The solitary star cluster of the Andromeda XXV dwarf spheroidal

2026The solitary star cluster of the Andromeda XXV dwarf spheroidal–C

C. Crociati A. M. N. Ferguson ^†^†thanks: E-mail: ccrociat@ed.ac.uk Affiliation: Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK G. McGill Affiliation: Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK R. Pascale Affiliation: Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK A. Genina Affiliation: INAF - Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, via Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, Italy P. B. Kuzma Affiliation: Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK D. Mackey Affiliation: Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK A. W. McConnachie Affiliation: National Research Council Herzberg Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria BC V9E 2E7, Canada R. Žemaitis Affiliation: Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK Affiliation: Independent Researcher, Charnwood, Canberra, ACT 2615, Australia

Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ

Abstract

We present Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys observations of Gep I, a globular cluster (GC) candidate in the low-mass ( $M_{\star}\sim 6.5\times 10^{5}\,M_{☉}$ ) M31 dwarf spheroidal (dSph) satellite Andromeda XXV (And XXV). We confirm the nature of this object and provide the first detailed characterisation of its resolved stellar populations using a colour-magnitude diagram (CMD) that reaches 2 magnitudes below the horizontal branch. We compare Gep I’s metallicity and distance with those of the surrounding And XXV stellar population, and find them to be strikingly similar, consistent with a physical association between the GC and the dSph. Gep I is very extended ( $R_{h}=24^{+5}_{-4}$ pc) and faint ( $M_{V}=-4.5\pm 0.2$ mag), similar to the star clusters residing in other low-mass dwarf galaxies. It is characterised by a very low metallicity ( $\rm[Fe/H]=-2.4^{+0.3}_{-0.4}\,$ dex) and a red horizontal branch morphology, a combination also seen in suspected accreted GCs in the M31 halo and in the Local Group dwarf irregular galaxy NGC 6822. While Gep I is mostly likely a genuine star cluster, the current data do not exclude the tantalising possibility that it consists of And XXV stars temporarily captured by a dark subhalo orbiting within the dSph’s potential well.

Keywords:

Local Group – star clusters: general – galaxies: dwarf – galaxies: individual: Andromeda XXV

1 Introduction

Globular clusters (GCs) residing in the smallest galaxies are key to understanding how star formation and hierarchical assembly proceed in low-mass systems. While clear correlations between GC system mass and host galaxy macro-properties – such as the dark matter (DM) halo and total stellar mass – are well-established in the high-mass regime, the behaviour of these scaling relations in the dwarf-galaxy regime remains remarkably uncertain (Georgiev et al., 2010; Forbes et al., 2018; Eadie et al., 2022; Berek et al., 2024; Dornan and Harris, 2026, e.g.). Furthermore, both the frequency of GCs in low-mass galaxies, as well as their typical properties, are still poorly constrained. These deficiencies in our understanding mean that theoretical models of the formation and evolution of stellar clusters in dwarf galaxies lack crucial observational constraints (El-Badry et al., 2019; Chen and Gnedin, 2023; Doppel et al., 2023; Gutcke, 2024; Taylor et al., 2025, e.g.).

In addition, observations of GCs in dwarf galaxies can provide important insight into the still-debated nature of DM. In fact, DM-only structure formation simulations in the standard cold DM cosmological framework ( $\Lambda$ CDM) predict DM haloes to have density profiles characterised by steep inner cusps (Navarro et al., 1996). However, observations of local dwarf galaxies favour, in many cases, a constant-density inner core (see, e.g., Moore 1994; Adams et al. 2014; Battaglia and Nipoti 2022). There is growing evidence (e.g., Read et al. 2019; Bouché et al. 2022) that stellar feedback and gas inflow can transform DM cusps into cores, but these processes can be inefficient in very low-mass, gas-depleted dwarfs (e.g., Peñarrubia et al. 2012; Di Cintio et al. 2014; Oñorbe et al. 2015; Orkney et al. 2021). The smallest galaxies are therefore optimal targets for investigating the pristine nature of DM haloes, and the presence of GCs in these systems may provide important clues. For example, several studies argue that the survival, over many Gyrs, of stellar clusters in the central regions of very low-mass dwarfs requires a central DM core (Goerdt et al., 2006; Cole et al., 2012; Amorisco, 2017; Contenta et al., 2018; Webb and Vesperini, 2018; Boldrini et al., 2019, e.g.), with further constraints coming from the GC properties, such as their ellipticity and size (Orkney et al., 2022, e.g.). The more examples we can find of GCs in low-mass galaxies, the tighter these constraints on DM properties can become.

Refer to caption — Figure 1: Stacked GMOS image in the $g$ -band of And XXV. The centre, with its associated uncertainties, and the half-light radius of the galaxy are shown in red, taken from Martin et al. 2016. The HST-ACS/WFC pointing capturing the stellar cluster is shown by the blue polygon. The inset panel shows a $25\times 25\,\rm arcsec^{2}$ thumbnail of the HST-ACS/WFC drc image in the F814W filter centred on the cluster Gep I.

Excluding the Fornax and Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal (dSph) galaxies, which are the only two Local Group dSphs hosting a system of GCs, only four very low-mass¹¹ 1 For comparison, the stellar masses of Fornax and Sagittarius, as listed in Forbes et al. (2018), are $M_{\star}=2.0\times 10^{7}\,M_{☉}$ and $1.3\times 10^{8}\,M_{☉}$ , respectively. ( $M_{\star}\leq 10^{6}\,M_{☉}$ ) dwarf galaxies are known to host a confirmed or candidate GC. Arranged in order of increasing stellar mass, these systems are Ursa Major II, Eridanus II, Andromeda XXV, and Andromeda I (see Forbes et al. 2018; Eadie et al. 2022 and references therein). Except for Eridanus II, for which both kinematic (Zoutendijk et al., 2020) and photometric (Simon et al. 2021; Weisz et al. 2023) investigations have been performed, the lack of deep resolved photometry and/or kinematical data hampers a firm conclusion about the nature of the remaining clusters. Here, we focus on the candidate GC of Andromeda XXV (hereafter And XXV), a low-mass satellite ( $M_{\star}\sim 6.5\times 10^{5}\,M_{☉}$ ; Forbes et al. 2018) of M31 located at a 3D galactocentric radius of $\sim$ 85 kpc (Savino et al., 2022). This object, named Gep I, was discovered by Cusano et al. (2016) using deep Large Binocular Telescope imagery acquired under in modest seeing conditions ( $\sim 0.8-1$ arcsec). Although these data were sufficient to allow an estimation of the structural properties of Gep I from integrated light, only a few red giant branch (RGB) stars were resolved and it was not possible to construct a detailed colour-magnitude diagram (CMD). No other photometric or spectroscopic studies of this cluster candidate have been published since the discovery paper. As a consequence, the nature of Gep I has remained ambiguous until now, with no robust measurements of its stellar populations or its distance. Without such measurements, even the association of Gep I with And XXV is insecure, as the object could simply be a member of the M31 GC halo population seen in projection.

Leveraging observations from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), we aim to investigate the nature of Gep I and put its association with And XXV on firmer footing. This will be carried out by performing a comparative analysis of the properties of Gep I and its surrounding field population using deep sub-horizontal branch (HB) photometry. In Section 2 we describe the observations and data reduction, and in Section 3.2 we analyse and compare the CMDs. Section 4 is dedicated to the discussion of the results, while Section 5 summarises our findings and conclusions.

2 Observations and data reduction

And XXV was observed as part of the HST Treasury Survey of M31 satellite system (GO-15902; PI: D. Weisz). Through deep exposures, this program produced deep photometric catalogues that reach to the old main-sequence turn-off for many M31 satellites (Savino et al., 2022; Savino et al., 2025). In the case of And XXV, only a subset of the dithered observations captured Gep I, and therefore the published catalogue of And XXV does not include stars lying at its location. In this work, we downloaded the four Advanced Camera for Surveys/Wide Field Channel (ACS/WFC) images which contained Gep I from the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST) archive. Specifically, these consisted of two dithered exposures in each of the $F606W$ and $F814W$ filters, with total exposure times of $2020\,$ s and $2460\,$ s, respectively.

Figure 1 shows an archival stacked $g$ -band image of And XXV, obtained with the GMOS-N instrument on the 8 m Gemini North Telescope (program ID: GN-2018B-FT-201; PI: McConnachie). The HST field analysed in this work is shown with the blue polygon, and the position of Gep I is marked by the grey square. For reference, the galaxy centre and half-light radius, as derived by Martin et al. (2016) using data from the Pan-Andromeda Archaeological Survey (PAndAS; McConnachie et al. 2018), are also indicated. The right panel of Fig. 1 presents a zoomed-in view of the cluster in the $F814W$ drc image, corresponding to an area of $25\times 25\,\rm arcsec^{2}$ .

The photometric reduction was carried out via DAOPHOT II (Stetson, 1987). We performed PSF fitting on the single flc images, after the correction for the Pixel Area Map had been applied. We focused only on the chip containing the cluster, i.e. chip 1. A specific PSF model for each image was determined by selecting more than 50 unsaturated, bright and isolated stars across the entire chip, and then applied to flux peaks at $3\sigma$ from the local background by means of DAOPHOT/ALLSTAR. The great majority of cosmic rays were rejected at this stage of the reduction by geometrically matching the first single-frame catalogues with DAOPHOT’s ancillary routines DAOMATCH and DAOMASTER (Stetson, 1993), and retaining only sources detected in both filters. This process also generated the input master star list for ALLFRAME (Stetson, 1994), which provided the photometry used throughout this paper. Instrumental magnitudes were calibrated onto the VEGAMAG system adopting the zero-points and encircled energy corrections provided for the ACS camera²² 2 https://www.stsci.edu/hst/instrumentation/acs.. Instrumental coordinates were reported on the absolute World Coordinate System by cross-matching our final catalogue with the one presented in Savino et al. (2025)³³ 3 The catalogue can be downloaded from the MAST HLSP repository: https://archive.stsci.edu/hlsp/m31-satellites. through the software CataXcorr⁴⁴ 4 Part of the astronomical software package CATAPACK developed by P. Montegriffo at INAF–OAS. The software is publicly available online: http://davide2.bo.astro.it/paolo/Main/CataPack.html..

We culled the photometric catalogue from badly fitted and spurious sources by applying an iterative $3\sigma$ clipping cleaning procedure on the distribution of photometric errors, chi and sharpness parameters as a function of magnitude. A visual inspection of the stars surviving this cleaning process on the stacked drc images confirmed that sources associated with background galaxies and saturation spikes were successfully excluded.

Our analysis focuses largely on a differential analysis of the Gep I stellar populations with those of the surrounding And XXV field. As crowding is not severe in either case, we assume these have similar completeness levels, and the comparative nature of the measurements means that this does not need to be determined in an absolute sense.

Figure 2: 2D density histograms (

N_{\rm stars}/\rm asec^{2}

) representing the observed distribution of stars (upper panel) and the model (lower panel). The spatial bin is equal to

0.5″

both in x and y. The resulting histogram of observed stars has been smoothed using a Gaussian kernel with a dispersion of

1.5″

. Stars’ positions are centred on the cluster centroid determined by Cusano et al. (2016).

3 Results

3.1 Structural properties

The 2D map of stars in a small region centred on Gep I is shown in the upper panel of Figure 2. The map, centred on the cluster’s centroid as determined by Cusano et al. (2016), was constructed using a pixel scale of $0.5″$ and subsequently smoothed with a Gaussian kernel with a dispersion of $1.5″$ . The stars were filtered following the photometric quality cuts described at the end of Section 2. In addition, stars with colours $m_{\rm F606W}-m_{\rm F814W}>1.5$ were excluded from the analysis.

We fitted the spatial distribution of these stars with the flattened Plummer profile (Plummer, 1911). The fitting procedure closely follows the method outlined in Martin et al. (2016, see also ). We considered the area circumscribed by the blue polygon in Fig. 1 as the sky region, a linear gradient to model the background, and uniform priors. In this way, we determined the cluster’s central coordinates, half-light radius ( $R_{h}$ ), ellipticity ( $e$ ), and position angle ( $\phi$ ). In addition, we report the number of stars in the HST catalogue associated with the cluster ( $N_{\star}$ ). We employed emcee (Foreman-Mackey et al., 2013) to sample the posterior distribution of the model parameters. Further details on the likelihood function and the sampling procedure are provided in Appendix A, together with the corner plot illustrating the marginalised one- and two-dimensional posterior distributions. The lower panel of Figure 2 illustrates the best-fit model, while Table 1 lists the 50th percentiles of the marginalised probability distribution functions of the model parameters, together with the 16th and 84th percentiles.

The structural properties of Gep I obtained from our resolved star analysis are in good agreement with those reported in Cusano et al. (2016), although these authors did not provide uncertainties and characterised the cluster using only integrated-light photometry. Our $R_{h}$ estimate for the cluster is $0.7″$ larger, while we find an offset with respect to their centroid of the order of $1.7″$ and $0.6″$ in right ascension and declination, respectively. In addition, from our fit, we recovered only an upper limit on the ellipticity and large uncertainties in the position angle (see Table 1), consistent with the largely circular appearance of the cluster core in Figure 2. While there are some low-level hints of irregularity in the outer regions of Gep I, deeper photometric observations are required to quantify this.

Parameter	Value
$\alpha$ (deg)	$7.54361^{+0.00017}_{-0.00017}$
$\delta$ (deg)	$46.85139^{+0.00017}_{-0.00020}$
$R_{h}$ (asec)	$6.7^{+1.3}_{-1.0}$
$R_{h}$ (parsec)	$24^{+5}_{-4}$
$e$	$0.17^{+0.14}_{-0.11}$
$\phi$ (deg)	$60^{+60}_{-30}$
$N_{\star}$	$102\pm 16$

Table 1: Derived structural properties for Gep I by means of resolved HST-ACS/WFC photometry. The linear size is computed by assuming the distance to And XXV that is measured in Savino et al. (2022).

3.2 Colour-magnitude diagram analysis

Figure 3 presents the CMDs of stars from the culled photometric catalogue. The left panel displays stars located beyond $3R_{h}$ from the cluster centroid, as determined in Sec. 3.1, while the central panel shows stars within $2R_{h}$ . This radius was chosen to maximise the number of stars likely associated with the cluster while maintaining a high probability of membership to Gep I ( $p>0.75$ ), as determined by the fitting procedure described above. We consider these stars to be representative of the stellar cluster. As shown in Fig. 3, stars within $2R_{h}$ (red points) trace a tight, well-defined RGB and a populous red HB. We provide the comparison between the CMD of stars within only $1R_{h}$ and those outside $3R_{h}$ in Appendix B. The right panel of Figure 3 illustrates the CMD of a control field just outside $3R_{h}$ . The small number of field stars with magnitudes equal to or brighter than the HB ensures that background contamination is unlikely to affect the following analysis.

These CMDs represent a considerable improvement over the photometry presented in Cusano et al. (2016), enabling, for the first time, a detailed comparison between the stellar population of the candidate cluster and that of the surrounding dwarf galaxy. To this aim, we followed McGill et al. (2025) by measuring a series of CMD indices – namely, the magnitude of the HB ( $V_{\rm HB}$ ), the corresponding RGB colour at the level of the HB ( $C_{\rm RGB}$ ), and the slope of the upper RGB – and used the empirical relationships derived by Mackey et al. (2026, subm.) to translate these quantities into $\rm[Fe/H]$ , reddening, and distance. The upper RGB slope is quantified by measuring the difference between $V_{\rm HB}$ and the magnitude of the RGB redward of $C_{RGB}$ by $\delta C=0.2$ . The upper RGB slope is used to infer the metallicity; from this, the intrinsic RGB colour could be determined, allowing the line-of-sight reddening, $E(B-V)$ , to be measured via comparison to $C_{RGB}$ . Finally, once the line-of-sight extinction is established, the distance is derived by comparing the observed HB magnitude, $V_{HB}$ , with the intrinsic value expected for its metallicity.

The empirical relationships between CMD indices and physical quantities are calibrated using 47 MW GCs from the ACS Globular Cluster Treasury survey (Sarajedini et al., 2007, GO-10775,) and a smaller extension program GO-11586, (Dotter et al., 2011b, GO-11586,), and resultant metallicities are on the scale of Carretta et al. (2009). While the procedure is calibrated using old GCs and therefore specifically tailored for such systems, it has also proven successful when applied to sparse GCs (McGill et al., 2025) and low-luminosity dSphs (Mackey et al. 2026, subm.). We apply this methodology to characterise the CMD of the candidate cluster and the surrounding field independently.

We first determined $V_{\rm HB}$ by identifying the peak in the luminosity function (LF) of stars within a colour range chosen to capture the HB. The LF was convolved with the Epanechnikov kernel from scikit-learn (Pedregosa et al., 2011), using a bandwidth of 0.055 mag, and the error on $V_{\rm HB}$ was defined as the interval over which the density falls to 0.7 of its peak value. To measure $C_{\rm RGB}$ , we then selected RGB stars within $\pm 0.3\,$ mag about $V_{\rm HB}$ . To detect the peak of this distribution, we applied the same kernel density estimate, this time with a bandwidth of 0.007 mag. Here, the error was set to the standard deviation of the distribution obtained from $\sim$ 1000 of Monte Carlo realisations, in which random Gaussian deviates about the HB magnitude were generated and a new $C_{\rm RGB}$ value was calculated each time. The measured values of $V_{\rm HB}$ and $C_{\rm RGB}$ are shown in Figure 3 by the horizontal and vertical orange solid lines, while the corresponding uncertainties are indicated by the shaded orange areas. Next, we fitted a second-order polynomial to the bright RGB, anchoring it at ( $C_{\rm RGB}$ , $V_{\rm HB}$ ). We quantified the RGB curvature from the magnitude difference between $V_{\rm HB}$ and at a colour 0.2 mag redder than $C_{\rm RGB}$ ( $\Delta V_{0.2}$ ; see dashed horizontal orange lines in Figure 3). The associated error was estimated with the same Monte Carlo procedure described above.

Figure 4: Probability density distributions resulting from the Monte Carlo method described in the text (see Sect. 3.2). Black and red histograms represent the results for And XXV field stars and Gep I stars, respectively. The derived values of

\rm[Fe/H]

E(B-V)

and distance – determined using the measured values of

V_{\rm HB}

C_{\rm RGB}

and

\Delta V_{0.2}

– are indicated by the solid lines. The 16th and 84th percentiles of these distributions (dashed vertical lines) were used to determine the uncertainties on the measured quantities.

Target	$V_{\rm HB}$	$C_{\rm RGB}$	$\Delta V_{0.2}$	$\rm[Fe/H]$	$E(B-V)$	$D\,$ (kpc)
Gep I	$25.10^{+0.03}_{-0.05}$	$0.834^{+0.007}_{-0.007}$	$2.41^{+0.04}_{-0.04}$	$-2.4^{+0.3}_{-0.4}$	$0.169^{+0.006}_{-0.015}$	$753^{+41}_{-23}$
And XXV	$25.14^{+0.07}_{-0.05}$	$0.835^{+0.016}_{-0.029}$	$2.54^{+0.11}_{-0.11}$	$-2.4^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$	$0.170^{+0.016}_{-0.020}$	$766^{+32}_{-31}$

Table 2: Inferred CMD indices (HB magnitudes, corresponding RGB colour, magnitude difference between

V_{\rm HB}

and the intersect with the best-fit polynomial), metallicity, reddening, and distance for Gep I and And XXV following the method described in Section 3.2. Stars within

2R_{h}

and outside

3R_{h}

from the cluster’s centre were considered as representative of Gep I and And XXV, respectively.

The derived index values are then fed into the empirical relationships provided by Mackey et al. (2026, subm.), which relate these fiducial measurements to the physical quantities of interest. We list these equations in Appendix C. Figure 4 shows solid black and red lines indicating the inferred metallicity, reddening, and distance values of And XXV field population and Gep I, respectively. To estimate the uncertainty on these measurements, we performed 10,000 Monte Carlo extractions, generating Gaussian deviates around each index value with variances set by their derived uncertainties. For each extraction, we applied a randomly-drawn calibration equation using the relevant covariance matrix (see Mackey et al. 2026, subm.). The dashed lines in Figure 4 mark the 16th and 84th percentiles of these distributions, defining the measurement uncertainty. The results are also summarised in Table 2.

The best-fit values of $\rm[Fe/H]$ , $E(B-V)$ , and distance were used to compute the blue isochrones shown in Figure 3. These isochrones correspond to a $10\,$ Gyr old⁵⁵ 5 The age has been chosen based on the star formation history of And XXV derived by Savino et al. (2025). Specifically, this is the time at which 90% of the total star formation occurred. and $\alpha$ -enhanced ( $\rm[\alpha/Fe]=+0.4$ ) BaSTI model (Hidalgo et al., 2018; Pietrinferni et al., 2021). As can be seen, these isochrones match the observed CMDs very well, validating the results of our fitting method (which is purely empirical). We therefore proceed to use the isochrone matching Gep I’s stellar population to estimate its luminosity and stellar mass. To do this, we generated a $10^{6}\,M_{☉}$ synthetic stellar cluster population by sampling a Kroupa initial mass function with the python package imf⁶⁶ 6 https://github.com/keflavich/imf. We then rescaled it to match the number of stars observed above the detection limit in the $F606W$ band ( $m_{\rm F606W}=28$ , see Fig. 3). Uncertainties were propagated via Monte Carlo sampling of the posterior distributions of the fitted number of member stars, distance, and reddening. The resulting absolute magnitude is $M_{V}=-4.5\pm 0.2\,$ mag, while the corresponding stellar mass is $M_{\star}=6.5\pm 1.3\times 10^{3}\,M_{☉}$ . We note that these estimates should be interpreted as lower limits, as we assume 100% completeness for stars brighter than our detection threshold. Nonetheless, our estimated total magnitude is in reasonable agreement with the value previously reported in the literature from an integrated-light analysis ( $M_{V}\sim-4.9\,$ mag, Cusano et al. 2016).

Given their common line of sight, very similar reddening values are expected for And XXV and Gep I, and this is consistent with our measurements of 0.169 and 0.170 for And XXV and Gep I, respectively (see Table 2). The reddening value predicted by Schlegel et al. (1998), as recalibrated by Schlafly and Finkbeiner (2011), for the And XXV sightline is $E(B-V)=0.1$ , which is slightly lower than our measurements. However, such a difference is not unexpected, given the relatively coarse spatial resolution ( $\sim$ 6 arcmin) of the Schlegel et al. (1998) dust maps compared to the pencil-beam measurements made here, which are more affected by small-scale dust structure along the sight-line (see also McGill et al. 2026, subm.)

On the other hand, the derivation of very similar metallicities ( $\rm[Fe/H]_{\rm And\,XXV}=-2.4^{+0.2}_{-0.3}\,$ dex and $\rm[Fe/H]_{\rm Gep\,I}=-2.4^{+0.3}_{-0.4}\,$ dex) and distances ( $D_{\rm And\,XXV}=766^{+32}_{-31}\,$ kpc and $D_{\rm And\,XXV}=753^{+41}_{-23}\,$ kpc) is interesting, strongly supporting the physical association of Gep I and the dwarf galaxy. The $\rm[Fe/H]$ values derived from our photometry are very metal-poor, yet consistent with the only spectroscopically-determined value available for this galaxy: $\rm[Fe/H]=-1.9\pm 0.1\,$ dex (Collins et al. 2013; Charles et al. 2023). It is important to note, however, that direct comparison between these two measurements is difficult because they rely on different metallicity scales. In addition, our calibration relation is based on $\alpha$ -enhanced Milky Way GCs, which may introduce metallicity offsets of about $0.3\,$ dex when analysing solar-scaled systems (see Mackey et al. 2026, subm.). Regardless of the absolute metallicity, we can assert that both And XXV and Gep I are comparably rather metal-poor. Furthermore, the line-of-sight distances measured for And XXV and Gep I are highly consistent, and are in excellent agreement with the distance of And XXV derived from RR-Lyrae stars (Savino et al., 2022, $D=751.6^{+25}_{-21}\,$ kpc;), as well as previous literature values obtained through alternative methods (see Richardson et al. 2011; Conn et al. 2012; Weisz et al. 2019).

4 Discussion

4.1 Gep I as the solitary star cluster of And XXV

On the basis of the results presented in Section 3.2, our analysis strongly supports the physical association of Gep I with the And XXV dSph galaxy, although a definitive confirmation of membership will be possible only by measuring the radial velocity of the cluster. The CMD of Gep I closely resembles that of the main body of And XXV, and we have shown that they share a common metallicity. On the other hand, the current dataset does not allow us to reach a conclusion regarding the age similarity between the cluster and the dSph, as our photometry does not reach the main-sequence turn-off (MSTO). This limitation arises because only a fraction of the exposures obtained of And XXV HST Treasury program captured Gep I (see Sec. 2).

Curiously, the cluster exhibits a very red horizontal branch in spite of its low metallicity. While the HB morphology is known to be influenced by various parameters, such as mass-loss and He abundance, a common way to produce such a red HB at low metallicity is to assume a relatively young age (Hidalgo et al., 2018; Pietrinferni et al., 2021). Yet, the SFH of the And XXV presented in Savino et al. (2025), which is based on photometry reaching its old MSTO, indicates that the system is old and that it quenched $\sim$ 10 Gyr ago. Therefore, an age younger than this for Gep I would be puzzling, suggesting that it formed later than the bulk of the stellar mass in And XXV, while sharing the same metallicity. Recently, using the same methodology applied in this study, McGill et al. (2025) and McGill et al. (2026, subm.) determined HB morphologies and $\rm[Fe/H]$ values for 48 GCs in the halo of M31, and 26 GCs in three Local Group dwarf galaxies, respectively. This work identified a small number of GCs in the halos of some of these systems which were characterised by low metallicities ( $\rm[Fe/H]\leq-1.8$ dex) and red HBs, consistent with that seen in Gep I. The authors argue that these peculiar GCs were likely recently accreted along with their now-destroyed low-mass companions. In the case of M31, the evidence for this is particularly compelling as the clusters in question are associated with tidal debris streams in the halo (McGill et al., 2025; Mackey et al., 2019).

Within the Milky Way, the GCs most similar to Gep I are Crater (Weisz et al., 2016) and AM-1 Dotter et al. (2011a). These are both characterised by very red HBs, low metallicities (Crater: (Kirby et al., 2015; Bonifacio et al., 2015, $[\text{Fe/H}]=-1.68$ ,), AM-1: (Carretta et al., 2009, $[\text{Fe/H}]=-1.84$ ,) and large sizes (Pace, 2025, $\sim 15-20$ pc,). MSTO age determinations suggest that AM-1 is slightly younger (Dotter et al., 2008, $\sim 11$ Gyr) than typical outer-halo GCs in the Milky Way, while Crater is substantially younger (Weisz et al., 2016, $\sim 7.5$ Gyr). Both these GCs lie in the far outer halo ( $\gtrsim 120$ kpc) of the Miky Way, and both are suspected to be accreted, with AM-1 specifically tagged, along with one or two other clusters on similarly high-energy retrograde orbits, to the Elqui stream (Massari, 2025; De Leo et al., 2026). Crater is not associated with any of the major accretion events that contributed to the Galactic stellar halo (Callingham et al., 2022; Massari, 2025) but it has been proposed to be dynamically linked to a group of four Milky Way satellites, known as the Crater-Leo group, which includes Leo II, Leo IV, and Leo V. The infall of this group likely occurred within the past 6 Gyr (Júlio et al., 2024). Within these satellites, the dwarf spheroidal galaxy Leo II, whose luminosity ( $M_{V}=-9.8$ ; Irwin and Hatzidimitriou 1995) is comparable to that of And XXV, is considered the probable progenitor of Crater due to its similar metallicity. Gep I would appear to be an analogue of these outer-halo GCs, but one which is still residing within its host dwarf galaxy.

On the other hand, the striking similarity between the CMD of Gep I and that of And XXV field stars makes this stellar overdensity a compelling candidate for investigating the presence of a dark matter subhalo. Small-scale dark substructures are predicted by the $\Lambda$ CDM cosmology, and Peñarrubia et al. (2024) argued that these subhalos can temporarily capture field stars as they orbit within the dark matter-dominated potential wells of dSph galaxies. Stellar systems formed through such interactions are expected to closely resemble the surrounding field dSph population, have extended sizes for their luminosities, and possess high mass-to-light ratios. While the photometric and structural properties of Gep I are consistent with the simulations of Peñarrubia et al. (2024), the absence of kinematical data precludes assessment of whether the cluster exhibits an anomalously high velocity dispersion.

4.2 Comparing the properties of the star clusters in And XXV and Eri II

In this section, we compare the observed properties of Gep I with those of the stellar cluster in Eridanus II (Eri II), which represents the only other well-studied example of a very low-mass dwarf hosting a solitary GC (Crnojević et al. 2016; Zoutendijk et al. 2020; Simon et al. 2021; Weisz et al. 2023). Relative to the majority of GCs orbiting in the Milky Way (see Baumgardt and Hilker 2018), these dwarf-hosted clusters are notably extended and faint. Gep I appears larger ( $R_{h}=24\,$ pc) and brighter ( $M_{V}=-4.5$ ) than Eri II’s cluster, which is measured to have $R_{h}=15\,$ pc and $M_{V}=-3.4$ (Simon et al. 2021; Weisz et al. 2023). This may reflect different birth conditions within their hosts, as And XXV is more luminous ( $M_{V}=-9.1$ ; Savino et al. 2025) than Eri II ( $M_{V}=-7.1$ ; Crnojević et al. 2016), or it may result from different tidal fields and mass-loss rates. As noted in Simon et al. (2021), the large ellipticity of Eri II’s cluster ( $e=0.31^{+0.05}_{-0.06}$ ), and its perfect alignment with the orientation of the parent galaxy, hint at an advanced stage of tidal-stretching. This would justify the lower stellar mass for Eri II’s cluster; yet, no signs of tidal stripping have been found around this system. In contrast, such a large elongation and well-defined position angle are not observed in Gep I, although deeper photometric observations are required to make this conclusion more robust.

Notably, the two clusters are characterised by a distinct offset from their host galaxy centres. While Eri II’s cluster is observed at a very small projected distance from the galaxy centre ( $23\pm 3\,$ pc, Simon et al. 2021), we find that Gep I is offset from And XXV’s centre by $138\pm 55\,$ pc. This offset was determined by measuring the angular distance between the cluster centre, as determined in Sec. 3.1, and the galaxy centre, as reported by Martin et al. (2016). For consistency, the coordinates from Martin et al. (2016) were transformed to our astrometric frame using stars common to both catalogues. The resulting value is $\theta=38″\pm 15″$ . This measurement and its associated uncertainty were estimated by sampling Gaussian distributions with variances set by the measured errors in the central coordinates, and by considering the 50th, 16th, and 84th percentiles of the resulting posterior distribution. The angular offset was then converted to the linear projected distance using the And XXV distance reported in Savino et al. (2022).

The observed properties of the star clusters in Eri II and Gep I provide valuable constraints for N-body simulations that aim to use their longevity to make inferences about the DM distribution in their host galaxies. Several simulations have been carried out focusing on Eri II’s cluster (Amorisco, 2017; Contenta et al., 2018; Webb and Vesperini, 2018; Orkney et al., 2022). All of these studies struggle to reconcile the present-day properties of the cluster with a cuspy DM profile, the halo configuration predicted by structure formation simulations in a $\Lambda$ CDM cosmology (Navarro et al., 1996). Within such a halo, only highly specific conditions would allow the cluster to survive for several Gyrs. In contrast, a scenario involving a large central dark matter core would naturally explain the cluster’s survival, size, ellipticity, and projected position. In light of our improved characterisation of Gep I, similar studies applied to And XXV would be extremely informative. Indeed, kinematic analyses of And XXV’s field stars have suggested an unusually low central dark matter density in this galaxy, which could possibly be explained by past tidal interactions with M31 (see Collins et al. 2013; Charles et al. 2023). While substantial uncertainties in the inferred dark matter profile preclude definitive conclusions, the survival of a low-mass, extended star cluster deep in its potential well may bring further insight.

5 Summary and conclusions

In this paper, we have characterised the candidate star cluster of And XXV, called Gep I, by means of deep archival HST-ACS/WFC observations. This is the first detailed resolved star analysis of this object, and our resulting CMD reaches to $\gtrsim 2$ magnitudes below the HB. We demonstrate the existence of a resolved star overdensity at the position of Gep I, and we employ new empirical relations to determine $\rm[Fe/H]$ , line-of-sight reddening and distance to both the cluster and the surrounding And XXV field. We find excellent agreement in all properties, strongly supporting the association of the cluster with the dSph, as first proposed by Cusano et al. (2016), and alleviating concerns about the chance projection of an M31 halo GC. And XXV is therefore one of the few known very low-mass galaxies ( $M_{\star}<10^{6}\,M_{☉}$ ) hosting a GC, along with the ultra-faint dwarf galaxy Eri II.

We find Gep I to be very extended ( $R_{h}=24^{+5}_{-4}$ pc), faint ( $M_{V}=-4.5\pm 0.2$ ), and located at a projected distance of only $138\pm 55\,$ pc from the galaxy centre. From the CMD, we measure a photometric metallicity of $\rm[Fe/H]=-2.4^{+0.3}_{-0.4}$ dex, a line-of-sight reddening of $E(B-V)=0.17$ , and distance $D=753^{+41}_{-23}\,$ kpc. Although it is metal-poor, the cluster exhibits a very red HB morphology. This combination of parameters has recently been found in a small number of GCs throughout the Local Group, including in the halo of M31 and the outskirts of the dIrr galaxy NGC 6822. In all of these cases, the clusters are hypothesised to be comparatively young and recently accreted from low-mass galaxies (McGill et al., 2025). Although slightly more metal-poor, Gep I also shares similarities with the Milky Way outer-halo GCs Crater and AM-1, both of which also have a strong suggested accretion origin and younger ages than the dominant old halo population. Gep I is a likely analogue of these outer-halo GCs, but one which is still residing within its host dwarf galaxy halo. An age estimate for Gep I would establish whether it formed along with, or later than, the bulk of And XXV’s stellar mass, which was 90 per cent in place by 10 Gyr (see Savino et al. 2025).

With the improved characterisation of Gep I, it will be possible to construct new models to explore whether such a cluster could survive in the inferred potential well of And XXV, shedding light on the nature of dark matter, the properties of low-mass haloes, and how they are affected by galaxy formation. Furthermore, a velocity dispersion measurement will clarify if Gep I represents a genuine long-lived star cluster, or is a transient stellar overdensity resulting from stars captured by a dark matter subhalo orbiting within the And XXV’s potential well.

Acknowledgements

We thank the referee for the helpful comments that improved the paper. We thank David Behrendt for his assistance during the early stages of this project, and Nicolas Martin for useful discussions. CC and AMNF are supported by the Science and Technology Facilities Council [grant number ST/Y001281/1]. AMNF also acknowledges support from UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) under the UK government’s Horizon Europe funding guarantee [grant number EP/Z534353/1]. GM acknowledges funding from the Bell Burnell Graduate Scholarship Fund [grant number BB0027]. Based on observations collected with the NASA/ESA HST under the program GO-15902, and at the Gemini South Observatory under the program GS-2007B-Q-23. This research made use of the following python libraries: Matplotlib (Hunter, 2007), Numpy (Harris et al., 2020), Scipy (Virtanen et al., 2020), scikit-learn (Pedregosa et al., 2011), Astropy (Astropy Collaboration et al., 2022).

Data Availability

The data used in this analysis is available from the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST) with the programme ID GO-15902. The photometric catalogue used for this article will be shared upon a reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

Adams et al. (2014) J. J. Adams, J. D. Simon, M. H. Fabricius, R. C. E. van den Bosch, J. C. Barentine, R. Bender, K. Gebhardt, G. J. Hill, J. D. Murphy, R. A. Swaters, J. Thomas, and G. van de Ven Dwarf Galaxy Dark Matter Density Profiles Inferred from Stellar and Gas Kinematics. ApJ 789 (1), pp. 63. External Links: Document, 1405.4854 Cited by: §1.
Amorisco (2017) N. C. Amorisco Deadly Dark Matter Cusps versus Faint and Extended Star Clusters: Eridanus II and Andromeda XXV. ApJ 844 (1), pp. 64. External Links: Document, 1704.06262 Cited by: §1, §4.2.
Astropy Collaboration et al. (2022) Astropy Collaboration, A. M. Price-Whelan, P. L. Lim, N. Earl, N. Starkman, L. Bradley, D. L. Shupe, A. A. Patil, L. Corrales, C. E. Brasseur, M. Nöthe, A. Donath, E. Tollerud, B. M. Morris, A. Ginsburg, E. Vaher, B. A. Weaver, J. Tocknell, W. Jamieson, M. H. van Kerkwijk, T. P. Robitaille, B. Merry, M. Bachetti, H. M. Günther, T. L. Aldcroft, J. A. Alvarado-Montes, A. M. Archibald, A. Bódi, S. Bapat, G. Barentsen, J. Bazán, M. Biswas, M. Boquien, D. J. Burke, D. Cara, M. Cara, K. E. Conroy, S. Conseil, M. W. Craig, R. M. Cross, K. L. Cruz, F. D’Eugenio, N. Dencheva, H. A. R. Devillepoix, J. P. Dietrich, A. D. Eigenbrot, T. Erben, L. Ferreira, D. Foreman-Mackey, R. Fox, N. Freij, S. Garg, R. Geda, L. Glattly, Y. Gondhalekar, K. D. Gordon, D. Grant, P. Greenfield, A. M. Groener, S. Guest, S. Gurovich, R. Handberg, A. Hart, Z. Hatfield-Dodds, D. Homeier, G. Hosseinzadeh, T. Jenness, C. K. Jones, P. Joseph, J. B. Kalmbach, E. Karamehmetoglu, M. Kałuszyński, M. S. P. Kelley, N. Kern, W. E. Kerzendorf, E. W. Koch, S. Kulumani, A. Lee, C. Ly, Z. Ma, C. MacBride, J. M. Maljaars, D. Muna, N. A. Murphy, H. Norman, R. O’Steen, K. A. Oman, C. Pacifici, S. Pascual, J. Pascual-Granado, R. R. Patil, G. I. Perren, T. E. Pickering, T. Rastogi, B. R. Roulston, D. F. Ryan, E. S. Rykoff, J. Sabater, P. Sakurikar, J. Salgado, A. Sanghi, N. Saunders, V. Savchenko, L. Schwardt, M. Seifert-Eckert, A. Y. Shih, A. S. Jain, G. Shukla, J. Sick, C. Simpson, S. Singanamalla, L. P. Singer, J. Singhal, M. Sinha, B. M. Sipőcz, L. R. Spitler, D. Stansby, O. Streicher, J. Šumak, J. D. Swinbank, D. S. Taranu, N. Tewary, G. R. Tremblay, M. de Val-Borro, S. J. Van Kooten, Z. Vasović, S. Verma, J. V. de Miranda Cardoso, P. K. G. Williams, T. J. Wilson, B. Winkel, W. M. Wood-Vasey, R. Xue, P. Yoachim, C. Zhang, A. Zonca, and Astropy Project Contributors The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package. ApJ 935 (2), pp. 167. External Links: Document, 2206.14220 Cited by: Acknowledgements.
Battaglia and Nipoti (2022) G. Battaglia and C. Nipoti Stellar dynamics and dark matter in Local Group dwarf galaxies. Nature Astronomy 6, pp. 659–672. External Links: Document, 2205.07821 Cited by: §1.
Baumgardt and Hilker (2018) H. Baumgardt and M. Hilker A catalogue of masses, structural parameters, and velocity dispersion profiles of 112 Milky Way globular clusters. MNRAS 478 (2), pp. 1520–1557. External Links: Document, 1804.08359 Cited by: §4.2.
Baumgardt and Vasiliev (2021) H. Baumgardt and E. Vasiliev Accurate distances to Galactic globular clusters through a combination of Gaia EDR3, HST, and literature data. MNRAS 505 (4), pp. 5957–5977. External Links: Document, 2105.09526 Cited by: Appendix C.
Bellazzini et al. (2026) M. Bellazzini, R. Pascale, E. Dodd, E. Ceccarelli, D. Massari, M. Libralato, S. Cassisi, M. De Leo, A. Della Croce, E. Vesperini, A. Mucciarelli, E. Dalessandro, M. Salaris, F. Aguado-Agelet, A. Bellini, F. R. Ferraro, B. Lanzoni, M. Monelli, and S. Saracino The Hubble Missing Globular Clusters Survey IV. Ultra-faint compact satellites of the Milky Way. The case of Koposov 2. arXiv e-prints, pp. arXiv:2606.12517. External Links: Document, 2606.12517 Cited by: §3.1.
Berek et al. (2024) S. C. Berek, G. M. Eadie, J. S. Speagle, and S. Y. Wang Should Zeros Count? Modeling the Galaxy–Globular Cluster Scaling Relation with(out) Zero-inflated Count Models. ApJ 972 (1), pp. 104. External Links: Document, 2407.04764 Cited by: §1.
Boldrini et al. (2019) P. Boldrini, R. Mohayaee, and J. Silk Fornax globular cluster distributions: implications for the cusp-core problem. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 485 (2), pp. 2546 – 2557 (English). External Links: Document Cited by: §1.
Bonifacio et al. (2015) P. Bonifacio, E. Caffau, S. Zaggia, P. François, L. Sbordone, S. M. Andrievsky, and S. A. Korotin Chemical abundances of giant stars in the Crater stellar system. A&A 579, pp. L6. External Links: Document, 1506.03615 Cited by: §4.1.
Bouché et al. (2022) N. F. Bouché, S. Bera, D. Krajnović, E. Emsellem, W. Mercier, J. Schaye, B. Epinat, J. Richard, S. L. Zoutendijk, V. Abril-Melgarejo, J. Brinchmann, R. Bacon, T. Contini, L. Boogaard, L. Wisotzki, M. Maseda, and M. Steinmetz The MUSE Extremely Deep Field: Evidence for SFR-induced cores in dark-matter dominated galaxies at z ≃ 1. A&A 658, pp. A76. External Links: Document, 2109.07545 Cited by: §1.
Callingham et al. (2022) T. M. Callingham, M. Cautun, A. J. Deason, C. S. Frenk, R. J. J. Grand, and F. Marinacci The chemo-dynamical groups of Galactic globular clusters. MNRAS 513 (3), pp. 4107–4129. External Links: Document, 2202.00591 Cited by: §4.1.
Carretta et al. (2009) E. Carretta, A. Bragaglia, R. Gratton, V. D’Orazi, and S. Lucatello Intrinsic iron spread and a new metallicity scale for globular clusters *. Astronomy & Astrophysics 508 (2), pp. 695–706. External Links: ISSN 0004-6361, Document, 0910.0675 Cited by: §3.2, §4.1.
Charles et al. (2023) E. J. E. Charles, M. L. M. Collins, R. M. Rich, J. I. Read, S. Y. Kim, R. A. Ibata, N. F. Martin, S. C. Chapman, E. Balbinot, and D. R. Weisz Andromeda XXV - a dwarf galaxy with a low central dark matter density. MNRAS 521 (3), pp. 3527–3539. External Links: Document, 2209.15022 Cited by: §3.2, §4.2.
Chen and Gnedin (2023) Y. Chen and O. Y. Gnedin Formation of globular clusters in dwarf galaxies of the Local Group. MNRAS 522 (4), pp. 5638–5653. External Links: Document, 2301.08218 Cited by: §1.
Cole et al. (2012) D. R. Cole, W. Dehnen, J. I. Read, and M. I. Wilkinson The mass distribution of the Fornax dSph: constraints from its globular cluster distribution. MNRAS 426 (1), pp. 601–613. External Links: Document, 1205.6327 Cited by: §1.
Collins et al. (2013) M. L. M. Collins, S. C. Chapman, R. M. Rich, R. A. Ibata, N. F. Martin, M. J. Irwin, N. F. Bate, G. F. Lewis, J. Peñarrubia, N. Arimoto, C. M. Casey, A. M. N. Ferguson, A. Koch, A. W. McConnachie, and N. Tanvir A Kinematic Study of the Andromeda Dwarf Spheroidal System. ApJ 768 (2), pp. 172. External Links: Document, 1302.6590 Cited by: §3.2, §4.2.
Conn et al. (2012) A. R. Conn, R. A. Ibata, G. F. Lewis, Q. A. Parker, D. B. Zucker, N. F. Martin, A. W. McConnachie, M. J. Irwin, N. Tanvir, M. A. Fardal, A. M. N. Ferguson, S. C. Chapman, and D. Valls-Gabaud A Bayesian Approach to Locating the Red Giant Branch Tip Magnitude. II. Distances to the Satellites of M31. ApJ 758 (1), pp. 11. External Links: Document, 1209.4952 Cited by: §3.2.
Contenta et al. (2018) F. Contenta, E. Balbinot, J. A. Petts, J. I. Read, M. Gieles, M. L. M. Collins, J. Peñarrubia, M. Delorme, and A. Gualandris Probing dark matter with star clusters: a dark matter core in the ultra-faint dwarf Eridanus II. MNRAS 476 (3), pp. 3124–3136. External Links: Document, 1705.01820 Cited by: §1, §4.2.
Crnojević et al. (2016) D. Crnojević, D. J. Sand, D. Zaritsky, K. Spekkens, B. Willman, and J. R. Hargis Deep Imaging of Eridanus II and Its Lone Star Cluster. ApJ 824 (1), pp. L14. External Links: Document, 1604.08590 Cited by: §4.2.
Cusano et al. (2016) F. Cusano, A. Garofalo, G. Clementini, M. Cignoni, L. Federici, M. Marconi, V. Ripepi, I. Musella, V. Testa, R. Carini, and M. Faccini Variable Stars and Stellar Populations in Andromeda XXV. III. a Central Cluster or the Galaxy NUCLEUS?*. ApJ 829 (1), pp. 26. External Links: Document, 1606.06862 Cited by: §1, Figure 2, §3.1, §3.1, §3.2, §3.2, §5.
De Leo et al. (2026) M. De Leo, M. Zoccali, J. Olivares-Carvajal, B. Acosta-Tripailao, F. Gran, and R. Contreras-Ramos Globular clusters in ORBIT: Complete dynamical characterisation of the Milky Way globular cluster population through updated orbital reconstruction. A&A 706, pp. A130. External Links: Document, 2512.06079 Cited by: §4.1.
Di Cintio et al. (2014) A. Di Cintio, C. B. Brook, A. V. Macciò, G. S. Stinson, A. Knebe, A. A. Dutton, and J. Wadsley The dependence of dark matter profiles on the stellar-to-halo mass ratio: a prediction for cusps versus cores. MNRAS 437 (1), pp. 415–423. External Links: Document, 1306.0898 Cited by: §1.
Doppel et al. (2023) J. E. Doppel, L. V. Sales, D. Nelson, A. Pillepich, M. G. Abadi, E. W. Peng, F. Marinacci, J. Naiman, P. Torrey, M. Vogelsberger, R. Weinberger, and L. Hernquist Modelling globular clusters in the TNG50 simulation: predictions from dwarfs to giant galaxies. MNRAS 518 (2), pp. 2453–2470. External Links: Document, 2209.11759 Cited by: §1.
Dornan and Harris (2026) V. Dornan and W. E. Harris Globular Cluster Systems in Dwarf Galaxies: Catalogs and Comparisons. ApJ 998 (1), pp. 41. External Links: Document, 2512.08453 Cited by: §1.
Dotter et al. (2011a) A. Dotter, A. Sarajedini, and J. Anderson Globular clusters in the outer galactic halo: new hubble space telescope/advanced camera for surveys imaging of six globular clusters and the galactic globular cluster age-metallicity relation. The Astrophysical Journal 738 (1), pp. 74. External Links: Document Cited by: §4.1.
Dotter et al. (2011b) A. Dotter, A. Sarajedini, and J. Anderson Globular Clusters in the Outer Galactic Halo: New Hubble Space Telescope/Advanced Camera for Surveys Imaging of Six Globular Clusters and the Galactic Globular Cluster Age-metallicity Relation. ApJ 738 (1), pp. 74. External Links: Document, 1106.4307 Cited by: §3.2.
Dotter et al. (2008) A. Dotter, A. Sarajedini, and S. Yang Globular Clusters in the Outer Galactic Halo: AM-1 and Palomar 14. AJ 136 (4), pp. 1407–1414. External Links: Document, 0807.1103 Cited by: §4.1.
Eadie et al. (2022) G. M. Eadie, W. E. Harris, and A. Springford Clearing the Hurdle: The Mass of Globular Cluster Systems as a Function of Host Galaxy Mass. ApJ 926 (2), pp. 162. External Links: Document, 2110.15376 Cited by: §1, §1.
El-Badry et al. (2019) K. El-Badry, E. Quataert, D. R. Weisz, N. Choksi, and M. Boylan-Kolchin The formation and hierarchical assembly of globular cluster populations. MNRAS 482 (4), pp. 4528–4552. External Links: Document, 1805.03652 Cited by: §1.
Forbes et al. (2018) D. A. Forbes, J. I. Read, M. Gieles, and M. L. M. Collins Extending the globular cluster system-halo mass relation to the lowest galaxy masses. MNRAS 481 (4), pp. 5592–5605. External Links: Document, 1809.07831 Cited by: §1, §1, footnote 1.
Foreman-Mackey et al. (2013) D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Goodman emcee: The MCMC Hammer. PASP 125 (925), pp. 306. External Links: Document, 1202.3665 Cited by: §3.1.
Georgiev et al. (2010) I. Y. Georgiev, T. H. Puzia, P. Goudfrooij, and M. Hilker Globular cluster systems in nearby dwarf galaxies - III. Formation efficiencies of old globular clusters. MNRAS 406 (3), pp. 1967–1984. External Links: Document, 1004.2039 Cited by: §1.
Goerdt et al. (2006) T. Goerdt, B. Moore, J. I. Read, J. Stadel, and M. Zemp Does the Fornax dwarf spheroidal have a central cusp or core?. MNRAS 368 (3), pp. 1073–1077. External Links: Document, astro-ph/0601404 Cited by: §1.
Gutcke (2024) T. A. Gutcke Low-mass globular clusters from stripped dark matter halos. The Astrophysical Journal 971 (1), pp. 103. External Links: ISSN 0004-637X, Document Cited by: §1.
Harris et al. (2020) C. R. Harris, K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt, R. Gommers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau, E. Wieser, J. Taylor, S. Berg, N. J. Smith, R. Kern, M. Picus, S. Hoyer, M. H. van Kerkwijk, M. Brett, A. Haldane, J. F. del Río, M. Wiebe, P. Peterson, P. Gérard-Marchant, K. Sheppard, T. Reddy, W. Weckesser, H. Abbasi, C. Gohlke, and T. E. Oliphant Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585 (7825), pp. 357–362. External Links: Document, Link Cited by: Acknowledgements.
Hidalgo et al. (2018) S. L. Hidalgo, A. Pietrinferni, S. Cassisi, M. Salaris, A. Mucciarelli, A. Savino, A. Aparicio, V. Silva Aguirre, and K. Verma The Updated BaSTI Stellar Evolution Models and Isochrones. I. Solar-scaled Calculations. ApJ 856 (2), pp. 125. External Links: Document, 1802.07319 Cited by: §3.2, §4.1.
Hunter (2007) J. D. Hunter Matplotlib: a 2d graphics environment. Computing in Science & Engineering 9 (3), pp. 90–95. External Links: Document Cited by: Acknowledgements.
Irwin and Hatzidimitriou (1995) M. Irwin and D. Hatzidimitriou Structural parameters for the Galactic dwarf spheroidals. MNRAS 277 (4), pp. 1354–1378. External Links: Document Cited by: §4.1.
Júlio et al. (2024) M. P. Júlio, M. S. Pawlowski, S. Tony Sohn, S. Taibi, R. P. van der Marel, and S. S. McGaugh Satellite group infall into the Milky Way: Exploring the Crater-Leo case with new HST proper motions. A&A 687, pp. A212. External Links: Document, 2404.16110 Cited by: §4.1.
Kirby et al. (2015) E. N. Kirby, J. D. Simon, and J. G. Cohen Spectroscopic Confirmation of the Dwarf Galaxies Hydra II and Pisces II and the Globular Cluster Laevens 1. ApJ 810 (1), pp. 56. External Links: Document, 1506.01021 Cited by: §4.1.
Mackey et al. (2019) A. D. Mackey, A. M. N. Ferguson, A. P. Huxor, J. Veljanoski, G. F. Lewis, A. W. McConnachie, N. F. Martin, R. A. Ibata, M. J. Irwin, P. Côté, M. L. M. Collins, N. R. Tanvir, and N. F. Bate The outer halo globular cluster system of M31 - III. Relationship to the stellar halo. MNRAS 484 (2), pp. 1756–1789. External Links: Document, 1810.10719 Cited by: §4.1.
Martin et al. (2016) N. F. Martin, R. A. Ibata, G. F. Lewis, A. McConnachie, A. Babul, N. F. Bate, E. Bernard, S. C. Chapman, M. M. L. Collins, A. R. Conn, D. Crnojević, M. A. Fardal, A. M. N. Ferguson, M. Irwin, A. D. Mackey, B. McMonigal, J. F. Navarro, and R. M. Rich The PAndAS View of the Andromeda Satellite System. II. Detailed Properties of 23 M31 Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies. ApJ 833 (2), pp. 167. External Links: Document, 1610.01158 Cited by: Figure 1, §2, §3.1, §4.2.
Massari (2025) D. Massari Origin of the System of Globular Clusters in the Milky Way—Gaia eDR3 Edition. Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society 9 (3), pp. 64. External Links: Document, 2503.14657 Cited by: §4.1.
McConnachie et al. (2018) A. W. McConnachie, R. Ibata, N. Martin, A. M. N. Ferguson, M. Collins, S. Gwyn, M. Irwin, G. F. Lewis, A. D. Mackey, T. Davidge, V. Arias, A. Conn, P. Côté, D. Crnojevic, A. Huxor, J. Penarrubia, C. Spengler, N. Tanvir, D. Valls-Gabaud, A. Babul, P. Barmby, N. F. Bate, E. Bernard, S. Chapman, A. Dotter, W. Harris, B. McMonigal, J. Navarro, T. H. Puzia, R. M. Rich, G. Thomas, and L. M. Widrow The Large-scale Structure of the Halo of the Andromeda Galaxy. II. Hierarchical Structure in the Pan-Andromeda Archaeological Survey. ApJ 868 (1), pp. 55. External Links: Document, 1810.08234 Cited by: §2.
McGill et al. (2025) G. McGill, A. M. N. Ferguson, D. Mackey, A. P. Huxor, G. F. Lewis, N. F. Martin, A. W. McConnachie, C. M. Sakari, N. R. Tanvir, and K. A. Venn Accreted globular clusters and horizontal branch morphology in the outer halo of M31. MNRAS 542 (1), pp. L60–L66. External Links: Document, 2506.21267 Cited by: Appendix C, §3.2, §3.2, §4.1, §5.
Moore (1994) B. Moore Evidence against dissipation-less dark matter from observations of galaxy haloes. Nature 370 (6491), pp. 629–631. External Links: Document Cited by: §1.
Navarro et al. (1996) J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos. ApJ 462, pp. 563. External Links: Document, astro-ph/9508025 Cited by: §1, §4.2.
Oñorbe et al. (2015) J. Oñorbe, M. Boylan-Kolchin, J. S. Bullock, P. F. Hopkins, D. Kereš, C. Faucher-Giguère, E. Quataert, and N. Murray Forged in FIRE: cusps, cores and baryons in low-mass dwarf galaxies. MNRAS 454 (2), pp. 2092–2106. External Links: Document, 1502.02036 Cited by: §1.
Orkney et al. (2022) M. D. A. Orkney, J. I. Read, O. Agertz, A. Pontzen, M. P. Rey, A. Goater, E. Taylor, S. Y. Kim, and M. Delorme EDGE: the puzzling ellipticity of Eridanus II’s star cluster and its implications for dark matter at the heart of an ultra-faint dwarf. MNRAS 515 (1), pp. 185–200. External Links: Document, 2201.13434 Cited by: §1, §4.2.
Orkney et al. (2021) M. D. A. Orkney, J. I. Read, M. P. Rey, I. Nasim, A. Pontzen, O. Agertz, S. Y. Kim, M. Delorme, and W. Dehnen EDGE: two routes to dark matter core formation in ultra-faint dwarfs. MNRAS 504 (3), pp. 3509–3522. External Links: Document, 2101.02688 Cited by: §1.
Pace (2025) A. B. Pace The Local Volume Database: a library of the observed properties of nearby dwarf galaxies and star clusters. The Open Journal of Astrophysics 8, pp. 142. External Links: Document, 2411.07424 Cited by: §4.1.
Pascale et al. (2026) R. Pascale, G. Battaglia, J. M. Arroyo-Polonio, E. Vasiliev, C. Nipoti, and G. F. Thomas Multi-component, axisymmetric dynamical models of dSphs based on distribution functions: inferences on dark matter and intermediate-mass black holes in Draco and Ursa Minor. arXiv e-prints, pp. arXiv:2604.24855. External Links: Document, 2604.24855 Cited by: §3.1.
Pedregosa et al. (2011) F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, A. Müller, J. Nothman, G. Louppe, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and É. Duchesnay Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12, pp. 2825–2830. External Links: Document, 1201.0490 Cited by: §3.2, Acknowledgements.
Peñarrubia et al. (2024) J. Peñarrubia, R. Errani, M. G. Walker, M. Gieles, and T. C. N. Boekholt Capture of field stars by dark substructures. MNRAS 533 (3), pp. 3263–3282. External Links: Document, 2404.19069 Cited by: §4.1.
Peñarrubia et al. (2012) J. Peñarrubia, A. Pontzen, M. G. Walker, and S. E. Koposov The Coupling between the Core/Cusp and Missing Satellite Problems. ApJ 759 (2), pp. L42. External Links: Document, 1207.2772 Cited by: §1.
Pietrinferni et al. (2021) A. Pietrinferni, S. Hidalgo, S. Cassisi, M. Salaris, A. Savino, A. Mucciarelli, K. Verma, V. Silva Aguirre, A. Aparicio, and J. W. Ferguson Updated BaSTI Stellar Evolution Models and Isochrones. II. $\alpha$ -enhanced Calculations. ApJ 908 (1), pp. 102. External Links: Document, 2012.10085 Cited by: §3.2, §4.1.
Plummer (1911) H. C. Plummer On the problem of distribution in globular star clusters. MNRAS 71, pp. 460–470. External Links: Document Cited by: Appendix A, §3.1.
Read et al. (2019) J. I. Read, M. G. Walker, and P. Steger Dark matter heats up in dwarf galaxies. MNRAS 484 (1), pp. 1401–1420. External Links: Document, 1808.06634 Cited by: §1.
Richardson et al. (2011) J. C. Richardson, M. J. Irwin, A. W. McConnachie, N. F. Martin, A. L. Dotter, A. M. N. Ferguson, R. A. Ibata, S. C. Chapman, G. F. Lewis, N. R. Tanvir, and R. M. Rich PAndAS’ Progeny: Extending the M31 Dwarf Galaxy Cabal. ApJ 732 (2), pp. 76. External Links: Document, 1102.2902 Cited by: §3.2.
Sarajedini et al. (2007) A. Sarajedini, L. R. Bedin, B. Chaboyer, A. Dotter, M. Siegel, J. Anderson, A. Aparicio, I. King, S. Majewski, A. Marín-Franch, G. Piotto, I. N. Reid, and A. Rosenberg The ACS Survey of Galactic Globular Clusters. I. Overview and Clusters without Previous Hubble Space Telescope Photometry. AJ 133 (4), pp. 1658–1672. External Links: Document, astro-ph/0612598 Cited by: §3.2.
Savino et al. (2025) A. Savino, D. R. Weisz, A. E. Dolphin, M. J. Durbin, N. Kallivayalil, A. Wetzel, J. Anderson, G. Besla, M. Boylan-Kolchin, T. M. Brown, J. S. Bullock, A. A. Cole, M. L. M. Collins, M. C. Cooper, A. J. Deason, A. L. Dotter, M. Fardal, A. M. N. Ferguson, T. K. Fritz, M. C. Geha, K. M. Gilbert, P. Guhathakurta, R. Ibata, M. J. Irwin, M. Jeon, E. N. Kirby, G. F. Lewis, D. Mackey, S. R. Majewski, N. Martin, A. McConnachie, E. Patel, R. M. Rich, E. D. Skillman, J. D. Simon, S. T. Sohn, E. J. Tollerud, and R. P. van der Marel The Hubble Space Telescope Survey of M31 Satellite Galaxies. IV. Survey Overview and Lifetime Star Formation Histories. ApJ 979 (2), pp. 205. External Links: Document, 2501.13152 Cited by: §2, §2, §4.1, §4.2, §5, footnote 5.
Savino et al. (2022) A. Savino, D. R. Weisz, E. D. Skillman, A. Dolphin, N. Kallivayalil, A. Wetzel, J. Anderson, G. Besla, M. Boylan-Kolchin, J. S. Bullock, A. A. Cole, M. L. M. Collins, M. C. Cooper, A. J. Deason, A. L. Dotter, M. Fardal, A. M. N. Ferguson, T. K. Fritz, M. C. Geha, K. M. Gilbert, P. Guhathakurta, R. Ibata, M. J. Irwin, M. Jeon, E. Kirby, G. F. Lewis, D. Mackey, S. R. Majewski, N. Martin, A. McConnachie, E. Patel, R. M. Rich, J. D. Simon, S. T. Sohn, E. J. Tollerud, and R. P. van der Marel The Hubble Space Telescope Survey of M31 Satellite Galaxies. I. RR Lyrae-based Distances and Refined 3D Geometric Structure. ApJ 938 (2), pp. 101. External Links: Document, 2206.02801 Cited by: §1, §2, §3.2, Table 1, §4.2.
Schlafly and Finkbeiner (2011) E. F. Schlafly and D. P. Finkbeiner Measuring Reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stellar Spectra and Recalibrating SFD. ApJ 737 (2), pp. 103. External Links: Document, 1012.4804 Cited by: Appendix C, §3.2.
Schlegel et al. (1998) D. J. Schlegel, D. P. Finkbeiner, and M. Davis Maps of Dust Infrared Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening and Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Foregrounds. ApJ 500 (2), pp. 525–553. External Links: Document, astro-ph/9710327 Cited by: §3.2.
Simon et al. (2021) J. D. Simon, T. M. Brown, A. Drlica-Wagner, T. S. Li, R. J. Avila, K. Bechtol, G. Clementini, D. Crnojević, A. Garofalo, M. Geha, D. J. Sand, J. Strader, and B. Willman Eridanus II: A Fossil from Reionization with an Off-center Star Cluster. ApJ 908 (1), pp. 18. External Links: Document, 2012.00043 Cited by: §1, §4.2, §4.2.
Smith et al. (2023) S. E. T. Smith, J. Jensen, J. Roediger, F. Sestito, C. R. Hayes, A. W. McConnachie, J. Cuillandre, S. Gwyn, E. Magnier, K. Chambers, F. Hammer, M. J. Hudson, N. Martin, J. Navarro, and D. Scott Discovery of a New Local Group Dwarf Galaxy Candidate in UNIONS: Boötes V. AJ 166 (2), pp. 76. External Links: Document, 2209.08242 Cited by: §3.1.
Stetson (1993) P. B. Stetson Further Progress in CCD Photometry. In IAU Colloq. 136: Stellar Photometry - Current Techniques and Future Developments, C. J. Butler and I. Elliott (Eds.), pp. 291. Cited by: §2.
Stetson (1987) P. B. Stetson DAOPHOT: A Computer Program for Crowded-Field Stellar Photometry. PASP 99, pp. 191. External Links: Document Cited by: §2.
Stetson (1994) P. B. Stetson The Center of the Core-Cusp Globular Cluster M15: CFHT and HST Observations, ALLFRAME Reductions. PASP 106, pp. 250. External Links: Document Cited by: §2.
Taylor et al. (2025) E. D. Taylor, J. I. Read, M. D. A. Orkney, S. Y. Kim, A. Pontzen, O. Agertz, M. P. Rey, E. P. Andersson, M. L. M. Collins, and R. M. Yates The emergence of globular clusters and globular-cluster-like dwarfs. Nature 645 (8080), pp. 327–331. External Links: ISSN 0028-0836, Document, 2509.09582 Cited by: §1.
Virtanen et al. (2020) P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S. J. van der Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K. J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A. R. J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C. J. Carey, İ. Polat, Y. Feng, E. W. Moore, J. VanderPlas, D. Laxalde, J. Perktold, R. Cimrman, I. Henriksen, E. A. Quintero, C. R. Harris, A. M. Archibald, A. H. Ribeiro, F. Pedregosa, P. van Mulbregt, and SciPy 1.0 Contributors SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nature Methods 17, pp. 261–272. External Links: Document Cited by: Acknowledgements.
Webb and Vesperini (2018) J. J. Webb and E. Vesperini The Structural and Kinematic Evolution of Central Star Clusters in Dwarf Galaxies and Their Dependence on Dark Matter Halo Profiles. MNRAS 479 (3), pp. 3708–3714. External Links: Document, 1807.02526 Cited by: §1, §4.2.
Weisz et al. (2019) D. R. Weisz, A. E. Dolphin, N. F. Martin, S. M. Albers, M. L. M. Collins, A. M. N. Ferguson, G. F. Lewis, A. D. Mackey, A. McConnachie, R. M. Rich, and E. D. Skillman A rogues gallery of Andromeda’s dwarf galaxies - II. Precise distances to 17 faint satellites. MNRAS 489 (1), pp. 763–770. External Links: Document, 1909.02017 Cited by: §3.2.
Weisz et al. (2016) D. R. Weisz, S. E. Koposov, A. E. Dolphin, V. Belokurov, M. Gieles, M. L. Mateo, E. W. Olszewski, A. Sills, and M. G. Walker A Hubble Space Telescope Study of the Enigmatic Milky Way Halo Globular Cluster Crater*. ApJ 822 (1), pp. 32. External Links: Document, 1510.08533 Cited by: §4.1.
Weisz et al. (2023) D. R. Weisz, A. Savino, and A. E. Dolphin On the Reionization-era Globular Cluster in the Low-mass Galaxy Eridanus II. ApJ 948 (1), pp. 50. External Links: Document, 2303.11348 Cited by: §1, §4.2.
Zoutendijk et al. (2020) S. L. Zoutendijk, J. Brinchmann, L. A. Boogaard, M. L. P. Gunawardhana, T. Husser, S. Kamann, A. F. Ramos Padilla, M. M. Roth, R. Bacon, M. den Brok, S. Dreizler, and D. Krajnović The MUSE-Faint survey. I. Spectroscopic evidence for a star cluster in Eridanus 2 and constraints on MACHOs as a constituent of dark matter. A&A 635, pp. A107. External Links: Document, 2001.08790 Cited by: §1, §4.2.

Appendix A Structural fit

This appendix provides the details of the likelihood function and the Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling adopted for the structural analysis. The likelihood is defined as

\mathcal{L}(\boldsymbol{\Theta}\,|\,X_{j},Y_{j})=\prod_{j=1}^{N_{\star}}\mathcal{P}(X_{j},Y_{j}\,|\,\boldsymbol{\Theta}),

(1)

where $\mathcal{P}$ is the model probability density, $(X_{j},Y_{j})$ are the sky coordinates of the $j$ -th star and $\boldsymbol{\Theta}$ denotes the set of model parameters. The model probability density is composed of the star cluster and a foreground component,

\begin{split}\mathcal{P}(X,Y\,|\,\boldsymbol{\Theta})=&w\,\frac{\Sigma_{\rm cl}(X,Y\,|\,\boldsymbol{\Theta})}{\int_{\mathcal{A}}\Sigma_{\rm cl}(X,Y\,|\,\boldsymbol{\Theta}){\text{d}}X{\text{d}}Y}\\ &+(1-w)\,\frac{\Sigma_{\rm bg}(X,Y\,|\,\boldsymbol{\Theta})}{\int_{\mathcal{A}}\Sigma_{\rm bg}(X,Y\,|\,\boldsymbol{\Theta}){\text{d}}X{\text{d}}Y},\end{split}

(2)

where $0<w<1$ is the fraction of stars associated with the cluster ( $\Sigma_{\rm cl}$ ), $\Sigma_{\rm bg}$ is the background component, and the integrals in the denominators ensure that the two terms are normalised to unity over the observed sky region ( $\mathcal{A}$ ). The cluster component is described by the flattened Plummer (1911) profile

\Sigma_{\rm cl}(m)=\frac{1}{(1-e)\pi R_{h}^{2}}\left(1+\frac{m^{2}}{R_{h}^{2}}\right)^{-2},

(3)

where $R_{h}$ is the projected half-light radius and the elliptical radius is defined as

\begin{split}m^{2}=&\left[\frac{(X-X_{0})\cos\phi-(Y-Y_{0})\sin\phi}{1-e}\right]^{2}\\ &+\left[(X-X_{0})\sin\phi+(Y-Y_{0})\cos\phi\right]^{2}.\end{split}

(4)

In the above equations, $\phi$ is the position angle, $e\equiv 1-b/a$ is the ellipticity, with $b$ and $a$ the semi-minor and semi-major axes, respectively. The background component is defined as

\begin{split}&\Sigma_{\rm bg}(X,Y)=1+\rho\left(X\cos\theta+Y\sin\theta\right),\\ &\Sigma_{\rm bg}(X,Y)>0,\quad\forall(X,Y)\in\mathcal{A}.\end{split}

(5)

In the above equation, $\rho$ is proportional to the gradient amplitude and $\theta$ is the direction of the gradient.

Posterior distributions are sampled with the affine-invariant ensemble sampler implemented in emcee. We adopt 48 walkers evolved for 7000 steps and discard an initial burn-in phase of 2000 steps. Walkers that fail to converge, as diagnosed by the behaviour of the log-posterior, are removed. The adopted parameter values correspond to the medians of the posterior distributions, while uncertainties are computed from the 16th–84th (1 $\sigma$ ). Figure 5 shows the marginalised one- and two-dimensional posterior distributions on the model’s free parameters.

Appendix B Additional colour-magnitude diagrams

To underscore the similarity between the CMD of Gep I and that of And XXV, we show in Figure 6 the comparison between stars within $1R_{h}$ (red markers), which have a probability of membership to Gep I higher than 0.95, and outside $3R_{h}$ (grey dots). While the red points are optimal for a qualitative comparison with And XXV field stars, their low statistics hamper convergence of our adopted fitting methodology (see Section 3.2).

Appendix C empirical relationships

Below, we list the relevant calibration relationships used in this work. These are based on a new empirical methodology described in Mackey et al. (2026, subm.), and employed in McGill et al. (2025) and McGill et al. (2026, subm.). These calibration relationships are tailored for ancient simple stellar populations observed with the ACS/WFC camera aboard HST using the filters F606W and F814W.

By exploiting the values of $V_{\rm HB}$ , $C_{\rm RGB}$ and $\Delta V_{0.2}$ measured in Section 3.2 (see Table 2), we first derived metallicity values with the following expression:

\begin{split}{\rm[Fe/H]}&=-2.1442885(\Delta V_{0.2})^{3}+10.6949430(\Delta V_{0.2})^{2}\\ &-18.5782241(\Delta V_{0.2})+10.3015266.\end{split}

(6)

Consequently, it is possible to compute the intrinsic colour of the RGB at the HB level via

\begin{split}C_{0,\rm RGB}&=0.0306324\,\rm[Fe/H]^{2}+0.1482682\,[Fe/H]\\ &+0.8539399,\end{split}

(7)

which allows the determination of $E(B-V)$ through the following equation:

E(B-V)=(C_{\rm RGB}-C_{0,RGB})/0.945.

(8)

To derive the above equation, we considered the reddening coefficient from Schlafly and Finkbeiner (2011). Specifically:

\begin{split}&A_{m_{\rm F606W}}=2.471\,E(B-V)\\ &A_{m_{\rm F814W}}=1.526\,E(B-V)\\ &E(m_{\rm F606W}-m_{\rm F814W})=0.945\,E(B-V).\end{split}

(9)

Finally, Mackey et al. (2026, subm.) presented a new relationship, based on GC distances reported in Baumgardt and Vasiliev (2021), relating metallicity and intrinsic luminosity of the HB:

M_{\rm V,HB}=0.1954416\,\rm[Fe/H]+0.7572936,

(10)

thanks to which it is possible to compute the distance in kpc through the following expression:

{\rm log_{10}}D=0.2\,(V_{\rm HB}-M_{\rm V,HB}-2.471\,E(B-V)-10).

(11)