Skyrmionic excitons
Extracted source text ยท arXiv cond-mat/9707045
\documentstyle[preprint,aps]{revtex}
\tightenlines
% REVTEX 3.0
%
% version: August 31, 1997
\begin{document}
\title{Skyrmionic excitons}
\draft
\author{T. Portengen, J. R. Chapman, V. Nikos Nicopoulos, and N. F. Johnson}
\address{Department of Physics, University of Oxford,
Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom}
\date{July 2, 1997}
\maketitle
\begin{abstract}
We investigate the properties of a Skyrmionic exciton
consisting of a negatively charged Skyrmion bound to
a mobile valence hole. A variational wave function is
constructed which has the generalized total momentum
${\bf P}$ as a good quantum number. It is shown that the
Skyrmionic exciton can have a larger binding energy than
an ordinary magnetoexciton and should therefore dominate
the photoluminescence spectrum in high-mobility quantum
wells and heterojunctions where the electron-hole
separation exceeds a critical value. The dispersion
relation for the Skyrmionic exciton is discussed.
\end{abstract}
\pacs{78.55.-m, 73.20.Dx}
Excitons play a crucial role in our understanding of the optical
properties of direct-gap semiconductors. The properties of excitons
in systems of reduced dimensionality in a high magnetic field were
first investigated by Lerner and Lozovik \cite{Lerner} many years
ago, and have been the subject of numerous studies \cite{Korolev}
since. Recently, the existence of unusual charged excitations, known
as Skyrmions, was predicted theoretically \cite{Sondhi}, and confirmed
experimentally \cite{Barrett,Schmeller,Aifer}, in quantum Hall
systems with filling factor near $\nu = 1$. A Skyrmion is a
topological twist in the spin density of the two-dimensional (2D)
electron gas. According to the sense of the twist, the Skyrmion
carries electrical charge $-e$ or $+e$. The size of the Skyrmion
is determined by a competition between the Zeeman energy and the
electron-electron exchange interaction. The relative strength of
these two competing effects is conveniently parameterized by the
ratio $g = \frac{1}{2}|g_{e}|\mu_{B}B/(e^{2}/\epsilon \ell)$, where
$g_{e}$ is the Land\'{e} $g$ factor ($g_{e} = -0.44$ in GaAs),
$\ell = \sqrt{\hbar c/e B}$, and $\epsilon$ is the background
dielectric constant. The Zeeman energy favours small Skyrmions,
while the exchange interaction prefers large ones \cite{Fertig}.
Ordinary spin $\frac{1}{2}$ quasielectrons (quasiholes) can be
regarded as negatively (positively) charged Skyrmions of zero size.
In this paper we show that, just as an electron and a hole may bind
to form an exciton, a negatively charged Skyrmion and a hole may bind
to form a {\em Skyrmionic} exciton. The Skyrmionic exciton can replace
the ordinary magnetoexciton as the lowest energy excitation probed
by a photoluminescence (PL) experiment \cite{Goldberg,Turberfield}
at $\nu = 1$. Previously \cite{Portengen}
we considered the optical recombination of a
Skyrmion with a hole {\em localized} near a minimum in the disorder
potential. The Skyrmionic exciton considered here is different in
that the Skyrmion and the mobile hole can move together throughout
the plane perpendicular to the magnetic field. The Skyrmionic
exciton hence has its own dispersion relation in terms of a quantum
number ${\bf P}$ which plays the role of the total transverse
momentum in a magnetic field. The key element in our approach is
the construction of a variational wave function with a definite value
of ${\bf P}$, which produces an equal probability of finding the
Skyrmionic exciton anywhere in the plane perpendicular to the
magnetic field. This allows us to compute
the energy and the spin of the Skyrmionic exciton as a function of
${\bf P}$.\@ We focus in particular on the state
with ${\bf P} = 0$ which dominates the optical recombination spectrum
at $\nu = 1$.
We study a model system consisting of a 2D electron gas lying in the
$x$-$y$ plane, interacting with a valence hole confined to a plane at
a distance $d$ from the electron gas, in a strong magnetic field along
the $z$ direction. The confinement of the hole along the $z$ direction
occurs naturally in an asymmetrically doped quantum well \cite{Goldberg},
and may be achieved in a single heterojunction \cite{Turberfield} by the
application of a bias voltage. The strong magnetic field restricts
the electrons and hole to the lowest Landau level. The electrons
can have spin up or down, while the hole can have
$m_{j} = \pm \frac{3}{2}$. The label $m_{j}$ plays no role other
than to select the polarization of the luminescence \cite{Cooper}.
Hence we drop this label and
leave it understood that for a right-circularly polarized (RCP)
transition the hole must have $m_{j} = -\frac{3}{2}$, while for a
left-circularly polarized (LCP) transition it must have
$m_{j} = +\frac{3}{2}$. The Hamiltonian is
%
\begin{eqnarray}
H & = & \varepsilon_{h} \sum_{m} h^{\dagger}_{m} h_{m} +
\frac{1}{2} g_{e}\mu_{B} B \sum_{m} (
e^{\dagger}_{m\,\uparrow} e_{m\,\uparrow} -
e^{\dagger}_{m\,\downarrow} e_{m\,\downarrow} )
\nonumber \\ & & \mbox{} +
\frac{1}{2} \sum_{\sigma \sigma'} \sum_{m m' m'' m'''}
V^{ee}_{m m' m'' m'''} e^{\dagger}_{m\,\sigma}
e^{\dagger}_{m'\,\sigma'} e_{m''\,\sigma'} e_{m'''\,\sigma}
\nonumber \\ & & \mbox{} +
\sum_{\sigma} \sum_{m m' m'' m'''}
V^{eh}_{m m' m'' m'''} e^{\dagger}_{m\,\sigma}
h^{\dagger}_{m'} h_{m''} e_{m'''\,\sigma} .
\end{eqnarray}
%
Here $e^{\dagger}_{m\,\sigma}$ creates an electron with
spin $\sigma$ ($\sigma = \;\uparrow$ or $\downarrow$) in the
state $\phi_{m}({\bf r}) = (2^{m+1} \pi\, m!)^{-1/2}
r^{m} e^{-i m \phi} e^{-r^{2}/4}$ ($\ell = 1$),
and $h^{\dagger}_{m}$ creates a hole in the state
$\phi^{*}_{m}({\bf r})$. The energy of the hole
($\varepsilon_{h}$) is measured relative to the position of the
Fermi level at $\nu = 1$. A uniform neutralizing background
is added to the Hamiltonian in the usual way.
The ground state of $H$ at $\nu = 1$ is the fully polarized
state $|0\rangle = \prod_{m=0}^{\infty} e^{\dagger}_{m \uparrow}
|{\rm vac} \rangle$, where $|{\rm vac}\rangle$ is the empty conduction
band. The positive background ensures that the state $|0\rangle$ is
electrically neutral. The initial states probed by a PL
experiment at $\nu = 1$ lie in the sector of the Hilbert space
with $n_{h} = 1$ and $n_{\downarrow}-n_{\uparrow} = 1$.
Here $n_{h}$ is the number of holes in the valence band, and
$n_{\downarrow}$ and $n_{\uparrow}$ are the number of spin down
electrons and spin up holes in the conduction band, respectively.
The initial states have one hole in the valence band, and a
negatively charged excitation in the conduction band. For a
magnetoexciton the negatively charged excitation is a spin down
electron. For a Skyrmionic exciton the negatively charged excitation
is a Skyrmion.
A magnetoexciton has the generalized
total momentum ${\bf P}$ as a good quantum number \cite{Gorkov}.
In general, conserved quantum numbers arise
from the invariance of the system under a group of
symmetry operations. The symmetry group associated with
${\bf P}$ is the magnetic translation group \cite{Zak}.
Magnetic translations differ from ordinary translations by
a gauge transformation, which compensates for the shift in the
argument of the vector potential due to the translation. Unlike
ordinary translations, magnetic translations do not commute
when acting on charged excitations such as $e^{\dagger}_{m \sigma}$
and $h^{\dagger}_{m}$. Hence ${\bf P}$ is not a good
quantum number for a charged particle in a magnetic field.
However, magnetic translations {\em do} commute when acting on
neutral excitations such as $e^{\dagger}_{m\,\sigma}h^{\dagger}_{m'}$
and $e^{\dagger}_{m\,\downarrow}e_{m'\,\uparrow}$.
The initial states can therefore be chosen as eigenstates of ${\bf P}$.
In the Hartree-Fock approximation, the wave function for a
Skyrmion and a hole localized at the origin is given by \cite{Fertig}
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:state_1}
a^{\dagger}|0\rangle = \prod_{m=0}^{M-1} (-u_{m}
e^{\dagger}_{m+1\,\downarrow} e_{m\,\uparrow} + v_{m})
e^{\dagger}_{0\,\downarrow} h^{\dagger}_{0} |0\rangle .
\end{equation}
%
A variational wave function for a Skyrmionic exciton of
generalized momentum ${\bf P}$ is constructed according to
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:state_2}
a^{\dagger}({\bf P})|0\rangle =
\int d^{2} {\bf R}\,e^{i {\bf P} \cdot {\bf R}}
a^{\dagger}({\bf R}) |0\rangle ,
\end{equation}
%
with
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:state_3}
a^{\dagger}({\bf R}) = M_{\bf R} a^{\dagger}M^{\dagger}_{\bf R} ,
\end{equation}
%
where $M_{\bf R}$ is the magnetic translation operator. This
construction is analogous to the tight-binding method for
constructing extended Bloch states from localized atomic orbitals.
Since $M_{\bf R} M_{\bf R'} = M_{\bf R+R'}$ when acting on neutral
excitations,
%
\begin{equation}
M_{\bf R} a^{\dagger}({\bf P}) M^{\dagger}_{\bf R} =
e^{-i {\bf P} \cdot {\bf R}} a^{\dagger}({\bf P}) .
\end{equation}
%
This shows $a^{\dagger}({\bf P})|0\rangle$ is a state with a
definite value of ${\bf P}$. The quantum number ${\bf P}$ labels the
irreducible representations of the magnetic translation group within
the sector of the Hilbert space containing the initial states.
Because $M_{\bf R}$ commutes with $H$, the states $a^{\dagger}
({\bf P})|0\rangle$ are orthogonal and uncoupled by $H$. The
energy of the Skyrmionic exciton may therefore be obtained by
minimizing the expectation value of $H$ in the state $a^{\dagger}
({\bf P})|0\rangle$. The values of $u_{m}$ and $v_{m}$ that
minimize the energy will depend on ${\bf P}$. For $u_{m} = 0$ and
$v_{m} = 1$ we recover the wave function for a magnetoexciton
in the lowest Landau level \cite{Lerner}.
Using a variational wave function with $M = 14$ parameters, we have
minimized the energy of the state $a^\dagger({\bf P}=0)|0\rangle$,
for various values of the separation $d$ between the electron and
hole planes. Our results are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:one}.
Figure~\ref{fig:one}(a) shows the difference in
energy between the Skyrmionic exciton and the ordinary magnetoexciton.
Figure~\ref{fig:one}(b) shows the corresponding difference in spin.
The size of the Skyrmionic exciton (i.e.\ the number of spin flips)
and its energy are controlled by three competing effects: the
electron-electron exchange interaction, the Zeeman energy, and the
electron-hole interaction. Just as for a localized Skyrmion \cite{Fertig},
the exchange interaction favours a large number of spin flips whilst the
Zeeman energy opposes this. The hole interacts with the
charge distribution of the Skyrmion, which becomes more diffuse as the
Skyrmion size increases. The electron-hole interaction favours a
strongly peaked charge distribution and as such moving the hole towards
the electron plane should decrease the number of spin flips.
The three-way competition is manifest in Figure \ref{fig:one}.
As the Zeeman energy is lowered, the Skyrmionic exciton becomes larger
in size and increasingly lower in energy than the magnetoexciton. When
the hole is moved towards the electron plane (decreasing $d$) the size
of the Skyrmionic exciton drops and its energy moves closer to that of
the magnetoexciton. A similar reduction in the size of the Skyrmion
due to its interaction with a charged particle has been found for
a Skyrmion bound to a localized valence hole \cite{Portengen} and
for a Skyrmion bound to a charged impurity \cite{Brey}.
For any given separation $d$ there is a threshold
to Skyrmionic exciton formation. When the hole is far removed from
the electron plane ($d = \infty$) the Skyrmionic exciton forms below
$g = 0.025$. As the hole moves towards the electron plane the threshold
drops to lower $g$. For the case of $d < \ell$ there is no Skyrmionic
exciton formation. This means that magnetoexciton states are the
appropriate initial states for systems in which the hole is close the
electron plane \cite{Cooper}. However for systems in which $d > \ell$
the ${\bf P} = 0$ magnetoexciton is {\em not} the lowest
energy state, this now being the ${\bf P} = 0$ Skyrmionic exciton.
As an example consider a high-mobility GaAs/Ga$_{1-x}$Al$_{x}$As
one-side doped quantum well, with an electron density of $n_{s} =
10^{11}$ ${\rm cm}^{-2}$ and a well width of $400$ \AA.\@ For this density,
the magnetic length at $\nu = 1$ is $\ell = 126$ \AA.\@ Based on our
calculations we expect that Skyrmionic excitons have a
lower energy than magnetoexcitons in such quantum wells.
The qualitative behaviour of the ${\bf P} = 0$ Skyrmionic exciton
is unaffected by the number of variational parameters, $M$; more
parameters simply scale the results to larger numbers of spin flips
and a correspondingly larger energy difference. The maximum number
of parameters we can use for the ${\bf P} = 0$ state is $M = 14$ to
yield a tractable computing problem. We believe that this yields all
the qualitative physical features of the Skyrmionic exciton. For a
given number of variational parameters (fixed $M$) we find that the
energy and spin differences for the ${\bf P} = 0$ state are always
larger than for the localized state studied in Ref.~\onlinecite{Portengen}.
By comparison with our earlier calculations for the localized state
using $M = 60$ parameters we therefore expect Skyrmionic excitons
with at least $3$ spin flips in a $400$ \mbox{\AA} wide quantum well
with $n_{s} = 10^{11}$ ${\rm cm}^{-2}$.
We now compare the optical recombination spectrum of the
Skyrmionic exciton with the recombination spectrum of a
magnetoexciton against a filled $\nu = 1$ background.
The selection rules require the conservation of ${\bf P}$,
and a change in the $z$
component of the total angular momentum by $+1$ ($-1$) unit
for a RCP (LCP) transition. At temperature $T = 0$ the initial
state prior to recombination is the state with the lowest
energy in the sector of initial states, i.e.\ the
${\bf P} = 0$ Skyrmionic exciton. The selection rules
give a final state containing $|S_{z} \pm \frac{1}{2}|$
spin waves with generalized total momentum ${\bf P} = 0$. For a
magnetoexciton ($S_{z} = -\frac{1}{2}$), the final state
contains no spin waves in the case of RCP,
and one spin wave in the case of LCP.\@ By
Larmor's theorem, the energy of a ${\bf P} = 0$
spin wave is $|g_{e}| \mu_{B} B$. Hence the
recombination spectrum of a magnetoexciton against a
$\nu = 1$ background consists, at $T = 0$ and in the
absence of disorder, of a sharp line in either polarization.
For a Skyrmionic exciton ($S_{z} < -\frac{1}{2}$) the final
state contains multiple spin waves. For $|S_{z} \pm \frac{1}{2}|
> 1$ there is a continuum of final states, with energies
between $|S_{z} \pm \frac{1}{2}| |g_{e}| \mu_{B}B$
(corresponding to all spin waves having ${\bf P} = 0$),
and $|S_{z} \pm \frac{1}{2}|
(|g_{e}|\mu_{B}B + \sqrt{\pi/2}\,e^{2}/\epsilon \ell)$
(corresponding to widely separated
spin down electrons and spin up holes \cite{Kallin}).
Hence the recombination spectrum
of a Skyrmionic exciton has an {\em intrinsic} width of
order $|S_{z} + \frac{1}{2}| \sqrt{\pi/2}\,e^{2}/\epsilon \ell$
in RCP, and of order $|S_{z} - \frac{1}{2}| \sqrt{\pi/2}\,
e^{2}/\epsilon \ell$ in LCP.\@ Since one more spin wave is
left after LCP recombination, the intrinsic width of the LCP
line exceeds that of the RCP line. A similar broadening of
the line shape due to the formation of a spin texture has
been predicted in the electromagnetic absorption spectrum of
a Skyrmion bound to a charged impurity \cite{Brey}. Whereas
an observation of the broadening of the absorption spectrum
would require the growth of specialized structures, the
broadening of the luminescence lines should be observable
in standard high-mobility quantum wells and heterojunctions.
An additional {\em extrinsic} broadening of the luminescence
lines is due to finite temperature and the presence of disorder.
The extrinsic broadening of the recombination spectrum of a
magnetoexciton also yields an LCP line whose width exceeds
that of the RCP line \cite{Cooper}, which can account for
the difference in line width observed in narrow quantum
wells \cite{Plentz}. In wide quantum wells both the extrinsic
and intrinsic mechanisms will contribute to the broadening
of the luminescence lines. The difference in line width between
the LCP and RCP lines should persist to low temperatures and
high mobilities in wide wells, where the intrinsic mechanism
dominates, but not in narrow wells, where only the extrinsic
mechanism operates.
The detailed PL spectrum is difficult to calculate owing
to the complicated final state after recombination of a
Skyrmionic exciton. However, the average PL energy can be
found directly from the initial state $|i\rangle$
using \cite{Apalkov}
%
\begin{equation}
\langle \omega \rangle =
\frac{\langle i|L^{\dagger}[L,H]|i\rangle}
{\langle i|L^{\dagger}L|i\rangle} ,
\end{equation}
%
where $L$ is the luminescence operator. Previously \cite{Portengen}
we calculated the average PL energy for a disordered system
using the initial state $|i\rangle = a^{\dagger}|0\rangle$.
We have repeated the calculation for a disorderless system using
the initial state $|i\rangle = a^{\dagger}({\bf P}=0)|0\rangle$.
As before, the $g$ dependence of the red shift of the LCP line
at $\nu = 1$ provides means to distinguish between the optical
recombination of a Skyrmionic exciton and the recombination
of a magnetoexciton against a filled $\nu = 1$ background.
For a Skyrmionic exciton the red shift increases with $g$,
while for a magnetoexciton the red shift is independent of
$g$. Using a wave function with $M = 14$ parameters, we
find the red shift increases by 0.03 $e^{2}/\epsilon \ell$
when $g$ varies from $0.025$ to $0.02$, with $d = 3 \ell$.
In practice, the $g$ factor may be varied by
tilting the magnetic field \cite{Schmeller} or by applying
hydrostatic pressure \cite{Maude}. In a tilted-field
experiment, the deformation of the hole $z$ wave function
by the parallel magnetic field ($B_{\parallel}$) leads
to an additional angle dependence of the luminescence
energy. The red shift remains unaffected by $B_{\parallel}$,
provided the hole confinement potential is the same on both
sides of $\nu = 1$. This is the case for an asymmetrically
doped quantum well \cite{Goldberg}. In a single heterojunction,
the hole is confined near the electron plane on the low-$B$
side of $\nu = 1$, but unconfined on the high-$B$ side.
The disparity in the confinement potential causes a decrease
of the red shift with tilting angle {\em opposing} the Skyrmion
signature. This problem may be overcome by applying a gate
voltage to the heterojunction, which confines the hole along
$z$ on both sides of $\nu = 1$.
Thus far our discussion has focused on the ${\bf P} = 0$ state,
which is the state that determines the PL spectrum at $T = 0$
in the absence of disorder. States with ${\bf P} \neq 0$ can
also be probed, for example using PL with a grating on the
sample, or by means of resonant light scattering.
In the remainder of the paper we derive two exact properties
of the ${\bf P} \neq 0$ Skyrmionic exciton: its electric dipole
moment and the asymptotic behaviour of the dispersion in the
high $|{\bf P}|$ limit. We also describe features of the dispersion
relation obtained from our variational state $a^{\dagger}({\bf P})
|0\rangle$.
The electric dipole moment of the Skyrmionic exciton is given by
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:dipole}
{\bf d} = \frac{c}{B^{2}} {\bf P} \times {\bf B} .
\end{equation}
%
Accordingly the electric dipole moment of the Skyrmionic exciton
is independent of its spin, and equal to the electric dipole
moment of an ordinary magnetoexciton \cite{Lerner}. This can be
shown explicitly for the state given by
Eqs.~(\ref{eq:state_1})--(\ref{eq:state_3}),
or more generally as follows. The Gor'kov momentum for a system
of $N$ charges in a magnetic field is given by
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:Gorkov}
\hat{\bf P} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} {\bf \Pi}_{i} + \frac{1}{c}
{\bf B} \times {\bf d} ,
\end{equation}
%
where ${\bf \Pi}_{i}=-i \nabla_{i}-\frac{q_{i}}{c}{\bf A}({\bf r}_{i})$,
and ${\bf d} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} q_{i} {\bf r}_{i}$ is the electric
dipole moment. We now take the expectation
value of Eq.~(\ref{eq:Gorkov}) in an eigenstate of $\hat{\bf P}$.
For a state in the lowest Landau level the expectation
value of $\sum_{i=1}^{N} {\bf \Pi}_{i}$ is equal to zero. Hence
${\bf P} = \frac{1}{c} {\bf B} \times {\bf d}$, where ${\bf P}$ is
the eigenvalue of $\hat{\bf P}$. Taking the cross product with
${\bf B}$ yields Eq.~(\ref{eq:dipole}).
Equation~(\ref{eq:dipole}) is a general property of a Skyrmionic
exciton in the lowest Landau level, which does not rely on the
specific form of the wave function in
Eqs.~(\ref{eq:state_1})--(\ref{eq:state_3}).
Using Eq.~(\ref{eq:dipole}) we can establish the exact
asymptotic form of the dispersion relation of the Skyrmionic exciton
in the high ${\bf P}$ limit. Suppose we were given the exact ground
state $s^{\dagger}_{0}|0\rangle$ and energy $\varepsilon_{SK}$ for a
Skyrmion localized at the origin. Exact Skyrmion eigenstates have
been found for a hard-core model Hamiltonian \cite{MacDonald}.
We now use the state $a^{\dagger}|0\rangle = s^{\dagger}_{0}
h^{\dagger}_{0}|0\rangle$ to construct the Skyrmionic exciton,
instead of Eq.~(\ref{eq:state_1}). The resulting state $a^{\dagger}
({\bf P})|0\rangle$ is an exact eigenstate of $H$ for $d = \infty$
with energy $\varepsilon_{h} + \varepsilon_{SK}$. If
$s^{\dagger}_{0}|0\rangle$ is within the lowest Landau level,
the dipole moment of $a^{\dagger}({\bf P})|0\rangle$ is given by
Eq.~(\ref{eq:dipole}). Because the Skyrmion has no {\em internal}
dipole moment in its ground state, the separation between the
Skyrmion and the hole in the state $a^{\dagger}({\bf P})|0\rangle$
is ${\bf r}_{0} = {\bf d}/e$. The electron-hole interaction breaks
the degeneracy of the states $a^{\dagger}({\bf P})|0\rangle$ with
respect to ${\bf P}$. For large $|{\bf P}|$ the energy shift is
$-e^{2}/(\epsilon |{\bf r}_{0}|)$. The exact asymptotic behaviour
of the dispersion law in the limit $|{\bf P}| \rightarrow \infty$
is therefore given by $\varepsilon_{h} + \varepsilon_{SK} - e^{2}/
(\epsilon |{\bf P}|\ell^{2})$.
We have obtained a dispersion law for the Skyrmionic exciton by
minimizing the energy of the state $a^{\dagger}({\bf P})|0\rangle$
with $M = 10$ parameters as a function of $|{\bf P}|$. The
dispersion is parabolic near ${\bf P} = 0$ with an effective
mass that differs by less than 7\% from the effective mass of
a magnetoexciton. The energy and spin differences between the
Skyrmionic exciton and the magnetoexciton become smaller as
$|{\bf P}|$ increases. While the variational state
$a^{\dagger}({\bf P})|0\rangle$ gives reliable
results for the dispersion at small ($< 1/\ell$) values of
$|{\bf P}|$, this state does not adequately describe the dispersion
at large ($ > 1/\ell$) values of $|{\bf P}|$. Above a certain
value of $|{\bf P}|$ the magnetoexciton becomes the lowest energy
state within the variational space, yielding a dispersion that
approaches
$\varepsilon_{h} + \frac{1}{2}|g_{e}|\mu_{B}B$ in the limit
$|{\bf P}| \rightarrow \infty$. However, from our previous
discussion we know that the exact dispersion must approach
$\varepsilon_{h} + \varepsilon_{SK}$. The incorrect behaviour
of the variational state $a^{\dagger}({\bf P})|0\rangle$ in
the high-$|{\bf P}|$ limit occurs because this state forces
the Skyrmion to develop an internal dipole moment as $|{\bf P}|$
increases. The internal dipole moment---which must be absent in
the exact state $a^{\dagger}({\bf P})|0\rangle$---prevents the
formation of a spin texture at high $|{\bf P}|$. Increasing the
number of parameters cannot suppress the internal dipole moment
and thus does not remedy the failure of our variational state
at high $|{\bf P}|$. The construction of a variational state that
{\em does} reproduce the correct asymptotic behaviour of the
dispersion in the high-$|{\bf P}|$ limit is left for future
research.
We thank Andrew Turberfield, Darren Leonard, Stuart Trugman and
Igor Lerner for helpful discussions. This work was supported by
EPSRC Grant No.\ GR/K 15619.
%
\begin{figure}
\caption{\label{fig:one}
Difference in (a) energy and (b) spin between a
${\bf P} = 0$ Skyrmionic exciton and a ${\bf P} = 0$
magnetoexciton. The energy difference
$\Delta E$ and spin difference $|\Delta S_{z}|$ are
plotted vs the reduced Zeeman energy $g =
\frac{1}{2}|g_{e}|\mu_{B}B/(e^{2}/\epsilon \ell)$,
for various values of the separation $d$ between
the electron and hole planes. The number of variational
parameters is $M = 14$.}
\end{figure}
%
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\bibitem{Lerner}
I. V. Lerner and Yu.\ E. Lozovik,
Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP {\bf 51}, 588 (1980).
\bibitem{Korolev}
For an overview, see
A. V. Korolev and M. A. Liberman,
Int.\ J. Mod.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 10}, 729 (1996).
\bibitem{Sondhi}
S. L. Sondhi, A. Karlhede, and S. A. Kivelson,
Phys.\ Rev.\ B, {\bf 47}, 16419 (1993).
\bibitem{Barrett}
S. E. Barrett, G. Dabbagh, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West,
and R. Tycko, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74}, 5112 (1995).
\bibitem{Schmeller}
A. Schmeller, J. P. Eisenstein, L. N. Pfeiffer, and
K. W. West, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 75}, 4290 (1995).
\bibitem{Aifer}
E. H. Aifer, B. B. Goldberg, and D. A. Broido,
Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 76}, 680 (1996).
\bibitem{Fertig}
H. A. Fertig, L. Brey, R. C\^{o}t\'{e}, and A. H. MacDonald,
Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 50}, 11018, (1994).
\bibitem{Goldberg}
B. B. Goldberg {\em et al.}
Surf.\ Sci.\ {\bf 263}, 9 (1992).
\bibitem{Turberfield}
A. J. Turberfield {\em et al}.,
Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 65}, 637 (1990).
\bibitem{Portengen}
T. Portengen, J. R. Chapman, V. Nikos Nicopoulos, and
N. F. Johnson, Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 55}, R7367 (1997).
\bibitem{Brey}
H. A. Fertig, L. Brey, R. C\^{o}t\'{e}, and A. H. MacDonald,
Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 77}, 1572 (1996).
\bibitem{Cooper}
N. R. Cooper and D. B. Chklovskii,
Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 55}, 2436 (1997).
\bibitem{Gorkov}
L. P. Gor'kov and I. E. Dzyaloshinski\u{\i},
Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP {\bf 26}, 449 (1968).
\bibitem{Zak}
J. Zak, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 134}, A1602 (1964).
\bibitem{Kallin}
C. Kallin and B. I. Halperin,
Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 30}, 5655 (1984).
\bibitem{Plentz}
F. Plentz {\em et al}., in {\em High Magnetic Fields
in the Physics of Semiconductors}, edited by D. Heiman
(World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), pp.\ 320--323.
\bibitem{Apalkov}
V. M. Apalkov and E. I. Rashba,
Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 46}, 1628 (1992).
\bibitem{Maude}
D. K. Maude {\em et al}., Phys.\ Status Solidi B
{\bf 198}, 259 (1996).
\bibitem{MacDonald}
A. H. MacDonald, H. A. Fertig, and L. Brey,
Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 76}, 2153 (1996).
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}