Cosmic Rays Astrophysics and Neutrino Astronomy beyond and beneath the Horizons
Extracted source text ยท arXiv astro-ph/0502017
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% template.tex: template for camera.cls/camera.sty:
% camera-ready papers (Societ\`a Italiana di Fisica)
% 1997/03/18
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% If you have LaTeX2e, replace the line below with:
% \documentclass{camera}
% If you don't know which version of LaTeX you have,
% leave it as it is and try it out; if it doesn't work,
% try with \documentclass.
% If you really want to know which version of LaTeX
% you have, just
% 1. typeset this (or any other file) with the command
% latex camera
% 2. ignore the errors
% 3. search among the first lines of output for
% a line such as
% LaTeX2e <1996/06/01>
% or
% LaTeX Version 2.09 <25 March 1992>
%
\documentstyle{camera}
% if you have landscape tables
% put your own definitions here:
% \newcommand{\cZ}{\cal{Z}}
% \newtheorem{def}{Definition}[section]
% ...
\newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
\newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
\newcommand{\ud}{\mathrm{d}}
\newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
\newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
\newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\iii}{\mathrm{i}}
\newcommand{\der}{\mathrm{d}}
\newcommand{\Ima}{\mathrm{Im}}
\newcommand{\Rea}{\mathrm{Re}}
\newcommand{\JoB}{\mathrm{J_0}}
\newcommand{\eex}{\mathrm{e}}
\newcommand{\lambdabar}{\lambda\!\!\bar{ }\ }
\newcommand{\dummy}[2]{\begin{array}{c} #1\\#2 \end{array} }
\newcommand{\bino}[2]{\left ( \begin{array}{c} #1\\#2 \end{array} \right )}
\newcommand\nutau{{\nu_\tau}}
\newcommand\anutau{\bar\nu_\tau}
\newcommand\numu{{\nu_\mu}}
\newcommand\anumu{\bar\nu_\mu}
\newcommand\nue{{\nu_e}}
\newcommand\anue{\bar\nu_e}
\newcommand{\Reg}{I\!R}
\newcommand{\Pom}{I\!P}
\newcommand{\fx}
{$F(x)=\frac{1}{\sigma}\frac{2E_{CM}}{\pi\sqrt s}\frac{\der
\sigma} {\der x_F}$}
\newcommand{\FLUKA}{{\sc FLUKA}}
\newcommand{\PEANUT}{{\sc PEANUT}}
\newcommand{\DPMJET}{{\sc DPMJET}}
\def\dm2{\Delta m^2}
\def\sq2{sin^2(2\Theta)}
\def\nubar{\overline {\nu} }
\def\aprle{\buildrel < \over {_{\sim}}}
\def\aprge{\buildrel > \over {_{\sim}}}
\def\to{\rightarrow}
\def\pep{$p\to e^+\pi^0$}
\def\pkn{$p\to \bar{\nu}K^+$}
\def\ra{\rightarrow}
% add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
\hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed
Post-Script}
\input epsf
\begin{document}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% The title, all uppercase; if you want to split it in
% two or more lines, put a \\ macro at each line break
% example:
% \title{TITLE: FIRST LINE\\ SECOND LINE}
%
\title{ Cosmic Rays Astrophysics and Neutrino Astronomy beyond and beneath the Horizons }
% use optional labels to link authors explicitly to addresses:
\author{D. Fargion}
%%%%% \author[label1]{, M. Grossi}
%%%%% \author[label1]{, M. De Santis}
%%%%% \author[label1]{ P.G. De Sanctis Lucentini}
%%%%% \author[label1,label2]{, M.Iori}
%%%%% \author[label1]{, A. Sergi}
%%%%% \author[label1]{, F.Moscato}
%%%%%% \address[label1]{Dep. of Physics, University of Rome "La Sapienza"}
%%%%%\address[label1]{Physics Department , INFN, Universit\'a di Roma "La Sapienza", Pl. A. Moro
%%%%%2, 00185, Rome, Italy}
\organization{ Physics Department, University of Rome "La
Sapienza" \\
and INFN Rome1, Italy}
% \address[label2]{}
%\author[label1]{M. Grossi}
%\address{}
\maketitle
\begin{abstract}
Modern Terrestrial Cerenkov Telescopes and Array Scintillators facing the Horizons may soon reveal
far Cosmic Rays or nearer PeVs-EeVs Neutrino Showers Astronomy.
Also UHE neutrino interactions in air, leading to Horizontal
Showers, may take place through several channels: the main Glashow
resonant $\overline{\nu}_{e}-e \rightarrow W^-$ one, the charged
nuclear interactions ${\nu}_e + N \rightarrow e^- + X $,
${\nu}_{\mu} + N \rightarrow \mu + X $, ${\nu}_{\tau} + N
\rightarrow \tau + X $,
and the neutral current events ${\nu}_e + N \rightarrow {\nu}_e + X $, ${\nu}_{\mu} + N \rightarrow
{\nu}_{\mu} + X $, ${\nu}_{\tau} + N \rightarrow {\nu}_{\tau}+ X
$. Analogous events occur also for $\bar{\nu}$-nucleon events.
These interactions are producing hadronic or electromagnetic
showers at the far horizons and their correlated secondaries
Cerenkov flashes; additional double showering in air may occur by
rare tau decay in flight. Comparable interactions ${\nu}_{\tau} +
N \rightarrow \tau + X $ are producing, inside the Earth, the
Horizontal, but Up-going ultra-relativistic tau, whose decay in
flight is source of $\tau$ Air Showers (Uptaus and HorTaus);
Horizontal Tau Air-Showers are rarely (one-two order of magnitude)
enhanced by highest mountain chains at horizons, as in AUGER
experimental site; their hadronic or electromagnetic traces are
preferentially at PeV-EeV energies; their tracks are amplified by
their muon-gamma bundles whose signals are above the random noises
and better disentangled by Cerenkov flashes in time coincidence.
More exotic UHE SUSY interactions $\chi^o + e\rightarrow \tilde{e}
\rightarrow\chi^o + e $ at tens PeVs-EeV energy may blaze at
Horizons if $\tilde{e}_R$ has a mass comparable with gauge boson
$W^-$ one ( within a top-down model for UHECR). Anyway common High
Energy Cosmic rays at PeVs-EeVs energy $must$ traces their
presence in Magic-like Cerenkov Telescopes at horizons; every
night these telescopes may observe tens of clustered C.R. showers
at $87^o-90^o$ zenith angle by the far precursor Cerenkov flashes
and later (micro-second) muon rings (hitting inside the telescope)
and-or decay (into electron) in flight leading to near-by
mini-gamma showers. They may be a first probe to calibrate a Novel
rare Neutrino Astronomy below the horizons. Present Magic Telescopes
facing the Horizons are, at equal given time, almost comparable with the
Amanda underground neutrino detector.
\end{abstract}
% main text
\section{Cosmic Ray Flashes above the Earth edges}
Ultra High Energy and High Energy Cosmic Rays (UHECR) Showers
(PeVs - EeVs band energy) born at high altitude in the atmosphere
may be detected by telescopes such as Magic provided that they are
pointed \emph{above the horizon} .
These Cerenkov telescopes, set in a crown circular array toward the Horizons, may be correlated by an analogous
scintillator ones able to trace muons and electromagnetic shower
particles. The earliest gamma and Cerenkov lights produced
by any down-ward horizontal, zenith angle $(85^o-90^o$ ),
cosmic rays (CR), observed by a high ($> 2$ km) mountain
(whose C.R. nature is mainly hadronic), while crossing the atmosphere
are severely absorbed by the thick horizontal air column depth ($10^4 - 5 \cdot 10^4$ $ g \cdot
cm^{-2})$. However the most energetic C.R. blazing Cerenkov shower
must survive and also revive during their propagation. Indeed
one has to expect that these CR showers contain also a diluted but
more penetrating component made of muon bundles, which can be
detected in two ways: a) by their Cerenkov lights emitted after
they decay into electrons near the Telescope; b) by the same muons
hitting inside the Telescope, blazing ring or arc by the same
muon Cerenkov lights. The latter muon bundles are less abundant
compared to the peak gamma bundles produced in the shower
(roughly $10^{-3}$ times lower). They are mostly produced at an
horizontal distance of $100-500$ km from the observer (for a Magic
site placed at 2.2km above the sea level and a zenith
angle of $85^{\circ}- 91.5^{\circ}$).
Therefore these hard muon bundles (each one at tens-hundred GeV
energy) might spread in large areas of tens - hundred $km^2$ while
they travel towards the observers. They are partially split and
bent by the local geomagnetic field, along an axis orthogonal to
the field and along their propagation direction; a fraction of
them may decay into electrons producing luminous mini-optical
Cerenkov flashes. The geo-magnetic spread of the shower leads to
an early aligned Cerenkov blaze whose shape (a twin split shower)
and inclination may probe the magnetic field "polarization" and
the CR origination. Such a characteristic signature may be
detected by the largest gamma telescope arrays as Hess, Veritas,
or the forthcoming stereoscopic version of Magic. We argue that
their Cerenkov flashes, either single or clustered, must take
place, at detection threshold, at least tens or hundreds times a
night for Magic-like Telescope pointing toward horizons at a
zenith angle between $85^{\o}$ and $90^{\o}$. Their easy
"guaranteed" discover may offer, we believe, a new tool in CR and
UHECR detection. At zenith angle between $85^{\o}$ and $80^{\o}$
by an accurate statistics there is the possibility to disentangle
the cosmic ray spectra and composition at PeV-EeV energy windows.
Their primary hadronic signature might be hidden by the distance
but its late tail may arise in a new form by its secondary
muon-electron-Cerenkov of electromagnetic showering.
Moreover a rarer but more exciting PeV - EeV
Neutrino ${\nu_{\tau}}$ Astronomy (whose flux is suppressed by
nearly three-four orders of magnitude respect to CR one) may arise
\emph{below the horizon} with the Earth-Skimming Horizontal Tau
Air-Showers (HorTaus); below the horizons one is not awaiting C.R.
shower, because Earth opacity, at all. These UHE Taus are
produced inside the Earth Crust by the primary UHE incoming
neutrino ${\nu}_{\tau}$, $\overline{\nu}_{\tau}$, and they are
generated mainly by the muon-tau neutrino oscillations from
galactic or cosmic sources, \cite{Fargion1999}\cite{Fargion
2002a}, \cite{Feng2002}, \cite{Bertou2002}, \cite{Fargion2004}.
Moreover we expect also that just above (one-two degree) or below
the horizon edge (half a degree), within a distance of a few
hundreds of km, fine-tuned $\overline{\nu}_e$-$e\rightarrow
W^-\rightarrow X$ Glashow resonance at $6.3$ PeV might be
detectable as horizontal air-showers; they are nearly two-three
orders of magnitude below CR ones (for comparable incoming
fluxes). The W main hadronic ($2/3$) or leptonic and
electromagnetic ($1/3$) signatures may be well observed and their
rate may be used to calibrate a new horizontal neutrino
multi-flavour Astronomy \cite{Fargion 2002a}. Again we argue that
such a signature of nearby nature (respect to most far away ones
at same zenith angle of hadronic nature) would be better revealed
by a Stereoscopic twin telescope such as Magic or a Telescope
array like Hess, Veritas.
Additional Horizontal flashes might arise
by Cosmic UHE $\chi_o + e \rightarrow \widetilde{e}\rightarrow \chi_o +
e$ electromagnetic showers within most SUSY models, if UHECR are born in topological
defect decay or in their annihilation, containing a relevant component of SUSY
particles. The UHE $\chi_o + e \rightarrow \widetilde{e}\rightarrow \chi_o +
e$ behaves (for light $\widetilde{e}$ masses around Z boson ones)
as the Glashow resonance peak \cite{Datta04}.
The total amount of air inspected within the characteristic field
of view of MAGIC ($2^{\o} \cdot 2^{\o}$) at the horizon ($360$
km.) corresponds to a (water equivalent) volume-mass larger than $
V_w\simeq 44 km^3$. However their detectable beamed volume
corresponds to a narrower thinner volume $ V_w\simeq 1.36
\cdot 10^{-2}$ $km^3$, yet comparable to the present AMANDA
confident volume (for Pevs $\overline{\nu}_e$-$e\rightarrow
W^-\rightarrow X$ and EeVs ${\nu}_{\tau}$,
$\overline{\nu}_{\tau} + N \rightarrow \tau\rightarrow $ showers).
\section{ Flashes by Prompt Showers and Muons}
The ultrahigh energy cosmic rays (UHECR) have been studied
in the past mainly through their secondary particles ($\gamma$, $e^\pm$, $\mu^\pm$)
collected vertically in large array detectors on the ground. UHECRs are rare events, however the multiple cascades occurring at high
altitudes where the shower usually takes place, expand and amplify the signal detectable on the ground.
On the other hand, at the horizon the UHECR are hardly observable (but also rarely
searched). They are diluted both by the larger distance they have to cover and
by the atmosphere opacity suppressing exponentially their
electromagnetic secondaries (electron pairs and gammas); also
their optical Cerenkov emission is partially suppressed by the
horizontal air opacity.
However this suppression acts also as a useful filter
leading to the selection of higher CR events. Their Cerenkov lights
will be scattered and partially transmitted ($1.8\cdot 10^{-2}$ at $551$ nm., $6.6\cdot 10^{-4}$ at $445$ nm.)
depending on the exact zenith angle and the seeing: assuming an average suppression factor - $5\cdot
10^{-3}$ for the air opacity and $10^{-3}$ for the $30$ times larger distances,
the nominal Magic threshold at $30$ GeV does
correspond to a hadronic shower coming from the horizon
with an energy above $E_{CR}\simeq 6 $ PeV.
Their primary flux may be estimated considering
the known cosmic ray fluxes at the same energy on the top of the atmosphere (both protons
or helium) (see DICE Experiment referred in \cite{Grieder01}) :
$\phi_{CR}(E_{CR} = 6\cdot 10^{15} eV)\simeq 9\cdot
10^{-12}cm^{-2}s^{-1}$.
Within a Shower Cerenkov angle $\Delta\theta = 1^{o}$
at a distance $d =167 km \cdot \sqrt{\frac{h}{2.2 km}}$
(zenith angle $\theta \simeq 87^{o}- 88^{o}$)
giving a shower area $ [A = \pi \cdot(\Delta\theta \cdot d)^2\simeq 2.7 \cdot 10^{11} cm^2 (\frac{d}{167 km})^2 ]$,
the consequent event rate per night for a Magic-like telescope
with a field of view of $[\Delta\Omega =(2^o \cdot 2^o)\pi \simeq
3.82 \cdot 10^{-3} sr.]$ is \\
%%%% ($[\Delta(t)= 4.32 \cdot 10^4s]$):
\[N_{ev}=\phi_{CR}(E= 6\cdot 10^{15} eV)\cdot A \cdot \Delta \Omega
\cdot \Delta(t) \simeq 401/12 h \]
Thus one may foresee that nearly every
two minutes a horizontal hadronic shower may be observed by Magic if it were pointed towards the horizon
at zenith angle $87^o-88^o$. Increasing the altitude $h$ of the observer, the
horizon zenith angle grows: $\theta \simeq [90^o + 1.5^o
\sqrt{\frac{h}{2.2km}}]$.
In analogy at a more distant horizontal edges (standing at height $2.2
km$ as for Magic, while observing at zenith angle $\theta \simeq 89^o- 91^o$
still above the horizons) the observation range $d$ increases : $d= 167\sqrt{\frac{h}{2.2 km}} + 360 km = 527
km$; the consequent shower area widen by more than an order of
magnitude (and more than three order respect to vertical showers) and the foreseen event number,
now for much harder CR at $E_{CR} \geq 3\cdot 10^{17} eV$, becomes:
$$N_{ev}=\phi_{CR}(E= 3\cdot 10^{17} eV)\cdot A \cdot \Delta \Omega \cdot
\Delta(t) \simeq 1.6 /12 h$$
Therefore at $\theta \simeq 91.5^o$, once per night, a UHECR around EeV energies,
may blaze the Magic (or Hess,Veritas, telescopes).
A long trail of secondary muons is associated to each of these far primary Cherenkov flash in a very huge
area. These muons showering nearby the telescope, while they decay in flight
into electrons, producing tens-hundred GeVs mini-gamma
showers, is also detectable at a rate discussed in the following section.
\section{ Muon's Arcs and Gamma Flashes by $\mu^\pm \rightarrow e^\pm $}
As already noted the photons from a horizontal UHECR may be also replenished by the secondary
tens-hundred GeVs muons: they can either decay in flight as a gamma
flashes, or they may hit the telescope and their muon Cerenkov lights "paint" arcs or rings within the detector.
Indeed these secondary very penetrating muon bundles
may cover distances of hundreds km ($\simeq 600 km \cdot\frac{E_{\mu}}{100\cdot GeV}$) away from the shower origin.
To be more precise a part of the muon primary energy will be dissipated
along their path in air of $360$ km (nearly a
hundred GeV energy loss); thus a primary $130-150$ GeV muon is necessary to reach a final
$30-50$ GeV energy at the minimal Magic threshold value.
Let us remind the characteristic multiplicity of secondary muons in a shower:
$ N_\mu \simeq 3\cdot 10^5 \left( \frac{E_{CR}}{PeV}\right)^{0.85} $ \cite{Cronin2004} for GeV muons. For the harder component (around 100
GeV), the muon number is reduced almost inversely proportionally to energy
$ N_\mu(10^2\cdot GeV) \simeq 1.3\cdot 10^4 \left( \frac{E_{CR}}{6 \cdot
PeV}\right)^{0.85}$.
These values must be compared to the larger peak multiplicity (but much lower energy) of
electro-magnetic showers: $ N_{e^+ e^-} \simeq 2\cdot 10^7 \left(
\frac{E_{CR}}{PeV}\right); N_{\gamma} \simeq 10^8 \left(\frac{E_{CR}}{PeV}\right) $.
As mentioned before, most of the electromagnetic tail is lost (exponentially) at
horizons (for a slant depth larger than a few hundreds of
$\frac{g}{cm^2}$), excluding re-born, upgoing $\tau$ air-showers
\cite{Fargion2004},\cite{Fargion2004b} to be discussed later.
Therefore gamma-electron pairs are only partially regenerated
by the penetrating muon decay in flight, $\mu^\pm \rightarrow \gamma, e^\pm$
as a parasite electromagnetic showering \cite{Cillis2001}.
Indeed $\mu^\pm $ may decay in flight (let say at $100$ GeV energy,at $2-3\%$ level within a $12-18$ km distances)
and they may inject more and more lights, to their primary (far born) shower beam.
The ratio between $\gamma$, $\pm e$ over $\pm \mu$ offer a clear hint of the
Shower evolution \cite{Fargion2004b}. These tens-hundred GeVs horizontal muons and their associated mini-Cerenkov $\gamma$ showers are generated by:
(1) either a single muon mostly produced at hundreds of kilometers by a single primary
hadron with an energy of hundreds GeV-TeV; \\
(2) rarer muons, part of a wider horizontal bundle
of large multiplicity born at TeVs-PeV or higher energies, as secondary of an horizontal shower.
Between the two cases there is a smooth link.
A whole continuous spectrum of multiplicity begins from a unique muon up to a multi muon shower production.
The dominant noisy "single" muons at hundred-GeV energies
will lose memory of their primary low energy and hidden mini-shower, (a hundreds GeV or TeVs hadrons );
a single muon will blaze just alone.
The frequency of muon "single" rings or arcs is larger than the muon bundles and it is based on solid observational data
(\cite{Iori04} ; \cite{Grieder01}, as shown in Fig.2 see also the references on the MUTRON experiment therein.
The event number due to the "noise" is:\\
$$N_{ev- \mu} (\theta = 90^o)= \phi_{\mu}(E\simeq 10^{2} eV) \cdot A_{Magic} \cdot \Delta \Omega \cdot
\Delta(t) \simeq 120 /12 h$$
The additional gamma mini-showers around the telescope due to a decay
of those muons in flight (with a probability $p\simeq 0.02$),
%recorded within a
%larger collecting Area $A_{\gamma} \geq 10^9 cm^2$
is even a more frequent source of noise (by a factor $\geq
8$):\\
$$N_{ev- \mu\rightarrow \gamma}\geq \phi_{\mu}(E\simeq 10^{2} eV)\cdot p \cdot A_{\gamma} \cdot \Delta \Omega \cdot
\Delta(t) \simeq 960 /12 h$$
These single background gamma-showers must take place nearly once
per minute (in a negligible hadronic background) and they represent a useful tool
to calibrate the possibility of detecting Horizontal CR.
\section{Showers precursor and their late Muon tails}
On the contrary PeVs (or higher energy) CR shower Cerenkov lights
maybe observed, more rarely, in coincidence both by their primary
and by their later secondary arc and gamma mini-shower.
Their $30-100$ GeV energetic muons are flying nearly undeflected
$\Delta \theta \leq 1.6^o \cdot \frac{100 \cdot GeV}{E_{\mu}}\frac{d}{300 km}$
for a characteristic horizons distances d , partially bent by the geo-magnetic fields ($\sim$ $0.3$
Gauss). As mentioned, to flight through the whole horizontal air column depth
($360$ km equivalent to $360$ water depth) the muon lose nearly $100$ GeV; consequently the initial muon energy should be a little above this threshold
to be observed by Magic: (at least $ 130-150 $ GeV). The deflection angle is small:
$\Delta \theta \leq 1^o \cdot \frac{150 \cdot GeV}{E_{\mu}}\frac{d}{300 km}$).
Given the area of Magic ($A = 2.5 \cdot 10^6 cm^2$) we expect roughly the
following number of events due to direct muons hitting the Telescope, flashing as rings and arcs, each
night:\\
$$N_{ev}=\phi_{CR}(E= 6\cdot 10^{15} eV)\cdot N_\mu(10^2\cdot GeV) \cdot A_{Magic} \cdot \Delta \Omega \cdot
\Delta(t) \simeq 45 /12 h$$ \\
to be correlated (at $11\%$ probability) with the above results of
$401$ primary Cerenkov flashes at the far distances. Moreover,
the same muons are decaying in flight at a minimal probability
$2\%$ leading to mini-gamma-showers in a wider area
($A_{\gamma}= 10^9 cm$). The related number of events we expect
is:\\
$$N_{ev}= \phi_{CR}(E= 6\cdot 10^{15} eV)\cdot N_\mu(10^2\cdot GeV) \cdot p \cdot A_{\gamma} \cdot \Delta \Omega \cdot
\Delta(t) \simeq 360 /12 h$$\\ Therefore, at $87^{\o}-88^{\o}$ zenith angle, there is a flow
of a few dozens of primary CR (at $E_{CR}\simeq 6\cdot 10^{16} eV$), whose earliest showers
and consequent secondary muon-arcs as well as nearby muon-electron mini-shower
take place at comparable rate (one every $120$ s).
Therefore they may occur in time coincidence. Sometime
also a bundle of arcs may better point to the C.R. Shower
arrival. A well known analogy occurs in meteor showers
by their group perspective pointing at their origination.
The time arrival of the prompt Shower respect the late muon one may be
estimated by geometrical and relativistic arguments and
may reach a detectable delay value \cite{Cazon04}.
These $certain$, clustered, signals offer
an unique tool for calibrating Magic (as well as Hess,Cangaroo,Veritas Cerenkov Telescope Arrays)
for Horizontal High Energy Cosmic Ray Showers. Some rarer events may contain at once both Rings,Arcs
and tail of gamma shower as well as a Cerenkov far primary shower.
It is possible to estimate also the observable muon-electron-Cerenkov
photons from up-going albedo muons observed by the most
recent ground experiments \cite{NEVOD} \cite{Decor}:
their flux is already suppressed at zenith angle $91^o$ by at least two orders of
magnitude and by four orders for up-going zenith angles $94^o$.
Pairs or bundles are nevertheless rarer (up to $\phi_{\mu} \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-13} cm^{-2}s^{-1}sr^{-1}$
\cite{NEVOD} \cite{Decor}). They are never associated to up-going showers (excluding the case of
tau air-showers or the Glashow $\bar{\nu_e}-e\rightarrow W^-$ and the comparable $\chi^o + e\rightarrow
\tilde{e}$).
%%% detectable by stereoscopic Magic or Hess array telescopes, selecting and evaluating their column depth origination, just discussed below.
%---------------------------------------------
\section{Glashow $\bar{\nu_e} + e \rightarrow W^{-}$ Neutrino Astronomy }
We note that UHE neutrinos may interact hitting nucleons and shower on air while crossing longest horizontal column
depth ($\simeq 360 g cm^{-2}$) by charged and neutral currents;
a defined competitive horizontal events by UHE $6.3$ PeV, Glashow $\bar{\nu_e}-e\rightarrow W^- \rightarrow $
(hadrons or electromagnetic showers)
are also taking place; one should remember that at Glashow's peak resonance
the probability conversion is $\simeq 5 \cdot 10^{-3}$ at 360 km air distance and the consequent event number is:
$$N_{ev}= \phi_{\bar{\nu_e}} (E= 6\cdot 10^{15} eV) \cdot A\cdot \Delta \Omega \cdot
\Delta(t) \simeq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-4}/12 h$$
assuming the minimal GZK neutrino flux : $\phi_{\bar{\nu_e}} (E= 6\cdot 10^{15} eV)\simeq 5 \cdot
10^{-15}$ $ cm^{-2} s^{-1}sr^{-1}$; the consequent GZK flat spectra
energy fluency is assumed as : $\phi_{\bar{\nu_e}}\cdot E = 30 eV cm^{-2} s^{-1}sr^{-1} $.
A comparable number of events are also taking place smoothly at
PeVs neutrino energies by nucleon charged current interactions (and marginally, by neutral
current ones): ${\nu}_e + N \rightarrow e^- + X $,
${\nu}_{\mu} + N \rightarrow \mu + X $, ${\nu}_{\tau} + N
\rightarrow \tau + X $,
and ${\nu}_e + N \rightarrow {\nu}_e + X $, ${\nu}_{\mu} + N \rightarrow
{\nu}_{\mu} + X $, ${\nu}_{\tau} + N \rightarrow {\nu}_{\tau}+ X
$. Naturally the air column depth at $360$ km distance is too dim
to let the Cerenkov signal to survive the Magic threshold, but
more muons bundle and showering or additional stereoscopic array
(or wider telescope area as $10^3$ $m^2$ ones ) may still record
such a far shower. The full night year record of $60$ or more
Magic like telescope may reach a dozen of events with a quite
guaranteed $\bar{\nu_e}-e\rightarrow W^- \rightarrow $
(hadrons or electromagnetic showers) channel.
\subsection{ SUSY $\chi^o + e\rightarrow \tilde{e} \rightarrow \chi^o +
e$ electromagnetic showers}
Therefore in a year of observations, provided that the data are taken at night,
assuming a minimal GZK flux, a full crown array of
a $90$ Magic-like telescopes set on a circle ($2\cdot \pi = 360^o$) and facing the horizon,
would give a number of events comparable to a $Km^3$ detector, (more than a dozen per year).
Indeed the present unique Magic Telescope
pointing at the horizon offers a detection comparable to the present
AMANDA $\simeq 1\% Km^3$ effective volume.
It should be noted that up-going $\bar{\nu_e}-e\rightarrow
W^-$ and $\chi^o + e\rightarrow \tilde{e}$ below the
horizons are possible within nearly $1^o$ because the Earth is not
totally opaque at those small angles for these two tuned resonant
interactions. The event number might be comparable with the
$\bar{\nu_e}-e\rightarrow W^- \rightarrow $
(hadrons or electromagnetic showers), provided that UHECR are
originated in SUSY neutralino as UHE neutrinos in top-down
models.
\section{Discovering UHE ${\nu_\tau}$ by Horizontal Tau Showers}
The appearance of horizontal UHE neutrino $\tau$ interaction in
matter $\bar{\nu_\tau} +N $ ${\nu_\tau}+ N \rightarrow \tau^\pm$
leading, in air, to air-showers (Hortaus or Earth-Skimming neutrinos)
has been widely studied \cite{Fargion1999},\cite{Fargion
2002a},\cite{Bertou2002},\cite{Feng2002}; see also
\cite{Fargion03},\cite{Fargion2004},\cite{Jones04},
\cite{Yoshida2004},\cite{Tseng03}and more recent \cite{Fargion2004b} ;
Their rise from the Earth is source
of rare clear signals for neutrino UHE astronomy .
The higher the observer is located the wider is the view
angle of the underneath Earth. The consequent up-going muon
flux, by tau air-showers, are changing with quota \cite{Fargion2004b}. The upward gamma and electron pair showering
may be also a very
solid probe of the $\tau$ air-shower nearby showering
\cite{Fargion2004b}; nevertheless the long lived muon bundle
trace, correlated also with the Cerenkov flashes $below$ the horizons, may allow to
confirm the UHE neutrino origination of the Horizontal blazing
and its muon detection and arrival timing may better define its primary energy.
\subsection{Polarization Filters rejecting reflected Cerenkov Flash }
One should take into account the noise due to any inclined
down-ward CR shower mirrored by the Sea leading to apparent
up-going Cerenkov flashes; this mirror noise signal
will be disentangled by the co-presence of the
twin up (above horizons primary Shower) and down image (reflected image)
by the different muon versus Cerenkov
arrival direction. An additional misleading signal may occur
also by the muons bent by geomagnetic fields or by albedo scattering on the Earth.
The very discriminant filter of
fake mirrored Cerenkov showers is offered by their extreme polarization
imprinted by the planar reflection (either sea or a ground).
Therefore it must be considered a polarization filter of
the arrival photons.
\section{GRBs and UHECR correlated with UHE $\nu$ and Upward Shower }
While the persistent UHE gamma sources , as BL Lacs are a
natural target for UHE neutrino Astronomy to follows, the rare GRBs are a more powerful, but
rarer and unexpected sources. However the fast follow up of GRB
direction by Magic Telescope, may be fast enough to catch a PeV neutrino
showering at the horizons as well as an upward one from the Earth. Indeed the rare
and sharp presence of a UHE neutrino scattering in air , by
Glashow resonance at horizons, may be quite rare but above the
noise at edge zenith $91.5^o-92.5^o$. The tau neutrinos may come at PeVs-EeVs energy from a much wider
angle windows, and they are observable, in principle, from $91.5^o-120^o$ angle view.
We may expect a few rare discover of GRBs or SGRs blazing from the dark horizons or
from the Earth a year, if a wide zenith angle windows will be realized.
The same events might be searched in correlation with UHECR
:therefore it might be interesting to search for UHECR event
arrival directions that may contains UHE neutrinos in
correlated time while arriving at Horizons or beneath the
Earth. This might be possible because the fast tracking of
Magic telescopes and the possibility to bend the mirror
below to the Earth side. This may occur in correlated TeV
activities of BL Lacs sources\cite{Fargion 2004d}.
\section{ Conclusions}
The Horizontal shower detection may be improved projecting a coexistence of a
scintillator Crown Array (for muons and electromagnetic secondaries)
aligned with Crown Magic Telescope Array; they will able to verify the electromagnetic
and muon shower nature in coincident arrival time with optical Cerenkov flashes.
The Crown Array may encompass a large area
as hundreds square meters array (see last figure) and
its structure may be added around the Cerenkov Crown telescope
array at the same mountain top. Its ability to discover muons
(sometimes in correlation with the Cerenkov telescope)
as well as the electromagnetic trace $\gamma, e^+,e^-$ nature and ratio, for a total area of
63 $m^2$, is superior by a factor two respect a (single ) Magic telescope, because it enjoys a
larger solid angle and a longer recording time. Magic-Crown
and Muon Crown array may reveal tens of thousands horizontal
CR shower and a ten of up-going neutrino induced air-shower
a year (for GZK minimal fluxes). Finally the possible detection of up-going (a
few-ten GeV) muons induced neutrino hitting the Earth-Ground energetic
Solar Flare at a rate $\phi_{\mu}\simeq 10^{-10} cm^{-2}s^{-1}$
for a thousand of seconds, during the maximal solar flare activity,
might also be a target of such future Muon-Cerenkov astronomy
\cite{Solar} based on largest telescopes looking on the nights down-ward the Earth toward the Sun.
To conclude, while Magic looks
upward to investigate the exciting Low Gamma GeVs Astronomy,
the same telescope looking at the horizon must discover higher
(PeVs-EeVs) CR at high frequency, and rarely along the edge,
GZK $\bar{\nu_e}-e\rightarrow W^-$ air-showering neutrinos;
some times looking downward also most power-full Solar flare, as the last 28th Oct. 2004 and 20th Jen. 2005 ones,
may shine neutrinos whose up-going muons may be observable well below the horizons.
In conclusions new array of crown detectors might be better tuned for the horizons and below the horizons
seeking $\nu_{\tau} \rightarrow \tau$,$\bar{\nu_e}-e\rightarrow W^-$ Earth-Skimmimng air-showers Astronomy
and, surprisingly even SUSY $\tilde{e}$ air-showering lights.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}[h!] %%% FIGURE 1 %%%
\epsfysize=5cm \hspace{4.0cm} \epsfbox{fargion_2004_01_fig01.eps}
\vspace{0.3cm} \caption[h]{The Earth view from Canarie sites for a
Magic-like Crown Telescope Array facing the Horizons, blazed, in
dark nights, by CR showers and rare up-going Tau Air-Shower
Cerenkov flashes; the telescopes in circular array (of tens
telescopes at $360^o$ ) may test a wide area volume, nearly a
$km^3$ of air mass. The present (real) single Magic telescope is
located in the bottom left corner of the picture}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\begin{figure}[h!] %%% FIGURE 1 %%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\epsfysize=7cm \hspace{2.0cm} \epsfbox{fargion_2004_01_fig02.eps}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\vspace{0.3cm} \caption[h]{Muon fluxes at different zenith angle
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%from recent observational data \cite{Iori04} (gray dots), and
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%earlier ones \cite{Grieder01}}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\begin{figure}[h!] %%% FIGURE 1 %%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\epsfysize=7cm \hspace{4.0cm} \epsfbox{fargion_2004_01_fig03.eps}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\vspace{0.3cm} \caption[h]{Differential Tau Number flux by GZK
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%neutrino flux and consequent Hortau Earth Skimming flux rate from
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%the Earth; while their number is small their muon shower
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%secondaries numbers are amplified}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\begin{figure}[h!] %%% FIGURE 1 %%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\epsfysize=7cm \hspace{4.0cm} \epsfbox{fargion_2004_01_fig04.eps}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\vspace{0.3cm} \caption[h]{Consequent Differential Muon Number
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%flux by GZK neutrino and Tau flux Hortau Earth Skimming the
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%Earth, and consequent secondary muons: because of a different
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%acceptance at different altitude the flux depends on the observer
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%quota as shown in figure. The horizontal fluxes at the horizons
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%are sometimes exceeding the induced muons by horizontal
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%atmospheric neutrinos $\phi_{\mu} \simeq 2 \cdot 10^{-13} cm^{-2}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%s^{-1} sr^{-1}$}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}[h!] %%% FIGURE 1 %%%
\epsfysize=7cm \hspace{4.0cm} \epsfbox{fargion_2004_01_fig05.eps}
\vspace{0.3cm} \caption[h]{A schematic figure of a Crown circular
detector array located in Balloon \cite{Fargion 2005} or on the
top of a mountain (possibly screened by a roof to avoid vertical
cosmic electro-magnetic C.R. noise) by a $\simeq 20-30$ meter
radius size, whose inner-outer aligned tiles are able to reveal,
by time of flight, the crossing and the azimuth directions of
horizontal muons (and electron pairs and gamma) bundles; in the
picture one observe a downward C.R. (a proton, label by p)and an
upward Horizontal Tau Air-Shower (label by $\tau$); the $360^o$
tile disposal guarantees a wide azimuth solid angle view. The twin
(upper and lower) rings distance (height of tens or hundred meters
at the mountain top) is able to better disentangle the zenithal
arrival direction of the Horizontal Shower particles above or
below the Earth edges. A smaller twin scale device maybe dressed
around present AUGER detectors to improve their zenith angular
resolution to Horizons, in order to disentangle Tau induced
showers from the Ande \cite{Fargion1999},\cite{Fargion
2002a}\cite{Bertou2002}. }
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{thebibliography}{100}
\bibitem{Cazon04}{\normalsize L. Cazon, R. A. Vazquez, E. Zas; astro-ph/0412338}
%%%\bibitem[Datta et al. 2004]{Datta04}{\normalsize Datta A., Fargion D., Mele B; hep-ph/0410176}
\bibitem{Datta04}{\normalsize Datta A., Fargion D., Mele B; hep-ph/0410176}
%
%%\bibitem[Becattini and Bottai(2001)]{Becattini Bottai 2001} {\normalsize %
%%Becattini F and Bottai S 2001 Astropart. Phys. 15 323 }
%
%
\bibitem{Bertou2002} {\normalsize Bertou, X. et al.
2002, Astropart. Phys., 17, 183}
%
%
\bibitem{Cao} Z. Cao, M. A. Huang, P. Sokolsky, Y. Hu, astro-ph/0411677.
\bibitem{Cillis2001}{\normalsize Cillis, A.N., \& Sciutto, S.J., 2001, Phys. Rev. D64, 013010}
\bibitem{Cronin2004}{\normalsize Cronin, J.W., 2004, TauP Proceedings, Seattle 2003; astro-ph/0402487}
%%%%\bibitem{Fargion-Mele-Salis99}
%%%%%%%%%%{\normalsize Fargion, D., Mele, B., \& Salis, A., 1999, ApJ 517,
%%%%%%%725; astro-ph/9710029 }
%
\bibitem{Fargion1999} {\normalsize Fargion, D., Aiello,et.all. 1999, 26th ICRC
HE6.1.10,396-398 }
%%%%%\bibitem[Fargion 2002]{Fargion 2002a} {\normalsize Fargion, D., 2002, ApJ, 570, 909; see astro-ph/0002453/9704205 }
\bibitem{Fargion 2002a} {\normalsize Fargion, D., 2002, ApJ, 570, 909; see astro-ph/0002453/9704205 }
%%%%\bibitem[Fargion et al. 2003]{Fargion03} {\normalsize
%%%%Fargion, D. et al. 2003, Recent Res. Devel.Astrophysics., 1, 395; astro-ph/0303233} .
\bibitem{Fargion03} {\normalsize
Fargion, D. et al. 2003, Recent Res. Devel.Astrophysics., 1, 395;
astro-ph/0303233} .
%
%%%%\bibitem[Fargion et al. 2004a]{Fargion2004}{\normalsize Fargion D., De Sanctis Lucentini, P.G., De Santis, M., Grossi, M.,
%%%% 2004, ApJ, 613, 1285; hep-ph/0305128.}
\bibitem{Fargion2004}{\normalsize Fargion D., De Sanctis Lucentini, P.G., De Santis, M., Grossi, M.,
2004, ApJ, 613, 1285; hep-ph/0305128.}
%%%%\bibitem[Fargion et al. 2004b]{Fargion2004b}{\normalsize Fargion D. et al., Nuclear Physics B (Proc. Suppl.), 136 ,119(2004) }
\bibitem{Fargion2004b}{\normalsize Fargion D. et al., Nuclear Physics B (Proc. Suppl.), 136 ,119(2004) }
\bibitem{Fargion 2004c}{\normalsize Fargion D. astro-ph/0412582, (2004) }
\bibitem{Fargion 2005}{\normalsize Fargion D. et. all. astro-ph/0501079, (2005) }
\bibitem{Fargion 2004d}{\normalsize D.Fargion, A.Colaiuda, Nuclear Phys.B, Proc.Suppl.Vol 136C, 256-262, (2004)}
%%%%\bibitem[Feng 2002]{Feng2002} {\normalsize Feng, J.L.,
%%%%Fisher, P., Wilczek, F., \& Yu, T.M., 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88,
%%%%161102; hep-ph/0105067 }
\bibitem{Feng2002} {\normalsize Feng, J.L.,
Fisher, P., Wilczek, F., \& Yu, T.M., 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88,
161102; hep-ph/0105067 }
%%%%%%%%%\bibitem{Gandhi96}{\normalsize Gandhi, R., Quigg, C., Reno, M.H., Sarcevic, I., 1996, Astrop. Phys., 5, 81}
%%%%%%\bibitem[Gandhi et al. 1998]{Gandhi98}{\normalsize Gandhi, R., Quigg, C., Reno, M.H., Sarcevic, I., 1998, Phys. Rev. D., 58, 093009}
\bibitem{Gandhi98}{\normalsize Gandhi, R., Quigg, C., Reno, M.H., Sarcevic, I., 1998, Phys. Rev. D., 58, 093009}
%
%%%%%\bibitem[Grieder 2001]{Grieder01}{\normalsize P.K.F. Grieder , Cosmic Rays at Earth, Elsevier 2001 }
\bibitem{Grieder01}{\normalsize P.K.F. Grieder , Cosmic Rays at Earth, Elsevier 2001 }
%%%%%%\bibitem[Iori et al. 2004]{Iori04}{\normalsize Iori, M., Sergi, A., Fargion, D., 2004, astro-ph/0409159}
\bibitem{Iori04}{\normalsize Iori, M., Sergi, A., Fargion, D., 2004, astro-ph/0409159}
%%%%%%\bibitem[Jones et al. 2004]{Jones04}{\normalsize Jones, J. et al.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%Mocioni, I., Reno, M.H., Sarcevic, I.,
%%%%%%2004 Phys. Rev. D , 69, 033004}
\bibitem{Jones04}{\normalsize Jones, J. et al.
%%%%%%%%%%%Mocioni, I., Reno, M.H., Sarcevic, I.,
2004 Phys. Rev. D , 69, 033004}
%%%%%%%%%\bibitem{Learned Pakvasa 1995} {\normalsize Learned, J.G., \& Pakvasa, S., 1995, Astropart. Phys., 3, 267 }
%
%%%%%%%%\bibitem{Matthews01}{\normalsize J.C. Matthews (2001), Proc. 27th ICRC (Hamburg), 1, 161.}
%%%%%%\bibitem[Tseng et al. 2003]{Tseng03}
%%%%%%{\normalsize Tseng, J.J, Yeh, T.W., Athar et al.
%%%%%% %%%%%%H., Huang, M.A., Lee, F.F., Lin, G.L.,
%%%%%% 2003, Phys. Rev. D68, 063003}
\bibitem{Tseng03}
{\normalsize Tseng, J.J, Yeh, T.W., Athar et al.
%%%%%%H., Huang, M.A., Lee, F.F., Lin, G.L.,
2003, Phys. Rev. D68, 063003}
%
%%%%%%\bibitem[Yahin et al. 2003]{NEVOD}{\normalsize I.I. Yashin et al., ICRC28 (2003), 1195.}
\bibitem{NEVOD}{\normalsize I.I. Yashin et al., ICRC28 (2003), 1195.}
%%%%%%%\bibitem[Yashin et al. 2003]{Decor}{\normalsize I.I. Yashin et al, ICRC28 (2003), 1147.}
\bibitem{Decor}{\normalsize I.I. Yashin et al, ICRC28 (2003), 1147.}
%%%%%%%\bibitem[Yoshida et al. 2004]{Yoshida2004}{\normalsize Yoshida, S.,et al
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%Ishibashi, R., Miyamoto, H.,
%%%%%%%2004, Phys. Rev. D69, 103004};
%%%%%%%%%astro-ph/0312078}
%
\bibitem{Yoshida2004}{\normalsize Yoshida, S.,et al
%%%%%%%Ishibashi, R., Miyamoto, H.,
2004, Phys. Rev. D69, 103004};
\bibitem{Solar} D.Fargion,F.Moscato,Chin. J. Astron. Astrophys.Vol 3.Suppl.75-86. 2003.
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}