, {Pike}, {Pilia}, {Poutanen}, {Stern}, {Tomsick}, {Walton}, {Webb}, \& {Wilms}}]{M82_X2_orbital_decay_Bachetti}
{Bachetti}, M., {Heida}, M., {Maccarone}, T., {et~al.} 2022, \bibinfo{title}{{Orbital Decay in M82 X-2},} \apj, 937, 125, \dodoi{10.3847/1538-4357/ac8d67}
% type= article
\bibitem[{A. {Balu} {et~al.}(2024){Balu}, {Roy}, {Manikantan}, {Tamang}, \& {Paul}}]{Ajith_Cen_X3}
{Balu}, A., {Roy}, K., {Manikantan}, H., {Tamang}, A., \& {Paul}, B. 2024, \bibinfo{title}{{Studying the X-ray absorption characteristics of Centaurus X-3 using nearly 14 years of MAXI/GSC data},} \aap, 692, A47, \dodoi{10.1051/0004-6361/202451922}
% type= article
\bibitem[{F. {Barra} {et~al.}(2024){Barra}, {Pinto}, {Middleton}, {Di Salvo}, {Walton}, {G{\'u}rpide}, \& {Roberts}}]{Ho_II_X1_Barra}
{Barra}, F., {Pinto}, C., {Middleton}, M., {et~al.} 2024, \bibinfo{title}{{Examining the nature of the ultraluminous X-ray source Holmberg II X-1},} \aap, 682, A94, \dodoi{10.1051/0004-6361/202348471}
% type= article
\bibitem[{A. {Belfiore} {et~al.}(2024){Belfiore}, {Salvaterra}, {Sidoli}, {Israel}, {Stella}, {De Luca}, {Mereghetti}, {Esposito}, {Pintore}, {D'A{\`\i}}, {Rodr{\`\i}guez Castillo}, {Walton}, {F{\"u}rst}, {Magistrali}, {Wolter}, \& {Imbrogno}}]{5907_ulx1_orbit_belfiore}
{Belfiore}, A., {Salvaterra}, R., {Sidoli}, L., {et~al.} 2024, \bibinfo{title}{{The Orbit of NGC 5907 ULX-1},} \apj, 965, 78, \dodoi{10.3847/1538-4357/ad320a}
% type= article
\bibitem[{M. Brightman {et~al.}(2022)Brightman, Bachetti, Earnshaw, Fürst, Heida, Israel, Pike, Stern, \& Walton}]{Brightman_2022}
Brightman, M., Bachetti, M., Earnshaw, H., {et~al.} 2022, \bibinfo{title}{Evolution of the Spin, Spectrum and Superorbital Period of the Ultraluminous X-Ray Pulsar M51 ULX7,} The Astrophysical Journal, 925, 18, \dodoi{10.3847/1538-4357/ac3829}
% type= article
\bibitem[{M.~D. Caballero-García(2011)Caballero-García}]{Caballero_M82_X1}
Caballero-García, M.~D. 2011, \bibinfo{title}{{Weakly broadened iron line in the X-ray spectrum of the ultraluminous X-ray source M82 X-1},} Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 418, 1973, \dodoi{10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19615.x}
% type= article
\bibitem[{S. {Carpano} {et~al.}(2018){Carpano}, {Haberl}, {Maitra}, \& {Vasilopoulos}}]{Carpano}
{Carpano}, S., {Haberl}, F., {Maitra}, C., \& {Vasilopoulos}, G. 2018, \bibinfo{title}{{Discovery of pulsations from NGC 300 ULX1 and its fast period evolution},} \mnras, 476, L45, \dodoi{10.1093/mnrasl/sly030}
% type= article
\bibitem[{G.~A.~R. Castillo {et~al.}(2020)Castillo, Israel, Belfiore, Bernardini, Esposito, Pintore, Luca, Papitto, Stella, Tiengo, Zampieri, Bachetti, Brightman, Casella, D’Agostino, Dall’Osso, Earnshaw, Fürst, Haberl, Harrison, Mapelli, Marelli, Middleton, Pinto, Roberts, Salvaterra, Turolla, Walton, \& Wolter}]{Rodríguez_Castillo_2020}
Castillo, G. A.~R., Israel, G.~L., Belfiore, A., {et~al.} 2020, \bibinfo{title}{Discovery of a 2.8 s Pulsar in a 2 Day Orbit High-mass X-Ray Binary Powering the Ultraluminous X-Ray Source ULX-7 in M51,} The Astrophysical Journal, 895, 60, \dodoi{10.3847/1538-4357/ab8a44}
% type= article
\bibitem[{J.~I. {Castor} {et~al.}(1975){Castor}, {Abbott}, \& {Klein}}]{Radiation_driven_wind_model_Castor_1975}
{Castor}, J.~I., {Abbott}, D.~C., \& {Klein}, R.~I. 1975, \bibinfo{title}{{Radiation-driven winds in Of stars.},} \apj, 195, 157, \dodoi{10.1086/153315}
% type= article
\bibitem[{G. {Fabbiano}(1989){Fabbiano}}]{Fabbiano1989}
{Fabbiano}, G. 1989, \bibinfo{title}{{X-rays from normal galaxies.},} \araa, 27, 87, \dodoi{10.1146/annurev.aa.27.090189.000511}
% type= article
\bibitem[{S.~N. {Fabrika} {et~al.}(2021){Fabrika}, {Atapin}, {Vinokurov}, \& {Sholukhova}}]{Fabrika}
{Fabrika}, S.~N., {Atapin}, K.~E., {Vinokurov}, A.~S., \& {Sholukhova}, O.~N. 2021, \bibinfo{title}{{Ultraluminous X-Ray Sources},} Astrophysical Bulletin, 76, 6, \dodoi{10.1134/S1990341321010077}
% type= article
\bibitem[{D.~B. {Friend} \& D.~C. {Abbott}(1986){Friend} \& {Abbott}}]{Friend_Abbott_1986}
{Friend}, D.~B., \& {Abbott}, D.~C. 1986, \bibinfo{title}{{The Theory of Radiatively Driven Stellar Winds. III. Wind Models with Finite Disk Correction and Rotation},} \apj, 311, 701, \dodoi{10.1086/164809}
% type= inproceedings
\bibitem[{A. Fruscione {et~al.}(2006)Fruscione, McDowell, Allen, Brickhouse, Burke, Davis, Durham, Elvis, Galle, Harris, Huenemoerder, Houck, Ishibashi, Karovska, Nicastro, Noble, Nowak, Primini, Siemiginowska, Smith, \& Wise}]{ciao_chandra_Fruscione}
Fruscione, A., McDowell, J.~C., Allen, G.~E., {et~al.} 2006, \bibinfo{title}{{CIAO: Chandra's data analysis system},} in Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems, ed. D.~R. Silva \& R.~E. Doxsey, Vol. 6270, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE), 62701V, \dodoi{10.1117/12.671760}
% type= article
\bibitem[{F. {F{\"u}rst} {et~al.}(2017){F{\"u}rst}, {Walton}, {Stern}, {Bachetti}, {Barret}, {Brightman}, {Harrison}, \& {Rana}}]{Furst_5907}
{F{\"u}rst}, F., {Walton}, D.~J., {Stern}, D., {et~al.} 2017, \bibinfo{title}{{Spectral Changes in the Hyperluminous Pulsar in NGC 5907 as a Function of Super-orbital Phase},} \apj, 834, 77, \dodoi{10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/77}
% type= article
\bibitem[{F. {F{\"u}rst} {et~al.}(2016){F{\"u}rst}, {Walton}, {Harrison}, {Stern}, {Barret}, {Brightman}, {Fabian}, {Grefenstette}, {Madsen}, {Middleton}, {Miller}, {Pottschmidt}, {Ptak}, {Rana}, \& {Webb}}]{Furst_7793}
{F{\"u}rst}, F., {Walton}, D.~J., {Harrison}, F.~A., {et~al.} 2016, \bibinfo{title}{{Discovery of Coherent Pulsations from the Ultraluminous X-Ray Source NGC 7793 P13},} \apjl, 831, L14, \dodoi{10.3847/2041-8205/831/2/L14}
% type= inproceedings
\bibitem[{G.~P. Garmire {et~al.}(2003)Garmire, Bautz, Ford, Nousek, \& Jr.}]{chandra_acis_garmire}
Garmire, G.~P., Bautz, M.~W., Ford, P.~G., Nousek, J.~A., \& Jr., G. R.~R. 2003, \bibinfo{title}{{Advanced CCD imaging spectrometer (ACIS) instrument on the Chandra X-ray Observatory},} in X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Telescopes and Instruments for Astronomy, ed. J.~E. Truemper \& H.~D. Tananbaum, Vol. 4851, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE), 28 -- 44, \dodoi{10.1117/12.461599}
% type= article
\bibitem[{A. {Gim{\'e}nez-Garc{\'\i}a} {et~al.}(2015){Gim{\'e}nez-Garc{\'\i}a}, {Torrej{\'o}n}, {Eikmann}, {Mart{\'\i}nez-N{\'u}{\~n}ez}, {Oskinova}, {Rodes-Roca}, \& {Bernab{\'e}u}}]{garcia_xmm_newton_Fe_k_alpha_HMXB}
{Gim{\'e}nez-Garc{\'\i}a}, A., {Torrej{\'o}n}, J.~M., {Eikmann}, W., {et~al.} 2015, \bibinfo{title}{{An XMM-Newton view of FeK{\ensuremath{\alpha}} in high-mass X-ray binaries},} \aap, 576, A108, \dodoi{10.1051/0004-6361/201425004}
% type= article
\bibitem[{Z. {Ioannou} {et~al.}(2002){Ioannou}, {Naylor}, {Smale}, {Charles}, \& {Mukai}}]{eclipsing_LMXB_X2127+119_Ioannou}
{Ioannou}, Z., {Naylor}, T., {Smale}, A.~P., {Charles}, P.~A., \& {Mukai}, K. 2002, \bibinfo{title}{{Understanding the LMXB X2127+119 in M 15. I. X-ray eclipses and dips},} \aap, 382, 130, \dodoi{10.1051/0004-6361:20011581}
% type= article
\bibitem[{G.~L. {Israel} {et~al.}(2017{\natexlab{a}}){Israel}, {Belfiore}, {Stella}, {Esposito}, {Casella}, {De Luca}, {Marelli}, {Papitto}, {Perri}, {Puccetti}, {Castillo}, {Salvetti}, {Tiengo}, {Zampieri}, {D'Agostino}, {Greiner}, {Haberl}, {Novara}, {Salvaterra}, {Turolla}, {Watson}, {Wilms}, \& {Wolter}}]{Israel_5907}
{Israel}, G.~L., {Belfiore}, A., {Stella}, L., {et~al.} 2017{\natexlab{a}}, \bibinfo{title}{{An accreting pulsar with extreme properties drives an ultraluminous x-ray source in NGC 5907},} Science, 355, 817, \dodoi{10.1126/science.aai8635}
% type= article
\bibitem[{G.~L. {Israel} {et~al.}(2017{\natexlab{b}}){Israel}, {Papitto}, {Esposito}, {Stella}, {Zampieri}, {Belfiore}, {Rodr{\'\i}guez Castillo}, {De Luca}, {Tiengo}, {Haberl}, {Greiner}, {Salvaterra}, {Sandrelli}, \& {Lisini}}]{Israel_7793}
{Israel}, G.~L., {Papitto}, A., {Esposito}, P., {et~al.} 2017{\natexlab{b}}, \bibinfo{title}{{Discovery of a 0.42-s pulsar in the ultraluminous X-ray source NGC 7793 P13},} \mnras, 466, L48, \dodoi{10.1093/mnrasl/slw218}
% type= article
\bibitem[{F. {Jansen} {et~al.}(2001){Jansen}, {Lumb}, {Altieri}, {Clavel}, {Ehle}, {Erd}, {Gabriel}, {Guainazzi}, {Gondoin}, {Much}, {Munoz}, {Santos}, {Schartel}, {Texier}, \& {Vacanti}}]{Jansen2001}
{Jansen}, F., {Lumb}, D., {Altieri}, B., {et~al.} 2001, \bibinfo{title}{{XMM-Newton observatory. I. The spacecraft and operations},} \aap, 365, L1, \dodoi{10.1051/0004-6361:20000036}
% type= article
\bibitem[{A. {King} {et~al.}(2023){King}, {Lasota}, \& {Middleton}}]{King2023}
{King}, A., {Lasota}, J.-P., \& {Middleton}, M. 2023, \bibinfo{title}{{Ultraluminous X-ray sources},} \nar, 96, 101672, \dodoi{10.1016/j.newar.2022.101672}
% type= article
\bibitem[{P. Kosec {et~al.}(2017)Kosec, Pinto, Fabian, \& Walton}]{kosec_blueshifted}
Kosec, P., Pinto, C., Fabian, A.~C., \& Walton, D.~J. 2017, \bibinfo{title}{{ Searching for outflows in ultraluminous X-ray sources through high-resolution X-ray spectroscopy},} Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 473, 5680, \dodoi{10.1093/mnras/stx2695}
% type= article
\bibitem[{P. {Kosec} {et~al.}(2021){Kosec}, {Pinto}, {Reynolds}, {Guainazzi}, {Kara}, {Walton}, {Fabian}, {Parker}, \& {Valtchanov}}]{Kosec_ionized_emission_absorption_2021}
{Kosec}, P., {Pinto}, C., {Reynolds}, C.~S., {et~al.} 2021, \bibinfo{title}{{Ionized emission and absorption in a large sample of ultraluminous X-ray sources},} \mnras, 508, 3569, \dodoi{10.1093/mnras/stab2856}
% type= article
\bibitem[{M. Kumar {et~al.}(2025)Kumar, Sharma, Paul, \& Rana}]{Manish_ULXPs}
Kumar, M., Sharma, R., Paul, B., \& Rana, V. 2025, \bibinfo{title}{Spectral analysis of ultraluminous X-ray pulsars with models of X-ray pulsars,} Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 536, 340, \dodoi{10.1093/mnras/stae2558}
% type= article
\bibitem[{M.~A. {Lara-L{\'o}pez} {et~al.}(2021){Lara-L{\'o}pez}, {Zinchenko}, {Pilyugin}, {Gunawardhana}, {L{\'o}pez-Cruz}, {O'Sullivan}, {Feltre}, {Rosado}, {S{\'a}nchez-Cruces}, {Chevallard}, {De Rossi}, {Dib}, {Fritz}, {Fuentes-Carrera}, {Gardu{\~n}o}, \& {Ibar}}]{Maritza_NGC_925_ULX_optical}
{Lara-L{\'o}pez}, M.~A., {Zinchenko}, I.~A., {Pilyugin}, L.~S., {et~al.} 2021, \bibinfo{title}{{Metal-THINGS: On the Metallicity and Ionization of ULX Sources in NGC 925},} \apj, 906, 42, \dodoi{10.3847/1538-4357/abc892}
% type= article
\bibitem[{K. Makishima {et~al.}(2000)Makishima, Kubota, Mizuno, Ohnishi, Tashiro, Aruga, Asai, Dotani, Mitsuda, Ueda, Uno, Yamaoka, Ebisawa, Kohmura, \& Okada}]{Makishima_2000}
Makishima, K., Kubota, A., Mizuno, T., {et~al.} 2000, \bibinfo{title}{The Nature of Ultraluminous Compact X-Ray Sources in Nearby Spiral Galaxies,} The Astrophysical Journal, 535, 632, \dodoi{10.1086/308868}
% type= article
\bibitem[{M. Mapelli {et~al.}(2009)Mapelli, Colpi, \& Zampieri}]{ULX_metal_poor_cartwheel_galaxy_Maprlli_2009}
Mapelli, M., Colpi, M., \& Zampieri, L. 2009, \bibinfo{title}{Low metallicity and ultra-luminous X-ray sources in the Cartwheel galaxy,} Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 395, L71, \dodoi{10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00645.x}
% type= article
\bibitem[{M. Mapelli {et~al.}(2010)Mapelli, Ripamonti, Zampieri, Colpi, \& Bressan}]{more_ULX_in_metal_poor_Mapelli_2010}
Mapelli, M., Ripamonti, E., Zampieri, L., Colpi, M., \& Bressan, A. 2010, \bibinfo{title}{Ultra-luminous X-ray sources and remnants of massive metal-poor stars,} Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408, 234, \dodoi{10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17048.x}
% type= article
\bibitem[{S. {Mondal} {et~al.}(2021){Mondal}, {R{\'o}{\.z}a{\'n}ska}, {Bagi{\'n}ska}, {Markowitz}, \& {De Marco}}]{Circ_ULX5_Mondal}
{Mondal}, S., {R{\'o}{\.z}a{\'n}ska}, A., {Bagi{\'n}ska}, P., {Markowitz}, A., \& {De Marco}, B. 2021, \bibinfo{title}{{Spectral state transitions in Circinus ULX5},} \aap, 651, A54, \dodoi{10.1051/0004-6361/202140459}
% type= article
\bibitem[{S. Mondal {et~al.}(2021)Mondal, Różańska, De Marco, \& Markowitz}]{Monda_NGC7456_ULX1}
Mondal, S., Różańska, A., De Marco, B., \& Markowitz, A. 2021, \bibinfo{title}{{Evidence for Fe Kα line and soft X-ray lag in NGC 7456 ultraluminous X-ray source-1},} Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 505, L106, \dodoi{10.1093/mnrasl/slab061}
% type= article
\bibitem[{S. {Naik} \& B. {Paul}(2003){Naik} \& {Paul}}]{naik_her_x-1}
{Naik}, S., \& {Paul}, B. 2003, \bibinfo{title}{Spectral variations of the X-ray binary pulsar LMC~X-4 during its long period intensity variation and a comparison with Her~X-1,} A\&A, 401, 265, \dodoi{10.1051/0004-6361:20030111}
% type= article
\bibitem[{ {Ng, C.} {et~al.}(2010){Ng, C.}, {D\'{\i}az Trigo, M.}, {Cadolle Bel, M.}, \& {Migliari, S.}}]{C_Ng_LMXB}
{Ng, C.}, {D\'{\i}az Trigo, M.}, {Cadolle Bel, M.}, \& {Migliari, S.} 2010, \bibinfo{title}{A systematic analysis of the broad iron~K line in neutron-star LMXBs with XMM-Newton,} A\&A, 522, A96, \dodoi{10.1051/0004-6361/200913575}
% type= misc
\bibitem[{M.~W. Pakull \& L. Mirioni(2002)Pakull \& Mirioni}]{ULX_optical_pakull_mirioni_2002}
Pakull, M.~W., \& Mirioni, L. 2002, Optical Counterparts of Ultraluminous X-Ray Sources, \doarXiv{astro-ph/0202488}
% type= article
\bibitem[{B. {Paul} {et~al.}(2002){Paul}, {Nagase}, {Endo}, {Dotani}, {Yokogawa}, \& {Nishiuchi}}]{Paul2002}
{Paul}, B., {Nagase}, F., {Endo}, T., {et~al.} 2002, \bibinfo{title}{{Nature of the Soft Spectral Component in the X-Ray Pulsars SMC X-1 and LMC X-4},} \apj, 579, 411, \dodoi{10.1086/342701}
% type= article
\bibitem[{C. {Pinto} {et~al.}(2016){Pinto}, {Middleton}, \& {Fabian}}]{Pinto_blueshifted}
{Pinto}, C., {Middleton}, M.~J., \& {Fabian}, A.~C. 2016, \bibinfo{title}{{Resolved atomic lines reveal outflows in two ultraluminous X-ray sources},} \nat, 533, 64, \dodoi{10.1038/nature17417}
% type= article
\bibitem[{F. {Pintore} {et~al.}(2014){Pintore}, {Zampieri}, {Wolter}, \& {Belloni}}]{Pintore_ULX_2014}
{Pintore}, F., {Zampieri}, L., {Wolter}, A., \& {Belloni}, T. 2014, \bibinfo{title}{{Ultraluminous X-ray sources: a deeper insight into their spectral evolution},} \mnras, 439, 3461, \dodoi{10.1093/mnras/stu195}
% type= article
\bibitem[{F. Pintore {et~al.}(2021)Pintore, Motta, Pinto, Bernardini, Rodriguez-Castillo, Salvaterra, Israel, Esposito, Ambrosi, Salvaggio, Zampieri, \& Wolter}]{NGC_4559_X7_rare_flaring_Pintore}
Pintore, F., Motta, S., Pinto, C., {et~al.} 2021, \bibinfo{title}{The rare X-ray flaring activity of the ultraluminous X-ray source NGC 4559 X7,} Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 504, 551, \dodoi{10.1093/mnras/stab913}
% type= article
\bibitem[{P. {Pradhan} {et~al.}(2018){Pradhan}, {Bozzo}, \& {Paul}}]{Pradhan_SFXT_SGHMXB}
{Pradhan}, P., {Bozzo}, E., \& {Paul}, B. 2018, \bibinfo{title}{{Supergiant fast X-ray transients versus classical supergiant high mass X-ray binaries: Does the difference lie in the companion wind?},} \aap, 610, A50, \dodoi{10.1051/0004-6361/201731487}
% type= article
\bibitem[{Y. {Qiu} \& H. {Feng}(2021){Qiu} \& {Feng}}]{Qiu2021}
{Qiu}, Y., \& {Feng}, H. 2021, \bibinfo{title}{{Linking Soft Excess in Ultraluminous X-Ray Sources with Optically Thick Wind Driven by Supercritical Accretion},} \apj, 906, 36, \dodoi{10.3847/1538-4357/abc959}
% type= article
\bibitem[{Y. Qiu {et~al.}(2019)Qiu, Soria, Wang, Wiktorowicz, Liu, Bai, Bogomazov, Stefano, Walton, \& Xu}]{Cg_X1_Qiu_2019}
Qiu, Y., Soria, R., Wang, S., {et~al.} 2019, \bibinfo{title}{CG X-1: An Eclipsing Wolf–Rayet ULX in the Circinus Galaxy,} The Astrophysical Journal, 877, 57, \dodoi{10.3847/1538-4357/ab16e7}
% type= article
\bibitem[{G. Raman {et~al.}(2018)Raman, Maitra, \& Paul}]{Eclipsing_LMXB_XTE_J1710-281_Gayathri}
Raman, G., Maitra, C., \& Paul, B. 2018, \bibinfo{title}{Observation of variable pre-eclipse dips and disc windsin the eclipsing LMXB XTE J1710-281,} Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 477, 5358, \dodoi{10.1093/mnras/sty918}
% type= article
\bibitem[{K. {Rikame} {et~al.}(2024){Rikame}, {Paul}, {Sharma}, {Jithesh}, \& {Paul}}]{Ketan_2024_eclipse_flare}
{Rikame}, K., {Paul}, B., {Sharma}, R., {Jithesh}, V., \& {Paul}, K.~T. 2024, \bibinfo{title}{{Flares during eclipses of high-mass X-ray binary systems Vela X-1, 4U 1700-37, and LMC X-4},} \mnras, 529, 3360, \dodoi{10.1093/mnras/stae739}
% type= article
\bibitem[{A. {Robba} {et~al.}(2021){Robba}, {Pinto}, {Walton}, {Soria}, {Kosec}, {Pintore}, {Roberts}, {Alston}, {Middleton}, {Cusumano}, {Earnshaw}, {F{\"u}rst}, {Sathyaprakash}, {Kyritsis}, \& {Fabian}}]{Robba}
{Robba}, A., {Pinto}, C., {Walton}, D.~J., {et~al.} 2021, \bibinfo{title}{{Broadband X-ray spectral variability of the pulsing ULX NGC 1313 X-2},} \aap, 652, A118, \dodoi{10.1051/0004-6361/202140884}
% type= article
\bibitem[{R. Sathyaprakash {et~al.}(2019)Sathyaprakash, Roberts, Walton, Fuerst, Bachetti, Pinto, Alston, Earnshaw, Fabian, Middleton, \& Soria}]{sathyapraksh_1313x2}
Sathyaprakash, R., Roberts, T.~P., Walton, D.~J., {et~al.} 2019, \bibinfo{title}{{The discovery of weak coherent pulsations in the ultraluminous X-ray source NGC 1313 X-2},} Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 488, L35, \dodoi{10.1093/mnrasl/slz086}
% type= article
\bibitem[{R. {Sharma} {et~al.}(2023){Sharma}, {Jain}, \& {Paul}}]{Sharma2023b}
{Sharma}, R., {Jain}, C., \& {Paul}, B. 2023, \bibinfo{title}{{4U 1626-67 returns to spin-down: timing features toe the line},} \mnras, 526, L35, \dodoi{10.1093/mnrasl/slad110}
% type= article
\bibitem[{R. Soria {et~al.}(2005)Soria, Cropper, Pakull, Mushotzky, \& Wu}]{NGC_4559_Optical_Soria_2005}
Soria, R., Cropper, M., Pakull, M., Mushotzky, R., \& Wu, K. 2005, \bibinfo{title}{The star-forming environment of an ultraluminous X-ray source in NGC 4559: an optical study,} Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 356, 12, \dodoi{10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08438.x}
% type= article
\bibitem[{L. {Str{\"u}der} {et~al.}(2001){Str{\"u}der}, {Briel}, {Dennerl}, {Hartmann}, {Kendziorra}, {Meidinger}, {Pfeffermann}, {Reppin}, {Aschenbach}, {Bornemann}, {Br{\"a}uninger}, {Burkert}, {Elender}, {Freyberg}, {Haberl}, {Hartner}, {Heuschmann}, {Hippmann}, {Kastelic}, {Kemmer}, {Kettenring}, {Kink}, {Krause}, {M{\"u}ller}, {Oppitz}, {Pietsch}, {Popp}, {Predehl}, {Read}, {Stephan}, {St{\"o}tter}, {Tr{\"u}mper}, {Holl}, {Kemmer}, {Soltau}, {St{\"o}tter}, {Weber}, {Weichert}, {von Zanthier}, {Carathanassis}, {Lutz}, {Richter}, {Solc}, {B{\"o}ttcher}, {Kuster}, {Staubert}, {Abbey}, {Holland}, {Turner}, {Balasini}, {Bignami}, {La Palombara}, {Villa}, {Buttler}, {Gianini}, {Lain{\'e}}, {Lumb}, \& {Dhez}}]{Struder2001}
{Str{\"u}der}, L., {Briel}, U., {Dennerl}, K., {et~al.} 2001, \bibinfo{title}{{The European Photon Imaging Camera on XMM-Newton: The pn-CCD camera},} \aap, 365, L18, \dodoi{10.1051/0004-6361:20000066}
% type= article
\bibitem[{A. {Tamang} {et~al.}(2025){Tamang}, {Roy}, {Manikantan}, {Balu}, \& {Paul}}]{Tamang_Vela_X1}
{Tamang}, A., {Roy}, K., {Manikantan}, H., {Balu}, A., \& {Paul}, B. 2025, \bibinfo{title}{{Unveiling the intensity-dependent wake structure of Vela X{\textendash}1 using MAXI/GSC},} \aap, 698, A122, \dodoi{10.1051/0004-6361/202451923}
% type= article
\bibitem[{J.~M. {Torrej{\'o}n} {et~al.}(2010){Torrej{\'o}n}, {Schulz}, {Nowak}, \& {Kallman}}]{Torrejon_2010_iron_line}
{Torrej{\'o}n}, J.~M., {Schulz}, N.~S., {Nowak}, M.~A., \& {Kallman}, T.~R. 2010, \bibinfo{title}{{A Chandra Survey of Fluorescence Fe Lines in X-ray Binaries at High Resolution},} \apj, 715, 947, \dodoi{10.1088/0004-637X/715/2/947}
% type= article
\bibitem[{M.~J.~L. {Turner} {et~al.}(2001){Turner}, {Abbey}, {Arnaud}, {Balasini}, {Barbera}, {Belsole}, {Bennie}, {Bernard}, {Bignami}, {Boer}, {Briel}, {Butler}, {Cara}, {Chabaud}, {Cole}, {Collura}, {Conte}, {Cros}, {Denby}, {Dhez}, {Di Coco}, {Dowson}, {Ferrando}, {Ghizzardi}, {Gianotti}, {Goodall}, {Gretton}, {Griffiths}, {Hainaut}, {Hochedez}, {Holland}, {Jourdain}, {Kendziorra}, {Lagostina}, {Laine}, {La Palombara}, {Lortholary}, {Lumb}, {Marty}, {Molendi}, {Pigot}, {Poindron}, {Pounds}, {Reeves}, {Reppin}, {Rothenflug}, {Salvetat}, {Sauvageot}, {Schmitt}, {Sembay}, {Short}, {Spragg}, {Stephen}, {Str{\"u}der}, {Tiengo}, {Trifoglio}, {Tr{\"u}mper}, {Vercellone}, {Vigroux}, {Villa}, {Ward}, {Whitehead}, \& {Zonca}}]{Turner2001}
{Turner}, M.~J.~L., {Abbey}, A., {Arnaud}, M., {et~al.} 2001, \bibinfo{title}{{The European Photon Imaging Camera on XMM-Newton: The MOS cameras},} \aap, 365, L27, \dodoi{10.1051/0004-6361:20000087}
% type= article
\bibitem[{R. {Urquhart} \& R. {Soria}(2016){Urquhart} \& {Soria}}]{Urquhart2016}
{Urquhart}, R., \& {Soria}, R. 2016, \bibinfo{title}{{Two Eclipsing Ultraluminous X-Ray Sources in M51},} \apj, 831, 56, \dodoi{10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/56}
% type= article
\bibitem[{D.~A. {Verner} {et~al.}(1996){Verner}, {Ferland}, {Korista}, \& {Yakovlev}}]{Verner1996}
{Verner}, D.~A., {Ferland}, G.~J., {Korista}, K.~T., \& {Yakovlev}, D.~G. 1996, \bibinfo{title}{{Atomic Data for Astrophysics. II. New Analytic FITS for Photoionization Cross Sections of Atoms and Ions},} \apj, 465, 487, \dodoi{10.1086/177435}
% type= article
\bibitem[{D.~J. Walton {et~al.}(2021)Walton, Mackenzie, Gully, Patel, Roberts, Earnshaw, \& Mateos}]{walton_2022}
Walton, D.~J., Mackenzie, A. D.~A., Gully, H., {et~al.} 2021, \bibinfo{title}{{A multimission catalogue of ultraluminous X-ray source candidates},} Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 509, 1587, \dodoi{10.1093/mnras/stab3001}
% type= article
\bibitem[{D.~J. {Walton} {et~al.}(2012){Walton}, {Miller}, {Reis}, \& {Fabian}}]{NGC_1313_X1_Ho_IX_X1_walton}
{Walton}, D.~J., {Miller}, J.~M., {Reis}, R.~C., \& {Fabian}, A.~C. 2012, \bibinfo{title}{{Searching for massive outflows in Holmberg IX X-1 and NGC 1313 X-1: the iron K band},} \mnras, 426, 473, \dodoi{10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21727.x}
% type= article
\bibitem[{D.~J. Walton {et~al.}(2012)Walton, Reis, Cackett, Fabian, \& Miller}]{Walton_XTEJ1650_500}
Walton, D.~J., Reis, R.~C., Cackett, E.~M., Fabian, A.~C., \& Miller, J.~M. 2012, \bibinfo{title}{{The similarity of broad iron lines in X-ray binaries and active galactic nuclei},} Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 422, 2510, \dodoi{10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20809.x}
% type= article
\bibitem[{D.~J. {Walton} {et~al.}(2016){Walton}, {F{\"u}rst}, {Bachetti}, {Barret}, {Brightman}, {Fabian}, {Gehrels}, {Harrison}, {Heida}, {Middleton}, {Rana}, {Roberts}, {Stern}, {Tao}, \& {Webb}}]{Walton_2016}
{Walton}, D.~J., {F{\"u}rst}, F., {Bachetti}, M., {et~al.} 2016, \bibinfo{title}{{A 78 Day X-Ray Period Detected from NGC 5907 ULX1 by Swift},} \apjl, 827, L13, \dodoi{10.3847/2041-8205/827/1/L13}
% type= article
\bibitem[{D.~J. Walton {et~al.}(2017)Walton, Fürst, Harrison, Middleton, Fabian, Bachetti, Barret, Miller, Ptak, Rana, Stern, \& Tao}]{Ho_IX_X1_Walton_2017}
Walton, D.~J., Fürst, F., Harrison, F.~A., {et~al.} 2017, \bibinfo{title}{The Broadband Spectral Variability of Holmberg IX X-1,} The Astrophysical Journal, 839, 105, \dodoi{10.3847/1538-4357/aa683e}
% type= article
\bibitem[{D.~J. Walton {et~al.}(2020)Walton, Pinto, Nowak, Bachetti, Sathyaprakash, Kara, Roberts, Soria, Brightman, Canizares, Earnshaw, Fürst, Heida, Middleton, Stern, Tao, Webb, Alston, Barret, Fabian, Harrison, \& Kosec}]{NGC1313_X1_Walton_2020}
Walton, D.~J., Pinto, C., Nowak, M., {et~al.} 2020, \bibinfo{title}{{The unusual broad-band X-ray spectral variability of NGC 1313 X-1 seen with XMM–Newton, Chandra, and NuSTAR},} Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 494, 6012, \dodoi{10.1093/mnras/staa1129}
% type= article
\bibitem[{S. Wang {et~al.}(2018)Wang, Soria, Urquhart, \& Liu}]{M51_S1_S2_Wang}
Wang, S., Soria, R., Urquhart, R., \& Liu, J. 2018, \bibinfo{title}{Discovery of two eclipsing X-ray binaries in M 51,} Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 477, 3623, \dodoi{10.1093/mnras/sty872}
% type= article
\bibitem[{M.~C. Weisskopf {et~al.}(2002)Weisskopf, Brinkman, Canizares, Garmire, Murray, \& Van~Speybroeck}]{chandra_Weisskopf_2002}
Weisskopf, M.~C., Brinkman, B., Canizares, C., {et~al.} 2002, \bibinfo{title}{An Overview of the Performance and Scientific Results from the Chandra X‐Ray Observatory,} Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 114, 1, \dodoi{10.1086/338108}
% type= article
\bibitem[{L.~A. West {et~al.}(2018)West, Lehmer, Wik, Yang, Walton, Antoniou, Haberl, Hornschemeier, Maccarone, Plucinsky, Ptak, Williams, Vulic, Yukita, \& Zezas}]{M33_X8_West_2018}
West, L.~A., Lehmer, B.~D., Wik, D., {et~al.} 2018, \bibinfo{title}{On the Nature of the X-Ray Emission from the Ultraluminous X-Ray Source, M33 X-8: New Constraints from NuSTAR and XMM-Newton,} The Astrophysical Journal, 869, 111, \dodoi{10.3847/1538-4357/aaec6b}
% type= article
\bibitem[{J. {Wilms} {et~al.}(2000){Wilms}, {Allen}, \& {McCray}}]{Wilms2000}
{Wilms}, J., {Allen}, A., \& {McCray}, R. 2000, \bibinfo{title}{{On the Absorption of X-Rays in the Interstellar Medium},} \apj, 542, 914, \dodoi{10.1086/317016}
% type= manual
\bibitem[{ {XMM-Newton Science Operations Centre}(2025){XMM-Newton Science Operations Centre}}]{XMM_SAS2025}
{XMM-Newton Science Operations Centre}. 2025, Users Guide to the XMM-Newton Science Analysis System, issue 19.0 edn., ESA: XMM-Newton SOC
% type= article
\bibitem[{L. Zampieri {et~al.}(2004)Zampieri, Mucciarelli, Falomo, Kaaret, Di~Stefano, Turolla, Chieregato, \& Treves}]{NGC_1313_X2_Optical_Zampieri_2004}
Zampieri, L., Mucciarelli, P., Falomo, R., {et~al.} 2004, \bibinfo{title}{The Ultraluminous X-Ray Source NGC 1313 X-2 (MS 0317.7–6647) and Its Environment,} The Astrophysical Journal, 603, 523, \dodoi{10.1086/381541}
\end{thebibliography}