Microwave induced negative resistance states in 2D electron gas with periodic modulation
Extracted source text ยท arXiv cond-mat/0610643
\documentclass[aps,prb,floatfix]{revtex4}
\usepackage{times}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
%% By default the equations are consecutively numbered. This may be changed by
%% the following command.
%% \numberwithin{equation}{section}
%%
\usepackage[]{graphicx}
%\usepackage{showlabels}
\setcounter{secnumdepth}{3}
%
%Newcommands
%
\newcommand{\Sh}{Schr\"odinger{ }}
\newcommand{\etal}{et al. }
\newcommand{\mca}[1]{\mathcal{#1}}
\newcommand{\bscal}[1]{\bs{\mathcal{#1}}}
\newcommand{\bs}[1]{\boldsymbol{#1}}
\newcommand{\mb}[1]{\mathbb{#1}}
\newcommand{\braket}[3]{\left\langle #1 \left\vert #2
\right\vert #3 \right\rangle}
\newcommand{\brakete}[3]{\left\langle #1 \right\vert #2
\left\vert #3 \right\rangle}
\newcommand{\brak}[2]{\left\langle #1 \left\vert
#2 \right. \right\rangle}
\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left\vert #1 \right\rangle}
\newcommand{\fuve}[1]{\left(\bs{#1}\right)}
\newcommand{\fues}[1]{\left(#1\right)}
\newcommand{\fuel}[2]{\fues{#1,\bs{#2}}}
\newcommand{\fuen}[3]{\fues{\bs{#1};#2,\bs{#3}}}
\newcommand{\fusa}[3]{_{\alpha,\bs{#1}}\fues{#2,\bs{#3}}}
\newcommand{\fuap}[3]{_{\alpha\pr,\bs{#1}}\fues{#2,\bs{#3}}}
\newcommand{\yav}[1]{\left[#1\right]}
\newcommand{\llav}[1]{\left\{#1\right\}}
\newcommand{\llal}[1]{\left\{#1\right.}
\newcommand{\abs}[1]{\left\vert#1\right\vert}
\newcommand{\num}{\nonumber}
\newcommand{\non}{\nonumber \\}
\newcommand{\delt}[1]{\delta\left(#1\right)}
\newcommand{\deltus}{\delta\left(\bs{k}\pr-\bs{k}\right)}
\newcommand{\Eq}[1]{Eq. (\ref{#1})}
\newcommand{\Eqs}[1]{Eqs. (\ref{#1})}
\newcommand{\rep}[1]{(\ref{#1})}
\newcommand{\pr}{^{\prime}}
\newcommand{\nas}[1]{\nabla_{\bs{#1}}}
\newcommand{\sa}{_{\alpha}}
\newcommand{\sap}{_{\alpha\pr}}
\newcommand{\sak}{_{\alpha,\bs{k}}}
\newcommand{\sapk}{_{\alpha\pr,\bs{k}}}
\begin{document}
%% The information for the title page will be placed between
%% \begin{document} and \maketitle. The order of most entries
%% is determined by the class file and can not be changed by
%% rearranging them. The maketitle command follows after the
%% absract.
%%
%% Most of the following commands will be completed by the publisher.
%%
%%\DOIsuffix{theDOIsuffix}
%%
%% issueinfo for header and copyright line
%\Volume{XX}
%\Issue{1}
%\Copyrightissue{01}
%\Month{01}
%\Year{2004}
%%
%% First and last pagenumber of the article. If the option
%% 'autolastpage' is set (default) the second argument may be left empty.
%\pagespan{1}{}
%%
%% Dates will be filled in by the publisher. The 'reviseddate' and
%% 'dateposted' (Published online) entry may be left empty.
%\Receiveddate{\sf zzz} \Reviseddate{\sf zzz} \Accepteddate{\sf
%%zzz} \Dateposted{\sf zzz}
%%
%% Give a maximum of six PACS code in numerical order.
%% You must insert up to 6 relevant codes, see www.aip.org/pacs
%% \pretitle{Editor's Choice}
%% We have a short and a long form for the title. The short form
%% (optional argument) goes into the running head.
\title[Microwave induced negative resistance states in 2D electron gas with periodic modulation]{Microwave induced negative resistance states in 2D electron gas with periodic modulation}
%% Please do not enter footnotes or \inst{}-notes into the optional
%% argument of the author command. The optional argument will go into
%% the header. If there is only one address the marker \inst{x} may be
%% omitted.
%% Information for the first author.
\author{Manuel Torres\footnote{Corresponding
author: e-mail: {\sf torres@fisica.unam.mx.}}}
\affiliation{Instituto de F\'{\i}sica, Universidad Nacional
Aut\'onoma de M\'exico, Apdo. Postal 20-364, M\'exico D.F.
01000, M\'exico}
%% Information for the second author
\author{Alejandro Kunold}
\affiliation{Departamento de Ciencias B\'asicas
Universidad Aut\'onoma Metropolitana Azcapotzalco,
Av. San Pablo 180, Col. Reynosa Tamaulipas,
Azcapotzalco, M\'exico D.F. 02200, M\'exico}
%%
%%\dedicatory{}
\begin{abstract}
We study the microwave-induced photoconductivity of a two-dimensional electron system (2DES)
in the presence of a magnetic field and a two-dimensional modulation. The microwave and Landau contributions are exactly taken into account, while the periodic potential is treated perturbatively. The longitudinal resistivity exhibits oscillations, periodic in $\omega / \omega_c$.
Negative resistance states (NRS) develop for sufficiently high electron mobility and microwave power. This phenomenon appears in a narrow window region of values of the lattice parameter ($a$),
around $a \sim l_B$, where $l_B$ is the magnetic length.
It is proposed that these phenomena may be observed in artificially fabricated arrays of periodic scatterers at the interface of ultraclean heterostructures.
{73.20.At,05.60.-k, 72.15.Rn}
\end{abstract}
%% maketitle must follow the abstract.
\maketitle % Produces the title.
%% If there is not enough space inside the running head
%% for all authors including the title you may provide
%% the leftmark in one of the following three forms:
%% \renewcommand{\leftmark}
%% {First Author: A Short Title}
%% \renewcommand{\leftmark}
%% {First Author and Second Author: A Short Title}
%\renewcommand{\leftmark}
%%{S. Hildebrandt et al.: Manuscript preparation guidelines for
%%authors of physica status solidi}
Novel strong magnetoresistance oscillations with the appearence of zero resistance states (ZRS) were recently discovered
\cite{mani1,zudov1}, when ultraclean $GaAs/Al_xGa_{1-x} As$ samples were subjected to microwave irradiation and moderate magnetic fields.
It is believed that the ZRS are probably originated from the evolution of negative resistance states (NRS) \cite{andre}.
Nowadays two distinct mechanisms that produce negative longitudinal resistance are known:
$(i)$ the impurity scattering mechanism \cite{theory1,tor0} and $(ii)$ the
inversion population mechanism \cite{theory2}.
Although the experiments described above do not include
the effect of periodical potential modulations, exploring its physical consequences is worthwhile, see the references \cite{dietel},
\cite{gumbs} and \cite{tor}. In this work we make a theoretical study of the microwave photoconductivity of a 2DES in the presence of a magnetic field and a two-dimensional modulation.
Consider the motion of an electron in two dimensions subject to a uniform magnetic field
$\mathbf{ B}$ perpendicular to the plane, a periodic potential $V$ and driven by microwave radiation. The
dynamics is governed by the \Sh equation %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{equation}\label{ecs1}
i \hbar \frac{\partial \Psi }{\partial t}= H \Psi = \left[ H_{\{B,\omega\}} + V({\bs r} ) \right] \Psi \, , \hskip1.5cm H_{\{B,\omega\}} = \frac{1}{2m^*} {\bs \Pi}^2 \, ,
\end{equation}
here $H_{\{B,\omega\}}$ is the Landau hamiltonian coupled to the radiation via the covariant derivative: ${\bs \Pi} = \mathbf{p} + e \mathbf{A}$, with
$ \mathbf{A} = - \frac{1}{2} \bs r \times \bs B + Re \,\, \left[ \frac{\bs E_\omega }{\omega} \exp\{ -i \omega t \} \right]$.
The superlattice potential is decomposed in a Fourier expansion:
$ V(\mathbf{r})= \sum_{m \, n} V_{m \, n} \exp \bigg{\{i} 2 \pi \left( \frac{m \, x}{a} + \frac{n \, y}{b} \right) \bigg { \}}. $
We shall assume: $(i)$ a weak modulation $ \vert V \vert \ll \hbar \omega_c $ and $(ii)$
the clean limit $\omega \, \tau_{tr} \sim \omega_c \, \tau_{tr} >> 1$; here $\tau_{tr}$ is the transport relaxation time that is estimated using its relation to the electron mobility $\mu = e \tau_{tr} / m^*$. Based on these conditions
it is justified to consider the exact solution of the microwave driven Landau problem and treat the periodic potential effects perturbatively.
A three step procedure is enforced in order to solve the problem posed by \Eq{ecs1}:
$(i)$ $H_{\{B,\omega\}}$ can be exactly diagonalized by a transformation of the form
$W^{\dagger} H_{\{B,\omega\}} W = \omega_c \left( \frac{1}{2} + a_1^\dagger \, a_1\right) \equiv H_0 $,
with the $W(t)$ operator given by \cite{tor0}
\begin{equation}\label{opw}
W(t)= \exp\{i \eta_1 \Pi_y\} \exp\{i \zeta_1 \Pi_x\} \exp\{i \eta_2 {\mathcal O}_x\} \exp\{i \zeta_2 {\mathcal O}_y\} \} \exp\{i \int^t {\mathcal L} dt^\prime \} ,
\end{equation}
where the functions $\eta_i(t)$ and $\zeta_i(t)$ represent the solutions to the classical equations of motion associated with
the Lagrangian $ {\mathcal L} = \frac{\omega_c}{2} \left( \eta_1^2 + \zeta_1^2 \right) + \dot \zeta_1\eta_1 + \dot \zeta_2 \eta_2
+ e l_B \, \left[ E_x \left( \zeta_1 + \eta_2 \right) + E_y \left(\eta_1 + \zeta_2 \right) \right] $. The center-guide operators
are defined according to: $ \sqrt{e B} \, {\mathcal O}_x = \Pi_x + e By \, , \hskip0.4cm \sqrt{e B} \, {\mathcal O}_y = \Pi_y - e B x $.
These operators generate the magnetic-translation algebra:
$ \left[\Pi_i, \Pi_j \right]=i B \, \delta_{ij}, \hskip0.4cm \left[ {\mathcal O}_i , {\mathcal O}_j \right]=- i B \, \delta_{ij} \hskip0.4cm
\left[\Pi_i, {\mathcal O}_j \right]=0 $.
$(ii)$ Applying the $W$-transformation, the \Sh \Eq{ecs1} becomes
$ i \hbar \frac{\partial \Psi^{(W)} }{\partial t} = \left( H_0 + V_W (t) \right) \Psi^{(W)},$
where $ V_W (t) = W(t) V( {\bs r }) W^{-1}(t)$ and $\Psi^{(W)}= W(t) \Psi$. Notice that the periodic potential acquires a time dependence brought by the $W(t)$ transformation. $(iii)$ The problem is now solved in terms of an evolution operator $U(t)$, using the interaction representation and first order time dependence perturbation theory:
$U(t) = 1 - i \int_{-\infty}^{t} dt^\prime \left[ W^{\dagger}(t^\prime) V (\mathbf{r}) W(t^\prime) \right]_I \, .$ The solution to the original \Sh equation has been achieved by means of three successive transformations
$ \vert \Psi_\mu (t) \rangle = W^\dag \, \exp\{-i H_0 t\} \, U(t - t_0) \, \vert \mu \rangle $. The explicit expressions for the matrix element of these operators in the Landau-Floquet base appear in detail
in references \cite{tor0,tor}.
\begin{figure}[htb]
\includegraphics[width=14cm, height=6.0cm]{figureA.eps}
\caption{(a) Longitudinal resistivity as a function $\omega/\omega_c$ for three values
of the electron mobility: $\mu = 0.5 \times 10^7 \, cm^2/Vs $ dotted line, $\mu = 1.5 \times 10^7 \, cm^2/Vs $ dashed line, and
$\mu = 2.5 \times 10^7 \, cm^2/Vs $ continuos line. In this case $a = 25 \, nm$. (b) $\rho_{xx} \,$ versus $\omega/\omega_c$
for three values of the lattice parameter: $a=22 \, nm$ dotted line, $a=25 \, nm$ continuos line, and $a=35 \, nm$ dashed line; in this case $ \mu = 2.5 \times 10^7 cm^2/V s$ .
The microwave polarization is linear transverse (with respect to the current), with $f = 100 \, Ghz$ and
$\vert E_\omega \vert = 15 \, V/cm$. The other parameters are selected as follows:
$V_0=0.05 \, meV $,
$m^* = 0.067 \, m_e$,
$\epsilon_F = 10 \, meV$, $T =1 \, K$. }
\label{figure1}
\end{figure}
The usual Kubo formula for the conductivity must be modified in order to include the Floquet dynamics \cite{tor0}.
The longitudinal and Hall conductivities are separated in a dark and
microwave induced contributions \cite{tor}. Here we quote the result for the
microwave induced longitudinal photoconductivity
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{equation}\label{condLw}
\hskip-0.8cm \mathbf{\sigma}_{xx} ^{(MM)} = \frac{ e^2 l_B^2 }{\pi \hbar}
\int d {\cal E} \sum_{\mu \nu} \sum_l \, \sum_{m \, n} \, Im G_\mu \left({\cal E} \right)B^{(l)} \left({\cal E} ,{\cal E} _\nu \right) \,
\bigg{ \vert} q_n^{(y)} \, J_l\left( \vert \Delta_{m \, n} \vert \right) V_{m \, n} D_{\mu\nu} (\tilde{q}_{mn}) \bigg{\vert}^2 ,
\end{equation}
where $l_B= \sqrt{\frac {\hbar}{eB}}$ is the magnetic length,
$ q^{(x)}_m = 2 \pi m /a $, $ q^{(y)}_n= 2 \pi n /b $, and $ B^{(l)}$ is given by
\begin{equation} \label{derspec}
B^{(l)} ( {\cal E} , {\cal E} _\nu) = - \frac{d}{d{\cal E} _0} \bigg{ \{ } \left[ f( {\cal E} + l \omega + {\cal E} _0)- f ( {\cal E} )\right]
Im \, G_\nu ( {\cal E} + l \omega + {\cal E} _0) \bigg{ \}}
\bigg{\vert}_{{\cal E} _0= 0}.
\end{equation}
Broadening effects are included phenomenologically choosing a Gaussian representation for the density of states
\begin{equation} \label{denst}
Im \, G_\mu({\cal E} ) = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2 \Gamma_\mu^2}} \exp{\left[ - ({\cal E} - {\cal E} _\mu)^2 /(2 \Gamma_\mu^2) \right] } , \hskip1.5cm \Gamma^2_\mu = \frac{ 2\beta \hbar^2 \omega_c }{ (\pi \tau_{tr})} \, .
\end{equation}
In \Eq{condLw}, $J_l\left( \vert \Delta \vert \right)$ is the Bessel function with
$ \Delta = \frac{\omega_c l_B^2 e E }{\omega \left( \omega^2 - \omega_c^2 + i \omega \Gamma \right)}
\left[ \omega \left(q_x e_x + q_y e_y \right) + i \omega_c \left(q_x e_y - q_y e_x \right) \right]$, where $\bs e $ is the microwave polarization vector.
$D^{\nu \mu}\fues{ \tilde{q}}= e^{-\frac{1}{2}\abs{ \tilde{q}}^2} \tilde{q}^{\nu-\mu}\sqrt{\frac{\mu!}{\nu!}} L^{\nu-\mu}_{\mu}\fues{\abs{ \tilde{q}}^2},$ with $L^{\mu}_{\mu}$ being the generalized Laguerre polynomial and $\tilde{q} = i l_B (q_x - i q_y)/ \sqrt{2}$.
The parameter $\beta \approx 10.5 $ takes into account the difference of the transport scattering time $\tau_{tr}$ from the single-particle lifetime $\tau_s$.
In our calculations it is assumed that a superlattice is cleaved at the interface of an ultraclean \\ $GaAs/Al_xGa_{1-x} As$ heterostructure with high electron mobility. We shall consider a square lattice potential of the form
$ V(\mathbf{r}) = V_0 \left[ \cos\left( \frac{2 \pi x }{a} \right) + \cos\left( \frac{2 \pi y }{a} \right) \right] $.
Negative magnetoresistance requires ultra-clean samples, the phenomenon appears when the
electron mobility exceeds a threshold $ \mu_{th}$. Figure (1a) displays $\rho_{xx} \, \, v.s. \,\, \omega / \omega_c $ plots for three selected values of $\mu$. For $\mu \approx 0.5 \times 10^7 cm^2/V s$ an almost linear behavior $\rho_{xx} $ is clearly depicted (except in the Shubnikov-deHass region). As the electron mobility increases to $\mu \approx 1.5 \times 10^7 cm^2/V s$, resistance oscillations periodic in $\omega/ \omega_c$ are clearly observed. However, several NRS appear only when the mobility is increased to $\mu \approx 2.5 \times 10^7 cm^2/V s$. The explanation for the NRS can be traced down to
Eqs. (\ref{condLw}) and (\ref{derspec}); the longitudinal photoconductivity contains a new contribution proportional to the derivative of the density of states: $ \frac{d}{d{\cal E} } Im \, G_\nu ( {\cal E} + l \omega )$. Due to the oscillatory structure of the density of states this extra contribution takes both positive and negative values. This term is proportional to the electron mobility, hence for sufficiently high mobility the new contribution dominates over the dark contribution, leading to negative conductivity states.
Figure (1b) shows that NRS appear only in a narrow
window of values of $a$ around $a^*$, for which the oscillations amplitude of $\rho_{xx}$ attains its maximum. It is found
that: $a^* \sim \pi l_B / \sqrt{2} $. Unlike the semiclassical origin of magnetoresistance oscillations observed in an antidot array for commensurate values of the ratio $R_c/a$, these conductance oscillations have a quantum origin and would only appear in a narrow window of values around
$ a \sim l_B$.
In conclusion, it is proposed that the combined effects of: periodic modulation, perpendicular magnetic field, plus microwave irradiation of 2DES predicts the existence of interesting oscillatory conductance phenomena, with the possible development of NRS.
We acknowledge financial support by
CONACyT and UNAM project No. \texttt{IN113305}.
\begin{thebibliography}{10}
\bibitem{mani1}
R. G. Mani, J. H. Smet, K. von klitzing, V. Narayanamurti, W.B. Johnson, Umansky,
{\em Nature \/}
{\bf 420}
(2002)
646.
\bibitem{zudov1}
M. A. Zudov, R. R. Du, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West,
{\em Phys. Rev. Lett \/}
{\bf 90}
(2003)
046807.
\bibitem{andre}
A. V. Andreev, I. L. Aleiner, A. J. Millis,
{\em Phys. Rev. Lett. \/}
{\bf 91}
(2003)
056803.
\bibitem{theory1}
V. I. Ryzhii,
{\em Sov. Phys. Solid State \/}
{\bf 11}
(1970)
2078;
A. C. Durst, S. Sachdev, N. Read, S. M. Girvin,
{\em Phys. Rev. Lett. \/}
{\bf 91}
(2003)
086803;
J. Shi, X. C. Xie,
{\em Phys. Rev. Lett. \/}
{\bf 91}
(2003)
086801;
X. L. Lei, S. Y. Liu,
{\em Phys. Rev. Lett. \/}
{\bf 91}
(2003)
226805;
M. G. Vavilov, I. L. Aleiner,
{\em Phys. Rev. B \/}
{\bf 69}
(2004)
035303;
J. I${\tilde n}$arrea, G. Plateros,
{\em Phys. Rev. Lett \/}
{\bf 94}
(2005)
016806.
\bibitem{tor0}
M. Torres, A. Kunold,
{\em Phys. Rev. B \/}
{\bf 71}
(2005)
115313-1;
{\em Phys. Stat. Sol. b \/}
{\bf 71}
(2005)
1192.
\bibitem{theory2}
I. A. Dmitriev, A. D. Mirlin, D. G. Polyakov,
{\em Phys. Rev. Lett. \/}
{\bf 91 }
(2003)
226802.
\bibitem{dietel}
J. Dietel, L. I. Glazman, F. W. J. Hekking, F. von Oppen,
{\em Phys. Rev. B \/}
{\bf 71}
(2005)
045329.
\bibitem{gumbs}
G. Gumbs
{\em Phys. Rev. B \/}
{\bf 72}
(2005)
125342.
\bibitem{tor}
M. Torres, A. Kunold,
{\em J. Phys. Condens. Matter \/}
{\bf 18}
(2006)
4029.
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}
%\endinput