The Effect of Heating and Cooling on Scaling Laws of X-Ray Clusters
Extracted source text ยท arXiv astro-ph/0109554
\documentstyle[11pt,newpasp,twoside,epsf]{article}
\markboth{Muanwong et al.}{Heating and Cooling in X-ray Clusters}
\pagestyle{myheadings}
\nofiles
% Some definitions I use in these instructions.
\def\emphasize#1{{\sl#1\/}}
\def\arg#1{{\it#1\/}}
\let\prog=\arg
\def\edcomment#1{\iffalse\marginpar{\raggedright\sl#1\/}\else\relax\fi}
\marginparwidth 1.25in
\marginparsep .125in
\marginparpush .25in
\reversemarginpar
\begin{document}
\title{The Effect of Heating and Cooling on Scaling Laws of X-Ray Clusters}
\author{Orrarujee Muanwong}
\affil{Astronomy Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QJ, UK}
\begin{abstract}
We present results of including heating and cooling in cosmological
simulations of the $\Lambda$CDM cosmology and demonstrate their effects
on scaling laws of galaxy clusters. The scaling relations when radiative
cooling is included are in good agreement with observations but the fraction
of cooled gas is on the upper limit allowed by observations. On the contrary,
the preheating model has a more realistic cooled fraction but the scaling
relations are less well reproduced.
\vskip -1.0truecm
\end{abstract}
\section{Introduction}
The predicted X-ray luminosity and temperature
relation from self-similarity (${L_X \propto T^{2}_X})$ is shallower than
the observed one (${{L_X}\propto T^{\sim3}_{X}}$).
The steepening of the relation implies that low temperature
clusters are less luminous
than they would have been if self-similarity were to hold. A physical
explanation of this effect is that as the luminosity is roughly
proportional to
the gas density squared, there must exist processes which lower the density
preferentially in low temperature clusters, hence the steepening of the
relation. Such processes are for example preheating and radiative cooling
of the gas.
Ponman, Cannon, \& Navarro (1999) have shown that the observed core entropies of low
temperature clusters are in excess of what can be achieved by gravitational
collapse alone.
They suggest that preheating can raise the entropy before the infall and
that level of entropy is maintained during gravitational collapse.
As the entropy scales as ${T/n^{2/3}_e}$, where
${n_{e}}$ is the electron gas density, and the temperature of the
gas is fixed by the virial temperature of the halo,
the excess entropy implies a
decrease in density, hence a decrease in luminosity. Energy sources
which can inject energy into the intergalactic medium (IGM) are
for example AGN, quasars, hypernova explosions,
supernova explosions and so on. However, it is still debatable whether the
energy injection efficiency of the heating sources is sufficient to
provide the required entropy level.
On the other hand, radiative cooling is a process which is also important
throughout the history of cluster formation. Low entropy gas, i.e. dense
and cold gas, is removed from the ICM, leaving behind high entropy material.
Pearce et al (2000) have shown that when radiative cooling is included, the
gas is slightly heated and the luminosity is greatly reduced thus acting
so as to reconcile simulations and observations.
In these Proceedings, we present results from cosmological simulations
of the $\Lambda$CDM cosmology in which 3 different models are considered.
In the first, 'non-radiative' model, non-adiabatic
heating comes about only via shocks
following gravitational collapse and the gas is not allowed to cool.
The second 'cooling' model introduces radiative cooling such that 20
percent of the gas in the box has turned into stars by the current
day - a value that is higher than suggested by observations (Balogh et
al 2001). Finally, the third 'preheating' model has both radiative cooling
and an impulsive heating event in which 0.1 keV per particle is injected
into the IGM at a redshift of 4. This lowers the cooled fraction down
to 10 percent.
The simulations consist of 160$^{3}$ particles each of gas and dark
matter within boxes of side 100 $h^{-1}$ Mpc. The cosmological
parameters are : density parameter, $\Omega_{0}$ = 0.35; cosmological
constant, $\Lambda_{0}$=0.65, Hubble parameter, $h=H_{0}$/100km
s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ = 0.71 and baryon density parameter,
$\Omega_{b}h^{2}$ = 0.019. The metallicities are varied with time in
the form of $Z=0.3(t/t_{0}) Z_{\sun}$, where $t/t_{0}$ is the age of
the Universe in units of the current time. The objective of this is to
mimic the gradual enrichment of the ICM by stars. Cluster
catalogues are constructed at redshift zero. The catalogues are
complete down to a cluster mass of $1.18 \times 10^{13} h^{-1}$
M$_{\sun}$ which corresponds to 500 particles of each species. Details
of cluster selection criteria can be found in Muanwong et al (2001).
\section{Results}
In this section, cluster properties are compared to those
observed. We calculate the X-ray properties (temperature and
luminosity) in a soft X-ray band (0.3-1.5 keV) by using the cooling
tables of Raymond \& Smith (1977). The luminosity is then corrected to
a bolometric one by assuming that the gas is isothermal. The main
effect of using band-limited rather than bolometric fluxes is to raise
the emission-weighted temperature of low-mass clusters slightly.
\subsection{${{T_{X}}-M_{200}}$ Relations}
We compare the derived ${{T_{X}}-M_{200}}$ relations of the simulated
catalogues with a compilation of observations made by Horner,
Mushotzky, \& Scharf (1999). By using mass estimates from galaxy
velocity dispersions, X-ray temperature profiles, the isothermal
$\beta$-model and the surface brightness deprojection method, they
obtain different scaling laws shown as dashed lines in Figure 1.
The normalisation of the cooling simulation (triangles) is greater
than that of the non-radiative simulation (squares) by about a factor
of 2 at the mass of 10$^{14} h^{-1}$ M$_{\sun}$. For clarity, we omit
the preheating results but they lie roughly between the two. Most of
the radiative cooling and preheating clusters, particularly the small
systems, are hotter than their virial temperatures (solid line), in
accord with expectation. Non-radiative cooling clusters are cooler
compared to the virial temperatures due to emission-weighting of cold
and dense gas remaining in the cluster core. The slopes of all 3
simulated catalogues are roughly 0.54. We find a good agreement
between the relations from the radiative cooling model and
observations, given the spread of the 4 estimates from observations.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}[ht]
\centering
\vskip -1.5truecm \plotone{muanwongfig1.eps}
\vskip -1.5truecm
\caption{The temperature-mass relation. The dashed lines are from
observations (Horner et al 1999). The solid line is the relation
between the virial temperature and mass. Non-radiative and radiative
cooling clusters are shown as squares and triangles, respectively.}
\vskip -0.5truecm
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection{${L_{bol}-T_{X}}$ Relations}
The effect of radiative cooling is demonstrated dramatically in terms
of luminosity. The ${L_{bol}-T_{X}}$ relations of the non-radiative
cooling, radiative cooling and preheating simulations are shown as
squares, triangles and circles respectively in Figure 2. The large
decrease in density as a result of radiative energy loss of the gas
manifests in a significant reduction in luminosity. At a temperature
of 1 keV, the luminosity is reduced by a factor of 100. The radiative
cooling model again is found to have a good agreement with
observations as shown as solid lines (Xue \& Wu 200). The different
solid lines are different fits to their subsamples, i.e. groups
(roughly below 1 keV), clusters (above 1 keV) and a mixture of the two
subsamples.
The preheating model produces a relation which lies between that of
the other two models. Preheating still results in an increase in
entropy, causing the normalisation of the relation to be a factor of
10 smaller than that of the non-radiative cooling simulation, but the
agreement with observations is not as good as the radiative cooling
simulation. The non-radiative clusters are consistent with
self-similarity. The relations in the other two models are
significantly steeper than 2, even more so in low temperature
clusters.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}
\vskip -1.5truecm \centering \plotone{muanwongfig2.eps}
\vskip -1.5truecm
\caption{The luminosity-temperature relation. The solid lines are from
observations (Xue \& Wu 2000). Symbols are as same as those used in
Figure 1. Circles represent preheated clusters.}
\vskip -0.5truecm
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Conclusions}
We have demonstrated the effect of heating and cooling on X-ray
properties of clusters in cosmological simulations. The
radiative cooling model can reproduce both the temperature-mass and
luminosity-temperature relations in good agreement with
observations. However, the fraction of cooled gas is considerably
higher than observed. In contrast, the preheating model results in a
lower cooled fraction but gives a poor match to the observed scaling
relations. As a possible resolution, we are currently undertaking a
simulation which includes energy feedback from supernovae.
\section{Acknowledgement}
I am grateful for the financial support from the Thai Government. I wish to
thank Peter Thomas and Scott Kay for reading this manuscript and their
feedbacks.
Simulations presented here were carried out at Edinburgh Parallel
Computing Centre as part of the Virgo Supercomputing Consortium.
\section{References}
\begin{references}
\reference Balogh, M. L., Pearce, F. R., Bower, R. G., \& Kay, S. T. 2001,
\mnras, in press (astro-ph/0104041)
\reference Horner, D. J., Mushotzky, R. F., \& Scharf, C. A. 1999, \apj, 520, 78
\reference Muanwong, O., Thomas, P. A., Kay, S. T., Pearce, F. R., \&
Couchman, H. M. P. 2001, ApJL, 552, L27
\reference Pearce, F. R., Thomas, P. A., Couchman, H. M. P., \& Edge, A. C. 2000, \mnras, 317, 1029
\reference Ponman, T. J., Cannon, D. B., \& Navarro, J. F. 1999, Nature, 397, 135
\reference Raymond, J. C., \& Smith, B. W. 1997, \apjs, 35, 419
\reference Xue, Y.-J. \& Wu, X.-P. 2000, \apj, 538,65
\end{references}
\end{document}