Hybrid mesons from anisotropic lattice QCD with the clover and improved gauge actions
Extracted source text ยท arXiv hep-lat/0209049
% Upper-case A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
% Lower-case a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z
% Digits 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
% Exclamation ! Double quote " Hash (number) #
% Dollar $ Percent % Ampersand &
% Acute accent ' Left paren ( Right paren )
% Asterisk * Plus + Comma ,
% Minus - Point . Solidus /
% Colon : Semicolon ; Less than <
% Equals = Greater than > Question mark ?
% At @ Left bracket [ Backslash \
% Right bracket ] Circumflex ^ Underscore _
% Grave accent ` Left brace { Vertical bar |
% Right brace } Tilde ~
%Publishers' ref.: NUPHBP / LATTICE2002
%Re: Proceedings of the XXt International Symposium on
%Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE 2002), MIT, Cambridge, MA,
%24-29 June 2002
%Lattice2002 (spectrum)
%Poster contribution to QCD Spectrum and Quark Masses session
%by Xiang-Qian Luo,
%"Hybrid mesons from anisotropic lattice QCD with the clover and improved gauge actions"
%%%%%%%%%% espcrc2.tex %%%%%%%%%%
%
% $Id: espcrc2.tex 1.2 2000/07/24 09:12:51 spepping Exp spepping $
%
\documentclass[fleqn,twoside]{article}
\usepackage{espcrc2}
% change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09
% \documentstyle[twoside,fleqn,espcrc2]{article}
% if you want to include PostScript figures
\usepackage{graphicx}
% if you have landscape tables
\usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
% put your own definitions here:
% \newcommand{\cZ}{\cal{Z}}
% \newtheorem{def}{Definition}[section]
% ...
\newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
\newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
% add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
\hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
% declarations for front matter
\title{Hybrid mesons from anisotropic lattice QCD with the clover and improved gauge actions}
\author{Xiang-Qian Luo\address[ZSU]{Department of Physics, Zhongshan (Sun Yat-Sen) University,
Guangzhou 510275, China}%
\thanks{Email: stslxq@zsu.edu.cn. Work supported by
National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars, National Science Foundation,
Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation,
Ministry of Education, and Foundation of Zhongshan Univ. Advanced Research Center.}
and Zhong-Hao Mei\addressmark
% and Eric B. Gregory\addressmark[ZSU]\address{Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA}
}
\begin{document}
\begin{abstract}
We study hybrid mesons from the clover and improved gauge actions at $\beta=2.6$ on the
anisotropic $12^3\times36$ lattice using our PC cluster. We estimate the mass of $1^{-+}$
light quark hybrid as well as the mass of the charmonium hybrid.
The improvement of both quark and gluonic actions, first applied to the hybrid mesons, is shown to be more
efficient in reducing the lattice spacing and finite volume errors.
\vspace{1pc}
\end{abstract}
% typeset front matter (including abstract)
\maketitle
\section{INTRODUCTION}
Lattice QCD is the ideal approach
not only for computing $\bar{q}q$ meson spectrum,
but also for hybrids and glueballs. However, the lattice technique
is not free of systematic errors.
The Wilson gauge and quark actions
suffer from significant lattice spacing errors,
which are smaller only at very large $\beta$,
and very large lattice volume is required to get rid of finite size effects.
There have been several quenched lattice calculations of hybrid meson masses,
part of them are listed in Tab.~\ref{tab6}.
In Ref.~\cite{Bernard:1997ib},
the Wilson gluon action and quark action were used.
In Refs.~\cite{Lacock:1996ny,McNeile:1998cp},
the authors used Wilson gauge action and SW improved quark action.
For the hybrid mesons containing heavy quarks ${\bar Q}Qg$,
the NRQCD action\cite{Manke:1998qc} and the LBO action\cite{Juge:1999ie}
have also been applied.
There is also a recent work using the improved KS quark action\cite{Gregory}.
In this work, we employ {\it both improved gluon and quark actions on
the anisotropic lattice}, which should have smaller systematic errors,
and should be more efficient in reducing
the lattice spacing and finite volume effects. We will present
data for the $1^{-+}$ hybrid mass
and the splitting between the $1^{-+}$ hybrid mass and the
spin averaged S-wave mass for charmonium. Details can be found
in Ref.~\cite{Mei:2002ip}.
\section{ACTIONS}
\label{secII}
The total lattice action is $S=S_g+S_q$.
The improved gluonic action $S_g$ is \cite{Morningstar:1997ff,Luo:1998dx}:
%
\begin{eqnarray}
S_g &=& -\beta {1 \over \xi} \sum_{x,j<k} \left( {5 \over 3} {P_{j,k} \over u_s^4}
-{1 \over 12} {R_{j,k} \over u_s^6} - {1 \over 12} {R_{k,j} \over u_s^6} \right)
\nonumber \\
&-& \beta \xi \sum_{x,j} \left( {4 \over 3} {P_{j,4} \over u_s^2}
- {1 \over 12} {R_{j,4} \over u_s^4} \right),
\label{S_g}
\end{eqnarray}
%
where $P$ stands for a $1\times 1$ plaquette and $R$ for a $2\times 1$ rectangle.
The SW improved action for quarks\cite{Klassen:1998fh,Okamoto:2001jb} is
%
\begin{eqnarray}
S_q &=& \sum_{x} {\bar \psi} (x)\psi(x)
\nonumber \\
&-& \kappa_t \sum_{x}
[\bar{\psi}(x) (1-\gamma_0)U_{4}(x)
\psi(x+\hat{4})
\nonumber \\
&+& {\bar \psi}(x)(1+\gamma_0)
U^{\dag}_{4}(x) \psi (x-\hat{4})]
\nonumber \\
&-& \kappa_s \sum_{x,j} [{\bar \psi}(x) (1-\gamma_j)U_{j}(x) \psi (x+\hat{j})
\nonumber \\
&+& {\bar \psi} (x) (1+\gamma_j)U^{\dag}_{j}(x-\hat{j})\psi(x-\hat{j})]
\nonumber \\
&+& i {\kappa}_s {C}_s^{TI} \sum_{x,j<k} {\bar \psi} (x)
\sigma_{jk}{\hat F_{jk}}(x)\psi (x)
\nonumber \\
&+& i \kappa_s C_t^{TI} \sum_{x,j}{\bar \psi} (x)
\sigma_{j4} {\hat F_{j4}} (x) \psi (x),
%
\label{S_q}
\end{eqnarray}
where ${\hat F}$ stands for the clover-leaf construction\cite{Luo:1996tx}
for the gauge field tensor.
Tadpole improvement is carried out so that the actions are more continuum-like.
\section{SIMULATIONS}
\label{secIV}
On our PC cluster\cite{Cluster,Luo:2002kr,Mei:2002fu},
the SU(3) pure gauge configurations were
generated with the gluon action in Eq. (\ref{S_g})
using Cabibbo-Marinari pseudo-heatbath algorithm. The configurations are decorrelated by
SU(2) sub-group over-relaxations. We calculated the
tadpole parameter $u_s$ self-consistently.
90 independent gauge configurations at $\beta=2.6$ and $\xi=3$ on the $12^3 \times 36$ lattice
were stored.
Although such an ensemble is not very big, it is bigger than earlier
simulations by UKQCD
and MILC collaborations\cite{Bernard:1997ib,Lacock:1996ny,McNeile:1998cp} on isotropic lattices.
The quark propagator was obtained by inverting the matrix $\Delta$
in $S_q=\sum_{x,y} {\bar \psi}(x) \Delta_{x,y} \psi (y)$ in Eq. (\ref{S_q})
by means of BICGStab algorithm. The residue is of $O(10^{-7})$.
We computed the correlation functions with
various sources and sinks\cite{Mei:2002ip}, at four values of the Wilson hopping parameter
($\kappa_t=0.4119$, 0.4199, 0.4279, 0.4359).
In Fig.~\ref{mprf1t.eps}, we plot the effective masses for the $\pi$, $\rho$,
$f_1$ ordinary mesons and
$1^{-+}$ exotic meson at $\kappa_t=0.4359$.
For the ordinary mesons, we used the their corresponding operator
as both source and sink. For the exotic meson, we tried two different cases:
(1) the $1^{-+}$ operator as both source and sink;
(2) the $q^4$ source and $1^{-+}$ sink, which give consistent results within error bars.
The CP-PACS, MILC and UKQCD collaborations
used the unimproved Wilson gauge action to generate configurations.
They had to work on very large $\beta (> 6$), corresponding to very small $a_s (<$ 0.1~fm), to get rid of the
finite spacing errors.
They had also to use very large lattices $L^3 \ge 20^3$, to avoid strong lattice size effects at such small $a_s$.
In comparison, our lattices are much coarser ($a_s=0.33$~fm), and the number of lattice sites is much smaller.
Our finite size effects could be ignored, for the physical size of the spatial lattice is
$12^3 a_s^3=(3.96~{\rm fm})^3$
and should be big enough.
Our results for the effective mass indicate the existence of a much wider
plateau than in the previous work on isotropic lattices.
\section{RESULTS}
\label{secV}
By extrapolating the effective mass of the $1^{-+}$ hybrid meson to the chiral limit,
and using $a_t$ determined from the $\rho$ mass, we get $2013 \pm 26 \pm 71$ MeV.
In Tab.~\ref{tab6}, we compare the results from various lattice methods.
Our result is consistent with the MILC data\cite{Bernard:1997ib},
obtained using the Wilson gluon action and clover quark action
on much larger isotropic lattices and much smaller $a_s$.
We also show our results in Tab.~\ref{tab6} for the $1^{-+}$ hybrid meson mass in the charm quark sector,
using the method discussed in Refs.~\cite{Bernard:1997ib,McNeile:1998cp}.
Our corresponding $\kappa_t^{\rm charm}=0.1806(5)(18)$
is obtained by tuning $(m_{\pi}(\kappa_t \to \kappa_t^{\rm charm})+3m_{\rho} (\kappa_t \to \kappa_t^{\rm charm}))/4
=(m_{\eta_c}+3m_{J/\psi})/4$=3067.6 MeV,
where on the right hand side, the experimental inputs $m_{\eta_c}= 2979.8$ MeV and $m_{J/\psi}=3096.9$ MeV are used.
The $1^{-+}$ hybrid meson mass at our
$1/\kappa_t^{\rm charm}$ is $m_{1^{-+}}= 4369 \pm 37 \pm 99$ MeV,
is consistent with the MILC data\cite{Bernard:1997ib}.
The splitting between the hybrid meson mass and the spin
averaged S-wave mass [$m_{1^{-+}}-(m_{\eta_c}+3m_{J/\psi})/4$], at our $\kappa_t^{\rm charm}$ is
$1302 \pm 37 \pm 99$ MeV, consistent with the CP-PACS data, obtained using the Wilson gluon action and NRQCD quark action
on much larger anisotropic lattices and much smaller $a_s$.
As a byproduct, we give the $f_1$ P-wave $1^{++}$ meson in the chiral limit,
as well as their experimental values\cite{Groom:in}.
If we assume that the pion is massive and $f_1(1420)$ is made of ${\bar s}s$,
the $f_1$ P-wave $1^{++}$ meson mass would be $1499 \pm 28 \pm 65$ MeV.
\section{SUMMARY}
To summarize, we have used the tadpole-improved gluon action and clover action to compute the
hybrid meson masses on much coarser anisotropic lattices.
The main results are given in Tab.~\ref{tab6} and
compared with other lattice approaches.
In our opinion,
our approach is more efficient in reducing systematic errors due to finite lattice spacing.
We would like to thank some CP-PACS, MILC and UKQCD members for useful discussions.
%
\begin{table*}[htb]
% \begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ccc}\hline
Light $1^{-+} {\bar q}qg$ (GeV) & Method & Ref. \\ \hline
1.97(9)(30) & Isotropic $S_g({\rm W})+S_q({\rm W})$ & MILC97\cite{Bernard:1997ib} \\
1.87(20) & Isotropic $S_g^{\rm TI}({\rm W})+S_q^{\rm TI}({\rm SW})$ &UKQCD97\cite{Lacock:1996ny} \\
2.11(10) & Isotropic $S_g^{\rm TI}({\rm W})+S_q^{\rm TI}({\rm SW})$ & MILC99\cite{McNeile:1998cp} \\
2.013(26)(71) & Anisotropic $S_g^{\rm TI}(1\times 1+ 2\times 1)+S_q^{\rm TI}({\rm SW})$ & {\bf ZSU (this work)} \\ \hline \hline
$1^{-+} {\bar q}qg$ (GeV) & Method & Ref. \\ \hline
4.390 (80) (200) & Isotropic $S_g({\rm W})+S_q({\rm W})$ & MILC97\cite{Bernard:1997ib} \\
4.369 (37) (99) & Anisotropic $S_g^{\rm TI}(1\times 1+ 2\times 1)+S_q^{\rm TI}({\rm SW})$ & {\bf ZSU (this work)} \\ \hline \hline
$1^{-+} {\bar c}cg$ -1S ${\bar c}c$ splitting (GeV) & Method & Ref. \\ \hline
1.34(8)(20)& Isotropic $S_g({\rm W})+S_q({\rm W})$ & MILC97\cite{Bernard:1997ib} \\
1.22(15) & Isotropic $S_g^{\rm TI}({\rm W})+S_q^{\rm TI}({\rm SW})$ & MILC99\cite{McNeile:1998cp} \\
1.323(13) & Anisotropic $S_g^{\rm TI}({\rm W})+S_q^{\rm TI}({\rm NRQCD})$ & CP-PACS99\cite{Manke:1998qc}\\
1.19 & Isotropic $S_g^{\rm TI}(1\times 1+ 2\times 1)+S_q^{\rm TI}({\rm LBO})$ & JKM99\cite{Juge:1999ie}\\
1.302(37)(99) & Anisotropic $S_g^{\rm TI}(1\times 1+ 2\times 1)+S_q^{\rm TI}({\rm SW})$ & {\bf ZSU (this work)} \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
% \end{center}
\caption{\label{tab6} Predictions for the masses of hybrid mesons.
Abbreviations: W for Wilson, $1\times 1+ 2\times 1$ for
the plaquette terms plus the rectangle terms,
SW for Sheikholeslami-Wohlert (Clover),
TI for tadpole-improved, NRQCD for non-relativistic QCD, and LBO for leading Born-Oppenheimer.}
\end{table*}
%
\begin{figure}[htb]
%\begin{center}
\rotatebox{270}{\includegraphics[width=55mm]{mprf1t.eps}}
%\end{center}
\vspace{-1cm}
\caption{\label{mprf1t.eps}
Effective masses for the $\pi$ (triangle down), $\rho$ (circles), $f_1$ P-wave (square) mesons
and $1^{-+}$ exotic meson (the diamond for $1^{-+}$ source and the triangle
up for the $q^4$ source).
}
\end{figure}
\begin{thebibliography}{9}
\bibitem{Bernard:1997ib}
C.~Bernard {\it et al.},
%``Exotic mesons in quenched lattice QCD,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D56} (1997) 7039.
%%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9707008;%%
\bibitem{Lacock:1996ny}
P.~Lacock, C.~Michael, P.~Boyle and P.~Rowland,
%``Hybrid mesons from quenched QCD,''
Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B401} (1997) 308.
%%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9611011;%%
\bibitem{McNeile:1998cp}
C. Bernard {\it et al.},
%``Exotic meson spectroscopy from the clover action at beta = 5.85 and 6.15,''
Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B(Proc. Suppl.)73} (1999) 264.
%%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9809087;%%
\bibitem{Manke:1998qc}
T. Manke {\it et al.},
%``Hybrid quarkonia on asymmetric lattices,''
Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 82}(1999) 4396.
%%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9812017;%%
\bibitem{Juge:1999ie}
K.~Juge, J.~Kuti and C.~Morningstar,
%``Ab initio study of hybrid anti-b g b mesons,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 82} (1999) 4400.
%%CITATION = HEP-PH 9902336;%%
\bibitem{Gregory}
C. Bernard, {\it et al.}, (MILC Collaboration), these proceedings.
\bibitem{Mei:2002ip}
Z.~H.~Mei and X.~Q.~Luo,
%``Exotic mesons from quantum chromodynamics with improved gluon and quark actions on the anisotropic lattice,''
hep-lat/0206012.
%%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0206012;%%
\bibitem{Morningstar:1997ff}
C.~Morningstar and M.~Peardon,
%``Efficient glueball simulations on anisotropic lattices,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D56} (1997) 4043;
%%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9704011;%%
\bibitem{Luo:1998dx}
X.~Q.~Luo, S.~Guo, H.~Kroger and D.~Schutte,
%``Improved lattice gauge field Hamiltonian,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D59} (1999) 034503.
%%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9804029;%%
\bibitem{Klassen:1998fh}
T.~Klassen,
%``Non-perturbative improvement of the anisotropic Wilson QCD action,''
Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B(Proc.\ Suppl.)73} (1999) 918.
%%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9809174;%%
\bibitem{Okamoto:2001jb}
M.~Okamoto {\it et al.},
%``Charmonium spectrum from quenched anisotropic lattice QCD,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D65} (2002) 094508.
%%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0112020;%%
\bibitem{Luo:1996tx}
X.~Q.~Luo,
%``Molecular dynamics for full QCD simulations with an improved action,''
Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 94} (1996) 119.
%%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9603021;%%
\bibitem{Cluster}
X.Q.~Luo,
E. Gregory, J. Yang, Y. Wang, D. Chang and Y. Lin,
%``Parallel computing for QCD on a pentium cluster,''
hep-lat/0011090;
%``Parallel supercomputing Pentium cluster and performance test in lattice QCD,''
hep-lat/0107017.
%%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0107017;%%
\bibitem{Luo:2002kr}
X.Q.~Luo,
E. Gregory, H. Xi, J. Yang, Y. Wang, D. Chang and Y. Lin,
%``High performance Beowulf computer for lattice QCD,''
Nucl. Phys. {\bf B(Proc. Suppl.)106} (2002) 1046;
%%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0202007;%%
\bibitem{Mei:2002fu}
Z.~H.~Mei, X.~Q.~Luo and E.~B.~Gregory,
%``Light hadron masses in QCD with valence Wilson quarks at beta = 6.25 from a parallel PC cluster,''
Chin.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf 19} (2002) 636.
%%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0202012;%%
\bibitem{Groom:in}
D.~Groom {\it et al.},
%``Review Of Particle Physics,''
Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ {\bf C15} (2000) 1.
%%CITATION = EPHJA,C15,1;%%
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}