Instability of Chaplygin gas trajectories in unified dark matter models
Extracted source text ยท arXiv astro-ph/0409740
\documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn]{revtex4}
%\documentclass[aps]{revtex4}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{natbib}
\begin{document}
\textheight 8.8in
\textwidth 6.5in
\topmargin -.25in
\oddsidemargin -.25in
\evensidemargin 0in
%\baselineskip 14pt
%\def\hm{\ {\rm {\it h}^{-1} Mpc}}
\newcommand{\lsim}{\,\lower2truept
\hbox{${<\atop\hbox{\raise4truept\hbox{$\sim$}}}$}\,}
\newcommand{\gsim}{\,\lower2truept
\hbox{${>\atop\hbox{\raise4truept\hbox{$\sim$}}}$}\,}
\title{{\large {\bf Instability of Chaplygin gas trajectories in
unified dark matter models}}}
\author{F. Perrotta$^{1,2}$, S. Matarrese$^{3,4}$, M. Torki$^{5}$}
\affiliation{
$^1$ SISSA/ISAS, Via Beirut 4, 34014 Trieste, Italy; \\
$^2$ INFN-Sezione di Trieste, via Valerio 2, 34127 Trieste, Italy; \\
$^3$ Dipartimento di Fisica `G. Galilei', Universita di Padova, via
Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, Italy; \\
$^4$ INFN-Sezione di Padova, via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, Italy; \\
$^5$ Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universita' di Padova,
vicolo dell'Osservatorio 2, 35122, Padova, Italy}
\newcommand{\etal}{{et~al.}}
\def\aa{{\sl Astron.\ \&\ Astrophys.}}
\def\aas{{ Astron. \& Astrophys.\ Suppl. \ }}
\def\apj{{Astrophys. \ J. \ }}
\def\apjl{{\sl Astrophys.\ J.\ Lett.}}
\def\apjs{{\sl Astrophys.\ J.\ Supp.}}
\def\araa{{\sl Ann.\ Rev.\ Astron.\ Astrophys.}}
\def\astroph#1{{\tt astro-ph/#1}}
\def\ieeespl{{\sl IEEE\ Signal\ Processing\ Lett.}}
\def\jcap{{\sl J.\ Cosm.\ Astroparticle\ Phys.}}
\def\mnras{{\sl MNRAS}}
\def\na{{\sl New\ Astron.}}
\def\np{{ Nucl.\ Phys.}}
\def\plb{{ Phys.\ Lett.\ B \ }}
\def\procieee{{\sl Proc.\ IEEE}}
\def\pr{{\sl Phys.\ Rep.}}
\def\prd{{ Phys.\ Rev. \ D \ }}
\def\prl{{ Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ }}
\def\ptp{{Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.}}
\def\rmp{{\sl Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.}}
%\baselineskip 10pt
%\today
\begin{abstract}
In the past few years, the Chaplygin gas (CG) has been considered as an
appealing candidate for unifying dark matter and dark energy into a
single substance. This picture had to face several problems when trying to
fit its predictions with cosmological observations. We point out another
potential problem of this model, showing that, when the CG is described
through a classical scalar field, the corresponding trajectories are strongly
unstable. This implies that an extreme fine tuning must apply to the
initial values of the field in order to end up today with values
allowed by observational data.
\end{abstract}
\maketitle
Since the observations of distant type Ia Supernovae pointed towards an
accelerated expansion of the Universe \cite{Perl,Riess}, a great effort
has been done to provide a reasonable, physically motivated responsible
for this speeding up. Apparently, a dark energy component adds
up to the dark matter, coming to dominate the total energy budget
at very recent times. The remarkable new feature of dark energy
is that it appears to violate the strong energy condition
\cite{Bahcall}; understanding the nature of dark energy is probably one
of the most important open problems in modern physics.
Besides the possibility of a quintessence scalar field \cite{Quintessence},
modifications of gravity \cite{EQ}, or an uncanceled cosmological
constant \cite{Lambda}, an interesting alternative class of dark
energy models is that of the so-called Chaplygin gas
\cite{Kamen}-\cite{Chimento2}.
In its simplest formulation, the Chaplygin gas is a perfect fluid
with equation of state $p=-{A / \rho}$, $A$ being a positive constant
with the dimensions of an energy
squared. A generalized form of the Chaplygin gas, containing
an additional free parameter, has also been studied in detail
(see, e.g., \cite{Bento,Bento2}). \\
While first introduced in a hydrodynamics context \cite{Chap_original},
the Chaplygin gas has recently raised growing interest in particle
physics, thanks to its connection with string theory
\cite{Bilic,Chap_string,Sen,Gibbons,Padmanabhan,Bagla,Gorini3} and
because it is the only fluid known to admit a supersymmetric
generalization \cite{Chap_susy}. \\
From a cosmological point of view, the striking
feature of the Chaplygin Gas (hereafter, CG) is that it allows for a
very elegant unification of dark energy (DE) and dark matter (DM), since its
equation of state interpolates between a dust dominated
phase at early times and a de Sitter phase at late times. \\
Despite the appeal of these intriguing features, several fatal
drawbacks turned out to affect CG models.
There are, actually, two different approaches to the cosmological role
of the CG: one can consider it as a unified dark matter component, so that
$\Omega_{DM}=0$ and the CG plays both the roles of dark matter and of
a cosmological constant, at different epochs (see, e.g., Ref.~\cite{Sandvik});
or one can look at the CG
as a Dark Energy candidate, which adds to the standard DM component, as
well as to baryons and radiation \cite{Bean,Amendola}. In both cases,
the CG is unable to match several observational data. \\
In Ref.~\cite{Sandvik} it was pointed out that perturbations in the CG
should affect the formation of structures, producing oscillations or
exponential blowups in the matter power-spectrum which are inconsistent
with observations; the analysis ruled out the CG as a unified dark
matter candidate ($\Omega_{DM}=0$) at $99.99 \%$ level. \\
The impact on cosmology has also been investigated in the context of
Supernovae data \cite{Fabris,Avelino,Beca,Makler,Silva,Bertolami},
showing initially a certain degree of consistency with data for a class
of CG models; Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) measurements, though,
provided stronger constraints to CG cosmologies
\cite{Carturan,Bean,Amendola}.
While Ref.~\cite{Bean} found that the joint analysis of type Ia Supernovae
and CMB data only allows for a CG gas which is today indistinguishable from a
cosmological constant, the analysis of Ref.~\cite{Amendola} rules out the
CG as a Dark Energy candidate at $99.99\%$ confidence level, and
also indicates that the CG as a unified model of dark matter and dark energy
is strongly disfavoured by the latest CMB data.
In this paper, we point out another possible problem related to the
dynamical behavior of the CG gas. We focus on the unified dark
matter cosmological model and we analyze the trajectories of
the classical scalar field which is meant to correspond to the CG
hydrodynamical representation, searching for attractor solutions.
For a flat universe, the parameters of the CG can be easily related to
the expansion rate today, $H_0$, and to the present cosmic equation of state,
$w_0$.
The latter quantity is constrained by the recent estimates of the
present deceleration parameter $q_0$ \cite{Riess2}, since
$w_0=(2q_0-1)/3$ ; we thus require $w_0 \sim -0.7$ today.
We find that, in order to finish up at the present epoch with such an
equation of state $w_0$ (different than $-1$) and a plausible value of the
expansion rate, a strong fine-tuning must be applied on the initial conditions
of the scalar field. In
other words, the trajectories which reproduce the observed parameters
are strongly unstable under variations of the initial conditions on the
field. The only attractor of the dynamical system under study is
indeed the de Sitter Universe, to which the model converges at late
times.
Our conclusions are complementary to the perturbation analysis of
\cite{Sandvik}, showing that, already at the background level, the
unified dark matter model shows serious instabilities.
We will undertake our analysis in a flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW)
cosmology;
since we are mostly interested in the dynamics at recent times, radiation
is not included in our treatment.
From the energy conservation and the CG equation of state, it follows
that
\begin{equation}
\label{rhoChap}
\rho_{Chap}=\sqrt{A+{B \over a^{6}}} \ \ , \ \
p_{Chap}={-A \over \sqrt{A+{B \over a^{6}}} }
\end{equation}
$a$ being the scale factor and $B$ an integration constant;
the ratio $B/A$ characterizes the transition between the matter-like
behavior and the cosmological-constant. \\
In the unified dark matter model,
the expansion rate and the cosmic equation of state today are,
respectively,
%\begin{equation}
$ H_0^2=\sqrt{A+B}$
%\end{equation}
and
%\begin{equation}
$w_0=-(1+B/A)^{-1}$ .
%\end{equation}
We see that the constants $A$ and $B$ can be determined once $H_0$ and
$w_0$ are known.
Our aim is to provide a description of the Chaplygin gas
through a minimally-coupled, classical scalar field.
In \cite{Kamen},\cite{Gorini} this description is simply built from
the analogy of the energy density and pressure of the CG in
Eq.~(\ref{rhoChap}) with the analogous quantitites for a scalar field $\phi$
evolving in a potential $V(\phi)$, i.e.
\begin{equation}
\rho_{\phi}= {\dot{\phi}^2 / 2 +V(\phi)}
\ \ , \ \
p_{\phi}= {\dot{\phi}^2 / 2 -V(\phi)} \ \ ,
\end{equation}
where a dot denotes differentiation w.r.t. the cosmic time. \\
Namely, by requiring that $\rho_{\phi}=\rho_{Chap}$ and
$p_{\phi}=p_{Chap}$, we can relate the
cosmic scale factor to the kinetic and potential energy a scalar field
should have in order to reproduce the Chaplygin fluid dynamics:
\begin{equation}
\label{phidotvsa}
\dot{\phi}^2= {B \over {a^6 \sqrt{A+{B \over a^6}}}} \ \ , \ \
V(\phi(a))= {2 a^6 A + B \over {2 a^6 \sqrt{A+{B \over a^6}}} } \ \ .
\end{equation}
By making use of the Friedmann equation and of Eq.~(\ref{phidotvsa}),
one can infer $d \phi / da$, which can be solved to give $a(\phi)$;
The authors of Ref.~\cite{Kamen} give
\begin{equation}
\label{avsphi}
a^6={4B {\rm{exp}}(6 \phi) \over A (1-{\rm{exp}}(6 \phi))^2} \ \ .
\end{equation}
There is a crucial assumption in Eq.~(\ref{avsphi}): the integration
constant has been choosen so that the value of the scalar field at some
(arbitrary) time $t_i$ is fixed; in particular, setting the initial
conditions at $a_i$, one should have
\begin{equation}
\label{phiinit}
\phi_i={1\over 6} {\rm ln } \left|
{ \sqrt{ {A \over B }a_i^6+1} -1 \over \sqrt{ {A \over B }a_i^6+1} +1
}
\right| \ \ ;
\end{equation}
The initial ``velocity'' $\dot{\phi}_i$ is fixed too, by
Eq.~(\ref{phidotvsa}). Substituting $a(\phi)$ in $V(a)$, one has
\begin{equation}
\label{Vvsphi}
V(\phi)= {1 \over 2} \sqrt{A} \left( {\rm{cosh}} 3 \phi + {1 \over
{\rm{cosh}} 3 \phi } \right) \ \ .
\end{equation}
As already noticed in Ref.~\cite{Gorini2}, a scalar field evolving in such a
potential will produce a cosmological evolution coinciding with that of
the Chaplygin gas only if the initial conditions are appropriately
handled to satisfy the relation $\dot{\phi}_i^4=4(V^2(\phi_i)-A)$;
indeed, the potential (\ref{Vvsphi}) has been built under this assumption.
\\
The evolution of a minimally-coupled scalar field follows the
Klein-Gordon equation of motion:
\begin{equation}
\label{KG}
\ddot{\phi}=-3 H \dot{\phi}-V_{,\phi} \ \ .
\end{equation}
As we said, in order for the solution of this equation to reproduce the
energy density and pressure (\ref{rhoChap}), one has to
exactly fix the initial values of $\phi,\dot{\phi}$.
This is quite intuitive, and it can also be easily understood by looking at
the shape of the potential (\ref{Vvsphi}), which is extremely flat for
small values of the field, increasing exponentially elsewhere; as an
example, a scalar field initially set on the minimum of this potential
with vanishing velocity, would exhibit no dynamics at all, and it would be
indistinguishable from a cosmological constant at any cosmic epoch.
Of course, this is not what we are expecting from a
plausible scalar-field representation of the Chaplygin fluid; first,
a unified model of dark matter needs at least an epoch when the
equation of state
$w_{\phi}\equiv p_{\phi}/\rho_{\phi}$
is zero, so that the energy density drops like a matter component.
This phase should
end up in a de Sitter phase, when the energy density of the scalar
field is constant (as for $a >> 1$ in (\ref{rhoChap}). Finally, since
the cosmic equation of state today is kinematically related to the
deceleration parameter $q \equiv \ddot a/aH^2$, the most recent
measurements give $w_0\sim 0.7$ \cite{Riess2}. It follows that
the intermediate stage of the CG evolution should be characterized by
a decreasing equation of state, shifting smoothly from $0$ to $-1$.
The point we focus on here is how much fine-tuning, if any, is
required to do that. In other words, is there any freedom in setting
the initial values of the field if one has to reproduce the scalings in
Eq.~(\ref{rhoChap})? The question may be turned into the phase-space
language, by asking whether the Chaplygin fluid trajectory is an
attractor for the system (\ref{KG}).
As we said, we can always provide a scalar-field description of the
Chaplygin gas, by appropriately setting its initial conditions and
building up the corresponding potential. Such a field will obey the
Klein-Gordon equation, and, in addition,
$\rho_{\phi},p_{\phi}$ will scale as in Eq.~(\ref{rhoChap})
at any time.
The scalar field model obtained with this particular choice of
initial conditions
would perfectly reproduce the dynamics of the Chaplygin gas. We will
refer to $\phi_{Chap}(t)$ as the solution of Eq.~(\ref{KG}) with
potential (\ref{Vvsphi}), which satisfies the required initial
conditions.
As for the late time behavior of (\ref{KG}), it is easily seen
that, whatever initial conditions we choose, the system will end up in
its global attractor, the de Sitter stable node (see \cite{SZY}) with
$\phi,\dot{\phi}=0$, $H=\sqrt{A}$ (note that the de Sitter node is the
only critical point of the dynamical system under investigation). In
particular, this is true for the solution $\phi_{Chap}(t)$.
However, we are interested in finding whether the trajectory
$\phi_{Chap}$ itself is an attractor for the problem on hand,
in the sense that many possible solutions of the system
converge to a common evolutionary track
represented by the $\phi_{Chap}$ trajectory.
We find that this is not the case; while $\phi_{Chap}$ requires
fine-tuned initial values to reproduce the Chaplygin gas cosmology,
slightly different initial conditions on $\phi_{Chap}$ may result in
completely different trajectories, which may even be unable to
reproduce the matter behavior at all. The general solutions of this
dynamical system turn out to behave much differently than
the ``tracking solutions'' of
\cite{gamma}. Following the notation of \cite{gamma}, we may anticipate
our result, saying that the system does not admit tracking solutions
because one of the two necessary
conditions on $\Gamma \equiv {V V_{,\phi \phi} / V_{,\phi}^2}$ is
violated, namely $\Gamma=1$ for almost any plausible initial field
value. One should be careful, however, in using the formalism of
\cite{gamma} in this case, in that the Chaplygin gas is supposed to be
the only component of the cosmic fluid, and there is no other
background component which may drive its trajectories (having
neglected the role of radiation in our analysis). For this reason
we found it useful to directly check for the stability of the
$\phi_{Chap}$ solutions with a numerical integration of the system.
Our plots refer to four different choices of initial conditions,
set at redshift $z \sim 10^{5}$.
The solid lines refer to the $\phi_{Chap}$ trajectories.
The present values of $H_0$ and $w_0$ unambiguously
determine $A$ and $B$ for a flat universe and the
present values of $\phi_{Chap}, \dot{\phi}_{Chap}$. We set $h=0.7$
and $w_0=-0.7$.
Together with the $\phi_{Chap}$ trajectories,
Figs.~\ref{Figenergy} and \ref{Figeos} show, respectively,
the energy density of the scalar
field and the corresponding equation of state, when the field starts
with the following initial conditions: \\
a) $\phi_i=\phi_{Chap,i}\times 1.1, \
\dot{\phi}_{i}=\dot{\phi}_{Chap,i}$ (dotted lines); \\
b) $\phi_i=\phi_{Chap,i}, \ \dot{\phi}_{i}=\dot{\phi}_{Chap,i} \times
10^{2}$ (dashed lines); \\
c) $\phi_i=\phi_{Chap,i}\times 0.9, \
\dot{\phi}_{i}=\dot{\phi}_{Chap,i}\times 10 $
(dot-dashed lines). \\
Even a slight modification of the initial values with
respect to $\phi_{Chap}$ can make the
equation of state today completely different from the required
value, resulting in trajectories which never join the $\phi_{Chap}$
curves, nor reproduce the CG behavior at any epoch.
Furthermore, the conditions a), b), c) finish up at present with
unacceptable values of the Hubble expansion rate.
Starting with a bigger amount of kinetic energy, as in b) and c),
an initial kination precedes the phase in which the field behaves like
matter.
In each of the plotted cases, there is a very sharp transition between
the matter-like scaling ($w=0$) and the $\Lambda$-like one ($w=-1$):
because of this sharpness, values of the equation of state different than
$0,-1$ turn out to be unnatural. This behavior is very different than
in tracking quintessence solutions, where the only parameters which need
to be adjusted are the amplitude of the potential and the current equation
of state: in that case, once these present values are fixed, there is no
dependence on the initial values of the quintessence field.
Concluding, we have shown that, in order to have a unified dark matter
model consistent with the most recent estimates of the cosmic equation
of state, one is forced to introduce an extreme fine tuning on
the initial values of the scalar field, because the problem does not
admit tracking solutions; the de Sitter universe is the only
global attractor of the system. \\
Although the potential (\ref{Vvsphi}) requires ad hoc initial
conditions on $\phi$, which allowed us to define $\phi_{Chap}$, this is
not a unique representation of the Chaplygin fluid.
One may start with different values of $\phi_i,\dot{\phi}_i$ and,
by a similar approach, build a potential $V(\phi)$ (generally, different
from \ref{Vvsphi}) for each set of initial conditions, so to reproduce the
behavior \ref{rhoChap}.
In this way, there would be an infinite class of potentials, mapping the
behavior of the Chaplygin fluid. However, our conclusions apply to any
on this potentials, due to the peculiar sharpness of the matter-$\Lambda$
transition of the CG fluid. \\
Therefore, the CG as a unified dark matter candidate, seems to be
strongly disfavored from the point of view of its dynamics. \\
{\it{Acknowledgments}} \\
{F.P. wishes to thank Carlo Baccigalupi and Martin Makler for the
useful comments.}
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=3.5in, height=2.8in]{energy2.ps}
\caption{Energy densities for the $\phi_{Chap}$ solution and for
different initial conditions, corresponding to the
cases a),b),c) described in the text. }
\label{Figenergy}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=3.5in, height=2.8in]{eos2.ps}
\caption{Equation of state for the $\phi_{Chap}$ solution and for
different initial conditions, corresponding to the
cases a), b), c) described in the text.}
\label{Figeos}
\end{figure}
\bibliographystyle{}
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\bibitem{Perl} S. Perlmutter et al., \apj {\bf 517}, 565 (1999)
\bibitem{Riess} A.G. Riess et al., \apj {\bf 116}, 1009 (1998)
\bibitem{Bahcall} N.A.~Bahcall, J.P.~Ostriker, S.~Perlmutter and
P.J.~Steinhardt,
%``The Cosmic Triangle: Revealing the State of the Universe,''
Science {\bf 284}, 1481 (1999)
\bibitem{Quintessence} C. Wetterich, Nucl.Phys. B {\bf 302}, 668
(1998); R.R. Caldwell, R. Dave and P.J. Steinhardt, Phys.Rev.Lett. {\bf 80},
1582 (1998); S.M. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81}, 3067 (1998);
I. Zlatev, L.Wang and P.J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 82}, 896
(1999)
\bibitem{EQ} F. Perrotta, C. Baccigalupi and S. Matarrese,
Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61}, 023507 (2000);
S.M.~Carroll, V.~Duvvuri, M.~Trodden and M.S.~Turner,
%``Is cosmic speed-up due to new gravitational physics?,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 043528 (2004)
\bibitem{Lambda} S.M.~Carroll,
%``The cosmological constant,''
Living Rev.\ Rel.\ {\bf 4}, 1 (2001)
%\bibitem{Chap_lett} :
\bibitem{Kamen} A.Y. Kamenshchik, U, Moschella and V. Pasquier, \plb
{\bf 511}, 265 (2001)
\bibitem{Podolski} D. Podolsky, Astron. Lett. {\bf 28}, 434 (2002)
\bibitem{Bilic} N. Bilic, G. B. Tupper and R. D. Viollier, \plb {\bf
535}, 17 (2002)
\bibitem{Bento} M.C. Bento, O. Bertolami and A.A. Sen,
Phys. Rev. D {\bf 66}, 043507 (2002)
% GENERALIZED CHAPLYGIN GAS, ACCELERATED EXPANSION AND DARK ENERGY
% MATTER UNIFICATION.
\bibitem{Avelino} P.P. Avelino, L.M.G. Beca, J.P.M. de Carvalho,
C.J.A.P. Martins and P. Pinto, Phys. Rev. D. {\bf 67}, 023511 (2003)
% Alternatives to Quintessence Model Building
\bibitem{Dev} A. Dev, J.S. Alcaniz and D. Jain, Phys. Rev. D
{\bf 67}, 023515 (2002)
%COSMOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF A CHAPLYGIN GAS DARK ENERGY.
\bibitem{Fabris} J.C. Fabris, S.V.B. Goncalves and P.E.V. de Souza,
Gen. Rel. Grav. {\bf 34}, 2111 (2002)
% Mass Power Spectrum in a Universe Dominated by the Chaplygin Gas
\bibitem{Bento2} M.C.~Bento, O. Bertolami and A.A.~Sen,
%``Generalized Chaplygin gas model: Dark energy - dark matter
% unification and CMBR constraints,''
Gen.\ Rel.\ Grav.\ {\bf 35}, 2063 (2003)
\bibitem{Gonzalez} P.F. Gonzalez-Diaz, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 562}, 1
(2003)
\bibitem{Gorini} V. Gorini, A. Kamenshchik and U. Moschella, \prd {\bf
67}, 063509 (2003)
\bibitem{Chimento} L.P. Chimento, A.S. Jakubi and D. Pavon,
\prd {\bf 67}, 087302 (2003)
\bibitem{Amendola} L. Amendola, F. Finelli, C. Burigana and D. Carturan,
JCAP {\bf 0307}, 005 (2003)
\bibitem{Bean} R. Bean and O. Dore, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 68}, 023515 (2003)
\bibitem{Reis} R.R.R.~Reis, I.~Waga, M.O.~Calvao and S.E.~Joras,
%``Entropy perturbations in quartessence Chaplygin models,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 061302(R) (2003)
\bibitem{Carturan} D. Carturan and F. Finelli, Phys. Rev. D {\bf
68}, 103501 (2003)
\bibitem{Gorini2} V. Gorini, A. Kamenshchik and U. Moschella and V.
Pasquier, proceedings of 10th Marcel Grossmann Meeting, Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil, 20-26 Jul 2003, gr-qc/0403062 (2004)
\bibitem{Chimento2} L.P.~Chimento,
%``Extended tachyon field, Chaplygin gas and solvable k-essence cosmologies,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 123517 (2004)
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\bibitem{Chap_original} S. Chaplygin, Sci. Mem. Moscow Univ. Math. Phys.
{\bf 21}, 1 (1904)
\bibitem{Chap_string} M. Bordemann and J. Hoppe, Phys. Lett. B {\bf
317}, 315 (1993)
\bibitem{Sen} A. Sen, Mod. Phys. Lett. A {\bf 17}, 1797 (2002)
\bibitem{Gibbons} G.W. Gibbons, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 537}, 1 (2002)
\bibitem{Padmanabhan} T.~Padmanabhan, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66},
021301(R) (2002)
\bibitem{Bagla} J.~S.~Bagla, H.~K.~Jassal and T.~Padmanabhan,
%``Cosmology with tachyon field as dark energy,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 063504 (2003)
\bibitem{Gorini3} V.~Gorini, A.~Kamenshchik, U.~Moschella and
V.~Pasquier,
%``Tachyons, scalar fields and cosmology,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 123512 (2004)
% The Role of Baryons in Unified Dark Matter Models
\bibitem{Chap_susy} R. Jackiw and A.P. Polychronakos, Phys. Rev. D
{\bf 62}, 085019 (2000)
\bibitem{Sandvik} H.B. Sandvik, M. Tegmark, M. Zaldarriaga and I.
Waga, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 69}, 123524 (2004)
\bibitem{Beca} L.M.G. Beca, P.P. Avelino, J.P.M. de Carvalho and
C.J.A.P. Martins, Phys.Rev. D {\bf 67}, 101301(R) (2003)
%The Role of Baryons in Unified Dark Matter Models
\bibitem{Makler} M. Makler, S.Q. de Oliveira and I. Waga, Phys. Lett.
B {\bf 555}, 1 (2003)
%Observational Constraints on Chaplygin Quartessence: Background Results
\bibitem{Silva} P. T. Silva and O. Bertolami, \apj {\bf 599}, 829
(2003)
%Expected constraints on the generalized Chaplygin equation of state
%from future supernova experiments and gravitational lensing statistics
\bibitem{Bertolami} O. Bertolami, A.A. Sen, S. Sen and P.T. Silva,
%``Latest Supernova data in the framework of Generalized Chaplygin Gas
% model,''
Mon.\ Not.\ Roy.\ Astron.\ Soc.\ {\bf 353}, 329 (2004)
\bibitem{Riess2} A. Riess et al., \apj {\bf 607}, 665 (2004)
%\bibitem{Spergel} D.N. Spergel et al., Astrophys.J.Suppl. {\bf 148}, 175
%(2003)
\bibitem{SZY} M. Szydlowski and W. Czaja, \prd {\bf 69}, 023506 (2004)
\bibitem{gamma} P.J. Steinhardt, L. Wang and I. Zlatev, Phys.Rev. D
{\bf 59}, 123504 (1999)
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}