Growth and magnetic properties of MnO2−delta nanowire microspheres
Extracted source text ยท arXiv cond-mat/0409345
\documentstyle[aps,manuscript]{revtex}
\newcommand{\MF}{{\large{\manual META}\-{\manual FONT}}}
\newcommand{\manual}{rm}
\newcommand\bs{\char '134 }
\begin{document}
\title{Growth and magnetic properties of MnO$_{2-\delta}$ nanowire microspheres}
\author{J.B. Yang, X.D. Zhou, W.J. James}
\address{Graduate Center for Materials Research and Departments
of Physics and Chemistry, University of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, MO
65409}
\author{S.K. Malik}
\address{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Mumbai 400-005, India}
\author{C. S. Wang}
\address{School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P.R. China}
\maketitle
\begin{abstract}
We report the synthesis of MnO$_{2-\delta}$ microspheres using hydrothermal and %%@
conventional chemical reaction methods. The microspheres of MnO$_{2-\delta}$ consist of %%@
nanowires having a diameter of 20-50 nm and a length of 2-8 $\mu$ m. The value of the %%@
oxygen vacancy $\delta$ estimated from the x-ray photoelectron spectrum (XPS) is ~0.3. %%@
The magnetization versus temperature curve indicates a magnetic transition at about 13 %%@
K. It is found that a parasitic ferromagnetic component is imposed on the %%@
antiferromagnetic structure of MnO$_{2-\delta}$, which might result from distortion of %%@
the lattice structure due to oxygen vacancies. The magnetic transition temperature %%@
T$_N$ is about 10 K lower than that of the bulk MnO$_2$ single crystal.
\bigskip
PACS numbers: 61.46 +w, 75.75 +a, 75.50 -y 81.07 -b
\end{abstract}
\newpage
The possibility of controlling the structure and the chemical composition of materials %%@
at the nanoscale level is of great interest for both basic science and technological %%@
applications. In particular, one dimensional(1-D) nanometric structures of oxides have %%@
attracted intensive attention\cite{daun,hu,heath,yang}. For example MnO$_2$ has %%@
distinctive properties which have enabled its use as catalysts, ion-sieves, and %%@
electrode materials\cite{ram,amm,hill}. Both $\alpha$- and $\gamma$- MnO$_2$ are %%@
poential candidates for cathodes and catalysts in Li/MnO$_2$ batteries \cite{ram}. They %%@
can be converted into Li$_{1-x}$Mn$_2$O$_4$ cathode by electrochemical Li$^+$ %%@
intercalation, in which Li$^+$ was inserted or extracted during the charging or %%@
discharge process. MnO$_2$ nanowires are of great interest due to that their morphology %%@
simultaneously minimize the distance over which Li$^+$ must diffuse during the %%@
discharge and charging processes\cite{li}. This may provide the opportunity to %%@
determine the theoretical operating limits of a Lithium battery as the 1-D nanowire is %%@
the smallest structure for the efficient electron transport. MnO$_2$ nanowires or %%@
nanostructure materials also contain much highly surface area which may become more %%@
ideal host materials for the insertion and extraction of lithium ions and chemical %%@
reactions. Therefore, well defined 1-D nanostructures appear as a much better candidate %%@
for studies on the space-confined transport phenomena as well as applications. %%@
Considerable effort has been made to prepare bulky or nanocrystalline MnO$_2$ with %%@
different structures\cite{bach,hunter,ros,wu}. Recently, single crystal MnO$_2$ %%@
nanowires have been synthesized using a hydrothermal method\cite{wang1}. MnO$_2$ also %%@
possesses an interesting magnetic structure\cite{zhuang,kaw,sato,yama}. Up to now, very %%@
few investigations on the magnetic properties of nano-sized Mn-oxides have been %%@
reported. In this letter, we report the synthesis of microspheres of MnO$_{2-\delta}$ %%@
consisting of nanowires. The microspheres were prepared using both hydrothermal and %%@
room temperature chemical reaction methods. The structure, morphology, composition and %%@
magnetic properties of the Mn-oxide microspheres were studied using x-ray %%@
diffraction(XRD), scanning electron microscopy(SEM), transmission electron %%@
microscopy(TEM), magnetic measurements and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy(XPS).
~~~The materials synthesized here were prepared by oxidation of hydrated manganese %%@
sulfate MnSO$_4$.H$_2$O with an equal amount of ammonium persulfate %%@
(NH$_4$)$_2$S$_2$O$_8$\cite{wang1}. MnSO$_4$.H$_2$O (0.08mol) and %%@
(NH$_4$)$_2$S$_2$O$_8$ (0.08 mol) were dissolved in 150 ml distilled water at room %%@
temperature to form a clear solution. Half of the solution was transferred into a %%@
stainless steel autoclave, sealed and maintained at 120 $^\circ$ for 12 h. Another half %%@
of the solution was kept at room temperature in air for 6 h. After the reaction, the %%@
resulting black solid from each solution was filtered and washed with distilled water %%@
and acetone several times, then dried at 60 $^\circ$C for 24 h. X-ray diffraction (XRD) %%@
using Cu-$K_{\alpha}$ radiation shows the material to be single phase, %%@
$\alpha$-MnO$_2$. The magnetization curves of the samples were measured using a SQUID %%@
magnetometer in a field of up to 6 T from 1.5 K to 300 K. The morphology was studied %%@
using SEM(JEOL-6340F) and TEM. X-ray photoelectron spectra were collected using a %%@
"KRATOS" model AXIS 165 XPS spectrometer with a Mg source and an Al monochrometer.
~~~Fig. 1 shows the x-ray diffraction patterns of the samples obtained by both methods. %%@
The diffraction peaks can be indexed to $\alpha$-MnO$_2$ with lattice parameters %%@
a=9.784$\AA$ and c=2.863$\AA$, space group I4/m. The XRD pattern of the room %%@
temperature treated sample(Fig. 1(b)) shows much broader, and less intensive peaks, due %%@
to its smaller grain size and the many crystal defects. There are some changes in the %%@
relative peak intensities in Fig. 1(b), suggesting a preferred orientation among the %%@
Mn-oxide grains. The mean size of the particles (Fig. 1(a)) is about 40 nm as %%@
determined by the Scherrer formula using the width of the [211] peak from Fig. 1 (a), %%@
and was further confirmed by SEM and TEM imaging(Fig. 2).
Fig. 2 shows the SEM((a)-(d)) and TEM(e) images of the samples prepared by the two %%@
methods. Figs. 2(a) and (b) show a sea urchin-like sphere with a diameter of 4-8 $\mu$m %%@
for the sample prepared by the hydrothermal method. These microspheres consist of %%@
bundles of small wires with a diameter of 20-50 nm(see TEM image (e)). Figures 2(c) and %%@
(d) show the typical morphology of the MnO$_2$ obtained by the reaction carried out at %%@
room temperature. The diameter of these microspheres varies from 1 to 4 $\mu$m. The %%@
microspheres are also made up of smaller needle-like wires, however, they are not so %%@
sharply defined as compared to the samples made by the hydrothermal method. The %%@
hydrothermal treatment increases the diameter of the microspheres and the length of the %%@
nanowires. It is found that the concentration of the solution is very important in %%@
forming the microspheres. The microspheres can be synthesized when the Mn$^{2+}$ %%@
concentration is higher than 0.3 mol/L. It suggests that, at high Mn$^{2+}$ %%@
concentrations, the formation of microspheres by aggregation of the nanowires is %%@
favored by a decrease in the total surface energy of the system.
A typical room temperature x-ray photoelectron spectrum of the Mn$_{2-\delta}$ prepared %%@
by the hydrothermal method is plotted in Fig. 3. The peaks of Mn (3s, 3p, 2p, 2s) and O %%@
(1s, 2s) are observed. Auger peaks from Mn and O are also observed as O KLL and Mn LMM %%@
lines. The binding energies of the Mn 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 states are 641.5 and 653.6 ev, %%@
respectively, which are lower than those of the standard MnO$_2$(642.1 and 653.8 ev) %%@
\cite{xps}. The decrease in binding energy is likely due to the oxygen vacancies formed %%@
in these materials which would decrease the Mn-O bond strength. The estimated relative %%@
ratio of Mn to O is 37:63 corresponding to a composition of about MnO$_{1.7}$.
Fig. 4 shows the zero field cooling (ZFC) and field cooling(FC) magnetization curves of %%@
Mn$_{2-\delta}$ prepared by the hydrothermal method measured under different magnetic %%@
fields. A kink is observed at about 13 K in Fig. 4 (a) and (b), corresponding to the %%@
N\'eel magnetic transition temperature T$_N$. This temperature is lower than that of a %%@
MnO$_2$ single crystal \cite{yama} T$_N$=24.5 K, which is due to the small grain size %%@
effect\cite{muly}. The kink as well as the difference between the ZFC and FC curves %%@
becomes smaller as the applied magnetic field increases. The inset in Fig. 4 (a) shows %%@
the ZFC and FC curves of the sample prepared at room temperature. A similar phenomenon %%@
is observed, except that the transition peaks are much broader and the magnetization %%@
value is higher which may be due to more defects and a larger distortion in this %%@
sample. Fig. 5 is the magnetization versus applied magnetic field curves of the sample %%@
prepared by the hydrothermal method. At 1.8 K, the M-H curve shows a small hysteresis, %%@
which indicates that a ferromagnetic component is superposed on the antiferromagnetic %%@
curve. This agrees with the M-T curves in that the magnetization increases with %%@
decreasing temperature suggesting a ferrimagnetic or ferromagnetic structure is formed %%@
in this compound. At 300 K, nearly linear M-H curves reveal that a paramagnetic state %%@
exists in this temperature range. The ferromagnetic component at low temperature may %%@
result from the noncollinear molecular field that cants the two antiparallel %%@
sublattices due to the distortion of the crystal structure, especially arising from %%@
the oxygen vacancies. The small canted angle between the moments of the Mn sublattices %%@
leads to a small ferromagnetic moment\cite{Nai}.
\section{Summary}
MnO$_{2-\delta}$ microspheres have been synthesized using hydrothermal and room %%@
temperature chemical reaction methods. The microspheres consist of MnO$_{2-\delta}$ %%@
nanowires having a diameter of 20-50 nm and a length of 2-8$\mu$m. The estimated value %%@
of the oxygen vacancy $\delta$ from XPS data is 0.3. The magnetic measurements indicate %%@
that MnO$_2$ has an antiferromagnetic structure with a parasitic ferromagnetic %%@
component below the N\'eel temperature, T$_N$. T$_N$ is about 13 K which is 10 K lower %%@
than that of bulk MnO$_2$ single crystals.
\section{ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
The support by DOE under DOE contract \#DE-FC26-99FT400054 is
acknowledged. We would like to thank A.G.S. Hemantha and Prof. J. Sweitz for help with %%@
the magnetic measurements.
\newpage
\begin{references}
\bibitem{daun} X.F. Daun, Y. Huang, Y. Cui, J.F. Wang, and C.M. Lieber, Nature(London) %%@
{\bf 409}, 66 (2001).
\bibitem{hu} J. Hu, M. Ouyang, P. Yang, and C.M. Lieber, Nature(London) {\bf 399}, %%@
48(1999).
\bibitem{heath}J. R. Heath, P.J. Kuekes, G. Snyder, and R.S. Williams, Science {\bf %%@
280}, 717(1998).
\bibitem{yang} M. Huang, S. Mao, H. Feick, H. Yan, Y. Wu, H. Kind, E. Weber, R. Russo, %%@
and P. Yang, Science {\bf 292}, 1897 (2001).
\bibitem{ram} A.R. Armstrong and P.G. Bruce, Nature(London) {\bf 381}, 499 (1996).
\bibitem{amm} B. Ammundsen and J. Paulsen, J. Adv. Mater, {\bf 13}, 943(2001).
\bibitem{hill} L. I. Hill, A. Verbaere, and D. Guyomard, J. Power Sources {\bf 119}, %%@
226 (2003).
\bibitem{li} Q. Li, J. B. Olson, and R. M. Penner, Chem. Mater.(2004) (in press).
\bibitem{bach} S. Bach, J.P. Pereira-Ramos, and N. Baffier, J. Solid State Chem. {\bf %%@
120}, 70 (1995).
\bibitem{hunter}J.C. Hunter, J. Solid State Chem. {\bf 39}, 142(1981).
\bibitem{ros} M.H. Rossouw, D.C. Liles and M.M. Thackeray, Mater. Res. Bull., {\bf 27 %%@
}, 221(1997).
\bibitem{wu} C. Wu, Y. Xie, D. Wang, J. Yang, and T. Li, J. Phys. Chem. B {\bf 107 }, %%@
13583 (2003).
\bibitem{wang1} X. Wang and Y.D. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc. {\bf 124}, 2880(2002); Chem, %%@
Commun, 764 (2002).
\bibitem{zhuang} M. Zhuang and J.W. Halley, Phys. Rev.B {\bf 64}, 024413 (2001).
\bibitem{kaw}H. Kawamura, J. Appl. Phys. {\bf 63}, 3086 (1988).
\bibitem{sato} H. Sato, K. Wakiya, T. Enoki, T. Kiyama, Y. Wakabayashi, H. Nakao, Y. %%@
Murakami, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, {\bf 70}, 37 (2001).
\bibitem{yama} N. Yamamoto, T. Endo, M. Shimada, and T. Takada, Jap. J. Appl. Phys. %%@
{\bf 13}, 723 (1974).
\bibitem{xps} Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Edited by J. Chastain, %%@
Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Physical Electronic Division, USA. pp79.
\bibitem{muly} Kh.Ya. Mulyukov, R.Z. Valiev, G.F. Korznikova, V.V. Stolyarov, Phys. %%@
Stat. Sol. (a), {\bf 112}, 137 (1989).
\bibitem {Nai} V. E. Naish and E. A. Turov, Fiz. Met.
Metalloved. {\bf 11}, 321 (1961); {\bf 9}, 10 (1960).
\end{references}
\begin{figure}
\caption{X-ray diffraction patterns of the sample prepared by the hydrothermal method %%@
(a) and room temperature reaction (b).}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\caption{ The SEM (a-d) and TEM(e) images of the Mn-oxides: (a), (b) prepared by %%@
hydrothermal method; (c) and (d) prepared at room temperature; (e) TEM image prepared %%@
by hydrothermal method.}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\caption { Room temperature x-ray photoelectron spectrum of MnO$_{2-\delta}$ prepared %%@
by the hydrothermal method. }
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\caption { The temperature dependence of the magnetization curves
under zero field cooling (ZFC) and field cooling (FC) for MnO$_{2-\delta}$ prepared by %%@
the hydrothermal method: (a) H=50 Oe, (b) H=1 kOe, (c) H=10 kOe). The inset in Fig. %%@
4(a) is for the sample made at room temperature
}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\caption {The magnetization versus applied magnetic field curves of MnO$_{2-\delta}$ %%@
prepared by the hydrothermal method at different temperatures. }
\end{figure}
\end{document}