Probing Memory-Burdened Primordial Black Holes with High-Energy Neutrinos

In this work we consider neutral non-rotating PBHs and use natural units, $\hbar=c=k_{B}=1$. Under these assumptions, the instantaneous mass $M$ is the only BH parameter governing the temperature and mass evolution of Hawking radiating BHs. The Hawking temperature is [39]

where $G$ is Newton’s gravitational constant. The inverse mass scaling implies that lighter PBHs are hotter and therefore radiate higher-energy particles.

In the standard semiclassical picture, the instantaneous emission rate for a particle species $j$ is given by [53]

where $g_{j}$ is the number of internal degrees of freedom for species $j$, and $\Gamma_{j}(E,M)$ denotes the greybody factor after summing over angular-momentum modes. The $-$ ($+$) sign applies for bosons (fermions).

As the PBH emits Hawking radiation, the emitted particles carry energy away from the BH, causing its mass to decrease with time. In the semiclassical picture, the rate of this mass loss is expressed as [48]

where

Here, $\mathcal{G}\simeq 3.8$ is an effective BH greybody coefficient due to near-horizon propagation dynamics and $g_{H}(T_{\rm BH})$ is the spin-weighted number of degrees of freedom at temperature $T_{\rm BH}$. For the mass ranges of the PBHs considered in this work, we approximate $g_{H}(T_{\rm BH})$ by the constant high-temperature Standard Model (SM) value $g_{H}\simeq 102.6$. For an initial PBH mass $M_{i}$, integrating Eq (4) yields

The corresponding lifetime of the PBH is then

where $t_{0}\simeq 4.3\times 10^{17}\,{\rm s}$ is approximately the age of the Universe. Thus, Eq.(7) shows the survival threshold, where PBHs with $M_{i}\lesssim 10^{15}\,\mathrm{g}$ have fully evaporated before the present epoch.

The memory-burden framework describes a possible modification of BH evaporation in which the information carried by the PBH is stored in internal degrees of freedom known as memory modes. As the PBH loses mass, maintaining the stored information becomes increasingly energetically costly. This growing memory burden backreacts on the evaporation process, suppressing the emission rate of the PBH and slowing down the subsequent evolution.

We implement this framework phenomenologically as a two-stage modification of the standard Hawking evaporation process, following Refs. [37, 24]. During the initial phase, the BH evolves according to the standard Hawking evaporation framework. The subsequent memory-burdened phase, in which evaporation is suppressed, begins once the mass of the PBH decreases to a fraction of its initial value,

Throughout the analysis we adopt $q=1/2$, following previous studies and motivated by the expectation that the backreaction due to memory burden becomes relevant no later than when the PBH has lost half of its initial mass. The corresponding onset time for the memory-burdened phase follows from the standard mass evolution

where $\tau_{\rm PBH}$ is the lifetime of the PBH. Once the PBH has lost half of its initial mass, the memory-burden effect becomes significant and the instantaneous emission rate is suppressed by a negative power of the BH entropy $S(M)=4\pi GM^{2}$ such that

Here, $k>0$ is a parameter that controls the strength of the backreaction due to the memory-burden effect. The limit $k=0$ recovers standard Hawking evaporation, while larger values lead to stronger suppression that may radically increase the lifetime of the PBH. Consequently, the mass-loss rate of the PBH is suppressed by the same BH entropy factor

Integrating Eq. (11) then gives

where $\lambda_{\rm mb}^{(k)}$ is the inverse timescale of the memory-burdened phase given by

The total lifetime of a memory-burdened PBH is therefore

The prescription used here corresponds to an instantaneous transition from the initial phase to the memory-burdened phase at $M=M_{q}$. More general smooth transitions, in which the suppression turns on gradually rather than discontinuously, have also been considered [32, 49, 29]. In these treatments, the PBH can spend a finite period in an intermediate regime between the standard Hawking phase and the fully memory-burdened phase, which can significantly alter its evolution relative to the instanateous transition framework. In this work, we restrict ourselves to the transition prescription defined above.

The neutrino emission spectrum from a PBH can be decomposed into a primary and a secondary component [16],

The primary component corresponds to neutrinos emitted directly through Hawking radiation, while the secondary component arises from the decays of other primary particles and their hadronization products. For the present analysis, the emission spectra are evaluated with BlackHawk v2.3 [11, 12] for neutral and non-rotating BHs, with the secondary neutrino spectra evaluated through HDMSpectra [15] ¹¹1The BlackHawk output obtained with the HDMSpectra option follows a single-particle convention. We therefore apply the rescaling prescription described in Appendix A of Ref. [29].. In the standard BlackHawk setup, neutrinos are treated as massless with six total degrees of freedom, corresponding to Majorana-neutrino convention. The alternative Dirac case, with $g_{\nu}=12$, would introduce additional degrees of freedom and therefore increase the diffuse neutrino flux from the PBHs [47]. This case is however not considered in the present work. Nevertheless, the analysis uses the diffuse all-flavor flux, summed over active neutrino flavors and antineutrinos. The observed diffuse neutrino flux receives contributions from PBHs in the DM halo of our galaxy as well as from extragalactic PBHs. For a monochromatic PBH population, the Galactic flux can be written as [24]

where

is the J-factor averaged over a solid angle $\Delta\Omega$. Here $M_{\rm mb}(t_{0})$ is the present-day PBH mass and $f_{\rm PBH}=\Omega_{\rm PBH}/\Omega_{\rm DM}$ is the present-day PBH abundance. For the DM density profile, we adopt a Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile [51],

where the galactocentric distance along a line of sight is

Here, $s$ is the line of sight distance, $\psi$ is the angular separation from the Galactic centre, and $R_{\odot}$ is the distance between the Sun and the Galactic centre. Following Ref. [25], we adopt $R_{\odot}=8.178\,\mathrm{kpc}$, $r_{s}=25\,\mathrm{kpc}$, and $\rho_{s}=0.23\,\mathrm{GeV\,cm^{-3}}$, corresponding to a local DM density $\rho_{\rm DM}(R_{\odot})=0.4\,\mathrm{GeV\,cm^{-3}}$. For a full-sky average of the J-factor, we have that

The extragalactic contribution is instead obtained by integrating the redshifted neutrino emission from the cosmological PBH population [45],

where $\rho_{\rm DM}\simeq 1.3\times 10^{-6}\,{\rm GeV\,cm^{-3}}$ is the average DM density of the Universe, and

is the Hubble expansion rate. Here, we adopt $H_{0}=67.4\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}}$, $\Omega_{m}=0.315$, $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.685$, and $z_{\rm eq}\simeq 3400$ [7]. The radiation density parameter follows from the matter–radiation equality as $\Omega_{r}=\Omega_{m}/(1+z_{\rm eq})\simeq 9.2\times 10^{-5}$. In the integrand of Eq. (22), the emission spectrum is evaluated at the emitted neutrino energy $E_{\nu}^{\prime}=(1+z)E_{\nu}$, and at the PBH mass $M[t(z)]$, where $t(z)$ is the cosmic time corresponding to redshift $z$. Furthermore, we take $z_{\rm max}=z_{\rm eq}$, corresponding to matter-radiation equality, and have verified that extending the integral beyond equality changes the predicted flux negligibly.

Therefore, the total sky-averaged all-flavor diffuse neutrino flux from PBHs in the Galactic DM halo and the isotropic extragalactic DM distribution is given by

Monochromatic mass functions are commonly used when studying PBHs as they provide a useful reference case. However, well-motivated PBH formation mechanisms do not produce exactly monochromatic populations, but rather yield different types of extended mass functions. For example, PBHs formed from the collapse of large primordial perturbations produces broadened mass distribution via critical collapse [34]. More generally, the shape and width of the peak in the primordial power spectrum also affect the resulting PBH mass function [35]. Extended mass functions can also arise near the QCD phase transition, where the softening of the equation of state modifies the collapse process and enhances PBH formation over a range of masses [50]. It is therefore of interest to consider the phenomenological consequences of an extended mass function.

In this work, we adopt a log-normal mass distribution. This distribution should not be interpreted as an exact prediction of any particular formation scenario. Rather, it is used as a standard benchmark for studying how an extended PBH mass function modifies the phenomenology as compared to the monochromatic case.

To implement these two cases, we describe the PBH population by the initial mass function [34]

where $\rho^{i}_{\rm PBH}(M_{i},t_{i})$ is the comoving mass density in PBHs of initial mass $M_{i}$ at formation time $t_{i}$, and $\rho_{\rm PBH}^{i}$ is the total initial comoving mass density of PBHs. For the monochromatic distribution, we take

where $M_{0}$ is the initial PBH mass. For the log-normal distribution, we take

where $M_{c}$ is the median initial mass and $\sigma$ controls the width of the distribution.

Since these mass functions are specified in terms of initial masses, we keep $M_{i}$ as the integration variable and evolve each initial mass to its present-day value $M_{\rm mb}(t_{0},M_{i},k)$. For sufficiently light initial PBH masses, evaporation alters the contribution of each initial mass interval to the present-day PBH mass density and must therefore be taken into account when defining the present-day population. We denote the range of initial masses that survive until today by $\mathcal{S}_{k}$, defined by $\tau_{\rm PBH}^{(k)}(M_{i})>t_{0}$. Numerically, $\mathcal{S}_{k}$ is further restricted to PBHs whose present-day masses lie within the mass range $10^{-1}\,{\rm g}\leq M_{\rm mb}(t_{0},M_{i},k)\leq 10^{12}\,{\rm g}$. The normalized present-day mass density distribution over initial masses is then

where the factor $M_{\rm mb}(t_{0},M_{i},k)/M_{i}$ accounts for the mass lost between formation and the present epoch. Thus, Eq. (28) gives the normalized present-day PBH mass-density distribution of the surviving PBHs, expressed in terms of their initial masses. The quantity $f_{\rm PBH}{\cal W}(M_{i},k)\mathrm{d}M_{i}$ gives the fraction of the present-day DM density in the form of surviving PBHs that formed with initial masses in the interval $[M_{i},M_{i}+\mathrm{d}M_{i}]$. With this convention, $f_{\rm PBH}=1$ corresponds to the case where the surviving PBH population accounts for all of the DM today.

Because the diffuse neutrino flux scales linearly with the PBH abundance, we have that for a log-normal PBH population,

Here $\mathrm{d}^{2}\Phi_{\nu}^{\rm mono}(E_{\nu})/(\mathrm{d}E_{\nu}\mathrm{d}\Omega)$ denotes the diffuse neutrino flux from a monochromatic PBH population with initial mass $M_{i}$, memory-burden parameter $k$, and unit present-day PBH abundance.

Fig. 1 compares the total sky-averaged all-flavor diffuse neutrino fluxes for illustrative monochromatic and log-normal benchmarks with the same memory burden strength and characteristic initial mass, $M_{0}=M_{c}$. The log-normal spectrum is broader and extends to higher energies because its low-mass tail contains lighter surviving PBHs with larger Hawking temperatures. Consequently, a larger fraction of its flux overlaps with the energy ranges targeted by future radio-neutrino detectors.

We now derive constraints on the present-day abundance of memory-burdened PBHs from three separate IceCube datasets. The HESE [4] and MESE [5] datasets are accounted for using their predicted measurements of the segmented diffuse all-flavor flux, while the IceCube EHE analysis is incorporated using its observed event count [1]. The HESE and MESE segmented flux measurements used in this work are shown in Fig. 1. We derive a separate abundance limit from each analysis and do not statistically combine the three samples.

We derive conservative upper limits on the present-day PBH abundance using a background-agnostic treatment as in Ref. [24]. The published segmented flux measurements and event counts are treated as upper bounds on an additional PBH contribution. Therefore, a flux or event-count prediction contributes only when it exceeds the corresponding observed value. Predictions below the observed value give no penalty, since the remaining flux or events may originate from non-PBH sources that are not modeled explicitly.

For each bin $i$, let $d_{i}$ denote the measured input and let $m_{i}(\boldsymbol{\theta})$ denote the corresponding PBH prediction. The model parameters are $\boldsymbol{\theta}_{\rm mono}=(M_{0},f_{\rm PBH},k)$ for a monochromatic PBH population and $\boldsymbol{\theta}_{\rm LN}=(M_{c},f_{\rm PBH},\sigma,k)$ for a log-normal PBH population. For HESE and MESE, $m_{i}(\boldsymbol{\theta})$ is a binned segmented flux measurement, whereas for EHE it is an expected event count. When deriving an abundance limit at each mass point, $M_{0}$ or $M_{c}$, $k$, and, where applicable, $\sigma$, are held fixed, while $f_{\rm PBH}$ is varied. The PBH abundance is therefore the sole parameter of interest in this analysis. We define the background-agnostic likelihood function as

where $\mathcal{P}$ is the probability distribution for data $d_{i}$ with expected mean $m_{i}(\boldsymbol{\theta})$, and the index $i$ runs over the number of data points. For the HESE and MESE segmented flux measurements, the probability distribution $\mathcal{P}$ is taken to be Gaussian. We thus adopt the test statistic

The PBH prediction in bin $i$ is computed as the logarithmic-bin average

where $\Delta\log_{10}E_{i}=\log_{10}\left(\frac{E_{i}^{\rm max}}{E_{i}^{\rm min}}\right)$. Since the one-sided test statistic only accounts for an additional positive PBH contribution, we use the quoted upper uncertainty $\sigma_{i}^{+}$ in each bin. We further neglect any correlations between the segmented energy bins. The resulting contribution to the test statistic is therefore

For IceCube EHE and for the future event-count analyses, we instead write the predicted number of events in detector $d$ and energy bin $j$ as

where $\mathcal{E}_{d,\alpha}(E_{\nu})$ is the exposure for flavor $\alpha$. Here, we write the PBH diffuse neutrino flux as all-flavor, $\Phi_{\nu}^{\rm all}=\sum_{\alpha}\Phi_{\nu_{\alpha}}$, and assume a $1:1:1$ flavor ratio at Earth, so that $\Phi_{\nu_{\alpha}}=\Phi_{\nu}^{\rm all}/3$. For the IceCube EHE analysis, the published exposure is given as a three-flavor-summed exposure,

Accordingly, when evaluating Eq. (34) with the three-flavor-summed EHE exposure, we use the per-flavor flux $\Phi_{\nu}^{\rm all}/3$. Furthermore, because of the lower-statistics, we take the probability distribution $\mathcal{P}$ to be Poissonian in this case. We apply the same one-sided construction with $m_{i}(\boldsymbol{\theta})=\mu_{\rm EHE}(\boldsymbol{\theta})$, and $d_{i}=n_{\rm obs}=1$, yielding the test statistic

We approximate the distribution of these one-sided test statistics using the asymptotic half-$\chi_{1}^{2}$ result of Ref. [27]. The corresponding critical value for a one-sided $90\%$ confidence limit with one degree of freedom is $\Delta\chi^{2}=1.64$.

Several proposals for future neutrino detectors aim to extend searches into the ultra-high-energy range, namely RNO-G [8], POEMMA [52], Trinity [17], IceCube-Gen2 radio [3], and GRAND200k [10]. Many of these experiments aim to detect secondary radio signals produced by high-energy neutrinos. RNO-G and IceCube-Gen2 radio are designed detect Askaryan radio pulses from neutrino-induced particle cascades in ice. GRAND200k is designed to detect radio emission from air showers initiated by tau leptons produced in Earth-skimming $\nu_{\tau}$ interactions, while POEMMA and Trinity search for Cherenkov light from tau-induced air showers. In this work, we focus on IceCube-Gen2 radio and GRAND200k as representative future radio-based benchmarks for UHE-neutrino searches. Representative projected 90% CL differential all-flavor sensitivities for IceCube-Gen2 radio and GRAND200k are shown for reference in Fig. 1.

For the IceCube-Gen2 radio forecast, we use the radio-only flavor-dependent effective volumes of Ref. [55]. These effective volumes are direction averaged and include attenuation of the neutrino flux in the Earth. Since the radio-only curves include both charged-current and neutral-current interactions, we define the direction-averaged effective area as

where $\alpha=e,\mu,\tau$, $\sigma_{\nu N}^{\rm CC}$ and $\sigma_{\nu N}^{\rm NC}$ are the neutrino-nucleon charged-current and neutral-current cross sections, respectively, and $n_{N}$ is the number density of nucleons in ice. We use the central neutrino-nucleon cross-section parametrization of Ref. [26] and take $n_{N}=\rho_{\rm ice}N_{A}$, with $\rho_{\rm ice}=0.92\,{\rm g\,cm^{-3}}$. The corresponding flavor-dependent IceCube-Gen2 radio exposure is

For GRAND200k, we use the published GRAND10k HotSpot1 exposure in Ref. [10]. We use the aggressive-threshold HotSpot1 exposure and assume that it scales linearly with detector size and live-time. The scaled GRAND200k $\nu_{\tau}$ exposure is then

where $\mathcal{E}_{\rm HS1,\tau}^{1{\rm yr}}(E_{\nu})$ is the one-year GRAND10k HotSpot1 exposure. The factor of $20$ scales the GRAND10k exposure to GRAND200k, while $T_{\rm GRAND}/1\,{\rm yr}$ accounts for the assumed live-time. Since GRAND200k is primarily sensitive to Earth-skimming $\nu_{\tau}$ events, the GRAND200k event count is evaluated using the $\nu_{\tau}$ component of the all-flavor PBH flux.

Future event counts are then evaluated using Eq. (34), with the exposures for both GRAND200k and IceCube-Gen2 radio. Unless otherwise stated, we take $T_{\rm Gen2}=T_{\rm GRAND}=10\,\mathrm{yr}$. To compute the projected limits we follow Ref. [24], and adopt a background-free zero-count scenario. The projected 90% CL upper limit for a detector is then defined by

in accordance with the Feldman-Cousins upper limit for $n_{\rm obs}=0$ with zero background [33].

The analyses above use a frequentist construction to derive upper limits on the present-day PBH abundance from current data and from projected future null observations. These limits determine which PBH populations are disfavored when no PBH-induced neutrino signal has been established.

We next consider a complementary forecast in which a PBH-induced neutrino signal is assumed to be present. The aim is to reconstruct the properties of the PBH population and determine whether the data favor a monochromatic or a log-normal mass function. The total event count alone is generally insufficient because variations in the abundance, mass, memory burden parameter and mass-function width can partially compensate one another. The event spectra in IceCube-Gen2 radio and GRAND200k therefore provide the main information for parameter reconstruction and mass-function discrimination.

Both frequentist and Bayesian methods could in principle be used for upper limits or signal inference. Here, we choose to adopt a Bayesian framework for the simulated-signal analysis because it provides a unified treatment of multidimensional parameter reconstruction and model comparison. Posterior distributions are used to summarize the constraints and degeneracies among the PBH parameters, while Bayesian evidences are used to compare the monochromatic and log-normal hypotheses. Furthermore, in contrast to the frequentist analysis above, the Bayesian credible regions are obtained directly from the posterior distribution and do not require an assumed asymptotic distribution for a test statistic making it suitable for smaller signal data sets.

The simulated event samples are generated from the benchmark parameter points in Table 1. We define separate benchmark parameter points for the monochromatic and log-normal populations so that each mass-function family can be tested both as the data-generating model and as a fitted hypothesis. We consider $k_{\rm true}=2$ and $k_{\rm true}=4$ as benchmark cases of moderate and stronger memory-burden suppression. These choices lead to distinct evaporation histories while allowing surviving PBHs to emit neutrinos in the energy range relevant for IceCube-Gen2 radio and GRAND200k. For the log-normal benchmark points, we set $\sigma_{\rm true}=1$, representing a broad mass distribution that is clearly distinct from the monochromatic case.

For each benchmark point, the mass parameter is selected in a region where the future detectors are sensitive. The PBH abundance is then chosen to give 30 expected events in the combined IceCube-Gen2 radio and GRAND200k exposure, while remaining compatible with the current IceCube limits. We choose this event yield because it provides adequate spectral information for meaningful parameter reconstruction and mass-function discrimination. We emphasize that these benchmarks are not predictions of the event rate expected in the future experiments, but rather show what could be concluded from a signal of this size.

The simulated event samples are generated under a signal-only approximation. The event counts are assumed to arise from the PBH signal alone, with no additional background components. The resulting forecasts therefore describe the ideal information contained in the PBH signal. Further consideration of astrophysical and detector backgrounds would weaken parameter reconstruction and mass-function discrimination. For a benchmark parameter point $\boldsymbol{\theta}_{b}$, the simulated counts are drawn as

and the resulting dataset is denoted by $D=\{n_{dj}\}$.

For the Bayesian model comparison, we generate 50 Poisson realizations of every benchmark and summarize the resulting distribution of Bayes factors. Parameter reconstruction is instead performed once using the expected-count dataset, $n_{dj}=\mu_{dj}(\boldsymbol{\theta}_{\rm b})$, so the corner plots provide a representative fluctuation-free forecast rather than the result of a particular Poisson realization.

For the analysis, we start from Bayes’ theorem [58],

where $P(\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\theta}}\lvert D,\mathcal{M})$ is the posterior probability distribution of the model parameters $\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\theta}}$, $D$ denotes the data, and $\mathcal{M}$ denotes the model under consideration. Furthermore, $Z_{\mathcal{M}}$ is the evidence, $\mathcal{L}(D\lvert\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\theta}},\mathcal{M})$ is the likelihood, and $\pi(\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\theta}}\lvert\mathcal{M})$ is the prior probability distribution.

For the Bayesian likelihood, each detector response is divided into five logarithmically spaced bins over its tabulated energy range. The bins are defined in true neutrino energy, and detector energy-resolution smearing is not included. For a fitted mass-function model $\mathcal{M}$, the likelihood is taken to be Poissonian, with the detector and energy bins treated as statistically independent, giving

For individual-detector forecasts, the product over $d$ contains either IceCube-Gen2 radio or GRAND200k, whereas for the combined forecast, it contains both detectors. Furthermore, the Bayesian evidence for a model $\mathcal{M}$ is given by the marginalized likelihood

Posterior samples and Bayesian evidences are numerically estimated with the nested sampling algorithm UltraNest [56, 18]. All reported estimates satisfy the convergence requirements summarized in Appendix A.

The mass-function discrimination analysis is performed by fitting the same simulated dataset with both the monochromatic and log-normal models, independently of which model generated the dataset. The model preference is quantified by the Bayes factor

or equivalently by its logarithm,

With this convention, $\ln B_{\rm LN,mono}>0$ favors the log-normal model, while $\ln B_{\rm LN,mono}<0$ favors the monochromatic model. We use the Bayes-factor scale of Ref. [42] as a qualitative guide when interpreting the Bayesian model-comparison results. We therefore regard $|\ln B_{\rm LN,mono}|<1$ as inconclusive, $1<|\ln B_{\rm LN,mono}|<3$ as positive evidence, $3<|\ln B_{\rm LN,mono}|<5$ as strong evidence, and $|\ln B_{\rm LN,mono}|>5$ as very strong evidence.

Parameter reconstruction is treated separately from mass-function discrimination. In this case, the mass-function family is assumed to be known, while its parameters are inferred. Therefore, a simulated dataset generated from a monochromatic benchmark parameter point is fitted only with the monochromatic model, while a simulated dataset generated from a log-normal benchmark parameter point is fitted only with the log-normal model. The output is the posterior distribution of the PBH parameters within the assumed mass distribution family.

The priors used for Bayesian model comparison and parameter reconstruction are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. These priors should be understood as tied to the local forecast detector-sensitive mass windows, rather than encapsulating the complete PBH parameter space. For the model comparison, parameters shared by the two hypotheses are assigned identical prior ranges.

We first present the frequentist upper limits on the present-day PBH abundance obtained from the current IceCube datasets, together with the projected upper limits for IceCube-Gen2 radio and GRAND200k assuming 10-years of exposure. The results are shown in Fig. 2 which compares the $90\%$ CL abundance limits for the different datasets.

For all values of $k$, the limits generally weaken toward larger characteristic masses. This is expected because more massive PBHs have lower Hawking temperatures and thus smaller neutrino emission rates, as seen in Eqs. (1) and (2). A larger PBH abundance is therefore required to produce the same neutrino flux. Increasing $k$ shifts the constrained mass range toward lower masses because the stronger suppression of late-time evaporation allows lighter PBHs to survive until the present epoch.

In the case of $k=1$, the strongest constraints are obtained from the current IceCube datasets both for the monochromatic and log-normal results. The HESE sample provides the leading limit over most of the mass range shown, while the MESE and EHE constraints are generally weaker. The projected IceCube-Gen2 radio and GRAND200k upper limits do not improve on the current IceCube limits in this case. This is because the surviving PBHs are relatively massive, so their neutrino emission falls in the energy range covered by the current IceCube data.

The situation changes completely for $k=2$ and $k=4$. The lower surviving PBH masses correspond to higher Hawking temperatures, shifting the emitted neutrino spectrum toward the energy range probed by the radio detectors. As a result, the projected IceCube-Gen2 radio and GRAND200k upper limits are considerably stronger than the current IceCube constraints over the relevant mass range. Among the current IceCube datasets, the HESE and EHE limits are comparable for $k=2$, while the EHE sample gives the strongest current constraint for $k=4$.

Generally, the log-normal results show the same dependence on $k$ and the same change in the constraining power of the datasets. At a fixed characteristic mass, the log-normal distribution generally gives stronger limits than the corresponding monochromatic distribution. It also extends the constraints over a broader range of characteristic masses. For the current IceCube datasets, the strongest upper limit is obtained for $k=1$ near a characteristic mass of $3\times 10^{7}\,{\rm g}$ and are approximately $f_{\rm PBH}\simeq 10^{-9}$ for the monochromatic population and $f_{\rm PBH}\simeq 9\times 10^{-11}$ for the log-normal population with $\sigma=0.5$. By contrast, the strongest projected upper limits occur for $k=2$ near a characteristic mass of $10^{4}\,{\rm g}$ and are approximately $f_{\rm PBH}\simeq 10^{-10}$ for the monochromatic population and $f_{\rm PBH}\simeq 3\times 10^{-12}$ for the log-normal population with $\sigma=0.5$. The difference between the monochromatic and log-normal upper limits is examined more directly in Sec. IV.2.

To quantify the effect of the extended mass function on the abundance limits, we define the ratio

where $d$ runs over the current IceCube datasets and the projected IceCube-Gen2 radio and GRAND200k results. The comparison is performed at equal characteristic mass, $M\equiv M_{0}=M_{c}$, with $k$ and $\sigma$ specified by the corresponding panel and curve, respectively. The numerator and denominator therefore represent the strongest upper limit obtained at each mass for the log-normal and monochromatic mass functions. Values of $\mathcal{R}_{90}<1$ indicate that the log-normal mass function gives a stronger upper limit on $f_{\rm PBH}$ than the corresponding monochromatic mass function. Fig. 3 shows that the log-normal mass function gives stronger limits throughout the mass ranges considered in this work. For $\sigma=0.5$ and $\sigma=1$, the ratio generally decreases with increasing mass, particularly for $k=2$ and $k=4$. Near the upper ends of the displayed mass ranges, $\mathcal{R}_{90}$ reaches values of approximately $10^{-2}$–$10^{-6}$ for $\sigma=0.5$ and $10^{-6}$–$10^{-9}$ for $\sigma=1$, depending on $k$. The corresponding log-normal limits can therefore be stronger than the monochromatic limits by several orders of magnitude. For $k=1$, the ratio has a less monotonic mass dependence but remains below unity for all widths. The strengthening of the limits is caused by the low-mass tail of the log-normal distribution. PBHs in this tail have higher Hawking temperatures and emit neutrinos more efficiently than the PBHs at the median mass. Their contribution can therefore dominate the predicted signal, particularly for broader mass functions.

We next examine whether the simulated event distributions can distinguish between the monochromatic and log-normal mass-function hypotheses. Fig. 4 summarizes the resulting log Bayes factors for the four benchmark signals.

For $k_{\rm true}=2$, the result depends strongly on the underlying mass function. For the monochromatic benchmark, all three median log Bayes factors favor the correct model in sign. The median is approximately $-0.21$ for GRAND200k, $-1.53$ for IceCube-Gen2 radio, and $-1.88$ for the combined dataset. The GRAND200k result remains inconclusive, while the IceCube-Gen2 radio and combined medians provide positive, but not strong, support for the monochromatic hypothesis. The $68\%$ interval for the combined dataset remains negative, whereas those of the individual detectors extend across or are close to equal evidence. For the log-normal benchmark, all three dataset choices favor the correct model. The median is approximately $1.93$ for GRAND200k, $5.36$ for IceCube-Gen2 radio, and $6.60$ for the combined dataset. The GRAND200k data typically provides positive evidence, while the IceCube-Gen2 radio and combined dataset provide very strong evidence in this scenario. The broad and asymmetric $68\%$ intervals, particularly for GRAND200k, show that the strength of the preference varies substantially between Poisson realizations. We also remark that these results significantly depends on the choice of prior. As examined in Appendix C, particularly extending the mass range prior can reduce the combined median to $\ln B_{\rm LN,mono}=1.42^{+0.57}_{-0.49}$, while preserving its positive sign.

For $k_{\rm true}=4$, all three dataset choices give positive median log Bayes factors for both underlying mass functions. For the monochromatic benchmark, the medians are approximately $0.92$ for GRAND200k, $0.63$ for IceCube-Gen2 radio, and $0.32$ for the combined dataset. These values incorrectly favor the log-normal hypothesis in sign, although they remain in the inconclusive-evidence category. For the log-normal benchmark, the corresponding medians are approximately $1.10$, $1.72$, and $1.92$, respectively, correctly favoring the log-normal hypothesis with positive evidence. The underlying mass function is therefore not reliably identified for $k_{\rm true}=4$, indicating a stronger spectral degeneracy between the two hypotheses.

Overall, these results show that the broad log-normal mass distribution can generally be correctly distinguished from the monochromatic distribution, although a conservative estimate from 30 events provides only inconclusive to slightly positive evidence. On the contrary, when the true distribution is taken to be monochromatic the evidence can yield the wrong conclusion. The inherent degeneracy lies in that a monochromatic PBH population with a strong memory burden suppression of $k=4$ closely mimics the signature of the dominant high energy tail signal of an extended mass distribution.

We next examine parameter reconstruction using the combined IceCube-Gen2 radio and GRAND200k expected-count dataset containing 30 signal events. Figs. 5 and 6 show the posterior distributions for the $k_{\rm true}=2$ monochromatic and log-normal benchmarks, respectively.

For the monochromatic benchmark, the mass and memory-burden parameters are reconstructed accurately. The marginalized $68\%$ credible intervals are

consistent with the benchmark values $\log_{10}(M_{0}^{\rm true}/{\rm g})=4.750$ and $k_{\rm true}=2$. The joint posterior shows a mild anticorrelation between $M_{0}$ and $k$, suggesting that variation in each of these parameters is somewhat interchangeable in the event-energy spectrum. Nevertheless, both parameters are reconstructed well.

The log-normal reconstruction is substantially less constraining because the additional width parameter introduces further spectral degeneracies. The marginalized $68\%$ credible intervals are

The marginalized posterior for $k$ is asymmetric, with a broader tail toward larger values. The posterior for $\sigma$ also retains substantial support toward the upper edge of the adopted prior, $\sigma=1.5$, so its upper uncertainty should be interpreted within the adopted prior rather than as a closed upper bound. All three benchmark values nevertheless lie within the corresponding credible regions.

The elongated contours show that an increase in $M_{c}$ can be partially compensated by changes in $k$ and $\sigma$. In particular, the central mass and width are positively correlated, while $M_{c}$ and $k$ are anticorrelated. Consequently, the characteristic mass is determined only to approximately $0.7$ dex, and the width remains comparatively weakly constrained.

In both reconstructions, the marginalized posterior for $\log_{10}f_{\rm PBH}$ remains broad across the adopted local prior. The abundance is therefore not precisely reconstructed once the other model parameters are marginalized over, and its quoted median should not be interpreted as a precise measurement. Overall, the spectral shape constrains $M_{0}$ and $k$ well for a monochromatic population, whereas the additional freedom of the log-normal model produces substantially broader and more correlated parameter constraints.

For comparison, the corresponding posterior reconstructions for $k_{\rm true}=4$ are presented in Appendix B. These reconstructions are considerably weaker than those obtained for $k_{\rm true}=2$. In the monochromatic case, $M_{0}$ and $k$ follow a broad anticorrelated band while in the log-normal case, this mass-$k$ degeneracy is joined by correlations with $\sigma$. At larger $k$, the mass and memory burden parameter have more strongly coupled effects on the PBH evolution. Changes in these parameters can therefore compensate one another and produce similar binned event-energy spectra. The likelihood consequently identifies a broad range of parameter combinations, although the benchmark values remain within the corresponding credible regions.