On the athermal character of structural phase transitions
Extracted source text ยท arXiv cond-mat/0109019
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Una de les dues opcions unicament:
%
\documentstyle[twocolumn,prl,epsfig,aps]{revtex}
%%\documentstyle[preprint,epsfig,aps]{revtex}
%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%
\def\btt#1{{\tt$\backslash$#1}}
%
\begin{document}
%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Activar per 2 columnes, desactivar per single column
\twocolumn[
\hsize\textwidth\columnwidth\hsize\csname@twocolumnfalse\endcsname
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%
\title{On the athermal character of structural phase transitions}
%
\author{ Francisco J. P\'erez-Reche, Eduard Vives,
Llu\'{\i}s Ma\~nosa, and
Antoni Planes}
%
\address{Departament d'Estructura i Constituents de la Mat\`eria, \\
Facultat de F\'\i sica, \\
Universitat de Barcelona. \\
Diagonal, 647, E-08028 Barcelona, Catalonia}
%
\maketitle
%
\begin{abstract}
The significance of thermal fluctuations on nucleation in structural
first-order phase transitions has been examined. The prototype case
of martensitic transitions has been experimentally investigated by
means of acoustic emission techniques. We propose a model based on
the mean first-passage time to account for the experimental
observations. Our study provides a unified framework to establish the
conditions for isothermal and athermal transitions to be observed.
\end{abstract}
%
\pacs{PACS numbers: 64.60.My, 64.60.Qb, 81.30.Kf }
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Activar per two-column, desactivar per single column
]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%
Fluctuations are considered as essential for a phase transition to
take place. However, at moderate temperatures many solids undergo
first-order phase transitions which are regarded as being athermal.
The kinetics of these transitions is not dominated by thermal
fluctuations and, consequently, they can only take place under the
change of an external parameter (stress, magnetic field,temperature
...) which modifies the free energy difference between high and low
symmetry phases. This behaviour is in contrast to thermally activated
transitions for which the relaxation from a metastable state can occur
at constant external conditions due to thermal fluctuations. Typical
examples of athermal transitions are found within the families of
magnetic and structural phase transitions which involve long-range
interactions (dipolar, elastic, \dots). The Martensitic Transition
(MT) undergone by many solids is an interesting case that will be the
prototype system experimentally investigated in the present letter.
It is a diffusionless first-order transition \cite{Otsuka98} mainly
caused by a shear mechanism \cite{Nishiyama78}. Often MT is preceded
by interesting premonitory effects such as softening of long and short
wavelength acoustic vibrational modes. The anharmonic coupling of
these modes is at the origin of the instability of the high
temperature phase \cite{Planes01}.
In general, when a system is externally driven through a first-order
phase transition, the response to the external control parameter is
determined by the characteristics of the energy barriers separating
the two phases. When thermal fluctuations are not relevant (athermal
transition), the system remains in a given configuration as long as
the state corresponds to a free energy local minimum. When driven, the
system jumps towards a different configuration, once the local
stability limit is reached. The path followed by the system is
strongly influenced by the existence of disorder (dislocations, grain
boundaries, vacancies, local composition, atomic configuration,
etc...), which controls the actual distribution of energy barriers.
As the system evolves, it passes through a sequence of metastable
states. The kinetics is characterised by jumps (avalanches) from one
metastable state to another which occur with a certain relaxation time
$\tau_{ava}$. In a number of cases this time has been found to be
power law distributed \cite{Vives94}. The jerky response for MT is
related to sudden changes in the local strain field which are at the
origin of the emission of acoustic waves in the range from $kHz$ to
$MHz$ \cite{Yu87}. This effect is the so-called acoustic emission
(A.E.). Similar crackling behaviour is observed in ferromagnetic
systems (Barkhausen noise) \cite{Vergne81}, capillary condensation
systems \cite{Lilly96} and others \cite{nature}. In the athermal case
the path followed by the system can be reproduced from cycle to cycle
provided that disorder does not evolve \cite{Sethna93}.
Traditionally MT have been regarded as athermal \cite{Cao90}, however
very recent experimental observations of the occurrence of the
transition at constant temperature question this athermal character in
shape-memory alloys \cite{Aspelmeyer99}. The present letter is aimed
at providing a simple explanation for the observation of apparent
athermal behaviour and describing the possibility of a cross-over
between such a behaviour and cases where thermal activation is
evident. The problem is intimately related to the nucleation
mechanism. Classical nucleation theories have proven to be inadequate
for MT and heterogeneous nucleation models have been proposed, most of
them neglecting the effect of themal fluctuations \cite{Vul93}. This
problem is central for the understanding of MT and remains an issue of
active debate \cite{Vul93,Cao90}. We have investigated two prototype
shape-memory materials undergoing a MT by detecting the A.E.
generated during the transition. The interest in the A.E. technique
lies in the fact that it is highly sensitive to very small
microstructural changes taking place in the studied sample. It is the
best suited technique to detect the nucleation and growth of any small
domain of the low temperature phase.
We have selected two single crystals with compositions
Cu$_{68.4}$Al$_{27.8}$Ni$_{3.8}$ and
Cu$_{68.0}$Zn$_{16.0}$Al$_{16.0}$. They underwent, respectively, a MT
from the $\beta$ (ordered-$bcc$) towards a $\gamma '$ (hexagonal) and
a $\beta'$ (orthorhombic) martensites. The samples were annealed for
30 min at 1173 K and then rapidly cooled down to room temperature and
further annealed for several days. A large number of cycles (more
than 50) were done in order to have a reproducible transformation.
A.E signals were detected by a resonant piezoelectric transducer
acoustically coupled to the top flat surface of the sample. The
bottom flat surface was mounted onto a Cu-block which was
cooled/heated by a Peltier element. In order to detect possible
isothermal effects it is of major importance to avoid uncontrolled
temperature oscillations and/or drifts. A computer-controlled
feed-back procedure provided temperature control with relative
oscillations smaller than 0.01 \%. The absolute value of the sample
temperature \cite{Calvet63} is known within $\pm 0.5$ K. A.E.
signals were counted using a frequency counter with a 1 s gate
\cite{porta}. Background noise is inherent to the detection of A.E;
this noise was quantified by performing experiments at a temperature
of more than 100 K above $M_s$. The background count rate is in the
range of 10 Hz. This renders a signal-to-noise ratio better than
10$^3$ during the M.T.
Two complementary experimental procedures were followed for each
studied sample. In the first case, the sample was cooled down from
room temperature in a stepwise manner. Each step consisted of an
isothermal plateau lasting a time $t$, followed by a cooling at
$\dot{T}= 1$ K/min down to the next plateau. The temperature
difference between consecutive plateaux was $\Delta T$ and several
values for $t$ and $\Delta T$ were tested. This procedure provided
very fine tuning for the detection of any possible isothermal
nucleation and growth of martensite. A typical example of the results
obtained is shown in Fig. \ref{FIG1}. For Cu-Zn-Al (Fig.
\ref{FIG1}a), no trace of A.E. was detected under isothermal holding
conditions, for any value of $\Delta T$ (values as low as $\Delta
T=0.2$ K were investigated). Moreover, below a certain temperature,
A.E. resumes each time the temperature is decreased. The behaviour
found for Cu-Al-Ni (Fig. \ref{FIG1}b) turns out to be different. For
isothermal plateaux separated by more than 0.8 K, the behaviour is
similar to that reported for Cu-Zn-Al. However, for smaller $\Delta
T$, A.E. under isothermal conditions is detected. A detailed view is
presented in the inset. The overshoot in the temperature caused by
heat release is clear evidence that the detected acoustic signals are
indeed generated by the transformation of a martensitic domain.
Furthermore, it is worth noting that in this case A.E. continues for
many minutes during the isothermal plateau above the average
background noise. From these stepwise experiments, it can be inferred
that thermal fluctuations do trigger the M.T. for Cu-Al-Ni, when the
system is close enough to the stability limit. In contrast, it seems
that thermal fluctuations are not able to trigger the transition in
Cu-Zn-Al even in the case when the system is in the two-phase
co-existence region.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Figure 1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}[th]
\begin{center}
\epsfig{file =fig1.eps, width=8cm}
%%\epsfig{file =fig1.eps, width=14cm}
\end{center}
\caption{Typical examples of the A.E. recorded during stepwise
isothermal runs for (a) Cu-Zn-Al and (b) Cu-Al-Ni. Notice the
difference in the temperature scale (right axis) between the two
plots. The inset in figure (b) shows a detailed view of the A.E.
recorded isothermically. The large fluctuation in the temperature is
caused by the latent heat released during the isothermal
transformation of a martensitic domain.}
\label{FIG1}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
The second procedure consists of measuring A.E. under continuous
cooling at different rates $\dot T$. Results for Cu-Zn-Al are shown in
Figure \ref{FIG2}a. We propose that, for athermal transitions, the
absence of kinetic effects will result in a scaling of the ratio
between the acoustic activity and the cooling rate ($\nu$/$\dot{T}$).
We have evaluated the actual cooling rate at each temperature and the
results for $\nu$/$\dot{T}$ are plotted as a function of temperature
in Fig. \ref{FIG2}b. Excellent scaling is observed over all the
temperature range and a magnified view of the high temperature region
is shown in the inset. The larger scatter for smaller $\dot T$ is due
to the propagation of the error in the temperature measurement (the
relative error in $\nu/{\dot T}$ is proportional to $1/{\dot T}$). The
results obtained for Cu-Al-Ni are presented in Fig. \ref{FIG3}. No
scaling is observed over all the temperature domain thus indicating
that the transition does not have an athermal character for this alloy
system. Instead, the transition is not reproducible and the values
for $M_s$ exhibit a stochastic character. The probability
distribution of $M_s$ can be characterized by its average value
$\langle M_s \rangle$ and its standard deviation $\sigma = \left (
\langle M_s^2 \rangle - \langle M_s \rangle^2 \right)^{1/2}$. The
behaviour of these two quantities as a function of $\dot{T}$ can be
estimated by performing a statistical analysis of $M_s$ data for a
large number of temperature loops. Results are shown in Fig.
\ref{FIG4} (solid symbols). The total number of cycles analysed for
each value of $\dot T$ ranges from 15 for $\dot{T}=0.5$K/min to 150
for $\dot{T}=6$K/min.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Figure 2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}[th]
\begin{center}
\epsfig{file =fig2.eps, width=8cm}
%%\epsfig{file =fig2.eps, width=14cm}
\end{center}
\caption{(a) A.E. recorded during continuous cooling runs for Cu-Zn-Al
at cooling rates of $\dot T$= 5 K/min (pink), $\dot T$= 2 K/min (dark
blue), $\dot T$= 1 K/min (green), $\dot T$= 0.5 K/min (red), $\dot T$=
0.1 K/min (blue). (b) Scaled acoustic activity as a function of
temperature, showing the scaling of the different curves. The inset
shows an enlarged view of the tail of the curves.}
\label{FIG2}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Figure 3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}[th]
\begin{center}
\epsfig{file =fig3.eps, width=8cm}
%%\epsfig{file =fig3.eps, width=14cm}
\end{center}
\caption{Scaled A.E. recorded during continuous cooling runs for
Cu-Al-Ni at cooling rates of $\dot T$= 2 K/min (dark blue), $\dot T$=
1 K/min (green), $\dot T$= 0.5 K/min (red) and $\dot T$= 0.1 K/min
(blue). The inset shows a detail of the low temperature region.}
\label{FIG3}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
A proper statistical analysis requires the detection and suppression
of any possible systematic deviation of the data or even a fake
dependence on $\dot T$ which may arise from ageing phenomena during
the experiment. To prevent these undesired effects, the experiment
was performed as a series of temperature loops ($220$K $\rightarrow
340$K$\rightarrow 220$K) and each series corresponded to a given value
of $\dot T$. The series are separated by low temperature waiting
periods randomly selected within the range from 1 to 1000 hours. The
studied values for $\dot T$ within the sequence are also randomly
chosen, and each value appears in the sequence several times. A small
drift of $\langle M_s \rangle$ ($< 1.4 $K/month) with ageing time was
detected and corrected from the data displayed in Fig. \ref{FIG4}.
The standard deviation $\sigma$ was found to be insensitive to ageing.
The inset illustrates the actual histograms of $M_s$ for three
different values of $\dot T$.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Figure 4 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}[th]
\begin{center}
\epsfig{file =fig4.eps, width=8cm}
%%\epsfig{file =fig4.eps, width=14cm}
\end{center}
\caption{Average value of the transition temperatures $\langle M_s
\rangle$ and its standard deviations $\sigma$ (symbols), as a function
of the cooling rate $\dot T$. Thick continuous lines correspond to the
fits of the three-parameter model proposed in the text. The thin
lines indicate the fitted values of $T_H$ and $T_L$. The inset shows
examples of histograms of $M_s$ distributions.}
\label{FIG4}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
The behaviour of $\langle M_s \rangle$ and $\sigma$ can be explained
by an adequate theory based on the analysis of the mean first-passage
time \cite{Perez00} between the $\beta$ and the martensitic phase.
Here we briefly summarise this theoretical approach. The probability
$P(t)$ for the system to remain in the metastable phase after time $t$
is given by: $dP(t)/dt = - \lambda(t) P(t)$, where $\lambda(t)$ is the
transition probability per unit time. As for certain systems the
transition seems to be athermal, while it is not in others, our main
assumption in reproducing the experimental observations is that
thermal fluctuations are only active within two characteristic
limiting temperatures: when $T>T_H$, $\lambda=0$ (no transition is
possible), and when $T<T_L$, $\lambda=\infty$ (the transition occurs
with absolute certainty). This assumption leads to the following
expressions for the average temperature transition $\langle M_s
\rangle$ and its fluctuations $\sigma^2$:
%
\begin{displaymath}
\langle M_s \rangle = T_H - {\dot T} \langle t \rangle , \; \sigma^2 =
{\dot T}^2 \langle t^2 \rangle + T_H^2 -2 {\dot T}\langle t \rangle -
\langle M_s \rangle^2
\end{displaymath}
%
where the mean first-passage time $\langle t \rangle$ and $\langle t^2
\rangle$ are given by ${\dot T} \langle t \rangle = \int_{T_L}^{T_H}
e^{W(\theta)} d\theta$ and $ {\dot T}^2 \langle t^2 \rangle = 2 \left
( {\dot T} \langle t \rangle T_H - \int_{T_L}^{T_H} \theta
e^{W(\theta)} d\theta \right )$. $W(\theta)$ is the logarithm of the
probability that the transition has not occurred before the
temperature $\theta$ is reached, and is given by $W(\theta) = -
\int_{\theta}^{T_H} \lambda \left ( u \right ) du / {\dot T}$.
In order to compare the predictions of the model with the experimental
results, we must propose a function $\lambda (T)$. Different
functions were checked and the results obtained were qualitatively
equivalent. The simplest assumption is that $\lambda$ exhibits a pole
at $T_L$ and a zero at $T_H$, i.e. $\lambda = \omega (T_H-T) /
(T-T_L)$, where $\omega$ is a characteristic frequency for nucleation.
By inserting $\lambda$ into the expression for $W(\theta)$ above, we
find:
%
\begin{displaymath}
W(\theta )=\frac{\omega}{\dot T} \left [ (T_H-\theta) - (T_H-T_L) \ln
\left ( \frac{T_H - T_L}{\theta-T_L}\right ) \right ]
\end{displaymath}
%
By a simultaneous non-linear minimum-$\chi^2$ fitting to the $\langle
M_s \rangle$ and $\sigma$ data for Cu$_{68.4}$Al$_{27.8}$Ni$_{3.8}$,
we obtain the following estimations of the three-free-parameter model:
$T_H = 257 \pm 1$ K, $T_L= 242 \pm 1 $ K and $\omega = (5.2 \pm 0.5)
10^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. The fit agrees remarkably well with the
experimental data (Fig. \ref{FIG4}) and reproduces the increase of
$\sigma$ with $\dot T$ and also the slightly decreasing behaviour of
$\langle M_s \rangle$. The fitted values of $T_H$ and $T_L$ are
estimations of the extreme values of $M_s$. Note that $\omega (T_H
-T_L) \simeq 50 $ K/min renders an estimation of the cooling rate above
which no time effects will be observed in
Cu$_{68.4}$Al$_{27.8}$Ni$_{3.8}$. On the other hand, for the
Cu$_{68.0}$Zn$_{16.0}$Al$_{16.0}$ sample we have found athermal
behaviour, even at 0.1 K/min. Assuming that $\omega$ for this sample
is similar to the previous one, $T_H-T_L < 2 $K. $T_H$ and $T_L$
coincides within the errors and no isothermal behaviour can be
observed with the allowed temperature control resolution.
Our results indicate that strictly, at finite temperatures, athermal
transitions do not occur. However, in practice, if $T_H-T_L$ is small
enough, kinetic effects are difficult to observe. In this case (close
to the athermal limit), scaling of $(\nu / \dot T)$ versus $T$ will
occur for A.E. measurements. We have verified the robustness of such
scaling in the case of the Cu-Zn-Al. We claim that, in general,
$dx/dT = (dx/dt)/{\dot T}$ versus $T$ will be independent of $\dot T$,
where $x$ is the transformed fraction. The model proposed in this
letter refers to the nucleation of the first martensite domain in the
system. The subsequent growth will be characterised by different
energy barriers. For Cu-Zn-Al the fact that scaling extends well
below the onset of the transition, reveals that the system satisfies
the conditions for it to behave athermally over all the transformation
range. In contrast, scaling does not occur for Cu-Al-Ni either at the
transition onset or in the subsequent evolution.
A question still remains open: why do the two selected samples, with
transition temperatures within the same temperature range, have
different $T_H - T_L$ ranges? We argue that the origin lies in the
small symmetry differences between the corresponding low temperature
phases: orthorhombic and hexagonal, which give rise to different
accommodation mechanisms of the transformational shape change
necessary to minimise the elastic stored energy during the transition.
Microgliding and microtwinning are the operative mechanisms in
Cu-Zn-Al and Cu-Al-Ni respectively \cite{Pelegrina90}. Our results
are consistent with the accepted idea that twinning permits a larger
degree of metastability.
To conclude, we have proposed a scaling argument to check when a
first-order phase transition can be treated as athermal. The
different behaviour exhibited by martensites with different
transformation mechanisms has been explained by a single model based
on the mean first-passage time. In the light of present results, it is
clear that for systems with a lack of scaling, the definition of a
single transition temperature $M_s$ is ambiguous: it is a stochastic
variable ranging between $T_H$ and $T_L$ which are the limiting
temperatures which characterize the transition.
We would like to thank J.M.Sancho and A.Labarta for fruitful
discussions. This work has received financial support from CICyT
(Project No MAT98-0315) and CIRIT (Project 2000SGR00025). F.J.P
acknowledges financial support from DGICyT.
%
\begin{references}
%
%%\vspace{-1cm}
%
\bibitem{Otsuka98} {\sl Shape Memory Materials}, ed. by K.Otsuka and
C.M.Wayman, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).
\bibitem{Nishiyama78} Z.Nishiyama, {\it Martensitic Transformations},
Academic Press, N.Y., 1978, p. 240.
\bibitem{Planes01} For a recent review see A. Planes and Ll.Ma\~nosa,
Solid State Phys. {\bf 55}, 159 (2001).
\bibitem{Bertotti98} G.Bertotti, {\it Hysteresis in Magnetism},
Academic Press, San Diego, 1998.
\bibitem{Vives94} E.Vives, J.Ort\'{\i}n, Ll.Ma\~nosa, I.R\`afols, R.
P\'{e}rez-Magran\'{e} and A. Planes, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 72},
1694 (1994); Ll.Carrillo, Ll.Ma\~nosa, J.Ort\'{\i}n, A.Planes and
E.Vives, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81}, 1889 (1998).
\bibitem{Yu87} Z.Yu, P.C.Clapp, J. Appl. Phys. {\bf 62}, 2212 (1987);
Ll. Ma\~nosa, A.Planes, D. Rouby, M.Morin , P.Fleischmann and
J.L.Macqueron, Appl. Phys. Lett, {\bf 54}, 2574 (1989).
\bibitem{Vergne81} R. Vergne, J.C. Cotillard, and J.L. Porteseil,
Rev. Phys. Appl. {\bf 16}, 847 (1981).
\bibitem{Lilly96} M.P. Lilly, A.H. Wootters, and R.B. Hallock,
Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 70}, 3347 (1995).
\bibitem{nature} For a recent review on crackling noise in complex
systems see: J.P.Sethna, K.A.Dahmen and C.R.Myers, Nature {\bf 410},
242 (2001).
\bibitem{Sethna93} J.P.Sethna, K.Dahmen, S.Kartha, J.A.Krumhansl,
B.W.Roberts and J.D.Shore, Phys. Rev. Lett., {\bf 70}, 3347 (1993).
\bibitem{Cao90}W. Cao, J.A. Krumhansl, R.J. Gooding, Phys. Rev. B {\bf
41} 11319 (1990); M. Rao, S. Sengupta, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 78},
2168 (1997).
\bibitem{Aspelmeyer99} M.Aspelmeyer, U.Klemradt, L.T.Wood, S.C.Moss,
and J.Peisl, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) {\bf 174}, R9 (1999); T.Kakeshita,
T.Saburi and K.Shimizu, Phil. Mag. B, {\bf 80}, 171 (2000).
\bibitem{Vul93} D.A. Vul and B.N. Harmon, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 48}, 6880
(1993).
%\bibitem{Ahluwalia01} R.Ahluwalia and G.Ananthakrishna, submited to
%Phys. Rev. Lett.
\bibitem{Calvet63} The temperature was measured on the Cu block. The
thermal lag between sample and block temperature was calibrated for
all the temperature rates investigated. A linear dependence of the lag
on $\dot T$ has been found consistently with the predictions of an
$RC$ model for heat conduction. See: E.Calvet and H.Prat, {\sl Recent
progress in microcalorimetry}, Pergamon Press (1963).
\bibitem{porta} The recorded number of counts as a function of time
has been double checked by using a continuous analog counter,
connected in parallel with the frequency counter. Results are
perfectly comparable which means that the dead times inherent to the
gated frequency counter are irrelevant for the analysis.
\bibitem{Perez00} M.C.Torrent and M.San Miguel, Phys. Rev. A {\bf 38},
245 (1988); V.P\'erez-Mu\~{n}uzurri, F.Sagu\'es and J.M.Sancho,
Phys. Rev. E {\bf 62}, 94 (2000).
\bibitem{Pelegrina90} J.L.Pelegrina and M.Ahlers, Acta
metall. mater. {\bf 38}, 293 (1990).
\end{references}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\end{document}