Current-induced Vortex Motion by Spin-Transfer Torque
Extracted source text ยท arXiv cond-mat/0508599
%2005.6.16.Thu.-
%\documentclass[preprint,aps,prl,fleqn]{revtex4}
%\documentclass[aps,prl,fleqn]{revtex4}
\documentclass[twocolumn,aps,prl,fleqn,showpacs]{revtex4}
\usepackage{graphicx}% Include files
%\usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
\usepackage{bm}% bold math
\usepackage{amsmath}
%\usepackage[dvipdfm]{color}
\usepackage[dvipdfm,bookmarks=true,bookmarksnumbered=true,bookmarkstype=toc]{hyperref}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{document}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\newcommand{\Area}{A}
\newcommand{\Av}{{\bm A}}
\newcommand{\av}{{\bm a}}
\newcommand{\Bv}{{\bm B}}
\newcommand{\DOS}{{\nu}}
\newcommand{\dx}{{d^3 x}}
\newcommand{\eF}{{\epsilon_F}}
\newcommand{\etaz}{{\eta^0}}
\newcommand{\etazk}{\eta^0_k}
\newcommand{\etazmk}{\eta^0_{-k}}
\newcommand{\Ev}{{\bm E}}
\newcommand{\js}{{j_{\rm s}}}
\newcommand{\jsc}{{j_{\rm s}^{\rm cr}}}
\newcommand{\jsca}{{j_{\rm s}^{\rm cr (1)}}}
\newcommand{\jscb}{{j_{\rm s}^{\rm cr (2)}}}
\newcommand{\jc}{{j^{\rm cr}}}
\newcommand{\kF}{{k_F}}
\newcommand{\kp}{{k_\perp}}
\newcommand{\Kp}{{K_\perp}}
\newcommand{\kB}{{k_B}}
\newcommand{\kBT}{{k_B T}}
\newcommand{\kv}{{\bm k}}
\newcommand{\Mv}{{\bm M}}
\newcommand{\nv}{{\bm n}}
\newcommand{\pv}{{\bm p}}
%\newcommand{\xv}{{\bm x}}
\newcommand{\Ne}{{N_{\rm e}}}
\newcommand{\Omegazk}{{\Omega^{(0)}_{\kv}}}
\newcommand{\Omegaok}{{\Omega^{(1)}_{\kv}}}
\newcommand{\omegazk}{{\omega^{(0)}_{\kv}}}
\newcommand{\Omegak}{{\Omega_{\kv}}}
\newcommand{\omegaell}{{\omega_{\ell}}}
\newcommand{\phiz}{{\phi_0}}
%\newcommand{\phizc}{\langle{\phi_0}\rangle}
\newcommand{\phizc}{\bar{\phi_0}}
\newcommand{\qv}{{\bm q}}
\newcommand{\rv}{{\bm r}}
\newcommand{\rhow}{{\rho_{\rm w}}}
\newcommand{\sigmav}{{\bm \sigma}}
\newcommand{\Sv}{{\bm S}}
\newcommand{\Smh}{{\left(S-\frac{1}{2}\right)}}
\newcommand{\Tv}{{\bm T}}
\newcommand{\torq}{{\tau}}
\newcommand{\Tz}{{\tau}}
\newcommand{\tileta}{{\tilde\eta}}
\newcommand{\tilF}{\tilde{F}}
\newcommand{\tilFc}{\tilde{F}_{\rm c}}
\newcommand{\tilK}{{\tilde{K}}}
\newcommand{\tilKp}{{\tilde{K}_\perp}}
\newcommand{\tiln}{{\tilde{n}}}
\newcommand{\tilTz}{v_{\torq}}
\newcommand{\tilv}{{\tilde{v}}}
\newcommand{\thetaz}{{\theta_0}}
\newcommand{\Vz}{{V_0}}
\newcommand{\xv}{{\bm x}}
\newcommand{\xiz}{\xi_0}
\newcommand{\Vv}{{\bm V}}
\newcommand{\vv}{{\bm v}}
\newcommand{\vc}{v_{\rm c}}
\newcommand{\vs}{v_{\rm s}}
\newcommand{\vck}{v_{\rm c}^{K}}
\newcommand{\vci}{v_{\rm ins}}
\newcommand{\tilS}{\tilde{S}}
\newcommand{\beqa}{\begin{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\eeqa}{\end{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
\newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
\newcommand{\la}{\langle}
\newcommand{\ra}{\rangle}
\title{Current-induced Vortex Motion by Spin-Transfer Torque}
\author{Junya Shibata}
\email{jshibata@riken.jp}
%\affiliation{Frontier Research System (FRS), The Institute of Physical and
%Chemical Research (RIKEN), 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan\\
\affiliation{$^{1}$RIKEN-FRS, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan\\
$^{2}$CREST, JST, 4-1-8 Honcho Kawaguchi, Saitama, Japan}
\author{Yoshinobu Nakatani}
\affiliation{University of Electro-communications, Chofu, 182-8585, Tokyo, Japan}
\author{Gen Tatara}
\affiliation{Department of Physics, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji, Tokyo,
192-0397, Japan\\
PRESTO, JST, 4-1-8 Honcho Kawaguchi, Saitama, Japan
}
\author{Hiroshi Kohno}
\affiliation{
Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University,
Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8531, Japan}
\author{Yoshichika Otani$^{1,2}$}
\affiliation{Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8581, Japan}
\date{\today}
\begin{abstract}
We investigate the dynamics of a magnetic vortex driven by spin-transfer torque due to
spin current in the adiabatic case.
The vortex core represented by collective coordinate
experiences a transverse force proportional to the product of spin current and gyrovector,
which can be interpreted as the geometric force determined by topological charges.
We show that this force is just a reaction force of Lorentz-type force from the spin current of conduction electrons. Based on our analyses, we propose analytically and numerically
a possible experiment to check the vortex displacement by spin current
in the case of single magnetic nanodot.
\end{abstract}
\pacs{72.25.Ba, 85.75.-d 75.70.Kw}
%72.25.Ba Spin polarized transport in metals
%85.75.-d Magnetoelectronics; spintronics: devices exploiting spin polarized transport or integrated magnetic fields
%75.70.Kw Domain structure (including magnetic bubbles)
%75.40.Gb Dynamic properties (dynamic susceptibility, spin waves, spin diffusion, dynamic scaling, etc.)
\maketitle
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%\section{Introduction}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Manipulation of nanoscale magnetization by electric current is one of the most attractive subjects
in both basic physics and technological applications.
After the theoretical prediction \cite{{Slonczewski},{Berger96}},
it has been widely recognized that spin-polarized current (spin current) plays a crucial role
in magnetization dynamics.
The spin current exerts a torque on localized spins
by transferring spin angular momenta of electrons
through the exchange interaction between conduction electrons and localized spins,
which is thus called the spin-transfer torque.
The key understanding of the effect is that the spin current favors magnetic configurations with spatial gradient, or more precisely, with finite Berry-phase curvature along the current.
%This is just the opposite phenomenon that a spontaneous current arises
%if we prepare a ring with an umbrella-like structure \cite{Loss90} or
%chiral spin structure in a magnetic metal \cite{TK03}.
Such spatial gradient by spin current indeed gives rise to the motion of domain wall
\cite{{Berger92},{TK04}}, spin-wave instability in a uniform ferromagnet
\cite{{BJZ98},{Macdonald04},{Zhang04}} and domain nucleation \cite{STK05}.
Recent experiments \cite{{Yamaguchi04},{Klaui05}} and numerical simulation \cite{{TNMS05}}
for current-induced domain wall motion
have shown that there is a vortex-like configuration in magnetic nanowire.
Also, magnetic vortices in nanodots have drawn much attention since
the MFM observation of a vortex core \cite{SOHSO00}.
However, an effective force on the vortex and its dynamics by spin-transfer torque
due to the spin current have not been clarified.
%It is therefore of great interest to investigate the dynamics of vortex due to the spin current.
In this Letter, we present a microscopic theory of vortex dynamics
in the presence of spin current by using the collective coordinate method.
In the adiabatic approximation, we derive an effective force exerted
on the vortex core due to spin-transfer torque.
It is shown that the vortex core experiences a transeverse force,
which compensates the Magnus-type force derived from the so-called Berry's phase term.
This specific force is topologically invarient,
which is characterized by topological charges.
Unlike the case of domain wall \cite{TK04}, we show that
there is no threshold current to induce the vortex motion
in the absence of an external pinning.
It is of great interest to the vortex-based devices for application.
To verify the exisitance of current-induced transverse force on the vortex,
we propose a possible experiment for the current-induced vortex displacement
in a single magnetic nanodot.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
We consider the Lagrangian of the localized spins in the continuum approximation.
The spins are assumed to have easy plane taken to be $x-y$ plane,
and are described by the Lagrangian
\beqa
\label{Lagrangian-spins}
L_{\rm S} &=& \hbar S \int\frac{d^{3} x}{a^3}\dot{\phi}(\cos\theta-1)-H_{\rm S}, \\
H_{\rm S} &=& \frac{S^{2}}{2}\int\frac{d^{3} x}{a^3}\left\{J(\nabla{\bm n})^{2}
+ K_{\perp}\cos^{2}\theta\right\},
\eeqa
where ${\bm S}({\bm x},t)=S{\bm n}({\bm x},t)$ represents the localized spin vector
with unit vector
${\bm n}= \sin\theta\cos\phi~{\bm e}_{x}+\sin\theta\sin\phi~{\bm e}_{y}+\cos\theta~{\bm e}_{z}$
and the magnitude of spin $S$; ${\bm e}_{i}(i = x, y, z)$ are unit vectors of Cartesian frame.
The $J$ and $K_{\perp}$ are respectively the exchange and the
hard-axis anisotropy constants and $a$ is the lattice constant.
The first term of the right hand side (r.h.s) in Eq.(\ref{Lagrangian-spins}) is the so-called
Berry-phase term, which in general determines the dynamical property of the localized spins.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Let us denote the spin configuration of a vortex centered at the origin by a vector field
${\bm n}_{\rm V}({\bm x})$ with unit modulus.
As a vortex profile, we take an out-of-plane vortex;
${\bm n}_{\rm V}({\bm x} \to {\bm 0})=p{\bm e}_{z}$, where
$p = \pm 1$ is the polarization, which refers to the spin direction of the vortex core center
and ${\bm n}(|{\bm x}| \gg \delta_{\rm V}) =\cos(q \varphi +C \pi/2 ){\bm e}_{x}+\sin (q \varphi +C \pi/2 ){\bm e}_{y}$, where $\delta_{V}$ is the vortex core radius, $\varphi = \tan^{-1}(y/x)$,
$q = \pm 1,\pm2,...,$ is the vorticity, which describes the number of windings of the spin vector projected on the order-parameter space and
$C=\pm 1$ is the chirality, which refers to the counterclockwise $(C=1)$ or the clockwise $(C=-1)$ rotational direction of the spin in the plane.
We here introduce a collective coordinate ${\bm X}(t)=X(t){\bm e}_{x}+Y(t){\bm e}_{y}$,
which represents vortex core center, and
assume that a moving vortex can be written as
${\bm n}({\bm x},t)={\bm n}_{\rm V}({\bm x}-{\bm X}(t))$ at least as a first approximation,
that is, ignoring the spin wave excitation.
Substituting this into Eq.(\ref{Lagrangian-spins}),
we obtain the Lagrangian for the collective coordinate as
\beq
\label{Lagrangian}
L_{\rm V}=\frac{1}{2}{\bm G}\cdot(\dot{{\bm X}}\times {\bm X})-U({\bm X}).
\eeq
Here ${\bm G}$ is the gyrovector defined by
\beqa
{\bm G}={\bm e}_{z} \hbar S \int \frac{d^3 x}{a^3} {\bm n}\cdot(\partial_{x}{\bm n}\times\partial_{y}{\bm n})%\nonumber\\
%&=& {\bm e}_{z} \frac{\hbar S}{a^3}L\int_{S_{2}}dxdy
%(\partial_{x}\theta\partial_{y}\phi-\partial_{x}\phi\partial_{y}\theta)\sin \theta
%\nonumber\\
=\frac{\hbar S}{a^3}2\pi L pq{\bm e}_{z},
\eeqa
with
$L$ being the thickness of the system, and $U({\bm X})$ is a potential energy
of a vortex evaluated from the Hamiltonian $H_{\rm S}$.
The gyrovector ${\bm G}$ is topologically invariant corresponding to polarization $p$ and vorticity $q$ and the number of corvering the mapping space $D$.
In the case of ${\bm n}_{V}({\bm x})$,
this mapping number is $1/2$ in unit of surface area $4\pi$.
The first term of the r.h.s in Eq.(\ref{Lagrangian}), which comes from the Berry-phase term,
represents that $X$ and $Y$ are essentially canonically conjugate each other.
This term provides a transeverse force $-{\bm G}\times\dot{{\bm X}}$ on the moving vortex,
the so-called Magnus force,
perpendicular both to the gyrovector and to the vortex velocity, whose term has been derived
and discussed by many workers
\cite{{Thiele73},{Volovik96},{Ao},{M-Stone96},{KY96}} in various systems.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Let us investigate the force acting on the vortex by spin current of conduction electrons.
The Lagrangian of the electrons are given by
\beq
\label{electron-Lagrangian}
L_{\rm el}^{0} =
\int d^3 x c^{\dagger}({\bm x},t)\left\{i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}
+ \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\nabla^{2}\right\}c({\bm x},t)-H_{\rm sd},
\eeq
where $c(c^{\dagger})$ is anihilation (creation) operator of conduction electrons.
The last term $H_{\rm sd}$
represents the exchange interaction between localized spins and conduction electrons
given by ${H}_{\rm sd}=-\Delta\int d^3 x {\bm n}\cdot (c^{\dagger}{\bm \sigma}c)_{\bm x}$,
where $2\Delta$ is the energy splitting, and ${\bm \sigma}$ is a Pauli-matrix vector.
Here we perform a local gauge transformation \cite{{TF94},{TK04}}
in electron spin space so that the quantization axis is parallel to the localized spins
${\bm n}({\bm x},t) $ at each point of space and time;
$c({\bm x},t) = U({\bm x},t)a({\bm x},t)$, where $a({\bm x},t)$ is the two-component electron operator in the rotated frame, and $U({\bm x},t) = {\bm m}({\bm x},t)\cdot{\bm \sigma}$ is
an SU(2) matrix with ${\bm m} = \sin (\theta/2)\cos\phi~{\bm e}_{x}+
\sin (\theta/2)\sin\phi~{\bm e}_{y}+\cos(\theta/2)~{\bm e}_{z}$.
The Lagrangian is now given by
\beqa
L_{\rm el} &=& \int d^3 x a^{\dagger}\bigg[
i\hbar\left(\partial_0+i A_{0}\right)\nonumber\\
&+&\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\left(\partial_{i} + i A_{i}
\right)^2 \bigg]a + \Delta \int d^3 x a^{\dagger}\sigma_{z}a,
\eeqa
where $A_{\nu}={\bm A}_{\nu}\cdot{\bm \sigma}=-iU^{\dagger}\partial_{\nu} U~(\nu =0, x,y,z)$ is SU(2) gauge field determined by the time and spatial derivative of the localized spins.
For slowly varying magnetic configurations,
the electron spins can mostly follow adiabatically the localized spins.
This is justified for the condition $(\Delta/\varepsilon_{\rm F})k_{\rm F}\lambda\gg 1$,
where $\varepsilon_{\rm F}$ and $k_{\rm F}$ are, respectively,
the Fermi energy and Fermi wave number of conduction electrons,
and $\lambda$ is the characteristic length scale of the spin texture of the localized spins.
In this adiabatic approximation,
taking the expectation value of $L_{\rm el}$
for the current-carrying nonequilibrium state,
we can obtain the following
interaction Hamiltonian of the first-order contribution to the localized spins \cite{STK05};
\begin{equation}
\label{spin-torque-Hamiltonian}
H_{\rm ST}=\int d^3 x \frac{\hbar}{2e}{\bm j}_{\rm s}\cdot\nabla\phi\cdot(1-\cos \theta),
\end{equation}
%\beqa
%\label{spin-torque-Hamiltonian}
%H_{\rm ST}&=&%\int d^3 x \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2mi}
%{\bm A}_{\mu}\cdot\langle (a^{\dagger}{\bm \sigma}\partial_{\mu}a-\partial_{\mu}a^{\dagger}{\bm \sigma}a)\rangle\nonumber\\
%\int d^3 x \frac{\hbar}{2e}{\bm j}_{\rm s}\cdot\nabla\phi\cdot(1-\cos \theta),
%\eeqa
where ${\bm j}_{\rm s}$ is the spin current density,
which is written by using the distribution function
$f_{{\bm k}\sigma}=\langle a^{\dagger}_{{\bm k}\sigma}a_{{\bm k}\sigma}\rangle$
in the rotated frame specifying the current-carrying nonequilibrium state as
$%\beqa
{\bm j}_{\rm s}
= \frac{1}{V}\sum_{{\bm k},\sigma}\sigma \frac{\hbar{\bm k}}{m}f_{{\bm k}\sigma}.
$%\eeqa
As seen from Eq. (\ref{spin-torque-Hamiltonian}),
the spin current favors a finite Berry-phase curvature along the current.
Indeed, the Hamiltonian $H_{\rm ST}$ leads to the spin-transfer torque in the case of domain wall
\cite{STK05}.
From Eq.({\ref{spin-torque-Hamiltonian}),
we can derive the effective Hamiltonian represented by the collective coordinate
for the vortex core.
Taking the variation $\delta{\bm n} = -\partial_{j}{\bm n}_{\rm V}({\bm x}-{\bm X})\delta X_{j}$,
where repeated roman indices imply sum over the in-plane spatial direction $j=x,y$,
we obtain
\beq
\label{deviation}
\delta H_{\rm ST} = %\delta \int d^3 x \frac{\hbar}{2e}{\bm j}_{\rm s}\cdot\nabla\phi (1-\cos \theta)\nonumber\\
%&=& \frac{\hbar}{2e} j_{\rm s,i}\int d^3 x {\bm n}\cdot(\partial_{i}{\bm n}\times\partial_{j}{\bm n})\delta X_{j} \nonumber\\
\frac{\hbar S}{a^3}2\pi L p q (v_{{\rm s},x}\delta Y-v_{{\rm s},y}\delta X),
\eeq
where ${\bm v}_{\rm s} = \frac{a^{3}}{2eS}{\bm j}_{\rm s}$
represents the drift velocity of electron spins.
By integrating Eq.(\ref{deviation}), we obtain
%This is the varization of
\beq
H_{\rm ST} = {\bm G}\cdot({\bm v}_{s}\times{\bm X}).
\eeq
Thus, a force acting on the vortex core is given by
\beq
\label{spin-torque-force}
{\bm F}_{\rm ST} = - \frac{\partial H_{\rm ST}}{\partial {\bm X}} = -{\bm G}\times {\bm v}_{\rm s}. \eeq
This current-induced transverse force has been previously derived by Berger
\cite{Berger86} based on a phenomenological treatment in the case of Bloch line.
Here we have derived this force from microscopic theory.
It is noted that this force does not depend on the chirality $C=\pm 1$ of the vortex
in contrast to a force produced by a magnetic field.
Since it is hard to control the chirality, this fact would great advantage in application.
A microscopic derivation of a general relation between force and torque
in the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation is presented in Ref. \cite{KTS05}.
Before proceeding, we here briefly remark that this force can be interpreted as a reaction force
of a Lorentz-type force from the spin current of conduction electrons.
%This is on the analogy of the force on magnetic flux in superconductors.
The interaction Hamiltonian, Eq.(\ref{spin-torque-Hamiltonian}),
can be rewritten by using the
%in the form
%\beqa
%H_{\rm ST}= -\int d^3 x {\bm j}_{\rm s}\cdot{\bm A}({\bm x}).
%\eeqa
%Here, we define the $U(1)$ gauge field interacting with the spin current density as
the $U(1)$ gauge field,
${\bm A}({\bm x})=\frac{\hbar}{2e}\nabla\phi({\bm x})(\cos\theta({\bm x})-1)$,
interacting with the spin current density.
Thus the magnetic field ${\bm B}({\bm x})$ is given by
\begin{equation}
\label{magnetic-field}
{\bm B} = (\partial_{x}A_{y}-\partial_{y}A_{x}){\bm e}_{z}
=-\frac{\hbar}{2e}{\bm n}\cdot(\partial_{x}{\bm n}\times\partial_{y}{\bm n}){\bm e}_{z},
\end{equation}
%\beqa
%\label{magnetic-field}
%{\bm B} &=& (\partial_{x}A_{y}-\partial_{y}A_{x}){\bm e}_{z}% \nonumber\\
%%=-\frac{\hbar}{2e}(\partial_{x}\theta\partial_{y}\phi-\partial_{x}\phi\partial_{y}\theta)\sin\theta {\bm e}_{z},
%=-\frac{\hbar}{2e}{\bm n}\cdot(\partial_{x}{\bm n}\times\partial_{y}{\bm n}){\bm e}_{z},
%\eeqa
which corresponds to the so-called topological field \cite{Bruno04}.
It is noted that the SU(2) field intensity,
$F_{\mu\nu}=\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}-i[A_{\mu},A_{\nu}]$,
vanishes, since the original Lagrangian $L^{0}_{\rm el}$
in Eq.(\ref{electron-Lagrangian}) does not include the local gauge field.
The finite magnetic field is a consequence of
the projection from SU(2) to the U(1)
by taking the adiabatic approximation.
Under this magnetic field,
the spin current of the conduction electrons may experience
the following Lorentz-type force as
\beqa
{\bm F}_{\rm L} = \int d^3 x ~{\bm j}_{\rm s}\times{\bm B}
={\bm G}\times {\bm v} _{\rm s} = -{\bm F}_{\rm ST},
\eeqa
which can be interpreted as the reaction force acting on the vortex.
Let us derive the equation of motion for the collective coordinate of vortex
in the presence of spin current based on the Euler-Lagrange equation;
\beqa
\label{Euler-Lagrange}
\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot{{\bm X}}}-\frac{\partial L}{\partial{\bm X}}
=-\frac{\partial W}{\partial \dot{{\bm X}}},
\eeqa
where $L = L_{\rm V}-H_{\rm ST}$ is the total Lagrangian,
$W$ is the so-called dissipation function given by
\beqa
W = \alpha\frac{\hbar S}{2} \int \frac{d^3 x}{a^3}~\dot{{\bm n}}^{2}({\bm x},t) = \frac{\alpha}{2}D\dot{{\bm X}}^2,
\eeqa
with $\alpha$ being the Gilbert damping constant.
The constant
\beqa
D = \frac{\hbar S}{a^{3}}L \int_{D}dxdy
\left\{(\partial_{i}\theta)^2+\sin^{2}\theta (\partial_{i}\phi)^2\right\},
\eeqa
generally includes a factor
$\ln (R_{\rm V}/\delta_{\rm V})$, where $R_{\rm V}$ is the system size.
Here we assume that system has rotational invariance along the $z$ axis.
The concrete expression in Eq. (\ref{Euler-Lagrange}) is given by
\beqa
\label{vortex-equation}
{\bm G}\times ({\bm v}_{\rm s} -\dot{\bm X}) =
-\frac{\partial U({\bm X})}{\partial {\bm X}}
-\alpha D\dot{\bm X}.
\eeqa
This is the equation of motion for the vortex dynamics in the presence of spin current.
If the r.h.s in Eq.(\ref{vortex-equation}) is absent, we obtain
$\dot{\bm X} = {\bm v}_{\rm s}$,
where the vortex core moves along the spin current
perpendicular to the transverse force ${\bm F}_{\rm ST}$.
%It is naturally understood from Galilean invariance,
%since the vortex core moving with velocity $\dot{{\bm X}}={\bm v}_{\rm s}$
%is equivalent to the vortex core at rest and in the absence of spin current.
This situation can be seen from the current-induced domain wall motion \cite{{TK04},{STK05}}.
On the other hand, the damping term $-\alpha D \dot{{\bm X}}$ acts as
deviating from the orbital direction of the moving vortex along the current.
Importantly, there is no intrinsic pinning in the dynamics of vortex
unlike the case of domain wall.
This lead to a vanishing threshold current for the vortex motion
in the absence of an external pinning.
This is because, in the translationally-invariant system,
there is no pinning on $X$ and $Y$.
This is in contrast with the case of domain wall,
where, $\phi_{0}$ is pinned by the hard-axis magnetic anisotropy
even in the translationally-invariant system \cite{TK04}.
Thus vortex-based devices would have great advantage in low-current opperation.
To verify the exisitence of current-induced force on the vortex,
we propose the vortex displacement by spin current in
single magnetic nanodot \cite{VGMZL05}, where an out-of-plane vortex
with vorticity $q=1$ is stabilized.
We assume the electric current is uniform in the nanodot,
and flowing in the possitive x-direction, that is, ${\bm v}_{\rm s} =
\frac{a^3}{2eS}{\bm j}_{\rm s} = v_{\rm s}{\bm e}_{x}$.
We assume the full spin polarization of the current, $P=1$, for simplicity (Fig. 1).
%Schematic illustration of an experimental set up is shown in Figure 1.
\begin{figure}[bp]
\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{fig1}
\caption{Schematic illustration
of an experimental set up for current-induced vortex displacement.
The topological charges are chosen to be $p=1$, $q=1$, and $C=1$ in the above vortex.}
\label{fig1}
\end{figure}
The potential energy $U({\bm X})$ is modeled by a harmonic one
$U({\bm X}) = \kappa {\bm X}^{2}/2$, where $\kappa$ is a force constant.
In Ref. \cite{Gu02}, $\kappa$ is evaluated in detail,
which depends on the aspect ratio $g=L/R$, where $R$ is the dot radius.
From Eq.(\ref{vortex-equation}), the equation of motion is given by
\beqa
(1+i\tilde{\alpha})\dot{Z}=-i\omega Z + v_{\rm s},
\eeqa
where $Z = X + i Y$, $\tilde{\alpha}= \alpha D/G$, and $\omega = \kappa / G$.
For an initial condition $Z(0)= 0$, the solution is given by
\beqa
Z(t) = i\frac{v_{s}}{\omega}\left\{
\exp\left(-\frac{i\omega t}{1+i\tilde{\alpha}} \right)-1
\right\}.
\eeqa
Thus the vortex center exhibits a spiral motion,
whose rotational direction depends on the sign of the core polarization $p=\pm 1$ (Fig. 2(a)).
The final displacement of the vortex core is perpendicular to the current direction
and given by $\delta Y = - G v_{\rm s}/\kappa$, which also depends on $p$,
where the transverse force $-{\bm G} \times {\bm v}_{\rm s}$
balances the restoring force $-\kappa {\bm X}$.
This result is consistent with the recent experimental one in Ref. \cite{Klaui05},
where a distorted vortex-wall was shifted to the diagonal direction and stopped moving.
\begin{figure}[bp]
\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{fig2}
\caption{(a)Spiral motion of vortex center under spin current obtained from the analtycal calculations. We took $\tilde{\alpha}= 0.02$.
(b)Numerical results of the time evolution of the volume-averaged magnetization components.}
\label{fig2}
\end{figure}
For comparison, the current-induced dynamics of a vortex was
calculated by micromagnetic numerical simulations based on
the LLG equation with spin current terms;
\beq
\label{modified-LLG}
\frac{\partial{\bm M}}{\partial t} =-\gamma_{0}{\bm M}\times{\bm H}_{\rm eff}
+\frac{\alpha}{M_{\rm s}}
{\bm M}\times \frac{\partial{\bm M}}{\partial t}-{\bm v}_{\rm s}\cdot\nabla{\bm M},
\eeq
where ${\bm M}({\bm x},t)$ is the magnetization vector,
$\gamma_{0}$ is the gyromagnetic constant,
${\bm H}_{\rm eff}$ is the effective magnetic field
including the exchange and demagnetizing field
and $M_{\rm s}$ is the sarturation magnetization.
The last term represents the spin-transfer torque
\cite{{BJZ98},{Zhang04},{Macdonald04},{STK05}}.
The sample is divided into identical cells,
in each of which magnetization is assumed to be constant.
The dimension of the cells is $4\times4\times h ~{\rm nm}^{3}$
with dot thickness $h= 10,~20,~30~{\rm nm}$.
The dot radius is taken to be $R = 500~{\rm nm}$.
The computational material parameters are typical for permalloy;
$M_{\rm s} = 1.0 ~{\rm T}~(M_{\rm s}/\mu_{0} = 8.0 \times 10^{5}~{\rm A/m})$,
the exchange stiffness constant $A=1.0 \times 10^{-11}~{\rm J/m}$
and $\gamma_{0} = 1.8 \times 10^{5} {\rm m}/{\rm A\cdot s}$.
We take $\alpha=0.02$.
The programing code is based on those of Refs. \cite{{TNMS05},{NTM03}}.
Figure 2(b) shows the time evolution of volume-averaged magnetization,
which exhibits the spiral motion of vortex core.
It is noted that the rotational direction is opposite to the case of
analytical result because of the replacemet $\hbar S / a^3 \to - M_{\rm s}/\gamma_{0}$.
Figure 3 shows that vortex displacement as a function of the spin current density
in various aspect ratios $g=L/R$.
The numerical results are in good agreement with the analytical ones
for small vortex displacement. %$g$ is larger.
It is found that the smaller $g$ is more advantageous to the vortex displacement.
\begin{figure}[bp]
\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{fig3}
\caption{Displacement of vortex center as a function of the spin current density $j_{\rm s}$
in various aspect ratios $g$.
Solid lines and dots represent the analytical and numerical results,
respectively.}
\label{fig3}
\end{figure}
In conclusion,
we have clarified the transverse force on the vortex
and its dynamics by spin-transfer torque due to the spin current
in the adiabatic regime.
We have proposed analytically and numerically
a possible experiment for the vortex displacement by spin current
in the case of single magnetic nanodot.
Finally, this vortex displacement may affect a magnetoregistance, which
is probable to be detected, for example, by using planar Hall effect \cite{IKO05}.
The authors would like to thank T. Ishida and T. Kimura for valuable discussion.
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\bibitem{Slonczewski}
J. C. Slonczewski, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. {\bf 159}, L1 (1996).
\bibitem{Berger96}
L. Berger, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 54}, 9353 (1996).
%Emission of spin waves by a magnetic multilayer traversed by a current
%\bibitem{Loss90}
%D. Loss, P Goldbart and A. V. Balatsky,
%Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 65}, 1655 (1990).
%Berry's Phase and Persistent Charge and Spin Currents in Textured Mesoscopic Rings.
%\bibitem{TK03}
%G. Tatara and H. Kohno,
%Phys. Rev. B {\bf 67}, 113316(2003).
%Permanent current from noncommutative spin algebra
\bibitem{Berger92}
L. Berger, J. Appl. Phys. {\bf 71}, 2721 (1992);
E. Salhi and L. Berger, {\it ibid}. {\bf 73}, 6405 (1993).
%Motion of a magnetic domain wall transversed by fast-rising current pulses;
%Current-induced displacements and precession of a Bloch wall in Ni-Fe thin films
\bibitem{TK04}
G. Tatara and H. Kohno, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92}, 086601 (2004).
%Theory of current-driven domain wall motion: spin transfer versus momentum transfer
%\bibitem{Kohno}
%H. Kohno, (2005), Notes on the Force-like Term in the LLG Equation.
\bibitem{BJZ98}
Ya. B. Bazaliy, B. A. Jones, and Shou-Cheng Zhang,
Phys. Rev. B {\bf 57}, R3213 (1998).
\bibitem{Macdonald04}
J. Fern\'andez-Rossier, M. Braun, A.S. N\'u\~nez and A. H. MacDonald,
Phys. Rev. B {\bf 69}, 174412 (2004).
\bibitem{Zhang04}
Z. Li and S. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92}, 207203 (2004).
%Domain-Wall Dynamics and Spin-Wave Excitations with Spin-Transfer Torques.
\bibitem{STK05}
J. Shibata, G. Tatara and H. Kohno, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94}, 076601 (2005).
%Effect of Spin Current on Uniform Ferromagnetism: Domain Nucleation
\bibitem{Yamaguchi04}
A. Yamaguchi, T. Ono, S. Nasu, K. Miyake, K. Mibu, and T. Shinjo,
Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92}, 077205 (2004).
%Real-Space Observation of Current-Driven Domain Wall Motion in Submicron
%Magnetic Wires.
\bibitem{Klaui05}
M. Kl${\rm \ddot{a}}$ui, P. O. Jubert, R. Allenspach, A. Bischof,
J. A. C. Bland, G. Faini, U. R${\rm \ddot{u}}$diger, C. A. F. Vaz,
L. Vila, and C. Vouille, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 95}, 026601 (2005).
%cond-mat/0504427.
%Direct observation of domain-wall configurations transformed by spin current.
%M. Kl${\rm \ddot{a}}$ui, C. A. F. Vaz, J. A. C. Bland, W. Wernsdorfer, G. Faini, E. Cambril,
%L. J. Heyderman, F. Nolting, and U. R${\rm \ddot{u}}$diger, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94}, 106601 (2005).
%Controlled and Reproducible DomainWall Displacement by Current Pulses Injected
%into Ferromagnetic Ring Structures
\bibitem{TNMS05}
A. Thiaville, Y. Nakatani, J. Miltat and Y. Suzuki,
Europhys. Lett. {\bf 69}, 990 (2005).
%Micromagnetic understanding of current-driven domain wall motion in patterned nanowires.
\bibitem{SOHSO00}
T. Shinjo, T. Okuno, R. Hassdorf, K. Shigeto, and T. Ono,
Science {\bf 289}, 930 (2000).
\bibitem{TF94}
G. Tatara and H. Fukuyama Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 72}, 772 (1994); %\bibitem{B01}
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 63}, 2538 (1994).
\bibitem{Berger86}
L. Berger, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 33}, 1572 (1986).
%Possible existence of a Josephson effect in ferromagnets.
\bibitem{Thiele73}
A. A. Thiele, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 30}, 230 (1973).
%Steady-State Motion of Magnetic Domains.
\bibitem{Volovik96}
G. Volovik, JETP Lett. {\bf 44}, 185 (1986).
\bibitem{Ao}
P. Ao and D. J. Thouless, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 70}, 2158 (1993).
\bibitem{M-Stone96}
M. Stone, Phys. Rev. B{\bf53}, 16573 (1996).
%Magnus force on skyrmions in ferromagnets and quantum Hall systems
\bibitem{KY96}
H. Kuratsuji and H. Yabu,
J. Phys. A {\bf 29}, 6505 (1996);
H. Kuratsuji and H. Yabu, {\it ibid}. {\bf 31}, L61 (1998).
%The equation of motion for a spin vortex and geometric force,
%Force on a vortex in ferromagnet model and the properties of vortex configurarions
\bibitem{KTS05}
H. Kohno, G. Tatara and J. Shibata, in preparation.
\bibitem{Bruno04}
P. Bruno, V. K. Dugaev and M. Taillefumier,
Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93}, 096806 (2004).
%Topological Hall Effect and Berry Phase in Magnetic Nanostructures
\bibitem{VGMZL05}
P. Vavassori, M. Grimsditch, V. Metlushko, N. Zaluzec, and B. Llic,
Appl. Phys. Lett. {\bf 86}, 072507 (2005).
%Magnetoresistance of single magnetic vortices
\bibitem{Gu02}
K. Yu. Guslienko, B. A. Ivanov, V. Novosad, Y. Otani, H. Shima and K. Fukamichi,
J. Appl. Phys. {\bf 91}, 8037 (2002).
%Eigenfrequencies of vortex state excitations in magnetic submicron-size disks.
\bibitem{NTM03}
Y. Nakatani, A. Thiaville and J. Miltat,
Nature materials {\bf 2}, 521 (2003).
%Faster magnetic walls in rough wires.
\bibitem{IKO05}
T. Ishida, T. Kimura and Y. Otani, in preparation.
%\bibitem{ZT01}
%{\it Spin Electronics}, edited by M. Ziese and M. J. Thornton
%(Springer, Berlin, 2001).
%\bibitem{Sun99}
%J. Z. Sun, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. {\bf 202}, 157 (1999).
%\bibitem{Myers99}
%E. B. Myers, D. C. Ralph, J. A. Katine, R. N. Louie, and Buhrman,
%Science {\bf 285}, 867 (1999).
%Current-Induced Switching of Domains in Magnetic Multilayer Devices.
%\bibitem{Katine00}
%J. A. Katine, F. J. Albert, R. A. Buhrman, E. B. Myers, and D. C. Ralph,
%Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 3149 (2000).
%Current-Driven Magnetization Reversal and Spin-Wave Excitations in
%Co/Cu/Co Pillars.
%\bibitem{Grollier01}
%J. Grollier, V. Cros, A. Hamzic, J. M. George, H. Jaffr\`es, A. Fert,
%G. Faini, J. Ben Youssef, and H. Legall,
%Appl. Phys. Lett. {\bf 78}, 3663 (2001).
%Spin-polarized current induced swtching in Co/Cu/Co pillars.
%\bibitem{Tsoi02}
%M. Tsoi, V. Tsoi, J. Bass, A. G. M. Jansen, and P. Wyder,
%Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 89}, 246803 (2002).
%Current-Driven Resonances in Magnetic Multilayers.
%\bibitem{Ralph03}
%S. I. Kiselev, J. C. Sankey, I. N. Krivorotov, N. C. Emley, R. J.
%Schoelkopf, R. A. Buhrman, and D. C. Ralph,
%Nature (London) {\bf 425}, 380 (2003).
%Microwave oscillations of a nanomagnet driven by a spin-polarized current.
%bibitem{Ansermet99}
%J.-E. Wegrowe, D. Kelly, Y. Jaccard,
%Ph. Guittienne, and J.-Ph. Ansermet,
%Europhys. Lett. {\bf 45}, 626 (1999).
%Current-induced magnetization reversal in magnetic nanowires.
%\bibitem{Brouwer04}
%M. L. Polianski and P. W. Brouwer,
%Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92}, 026602 (2004).
%Current-Induced Transverse Spin-Wave Instability in a Thin Nanomagnet.
%\bibitem{Yamaguchi04}
%A. Yamaguchi, T. Ono, S. Nasu, K. Miyake, K. Mibu, and T. Shinjo,
%Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92}, 077205 (2004).
%Real-Space Observation of Current-Driven Domain Wall Motion in Submicron
%Magnetic Wires.
%\bibitem{Yamanouchi04}
%M. Yamanouchi, D. Chiba, F. Matsukura, and H. Ohno,
%Nature, {\bf 428}, 539 (2004).
%Current-induced domain-wall switching in a ferromagnetic semiconductor
%structure.
%\bibitem{SMYT04}
%E. Saitoh, H. Miyajima, T. Yamaoka and G. Tatara,
%Nature, {\bf 432}, 203 (2004).
%Current-induced resonance and mass determination of a single magnetic domain wall
%\bibitem{Berger92}
%L. Berger, J. Appl. Phys. {\bf 71}, 2721 (1992);
%E. Salhi and L. Berger, {\it ibid}. {\bf 73}, 6405 (1993).
%\bibitem{Ji03}
%Y. Ji, C. L. Chien, and M. D. Stiles,
%Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 90}, 106601 (2003).
%Current-Induced Spin-Wave Excitations in a Single Ferromagnetic Layer.
%\bibitem{Chen04}
%T. Y. Chen, Y. Ji, and C. L. Chien, Appl. Phys. Lett. {\bf 84}, 380 (2004).
%Switching by point-contact spin injection in a continuous film.
%\bibitem{Chen04-2}
%T. Y. Chen, Y. Ji, C. L. Chien, and M. D. Stiles,
%Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93}, 026601 (2004).
%Current-driven switching in a single exchange-biased ferromagnetic leyer.
%\bibitem{Chiba04}
%D. Chiba, Y. Sato, T. Kita, F. Matsukura, and H. Ohno,
%cond-mat/0403500.
%Current-driven Magnetization Reversal in (Ga,Mn)As/GaAs/(Ga,Mn)As Tunnel
%Junction.
%\bibitem{Thi04}
%A. Thiaville and Y. Nakatani, private communication.
%\bibitem{TF94}
%G. Tatara and H. Fukuyama Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 72}, 772 (1994);
%J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 63}, 2538 (1994).
%\bibitem{com1}
% They modify $J$ by
%$ \Delta J = (a^3 \hbar^2/4mS^2)(\rho - \frac{1}{m\Delta V} \times
% \sum_{{\bf k} \sigma} \sigma k_x^2 f_{{\bf k} \sigma} )$,
%and $S$ by $ \Delta S = \rho_{\rm s}a^{3}/2$, where
%$\rho = \frac{1}{V} \sum_{{\bf k} \sigma} f_{{\bf k} \sigma}$ and
%$\rho_{\rm s} = \frac{1}{V} \sum_{{\bf k} \sigma} \sigma f_{{\bf k} \sigma}$
%are, respectively, number density and spin density of
%lectrons.
% In the following part, we neglect these renormalizations for simplicity.
%\bibitem{Berger78}
%L. Berger, J. Appl. Phys. {\bf 49}, 2156 (1978).
%\bibitem{Berger84}
%L. Berger, J. Appl. Phys. {\bf 55}, 1954 (1984).
%\bibitem{Berger92}
%L. Berger, J. Appl. Phys. {\bf 71}, 2721 (1992);
%E. Salhi and L. Berger, {\it ibid}. {\bf 73}, 6405 (1993).
%\bibitem{Bouzidi90}
%D. Bouzidi and H. Suhl, Phys.Rev. Lett. {\bf 65}, 2587 (1990).
%\bibitem{Rajaraman}
%R. Rajaraman, {\it Solitons and Instantons} (North-Holand, Amsterdam,
%1982).
%\bibitem{damping}
%If one put the damping term into Eq. (\ref{LLG2}),
%the term $-\alpha\frac{S}{\tilde{S}}{\bm n}\times
%\frac{\partial{\bm n}}{\partial t}$
%is added to the r.h.s. of Eq. (\ref{LLG2}),
%where $\alpha$ is the phenomenological damping parameter.
%\bibitem{BL96} H.-B. Braun and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B{\bf 53}, 3237 (1996).
%\bibitem{TT96}
%S. Takagi and G. Tatara, Phys. Rev. B{\bf 54}, 9920 (1996).
%\bibitem{ST00}
%J. Shibata and S. Takagi, Phys. Rev. B{\bf 62}, 5719 (2000).
%\bibitem{ST01}
%J. Shibata and S. Takagi, Phys. Atom. Nucl. {\bf 64}, 2206 (2001).
%\bibitem{BKL97} H.-B. Braun, J. Kyriakidis and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B{\bf 56}, 8129 (1997).
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}