Classifying the zoo of ultraluminous X-ray sources
Extracted source text ยท arXiv astro-ph/0409130
%% *************************************************************************
%% cjaa.tex
%% CJAA Ver. 1.0, LaTeX class for Chinese Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics
%% demonstration file
%% (C) Chin. J. Astron. Astrophys.
%% revised by Zhou Ai-Ying, 2001.08.28;2003.04.20
%%
%% Note: 1. The ChJAA macro class cjaa.cls for LaTeX2e was adapted from
%% aa.cls, the A&A's macro class (Ver.5.01). Manuscripts for
%% ChJAA can be prepared following this demo file using cjaa.cls.
%% 2. To include EPS/PS graphics, you may use one of the graphics macro packages:
%% graphicx.sty, epsf.sty or psfig.sty, or their mix. Please note the usage
%% of \input{*.sty} and \usepackage{*}, they have no difference.
%% 3. Pay close attention to the format of ChJAA's reference list and
%% other requirements. See Instructions for Authors (2001, ChJAA, Vol.1, No.1)
%% or visit ChJAA's web pages at http://www.chjaa.org
%% 4. Final publication layout will be produced with this LaTeX source file.
%%---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%%
%\documentclass[referee]{cjaa} % referee version: for submission
\documentclass{cjaa} % preprint, the final version for publication
%if use preprint, please de-comment \volnopage{} too.
\usepackage{graphicx} %for PS/EPS graphics inclusion, new
\input{epsf.sty} %for PS/EPS graphics inclusion, old
\input{psfig.sty} %for PS/EPS graphics inclusion, old
%\baselineskip=6mm %%preserved for Editor. DOn't remove!
\begin{document}
\title{Classifying the zoo of ultraluminous X-ray sources
%\,$^*$
%\footnotetext{$*$ Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.}
}
% \subtitle{I. Place Your Subtitle Here}
\volnopage{Vol.0 (200x) No.0, 000--000} %%preserved for Editor. DOn't remove!
\setcounter{page}{1} %%starting page, preserved for Editor. DOn't remove!
% \baselineskip=5mm %%preserved for Editor. DOn't remove!
\author{Roberto Soria
\inst{1}\mailto{}
%% Please move "\mailto{}" to the corresponding author of the paper.
%% For single author or all the authors from an institute, use "\inst{}" only
%% Here is an example of three authors come from different institutes.
\and Mark Cropper
\inst{1}
\and Christian Motch
\inst{2}
}
\offprints{R. Soria} %% is disabled in fact
% \baselineskip=4.642mm %% preserved for Editor. DOn't remove!
\institute{MSSL, University College London,
Holmbury St Mary, RH5 6NT, United Kingdom\\
\email{Roberto.Soria@mssl.ucl.ac.uk}
%% Please give the E-mail address of the author, to whom future correspondence and
%% offprint requests will be sent. Note to pair \mailto{} with \email{}
\and
Observatoire de Strasbourg, 11, rue de l'Universit\'{e},
F-67000 Strasbourg, France\\
}
\date{Received~~2004 July 15; Accepted 2004 September 6}
\abstract{
Ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) are likely to include
different physical types of objects.
%differing in the mass of the accreting BH,
%age, mechanism of formation and geometry of emission.
We discuss some possible subclasses, reviewing
the properties of a sample of ULXs recently observed
by {\it Chandra} and {\it XMM-Newton}.
Sources with an isotropic X-ray luminosity up to a few times
$10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$ are consistent with ``normal''
stellar-mass X-ray binaries (mostly high-mass X-ray binaries
in star-forming regions). Higher black hole (BH) masses ($\approx 50$--$100 M_{\odot}$)
may be the end product of massive stellar evolution
in peculiar environments: they may explain ULXs with
luminosities $\approx 1$--$2 \times 10^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$.
Only a handful of ULXs require a true intermediate-mass BH
($M \ga 500 M_{\odot}$).
%; its formation in a young cluster core
%is consistent with one source, but other mechanisms
%may be required in other cases.
Finally, a small subclass of ULXs shows flaring or rapid variability
in its power-law spectral component.
%: we discuss possible interpretations.
\keywords{accretion, accretion disks --- black hole physics
--- galaxies: individual: NGC\,4559 --- X-ray: galaxies --- X-ray: stars}
}
\authorrunning{R. Soria, M. Cropper, \& C. Motch} %author_head in even pages
\titlerunning{The ULX zoo} % title_head in odd pages
\maketitle
%% The author head (on even pages) and the title head (on odd pages) will be
%% automatically extracted from \author{} and \title{}. Whenever the title is too long,
%% you will be asked to supply a shorter one by inserting either \authorrunning{} or
%% \titlerunning{} before \maketitle. Anyway, you can specify your own heads in advance.
%%
%%
%% Note: In the following text body of your manuscript, please note several differences from
%% other major journals:
%% (1) \subsection{Please Capitalize the First Letter of Each Notional Word in Subsection Title}
%% (2) Please Capitalize the First Letter of Each Notional Word in table's caption
%
%________________________________________________ sections below
%
\section{Introduction} %% first-level sections will be auto-capitalized
\label{sect:intro}
%\hspace{15pt}% %% preserved for Editor
%Ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) is a generic name
%attributed to
ULXs are defined as
point-like, accreting sources with apparent
isotropic luminosities $L_{\rm x} > 10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$,
not including supermassive BHs in AGN and quasars.
%The name refers to the fact that they appear brighter
%than the Eddington limit for ``canonical'' stellar-mass
%BH candidates detected in the Milky Way
%($M \approx 5$--$10 M_{\odot}$).
Masses, ages and mechanisms of formation of the
accreting objects are still unclear, as is the geometry
of emission. In fact, ULXs are likely to include
different physical classes of sources.
At least four scenarios have been suggested:
{\it a)} intermediate-mass BHs (Colbert \& Mushotzky 1999),
with masses $\sim 10^2$--$10^3 M_{\odot}$;
{\it b)} normal BH X-ray binaries ($M \la 20 M_{\odot}$)
with mild geometrical beaming, during phases of super-Eddington
mass accretion (King et al.~2001); {\it c)}
microquasars with a relativistic jet pointing towards us
(Fabrika \& Mescheryakov 2001; K\"{o}rding et al.~2002);
{\it d)} BH X-ray binaries with super-Eddington emission
from inhomogeneous disks (Begelman 2002).
These different scenarios also predict different
duty cycles for the X-ray-bright phases,
thus leading to different predictions for the location and
total number of such systems (active or quiescent) in a galaxy.
ULXs have been detected in many nearby spiral, irregular
and elliptical galaxies; however, most sources brighter
than $\approx 2 \times 10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$
are located in star-forming galaxies, associated
with young populations (Irwin et al.~2004).
%Unique identifications of optical counterparts
%have proved difficult, even when {\it HST} and {\it Chandra}
%images are available.
In the few cases when stellar counterparts have been identified
(Soria et al.~2004a and references therein),
%(NGC 1313 X-2: Zampieri et al.~2004; NGC 5204: Roberts et al.~2001; Liu,
%Bregman \& Seitzer 2004; NGC 3031 X-11: Liu,
%Bregman \& Seitzer 2002),
they have masses $\approx 15$--$30 M_{\odot}$.
X-ray ionized emission nebulae
have been found around many ULXs (Pakull \& Mirioni 2002;
Kaaret et al.~2004):
in some cases, they provide evidence against
beaming (Holmberg II X-1: Pakull \& Mirioni 2002);
in other cases, they suggest anisotropic
emission (IC 342 X-1: Roberts et al.~2003).
The presence of a young, massive star cluster near
a ULX (as suggested for the ULXs in the Antennae:
Zezas et al.~2002) is consistent with the formation
of an intermediate-mass BH from merger processes
in a cluster core.
However, for most of the sources, multi-band
observations so far have not been able to rule out
any of the alternative scenarios.
%For most of the sources, multi-band
%observations so far have not been able to rule out
%any of the alternative scenarios.
%However, in a few cases, such as for the brightest ULX in M\,82
%(Strohmayer \& Mushotzky 2003) and for
%NGC\,4559 X7 (Cropper et al.~2004),
%there is spectral and timing evidence against beaming.
%The identification of an optical counterpart
%can also provide important information on the environment,
%the age of the system, the mechanism
%of mass transfer and the mass-transfer rate.
%However, in general,
%% ChJAA editors DID NOT use \cite{} for citation, \ref and \label for
%% cross-references of Table/Figure in publication version.
%% ChJAA editors prefered you giving a citation as 'Michel et al. 1992', and
%% writting Table~1 or Fig.~1 and so forth. However, that will make authors
%% inconvenient in adjusting/adding/removing text, tables or figures. Anyway,
%% authors can use \cite, \citep and \citet as widely used in other journals.
%% ChJAA editors are moving to use a more flexible LaTeX source.
\section{A case study: different types of ULXs in NGC\,4559}
\label{sect:Obs}
%\hspace{15pt}% %% preserved for Editor
Located at a distance of $\approx 10$ Mpc,
the late-type spiral NGC\,4559 (Type SAB(rs)cd)
has been observed by {\it XMM-Newton} and {\it Chandra}
on various occasions between 2001 and 2003 (Cropper et al.~2004;
Soria et al.~2004a; Roberts et al.~2004). It hosts four sources
detected at $L_{\rm x}\ga 10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$
on at least one occasion. Here we briefly summarize the properties
of these four sources: we argue that they may represent four different
classes of ULXs.
\subsection{Intermediate-mass BHs in nuclear star clusters?}
A variable ($L_{\rm x} \approx 1.5 \times 10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$
in 2002 March; $L_{\rm x} < 10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$ in 2001 June),
point-like X-ray source coincides with the nucleus
of NGC\,4559. Bulgeless Scd galaxies do not contain a supermassive BH
in their nucleus; this is in agreement with the observed relations between
the nuclear BH mass and the luminosity and velocity dispersion of the bulge
(Magorrian 1998; Ferrarese \& Merritt 2000).
Instead, many of them contain a bright,
massive nuclear star cluster ($M \sim 10^6
M_{\odot}$, $L \sim 10^6$--$10^7 L_{\odot}$; B\"{o}ker et al.~2004),
with a complex history of intermittent star formation.
The nuclear star cluster in NGC\,4559 has $M_B \approx -12$,
$M_I \approx -13$. It is marginally resolved in the {\it HST}/PC image,
with a full-width half maximum of $\approx 5$ pc.
The Local-Group galaxy M\,33 provides another example
of a ULX ($L_{\rm x} \approx 1.5 \times 10^{39}$
in the $0.5$--$10$ keV band: Dubus \& Rutledge 2002)
in the nuclear star cluster ($M_B = -10.2$: Kormendy \& McClure 1993)
of a bulgeless late-type spiral, without a supermassive BH
($M_{\rm BH} < 1500 M_{\odot}$: Gebhardt et al.~2001).
Theoretical and observational studies have investigated
the possible formation of intermediate-mass BHs
in the core of old globular clusters (Miller \& Hamilton 2002)
or of young super star clusters (Portegies Zwart et al.~2004;
G\"{u}rkan et al.~2004).
We suggest that nuclear star clusters in late-type spirals
may offer another natural environment for these objects,
and can be used as a test for BH formation and galaxy merger models.
% \begin{figure}
% \centering
% \includegraphics[angle=0,width=8cm]{nucleus.ps}
% \caption{Demo2: One column rotated figure using package `graphicx'. }
% \label{Fig:demo2}
% \end{figure}
\subsection{Bright high-mass X-ray binaries?}
A ULX with $L_{\rm x} \approx 2$--$3 \times 10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$
is located in the inner disk of NGC\,4559, along a spiral arm, in a region
of young star formation. Its spectrum is well fitted
by a disk-blackbody model with color temperature
$kT_{\rm in} \approx 0.88$--$1.07$ keV (in 2003 and 2001 respectively),
and inner disk radius $\approx 110/(\cos \theta)^{1/2}$ km (in 2003)
or $\approx 85/(\cos \theta)^{1/2}$ km (in 2001),
where $\theta$ is the viewing angle of the disk.
Assuming an efficiency $\sim 0.1$,
the mass accretion rate is $\sim$ a few $\times 10^{19}$
g s$^{-1}$, i.e., $\sim$ a few $\times 10^{-7} M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$.
Color temperature and luminosity are consistent with
the emission from a standard disk around a
$\approx 15$--$25 M_{\odot}$ BH, accreting close to its Eddington
limit, in a high/soft state.
Hence, this source can be considered a normal stellar-mass
BH X-ray binary, probably with an OB donor star filling
its Roche lobe.
%formed from single stellar evolution.
The BH mass is similar to what is inferred
for the most massive BH candidates in the Milky Way: for example,
$M = (14.0\pm 4.4) M_{\odot}$ for the BH in GRS 1915$+$105
(Harlaftis \& Greiner 2004),
and $M \approx 16$--$32 M_{\odot}$ for the BH in Cyg X-1
(Ziolkowski 2004; Gies \& Bolton 1986).
It is likely that the majority of ULXs
with $10^{39} \la L_{\rm x} \la 10^{40}$
erg s$^{-1}$ fall in this category.
\subsection{Young, massive BHs from stellar evolution?}
The brightest ULX in NGC\,4559, X7,
%using the terminology of Vogler, Pietsch \& Bertoldi 1997)
has a $0.3$--$10$ keV luminosity $\approx 2$--$3 \times 10^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$,
and an extrapolated bolometric luminosity $> 5 \times 10^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$
(Cropper et al.~2004). Hence, it is too bright
to be a ``normal'' stellar-mass remnant,
if we assume strictly Eddington-limited isotropic emission.
We have discussed the case for three possible mass ranges
(Soria et al.~2004a). A stellar-mass BH
($M \la 20 M_{\odot}$) would require either strong, collimated
beaming (it would effectively be a microblazar)
or strongly super-Eddington emission.
A $\sim 50$--$100 M_{\odot}$ BH accreting
from a $15$--$25 M_{\odot}$ supergiant companion would require
mildly anisotropic emission (geometrical beaming
of a factor $\sim 5$--$10$; King 2004) or mildly super-Eddington
luminosity. An intermediate-mass BH ($M \ga 500 M_{\odot}$)
would be consistent with isotropic, sub-Eddington emission.
Our X-ray spectral and timing study (Cropper et al.~2004)
has shown the presence of a very soft thermal component
($kT_{\rm in} \approx 0.12$--$0.15$ keV),
and a break in the power-density-spectrum at 0.03 Hz.
These findings are not consistent with a microblazar
scenario, and suggest a BH mass $\ga 50 M_{\odot}$.
The optical data
%do not directly rule out
%any of the three mass ranges; however, they
indicate an association with a young region of massive star formation
at the edge of the galactic disk (age $< 30$ Myr).
They also rule out an association between the ULX and any star clusters;
hence, they rule out at least one mechanism of formation for
an intermediate-mass BH. Other formation processes
have been proposed (e.g., from Pop-III
stars), but they are more difficult to reconcile with a young age
and disk location. Therefore, the X-ray and optical data
together are more consistent with a young $50$--$100 M_{\odot}$ BH
originating from massive stellar evolution
and accreting from an OB supergiant companion (Soria et al.~2004a).
Such a massive remnant would require a progenitor star
at least twice as massive. One can only speculate that
such massive stars, not observed in the Milky Way,
may exist, and evolve into massive remnants,
in other galactic environments. NGC\,4559 X7 is located
in a region of active star formation triggered by a satellite
galaxy collision (Soria et al.~2004a), and in a metal-poor
environment. These two conditions are also a characteristic
of many other bright ULXs. We speculate
that such environments can affect the equation
of state of the gas, and the balance of heating and cooling,
reducing the fragmentation process in the collapse
of a molecular cloud core, and leading to the formation
of more massive stars (Spaans \& Silk 2000).
%Li, Klessen \& Mac Low 2003).
Low metal abundance
has an effect at later stages of the stellar
evolution, by reducing the mass-loss rate
in the radiatively-driven wind (Pakull \& Mirioni 2002).
%($\dot{M}_{\rm w} \sim Z^{0.85}$: Vink et al.~2001;
%Bouret et al.~2003).
This leads to a more massive stellar core,
which may then collapse into a more massive BH.
\subsection{NGC\,4559 X10: still a mystery}
Another source with isotropic luminosity
$L_{\rm x} \ga 10^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$ (NGC\,4559 X10)
is located in the inner galactic disk, in an inter-arm region,
away from young OB associations or H{\footnotesize {II}} regions.
Its X-ray spectrum is consistent with
a simple power-law (photon index $\Gamma \approx 2$),
without a significant disk component.
Its nature is still a mystery, and may well be different from
the three classes of ULXs described above.
Possible speculations include an isolated intermediate-mass BH
accreting from a molecular cloud (R. Mushotzky, priv. comm.; see also
Krolik 2004), or a stellar-mass microblazar.
Further {\it HST} observations of this source are scheduled for
2005 March; we are also planning to carry out radio observations.
\section{True intermediate-mass BHs in colliding systems?}
Colliding and tidally-interacting systems seem to offer
the most favorable environment for ULXs.
For example, ULXs have been found in the Antennae (Zezas et al.~2002),
the Cartwheel ring (Gao et al.~2003),
M\,82 (Griffiths et al.~2000), the Mice (Read 2003),
the M\,81 group dwarfs (Wang 2002).
%Makarova et al.~2002).
NGC\,4559 X7 is also associated with a minor collisional
event: we have suggested (Soria et al.~2004)
that the initial perturbation responsible for the expanding
wave of star formation was caused by a satellite dwarf galaxy
crossing the gas-rich outer disk of NGC\,4559.
Another example of a ULX in a colliding system
%was identified by Soria \& Motch (2004).
%This ULX is located
was found at the intersection of the collisional ring
of NGC\,7714 (mostly old stars, with negligible gas or star formation)
with the gas-rich bridge between NGC\,7715 and NGC\,7714 (Soria \& Motch 2004).
The bridge contains a string of young super star clusters, though none
is found near the ULX position. Hydrodynamical simulations
of the interaction between the two galaxies (Struck \& Smith 2003)
suggest that the connecting bridge consists of multiple components,
and that the most recent star-formation episode (responsible
for the string of young clusters) was triggered by their interaction,
which shocked or compressed the gas. It was also suggested
that part of the gas in the bridge is currently infalling
onto NGC\,7714, impacting the outer disk at approximately
the ULX location.
The ULX luminosity reached $\approx 6 \times 10^{40}$
erg s$^{-1}$ in 2002 December ($0.3$--$12$ keV band),
implying an estimated bolometric luminosity
$\ga 1.5 \times 10^{41}$ erg s$^{-1}$. If isotropic, it requires
an accreting BH with a mass $\ga 500 M_{\odot}$,
ruling out its origin from single stellar evolution processes.
The X-ray spectrum is featureless, and in the absence of an accurate
{\it Chandra} position and of an identified optical counterpart,
none of the proposed scenarios can be ruled out at present.
At least three other bright ULXs fall in this category:
a source in NGC\,2276 (tidally interacting
with NGC\,2300), with a luminosity $\approx 1.1 \times 10^{41}$
erg s$^{-1}$ in the $0.5$--$10$ keV band (Davis \& Mushotzky 2004);
a ULX in the colliding Cartwheel galaxy, with $L_{\rm x}
\approx 1 \times 10^{41}$ erg s$^{-1}$ (Gao et al.~2003);
and a variable source in M\,82 with a $L_{\rm x}
\approx 1$--$9 \times 10^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$ (Matsumoto et al.~2001).
The last source has been interpreted as an intermediate-mass BH
($M \sim 800$--$3000 M_{\odot}$),
from numerical simulations
of runaway collisions in cluster cores
(Portegies Zwart et al.~2004).
This explanation seems more difficult
to reconcile with the ULXs in NGC\,2276 and NGC\,7714.
%Struck, Curtis; Smith, Beverly J. 2003ApJ...589..157S
\section{ULXs with short-term variability}
X-ray observations may provide two methods to constrain
the mass of the accreting BH. When a soft thermal component
is present in the spectrum, fitting a disk model provides
the color temperature at the inner disk boundary;
hence, one can infer the radius of the last stable orbit
and the BH mass.
For example, thermal components at $kT \approx 0.15$ keV
have been found in many ULXs, and were initially used
as evidence for an intermediate-mass BH (Miller et al.~2003).
However, this method is based on highly questionable
assumptions on the accretion flow structure,
and the mass estimates thus derived are probably unreliable.
Alternatively, X-ray timing observations can provide
the characteristic variability time-scale in the X-ray emitting
region; this is also assumed to be related to the inner-disk size
and hence to the BH mass. A linear correlation appears to exist between
the mass of an accreting BH and a characteristic break frequency
in its power-density-spectrum (e.g., McHardy et al.~2004;
Markowitz et al.~2003).
Evidence for characteristic breaks has been found
in a few sources, most notably for the ULX in the metal-poor
starburst dwarf galaxy NGC\,5408 ($L_{\rm x} \approx 10^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$:
Soria et al.~2004b; Kaaret et al.~2003).
The position of the break, at $\approx 2.5$ mHz, suggests
a mass at least one order of magnitude larger than Cyg X-1.
Moreover, the flux variability
is associated with a spectral change. The X-ray spectrum
can be interpreted as the sum of a constant or slowly-variable
soft thermal component ($kT_{\rm bb} \approx 0.12$ keV) and
a rapidly variable power-law component
(photon index $\Gamma \approx 2.7$),
responsible for the flaring behaviour (Soria et al.~2004b).
The source gets harder at higher fluxes, at the flare peaks.
ULXs with short-term variability are comparatively rare
(Roberts et al.~2004).
M\,74 X-1 has a $0.3$--$10$ keV luminosity
varying from $\approx 5 \times 10^{38}$ to $\approx 1.2 \times 10^{40}$
erg s$^{-1}$, over timescales of a few $\times 10^3$ s,
and is harder at higher fluxes (Krauss et al.~2004).
The flaring behaviour has been attributed to the power-law component,
while the thermal component is less variable.
Similar behaviour is exhibited by NGC\,6946 X-11 ($\approx 2.5 \times 10^{39}$
erg s$^{-1}$: Roberts \& Colbert 2003),
with a rapidly-varying power-law component (timescale $\la 350$ s).
There are at least three possible interpretations
for the spectral variability properties of ULXs
such as NGC\,5408 X-1, M\,74 X-1 and NGC\,6946 X-11.
The first scenario is that the power-law flaring may be due to
intermittent ejections and variable emission at the base of a jet.
If so, these ULXs would be microquasars or microblazars; the accreting
BH would still have to be rather massive ($M \ga 40 M_{\odot}$ for
NGC\,5408 X-1) to explain the non-beamed thermal disk emission,
which provides a lower limit to the mass.
Alternatively, the variability could be due to magnetic
reconnections in the disk corona (Reeves et al.~2002).
Finally, in the framework of the two-component
accretion model (Chakrabarti \& Titarchuk 1995),
the power-law variability can be due to rapid
changes in the sub-Keplerian (halo) accretion rate,
$\dot{M}_{\rm h} \approx 0.5$--$1 \dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$,
at a constant disk accretion rate $\dot{M}_{\rm d}$,
when $\dot{M}_{\rm d} \approx 0.1$--$0.5 \dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$
(corresponding to the transition regime
between the ``canonical'' hard and soft states).
\section{Conclusions}
\label{sect:conclusion}
%\hspace{15pt}% %% preserved for Editor
%The most common definition of ULXs is based only on
%their apparent isotropic luminosity. However, they
ULXs are likely to contain
different physical types of sources, in terms of BH mass,
age, mechanism of formation and geometry of emission.
We have briefly discussed some possible subclasses, reviewing
the properties of a sample of ULXs recently observed by {\it Chandra} and
{\it XMM-Newton}. Sources with an isotropic X-ray luminosity up to a few times
$10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$ are consistent with bright X-ray binaries
(in particular, young high-mass X-ray binaries in a star-forming region)
containing a stellar-mass BH, in the same mass range as those
inferred for Milky Way BH candidates.
BH masses $\approx 50$--$100 M_{\odot}$ are required to explain
a group of sources with X-ray luminosities $\approx 1$--$2 \times 10^{40}$
erg s$^{-1}$. We speculate that they, too, could be the end product
of single stellar evolution, in metal-poor environments.
Only a handful of sources so far are strong candidates
for the intermediate-mass BH class ($M \ga 500 M_{\odot}$).
Coalescence of smaller bodies in the cores
of young super star clusters and nuclear star clusters
are possible mechanisms of formation for intermediate-mass BHs;
this scenario may apply to the brightest ULX in M\,82
(Portegies Zwart et al.~2004).
However, most of the brightest ULXs do not reside
in clusters, and may have been formed via other processes.
Finally, we have reviewed a sub-sample of ULXs which exhibit
short-term variability and flaring in their Comptonised (power-law)
emission component, and we have briefly discussed possible
interpretations.
%Misra, R.; Sriram, K.
%2003ApJ...584..981M
While we expect the number of ULXs in the high-mass X-ray binaries
subclass to be proportional to the star-formation rate,
there is mounting evidence that the brightest sources
are preferentially found in colliding or tidally interacting
systems. It is not yet clear whether star formation
triggered by molecular cloud collisions
can allow the formation of very massive stars,
or whether there is another mechanism at play there:
for example, the accretion or infall
of primordial BHs from the galactic halo towards gas-rich parts
of a galaxy, or the accretion and subsequent tidal stripping
of satellite dwarfs with a nuclear intermediate-mass BH.
Multiwavelength observations will be necessary
to disentangle the various subclasses of ULXs:
for example, radio detections would identify microquasars
and microblazars; infra-red surveys might allow us to find
the reprocessed radiation from anisotropic X-ray sources not oriented
along our line of sight (i.e., sources that would not
be identified as ULXs); optical studies of X-ray ionized
nebulae can constrain the total luminosity
from the central sources.
\begin{acknowledgements}
We thank Miriam Krauss, Craig Markwardt, Richard Mushotzky, Manfred Pakull,
Andrew Read, Jason Stevens, Doug Swartz and Kinwah Wu
for useful discussions.
\end{acknowledgements}
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
%% you can type \apj for ApJ, \aap for A&A, \apss for Ap&SS, etc. Please consult
%% the macro cjaa.cls. You can also find them in aasguide.tex (AASTeX for ApJ, AJ, PASP)
%% Please follow the format of ChJAA's reference list
%\bibitem[]{}
\bibitem[2002]{beg}
Begelman, M. C. 2002, ApJ, 568, L97
\bibitem[2004]{bok}
B\"{o}ker, T., Sarzi, M., McLaughlin, D. E., et al.~2004, AJ, 127, 105
%van der Marel, R. P., Rix, H.-W., Ho, L. C., \& Shields, J. C. 2004, AJ, 127, 105
\bibitem[1995]{cha}
Chakrabarti, S., \& Titarchuk, L. G. 1995, ApJ, 455, 623
\bibitem[1999]{col}
Colbert, E. J. M., \& Mushotzky, R. F. 1999, ApJ, 519, 89
\bibitem[2004]{crop}
Cropper, M. S., Soria, R., Mushotzky, R. F., et al.~2004, MNRAS, 349, 39
% Wu, K., Markwardt, C. B., \& Pakull, M.~2004,
% MNRAS, 349, 39
\bibitem[2004]{dav}
Davis, D. S., \& Mushotzky, R. F. 2004, ApJ, 604, 653
\bibitem[2002]{dub}
Dubus, G., \& Rutledge, R. E. 2002, MNRAS, 336, 901
\bibitem[2001]{fabrika}
Fabrika, S., \& Mescheryakov, A. 2001, in: High Angular Resolution in Astronomy,
ed. R. Schilizzi et al. (ASP Publication) (astro-ph/0103070)
\bibitem[2000]{fer}
Ferrarese, L., \& Merritt, D. 2000, ApJ, 539, L9
\bibitem[2003]{gao}
Gao, Y., Wang, Q. D., Appleton, P. N., \& Lucas, R. A. 2003,
ApJ, 596, L171
%\bibitem[]{}
\bibitem[2001]{geb}
Gebhardt, K., Lauer, T. R., Kormendy, J., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 2469
\bibitem[1986]{gies}
Gies, D. R., \& Bolton, C. T. 1986, ApJ, 304, 371
\bibitem[2000]{grif}
Griffiths, R. E., Ptak, A., Feigelson, E. D., et al.~2000, Science, 290, 1325
% Garmire, G., Townsley, L., Brandt, W. N., Sambruna, R.,
% \& Bregman, J. N. 2000, 290, 1325
\bibitem[2004]{gur}
G\"{u}rkan, M. A., Freitag, M., \& Rasio, F. A. 2004, ApJ, 604, 632
\bibitem[2004]{harl}
Harlaftis, E. T., \& Greiner, J. 2004, A\&A, 414, L13
\bibitem[2004]{irw}
Irwin, J. A., Bregman, J. N., \& Athey, A. E. 2004, ApJ, 601, L143
\bibitem[2003]{kaar1}
Kaaret, P., Corbel, S., Prestwich, A. H., Zezas, A.~2003, Science, 299, 365
\bibitem[2004]{kaar2}
Kaaret, P., Ward, M. J., \& Zezas, A. 2004, MNRAS, 351, L83
\bibitem[2004]{king1}
King, A. R. 2004, MNRAS, 347, L18
\bibitem[2001]{king2}
King, A. R., Davies, M. B., Ward, M. J., Fabbiano, G.,
\& Elvis, M. 2001, ApJ, 552, L109
%\bibitem[]{}
\bibitem[2002]{kord}
K\"{o}rding, E., Falcke, H., \& Markoff, S. 2002, A\&A, 382, L13
\bibitem[1993]{kor}
Kormendy, J., \& McClure, R. D. 1993, AJ, 105, 1793
%\bibitem[2002]{liu1}
%Liu, J.-F., Bregman, J. N., \& Seitzer, P. 2002, ApJ, 580, L31
%\bibitem[2004]{liu2}
%Liu, J.-F., Bregman, J. N., \& Seitzer, P. 2004, ApJ, 602, 249
\bibitem[2004]{kra}
Krauss, M. I., Kilgard, R. E., Garcia, M. R., Roberts, T. P.,
\& Prestwich, A. H. 2004, ApJ, in press
\bibitem[2004]{kra}
Krolik, J. H. 2004, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/0407285)
\bibitem[1998]{mag}
Magorrian, J., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 2285
%\bibitem[2002]{mak}
%Makarova, L. N., Grebel, E. K.,
% Karachentsev, I. D., et al.~2002, A\&A, 396, 473
\bibitem[2003]{mark}
Markowitz, A., Edelson, R., Vaughan, S., et al.~2003, ApJ, 593, 96
\bibitem[2001]{mat}
Matsumoto, H., Tsuru, T. G., Koyama, K., et al.~2001, ApJ, 547, L25
%Awaki, H., Canizares, C. R.,
%Kawai, N., Matsushita, S., \& Kawabe, R. 2001, ApJ, 547, L25
\bibitem[2004]{mch}
McHardy, I. M., Papadakis, I. E., Uttley, P., Page, M. J.,
\& Mason, K. O. 2004, MNRAS, 348, 783
\bibitem[2001]{mill1}
Miller, J. M., Fabbiano, G., Miller, M. C., \& Fabian, A. C. 2003, ApJ, 585, L37
\bibitem[2002]{mill2}
Miller, M. C., \& Hamilton, D. P. 2002, MNRAS, 330, 232
\bibitem[2002]{pak}
Pakull, M. W., \& Mirioni, L. 2002, to appear
in the proceedings of the symposium 'New Visions
of the X-ray Universe', 26-30 November 2001,
ESTEC, The Netherlands (astro-ph/0202488)
\bibitem[2004]{port1}
Portegies Zwart, S. F., Baumgardt, H., Hut, P., et al.~2004, Nature, 428, 724
%Makino, J.,
% \& McMillan, S. L. W. 2004, Nature, 428, 724
\bibitem[2003]{read}
Read, A. M. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 715
\bibitem[2002]{ree}
Reeves, J. N., Wynn, G., O'Brien, P. T., \& Pounds, K. A. 2002, MNRAS, 336, L56
%\bibitem[]{}
\bibitem[2003]{rob1}
Roberts, T. P., \& Colbert, E. J. M. 2003, MNRAS, 341, L49
%\bibitem[2001]{rob}
%Roberts, T. P., Goad, M. R., Ward, M. J., Warwick, R. S.,
%O'Brien, P. T., Lira, P., \& Hands, A. D. P. 2001, MNRAS, 325, L7
\bibitem[2003]{rob2}
Roberts, T. P., Goad, M. R., Ward, M. J., \& Warwick, R. S. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 709
\bibitem[2004]{rob3}
Roberts, T. P., Warwick, R. S., Ward, M. J., \& Goad, M. R. 2004,
MNRAS, 349, 1193 (also, Erratum: 1994, MNRAS, 350, 1536)
\bibitem[2004]{sor1}
Soria, R., Cropper, M. C., Pakull, M., Mushotzky, R. F., \& Wu, K. 2004a, MNRAS, in press
%(Soria et al.~2004a)
\bibitem[2004]{sor2}
Soria, R., \& Motch, C. 2004, A\&A, 422, 915
\bibitem[2004]{sor3}
Soria, R., Motch, C., Read, A. M., \& Stevens, I. R. 2004b, A\&A, 423, 955
%(Soria et al.~2004b)
\bibitem[2000]{spa}
Spaans, M., \& Silk, J. 2000, ApJ, 538, 115
\bibitem[2003]{str}
Struck, C., \& Smith, B. J. 2003, ApJ, 589, 157
%\bibitem[2004]{swar}
%Swartz, D. A., Ghosh, K. K., Tennant, A. F., \& Wu, K. 2004, ApJS, in press
%(astro-ph/0405498)
%\bibitem[2004]{zamp}
%Zampieri, L., Mucciarelli, P., Falomo, R., Kaaret, P.,
%Di Stefano, R., Turolla, R., Chieregato, M., \& Treves, A. 2004, ApJ, 603, 523
\bibitem[2002]{wang}
Wang, Q. D. 2002, MNRAS, 332, 764
\bibitem[2002]{zez}
Zezas, A., Fabbiano, G., Rots, A. H.,
\& Murray, S. S. 2002, ApJ, 577, 710
\bibitem[2004]{ziol}
Ziolkowski, J.~2004, ChJAA, submitted
\end{thebibliography}
\label{lastpage}
\end{document}
%%==^..^============== the END of cjaa.tex ===================^_^==
page 1, last sentence: change "has" to "have"
page 3, last paragraph section 2.3: change "triggered by a satallite galaxy collisions"
to "triggered by satallite galaxy collisions"
page 3, last sentence: change "associated to" to "associated with"
page 4, last paragraph section 3: change "a ULXs in the colliding Cartwheel" to
"a ULX in the colliding Cartwheel"
page 4, bottom of page: change ", flares over timescales" to
"over timescales"