A Dynamical Trap Made of Target-Tracking Chasers
Extracted source text ยท arXiv 2512.22460
%% ****** Start of file apstemplate.tex ****** %
%%
%%
%% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
%% Version 4.1r of REVTeX, August 2010
%%
%%
%% Copyright (c) 2001, 2009, 2010 The American Physical Society.
%%
%% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
%%
%
% This is a template for producing manuscripts for use with REVTEX 4.0
% Copy this file to another name and then work on that file.
% That way, you always have this original template file to use.
%
% Group addresses by affiliation; use superscriptaddress for long
% author lists, or if there are many overlapping affiliations.
% For Phys. Rev. appearance, change preprint to twocolumn.
% Choose pra, prb, prc, prd, pre, prl, prstab, prstper, or rmp for journal
% Add 'draft' option to mark overfull boxes with black boxes
% Add 'showpacs' option to make PACS codes appear
% Add 'showkeys' option to make keywords appear
% It also requires running BibTeX. The commands are as follows:
%
% 1) latex apssamp.tex
% 2) bibtex apssamp
% 3) latex apssamp.tex
% 4) latex apssamp.tex
%
\documentclass[aps,pre,twocolumn,superscriptaddress,showpacs]{revtex4-1}
\usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
\usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
\usepackage{bm}% bold math
\usepackage{epsfig}
\usepackage{color}
%\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,superscriptaddress]{revtex4-1}
%\documentclass[aps,prl,reprint,groupedaddress]{revtex4-1}
% You should use BibTeX and apsrev.bst for references
% Choosing a journal automatically selects the correct APS
% BibTeX style file (bst file), so only uncomment the line
% below if necessary.
\bibliographystyle{apsrev4-1}
\begin{document}
% Use the \preprint command to place your local institutional report
% number in the upper righthand corner of the title page in preprint mode.
% Multiple \preprint commands are allowed.
% Use the 'preprintnumbers' class option to override journal defaults
% to display numbers if necessary
%\preprint{}
%Title of paper
\title{A dynamical trap made of target-tracking chasers}
% repeat the \author .. \affiliation etc. as needed \email,
% \thanks, \homepage, \altaffiliation all apply to the current
% author. Explanatory text should go in the []'s, actual e-mail
% address or url should go in the {}'s for \email and \homepage.
% Please use the appropriate macro foreach each type of information
% \affiliation command applies to all authors since the last
% \affiliation command. The \affiliation command should follow the
% other information
% \affiliation can be followed by \email, \homepage, \thanks as well.
\author{Guo-Jie Jason Gao}
\email{koh.kokketsu@shizuoka.ac.jp, gjjgao@gmail.com}
%\homepage[]{Your web page}
%\thanks{}
%\altaffiliation{}
\affiliation{Department of Mathematical and Systems Engineering,
Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 432-8561, Japan}
\date{\today}
\begin{abstract}
We propose a dynamical trapping system composed of multiple chasers
subject to target-tracking forces utilizing the velocity and position
information of a single escaping target. To successfully capture the
target, dividing chasers into multiple groups while each group
approaching its assigned destination in the proper vicinity of the
target is essential. Moving direction synchronization between the
target and its chasers is crucial to the capturing process, while
guiding chasers to the predicted position of the target in future only
improves the efficiency of capture but is not indispensable. Potential
applications of our trapping system include capturing live animals
such as bears invading a human residential area.
\end{abstract}
% insert suggested PACS numbers in braces on next line
%\pacs{61.43.-j,61.46.-w,81.05.-t}
% insert suggested keywords - APS authors don't need to do this
%\keywords{}
%\maketitle must follow title, authors, abstract, \pacs, and \keywords
\maketitle
% body of paper here - Use proper section commands
% References should be done using the \cite, \ref, and \label commands
\section{Introduction}
\label{introduction}
Wildlife-human conflict increases significantly due to climate change
\cite{abrahms23}. For example, warmed temperature prolongs bears'
active season and therefore they have to look for additional food
resources in humans' residential areas, which ensues greater
human-caused mortality \cite{laufenberg18}. In Japan, a similar
temperature issue has caused the bear crisis in these years
\cite{honda20,nakamoto25}, and human mortality reached a historical
high in the year of 2025 \cite{moej25}. Although there exist long-term
bear forecasting and warning systems \cite{oka04,koike09,nakamoto25}
and quick but risky solutions such as using a hunting rifle, pepper
spray, or bear bell for wildlife management, but an effective and
non-lethal strategy to neutralize imminent danger from individual
bears invading areas inhabited by humans without exposing either
creature getting involved to unpredictable consequence is still
lacking. In this study, we fulfill this need by proposing a dynamical
trap composed of multiple chasers based on a prescribed algorithm that
automatically tracks and confines a bear (target) - a kind of
interaction also commonly found during the early stage when predators
hunt preys in the biological world.
We take reference to the animal collaborative hunting strategies and
patterns \cite{hansen23} and the existing agent-based numerical
target-chaser models
\cite{kamimura10,janosov17,zhang19,bernardi22,souza22,su23}. Then we
add new functions that can be performed easily by artificial machines
but not animals such as maneuvering by accurately monitoring the
relative distance to a target. Specifically, the target escapes if a
chaser approaches too close, while all chasers constantly follows the
target by tracking its position and velocity. We simulate their
interactions using the discrete element method (DEM), where each
individual (target or chaser) is subject to modeled inter-individual
forces and obeys Newton's equation of motion, integrated numerically
as a function of time.
Below we elaborate on the details of the simulated system in section
\ref{method}, followed by quantitative analysis in section
\ref{results_and_discussions}. We conclude our study in section
\ref{conclusions}.
\section{Numerical simulation method}
\label{method}
In the DEM simulation, we place $N$ individuals composed of one target
and $N-1$ chasers on a two-dimensional $x$-$y$ plane with open
boundary conditions. We choose a two-dimensional setup because bears
mostly move on the ground with ignorable altitude variation on a short
time scale. The target, randomly surrounded by static chasers at the
beginning, has a nonzero initial velocity. Each individual (target or
chaser) $i$ with mass $m$ and subject to total force
${{\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}}
\over F} }_i}$ is treated as a sizeless particle and accelerates
by
${{\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}}
\over a} }_i}$, following Newton's translational equation of
motion
%
\begin{equation} \label{newton_law}
m\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}}
\over a} _i =
\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}}
\over F} _i =
\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}}
\over F} _i^{rep} +
\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}}
\over F} _i^{self} +
c\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}}
\over F} _i^{track},
\end{equation}
%
where
$\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}}
\over F} _i^{rep}$,
$\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}}
\over F} _i^{self}$, and
$\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}}
\over F} _i^{track}$ are repulsive force from other interacting
particles, self-regulation force, and tracking force,
respectively. The parameter $c$ is a constant whose value is $0$ for
the target and $1$ for all chasers. We integrate
Eqn. \ref{newton_law} using the velocity Verlet algorithm
\cite{tildesley17}. Below we give details of these constituent forces.
To simulate a group of separate particles, we consider the nonlinear
elastic repulsive force that sets a lower limit to the interparticle
distance \cite{charbonneau17}. The repulsive force on particle $i$
having $n$ interacting neighbors $j$ can be expressed as
%
\begin{equation} \label{interparticle_rep_force}
\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}}
\over F} _i^{rep} = \sum\limits_{j \ne i}^n \epsilon {\left(
{\frac{{{\delta _{ij}}}}{{{d_{ij}}}}} \right)^{3/2}}\Theta ({\delta
_{ij}}){{\hat n}_{ij}},
\end{equation}
%
where $\epsilon$ is the elastic repulsive force amplitude, $d_{ij} =
(d_i+d_j)/2$ is the average interaction diameter of particles $i$ and
$j$, $\delta_{ij} = d_{ij} - r_{ij}$ is the repulsive interaction
overlap, $r_{ij}$ is the center-to-center distance between particles
$i$ and $j$, $\Theta(x)$ is the Heaviside step function, and ${{\hat
n}_{ij}}$ is the unit vector pointing from the center of particle
$j$ to that of particle $i$. Practically, free-roaming animals such as
bears show mild behavioral response to approaching drones
\cite{ditmer15}. Therefore, we use the smooth repulsive force defined
in Eqn. \ref{interparticle_rep_force} to mimic the escaping behavior
of a bear (target), where the target feels an approaching chaser and
runs away from it. Throughout the study, we set $\epsilon^t = 25$ and
$d^t = 0.2$ for the target, and $\epsilon^c = 20$ and $d^c = 0.05$ for
chasers.
The self-regulation force of particle $i$ contains a braking term and
a random term
%
\begin{equation} \label{self_reg_force}
\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}}
\over F} _i^{self} = \mu ({v_0} - {v_i}){{\hat v}_i} + R_{\eta}
{{\hat n}^{(x,y)}},
\end{equation}
where in the braking term $v_0$ is the goal braking velocity, $v_i$ is
its current velocity along its unit vector ${\hat v}_i$, and $\mu$
sets the magnitude of the braking force. If a particle does not chase
or escape from others, it stays still. Therefore we set $v_0=0$ to
model this scenario. In the random term, $R_{\eta}$ is a random number
between [$-R_{\eta}$,$R_{\eta}$] and ${\hat n}^{(x,y)}=\hat x + \hat
y$, where $\hat x$ and $\hat y$ are unit vectors in the $x$ and $y$
directions, respectively. In the study, we set $\mu=10$ and
$R_{\eta}=0.1$.
Lastly, the tracking force of chaser $i$ contains two terms related to
the velocity and position of the target, respectively,
%
\begin{equation} \label{tracking_force}
\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}}
\over F} _i^{track} = \alpha \hat v^t\Theta (l-r_i^{ct}) + \beta
\hat n_i^{ct},
\end{equation}
where the velocity-related term puts a force of magnitude $\alpha$
along the target's velocity unit vector $\hat v^t$ on chaser $i$ so
that it can follow the target if the distance $r_i^{ct}$ between them
is shorter than $l$. The position-related term is defined in
Fig. \ref{fig:algorithm}, where chaser $i$ is subject to a force of
magnitude $\beta$ along a unit vector $\hat n_i^{ct}$ pointing from
chaser $i$ at position ($x_i^c,y_i^c$) to a random target point
($x^t,y^t$) generated in a square domain of size $L$
(Fig. \ref{fig:algorithm}a) or a cross-like domain composed of four
identical sub-domains of size $L_2-L_1$ by $L_3$ , away from the
target by a minimal distance $L_1$ and oriented perpendicularly to one
another (Fig. \ref{fig:algorithm}b), centered on point $T$. Point $T$
is the current position ($x^T,y^T$) of the target or the waypoint
($x^T+v_x^Tdt,y^T+v_y^Tdt$) of the target moving with velocity $v^T$
after time $dt$, the time step for integrating
Eqn. \ref{newton_law}. In the field of biology \cite{hansen23}, the
former and the latter are called the classical pursuit (CP) strategy
and the target direction pursuit (TDP) strategy, respectively. When
using the cross-like domain, we evenly divide the $N-1$ chasers into
four groups from $i$ to $iv$ with each group's $t$'s in the
corresponding sub-domain labeled accordingly, and the distance $L_1$
serves as a control variable. We set $\alpha=1$, $l=0.3$, $\beta=10$,
$L=20d^t$, $L_2=1.125d^t$, and $L_3=0.75d^t$, unless otherwise
specified.
The DEM simulations use the repulsive interaction diameter $d^t$ and
amplitude $\epsilon^t$ of the target and mass $m$ of a particle as the
reference length, energy, and mass scales, respectively. Without loss
of generality, we set $N=256$ in this study to reveal sufficient
details of the system evolution. The conclusions do not change if we
use a minimal value of $N=5$, which allows one target and four
chasers.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=0.40\textwidth]{Fig1_algorithm.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:algorithm} (Color online) Specifications of the
position-related term $\beta \hat n^{ct}$ of the tracking force. A
chaser pursuing the target is subject to a force of magnitude
$\beta$ along the center-to-center direction $\hat n^{ct}$ between
the chaser's current position $c$ (filled green circle) and a random
point $t$ (open red circle) in (a) a square domain of side length
$L$ or (b) a cross-like domain, with the shortest distance $L_1$
away from the target and composed of four identical sub-domains of
size $L_2-L_1$ by $L_3$, centered on $T$ (filled red circle), the
target's current position (CP strategy) or waypoint (after time
$dt$, TDP strategy). The $N-1$ chasers are evenly divided into four
groups from $i$ to $iv$ with their $t$'s in the corresponding
sub-domains labeled accordingly if the cross-like domain is used.}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Results and Discussions}
\label{results_and_discussions}
We first test the target-chaser trapping system using the tracking
force whose TDP position-related term is associated with a square
domain and a single chaser group. Next, we replace the square domain
by a cross-like domain of varied geometry and the chasers are divided
into four groups. Finally, we investigate the effect of the tracking
force by turning off its velocity-related term or using the CP
position-related term.
\subsection{The target pursued by a single chaser group}
\label{single_group_chaser}
To see if an escaping target can be trapped by a single chaser group,
we implemented the TDP position-related tracking force associated with
a square domain defined in Fig. \ref{fig:algorithm}a. The separation
distance $\Delta$ between the target and the center of mass of its
chasers as a function of time $t$ of a representative realization is
shown in Fig. \ref{fig:1division}a. The value of $\Delta$ is close to
zero for a short while at the initial stage, meaning the target is
well surrounded by its chasers. However, after that, $\Delta$
increases rapidly until it reaches a final steady value, where the
target, followed by the chasers behind, escapes. The velocity of the
target is always faster than that of the chaser group until reaching
the final stage, as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:1division}b.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=0.40\textwidth]{Fig2_1division_type2_wo_walls_IC01.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:1division} (Color online) Representative data of a
failed capture. (a) Separation distance $\Delta$ between the target
and the center of mass of a single chaser group as a function of
time $t$. The corresponding configuration of the system when the
value of $t$ is at 1, 2, or 3 (red open circle) is shown in
Fig. \ref{fig:1division_details}. (b) Velocity $v$ of the target
(red) or the center of mass of its chasers (green) as a function of
time $t$. The data are obtained using a single realization.}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
In Fig. \ref{fig:1division_details}, we show the system at its
initial, middle, and final stages of escape, corresponding to time $t$
at 1, 2, and 3 labelled in Fig. \ref{fig:1division}a. The initial
stage (state 1) is unstable and therefore transient. The unstable
initial stage soon moves to the middle stage due to a force imbalance
between the target and chasers (state 2). Built-up force imbalances
speed up the separation process with positive feedback until the
target and the chasers reach a well-separated final stage (state 3),
where the target is always ahead of its chasers, and the whole system
becomes stable again.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth]{Fig3_1division_type2_wo_walls_IC01_details.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:1division_details} (Color online) Representative
configurations of a failed capture, where the system is composed of
one target (red) and a single chaser group (green or blue so that
different configurations are visually discernible), when the value
of time $t$ is at 1, 2, or 3, as labelled in
Fig. \ref{fig:1division}a. All particles are drawn with identical
arbitrary size and their relative positions preserved; added arrows
show each particle's current direction of movement, with length
being proportional to its speed.}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection{The target pursued by four chaser groups}
\label{multi_group_chaser}
Since an escaping target cannot be trapped by a single chaser group,
we then tried the TDP position-related tracking force associated with
a cross-like domain and four chaser groups, defined in
Fig. \ref{fig:algorithm}b. The separation distance $\Delta$ between
the target and the center of mass of its chasers as a function of time
$t$ of a representative realization is shown in
Fig. \ref{fig:4division_bis}a. Unlike the failure of trapping the
target by a single chaser group, the four chaser groups form a stable
energy minimal of the repulsive potential, whose force form is defined
in Eqn. \ref{interparticle_rep_force}, and successfully capture the
target. The velocity of the target is initially faster than that of
the chasers but eventually the chasers catch up, slow down the target,
and arrest it, as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:4division_bis}b.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=0.40\textwidth]{Fig4_4division_bis_limit_0.25_IC03.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:4division_bis} (Color online) Representative data
of a successful capture. (a) Separation distance $\Delta$ between
the target and the center of mass of the four chaser groups as a
function of time $t$. The corresponding configuration of the system
when the value of $t$ is at 1, 2, or 3 (red open circle) is shown in
Fig. \ref{fig:4division_bis_details}. (b) Velocity $v$ of the target
(red) or the center of mass of its chasers (green) as a function of
time $t$. The data are obtained using a single realization.}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
The capture mechanism of the four chaser groups can be explained using
Fig. \ref{fig:4division_bis_details}, which shows the system at its
initial, middle, and final stages of capturing, corresponding to time
$t$ at 1, 2, and 3 labelled in Fig. \ref{fig:4division_bis}a. At the
initial stage of capturing (state 1), the two chaser groups (i and iv)
at the tail of the target-chaser system push not only the target but
also the two other chaser groups (ii and iii) ahead of them. The
position-related tracking force $\beta \hat n_i^{ct}$, defined in
Eqn. \ref{tracking_force}, helps the two leading chaser groups (ii and
iii) pass the target and converge in front of it (state 2). Once the
two leading chaser groups are ahead of the target, they are pushed and
accelerated not only by the two chaser groups behind but also by the
target. The leading chasers close to the equilibrium average positions
rapidly slow down and eventually the capturing process completes,
where the target stably sits in the potential energy minimum formed by
the four chaser groups and cannot escape anymore (state 3).
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth]{Fig5_4division_bis_limit_0.25_IC03_details.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:4division_bis_details} (Color online)
Representative configurations of a successful capture, where the
system is composed of one target (red) and four chaser groups (i:
light green, ii: light blue, iii: green, and iv: blue) when the
value of time $t$ is at 1, 2, or 3, as labelled in
Fig. \ref{fig:4division_bis}a. All particles are drawn in the same
way as in Fig. \ref{fig:1division_details}.}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
After showing that using four chaser groups can successfully capture
an escaping target, we investigate the effect of varying $L_1$, the
shortest distance measured from the cross-like domain to the target
for the position-related tracking force. Using smaller $L_1$ allows
chasers to get closer to the target and on average results in greater
target-chaser repulsive forces, which more likely push the target away
and slow down the capturing process. If the value of $L_1=0.375d^t$ is
reduced by a factor of $0.6$, the time required to capture the target
is increased by a factor of more than four. If the value of $L_1$ is
further reduced by a factor of $0.4$, a successful capture is
impossible. The results are shown in
Fig. \ref{fig:separation_varied_limits}.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=0.40\textwidth]{Fig6_separation_ave_std_varied_limits.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:separation_varied_limits} (Color online)
Separation distance $\Delta$ between the target and the center of
mass of four chaser groups with $L_1=0.375d^t$ (purple), $0.225d^t$
(green), or $0.150d^t$ (orange) as a function of time $t$. Each mean
and its error bar are obtained using 10 realizations.}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
To learn the importance of the velocity-related term and the
position-related term in the tracking force, we change the value of
$\alpha$ and the type of position $T$, respectively. The results are
shown in Fig. \ref{fig:separation_varied_types}. Switching off the
velocity-related term in the tracking force by changing the value of
$\alpha$ from $1$ to $0$ makes a successful capture impossible, even
though the position of $T$ is maintained as TDP, which allows chasers
to predict where the target will be at the next moment. Additionally,
switching the type of position $T$ from TDP to CP strategy while
keeping the velocity-related term in the tracking force only slows
down the capturing process. Overall, the velocity-related term in the
tracking force plays a crucial role in the capturing process because
it allows chasers to follow the target closely by monitoring its
moving directions. Besides, guiding chasers to the target's future
position by using the TDP position-related term in the tracking force
improves the efficiency of capture, which is desirable but not
essential.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=0.40\textwidth]{Fig7_separation_ave_std_limit_0.25_varied_types.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:separation_varied_types} (Color online) Separation
distance $\Delta$ between the target and the center of mass of the
four chaser groups with TDP tracking force and $\alpha=1$ (purple),
TDP tracking force and $\alpha=0$ (green), or CP tracking force and
$\alpha=1$ (orange) as a function of time $t$. Each mean and its
error bar are obtained using 10 realizations.}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\vspace{6 mm}
\section{Conclusions}
\label{conclusions}
In this study, we propose a dynamical trap made of chasers subject to
target-tracking forces using the velocity and position information of
the target. The velocity-related tracking force allows a chaser to
synchronize its moving direction with the target's while the
position-related tracking force guides a chaser to the vicinity of the
target. We show that the strategy of dividing the chasers into four
groups and assigning each group to a designated domain close but not
immediately next to the target allows successful and inescapable
capture. On the other hand, using a single chaser group creates
unbalanced forces between the target and its chasers and therefore the
capturing process becomes unstable and fails. Furthermore, we also
show that the velocity-related tracking force is crucial to the
dynamical trap, while the position-related tracking force able to
guide chasers to the future instead of the current position of the
target only improves the efficiency of the capturing process.
Potential applications of our study include capturing wild animals
such as hungry bears entering areas inhabited by humans using unmanned
aerial vehicle (UAV) like drones \cite{souza22,sarmento25}. Multiple
chaser drones can be controlled by a commanding one that monitors
their positions and velocities using reconstructed three-dimensional
images, a technique for studying the group behavior of birds
\cite{ballerini08}. Besides, a target animal can be tracked using
drone-mounted thermal infrared cameras \cite{burke19}. To realize
these applications, it is essential to study how a bear responses to
multiple approaching chasers and if there exists an uncatchable
situation even though in principle the trapping system is unbreakable,
which will be the future direction of our work.
% Put \label in argument of \section for cross-referencing
%\section{\label{}}
%\subsection{}
%\subsubsection{}
% If in two-column mode, this environment will change to single-column
% format so that long equations can be displayed. Use
% sparingly.
%\begin{widetext}
% put long equation here
%\end{widetext}
% figures should be put into the text as floats.
% Use the graphics or graphicx packages (distributed with LaTeX2e)
% and the \includegraphics macro defined in those packages.
% See the LaTeX Graphics Companion by Michel Goosens, Sebastian Rahtz,
% and Frank Mittelbach for instance.
%
% Here is an example of the general form of a figure:
% Fill in the caption in the braces of the \caption{} command. Put the label
% that you will use with \ref{} command in the braces of the \label{} command.
% Use the figure* environment if the figure should span across the
% entire page. There is no need to do explicit centering.
% \begin{figure}
% \includegraphics{}%
% \caption{\label{}}
% \end{figure}
% Surround figure environment with turnpage environment for landscape
% figure
% \begin{turnpage}
% \begin{figure}
% \includegraphics{}%
% \caption{\label{}}
% \end{figure}
% \end{turnpage}
% tables should appear as floats within the text
%
% Here is an example of the general form of a table:
% Fill in the caption in the braces of the \caption{} command. Put the label
% that you will use with \ref{} command in the braces of the \label{} command.
% Insert the column specifiers (l, r, c, d, etc.) in the empty braces of the
% \begin{tabular}{} command.
% The ruledtabular environment adds doubled rules to table and sets a
% reasonable default table settings.
% Use the table* environment to get a full-width table in two-column
% Add \usepackage{longtable} and the longtable (or longtable*}
% environment for nicely formatted long tables. Or use the the [H]
% placement option to break a long table (with less control than
% in longtable).
% \begin{table}%[H] add [H] placement to break table across pages
% \caption{\label{}}
% \begin{ruledtabular}
% \begin{tabular}{}
% Lines of table here ending with \\
% \end{tabular}
% \end{ruledtabular}
% \end{table}
% Surround table environment with turnpage environment for landscape
% table
% \begin{turnpage}
% \begin{table}
% \caption{\label{}}
% \begin{ruledtabular}
% \begin{tabular}{}
% \end{tabular}
% \end{ruledtabular}
% \end{table}
% \end{turnpage}
% Specify following sections are appendices. Use \appendix* if there
% only one appendix.
%\appendix
%\section{}
% If you have acknowledgments, this puts in the proper section head.
\section{acknowledgments}
GJG thanks Shizuoka University for supporting this work.
% Create the reference section using BibTeX:
\bibliography{paper_dynamical_trap}
\end{document}
%
% ****** End of file apstemplate.tex ******