Competition of $\chi_{c}(2P)$ quarkonia and continuum in $e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- D \bar{D}$
Extracted source text ยท arXiv 2511.16862
%\documentclass[prd,reprint,superscriptaddress,amsmath,amssymb,longbibliography]{revtex4-2}
\documentclass[prd,amsmath,amssymb,superscriptaddress,onecolumn]{revtex4-2}
%\documentclass[prd,preprint,tightenlines,amsmath,amssymb,superscriptaddress]{revtex4-1}
%%\usepackage{multicol}
\usepackage{bbm}
\usepackage{todonotes}
%\topmargin -1.2cm
%\usepackage{amsmath}
%\usepackage{subcaption}
\usepackage[export]{adjustbox}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{epsfig}
\usepackage{braket}
%\usepackage{amssymb}
%\usepackage{caption}
\usepackage{bm}
%\usepackage[font=small,labelfont=bf]{caption}
\usepackage{capt-of}
\usepackage{hyperref}
% For EqNumber 1.1 , 1.2 ....
%TODO \numberwithin{equation}{section}
%\numberwithin{figure}{section}
%\numberwithin{table}{section}
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}
\usepackage[noabbrev]{cleveref}
\newcommand{\dv}{\text{d}}
\newcommand{\PL}{\color[rgb]{0,0,1}}
%\bibliographystyle{utphys}
%------------------
%\linenumbers
%------------------
\begin{document}
\title{\boldmath
Competition of $\chi_{c}(2P)$ quarkonia and continuum in $e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- D \bar{D}$}
%\vspace{0.6cm}
\author{Izabela Babiarz}
%\orcid{0000-0001-5343-9509}
\email{Izabela.Babiarz@ifj.edu.pl}
\affiliation{Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Radzikowskiego 152, PL-31342 Krak{\'o}w, Poland}
\author{Piotr Lebiedowicz}
%\orcid{0000-0003-1963-6263}
\email{Piotr.Lebiedowicz@ifj.edu.pl}
\affiliation{Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Radzikowskiego 152, PL-31342 Krak{\'o}w, Poland}
\author{Wolfgang Sch\"afer}
%\orcid{0000-0002-0764-0372}
\email{Wolfgang.Schafer@ifj.edu.pl}
\affiliation{Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Radzikowskiego 152, PL-31342 Krak{\'o}w, Poland}
\author{Antoni Szczurek}
%\orcid{0000-0001-5247-8442}
\email{Antoni.Szczurek@ifj.edu.pl}
\affiliation{Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Radzikowskiego 152, PL-31342 Krak{\'o}w, Poland}
\affiliation{Institute of Physics, Faculty of Exact and Technical Sciences, University of Rzesz{\'o}w,
Pigonia 1, PL-35310 Rzesz{\'o}w, Poland}
\begin{abstract}
We discuss the production of $D \bar{D}$ pairs in $e^+ e^-$ collisions, where $D$ refers to either $D^0$
or $D^+$.
The continuum mechanism with the $t/u$-channel vector-meson $D^*$ exchanges are considered.
The results of the calculation depend on the parameter of the off-shell form-factor
for the virtual $D^*$ mesons.
The $D^* D \gamma$ coupling constants are found from the $D^* \to D \gamma$ decays.
We find relatively large contribution for the $D^0 {\bar D}^0$ channel
and much smaller contribution in the $D^+ D^-$ channel.
In the second case we consider also the $D^{\pm}$ exchanges.
We conclude that the bump at $M_{D^0 {\bar D}^0} = 3.8$~GeV
observed by the Belle and BaBar Collaborations has rather
continuum origin than it corresponds to the broad resonance $\chi_{c0}(3860)$.
We discuss also production of the $\chi_{c2}(3930)$ resonance
which is a candidate for the $\chi_{c2}(2P)$ state.
This state can decay into both $D \bar{D}$ channels, however
the branching fractions are not well known at present.
From a comparison of our model results to the BaBar data we find
$B(\chi_{c2}(3930) \to D \bar{D}) = 0.58 \pm 0.13$
using the two-photon width $\Gamma_{\gamma \gamma} = 0.544$ keV
(obtained for the Buchm\"uller-Tye potential)
evaluated within the light-front approach (NRQCD limit).
Our finding of $\Gamma_{\gamma \gamma} \times B(\chi_{c2}(3930) \to D \bar{D}) = 0.32 \pm 0.07$ keV
is close to the Belle and BaBar results.
Realistic predictions of the differential distributions in several variables
and integrated cross-sections are given for the Belle II kinematics.
\end{abstract}
%\keywords{$D \bar{D}$ production, $e^+ e^-$ collisions, excited $P$-wave charmonia, \chi_{c0}(2P)$, $\chi_{c2}(2P)$}
%\pacs{}
\maketitle
%----------------------------
\section{Introduction}
\label{sec:Introdution}
%----------------------------
The ground state properties of $P$-wave charmonia
$\chi_{cJ}$ ($J = 0, 1, 2$) are relatively well known.
Their decay widths and branching fractions were measured \cite{ParticleDataGroup:2024cfk}.
In contrast, the excited $P$-wave charmonia (their masses, widths,
and branching fractions) are poorly known.
Recently the production of axial $\chi_{c1}(2P)$ state
in $pp$ \cite{Cisek:2022uqx}
and $e^+ e^-$ \cite{Babiarz:2023ebe} collisions was discussed.
These studies indicate
that also for the famous $X(3872)$,
although potentially an exotic state,
the $c \bar{c}$ component can play an important role.
This naturally raises the question of whether similar situation can occur for the $J^P = 0^+$ and $2^+$ states.
A number of observed states are considered as candidates for the first excited $P$-wave charmonia $\chi_{c0,2}(2P)$.
A candidate for the $\chi_{c2}(2P)$ state
($\chi_{c2}(3930)$ in PDG \cite{ParticleDataGroup:2024cfk})
was observed by the Belle Collaboration \cite{Belle:2005rte}
and confirmed by the BaBar Collaboration \cite{BaBar:2010jfn}
in the two-photon fusion process
$e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- (\gamma \gamma \to D \bar{D})$
as a resonance
in the $D^{+} D^{-}$ and $D^0 \bar{D}^0$ invariant mass distributions.
In the $D^0 {\bar D}^0$ channel,
one can also observe a broad enhancement at $M \sim 3.8$~GeV.
%In this mass range,
The intriguing problem of searching for $\chi_{c0}(2P)$
was a topic of several works, see \cite{Guo:2012tv,Olsen:2014maa}.
The candidate for the $\chi_{c0}(2P)$ state
is either the $X(3860)$ ($\chi_{c0}(3860)$ in PDG)
or the $X(3915)$ ($\chi_{c0}(3915)$ in PDG).
The $X(3915)$ state is relatively narrow ($\Gamma \simeq 20$~MeV)
and was observed in two-photon fusion in the $\omega J/\psi$ decay mode \cite{BaBar:2012nxg}
as well as in the $B$ meson decays,
$B \to K J\psi \omega$
(Belle \cite{Belle:2004lle}, BaBar \cite{BaBar:2007vxr})
and
$B^{+} \to K^{+} D^{+} D^{-}$ (LHCb \cite{LHCb:2020pxc}).
The observation of a broad resonance
identified as a new charmonium-like state $X(3860)$
with preference for $J^{PC} = 0^{++}$ over $2^{++}$
was reported by the Belle Collaboration \cite{Belle:2017egg}
in the process $e^{+} e^{-} \to J/\psi D \bar{D}$.
In line with the arguments presented there,
the $X(3860)$ state seems to be a better candidate
for the $\chi_{c0}(2P)$ charmonium state than the $X(3915)$.
There is still much uncertainty about the above assignments
for the $\chi_{c0,2}(2P)$ states
due to limited information on their production
and decay properties,
and therefore further confirmation is required.
The nature of the $\chi_{c0}(3915)$ and $\chi_{c2}(3930)$ charmonium-like states
is also not well understood.
In Ref.~\cite{Zhou:2015uva} the authors
suggest that the two resonances $X(3915)$ and $X(3930)$
can be regarded as the same $J^{PC} = 2^{++}$ state.
It was shown in \cite{Ortega:2017qmg},
using the framework of a constituent quark model,
that this may be related to the molecular structure for these two states.
Further considerations on the $X(3915)/X(3930)$ puzzle
can be found in \cite{Baru:2017fgv}
and in the references therein.
Regarding the reactions $e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- D \bar{D}$,
where $D = D^{0}$, $D^{+}$,
we are not convinced of the existence of a broad resonance
($\Gamma \sim 200$~MeV)
at $M \sim 3.85$~GeV
reported by the Belle and BaBar Collaborations.
The reason being that while an enhancement is observed in the $D^0 {\bar D}^0$ invariant mass distribution,
the effect is not clearly seen in the $D^+ D^-$ channel.
In order to increase the statistics
several groups combined the $D^0 {\bar D}^0$ and $D^+ D^-$ final states and studied the combined data.
For example,
some of the first descriptions of the combined Belle and BaBar data
on $\gamma \gamma \to D \bar{D}$ reactions were reported in \cite{Guo:2012tv,Chen:2012wy,Zhou:2015uva}.
More recently, the data-driven analysis of $\gamma \gamma \to D \bar{D}$
performed in a partial-wave dispersive formalism \cite{Deineka:2021aeu},
indicates no evidence for the broad resonance $X^{*}(3860)$, but rather reports a bound state below the $D \bar{D}$ threshold.
In \cite{Wang:2020elp} a possible bound state of $D \bar{D}$
generated by the meson-meson interaction is discussed.
In Ref.~\cite{Ji:2022vdj}
the available data in the $D \bar{D}$ and $D_{s}^{+} D_{s}^{-}$ channels
from both $\gamma \gamma$-fusion reaction and
$B^{+} \to D^{+}D^{-} K^{+}$, $B^{+} \to D_{s}^{+} D_{s}^{-} K^{+}$ decays
were analyzed considering the $D \bar{D}$-$D_{s} \bar{D}_{s}$-$D^{*} \bar{D}^{*}$-$D_{s}^{*} \bar{D}_{s}^{*}$ coupled channels with scalar and tensor states.
In this paper, we consider two different mechanisms
contributing to the $e^{+} e^{-} \to e^{+} e^{-} D \bar{D}$ reactions.
The first mechanism is the so-called continuum contribution described by $t$- and $u$-channel meson exchanges and contact terms.
For the $D^0 {\bar D}^0$ final state
we consider the vector-meson $D^{*}(2007)^{0}$ $t/u$-channel exchanges
as the underlying continuum process
while in the $D^+ D^-$ case
we consider the pseudoscalar $D^{\pm}$ $t/u$-channel exchanges plus a contact term.
The second production mechanism proceeds through an intermediate resonance state.
Here, we shall examine only the $\chi_{c0}(3860)$ and $\chi_{c2}(3930)$ resonances,
assuming that they correspond to $\chi_{c0}(2P)$ and $\chi_{c2}(2P)$, respectively.
We stress that we aim to describe the Belle and BaBar data simultaneously, for both the neutral and charged channels separately.
In this paper we discuss the production of $D \bar{D}$ meson pairs in $e^{+} e^{-}$ collisions,
concentrating on low $\gamma \gamma$ energies ($W_{\gamma \gamma} < 4.3$~GeV).
In \cite{Luszczak:2011js}, the interested reader may find predictions
for the exclusive $D \bar{D}$ production
in ultraperipheral ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions (UPCs).
There, the $\gamma \gamma \to D \bar{D}$ subprocesses
were estimated for $W_{\gamma \gamma} > 4$~GeV
in the heavy-quark approximation
and in the Brodsky-Lepage formalism.
It is also worth noting that the production of open-charm meson pairs in UPCs
is one of the potential opportunities to search for the lightest possible exotic charmonium state;
see \cite{Sobrinho:2024tre}.
%----------------------------
\section{Production of $D \bar{D}$ pairs in $e^+ e^-$ collisions via $\gamma \gamma$ fusion}
\label{sec:Formalism}
%----------------------------
%-------------------------------------------------------------------
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{ee_eeDpDm.eps}
\quad
\includegraphics[width=0.64\textwidth]{gamgam_DpDm.eps}
\caption{Diagrams representing $D^{+}D^{-}$ production in $e^{+}e^{-}$ collisions.
For the process $\gamma \gamma \to D^{+} D^{-}$ we consider
the $t$- and $u$-channel $D^{\pm}$ and $D^{*}(2010)^{\pm}$ exchanges,
the contact term,
and the exchange of $\chi_{c0,2}$ mesons in the $s$ channel.
The diagrams for the $D^0 {\bar D}^0$ production are similar,
but in the case of non-resonant production
we consider only the $D^{*}(2007)^{0}$ $t/u$-channel exchanges.}
\label{fig:diagram1}
\end{figure}
%------------------------------------------------------------------
In the present studies, we perform calculations for the considered exclusive
$2 \to 4$ reaction,
see the diagrams shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:diagram1}.
The fully differential cross section reads
%
\begin{eqnarray}
d \sigma = \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{s (s - 4m_{e}^{2})}}
\overline{|{\cal M}_{2 \to 4}|^{2}} (2 \pi)^{4}
\delta^{(4)}(p_{1} + p_{2} + p_{3} + p_{4} - p_{a} - p_{b})
\prod_{i=1}^{4}
\frac{\dv^{3}p_{i}}{(2\pi)^{3}2p_{i}^{0}}\,.
\label{xs_2to4}
\end{eqnarray}
%
%The formula is written in the overall center-of-mass frame. {\WS actually it is written in Lorentz-invariant form.}
Here four-momenta of incoming and outgoing particles are denoted by
$p_{a}, p_{b}, p_{1}, \ldots, p_{4}$,
the energy variable is $s = (p_{a} + p_{b})^{2}$,
$m_{e}$ is the electron mass, and
$\overline{|{\cal M}_{2 \to 4}|^{2}}$ is the amplitude squared averaged over initial
and summed over final lepton polarization states.
To calculate the total cross section one has to perform an eight dimensional phase space integration as is done
for instance for the $pp \to pp \pi^{+} \pi^{-}$ reaction
\cite{Lebiedowicz:2009pj}
and for the $pp \to pp \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$ reaction \cite{Lebiedowicz:2018muq}.
In the present paper, we use the following integration variables:
the transverse momenta of outgoing leptons ($p_{t1}$, $p_{t2}$),
the azimuthal angles of outgoing leptons ($\phi_{1}$, $\phi_{2}$),
the rapidities of the mesons ($y_{3}$, $y_{4}$),
the length and the azimuthal angle of the difference
of the transverse momenta of the mesons ($p_{m t}$, $\phi_{m}$).
We are interested in the photon-photon fusion production mechanism relevant for small--angle scattering of leptons. The generic $2 \to 4$ amplitude has the form
%%%%
\begin{eqnarray}
{\cal M}_{\lambda_a \lambda_b \to \lambda_1 \lambda_2 D \bar D} =
i j^{(1)}_{\alpha}(\lambda_1, \lambda_a) \,
\frac{- i g^{\alpha \mu}}{q_1^2} \,
{\cal M}_{\mu \nu}(\gamma^* \gamma^* \to D \bar D) \,
\frac{-i g^{\nu \beta}}{q_2^2} \,
i j^{(2)}_\beta(\lambda_2,\lambda_b) \,,
\end{eqnarray}
%%%%
where $\lambda_{a}, \lambda_{b}, \lambda_{1}, \lambda_{2} \in \{1/2, -1/2 \}$
are the lepton polarizations, and
$q_{1} = p_{a} - p_{1}$,
$q_{2} = p_{b} - p_{2}$.
Below, we also use the Mandelstam variables
$t_{1} = q_{1}^{2}$, $t_{2} = q_{2}^{2}$, and
$p_{34} = q_{1} + q_{2} = p_{3} + p_{4}$. Furthermore,
%%%
\begin{eqnarray}
j^{(1)}_{\alpha}(\lambda_1, \lambda_a) &=& \bar{v}(p_{1}, \lambda_{1})
\gamma_{\alpha}
v(p_{a}, \lambda_{a})
\approx (p_{1} + p_{a})_{\alpha} \,\delta_{\lambda_1 \lambda_a}
\,, \nonumber \\
j^{(2)}_{\beta}(\lambda_2, \lambda_b) &=&
\bar{u}(p_{2}, \lambda_{2})
\gamma_\beta
u(p_{b}, \lambda_{b})
\approx (p_{2} + p_{b})_{\beta} \,\delta_{\lambda_2 \lambda_b}
\,,
\end{eqnarray}
%%%
are the lepton currents.
Let us now collect the amplitudes for the various
$\gamma^* \gamma^* \to D \bar D$ subprocesses considered by us.
%=============================================
\subsection{Resonant production: $\gamma^* \gamma^* \to \chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}$}
\label{sec:Formalism_A}
%=============================================
The amplitude for the $\gamma^*(q_1) \gamma^*(q_2) \to \chi_{c2} \to D(p_3) \bar{D}(p_4) )$ subprocess is given by
%
\begin{eqnarray}
{\cal M}_{\mu \nu}(\gamma^{*} \gamma^{*} \to \chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D})
&=&
i\Gamma^{(\gamma^* \gamma^* \to \chi_{c2})}_{\mu \nu \rho \sigma}(q_{1},q_{2}) \;
i\Delta^{(\chi_{c2})\,\rho \sigma, \alpha \beta}(p_{34})\;
i\Gamma^{(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D})}_{\alpha \beta}(p_{3},p_{4})\,.
\label{3.1}
\end{eqnarray}
%
Here, we have introduced the
propagator for a narrow tensor-meson resonance in
the relativistic Breit-Wigner form
\begin{eqnarray}
i\Delta_{\mu \nu, \kappa \lambda}^{(\chi_{c2})}(p_{34})&=&
\frac{i}{p_{34}^{2}-M_{\chi_{c2}}^2+i M_{\chi_{c2}} \Gamma_{\chi_{c2}}}
\left[
\frac{1}{2}
( \hat{g}_{\mu \kappa} \hat{g}_{\nu \lambda} + \hat{g}_{\mu \lambda} \hat{g}_{\nu \kappa} )
-\frac{1}{3}
\hat{g}_{\mu \nu} \hat{g}_{\kappa \lambda}
\right] \,,
\label{3.2}
\end{eqnarray}
%
where $\hat{g}_{\mu \nu} = -g_{\mu \nu} + p_{34 \mu} p_{34 \nu} / p_{34}^2$.
The total decay width of the $\chi_{c2}(3930)$ resonance and its mass is taken from the PDG~\cite{ParticleDataGroup:2024cfk} as:
%
\begin{eqnarray}
M_{\chi_{c2}} &=& 3922.5 \pm 1.0~{\rm MeV}\,, \nonumber \\
\Gamma_{\chi_{c2}} &=& 35.2 \pm 2.2~{\rm MeV}\,.
\label{3.3}
\end{eqnarray}
%
\subsubsection{Two photons vertex: $\gamma^* \gamma^* \to \chi_{c2}$ }
The production of the $\chi_{c2}$ resonance is encoded in the $\gamma^* \gamma^* \to \chi_{c2}$ vertex, which in general depends on five invariant form factors that are functions of the photon virtualities $q_1^2,q_2^2$.
For the corresponding Lorentz structures, see e.g. \cite{Poppe:1986dq,Pascalutsa:2012pr,Babiarz:2020jkh}.
Here we concentrate on the resonance
$\chi_{c2}(3930)$ which can be identified
as the $\chi_{c2}(2P)$ charmonium $c \bar{c}$ state.
We anticipate that the main contribution to the cross section will come from quasireal transversally polarized photons.
In addition, we expect that the helicity-2 component will dominate over the helicity-0 one.
For example in the nonrelativistic quark model, the contribution of the $J_z=0$ polarization of the heavy tensor meson vanishes, see e.g. \cite{Schuler:1997yw}.
We therefore limit ourselves only to helicity-2 component, so that the vertex
can be written as
%
\begin{equation}
\Gamma_{\mu \nu \kappa \lambda}^{(\gamma^* \gamma^* \to \chi_{c2})}(q_{1},q_{2})=
e^2
\frac{1}{2} \Big( R_{\mu \kappa} R_{\nu \lambda}
+ R_{\nu \kappa} R_{\mu \lambda}
- R_{\mu \nu} R_{\kappa \lambda} \Big) F_{TT,2}(Q_1^2,Q_2^2)
\,,
\label{2.1}
\end{equation}
%
where $e^{2} = 4 \pi \alpha_{\rm em}$,
the photon virtualities
$Q_{1,2}^{2} \equiv -q_{1,2}^{2} \geqslant 0$,
and
%the projector on transverse polarization states of virtual photons reads
%
\begin{equation}
R_{\mu \nu} \equiv R_{\mu \nu}(q_1,q_2)
%\delta^{\perp}_{\mu \nu}(q_1,q_2)
= -g_{\mu \nu} + \frac{1}{X}
\Big( (q_{1} \cdot q_{2}) (q_{1 \mu} q_{2 \nu} + q_{1 \nu} q_{2 \mu})
- q_{1}^{2} q_{2 \mu} q_{2 \nu} - q_{2}^{2} q_{1 \mu} q_{1 \nu} \Big)\,,
\label{2.2}
\end{equation}
%
$X = (q_{1} \cdot q_{2})^{2} - q_{1}^{2} q_{2}^{2}$.
This vertex function satisfies the relations
%
\begin{eqnarray}
&&\Gamma_{\mu \nu \kappa \lambda}(q_{1},q_{2})=
\Gamma_{\nu \mu \kappa \lambda}(q_{2},q_{1})\,, \\
&&q_{1}^{\mu}\Gamma_{\mu \nu \kappa \lambda}(q_{1},q_{2})=0\,, \\
&&q_{2}^{\nu}\Gamma_{\mu \nu \kappa \lambda}(q_{1},q_{2})=0\,, \\
&&\Gamma_{\mu \nu \kappa \lambda}(q_{1},q_{2}) g^{\kappa \lambda}=0\,,\\
&&\Gamma_{\mu \nu \kappa \lambda}(q_{1},q_{2})
(q_{1} + q_{2})^{\kappa} (q_{1} + q_{2})^{\lambda} = 0\,,
\label{2.3}
\end{eqnarray}
%
and is also symmetric when exchanging $\kappa \leftrightarrow \lambda$.
The transition form factor will be parametrized as
%
\begin{eqnarray}
F_{TT,2}(Q_1^2,Q_2^2) = F_{TT,2}(0,0)
\frac{\Lambda^2}{Q_1^2 + Q_2^2 + \Lambda^2} \,.
\label{2.7}
%F_{TT,2}(Q_1^2,Q_2^2) &=& F_{TT,2}(0,0)
%\left( \frac{\Lambda^2}{Q_1^2 + Q_2^2 + \Lambda^2} %\right)^{2}\,.
%\label{2.7b}
\end{eqnarray}
%
In the calculations
we take $\Lambda = M_{\chi_{c2}(3930)} = 3.9225$~GeV
which, in principle, is a free parameter.
We would like to mention that $F_{TT,2}(0,0)$,
the form factor at the on-shell point,
is not dimensionless.
Assuming that the tensor $\chi_{c2}(2P)$ state is quarkonium-like
(pure $c \bar{c}$ state)
one can calculate $F_{TT,2}(0,0)$ in the NRQCD limit
[see (4.2) of \cite{Babiarz:2024sqw}]
%
\begin{equation}
F_{TT,2}(0,0) = 8 e_f^2 \sqrt{\frac{3 N_c}{\pi M_{\chi_{c2}}^{3}}} |R_{2P}'(0)|
\label{2.12}
\end{equation}
%
with $e_f = 2/3$ and $N_{c} = 3$.
The first derivative of the radial wave function at the origin is estimated for several $c \bar{c}$ interaction potential models from the literature, listed in Table~\ref{tab:R0_LFWF} below.
Following the approach in \cite{Babiarz:2020jkh}, we solve Schr\"odinger equation, but for $2P$ state, and get $|R_{2P}'(0)|$ values.
As shown in Table~\ref{tab:R0_LFWF}, there is a considerable spread of results for the different potential models.
%==========================================================
\begin{table}[h!]
\caption{Results of the derivative of the wave function
at the origin $|R_{2P}'(0)|$ for $\chi_{c2}(2P)$ state
obtained from the light front quark model for five different potential model,
the corresponding values of transition form factor (\ref{2.12}),
and of two-photon width for the helicity-2 contribution in NRQCD limit.}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{l |c |c |c }
\hline
\hline
Potential type &
$|R'_{2P}(0)|\, (\rm GeV^{5/2})$ &
$|F_{TT,2}(0,0)| \, (\rm GeV)$ &
$\Gamma_{\gamma \gamma}(\lambda = \pm 2) \,(\rm keV)$ \\
\hline
Cornell & 0.405 & 0.314 & 0.840 \\
Buchm\"uller-Tye & 0.326 & 0.253 & 0.544 \\
harmonic oscillator & 0.275 & 0.213 & 0.387 \\
logarithmic & 0.263 & 0.204 & 0.354 \\
power like & 0.228 & 0.177 & 0.266 \\
\hline
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:R0_LFWF}
\end{table}
%==========================================================
In the NRQCD limit, the helicity-0 term vanishes
and the helicity-2 is the dominant one.
Then, $F_{TT,2}(0,0)$ is related to the two-photon decay
width of the $\chi_{c2}$ state
%
\begin{eqnarray}
\Gamma(\chi_{c2}(2P) \to \gamma \gamma) =
(4 \pi \alpha_{\rm em})^2 \frac{|F_{TT,2}(0,0)|^2}{80 \pi M_{\chi_{c2}}}\,;
\end{eqnarray}
%
see the discussion in Sec.~4 of \cite{Babiarz:2024sqw}.
Using $|R_{2P}'(0)| = (0.228 - 0.405)$~GeV$^{5/2}$
we find $\Gamma_{\gamma \gamma}(\lambda = \pm 2) = (0.27 - 0.84)$~keV
assuming the dominance of the helicity-2 term.
Here, the Cornell potential gives the largest value of the two-photon width.
It is worth noting that the BLFQ prediction \cite{Li:2021ejv}
for the two-photon width of $\chi_{c2}(3930)$,
$\Gamma_{\gamma \gamma} = 0.58(25)$~keV (see Table~I of \cite{Li:2021ejv}),
is most compatible with our result obtained for the Buchm\"uller-Tye potential.
For comparison, a value
$|R_{2P}'(0)|^2 = 0.1767$~GeV$^5$ was found in \cite{Eichten:2019hbb}
computed for the mass $M = 3.9554$~GeV
with $m_{c} = 1.84$~GeV
within the Cornell
%Coulomb-plus-linear (\textit{frozen-$\alpha_{s}$}})
potential.
This value, $|R_{2P}'(0)| \simeq 0.420$~GeV$^{5/2}$,
appears to be larger than our findings.
Nevertheless, it was used
for the inclusive $\chi_{c1}(3872)$ production \cite{Cisek:2022uqx}
leading to a good description of the proton-proton data
within the uncertainty of the model (different gluon uPDFs).
Alternatively, for the $\gamma^* \gamma^* \to \chi_{c2}$ vertex
one can use the form given in (C25) of \cite{Pascalutsa:2012pr}.
In this case, the helicity-2 component reads
%
\begin{equation}
\Gamma_{\mu \nu \kappa \lambda}^{\rm PPV}(q_{1},q_{2})=
%{\cal M}_{\mu \nu \kappa \lambda}(\gamma^* \gamma^* \to \chi_{c2})=
e^2
\Big(
R_{\mu \kappa}(q_1,q_2)
R_{\nu \lambda}(q_1,q_2)
%\delta^{\perp}_{\mu \kappa}(q_1,q_2)
%\delta^{\perp}_{\nu \lambda}(q_1,q_2)
+
\frac{\hat{s}}{8X}
R_{\mu \nu}(q_1,q_2)
(q_{1} - q_{2})_{\kappa} (q_{1} - q_{2})_{\lambda} \Big)
\frac{q_{1} \cdot q_{2}}{M_{\chi_{c2}}}
\tilde{F}_{TT,2}(Q_1^2,Q_2^2)
\,,
\label{2.9}
\end{equation}
%
where
$\hat{s} = (q_{1} + q_{2})^{2} = 2 (q_{1} \cdot q_{2})
+ q_{1}^{2} + q_{2}^{2}$.
We have $q_{1} \cdot q_{2} = (M_{\chi_{c2}}^{2} + Q_{1}^{2} + Q_{2}^{2})/2$.
Introducing an extra factor $(q_{1} \cdot q_{2})/M_{\chi_{c0}}$
the transition form factor $\tilde{F}_{TT,2}(Q_1^2,Q_2^2)$ remains dimensionless.
For the vertex function
(\ref{2.9}) we find the relations
%
\begin{eqnarray}
&&\Gamma_{\mu \nu \kappa \lambda}^{\rm PPV}(q_{1},q_{2}) g^{\kappa \lambda} \neq 0\,,\\
&&\Gamma_{\mu \nu \kappa \lambda}^{\rm PPV}(q_{1},q_{2})
(q_{1} + q_{2})^{\kappa} (q_{1} + q_{2})^{\lambda} \neq 0\,.
\label{2.11}
\end{eqnarray}
%
In order to get compatibility with the formula (\ref{2.1}), we write
%
\begin{equation}
\tilde{F}_{TT,2}(Q_1^2,Q_2^2) =
%\frac{2}{M_{\chi_{c2}}} F_{TT,2}(Q_1^2,Q_2^2)
\frac{M_{\chi_{c2}}}{q_{1} \cdot q_{2}} F_{TT,2}(Q_1^2,Q_2^2)
\,.
\label{2.10}
\end{equation}
The vertices (\ref{2.1}) and (\ref{2.9})
are written for `on-shell' $\chi_{c2}$ meson,
that is for $p_{34}^{2} = M_{\chi_{c2}}^{2}$.
For $p_{34}^{2} \neq M_{\chi_{c2}}^{2}$
the form factor $F^{(\chi_{c2})}(p_{34}^{2})$
can be inserted in addition.
%The form factor can be parametrized as
%
%\begin{eqnarray}
%F^{(\chi_{c2})}(p_{34}^{2}) =
%\exp{ \left( \frac{-(p_{34}^{2}-M_{\chi_{c2}}^{2})^{2}}{\Lambda_{\chi_{c2}}^{4}} \right)}\,,
%\quad \Lambda_{\chi_{c2}} = 1\;{\rm GeV}\,.
%\label{3.5}
%\end{eqnarray}
%
%The cutoff $\Lambda_{\chi_{c2}}$ is a free parameter.
The form factor should be normalized to
$F^{(\chi_{c2})}(M_{\chi_{c2}}^{2}) = 1$.
%We assume the same form factor to describe
%the $p_{34}$ dependence of the $\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}$ coupling
%which we will discuss below.
In our calculation we put $F^{(\chi_{c2})}(p_{34}^{2}) = 1$.
%=============================================
\subsubsection{$\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}$ vertex}
%=============================================
The $\chi_{c2} D \bar{D}$ vertex
(see Eq.~(3.37) of \cite{Ewerz:2013kda}
for the analogous $f_{2} \pi \pi$ vertex)
can be written as
%
\begin{eqnarray}
i\Gamma_{\mu \nu}^{(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D})}(p_{3},p_{4})=
-i \,\frac{g_{\chi_{c2} D\bar{D}}}{2 M_{0}}
\left[ (p_{3}-p_{4})_{\mu} (p_{3}-p_{4})_{\nu}
- \frac{1}{4} g_{\mu \nu} (p_{3}-p_{4})^{2} \right] F^{(\chi_{c2})}(p_{34}^{2})
\label{3.4}
\end{eqnarray}
%
with $M_{0} \equiv 1$~GeV.
We have
$\Gamma_{\mu \nu}^{(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D})}(p_{3},p_{4}) g^{\mu \nu} = 0$.
Here we can assume the form factor for the off-shell $\chi_{c2}$ meson.
In our calculation we put $F^{(\chi_{c2})}(p_{34}^{2}) = 1$.
The decay width of $\chi_{c2} \to D^{+} D^{-}$ is given by
%
\begin{eqnarray}
\Gamma(\chi_{c2} \to D^{+} D^{-}) =
\frac{M_{\chi_{c2}}}{480 \pi}\,
|g_{\chi_{c2} D\bar{D}}|^{2}
\left( \frac{M_{\chi_{c2}}}{M_{0}} \right)^{2}
\left( 1-\frac{4 m_{D}^{2}}{M_{\chi_{c2}}^{2}} \right)^{5/2}\,.
\label{3.6}
\end{eqnarray}
%
We take $m_{D} = m_{D^{+}}$.
The $\chi_{c2}(3930)$ has isospin $I = 0$.
Assuming isospin invariance in the decay, we get
%
\begin{equation}
\Gamma(\chi_{c2} \to D^{+} D^{-}) =
\Gamma(\chi_{c2} \to D^{0} \bar{D}^{0}) =
\frac{1}{2}\Gamma(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}) \,.
\label{3.7}
\end{equation}
%
We noted that the most significant partial widths for
$\chi_{c2}(2P)$ are $\Gamma(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D})$
and $\Gamma(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}^{*})$.
Different calculations in the literature
support the fact that
the total width of $\chi_{c2}(2P)$
is largely saturated by the $D \bar{D}$ mode.
For instance,
in Eq.~(24) and Fig.~24 of \cite{Wilson:2023anv} one can find
$\Gamma(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}) \approx 26 (12)$~MeV and
$\Gamma(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}^{*}) \approx 22 (14)$~MeV.
In Table~I of \cite{Gui:2018rvv}
one can find
$\Gamma(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}) = 24$~MeV and
$\Gamma(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}^{*}) = 13.6-16.6$~MeV (depending on model).
In Table~IV of \cite{Wang:2022dfd},
the following values corresponding to $M_{\chi_{c2}(2P)} = 3930$~MeV are stated
$\Gamma(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}) = 20.4$~MeV and
$\Gamma(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}^{*}) = 6.9$~MeV.
On the other hand, the authors of \cite{Ortega:2017qmg}
found a different decomposition of partial widths.
Thus, for the estimate, we take
$\Gamma(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}) = 14 - 26$~MeV,
and using
(\ref{3.3}),
(\ref{3.6}), and (\ref{3.7})
we obtain
$|g_{\chi_{c2} D\bar{D}}| = 8.34 - 11.37$.
With $\Gamma_{\chi_{c2}} = 35.2$~MeV (\ref{Gamma_gamgam})
we get the branching fraction in the range
$B(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}) = 0.40 - 0.74$.
%=============================================
\subsection{Resonant production: $\gamma^* \gamma^* \to \chi_{c0} \to D \bar D$}\label{sec:Formalism_chic0}
%=============================================
Here we write formulas for the production of the scalar
$\chi_{c0}(2P)$ state assumed by us to have the mass of $\chi_{c0}(3860)$.
The total decay width of the $\chi_{c0}(3860)$ resonance
and its mass given in the PDG~\cite{ParticleDataGroup:2024cfk} is:
%
\begin{eqnarray}
M_{\chi_{c0}} &=& 3862^{+50}_{-35}~{\rm MeV}\,, \nonumber \\
\Gamma_{\chi_{c0}} &=& 200^{+180}_{-110}~{\rm MeV}\,.
\label{4.0_pdg}
\end{eqnarray}
%
In the calculations, we also consider another scenario:
%
\begin{eqnarray}
M_{\chi_{c0}} &=& 3862~{\rm MeV}\,, \nonumber \\
\Gamma_{\chi_{c0}} &=& 50~{\rm MeV}\,.
\label{4.0_fit}
\end{eqnarray}
%
%We can take $M_{\chi_{c0}} = 3830$~MeV, which is close to the lower limit of the measurements.
The narrower total width of $\chi_{c0}(3860)$ seems to be consistent
with BaBar data for $D^+D^-$ channel;
see Fig.~\ref{fig:M34_BaBar}(b) below.
Similar values are given in Table~VI of \cite{Eichten:2004uh}
(see $2^{3}P_{0}$ state),
in Table~III of \cite{Gui:2018rvv},
and in Sec.~III~A and Table~II of \cite{Wang:2022dfd}.
The amplitude for the $\gamma^*(q_1) \gamma^*(q_2) \to \chi_{c0} \to D(p_3) \bar{D}(p_4) )$
subprocess is given by
%
\begin{eqnarray}
{\cal M}_{\mu \nu}(\gamma^{*} \gamma^{*} \to \chi_{c0} \to D \bar{D})
=
i\Gamma^{(\gamma^* \gamma^* \to \chi_{c0})}_{\mu \nu}(q_{1},q_{2}) \,
i\Delta^{(\chi_{c0})}(p_{34})\,
i\Gamma^{(\chi_{c0} \to D \bar{D})}(p_{3},p_{4})\,.
\label{4.1}
\end{eqnarray}
%
The scalar-meson propagator is parametrized as
%
\begin{eqnarray}
i\Delta^{(\chi_{c0})}(p_{34})=
\frac{i}{p_{34}^{2}-M_{\chi_{c0}}^2+i M_{\chi_{c0}} \Gamma_{\chi_{c0}}}
\label{4.1a}
\end{eqnarray}
%
with a constant decay width.
The $\gamma^* \gamma^* \to \chi_{c0}$ vertex,
limiting only to the transverse component,
can be written as
%
\begin{equation}
\Gamma_{\mu \nu}^{(\gamma^* \gamma^* \to \chi_{c0})}(q_{1},q_{2}) =
-e^2
%\delta^{\perp}_{\mu \nu}(q_1,q_2)
R_{\mu \nu}
F_{TT}(Q_1^2,Q_2^2)\,.
%+e^2
%\epsilon_{\mu}^L(q_1) \epsilon_{\nu}^L(q_2)
%F_{LL}(Q_1^2,Q_2^2) \,.
\label{4.2}
\end{equation}
%
Here, $R_{\mu \nu}$ is defined by (\ref{2.2}) and the form factor $F_{TT}$ is parametrized as
%
\begin{eqnarray}
F_{TT}(Q_1^2,Q_2^2) = F_{TT}(0,0)
\frac{\Lambda^2}{Q_1^2 + Q_2^2 + \Lambda^2} \,, \quad \Lambda = M_{\chi_{c0}}\,.
\label{2.3a}
%F_{TT}(Q_1^2,Q_2^2) &=& F_{TT}(0,0)
%\left( \frac{\Lambda^2}{Q_1^2 + Q_2^2 + \Lambda^2} \right)^{2}\,.
%\label{4.3}
\end{eqnarray}
%
Assuming that the state is quarkonium-like one can calculate
$F_{TT}(0,0)$ in the NRQCD limit as
[see (4.11) of \cite{Babiarz:2020jkh}]
%
\begin{equation}
F_{TT}(0,0) = e_f^2 \sqrt{N_c} \frac{12}{\sqrt{\pi}}
\frac{R_{2P}'(0)}{M_{\chi_{c0}}^{3/2}}\,.
\label{4.4}
\end{equation}
%
The two-photon decay width for $\chi_{c0}(2P) \to \gamma \gamma$
is given by
%
\begin{equation}
\Gamma(\chi_{c0}(2P) \to \gamma \gamma) =
\frac{\pi \alpha_{\rm em}^2}{M_{\chi_{c0}}} |F_{TT}(0,0)|^2 \,.
\label{4.5}
\end{equation}
%
In Table~\ref{tab:chic0_2P} we listed our estimates
for $|F_{TT}(0,0)|$ and $\Gamma_{\gamma \gamma}$
for the $\chi_{c0}(2P)$ state.
These values are larger than for $\chi_{c2}(2P)$ given in
Table~\ref{tab:R0_LFWF}.
It is worth noting that the BLFQ approach \cite{Li:2021ejv}
for the two-photon width of $\chi_{c0}(2P)$
predicts
$\Gamma_{\gamma \gamma} = 0.68(22)$~keV.
%PROBABLY There, a larger mass of $M_{\chi_{c0}} \sim 3.9$~GeV was used.
%==========================================================
\begin{table}[h!]
\caption{Results for $\chi_{c0}(2P)$ state with $M_{\chi_{c0}} = 3862$~MeV
obtained from the light front quark model for different potential models in NRQCD limit.}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{l |c |c |c }
\hline
\hline
Potential type &
$|R'_{2P}(0)|\, (\rm GeV^{5/2})$ &
$|F_{TT}(0,0)| \, (\rm GeV)$ &
$\Gamma_{\gamma \gamma} \,(\rm keV)$ \\
\hline
Cornell & 0.405 & 0.278 & 3.351 \\
Buchm\"uller-Tye & 0.326 & 0.224 & 2.171 \\
harmonic oscillator & 0.275 & 0.189 & 1.545 \\
logarithmic & 0.263 & 0.181 & 1.413 \\
power like & 0.228 & 0.157 & 1.062 \\
%% results for $M_{\chi_{c0}} = 3830$~MeV
% Cornell & 0.405 & 0.282 & 3.464 \\
% Buchm\"uller-Tye & 0.326 & 0.227 & 2.244 \\
% harmonic oscillator & 0.275 & 0.192 & 1.597 \\
% logarithmic & 0.263 & 0.183 & 1.461 \\
% power like & 0.228 & 0.159 & 1.098 \\
\hline
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:chic0_2P}
\end{table}
%==========================================================
For the $\chi_{c0} D \bar{D}$ vertex we have ($M_{0} \equiv 1$~GeV)
%%%%%
\begin{eqnarray}
i\Gamma^{(\chi_{c0} \to D \bar{D})}(p_{3},p_{4})=
i g_{\chi_{c0} D\bar{D}} M_{0} \,
F^{(\chi_{c0})}(p_{34}^{2})\,,
\label{4.6}
\end{eqnarray}
%%%%
where the coupling constant $g_{\chi_{c0} D\bar{D}}$ is related to the partial
decay width of the $\chi_{c0}$ meson
%%%%
\begin{eqnarray}
\Gamma{(\chi_{c0} \to D \bar{D})}=
\frac{M_{0}^{2}}{16 \pi M_{\chi_{c0}}} |g_{\chi_{c0} D\bar{D}}|^{2}
\left( 1-\frac{4 m_{D}^{2}}{M_{\chi_{c0}}^{2}} \right)^{1/2}\,.
\label{4.7}
\end{eqnarray}
%
For the isoscalar $\chi_{c0}$ we have
%
\begin{equation}
\Gamma(\chi_{c0} \to D^{+} D^{-}) =
\Gamma(\chi_{c0} \to D^{0} \bar{D}^{0}) =
\frac{1}{2}\Gamma(\chi_{c0} \to D \bar{D}) \,.
\label{4.8}
\end{equation}
%
In (\ref{4.2}) and (\ref{4.6}) we can assume the form factor for off-shell $\chi_{c0}$ meson.
In our calculations we put $F^{(\chi_{c0})}(p_{34}^{2}) = 1$.
In Table~II of \cite{Wang:2022dfd}
one can find
$\Gamma(\chi_{c0} \to D \bar{D}) = 21.0(16.4)$~MeV
for $M_{\chi_{c0}(2P)} = 3836.8(3862.0)$~MeV.
Taking $M_{\chi_{c0}} = 3862$~MeV,
$\Gamma(\chi_{c0} \to D \bar{D}) = 16.4$~MeV,
and using Eqs.~(\ref{4.7}), (\ref{4.8}) we obtain
$|g_{\chi_{c0} D\bar{D}}| = 2.52$.
%--------------------------------------------
\subsection{Continuum production of neutral $D$ mesons: $\gamma^{*} \gamma^{*} \to D^{0} \bar{D}^{0}$}
\label{sec:Formalism_B}
%--------------------------------------------
The $\gamma \gamma \to D^{0} \bar{D}^{0}$ amplitude
with the $D^{*0} \equiv D^{*}(2007)^{0}$
$t/u$-channel exchanges can be expressed as
%
\begin{eqnarray}
{\cal M}_{\mu \nu}(\gamma^{*} \gamma^{*} \to D^0 \bar D^0)
&=&
i\Gamma^{(D^{*0}D^0\gamma)}_{\kappa_{1} \mu}(\hat{p}_{t},q_{1})\,
i\tilde{\Delta}^{(D^{*0})\,\kappa_{1} \kappa_{2}}(s_{34},\hat{p}_{t}^{2})\,
i\Gamma^{(D^{*0}D^0\gamma)}_{\kappa_{2} \nu}(-\hat{p}_{t},q_{2})
%\right.
\nonumber \\
&&
%\left.
+
i\Gamma^{(D^{*0}D^0\gamma)}_{\kappa_{1} \mu}(-\hat{p}_{u},q_{1})\,
i\tilde{\Delta}^{(D^{*0})\,\kappa_{1} \kappa_{2}}(s_{34},\hat{p}_{u}^{2})\,
i\Gamma^{(D^{*0}D^0\gamma)}_{\kappa_{2} \nu}(\hat{p}_{u},q_{2}) .
%\right.
\label{amplitude_D0D0bar_continuum}
\end{eqnarray}
%
where
$\hat{p}_{t} = p_{a} - p_{1} - p_{3}$,
$\hat{p}_{u} = p_{4} - p_{a} + p_{1}$, and
$s_{34} = p_{34}^{2}$.
The $D^{*0}D^{0}\gamma$ vertex, including a form factor,
is taken as:
%
\begin{eqnarray}
i\Gamma_{\mu \nu}^{(D^{*0}D^0\gamma)}(\hat{p},q)
= -i e \frac{g_{D^{*0}D^0\gamma}}{m_{D^{*0}}}\,
\varepsilon_{\mu \nu \rho \sigma} \hat{p}^{\rho} q^{\sigma}
F^{(D^{*0}D^{0}\gamma)}(\hat{p}^{2},q^{2})\,.
\label{DstarDgam_vertex}
\end{eqnarray}
%
We use the factorized form for the $D^{*0}D^{0}\gamma$ form factor
%
\begin{eqnarray}
F^{(D^{*0}D^0\gamma)}(\hat{p}^{2},q^{2}) =
F^{(D^{*0})}(\hat{p}^{2}) F^{(\gamma)}(q^{2})
\label{DstarDgam_ff}
\end{eqnarray}
%
with $F^{(D^{*0}D\gamma)}(m_{D^{*0}}^{2},0) = 1$.
We take
%
\begin{eqnarray}
F^{(D^{*0})}(\hat{p}^{2}) &=& \exp \left( \frac{\hat{p}^{2}-m_{D^{*0}}^{2}}{\Lambda_{D^{*0}}^{2}} \right)\,,
\qquad \Lambda_{D^{*0}} = 3.5\;{\rm GeV}\,,
\label{DstarDgam_ff_exp}
\\
F^{(\gamma)}(q^{2}) &=& \frac{\Lambda_{\gamma}^{2}}{\Lambda_{\gamma}^{2}-q^{2}}\,,
\qquad \Lambda_{\gamma} = 1\;{\rm GeV}\,.
\label{DstarDgam_ff_aux}
\end{eqnarray}
%
Here $\hat{p}^{2} < 0$ and $q^{2} < 0$.
We take $\Lambda_{D^{*0}} = 3.5\;{\rm GeV}$
estimated from a comparison of the model results
to the experimental data (see Fig.~\ref{fig:M34_BaBar}).
The coupling constant $g_{D^{*0}D^0\gamma}$
is related to the decay width of $D^{*0}(2007)^{0} \to D^{0} \gamma$
as follows
%
\begin{eqnarray}
\Gamma(D^{*0} \to D^{0} \gamma) =
\frac{\alpha_{\rm em}}{24}\frac{(m_{D^{*0}}^{2}-m_{D^{0}}^{2})^{3}}{m_{D^{*0}}^{5}}
|g_{D^{*0} D^{0} \gamma}|^{2}\,.
\label{coupling_DstarDgam}
\end{eqnarray}
%
From \cite{ParticleDataGroup:2024cfk} we find
%
\begin{eqnarray}
&&m_{D^{*0}} = 2006.85 \pm 0.05~{\rm MeV}\,, \nonumber \\
&&m_{D^{0}} = 1864.84 \pm 0.05~{\rm MeV}\,, \nonumber \\
&&\Gamma(D^{*0} \to D^{0} \gamma) / \Gamma_{D^{*0}}
= (35.3 \pm 0.9)\%\,, \nonumber \\
&&\Gamma_{D^{*0}} < 2.1~{\rm MeV} \,.
\label{PDG_Ds2007}
\end{eqnarray}
%
There is no accurate experimental result
for the total width of $D^{*}(2007)^{0}$.
However, there are some estimates, see e.g.
%There is no accurate experimental result for the $\Gamma_{D^{*0}}$ width.
%Using the center values for masses $m_{D^{*0}}$, $m_{D^{0}}$,
%and
%$\Gamma_{D^{*0}} = 2.1$~MeV
%the upper limit is
%$|g_{D^{*0} D^{0} \gamma}| = 21.85 \pm 0.28$.
\cite{Jaus:1996np,Rosner:2013sha,Guo:2019qcn,Jia:2024imm}.
With $\Gamma_{D^{*0}} = 55.3$~keV \cite{Guo:2019qcn,Cao:2024nxm}
we get $|g_{D^{*0} D^{0} \gamma}| = 5.97$
and this value is used in our calculations.
The sign of $g_{D^{*0} D^{0} \gamma}$
does not matter as our amplitude is quadratic in the coupling.
%and with $\Gamma_{D^{*0}} = 1$~MeV we have
%$|g_{D^{*0} D^{0} \gamma}| = 15.08 \pm 0.19$}
%Assuming $\Gamma(D^{*0} \to D^{0} \gamma) = 20$~keV we get
%$\Gamma_{D^{*0}} = 0.057$~MeV and $|g_{D^{*0} D^{0} \gamma}| = 3.59$.
We use in (\ref{amplitude_D0D0bar_continuum})
$\tilde{\Delta}^{(D^{*0})\, \kappa_{1} \kappa_{2}}(s_{34},\hat{p}^{2})$
the propagators
for the reggeized vector meson $D^{*0}(2007)^{0}$.
Two scenarios for the vector-meson reggeization effect were considered in \cite{Lebiedowicz:2019jru,Lebiedowicz:2021pzd}.
In the present work, we proceed analogously to (3.20)--(3.22) of \cite{Lebiedowicz:2019jru}.
The $D^{*0}$-meson propagator and the transverse function reads
%
\begin{eqnarray}
&&\tilde{\Delta}^{(D^{*0})\, \kappa_{1} \kappa_{2}}(s_{34},\hat{p}^{2})
= - g^{\kappa_{1} \kappa_{2}} \tilde{\Delta}_{T}^{(D^{*0})}(s_{34},\hat{p}^{2})
\,, \\
&&\tilde{\Delta}_{T}^{(D^{*0})}(s_{34},\hat{p}^{2})=
\Delta_{T}^{(D^{*0})}(\hat{p}^{2})
\left( \exp (i \phi(s_{34}))\,\frac{s_{34}}{s_{\rm thr}}
%\alpha'_{V}
\right)^{\alpha_{D^{*}}(\hat{p}^{2})-1}\,,
\label{reggeization}
\end{eqnarray}
%
where we take the simple expression
$(\Delta_{T}^{(D^{*0})}(\hat{p}^{2}))^{-1} = \hat{p}^{2} - m_{D^{*0}}^{2}$, and
%
\begin{eqnarray}
\phi(s_{34}) =
\frac{\pi}{2}\exp\left(\frac{s_{\rm thr}-s_{34}}{s_{{\rm thr}}}\right)-\frac{\pi}{2}\,, \qquad
s_{\rm thr} = 4 m_{D^{0}}^2\,.
\label{reggeization_aux}
\end{eqnarray}
We use a specific nonlinear Regge trajectory for the $D^{*0}$ mesons,
the so-called ``square-root'' trajectory \cite{Brisudova:1999ut}, viz.
%
\begin{eqnarray}
\alpha_{D^{*}}(\hat{p}^{2}) =
\alpha_{D^{*}}(0) +
\gamma \left( \sqrt{T_{D^{*}}} - \sqrt{T_{D^{*}} - \hat{p}^{2}} \right)\,,
\label{Kstar_trajectory_nonlinear}
\end{eqnarray}
%
where $\gamma$ governs the slope of the trajectory
and $T_{D^{*}}$ denotes the trajectory termination point.
The parameters are fixed to be
$\alpha_{D^{*}}(0) = -1.02$,
$\gamma = 3.65$~GeV$^{-1}$, $\sqrt{T_{D^{*}}} = 3.91$~GeV;
see Table~I of \cite{Brisudova:1999ut}.
%--------------------------------------------
\subsection{Continuum production of charged $D$ mesons: $\gamma^{*} \gamma^{*} \to D^{+} D^{-}$}
\label{sec:Formalism_C}
%--------------------------------------------
The continuum amplitude with the $D^{\pm}$ exchanges
can be written in a similar manner as described in
\cite{Lebiedowicz:2015cea,Klusek-Gawenda:2017lgt}
for the $\gamma \gamma \to H^{+} H^{-}$
and $\gamma \gamma \to p \bar{p}$ collisions, respectively.
The amplitude for the subprocess $\gamma \gamma \to D^{+} D^{-}$ has the form:
%
\begin{eqnarray}
{\cal M}_{\mu \nu}(\gamma^{*} \gamma^{*} \to D^{+} D^{-})
&=& -i e^{2}
\left[
(q_{1} - 2 p_{3})_{\mu}(q_{1} - p_{3} + p_{4})_{\nu} \frac{1}{\hat{p}_{t}^{2} - m_{D}^{2}}
+
(q_{1} - 2 p_{4})_{\mu}(q_{1} + p_{3} - p_{4})_{\nu} \frac{1}{\hat{p}_{u}^{2} - m_{D}^{2}}
-
2 g_{\mu \nu}
\right] \nonumber \\
&& \times
F^{(\gamma)}(q_{1}^{2}) F^{(\gamma)}(q_{2}^{2})
F(\hat{p}_{t}^{2},\hat{p}_{u}^{2},p_{34}^{2})\,.
\label{amplitude_DpDm_continuum}
\end{eqnarray}
%
Here $F^{(\gamma)}(q_{1,2}^{2})$ are given by
(\ref{DstarDgam_ff_aux}) and
the off-shell meson dependences are taken into account via multiplication of the amplitude
by a common form factor
$F(\hat{p}_{t}^{2},\hat{p}_{u}^{2},p_{34}^{2})$
[see (2.12), (2.13) of \cite{Klusek-Gawenda:2017lgt}
but with the replacements $m_{p} \to m_{D^{+}}$ and $\Lambda_{p} \to \Lambda_{D}$].
The parameter $\Lambda_{D}$ should be fitted to the experimental data.
In the present paper, we performed calculations for
$F(\hat{p}_{t}^{2},\hat{p}_{u}^{2},p_{34}^{2}) = 1$.
By a similar way as in Sec.~\ref{sec:Formalism_B},
the $D^{+} D^{-}$-production mechanism via the $D^{*}(2010)^{\pm}$ exchanges
can also be considered.
To estimate the coupling constant
$g_{D^{*}(2010)^{+}D^{+}\gamma}$
we find \cite{ParticleDataGroup:2024cfk}
%
\begin{eqnarray}
&&m_{D^{*}(2010)^{+}} = 2010.26 \pm 0.05~{\rm MeV}\,, \nonumber \\
&&m_{D^{+}} = 1869.66 \pm 0.05~{\rm MeV}\,, \nonumber \\
&&\Gamma(D^{*}(2010)^{+} \to D^{+} \gamma) / \Gamma_{D^{*0}(2010)^{+}}
= (1.6 \pm 0.4)\%\,, \nonumber \\
&&\Gamma_{D^{*}(2010)^{+}} = 83.4 \pm 1.8~{\rm keV} \,.
\label{PDG_Ds2010}
\end{eqnarray}
%
Using (\ref{coupling_DstarDgam})
with (\ref{PDG_Ds2010}) we get
$|g_{D^{*}(2010)^{+}D^{+}\gamma}| = 0.3$.
Thus, the corresponding contribution of the continuum
for
$e^{+} e^{-} \to e^{+} e^{-} D^{+} D^{-}$
via the $D^{*}(2010)^{\pm}$ exchanges
is much smaller than for the $D^{0} \bar{D}^{0}$ case,
and can be safely neglected.
%--------------------------------------------
\section{Results and discussion}
\label{sec:Results}
%--------------------------------------------
The experimental cross section for $\chi_{c2}(3930)$
production determined by the BaBar Collaboration
(Eq.~(17) of \cite{BaBar:2010jfn}) is
\begin{eqnarray}
%
\sigma_{\rm exp}(e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- (\gamma \gamma \to \chi_{c2}(3930) \to D \bar{D}))
= 741 \pm 166 \; {\rm fb}\,.
\label{xs_BaBar}
\end{eqnarray}
%
Here the error is only statistical.
It is not clear whether the BaBar Collaboration imposed the cut on $p_{t}$ of the $D \bar{D}$ pair when presenting the integrated cross section.
The BaBar~\cite{BaBar:2010jfn} and Belle~\cite{Belle:2005rte}
Collaborations
%based on the analysis of $e^{+} e^{-} \to e^{+} e^{-} D \bar{D}$
conclude that
%
\begin{equation}
\Gamma_{\gamma \gamma} \times B(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D})
=
\begin{cases}
0.24 \pm 0.05~{\rm (stat)} \pm 0.04~{\rm (syst)} \, {\rm keV} & {\rm from~BaBar} \,,
\\
0.18 \pm 0.05~{\rm (stat)} \pm 0.03~{\rm (syst)} \, {\rm keV} & {\rm from~Belle} \,,
\end{cases}
\label{Gamma_gamgam}
\end{equation}
%
with the assumption for the Belle result that
$B(\chi_{c2} \to D^{+} D^{-}) = 0.89 \times B(\chi_{c2} \to D^{0} \bar{D}^{0})$.
The PDG average gives
$\Gamma_{\gamma \gamma} \times B(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}) = 0.21 \pm 0.04$~keV \cite{ParticleDataGroup:2024cfk}.
\subsection{$e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- \chi_{c2}(3930)$}
\label{sec:3b}
We made calculations of the cross sections for the $e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- \chi_{c2}(3930)$ reaction for c.m. energy $\sqrt{s} = 10.54$~GeV.
The results are
$\sigma(e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- \chi_{c2}) = 1.577$~pb
using the Cornell potential,
and $1.022$~pb using Buchm\"uller-Tye (BT) potential.
To obtain (\ref{xs_BaBar}),
we find $B(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D})$
corresponding to $\Gamma_{\gamma \gamma}$
from Table~\ref{tab:R0_LFWF} for these two potentials.
We got
%
\begin{equation}
\Gamma_{\gamma \gamma} \times B(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D})
=
\begin{cases}
0.840~{\rm keV} \times 0.47^{+0.10}_{-0.11} = 0.39^{+0.09}_{-0.09}~{\rm keV}
& {\rm for~Cornell} \,,
\\
0.544~{\rm keV} \times 0.73^{+0.16}_{-0.17} = 0.40^{+0.08}_{-0.10}~{\rm keV}
& {\rm for~BT} \,.
\end{cases}
\label{Gamma_gamgam_th}
\end{equation}
%
A comparison of our $2 \to 3$ cross sections
to the BaBar result (\ref{Gamma_gamgam}),
$\Gamma_{\gamma \gamma} \times B(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}) = 0.24 \pm 0.06~{\rm keV}$,
favours rather smaller values for $B(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D})$.
Taking into account the condition
$p_{t, \chi_{c2}} < 0.05$~GeV
we obtain
$\sigma(e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- \chi_{c2}) = 0.625$~pb
(Cornell)
and $0.405$~pb (BT).
These results with comparison to (\ref{Gamma_gamgam})
leads to $B(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}) = 1.19$ and 1.83
for Cornell and BT potential, respectively.
This suggests that the value given in (\ref{xs_BaBar}) does not include cuts.
%It is worth recalling that a similar cross section $\sigma = 0.9$~pb
%was measured for $\eta_c(1S)$ production near $\sqrt{s} = 10.6$~GeV
%by the BaBar Collaboration \cite{BaBar:2010siw}.
%Here the $K {\bar K} \pi$ decay channel was used for the measurement
%with the branching fraction less than 10\%.
%%First we are interested in no tag (semi-inclusive) case.
\subsection{$e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- D \bar{D}$}
\label{sec:3c}
In Table~\ref{tab:2}, we listed the values of the fitted parameter
$|g_{\chi_{c2} D \bar{D}}|$ obtained from comparison to
the combined BaBar cross section (\ref{xs_BaBar}).
For neutral and charged channel we obtain
%
\begin{align}
\sigma(e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- (\chi_{c2}(3930) \to D^{0} \bar{D}^{0}))
&= 390 \pm 87 \;{\rm fb}\,, \nonumber \\
\sigma(e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- (\chi_{c2}(3930) \to D^{+} D^{-}))
&= 351 \pm 79 \;{\rm fb}\,.
\end{align}
%
The requirement of very small transverse momentum
$p_{t, D\bar{D}} < 0.05$~GeV
is motivated by an untagged analysis
of $\gamma \gamma \to D \bar{D}$ production by Belle and BaBar.
Due to the $p_{t, D\bar{D}}$ cut the cross section
is reduced by a factor of 2.54.
In order to describe the BaBar result (\ref{xs_BaBar}),
this causes a larger value for the constant $|g_{\chi_{c2} D \bar{D}}|$
and thus leads to branching fraction $B(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}) \sim 1$.
Then, the theoretical results for the potential models
under consideration are not consistent with the experiment.
%==========================================================
\begin{table}[h!]
\caption{Results for the reaction
$e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- D \bar{D}$ via $\chi_{c2}(3930)$
calculated for $\sqrt{s} = 10.54$~GeV
without and with the limitations on the transverse momenta of the final state particles.
The fitted coupling parameter $|g_{\chi_{c2} D \bar{D}}|$
for the Cornell and Buchm\"uller-Tye (BT) potential is shown.
In the last column the product of the two-photon width
of the $\chi_{c2}(3930)$ state
and the branching fraction to $D \bar{D}$
for each model is given.}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{l |l |r |c |c }
\hline
\hline
&
Potential &
% $\sigma(D^{0} \bar{D}^{0})$ &
% $\sigma(D^{+} D^{-})$ &
$|g_{\chi_{c2} D \bar{D}}|$ &
$B(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D})$&
$\Gamma_{\gamma \gamma} \times B(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D})$ (keV) \\
\hline
no cuts
& Cornell
%& $390 \pm 87$
%& $351 \pm 79$
& $8.1^{+0.9}_{-1.0}$
& $0.38 \pm 0.08$ & $0.32 \pm 0.07$\\
& BT
%&
%&
& $10.1^{+1.1}_{-1.2}$
& $0.58 \pm 0.13$ & \\
\hline
$p_{t1}, p_{t2} < 1$~GeV
& Cornell
%&
%&
& $8.4^{+0.9}_{-1.0}$
& $0.40 \pm 0.09$ & $0.34 \pm 0.08$\\
& BT
%&
%&
& $10.4^{+1.1}_{-1.2}$
& $0.62 \pm 0.14$ &\\
\hline
$p_{t, D\bar{D}} < 0.05$~GeV
& Cornell
%&
%&
& $12.9^{+1.4}_{-1.5}$
& $0.96 \pm 0.21$ & $0.80 \pm 0.18$\\
& BT
%&
%&
& $16.1^{+1.7}_{-1.9}$
& $1.48 \pm 0.33$ & \\
\hline
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:2}
\end{table}
%==========================================================
Now we wish to show some differential distributions
for the $e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- (\chi_{c2}(3930) \to D^0 {\bar D}^0)$ reaction.
Figure~\ref{fig:dsig_dxi} shows the distributions in
$p_{t, D\bar{D}}$ the transverse momentum of the $D^0 {\bar D}^0$ pair,
in $\log_{10}(p_{t1}/ 1\,\rm{GeV})$
%($\log_{10}(p_{t2}/ 1~\rm{GeV})$ is identical)
one of the integration variables, and
in $|t_{1}|$ the four-momentum transfer squared.
In the calculation
we used $g_{\chi_{c2} D \bar{D}} = 10.1$
corresponding to the BT potential.
%One can clearly see the numerical convergence of our calculations.
We show results when
we have not imposed any restrictions on kinematic variables
and the results with the condition
$p_{t, D\bar{D}} < 0.05$~GeV.
The distribution in $p_{t, D\bar{D}}$
peaks in the region of low $p_{t, D\bar{D}}$.
The $t$~distributions are strongly peaked
at very small $|t_{1}|$ and $|t_{2}|$.
This is caused by the factors $1/t_{1,2}$ from the photon propagators.
One can clearly see that imposing
the condition on $p_{t, D\bar{D}} < 0.05$~GeV
significantly reduces the cross-section
and limits the momentum transfers to the electrons,
$|t_{1,2}| < 0.01$~GeV$^{2}$.
%-------------------------------------------------------------------
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=0.325\textwidth]{ptsum_chic2_D0D0bar.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.325\textwidth]{beta1_chic2_D0D0bar.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.325\textwidth]{t1_chic2_D0D0bar.eps}
\caption{Distributions in $\log_{10}(p_{t1}/ 1\,\rm{GeV})$,
$|t_{1}|$, and $p_{t, D\bar{D}}$
for the $e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- (\chi_{c2}(3930) \to D^0 {\bar D}^0)$ reaction
for $\sqrt{s} = 10.54$~GeV.
We show the results without and with the cut on $p_{t, {\rm sum}} < 0.05$~GeV.
The calculations were done for the BT potential and with
$g_{\chi_{c2} D \bar{D}} = 10.1$.}
\label{fig:dsig_dxi}
\end{figure}
%------------------------------------------------------------------
We compare our theoretical results
for the $e^{+} e^{-} \to e^{+} e^{-} D \bar{D}$ reaction
calculated for $\sqrt{s} = 10.54$~GeV
with the Belle data from Fig.~2 of \cite{Belle:2005rte}
and
BaBar data from Fig.~5 of \cite{BaBar:2010jfn}.
The $\chi_{c0}(3860)$ and $\chi_{c2}(3930)$
contributions are calculated for the BT potential
with $R'_{2P}(0) = 0.326$~GeV$^{5/2}$
(see Tables~\ref{tab:R0_LFWF} and \ref{tab:chic0_2P})
and with $g_{\chi_{c2} D \bar{D}} = 10.1$
(see Table~\ref{tab:2})
and $g_{\chi_{c0} D \bar{D}} = 2.52$.
In Fig.~\ref{fig:M34_BaBar}(a)-(c)
we show the invariant mass distributions
for the combined $D \bar{D}$ final state
and for the $D^{0} \bar{D}^{0}$ and $D^{+} D^{-}$ channels separately.
We can see that the complete model results,
containing the continuum and resonant contributions,
can reasonably well describe the experimental data.
There is a significant interference effect between
the $\chi_{c0}(3860)$ resonance and continuum terms.
The $D^{0} \bar{D}^{0}$-continuum contribution
increases from the reaction threshold,
reaches a maximum at $M_{D^{0} \bar{D}^{0}} \sim 3.8$~GeV,
and has a large share in the $\chi_{c2}(3930)$ resonance region.
From the results,
it is clearly visible that
the $D^{+} D^{-}$-continuum contribution is small.
Since the form factor
$F(\hat{p}_{t}^{2}, \hat{p}_{u}^{2}, p_{34}^{2})$
is set to 1 in the calculation,
our estimate should be viewed as an upper limit,
especially at large $M_{D^{+} D^{-}}$.
In Fig.~\ref{fig:M34_BaBar}(d) we show the distribution
in $p_{t, D\bar{D}}$
in the region $M_{D \bar{D}} \in (3.91, 3.95)$~GeV.
%-------------------------------------------------------------
\begin{figure}
(a)\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{M34_Belle.eps}
(b)\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{M34_BaBar.eps}
(c)\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{M34.eps}
(d)\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{ptsum.eps}
\caption{
The invariant mass distribution
for the $e^{+} e^{-} \to e^{+} e^{-} D \bar{D}$ reaction
for the neutral and charged channels,
and the combined $D \bar{D}$ final state.
(a)
Comparison of theoretical results
to the Belle data \cite{Belle:2005rte}.
(b)
Comparison of theoretical results
to the BaBar data \cite{BaBar:2010jfn}.
(c)
The differential cross sections $d\sigma/dM_{D \bar{D}}$
for the complete model (continuum, $\chi_{c0}(3860)$, and $\chi_{c2}(3930)$ contributions)
and for the continuum contribution alone.
For the $\chi_{c0}(3860)$ term we take (\ref{4.0_fit}).
The red long-dashed lines correspond to the $D^0 {\bar D}^0$ channel
and the blue dashed lines correspond to the $D^{+}D^{-}$ channel.
The black solid line represents the sum of all contributions for two channels.
In panel (d), we show the differential distributions in transverse momentum
of the $D \bar{D}$ pair.
The calculations were done for $\sqrt{s} = 10.54$~GeV
and with the cut on $M_{D \bar{D}} \in (3.91, 3.95)$~GeV.
The meaning of the lines is the same
as in Fig.~\ref{fig:M34_BaBar}(c).}
\label{fig:M34_BaBar}
\end{figure}
%-------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, in Fig.~\ref{fig:M34_BaBar_200} we present our results
obtained for (\ref{4.0_pdg}) for the $\chi_{c0}(3860)$ resonance.
In this case, we have that the increase in $\Gamma_{\chi_{c0}}$ implies a worse description of low-$M_{D \bar{D}}$ data.
The contributions from the $\chi_{c2}(3930)$ resonance
and $D^{0} \bar{D}^{0}$-continuum are dominant.
The term from $\chi_{c0}(3860)$ is found to be small
but the interference effect between the $\chi_{c0}(3860)$
and the $D^{0} \bar{D}^{0}$ continuum is significant.
%-------------------------------------------------------------
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{M34_BaBar_200.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{M34_200.eps}
\caption{
Comparison of theoretical results to the BaBar data \cite{BaBar:2010jfn}.
The meaning of the lines is as in Fig.~\ref{fig:M34_BaBar},
but for the $\chi_{c0}(3860)$ term
we used the middle values from (\ref{4.0_pdg}).}
\label{fig:M34_BaBar_200}
\end{figure}
%--------------------------------------------------------------
%--------------------------
\section{Conclusions}
\label{sec:Conclusions}
%--------------------------
In the present paper, we have concentrated on the possible
observation of excited $P$-wave charmonia
%($\chi_{c2}(2P)$)
in the $e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- D \bar{D}$ reaction.
One of our goals was to estimate the cross-section of meson-pair continua for
both $D^0 {\bar D}^0$ and $D^+ D^-$ channels separately.
We have considered $t$- and $u$-channel exchanges of the vector
$D^{*,0}$ and $D^{*,\pm}$ mesons. The corresponding coupling constants
for the $D^* D \gamma$ couplings have been obtained from the experimental
radiative partial decay widths of $D^* \to D \gamma$.
For the $D^+ D^-$ channel, we have also considered the continuum mechanism
via the $D^{\pm}$ $t/u$-channel exchanges plus contact term.
Comparing our model results with the experimental data
(Belle \cite{Belle:2005rte}, BaBar \cite{BaBar:2010jfn})
we find a large contribution of the continuum
to the $D^0 {\bar D}^0$ channel and a much smaller one for the $D^+ D^-$ channel
(see Fig.~\ref{fig:M34_BaBar}).
Our analysis suggests that the broad bump at $M_{D \bar D} = 3.8$~GeV observed in the $D^0 {\bar D}^0$ channel, and not observed significantly in $D^+ D^-$, is rather due to the continuum mechanism.
However, a certain contribution of a broad resonance $\chi_{c0}(3860)$
cannot be completely ruled out.
We have shown that taking this resonance
into account
with $\Gamma_{\chi_{c0}} \sim 50$~MeV
improves
the description of the near-threshold data.
We have also estimated the cross section for the $\chi_{c2}(3930)$
production in no tag conditions using $R_{2P}'(0)$
calculated within the light front quark model.
Calculations were performed for different potentials
known from the literature; see Table~\ref{tab:R0_LFWF}.
We have obtained an integrated cross-section
$\sigma(e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- \chi_{c2}(3930)) \sim 1$~pb
using the Buchm\"uller-Tye potential.
From a comparison of our results
for the $e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- (\chi_{c2}(3930) \to D \bar{D})$ reaction
to the BaBar results, we have found
the branching fraction $B(\chi_{c2}(3930) \to D \bar{D}) = 0.58 \pm 0.13$
(Buchm\"uller-Tye potential) and $0.38 \pm 0.08$ (Cornell potential).
We have also obtained
$\Gamma_{\gamma \gamma} \times B(\chi_{c2} \to D \bar{D}) = 0.32 \pm 0.07$~keV
(see Table~\ref{tab:2}).
This is not far from the experimental value (\ref{Gamma_gamgam}).
Our results strongly motivate a more detailed analysis of the $D \bar{D}$ production.
This would require Monte Carlo simulations of
both neutral and charged channels, including experimental acceptances and efficiencies.
Hopefully, this will be possible with future Belle~II high-statistics data.
%-------------------------------------------------------------------------
%--------------------
%\section*{Acknowledgments}
%--------------------
%--------------------
\acknowledgments
%--------------------
%The authors would like to thank ... for useful discussions.
The work of A.S. was partially supported by the Centre for Innovation and
Transfer of Natural Sciences and Engineering Knowledge in Rzesz\'ow (Poland).
%------------------------------------------------------------------
\bibliography{refs}
%------------------------------------------------------------------
\end{document}
%apsrev4-2.bst 2019-01-14 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrev4-1.bst
%Control: key (0)
%Control: author (8) initials jnrlst
%Control: editor formatted (1) identically to author
%Control: production of article title (0) allowed
%Control: page (0) single
%Control: year (1) truncated
%Control: production of eprint (0) enabled
\begin{thebibliography}{45}%
\makeatletter
\providecommand \@ifxundefined [1]{%
\@ifx{#1\undefined}
}%
\providecommand \@ifnum [1]{%
\ifnum #1\expandafter \@firstoftwo
\else \expandafter \@secondoftwo
\fi
}%
\providecommand \@ifx [1]{%
\ifx #1\expandafter \@firstoftwo
\else \expandafter \@secondoftwo
\fi
}%
\providecommand \natexlab [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \enquote [1]{``#1''}%
\providecommand \bibnamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \bibfnamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \citenamefont [1]{#1}%
\providecommand \href@noop [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \href [0]{\begingroup \@sanitize@url \@href}%
\providecommand \@href[1]{\@@startlink{#1}\@@href}%
\providecommand \@@href[1]{\endgroup#1\@@endlink}%
\providecommand \@sanitize@url [0]{\catcode `\\12\catcode `\$12\catcode
`\&12\catcode `\#12\catcode `\^12\catcode `\_12\catcode `\%12\relax}%
\providecommand \@@startlink[1]{}%
\providecommand \@@endlink[0]{}%
\providecommand \url [0]{\begingroup\@sanitize@url \@url }%
\providecommand \@url [1]{\endgroup\@href {#1}{\urlprefix }}%
\providecommand \urlprefix [0]{URL }%
\providecommand \Eprint [0]{\href }%
\providecommand \doibase [0]{https://doi.org/}%
\providecommand \selectlanguage [0]{\@gobble}%
\providecommand \bibinfo [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \bibfield [0]{\@secondoftwo}%
\providecommand \translation [1]{[#1]}%
\providecommand \BibitemOpen [0]{}%
\providecommand \bibitemStop [0]{}%
\providecommand \bibitemNoStop [0]{.\EOS\space}%
\providecommand \EOS [0]{\spacefactor3000\relax}%
\providecommand \BibitemShut [1]{\csname bibitem#1\endcsname}%
\let\auto@bib@innerbib\@empty
%</preamble>
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Navas}\ \emph {et~al.}(2024)\citenamefont {Navas}
\emph {et~al.}}]{ParticleDataGroup:2024cfk}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Navas}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {Particle Data Group}),\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Review of particle physics}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {110}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {030001} (\bibinfo {year} {2024})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Cisek}\ \emph {et~al.}(2022)\citenamefont {Cisek},
\citenamefont {Sch{\"a}fer},\ and\ \citenamefont {Szczurek}}]{Cisek:2022uqx}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Cisek}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Sch{\"a}fer}},\
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Szczurek}},\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Structure and production mechanism of
the enigmatic $X(3872)$ in high-energy hadronic reactions}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-11029-x} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Eur. Phys. J. C}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {82}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {1062} (\bibinfo {year} {2022})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07827} {arXiv:2203.07827 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Babiarz}\ \emph {et~al.}(2023)\citenamefont
{Babiarz}, \citenamefont {Pasechnik}, \citenamefont {Sch{\"a}fer},\ and\
\citenamefont {Szczurek}}]{Babiarz:2023ebe}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.}~\bibnamefont
{Babiarz}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont {Pasechnik}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Sch{\"a}fer}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Szczurek}},\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Probing the structure of $\chi_{c1}(3872)$ with
photon transition form factors}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L071503} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {107}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {L071503} (\bibinfo {year} {2023})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.09175} {arXiv:2303.09175 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Uehara}\ \emph {et~al.}(2006)\citenamefont {Uehara}
\emph {et~al.}}]{Belle:2005rte}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.}~\bibnamefont
{Uehara}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {Belle Collaboration}),\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Observation of a $\chi'_{c2}$
Candidate in $\gamma \gamma \to D \bar{D}$ Production at Belle}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.082003} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {96}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {082003} (\bibinfo {year} {2006})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/0512035} {arXiv:hep-ex/0512035} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Aubert}\ \emph {et~al.}(2010)\citenamefont {Aubert}
\emph {et~al.}}]{BaBar:2010jfn}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.}~\bibnamefont
{Aubert}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {BABAR Collaboration}),\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Observation of the $\chi_{c2}(2P)$
meson in the reaction $\gamma \gamma \to D \bar{D}$ at BABAR}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.092003} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {81}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {092003} (\bibinfo {year} {2010})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1002.0281} {arXiv:1002.0281 [hep-ex]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Guo}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Meissner}(2012)}]{Guo:2012tv}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.-K.}\ \bibnamefont
{Guo}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {U.-G.}\ \bibnamefont
{Meissner}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Where is the
$\chi_{c0}(2P)$?}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.091501}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {86}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {091501} (\bibinfo {year} {2012})},\
\Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/1208.1134} {arXiv:1208.1134 [hep-ph]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Olsen}(2015)}]{Olsen:2014maa}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {S.~L.}\ \bibnamefont
{Olsen}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Is the $X$(3915) the
$\chi_{c0}(2P)$?}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.057501}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {91}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {057501} (\bibinfo {year} {2015})},\
\Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.6534} {arXiv:1410.6534 [hep-ex]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Lees}\ \emph {et~al.}(2012)\citenamefont {Lees} \emph
{et~al.}}]{BaBar:2012nxg}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~P.}\ \bibnamefont
{Lees}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {BABAR Collaboration}),\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Study of $X(3915) \to J/\psi \omega$
in two-photon collisions}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.072002} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {86}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {072002} (\bibinfo {year} {2012})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.2651} {arXiv:1207.2651 [hep-ex]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Abe}\ \emph {et~al.}(2005)\citenamefont {Abe} \emph
{et~al.}}]{Belle:2004lle}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont
{Abe}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {Belle Collaboration}),\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Observation of a near-threshold
$\omega J/\psi$ mass enhancement in exclusive $B \to K \omega J/\psi$
decays}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.182002} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {94}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {182002} (\bibinfo {year} {2005})},\
\Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/0408126} {arXiv:hep-ex/0408126}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Aubert}\ \emph {et~al.}(2008)\citenamefont {Aubert}
\emph {et~al.}}]{BaBar:2007vxr}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.}~\bibnamefont
{Aubert}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {BaBar Collaboration}),\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Observation of $Y(3940) \to J/\psi
\omega$ in $B \to J/\psi \omega K$ at BABAR}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.082001} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {101}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {082001} (\bibinfo {year} {2008})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/0711.2047} {arXiv:0711.2047 [hep-ex]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Aaij}\ \emph {et~al.}(2020)\citenamefont {Aaij} \emph
{et~al.}}]{LHCb:2020pxc}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont
{Aaij}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {LHCb Collaboration}),\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Amplitude analysis of the $B^+ \to
D^+D^-K^+$ decay}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.112003}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {102}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {112003} (\bibinfo {year} {2020})},\
\Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.00026} {arXiv:2009.00026 [hep-ex]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Chilikin}\ \emph {et~al.}(2017)\citenamefont
{Chilikin} \emph {et~al.}}]{Belle:2017egg}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont
{Chilikin}} \emph {et~al.} (\bibinfo {collaboration} {Belle Collaboration}),\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Observation of an alternative
$\chi_{c0}(2P)$ candidate in $e^+ e^- \to J/\psi D \bar{D}$}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.112003} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {95}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {112003} (\bibinfo {year} {2017})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.01872} {arXiv:1704.01872 [hep-ex]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Zhou}\ \emph {et~al.}(2015)\citenamefont {Zhou},
\citenamefont {Xiao},\ and\ \citenamefont {Zhou}}]{Zhou:2015uva}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Z.-Y.}\ \bibnamefont
{Zhou}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\bibnamefont {Xiao}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.-Q.}\ \bibnamefont {Zhou}},\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Could the $X(3915)$ and the $X(3930)$ Be the Same
Tensor State?}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.022001}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf
{\bibinfo {volume} {115}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {022001} (\bibinfo {year}
{2015})},\ \Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.00879} {arXiv:1501.00879
[hep-ph]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Ortega}\ \emph {et~al.}(2018)\citenamefont {Ortega},
\citenamefont {Segovia}, \citenamefont {Entem},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Fern{\'a}ndez}}]{Ortega:2017qmg}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.~G.}\ \bibnamefont
{Ortega}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {Segovia}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~R.}\ \bibnamefont {Entem}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.}~\bibnamefont {Fern{\'a}ndez}},\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Charmonium resonances in the 3.9
GeV/$c^2$ energy region and the $X(3915)/X(3930)$ puzzle}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.01.005} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Lett. B}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {778}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {1} (\bibinfo {year} {2018})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.02639} {arXiv:1706.02639 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Baru}\ \emph {et~al.}(2017)\citenamefont {Baru},
\citenamefont {Hanhart},\ and\ \citenamefont {Nefediev}}]{Baru:2017fgv}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.}~\bibnamefont
{Baru}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Hanhart}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.~V.}\ \bibnamefont {Nefediev}},\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Can $X(3915)$ be the tensor partner
of the $X(3872)$?}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2017)010}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {JHEP}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {06}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {010}},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.01230} {arXiv:1703.01230 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Chen}\ \emph {et~al.}(2012)\citenamefont {Chen},
\citenamefont {He}, \citenamefont {Liu},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Matsuki}}]{Chen:2012wy}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.-Y.}\ \bibnamefont
{Chen}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.}~\bibnamefont {He}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {X.}~\bibnamefont {Liu}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont {Matsuki}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo
{title} {{Does the enhancement observed in $\gamma\gamma \to D\bar{D}$
contain two $P$-wave higher charmonia?}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2226-4} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Eur. Phys. J. C}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {72}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {2226} (\bibinfo {year} {2012})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3561} {arXiv:1207.3561 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Deineka}\ \emph {et~al.}(2022)\citenamefont
{Deineka}, \citenamefont {Danilkin},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Vanderhaeghen}}]{Deineka:2021aeu}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {O.}~\bibnamefont
{Deineka}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.}~\bibnamefont {Danilkin}},\
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Vanderhaeghen}},\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Dispersive analysis of the $\gamma
\gamma \to D \bar{D}$ data and the confirmation of the $D \bar{D}$ bound
state}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.136982} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Lett. B}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{827}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {136982} (\bibinfo {year} {2022})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.15033} {arXiv:2111.15033 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Wang}\ \emph {et~al.}(2021)\citenamefont {Wang},
\citenamefont {Li}, \citenamefont {Liang},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Oset}}]{Wang:2020elp}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont
{Wang}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {H.-S.}\ \bibnamefont {Li}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.-H.}\ \bibnamefont {Liang}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.}~\bibnamefont {Oset}},\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Analysis of the $\gamma \gamma \to D \bar{D}$
reaction and the $D \bar{D}$ bound state}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.054008} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {103}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {054008} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.15431} {arXiv:2010.15431 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Ji}\ \emph {et~al.}(2023)\citenamefont {Ji},
\citenamefont {Dong}, \citenamefont {Albaladejo}, \citenamefont {Du},
\citenamefont {Guo}, \citenamefont {Nieves},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Zou}}]{Ji:2022vdj}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {T.}~\bibnamefont
{Ji}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {X.-K.}\ \bibnamefont {Dong}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Albaladejo}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {M.-L.}\ \bibnamefont {Du}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {F.-K.}\ \bibnamefont {Guo}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{J.}~\bibnamefont {Nieves}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {B.-S.}\
\bibnamefont {Zou}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Understanding
the $0^{++}$ and $2^{++}$ charmonium(-like) states near 3.9~GeV}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2023.02.034} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Sci. Bull.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {68}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{688} (\bibinfo {year} {2023})},\ \Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.00631}
{arXiv:2212.00631 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {{\L}uszczak}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Szczurek}(2011)}]{Luszczak:2011js}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{{\L}uszczak}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Szczurek}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Exclusive $D \bar{D}$
meson pair production in peripheral ultrarelativistic heavy-ion
collisions}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2011.04.050}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Lett. B}\ }\textbf
{\bibinfo {volume} {700}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {116} (\bibinfo {year}
{2011})},\ \Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/1103.4268} {arXiv:1103.4268
[nucl-th]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Sobrinho}\ \emph {et~al.}(2024)\citenamefont
{Sobrinho}, \citenamefont {Abreu}, \citenamefont {Bertulani},\ and\
\citenamefont {Navarra}}]{Sobrinho:2024tre}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.~C.}\ \bibnamefont
{Sobrinho}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.~M.}\ \bibnamefont {Abreu}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.~A.}\ \bibnamefont {Bertulani}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.~S.}\ \bibnamefont {Navarra}},\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Production of meson molecules in
ultraperipheral heavy ion collisons}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034037} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {110}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {034037} (\bibinfo {year} {2024})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02645} {arXiv:2405.02645 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Lebiedowicz}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Szczurek}(2010)}]{Lebiedowicz:2009pj}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Lebiedowicz}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Szczurek}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Exclusive $pp \to pp
\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ reaction: From the threshold to LHC}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.036003} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys.Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {D81}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{036003} (\bibinfo {year} {2010})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.0190} {arXiv:0912.0190 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%\%CITATION = ARXIV:0912.0190;\%\%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Lebiedowicz}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Szczurek}(2018)}]{Lebiedowicz:2018muq}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Lebiedowicz}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Szczurek}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Exclusive and
semiexclusive production of $\mu^+ \mu^-$ pairs with $\Delta$ isobars and
other resonances in the final state and the size of absorption effects}},\
}\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.053007} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {98}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {053007} (\bibinfo {year} {2018})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06069} {arXiv:1807.06069 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Poppe}(1986)}]{Poppe:1986dq}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Poppe}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Exclusive Hadron
Production in Two Photon Reactions}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X8600023X} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Int.J.Mod.Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {A1}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {545} (\bibinfo {year} {1986})}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
%%CITATION = IMPAE,A1,545;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Pascalutsa}\ \emph {et~al.}(2012)\citenamefont
{Pascalutsa}, \citenamefont {Pauk},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Vanderhaeghen}}]{Pascalutsa:2012pr}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.}~\bibnamefont
{Pascalutsa}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {V.}~\bibnamefont {Pauk}},\
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Vanderhaeghen}},\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Light-by-light scattering sum rules
constraining meson transition form factors}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.116001} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {D85}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{116001} (\bibinfo {year} {2012})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.0740} {arXiv:1204.0740 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1204.0740;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Babiarz}\ \emph {et~al.}(2020)\citenamefont
{Babiarz}, \citenamefont {Pasechnik}, \citenamefont {Sch{\"a}fer},\ and\
\citenamefont {Szczurek}}]{Babiarz:2020jkh}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.}~\bibnamefont
{Babiarz}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont {Pasechnik}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Sch{\"a}fer}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Szczurek}},\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Hadroproduction of scalar $P$-wave quarkonia in
the light-front $k_{T}$-factorization approach}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2020)101} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {JHEP}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {06}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{101}},\ \Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.09352} {arXiv:2002.09352
[hep-ph]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Schuler}\ \emph {et~al.}(1998)\citenamefont
{Schuler}, \citenamefont {Berends},\ and\ \citenamefont {van
Gulik}}]{Schuler:1997yw}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.~A.}\ \bibnamefont
{Schuler}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.~A.}\ \bibnamefont
{Berends}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont {van
Gulik}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Meson photon transition
form-factors and resonance cross-sections in $e^+ e^-$ collisions}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00128-X} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Nucl. Phys. B}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {523}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {423} (\bibinfo {year} {1998})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9710462} {arXiv:hep-ph/9710462} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Babiarz}\ \emph {et~al.}(2024)\citenamefont
{Babiarz}, \citenamefont {Pasechnik}, \citenamefont {Sch{\"a}fer},\ and\
\citenamefont {Szczurek}}]{Babiarz:2024sqw}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {I.}~\bibnamefont
{Babiarz}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.}~\bibnamefont {Pasechnik}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Sch{\"a}fer}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont {Szczurek}},\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{$\chi_{c2}$ tensor meson transition form factors
in the light front approach}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2024)159} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {JHEP}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {06}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{159}},\ \Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13910} {arXiv:2402.13910
[hep-ph]} \BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Li}\ \emph {et~al.}(2022)\citenamefont {Li},
\citenamefont {Li},\ and\ \citenamefont {Vary}}]{Li:2021ejv}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Y.}~\bibnamefont
{Li}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Li}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~P.}\ \bibnamefont {Vary}},\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Two-photon transitions of charmonia on the light
front}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.L071901} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{105}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {L071901} (\bibinfo {year} {2022})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.14178} {arXiv:2111.14178 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Eichten}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Quigg}(2019)}]{Eichten:2019hbb}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.~J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Eichten}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont
{Quigg}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Quarkonium wave functions
at the origin: an update}},\ }\href@noop {} {\ (\bibinfo {year} {2019})},\
\Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.11542} {arXiv:1904.11542 [hep-ph]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Ewerz}\ \emph {et~al.}(2014)\citenamefont {Ewerz},
\citenamefont {Maniatis},\ and\ \citenamefont {Nachtmann}}]{Ewerz:2013kda}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont
{Ewerz}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont {Maniatis}},\
and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {O.}~\bibnamefont {Nachtmann}},\
}\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{A Model for Soft High-Energy
Scattering: Tensor Pomeron and Vector Odderon}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2013.12.001} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Annals Phys.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume}
{342}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {31} (\bibinfo {year} {2014})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.3478} {arXiv:1309.3478 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%\%CITATION = ARXIV:1309.3478;\%\%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Wilson}\ \emph {et~al.}(2024)\citenamefont {Wilson},
\citenamefont {Thomas}, \citenamefont {Dudek},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Edwards}}]{Wilson:2023anv}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {D.~J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Wilson}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.~E.}\ \bibnamefont {Thomas}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~J.}\ \bibnamefont {Dudek}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {R.~G.}\ \bibnamefont {Edwards}} (\bibinfo
{collaboration} {Hadron Spectrum}),\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title}
{{Charmonium $\chi_{c0}$ and $\chi_{c2}$ resonances in coupled-channel
scattering from lattice QCD}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.114503} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {109}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {114503} (\bibinfo {year} {2024})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.14071} {arXiv:2309.14071 [hep-lat]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Gui}\ \emph {et~al.}(2018)\citenamefont {Gui},
\citenamefont {Lu}, \citenamefont {L{\"u}}, \citenamefont {Zhong},\ and\
\citenamefont {Zhao}}]{Gui:2018rvv}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.-C.}\ \bibnamefont
{Gui}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.-S.}\ \bibnamefont {Lu}},
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Q.-F.}\ \bibnamefont {L{\"u}}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {X.-H.}\ \bibnamefont {Zhong}},\ and\ \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {Q.}~\bibnamefont {Zhao}},\ }\bibfield {title}
{\bibinfo {title} {{Strong decays of higher charmonium states into open-charm
meson pairs}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.016010}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {98}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {016010} (\bibinfo {year} {2018})},\
\Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.08791} {arXiv:1801.08791 [hep-ph]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Wang}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Wang}(2022)}]{Wang:2022dfd}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {Z.-H.}\ \bibnamefont
{Wang}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {G.-L.}\ \bibnamefont
{Wang}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Two-body strong decays of
the 2P and 3P charmonium states}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.054037} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {106}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {054037} (\bibinfo {year} {2022})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.08236} {arXiv:2204.08236 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Eichten}\ \emph {et~al.}(2004)\citenamefont
{Eichten}, \citenamefont {Lane},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Quigg}}]{Eichten:2004uh}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {E.~J.}\ \bibnamefont
{Eichten}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {K.}~\bibnamefont {Lane}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {C.}~\bibnamefont {Quigg}},\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Charmonium levels near threshold and the narrow
state $X(3872) \to \pi^{+}\pi^{-}J/\psi$}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.094019} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {69}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {094019} (\bibinfo {year} {2004})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0401210} {arXiv:hep-ph/0401210} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Jaus}(1996)}]{Jaus:1996np}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont
{Jaus}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Semileptonic, radiative,
and pionic decays of $B$, $B^*$ and $D$, $D^*$ mesons}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.53.1349} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {53}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {1349} (\bibinfo {year} {1996})},\ \bibinfo {note} {[Erratum:
Phys.Rev.D 54, 5904 (1996)]}\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Rosner}(2013)}]{Rosner:2013sha}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~L.}\ \bibnamefont
{Rosner}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Hadronic and radiative
$D^*$ widths}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.034034}
{\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {88}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {034034} (\bibinfo {year} {2013})},\
\Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.2550} {arXiv:1307.2550 [hep-ph]}
\BibitemShut {NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Guo}(2019)}]{Guo:2019qcn}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.-K.}\ \bibnamefont
{Guo}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Novel Method for Precisely
Measuring the $X(3872)$ Mass}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.202002} {\bibfield {journal}
{\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Lett.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {122}},\
\bibinfo {pages} {202002} (\bibinfo {year} {2019})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.11221} {arXiv:1902.11221 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Jia}\ \emph {et~al.}(2025)\citenamefont {Jia},
\citenamefont {Li}, \citenamefont {Pei}, \citenamefont {Du}, \citenamefont
{Ning},\ and\ \citenamefont {Wang}}]{Jia:2024imm}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{Jia}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {W.}~\bibnamefont {Li}}, \bibinfo
{author} {\bibfnamefont {S.-Y.}\ \bibnamefont {Pei}}, \bibinfo {author}
{\bibfnamefont {X.-Y.}\ \bibnamefont {Du}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{G.-Z.}\ \bibnamefont {Ning}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont
{G.-L.}\ \bibnamefont {Wang}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title}
{{Relativistic effects in the strong and electromagnetic decays of the $D^*$
meson}},\ }\href {https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13974-9} {\bibfield
{journal} {\bibinfo {journal} {Eur. Phys. J. C}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo
{volume} {85}},\ \bibinfo {pages} {282} (\bibinfo {year} {2025})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10775} {arXiv:2412.10775 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Cao}\ \emph {et~al.}(2024)\citenamefont {Cao},
\citenamefont {Du},\ and\ \citenamefont {Guo}}]{Cao:2024nxm}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {X.-H.}\ \bibnamefont
{Cao}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.-L.}\ \bibnamefont {Du}},\ and\
\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {F.-K.}\ \bibnamefont {Guo}},\ }\bibfield
{title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Photoproduction of the $X(3872)$ beyond vector
meson dominance: the open-charm coupled-channel mechanism}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ad6fbc} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {J. Phys. G}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {51}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{105002} (\bibinfo {year} {2024})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16112} {arXiv:2401.16112 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Lebiedowicz}\ \emph {et~al.}(2019)\citenamefont
{Lebiedowicz}, \citenamefont {Nachtmann},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Szczurek}}]{Lebiedowicz:2019jru}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Lebiedowicz}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {O.}~\bibnamefont
{Nachtmann}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Szczurek}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Central exclusive
diffractive production of $K^{+} K^{-} K^{+} K^{-}$ via the intermediate
$\phi \phi$ state in proton-proton collisions}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.094034} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {D99}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{094034} (\bibinfo {year} {2019})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.11490} {arXiv:1901.11490 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1901.11490;%%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Lebiedowicz}(2021)}]{Lebiedowicz:2021pzd}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Lebiedowicz}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Study of the
exclusive reaction $pp \to pp K^{*0} \bar{K}^{*0}$: $f_{2}(1950)$ resonance
versus diffractive continuum}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.054039} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {103}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {054039} (\bibinfo {year} {2021})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.13029} {arXiv:2102.13029 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Brisudov{\'a}}\ \emph {et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont
{Brisudov{\'a}}, \citenamefont {Burakovsky},\ and\ \citenamefont
{Goldman}}]{Brisudova:1999ut}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.~M.}\ \bibnamefont
{Brisudov{\'a}}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {L.}~\bibnamefont
{Burakovsky}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {J.~T.}\ \bibnamefont
{Goldman}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Effective functional
form of Regge trajectories}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.61.054013} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {61}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {054013} (\bibinfo {year} {2000})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9906293} {arXiv:hep-ph/9906293} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {Lebiedowicz}\ and\ \citenamefont
{Szczurek}(2015)}]{Lebiedowicz:2015cea}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Lebiedowicz}}\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Szczurek}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{Exclusive production of
heavy charged Higgs boson pairs in the $p p \to p p H^+ H^-$ reaction at the
LHC and a future circular collider}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.095008} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {91}},\ \bibinfo
{pages} {095008} (\bibinfo {year} {2015})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.03323} {arXiv:1502.03323 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
\bibitem [{\citenamefont {K{\l}usek-Gawenda}\ \emph {et~al.}(2017)\citenamefont
{K{\l}usek-Gawenda}, \citenamefont {Lebiedowicz}, \citenamefont {Nachtmann},\
and\ \citenamefont {Szczurek}}]{Klusek-Gawenda:2017lgt}%
\BibitemOpen
\bibfield {author} {\bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {M.}~\bibnamefont
{K{\l}usek-Gawenda}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {P.}~\bibnamefont
{Lebiedowicz}}, \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {O.}~\bibnamefont
{Nachtmann}},\ and\ \bibinfo {author} {\bibfnamefont {A.}~\bibnamefont
{Szczurek}},\ }\bibfield {title} {\bibinfo {title} {{From the $\gamma \gamma
\to p \bar{p}$ reaction to the production of $p \bar{p}$ pairs in
ultraperipheral ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions at the LHC}},\ }\href
{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.094029} {\bibfield {journal} {\bibinfo
{journal} {Phys. Rev.}\ }\textbf {\bibinfo {volume} {D96}},\ \bibinfo {pages}
{094029} (\bibinfo {year} {2017})},\ \Eprint
{https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.09836} {arXiv:1708.09836 [hep-ph]} \BibitemShut
{NoStop}%
%%CITATION = ARXIV:1708.09836;%%
\end{thebibliography}%