Possible Test of the GUT Relation between $M_1$ and $M_2$ in Electron-Photon Scattering
Extracted source text ยท arXiv hep-ph/0001034
\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
\usepackage{a4}
\usepackage{graphics}
\renewcommand{\textfraction}{0}
\renewcommand{\topfraction}{1}
\renewcommand{\floatpagefraction}{0.8}
\setlength{\parindent}{1.5em}
\setlength{\parskip}{0.5ex plus 0.5ex minus 0.2ex}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
\setlength{\textwidth}{15.0cm}
\setlength{\textheight}{23.5cm}
\setcounter{secnumdepth}{5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{5}
\begin{document}
\begin{center}
{\Large \bf Possible Test of the GUT Relation between $M_1$ and $M_2$ in Electron-Photon Scattering}
\end{center}
\vspace{0.5cm}
\begin{center}
{\large \sf Claus Bl\"ochinger\footnote{e-mail: bloechi@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de}, Hans Fraas\footnote{e-mail: fraas@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de}}
\end{center}
\begin{center}
{\small \it Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, Universit\"at W\"urzburg, Am
Hubland, \\
D-97074 W\"urzburg, Germany}
\end{center}
\begin{abstract}
We investigate associated production of selectrons and the lightest
neutralino (LSP) in the process
$e^-\gamma \longrightarrow \tilde{\chi}_1^0\tilde{e}_{L/R}^-$ with
the selectron subsequently decaying into an electron and the LSP.
Total cross sections and various polarization asymmetries are calculated for
photons produced by Compton back\-scattering of a polarized laser beam at an
$e^+e^-$ linear collider with CMS energy $\sqrt{s_{ee}}=500$ GeV and with
polarized beams. The total cross section and in particular the polarization
asymmetries show a characteristic dependence on the gaugino mass parameter
$M_1$. Therefore this process is suitable for testing the GUT relation
$M_1=M_2\cdot\frac{5}{3}\tan^2\theta_W $.
\end{abstract}
\section{Introduction}
The search for supersymmetry (SUSY) \cite{susy} is one of the most important
goals of a future
$e^+e^-$ linear collider (LC) in the energy range between 500 GeV and 1000 GeV \cite{LC}. In addition to the $e^+e^-$ option the
$e^-\gamma$ mode is also technically realizable with high luminosity polarized photon
beams obtained by backscattering of intensive laser pulses off the electron beam \cite{PLCX,PLCY,PLC1}. Associated production of selectrons with the
lightest neutralino $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$
(assumed to be the LSP) in $e^-\gamma$ collisions allows to probe
heavy selectrons beyond the kinematical limit of selectron pair production in
$e^+e^-$ annihilation. Further
associated production of selectrons and gaugino-like neutralinos provides us with the
possibility to study the
electron-selectron-neutralino couplings complementary to $e^+e^-$ annihilation.
In the present paper we study the associated production $e^-\gamma \longrightarrow \tilde{\chi}_1^0 \tilde{e}_{L/R}^-$ with polarized beams and the subsequent direct
leptonic decay $\tilde{e}_{L/R}^-\longrightarrow
\tilde{\chi}_1^0e^-$. The beam polarization is chosen suitably to optimize cross
sections and polarization asymmetries. The signal is a single electron with high
transverse
momentum $p_T$. We do not consider cascade decays of heavy selectrons, which
may yield a similar single electron signal with, however, a less pronounced
$p_T$ \cite{PLC1}. We also refrain from a discussion of the background.
The calculations are done in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model \linebreak[4](MSSM). The masses and couplings of the neutralinos depend
on the gaugino mass parameters $M_1$ and $M_2$, the higgsino mass parameter $\mu$ and the ratio $\tan\beta$ of the two Higgs vacuum expectation values.
The parameters $M_2$, $\mu$ and $\tan\beta$ can in principle be determined by
chargino production alone \cite{otherM1}.
For the gaugino mass
parameters usually the GUT relation $M_1=M_2\cdot\frac{5}{3}\tan^2\theta_W$ is
assumed.
A precise determination of $M_1$ is, however, only possible in the neutralino
sector \cite{neutrsec}.
In the present paper we investigate if associated production of selectrons and the LSP $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ is suitable as a test for this relation. We therefore study the influence of the gaugino mass
parameter $M_1$ on the total cross section and on polarization asymmetries for different selectron masses.
\section{Cross Sections and Polarization Asymmetries}
The production cross section $\sigma_P^{L/R}\left(s_{e\gamma}\right)$ for the
process
$e^-\gamma \longrightarrow \tilde{\chi}_1^0\tilde{e}_{L/R}^-$ proceeds via electron
exchange in the
s-channel and
selectron exchange in the t-channel.
The electron-selectron-LSP
couplings
\begin{equation}\label{coupl}
f_{e1}^L=-\sqrt{2}\left[\frac{1}{\cos\theta_W}\left(-\frac{1}{2}+\sin^2\theta_W\right)N_{12}-\sin\theta_WN_{11}\right],
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{coupr}
f_{e1}^R=\sqrt{2}\sin\theta_W\left[\tan\theta_WN_{12}^*-N_{11}^*\right]
\end{equation}
for left and right selectrons with masses $m_{\tilde{e}_L}$ and
$m_{\tilde{e}_R}$ depend on the photino component
$N_{11}$ and the zino component $N_{12}$ of the LSP \cite{susy}.
For an electron beam with longitudinal polarization $P_e$ the cross sections
$\sigma_P^L$ and $\sigma_P^R$ are proportional to $\left(1-P_e\right)$ and
$\left(1+P_e\right)$, respectively.
For special cases the cross sections are given in \cite{PLC1} and \cite{Grifhols}, the
complete analytical expressions for the differential and the total cross section for
polarized beams
will be given in a forthcoming paper \cite{forthcoming}.
In the narrow width approximation one obtains the total cross section
$\sigma_{e\gamma}^{L/R}$ for the combined process of $\tilde{e}_{L/R}^-$$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ production and the subsequent leptonic decay $\tilde{e}_{L/R}^-\longrightarrow e^-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ by multiplying the production cross section with the leptonic branching ratio:
\begin{equation}
\sigma_{e\gamma}^{L/R}\left(s_{e\gamma}\right) =
\sigma_P^{L/R}\left(s_{e\gamma}\right) \cdot {\rm Br}\left(\tilde{e}_{L/R}^-\longrightarrow e^-\tilde{\chi}_1^0 \right).
\end{equation}
The LSP-selectron-electron coupling $f_{e1}^{L/R}$
appears in the production amplitudes as well as in the decay amplitude, so
that the total cross section $\sigma_{e\gamma}^{L/R}\left(s_{e\gamma}\right)$ is proportional to $\left(f_{e1}^{L/R}\right)^4$.
The photon beam is assumed to be produced by Compton backscattering of circularly polarized laser photons (polarization $\lambda_L$) off longitudinally polarized electrons (polarization $\lambda_e$). The energy spectrum $P\left(y\right)$ and the mean helicity $\lambda\left(y\right)$ of the high energy
photons are given in \cite{PLCY,PLC1,energyspectrum}. The
ratio $y=E_{\gamma}/E_e$ of the photon energy $E_{\gamma}$ and the energy of the
converted electron beam $E_e$ is confined to $y\stackrel{\textstyle<}{\sim} 0.83$
\cite{PLCX}.
For $y>0.83$ $e^+e^-$ pairs can be produced via scattering of laser photons and
backscattered photons, so that the flux of high energetic photons drops considerably.
To obtain the total cross section
$\sigma_{ee}^{L/R}\left(s_{ee},P_e,\lambda_e,\lambda_L\right)$ for the combined process in the laboratory frame ($e^+e^-$ CMS) one has to convolute the total cross section $\sigma_{e\gamma}^{L/R}\left(s_{e\gamma}\right)$ in the $e\gamma$ CMS
with the energy distribution $P\left(y\right)$ and the mean helicity $\lambda\left(y\right)$ of the backscattered photon beam \cite{stefan}:
\begin{equation}
\sigma_{ee}^{L/R} = \int dy P\left(y\right)\hat{\sigma}_{e\gamma}^{L/R}\left(s_{e\gamma}=ys_{ee}\right),
\end{equation}
\begin{eqnarray} \label{sigmahat}
\hat{\sigma}_{e\gamma}^{L/R} & = & \frac{1}{2}\left(1+\lambda\left(y\right)\right)\left(\sigma_{e\gamma}^{L/R}\right)^++\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\lambda\left(y\right)\right)\left(\sigma_{e\gamma}^{L/R}\right)^-\nonumber\\
& = & \sigma_{e\gamma}^{L/R}\left(1+\lambda\left(y\right) A_c^{L/R}\right).
\end{eqnarray}
In eq. (\ref{sigmahat}) $\left(\sigma_{e\gamma}^{L/R}\right)^{+/-}$ are the total
cross sections for a completely right (left) circular polarized photon beam
whereas $\sigma_{e\gamma}^{L/R}$ is the cross section for unpolarized photons.
\begin{equation}
A_c^{L/R}=\frac{\left(\sigma_{e\gamma}^{L/R}\right)^+-\left(\sigma_{e\gamma}^{L/R}\right)^-}{\left(\sigma_{e\gamma}^{L/R}\right)^++\left(\sigma_{e\gamma}^{L/R}\right)^-}
\end{equation}
is the polarization asymmetry for circular polarized photons.
Since the production and decay of right and left selectrons lead to
the same final state we add both cross sections and obtain
\begin{equation}
\sigma_{ee}=\sigma_{ee}^L+\sigma_{ee}^R.
\end{equation}
We consider two types of polarization asymmetries of the convoluted
cross section. For the first one we flip the electron polarization
$P_e$ and fix the polarization $\lambda_L$ of the laser beam and the polarization $\lambda_e$ of the converted electron beam:
\begin{equation}\label{Ae}
A_{P_e}=\frac{\sigma_{ee}\left(s_{ee},P_e,\lambda_e,\lambda_L\right)-\sigma_{ee}\left(s_{ee},-P_e,\lambda_e,\lambda_L\right)}{\sigma_{ee}\left(s_{ee},P_e,\lambda_e,\lambda_L\right)+\sigma_{ee}\left(s_{ee},-P_e,\lambda_e,\lambda_L\right)}.
\end{equation}
If we split off from $\sigma_{ee}^{L/R}$ the dependence of beam polarization
$\left(1\mp P_e\right)$
\begin{equation}
\sigma_{ee}\left(s_{ee},P_e,\lambda_e,\lambda_L
\right)=\left(1-P_e\right)\tilde{\sigma}_{ee}^L+\left(1+P_e\right)\tilde{\sigma}_{ee}^R,
\end{equation}
we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{Ae2}
A_{P_e}=P_e\cdot\frac{\tilde{\sigma}_{ee}^R-\tilde{\sigma}_{ee}^L}{\tilde{\sigma}_{ee}^R+\tilde{\sigma}_{ee}^L}.
\end{equation}
Here $\tilde{\sigma}_{ee}^R$ ($\tilde{\sigma}_{ee}^L$) is the cross section for production of right (left) selectrons with an unpolarized electron beam ($P_e=0$)
and their subsequent leptonic decay.
As a second asymmetry we discuss that with respect to the polarization $\lambda_L$ of the laser beam:
\begin{equation}\label{AL}
A_{\lambda_L}=\frac{\sigma_{ee}\left(s_{ee},P_e,\lambda_e,\lambda_L\right)-\sigma_{ee}\left(s_{ee},P_e,\lambda_e,-\lambda_L\right)}{\sigma_{ee}\left(s_{ee},P_e,\lambda_e,\lambda_L\right)+\sigma_{ee}\left(s_{ee},P_e,\lambda_e,-\lambda_L\right)}.
\end{equation}
\section{Numerical Results}
In the following numerical analysis we study the total cross section
$\sigma^{(L/R)}_{ee}$ and the
polarization asymmetries $A_{P_e}$ and $A_{\lambda_L}$ for $\sqrt{s_{ee}}=500$
GeV. For the MSSM para\-meters we choose
$M_2=152$ GeV, $\mu=316$ GeV, $\tan\beta=3$ with $M_1$ varying between
$M_1=40$ GeV and $M_1=300$ GeV. The region $M_1<40$ GeV is excluded by assuming
a lower limit of 35 GeV for the LSP mass $m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^0}$. In the figures the
excluded region is shaded.
For $M_1=78.7$ GeV this corresponds to the
DESY/ECFA reference scenario for the Linear Collider \cite{szen1}, which
implies the GUT relation $M_1=M_2\cdot\frac{5}{3}\tan^2\theta_W$.
\begin{figure}[htb]
\label{cross-section}
\centering
\begin{picture}(14,10.5)
%\put(0,0){\framebox(14,10){}}
\put(-1.4,1.9){\special{psfile=masseneutralino1varM1.ps hscale=40 vscale=40}}
\put(5.9,5.25){{\tiny $M_1$/GeV}}
\put(-0.4,9.9){{\tiny $m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^0}$/GeV}}
\put(2.5,5.2){{\tiny (a)}}
\put(6.0,1.9){\special{psfile=n11n12varM1.ps hscale=40 vscale=40}}
\put(13.3,7.8){{\tiny $M_1$/GeV}}
\put(7.0,9.7){{\tiny $N_{11}$,$N_{12}$}}
\put(9.9,5.2){{\tiny (b)}}
\put(2.3,-3.3){\special{psfile=f1LRhoch4.ps hscale=40 vscale=40}}
\put(9.7,0.05){{\tiny $M_1$/GeV}}
\put(3.3,4.55){{\tiny $\left(f_1^{L/R}\right)^4$}}
\put(6.7,4.0){{\tiny $M_1=78.7$ GeV}}
\put(6.6,4.1){\vector(-1,0){1}}
\put(6.2,0.0){{\tiny (c)}}
\end{picture}
\caption{(a) $M_1$-dependence of the LSP mass $m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^0}$;
(b) $M_1$-dependence of the photino component $N_{11}$ (solid line) and of
the zino component $N_{12}$ (dashed line) of the LSP;
(c) $M_1$-dependence of the couplings $\left(f_{e1}^R\right)^4$
(solid line) and $\left(f_{e1}^L\right)^4$ (dashed line).}
\end{figure}
For this set of
parameters one has
$35 \mbox{ GeV}<m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^0}<m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^{\pm}}<128$ GeV.
Fig.\ 1a shows that in the region
$40 \mbox{ GeV}<M_1<150$ GeV the LSP mass depends very strongly on $M_1$,
varying between
$m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^0}=35$ GeV for $M_1=40$ GeV and $m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^0}=121$
GeV for $M_1=150$ GeV whereas for $M_1>150$ GeV the mass of the LSP is
practically
independent of $M_1$. In the whole $M_1$ region the LSP is
gaugino-like (fig.\ 1b). At $M_1=M_2$ the photino component $N_{11}$ changes its
sign which leads
to completely different strength of the couplings $f_{e1}^{L/R}$ in the
regions $M_1>150$ GeV and $M_1<150$ GeV (fig.\ 1c).
For the selectron masses we choose two examples:
$m_{\tilde{e}_L}=179.3$ GeV, $m_{\tilde{e}_R}=137.7$ GeV corresponding to
the value $m_0=110$ GeV of the common scalar mass at the GUT scale and
$m_{\tilde{e}_L}=350.0$ GeV, $m_{\tilde{e}_R}=330.5$ GeV corresponding to
$m_0=320$ GeV. In the second case selectron
pair production at an $e^+e^-$ collider with $\sqrt{s_{ee}}=500$ GeV is
kinematically forbidden.
For the integrated luminosity of the $e\gamma$ machine we assume
$\int\mathcal{L}=100$ fb$^{-1}$ so that cross sections of a few fb should be
measurable.
Fig.\ 1c shows that in our scenario also the electron-selectron-LSP couplings
strongly depend
on $M_1$. For $M_1<150$ GeV the coupling of
the right selectron $f_{e1}^R$ dominates whereas for $M_1>150$ GeV that of the left
selectron $f_{e1}^L$ is the stronger one.
Similarly the
total cross sections
$\sigma^{L/R}_{ee}$ depicted in fig.\ 2a for a CMS energy $\sqrt{s_{ee}}=500$
GeV and for unpolarized beams ($P_e=\lambda_L=\lambda_e=0$) have a
pronounced $M_1$-dependence.
Comparing fig.\ 2a for the cross sections with fig.\ 1c for the couplings
$f_{e1}^{L/R}$ one can see that even in the region $40\mbox{ GeV}<M_1<150$ GeV the
influence of the additional $M_1$-dependence
of the LSP mass (fig.\ 1a) is weak so that the total cross sections reflect
essentially the $M_1$-dependence of the couplings.
\begin{figure}[h]
\label{f1LRhoch4}
\centering
\begin{picture}(14,10.5)
%\put(0,0){\framebox(14,10){}}
\put(-1.4,1.9){\special{psfile=sigmaM1.ps hscale=40 vscale=40}}
\put(6.0,5.25){{\tiny $M_1$/GeV}}
\put(-0.4,9.7){{\tiny $\sigma_{ee}^{L/R}$/fb}}
\put(2.5,5.2){{\tiny (a)}}
\put(6.0,1.9){\special{psfile=sigmaM178.ps hscale=40 vscale=40}}
\put(13.2,5.3){{\tiny $\sqrt{s_{ee}}$/GeV}}
\put(7.0,9.7){{\tiny $\sigma_{ee}^{L/R}$/fb}}
\put(9.6,7.0){{\tiny $M_1=78.7$ GeV}}
\put(9.9,5.1){{\tiny (b)}}
\put(-1.4,-3.3){\special{psfile=sigmaM1170.ps hscale=40 vscale=40}}
\put(6.0,0.1){{\tiny $\sqrt{s_{ee}}$/GeV}}
\put(-0.55,4.5){{\tiny $\sigma_{ee}^{L/R}$/fb}}
\put(2.2,1.8){{\tiny $M_1=170$ GeV}}
\put(2.5,0.0){{\tiny (c)}}
\put(6.0,-3.3){\special{psfile=sigmaM1250.ps hscale=40 vscale=40}}
\put(13.2,0.1){{\tiny $\sqrt{s_{ee}}$/GeV}}
\put(7.0,4.5){{\tiny $\sigma_{ee}^{L/R}$/fb}}
\put(9.6,1.8){{\tiny $M_1=250$ GeV}}
\put(9.7,0.0){{\tiny (d)}}
\end{picture}
\caption{Total cross sections $\sigma_{ee}^R$ (solid lines) and $\sigma_{ee}^L$
(dashed lines) for $m_{\tilde{e}_R}=137.7$ GeV, $m_{\tilde{e}_L}=179.3$ GeV
and unpolarized electron and photon beams ($P_e=\lambda_e=\lambda_L=0$);
(a) $M_1$-dependence of $\sigma^{L/R}_{ee}$ for $\sqrt{s_{ee}}=500$ GeV;
Energy dependence of $\sigma^{L/R}_{ee}$ for (b) $M_1=78.7$ GeV,
(c) $M_1=170$ GeV and
(d) $M_1=250$ GeV.}
\end{figure}
As a consequence of the somewhat higher mass the cross section for production
and decay of $\tilde{e}_L$ is additionally suppressed compared to that for
$\tilde{e}_R$. Therefore in fig.\ 2a the crossing of the cross sections is
at a somewhat
higher value of $M_1\sim 175$ GeV than that of the couplings at $M_1\sim 150$
GeV in fig.\ 1c. For $M_1<175$ GeV the production of $\tilde{e}_R$ dominates whereas for
$M_1>175$ GeV that of $\tilde{e}_L$ dominates with, however, much smaller
cross sections.
Fig.\ 2a shows the strong variation of the cross section
$\sigma_{ee}^R$ with $M_1$. If we assume that a cross section
$\sigma_{ee}^R=100$ fb has been measured with an error
of $\pm5\%$ this is compatible
with $M_1$ between 122 GeV and 126 GeV.
For an unpolarized electron beam ($P_e=0$) polarization of the laser beam and of the
converted electrons essentially
changes only the magnitude of
the cross sections by a maximal factor between 0.7 and 1.3. As we have checked
numerically the
$M_1$ dependence is very
similar to that given in fig.\ 2a.
Fig.\ 2b - 2d exhibit the energy dependence of the total cross section for
three different values of $M_1$: the GUT value $M_1=78.7$ GeV (fig.\ 2b) and two
higher values $M_1=170$ GeV (fig.\ 2c) and $M_1=250$ GeV (fig.\ 2d).
For a polarization of the electron beam $P_e=+0.9$ ($P_e=-0.9$)
%and take into account eq. \ref{pedep},
the cross section for production and decay of left (right)
selectrons is reduced and that for right (left) selectrons is enhanced.
\begin{figure}[htb]
\label{asy}
\centering
\begin{picture}(14,15.5)
%\put(0,0){\framebox(15,15){}}
\put(2.3,7.2){\special{psfile=asype1.ps hscale=40 vscale=40}}
\put(10.0,12.5){{\tiny $M_1$/GeV}}
\put(3.7,14.9){{\tiny $A_{P_e}$}}
\put(6.2,10.5){{\tiny (a)}}
\put(-1.4,1.9){\special{psfile=sigmaM1pe9.ps hscale=40 vscale=40}}
\put(6.0,5.2){{\tiny $M_1$/GeV}}
\put(-0.4,9.7){{\tiny $\sigma_{ee}$/fb}}
\put(2.9,5.2){{\tiny (b)}}
\put(6.0,1.9){\special{psfile=asylaml1.ps hscale=40 vscale=40}}
\put(13.4,5.4){{\tiny $M_1$/GeV}}
\put(7.0,9.6){{\tiny $A_{\lambda_L}$}}
\put(9.9,5.1){{\tiny (c)}}
\put(-1.4,-3.1){\special{psfile=sigmaM1pe-9.ps hscale=40 vscale=40}}
\put(6.0,0.2){{\tiny $M_1$/GeV}}
\put(-0.4,4.7){{\tiny $\sigma_{ee}$/fb}}
\put(2.5,0.2){{\tiny (d)}}
\put(6.0,-3.1){\special{psfile=asylaml2.ps hscale=40 vscale=40}}
\put(13.4,1.1){{\tiny $M_1$/GeV}}
\put(7.0,4.6){{\tiny $A_{\lambda_L}$}}
\put(9.9,0.1){{\tiny (e)}}
\end{picture}
\caption{Total cross section $\sigma_{ee}=\sigma^L_{ee}+\sigma^R_{ee}$ and
polarization asymmetries for $m_{\tilde{e}_R}=137.7$ GeV and
$m_{\tilde{e}_L}=179.3$ GeV; (a) $M_1$-dependence of the asymmetry $A_{P_e}$ for
$P_e=\pm 0.9$ and $\lambda_e= \lambda_L=0$; (b) $M_1$-dependence of
$\sigma_{ee}$ for $P_e=0.9$, $\lambda_e=1$, $\lambda_L=+1$ (solid line)
and for $P_e=0.9$, $\lambda_e=1$, $\lambda_L=-1$ (dashed line);
(c) $M_1$-dependence of the asymmetry $A_{\lambda_L}$ for
$P_e=0.9$, $\lambda_e=+1$ and $\lambda_L=\pm 1$;
(d) $M_1$-dependence of
$\sigma_{ee}$ for $P_e=-0.9$, $\lambda_e=-1$, $\lambda_L=+1$ (solid line)
and for $P_e=-0.9$, $\lambda_e=-1$, $\lambda_L=-1$ (dashed line);
(e) $M_1$-dependence of the asymmetry $A_{\lambda_L}$ for
$P_e=-0.9$, $\lambda_e=-1$ and $\lambda_L=\pm 1$.}
\end{figure}
In fig.\ 3a the asymmetry $A_{P_e}$ defined in eq.\ (\ref{Ae2}) is shown for
unpolarized converted electrons ($\lambda_e=0$), unpolarized laser photons
($\lambda_L=0$) and electron polarization $P_e=\pm 0.9$. In our scenario the dependence
of $A_{P_e}$ on $\lambda_L$ and on $\lambda_e$ turns out to be negligible. The
$M_1$-dependence of $A_{P_e}$ is as expected from that of the
cross sections (fig.\ 2). Since for $M_1<175$ GeV ($M_1>175$ GeV) the
production of $\tilde{e}_R$ ($\tilde{e}_L$) dominates we obtain large
positive asymmetries (large negative asymmetries) for $M_1<175$ GeV
($M_1>175$ GeV).
For $40\mbox{ GeV}<M_1<142$ GeV the asymmetry $A_{P_e}$ is larger than 0.85 and
nearly independent of $M_1$. In this region, however, the LSP mass (fig.\ 1a)
and the total cross section (fig.\ 2) depend strongly on $M_1$.
For $M_1> 205$ GeV the asymmetry increases up to large negative values between
$A_{P_e}=-0.5$ for $M_1=205$ GeV and $A_{P_e}=-0.82$ for $M_1=300$ GeV with,
however, rather small cross sections $<38$ fb.
For $142\mbox{ GeV}<M_1<205$ GeV
the asymmetry $A_{P_e}$ shows a strong variation with $M_1$.
If we assume that for instance an asymmetry $A_{P_e}=0.5\pm 5\%$ has been
measured this
is compatible with $M_1$ in the narrow region between 158 GeV and 160 GeV.
Additional informations on the value of $M_1$ can be obtained
if the laser beam and the converted electrons are polarized.
In fig.\ 3b we show the $M_1$-dependence of the total cross section
$\sigma_{ee}$ for $P_e=0.9$ and $\lambda_e=+1$. For $\lambda_L=-1$
ambiguities exist in the region $40\mbox{ GeV}<M_1<120$ GeV and for $M_1>180$ GeV
the dependence on $M_1$ is rather weak.
For $120\mbox{ GeV}<M_1<180$ GeV however this cross section shows a strong
variation with $M_1$.
For $\lambda_L=+1$ the cross section again shows ambiguities
in the region $40\mbox{ GeV}<M_1<108$ GeV and is nearly independent on $M_1$
for $M_1>180$ GeV. The interval
$108\mbox{ GeV}<M_1<180$ GeV, where
the cross section is sensitive to $M_1$ is however larger than for
$\lambda_L=-1$. If we assume that a cross section
$\sigma_{ee}=250\mbox{ fb}\pm 5\%$ has been measured this is compatible with
$M_1$ between 122 GeV and 127 GeV.
In the region $60 \mbox{ GeV}<M_1<300$ GeV the asymmetry
$A_{\lambda_L}$ (eq.\ (\ref{AL})) depicted in fig.\ 3c for $P_e=0.9$ and
$\lambda_e=+1$
is nearly linearly dependent on $M_1$ so that it should be possible to
determine $M_1$ uniquely in the region
$60\mbox{ GeV}<M_1<190$ GeV.
An asymmetry $A_{\lambda_L}=0.25\pm 5\%$ would be
compatible with $M_1$ between 116 GeV and 132 GeV according to
fig.\ 3c. In the region $M_1>190$ GeV the cross sections are
smaller than 16 fb.
The cross section $\sigma_{ee}$ and the asymmetry $A_{\lambda_L}$ are
depicted in fig.\ 3d, e for the polarization configuration $P_e=-0.9$ and
$\lambda_e=-1$. For $\lambda_L=-1$ the total cross section has ambiguities
in the region $40\mbox{ GeV}<M_1<167$ GeV and for $\lambda_L=+1$ in
the region $40\mbox{ GeV}<M_1<173$ GeV. For $M_1>173$ GeV one notices a strong
variation of the
cross section for $\lambda_L=\pm1$. As can be seen from fig.\ 3d with
$\lambda_L=+1$
a cross section $\sigma_{ee}=35\mbox{ fb}\pm5\%$
is compatible with $M_1$ between 193 GeV and 209 GeV.
For this polarization configuration the asymmetry $A_{\lambda_L}$ (fig.\ 3e)
grows practically
linearly between $M_1=40$ GeV and $M_1=126$ GeV
and is very sensitive on $M_1$ but shows ambiguities between $M_1=40$ GeV and $M_1=150$ GeV . If we assume that an asymmetry
$A_{\lambda_L}=0.15\pm5\%$ has been measured this is compatible with $M_1$
between 89 GeV and 94 GeV or between 138 GeV and 140 GeV according to fig.\ 3e.
One can distinguish between these two regions via the cross section for
$\lambda_L=+1$ depicted in fig.\ 3d because one expects 18-19 fb for $M_1$
between 89 GeV and 94 GeV and 7-8 fb for $M_1$ between 138 GeV and 140 GeV.
For $M_1>170$ GeV the
asymmetry is nearly constant
$A_{\lambda_L}\sim -0.07$.
To sum up: for unpolarized laser beams ($\lambda_L=0$) and converted
electrons ($\lambda_e=0$) the polarization asymmetry
$A_{P_e}$ exhibits a pronounced $M_1$ dependence in the region
$142\mbox{ GeV}<M_1<205$ GeV. For the polarization configuration
$P_e=0.9$, $\lambda_e=+1$ and $\lambda_L=\pm 1$ the cross sections
$\sigma_{ee}$ and the polarization asymmetry $A_{\lambda_L}$
are sensitive to $M_1$ in the region $60\mbox{ GeV}<M_1<190$ GeV.
Finally for $P_e=-0.9$, $\lambda_e=-1$ and
$\lambda_L=\pm 1$ these observables show a strong $M_1$ dependence in the
region $40\mbox{ GeV}<M_1<300$ GeV.
\begin{figure}[htb]
\label{asy2}
\centering
\begin{picture}(14,5.5)
%\put(0,0){\framebox(14,5){}}
\put(-1.4,-3.1){\special{psfile=sigmaM1pe92.ps hscale=40 vscale=40}}
\put(6.0,0.4){{\tiny $M_1$/GeV}}
\put(-0.4,4.7){{\tiny $\sigma_{ee}$/fb}}
\put(2.5,0.2){{\tiny (a)}}
\put(6.0,-3.1){\special{psfile=asylaml3.ps hscale=40 vscale=40}}
\put(13.4,4.5){{\tiny $M_1$/GeV}}
\put(7.0,4.6){{\tiny $A_{\lambda_L}$}}
\put(9.9,0.1){{\tiny (b)}}
\end{picture}
\caption{Total cross section $\sigma_{ee}=\sigma^L_{ee}+\sigma^R_{ee}$ and polarization
asymmetry $A_{\lambda_L}$ for $m_{\tilde{e}_R}=330.5$ GeV and
$m_{\tilde{e}_L}=350.0$ GeV; (a) $M_1$-dependence of $\sigma_{ee}$
for $P_e=0.9$, $\lambda_e=1$, $\lambda_L=+1$
(solid line) and $P_e=0.9$, $\lambda_e=1$, $\lambda_L=-1$ (dashed line);
%\linebreak
(b) $M_1$- dependence of $A_{\lambda_L}$
for $P_e=0.9$, $\lambda_e=+1$
and $\lambda_L=\pm 1$.}
\end{figure}
We choose as a second example higher selectron masses
$m_{\tilde{e}_L}=350.0$ GeV and $m_{\tilde{e}_R}=330.5$ GeV corresponding to
$m_0=320$ GeV.
Then for $\sqrt{s_{ee}}=500$ GeV selectron pair production in $e^+e^-$
annihilation is forbidden, whereas single selectron production in
$e^-\gamma \longrightarrow \tilde{\chi}_1^0\tilde{e}_{L/R}^-$ is still
possible, provided that
$\sqrt{s_{e\gamma}}>m_{\tilde{e}_{L/R}^-}+m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^0}$ where
$\sqrt{s_{e\gamma}} \sim 0.91\cdot\sqrt{s_{ee}}$ is the energy of the hardest photon
obtained by Compton backscattering \cite{stefan}.
Now the kinematical accessible $M_1$ region is confined to $M_1<184$ GeV
($m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^0}<124.6$ GeV).
In fig.\ 4a,b we show the total cross section and the asymmetry $A_{\lambda_L}$
for $P_e=0.9$, $\lambda_e=+1$ and $\lambda_L=\pm 1$. For $\lambda_L=+1$ the
cross section depends nearly linearly on $M_1$ in the region
$40\mbox{ GeV}<M_1<115$ GeV. For $M_1>115$ GeV the cross section is smaller than
2 fb. The cross section for $\lambda_L=-1$ is higher and more sensitive to
$M_1$ between
$40\mbox{ GeV}<M_1<135$ GeV. If we assume for example that a cross section
$\sigma_{ee}=45\mbox{ fb}\pm5\%$ has been measured this is compatible with
$M_1$ between
80 GeV and 88 GeV. Also the polarization asymmetry $A_{\lambda_L}$ strongly
depends on $M_1$ in the whole region. According to fig.\ 4b an asymmetry
$A_{\lambda_L}= -0.7\pm5\%$ would be
compatible with $M_1$ between 99 GeV and 109 GeV.
The polarization asymmetry $A_{P_e}$ for this scenario is between 0.85
and 0.9 and depends only weakly on $M_1$. Also the polarization
configuration $P_e=-0.9$, $\lambda_e=-1$ and $\lambda_L=\pm 1$ is not
shown because the cross sections are smaller than 2 fb.
Thus for the case of high selectron masses and polarization configuration
$P_e=0.9$, $\lambda_e=+1$ and $\lambda_L=\pm 1$ both the cross section
and the asymmetry $A_{\lambda_L}$ can be helpful for determining
$M_1$ in the greatest part ($40\mbox{ GeV}<M_1<135$ GeV) of the
kinematical accessible region $M_1<184$ GeV.
\section{Conclusion}
We have demonstrated that associated selectron - LSP production with subsequent
leptonic decay of the selectron
$e^-\gamma \longrightarrow \tilde{\chi}_1^0\tilde{e}_{L/R}^-
\longrightarrow e^-\tilde{\chi}_1^0\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ at a $\sqrt{s_{ee}}=500$
GeV linear collider in the $e\gamma$ mode should allow to test for a
gaugino-like LSP the GUT relation $M_1=M_2\cdot\frac{5}{3}\tan^2\theta_W$
between the MSSM gaugino mass parameters.
The polarization $P_e$ of the electron beam
helps to enlarge the production cross section for left or right selectrons.
For suitably polarized electron beams and laser photons the total cross section
$\sigma_{ee}$ and the polarization asymmetries $A_{P_e}$ and $A_{\lambda_L}$
are very sensitive to the gaugino mass parameter $M_1$ in the whole
investigated region between 40 GeV and 300 GeV. For high selectron masses
$m_{\tilde{e}_{L/R}}$ the accessible $M_1$ region is kinematically constrained. The
optimal polarization configuration depends on the values of the selectron
masses. For realistic predictions a complete MC study with inclusion of
background processes and experimental cuts would be indispensable.
\section{Acknowledgements}
We are grateful to Gudrid Moortgat-Pick and Stefan Hesselbach for valuable
discussions.
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under contract
no. FR 1064/4-1 and the Bundesministerium f\"ur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)
under contract number 05 HT9WWA 9.
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\bibitem{susy} H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane, {\sl Phys. Rep.} 117 (1985) 75.\\
M. F. Sohnius {\sl Phys. Rep.} 128 (1985) 39.
\bibitem{LC} JLC Group, JLC-1, KEK Report No. 92-16 (1992).\\
Desy-Reports, DESY 92-123 A,B; DESY 93-123 C; DESY 96-123 D; DESY 97-123 E.\\
SLAC-Report 485, submitted to Snowmass 1996.
\bibitem{PLCX} I. F. Ginzburg, G. L. Kotkin, V. G. Serbo, V. I. Telnov,
{\sl Nucl. Inst. Meth.} 205 (1983) 47.\\
V. I. Telnov, {\sl Proceedings of the First Arctic Workshop on Future Physics
and Accelerators}, Saariselka 1994, eds. M. Chaichian, K. Huitu and R. Orava,
World Scientific, 1995.\\
R. Brinkmann, I. F. Ginzburg, N. Holtkamp, G. Jikia, O.
Napoly, E. Salsin, E. Schneidmiller, V. Serbo, G. Silvestrov, V. Telnov,
A. Undrus, M. Yurkov, {\sl Nucl. Inst. Meth.} A406 (1998) 13.
\bibitem{PLCY} I. F. Ginzburg, G. L. Kotkin, S. L. Panfil, V. G. Serbo, V. I.
Telnov, {\sl Nucl. Inst.} 219 (1984) 5.\\
D. L. Borden, D. A. Bauer, D. O. Caldwell, {\sl Phys. Rev.}
D48 (1993) 4018.\\
D. L. Borden, D. A. Bauer, D. O. Caldwell, SLAC-PUB-5715, 1992 (unpublished),
UCSB-HEP-92-01, 1992 (unpublished).
\bibitem{PLC1} F. Cuypers, G. J. van Oldenborgh, R. R\"uckl, {\sl Nucl. Phys.}
B383 (1992) 45.\\
F. Cuypers, G. J. van Oldenborgh, R. R\"uckl, MPI-Ph/93-70,
LMU-93/12.
\bibitem{otherM1} S. Y. Choi, A. Djouadi, H. Dreiner, J. Kalinowski, P. Zerwas, {\sl Eur. Phys. J. C} 7 (1999) 123.\\
S. Y. Choi, A. Djouadi, H. S. Song, P. Zerwas, {\sl Eur. Phys. J. C} 8 (1999) 669.\\
G. Moortgat-Pick, H. Fraas, A. Bartl, W. Majerotto, {\sl Eur. Phys. J. C} 7 (1999) 113.
\bibitem{neutrsec} J. Kalinowski, {\sl Acta Phys. Polon.} B30 (1999) 1921.\\
J. L. Kneur, G. Moultaka, Talk presented at the Intern. Workshop on Linear Colliders (LCWS99), Sitges, Apr. 1999, to be published in the proceedings, hep-ph/9910267.\\
J. L. Feng, M. J. Strassler, {\sl Phys. Rev.} D55 (1997) 1326.\\
J. L. Feng, M. J. Strassler, {\sl Phys. Rev.} D51 (1995) 4661.\\
G. Moortgat-Pick, H. Fraas, A. Bartl, W. Majerotto, {\sl Eur. Phys. J. C} 9 (1999) 521.
\bibitem{Grifhols} J. A. Grifols, R. Pascual, {\sl Phys. Lett.} B135 (1984) 319.
\bibitem{forthcoming} C. Bl\"ochinger, H. Fraas, in preparation.
\bibitem{energyspectrum} F. Cuypers, G. J. van Oldenborgh, R. R\"uckl, in {\sl $e^+e^-$ Collisions at
500 GeV: The Physics Potential, Part B}, Proceedings of the Workshop, Munich,
Annecy, Hamburg, Germany, 1993, edited by P. M. Zerwas (DESY Report No. 93-123C, Hamburg,1993), p. 475.
\bibitem{stefan} S. Hesselbach, H. Fraas, {\sl Phys. Rev.} D55 (1997) 1343.
\bibitem{szen1} S. Ambrosanio, G. A. Blair, P. Zerwas, ECFA-DESY
Linear Collider Workshop, 1998,
http://www.desy.de/conferences/ecfa-desy-lc98.html.
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}