Discovery and Implications of a New Large-Scale Stellar Bar in NGC 5248
Extracted source text ยท arXiv astro-ph/0201208
%\documentstyle[emulateapj,epsfig]{article}
%\usepackage{apjfonts}
%
% manuscript,two col or one col
%\documentclass[aasms4]{aastex}
%\documentclass[aaspptwo]{aastex}
%\documentclass[aaspp4]{aastex}
\documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
\usepackage{epsfig}
%
%
%\tighten
% The \tighten command merely resets the \baselinestretch to a
% smaller factor, resulting in single-column text that is more closely
% spaced. (This will always work.)
%
\begin{document}
% \submitted{Submitted to ApJ Letters}
\title{Discovery and Implications of a New Large-Scale Stellar Bar in NGC 5248}
%
\author{
Shardha Jogee$^{1}$,
Johan H. Knapen$^{2,3}$,
Seppo Laine$^{4}$,
Isaac Shlosman$^{5,6}$, \\ Nick Z. Scoville$^{1}$, and Peter
Englmaier$^{7}$
}
\footnotetext[1]{
Division of Physics, Mathematics, and Astronomy, MS 105-24,
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125}
\footnotetext[2]{
Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes, Apartado 321, Santa Cruz de La Palma, E-38700 Spain}
\footnotetext[3]{Department of Physical Sciences, University of
Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB, UK}
\footnotetext[4]{
Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin
Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218}
\footnotetext[5]{Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics, University of
Colorado, Campus Box 440, Boulder, CO 80309-0440}
\footnotetext[6]{JILA Visiting Fellow. Permanent address: Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0055}
\footnotetext[7]{MPI f{\" u}r extraterrestrische Physik, Postfach 1312,
85741 Garching, Germany}
%\author{Shardha Jogee}
%\affil{Division of Physics, Mathematics, and Astronomy, MS
%105-24, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
% Email: sj@astro.caltech.edu}
% \author{Johan H. Knapen}
% \affil{Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes, Apartado 321, Santa
% Cruz de La Palma, E-38700 Spain.\\
% Email: knapen@ing.iac.es}
% \affil{Department of Physical Sciences, University of
% Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB, UK.}
% \author{Seppo Laine}
% \affil{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin
% Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218.
% Email:~laine@stsci.edu}
% \author{Isaac Shlosman\altaffilmark{1,2}}
% \affil{Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics, University of
% Colorado, Campus Box 440, Boulder, CO 80309-0440.
% Email: shlosman@jila.colorado.edu}
% \altaffiltext{1}{JILA Visiting Fellow}
% \altaffiltext{2}{Permanent address: Department of Physics and Astronomy,
% University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0055}
%\and
%\author{Nick Z. Scoville}
%\affil{Division of Physics, Mathematics, and Astronomy, MS
%105-24, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
%Email: nzs@astro.caltech.edu}
\begin {abstract}
For decades, the grand-design SAB spiral galaxy NGC 5248
has been postulated to host a short bar
of semi-major axis $22\arcsec$ (1.6 kpc).
From dynamical and morphological arguments, we argue, however,
that its spiral structure is being
driven by a large-scale bar whose corotation radius lies at
$\sim 115\arcsec$ (8.6~kpc).
Our estimate is based partially on a deep $R$-band image
which reveals that the feature previously thought to be
an inclined disk is in fact an extended stellar bar.
The bar is embedded within a fainter outer disk
visible out to a radius of $230\arcsec$ (17.2 kpc).
The bar has a deprojected ellipticity of 0.44 and
a semi-major axis of $95\arcsec$ (7.1~kpc).
The classical grand-design spirals of NGC 5248,
prominent in $B$, $R$, and $K$ light,
lie on the leading edge of the large-scale stellar
bar and are accompanied by concave dust lanes
out to at least $70\arcsec$.
The offset between the dust and young stars is consistent
with our understanding of gas flows in barred galaxies,
where shocks along the leading edges of a moderately strong bar
compress the gas to form massive young stars.
%Beyond the bar end, the spiral arms in NGC~5248 broaden,
%bifurcate, and become much fainter as they extend out
%in the optical disk, covering a large angle in azimuth.
While in many strongly barred galaxies, optical spiral
arms are prominent outside the bar but not within it,
NGC 5248 illustrates how intense star formation along a
moderately strong bar can lead to conspicuous open spiral arms
within the bar itself. NGC 5248 also provides a clear example of how
a large-scale stellar bar embedded within a faint outer
optical disk can be misidentified as an inclined disk
when imaging studies lack the sensitivity to detect the actual
outer disk. We discuss the implications for the
estimated bar fraction at higher redshifts.
\end{abstract}
\keywords{
galaxies: individual (NGC 5248) ---
galaxies: kinematics and dynamics ---
galaxies: structure ---
galaxies: ISM ---
galaxies: evolution ---
galaxies: high-redshift
}
%%
%
\section {Introduction}
Grand-design spiral galaxies generally host two long symmetric
spiral arms which can be followed over a large azimuthal
angle and dominate the optical disk, e.g.,
NGC~1300 (Sandage 1961),
NGC~895, NGC~1566 (Elmegreen \& Elmegreen 1995),
M51, M100 (Elmegreen, Seiden, \& Elmegreen 1989)
and NGC~5248 (e.g., Patsis, Grosbol, \& Hiotelis 1997).
%(e.g., Elmegreen et al. 1997; Patsis,
%Grosbol, \& Hiotelis 1997; Puerari et al. 2000).
Within the framework of the spiral density wave (SDW)
theory (e.g., Lin \& Shu 1964)
% ; Bertin et al. 1989),
spiral arms in disk galaxies
result from a traveling wave pattern that remains
quasi-stationary in a frame of reference rotating around the
galaxy center at a certain pattern speed.
Spiral density waves can be excited by a companion
% (e.g., Holmberg 1941)
% (e.g., Kormendy \& Norman 1979)
or by a bar.
% (e.g., Toomre 1969).
The spiral waves can get swing amplified as they
are sheared from leading to trailing (e.g., Goldreich \& Lynden-Bell 1965)
% ; Toomre 1981)
provided the disk is cold enough.
In this Letter, we focus on the driving mechanism for a SDW in
the nearby ($D$=15 Mpc) well studied grand-design spiral
NGC~5248 and discuss the implications of an extended stellar bar in
this galaxy.
Optical imaging (e.g., Fig.~1) of NGC~5248 reveals two bright,
relatively symmetric
spiral arms from about $30\arcsec$ (2.2 kpc) to $80\arcsec$ (6.0 kpc).
NGC~5248 does not show evidence of any recent or ongoing
interaction with its three faint irregular neighbors
(UGC 8575, UGC 8614, and UGC 8629; Zaritsky et al. 1997)
which have similar redshifts and are
located more than $30\arcmin$ (135 kpc) away in projection.
It is therefore likely that the grand-design spirals in
NGC~5248 are driven by a massive large-scale bar,
which is verified in the present work.
The circumnuclear ring of H{\sc ii} regions
at a radius of $5\arcsec$ (375 pc) (e.g., Elmegreen et al. 1997)
%Laine et al. 1999; Maoz et al. 2001)
also suggests the presence of a bar since rings are commonly
associated with the dynamical resonances of a bar
(e.g., review by Buta \& Combes 1996).
NGC~5248 is classified as SAB(rs)bc (de Vaucouleurs et al. 1991; hereafter RC3)
and has been postulated to have a weak stellar bar
with an ellipticity of 0.32 and a semi-major axis of $22\arcsec$
(1.6 kpc) at a position angle (PA) of $110^\circ$ (e.g., Martin 1995).
This oval feature is evident in optical images (e.g., Fig.~1).
However, the extent and morphology of the
grand-design spirals in NGC 5248
strongly suggests that the bar driving these spirals
must be significantly longer and more massive than previously assumed.
The two bright inner stellar
spiral arms have prominent dust lanes on their
\it inner (concave) sides \rm (Fig.~1)
out to a radius $r \ge 70\arcsec$ (5 kpc).
Such a dust lane morphology is expected to exist only
inside the corotation resonance (CR) of the arms,
where young stars which form when gas is compressed by
shocks, seen as dust lanes,
can overtake the pattern
% (e.g., Sellwood \& Sparke 1988).
From this argument alone, we expect that the
CR of the spiral pattern in NGC~5248 is
beyond $70\arcsec$.
If the bar and spirals in this galaxy have the same pattern speed,
the latter must be driven by a stellar bar whose semi-major axis is
comparable in size to that of their common CR.
Large-scale bars are expected to end at or near CR based on the
studies of stellar orbits (Contopoulos \& Papayannopoulos 1980),
and on the analysis of shapes of offset dust lanes within
bars (Athanassoula 1992).
In order to test the existence of an extended bar in NGC~5248,
we obtained a deep $R$-band image with a large field of view ($\S$ 2).
%In $\S$ 3, we describe the properties of the detected bar and outer disk.
%In $\S$ 4, we discuss the implications of the bar detection in NGC~5248 for
%the spiral structure of nearby galaxies and the bar fraction
% at higher redshifts.
While this Letter focuses on the observational aspects of
the large-scale bar in NGC~5248 and its consequences for galactic
dynamics in nearby and high redshift galaxies, the subsequent paper
(Jogee et al. 2002, hereafter Paper II) addresses gas dynamics in the
inner few kpc of this galaxy, based on multi-wavelength observations
and modeling.
%fig 1
\section {Observations and Data Reduction}
NGC~5248 was imaged through the Harris $R$-band filter for
a total of 30 minutes using the
Wide Field Camera on the 2.5 m Isaac Newton Telescope (INT) in La Palma
in August 2001. The data frames had a plate scale of
0\farcs 33/pixel, a field of view (fov) of 11\farcm 3 $\times$ 22\farcm 5,
and an average seeing of 1\farcs 8.
Photometric calibration was performed by comparison with a shorter image
of the galaxy in the same band, taken on the same night with the 1 m
Jacobus Kapteyn Telescope.
The $R$-band surface brightness (SB) goes down to 26.5 mag arcsec$^{-2}$.
Bias-subtracted and flat-fielded frames were obtained from
the INT data reduction pipeline. Sky-fringing at the 1 \% level is present,
an effect known for the thinned EEV chip CCD4.
We used the IRAF package for
fixing bad pixels, cleaning cosmic rays, and
%convolving the frames to a common seeing before
combining frames into a final image.
After masking out stars and faint background galaxies,
%% in the outer parts of the final image,
isophotal analysis
% of the $R$-band light
was performed with the ``isophote'' package in IRAF.
We also refer to a $K'$-image obtained in May 2000
using the INGRID camera on the 4.2~m William Herschel Telescope. This
image, and other data described in this paper, are fully detailed in
Paper~II.
\section {The extended bar and faint outer disk}
The $R$-band image (Fig.~1) reveals a hitherto unknown
large-scale stellar bar-like feature embedded within a fainter,
more circular, outer
disk which is visible out to a radius of $230\arcsec$ (17.2 kpc).
Below we describe the morphological, photometric, and
dynamical properties of this bar.
Earlier optical and NIR images lacked the sensitivity and/or field of
view to clearly detect the end of the
large-scale stellar bar and the faint outer disk.
As a result, the bar was
misinterpreted as an inclined outer disk.
The new $R$-band image (Fig. 1) shows the actual
outer disk and the full extent of the bar.
In order to quantitatively describe the features
in NGC~5248, we performed an isophotal analysis (Fig.~2)
of the $R$-band and available $K$-band images.
To minimize the effects of extinction, the $K$-band image of
$0 \farcs 6$ seeing is used out to a radius of $50\arcsec$.
Beyond this point, its S/N ratio is low and we use
the $R$-band image.
%fig2
% We first discuss the large-scale stellar bar.
The bright optical stellar spiral arms
extend along the leading ($\S$ 4) edge of the bar and
cross its major axis (PA $\sim 135^\circ$) at around $95\arcsec$
(Fig. 1). This suggests that the bar has a
semi-major axis of about $95\arcsec$ (7.1 kpc).
Large-scale bars typically tend to end near the ultra harmonic resonance
where chaos and orbital instability set in.
The ratio of corotation to bar radii ($R_{\rm CR}$/$R_{\rm bar}$)
is expected to lie in the range of $1.2\pm 0.2$ as found empirically
by Athanassoula (1992). This corresponds to a CR
of $\sim 115\arcsec$ (8.6~kpc) in NGC~5248 -- a value supported by
photometric evidence.
As seen in Fig.~2, between $60\arcsec$ to $115\arcsec$, the projected
ellipticity {\it e} rises to a maximum of 0.52 and the
PA settles to a fairly constant value of $135^\circ$,
after some initial variation between $120^\circ$--$135^\circ$.
This small variation is due to the unusual prominence of the spiral arms
within the bar. The peak in $e$ over a fairly constant PA,
as observed in NGC~5248, is the behavior expected of bars
(e.g., Knapen et al. 1995).
% Wozniak et al. 1995).
% Note that larger values of $R_{\rm CR}$/$R_{\rm bar}$ have been claimed
% in several systems, e.g., NGC~3081 (R.~Buta, private communication).
%fig3
Between $a$~=~$115\arcsec$--$150\arcsec$, secondary faint spirals
which stem off the bar at lower radii become particularly prominent.
They dominate the fitted isophotes which show a varying \it e \rm
of 0.41--0.46 (Fig.~2). Such features are reminiscent of ``plumes''
which are seen in other barred systems such as NGC~1433 and
may be secondary compression zones which arise near CR (Buta 1984).
%(e.g., Schwarz 1979).
Between $150\arcsec$--$230\arcsec$, the isophotes are dominated by
the outer disk and very faint spirals which extend away from
the bar and cover $90^\circ$--$100^\circ$ in azimuth (Fig. 1).
This leads to a low but varying $e$ (Fig. 2).
The outer Lindlad resonance (OLR), where arms are expected to end,
is probably around $230 \arcsec$.
The PA of the projected disk is relatively constant at $105^\circ$.
Assuming the outer disk is intrinsically circular, we derive
a PA of $105^\circ \pm 2^\circ$ for the line of nodes and an inclination
of $40^\circ \pm 4^\circ$. With these parameters, we performed
a two-dimensional deprojection of the $R$-band and $K$-band images.
The deprojected disk (Paper~II) is circular with
\it e \rm below 0.02 (Fig.~2)
while the deprojected bar is moderately strong with
a peak \it e \rm of 0.44.
We note that the deprojection is somewhat uncertain because
the intrinsic shape of the disk between CR and OLR
is expected to be slightly elongated along the bar minor axis.
We now turn our attention to the inner regions ($r \le 50\arcsec$)
of NGC~5248.
A very weak oval feature is present in the inner $3\arcsec$
radius of the $K$-band image (Fig.~3) where the deprojected \it e \rm
varies from 0.18 to 0.10 (Fig.~2).
Two $K$-band spirals, extending from this oval, are
lined with ``hot spots'' between $3\arcsec$--$9\arcsec$. They cross
the optically-visible
starburst ring at $\sim 5\arcsec$ and between $5\arcsec$--$8\arcsec$,
they delineate the bright super star clusters
seen in {\it HST} images (see Paper~II).
Near the bar major axis, the spirals fade out, and \it e \rm
falls from 0.20 to 0.11 between $10\arcsec$--$13\arcsec$ (Fig.~2).
% Only very faint $K$-band spirals exist from $13\arcsec$--$17\arcsec$
% where \it e \rm rises slightly (0.07--0.12).
Between $17\arcsec$--$26\arcsec$, the stellar distribution
looks smoother (Fig.~3) and the $K$-band spirals fade as they approach
the bar major axis.
% This leads \it e \rm to drop (0.012--0.05)
Further out, between $30\arcsec$--$50\arcsec$, the
bright patchy outer $K$-band spirals (Fig.~3) dominate,
leading to a higher $e$ (0.15--0.30) and a smoothly varying PA.
The oval-shaped feature of radius $\sim$~$22\arcsec$
which is visible in the projected images (e.g., Fig.~1)
has been interpreted as a
primary bar of semi-major axis $22\arcsec$ (1.6 kpc) at a
PA of $110^\circ$ in earlier studies (e.g., Martin 1995).
However, after deprojection, this feature has a
peak $e$ of only 0.15 (Fig.~2).
Therefore, the oval appearance of this feature in the sky plane
seems to be largely due to projection effects.
The dip in $e$ at around $26\arcsec$ is due to the K-band
arms joining the oval at its minor axis.
Uncertainties in the deprojection are unlikely to change this
conclusion, namely, there appears to be no signs of a bar of size $22\arcsec$
in NGC~5248.
% In the galaxy plane, this feature corresponds
% to the inner regions of the large-scale stellar bar.
%fig 4
% \section {The grand-design gaseous, stellar, and dust spirals in NGC~5248 }
\section {Discussion: Implications for barred spirals locally and at high redshifts }
NGC~5248 shows a grand-design spiral morphology in stars, dust, and gas,
as traced by $B$-band (Paper~II), $R$-band (Fig.~1),
$K$-band (Fig.~3), $B-I$, H$\alpha$, and CO maps (Paper~II).
In $B$, $R$ and $K$ light, there are prominent
stellar spiral arms between about $30\arcsec$--$80\arcsec$ (2.2--6.0 kpc),
on the leading edge of the large-scale stellar bar.
The stellar arms
have prominent dust spirals on their inner (concave) sides
out to at least $70\arcsec$ (e.g., Fig.~1), as is expected
inside the CR.
The observed offset between the dust and stellar spirals
is consistent with our understanding of gas flows in
barred galaxies where offset dust lanes along the leading edges
of the bar delineate the shocks which compress the gas,
%(e.g., Athanassoula 1992), %(Prendergast 1962; Roberts 1969;
%Roberts, Huntley, \& van Albada 1979; Athanassoula 1992),
leading to the formation of massive young stars.
%which subsequently overtake the bar pattern.
Within this framework, the bar is rotating clockwise, and
the patchy $B$, $R$, and $K$ stellar spiral arms immediately offset from
the dust lanes are made of \it young \rm stars.
%Similar offsets between dust, gas, and stars have also been seen in
%observations of spiral arms in disks (e.g., Allen, Atherton,
%\& Tilanus 1986).
It is particularly noteworthy that the appearance of the $K$-band spirals
in NGC~5248 is dominated by young stars. $K$-band light
is generally assumed to trace old stellar populations,
but it can be dominated by very young (8-10 Myr)
supergiants in starburst regions (e.g., Knapen et al. 1995)
%Leitherer \& Heckman 1995).
Along the $K$-band arms in NGC~5248, there is good
spatial coincidence between peaks in $K$-band emission
and H{\sc ii} regions as traced by H$\alpha$ images.
The patchy morphology of the $K$-band spirals is
in stark contrast to the smooth appearance of old stellar arms
(e.g., Kennicutt \& Edgar 1986). Taken together, these properties
suggest that young stars dominate the $K$-band spirals.
While grand-design optical spiral arms in many
\it strongly \rm barred galaxies stem from the ends of a stellar bar,
in NGC~5248, open spiral arms appear conspicuous within the
\it moderately strong \rm bar itself, delineating intense SF.
The SF along the offset bar dust lanes
in NGC~5248 is consistent with current understanding of gas flows and
SF in barred galaxies.
% and presents a rather extreme case of this phenomenon.
In strong bars which exhibit almost straight offset dust lanes
delineating shocks, little SF is seen
along the bar. Common examples are NGC~1300 and NGC~5383 (Tubbs 1982).
% NGC~4535, and NGC~4548 (Koopmann 1997).
Star formation is believed to be inhibited because of
the strong shear in the postshock flow (e.g., Athanassoula 1992).
In weaker bars, where the offset dust lanes are curved,
the weaker shocks and shear can induce SF rather than inhibit it.
For instance, the collapse of gas cores to form stars can be
induced by weak shocks with speeds of order 20 to 30
km~s$^{-1}$ (e.g., Vanhala \& Cameron 1998).
It is thus common to see SF along weak bars, e.g.,
in M100 (Elmegreen et al. 1989),
% Knapen \& Beckman 1996),
NGC~4254, and NGC~4303 (Koopmann 1997).
NGC~5248 falls in this category as its large-scale bar is
only moderately strong with curved
offset dust lanes (Fig.~1), and a deprojected ellipticity of 0.44.
%About 50 \% of the 26 grand-design spirals
%in the study of Elmegreen \& Elmegreen (1995) show conspicuous
%star formation in the two inner symmetric arms
%e.g., NGC~1566, NGC~895.
% How does NGC 5248 compare to other well-known grand-design spirals?
% Like the grand-design spiral galaxies in the studies of
% Elmegreen \& Elmegreen (1982, 1987, 1995),
% NGC~5248 has two bright optical spiral arms which
% dominate within its inner $R_ {\rm 25}$/2 ($93\arcsec$; RC3) radius,
% and bifurcate, broaden, and dramatically change appearance
% beyond $R_ {\rm 25}$/2.
% In a study of a large sample of galaxies
% Elmegreen \& Elmegreen (1982, 1987, 1995) find
% that grand-design spiral galaxies
% (e.g., NGC~895, NGC~1566, and NGC~7412)
% tend to host two relatively symmetric arms in
% the inner parts of their disks. At around $R_ {\rm 25}$/2,
% these spiral arms dramatically change appearance,
% showing symmetric bifurcation or broadening.
% Broader and fainter spirals then extend further out in
% the optical disk.
% This behavior may be related to the CR of the spiral
% pattern (Elmegreen \& Elmegreen 1995), since
% various studies suggest that the CR
% is of order 0.4-0.6 $R_ {\rm 25}$ in M81, M100, and M51.
We note that there exists a class of weakly barred galaxies
where bright optical spiral arms appear to emerge from
a relatively short oval bar-like feature and extend to twice
the radius of this bar (Elmegreen \& Elmegreen 1995).
We would have put NGC~5248 in this category
if we had taken its primary stellar bar to be the oval
feature of radius $22\arcsec$, as was long assumed
to be the case. However, with our identification
of the large-scale bar of radius $95\arcsec$,
the bright optical spiral arms with concave dust lanes
in NGC~5248 turn out to lie inside the bar. The short
oval turns out to be primarily the result of projection effects
($\S$ 3). It is therefore imperative to ask whether galaxies
with bright extended optical spiral arms apparently driven
by a short oval feature, are in fact hiding
a more extended large-scale bar.
NGC~1566 and ESO 111-110 (Buta 1995) are two such possible
candidates.
While the majority of nearby spiral galaxies are barred (e.g.,
Grosbol 2002), a low fraction of bars ($<$ 10 \%)
has been reported in galaxies at redshifts $z \sim$ 0.5--0.8 (e.g.,
Abraham et al. 1999). In this latter study, the authors apply the
same bar identification method to nearby galaxies and
to spirals at $z \sim$ 0.5--0.8.
Images which trace the rest-frame $B$-band light are used.
The inclination $i$ is derived from an outer isophote which corresponds
to an arbitrary fraction (1\%) of the peak flux.
After removing the projected ellipticity corresponding to $i$,
a bar is identified based on the residual ellipticity in the inner bright
regions of the spiral galaxy. The authors find a much lower bar fraction
at intermediate redshifts than locally.
It has been suggested that this result may be biased due to the small
sample size or that bars are truly deficient
at intermediate redshifts because of dynamically hotter disks or
an enhanced efficiency in bar destruction (Abraham et al. 1999).
Another possibility is that the method used is less
efficient in identifying bars at intermediate redshifts than locally.
This method relies on the $B$-band surface brightness ratio ($R_{\rm 1}$)
between the central regions and the outer disk beyond the bar end.
In a barred spiral with a bright central region and a faint
outer disk beyond the bar end, $R_{\rm 1}$ is low, and this method
can readily fail: the outer 1\% isophote would lie inside the bar rather
than in the faint, more circular outer disk and, consequently,
the bar would be misinterpreted as an inclined disk.
Bars may be missed more frequently at $z \sim$ 0.5--0.8 than
locally with this method because of two factors: evolution and imaging depth.
If there is evolution in the surface-brightness profiles of spirals
with redshift such that $R_{\rm 1}$ is on average lower at higher
redshifts, then bars may be missed more frequently at $z \sim$ 0.5--0.8
than locally. Detailed future studies with large samples
are needed to quantify $R_{\rm 1}$, but our suggestion is not ruled
out by existing data. Spiral galaxies at intermediate redshifts have
bright blue central colors indicative of recent starbursts
(Ellis, Abraham, \& Dickinson 2001), and the outer disk/bar
which have presumably formed recently may still be quite faint.
Another factor is that images of spirals at $z \sim$ 0.5--0.8 often
do not reach the same sensitivity level as images of nearby galaxies.
%
% NGC~5248 provides a good example of how even in a local
% spiral galaxy, such a bar can be easily misidentified
% as an inclined disk by imaging studies which lack the
% sensitivity to detect the true outer disk.
We also discuss why a higher bar fraction at
$z \sim$ 0.5--0.8 is quite likely.
It is well known that bars or $m$=2 modes can be easily excited in
a dynamically cold disk either spontaneously
% (e.g., Schwarz 1984)
or during tidal interactions and minor mergers.
% (e.g., Holmberg 1941).
On the other hand, major mergers tend to produce highly disturbed
systems which eventually evolve into elliptical-like systems (e.g.,
Barnes 1992) through violent relaxation.
The fraction of spiral galaxies in pairs
increases with redshift out to $z \sim $ 0.75--1 (Le F\`evre et al.
2000), suggesting enhanced interaction between spiral galaxies.
These interactions do not appear to involve major mergers since
\it HST \rm studies hint that sizes of spiral galaxies
(e.g., Lilly et al. 1998)
%(e.g., Lilly et al. 1998; Simard et al. 1999),
and the number counts of spirals with $I<$22 mag
in \it HST \rm fields (e.g., Glazebrook et al. 1995)
do not show much evolution out to $z \sim $ 1.
Taken together, these results suggest that conditions
out to $z \sim $ 1 are favorable to the formation of bars
in disk galaxies.
Furthermore, if the recently discovered massive disk
galaxy at $z$ =1.34 (Van Dokkum \& Stanford 2001)
is representative, it reveals that massive, organized,
%dynamically cold
disks with ongoing SF are already in place by
$z$ =1. The ring of SF at a $\sim$~10 kpc radius
may be associated with the dynamical resonances of a bar or
alternatively could be an out-of-the-plane ring.
%
% In fact, there are several pieces of indirect, but tantalizing evidence
% for the prevalence of bars at high redshift.
% Ellis, Abraham, \& Dickinson (2001) propose that starburst activity
% may have rejuvenated the population in the central regions of many spirals% at intermediate redshifts of $z \sim 0.6$. Bars, whether
% spontaneously or tidally induced, are efficient
% triggers for circumnuclear starbursts in present-day spirals
% (e.g., Jogee et al. 2001b). Furthermore,
% In the recently discovered, massive disk galaxy at $z$ =1.34
% (Van Dokkum \& Stanford 2001), a ring of star formation exists
% at a $\sim$10 kpc radius. This strongly suggests the presence
% of a large-scale stellar bar since rings are typically associated with
% the dynamical resonances of a bar in local spirals
% (e.g., Buta \& Combes 1996).
%hierarchical models of galaxy formation predict
%that massive present-day spirals disks form late
%at $z <~ 1$ (e.g., Mo, Mao, \& White 1998;
%van den Bosch 1998),
\acknowledgments
Support for this work was provided by
a grant from the K. T. and E. L. Norris Foundation, and an
NSF grant AST 99-81546 for S. J. and N. Z. S., and grants
NAG 5-10823, HST GO-08123.01-97A, and WKU 516140-02-07 for I. S.
%%We thank Bruce Elmegreen, Frank Shu, and Chi Yuan for
%% interesting discussions,
We thank Thomas Augusteijn for INT service observations and
Ron Buta for useful comments.
% and Sharon Stedman for data analysis (PII)
% for participating in data analysis.
%This publication is based on observations made with the
%NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, obtained from the Data Archive
%at the Space Telescope Science Institute,
%which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research
% in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555.
Data were retrieved from the Isaac Newton Group (ING) archive.
The William Herschel, Isaac Newton, and Jacobus Kapteyn Telescopes
%are operated on the island of La
are operated on La
Palma by the ING in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos
of the Instituto de Astrof\'\i sica de Canarias.
\clearpage
\begin{references}
\reference{}Allen, R.~J., Atherton, P.~D., \& Tilanus, R.~P.~J.\ 1986, \nat, 319, 296
\reference{}Abraham, R. G. et al. 1996, ApJS, 107, 1
%\reference{}Abraham et al. 1999, MNRAS, 308, 569
\reference{}Abraham, R. G., Merrifield, M. R., Ellis, R. S., Tanvir, N. R., \&
Brinchmann, J. 1999, MNRAS, 308, 569
% \reference{}Abraham, R. G.,\& van den Bergh, S. 2001, Science, 293, 1273
\reference{}Athanassoula, E. 1992, MNRAS, 259, 345
\reference{}Barnes, J. E. 1992, ApJ, 393, 484
%\reference{}Bertin, G., Lin, C. C., Lowe, S. A., Thurstans, R. P. 1989, ApJ,
%338, 78
%\reference{}Bertin, G., Lin, C. C., Lowe, S. A., Thurstans, R. P. 1989b, ApJ,
%338, 104
% \reference{}Block, D. L. et al. 2001, A\&A, 375, 761
%\reference{}Block, D. L., Puerari, I., Knapen, J. H., Elmegreen, B. G.,
% Buta, R., Stedman, S., \& Elmegreen, D. M. 2001, A\&A, 375, 761
%plumes
\reference{}Buta, R. 1984, Proc. Astron. Soc. Aus. 5, 472, 1984
%1566
% \reference{}Buta, R. 1986, ApJS, 61, 609
% ESO 110
\reference{}Buta, R. 1995, ApJS, 96, 39
\reference{}Buta, R., \& Combes F. 1996, Fund. of Cosmic Physics, 17, 95
%Volume 17, (Overseas Publishers Association), 95
% \reference{}Buta, R., Stuart D.; Madsen, G. J., Wesson, K., Crocker,
% D. A., \& Combes, F. 2001, AJ, 121, 225
% xxxxxxxxxxx Chi Yuan ?
\reference{}Contopoulos, G. \& Papayannopoulos, T. 1980, A\&A, 92, 33
% \reference{}Combes, F. \& Elmegreen, B. G. 1993, A\&A, 271, 391
\reference{}De Vaucouleurs, G., de Vaucouleurs, A., Corwin Jr., H. G.,
Buta, R. J., Paturel, G., \& Fouque, P. 1991, Third Reference Catalogue
of Bright Galaxies (New York: Springer) (RC3)
\reference{}Ellis, R. S., Abraham, R. G., \& Dickinson, M. 2001, ApJ, 551, 1111
%\reference{}Elmegreen, D. M. \& Elmegreen, B. G. 1982, MNRAS, 201, 1021
%\reference{}Elmegreen, D. M. \& Elmegreen, B. G. 1987, ApJ, 314, 3
\reference{}Elmegreen, D. M., \& Elmegreen, B. G. 1995, ApJ, 445, 591
\reference{}Elmegreen, B. G., Seiden, P. E., \& Elmegreen, D. M. 1989, ApJ, 343, 602
\reference{}Elmegreen, D. M., Chromey, F. R., Santos, M., \& Marshall, D. 1997, AJ,
114, 1850
\reference{}Glazebrook, K., Ellis, R., Santiago, B., \& Griffiths, R. 1995
MNRAS, 275, L19
\reference{}Goldreich, P., \& Lynden-Bell, D. 1965, MNRAS, 130, 125
\reference{}Grosbol, P. 2002, in ASP Conf. Series, Disks of Galaxies: Kinematics,
Dynamics, \& Perturbations eds. E. Athanassoula \& A. Bosma, in print
% \reference{}Hernquist, L. E. 1989, Nature, 340, 687
% \reference{}Holmberg, E. 1941, ApJ, 94, 385
% \reference{}Jogee, S. 1999, Ph.D. thesis, Yale University
\reference{}Jogee, S., Shlosman, I., Laine, S., Knapen, J. H., Englmaier, P.,
Scoville, N. Z., \& Wilson, C. D. 2002, ApJ, in press (Paper II)
% \reference{}Jogee, S., Baker, A. J., Sakamoto, K., Scovile, N. Z.,
% \& Kenney, J. D. P.
% 2001b, in ASP Conf. Series, The Central kpc of Starbursts and AGN:
% The La Palma Connection. eds. J.H. Knapen, J.E. Beckman, I. Shlosman, \& T.J.
% Mahoney (ASP, San Francisco) 249, 612
\reference{}Kennicutt, R. C., Jr., \& Edgar, B. K. 1986, ApJ, 300, 132
%Observational constraints on driving mechanisms for spiral density waves
% \reference{}Kormendy, J., \& Norman, C. A., 1979, ApJ, 233, 539
%% 'The striking near-infrared morphology of the inner region in M100 (PI)
% \reference{}Knapen, J. H., Beckman, J. E., Shlosman, I., Peletier, R. F.,
% Heller, C. H., \& de Jong, R S. 1995, ApJL, 443, L73.
\reference{}Knapen, J. H., Beckman, J. E., Heller, C. H., Shlosman, I.,
\& De Jong, R. S. 1995, ApJ, 454, 623
% \reference{}Knapen, J. H., \& Beckman, J. E. 1996, MNRAS, 283, 251
\reference{}Koopmann, R. A., 1997, Ph.D. thesis, Yale University
%\reference{}Laine, S., Knapen, J. H., Perez-Ramirez, D., Doyon, R., \&
% Nadeau, D. 1999, MNRAS, 302, 33
%% HST imaging of CFRS amd LDSS Redshift surveys
% IV Influence of mergers in the evolution of faint galaxies
% from z~1
\reference{} Le F\`evre, O. et al. 2000, MNRAS, 311, 565
% \reference{}Leitherer, C., \& Heckman, T. M. 1995, ApJS, 96, 9
\reference{}Lilly et al. 1998, ApJ, 500, 75
\reference{}Lin, C. C., \& Shu, F. H. 1964, ApJ, 140, 646
% \reference{}Lin, C. C., Yuan, C., \& Shu, F. H. 1969, ApJ, 155, 721
% \reference{}Maoz, D., Barth, A. J., Ho, L. C., Sternberg, A., \& Filippenko,
% A. V. 2001, AJ, 121, 3048
\reference{}Martin, P. 1995, AJ, 109, 2428
% \reference{}Noguchi , M. 1988, A\&A, 203, 259
% \reference{}Ostriker, J. P., \& Peebles, J. P. E. 1973, ApJ 186, 467
\reference{}Patsis, P., Grosbol, G., \& Hiotelis, N. 1997, A\&A, 326, 493
%\reference{}Petrou, M. \& Papayannopolous, T. 1986, MNRAS, 219, 157
%\reference{}Prendergast, K. H. 1962, in Distribution and Motion of the ISM
% in Galaxies, ed. L. Woltjer (New York: Benjamin), 217
% \reference{}Puerari, I., Block, D. L., Elmegreen, B. G., Frogel, J. A., \&
% Eskridge, P. B. 2000, A\&A, 359, 932
% \reference{}Roberts, W. W. 1969, ApJ, 158, 123
%\reference{}Roberts, W. W., Jr., Huntley, J. M., and van Albada, G. D. 1979, ApJ, 233, 67
\reference{}Ryder, S. D., \& Knapen, J. H. 1999, MNRAS, 302, L7
\reference{}Sandage, A. 1961, The Hubble Atlas of Galaxies
(Washington D. C.: Carnegie Institute of Washington)
%\reference{}Sanders, R. H., \& Huntley, J. M. 1976, ApJ, 209, 53
%\reference{}Sanders, R. H., \& Tubbs, A. D. 1980, ApJ, 235, 803
% \reference{}Schwarz, M. P 1981, ApJ, 247, 77
% \reference{}Schwarz, M. P. 1984, MNRAS, 221, 195
%Pattern speeds in barred spiral galaxies
% \reference{}Sellwood, J. A., \& Sparke, L. S. 1988, MNRAS, 231, 25S
%Unstable modes from galaxy simulations
% \reference{}Sellwood, J. A., \& Athanassoula, E. 1986, MNRAS, 221, 195
% \reference{}Simard, L. et al 1999, ApJ, 519, 563
% Dissection of an N-body bar
% \reference{}Sparke, L. S. \& Sellwood, J. A., 1987, MNRAS, 225, 653
% \reference{}Tagger, M., Sygnet, J. F., Athanassoula, E., Pellat, R. 1987, ApJ, 318, 43
%Group Velocity of Spiral Waves in Galactic Disks
% \reference{}Toomre, A. 1969, ApJ, 158, 899
% \reference{}Toomre, A. 1981, in The Structure and Evolution of Normal Galaxies,
% ed. S. M. Fall and Lynden-Bell (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 111
\reference{}Tubbs, A. D. 1982, ApJ, 255, 458
%\reference{}Tully, R. B. 1988, `Nearby Galaxies Catalog' (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
\reference{}Van Dokkum, P. G., \& Stanford, S. A. 2001, ApJL, 562, L35
\reference{}Vanhala, H. A. T., \& Cameron, A. G. W. 1998, ApJ, 508, 291
%\reference{}Wozniak, H., Friedli, D., Martinet, L., Martin, P.,
% Bratschi, P., 1995, A\&AS 111, 115.
\reference{}Zaritsky, D., Smith, R., Frenk, C., White, S. D. M. 1997, ApJ, 478, 39
\end{references}
\clearpage
\setcounter{figure}{0}
\begin{center} % fig.1
%\epsfig{file=f1.cps.eps,height=8.5cm}
\epsfig{file=f1.cps.eps,height=17.5cm}
\figcaption{
%\bf The large-scale stellar bar and faint outer disk:
\rm
The $R$-band image
reveals a hitherto unknown prominent stellar bar of size $95\arcsec$,
embedded within a faint, more circular, outer disk which is visible
out to a radius of 230\arcsec (17.2 kpc).
The two bright inner spirals between $30\arcsec$ (2.2 kpc)
and $80\arcsec$ (6.0 kpc) lie on the leading edge of the bar.
For a high resolution version of this figure, see
ftp://ftp.astro.caltech.edu/users/sj/astroph/n5248-p1-highres.ps.gz
\label{fig1}}
\end{center} % fig.1
\clearpage
\setcounter{figure}{1}
\begin{center}
%\epsfig{file=f2.eps,height=8.0cm}
\epsfig{file=f2.eps}
\figcaption{
%\bf
%Isophotal analysis:
%\rm
The radial profiles of surface brightness (SB), ellipticity ($e$),
and position angle (PA) of the azimuthally-averaged $K$-band and
$R$-band light are shown.
The dotted and dashed lines refer to the values before deprojection.
The symbols refer to deprojected values.
% derived from images deprojected
%assuming an inclination of 40$^\circ$ and a line of nodes of
%105$^\circ$.
The $K$-band SB has been scaled by 1.32 so that
it can be plotted on the same scale as the $R$-band profile.
In deprojected images, we adopt the convention that PAs
are measured anticlockwise from ``North''.
The deprojected bar has an ellipticity of 0.44.
%, and have dust lanes on their inner (concave) sides.
\label{fig2}}
\end{center}
% \clearpage
% \setcounter{figure}{2}
% \begin{center}
% \epsfig{file=f3.eps,height=14.5cm}
% \figcaption{
%\bf
%\rm
%In the deprojected $R$-band image, the outer disk is relatively
%circular and the deprojected bar
%is moderately strong, with inner bright spirals on its leading edge.
%% The contour levels are 40, 70, 80, 90, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800 counts
%\label{fig3}}
%\end{center}
\clearpage
\setcounter{figure}{2}
\begin{center}
\vspace{-10.0cm}
\epsfig{file=f3a-b.eps,height=19cm}
\vspace{-1.6cm}
\figcaption{
%\bf
%The deprojected $K$-band image:
%\rm
The bottom and top panels show, respectively,
the central $30 \arcsec$ (2.2 kpc) and $2.4 \arcmin$ (10.8 kpc)
of the deprojected $K$-band image.
%Contour levels are 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80,
% 90, 100, 110, 120, 140, 160 counts.
% **** change from counts to mag arcsec-2.
% The bottom panel shows the central $2.4 \arcmin$ (10.8 kpc).
% Greyscale range is 25--120 counts.
Notice
% the very weak oval in the inner $3\arcsec$ radius,
the $K$-band spirals lined with ``hot'' spots between
$4\arcsec$--$9\arcsec$, the relatively axisymmetric distribution
between $17\arcsec$--$26\arcsec$, and the patchy $K$-band spirals
beyond $30 \arcsec$. For a high resolution version of this figure, see
ftp://ftp.astro.caltech.edu/users/sj/astroph/n5248-p1-highres.ps.gz
\label{fig3}}
\end{center}
\end{document}